Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. The Democrats are starting
Speaker 1: to tell us who they really are. They don't believe
Speaker 1: in the rule of law when it comes to immigration.
Speaker 1: In fact, more and more of them are slipping up
Speaker 1: and letting the public know that they are in favor
Speaker 1: of abolishing enforcement of our immigration laws in favor of
Speaker 1: an open border society that would destroy the country we know. Plus,
Speaker 1: the left has completely lost their minds. They are now
Speaker 1: calling for rage mobs to form around administration officials, and
Speaker 1: some people are cheering this behavior despite the fact that
Speaker 1: it is grotesque across as a red line and it's
Speaker 1: time for us to put a stop to that and
Speaker 1: more coming up on The buck Sexton Show. This is
Speaker 1: the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is
Speaker 1: to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistakes, American,
Speaker 1: let me ring you're a great American again. The buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show begins. CIA analysts set, if you think we're roll,
Speaker 1: you're now You ain't saying nothing yet, Oh that you
Speaker 1: have members of your cabinet that have been booed out
Speaker 1: of restaurants, who have protest is taking up at that house.
Speaker 1: He's saying no thing, nor sleep, nur sleep, and guess what,
Speaker 1: We're gonna win this battle because while you try and
Speaker 1: put the Bible, Jeff Sessions and others, you really don't
Speaker 1: know the Bible, God is on our side. You get
Speaker 1: out and you create a cloud, and you cussed back
Speaker 1: on them and you tell them they're not welcome anymore anywhere,
Speaker 1: Welcome to the buck Section show. Everybody. Great to have
Speaker 1: you here with me. And you just started to get
Speaker 1: a sense, I think there of what we are up
Speaker 1: against and what we are dealing with. We have reached
Speaker 1: a point in time where where the Democrat media, where
Speaker 1: the left truly believes that the way that they should
Speaker 1: go forward, the way that they should deal with their
Speaker 1: ideological opponents, is to harass them, is to create situations
Speaker 1: where there could be conflict. There in fact, could even
Speaker 1: be violent conflict. That's what we're finding out here. That
Speaker 1: was from Maxine Waters. Now she's a member of Congress,
Speaker 1: So this isn't just some random person. This isn't just
Speaker 1: a situation where we found someone who's taking the most
Speaker 1: extreme point of view, somebody who is going to obviously
Speaker 1: represent a very small constituency. You know, Maxie Waters is
Speaker 1: somebody who will go on TV. She's you know, she's
Speaker 1: treated as a respectable elected politician in American society, and
Speaker 1: she's out there saying you, oh, you've got to harass people.
Speaker 1: You got to go after them. That's the way to
Speaker 1: deal with this. Now, why is there such a focus
Speaker 1: on this right now? Such a focus because over the
Speaker 1: weekend at the Red Hen restaurant. I will note that
Speaker 1: before you start doing Google searches, there are many different
Speaker 1: red Hens across the country. So this is the one
Speaker 1: in Virginia. Let's not get all angry at the Red
Speaker 1: Head restaurant in central Massachusetts or wherever it is. But
Speaker 1: at the Redhead Restaurant, Sarah Huckaby Sanders was out there
Speaker 1: and she took it up, or rather the owner took
Speaker 1: it upon herself to tell Sarah Huckaby Sanders that she
Speaker 1: should leave and she should get out now. She was
Speaker 1: out there with family and friends trying to have a meal.
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you there are only a few relatively
Speaker 1: sacred things left in our political discourse in terms of
Speaker 1: how we treat each other. And if you can't go
Speaker 1: out now, as a member of this administration, if you
Speaker 1: can't go out and have a meal in peace. This
Speaker 1: country's got big problems if you can't go out there
Speaker 1: and not be political twenty four to seven. And if
Speaker 1: there are folks who think that it is their role
Speaker 1: to go up to you and say, you know what,
Speaker 1: we'd really like it if you never aid in a
Speaker 1: restaurant again, or you know, you're not welcome here. What
Speaker 1: do they think it's going to do for discourse? This
Speaker 1: is childish, it's really dangerous because of what it leads to,
Speaker 1: and it's unwise. It is childish, dangerous, and unwise. I
Speaker 1: think all of those are accurate ways to describe what's
Speaker 1: gone on here, but they're really not backing down from it.
Speaker 1: In fact, you see a lot of people, so I'm
Speaker 1: with huge social media followings, who are saying, oh, well,
Speaker 1: it's a small price to pay compared to what's going
Speaker 1: on at the border. Where does that end? If everything
Speaker 1: is going to be justifiable based upon what the left
Speaker 1: says is near Nazi like activity at the border, that's
Speaker 1: what they're saying, And don't take my word for it. Here,
Speaker 1: we've got play clip twelve. Actually we'll play clip twelve
Speaker 1: in a moment because our computer has frozen in New
Speaker 1: York city. This is the joys of live radio, my friends.
Speaker 1: We will play it though in just a moment. But
Speaker 1: they are calling people Nazis. They're saying that there are Nazi,
Speaker 1: Nazi sympathizers in the administration, that the president is acting
Speaker 1: like a Nazi by separating kids at the border. If
Speaker 1: they really help, go ahead and play a job. Let's
Speaker 1: is see United States of Americaid. Isn't Nazi Germany. That's
Speaker 1: what Hitler said about Jews infesting. The Jews were vermin
Speaker 1: in Nazi Germany. It is also what happened in Nazi Germany.
Speaker 1: I found that we are in pre Nazi Germany. I
Speaker 1: know we're not Nazi Germany, all right, but there is
Speaker 1: a commonality there. How did Hitler get all the power
Speaker 1: that he got? Did people just stand by and say
Speaker 1: nothing and do nothing. If you vote for Trump, then
Speaker 1: you the voter, you not Donald Trump, are standing at
Speaker 1: the border like Nazis, than at the border like Nazis,
Speaker 1: just like Nazi. These people are morons, they really are.
Speaker 1: And those were big, big voices in the media, multi millionaires,
Speaker 1: big platforms. They are idiots who are either wildly historically
Speaker 1: ignorant or just so disingenuous, dishonest, just liars. You're gonna
Speaker 1: compare temporary separation of people, you know, you know, there's
Speaker 1: all this stuff going on where they're acting like we're
Speaker 1: going out and splitting up families. The US government is
Speaker 1: going out and taking families and saying, you know what,
Speaker 1: we're going to separate you just cause. What we found
Speaker 1: out from the photo, which was the iconic photo that
Speaker 1: everyone's pointing to, is oh, look what's going on with
Speaker 1: the children at the border. What we found out is
Speaker 1: that that woman wasn't fleeing imminent violence, had a husband
Speaker 1: at home, wasn't the first time she crossed in the
Speaker 1: country legally. She made an affirmative decision to break the
Speaker 1: laws of the United States to financially benefit herself. And
Speaker 1: now we're being told, oh, it's it's so terrible, and
Speaker 1: it's like Nazi Germany. Now, these are people that are
Speaker 1: trying to get around our laws. They're violating there, they're
Speaker 1: actively and knowingly violating US sovereignty. Now I'm not saying that,
Speaker 1: you know, we should be building electric, electrified fences and
Speaker 1: you know, pits with crocodiles and then everything. But I
Speaker 1: am saying we've got to be able to deport people.
Speaker 1: And what you are seeing now is the left. The
Speaker 1: mask has dropped with the left. Now you're starting to
Speaker 1: see that the open border's tendency is becoming a little
Speaker 1: more out in the open. You're starting to see people
Speaker 1: that are willing to come out and actually say that
Speaker 1: that they are doing they are they want open borders,
Speaker 1: they want to abolish immigrations and customs enforcement. You know,
Speaker 1: we I want to get into all that immigration piece
Speaker 1: and just that's going to be a big part of
Speaker 1: the show today. But but I'm not done yet with
Speaker 1: the civility issue. You know, last week and the last week,
Speaker 1: let's say, we've had Sarah Sanders chased out of a restaurant,
Speaker 1: and I believe I saw reports I wasn't able to
Speaker 1: confirm this before I went on air, saw reports that
Speaker 1: she may have been followed by that restaurant, the red
Speaker 1: hand restaurant owner, which Trump tore apart today and said
Speaker 1: looked like dingy and dirty. And you know, old Trump
Speaker 1: is sometimes he's so amazing. I really, I really just
Speaker 1: want to walk over and just be like, hi five,
Speaker 1: mister President. You're amazing. But you know, so she gets
Speaker 1: kicked out of the red hen And I can't help
Speaker 1: but take this a little personally, because you know, I'm
Speaker 1: not I'm not doing CNN these days obviously, so people
Speaker 1: don't see me on the treadmiller in the airport like
Speaker 1: they used to. But I'm a conservative that is known
Speaker 1: and occasionally catches the eye of the left, and I
Speaker 1: think that they also I come across I'm a polite fellow,
Speaker 1: and I think I come across a somebody who would
Speaker 1: be reasonable in person and in a public setting. But
Speaker 1: you know, some protester gets up in my face. If
Speaker 1: I'm trying to have a meal with Miss Molly protesters
Speaker 1: in for a surprise, Bluck's not gonna handle that. It's
Speaker 1: not going to be be gentle with them. It's not
Speaker 1: going to go well for them. But that's not where
Speaker 1: we should be as a country and as a society.
Speaker 1: I shouldn't even have to think about this, but it's
Speaker 1: hard not to feel like here I am in d C.
Speaker 1: And remember Sarah Sanders was out in in Virginia, a
Speaker 1: couple of hours from the district. The swamp. She she
Speaker 1: fled the swamp and the swamp found her. Is what
Speaker 1: ended up happening people were saying this was okay. They're
Speaker 1: saying yeah, because the Trump administration is so bad. Imagine
Speaker 1: for a moment would have had any similarity or or
Speaker 1: this slew of events that occurred during the Obama administration.
Speaker 1: We had Sarah Sanders chase out of a restaurant. We
Speaker 1: had a Republican official in Florida heckled and chased out
Speaker 1: of a movie theater. Police had to arrive and get
Speaker 1: her out of there. We had a I guess reasonably
Speaker 1: well known actor threatened Baron Trump kids like twelve or
Speaker 1: something ten and he's like a little kid. These people
Speaker 1: are disgrace. They're just a disgrace. And and we had
Speaker 1: Stephen Miller was but he probably just gave the protesters
Speaker 1: the cold Stephen Miller death stare, and that must have
Speaker 1: terrified them. I bet they're still having nightmares. But Stephen
Speaker 1: Miller got, he got harassing, heckled. That's also here in DC.
Speaker 1: People think this is okay. Look, I think Obama was
Speaker 1: a bad president, and I think he did a lot
Speaker 1: of things that hurt this country. But if anybody ever
Speaker 1: stepped out of line about his kids, I would have said,
Speaker 1: and I believe every conservative I know of honor and
Speaker 1: decency would have said, hey, unacceptable. Okay. Beyond that, you know,
Speaker 1: if I saw David Axelron out to dinner when he
Speaker 1: was Obama's chief consolieri and he was out with his family,
Speaker 1: not only would I not heckle him, if I saw
Speaker 1: people heckling him, I would have words with the hecklers.
Speaker 1: This is not okay. This is not the country I
Speaker 1: want to live in. It's not the America I want
Speaker 1: to be a part of. All right, everyone should be
Speaker 1: allowed their private sis. Remember we're talking about political disagreements.
Speaker 1: We're not talking about mass murderers here, We're not talking
Speaker 1: about war criminals. But you know, you see a recurring theme.
Speaker 1: When the left can't win the argument, they become increasingly shrill.
Speaker 1: They are becoming desperate. Now because the administration is doing well,
Speaker 1: the economy is booming, and what is the answer from
Speaker 1: the left? Trump is a Nazi? Have they just the
Speaker 1: people saying this? Have they never read a book? Do
Speaker 1: they not know anything about? You know, I've got a
Speaker 1: whole shelf just about totalitarianism, authoritarianism. I've got a book
Speaker 1: that's just a deep dive history into the SS. I
Speaker 1: could give this to them. It would give them nightmares
Speaker 1: if they read it. But they're not going to read it.
Speaker 1: Trump's did nazi? Trump's what a what a grotesque not
Speaker 1: just overstatement but a lie. You know. Make the case,
Speaker 1: make the case that Obamacare is not a disaster. Good
Speaker 1: luck with that. Make the case that we shouldn't have
Speaker 1: open borders, good luck with that. But don't run around
Speaker 1: inciting harassment, and with it will come violence. You know,
Speaker 1: people say, oh, Maxine Waters in that clip we started
Speaker 1: out with, she's just saying, get in their faces and
Speaker 1: you know, yell at them. That leads that that's a
Speaker 1: very aggressive thing to do. That that leads people to
Speaker 1: feel threatened, and they may respond as though they have
Speaker 1: been threatened. And I want to just mention this. We've
Speaker 1: got a lot to get into here about this, and
Speaker 1: that the decrepit and detestable culture of aggressive and aggressive
Speaker 1: and very personal and very nasty politics on the left now,
Speaker 1: which is just being magnified by all the different media outlets,
Speaker 1: and it's just disgusting, and they're going after Trump people
Speaker 1: in a way that they should be ashamed of. But
Speaker 1: beyond that, it was almost a year ago to the week,
Speaker 1: I mean within a couple of weeks. It was almost
Speaker 1: exactly a year ago that a Bernie Sanders supporting leftist
Speaker 1: tried a mass assassination of conservative members of Congress, specifically
Speaker 1: going after conservative members of Congress because of what he
Speaker 1: believed he was being told by the media and what
Speaker 1: the narratives were out there about how the country is
Speaker 1: devolving into fascism, the country is being destroyed by these
Speaker 1: authoritarian monsters. Trump is going to lead us into a
Speaker 1: nuclear war. Trump is going to put people in internment camps,
Speaker 1: which are things that people are saying now openly. And
Speaker 1: so what I want to say to all of you,
Speaker 1: and I want to go on the record right now
Speaker 1: with this, is that these voices, these elected officials, these
Speaker 1: members of the media and others so called activists who
Speaker 1: are using this overheated rhetoric right now, they know what
Speaker 1: they are doing is reckless, They know it is dangerous,
Speaker 1: and they do not care. And the only way they
Speaker 1: will ever be held responsible is if a tragedy happens,
Speaker 1: and it might. You and I remember, we don't let
Speaker 1: them slither away from this. We don't let them pretend
Speaker 1: like they had no hand in creating this environment, in
Speaker 1: this atmosphere and we hold them accountable. That is the
Speaker 1: only way. Eight four four nine two eight two five
Speaker 1: eight four four nine hundred buck. We've got a lot
Speaker 1: more coming. And by the way, if you want to,
Speaker 1: you can watch on a live stream right now. We're
Speaker 1: live streaming the show on facebook dot com slash buck sextance.
Speaker 1: If you want to see what it looks like here
Speaker 1: in the Hut, check it out. We'll be right back.
Speaker 1: And the separation of deportation of over ten thousand children,
Speaker 1: separated from their parents a Mexican dinner as you're deported
Speaker 1: and imprisoning tens of thousands of people who come here
Speaker 1: seeking asylum in the United States. I'm Barrie, I'm Balaye
Speaker 1: our shame shame Jean, Jean, Jean. What would be for rogers?
Speaker 1: Think about you when you're ingport to take it away?
Speaker 1: Healthy hir put people with breakings as the Brisons and
Speaker 1: decent Sam Bondi, Shame on you, Shame on you, Shame
Speaker 1: on you, Shame on you, Cambondi. And if you see
Speaker 1: anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store,
Speaker 1: at a gasol station, you get out and you try
Speaker 1: a gay and yous back on them? Can you tell
Speaker 1: them then? I will come anymore anywhere. I asked liberals.
Speaker 1: They all they have to do to have a shot
Speaker 1: of the mid terms is not be crazy, and they
Speaker 1: can't do it. They can't. Do you hear that? Would
Speaker 1: yell like a Pam BONDI that's what she like Florida.
Speaker 1: She's on Florida elected official or something. What does she Mike?
Speaker 1: I forget what her title is? Inspect your general of
Speaker 1: attorney general in Florida. Yeah, this woman's like, how can
Speaker 1: you take healthcare away from peopall? Boss? Do you think
Speaker 1: you're making your case? Do you think this is you know?
Speaker 1: There are really two simultaneous points here on the on
Speaker 1: the harass flash mob mentality going on here? Harass Trump,
Speaker 1: people make flash mobs up to two related points. One,
Speaker 1: it's a jerk thing to do. It's a jerk move.
Speaker 1: It's just this shouldn't do it. You shouldn't arask people
Speaker 1: in public places for no reason. Okay. People should be allowed.
Speaker 1: Everybody should be allowed their private space. All right, We're not,
Speaker 1: like I said, we're not talking about mass murderers here,
Speaker 1: although they are talking about Nazis a lot, which is crazy,
Speaker 1: But that's just because they're idiots. That's a good test.
Speaker 1: By the way, anyone who says what's going on at
Speaker 1: our border is reminiscent of Nazism is a moron rule
Speaker 1: litmus test. It's a dumb thing to say, only a
Speaker 1: dumb person could say it. Or it's a very very
Speaker 1: dishonest person, a person who doesn't care how much they lie,
Speaker 1: because it's effective right now to appeal to the emotions
Speaker 1: of the mob. So that's one read. But the other
Speaker 1: reason is it doesn't It's not this whole approach of
Speaker 1: yelling at people and shaming them in public, you know,
Speaker 1: shame the conservative, shame the Trump supporter. It's not effective.
Speaker 1: They're not going to win anybody over to their side
Speaker 1: with this. This is not going to be some great
Speaker 1: victory for them. In fact, it has the opposite effect.
Speaker 1: And they've already shown this. They've shown Poland that the
Speaker 1: more people try and undermine Trump and his people by
Speaker 1: attacking them in a very personal way, in a very aggressive,
Speaker 1: harassing way, the more a lot of us are just
Speaker 1: gonna say, Okay, the left, the Democrat Party full of maniacs,
Speaker 1: run by maniacs. We're sick of it all right, Even
Speaker 1: if you got your misgivings about Trump, you gotta be like, hey, Buck,
Speaker 1: is there room there in the Trump Bunker? And I'm like, yes,
Speaker 1: yes there is. Come or or the trench. Come hop
Speaker 1: into the Trump trench with me, because the other side
Speaker 1: is full of loons who are yelling about Nazism while
Speaker 1: the country's actually doing really well. He's back with you
Speaker 1: now because when it comes to the fight for the
Speaker 1: fuck never stops. Many by now have heard that I
Speaker 1: was asked to leave a restaurant this weekend where I
Speaker 1: attempted to have dinner with my family. My husband and
Speaker 1: I politely left and went home. I was asked to
Speaker 1: leave because I worked for President Trump. We are allowed
Speaker 1: to disagree, but we should be able to do so
Speaker 1: freely and without fear of harm. And this goes for
Speaker 1: all people, regardless of politics. Some have chosen to push
Speaker 1: hate and vandalism against the restaurant that I was asked
Speaker 1: fully from. A Hollywood actor publicly encouraged people to kidnap
Speaker 1: my children, and this weekend, a member of Congress called
Speaker 1: for people to push back and make clear to those
Speaker 1: serving their country and this administration that they are not
Speaker 1: welcome anywhere, anytime for anything. Healthy debate on ideas and
Speaker 1: political philosophy is important, but the calls for harassment and
Speaker 1: push for any Trump supporter to avoid the public is unacceptable.
Speaker 1: It is completely unacceptable. But there is a real strain
Speaker 1: right now of crazy coming from the left that is
Speaker 1: like nothing else we've seen so far in the Trump era.
Speaker 1: It's worse now than it's ever been. You know, they
Speaker 1: were writing think pieces before about how fascism was coming
Speaker 1: to America, but at least they were saying it was coming.
Speaker 1: Now they're just saying crazy stuff about how it's already here.
Speaker 1: And I'm walking around, I'm like, there's no fascism. Sorry,
Speaker 1: that's just that's just insane, right. Judd apataw who I
Speaker 1: don't know. I guess he's made a couple of okay movies.
Speaker 1: This is what he tweeted at. Remember, these people have
Speaker 1: millions of followers, so they get to affect the discussion
Speaker 1: for better or for worse, usually for worse in meaningful ways.
Speaker 1: Judd Apatau shared this, He's a Nazi, he wants no
Speaker 1: judicial process. He kidnapped children and commits acts of violence
Speaker 1: for political gain and to support his racist views. He
Speaker 1: admires violent dictators. Trump is a Nazi. The debate is over.
Speaker 1: Soon we will have proof he as a Nazi supported
Speaker 1: by the Russians. Judd Apatow needs help or he needs
Speaker 1: to read. Just start reading, learn something, somehow figure out
Speaker 1: what is actually happening in the world and what used
Speaker 1: to happen. It's called history. Doesn't know any of this stuff.
Speaker 1: But you know, you can get very far in life
Speaker 1: by being a being an idiot who says whatever he
Speaker 1: thinks is going to be popular among the Hollywood left.
Speaker 1: And unfortunately, we're seeing a lot of that. We really are.
Speaker 1: We're seeing this in a way that is deeply concerning.
Speaker 1: We've got a bunch of calls lit. I want to
Speaker 1: get to some of them before because I've got a
Speaker 1: lot of faults in the immigration issue. I mean, here's
Speaker 1: one thing people were saying Trump and the New York
Speaker 1: Times even reported Trump wants no due process for immigrants
Speaker 1: who enter illegally. That was their headline. That means illegal aliens. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right. The President the United States doesn't want to
Speaker 1: give due process to illegal aliens. There's a reason for this, folks,
Speaker 1: and they don't want you. They don't want us to
Speaker 1: figure out what's really going on here. The reason is
Speaker 1: that overwhelming the system is the whole point of this process,
Speaker 1: inundating our border so that it's impossible for us to process,
Speaker 1: so that you just then have an overflow of people
Speaker 1: coming into the country whenever they want, undermining rule of law,
Speaker 1: undermining our political norms, all of it. That's the reason
Speaker 1: they're doing this. But first I want to hear from
Speaker 1: some of you folks. Eight four four nine two eight
Speaker 1: two five eight four four nine hundred buck. And also
Speaker 1: if you go to Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton
Speaker 1: right now, you can get a little special view of
Speaker 1: the Freedom Hut of them being told that the sign
Speaker 1: that I just had made. I was all proud, got
Speaker 1: a sign made over the weekends for the Hut. And
Speaker 1: it looks backwards right now. But we will fix that.
Speaker 1: We will fix our backwards sign. It's kind of class.
Speaker 1: That's how Yeah, that's how we do in the Freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: It a sign is backwards. Sometimes the sign is gonna
Speaker 1: be a little bit backwards. Rich In mckhenry, Illinois, good
Speaker 1: to have you, sir, Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show, Illinois.
Speaker 1: I'd like to remind all olar listeners. Sixty years circle,
Speaker 1: the people were inflicated about how Sarah Palin's use of
Speaker 1: a target on a political thing brought about the shooting
Speaker 1: of Abby Difference and how badly the rhetoric was used
Speaker 1: by the Republican Party to incite violence. What do you
Speaker 1: remember about six years ago Sarah Sarah Palin was tagged?
Speaker 1: He's tags on her political campaign. Oh yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: yeah no. They got all upset about that. Yeah, Rich,
Speaker 1: leave leave the accents to the professionals, my friend. But yeah, no,
Speaker 1: they definitely pushed that stuff and they got all mad.
Speaker 1: And there was the whole targeting of electoral districts and
Speaker 1: they act like that was that was a big deal. Yeah. Look,
Speaker 1: they're calling for confrontation or harassment and that could lead violence.
Speaker 1: Thanks for calling from Illinois, Rich. I think he went
Speaker 1: from like sort of almost like commy bear Russian Russian
Speaker 1: voice to Irish brogue too. He was all over the
Speaker 1: map there. I just hope he was paying attention. It
Speaker 1: sound like he was driving Mary in Old Fairy Uh Maryland,
Speaker 1: Hey Mary, Hey Block, how are you? I'm good? Thanks
Speaker 1: for the call um calling to comment on Maxine Water's
Speaker 1: behavior or despicable behavior. I think people are pretty set
Speaker 1: up with this stuff, but I'm hoping they are. Um,
Speaker 1: I think it's very sad and um just it brings
Speaker 1: so much dishonor to um the position that she's in,
Speaker 1: and just her behavior is affordable to me. Yes, it's disgusting,
Speaker 1: isn't it? But but do do you think that anybody
Speaker 1: on the left, the Democrats will shun her? Will? You know,
Speaker 1: she's gonna get reelected by why, she'll get elected by
Speaker 1: a huge margin. She'll be if you know, they'll have
Speaker 1: her on MSNBC in a week. No one's gonna care.
Speaker 1: She can get away with saying this. It's amazing, isn't it.
Speaker 1: It is? And to try to get people to you know,
Speaker 1: harass people and get up in their faces, and especially
Speaker 1: public officials, not just I mean, I know it's a individuals.
Speaker 1: You know, we have the right to our personal space
Speaker 1: as well, but that's going to lead to some pretty
Speaker 1: I mean, our unfortunate circumstances. I hope no one gets hurt. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I hope no one gets hurty or either. I mean,
Speaker 1: I do worry about the possibility of violence because you know,
Speaker 1: it's amazing, isn't it. The left? Mary will talk about
Speaker 1: a they'll talk about an environment of hostility. You know,
Speaker 1: for example, here's a perfect one because I used to
Speaker 1: get involved in these debates over it CNN, which you know,
Speaker 1: I still I have a special kind of of of
Speaker 1: like CNN PTSD, but I used to I used to
Speaker 1: get involved in this debate when there would be a
Speaker 1: terrorist attack, which invariably you know, or or usually involved
Speaker 1: a ge hottest of some kind, and they'd say, oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, you know, there's somebody left a mean message
Speaker 1: on a voicemail of a mosque somewhere, and there's just
Speaker 1: gonna be blood in the streets now, and the hostility
Speaker 1: of Republicans and people like you, mister Sex said, I'm like,
Speaker 1: I'm hostile to terrorists. I'm not hostile the Muslims, and exactly,
Speaker 1: and and just notice how but they're a discussion of
Speaker 1: the issues can lead to violence right away. Here you
Speaker 1: got people that are calling I mean, Mary, keep in mind,
Speaker 1: they're they're calling people Nazis. If I really believe that
Speaker 1: we were on the precipice, and I'm not trying to
Speaker 1: scare people here, but if I believe that this country
Speaker 1: was on the precipice of a Nazi fascist takeover. What
Speaker 1: would I be unwilling to do to stop that? And
Speaker 1: the answer is I'm very much exactly. You know, they're
Speaker 1: either lying and they're just saying this for the and
Speaker 1: I think that's mostly what it is. They're just they're
Speaker 1: just childish and they're using the overheated rhetoric and they're
Speaker 1: they're pandering to the base, and they're they're trying to
Speaker 1: whip up people's emotions. Go ahead, Mary, Yeah, I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: I don't mean it just doesn't read you know, doesn't
Speaker 1: know their history, doesn't and you know they're gonna hurt someone. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm really concerned about it. It's very irresponsible and it's
Speaker 1: it's very it's scared. I'm not trying to make more
Speaker 1: of it than it is. But you know, some people
Speaker 1: don't have before understanding what's selling on because they don't
Speaker 1: educate themselves and says to the kind of people that
Speaker 1: can hurt people. Mary, thank you very much for your call.
Speaker 1: Appreciated Bob. Bob down in Mississippi, Hey Bob, Hey, Hey
Speaker 1: buck shield tie shield tie Bob. After listening to your
Speaker 1: montage of morons. It occurred to me that nice literation. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you like that. These people really are ignorant. As you mentioned,
Speaker 1: you know, the Nazis were socialists. Yes, before they were
Speaker 1: the master race, they were socialists. Yeah. In fact, the
Speaker 1: Nazis in the early days, one of their biggest they
Speaker 1: were fighting. They had street brawls with the Communists. They
Speaker 1: hated the Communists, not because they were polar opposite ideologies,
Speaker 1: but because they were often fighting for the same recruits.
Speaker 1: They were both strains of collectivism that were clashing on
Speaker 1: the streets of Berlin and across Germany and across Eastern
Speaker 1: Europe at the time, and and and in Russia too,
Speaker 1: by the way, in the Soviet Union. So and you know,
Speaker 1: most people don't realize this though, that the Socialists drove
Speaker 1: Germany into war because they were starving to death because
Speaker 1: of their policies. Well, yeah, there's versus cost ten thousand
Speaker 1: dollars to get a local bread. Yeah, yeah, hyperinflation. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there's there's such a lack of real understanding of history
Speaker 1: that comes particularly. I mean, look Democrats, there's just a hostility.
Speaker 1: Did they rewrite history? They're completely delusional about you know,
Speaker 1: the comparisons they're making right now, and I find a
Speaker 1: very trouble Bob. Thank you Shield, Sorry, thank you for
Speaker 1: calling a Mississippi man. We'll take one more call before
Speaker 1: we're going to break here. Patty in Biloxi, Hey, Patty, Hey, Mark, Hey,
Speaker 1: I have a question to pose. A Comma thought experiment.
Speaker 1: Um says, it's an election year. When is the media
Speaker 1: going to start doing their job and asking all these
Speaker 1: Democrat candidates if they agree with what Maxie Waters is
Speaker 1: saying and if they agree with the actions of the
Speaker 1: owner of the Red Hend, like they would be doing
Speaker 1: two Republicans, right about Patty. It's a It's a great question,
Speaker 1: and this is one of the ways they play This
Speaker 1: is one of the ways the media plays games. They go,
Speaker 1: we're not bus We're not doing anything, all right. They
Speaker 1: if this were a different situation, a different set of circumstances,
Speaker 1: they would be asking every person who goes on TV,
Speaker 1: what do you think of Maxie waters comments? What do
Speaker 1: you think if it was a Republican calling for public
Speaker 1: harassment and confrontation against Obama administration officials? Everyone be us?
Speaker 1: Do you condemn? Do you condemn? And you better say, oh,
Speaker 1: I condemn? Or also going to say, oh, you're a supporter.
Speaker 1: You know, this is one of their favorite games to play,
Speaker 1: the do you condemn or support the comments of some
Speaker 1: other person? When do they institute that is something they're
Speaker 1: going to ask and when do they skip over it?
Speaker 1: And you're you're completely right here, Patty, No one's going
Speaker 1: to be asked what they think of Max maxiem Waters
Speaker 1: comments to skip right by it. You know they're gonna
Speaker 1: go right by it. Patty. Thank you for calling in
Speaker 1: for Mississippi eight four nine Buck Team if you want
Speaker 1: to chat, also Facebook dot com slashbuck Sex. Then we
Speaker 1: had a live stream up there of the show. You
Speaker 1: can also follow the page immigration. Folks, we are going
Speaker 1: to drill down into what is really going on at
Speaker 1: the border. Stay with me for that. It is repeating itself,
Speaker 1: but it has gone to a new low with Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: When we were incarcerated, our families were intact. My parents
Speaker 1: were with me. But in this case it's see, it's
Speaker 1: come to a chilling low where babies are torn away
Speaker 1: from their mothers and place in separate internment camps. And
Speaker 1: now that Donald Trump has rescinded is a zero tolerance policy. Uh,
Speaker 1: the children are being scattered throughout the country, making it
Speaker 1: even more complicated to reunite the families. So this is
Speaker 1: a new low in American history. He's saying it's worse.
Speaker 1: That's George Takai. He's saying it's worse than the internment
Speaker 1: camps of the Japanese. I don't think. I don't think
Speaker 1: the Japanese were put it interment camps and they were
Speaker 1: told like it's going to be a couple of days
Speaker 1: and then you know, and by the way they were
Speaker 1: they were US citizens. Their government turned on them. One
Speaker 1: of the darkest chapters in certainly twentieth century American history.
Speaker 1: They didn't show up to, you know, invade the sovereignty
Speaker 1: of a foreign country, which is what's going on here, folks.
Speaker 1: This is this is not about skin color or ethnicity.
Speaker 1: This is about rule of law, and it is about sovereignty,
Speaker 1: and it's about the right of a nation to define
Speaker 1: its borders and to enforce them. I've been saying this,
Speaker 1: borders are arbitrary. A country is an arbitrary creation in
Speaker 1: the sense that you know, where you're born is a
Speaker 1: determinant of who you are and what your nationality is.
Speaker 1: At some level, we have a process for bringing in
Speaker 1: other people. But it is a process, it's not just
Speaker 1: to show up. You had John Legend, who has twelve
Speaker 1: million faced Twitter followers, so you can imagine how many
Speaker 1: people are reading this stuff wrote about Sarah Sanders. If
Speaker 1: she doesn't want to be held account for the administration's evil,
Speaker 1: she can resign and denounce it. And then bottom line is,
Speaker 1: I'm very comfortable with a non violent form of social
Speaker 1: censure being visited upon people who implement and defend such
Speaker 1: intentionally harmful policies. Far less pain is being visited upon
Speaker 1: Sarah than these families at the border. Shame on the
Speaker 1: whole lot. See, Now, this is what the left likes
Speaker 1: to do. You know, they reached a point point where
Speaker 1: you know, every Iraqi civilian killed, for example, was pretty
Speaker 1: much Dick Cheney's fault. It's like he pulled the trigger himself,
Speaker 1: not just Cheney, anyone who anyone who worked for him.
Speaker 1: And you're like, wasn't bushed the president. Yeah, but they
Speaker 1: hated Cheney even more and all the stuff about this
Speaker 1: this stealth Cheney presidency. You know, John Legend and these
Speaker 1: other celebrities, they're in courage. They are creating a moral
Speaker 1: calculus in people who believe them that will justify any
Speaker 1: anti Trump behavior worse than interment camps. There as bad.
Speaker 1: The Nazism is what we're seeing at the border. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: the truth, which even where do we have? Yeah, Jay
Speaker 1: Johnson admitted that, yes, there was family detention under the
Speaker 1: Obama administration play clip six. The images and the reality
Speaker 1: from twenty fourteen, just like twenty eighteen, are not pretty,
Speaker 1: and so we expanded family detention. We had then thirty
Speaker 1: four thousand beds for family detention, only ninety five of
Speaker 1: thirty four thousand equipped to deal with families, so we
Speaker 1: expanded it. I freely admit it was controversial. We believed
Speaker 1: it was necessary at the time. I still believe it
Speaker 1: is necessary to main a certain capability for families. We
Speaker 1: can't have catch and release, and in my three years
Speaker 1: we deported or repatriated or returned over a million people.
Speaker 1: But again, you can deal with this on the border.
Speaker 1: You can try different things. We did not want to
Speaker 1: go as so far as separate families. But unless we
Speaker 1: deal with the underlying causes that are motivating people to
Speaker 1: come here in the first place, we're going to continue
Speaker 1: to bang our heads against the Wall on this issue.
Speaker 1: So why why wasn't the Obama administration engaged in Nazism? Oh,
Speaker 1: it was just Nazism on a smaller scale. Is that
Speaker 1: now the dodge? Is that the explanation we're being given?
Speaker 1: It was Nazism? That wasn't wasn't it quite the same numbers?
Speaker 1: Oh well, isn't that an interesting new opinion of things? Folks?
Speaker 1: This is just this is all the hysteria to left
Speaker 1: because you know what, there their worst nightmare is coming true,
Speaker 1: and that is that the American people are going to
Speaker 1: have an opportunity, after electing Trump to look at the
Speaker 1: Republican Party that Trump leads in a mid term election
Speaker 1: and say, you know what, this guy's actually doing a
Speaker 1: pretty good job. GOP's not hitting home runs, but they're
Speaker 1: not messing stuff up either. I kind of like the
Speaker 1: way things are going. I'm gonna give it. I'm gonna
Speaker 1: give it another couple of years here, see what happens.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna ride this out because that sentiment if you
Speaker 1: are a journalist here in DC, if you you know,
Speaker 1: if you work at one of these left wing outlets
Speaker 1: that pretends to be just the facts, just the truth,
Speaker 1: all the time, that mentality. You just can't handle it
Speaker 1: because it means that everything you've been saying is wrong
Speaker 1: and a lie, and you're a fraud and you're a hack.
Speaker 1: So they're in this panic, this desperate pen Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: Trump nazis he just lying, lying and lying. Immigration of
Speaker 1: the deep dive on this. It's coming up stair right there.
Speaker 1: In the business world, information is absolutely essential to your success.
Speaker 1: You know this. But how do you get the best
Speaker 1: information on prospective hires, on a possible tenant for a property,
Speaker 1: or a major business partner or transaction. You need to
Speaker 1: have somebody you can call upon. He does the best
Speaker 1: background investigations and vetting into business, and my friends, that
Speaker 1: is Global Verification Network. Global Verification is federally certified as
Speaker 1: a veteran owned small business. The headquarters are here in Chicago,
Speaker 1: and they separate themselves from the other guys by doing
Speaker 1: all of the work here stateside and keeping your data
Speaker 1: here in the United States. They don't offshore the work,
Speaker 1: they don't offshore the information. And when you call them,
Speaker 1: somebody's gonna pick up that phone and you're gonna have
Speaker 1: your problem dealt with right away. Call eight seven seven
Speaker 1: six nine five one one seven nine, or go to
Speaker 1: MYGVN dot com. That's MYGVN dot com Global Verification Network.
Speaker 1: Leave no stone on turn buck Sexton Remission, decoding the
Speaker 1: news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake
Speaker 1: American Ready, You're a great American again. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show. Analyst Sexton, No, Let's be clear that
Speaker 1: for many, many years we had a net zero immigration issue.
Speaker 1: Mexico's economy was doing well, So a lot of this
Speaker 1: has been contrived right by this administration. Like to have
Speaker 1: certainly a strong border patrol as it relates to making
Speaker 1: sure that we are not allowing traffickers to come into
Speaker 1: this country, and we can do that, but we don't
Speaker 1: have to separate families. We don't have to have a
Speaker 1: zero talance policy. We want a system where when people
Speaker 1: come in illegally, they have to go out, and a
Speaker 1: nice simple system that works. You know, Mexico holds people
Speaker 1: for four hours, for five hours, for two hours, and
Speaker 1: they're gone. We have people for four or five six
Speaker 1: years and they never leave. So we want to have
Speaker 1: a great immigration. What we have is very simple. We
Speaker 1: want strong borders and we want no crime strong borders.
Speaker 1: We want no crime. The Democrats want open borders, and
Speaker 1: they don't care about crime, and they don't care about
Speaker 1: our military. I care about our military. That's what we want,
Speaker 1: and that's what we're gonna get, and we're gonna get
Speaker 1: it sooner than people think. Welcome back to the Buck
Speaker 1: sexon show. I think Kamala Harris, Senator from California and
Speaker 1: Trump illustrating in short form where the two parties are
Speaker 1: right now, Notice how Harris said on immigration, and you
Speaker 1: know this christ the border. First of all, she says
Speaker 1: that they're net zero immigration. That's just crap, all right,
Speaker 1: that's just not true. So you know, first of all,
Speaker 1: how they even really track this. They don't know's there's
Speaker 1: just no way. Yeah, for a while when the economy
Speaker 1: was bad, maybe you had a little bit of a drop,
Speaker 1: but we've got hundreds of thousands of people that have
Speaker 1: come into the country seeking asylum alone. Do you think
Speaker 1: hundreds of thousands of people have permanently left the United
Speaker 1: States for Mexico or Central America? Right, we just apply
Speaker 1: logic to this and just know that it's just just garbage.
Speaker 1: There's just no way what she's saying is true. It's preposterous,
Speaker 1: utterly preposterous. But there was a very interesting point that
Speaker 1: she made without intending to make it. And this is
Speaker 1: what we're seeing now is a is an opening into
Speaker 1: the mind of what's really what's really going on with
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party and immigration. She said, not allow We
Speaker 1: should have a strong you know, immigration to customer enforcement
Speaker 1: that will not allow traffickers through. Okay, so just I
Speaker 1: suppose human and drug traffickers we will stop. What about
Speaker 1: the masses of people that are coming into the country.
Speaker 1: Do they just get to stay? Is that really what
Speaker 1: the Democrats want? That they're never forced to answer this question,
Speaker 1: And I would just like to know, is it now
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party's position that anyone who comes to America
Speaker 1: and claims that they have been that they don't like
Speaker 1: their country, that it's really mean and therefore they claim asylum,
Speaker 1: which is not actually a legal asylum claim. But you know,
Speaker 1: if they say that, and the Obama administration, which expanded
Speaker 1: as something that Obama used to play with the law
Speaker 1: and just make the law meaningless or he would change
Speaker 1: the plain meaning of law to suit his whims, and
Speaker 1: we're dealing with the fallout from that still, especially on immigration.
Speaker 1: But is it now the Democrat position that if you
Speaker 1: come to this country and say you want asylum, you
Speaker 1: get to stay. Because if they're this is what where
Speaker 1: people refer to us catch and release. If that is
Speaker 1: their position, they should be forced to state it and
Speaker 1: we should know that. And then what we have is
Speaker 1: effectively not an open border, but a check in border,
Speaker 1: meaning get check in, like you're arriving at a hotel,
Speaker 1: but you're definitely going to be allowed to stay unless
Speaker 1: you're like a known cartel member or something. You know.
Speaker 1: But even then, even then, even if we could narrow
Speaker 1: it down, they'd say, oh, maybe the cartel members reformed himself.
Speaker 1: He'll do the jobs Americans won't do. Cartel members need
Speaker 1: work too. I mean, you know, it's always a moving
Speaker 1: target with the left, you never know what you're dealing with.
Speaker 1: But this is all very Olynskyite too. The Obama administration
Speaker 1: knew what they were doing. They knew that by expanding
Speaker 1: the definition of asylum seekers, it was ringing the dinner
Speaker 1: bell for huge waves of migrants to come, including children
Speaker 1: who were put in very dangerous positions, who were taking
Speaker 1: tremendous risk. But the obamaministration made it clear that if
Speaker 1: you come to the border and your child you're under eighteen,
Speaker 1: or you say you're under eighteen by the way, and
Speaker 1: you have no documentation for any of this, you'll get
Speaker 1: to stay. And this then created a situation where, you know,
Speaker 1: asylum is supposed to be a very specific process. You're
Speaker 1: supposed to turn yourself in claim asylum. There are specific guidelines,
Speaker 1: and a lot of assy lese or would be assilees
Speaker 1: are denied. So this was exploiting the seams in the system.
Speaker 1: This was finding a way for the Obama aministration to
Speaker 1: allow mass illegal immigration into the country under the guise
Speaker 1: of rules, under the guise of respecting the rules and
Speaker 1: the laws at some level, which was just a fraud.
Speaker 1: It was a fake. It was a phony. And we
Speaker 1: have hundreds of thousand people who have come in and
Speaker 1: to say that this isn't a crisis. We were never
Speaker 1: supposed to have all these people at the border claiming
Speaker 1: and I'm not supposed to a family showing up at
Speaker 1: the border claiming asylum. And so now Trump turns around
Speaker 1: and he says in a tweet today, you know we
Speaker 1: should just no more getting in front of a judge normal,
Speaker 1: We can't handle this, folks, we can't handle the processes.
Speaker 1: Here's an example of this. If every person in the
Speaker 1: country wanted a federal criminal trial, who was who was
Speaker 1: criminally charged, the court system would would cease to function.
Speaker 1: That's why ninety seven percent plus of federal criminal federal
Speaker 1: criminal cases are plea bargained. That's why plea bargains are
Speaker 1: it's it's a good if you're guilty, it's a good deal.
Speaker 1: You're guilty, take that plea, okay, because if you don't.
Speaker 1: In the federal system, there's mandatory minimums and you serve
Speaker 1: the whole sentence, and you know, the plea might be
Speaker 1: way better for you. But it's the system has also
Speaker 1: incentivized to give out police because they don't have the
Speaker 1: infrastructure to give everyone a trial. Another example of this,
Speaker 1: right the seams in the system idea here. I remember
Speaker 1: this is all very Olynsky, and I'll get into some
Speaker 1: of the Lynsky tactics in a moment. A bank run
Speaker 1: on a bank. What happens if everybody shows up at
Speaker 1: a bank says I want my money. The bank doesn't say,
Speaker 1: no problem, here's all your money. The bank's gonna run
Speaker 1: out of money real fast. Have you had a coordinated effort,
Speaker 1: especially back in the day when this wasn't all done digitally,
Speaker 1: to have all kinds of people say that they all
Speaker 1: need their money out of the bank at the same
Speaker 1: time you create a bank run and that that can
Speaker 1: bring down the whole bank. And they don't have the money,
Speaker 1: right they don't. They don't have the deposits. Pay you
Speaker 1: out right exploiting the seams in the system. Same thing
Speaker 1: with the border and immigration an asylum and fraudulent asylum claims.
Speaker 1: But you know, Jim Jim Jordan, Oh, I believe is
Speaker 1: gonna be on Rising Hill dot TV slash Rising my show,
Speaker 1: my new TV show tomorrow. Jim Jordan's gonna be joining us,
Speaker 1: so check out that for sure. But he's pointing this out.
Speaker 1: These aren't even legitimate asylum seekers. These are just people
Speaker 1: who there. This is just a legal immigration with a
Speaker 1: facade of ASI lee. It's not this is not asylum
Speaker 1: all right. Central American countries are poor and having a
Speaker 1: rough time right now. But you are not an asylum
Speaker 1: seeker unless you are fleeing political violence directly to you personally.
Speaker 1: You know, there are specific criteria and my husband is
Speaker 1: you know, is abusive or there are bad crimes in
Speaker 1: my area, doesn't count, and a lot of them are showing.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying, you know, I want economic opportunity. Well
Speaker 1: that's like a getting line, folks, right, getting line situation.
Speaker 1: Everybody wants economic opportunity anyway. Jim Jordan's finally he's one
Speaker 1: of the ones pointing this out. Seven America's the most
Speaker 1: welcoming country on the planet. But you got to you
Speaker 1: gotta follow the law, and the Secretary Nielson has been
Speaker 1: real clear. You show up to a port of entry,
Speaker 1: your family will be kept together, you will go through
Speaker 1: the process, and we'll see if you're actually a legitimate
Speaker 1: asylum seeker. What I do know is when I was
Speaker 1: in our office just a week and a half ago,
Speaker 1: they told me eighty percent of the folks seeking asylum
Speaker 1: wind up not getting it. They're not actually eligible for it.
Speaker 1: So we want to sort that all out, do it
Speaker 1: in a way that's consistent with the law. Eighty eighty
Speaker 1: percent is straight from the folks that at Immigration and
Speaker 1: Customs Enforcement. So they're telling me the number eighty percent
Speaker 1: aren't actual legitimate asylum seekers. Eighty percent folks, eighty percent
Speaker 1: of hundreds of thousands of people for many years. You're
Speaker 1: gonna say this isn't a crisis. Yeah, we don't have
Speaker 1: the facilities, we don't have the beds. We're not supposed
Speaker 1: to have the beds and the facilities for this. Because
Speaker 1: these people that are claiming asylum should be treated as
Speaker 1: illegal crossers, deported right away. And that's what Trump is
Speaker 1: trying to say today, not oh you get to plead
Speaker 1: your case in front of a judge. Sorry, especially if
Speaker 1: you are caught trying illegal entry. You're by definition not
Speaker 1: an asylum seeker. By definition, you are an illegal alien
Speaker 1: and violation of US law. Why should you get a
Speaker 1: hearing to plead your asylum case? What sense does what's
Speaker 1: I mean? He put aside? Even whether that's technically what
Speaker 1: would happen or should happen or not, based on what
Speaker 1: those statutes are right now, we should change it. That's crazy.
Speaker 1: Everyone shows up, they get to have a hearing. And
Speaker 1: you'll notice that that they also the Democrats were starting
Speaker 1: to say, oh, we're detaining families. Now, oh, you can't
Speaker 1: detain the families, because they know that this is the
Speaker 1: way the game works. You show up, let's say, as
Speaker 1: you know, as a mother and son at the border,
Speaker 1: you try to get in the country illegally because that's
Speaker 1: the easiest way. Oh, you got caught by border patrol. Well,
Speaker 1: now you say you're claiming asylum, and now you've got
Speaker 1: all these you know, human rights lawyers and the ACLU
Speaker 1: and all these people. Oh gosh, you know so and
Speaker 1: then they say, Okay, we've got to hold you, gotta
Speaker 1: process you, and that's also mean. But we can't hold
Speaker 1: you for long, so we have to release you in
Speaker 1: the United States and tell you to come back for
Speaker 1: a hearing. They don't show up for the hearings, folks.
Speaker 1: This is just like teaching people to get around the
Speaker 1: security system to break into a home. That's all. This is. No,
Speaker 1: this is a ruse is It is a fraud perpetrated
Speaker 1: against the American people. And the Obama administration put this
Speaker 1: in motion, they did, and the Trump administra people keep
Speaker 1: saying zerotolerance policy. Another word for zerotolerance policy is enforced
Speaker 1: the law, or another way of saying it is enforced
Speaker 1: the law that has that That is now a radical
Speaker 1: concept tells you everything you need to know about the
Speaker 1: current immigration discussion. Can enforce the law, so now we
Speaker 1: have nullification by you know, via the virtue signaling squad.
Speaker 1: I mean, how are we supposed to know, how are
Speaker 1: we supposed to know what the future is going to
Speaker 1: be here? But this is I think where you're starting
Speaker 1: to see also that the Democrats have jumped the shark
Speaker 1: on this. The American people are not with them once
Speaker 1: they find out what Democrats really want, which is a
Speaker 1: country that anybody from south of our border right stretching
Speaker 1: down into Mexico, Central America, you know, because that's a
Speaker 1: reliable political constituency for the Democrats, and Democrats think in
Speaker 1: terms of group voting and group identity, and so that's
Speaker 1: just how they view all this. But when people figure
Speaker 1: out that the democrats real goal here is to allow
Speaker 1: the near unrestricted, continued mass migration into the country of
Speaker 1: non English speakers with limited to no skills to compete
Speaker 1: in an economy that people keep saying, oh, we need,
Speaker 1: we need these people, that we need laborers. Actually, mechanization
Speaker 1: is what should have happened in a lot of these farms.
Speaker 1: And keep in mind that many of the people who
Speaker 1: are running businesses that say, oh, I you know, my
Speaker 1: business is going to suffer, they're passing off the cost
Speaker 1: of many of those underpaid laborers that they are hiring
Speaker 1: to you, the taxpayer. They are socializing much of the
Speaker 1: cost the healthcare costs, the general welfare costs, education costs,
Speaker 1: all this of illegals and others who come into the
Speaker 1: country and claiming that, you know, they're just trying to
Speaker 1: be capitalists. You know, a capitalist will actually just pay
Speaker 1: the people that are in the country the wages that
Speaker 1: the market would allow, not to pay them less than
Speaker 1: market wages because one in many cases, they're paying them
Speaker 1: off the books, so they they're not paying payroll taxes
Speaker 1: on this, they're paying them in cash there. But also
Speaker 1: they are doing this in such a way that it
Speaker 1: undermines their competitors who have to do those things and
Speaker 1: pay those wages and play by the rules. So it's
Speaker 1: an unfair advantage to them too. So, you know, the
Speaker 1: immigration issue is very complicated. I understand that. But there
Speaker 1: was actually a piece over the weekend that I have
Speaker 1: to say from from a Trump hater named David Frum
Speaker 1: that I'm familiar with. His writing rights for The Atlantic.
Speaker 1: He's a he's a good writer. He was a Bush
Speaker 1: administration speech writer, but he made some very interesting points. Again,
Speaker 1: I want to bring you into some of that peace
Speaker 1: and what he had to say, and he diagnosed some
Speaker 1: of the mania now on immigration that the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: has in a way that I think they can escape.
Speaker 1: I don't think that they really can refute the points
Speaker 1: that from makes. But you know that I'm making here
Speaker 1: either that we're all coming to this conclusion. We're coming
Speaker 1: to that the Democrats have lost their way on the
Speaker 1: issue of immigration, and this has now gotten tied up
Speaker 1: in their virtue signaling, their social justice aspirations, their identity politics,
Speaker 1: their assault on this nonsensical concept of white privilege, and
Speaker 1: you know, all of us. This all gets tied into together,
Speaker 1: so we have more an immigration And then if I
Speaker 1: got some time, we'll talk about the IG, the latest
Speaker 1: with the Muller probe, not specific to the IG report,
Speaker 1: but the Muller probe. And then third hour, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: get into another a CNN slime slime attack, not an ambush,
Speaker 1: but a slime attack. We'll break that one down for you,
Speaker 1: and then just some other fun things. The viral clip
Speaker 1: discussing many many things A four four nine two eight
Speaker 1: two five eight four four nine hundred Buck, Please download
Speaker 1: the Freedom on podcast folks, still good from last week.
Speaker 1: Freedom of podcasts are evergreen. They're not just based on
Speaker 1: the new cycle. It's just thoughts for the week from
Speaker 1: yours truly producer Mark. Do we have it on Stitcher yet?
Speaker 1: Are we getting there? We're getting there, team, Yeah, we
Speaker 1: got a little We need a little tech help in here.
Speaker 1: The Buck is tired. He's so tired that he's speaking
Speaker 1: the third person right now, which means he should probably
Speaker 1: slap himself in the face. We're gonna do a quick break.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back. Nine Line Apparel, my Friends is
Speaker 1: a veteran owned and operated patriotic lifestyle brand. Once you
Speaker 1: go on their site, you'll see for yourself. These guys
Speaker 1: love America, freedom, are troops and making the best T shirts, hoodie, sweatshirts, shorts, pants,
Speaker 1: you name it. They've got it all designs that will
Speaker 1: show what you care about, that will show your support
Speaker 1: for the military and also your patriotism. You will literally
Speaker 1: wear it on your sleeve, or on your chest, or
Speaker 1: on your back, maybe wherever you want it. Go check
Speaker 1: it out for your off Visit nine line apparel dot com.
Speaker 1: Use coupon code Buck twenty to save twenty percent off
Speaker 1: your next order. That's a great deal, folks. Nine line
Speaker 1: apparel dot Com coupon code buck twenty. You type in
Speaker 1: that coupon code, tells him you learned about them here
Speaker 1: in the Freedom Hunt also tells them that you want
Speaker 1: twenty percent off, and you love America and freedom and patriotism,
Speaker 1: and you're gonna have great gear. Nine line apparel dot Com.
Speaker 1: I believe and peaceful, very peaceful protests. I have not
Speaker 1: called for the harm of anybody. This president has lied
Speaker 1: again when he's saying that I called for harm to anyone.
Speaker 1: He is the one that's responsible for promoting violence. Um, okay,
Speaker 1: what was that all about it? Because we play the
Speaker 1: audio at the top of the show from Maxine Waters
Speaker 1: there where she said, you know, find them getting their
Speaker 1: face harassed them and if you don't think that's not
Speaker 1: going to turn into violence really fast, you know you're
Speaker 1: you're not thinking very hard about the problem, Maxine. And
Speaker 1: then Trump Trump went after her pretty pretty trump like today,
Speaker 1: trying to find the exact tweet here. He was not
Speaker 1: he was not messing around a long word it go.
Speaker 1: Congresswoman Maxine Waters is from Trump's Trump's Twitter account, an
Speaker 1: extraordinarily low IQ person has become together with Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker 1: the face of the Democrat Party. She has just called
Speaker 1: for harm to supporters of which there are many of
Speaker 1: the Make America Great Again movement. Be careful what you
Speaker 1: wish for, Max. So that's the back and forth that
Speaker 1: we're seeing there. She says she never called for harm.
Speaker 1: But yeah, but what she said was irresponsible and would
Speaker 1: very reasonably be expected to lead to harm, to lead
Speaker 1: to violence, and that's not acceptable and people should call
Speaker 1: that out and they should have a problem with it.
Speaker 1: And in a maxim water, she should be a shame
Speaker 1: But I don't think she's really a capable of shame.
Speaker 1: Alrightyway back to the border for second. Here you had
Speaker 1: Sarah Huckaby standers speaking about the due process issue today.
Speaker 1: Play fifteen. This is from the press conference. Does the
Speaker 1: President believe that undocumented immigrants have no due process rights whatsoever?
Speaker 1: Virtually all Americans agree that it makes no sense that
Speaker 1: an illegal alien sets one foot on American soil and
Speaker 1: then they would go through a three to five year
Speaker 1: judicial process to be removed from the country. Thousands of
Speaker 1: illegal aliens are removed every month without seeing an immigration
Speaker 1: judge as a result of procedures in current law, including
Speaker 1: voluntary removal and expedited removal. Just because you don't see
Speaker 1: a judge doesn't mean you aren't receiving due process. The
Speaker 1: President is focused on securing our borders and reforming our
Speaker 1: immigration system to prevent the crisis at the border from
Speaker 1: getting worse. I mean, think about what the what the
Speaker 1: alternative here is, folks, They're they're all being snippy with
Speaker 1: Sarah Sanders there. Think about the alternative. Anyone can show
Speaker 1: up at at a US border port of entry and
Speaker 1: say I want, you know, I want my day in court.
Speaker 1: I need to see a judge. Oh okay, well how
Speaker 1: many judges do we really think we have? Guys, And
Speaker 1: think about the work and the research and the case
Speaker 1: and everything that goes into that too. You know, Asylum
Speaker 1: was never supposed to be used in this way by
Speaker 1: this many people. Is supposed to be very specific, case
Speaker 1: by case, charitable thing. Really, we're giving people asylum because
Speaker 1: we're good people. And as the Left always does, they
Speaker 1: have taken our desire to be good, to be decent.
Speaker 1: They've taken that desire of the American people, and they
Speaker 1: are using it against us for their own political gain. Recently,
Speaker 1: I've been getting all my style tips from the clothing
Speaker 1: experts at Peter Malone. And if you're like me and
Speaker 1: you love wearing some golf gear when you're out and about,
Speaker 1: you know the name. If you don't, you should, because
Speaker 1: Peter Millar is all about quality, value and style. It's
Speaker 1: the most comfortable clothing I've ever worn. And right now
Speaker 1: I'm wearing their performance sports shirt. That's right. I like
Speaker 1: to do it when I'm in the radio mode because
Speaker 1: guess what, it's kind of wicking. It has a lot
Speaker 1: of breathability. It's comfortable, and Molly says it makes me
Speaker 1: look like a handsome dad, even though I'm not a
Speaker 1: dad yet, so I'm all about it. Peter Millar stuff
Speaker 1: is top quality. I love their gear, and the performance
Speaker 1: sports short that I'm wearing is the most comfortable shirt
Speaker 1: I've ever worn. I can say that about everything that
Speaker 1: I've gotten from Peter Millar. And right now you can
Speaker 1: head over to Peter Millar dot com slash buck to
Speaker 1: check out some of my favorites. Be sure to use
Speaker 1: my link and you'll receive complimentary shipping at a free
Speaker 1: hat that's Peter Millar m I L Laar dot com
Speaker 1: slash buck. Peter Millar dot com slash buck. He's holding
Speaker 1: the line for America, buck Sexton his back. I think
Speaker 1: the Mullard probe is running out of steam, or at
Speaker 1: least I hope it's running out of steam. It's tough
Speaker 1: to really tell. But you know, Andy McCarthy, whom you
Speaker 1: all know is among the the very very best in
Speaker 1: the biz. I'm a guy who I think does a
Speaker 1: phenomenal job of analyzing everything that's going on in the
Speaker 1: Mullard probe, everything that's going on in the world of
Speaker 1: the deep state and all the legal though he doesn't
Speaker 1: tend to you, he doesn't use that term, but I
Speaker 1: do the deep state and all the machinations behind the scenes.
Speaker 1: He is making the case now publicly, Andy, is that
Speaker 1: it's just time to pull the plug on the obstruction
Speaker 1: component of Muller's probe play clip two. It should pull
Speaker 1: the plug on the aspect of the Mulla probe that
Speaker 1: deals with whether the president's guilty of obstruction. I mean poorly.
Speaker 1: Confusion here is that when you talk about the Muller probe,
Speaker 1: people seem to mean different things about it as they
Speaker 1: say it, The Mulla probe, as it was originally articulated
Speaker 1: by Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein, is a counterintelligence probe into
Speaker 1: Russia's interference in the twenty sixteen election. I don't think
Speaker 1: anybody thinks that that the entirety of that mission is
Speaker 1: a waste of time. And unless it's very necessary, you
Speaker 1: should not have a situation where the president is under
Speaker 1: the cloud of federal criminal investigation. So the question is
Speaker 1: do they have a case on him, and it appears
Speaker 1: that they don't as a matter of law, and the
Speaker 1: Inspector General's report underscores that it's impossible at this case
Speaker 1: that unless President Tupe, President Troupe, President Trump wrote out
Speaker 1: a letter that's like I am I am in it
Speaker 1: with criminal mindset going to fire, come for the purposes
Speaker 1: of obstructing. And even then people would argue that it's
Speaker 1: probably not possible for the President to obstruct. There's no
Speaker 1: way they're gonna find out, there's no way they're gonna
Speaker 1: prove obstruction. It's impossible now, so why is this even
Speaker 1: still a discussion? Right? And they're also not going to
Speaker 1: prove any collusion. It's just a joke. I think you
Speaker 1: had a report out today and and Trump has been
Speaker 1: mentioning this that what is it? Mark Warner, Senator Warner saying,
Speaker 1: you know, people need to be prepared for what they're
Speaker 1: gonna find out about what they're gonna find out from
Speaker 1: this probe. I think I think you're gonna find out, Well,
Speaker 1: we're gonna find out a lot of malfeasance, a lot
Speaker 1: of bad behavior from the deep state and the anti
Speaker 1: Trump folks on the left happened to work in the government.
Speaker 1: That's for sure. You're going to see more of that.
Speaker 1: But what is the media? I mean, I'm just wondering.
Speaker 1: I want to I want to touch on this now
Speaker 1: because we'll clearly be discussing it later. Does CNN think
Speaker 1: we're just going to forget all the stories about Russia
Speaker 1: and Trump Tower and collusion. They're just that's just all
Speaker 1: gonna go away, you know, like like when they ran
Speaker 1: endless stories on the missing plane. Do you guys remember
Speaker 1: that this is this is America's like premier cable news network.
Speaker 1: They think, not you, but they think that. And you know,
Speaker 1: they had an anchor asked the question on air once
Speaker 1: maybe the airplane got lost in a black hole or
Speaker 1: something you remember that. But are we just supposed to
Speaker 1: forget and move on from all the Russia collusion fantasies
Speaker 1: that were bandied about for such a long time. Is
Speaker 1: that the expectation here? I just I'm wondering. I'm just
Speaker 1: putting it out there. And we also know that they're
Speaker 1: not being honest about what we've already found out with
Speaker 1: these investigations. There's there's a lack of integrity in the
Speaker 1: analysis of the ongoing investigations of and what has been
Speaker 1: released from the investigations. You know, I mean Devin Nunez,
Speaker 1: you know that he's doing a good job because the
Speaker 1: left hates this guy. Now you know, he's taken flak
Speaker 1: because he's above the target, so to speak. And he
Speaker 1: spoke a bit about the just the the gall I mean,
Speaker 1: the bald face, in your face, brazenness of there's there's
Speaker 1: nothing to see here from the ig rapport with the
Speaker 1: other things we've been talking about, nothing to see with
Speaker 1: regard to bias and the investigations, like it's just crazy.
Speaker 1: It's just crazy. So what that shows is it shows
Speaker 1: clear intent to run a very biased investigation. And look,
Speaker 1: I don't believe for a second that mister Struck was
Speaker 1: just happeningly put in charge of this just a week before.
Speaker 1: Struck and Page and the rest of them all knew
Speaker 1: about this month in advance. They were well aware of
Speaker 1: what they were doing. They had opened this investigation, maybe
Speaker 1: not officially, but they were doing lots and lots of
Speaker 1: bad things that they have not shown Congress before that
Speaker 1: July late July date. Yep. And we don't get answers
Speaker 1: from this. We don't get the truth. We just get
Speaker 1: more and more nonsense delays. Peter King spoke about how
Speaker 1: the DJ response and what's going on with the Trump
Speaker 1: of the Trump probe is just complete garbage play three
Speaker 1: as we continue a bad faith here from the FBI
Speaker 1: and the Department in Justice. This is delayed and delayed,
Speaker 1: and literally if the eleventh dial Friday night, we got
Speaker 1: this response. The response is inadequate. For instance, they do
Speaker 1: not answer the question about whether or not their informants
Speaker 1: and human sources use They imply they were, but they
Speaker 1: say they've referred that question to the Director of National Intelligence,
Speaker 1: who had nothing to do with this. In fact, I
Speaker 1: mean with James claff saying he wasn't even aware there
Speaker 1: was an investigation going on when he was the Director
Speaker 1: of National Intelligence, tucking this. We have the absolute right
Speaker 1: under the Constitution to seek these documents, and they are
Speaker 1: obstructing it. And people have complaining for years that Congress
Speaker 1: doesn't do an adequate job of oversite. Well, we are
Speaker 1: doing it now and we're investigating the Trump administration. Do
Speaker 1: you guys won't comply? It's really shameful. You start to
Speaker 1: have to ask the question. I actually I talked to
Speaker 1: Peter King about this a couple of weeks ago. You know,
Speaker 1: off air, what happens when they just won't comply. I've
Speaker 1: asked other members of the House Judiciary Committee this off
Speaker 1: air too and on air. What do we do when
Speaker 1: the deep state just decides that they're gonna dig in.
Speaker 1: They're not gonna give on this, They're not gonna move,
Speaker 1: They're just gonna Their approach is going to be we're
Speaker 1: not sharing the information with you. What are we supposed
Speaker 1: to think? What are we supposed to do when that
Speaker 1: is there? And the answer is we don't. Yeah, you
Speaker 1: can fire them, and but this is not something we
Speaker 1: should even have to consider. But I think that's where
Speaker 1: we are. They are going to force a governmental never
Speaker 1: mind constitutional governmental crisis and try to use the gears
Speaker 1: of the bureaucracy in order to hide illicit political intent,
Speaker 1: which is what this all really comes down to. This
Speaker 1: is all what's really really going on all the way.
Speaker 1: We're gonna be breaking a big story here on Hill
Speaker 1: dot TV tomorrow morning, which I'm hoping you can all
Speaker 1: check out. And here's the here's the teaser on it.
Speaker 1: It involves Julian Assange, it involves a possible safe conduct deal,
Speaker 1: and it involves James Comey. Oh yeah, Comey. We are
Speaker 1: going to be breaking that story here at the Hill
Speaker 1: and we will be discussing it tomorrow morning on Hill
Speaker 1: dot TV. You're going to find out that there's even
Speaker 1: there's even more reason to question Comey's udgment, to question
Speaker 1: his well, how much he allowed politics to influence his
Speaker 1: work and his thinking. So that's just an aside there,
Speaker 1: But Hill dot TV, Slash Rising, you want to check
Speaker 1: that out, you know, it's it's a remarkable thing to
Speaker 1: watch as this administration just keeps pushing on, just keeps
Speaker 1: pushing forward and going onward despite all of the stuff
Speaker 1: that's been a rate against it. I mean, the fact
Speaker 1: that here we are with the Democrats in this desperate
Speaker 1: state of affairs talking about Nazism and fascism and you know,
Speaker 1: all this stuff. While the economy is absolutely booming. We're
Speaker 1: not starting any needless wars around the world. You know,
Speaker 1: we're not sending large amounts of Americans overseas to try
Speaker 1: to build countries for people that aren't able to build
Speaker 1: them for themselves. You know, we're not doing that. And
Speaker 1: things are going well. Yeah, I know there's some a
Speaker 1: little bit of a dust up over trade, but that's
Speaker 1: going to get sorted out. Things are going well. And
Speaker 1: what you're seeing is the left wing mind can neither
Speaker 1: process nor accept how successful Trump is. They are act
Speaker 1: they're in denial. They can't handle it. We'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Populus can stay in power by mobilizing a fervent base. Now,
Speaker 1: there are many other lessons like this. Louise mentioned my
Speaker 1: personal experience with winning three million more votes but still losing.
Speaker 1: And we will leave discussions of the American Electoral College
Speaker 1: for another day. No, but you see, she won't leave
Speaker 1: it for another day. I'll talk about it another time
Speaker 1: after I talk about it, because I'm Hilary. She won't stop, folks.
Speaker 1: She absolutely positively will not stop. She cannot be reasoned with.
Speaker 1: She does not feel pity or remorse. She just has
Speaker 1: to be in the public guy, and she is delusional. Okay,
Speaker 1: Not only is the electoral college in place for a reason,
Speaker 1: more importantly, the race that was run was about winning
Speaker 1: the electoral college. This is the equivalent. I know, I
Speaker 1: don't know how many of you are our tennis fans,
Speaker 1: but the way they score tennis, you know, you get
Speaker 1: to four points and you have to get two in
Speaker 1: a row to win the game, and it's not aggregate
Speaker 1: point total. You know, you can win more games and
Speaker 1: actually lose to somebody because of the way that they structure.
Speaker 1: And that's why certain points matter more than others. It's
Speaker 1: part of the game, right, and this is there. There
Speaker 1: are other sports I know where this is true too,
Speaker 1: but certain times, certain points are much more critical. And
Speaker 1: that's true the electoral college too. Okay. Trump didn't spend
Speaker 1: a lot of time running around California trying to drum
Speaker 1: up as many Republican votes there as he could because
Speaker 1: it was a lost cause, a right Democrats have now
Speaker 1: completely over for a long time now. I've totally overtaken
Speaker 1: that state and they've ruined it as well. They're ruining
Speaker 1: the state of California. I know people there who are like,
Speaker 1: it would be so great we could split California into
Speaker 1: two or even three states, just because you'd see how
Speaker 1: quickly the conservative red California would become a place people
Speaker 1: actually wanted to move to and live, and blue California
Speaker 1: would just become this version of South America where you
Speaker 1: have a very wealthy class and then a whole servant
Speaker 1: class below them. And that's that's what the blue Democrat
Speaker 1: California would be. But you know, you know, Hillary's out there,
Speaker 1: and it just I would love to see her on
Speaker 1: the campaign trail in advance of the midterms as much
Speaker 1: as possible too, because I think that she's a great
Speaker 1: reminder of what we could have had I miss you.
Speaker 1: I mean, she could be out there of making the
Speaker 1: case for herself about why we should still have Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton as the president. I mean, I think this is
Speaker 1: a little crazy. I know, I think somewhere in her
Speaker 1: mind she has the belief that she's still going she's
Speaker 1: still going to be president. I think she still thinks that.
Speaker 1: And I also think that if I know right now,
Speaker 1: you're like but come on, come on, I think if
Speaker 1: you opened, if there was a pathway open for her
Speaker 1: to try and run a third time for the presidency,
Speaker 1: she would do it in a heartbeat. This is who
Speaker 1: she is. And now I'm I'm starting to think as well.
Speaker 1: And maybe this is why I'm sure she said no
Speaker 1: and people say balk no and they semi links and
Speaker 1: oh no Hillary whenever. I'm not sure that she doesn't
Speaker 1: think she's gonna run again. I I there's the part
Speaker 1: of it, because it hasn't really sunk in yet, based
Speaker 1: on her public comments like Electron College, Russia and all
Speaker 1: this stuff. I don't think that she has really come
Speaker 1: to grips with the fact that she did not win,
Speaker 1: that she's not going to be president, that this is
Speaker 1: not going to happen. And I also think the Democrat
Speaker 1: Party right now is in such a desperate situation. As
Speaker 1: we've been talking about the whole show. They are desperate
Speaker 1: right now. They have no message forget about inspiring. I mean,
Speaker 1: their their message is let's just rip the country apart
Speaker 1: and see what happens. Right borrow from what is it
Speaker 1: James Kane or whatever his name, Michael Kane in The
Speaker 1: Batman movies. You know, Steve Man just won't say the
Speaker 1: Wale band. He's got that real you know, remember that
Speaker 1: in the Batman movie that man just won't wal Bad.
Speaker 1: He's got that super don't even know if it's cockney,
Speaker 1: it's like cockney, but something else starting there too. He's
Speaker 1: got a British accent that even British people are like,
Speaker 1: what's that's all about? Anyway? Yeah, so Hillary's out there.
Speaker 1: I want to see more Hillary. She's really effective for
Speaker 1: our side, a great reminder of what we were able
Speaker 1: to miss out on thanks to President Trump. It's one
Speaker 1: of the great all time of one of the great
Speaker 1: favors that has ever been done to a great people,
Speaker 1: the American people, President Trump saving us from hearing Think
Speaker 1: of all the Hillary speeches. Folks, I'm here breaking glass ceilings,
Speaker 1: breaking it with my voice day after day. You just
Speaker 1: be like, oh my gosh, you have to listen to that.
Speaker 1: I'm forreat yours of this, a fret yours of I'm perfect.
Speaker 1: I'm a juniors and you well should do what I say.
Speaker 1: You know, after a while you got tired of that too, Right.
Speaker 1: Obama gave a good speech, It's just all the content
Speaker 1: was wrong. I think all the policy prescriptions were all
Speaker 1: but yeah, I'm not gonna say that guy doesn't have
Speaker 1: a you know, it doesn't have a good presence, good speech. Hillary, however,
Speaker 1: has you know, the the political skill set of a
Speaker 1: three toad sloth, which is my favorite of the sloth family. Though,
Speaker 1: I will say, I mean just nothing nothing to uh,
Speaker 1: you know, recommend her at all as a politician. Are
Speaker 1: slots particular? No, they're not sociable animals at all, so
Speaker 1: that would actually make sense. I just wanted to work
Speaker 1: three toad sloth into the conversation somehow. But yes, Hillary
Speaker 1: is not going to be president, but I'm not sure
Speaker 1: she has figured that out yet. I'm mica, is this
Speaker 1: is this too? Is this too radical? Do you think
Speaker 1: that there's a part of her that thinks that maybe
Speaker 1: think about this. People believe that Trump Russia, maybe he
Speaker 1: leaves office early, and then it's how do you make
Speaker 1: that all better? Right? If you believe that the only
Speaker 1: way to set the universe right is to bring Hillary in?
Speaker 1: Am I crazy? I mean, I know it's unlikely, but
Speaker 1: come on, I don't think you're crazy at all. I
Speaker 1: think absolutely believes that. Right. If if let's just say
Speaker 1: the Muller probe, which a lot of people seem to think,
Speaker 1: I mean, I'll think a lot of them along a
Speaker 1: lot of people seem to think is going to come
Speaker 1: to something. Let's say the Muller probe did end up
Speaker 1: with all this really damaging stuff on Trump the administration,
Speaker 1: Pence becomes president, you think they wouldn't run. Of course,
Speaker 1: they'll run Hillary again because that's the only way for
Speaker 1: the Democrats, for the left to set the universe right
Speaker 1: in their minds. So I'm telling you, folks, there is
Speaker 1: a part of Hillary that's holding out hope that she's
Speaker 1: still going to be president. You know. And if you
Speaker 1: think that's crazy, think about the Mueller thing that's been
Speaker 1: going on for They really believe all this stuff. They
Speaker 1: really believe that we're gonna have you know, no, not
Speaker 1: gonna happen, but they they're holding out hope against it.
Speaker 1: Oh so, so coming up here in a minute, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna have but of a breakdown of not really a
Speaker 1: CNN ambush, just a CNM slime session. It's gonna be
Speaker 1: a recurring thing where Brian's Delter slimes Glenn Beck on air,
Speaker 1: and it's one of those things where we're going to
Speaker 1: break it apart piece by piece. Really bothered me because
Speaker 1: I think Glenn was earnest in his outreach and we're
Speaker 1: going to go on TV and try to talk about
Speaker 1: coming together solutions. You know. Glenn is when when he
Speaker 1: gets fired off about something, he throws himself into it,
Speaker 1: and Stelter's like, sis, your cup of failings there? Like Stelton,
Speaker 1: I don't know if he's a l worst, but in
Speaker 1: the category of worseness he is high. Our three coming up,
Speaker 1: buck Sexton Permission Decoding the news and disseminating information with
Speaker 1: actionable intelligence. Mag Noo, mistake American, Frank, you're a great
Speaker 1: American Again. This is the buck Sexton Show, Analysts set no.
Speaker 1: Welcome to our three of the buck Sexton Show. Great
Speaker 1: to have you here with me as always my friends.
Speaker 1: So my old boss, Glenn Beck, guy who gave me
Speaker 1: my start in the media business, also a syndicated host
Speaker 1: on Premier Networks, so he's on earlier in the day
Speaker 1: with Premiere he went over to do an interview with CNN. Now,
Speaker 1: Glenn used to work at HLN, which is a subsidiary
Speaker 1: or whatever you call it. It's the like the JV
Speaker 1: channel of CNN, and then Glenn from there went to
Speaker 1: Fox and achieved media stardom. While his Fox News show
Speaker 1: was at one point, I think, really setting the national
Speaker 1: conversation about politics, but Glenn went over to CNN because
Speaker 1: I remember I was at the blaze years ago when Glenn,
Speaker 1: just out of sheer humanitarian concern, went to the border
Speaker 1: during the original migrant child crisis, which was a crisis
Speaker 1: of people trying to overwhelm the immigration system, of people
Speaker 1: who were taking advantage of loopholes and trying to find
Speaker 1: ways to exploit the kindness and decency of the American
Speaker 1: people for their own you know, economic reasons, which I
Speaker 1: get it. People are driven by economics in a whole
Speaker 1: number of ways. But the Obama administration was kicking the
Speaker 1: door wide open. But Glenn just said, look, there are
Speaker 1: kids at the border, there are kids being detained. Let's
Speaker 1: bring them some food, some soccer ball, some clothes. And
Speaker 1: you know, now Glenn is also and so that was
Speaker 1: back in twenty fourteen. Now Glenn has been trying to
Speaker 1: talk publicly about healing the country, about how concerned he
Speaker 1: is about the divide, and he went on CNN to
Speaker 1: speak about the border, and well you'll hear some of
Speaker 1: exactly what I'm talking about in just a second. Look.
Speaker 1: Glenn went on with Stelter, Brian Stelter, whom I'm pretty
Speaker 1: sure has a show on CNN because he looks like
Speaker 1: a mini me Jeff Zucker. But Stelter is a guy
Speaker 1: who I had limited personal interaction with over there, but
Speaker 1: I just remember one. He is an incredibly weak broadcaster.
Speaker 1: His skills, whether it's interviewing, reading off a teleprompter, or
Speaker 1: just carrying a broadcast in general, are lackluster, to say
Speaker 1: the least. But also he tried to ambush me in
Speaker 1: an interview on counter terrorism, which I know a lot
Speaker 1: more than he does about. The interview got turned around,
Speaker 1: did not go as planned, and then they did not
Speaker 1: air it for a Sunday show. They taped it on Friday,
Speaker 1: and Stelter did not have the nor did his staff
Speaker 1: have the decency to let me know that they had
Speaker 1: just cut the interview, which I thought they would because
Speaker 1: he got buck slapped all over the place. But that's
Speaker 1: who you're dealing with here, And I don't know if
Speaker 1: Glenn knew that that's who he was dealing with, but
Speaker 1: he certainly does. Now Stelter is a he's an reagenous fellow.
Speaker 1: And here's how this interview went, that you you have
Speaker 1: you have become me circa two thousand and nine. Is
Speaker 1: that a compliment it? No, it's no, it's not um
Speaker 1: and you don't see it. None of you are willing
Speaker 1: to listen to what you're doing. Um and and you're
Speaker 1: dividing us even more. We've had two people threatened the
Speaker 1: lives of either a congressman's child or the president's child.
Speaker 1: Where are the people that were so worried about language
Speaker 1: in the tone on television? You just had George Decai
Speaker 1: talking about Japanese and tournament camps. What's next FEMA camps.
Speaker 1: Don't you understand what you're doing. You're driving people into
Speaker 1: the arms of Donald Trump. You're driving them into it
Speaker 1: because they've already they've already point out that he's lying
Speaker 1: every day. It drives people into his arms. What is
Speaker 1: the right answer that if if we don't point out
Speaker 1: the lies, then what if it don't put out the lies,
Speaker 1: then what notice? How Glenn is trying to have an
Speaker 1: adult conversation with Stelter about how the media is distrusted
Speaker 1: for good reason. They are lying all the time about
Speaker 1: where they're coming from and what they're pushing. They may
Speaker 1: say that they get the facts right, but their presentation
Speaker 1: of the facts is obviously partisan. Whether we're talking about Blitzer, Cooper, Tapper, Burnett,
Speaker 1: any of the so called objective TV journalists over at
Speaker 1: CNN or on some of the other broadcasts which I
Speaker 1: don't watch, ABC, NBC, they are peddling a lie night
Speaker 1: after night. And notice how Stelter immediately transitions to us
Speaker 1: today that the presidents lie every day. It's like, well,
Speaker 1: maybe maybe the way that you cover a minor presidential
Speaker 1: lie versus say, the way that you cover a threat
Speaker 1: against the president's very young son, you know, maybe tells
Speaker 1: people something about your agenda, and you should be more
Speaker 1: aware of that. CNN, you should be more aware of that.
Speaker 1: Mainstream media, but they are clinging to, desperately clinging to
Speaker 1: this notion they are not biased when they are biased.
Speaker 1: This has changed now. Our perception is a country about
Speaker 1: CNN and other networks that claim to be objective journalists
Speaker 1: has changed because it should change because they are engaged
Speaker 1: in a lie as an enterprise, and then this continues
Speaker 1: in it by the way, it's going to get worse
Speaker 1: this interview, sir that if we don't point out the lies,
Speaker 1: then what Well, first of all, you have to recognize
Speaker 1: the mistakes of the past. I can't take this border
Speaker 1: issue because I wasn't I wasn't allowed into anybody's circle.
Speaker 1: After my audience raised three million dollars and we risked
Speaker 1: everything to go down to the border and we brought
Speaker 1: churches together. We actually fed the homeless. I was mocked
Speaker 1: for bringing them soccer balls, which people now say is
Speaker 1: a good thing because at least they have soccer balls
Speaker 1: at summer camp. And on the other side, no one
Speaker 1: in the media would even listen, No one would would
Speaker 1: listen when I said that's not true. I remember this
Speaker 1: kind of worse. Now, was there was there kids when
Speaker 1: you weren't as many kids in jail? Oh stop it
Speaker 1: stop what there were not as many kids in jail?
Speaker 1: You're telling me, So it's the number. So what's the number, Brian,
Speaker 1: that we care about putting kids in cages? What's the
Speaker 1: number that we start caring about when we're secre we care?
Speaker 1: I mean, this is this is the classic Sena maneuver,
Speaker 1: though they covered it. Yeah, we know how you covered it.
Speaker 1: You didn't cover it like you're covering it now though,
Speaker 1: did you when you're saying that Trump is a Nazi
Speaker 1: and fascism is coming to America? And I mean, the
Speaker 1: rhetoric is so out of control. Now, let's see this
Speaker 1: what the media does with everything. They think that because
Speaker 1: they report a story, they're covered. They think that there's
Speaker 1: nothing else, there's no other discussion. CNN is classic with this,
Speaker 1: by the way, there's nothing else to talk about, you know,
Speaker 1: Oh wait, we've covered that. Look at this story, this
Speaker 1: story this Yeah, were you saying that Obama was a fascist?
Speaker 1: Were you saying that Obama didn't care about crying children?
Speaker 1: Because you're magnifying that narrative now, sonn that's what you've
Speaker 1: been doing. But you see, this whole discussion that Glenn
Speaker 1: and Stelter are having is a perfect example of exactly
Speaker 1: what the problem is. You know, the left wing media,
Speaker 1: which CNN is a part of, just wants to live
Speaker 1: this lie and they won't change and they won't adjust,
Speaker 1: they won't adapt, and so that's why this whole thing devolves.
Speaker 1: Even though Glenn wants to have a good faith discussion
Speaker 1: with this guy, which is not possible. In Stelter's he's
Speaker 1: just he's not not honorable in his profession. Hey, that's
Speaker 1: a fact. We see that in all the pot Well
Speaker 1: then here's here's the deal. Brian. You all have my
Speaker 1: phone number. I've reached out to all of you in
Speaker 1: the past and said, let's have a conversation, not on
Speaker 1: the air. You really want to understand, you want to
Speaker 1: hear the others conversation where right now? Because it's all
Speaker 1: about ratings. Because this is all about ratings. This isn't
Speaker 1: about ratings. This is about saving our country, bringing us together.
Speaker 1: Stop dividing us. I mean you can so to be clear,
Speaker 1: you think that you think I'm dividing the country for ratings, Brian,
Speaker 1: stop drive look at what look what you're doing. When
Speaker 1: did this become about you? Now I can answer that
Speaker 1: question for Glenn, for bryan' Stelter, it's always about him.
Speaker 1: For all these seeing and talking heres, it's always about them.
Speaker 1: They're not some they're not concerned with some greater truth
Speaker 1: or you know, journalism as a as a necessary check
Speaker 1: on the power of the state or whatever. They're complete
Speaker 1: cheerleaders for statism and for democrats when they're in power.
Speaker 1: It's absurd. It is absurd, and we shouldn't have to
Speaker 1: play along anymore and pretend we're all sick of it. But,
Speaker 1: you know, just to really finish things off, so Glenn
Speaker 1: goes on Stelter's show to have a real discussion with them.
Speaker 1: I know, Glenn feels very passionately about trying to bring
Speaker 1: the country back together. And given that we're now being
Speaker 1: told that it's okay for conservatives, for Trump administration officials,
Speaker 1: anybody on the right to get thrown out of a
Speaker 1: restaurant because of their beliefs, you know, maybe it is
Speaker 1: time to have a talk about how we should all
Speaker 1: be a little bit more decent to each other, or
Speaker 1: just really the left needs to stop being so disgusting
Speaker 1: and baby ash end throwing a collective tantrum all the time.
Speaker 1: But Selter decides to rub a little salt in the
Speaker 1: wound here and decides to dig a little deeper and
Speaker 1: go after Glenn's business, which has been in trouble a
Speaker 1: company I used to work at. It's had its difficulties.
Speaker 1: This segment's not about that, but oh Stelter wants to
Speaker 1: make it about that. Joy says yes, but as soon
Speaker 1: as it gets tough or uncomfortable. Nobody's interested. Nobody's interested
Speaker 1: in looking at themselves and saying, what did I do?
Speaker 1: I know what I've done. I know what I've done.
Speaker 1: I've tried to make amends and I'm trying to and
Speaker 1: we've talked about that before. I completely agree with you,
Speaker 1: and we all do need to be more self reflective.
Speaker 1: I do have to ask you. There's this new headline
Speaker 1: on the Daily be saying that your company is in trouble,
Speaker 1: that you were trying to find a buyer. Is this
Speaker 1: related to the point about people not talking to each
Speaker 1: other that if you want to create that media company,
Speaker 1: there's not interest. What's going on with that? Wow? Brian,
Speaker 1: thanks a lot. I think that's the most ridiculous question
Speaker 1: I've ever heard. I'm sitting here ready to talk to
Speaker 1: you about the detaining of children and parents and trying
Speaker 1: to break break families apart, something that has been happening
Speaker 1: with Janet Reno. That's why it went to the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court in the first place. With Janet Reno. It's been happening.
Speaker 1: We want to stop it, and you want to play
Speaker 1: those games. Have a nice day. What game did I
Speaker 1: just play? So the question. On the Daily Beast website,
Speaker 1: the headline says, Glenn Beck's media empire is imploding again.
Speaker 1: That's the headline on the Daily Beast. Why did it
Speaker 1: ploding again? Brad? Look, this is just it's this. This
Speaker 1: segments perfect in a way. Glenn wants to have a
Speaker 1: real conversation about the divisions in the country and the
Speaker 1: border and and it's serious issue, and Stealter wants to say, hey,
Speaker 1: ha ha, your company's failing. Do you have any comment
Speaker 1: on that? You know, this is just the way they
Speaker 1: do things, and it's also why you can't have a
Speaker 1: serious conversation with these people anymore. They are character assassins.
Speaker 1: They play dirty, they approach the other side with no
Speaker 1: good faith, and they're just honestly not worth it. They're
Speaker 1: just not worth the time, and I feel sorry for
Speaker 1: their audiences that believe that they're getting some product here
Speaker 1: that's really worthwhile and the gold standard of journalism. People
Speaker 1: like Stalter and some of his other on air anchors
Speaker 1: at CNN, they're just clowns and the whole thing is dishonest,
Speaker 1: and they make me dislike this profession of media. I
Speaker 1: won't say journalism, just media in general, because as I
Speaker 1: tell you, some of the worst people you'll ever meet,
Speaker 1: so called TV journalists, And I'm sorry they Glenna had
Speaker 1: to go through that. But you know, Glen, I'll be
Speaker 1: all right. He's a trooper. We'll be right back, man.
Speaker 1: I get up every day now at like four forty
Speaker 1: five am. It's a long one. Let me tell you,
Speaker 1: I've got a TV show, a radio show, hits throughout
Speaker 1: the day writing. How do I do it all? You
Speaker 1: may ask, Well, I get quite a boost from my
Speaker 1: friends at Black Rifle Coffee. That's how I start out
Speaker 1: every day. Black Rifle is delicious coffee that doesn't believe
Speaker 1: in pushing a progressive agenda. In fact, quite the opposite.
Speaker 1: These guys are former members of the United States military.
Speaker 1: They are patriots and they love some delicious coffee. Stay
Speaker 1: away from that commie bru. My friends. Join the coffee
Speaker 1: or die revolution. Drink the real stuff. Go to Black
Speaker 1: Riflecoffee dot com slash buck receive fifteen percent off your
Speaker 1: next your first order Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck.
Speaker 1: Type into coupon code buck one five for fifteen percent
Speaker 1: off Black Riflecoffee dot Com slash Buck coupon code buck
Speaker 1: fifteen for fifteen percent off. Look at this, folks, or
Speaker 1: listening to this. You got protests going on in Iran.
Speaker 1: Hold on a second. I would think that would be
Speaker 1: a big story. That's the media would be all over right.
Speaker 1: I want to talk about oppression, you want to talk
Speaker 1: about fascism. Iran is a vi theocracy and it's actually
Speaker 1: a country full of educated, often pro Western young people.
Speaker 1: And you know, Iran is demographically poised to be a
Speaker 1: realm allied to the United States if it can throw
Speaker 1: off this horrific regime it's Islamic extremism. But remember, there
Speaker 1: are a lot there are a lot of people inside
Speaker 1: of at least in the cities in Iran, that have
Speaker 1: a desire for economic freedoms, have a desire to be
Speaker 1: free of this regime. And think about that. By the way,
Speaker 1: can I just I'm just gonna put a crazy idea
Speaker 1: out there for a second, all right, And I don't
Speaker 1: think this is gonna happen. I'm just gonna say it's
Speaker 1: fun to just have the psychological experiment of imagine if
Speaker 1: Trump puts North Korea on a path to being solved
Speaker 1: as an international an ongoing international crisis, and the Mullahs
Speaker 1: in Tehran are topple. During Trump's what I would wager
Speaker 1: will be eight years in office, liberal heads will explode everywhere.
Speaker 1: I mean, we will all be bathing in vats of
Speaker 1: liberal tiers for the rest of our lives, and tens
Speaker 1: of more importantly, more importantly, tens of millions of people
Speaker 1: will be freed from tyranny and despotism. And we also
Speaker 1: want to have the prospect of a war with either
Speaker 1: of those countries hanging over our heads. You know, we
Speaker 1: don't want any more worse. Be great if I could
Speaker 1: go the rest of my life in this country without
Speaker 1: having to fight a major without our country having to
Speaker 1: fight a major war. I think that really should be
Speaker 1: a goal that we all share, and I think we
Speaker 1: do all share it. And you look at the places
Speaker 1: that are most likely for there to be an outbreak
Speaker 1: of major hostilities. North Korea, Iran top of the list,
Speaker 1: although long term it's China, folks, and I no one
Speaker 1: likes to think about that right now, because that would
Speaker 1: get really ugly really fast. The long term it is China,
Speaker 1: But in the short term, there are protesting Iran. Here's
Speaker 1: why this is so interesting. They are chanting and you
Speaker 1: see very little coverage of this. They much rather have
Speaker 1: Michael evan I over at CNN talk about the latest
Speaker 1: Stormy Daniel's capers all about. But in Iran, on the
Speaker 1: streets in Tehran, the capital, they're chanting death, death to Palestine.
Speaker 1: They're not chanting death to Israel. They're not chanting death
Speaker 1: to America. They are sick of their regime, and they
Speaker 1: are sick of all the excuses and the focus on
Speaker 1: what's going on outside their own borders. You know, Oh,
Speaker 1: we gotta take care of Palestine. We've gotta take care
Speaker 1: of Palestine. Hey, there's fire and off tier, guys. This
Speaker 1: is the this is the people rising up because of
Speaker 1: the economic ineptitude of the regime. And I would also
Speaker 1: note that Trump has put the sanctions back in place,
Speaker 1: and look at this. Now there's now there's some trouble
Speaker 1: in Iran. Now there's some stuff on the streets that
Speaker 1: is pro freedom. Oh wow, you mean allowing the regime
Speaker 1: Obama style to enrich itself was a bad idea. Yeah. Really,
Speaker 1: you know, with Obama on foreign policy in general, but
Speaker 1: specifically on any area of national security foreign policy, he
Speaker 1: really provided us all with a how to guide of
Speaker 1: what not to do. I'm also just gonna know. Look,
Speaker 1: they're reporting on it. I'm not. I'm not. This is
Speaker 1: this is the new game that the CNN and the
Speaker 1: MSNBC and well not so much MSNBC, but NBC, CNN,
Speaker 1: New York Times, Washington Post. The new game is we
Speaker 1: were plugging on that. Yeah, we know you reported on it,
Speaker 1: but you didn't report on it in such a way
Speaker 1: that you thought any that you were trying to make
Speaker 1: anybody remember or care. That's different this issue in Iran.
Speaker 1: I can tell you this right now. It's probably not
Speaker 1: going to result in the toppling of the regime or
Speaker 1: anything like that. But right now you've got journalists in
Speaker 1: major newspapers across the country who are who are? They
Speaker 1: will not they will never say it a loud but
Speaker 1: you know what they're thinking. Gosh, I hope Trump doesn't
Speaker 1: actually help bring about the end of the Iranian terror
Speaker 1: regime because then, well what they say, we will keep
Speaker 1: an eye on this year in the hut. Stay with me.
Speaker 1: He's back with you now, because when it comes to
Speaker 1: the fight for truth, the fuck never stops. This woman
Speaker 1: don't want to let a little girl sell some water.
Speaker 1: She called the police on an eight year old little girl.
Speaker 1: You can hide all you want, the whole where I'm
Speaker 1: gonna see you. Boo yeah, and illegally selling water without
Speaker 1: a permit. Yea, on my property. It's not your property.
Speaker 1: So so this is a this is a clip that
Speaker 1: went viral over the weekend. You saw, you saw most
Speaker 1: of it, or you heard you heard all of it.
Speaker 1: I should say you didn't see any of it, but
Speaker 1: you heard it there. This is what happened. So there's
Speaker 1: a little girl, eight year old girl, selling water bottles
Speaker 1: to San Francisco Giants fans outside at and T Park
Speaker 1: and this woman and I don't know how this, you know?
Speaker 1: She oh, yeah, that's right here, here we go. The
Speaker 1: controversial call was caught on video. This is according the
Speaker 1: ABC affiliate in San Francisco. The win later said the
Speaker 1: girl was loudly selling water outside her apartment for hours.
Speaker 1: The child's mother, Aaron Austin, confronted the call her. She
Speaker 1: comes out and demands the permit for my daughter. She said,
Speaker 1: if we didn't give it to her, she'd call the cops.
Speaker 1: So I said, okay, call the cops, and she did.
Speaker 1: The lady called the police because I didn't have a permit,
Speaker 1: said the little girl. Oh man, you know, by the way,
Speaker 1: they got a photo of a little girl. She's like,
Speaker 1: she's like really cute, she's smiling, and you know he's
Speaker 1: got her. He's got water that she's selling. Man, there's
Speaker 1: there's so many different ways to take this story. You know,
Speaker 1: it's it's not important, but it's really a sign of
Speaker 1: the times. One thing I always say this, everything now
Speaker 1: instagrammed and instagrammable and live streamed and videoed, so that
Speaker 1: affects our public conduct in all kinds of ways. Really
Speaker 1: does changes the game or what you can get away
Speaker 1: with in public. I thought they came up with like
Speaker 1: a mean nickname for the woman that called Mike. Do
Speaker 1: you know what I'm talking. There's a nickname they called her,
Speaker 1: like permit missy or something like that. They had some
Speaker 1: they had some name for. Anyway, she was trending on
Speaker 1: Twitter for a while and she's like, you know, that's right,
Speaker 1: I'm calling the police. She does not have a permit
Speaker 1: for water. Yeah, so there's that. Anyway, all of your
Speaker 1: conduct now is you know, can be the video can
Speaker 1: go on, which is usually a good thing, but it
Speaker 1: does mean that for people like me who get grumpy
Speaker 1: sometimes about people being loud and talking. I have to
Speaker 1: try to be a little bit careful about things. And
Speaker 1: then also it's just a reminder of how how crazy
Speaker 1: government regulations are. By the way, I don't think the
Speaker 1: cops actually showed up. So Etel told ABC News that
Speaker 1: she never spoke to the little girl, but says her
Speaker 1: building security guy, a guard, first tried to get the
Speaker 1: girl and her mom to keep the noise down or move,
Speaker 1: saying she did phone the police, but not to report them,
Speaker 1: and she simply wanted to know if what they were
Speaker 1: doing was legal. You know, I have a feeling, I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna put this out there. What do you got, Mike,
Speaker 1: And they're calling her permit Patty, Permit Patty. There you go,
Speaker 1: Permit Patty. Permit Patty was trending over the weekend. I
Speaker 1: have a feeling that, based on some San Francisco ordinance,
Speaker 1: you're probably and this is the truth, in San Francisco,
Speaker 1: you're probably allowed to defecate in broad daylight on a
Speaker 1: main boulevard. And you know, and then and you know what,
Speaker 1: I'll stop there. I was getting it even grosser, but
Speaker 1: you're probably allowed to do that. But my guess is
Speaker 1: the nanny state in San Francisco or the big brother
Speaker 1: super state needs you know, you need a permit to
Speaker 1: sell things. So if you want to be a hostile
Speaker 1: vagrant rolling around on the ground in your own urine
Speaker 1: and yelling epithets at strangers for not giving you money,
Speaker 1: San Francisco wants to protect that behavior. But if you
Speaker 1: want to sell bottles of water, I'm willing to bet
Speaker 1: you probably need a permit. There have been other stories
Speaker 1: like this of and it's almost always a little girl,
Speaker 1: which I think is kind of funny, you know, the
Speaker 1: young women entrepreneurs of the future. But there have been
Speaker 1: other stories where you know, they were they opened the
Speaker 1: classic thing, a lemonade stand. And you know, I think
Speaker 1: that's a good lesson in economics, right, You go to
Speaker 1: the store, you buy lemonade, you water it down, you
Speaker 1: sell it to people who think you, you know, have
Speaker 1: a nice, cute smile and are doing a good thing,
Speaker 1: and you know, you make some money, You make some
Speaker 1: spending money for the day commerce baby. I support it,
Speaker 1: But this thing in San Francisco is pretty funny. Everybody
Speaker 1: got really really fired up about it. Sure enough, you
Speaker 1: know this this this woman was. Now she's famous. Now
Speaker 1: she said, you gotta watch out. You know, you could
Speaker 1: get your fifteen minutes of fame, but you don't want
Speaker 1: to get the wrong fifteen minutes of fame these days.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm just gonna say this and everyone. Everyone's
Speaker 1: probably gonna get mad at me for this, But some
Speaker 1: people get mad at me for this. What if the
Speaker 1: little girl was outside your apartment, though, and she was
Speaker 1: yelling really loudly, like water, come and get it like
Speaker 1: because I'm gonna tell you all. I'm gonna tell you
Speaker 1: all a secret. The ice cream truck sound drives me insane,
Speaker 1: drives me absolutely insane. Lu lu lu lu lu lu lulu.
Speaker 1: You know you know that I can't really I'm not
Speaker 1: doing a good impression of it, but you know what
Speaker 1: I'm talking about, the little like carnival sound ice cream
Speaker 1: truck noise that you hear neighborhoods, because it'll just sit
Speaker 1: there and just go on and on and on and
Speaker 1: if you're trying to get work done or just you know,
Speaker 1: enjoy a peaceful afternoon. I'm sorry I hate the ice
Speaker 1: cream truck sound. I do so if I was able.
Speaker 1: That's right. This is a get off you, get off
Speaker 1: my lawn moment. If I were able to call the
Speaker 1: police on the ice cream truck, ice cream truck, guy,
Speaker 1: I would do it. What do you like the ice cream?
Speaker 1: It's inside the ice cream truck? Really, man, I'm I'm
Speaker 1: gonna I'm not gonna lie to Mike. I'm kind of
Speaker 1: fru through in my ice cream taste. You know, I'm
Speaker 1: like an Earl Gray Van Luin kind of guy. I'm
Speaker 1: not really into like, you know, those sandwiches. They look
Speaker 1: like they've been sitting around for fifteen years. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: get that. Yeah, Oh, haggin dogs is delicious. I'm I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm not that snob. I love hogging dogs. I'm just
Speaker 1: you know, the stuff that's like got too much food
Speaker 1: coloring I stay away from. All Right, we got roll call.
Speaker 1: Stay with me. Ain't no party like a Team Buck party,
Speaker 1: because a Team Buck party don't stop. Yeah, we got
Speaker 1: bucks turned up to eleven. It's time for roll call.
Speaker 1: It is the Roll Call time. I just wanted to
Speaker 1: say that everybody, please do download the Freedom Hut podcast.
Speaker 1: For those of you who are not podcast listeners, this
Speaker 1: should be your first. For those of you who do listen,
Speaker 1: to podcast. This should be top of your lists on them.
Speaker 1: Gonna be weekly, guys. It's gonna be probably thirty forty
Speaker 1: minutes in length, a little more of a relaxed tone,
Speaker 1: kind of like the original Saturday shows we used to do.
Speaker 1: And you just go on to the Apple podcast store
Speaker 1: type in Freedom Hunt and it will pop up and
Speaker 1: you can subscribe. Please do, got some good numbers going,
Speaker 1: would love to get even more. Please do spread the word,
Speaker 1: share it with friends. We're gonna have a fun episode
Speaker 1: this week. I'm gonna give you the top ten martial
Speaker 1: arts movies of all time, and we'll also have an
Speaker 1: appearance by Comrade Commie Bear and some general thoughts about
Speaker 1: some other very interesting things. With that, let's get into
Speaker 1: your thoughts. We have Willie who writes, I listened to
Speaker 1: you Monday to Friday after ten pm. Sounds great, comrade,
Speaker 1: And there you go. Thank you so much, Catherine, right.
Speaker 1: I love having Comy bear back. Congratulations on all your success. Well,
Speaker 1: thank you, Katherine. It's good to have Comedy bear back.
Speaker 1: And I would just say that whatever success that we've
Speaker 1: had here on the show is only possible because of
Speaker 1: all you folks. And I'm hoping we have a whole
Speaker 1: lot more of it, so please keep listening and please
Speaker 1: do spread the word. Evan writes suggestion in coming team
Speaker 1: up with Black Rifle Coffee and have callers submit their
Speaker 1: favorite ideas for a name of a buck Sexton Black
Speaker 1: Rifle blend. My submission would be buck Slapped. It would
Speaker 1: be a bold flavor that is highly caffeinated. Keep up
Speaker 1: the good work, Shields High. I love this idea. I
Speaker 1: think it's a great idea, Evan. So let me give
Speaker 1: it a little bit of thought and I'll push it
Speaker 1: along to the Black Rifle guys. I mean, they're awesome,
Speaker 1: and they're a game for anything that's fun and good,
Speaker 1: good for the brand, good for coffee, good for folks.
Speaker 1: So I just took a note on your note and
Speaker 1: I'm hoping to pass it along. Thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Great idea, Buckslap would be a fantastic coffee blend. Dale writes,
Speaker 1: I've been fired up this weekend over George Will's call
Speaker 1: to vote for Democrats in the midterms. I have two
Speaker 1: of the men's books on my shelf and was a
Speaker 1: longtime fan. But between the Classless screed he panned about
Speaker 1: Billy Graham after the evangelist's death and this last misguided column.
Speaker 1: I don't know whether to pity as he demonstrates that
Speaker 1: he is obviously losing his mind, or be angry that
Speaker 1: he is selling out to his employers at the Washington Post.
Speaker 1: Probably both disappointed and disgusted. Dale, I gotta agree with you,
Speaker 1: and you know, I think, George Will, I think this
Speaker 1: is true of a lot of people in the space.
Speaker 1: They are used to a certain degree of importance. And
Speaker 1: while they've been writing about the movement for a long
Speaker 1: time and the importance of conservatism, it can often be
Speaker 1: really the importance of the calumnists, the pundit, whomever we're
Speaker 1: talking about, that matters most to that person. I don't
Speaker 1: know how you could say that you want. You know, Look,
Speaker 1: I'll make this real simple. If you are pro life,
Speaker 1: I do not understand how you can vote for Democrats.
Speaker 1: I don't understand how you can do it. I don't
Speaker 1: understand how you could advocate that anyone else do it. So,
Speaker 1: just based on that alone, George Will's argument to me
Speaker 1: is incredibly self serving. And I think I know he's
Speaker 1: a bunch older than me and everything else, but I
Speaker 1: think it's childish. I think it's a tantrum. And I
Speaker 1: also think that it shows you how some people, you know,
Speaker 1: they've made a career about it, being about their writing
Speaker 1: and their thoughts being for you know, the good of
Speaker 1: conservatism in the country, and now that they feel like
Speaker 1: they're out in the cold, the country doesn't matter so
Speaker 1: much anymore. Now they'll push to vote for Democrats. I
Speaker 1: mean the party of Warren and Pelosi and Schumer and
Speaker 1: Maxine Waters, and you know that's who they will push
Speaker 1: for you to vote for. M I find that I
Speaker 1: find it intellectually dishonest, if nothing else. Marcy right Shield's high. Buck.
Speaker 1: Just want to let you know how much you are appreciated.
Speaker 1: I haven't missed an episode since I first heard you
Speaker 1: fill in for Rush Limball. Since you're close to the
Speaker 1: same age as my daughter and use the same vernacular,
Speaker 1: it's like listening to my girl every day. Sort of
Speaker 1: love your new podcast, The Freedom Hunt. Have been waiting
Speaker 1: for more Buck for a while. Can't get too much. Buck.
Speaker 1: You're the best and always make my day. Thank you
Speaker 1: for all your hard work. Please keep it up. Support
Speaker 1: your sponsors you can keep going well. Marcy, Thank you,
Speaker 1: thank you, and thank you very kind note. You've given
Speaker 1: me a little bit of a extra pepping my step
Speaker 1: today is really much appreciated, and please do keep listening.
Speaker 1: And yes, for all of you listening. You know, whenever
Speaker 1: you ask Kbuck, how can I help? Biggest single thing
Speaker 1: you can do is tell folks about the show, and
Speaker 1: but not just tell them, but share the podcast of
Speaker 1: the show with them. That's the best way to get
Speaker 1: them listening. Tell them about the Freedom Hunt with Buck Sexton.
Speaker 1: And then also please do check out the sponsors that
Speaker 1: we have. They've all got great products. These are really
Speaker 1: fantastic companies that I use all the products that I
Speaker 1: endorse on air. I'm a you know, I'm all about
Speaker 1: being in contact with those folks making sure that we
Speaker 1: are telling you as much relevant information as possible at
Speaker 1: the products. So that really helps too. So please when
Speaker 1: I give you that promo code and everything, you know,
Speaker 1: every time you buy some black Rifle or you get
Speaker 1: some you get a simply Safe you know, you got
Speaker 1: a simply safe dot com slash buck any of those things.
Speaker 1: You are voting for the show. You are making a
Speaker 1: vote for the show, So thank you. Alan. Next up here,
Speaker 1: hey Buck, will you be calling on crowds to scream
Speaker 1: at Maxi and Waters when she goes to a restaurant.
Speaker 1: You know, Alan, as I've been saying on the show today,
Speaker 1: it really bothers me. I think this is a bright
Speaker 1: red line. I don't think that we should be crossing this,
Speaker 1: And I mean, just some basic respect and decency for
Speaker 1: our fellow human beings in this country would really go
Speaker 1: a long way, you know, it really would. And I'm
Speaker 1: obviously upset about the way Democrats are treating this, the
Speaker 1: way liberals are approaching this, but I can't say I'm
Speaker 1: all that surprised. You know, they have elevated emotionalism above
Speaker 1: reason and this is the end result of it. And yes,
Speaker 1: it is very olynski I too. There's a lot of
Speaker 1: Olynsky going on right now. Olynsky with the overwhelming of
Speaker 1: our border apparatus, with all these bogus asylum claims. There's
Speaker 1: a Lynsky with separating and freezing the target, which is
Speaker 1: what they like to do. Separate the target, freeze the target,
Speaker 1: and then let it well destroy it. That's what they're
Speaker 1: doing to people as well. Next up here, Diane, this
Speaker 1: is regarding Kirsten Nielsen and Sarah Sanders. Both of these
Speaker 1: women deserve highest praise for their recent behaviors and public restaurants.
Speaker 1: The Dems are quick to call President Trump hitler, and
Speaker 1: yet by such rude behavior by establishments, they are turning
Speaker 1: Republicans into Anne Frank, causing Republicans to go into hiding
Speaker 1: to maintain their beliefs. As a more mature female, I
Speaker 1: want to call the Dems out for their ridiculous behavior.
Speaker 1: What are they three do They need to be put
Speaker 1: into timeouts to reflect on what's gotten them into the
Speaker 1: corner of shame from Diana well Dane, Yeah, there they
Speaker 1: are childish, Oh they really are. And these policies they're
Speaker 1: pushing are disgraceful. They are disgraceful. William writes, Hold on
Speaker 1: a second, Yankees talk too fast. We Southern's talk slow,
Speaker 1: probably because it's so hot. Maybe we talk faster from
Speaker 1: December through February. And then the things you discussed let
Speaker 1: a fire in my heart and mind. You endlessly point
Speaker 1: out what is wrong, but also tell us there's nothing
Speaker 1: we can do about it. Well, William, I don't say
Speaker 1: there's nothing you can do about it. But the first
Speaker 1: step in this is the first step in this is
Speaker 1: always to establish what the problem is. And look, my
Speaker 1: solution is for people to agree with me, So I'm trying.
Speaker 1: In a sense, my solution is to get as many
Speaker 1: folks as possible to understand my arguments, to understand my
Speaker 1: point of view, to share them, and to spread them.
Speaker 1: That's that's how I think we can solve a lot
Speaker 1: of this Because if you're looking for a pure legislative fix, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: we have to win the argument first. So if you're
Speaker 1: asking me what the solution is, the solution is, you know,
Speaker 1: get fifty one percent of our fellow Americans to agree
Speaker 1: with what we do here in the Hut every day
Speaker 1: and what we say and how we feel and how
Speaker 1: we treat each other and what we believe is important.
Speaker 1: So that would be my that's and honestly, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: I could tell you know, call your congressmen. Sure that
Speaker 1: can be helpful sometimes, but it also can be not helpful.
Speaker 1: It also can do nothing. So it depends on the
Speaker 1: specifics of the situation. And there you have it. Alex write,
Speaker 1: Star Wars fans are a little annoyed a human character
Speaker 1: has been introduced in the latest novel, Last Shot that
Speaker 1: doesn't identify as a male or female. Oh boy, well,
Speaker 1: you know, Alex, this is the social justice warriors. Nothing
Speaker 1: will be free of social justice attitudes, nothing will be
Speaker 1: nothing is outside of politics anymore. And this is just
Speaker 1: what we're seeing, and this is what's going to happen.
Speaker 1: Erica writes, I'm willing to pay internet sales tax if
Speaker 1: it comes to my small rural community. The tax rate
Speaker 1: should be based on a combination of mailing address of
Speaker 1: credit card bill or bank account linked to a pay service,
Speaker 1: and the delivery address. But something for yourself delivered your house,
Speaker 1: and all your tax money stays local. Have your tax
Speaker 1: rate and taxes collected by the credit card companies and
Speaker 1: have them pay quarterly to each state. Each state can
Speaker 1: do the country and city splitting. Interesting, Erica. I like
Speaker 1: the tax analysis and I appreciate you very very much
Speaker 1: sharing it with us today. That's gonna be it for today.
Speaker 1: I remember This Wednesday, the Freedom Hut with Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and podcasts will be released, So please go on iTunes
Speaker 1: and click subscribe. We'll talk martial arts, we'll have COMMI
Speaker 1: bear it will be magnifico. I think that's a word
Speaker 1: many feet that's definitely the words. It's gonna be a
Speaker 1: great podcast, be a lot of fun, and maybe we'll
Speaker 1: even have a couple of drinks beforehand, just to get
Speaker 1: just to get the party started. I'm just kidding, or
Speaker 1: am I join me tomorrow here in the Freedom Hunt
Speaker 1: and every day this week. Oh and if you like
Speaker 1: the Facebook Live from the Freedom Hunt, let me know
Speaker 1: and give any thoughts you account on that one. And
Speaker 1: that's something we're thinking about really getting into here until
Speaker 1: next time. Team She'll tie. FBI knows this, you should
Speaker 1: know it too. Home title theft is one of the
Speaker 1: fastest growing crimes out there. Embrace yourself because having your
Speaker 1: credit card stolen is nothing compared to the hell you're
Speaker 1: in for once an identity thief takes control of your
Speaker 1: home's title. You know, everything is stored online these days,
Speaker 1: including your homes title, and that means that international thieves
Speaker 1: can just get access to it if they have an
Speaker 1: Internet terminal. And what they do is they take your
Speaker 1: home title, they replace you with an alias, and then
Speaker 1: borrow every penny they can off your home's equity and
Speaker 1: then you get stuck with the payments. By the time
Speaker 1: you find out, my friends eight can be too late.
Speaker 1: Identity theft programs and insurance policies do not protect you,
Speaker 1: but for just pennies a day, home title lock can
Speaker 1: Home title Lock protects my most valuable asset, my family home.
Speaker 1: Register now for a free analysis and discover if your
Speaker 1: home's title has been compromised. That's a sixty dollar value
Speaker 1: free visit hometitlelock dot com. That's home titlelock dot com.