WEBVTT - Rerun: Planned Obsolescence and the Right to Repair

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tex Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you. Well, it's Thanksgiving here

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, which means we are actually off

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>work today, but we thought we'd bring you a rerun episode.

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>This episode published last year March nine, two thousand twenty one,

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>with the title Planned Obsolescence and the Right to Repair.

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought this would be an appropriate topic to bring

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>back up because we are in the heart of holiday

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>gift buying season. You know, tomorrow is Black Friday, which

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>is traditionally a big shopping day, but we all know

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that those shopping days have been expanded both before and

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>after Black Friday. But one of the big things people

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:05.639
<v Speaker 1>like to get our tech gifts for their loved ones.

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>And one of the downsides to tech is that it

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>can go obsolete pretty quickly, and sometimes when stuff goes wrong,

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>there's not necessarily an easy way to fix it, and

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>that brings us to the right to Repair movement. So

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>sit back, relax, and enjoy this episode from last year,

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Planned Obsolescence and the Right to Repair. I recently did

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a series of episodes about General Motors, and one of

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>the many things I talked about in those episodes was

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>how Alfred Sloan, who was an absolutely critical leader of

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>GM early on, established a practice of planned obsolescence. That

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is part of Sloan's market strategy was creating a company

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that every year would release cars that had updated styling

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and features in order to entire not just first time

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>car buyers, but people who had already, you know, purchased

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a car in the past. And that got me to

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking that I should really talk about planned obsolescence in

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>general and examine the facts and consider the myths, and

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>also chat a bit about the right to repair movement

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and recycling, because all of this is kind of connected together.

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about casual consumption of electronic goods, almost a

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>disposable approach to them, and electronic goods are not necessarily

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the best thing in the world to treat as disposable.

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>So let's just start off by defining what planned obsolescence

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>is really all about. Now. Generally, people talk about planned

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:49.119
<v Speaker 1>obsolescence as a strategy in which the maker of a thing,

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a physical good or an app or whatever,

0:02:54.240 --> 0:03:00.399
<v Speaker 1>builds into that thing a predetermined end of life. Other words,

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you've already determined how long this thing is supposed to last.

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>And the purpose of planned obsolescens is to not just

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>sell one thing to each customer one time, but to

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>sell many of that same thing to every customer over time.

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 1>It's the same reason why a lot of software companies

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>will migrate toward a subscription based revenue model, because it's

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 1>more profitable to get customers to regularly give you money

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>than to bank on selling them a lot of the

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>same thing to a huge customer base. Like if I'm

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>selling a software package for two hundred dollars, I'm going

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>to get you know, X number of customers, and chances

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>are they're not going to buy another product for me

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>for a while. If I offer a subscription fee for

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a much lower monthly plan, I might get people locked

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>into that system for years and thus make way more

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>money off of them in the long run than I

0:03:58.000 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>would if I had gone with the big ticket i'd

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>up front. This can actually manifest in lots of different ways. Now, typically,

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I get the sense that the popular perception of you know,

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>planned ups lessons is that companies make stuff that's just

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>designed to stop working after a certain number of hours

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>of operation. So, in other words, the manufacturer isn't making

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>products that are meant to stand the test of time. Rather,

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>these are products that will at some point break down

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and either require repairs or a replacement. Now, repairs were

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>great if you happen to be the not only the

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>company that's selling the thing, but you're also the company

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that provides maintenance and repair services. Car dealerships often fall

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>into this category. You can purchase a car at a dealership,

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and then most dealerships have service centers as well, or

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>they have, you know, an agreement with a service center,

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>so the dealership can continue to make money off of

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a sale if the salesperson can and convince the customer

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to bring the car back to the dealership's service center

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>for regular maintenance or repair work. But not all technology

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>has the value of a car. Obviously, there's a lot

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of tech out there that's fairly inexpensive to make, and

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>companies might price that technology it's such a relatively low

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>cost that a repair might set you back the same

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>amount or more than buying just a new version of

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>whatever that tech is. For a lot of us, I

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>figure the reaction to that as well, I might as

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>well buy a new one if I'm going to be

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>spending that kind of money. Heck, the new thing of

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a jig might have more features than the old one,

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>or it might look a little different, you know, more stylish,

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and so we toss aside whatever old thing of a

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>jig we have and then we go out and buy

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a new one. Or maybe you would actually like to

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>do repairs yourself. That's something we're going to chat about

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.479
<v Speaker 1>more towards the end of this episode. But some companies

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>have been known to make it challenge or maybe even impossible,

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 1>for the end customer to really repair the technology they purchase,

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>whether it's through using proprietary screws that need a specific

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>tool to remove them, or actually sealing components into compartments

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>with glue and rivets and solder or other fasteners, making

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.239
<v Speaker 1>it impossible to open without risk of causing further damage.

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Companies have used a few different ways to obscure or

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 1>impede repairs mm apple. Or you could also get to

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a point with stuff like cars where it just becomes

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>harder to make repairs because it's hard to even determine

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>what is wrong with the thing without a special diagnostic

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>device like a computer. This is the case with a

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of modern cars. You might be able to lift

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the hood and look around a little bit, but some

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>vehicles have various covers or engine configurations that make it

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>really challenging for the average person to access specific parts

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of the motor, let alone do any work on it. Again,

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 1>this limits what you can do with tech once it

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>starts to fail, and all tech does fail over time,

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>because well, entropy is something we just can't avoid. It's

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a fundamental law of the universe, particularly when it

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>comes to cheap technology. The sort of disposable approach has

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of negative drawbacks, including what to do with

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>old tech that no longer works. I mean, a lot

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of technology contains stuff that's pretty toxic, so throwing it

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>out in the garbage could lead to it ending up

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in a landfill somewhere, and then harmful stuff like lead

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 1>or mercury could leach into the environment. Because of that,

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not great. So we'll touch a tiny bit on

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>electronics recycling in this episode two, but I have done

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>full episodes about e waste recycling, so I'm not going

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to spend too much time on it, and there are

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>often ways to make older tech obsle elite that are

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily obvious on the face of it. So let's

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about smartphones, for example. That's an easy one. One

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of the big trends we see in technology is that

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>as devices or components within devices get more powerful, the

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>software developers end up making software that eats up that

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>extra power. Nicholas Worth wrote about this pro problem back

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>in the ninety nineties. He wrote a paper titled a

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Plea for Lean Software, and his point has essentially boiled

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>down into what we now call Worth's law, which is

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that software is getting slower. That is, it's getting more

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:46.599
<v Speaker 1>resource hungry at a rate that's faster than hardware is

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>getting faster. So while subsequent generations of hardware are getting

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>more powerful, the requirements of software are outpacing that progress,

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and the end result is that we often feel our

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>shiny new devices just aren't keeping up as much as

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>we expected them to. We're basing our perception on what

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>the new device should be able to do based on

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>what we have right now, and that's just not how

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff works. Unfortunately, gamers who want to be on the

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>bleeding edge of computing capability experience this a lot. A

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>top gaming rig would cost thousands of dollars. It requires

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a powerful central processor or CPU, and quite likely multiple

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 1>powerful graphics processing units or GPUs. Plus you need a

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>power supply that's capable of providing the juice that these

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>components need, and you need a killer cooling system to

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>make sure the whole thing doesn't overheat. And just as

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you get all of this stuff set up and running

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the latest games, developers start making games that are so

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>resource hungry that even with your killer rig you might

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>have to knock a few of the game's settings down

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple of notches just to make it run smoothly. Meanwhile,

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you're already anticipating the next big development and hardware that

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>will let you move all those sliders all the way

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to the top. That's going to set you back a

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>few more thousand dollars, which is brutal. With smartphones, we

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>see this happen a lot as newer models use better processors,

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 1>and typically new processors are usually more powerful and hopefully

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>more efficient, so in other words, you're not seeing battery

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>life just plummet from one generation to the next, or

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>phones get way bigger because you need a bigger battery

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>in order to make them last long enough. Processor technologies

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 1>follow pretty close to Moore's law, and we typically interpret

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that as meaning that a processor's capabilities effectively double every

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>two years or so. Not the same processor, but rather

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>new processors on the market end up being twice as

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>powerful as the processors that came out two years earlier.

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>That's generally what we mean. More's laws more subtle than that,

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>but we won't go into it. Battery life does not

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>follow this same trajectory. It's again a law of physics.

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about electrochemical reactions, and so there's not a

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>magic way to make batteries just last longer. It requires

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>more incremental improvement. So if we only concentrated on making

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>processors more powerful, they would just pull more juice per

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>hour than older processors, and soon we would have smartphones.

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>They would only have a couple of hours of useful

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>battery life. So there is a balance to be made here. Meanwhile,

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>smartphone apps still follow Worth's law. The apps drawn more

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>processor power, or they interact with more components, and smartphones

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 1>like GPS receivers or accelerometers or the camera or microphone,

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>or some combination of all of these and more, and

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the smartphone operating systems themselves evolved to support these apps

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and provide more functionality. Well, older smartphones just can't keep

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>up with this all the time, and so you will

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>often see companies make a cut off for operating system updates.

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Older phones might stall out at a certain OS version

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and be unable to install more recent updates of the

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>operating system. So you could have an Android smartphone that's

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe a few years old, and it's running a version

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of Android that's several generations old at this point because

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Google has determined that the hardware you're using simply cannot

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>meet the needs of later operating systems. Meanwhile, the app

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>developers are focusing on what they can do with the

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>most recent OS version, which means you might not be

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.959
<v Speaker 1>able to run a new app with all of its features,

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>or you might not even be able to run the

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>app at all if you're using an older phone. And

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>since apps are what makes smartphones smart, that ends up

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 1>being a big problem. And so now the incentive is

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>there for you to upgrade your phone, even if your

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:56.280
<v Speaker 1>old phone still works, so that you can, you know,

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>just use your smartphone the way you want to. And

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 1>you're not stuck older versions of apps. And that's particularly

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>important because sometimes these older versions of apps end up

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>being tied to servers that could go offline, or they

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>might swap over to a new process, and then you

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>have an outdated smartphone that has a bunch of inactive

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>apps stored on it and it becomes practically useless. On

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a related note, battery life decreases over time and use,

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>so older batteries just don't hold as much of a

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:31.839
<v Speaker 1>charge as newer batteries, and they drain faster, which means

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that your older battery operated devices will need recharging more frequently.

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:40.959
<v Speaker 1>Apple famously tried to address this problem by purposefully throttling

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the processing speed of older iPhones. The processors would work

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>more slowly so that they would consume less battery power,

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>thus extending the usefulness of a battery at the cost

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of smartphone performance. But Apple didn't, you know, tell anyone

0:13:57.440 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 1>about it, and a lot of users figured out that

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>there too, vices were slowing down due to age. That's

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>what they assumed. It's just, oh, this is older, that's

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 1>why it's getting slower. And in a way that was

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of true, but not in the same way that

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>these users thought. They just thought, this thing is getting old,

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I need a new one, so they opted to buy

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a new, later generation iPhone. But in iPhone, users figured

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>out that their phones were being throttled and they had

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>no choice in the matter, and that led to a

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>big class action lawsuit. As users said, had they known

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>what was going on, they would have opted to replace

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the battery in their old iPhone rather than buy a

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>brand new iPhone. And I should add that Apple does

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>not make it easy for you to do this. You

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you really can't replace a battery in your iPhone, at

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>least not without violating your warranty. But under certain circumstances,

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>like if you enroll in Apple Care Plus, then Apple

0:14:55.240 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>actually will replace an iPhone battery free of charge. I say,

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>for your charge. Really, I should say that prices included

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in your enrollment into Apple Care Plus. So for those users,

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>the people who had enrolled in Apple Care Plus, they

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>could have chosen to have a new battery put into

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>their older iPhone and it would have extended the life

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of that device, but they weren't told about what was

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>going on, so instead they opted to buy a brand

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>new phone, which was way more expensive. In Apple reached

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a settlement agreement, actually to settlement agreements for two different

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>class action lawsuits brought against the company about this very issue.

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>The first settlement was for five hundred million dollars a

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>princely some, and the second was for another one thirteen

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. In both cases, prosecution argued that Apple was

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>deliberately hiding the fact that it was throttling processing output

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and that the battery was degrading over time, and they

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>knew that most users would opt to upgrade to a

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>newer iPhone as long as they didn't realize that there

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>was an alternative path they could have taken. Now, that

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty much hits the planned obsolescence definition right on the nose.

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>So it turns out there are a lot of different

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>approaches to planned obsolescence. While the phrase might make you

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>think that the company is purposefully making stuff that just

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>won't stand the test of time, as in the company

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>is choosing to create substandard products knowing that these products

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>will break down and the customer is likely to come

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>back and buy another one. Really, that's just the tip

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of the iceberg, and it's usually not even the case.

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>If a company's reputation gets tied to the idea that

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the stuff they make breaks easily. That's not good for business.

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>And the rest of this episode, we're going to take

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a closer look at some historical examples of planned obsolescence

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and what was going on from different perspectives, and we'll

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>also get into the right to Repair movement and what

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it might mean to the tech industry moving forward, assuming

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the movement actually achieves its goal. But first let's take

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. We're back and on December twenty three,

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty four, a group of elite entrepreneurs met to

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>establish some shady guidelines, which was pretty ironic because they

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 1>were all in the lightbulb business. That's sort of a

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>pun I guess anyway. The leaders represented some of the

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>largest light bulb manufacturers in the world. There was General Electric,

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the grand daddy of big tech companies in the United States.

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>There was the company Phillips from the Netherlands, as Rum,

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a company from Germany had a representative present, and the

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>French had their place too, with executives from the company

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>De Lump And together they created a powerful idea, which

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>we can represent as a very large lightbulb turning on

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 1>behind their heads or at least we could if this

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>were a video and not an audio podcast. Their idea

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>was to form a new company, an organization that would

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>coordinate how lightbulbs should work, as in how bright they

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>should be and how long they should last, as well

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>as which company would be allowed to sell its products

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in certain specific regions. It was collusion of the highest order,

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and it violated pretty much every antitrust law you can

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>think of. And it became known as the Phoebus Cartel.

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Cute huh, because Phoebus is another name for Apollo, the

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>god of the sun. Before the cartel, manufacturers were making

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>lightbulbs that could last between fifteen hundred and two thousand

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>hours of operation. But the cartel collectively decided that their

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>light bulbs should have a life expectancy of one thousand

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>hours of use. A ha. These companies were producing a

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>technology that already had a limited lifespan just because of

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 1>how it works. You know, the filaments and light bulbs,

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the part that actually gives off light, they eventually burned

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>through and break, and that's what makes incandescent lightbulbs die. Clearly,

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.719
<v Speaker 1>this group of people were all agreeing to a worldwide

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>limit on the useful number of hours a light bulb

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.479
<v Speaker 1>would operate in in order to sell more light bulbs. Right,

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>they were making a predetermined end of life cycle for

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 1>light bulbs, and by making everyone agree to this limitation,

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>no manufacturer would be able to defy the others and

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>start selling bulbs that had longer lifespans, which would ruin

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it for everybody else. Now you can see the appeal

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of that narrative, right, rich fat cats are cynically limiting

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a technology just to sell more light bulbs, while simultaneously

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 1>creating pressure to prevent any other company from offering up

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a superior product. You could just hear the thumbs twiddling,

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the mustaches waxing, and the chore as shortling. Heck,

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the cartel would even test light bulbs from each manufacturer,

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 1>and if any of those light bulbs proved to have

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a lifespan that was well beyond those one thousand hours

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of operation, the cartel would find the responsible manufacturer keep

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:22.719
<v Speaker 1>those light bulbs lives shorter or else. But if we

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 1>want to be a little more fair, we should take

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 1>into consideration another factor. As light bulbs age, they would

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>give off less light. Incandescent bulbs they are less luminously efficient,

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in other words, and so the counter argument was made

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 1>that by limiting the lifespan to one thousand hours, it

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>was more about maximizing luminous efficiency. It was to make

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>certain that the light bulbs were providing enough light throughout

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>their lifespans and not just turning into increasingly dim light sources.

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>So there was an argument being made that the restriction

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of the life span was more about improving the quality

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of the performance of light bulbs rather than speeding up

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the need to replace those light bulbs. It was a

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>compelling enough argument to lead the u K's Monopolies and

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Restrictive Practices Commission to give the companies some slack with

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that regard. Though there were many other things the Phoebus

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Cartel did that did not get a free pass, but

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>those are more market focused than tech focused, so I'm

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to go into them. The cartel itself, by

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>the way, dissolved in the late nineteen thirties, not because

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 1>of government pressure, or at least not the kind of

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>regulation pressure, but because of a little thing called World

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>War Two. Now, I suspect that the decision to arrive

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>at one thousand hours of useful life was guided both

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>by practical considerations and good old fashioned greed. So I

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>suspect there is some truth to both of the scenarios

0:21:56.400 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, or if you listen to ridiculous history scenarios

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and considering that some of the other moves that the

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>cartel made, like namely price fixing, you definitely cannot count

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>greed out because that was the primary motivator for those decisions.

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>But there are at least some people who are a

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>little more charitable toward the idea of limiting bulb lifespan

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to favor better luminous efficiency. So we'll

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.639
<v Speaker 1>move on. The next big example is the one that

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:30.919
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier and talked about a little bit in

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>my episodes about General Motors. This was the GM under

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Alfred B. Sloan, the man who took a big mess

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of companies that were acquired by GM founder William C. Durant,

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and then he organized all of this mishmash into individual

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>business units looking over specific makes of car, and each

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of those units had a great deal of autonomy between them.

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>He was also a consummate capitalist, and I don't necessarily

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>mean that in a flattering way. He had a habit

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>of focusing on profits and ignoring people. But you can

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:09.199
<v Speaker 1>learn more about that in the GM episodes. One of

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Sloan's many contributions to the automotive industry was the introduction

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of stylistic changes to various car models year over year.

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>In the early days of automobiles, the dominating manufacturer was

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the Ford Motor Company. Henry Ford's company produced the famous

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Model T. Ford and first introduced that Model T in

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen o eight, and it remained in production until nineteen

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven. By nine, this was a mass produced cars,

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 1>so on a huge scale, Ford dominated car sales in

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States for like decades now. Allegedly, Ford himself

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>once said that there was no use in overtaking and

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>passing a Model T on the road because you would

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>just find yourself behind a different Model T. That's how

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 1>commonplace they were. He also reportedly said that a customer

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>could get a Model T and whatever color they wanted

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>as long as it was black. While the company would

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 1>offer Model T s and other colors up to nineteen fourteen,

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>between nineteen fourteen and nineteen Ford only churned out black

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Model T cars. This meant that Ford's factories could build

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>nearly identical cars, one right after the other, using mass

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 1>production techniques, thus increasing efficiency and keeping costs down. And

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it also meant that Ford could sell these cars at

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>affordable prices. They were meant to be practical, durable, and reliable,

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's how he made so many early sales. Now

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>there was a big emphasis on uniformity and consistency, in

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>other words, because those are things that make it easier

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to mass produce something. And Alfred Sloan saw an opportunity

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to appeal to people on a different level over at

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>General Motors. He thought it would be a good idea

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to change up the style of a model of car

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>on a regular basis. At a glance, you would be

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 1>able to give a ballpark estimate of the year when

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>a certain model came out due to distinguishing features that

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 1>were on that car. You know, maybe the headlights are

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in a slightly different spot, or maybe the car has

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>a different kind of grill on the front of it,

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>or maybe you put a pair of big old tail

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>fins on the back of the thing. That's the sort

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>of thing that Sloan was thinking about. Harley Earl, a

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>man whom many historians credit as the first professional designer

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to work in the automotive industry. Worked was Sloan to

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>make this vision a reality, and Earl would sculpt models

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>out of clay and then mold them in different ways

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to create new features, and as tastes changed, he could

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>reflect that in different car body designs, and now cars

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>could appeal to people by embodying certain design trends. This

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>approach meant that car has now had a sort of

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 1>planned obsolescence. As time passes, fashions change and older cars

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 1>will pass out of fashion. Out of style, they'll become unfashionable,

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and that creates a psychological lever that GM could lean

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:19.120
<v Speaker 1>on to convince people to come in trade in their

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>older cars and buy newer ones. The older cars might

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>still work perfectly well from an operational point of view,

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>but they could be seen as being old fashioned, and

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>that was enough to push some people to upgrade to

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a new vehicle. It was still important for GM to

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>make cars that were perceived to be reliable and powerful.

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>If the cars were known to break down quickly, that

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of reputation would hurt sales. So while you could

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:47.439
<v Speaker 1>keep driving the same car for many years, assuming you

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>took good care of the car, Sloan's goal was to

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>make you feel like a like kind of a social

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>pariah if you did that for a really long time, Like, Oh,

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that poor so and so they can't afford a new car.

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Look them driving that old, you know, Chevy or whatever

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it might be. Sloan's approach accelerated car pon the role

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>of a car as a status symbol. GM offered several

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>different makes of cars, and each make targeted a different

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>economic demographic. So on the cheaper end was the Chevrolet

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.719
<v Speaker 1>line and on the opposite side of the spectrum was

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the Cadillac. But no matter which make of car you

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about, that strategy of planned obsolescence was at play.

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>You can see Sloan's impact in consumer products across the board,

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 1>and not just in tech, though it tends to be

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly evident in the tech world. It's why Apple releases

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a new iPhone every year, or more to the point,

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>it's why companies like Apple hold really big exclusive press

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>events to hype the release of a new model of

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 1>iPhone every year. And to be clear, Apple does this

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>with lots of its products, not just the iPhone. It's

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>just the iPhone event tends to get the most attention.

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>So let's think about that yearly schedule for a moment,

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 1>and also think back to how phones were marketed in

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the US when the iPhone first launched in two thousand seven.

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>So at that time, Apple had signed an exclusive agreement

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 1>with the carrier A T and T here in the

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 1>United States. Now, the reasons behind that agreement are fascinating,

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.040
<v Speaker 1>but they also go beyond what I'm going to talk about,

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>so I'll save that for some future episode. You're welcome.

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>But back in those days, it was pretty common practice

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in the United States for carriers like A T and

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>T to offer subsidized phones in return for signing two

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>year contracts where you agreed that this was your carrier

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>for two years. You were locked into a carrier. That

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>made the initial purchase price of phones a little bit

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>more affordable, at least initially, so rather than shelling out

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a thousand dollars for a phone, you might spend a

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>couple hundred by signing onto a two year agreement with

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the carrier. Typically, those agreements would limit your options when

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it came to upgrades. Normally you would have to wait

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>out the two years to get to the point where

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you would renew your agreement or sign whatever newer version

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of the agreement the carrier was offering, and then you

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>could upgrade to a new phone at a reduced cost,

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>or sometimes the phone would be included as part of

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the agreement. But Apple was releasing a brand new iPhone

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>every year, and each new iPhone would have new features

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and new styling, so the phones were following Sloan's approach

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to product design. A new iPhone wasn't just flashy technology.

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>It was also a status symbol, and a lot of

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>folks would choose to upgrade to the new version, even

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>if it meant they had to pay more to do

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>it because they were only a year into a service

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>agreement with their carrier and they could not yet qualify

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>for a subsidized phone. Now. This happened for a few years,

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>but gradually US carriers kind of phased out those two

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 1>year contract plans, which also meant that the subsidized phone

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>model began to disappear. Customers had more freedom to choose

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>whichever carrier they wanted to without getting locked into things,

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>but it also meant that they often had to pay

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>full price for phones. For those who had been upgrading

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to a new iPhone every year, despite the limitations of

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>two year contracts. This was actually probably a welcome change

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of us. It was a bit of

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>an adjustment, not a bad thing, but it did take

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>some time to adjust to it. The brilliant thing about

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Sloan's approach, the thing that Apple often relies upon, is

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that you're encouraging customers to crave the new There's this

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>built in desire in the market to get the coolest

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>new toy with the latest features and the latest options.

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Companies don't have to trash the older technology. They just

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>helped the new things that the latest version can do.

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>And it might mean that companies take steps to roll

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>out new features very carefully. So in some cases a

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>company might be ready to implement a brand new feature,

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>at least from a technological level. However, the whole back,

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>they'll make a market based decision to wait and sit

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>on that technology for a little bit in order to

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>maximize sales. You might say, well, we could install these

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>three new features in our next phone, but if we

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>only install one of them, and then the phone after

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that we add a second one, and the phone after

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that we add the third one, we are able to

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>keep boosting sales year over year. If we do all

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>three right now, we might not have enough of an

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>improvement to get that same boost next year. So it

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>becomes this kind of game of chess. So why would

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you put in all the bells and whistles if you

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>can hold back a few of them and then make

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>many more sales in the next update. Now, is this insidious?

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't really think so. I mean, from a business perspective,

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it does make a lot of sense. From a consumer perspective,

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I say, what this should do is teach us that

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>jumping on a brand new technology, or even just a

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>new model of an existing technology, might not be the

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>best option right out of the gate. We might need

0:32:18.520 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to use some self control before we buy the next

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>shiny thing. Of course, this approach requires moderation as well,

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>or else you would never buy anything at all. If

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I need a new phone and I know that I'm

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>three months out from the release of something that I

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>think is really worthwhile, then I can wait that out.

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm perpetually waiting for a phone that blows

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>me away with all the features, I'll probably be worried

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that I'm going to experience buyer's remorse. If I jump

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in right. So in other words, if I buy something

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and I don't feel like it's really what I was

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>waiting for, then maybe the next thing that comes out

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the next month makes me feel badly about it, and

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>so that can actually become um a bit of a crisis.

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>It can. It can prevent you from taking action because

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>you're always worried that once you take action, you're committed,

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and then the next day you find out there was

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a better option. But yeah, that desire for the new

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 1>is something that's really ingrained in the tech world. Companies

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have to make products that will break after a

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of time. They don't have to have that

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of planned obsolescence because with lots of tech, just

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the desire to have the latest thing is enough all

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>on its own. That means the companies just have to

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>focus on offering up products that are different enough from

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the previous generation to spark our desire. When we come back,

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>i'll talk a little bit more about this, and then

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll learn about the right to repair. But first let's

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break. So, if manufacturers are actually giving

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the people what they want, that is update, it's to

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>technology that flesh out what it can do at least

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in the ways that consumers desire. Then we can't really

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>put all the blame on manufacturers for planned obsolescence. We

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 1>are somewhat responsible for it too. It's good to keep

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in mind, and if we recognize that part of us,

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>we can try to make a better balance of when

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we actually need something new and when we just want

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>something new. I struggle with this all the time, whether

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a new flagship phone. I mean, when Android comes

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 1>up with a brand new flagship phone, I feel the

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:40.399
<v Speaker 1>temptation to jump on it. Not literally jump on it,

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:43.720
<v Speaker 1>but you know what I mean. However, in most cases,

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the phone I have at the time tends to be

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>perfectly fine for my needs. The last time I did

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>upgrade a phone, it was because the microphone on my

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>phone had broken. I could use Bluetooth devices and talk

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on the phone, but I couldn't use my phone as

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a phone just on its own, so I did have

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to upgrade then. But I tend to stick to getting

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a new phone just every few years as the older

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 1>one starts to lag behind, especially when it comes to

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>what apps it can run. And the same is true

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>for game systems. I've gotten a lot better about that too.

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>It used to be that as soon as a game

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>system came out, I felt the urge to rush out

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and buy it. I usually didn't because I usually didn't

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 1>have the money, but I always wanted to. However, now

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I actually prefer to hang back, both so that any

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>bugs in those early versions can be worked out. I mean,

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I do not want another red Ring of Death situation

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>ever again, and also so that game developers can release

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 1>more titles for the system. It's not much fun pouring

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of money into a technology and then having

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to wait around for it to become useful. But now

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 1>we also have to talk about the issue of right

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to repair. So earlier I talked about the ways companies

0:35:56.840 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 1>make it challenging or impossible for the average person and

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to repair stuff. And initially my reaction to that kind

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of thing is this is how they get you. They

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 1>want you to get back to them and bring all

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the stuff to get it fixed by them themselves. But

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:14.399
<v Speaker 1>there can be other reasons for this that, while you

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>may or may not agree with them, can be a

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 1>little more subtle. So, for example, let's take Apple again.

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>For most of the company's history, Apple products have been

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 1>largely inaccessible to those who wish to do their own repairs,

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>at least to do so without violating a warranty. But

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the big reasons for that is that Apple

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:37.760
<v Speaker 1>has a specific vision as to how consumers are supposed

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to experience Apple products. This was a philosophy that Steve

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Jobs had pushed pretty hard. The goal was to create

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a controlled experience from beginning to end. The company would

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:52.879
<v Speaker 1>have an enormous amount of authority in deciding this, from

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 1>hardware configurations to the kinds of software that would be

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 1>allowed to run on the device. We see this reflected

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in the iPhone app store, where developers have to get

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>approval from Apple before their apps will actually appear on

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the market. This level of control helps a company deliver

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 1>consistent quality to users. The challenge is then selling users

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:18.520
<v Speaker 1>on the idea that the company's approach is what the

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:23.439
<v Speaker 1>customer actually wants. Jobs was amazing at this. He could

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:26.239
<v Speaker 1>bring a device to a crowd and by the end

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of a presentation have that crowd convinced that Apple's product

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is exactly what the crowd wanted and needed. But Apple

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>relinquishing control in any way wouldn't make that more difficult

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to do. Because a third party might not perform up

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to Apple's standards and it would reflect poorly on Apple.

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 1>But that also meant that Apple products were difficult to modify.

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Early consumer computers came out as kits, and the people

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:57.360
<v Speaker 1>who bought those kits would typically put them together themselves.

0:37:57.440 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 1>You could also pay to have some of those kits

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>fully assembled. You would have to pay extra for that,

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of early computer owners actually enjoyed the

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>experience of building the computers from the kits, and this

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>meant that really enterprising hobbyists could even make little tweaks

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.879
<v Speaker 1>to the design to change the performance of the end

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 1>machine a little bit. This was the early era of

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the hacker, as people figured out how these systems worked,

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and then they modified those systems in different ways. And

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty common practice along many different computer manufacturers

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to have components that you could swap out, like RAM chips.

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:38.360
<v Speaker 1>So if you wanted your computer to have more memory,

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you could open up your computer case and install more RAM,

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>assuming your computer's motherboard and processor could support the additional RAM.

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 1>But Apple typically made this really hard to do. If

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 1>you wanted an Apple computer with more RAM, you were

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:57.240
<v Speaker 1>going to have to pay extra to buy a computer

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 1>model that was a step up from whichever one we're

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 1>looking at. And that also extends to making it really

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 1>hard to repair Apple computers if something were to go wrong,

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and thus we get to the birth of the genius bar.

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 1>So we get companies creating complicated electronic devices, many of

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 1>which have proprietary fasteners and such holding them together, and

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 1>the message that the customer is to bring any of

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:23.839
<v Speaker 1>those devices that aren't working, you know, they might need

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>some repair. You're supposed to bring those back to the

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 1>company or maybe an authorized service vendor. Critics of this

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 1>approach say it's anti competitive and it hurts the consumer. Ideally,

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the consumer would have an open choice as to whom

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 1>they could bring a broken device for a repair. So

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 1>if I were particularly talented at repairs, I would be

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 1>able to open up a shop and work on all

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>sorts of devices. I might offer more competitive rates than

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>what people might find going through the original manufacturer or

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:59.799
<v Speaker 1>enrolling in an extended care or warranty program. And these

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>are ideas are the underlying principles of the right to

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 1>repair movement. There are a lot of organizations that advocate

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>for the right to repair, and they weren't to lobby

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 1>governments to pass legislation that would mandate it. Primarily we

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 1>see the movement in the United States and even more

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 1>prominently in the European Union. This is also tied to

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the problem of electronic waste. As I mentioned earlier. According

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to the Public Internet Research Group, which I should add

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>is not an unbiased source of information, but according to them,

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Americans throughout four hundred sixteen thousand cell phones a day.

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I find that number a little hard to believe. Maybe

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it's true. I didn't find, you know, other sources that

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 1>backed this up, but I did find other sources that

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>had similar eye popping statistics. Only a fraction of the

0:40:50.600 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 1>electronic devices we throw away, ever, end up in recycling centers.

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's mostly on us. If we just toss

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>it in the garbage, then that's where it's gonna go.

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Take effort to find good recycling centers. Not all of

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>them are ethical, by the way. It takes some research.

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 1>So considering all the stuff that's in electronics, including valuable metals.

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>There's like gold and copper in this stuff, it's a

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 1>real shame to just throw them out. And then you

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>consider the environmental impact and it gets worse. Right to

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:24.320
<v Speaker 1>repair groups want to see companies include access to stuff

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>like repair guides, so make it possible to understand how

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:30.839
<v Speaker 1>these things work and how to fix them. Make it

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>repair tools accessible if any proprietary tools are needed, and

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 1>also make us accessible parts needed for repairs. Sell the

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 1>parts individually as well, so none of this would be free.

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, the companies could still make money. They could

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>actually offer repair kits that you can purchase. But imagine

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:51.719
<v Speaker 1>that instead of having to bring back your smartphone to

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>some store or send it off to a manufacturer through

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:58.239
<v Speaker 1>the mail, you instead could order a repair kit, and

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:01.360
<v Speaker 1>if you have steady hands, maybe you replace that cracked

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 1>screen or that dead battery by yourself. That's the appeal

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of the right to repair movement. But as electronics get

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 1>more complicated, it's more challenging to meet that kind of standard.

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Some devices are complex enough that it requires a person

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 1>with specialized knowledge and skill in order to tackle the problem,

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of us, myself included, would probably find

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 1>ourselves popping into an independent repair shop to have our

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 1>stuff fixed rather than take it on ourselves and risk

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:37.319
<v Speaker 1>breaking it more. Look, all I'm saying is I know

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 1>what my track record is for taking stuff apart versus

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 1>putting it together again, and that ratio is way out

0:42:44.640 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of balance. We're seeing this movement embrace not just consumer

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 1>goods like smartphones, but really big stuff like farming equipment

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and tractors. Farmers have criticized manufacturer John Dear for including

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 1>essentially the equivalent of a digital lock and those limits

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>who can actually make repairs to a machine. For farmers

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 1>who depend upon these big vehicles for their livelihood, that

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>represents a lack of freedom and lack of options, and

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 1>it really does feel anti competitive. It's saying you have

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:20.399
<v Speaker 1>to go to people of our choosing if you want

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to have the thing you bought repaired. And this also

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 1>gets into that weird area we find ourselves in in

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:31.399
<v Speaker 1>the digital age. In the old days, you would buy

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:34.439
<v Speaker 1>something and you would just think this is mine, right,

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Like you bought a watch, that's your watch. You could

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 1>repair that watch however you liked. But these days things

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:44.400
<v Speaker 1>are being sold not just as a product but as

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 1>an ongoing service. And it's not so much that you

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 1>own the thing, it's that you own access to that thing,

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:58.239
<v Speaker 1>and some ownership is retained by the original manufacturer. This

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is an idea that I'm not super keen on because

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it does put a lot more power back in the

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 1>hands of the manufacturers and and takes a lot of

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 1>power away from consumers. Well, in the United States, twenty

0:44:11.680 --> 0:44:15.040
<v Speaker 1>states have filed legislation in an effort to address these

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 1>kinds of issues, and in the EU some progress on

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:21.800
<v Speaker 1>this front has already been made. This month a series

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of regulations that apply to manufacturers that make appliances like

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 1>washing machines, refrigerators, dishwashers, I think computer monitors too. It

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 1>goes into effect and those regulations state that companies need

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to offer products that have replaceable components, and moreover, that

0:44:41.440 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 1>anyone would be able to make these replacements using common tools.

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:47.759
<v Speaker 1>You shouldn't need anything special in order to do this

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:50.840
<v Speaker 1>repair work. So, in other words, companies are not supposed

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to solder stuff together or otherwise make it impossible or

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>difficult to access components without causing further damage. And you

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't need a you know, number seventy three spanner up

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to iconological wrench or something in order to work on it.

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:08.879
<v Speaker 1>The EU has yet to pass regulations that would cover

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:13.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff like cell phones, computers, and tablets, though and that

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is a big problem because these are some of the

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 1>most common and harmful forms of consumer waste. People go

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 1>through these types of devices on a pretty regular basis,

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and some of the member nations of the EU have

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 1>gone on to move ahead and pass their own regulations

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:31.640
<v Speaker 1>since the EU as a whole has been a little

0:45:31.719 --> 0:45:35.480
<v Speaker 1>slow on this. So, for example, in France, a new

0:45:35.520 --> 0:45:39.399
<v Speaker 1>piece of information will be included with consumer electronics. It's

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:43.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially a repair index, is a score that ranges between

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:47.200
<v Speaker 1>one and ten. The index gives consumers the idea of

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>how easy or difficult it is to disassemble a device,

0:45:51.120 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you can find information on how to

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:56.640
<v Speaker 1>repair the device, you know, if it's readily available or not,

0:45:57.360 --> 0:46:00.160
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you can find spare parts of that

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of device, how expensive those spare parts are, So

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the more difficult it is to repair something,

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the lower that score is going to be for that

0:46:09.760 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 1>particular item. Now, where we go from here will depend

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>upon how governments either past legislation or they opt not to,

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 1>plus how they intend to enforce legislation. Companies have very

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 1>little incentive to offer up, you know, repair options to

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the end user because those can end up hitting revenue

0:46:31.239 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 1>down the line. Now, personally, I would love to see

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot more options for repair. I'd like to see

0:46:37.120 --> 0:46:39.440
<v Speaker 1>an approach similar to what it was like to buy

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a car twenty years ago, because yeah, you could bring

0:46:43.080 --> 0:46:46.600
<v Speaker 1>your car back to the dealership for maintenance, but chances

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 1>are you might find a great mechanic who is more

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:53.120
<v Speaker 1>convenient to where you live, or maybe they have more

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:56.399
<v Speaker 1>competitive rates and that might end up being your first

0:46:56.440 --> 0:46:59.360
<v Speaker 1>choice instead of bringing it back to the dealership, or

0:46:59.640 --> 0:47:02.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe you invest the time and energy to learn how

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to do the repairs yourself. I think the options should

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:09.840
<v Speaker 1>all be there, and I definitely think that's an improvement

0:47:09.880 --> 0:47:13.000
<v Speaker 1>over the status quo we have now. Well, that wraps

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 1>up this episode. I hope you enjoyed learning about planned

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 1>obsolescence and the right to repair. If you have suggestions

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:22.920
<v Speaker 1>for topics I should tackle in future episodes of tech Stuff,

0:47:23.000 --> 0:47:25.440
<v Speaker 1>let me know. The best way to reach out is

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 1>over on Twitter. The handle is tech stuff h s

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 1>W and I'll talk to you again really soon. Ye.

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Tex Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app,

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows,