WEBVTT - Musk Launches xAI and Lina Khan Testifies

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>From markhard where Innovation of Money and Power Collie in

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:11.120
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlove.

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm Karene Heidel Bloomberg's world head quarters in New York

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 3>and Ludlow's assignment in Sun Valley. This is Bloomberg Technology

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 3>coming up. Elon Musk launches his competitor to open AI.

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 3>We'll bring you all the details of his sick company

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 3>x AI, and we'll talk big tech regulation. That's his

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 3>FTC Chairlea and it Khan appears before a House Judiciary

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Committee hearing on the oversight of the competition regulator. More ahead. Plus,

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 3>the former CEO of crypto Leender Celsius is arrested, charged

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 3>with fraud and sued by three regulatory agencies over the

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 3>company's collapse. We'll bring you their details, but first let's

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 3>get ahead of these markets once again. We're on the

0:00:58.800 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 3>high note, Abigail do little.

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we have a solid rally here at Caroline and

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 4>for some of the indexes, three to four days in

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 4>a row, big Tech.

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 5>It's best day since the end of June. So the

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 5>tech buyers are out.

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 4>This, of course is the Bloomberg Dollar Index and yields

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 4>are lower. We'll take a look at.

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 5>That in a moment.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 4>But the New York Fang Index pure Megacaptech up one

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 4>point eight percent, one of the big helps alphabet of

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 4>four point nine percent. I was just searching the tape

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 4>right now to see if anything new has come out.

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure that anything new has come out. But

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:29.639
<v Speaker 4>what as on the year into today? We had Google

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 4>up about thirty eight percent on the year, not so shabby,

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 4>but when you compare that to Meta's one hundred and

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 4>sixty percent move on the year, perhaps some investors looking

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 4>up for looking for a potential catchup trade. Amazon also

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 4>up two point two percent, of course, record prime day

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 4>sales numbers. As for one of the big drivers, again,

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 4>the Bloomberg Dollar Index down for a fourth or fifth

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 4>day in a row, the longest losing.

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 5>Streak of the year. But take a look at the

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 5>two year yield.

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 4>It is over the last week down thirty four basis points.

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Again on that cooler CPI and then the PPI print today,

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 4>inflation concerns are.

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 5>Fading, so that means that valuation.

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Concerns on big tech stocks with yields down also fading

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 4>and maybe the idea that the FED is going to

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 4>stop its hiking cycle sooner rather than earlier anticipated. One

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 4>thing I will point out, though, Caroline, there is still

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 4>the possibility that big tech could get volatile. If you

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 4>take a look at the vix relative to the Vixen,

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 4>there is.

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 5>A six point spread.

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 4>So investors still worried about tech at some point over

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 4>the next three months, but just not right now.

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 5>And then finally, Meta.

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 4>Over the last four days surging today of course the

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 4>announcement or the idea, the ft report that they may

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 4>be planning to commercialize their AI product to compete, of

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 4>course with both Apple or excuse me, Microsoft and Alphabet

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 4>and that on top.

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 5>Of threads in the year of efficiency.

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 4>Well again, Caroline, Meta on the year up about one

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 4>hundred and sixty percent.

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Phenomenal outperformance a migail, thank you so much. Well, let's

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 3>talk about who else is looking into the world as

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 3>AI at the moment. Edel Musk taking to Twitter spaces

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 3>to discuss the launch of his CHATCHBD rival Xai hamm'ing

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 3>last night. He says, a company's mission is to understand

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 3>the true nature of the universe.

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 6>Prominent safety standpoint I think a maximumly curious AI one

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 6>is that that is trying to sort of understand the universe.

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 6>Is I think going to be pro humanity from the

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 6>standpoint that humanity is just much more interesting than my humanity.

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.839
<v Speaker 3>Joining us for more. Ed Ludlow out there in sun

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Valley where I'm pretty sure this is a hot topic.

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 7>It's a hot topic, and XAI was a hot topic

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 7>in the last twenty four hours understand the true nature

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 7>of the universe. And I've spoken to so many sources

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 7>in the AI industry here on the phone. They don't

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 7>really know what it is that they're building, right. Is

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 7>this a company that's building a foundation model or large

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 7>language model like Inflection AI did separate to Open AI

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 7>in GPT three point five, or are they doing something

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 7>kind of more niche or specific in the field of

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 7>machine learning. What we know is they're hiring in the

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 7>Bay Area and they've assembled this all male roster of

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 7>tenured Google DeepMind researchers and also some pretty key names

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 7>from academia in Canada.

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I think it is being a charge notable,

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 3>as you say, at the moment, not a particularly diverse

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 3>set of people, but certainly with a wealth of experience

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 3>for across private markets and indeed from academia. As you say, ultimately,

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 3>he said for months that he wants to perhaps bring

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 3>some sort of competition to open ai. He's been frustrated

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 3>by the team with Microsoft. He's worried about it's for

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 3>profit nature after he stood down for the board in

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty eighteen. But what ultimately does he want out of this?

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 3>I remember what was it back in March he was saying,

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 3>hold on, we need to put a pause for six months,

0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 3>and then he's actually busily building himself.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 7>So spoke about this exact issue of read Hoffmann yesterday.

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 7>You know, he acknowledged that open AI's origins are all

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 7>directly tied to Elon Musk. He was an early investor,

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 7>he was in on that initiative. But the way that

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 7>read Hoffman put it, Carrie said, I'm askance at the

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 7>idea that this is somebody who signed that pause petition

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 7>and yet in the interim carried on with his own

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 7>efforts in the field of AI. It doesn't really add up.

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 7>We know his concerns are sort of existential. Still working

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 7>on it.

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 3>He is, and you're still working on staying with us

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 3>for a moment ed hold type because we're going to

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 3>join the conversation now with Gerbert Kawasaki, President and CEO

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Ross Gerber, who, of course, you were an investor in Twitter,

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:49.239
<v Speaker 3>You became an investor in the what when Twitter went private?

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.559
<v Speaker 3>You stuck with it. It of course was folded into

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 3>the now parent company x and now we have the

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 3>birth of Xai. Look, given your expertise within Tesla as

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 3>well and a firm commitment to that company. Is he

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 3>too busy? Is Elon Musk now a sixth company he's leading?

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, yes and no.

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 1>I think that of course Elon's been too busy for

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a decade now and somehow has survived. And I think

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these projects he spearheads and puts a

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of like sort of initial inertia into and then

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>he turns him over to really competent leadership and he

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>builds great teams of engineers that we know he's good at.

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>And that's what he's doing with Xai. And I don't

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>think he's really quite sure yet what it will be.

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of the genius of Musk, is you know,

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 1>he kind of builds these teams with a general goal.

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>But the what will come out of this, I'm sure

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>he has no idea yet, but it'll be probably pretty interesting.

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 7>Russ was the idea of XAI in the incorporation documents

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 7>for ex scoop at the time you invested, No, I

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 7>mean that.

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>That so they kind of said, you know, there's a

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>lot we don't know he will do within this structure,

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, but it's really about acquiring Twitter.

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 2>But I think if you really understand Elon, he always.

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Sees things way further than that I do, as far

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>as like the way he sees the future. And Twitter

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>is just a wonderful source of data to build an

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>AI company around, don't you think so? I think, you know,

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>there is a grand vision of He's got the data,

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's why he's protecting it so much with the

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>limiting of the scraping of the data from Twitter, as

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to protect his data because he knows it's

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>super valuable.

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Twitter data is way more valuable than metadata, you know.

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Metadata, you know, is much more personal about people, and

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter data is really all about the world.

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 2>So if you're worried about humanity and sort of bigger issues.

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Elon, you know, is building something that could

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>be incredible as always.

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 7>Really, When the x Ai Twitter handle tweeted you know,

0:07:56.360 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 7>questions to its following, I replied saying, how many the

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 7>h one hundreds do you have in reference to Nvidia's

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 7>most powerful GPU related to building of lms and the

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 7>inference side. Lots of people replied and said, what are

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 7>you talking about? Elon's got Dojo, So what's your interpretation

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 7>of the read through between Xai and the work that

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 7>Tesla's done historically in machine learning neural networks?

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I'm not really an engineer. I'm not

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>an engineer. In fact, I feared these passes in school.

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>So my understanding of it is, if you're going to

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>build AI quickly, you need in video chips because they're

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>scaling chips that are crucial to this. And Tesla has

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>their own AI chips and they're building autonomy around them

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:48.959
<v Speaker 1>and they design their own ships, and then they have Dojo,

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>which is really like a training mechanism, which would really

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 1>speed up the process of learning through this AI mechanism.

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>But I don't see any way around them buying Mattoman

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>video chips is really the hugest winner in the AI

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>revolution being, you know, the brains behind AI and the.

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:10.559
<v Speaker 2>Hardware brains, So I think that it doesn't really matter.

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 2>You know. The Nvidia and.

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>The Tesla chips are kind of similar, I think, in

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways, and they.

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Serve the same purposes.

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>But Tesla designs its own ships and designed its own training,

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and that is something that people should pay very close

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>attention to, because this is really Elon's expertise. Actually, he's

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>not going into something he you know, like out of

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>his range, like Twitter, you know. So I'm very bullish

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 1>on this, you know, And of course I think he's

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the right person.

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 3>There is a different leader for Twitter now, Ladie Acarino

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 3>as a CEO. But I'm interested more broadly on the

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 3>return on investment that we're likely to be getting from this,

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 3>and ultimately, this is a lot of the time. When

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 3>he bought Twitter, it was about more than just the

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 3>of course, the profitability and the rewards there. It was

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 3>about building something he thought were ultimately be better for humanity.

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 3>So is SpaceX to a large extent now we see

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 3>it with XAI. How much you pay attention to some

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 3>of the concerns he ultimately has around AI's risks, of course,

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 3>he's got the Center for AI Safety on board as

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 3>an overseer of this new venture.

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 1>I think his concerns are very legitimate, and I'm really

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>happy he's bringing them up very early in the process

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of this technology, because if somebody would have done this

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>during the development of social media, it might have prevented

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the mass amount of harm that Facebook and Instagram and

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>other social media's that's caused our youth, for example. And

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>so the fact that he's stepping on early and saying

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>we do need to look at the guardrails around this

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>because the opportunity for abuse, misinformation, and then ultimately bad

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>outcomes from AI are a possibility. And so I think

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>his focus on this early on is actually a great thing.

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think he's in a position where he can

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>build a company with very long term focus because it's

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a privately held company with investors like myself who really

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 1>don't care about the short term at all.

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, he's really in the right position to execute US.

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 3>I remember when you joined US, I believe to really

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 3>vent some frustration about leadership at Tesla distraction concern. You

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 3>are so concerned about it, you were wanting to help

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 3>take a board seat to help drive this company forward.

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 3>What changes now with the birth of you at another company?

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:32.959
<v Speaker 3>You say, he's been too busy for about a decade,

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 3>But what gets sacrificed here as an investor in his

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 3>other companies.

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, two things.

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 1>One, he did find a CEO for Twitter, and all

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the things I was pushing for have happened now, from

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>advertising to secession planning and changes of the board.

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 2>And we've seen the stock recover.

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's been a hugely successful campaign economically for me

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and my clients and for Tesla's shareholders.

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 2>So I've been really happy about that.

0:11:56.120 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't look at XAI as like such a distraction Twitter,

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>because with Twitter he was really like getting killed every day.

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 2>He still gets killed.

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Every day with half his decisions and just his whole

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>thing on Twitter has been I think somewhat detrimental, if

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>not very detrimental to his image. But like when you

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>look at doing an AI company, that's like right up

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>as Alley, and he's most competent and capable of leading

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a team in this area without really distracting him. And

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of ancillary benefits that Tesla and his shareholders

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>will get from this development versus Twitter, where I think

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the risk reward was much worse for the Tesla shareholders

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>for sure.

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 7>Ross also in the news cycle Activision Microsoft. You are

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 7>an Activision shareholder the merger of say that the chance

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 7>of this deal going ahead eighty to eighty five percent.

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 7>The FTC filed it's appeal last night. What do you

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 7>see is the chances of this deal going through?

0:12:58.520 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 2>We'll just with pull this.

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>We sold most of our Activision in the last two

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>days after the FTC decision at over around ninety dollars

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a share er above. We felt the risk reward of

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>just more time. It's a cash heel at ninety five,

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>so we've moved on. So just out of disclosure. So

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 1>I do think the FTC is going to lose again.

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Linda Kon and FTC have way overstepped their bounds, taking

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 1>very weak cases to court to hurt competition in in

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in gaming.

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 2>They hurt competition, They weren't helping at all, and.

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think, you know, the FDC needs to really

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>reconsider what their purpose is because we're a capitalistic you know,

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>society and businesses by other businesses, So they need to

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>find better cases, and there are plenty of good cases

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>they can jump in on.

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 2>How about the live golf PGA situation. Where's the FTC there?

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>They should be blocking that one hundred percent, so you know,

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they should need to focus on something a little bit

0:13:58.520 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>more meaningful.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 3>We're going to let you get back to some well

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 3>earned golf playing now, it seems for us because you're

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.719
<v Speaker 3>on vacation and you came on just for us in California.

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 3>We thank you very much. In Degaba Kawasaki president and

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 3>CEO Ros Gerbert and our very own ed LaAlO who

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 3>is not on vocation, but he's out there in some

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 3>valley working extremely hard for us, and we're going back

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 3>to him in a minute. Thank you both. Huawei and

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 3>it's disclosing for the first time it's annual income from

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 3>its patent licensing deals, showing the company is making in

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 3>well more than five hundred sixty million dollars last year

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 3>from the part of the business. After of course, this

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 3>business model of old was kind of upended by US

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 3>sanctions of the Chinese tech player joining us now to

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 3>see how this galvanizes growth of the future. Stephen guisles

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 3>with us. He's the US Chief Intellectual Property Council at Huawei.

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 3>As long as Anni Perdy, He's Huawei USA Cso, gentlemen,

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 3>both great to have you, Stephen. Just a lot of patents,

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 3>thousands that Huawei has. How do you ultimately look to

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 3>monetize all of this? You've been launching this licensing website

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 3>as well, just in the last few days, you're providing

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:07.479
<v Speaker 3>details of how you're going to have bilateral licensing programs.

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Would you sell to Apple and the like? Even within

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 3>these sanctions? How these sorts of conversations go with big

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 3>tech giants.

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 8>Well, So, regardless of Huawei sales, our patent portfolio covers

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 8>many of the telecommunications products globally. So, for instance, in

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 8>five G alone, we own approximately twenty percent of all

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 8>standard essential patents globally for five G. So where our

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 8>competitors or other marketing entrants are using five G technology,

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 8>they would need to pay for a license from Huawei.

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 8>We're not, though, primarily concerned with monetizing making revenue.

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 9>In fact, one.

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 8>Of the drivers of releasing the number five hundred and

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 8>sixty million dollars in revenue last year from patent licensing

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 8>was to show that, in the grand scheme of things

0:15:56.120 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 8>within Huawei, that patent licensing is not our business emphasis. Certainly,

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 8>my team, we're proud of the work that we've done

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 8>globally in licensing, and for two years straight we've been

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 8>positive in patent licensing. But Huawei certainly is a product

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 8>and services company. So this is transparency to allow people

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 8>to see within context that it still is the productization

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 8>that Huawei is driving for Andy.

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Therefore, hol must define what Huawei is now because in

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 3>many ways you have pivoted. You were survival mode now

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 3>it's more focused on B to B. How do you

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 3>summarize really what Huawei stands for now.

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 10>Well, we are now at a new normal phase of

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 10>the evolution of this company. The context is there's technologies converging,

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 10>five G software, cloud centered technologies, artificial intelligence, all these

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 10>things are converging. So our strategy with an incredible investment

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 10>in R and D. We now have one hundred and

0:16:57.880 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 10>fourteen thousand people in R and D out of our

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 10>two hundred and eight thousand dollars two hundred and eight

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 10>thousand employee mixture. So we've been adjusting our portfolios to

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.439
<v Speaker 10>bring value to the network carriers, the enterprises, to the consumers,

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 10>embracing the key trends of digitalization, intelligence, and carbon neutrality,

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 10>helping to reduce the carbon footprint. So we are a

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 10>company about connecting the world, about bringing technology to every home,

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 10>every company, every organization, and frankly, it's really exciting to

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 10>be a member of this an employee.

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:26.959
<v Speaker 9>Of this company.

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Money is hard, and you know this while having worked

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 3>with the White House prior to Huawei to do this,

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 3>while navigating such sanctions. Do you ever see a world

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 3>in which that will be alleviated in this currency of

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 3>political environment.

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 10>Well, there's an awful lot of countries in the world

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 10>that are eager to do business with us, and thousands

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 10>of companies to partner with us. And in fact, when

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 10>you look at the world, we have formed digitalization partnerships

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.199
<v Speaker 10>and Global Fortune five hundred companies with two hundred and

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 10>sixty seven of the Global Fortune five hundred and seven

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 10>hundred cities. So we're not so can learn about what

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 10>we can't do. We're excited about what we can do

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 10>and how we're bringing the technology to the world, including

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 10>five point five G and including our pangu ai and

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 10>AI for industry approach, which is I think going to

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 10>generate quite a bit of revenue.

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I like that you went to the AI. How

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 3>much focus is there on AII P at the moment.

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 8>Stephen, Well, I'll defer to Andy on the on the AI.

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So our company looks at the larger world where

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 10>the future of computing is everywhere. There's going to be

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 10>an intelligent world. There's going to be Internet of everything,

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 10>and five G and increasingly five point G are going

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.199
<v Speaker 10>to help bring that about. We think artificial intelligence is

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 10>going to rewrite everything, and so our lead for Huawei Cloud,

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 10>for example, Zang Ping Ghan has said the Pegu model

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 10>of AI is not about writing poetry. It's not generative

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 10>AI like the most publicity and these models. The Pangu

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 10>model empowers every industry with in effect an intelligent system

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 10>to make them more productive, more efficient in a real

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 10>learning environment. Frankly, when we look at the future, we

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 10>believe Ken who our vice chairman, has said that when

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 10>you look at AI, generally ninety eight percent of AI

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 10>will be industry in some agriculture and only two percent

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 10>will be consumer. So hopefully the United States is going

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 10>to really get all in about the benefits of digitalization

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 10>and transformation.

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Certainly, so it feels that way when in terms of

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 3>the level of conversation we have here on the show

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 3>about AI in the US. We want to thank you

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 3>both Stephen Guyser of course US Chief Intellectual Property Council

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 3>at Huawei and Annie Perdi Huawei USA CSO. And while

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 3>coming up, No, we're talking about FTC Charley in a

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Khan just with Roscerber a moment ago. Well, in fact,

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 3>she's up in the House of the moment testifying for them.

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 3>We'll have all of the details. Next, this is Blomberg.

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Senator Elizabeth Warren says she applauds the FTC for trying

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 3>to take on Microsoft and its merger with Activision Blizzard.

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Is what she had to say on Bloemberg's balance of

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 3>power last night.

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 11>The merger itself is not legal, but we have an

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:18.360
<v Speaker 11>opinion from the judge. I want to commend the FTC

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 11>for taking on hard cases, taking on big companies, taking

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 11>on cases that in the past off and just slid through,

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 11>but that are clear violations of the law. I applaud

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 11>what the FTC has done and I say stay after it.

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, underway, the FTC Charley and Khanna is currently testifying

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 3>before the House Committee on the Judiciary on Oversight. In fact, well,

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 3>let's get to Blueos Katie Lyones, who was busy conducting

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 3>that interview with Senator Warren, and well, she's a Democrat,

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 3>and she speaks highly of a Democrat led FTC at

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 3>the moment, but it's kind of partizan and certainly that

0:20:57.240 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 3>committee that Lena Khan's in front of at the moment

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 3>is an embdem of that.

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, exactly right, Caroline. I just returned from Capitol Hill.

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 12>I was standing outside that hearing room, and Democrats I

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 12>spoke with, like Senator Elizabeth Warren, did have kind words

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 12>for the FTC Chair Republicans, though not so much in

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 12>the hearing room. Chair con has been accused of being

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 12>a bully, of her leadership being a disaster and outside

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 12>of it. And I spoke to several Republican members who

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 12>sit on the committee who suggested that she's an ideologue,

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 12>politicized and that her losing record shows that she's pursuing

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 12>cases that don't actually have the law on their side.

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 12>A lot of criticism of her leadership of the FTC

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 12>and the degree to which she has pushed this kind

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 12>of anti competition agenda. To summarize their words, I would

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:42.920
<v Speaker 12>note also that this is coming as she is trying

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 12>to fight the fight on the Microsoft Activision Blizzard deal.

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 12>Of course, as Senator Warren was just speaking with us

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 12>about last night, the idea that the judge ruled against her.

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 12>In that case, the FTC does plan to appeal. When

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 12>I saw chair Con walking into the hearing room earlier,

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 12>I asked her why she was appealing if she thought

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 12>that appeal would be successful. She didn't answer either of

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 12>those questions.

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Caroline, she's answering questions now, Kayleie lyons. I'm sure we'll

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 3>be there putting more to her very soon. We really

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 3>appreciate the time. Thank you. Welcome back to Blue Meg Technology.

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm Karen hid in New York. Quick check on the

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 3>markets for you. Because we are higher. We are higher

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 3>because inflation is cooling. We only had some CPI yesterday.

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 3>We get PPI today and it adds some fuel to

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 3>the Nasdaq one hundred, Big Tech on top. We're see

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 3>the two year yields just chrishnd no lower at the moment.

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 3>That's the opposite way of saying it. I should say

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 3>spiral lower by some thirteen basis points. At the moment,

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 3>four spot sixty one is where we trade. We're seeing

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 3>Bitcoin actually getting a bit as well as the dollar

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 3>goes lower, up one point eight percent. Still have that

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 3>thirty thousand or thereabouts level. Moving on and go to

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:49.400
<v Speaker 3>some individual names, because boy, Amazon Prime Day and days

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 3>as it was did well. We're up more than two

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 3>percent for Amazon, and we're seeing Alphabet actually getting a

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 3>bye well a higher price target at least for Morgan

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Stanley up more than four and a half percent on

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 3>the day. Is once again see to be the moon

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 3>music around Bard. It's Ai really managing to win some

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 3>hearts and minds there. We're also seeing continued focus from

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 3>the business on well where it now managers is all

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 3>of this, We're seeing the Golden Dragon China Index. This

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 3>is the NASDAK Golden Dragon up almost well two percent.

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 11>Now.

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 3>We're seeing China once again committing to well stop punishing

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 3>their tech sector instead start supporting them. It seems to

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 3>be the read across the investor market right now. We're

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 3>currently up two percent on some of those big publicly

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 3>traded Chinese companies that trade here in the US. Meanwhile,

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 3>let's talk a little bit of what sels is happening

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 3>in the US and a bit of a crackdown on

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 3>crypto still. The former chief executive of the bankrupt crypto

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 3>lender Celsius rested today charged with fraud in addition to

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.959
<v Speaker 3>being sued by three regulatory agencies over the company's collapse.

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Places say Bloemberg's Adson Investoral is joining us for more

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 3>and will we anticipating this?

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 13>You know, we knew that the investigations were ongoing, and

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 13>last week actually I had reported that the CFTC you know,

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 13>had their investigators had determined that Alex Mishinski and Celcius

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 13>had broken their rules and that basically the commissioners were

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.360
<v Speaker 13>just going to take a vote if they agreed, And

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:10.360
<v Speaker 13>we knew SEC and SD and Y we're also looking

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 13>at this, so a little bit anticipated, but you know,

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 13>it's always uh, you know, we don't know until we know.

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 3>What is the read across Now because we have, i mean,

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 3>ultimately in some bitcoin prices we stabilized, it feels as

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 3>though the noise the storm has started to dial down,

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 3>even though of course we have the SEC really focused

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 3>on some of the key big crypto players here in

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 3>the United States. But what does this ultimate focus on

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 3>the demise of Celsius mean for the rest of the sector.

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:40.239
<v Speaker 13>You know, I think it means that we're going to

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 13>continue seeing these sort of enforcement actions, you know, specifically

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 13>for companies that were part of the turmoil last year.

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 13>You know, we've now seen criminal charges against executives at

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 13>Terraform Labs, which was the issuer of that terror USD

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 13>stable coin that collapsed last May. We've seen criminal charges

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:00.479
<v Speaker 13>brought against Sam Bankman freed of FTX, and so now

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 13>these Celsius charges. You know, it's all pointing to the

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 13>fact that we can expect there to be a lot

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 13>of enforcement going forward.

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 3>And to a point, I mean, just run us through

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 3>exactly what is being alleged of Alex because I think

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 3>the fact that maybe he was not playing as many

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 3>others would wanted him to is kind of key for

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 3>the crypto ecosystem as well to show that there was

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 3>wrongdoing involved here.

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 13>So there are slew of allegations, as you mentioned, there

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 13>are three regular later lawsuits in addition to these criminal charges.

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 5>But at the core of.

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 13>It, it's basically that they're alleging that he lied about

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 13>the financial success of the company, including the amount that

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 13>the company raised in its initial coin offering. They're alleging that,

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 13>you know, the firm was placing risky bets and then

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 13>not disclosing that to investors that they were manipulating the

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 13>price of the of Celsius's native token CEL. So it's

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 13>a lot of misleading customers, misleading and there's that sort

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 13>of vibe. And we also know that there are criminal

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 13>charges brought against another as Sociates executive, the former chief

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 13>revenue officer. So you know it's not just Mashinski here.

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 3>We will follow it. Sivers Film, thank you so much

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 3>for bringing us up to speed in the latest. Meanwhile,

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 3>we want to take a hard turn here and think

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 3>about an area of focus when it comes to black

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 3>technologists and entrepreneurs and vcs. Because Black Tech Week starts

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 3>on Tuesday and it's in Cincinnati now, connecting CEOs and

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 3>investors to rising black entrepreneurs. Back by headlines like I

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 3>siray if she isn't busy on the Barbie tour, Black

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Tech Week aims to really bridge the gap between minority

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 3>communities in the tech and business world. Joining us sound

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 3>really policed to say, is like hip CEO Cannis Matthews

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 3>and also Bracken as well, and who also is running

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 3>this event and who's going to be involved in it.

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Revolt CEO Data Avio Samuels and both of you. Welcome

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 3>Candice to you first. You brought this from originally, I

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 3>think it was born in Miami, Florida. You've ordered Cincinnati.

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 14>Why, oh, think about all the Fortune one hundred companies

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 14>in Cincinnati. It's a great place to connect black entrepreneurs

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:16.400
<v Speaker 14>to enterprise contracts. And that's what we did our first

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 14>year and we'll continue to do that. I think you

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 14>probably know that one percent of the US GDP is

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 14>invested into venture capital. Yet venture capital accounts for like

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 14>this fifty seven percent of the US market cap.

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 5>We want to make.

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 14>Certain that black founders are involved with that, and Cincinnati

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 14>is the right place to do it.

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's talk about an entrepreneur leader, a business leader,

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 3>and in fact someone that many I'm sure will want

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 3>to emulate. Just did have you your your background, the

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:45.640
<v Speaker 3>fact that you were, by the age of twenty five

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 3>already got a Bao duke. You're then at Stanford getting

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 3>your MBA, You're now leading one of the fastest growing

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.360
<v Speaker 3>media companies out there. And I'm interested as to what

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 3>you want to be able to speak about. Talk about

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 3>c and Shine a light on because many might feel that, well,

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 3>you're to replicate.

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, the notion about me being hard to replicate always

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 15>breaks my heart because I believe that in order for

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 15>black people to succeed, it can't be that you have

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.479
<v Speaker 15>to have the perfect background, right, it can't be that

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 15>you have to go to Duke University in Stanford University

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 15>in order to make it.

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 9>Well.

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 15>I'm hopeful and excited to talk about while in Cincinnati

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 15>at Black Tech Week is this notion of the importance

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 15>of black people owning and controlling our own narrative. Black

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 15>people across the world have had a perception issue, which

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:32.920
<v Speaker 15>I think absolutely contributes to the policy issues that we have.

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 15>And those perception issues are driven by the stories and

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 15>the negative stories that have plagued us for hundreds of years.

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 15>And so if you want to change the perception, you

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 15>have to change the story. If you want to change

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 15>the story, you have to change the storytellers. And so

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 15>I'm excited to have a conversation about the importance of

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 15>changing the story, changing the narrative. How we can do

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 15>it in businesses like mine, of course, but in tech,

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 15>what are the stories we're telling within the tech industry space.

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 15>What are the stories that we're telling in our marketing,

0:28:58.120 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 15>even just the way that we show up as tech

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 15>leaders entrepreneurs.

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 9>That's the conversation. I'm excited there.

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 3>And that's exactly why Shawan Diddy Combs set up Revolt

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 3>and you now lead it. Can is I'm interested in. Therefore,

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 3>the perception, many would say, the perception of this economy

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 3>is one that is slowing, that one where vcs go

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 3>back to backing entrepreneurs they know, understand and have already

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 3>proved successful, That banks lend to people that look like

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 3>them that fear, and ultimately that it's the women, the minorities,

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 3>the people who are new to entrepreneurship and VC that suffer.

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Is that something you're seeing or is that just a

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 3>wrong perception.

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 2>That's just the wrong perception.

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 14>If we can invent a narrative, we can reinvent it

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 14>a narrative. And so the entire week next week, you're

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 14>going to see amazing founders who are growing big things.

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 14>I mean, look, Procter and Gamble just acquired a company

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 14>from a black founder, Monti Rodriguez from Mayel. She's built

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 14>an amazing, amazing business that will be a one billion

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 14>dollar brand. Soon, and so eg Xitavio said, it's just

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 14>time to make certain that people under stand that this

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 14>is available, that these founders are out there, and really,

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:06.959
<v Speaker 14>if they're not looking, they're missing out in an opportunity

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 14>of a lifetime.

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Datavia. Of course, many would at the moment be wanting

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 3>to see a commitment, whether it be from big companies

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 3>continuing to put money into diversity to ensure that we

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:24.239
<v Speaker 3>get diversity at the founding of companies when indeed, when

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing the building blocks of AI at the moment

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 3>everyone's discussing artificial intelligence, worried about the bias they're in

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 3>ensuring that there are diverse voices at the very top

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 3>of these companies. How are you seeing the landscape change

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 3>as you go throughout your leadership of a business. How

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 3>do you how does it drive you as a leader

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 3>of color at the moment.

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I think that I think that we're all here

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 15>for a very specific reason. Right when you look at

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 15>the unfortunate murder of George Floyd, without question and my industry,

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 15>it sparks noise. It made people want to behave differently.

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 15>That's where we see advertisers and brands start to come

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 15>out with these commitments about growing black on media, and

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 15>if you think about what it took to make that happen,

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 15>like you literally had to have a man murdered for

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 15>nine minutes, the whole world had to be shut down

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 15>to be able to watch it in order for people

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 15>to then have that desire and that momentum to create change.

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 15>And so my belief and what I say all the

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 15>time is we are the people who are here for

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 15>a reason. Whether you're sitting in my seat, or candidscy

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 15>or you're the CMO of PNG McDonald's Google, I don't

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 15>care what it is. We are all here in this

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 15>very specific moment in time for a very specific reason,

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 15>and it is up to us to create change, to

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 15>shift the algorithm.

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 9>And my opinion for all oppressed people.

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 15>Of course, I'm leading a charge and a revolution to

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 15>fight for black leaders, black community, black culture, and black storytellers.

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 15>But I think this is a moment where we all

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 15>need to look around and say it is the job

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 15>of the oppressed to be on the side of the oppressed.

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 15>How do we fix the world and change the world

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 15>going forward?

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Da Javier has that got harder given the economy, given

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 3>people's ability to put money between behind marketing and advertising.

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 15>For you at the moment out question, I mean, I

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 15>think the last two years, you know, we can always

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 15>brag about the growth of Revolt has had.

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 9>We always talk about how are.

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 15>The fastest growing black owned media company in the world.

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 15>Right now, that said, you can absolutely feel the momentum

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 15>start to slow, even if you weren't looking at the

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 15>momentum slowing. What I would say is, you know, right

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 15>now REVOLDA is probably doing work with you know, one hundred,

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 15>two hundred and fifty of the top five Fortune five hundred.

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 9>Where are the other three fifty? Right?

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 15>When this thing first happened, the the the data that

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 15>was out there was saying that black on media is

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 15>one percent of the total industry.

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 9>That was in twenty twenty.

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 15>Well, od Ages just reached the report that says even

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 15>after doubling the industry over the last two years, we're

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 15>just now getting to one percent. And so we're still

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 15>very much in this challenge where black folks and black

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 15>on media are getting kinneys, and the energy around fueling

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 15>the dreams of transforming the media landscape by fueling black

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 15>on media is getting is getting smaller.

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned the cool say the discussion around Black Tech

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Week the amount of fortune five hundred executives or focus

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 3>that there is on your community at the moment, Candae, Well,

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 3>within that fortune five hundred, less than a percentage of

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 3>it are CEOs who are people of color and I'm

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 3>into or at least black. I'm interested in your perspective, Candice,

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:21.479
<v Speaker 3>and whether what you want people who've come to your

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 3>event to take away what key points If I'm a

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 3>budding entrepreneur who wants to continue to and drive this change,

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 3>what two or three things can I go away and

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 3>do to easily start to bring about change from myself?

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean we are the change.

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 2>We don't staff regardless.

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 14>I mean Tope from Calendly bootstrapped his business to the

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 14>point where then people noticed what he was doing. We've

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 14>got Dlally from Fearless in Baltimbore, who's bootstp wrapped his

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 14>business to a billion dollar valuation. And so we're going

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 14>to keep pushing and we're going to keep doing It

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 14>is harder, and that is unfortunate, but we are and

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 14>people are taking notice that interreasing coming in to look

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 14>at companies, capitalized drive kpor, new voices, our own fund Lightship.

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 3>Capital, which is remind us fifty million.

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 14>Meat, Yeah, we have a fifty million dollar fund.

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and that's been committed at the moment.

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 5>That's right.

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Come to us when you've got some checks to talk

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:22.760
<v Speaker 3>about as well, and the companies you're backing. In the meantime,

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 3>we wish you were a very good week.

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely.

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Lightship founder and CEO Can thank you very mean and

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Revolt CEO Datavio Samuel thank you both very much. Indeed. Meanwhile,

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 3>coming up, look, we're going to be looking at that

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 3>VC Outlook, we're just talking about a sixteen Z about Lighthouse.

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 3>What about the VC pulse right now? Carl Stamford, lead

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 3>VC analyst at Pitchbook, I'm afraid it's not pretty for

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 3>Q two. This's a Bloomberg pitchbook out with this latter

0:34:57.360 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 3>support on the health of the VC world and the

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:02.879
<v Speaker 3>result el that's somewhat mixed. Let's bring in Pitchbook lead

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 3>VC analyst Kyle Stamford for Today's VC Spotlight and Carl,

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 3>I mean I say mixed. They're pretty ugly. Actually, if

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 3>you're continuing to look at Q.

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 16>Two, yeah, I mean, unsurprisingly, VC stayed pretty pretty.

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 9>You know, tepid.

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:18.879
<v Speaker 16>In Q two we had deal count kind of level

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 16>off around four thousand deals, which I should mention is

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:25.280
<v Speaker 16>above any quarter before twenty twenty one. But deal value

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 16>is still really low.

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:30.319
<v Speaker 16>It's getting pushed up by Open AI and pushed up

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 16>by Strip Steel this year, but excess look really really dismal. Obviously,

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 16>the public market has not opened up yet for VC

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.359
<v Speaker 16>backed companies M and A is still really low as well.

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 16>Obviously with you know, the FTC, you know, still making

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 16>sure that they are putting pressure on the M and

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 16>A market, we haven't seen much movement there either.

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Can you break it down geographically a little bit for

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 3>US as well, Kyle, because often on this show we're

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:58.320
<v Speaker 3>trying to represent that, Look, technology is being built everywhere,

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 3>technology is being backed everywhere. But look, really Europe and

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Asia in particular seem to have a mark slowdown.

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:07.839
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, that's right.

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 16>I mean, I think when you're comparing the US versus

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 16>some of the other markets, US is much more developed,

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:15.720
<v Speaker 16>there's much more there's a larger group of large investors

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 16>that are able to really push up that deal value.

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:20.800
<v Speaker 16>So it's gonna look a little less of a dampened

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:23.400
<v Speaker 16>market than when you look at Europe or in Asia

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:26.280
<v Speaker 16>Asia two as well. China obviously having a very difficult

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 16>time with their BC market. There's been a lot of

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 16>tensions between the US and the Chinese governments, which is

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 16>pressuring the market.

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:33.319
<v Speaker 17>There as well.

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 16>So you know, US has stayed relatively strong compared to

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 16>the other markets around the world, but still still dampened.

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Here and other particular rays of light. I felt like

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 3>everyone was really rather hanging the hat and AI would

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 3>come to save the day in terms of the startups

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 3>that are getting backed. Is that something you see in

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:50.240
<v Speaker 3>the numbers?

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, right, well, I think it's a little more. You know,

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 16>it's a little different than that, right generator. AI obviously

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 16>getting a lot of attention right now, getting a lot

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 16>of investment as a subsector of AI that is seen,

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:04.879
<v Speaker 16>you know, an increase over what we would have seen

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:07.320
<v Speaker 16>in twenty twenty two or twenty twenty one, but AI

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 16>in general is not gonna pull back. The venture market overall.

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:13.919
<v Speaker 16>The investment indu AI is lower than what we saw

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:17.800
<v Speaker 16>in twenty twenty one as a broader market, so everywhere

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 16>we look, venture is a little bit slower than it

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 16>was in twenty twenty two, which is much slower than twenty.

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Twenty one, and of course that IPO market is firmly

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 3>shot for the time being unless you're a salad based

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 3>company or perhaps some energy drink that worn deed, a

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 3>water company if it's called liquid death, I think is

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:36.240
<v Speaker 3>at some point looking at an IPO in twenty twenty

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 3>four it seems to be the news. But second, I

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 3>mean exits limited, if any.

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 9>Very limited.

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 16>Right, we're still at about twelve billion in exit value

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 16>generated this year. You know, the record of twenty twenty

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 16>one was about seven hundred and seventy five billion, So

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 16>right there you can see how much lower that market is.

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 16>You know, that's seventy seven seventy seven and a half

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 16>billion dollars. A lot of the eighty six percent was right.

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 16>Cava obviously was a nice exit for VC, but it's

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 16>not a tech company, and so it's not gonna bring

0:38:06.719 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 16>back the IPO marketing and material way. We're still looking

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 16>for those s ones to be filed, you know again, yeah, again,

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 16>if you're a salad company or if you're a liquid

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:19.359
<v Speaker 16>death water company, you've made that move, but we haven't

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 16>seen any material movement from the tech companies yet.

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 3>And do you think regulation is hindering it too. In

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 3>terms of big tech spending.

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, of course, right. You can think of Microsoft or

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 16>Amazon willing to take on the FTC because they have

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 16>the cash behind them to do it. But if you're

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:37.439
<v Speaker 16>making a billion dollar deal, are you gonna sende hundred

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:39.879
<v Speaker 16>million dollars to fight the FTC to get that deal done?

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 16>Maybe not right, But I think when we look at

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 16>the public markets too. Obviously, with the number of unicorns

0:38:45.640 --> 0:38:47.720
<v Speaker 16>we have in the US and where around eight hundred,

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:50.840
<v Speaker 16>IPO is going to be the more common route for

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 16>those unicorns to go public or to to exit, and

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 16>without the public markets willing to accept the kind of

0:38:57.160 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 16>you know, growth at all costs models, we're gonna se

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 16>a lot of these companies continue to wait out the

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 16>exit market.

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:03.319
<v Speaker 17>Wait.

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Mark Kyle Stamford, we thank you always for shining Alne

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 3>what's happening in the world of VC and money flows.

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 3>We thank you from Pitchworck.

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 17>Bob is I think one of the great CEOs of

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 17>our time. I think he cares a lot about Disney.

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 17>He's been a great steward. I think he's uh, the news.

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't surprise me. I didn't have any I learned about

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 2>it here. I didn't. I didn't actually know in advance.

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 17>But I think it's part of what you want CEOs

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:38.240
<v Speaker 17>to be doing, which is acting like owners and feeling

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:41.280
<v Speaker 17>that the important thing is the legacy of the company

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 17>that they hand on to their successors, to employees, to society.

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 17>And I think Bob is that guy.

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:51.359
<v Speaker 3>Gray Lock Partners. Read Hoffman there reacting to the news

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:55.359
<v Speaker 3>that Barbaiaga's contract was extended at Disney. Sat there talking

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:58.280
<v Speaker 3>to him was Ed Ludlow right now, still in Sun Valley,

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 3>and its interesting read Hoffman talking about Bob Eiger in

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 3>that way. I think, almost exactly word for word, one

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 3>of the best CEOs ever seen with Steve Pagliuca. As

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 3>well of being capital it clearly I people are relieved.

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:14.720
<v Speaker 7>It's been the universal response, and you know, the boards

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 7>thinking on this is that it's continuity of leadership and

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 7>it gives more time for succession. And I think if

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 7>there's still the question market is succession. You know, during

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:26.840
<v Speaker 7>that extended interview with CNBC, Iiger was really quick to

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 7>make the point that this is partly what it's about.

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 7>It gives them more time for whoever comes next. But

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:33.800
<v Speaker 7>if you look at some of the cell side reaction

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:36.880
<v Speaker 7>or the market reaction, they basically point to this as

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 7>being evidence that they hadn't come up with anyone, that

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 7>the internal candidates weren't good enough. So there are still

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 7>questions about the future of this company. But Eiger's on

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 7>the job, and how.

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 3>Much did that upset some of the potential successes who

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 3>are currently there in Sun Valley with him?

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 7>Right?

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:53.800
<v Speaker 3>I understand there's Josh Damario of course, got the Parks

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 3>chair and their TV chief there. We've got film Bass

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:56.920
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 7>So what sources have been telling is that the CEO search,

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 7>in terms of like interviews round has been ongoing anyway.

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 7>And you know, during that interview earlier this morning, Eiger

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 7>did say or disputed the idea that internally people aren't

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 7>ready to step up. He said, actually he thinks they are,

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:17.800
<v Speaker 7>it's just that they need more time for this transition.

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:21.919
<v Speaker 7>What so interesting is how candid he was about things

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 7>that Disney got wrong. He stood by Disney Plus being

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 7>priced at six P ninety nine because they knew that

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 7>the time they wanted subs, but they got the marketing wrong.

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:32.800
<v Speaker 7>And there are other parts of the business linear TV

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 7>sports where He's like, look, I'm going to act. But

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:39.080
<v Speaker 7>universally the response is Bob Iger is the right man

0:41:39.160 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 7>for the job. He's the only person that can get

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 7>this giant that is Disney transitioning into a more digital,

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 7>streaming focused business that is profitable.

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:52.319
<v Speaker 3>Ultimately, the conversation other than streaming wars, what else are

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 3>you gonna hip an I on for the day?

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think that there's just this massive overhang with

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:01.040
<v Speaker 7>Activision and Microsoft. Do you see appeal was a bit

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 7>of a surprise, came really quickly. Then what's the response

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 7>from the companies? We have a July eighteenth deadline, and

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 7>you and I love a deadline. It gives us something

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 7>to talk about until that point. Hopefully they'll extend it.

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Ed, I know you're going to be pushing up

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:16.120
<v Speaker 3>to those deadlines and getting the great news for us.

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much. Of course, edlar Low out there

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 3>in Sun Valley. That does it for this edition of

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 3>Blueberg Technology. You do not want to forget to check

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 3>out a podcast. Find it on the terminal as well

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:28.879
<v Speaker 3>as online on Apple, on Spotify, and on iHeart from

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 3>New York, I've from Ida home. This is Bluebg Technology.