WEBVTT - Nvidia to Invest $3.5 Billion in Chipmaker MediaTek 

0:00:02.750 --> 0:00:04.410
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios.

0:00:04.890 --> 0:00:05.569
<v Speaker 2>Podcasts.

0:00:05.890 --> 0:00:06.410
<v Speaker 3>Radio.

0:00:06.850 --> 0:00:07.250
<v Speaker 4>News.

0:00:09.750 --> 0:00:13.470
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:00:13.550 --> 0:00:16.570
<v Speaker 5>weekdays at 10 a.m. Eastern on Apple CarPlay and Android

0:00:16.630 --> 0:00:19.939
<v Speaker 5>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:00:19.980 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 5>you get your podcasts or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.230 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about big tech, NVIDIA in particular, because it's

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 3>investing $ 3.

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.420
<v Speaker 1>5 billion in media tech.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.380
<v Speaker 3>This is a Taiwanese chip maker, and this agreement broadens

0:00:33.420 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 3>a partnership between the two chip designers. It's part of

0:00:36.260 --> 0:00:39.330
<v Speaker 3>NVIDIA's future and effort to ensure that the future of

0:00:39.409 --> 0:00:43.530
<v Speaker 3>AI is built around its hardware platform and standards. NVIDIA's CEO,

0:00:43.550 --> 0:00:46.370
<v Speaker 3>Jensen Huang, spoke with our Ed Ludlow. Here's what he

0:00:46.409 --> 0:00:47.990
<v Speaker 3>had to say on this particular deal.

0:00:48.010 --> 0:00:52.260
<v Speaker 6>Well, this is not circular because, obviously, they do their

0:00:52.300 --> 0:00:56.590
<v Speaker 6>own business and we do our own business. And MediaTek's

0:00:56.830 --> 0:01:02.690
<v Speaker 6>already incredibly profitable, incredibly successful. They are the world's best

0:01:02.970 --> 0:01:06.300
<v Speaker 6>SOC maker. They make more SOCs than any company in

0:01:06.330 --> 0:01:09.459
<v Speaker 6>the world. It's a great pleasure for us to invest

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.460
<v Speaker 6>in a technology company in Taiwan. It's a great pleasure

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:14.900
<v Speaker 6>for us to invest in MediaTek. This is going to

0:01:14.940 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 6>turn out, of course, the investment is grounded on a

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:20.660
<v Speaker 6>deep partnership that's going to be multiple years.

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 3>That was NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang speaking earlier with our

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:26.339
<v Speaker 3>Ed Ludlow.

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in Mandeep Singh now.

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.100
<v Speaker 3>He is our Global Head of Tech Research here at

0:01:30.140 --> 0:01:33.390
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Intelligence. And Mandeep, I liked how the first thing

0:01:33.410 --> 0:01:36.010
<v Speaker 3>Jensen Huang said was, this is not circular. It's kind

0:01:36.030 --> 0:01:38.070
<v Speaker 3>of like he has to make that point out front

0:01:38.430 --> 0:01:42.429
<v Speaker 3>to everyone because there's so many concerns, maybe accusations, that

0:01:42.750 --> 0:01:46.430
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the investments and deals that NVIDIA makes

0:01:46.510 --> 0:01:49.170
<v Speaker 3>kind of goes round and round in this small little ecosystem.

0:01:49.370 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, it has had an impact on Nvidia's stock.

0:01:54.220 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 4>They're not trading like everyone else in terms of earnings

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.940
<v Speaker 4>or free cash flow multiples. So everyone right now is

0:02:02.060 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 4>critical of their circular financing. But look, in this case,

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.900
<v Speaker 4>they want to expand the ecosystem. And for a company

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:13.870
<v Speaker 4>that's generating over $ 200 billion in free cash flow, You know,

0:02:13.930 --> 0:02:18.490
<v Speaker 4>investing $ 3. 5 billion has changed right now in terms of

0:02:18.570 --> 0:02:20.790
<v Speaker 4>just what they could afford to do.

0:02:20.910 --> 0:02:22.190
<v Speaker 7>And there are benefits.

0:02:22.250 --> 0:02:27.500
<v Speaker 4>They did that with Marvell first, now with MediaTek. I mean, essentially,

0:02:27.860 --> 0:02:31.780
<v Speaker 4>anybody who is making an accelerator chip right now, NVIDIA

0:02:31.820 --> 0:02:35.820
<v Speaker 4>is saying, we provide the networking technology that can help

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:39.050
<v Speaker 4>you scale up that chip into a much bigger chip.

0:02:39.570 --> 0:02:43.270
<v Speaker 4>kind of entity that can run these large inference workloads

0:02:43.310 --> 0:02:48.250
<v Speaker 4>that every large hyperscaler is doing. So from that standpoint,

0:02:48.430 --> 0:02:52.169
<v Speaker 4>interoperability is a good thing, whether it's Google TPUs or

0:02:52.210 --> 0:02:54.490
<v Speaker 4>their own chips, and that's why they are going to

0:02:54.550 --> 0:02:55.989
<v Speaker 4>all these suppliers here.

0:02:56.669 --> 0:03:00.130
<v Speaker 8>So real quick, just where is the market these days?

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 8>When you talk to institutional investors, where is the market

0:03:03.660 --> 0:03:06.180
<v Speaker 8>In terms of its view of these circular deals, is

0:03:06.220 --> 0:03:08.780
<v Speaker 8>it like it is what it is, we got to

0:03:08.860 --> 0:03:11.060
<v Speaker 8>deal with it, or it's a problem, I'm staying away?

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:13.500
<v Speaker 7>What's the market thinking these days?

0:03:13.580 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, NVIDIA has just guided to over $ 650 billion

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.870
<v Speaker 4>in annual revenue by next calendar year. So think of

0:03:22.930 --> 0:03:26.390
<v Speaker 4>the size of this market. Just one company, which still

0:03:26.470 --> 0:03:31.889
<v Speaker 4>has almost 80% share, in that accelerator chip space is

0:03:31.930 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 4>guiding to 650 billion. Then you've got Google GPUs and

0:03:36.250 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 4>AMD and you combine everything, you come up with at

0:03:39.620 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 4>least an $ 800 billion plus market that is growing 70%.

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.119
<v Speaker 4>That's what Nvidia said. And it would have grown faster

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:52.150
<v Speaker 4>if they had more supply. So that's what I think

0:03:52.270 --> 0:03:55.310
<v Speaker 4>everyone is focused on is at the end of the day,

0:03:55.350 --> 0:03:59.190
<v Speaker 4>there could be some pull forward because of this circular financing,

0:03:59.230 --> 0:04:02.510
<v Speaker 4>because Nvidia is giving them the money. But in the end,

0:04:02.730 --> 0:04:06.650
<v Speaker 4>this is still a very large market with a very

0:04:06.710 --> 0:04:10.170
<v Speaker 4>high growth rate. And I think everyone wants to cater

0:04:10.210 --> 0:04:11.230
<v Speaker 4>to that market. Okay.

0:04:11.250 --> 0:04:13.230
<v Speaker 3>So as much as it might look like Nvidia is

0:04:13.270 --> 0:04:17.910
<v Speaker 3>dominating everything with the deal making within its ecosystem, it's actually...

0:04:18.630 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of room for other companies to come in.

0:04:20.950 --> 0:04:25.300
<v Speaker 3>Having said that, NVIDIA's investment with MediaTek, who does that hurt?

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.979
<v Speaker 1>What companies are kind of left out as a result

0:04:29.020 --> 0:04:29.300
<v Speaker 1>of this?

0:04:29.900 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 4>Not left out, but Google was planning to ramp up

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:38.219
<v Speaker 4>beyond Broadcom with MediaTek. And so this is kind of

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.700
<v Speaker 4>front-running Google to say, hey, Google, we will make sure

0:04:41.740 --> 0:04:45.330
<v Speaker 4>we lock every capacity that's out there, whether it's with

0:04:45.470 --> 0:04:48.970
<v Speaker 4>TSMC or with MediaTek or any FAB provider. And I

0:04:49.029 --> 0:04:52.570
<v Speaker 4>think this is NVIDIA flexing its balance sheet to say,

0:04:52.990 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 4>we can lock in any supplier that's out there that

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 4>could help Google to ramp up capacity.

0:04:59.580 --> 0:05:00.020
<v Speaker 7>Stay with us.

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:05:06.620 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 5>weekdays at 10 a.m. Eastern on Apple CarPlay and Android

0:05:13.500 --> 0:05:16.790
<v Speaker 5>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:05:16.850 --> 0:05:19.890
<v Speaker 5>you get your podcasts or watch us live on YouTube.

0:05:21.230 --> 0:05:24.089
<v Speaker 3>Anthropic is going to be the big IPO that everyone's

0:05:24.110 --> 0:05:27.909
<v Speaker 3>waiting for sometime in the fall. We're thinking September, we're

0:05:27.930 --> 0:05:30.790
<v Speaker 3>thinking October. That's what Bailey Lipschultz has told us. He

0:05:30.870 --> 0:05:33.510
<v Speaker 3>is our senior equities reporter. He covers the capital markets

0:05:33.690 --> 0:05:36.870
<v Speaker 3>and he joins us now on the upcoming IPO.

0:05:36.930 --> 0:05:38.930
<v Speaker 1>So we're still thinking September, October?

0:05:39.650 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 9>Still thinking September, October, but if you just- understand how

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 9>IPOs work. For the company to price and debut in September,

0:05:47.460 --> 0:05:50.620
<v Speaker 9>it needs to publicly be on file by the Tuesday

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 9>after Labor Day. So that's like kind of a best

0:05:54.220 --> 0:05:57.700
<v Speaker 9>case scenario. If we believe our understanding when we talk

0:05:57.720 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 9>to bankers and people around the steel to be true,

0:05:59.740 --> 0:06:01.979
<v Speaker 9>they still haven't finalized their revolving credit facility.

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 7>That's a big step.

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.170
<v Speaker 9>Bringing the other banks outside of the big four that

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.090
<v Speaker 9>we've broken a lot of news around under the tent

0:06:08.170 --> 0:06:08.810
<v Speaker 9>is a big step.

0:06:09.029 --> 0:06:10.010
<v Speaker 7>And they also have to have.

0:06:09.910 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 9>An analyst day so the analysts can model out what

0:06:12.540 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 9>they're expecting with Anthropic. When you're at Goldman Sachs, if

0:06:15.779 --> 0:06:17.490
<v Speaker 9>you call up your sales desk and say, hey, I

0:06:17.529 --> 0:06:18.390
<v Speaker 9>want to talk to the analyst.

0:06:18.410 --> 0:06:20.310
<v Speaker 7>He has to have a model to be able to share.

0:06:20.730 --> 0:06:22.390
<v Speaker 9>So if you put all of those kind of pieces

0:06:22.430 --> 0:06:25.570
<v Speaker 9>into formation, you look at it and say, the fastest

0:06:25.690 --> 0:06:28.580
<v Speaker 9>probably is Thursday or Friday. But in reality, they've been

0:06:28.779 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 9>kind of dragging their heels with piecing together this revolving

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:34.539
<v Speaker 9>credit facility. But once that takes place, it should move

0:06:34.580 --> 0:06:35.260
<v Speaker 9>pretty darn quickly.

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.050
<v Speaker 2>Is there going to be a crowding out effect for

0:06:39.190 --> 0:06:40.229
<v Speaker 2>other deals, do you think?

0:06:40.529 --> 0:06:42.350
<v Speaker 8>Good question. I mean, it's going to take all the

0:06:42.470 --> 0:06:45.190
<v Speaker 8>oxygen and including a lot of the dollars out of

0:06:45.230 --> 0:06:47.810
<v Speaker 8>the marketplace. How's the street kind of thinking about this?

0:06:47.830 --> 0:06:49.310
<v Speaker 8>Because presumably after Labor Day.

0:06:49.330 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 7>There's a lot of companies that will want to go public. Yeah, no,

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:53.300
<v Speaker 7>and we've already seen a few that have flipped publicly.

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 9>So smaller, lesser known deals, Agreco, Covault Power, obviously they're

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 9>both private equity. They're both kind of playing the AI angle.

0:07:00.900 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 9>But the big thing is if you're trying to schedule

0:07:03.540 --> 0:07:06.050
<v Speaker 9>a meeting with a long only, or if you're trying

0:07:06.070 --> 0:07:07.690
<v Speaker 9>to schedule a meeting with the sovereign wealth fund, these

0:07:07.710 --> 0:07:11.470
<v Speaker 9>aren't huge teams. They're not the millennium IPO pods that

0:07:11.490 --> 0:07:13.670
<v Speaker 9>are really playing all of these deals. So I've talked

0:07:13.690 --> 0:07:16.050
<v Speaker 9>to some sponsors, I've talked to some bankers, And that's

0:07:16.170 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 9>kind of been consternation. When you look at SpaceX, which

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:22.370
<v Speaker 9>we saw back in June, we crunched the numbers, the

0:07:22.370 --> 0:07:25.590
<v Speaker 9>14 notable deals to go public in the month before SpaceX,

0:07:25.610 --> 0:07:29.150
<v Speaker 9>so kind of racing to hit that pre-SpaceX window. Weighted

0:07:29.190 --> 0:07:31.710
<v Speaker 9>average loss is almost 10% from the offer price. You're

0:07:31.730 --> 0:07:34.030
<v Speaker 9>supposed to buy IPOs to make money, not lose money.

0:07:34.430 --> 0:07:36.570
<v Speaker 9>So when you look at the calendar, we have seen

0:07:36.610 --> 0:07:39.570
<v Speaker 9>companies flip public. We expect some to flip public this week.

0:07:39.950 --> 0:07:42.950
<v Speaker 9>That should open the opportunity to beat Anthropic out the door.

0:07:43.330 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 9>But you don't want to be on the road at

0:07:44.830 --> 0:07:46.750
<v Speaker 9>the same time. You don't want to be calling Wellington

0:07:46.830 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 9>asking for them to take time to talk to your

0:07:48.780 --> 0:07:52.260
<v Speaker 9>company if Dario is trying to make a visit. Yeah.

0:07:52.300 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 7>They'll be like, we'll get back to you.

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:54.220
<v Speaker 10>Exactly.

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about another company, which a couple of years

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.380
<v Speaker 3>ago was a big, big deal for young people.

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Shein, kind of like fast fashion.

0:08:03.900 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Shein Global Holdings, the shares fell as much as 14%

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:08.500
<v Speaker 3>in Hong Kong gray market trading.

0:08:08.550 --> 0:08:11.290
<v Speaker 1>This is before the stock makes its debut in Hong.

0:08:11.190 --> 0:08:11.550
<v Speaker 11>Kong, right?

0:08:11.610 --> 0:08:12.870
<v Speaker 7>It'll make its debut tomorrow.

0:08:12.930 --> 0:08:16.090
<v Speaker 9>And again, this is a company that sold almost $ 2

0:08:15.890 --> 0:08:19.030
<v Speaker 9>billion worth of shares in the IPO last Market cap's

0:08:19.030 --> 0:08:21.270
<v Speaker 9>26 billion. You mentioned just a few years ago, 2022,

0:08:21.270 --> 0:08:24.930
<v Speaker 9>they raised a private round around $ 100 billion.

0:08:25.350 --> 0:08:26.690
<v Speaker 7>So that is a huge drop off.

0:08:26.730 --> 0:08:28.790
<v Speaker 9>When you talk to investors who've met with the company,

0:08:29.250 --> 0:08:32.589
<v Speaker 9>the critique is, I'm paying a similar multiple for a

0:08:32.630 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 9>Zara or an H &amp; M that I'm paying for

0:08:35.059 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 9>a company that hasn't seen growth, that has a lot

0:08:38.020 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 9>of political uncertainty and a lot of headwinds. There were

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 9>reports that they wanted to go public in the US,

0:08:43.420 --> 0:08:46.199
<v Speaker 9>then London, now they're listing in Hong Kong. There's just

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.579
<v Speaker 9>so much uncertainty around the company. And again, it'll be

0:08:48.660 --> 0:08:51.230
<v Speaker 9>interesting to see when we see that formal trading. But

0:08:51.260 --> 0:08:53.770
<v Speaker 9>we've been really using over the last few weeks and

0:08:53.850 --> 0:08:56.870
<v Speaker 9>months this gray market to better inform what's going to

0:08:56.929 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 9>happen actually on exchange. And even if you just go

0:09:00.140 --> 0:09:02.420
<v Speaker 9>one to one or even half two to one, you're

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.339
<v Speaker 9>still saying this is going to be something that trades

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 9>down pretty sharply.

0:09:05.980 --> 0:09:07.140
<v Speaker 7>So just real quick, 30 seconds.

0:09:07.179 --> 0:09:09.380
<v Speaker 8>Are we expecting a flood of deals to be filed

0:09:09.420 --> 0:09:11.290
<v Speaker 8>or hit the road in the next several weeks?

0:09:11.450 --> 0:09:11.810
<v Speaker 3>Definitely.

0:09:11.870 --> 0:09:14.390
<v Speaker 9>We expect potentially a couple this week. And then I

0:09:14.429 --> 0:09:16.949
<v Speaker 9>think after Labor Day, you'll see people back in the seats.

0:09:17.010 --> 0:09:20.450
<v Speaker 9>You'll see filings being put public. You'll see companies starting

0:09:20.470 --> 0:09:23.510
<v Speaker 9>those formal roadshows. And we should expect a pretty darn

0:09:23.890 --> 0:09:26.900
<v Speaker 9>packed September into October. Again, though, we do have a

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 9>live September meeting for the Fed. So that has a

0:09:29.340 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 9>bit of a concern for some of these bankers. And

0:09:31.660 --> 0:09:35.260
<v Speaker 9>then obviously all eyes will shortly after pivot to the

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.700
<v Speaker 9>election in the midterms and what that does or doesn't

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:38.260
<v Speaker 9>mean for risk.

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:41.819
<v Speaker 3>So I'm just looking at POTS bull tickers for Anthropic.

0:09:41.940 --> 0:09:48.170
<v Speaker 3>ANTH is already taken by Anthra Pharmaceuticals. So what, ANTR? No,

0:09:48.210 --> 0:09:50.030
<v Speaker 3>like you still have to have the like thethropic part

0:09:50.070 --> 0:09:52.349
<v Speaker 3>of it in the ticker. Do we have any idea

0:09:52.390 --> 0:09:52.870
<v Speaker 3>what they're going.

0:09:52.790 --> 0:09:53.589
<v Speaker 1>To use as their ticker?

0:09:53.650 --> 0:09:54.849
<v Speaker 7>No, that's a good question though.

0:09:54.890 --> 0:09:55.110
<v Speaker 6>All right.

0:09:55.230 --> 0:09:57.420
<v Speaker 7>I'm sure you could probably bet on it on Calgary. Oh,

0:09:57.500 --> 0:09:59.660
<v Speaker 7>I'm sure. There's a market for that.

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:00.660
<v Speaker 1>There's a market for everything.

0:10:01.300 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 7>Stay with us.

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.340
<v Speaker 2>More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:10:08.340 --> 0:10:12.020
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:10:12.100 --> 0:10:15.140
<v Speaker 5>weekdays at 10 a.m. Eastern on Apple CarPlay and Android

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:18.500
<v Speaker 5>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:10:18.540 --> 0:10:21.590
<v Speaker 5>you get your podcasts or watch us live on YouTube.

0:10:21.610 --> 0:10:24.990
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's Monday, which means it's Merger Monday, which means

0:10:25.890 --> 0:10:29.390
<v Speaker 8>a pharmaceutical company is out there buying another healthcare pharmaceutical

0:10:29.429 --> 0:10:34.630
<v Speaker 8>slash biotech company. And today it's Eli Lilly buying Merida Biosciences,

0:10:34.630 --> 0:10:39.329
<v Speaker 8>$ 2. 88 billion in cash. Michelle Cortez joins us. She's the

0:10:39.350 --> 0:10:42.449
<v Speaker 8>Senior Editor for Global Business for Bloomberg News. She's based

0:10:42.470 --> 0:10:44.470
<v Speaker 8>down there in D.C. Michelle, talk to us about Eli

0:10:44.510 --> 0:10:47.189
<v Speaker 8>Lilly and Merida Biosciences. What's going on here?

0:10:48.730 --> 0:10:52.230
<v Speaker 10>Well, Lilly has been making a bet on this particular

0:10:52.270 --> 0:10:56.010
<v Speaker 10>space on immunology products for the last several years. It

0:10:56.050 --> 0:10:58.500
<v Speaker 10>does have a number of products here as well. But

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.540
<v Speaker 10>the bigger story is that Lilly is looking to actually

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:05.630
<v Speaker 10>put some of this power that it's getting from selling

0:11:06.170 --> 0:11:09.390
<v Speaker 10>diabetes shots and weight loss shots that have become so

0:11:09.490 --> 0:11:12.370
<v Speaker 10>ubiquitous in the United States and the rest of the world.

0:11:12.650 --> 0:11:14.620
<v Speaker 10>They're trying to put that to use so that when

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.939
<v Speaker 10>they do eventually lose some of that protection, some of

0:11:17.980 --> 0:11:22.380
<v Speaker 10>that patent protection, they'll be able to have future income streams.

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:24.350
<v Speaker 10>It's hard to look at now because they do make

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.050
<v Speaker 10>so much money from those. But immunology is a huge

0:11:27.070 --> 0:11:29.170
<v Speaker 10>and growing area. And that's one of the areas where

0:11:29.210 --> 0:11:30.570
<v Speaker 10>Lilly is really staking its claim.

0:11:31.350 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Michelle, I go to the BUYP buyer profile or intent

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.780
<v Speaker 3>profile page on the Bloomberg Terminal, and Lilly has made

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 3>a number of acquisitions in recent weeks and months. Merida

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.770
<v Speaker 3>is just the latest for $ 2. 9 billion, but in August,

0:11:46.790 --> 0:11:50.910
<v Speaker 3>there were two purchases with some other companies, Indupro and

0:11:51.090 --> 0:11:55.270
<v Speaker 3>Amplifica Holdings. In July, there was Ratio Therapeutics. Do any

0:11:55.290 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 3>of these get the attention of regulators?

0:11:59.860 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 10>You know, these acquisitions aren't really getting the attentions of regulators.

0:12:02.940 --> 0:12:07.719
<v Speaker 10>It's getting a lot of attention from investors. Lilly is

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.140
<v Speaker 10>really taking a very different approach. They're buying things at

0:12:10.179 --> 0:12:12.660
<v Speaker 10>a very early stage. It's a great question, actually. I

0:12:12.780 --> 0:12:16.470
<v Speaker 10>don't know if they're somehow, you know, hovering up an

0:12:16.590 --> 0:12:20.650
<v Speaker 10>awful lot of early stage products in the same category

0:12:20.750 --> 0:12:23.870
<v Speaker 10>so that they could be kind of cornering the market

0:12:23.950 --> 0:12:28.450
<v Speaker 10>on some new technology that's just emerging. It's so early

0:12:28.470 --> 0:12:30.829
<v Speaker 10>what they're doing, though. I think that it's probably unlikely

0:12:30.870 --> 0:12:34.069
<v Speaker 10>and others would follow quickly along. It's interesting, all of

0:12:34.110 --> 0:12:38.510
<v Speaker 10>those things that you're citing, the numbers, they've told us

0:12:38.550 --> 0:12:42.270
<v Speaker 10>that they look at 10 different acquisitions every single week.

0:12:42.570 --> 0:12:44.410
<v Speaker 10>And so they're pulling the trigger a lot, but they're

0:12:44.470 --> 0:12:46.870
<v Speaker 10>pulling it at a very low rate, right? All of

0:12:46.929 --> 0:12:49.750
<v Speaker 10>those ones that you're talking about. I think the biggest

0:12:49.790 --> 0:12:51.950
<v Speaker 10>deal that Lilly has ever done is sub $ 8 billion,

0:12:52.340 --> 0:12:52.790
<v Speaker 10>you know, like.

0:12:56.059 --> 0:12:59.780
<v Speaker 10>It is comparatively to the size of the company. It's

0:12:59.960 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 10>very small potatoes. They are just chucking a lot of potatoes,

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:04.199
<v Speaker 10>in all honesty.

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:05.100
<v Speaker 7>It's interesting.

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 8>Well, I've been at Bloomberg 17 years, and I just

0:13:07.179 --> 0:13:10.420
<v Speaker 8>learned another function today, the BYP function.

0:13:10.470 --> 0:13:10.990
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, yeah.

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:12.069
<v Speaker 7>Very cool. I like that.

0:13:13.150 --> 0:13:16.150
<v Speaker 8>Michelle, what does Eli Lilly prefer to do? Do they

0:13:16.290 --> 0:13:19.970
<v Speaker 8>prefer to develop stuff in their lab or just go

0:13:20.030 --> 0:13:21.350
<v Speaker 8>out and buy it, like with this deal?

0:13:22.830 --> 0:13:23.030
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:13:23.090 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 10>Well, I mean... It's got to be a hard decision, right?

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 10>Lilly paid the price of this a long time ago

0:13:31.420 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 10>with Prozac. Of course, they were dominant in that particular space.

0:13:35.020 --> 0:13:37.060
<v Speaker 10>And then when they lost the patent protection on Prozac,

0:13:37.140 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 10>they really had to scramble. And then the GLP-1s, they

0:13:41.140 --> 0:13:44.340
<v Speaker 10>did that themselves. Like this is a huge market. Obviously,

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:48.330
<v Speaker 10>they weren't first movers. That was Novo Nordisk. But they

0:13:48.350 --> 0:13:52.630
<v Speaker 10>developed their weight loss and obesity drugs in-house, and they

0:13:52.650 --> 0:13:55.189
<v Speaker 10>have really reaped the benefits there. And they want to

0:13:55.230 --> 0:13:58.179
<v Speaker 10>do that again. And the problem is, is that it

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:00.950
<v Speaker 10>just can't be an expert everywhere. So they're bringing in

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 10>stuff early stage. They're trying to develop it in-house and

0:14:04.580 --> 0:14:08.490
<v Speaker 10>then create it long-term. We'll see what happens. A lot

0:14:08.500 --> 0:14:11.650
<v Speaker 10>of other companies in this particular situation, when they've had

0:14:11.790 --> 0:14:16.630
<v Speaker 10>huge products that are losing patent protection, they go out

0:14:16.690 --> 0:14:20.410
<v Speaker 10>and do $ 25 billion, $ 30 billion, $ 50 billion. I mean,

0:14:20.450 --> 0:14:22.370
<v Speaker 10>not a lot because there's not a lot of companies

0:14:22.390 --> 0:14:24.530
<v Speaker 10>that can pony up that kind of money. But we

0:14:24.570 --> 0:14:27.950
<v Speaker 10>do see massive M &amp; A. They're doing massive numbers

0:14:28.330 --> 0:14:32.050
<v Speaker 10>in terms of deals, not massive size of the deals themselves.

0:14:32.610 --> 0:14:35.630
<v Speaker 3>I'm fascinated by the fact that Eli Lilly is kind

0:14:35.670 --> 0:14:39.090
<v Speaker 3>of scouring for deals on such a frequent basis. And yes,

0:14:39.150 --> 0:14:41.550
<v Speaker 3>pulls the trigger on a couple of them, but doesn't

0:14:41.610 --> 0:14:44.850
<v Speaker 3>necessarily take a bite out of all of them. What

0:14:44.870 --> 0:14:48.370
<v Speaker 3>does that mean in terms of their willing? I mean,

0:14:48.410 --> 0:14:50.730
<v Speaker 3>do they have like a goal of how many companies

0:14:50.910 --> 0:14:53.670
<v Speaker 3>or investments they want to make, you know, that they

0:14:53.870 --> 0:14:55.810
<v Speaker 3>feel that they need to execute on?

0:14:57.530 --> 0:14:59.490
<v Speaker 10>I don't think that they have a number that they

0:14:59.550 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 10>need to execute on at this point. And to be fair,

0:15:02.380 --> 0:15:07.380
<v Speaker 10>they don't have an awful lot of pressure at the moment, right?

0:15:07.420 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 10>The patents that they have on these GLP-1 drugs, the shots,

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.660
<v Speaker 10>they have those for at least another decade. So that's

0:15:13.700 --> 0:15:15.420
<v Speaker 10>not going to be hit too hard. And they are

0:15:15.700 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 10>innovating in that particular space. Like we see some pills

0:15:19.380 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 10>and whatnot that are coming along, even more effective, more

0:15:22.340 --> 0:15:26.300
<v Speaker 10>potent medicines. They will face a little bit of pressure because...

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 10>Novonar discs drugs are older and they are coming off patent,

0:15:31.020 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 10>but Lilly's to this point have been a little bit

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:36.020
<v Speaker 10>more effective. So we'll see if that creates pressure, but

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:38.990
<v Speaker 10>it won't be, I think, for another five to eight

0:15:39.020 --> 0:15:42.630
<v Speaker 10>years that Lilly will actually start having to show how

0:15:42.670 --> 0:15:44.550
<v Speaker 10>they're going to replace this medicine. You only have to

0:15:44.570 --> 0:15:47.950
<v Speaker 10>look at Pfizer and the struggles that they've had post-pandemic, right,

0:15:47.990 --> 0:15:51.109
<v Speaker 10>when they've lost their covid vaccines and their covid treatments

0:15:51.150 --> 0:15:52.150
<v Speaker 10>they just do not want.

0:15:52.030 --> 0:15:54.850
<v Speaker 2>To do that stay with us more from bloomberg intelligence

0:15:54.890 --> 0:15:56.050
<v Speaker 2>coming up after.

0:15:55.890 --> 0:16:03.270
<v Speaker 5>This you're listening to the bloomberg intelligence podcast catch us

0:16:03.390 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 5>live weekdays at 10 a.m eastern on apple carplay and

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.780
<v Speaker 5>android auto with the bloomberg business app listen on demand

0:16:09.820 --> 0:16:12.900
<v Speaker 5>wherever you get your podcasts or watch us live on.

0:16:12.860 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 8>Youtube merger monday full force here today kkr our friends

0:16:17.540 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 8>over there They are selling USI Insurance Services to Aon

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:28.420
<v Speaker 8>for $ 17 billion, and KKR is set to reap a

0:16:28.420 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 8>$ 3. 3 billion windfall for the deal.

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:31.490
<v Speaker 7>Pretty good for our.

0:16:31.450 --> 0:16:34.410
<v Speaker 8>Friends over there. Matt Palazzolo joins us here, Senior Analyst.

0:16:34.430 --> 0:16:37.270
<v Speaker 8>He covers the property and casualty insurance space. Talk to

0:16:37.310 --> 0:16:40.229
<v Speaker 8>us about what Aon is buying.

0:16:39.970 --> 0:16:40.430
<v Speaker 7>Here for $ 17 billion.

0:16:40.470 --> 0:16:40.570
<v Speaker 6>Yep.

0:16:42.710 --> 0:16:45.910
<v Speaker 12>They are buying another insurance broker. This is not an

0:16:45.930 --> 0:16:50.330
<v Speaker 12>insurance company. USI doesn't take on risk. They're a middleman.

0:16:51.270 --> 0:16:55.550
<v Speaker 12>What's been happening is the big global brokers like Aon

0:16:55.690 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 12>and Marsh, they have historically operated in the large account market,

0:16:59.780 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 12>like Fortune 500 companies. For many years now, they have

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 12>been battling over the middle market in the US and

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 12>trying to grow there. Marsh has an organic way of growing,

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 12>and they do some bolt-on deals. Aon has really done

0:17:13.780 --> 0:17:18.190
<v Speaker 12>it through big deals. So the purpose here for Aon

0:17:18.250 --> 0:17:19.830
<v Speaker 12>is to grow in the U.S.

0:17:20.270 --> 0:17:24.290
<v Speaker 11>Middle market. KKR owned it. I believe they have.

0:17:24.230 --> 0:17:27.410
<v Speaker 12>To monetize these things over time anyway, so I think

0:17:27.430 --> 0:17:28.690
<v Speaker 12>it seemed like a good time for.

0:17:28.609 --> 0:17:29.010
<v Speaker 11>Both of them.

0:17:29.350 --> 0:17:31.340
<v Speaker 8>It says here in Bloomberg News reporting, the sale is

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 8>expected to generate a 3.4 times return. On KKR's balance sheet,

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 8>capital invested pretty solid there.

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.220
<v Speaker 7>So why go after the middle market?

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:43.700
<v Speaker 8>Is the middle market more or less profitable than doing

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:46.050
<v Speaker 8>the corporate, the Fortune 500 type thing?

0:17:46.130 --> 0:17:47.250
<v Speaker 11>It's more profitable.

0:17:47.270 --> 0:17:50.930
<v Speaker 12>The prices are more sticky. So these guys will get paid.

0:17:51.310 --> 0:17:54.070
<v Speaker 12>The brokers will get paid on a commission on the business, right?

0:17:54.530 --> 0:17:56.570
<v Speaker 12>And if you're doing a bigger company, you might get

0:17:56.609 --> 0:17:59.659
<v Speaker 12>paid on a fee. So if they're organizing all of whoever,

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 12>Google's insurance or something, Google's not going to say, look,

0:18:03.310 --> 0:18:05.530
<v Speaker 12>We're going to pay you 10% to 15% of it all.

0:18:05.810 --> 0:18:08.389
<v Speaker 12>We'll pay you a fixed fee. In the middle market,

0:18:08.430 --> 0:18:12.070
<v Speaker 12>there's more commission business, and the prices are more sticky.

0:18:12.510 --> 0:18:14.869
<v Speaker 11>It is more attractive, but it can be smaller.

0:18:15.790 --> 0:18:18.060
<v Speaker 2>It seems like this insurance brokerage business is a pretty

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:19.409
<v Speaker 2>good business.

0:18:19.780 --> 0:18:20.540
<v Speaker 11>It is a good business.

0:18:20.580 --> 0:18:24.220
<v Speaker 12>This is why private equity loves this business. It generates

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:29.619
<v Speaker 12>a lot of cash. They buy these companies. Some of

0:18:29.660 --> 0:18:32.420
<v Speaker 12>the companies they buy continue to roll up smaller companies.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:34.859
<v Speaker 12>They throw off a lot of cash, and then they

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:39.500
<v Speaker 12>can turn around and sell them. The space as a

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.970
<v Speaker 12>whole was trading at peak PE or EV to EBITDA

0:18:43.990 --> 0:18:46.929
<v Speaker 12>multiples over the past couple of years because growth was

0:18:46.990 --> 0:18:49.690
<v Speaker 12>really good. Margin expansion was really good. Those margins have

0:18:49.730 --> 0:18:53.889
<v Speaker 12>come down a significant amount. This deal was still kind

0:18:53.930 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 12>of struck. on an unadjusted basis at those higher levels.

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:02.650
<v Speaker 12>So I think good business, good strategic piece for Aon,

0:19:04.030 --> 0:19:07.109
<v Speaker 12>more compelling strategically than financially, I think, for Aon.

0:19:07.590 --> 0:19:10.270
<v Speaker 8>I used to look around and I said, this insurance

0:19:10.310 --> 0:19:14.050
<v Speaker 8>brokerage business, I was looking at my buddies, solid C

0:19:14.109 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 8>players coming out of school making a boatload of dough

0:19:16.619 --> 0:19:17.700
<v Speaker 8>in the insurance business.

0:19:18.650 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 7>And I remember, that's a good business.

0:19:20.940 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 8>Now, in the investment brokerage business, my business, the competition

0:19:25.619 --> 0:19:29.540
<v Speaker 8>has cut the margins to like nothing practically. You know,

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 8>I used to make three quarters of a bid trading

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:32.959
<v Speaker 8>stocks back in the day.

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 7>Now I get a penny or two. Has that happened

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:35.700
<v Speaker 7>in the insurance business?

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:36.340
<v Speaker 11>It has not.

0:19:36.380 --> 0:19:40.570
<v Speaker 12>So the commissions in this business have been historically pretty resilient.

0:19:41.990 --> 0:19:44.230
<v Speaker 12>I remember back when, you know, I don't want to

0:19:44.250 --> 0:19:46.300
<v Speaker 12>say when the internet, but you know, when the internet

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.090
<v Speaker 12>was becoming kind of wider spread, people thought, okay, this

0:19:49.150 --> 0:19:53.030
<v Speaker 12>is going to democratize. this, uh, process and it's going

0:19:53.050 --> 0:19:53.970
<v Speaker 12>to cut into margins.

0:19:54.010 --> 0:19:54.790
<v Speaker 11>Didn't really do it.

0:19:55.109 --> 0:19:58.490
<v Speaker 12>Um, earlier this year, we had a whole panic about

0:19:58.630 --> 0:20:00.859
<v Speaker 12>AI and AI was going to cut into the broker

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:05.060
<v Speaker 12>margins still to be determined, but I don't think so.

0:20:05.340 --> 0:20:08.460
<v Speaker 8>So why hasn't some kid in the garage come up

0:20:08.500 --> 0:20:14.950
<v Speaker 8>with a cheap way to to price and trade insurance policies,

0:20:14.990 --> 0:20:17.340
<v Speaker 8>just like they have for stocks and bonds?

0:20:17.619 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 11>I mean, it's a good question. I think.

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 12>This is a relationship business, and that's kind of.

0:20:23.500 --> 0:20:27.260
<v Speaker 11>The stock answer. It's a relationship business.

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:29.379
<v Speaker 12>I think it's very complex. I think the way I

0:20:29.420 --> 0:20:32.619
<v Speaker 12>break it down is, think about this. So you have

0:20:32.660 --> 0:20:35.570
<v Speaker 12>your car, you have your house, right? Maybe you're comfortable

0:20:35.590 --> 0:20:37.850
<v Speaker 12>buying your car insurance online, right?

0:20:38.010 --> 0:20:38.109
<v Speaker 6>Yep.

0:20:38.750 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 12>When you have to protect your house, especially your shore house,

0:20:41.859 --> 0:20:45.460
<v Speaker 12>you want to know, am I covered for this? Am

0:20:45.500 --> 0:20:47.340
<v Speaker 12>I not covered for that? Am I covered for wind?

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:49.179
<v Speaker 12>Am I covered for flood? What does it pay in

0:20:49.220 --> 0:20:54.270
<v Speaker 12>these situations? So it's a more complex transaction. Now, scale

0:20:54.310 --> 0:20:57.970
<v Speaker 12>that up to, I'm a corporation. I've got liability.

0:20:58.010 --> 0:20:58.990
<v Speaker 11>I've got this. I've got that.

0:20:59.530 --> 0:21:05.129
<v Speaker 12>So that tech, the kid in the can't duplicate necessarily

0:21:05.390 --> 0:21:07.770
<v Speaker 12>yet that kind of knowledge base.

0:21:07.850 --> 0:21:11.580
<v Speaker 11>So hopefully that makes sense.

0:21:11.630 --> 0:21:15.180
<v Speaker 8>But AI seems like, I mean, again, AI just seems

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 8>to me it's searching around for inefficiencies in the market

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 8>writ large. You know, the securities market's already been squished

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 8>to a penny.

0:21:23.420 --> 0:21:25.940
<v Speaker 11>Agreed. I think so. I think there's two things.

0:21:25.980 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 12>I think, one, if you're a sophisticated risk manager, you

0:21:28.900 --> 0:21:32.470
<v Speaker 12>may be able to use AI to assess your risk

0:21:32.490 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 12>landscape a little bit better than you were in the past.

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 11>So you might need.

0:21:36.140 --> 0:21:38.370
<v Speaker 12>Less of the services from these companies, but I think

0:21:38.380 --> 0:21:39.510
<v Speaker 12>you still need the relationship.

0:21:40.420 --> 0:21:45.220
<v Speaker 5>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:21:45.369 --> 0:21:49.270
<v Speaker 5>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:21:49.270 --> 0:21:54.570
<v Speaker 5>10 a.m. to noon Eastern, on Bloomberg.com, the iHeartRadio app, TuneIn,

0:21:54.730 --> 0:21:57.889
<v Speaker 5>and the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us

0:21:58.010 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 5>live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.