WEBVTT - Meta and Apple Hand Over Data to Hackers

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power colli

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:11.239
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Vallet and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay I'm Emily checking San Francisco and this is

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour a Bloomberg scoop.

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Hackers masquerading is law enforcement tricked Apple and Meta into

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>handing over customer data. We have all the details. Plus

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple is cutting out the middleman, the iPhone maker developing

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>its own payment processing technology, building a full in house

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>set of financial services offerings on top of its Apple

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>credit card and wallet. Bloomberg's Mark German will bring us

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>his exclusive story and Tesla's hidden competitive advantage. The electric

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>car maker made a secret deal to help dodge the

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>nickel crisis. Russia is one of the world's top suppliers.

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Now to that Bloomberg exclusive, Bloomberg learning that Apple and

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Meta provided customer data to presumed law enforcement officials who

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>were really hackers in disguise. William Turton, our Bloomberg cubersecurity reporter,

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>joins us. Now with that school will how did the

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>hackers pull this off? Hey, Emily, thanks for having me.

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.199
<v Speaker 1>So here's what the hackers did. They kind of exploited

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>what some might call a loophole in this system. When

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you send a request of a search warrant or subpoena

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to a company for data, that has to be signed

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>by a judge. But if you send something called an

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>emergency data request, UM that's not something that has to

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>be signed by a judge. So what these hackers did

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is they broke into the email boxes of legitimate law

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>enforcement agencies and they sent emails posing as a legitimate

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement officer to these companies with a forged emergency

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 1>data request. And as we're reporting today, the co and

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>he's complied with those requests and actually turned over user data.

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>But we don't know is just the scale of this problem.

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 1>We've been hearing from sources that you know, it's much

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>bigger than these companies um AND has a much bigger scope.

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we're trying to find out now. So

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is it understandable then that Apple and Meta could have

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>fallen for this or is this a major loophole in

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>their systems? So, I mean, it cannot be overstated how

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>complicated and difficult these process are. The emergency data request.

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Some will say it's a very legitimate form for law

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 1>enforcement to get information in times of crisis, like a

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 1>like a terrorist threat or someone's life is an imminent danger.

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what the hackers do in their Forge request.

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>They will say something along the lines of there's a

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>terrorist threat, someone's life is in danger, someone's you know,

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>at risk of suicide, and you know, companies are expected

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to comply very quickly with these requests. Now, you know,

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, as it's becoming clear, companies need to have

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>more oversight and more verification that these requests are legitimate

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and are coming from real law enforcement officers. Now, according

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to your reporting, William Discord had a similar issue. Also,

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Snap also got this request, but we don't know yet

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>if they provided any of this information to the hackers.

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Are there other companies that could be looped into this?

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>That's right, So yesterday Brian Krebs reported that Discord, also,

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, was a victim of the same kind of scheme.

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>We reported today that Snap received a Forge emergency data request,

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>but we do not know whether they actually provided data.

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And yes, I'm hearing from sources that many other companies,

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>even beyond tech companies, beyond social media companies, have been

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>affected by this Um, if anyone knows more, I you

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>should reach out to me because I would love to

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>know more. I think this problem extends beyond just the

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>two companies that we've reported on today. Alright, bloombergs William

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Turton with that scoop, William, thank you. I want to

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>talk more about this now with Wendy Whitmore, senior vice

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>president for Unit forty two, the threat intelligence team at

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Palo Alto Networks. Wendy, thank you so much for joining us.

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you find most notable about how these accurs

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>hackers were able to pull these off with massive companies

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>with very established systems. Yeah, Emily, great question. So I

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>think the biggest concern here of these attacks is clearly

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>how well the attackers understand uh, this potential vulnerability, this

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>process of government request to technology companies, social media companies,

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and understand it and are willing to take the risk

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to exploit it. So talk to us about why it's

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>so apparently easy to do this. I mean, some of

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:50.919
<v Speaker 1>the folks behind these attacks we're finding out our teenagers. Yeah. Again,

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>great questions. So the interesting thing is it's not easy

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>at all. This is relatively complicated. So first I would

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>say The easiest part is probably for the attackers to

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>get access to the data that they're stealing. Last year alone,

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>our team identified over breaches where there was stolen data leaked.

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>So what the attackers do is by this information for

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>relatively inexpensive prices and then use that to test out

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>which kind of credentials they can use to legitimately break

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>into organizations, and in this case, they chose those to

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>be law enforcement organizations. The complicating part is they have

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>to understand that process, and then they have to be

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>willing to spend the time that it takes to to

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>do the social engineering aspects, understanding specifically who they need

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to contact that these organizations to make these requests, who

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the legitimate law enforcement officers are, and what their processes.

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>So this is certainly not an easy task for them

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to orchestrate, clearly being done by people with time on

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>their hands. Well to that point, the folks suspected in

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>this particular case are minors located in the US and UK.

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm reminded of the OPTA hacks that we covered last week,

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>where you know, the suspected mastermind is a teenager who

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>still lives with his mom in England. What do you

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>make of the fact that these are potentially very young

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>people behind these very disruptive attacks. It's it's incredibly concerning, right.

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>We typically would see this level of attack orchestrated by

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>an organization who's got clear objectives and clear financial backing.

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>So the point is these UH, the organization related to

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>these attacks certainly has overlapped with lapses and the activities

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we've seen last week. One of the things that they're

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>doing incredibly effectively, and we see this in ransomware investigations

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>as well, is they use time demands as a way

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 1>to force an organization to make a quick decision. We

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>see that with these ransomware attacks when there's extortion involved,

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing this work very well with these emergency

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>data requests. Now six hundred thousand open jobs in cybersecurity,

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what Bloomberg is reporting today that there are six

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand jobs UH in the cyber threat landscape that

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>are unfilled. Is that part of the reason we may

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>be seeing an uptick in hacks. Well, I think you're

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing that. So there's no greater example of that today

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and the challenges that we as an industry face than

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to Russian Ukraine. Right, the US government

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>has come out and provided a tremendous amount of recommendations

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and actions to be taken, but the reality is it's

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>challenging for organizations across the world to implement all of

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>them in a timely manner. Uh, it's much cheaper for

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the attackers to conduct these attacks, and it's much more

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>costly and time and resource intensive for organizations to defend

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>against them today. So yes, absolutely that's a concern. Now

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>we're understanding that the information that was shared with these

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>hackers includes addresses, phone numbers, I P addresses. How damaging

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>could the release of this information be? How could the

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>hackers use it? Well, I think that there's some concern

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of people being cyberstocked, being at that translated

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to physical attacks. Right, So when you look at these

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the people that are behind this oftentimes so they're selling

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>this information for really inexpensive amount, right, the equivalent of

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>about one fifty U S dollars, So that can be

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>used in a wide variety of ways. We want to

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>make sure that people are protected and uh, you know

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that this data doesn't then translate to those type of

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>tax So certainly law enforcement is going to be working

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>very closely with these organizations who have released the data

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that they can protect people. What do

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you see as the learnings and takeaways here? I mean,

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>is this a new tactic that we're going to see

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>more cyber criminals start exploiting. Yeah, I think it's it's

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>become pretty widespread. Right, So these lapses group attacks over

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 1>the past week saw that you know which you mentioned

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>right to Octa to Microsoft um. The level of sophistication

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>was largely in the social engineering, so the human to

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>human aspects as well as the persistence of their ability

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to figure out once they got inside an organization how

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>they could actually get to the data that they needed.

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>And so what the good news on that is that

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that largely relates to defense and depth strategies and best

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>practices that we recommend the organizations. It doesn't often mean

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to buy millions of dollars of new technology, right.

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>It means we have to get back to the basics

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 1>and we have to make sure that, for example, for

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>help desk, that we are not asking identity verification questions

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>of our employees. That's information that could be easily found

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>on the internet. So we've got to continually focus on

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>security awareness trainings for organizations and make sure that they're

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>well implemented. As the war on Ukraine shows no signs

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of d escalation, but Ukrainian forces and the West have

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>really put a lot of pressure on Russian forces. Do

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you see Russia resorting to more cyber attacks and getting

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>more aggressive in the cyber landscape? Since we haven't quite

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 1>seen as potentially devastating attacks from the Russian side, is

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>some more expecting yet, I think it's a likely scenario.

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>One thing we know for certain is that the Russians

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>have been incredibly formidable capability when it comes to cyber

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>attacks and cyber warfare. So we are encouraging all of

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>our clients as well as non clients to be prepared

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that they've got a documented incident response

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>plans in place, that they understand what rules and responsibilities

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>their employees have across the board, so that if these

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>attacks do occur, that we've got a well orchestrated response

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>plan and we can contain contain that the damage as

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>quickly as possible. All Right, Wendy went more power outs

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 1>on networks. Always appreciate your insight on these incidents. Thank

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 1>you so much Wendy for joining us coming up. Russia

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>is one of the world's largest suppliers of nickel. It

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>is a key component in batteries for electric cars. How

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Tesla struck a secret deal to keep supplies coming. This

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. This back market has been up and down,

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>catching the attention of the SEC, which just announced a

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>plan for new disclosure requirements. One company that just went

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>public this week vs. Back is Storry, the broadband provider

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 1>listed on the New York Stock Exchange just yesterday. The transaction,

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>implying at one point seven six billion dollar value, were

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>joined out by check Kenogs Starry CEO and co founder

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>chet How'd you pull this off in the middle of

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>all this market volatility and a war that's casting a

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>great deal of uncertainty over the road ahead. Yeah. Well,

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I think probably two or three factors that contributed to it.

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Number one, a very supportive investor base, which I think

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>is critical in this market and climate obviously, uh And

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think the basic for that support, or the

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>basis for the support, including the new investors that came in,

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 1>is really the company's performance. You know, Unlike a lot

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of sort of concept companies in the stack land if

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you will, we um. You know, we're a real company

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>growing very rapidly, real revenues, real customers, very lower customer based,

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>massive tam um uh and and it real bottoms up

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 1>analysis in terms of what the company is going to

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>be doing. So so I think the deal basically got

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>done because of those parameters. So talk to us about

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the ambition here. You know, you have for many, many

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>years wanted to close the digital divide and democratize access.

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>What's the goal with Starry? What unmet needs do you

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like you're filling? So, you know, it really depends

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>on geography. But in certain areas, in urban areas in particular,

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously in the rule is the government's had a lot

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of subsidy programs that provide connectivity because I think that's

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 1>an important component for economic growth and economic engine and

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>healthcare education is you know, the pandemic taught us. But

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>there's an affordability problem in urban areas uh and UH.

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Affordability ranges from people that you know, are looking for

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a better product that without the television bundle, which is

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>typically how the cable companies sell it. For affordability for

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>folks that can certainly. Uh, you know, euilize the technology

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and connectivity, but you are you know, can't pay. But

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the government is helping with that with subsidizing with the

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>program called a c P or Affordable Connectivity Plan. So

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>endgame for us is really you know, core belief for

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the company is that what we're doing is a great

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>work in terms of providing you know, real use case,

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>real resource to consumers, taking care of them, elevating the experience.

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh and hopefully you know, by doing all of these things,

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>we're moving um society forward in terms of at least

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 1>economic opportunity and availability of resources to to folks that

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>would otherwise either be paying over too much or they

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>would be paying or not getting the product at all

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>because you know, they happen to be in a difficult

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>time in their lives. How is what you're offering, this

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>personalized network service different from what traditional legacy broadband providers

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>offer aside from price, and is this something that customers

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>really want? So yes, there are different cohorts of customers

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that really look for different things. So I'll give you

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>an example. You know, if you're a gamer, for example,

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you may be interested in different kinds of latency statistics.

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>You work from home potentially, and you know, cable broadband

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>network will give you, you know, a very marginal up link,

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and we can offer you several hundred megabits up link

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>up to gig a bit up link. Uh. So all

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of these things, you know, our bet is ultimately technology.

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>We lead towards personalization and what people are willing to

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>pay and what they want. Uh. And that's uh, that's

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the purpose and then that's how we are check with.

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>The network is in a highly personalizable way, which is

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>very different than your traditional broadband network that tends to

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>be one size fits all. You know, teaser rates that

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>started whatever number and then go up the year after.

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>You know all what I will say, you know, hundred

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>year old business practices that really don't belong in a

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>modern ecosystem. Alright, check Canoga Starry CEO and co founder.

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll keep watching as you continue trading. Thank you so

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. The war in Ukraine is raising

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>anxiety across the electric car industry, Russia being one of

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the world's biggest producers of nickel, a critical component in

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a VY batteries. Sources tell Bloomberg that Tesla, however, has

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>been signing deals to circumvent any supply disruptions. I want

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to bring in analysts as she Satilla, who leads our

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Commodities and energy research at Bloomberg do Energy Finances. She's

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. So, according to

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>our reporting, Tesla has been scouring the globe since last

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>year for deals on nickel. In particular, has struck a

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>deal with Veil, a multi year supply deal that involves

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>nickel coming from Canada. What is it you think that

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>made this deal possible? Good evening emplace. So essentially, nickel

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>prices are already rising slowly and steadily before the Russian

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>invasion of Ukraine, and part of the reason for that

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>was a tight market for class one nickel, which is

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>predominantly used in manufacturing batteries which went to electric beakers.

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Now Russia was supplying almost scent of this class one nickel,

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>so a potential disruption. They're definitely cost an impact on

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the market. Tesla strategy, although has been quite straightforward for

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the last year and a half or so. They've been scouring,

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>as you rightly said, for nickel around the world. Deals

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>with pH D last year and another deal with teln

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Metals and Riot into earlier this year, so they're trying

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to kind of secure their place in the supply chain

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and interrate verticularly as much as possible. In reality, it's

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the battery metal supply chain in general that is under pressure.

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>How concerned should governments be and companies beyond the electric

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>car market b so absolutely rightingly that there's a lot

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 1>of pressure in the supply chain around the world. Um Interestingly,

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>even in the absence of any long term net zero

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>carbon emission policies, we expect demand for lethuman batteries to

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>rise almost nine times between now and in particularly driven

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>by electric vehicles. So commodities like lithium, cobalt, nickel magnees

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.479
<v Speaker 1>will be required in large quantities, and actually the supply

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of these are in particular parts of the world which

0:17:56.520 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 1>are sometimes not that robust in terms of government structures

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>or supply chain enhanced Governments and companies around the world

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>are trying to take matters in their own own hands

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to develop the supply chain, either domestically or essentially create

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>these partnerships around the world. Now, obviously these companies can

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 1>work to secure extra supplies of nickel or cobalt or

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>lithium what else can they do beyond that? UM, so

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>I think two or three other interesting things they can do.

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 1>The first one is UM they can use different battery

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>chemistryes to reduce dependence on one specific material or metal.

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 1>For example, Tesla has been using more of lithium and

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>fosters batteries which require less nickel, although they have lower

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>range and lower performance. UM. There is a move towards

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:51.360
<v Speaker 1>using batteries which have hired magnees content and less nickel content. UM.

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 1>The second thing that would be done is building more

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>charging infrastructure. If you build more charging infrastructure, you need

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>batteries that slightly lower range as well. Perhaps. And the

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>third thing that could be done is recycling. So UM

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>from twenty onwards you will have a lot of batteries UM,

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>large volume of batteries that would be available for recycling,

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and we probably need to make yourse oft time. All right,

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>she Saiitia, thank you for that context. They're head of

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Commodities and Energy Research at Bloomberg and welcome back to

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology, Emily Jack in San Francisco. This week, I

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>spoke exclusively with Uber CEO Dark Causa Shocking about the

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>company's plan to quote out Amazon, Amazon, take a listen.

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:47.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that Amazon has is an incredible company and

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>no one is ever going to replace Amazon. But we

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>can essentially use our technology local logistics capabilities to power

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the local merchant or restaurant to deliver anything within an hour,

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 1>which we think is a delightful experience causa. He says,

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Uber's delivery business could eventually grow to be bigger than rides,

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the idea being that it doesn't deliver just food, but

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>potentially anything. This coming at a time though, when other

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>delivery services are cutting back, instat Carts slashing its valuation

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and the information reporting go Puff plans to cut hundreds

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of employees. Here to discuss. Andrea Walney, general partner at

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan Venture Partners. And Andrea, you're an investor in instat

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>cart What do you make of of instat carts move here?

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Should we be worried about its business? Thanks so much, Emily,

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>So overall, we're really not worried. I think generally this

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>act of actually reducing the valuation is very much so

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 1>based on the value of the stock options that the

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>company is issuing to their employees today and any incoming employees.

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 1>We think this move is really smart for the hiring

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and recruitment of new employees, because generally what employees want

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 1>to see is the upside upside in their stock right.

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>They want to see that there's going to be value

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>accruel once they joined the company. So overall, we think

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that this is a move that made headlines because they

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 1>were one of the first companies to do it, amiss

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>all the volatility in the market, and we just assume

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that many and many other companies are going to join

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 1>suit in this. But doesn't it mean that anyone who

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>exercise their shares that the original valuation thirty nine billion

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars would be underwater now? Well, the folks that did

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>exercise their stock options are probably there to hold on

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and see where the company goes as per their I

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>p O and the plans there. So overall, with the

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>lack of liquidity now leading up to the I p O, yes,

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>those employees just have to bear with us and hold on.

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>But generally the tax treatment between the four owner and

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>A which is the valuation, right, that's the addit valuation

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that every company who is private has to do once

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a year at least between that spread of the foreigner

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 1>and A and where they actually sell the stock is

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>what's really meaningful. So if we reduce that valuation price,

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.199
<v Speaker 1>it means that they can have more upside leading up

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to what they ultimately sell the stock. At meantime, we

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>just saw go Puff planning to cut hundreds of employees

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>according to a report from The Information cutting forty million

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars in cost three of their global workforce. Do you

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to see more companies slashing their valuations

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>like Insta cart and potentially going through these mass layoffs. Yeah, Emily, so,

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I truly think that we're about to see a one

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 1>eighty reverse of the Great Resignation. I think many companies

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>are using this opportunity of the volatility in the market

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to reduce spend, reduce opex, increase their margins, get to profitability,

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and show both investors private and public that they can

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>succeed as they grow, right, And so we do think

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to see a lot of companies. You know, further,

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>even though we are expecting the opposite of the Great Resignation,

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>we expect the talent pool and the recruitment landscape to

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>be just as competitive as it ever was. And so

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>with that being said, companies need to find really compelling

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>ways to recruit and retain, and so with that, they

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.880
<v Speaker 1>are going to be looking for ways to show the

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>talent pool that's out there that they can have an

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>increase in the value of the stock they're getting issued.

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>So we think there's gonna be a lot more of

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the layoff and news coming out. We expect a lot

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>of companies are having conversations with the board of directors

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to say, what should we do around our valuation, should

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>we bring it back down to real levels, and then

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 1>how should we plan ahead for our hiring plans going

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>into the rest of the year. Generally, companies like insta Car.

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Last year we're really really focused on profitability and broke

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>even because of that, and now companies like insta Car

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>are focusing on top line continuous sing the focus on growth,

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and then furthermore really just focusing on that reduction of

0:24:06.119 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>um spend across the board. So profitability is key, margins

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>are key, and retaining talent from the executive level on

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>down is also incredibly important. Now public companies in this

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>space also seeing their stocks slide. Uber and door Dash,

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.679
<v Speaker 1>for example, down here today, and I'm curious what you

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>think of Uber's vision here to be the future of

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>driving retail. That you know, the idea that they could

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>deliver something faster, for example, than Amazon. And if you

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's gonna work, well, Uber certainly has the fleet

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>capacity to be capacity to do so. But these days

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>their fleet is suffering. So I do think they're going

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to have to uh revitalize the way that they really

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 1>incentivized the driver base and furthermore increase their own margins

0:24:57.400 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>because it's not like Uber has always been the company

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to who that they understand how to focus on unit economics.

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>So generally, though they have the fleet and logistics down, um,

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not there to say that they've proven themselves as

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>it relates to being able to scale the logistics side

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:14.919
<v Speaker 1>of the business. So I think overall they have a

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>fighting chance. But Amazon has always been the clear winner

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 1>in this category, and it's investing a lot in this space.

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think from a bet perspective, we're looking at

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 1>where Uber can sit, but overall Amazon has always been

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the leading category winner. Here isn't a cautionary tale here, Andrea,

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>for investors and for employees and perspective employees, I mean,

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>we all thought valuations were getting pretty hot towards the

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>end of last year, and now you know, at least

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>as you're saying, we're going to see a lot of

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>companies bring those numbers down. Yes, So overall, I think

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the cautionary tale to see here is that these companies

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that are raising money from big crossover funds, and when

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I say crossover, I mean the funds that are the

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>mutual funds, they're the hedge funds that invest in both

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>private and public companies, and then they really hold onto

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>those positions once the company goes public. Those crossover investors

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>have a war chest of a ton of capital to deploy,

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and their risk profile is very very different than a

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>traditional venture investor or retail investor. So what I say

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to investors is that we have to really look out

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to say for the late stage companies that are raising

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>money um and furthermore just sitting on their own war

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>chest of a balance sheet. Those companies really raised a

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of rounds from those crossover investors who can weather

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the storm and plan on holding onto those positions and

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>setting up arbitrage opportunities long after the company goes public,

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>which is a very different strategy than a traditional venture investor. Right,

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>traditional venture investors. Their role is primarily to distribute and

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>cash out once a company has a lack of UH

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and the lack of expires. And so I think that

0:26:56.840 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>tail is that, you know, measure the risk profile, measure

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>risk tolerance, you know, battened down the hatches. But furthermore,

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>we're always going to be looking for companies in the

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 1>venture community that are investing into growth, increasing their margins,

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and showing that they can become profitable if and when

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to be. So are you saying, Andrea, that

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.879
<v Speaker 1>some of these big crossover funds, I'll just throw a

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 1>name out there, like Tiger Global, are they driving up

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:27.959
<v Speaker 1>valuations in an unhealthy way? I think that overall, Tiger

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Global and many other businesses that are operating similar to

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>theirs in the venture and crossover space were the ones

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that have had war chests that are sizeably larger than

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.880
<v Speaker 1>most traditional venture funds, and so in the last few

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>years they've proven that they could be very, very competitive

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 1>because their strategy is so focused on arbitraging opportunities once

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>companies go public. So overall, I don't think anything Tiger

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>has been doing from an activity perspective has been predicated

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>on them trying to drive up valuations. They've been very

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:03.679
<v Speaker 1>competitive for that reason. But for now it seems like

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>groups like Tiger and others are very much so focused

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.400
<v Speaker 1>on making sure that they kind of sit back see

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>where things pan out, and they're not as focused on

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 1>driving up valuations or putting all their bets in the

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 1>private markets in recent days. All Right, Andrea well Night,

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>general partner in Manhattan Venture Partners, will be watching to

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>see if some of the stuff you've predicted comes true.

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, the future of decentralized wireless, We're gonna talk

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>with Noble Labs about their recent two hundred million dollar

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 1>funding round and how they plan on using that to

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>expand their crypto wireless network. That is next this is

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>bloomer Halium, the creator of a blockchain that powers a

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>d centralized wireless network, just announced a two hundred million

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 1>dollar rays in funding lad by Agriglobal Andagies and Horror.

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>It's valuing them at one point to billion dollars. Helium

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>also changing its name to Noval Labs. I want to

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>bring in Noval Labs CEO Amir Haleem for more on

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>all of this as part of our crypto rapport. So

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>walk us through how a crypto wireless network actually works. Yeah.

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think that the really really the easiest way

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to think about what Helium does is it empowers ordinary people,

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>everyday people to participate in the telecom business. Right, this

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is the most entrenched industry that's almost impossible for like

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a regular person to participate in. And what Helium is

0:29:36.200 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>really pioneered is the ability for really everyday people to

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>become part of the telecom business with this sort of decentralization,

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in this crypto twistedment. So everyday participants by a little

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>piece of harnorware called the hotspot. You can think of

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it as a miniature cell tower um, and they earn HNT,

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>which is the Helium token for providing network coverage that

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 1>other people can use. That's that's sort of the simplest

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>word you think become it does. What are some of

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>your first use cases and customers. Yeah, so there's been

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>some interesting ones. I mean, the network today is focused

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet of Things, right, which is most these sensors,

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>small devices that are battery powered, and so we've seen

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>everything from drone delivery, so packages being delivered by drones

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that are orchestrated through the helium network, precision agriculture, things

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>like wildfire monitoring, connected rat traps. You know, there's the

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>number of use cases extremely broad, and IoT as a

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>category has been one that has really lacked a network

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that supports the kinds of applications that we're now seeing

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>getting built. So it's we're really starting to see like

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the transformation of an idea which was IoT ten years

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>ago to to the reality, which is people and businesses

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>starting to deploy sensors that solve the real problems. So

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>is the goal here to take share from major wireless

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>carriers and how do you plan to do that? You know,

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the goal really is to try and build

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>an alternative to what we have today, Like the the

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Internet or access to the Internet has been something which

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>has been so difficult, uh to separate from a sort

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of small constituent of of companies that own access to

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. It's incredibly difficult to to decentralize that way

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>due to so many different modes, whether it's sectrum, whether

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it's physical access. UH. And so what we see now

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>is uh the sort of convergence of all these different technologies,

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>including crypto, that makes it possible now for us to

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>provide an alternative that is completely open, that is very private,

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that is very secure, that is really owned by the people,

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>rather than a small group of companies that typically haven't

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>stranglehold in this industry. Now, given your fundraising announcement today

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>two hundred million dollars, including from Tiger Global, we were

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>just having a conversation earlier with Andrea Walnett Manhattan Venture Partners,

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>who maintains that some of these bigger funds like Tiger

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Global are driving up valuations because they simply have so

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>much money to plow into startups. What do you make

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of that critique and do you think it applies at

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>all to Nova? If you look at the telecom industry,

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is one of the few industries that

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is valued and trillions of dollars, right, and so the

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunity here is so large that I think it is

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>quite difficult to ascribe evaluation to it. Right. It's obviously

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously I'm biased, and I'm not going to say that

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>we're overvalued or anything like that, but I think the

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>opportunity that we're looking at is so big and so unique, right.

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Helium is one of the few crypto projects

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that has a real tangible like, you know, really world

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>use case that everyone can understand, right when people get

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to participate and become basically a little a miniature cell tower, right,

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And so if you think about how that grows. You know,

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>today the network is focused mostly on IoT, but as

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you think of the expansion, and there are now something

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>like twenty thousand five G hotspots being deployed, and you know,

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>we expect there to be other types of wireless network

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>that get built on top of Helium too, whether that's

0:32:55.440 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Qui Fi, Bluetooth six G, or any other future technology. Meantime,

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing companies more broadly slash evaluation plan for layoffs.

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>We're in the middle now of of what seems to

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>be a market downturn. How are you you know, are

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you changing your strategy at all? Are being more conservative

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>with your cash as you navigate these macroeconomic conditions? You know,

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we've generally been the believers in small teams

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that that can do big things. And you know, today

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>we are sixty or so employees and looking to grow um.

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think the philosophy of the company

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>has always been that small teams can do lots of

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>big things. And that has allowed us to be very

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>flexible in different economic conditions. Right we are looking to

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>add two thousand employees and put ourselves in dangering that way. So,

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there's a lot of pressure on

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>startups to to show growth in multiple directions, and one

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of those is is head count um and so we're

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>we've always been careful about that and I think that

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>will serve as well going forward. Because you built this

0:33:56.840 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>culture of trying to be disruptive this play, and as

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a result of being able to use crypto economics, you

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>really get to build an entire community behind you. You know,

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>So the size of the actual founding team or the

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:10.879
<v Speaker 1>core team matters a hull of a lot less because

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 1>you've got a six hundred thousand plus spot hosts who

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 1>are really the ones that actually running the network, who

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>owned the network, and that's you know, those are the

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>numbers that matter rather than than our individual headcounts. All right, interesting,

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Amir Helleen, CEO of newly branded Nova Labs, thank you

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Apple is developing its own payment processing

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>technology and infrastructure for future financial products. According to Bloomberg sources,

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>This as the iPhone maker is trying to reduce its

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>reliance on outside partners over time. Let's bring in Bloomberg's

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Mark German for this scoop And why Mark, what's the

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>plan here? The plan is to bring the underlying infrastructure,

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the underlying processing, underlying you know, development process for Apple's

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>future fintech products, things beyond Apple Pay, things beyond the

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 1>Apple card and the Apple cash card. Will Apple in

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>house right right now, as we know, Apple has a

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:17.240
<v Speaker 1>few partners in the fintech space, Goldman Sachs, Core Card,

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Green Dot Bank, and a few others. They want to

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>bring the underlying technology that they leverage from those partners

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>in house for the next suite of Apple financial services.

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>So who have this hurt definitely would hurt core Card right,

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:36.879
<v Speaker 1>every credit card, most financial products, they require what's known

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>as a core processor or is it payment processor. That's

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the engine that allows banks to either approve or reject

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a transaction. Now, the core processor core Card in this

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:49.879
<v Speaker 1>case does a lot more. They handle disputes, they handle

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>parts of customer service through Goldman Sachs, they handle other

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:57.439
<v Speaker 1>underlying infrastructure for the financial system. And you saw their

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>stock dropped, I believe more than ten percent this morning

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 1>on the news of the story. That's because investors in

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the company and analysts know how important core Card is

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to the Apple Card and Golden Sex. Now Apples building

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 1>their own full on replacement for the work done by

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>core Card, meaning core Card won't be Apple's partner in

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 1>all likelihood in future fintech products. Apple will be going

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 1>at it alone. So this will be Apple's biggest for

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a yet into the world of finance. I mean, it

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>sounds like it's not going to be easy. Are they

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to pull this off? This is

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a multi year effort with many engineers and other people

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>across Apple in all sorts of teams across the company.

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 1>They're investing hundreds of millions of dollars, if not billions

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in this. You saw an acquisition recently called Credit Kudos

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 1>from the UK. Now that company has technology to help

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>determine credit scores. That's part of Apple's push. Right This

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is all part of the same thing because Apple will

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 1>for the first time also be working with credit bureaus

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to make lending decisions and approval decisions for fintech product

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>applications for the first time. Right now, they go through

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:03.919
<v Speaker 1>core Card and Golden sacks to work with the transunions

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and Equifaxes of the world. Now they're trying to build

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that on their own as well. So this is a major,

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>major effort, very much underlying the whole future plans Apple has.

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know there's a few services Apple has in

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the works right now that go well beyond Apple Pay.

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>They're working on a buy now later program actually to

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 1>buy now later programs to compete with the firm and

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 1>others that will launch, you know, this year and next.

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 1>And you're also seeing them work on a hardware subscription

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 1>service which also is going to rely on this new platform,

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:35.879
<v Speaker 1>particularly for subscribing monthly to an iPhone. Quickly, when can

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>we expect the first product that will rely on this

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 1>new system, So buy now, Pay Later will be the

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>first product, and that will launch either this year or next.

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, Mark German with get another scoop. Thanks so much, Mark,

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 1>as always, thanks, and that does it for this edition

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:54.239
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Technology. You don't forget to check out our podcast.

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>You can find it on the terminal, Apple, Spotify, i Heeart,

0:37:57.239 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 1>anywhere you get your podcast for this daily news round up,

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:04.840
<v Speaker 1>catch it every day. I'm Emily checking in San Francisco.

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg,