WEBVTT - Pete Dye’s Design Legacy (feat. Scot Sherman)

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Pete Dye had one of the most unusual and fruitful

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>careers in the history of golf architecture, and in this

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>episode we're digging into it. My guest is Scott Sherman,

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the lead designer at Love Golf Design. Last year, Scott

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:19.439
<v Speaker 1>and Love Golf Design carried out a major restoration of

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Pete Dye's Harbor Town golf Links, and they're also in

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the midst of a multi year series of renovation projects

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:32.239
<v Speaker 1>at TPC Sawgrass, another pivotal Die Design. We're going to

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about all of it. I'm Garrett Morrison, and this

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>is Designing Golf, all right. Today's big question why do

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>golf architecture nerds love Pete Dye. If you spend any

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>time looking at what enthusiasts say about golf course design,

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and since you're listening to this podcast, I assume that

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you do, you might have noticed a contradiction. The same

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>people who criticize golf courses for disregarding the natural terrain

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>or being too difficult for the average player, or having

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>too many trees, or being too narrow to accommodate strategic angles,

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>or relying too much on water hazards, those same people

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>will often tell you that Pete Dye was a great

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>golf architect, which is strange because Pete Dye's courses did

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>all of those things that I just mentioned. They usually

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>feature a lot of water, some of them are pretty

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>narrow and have a lot of trees. Most of them

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>are very difficult for an average golfer to play. And obviously,

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever seen a Pete Die course, you know

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that he wasn't all that interested in naturalism. So what's

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>going on here? Why is Die so beloved by people

0:01:55.880 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>who would otherwise seem inclined to criticize them. I think

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>there are three main reasons for that. One, Pete Dye

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>was genuinely original and innovative. He was constantly trying to

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>find new ways of doing things. So, for example, in

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the early nineteen sixties, Die and his wife Alice made

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a trip to Scotland to study the Classic Links courses.

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And I should point out here that this itself was

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>unusual for a golf architect at the time. So when

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Dye came back from Scotland, he had this foundation of

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>knowledge that not a lot of American golf architects shared,

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and he processed that knowledge in a really interesting and

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>original way. He didn't just go about trying to replicate

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Scottish links golf. Instead, he came up with his own

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>versions of certain features that he had seen. Famously, he

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:58.119
<v Speaker 1>started building pop bunkers and shoring up hazards with wooden bulkheads,

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 1>often made out of railroad ties, but he also experimented

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>with contour. He captured the eccentricity and irregularity of links

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>undulations without just reproducing links undulations. He created a variety

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 1>of rugged textures at his golf courses. A lot of

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>these have faded over time, but initially he used many

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of grasses, different kinds of bunker sand. Even

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>basically after his trip to Scotland, Dye reintroduced some wildness

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to American golf course design, and the results were completely

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>different from anything else being built at the time. This

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is a fact that he was very conscious of. Pete

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Dye was a contrarian. He wanted to be different. I

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>often think about the famous story behind the inspiration for

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Dye's design at Harbortown Golf Links on Hilton Head Island.

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>At the same time he was designing Harbortown, A Robert

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Trent Jones golf course was under construction on Hilton Head

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. This course was called Palmetto Dunes. Robert Trent Jones,

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, was the dominant golf architect of the era.

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Everyone was trying to catch up to him by imitating

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>what he was doing. But Die, instead of just imitating

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>what he saw at Palmetto Dunes, thought to himself, I'm

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>going to do the opposite of that. Here's how he

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.359
<v Speaker 1>describes it in his book, Bury Me in a pop bunker,

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>which I would highly recommend to anybody. He writes, as

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I watched the big machinery carve out long teas, huge bunkers,

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>and large greens, I wondered how I could design something

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that would separate my identity from his. Somehow, the concept

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of designing small greens and a low profile course crept

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>into my brain. Instead of long teas, flowing fairways, and

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>elevated large greens, I deliberately chose to design multiple tea positions,

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>small to medium size, shot demanding greens, undulating fairways, long

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:17.559
<v Speaker 1>waist areas, and abrupt, steep pop bunkers. So, in other words,

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Di was intentionally zagging on the Harbor Town project. He

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>was thinking like an artist rather than a business person

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>or a member of a resort development team, and that's

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>something that golf architecture nerds really appreciate. Now. It is

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>true that I could occasionally go a little too far

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 1>in his effort to be novel. A quick example would

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>be the so called volcano bunkers that he built at

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>French Lick in Indiana, which are unique and memorable and

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine have their fans, but I consider them

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>pretty silly, and I can't imagine that they're easy or

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>cheap to maintain. Even in cases like that, Though I

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>like that Di went for it, his missteps came from

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the same source as his best work, which was a

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>genuine willingness to push an experiment, and in a field

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>full of people who play it safe, that quality stands out.

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Another reason design enthusiasts love Pete Dye is that he

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>knew how to make difficult courses interesting. Anyone can design

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>a golf course that produces high scores, but it takes

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>real ingenuity and skill to design one that's enjoyable and

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>engaging while it's dishing out punishment. And that's what Pete

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Dye was able to do over and over the stadium

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>course at TPC Sagrass is maybe the best example of this.

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>When Die designed it, his brief was to build the

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>most difficult golf course in the world. Usually that kind

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of brief does not result in interesting golf courses, but

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the stadium courses stood the test of time, and a

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>big reason for that is that the holes don't just

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>punish poor shots, they also test decision making. They test

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>risk tolerance. So consider the eighteenth hole, by any standard,

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult finishing par four. At last year's Players Championship,

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it was the second hardest hole on the course. But

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:35.559
<v Speaker 1>it's not just straightforwardly sadistic. It's actually a very nuanced hole.

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Off the tee, what you're looking at is a fairway

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>running on a right to left diagonal, with a lake

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>hard against the left side and trees on the right.

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>The fairway is at its widest point about two hundred

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and sixty yards from the back tee, But if you

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>play to that relatively safe spot, you'll have a two

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred yard approach into a green that tilts toward the

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>water and is also guarded by mounting in a pot

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>bunker front right. That's a really tough shot. So most

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>players try to push up a little more. But the

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>problem is the more you push up, the more left

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to go, because that's where the fairway is moving.

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>So this means you either start your ball over the

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>water or carve a right to left t shot into

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the fairway, both of which are very uncomfortable plays, especially

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>for right handed pros who are used to hitting a fade.

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of players end up in the trees

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>on the right, which is obviously better than the water

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>on the left, but still a very tough spot to

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 1>be you're making par or bogie from there pretty much certainly,

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>so every year we see a surprising number of players

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>flirting with the water. And I think that's because if

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you pull off that te shot, a three is there

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>for the taking its base a short iron or even

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>a wedge into a decently receptive green from that angle,

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and on the final whole of the day, when you're

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to make the cut, or win the tournament, or

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>just make up ground on the field, that is a

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>very tempting proposition. So, yes, a difficult golf hole, but

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to play and watch. All Right, we've talked about

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Dye's originality, and his way of achieving difficulty and interest simultaneously.

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Another big reason he's so beloved by golf architecture nerds

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>is that he reintroduced design build methodology to the game. Now,

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>this topic deserves a podcast of its own, so I

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>won't go as in depth here as I want to,

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>But the short of it is that when Dye started

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>his career, Robert Trent Jones was turning golf architecture into

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>an office job. His approach was to draw up a

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>set of plans and then hand them off to a

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>construction company, usually a construction company that he himself owned.

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>This allowed Jones to scale up his business and to

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>design a tremendous number of golf courses across the world.

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Die didn't work this way. He was famously averse to

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>formal plans and he much preferred to work things out

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in the ground with a shovel and a bulldozer. He

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>was intensely collaborative. His wife, Alice, his most trusted design advisor,

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>made critical contributions to every project that Dyes company was

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>involved in. So the courses evolved as they were being built,

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and the effect of this is that die'es courses have

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a handmade quality to them. Yes, they are clearly manufactured,

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>but they're interesting to look at because they're shaped with

0:10:56.400 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>such care and individual attention. You don't see a lot

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of cookie cutter stuff at Die's best courses. His features

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>are really varied and irregular. His mounding, for instance, is

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>chaotic and unpredictable, very different from the tidy containment mounding

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that was typical on courses built during his period. There's

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>just an appealing strangeness to Dye's shaping that I think

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>comes from his devotion to the on site boots on

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the ground craft of golf architecture. And this approach turned

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>out to be very influential because Die passed it on.

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>He was like an NFL coach who produces a lot

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of other really good NFL coaches. Pete Dye trained Bill Corr,

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 1>He trained Tom Doak. He trained Rod Whitman and Jim

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Orbina and Tim Liddy and Bobby Weed and many others

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>who in turn a huge number of the up and

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>coming designers who will define the next era of golf architecture.

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Often their courses look nothing like Dies, but his methods

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>are in their DNA. So that's your answer to the

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>apparent contradiction that I started with. Certainly, Pete Dye did

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that current enthusiasts claim to dislike,

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>but he did it with such originality and such a

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 1>contrarian spirit and such a sense for the nuances of

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>strategy and psychology that people who are passionately into golf

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>architecture just can't help but love his courses. And on

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>top of that, he introduced a design build workflow that

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>has produced most of the greatest golf courses of the

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>past thirty years. That's why golf architecture nerds appreciate and

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>respect Pete Dies so much, even if his work doesn't

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>really resemble what we usually like. All Right, I'd like

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to dive deeper into a couple of specific Pete Die

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>golf courses. For that, I'll bring on Scott Sherman, who

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>is the lead designer at Love Golf Design alongside Davis

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Love the third and Mark Love. Scott has developed a

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of specialty in Pete Die renovation and restoration. He

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>helped to prepare the Ocean course at Kiawa Island for

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty one PGA Championship, and he restored an

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>excellent early Die Design called Delray Dunes in Florida. Most recently,

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and most relevantly to this episode, he and Love Golf

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Design carried out a restoration of Harbortown Golf Links last year.

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>This is the host of the annual Heritage Tournament on

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour, and they are also heading up an

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:55.479
<v Speaker 1>ongoing renovation plan at the stadium course at TPC Sawgrass,

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the annual site of the Players Championship. Basically, there's a

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>lot going on in Scott's world related to Pete Dye,

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>so I thought this would be a good time to

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>bring them on and talk specifically about what's happening at

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Harbortown and Sawgrass. Let's get to it all, right, Scott Sherman,

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the podcast.

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Good morning, Garrett. How are you.

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing pretty well. How about you?

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 2>So keeping busy but as I said, better than I deserve.

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you you have certainly been very busy lately, and

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be talking about a little bit of

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>what you've been doing lately. But first of all, I

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>want to I want to chat a bit about your

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>your history with Pete Dye. The subject of this episode

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>here is Die his design style, some of his courses.

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>You began your career, as I understand it, working with

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Pete and Alice Dye at Kiwa Island.

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 2>That's where I met them. Actually, like a lot of us,

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 2>I was captivated as a teenager by the first watching

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 2>TPC Sawgrass on television, not knowing that I would want

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 2>to be a golf designer one day. Fast forward many

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 2>years in the first time I really thought about being

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 2>in the business was in college. And the first time

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 2>I had ever set foot on Harbortown, ironically, was in

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighty nine. That was called the Nabisco Championship back

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 2>in those days, the forerunner of the Tour Championship walked

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 2>that golf course after the fourteenth hole, I thought to myself,

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 2>I need to go find Pete and Alice. So made

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 2>my way to Kiowa while it was under construction, and

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 2>that's really where I connected with some of their staff.

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 2>To be honest with you, some of the guys out

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 2>in the field, but Pete and Alice had moved there

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 2>to do that project at Kiowa. So I wrote them

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 2>a letter and got a response from Alice, a letter

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 2>I have to this day kept in my file. So

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 2>that would have been you know, late eighty nine, early

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 2>ninety and lo and behold, they connected me with Perry

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Dye who was working on some projects with them, and

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 2>I first, you know, went to work with the Die

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 2>family out in Denver, Colorado as part of their bigger staff,

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 2>and got together with Pete and Alice out there actually,

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 2>and then was sent to Hawaii to build my first

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 2>golf course, which was not bad duty, but it was

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 2>a very difficult project. So that's how that sort of happened.

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 2>And ironically having been at Harbor Town and now all

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 2>these years later helping them with their work there and

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 2>the ocean course at Kiowa and as you mentioned, TPC

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Sawgrass as we're working right now. So it's just crazy.

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the initial experiences you had in

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the kind of Die family system that taught you things

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 1>about golf course architecture and construction.

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, so my first memory of anything at all would

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 2>have been walking on the ocean course, which was just

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 2>it looked like the moon, you know, just a big

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 2>old moonscape out there of sand and movement and whatnot.

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 2>So I didn't have a clue what I was looking at.

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 2>And when I got to Denver, it was hired properly

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.919
<v Speaker 2>Perry their son, their older son, said hey, look, you

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 2>need to understand what we do in our style. And

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 2>I had a feel for it. But he was gracious

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 2>enough to send me to some of their golf courses

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 2>that were well known and had been built years before,

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 2>and he immersed me in photography that was sort of

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 2>archived at their office in Denver. Their their photographer, Kenny May,

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 2>their family photographer, availed me of any any golf course

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 2>that they had ever built all over the world, and

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 2>so I immersed myself in photography, which many years later,

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 2>ironically has has come back. So that's where it sort

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 2>of started. Get a feel for what we do, and

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:30.120
<v Speaker 2>then they started teaching me about the strategy. Here's how

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 2>we think about golf holes. Pete always mentioned building in

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 2>a third dimension, you know, as you know, there's there's

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 2>lots of features that cast shadows and look more intimidating

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 2>than they really are. So my earliest memories are of

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 2>really studying their golf courses over a pretty short period

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 2>of time. And then off I was sent to Hawaii

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 2>to build this golf course in the middle of the

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Monowilly Valleys as they call it, and that's where it's

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 2>or started.

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Do any stories come to mind from these early years about,

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, how construction was done on a Pete Dye

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>golf course. I mean, clearly, this firm, this family had

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 1>an approach to golf course construction that was different from

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 1>that of other golf architecture firms. You may not have

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:26.719
<v Speaker 1>been aware of that because this was your you know,

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.479
<v Speaker 1>this was these were some of your first experiences in

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>building golf But what was distinctive about the way that

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>construction was done in the kind of die method?

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, and of course I knew nothing different other than

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 2>when I got to my first project. So I was

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 2>partly a design associate and partly construction manager as it were,

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 2>and I was put in a ditch right from the

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 2>beginning and told you need to learn how to build

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 2>these golf courses from the ground up, which has served

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 2>us well to this day. So I really didn't know

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 2>any other way than to really build a golf course

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 2>and designed it. At the same time, I think Pete

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 2>would have even said he was a golf course builder

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 2>much more than a golf course designer, and certainly didn't

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 2>use the term too much golf architect. But we learned

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 2>to build golf courses, and that's how we still do it. Yes,

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 2>we have to deal with AutoCAD and plans and permitting

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 2>and all that sort of thing, but that only gets

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 2>you about eighty percent of the way. And we build

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 2>a golf course and the features sort of reveal themselves

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 2>as we impose our will here and there and work

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 2>with sites, you know, somewhat minimalistically sometimes, but sometimes we

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 2>have to impose our will. But we're really, we're really

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 2>at the heart of it, golf course builders. And that's

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 2>just how I learned, and of course is I got

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 2>to know other people in the business and other people

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.639
<v Speaker 2>that work for the Die family. That's exactly how they

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.439
<v Speaker 2>learned to bill golf courses, folks like Bill Coohr and

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 2>Tom Doak, and you go on and on. I'm really

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 2>sort of the third generation, you know, Pete and Alice

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 2>being the first generation, and folks like Bill Cooorr being

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, the second generation. I'm a younger generation, and

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 2>I certainly didn't work on as many golf courses as

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 2>lots of other guys did and gals, but certainly was

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 2>very very influenced by the building process, much more so

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 2>than the design process, and to this day it's a

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 2>necessary evil to get things on paper and be able

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 2>to permit and land plan and all that sort of thing.

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 2>But I guess the instinctive part of what we do

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 2>is the building part, the part that's fun, the part

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:54.679
<v Speaker 2>where you just feel, I feel comfortable standing on the

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 2>ground and making it happen. You know, with all the

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 2>fellows that we deal with the golf course builders at

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 2>this point one.

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Were you building greens at this point?

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes? Absolutely, you know, how did.

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 1>That process go?

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 2>It was?

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because different architects have different approaches to building greens,

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's pretty interesting. I mean, Bill Corer and Tom

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Doak approach building greens differently. Tom Doak kind of has

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>his associates go out and mess around with it and

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>come up with these ideas, and then Tom comes in

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and edits. You know, these are very broad strokes here.

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Bill is more like, you know, he'll he'll figure out

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the concept of the green and have a pretty specific

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 1>idea of what he wants done, and then they go

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 1>out and execute that. What was the nature of that

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>process for you in the die system.

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, at the beginning, so interestingly enough, I was sent

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 2>to Hawaii, and the crew that built the ocean course

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 2>at Kiowa for the ninety one Ryder Cup left Kiowa,

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 2>picked me up in Denver, and we went to Hawaii

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 2>to build this golf course. So that crew of folks,

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Steve Mann, Keith Sparkman, lots of guys that were at

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Kiawa taught me here's how you do it, and they

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 2>would hand me bundles of flags and put my rear

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 2>end on a sand pro or a tractor. I tried

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 2>to do some work on a bulldozer' maybe too a

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 2>d D and too impatient to sit on a bulldozer

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 2>all day. I've got to be roaming the site. But

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 2>I did learn to run some small equipment and do

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 2>that a little bit less now these days, but still

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:35.479
<v Speaker 2>enjoy doing that. But we would literally you have a

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 2>green site that was roughed in, and the guys would

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 2>flag it out or I would flag it out, and

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 2>we would just start playing with the dirt. As I say,

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 2>the construction part of it have kind of a concept.

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 2>I guess I have personally moved on to doing some

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 2>green sketches, which helps us sort of anchor where we

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 2>start and move the dirt around back in those days

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 2>build in USGA green, we would build the core of

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.479
<v Speaker 2>the green, in other words, sixteen inches down in the

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 2>in the dirt. And I always struggle with that. I

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 2>like to like to build the whole green complex with

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 2>all of the features as they would be finished, and

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 2>then core it out and build, you know, ourselves a green.

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 2>But so you know, it's always very different how we

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 2>do these things. But that's that's the way. I started,

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 2>just out in the field flagging out greens and figuring

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 2>out the best way it fits in there strategically, and

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 2>then we would mess with the contours physically with the

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.360
<v Speaker 2>sand pro, with the box blade and the tractor.

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've heard I've heard versions of that from various

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>people who have worked with Pete Dye and with Perry

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Dye and others associated with the family, that that is

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:52.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of the problem. You really go out and play

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 1>with it for a while and see what works, and

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>then and then you come in kind of with the

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>critical mind and shape it from there, which is a

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>very interesting process, and it's it's got to be one

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>that's that's tough for clients to deal with sometimes because

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what you.

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Have no idea yes, they're scared to death, but you know,

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 3>at this point in our career we have a history,

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 3>uh that that sort of shows them that that we

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 3>kind of know what we're doing.

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 2>But yes, it can scare them to death because and

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 2>I learned some freedom from Pete by watching him answer

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 2>questions of clients who would say, well, what are you

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 2>going to do here? And what are you going to

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 2>do there? And why did you do this or why

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 2>did you do that? And he would just say, I

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 2>don't know. Just felt right, I don't know, Okay, I mean,

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 2>it is a creative process, you know. It's it's you're

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 2>not building a four wall structure that walls have to

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 2>be in a certain spot. So it just gave us

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 2>some some freedom. And I guess to carry that on

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 2>a little further. And I didn't see Pete do this much.

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 2>He did it a little bit and taught us how

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 2>to float greens. Originally, we would take a sand pro

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 2>in a three by eight by about ten feet long

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 2>board that was drug around with the sand pro that

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 2>he stood on. It was like he was water skiing,

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.719
<v Speaker 2>and we would call it skiing the green and he

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 2>would float contours with his feet and again I didn't

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 2>see him do it much, but the guys that came

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 2>from Kiowa taught me a little bit about how to

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 2>do that, which is a very tiring process actually, And

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 2>so Pete would make changes in the green, sometimes substantial.

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, you're supposed to only have twelve inches or

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 2>so of greens mix in the profile of a green,

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes it would be a little less or sometimes

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more. But that was again part of

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 2>the creative process contouring. You know, Bill Koorr calls it

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 2>grading the green. So just right from the beginning, I

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 2>was so fortunate to dive right into everything that was

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 2>under the ground building this guy course in Hawaii, all

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 2>the way to the finished contours. And then we were

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 2>in charge of the whole construction process, so grassing and

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 2>irrigating and the whole deal. So it was it was

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 2>quite the education. I got my master's for sure, building

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 2>two golf courses in Hawaii.

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we've got the Players Championship coming up

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>soon here, so let's talk a little bit about TPC sawgrass,

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:32.239
<v Speaker 1>all right, And I love golf designs work. There you

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>are in the early phases of what I understand to

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>be a very long renovation timeline. So could you give

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>me an idea of what the overall vision for the

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>stadium course is and the changes that will be made

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in the coming years. Is this a restoration, is it

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a modernization? What is it?

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes? Yes, yes to both, that's right, and so we

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 2>we're engaged in the process. Gosh, it's been almost three

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 2>years ago now, so we have done some summer work

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 2>for the last two years. We were all just there

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 2>yesterday preparing for the summer work that's coming up this year.

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Partly we go there during tournament set up so that

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 2>we can see how I mean, obviously it's built for

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 2>tournament golf, so see how what we are about to

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 2>do would affect circulation and the fan experience and obviously

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 2>the architecture of the golf course. So this was a

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 2>tough thing to start because and I have to be

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 2>very careful how I say this. I don't want to

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 2>be critical, but I just want to be factual about

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 2>what's happened over the years, over these thirty some years

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 2>to the golf course. I think the tour recognized that

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 2>they were they have taken everyone's input over these thirty years, players,

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 2>rules officials and administrators, fans, TV folks, media folks. They

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 2>have slowly but surely over the years taken input from

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 2>lots of folks, and one little thing at a time.

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 2>The golf course changed and changed and changed. And the

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 2>thing that we've noticed the most is and of course

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I know a little bit too much to be dangerous

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to the greens, but the greens in

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 2>particular have become softer. The slopes are less pronounced, the

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 2>transitions are less pronounced, the greens are generally bigger than

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 2>they were originally. And as you know, I know, you've

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 2>traveled all over the place and you have seen everything

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 2>in this day and age. To challenge the best players

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:47.719
<v Speaker 2>in the world, it's all about the greens. We can

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 2>keep moving teas back as far as we want. But

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 2>the great golf courses that host majors, that do a

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 2>great job of trying to challenge the player but yet

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 2>still be enjoy for the member are the ones that

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 2>have some really interesting, maybe severe greens. You think of

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 2>the oak monts in the wing foots of the world, well,

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 2>tpc sawgrasses. Greens really have become soft, slope wise, whole

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 2>location wise. They're just not as difficult as they were,

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 2>so we sort of start there and eventually in twenty

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty eight, as we understand it, we will focus on

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 2>the greens and the green complexes. But leading up to that,

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 2>there have been so many changes. For example, originally the

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 2>golf course was very rough, you know, and how far

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 2>back in the roughness do we go? And we have

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 2>lots of documentation from day one really during construction. We

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 2>have lots of documentation of the golf course plans to

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 2>the extent that those are helpful, lots of photographs, lots

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 2>of tournament video and so forth. We have lots of

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 2>influence that you know, it's sort of like when Marion

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 2>had to decide what era were they going to go

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 2>back to, and we have sort of settled on about

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighty nine as far as features go. And so

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 2>for example, you know, there was lots of quote, waste areas,

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 2>areas where you could ground your club, that were sandy shelley,

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 2>areas that were strategic and a little you know, gave

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 2>you a little uncertainty when you hit a shot out

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 2>of those areas. And of course you fast forward to

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 2>today and there's none of that. Every bit of sand,

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 2>there is a bunker a bunker proper. So we're going

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 2>through the process of deciding what if any of those

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:46.959
<v Speaker 2>areas do we restore as native through the green shell

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 2>sand screening areas. And then you look at the architecture

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 2>around all of that, and so much has changed, partly

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 2>because it needed to. Some of it was too severe

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 2>for you know, fan use, spectator use, some of it

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 2>was too severe to maintain and that sort of thing.

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 2>So we walk around constantly, and I have a computer

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 2>full of photographs and photographs and miss Alis sent us

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 2>their family photographer, Kenny May, who's photographed the place for

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 2>years the tour, and we look, you know, really, square

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 2>foot by square foot, what were those features like and

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 2>how different are they today? And why can't we put

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 2>this back? So it's really it really is more of

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 2>a restoration. But again to keep up with the modern

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 2>tour player who is six foot six or taller and looks,

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 2>as Davis says, looks like a linebacker when he goes

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 2>to the locker room, they all look like linebackers standing

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 2>in the you know, golf locker room. So these guys

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 2>are physically, and I would even say women are physically

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 2>very fit and capable of hitting the ball a long way.

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.239
<v Speaker 2>They have a lot of certainty about their game, and

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 2>so you know, as far as a restoration goes, the

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 2>architecture is restorative. But again we have to think about

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 2>it in the modern context, not only playing the golf course,

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 2>but also maintaining the golf course. We are not going

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 2>back to nineteen eighty three. You've probably seen pictures and

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 2>how really really rough that place was. It was rougher

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 2>than Pine Valley ever thought about being, to be honest.

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 2>So there's a happy medium there. But there are so

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 2>many neat features that we are picking up here and

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 2>there that we will restore throughout the golf course. And honestly,

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 2>there's some golf holes from nineteen eighty nine in a

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 2>little bit earlier we don't even recognize. The second hole

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 2>is completely different than it was originally, the sixth hall.

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 2>I could just go on and on, and so it

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 2>is really a massive download of information that we have.

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 2>Aesthetics that Pete created, funkiness, strangeness, coolness, you know, you know,

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 2>funky good stuff that we're trying to slowly but surely

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 2>put back into the golf course and will really more

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:17.799
<v Speaker 2>effectively be able to do it when we close in

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:22.479
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty eight. That's a very long answer to say

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 2>that we are locking arms with the tour and their

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 2>agronomy staff and their rule staff and their competition staff,

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 2>and walking down every golf hole with them leading the

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 2>process and really relying on you know, Pete's the golf

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 2>architect here. He was the builder. He and Alice designed

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 2>and built this place, and we're just being totally influenced

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 2>by what was there and trying to make sure that

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 2>we can be respectful of that and make it work

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 2>because it was, you know, for its day and even

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 2>for this day, it was crazy. We want to go

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 2>back a little bit more to the crazy and a

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 2>little less to the perfect. And if you're a keen

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:05.800
<v Speaker 2>observer of that tournament and that golf course, you're slowly

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 2>but surely seeing that, partly due to the agronomic staff

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:15.319
<v Speaker 2>who is taking a lot of the ornament ornamental material out,

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 2>bringing more native landscape material in and trying to keep

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 2>with that more native look of the golf course.

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of interesting stuff in there in that answer. Okay,

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 1>this episode is brought to you by the new Cobalt

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>QZ six slope rangefinder. The QZ six represents a significant

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>leap in golf rangefinder technology. Most rangefinders have a kind

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>of fixed magnification right, but the Cobalt QZ six has

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>an optical zoom feature ranging from six x to twelve X,

0:35:57.920 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>so when you're on the golf course, you can just

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>see your target better. You can identify your exact landing

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:08.359
<v Speaker 1>spot more clearly, You can assess the contours of a

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>fairway or a green more easily. You can actually see

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 1>the characteristics of a pin placement, which is helpful. All

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that stuff is just very useful and not something you

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>typically get with a rangefinder. Now. In addition to zoom,

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the QZ six has COBALT's proprietary pin sense and surge

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 1>technologies which make locking onto the flag fast and reliable.

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>And it offers a total performance ranging from five to

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty five hundred yards, including six hundred plus yards to

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a pin and two thousand yards to trees. This thing

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>is just built for golfers who prioritize accuracy, consistency and

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:52.799
<v Speaker 1>trust in their equipment. Every Cobalt rangefinder is backed by

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a lifetime warranty and sold direct consumer, which ensures uncompromising

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>quality without the usual retail markup. So go to Cobalt

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:07.840
<v Speaker 1>dash golf dot com and enter the code fried egg

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Pod fifteen for fifteen percent off. That's fried egg Pod

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>fifteen all one word at Cobalt dash goolf dot com.

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Check it out. I'll pick out one idea at a

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 1>time here. I think maybe we should start with the

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the former ruggedness of Tpcsawgrass. Right, as you mentioned, the

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 1>course originally had a pretty wild look.

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I remember talking to Jerry Pate about it one time

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and he said, you know, you were you were almost

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking that wild animals were going to come out of

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the jumble attack.

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 2>And we've seen pictures that really look like that.

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just oh yeah, I mean it's a it's a

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Florida swamp. It felt like a Florida swamp initially with

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 1>some I mean, there was something pinehursty about it maybe

0:38:03.640 --> 0:38:06.359
<v Speaker 1>towards the beginning as well. Yes, and so it was

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:10.800
<v Speaker 1>it was. Yeah, it was pretty raw at the beginning,

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and it gained some refinement over the course of the eighties,

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 1>But even even by nineteen eighty nine, which is the

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:23.720
<v Speaker 1>year you've pointed out, the course was much more rugged

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>looking than it is now now. It's kind of like

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Augusta National, Florida. In a lot of ways. You can

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 1>see the influence of Augusta National's maintenance practices on what

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the stadium course has become. So how do you find

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>that happy medium? What are the features or what are

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:50.799
<v Speaker 1>the presentation practices that allow you to reintroduce some of

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that initial wildness without pushing it to the point where

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour says, hey, hey, we don't want our

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 1>home of golf looking like it's downtrodden or dilapidated. Right,

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 1>because clearly the PGA Tour has an interest in presenting

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the courses as as very shiny looking. And so what

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 1>do you what do you do there? What are the

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:18.359
<v Speaker 1>places where you can can bring back some of that

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 1>original look, and what are the what are the things

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 1>that you just can't do?

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay? Well, So in defense of the tour as our client,

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, I would compare TPC sawgrass Uh currently in

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 2>a modern context in a similar way, I would think

0:39:39.040 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 2>about what we see at Oakmont. You know, I remember

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:47.040
<v Speaker 2>one time hearing John Zimmer's I think, say to Paul

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Latshaw or someone, you go out to that golf course

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 2>the Monday of the US Open a few years ago.

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 2>You go try and find something that's imperfect about Oakmont,

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:00.359
<v Speaker 2>You're not gonna find it. I mean, we we are

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 2>so good, I'd say we the agronomic staff everywhere in

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 2>the world, especially at these high level of facilities hosting

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:14.359
<v Speaker 2>big tournaments, are so good at creating perfect that that's

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 2>a standard that that's going to stay, you know, the perfection.

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 2>You go to Pinehurst number two. Although it's rugged, there

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 2>are times when teas, fairways, greens are you know, they

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 2>may be a little off color, but the conditions are

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 2>great and then it sort of fades to its you know,

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 2>native look. So in defense of the tour, they're going

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:39.280
<v Speaker 2>to create conditions that are fabulous for the tournament. For sure,

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:42.759
<v Speaker 2>because it's in March, it will be overseated as long

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:45.360
<v Speaker 2>as it stays in March. I'm sure that's the case.

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 2>So having said that, you know, again, we can't go

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 2>back to nineteen eighty three, just can't. It's it's you know,

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 2>there was massive areas of the golf course that you know,

0:40:56.560 --> 0:41:00.320
<v Speaker 2>spectators couldn't get around in. Really it was a coadd

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 2>It was really a kind of a mess, honestly, and

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 2>when you're hosting, I don't know, three hundred thousand people

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:10.120
<v Speaker 2>at an event, You've got to be careful about that.

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 2>But having said that, slowly but surely, as I mentioned,

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 2>first off, there was a landscape palette that sort of

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 2>crept in that was more ornamental, honestly, literally knockout roses

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:24.839
<v Speaker 2>and tea plants and things that were, you know, too

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 2>much color for this native of a sight. So that's

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 2>slowly but surely going away, maybe not completely, but as

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:38.280
<v Speaker 2>we think about how we fade into the native Florida swamp,

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, we are replacing a lot of that vegetation

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 2>with things that were there before, wire grass and mully

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 2>grass and things that are native to the area. We're

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 2>certainly moving big trees. You may be aware of some

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 2>big trees that we've moved there.

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, we'll talk about that in a second, okay,

0:41:58.000 --> 0:41:58.359
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:01.799
<v Speaker 2>And preserving the oaks, the palms, and the pines that

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:05.879
<v Speaker 2>are indicative of that site. And then as we get

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 2>closer to the golf holes, as we get closer to

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 2>the center line of the fairway, that's where we're in

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:14.360
<v Speaker 2>sort of a discussion about as I said, these native

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 2>quote waste areas that once were that at least give

0:42:19.000 --> 0:42:22.279
<v Speaker 2>the golf course a little bit different contrast. Again, I

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 2>don't want to be critical, but if you were to

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:28.759
<v Speaker 2>view the golf course maybe two years ago, it was

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 2>so perfect and so contrasting between green and white. It

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 2>was just as you say, Augusta National is wonderful, it's marvelous.

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I have no bad things to say about their esthetic.

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:48.240
<v Speaker 2>But TPC Sawgrass was not that, and it just seemed

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 2>a little sterile to us. So as we started the

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:54.759
<v Speaker 2>conversation and we had a very receptive audience who said, yes,

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 2>we look at these old pictures, we see what this

0:42:57.520 --> 0:43:00.680
<v Speaker 2>used to look like, and so let's try to use that.

0:43:00.760 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 2>But there's going to be a limit, you know, there's

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 2>going to be a place or two where we just

0:43:05.520 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 2>can only go so far with that. And the tournament

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:11.919
<v Speaker 2>is growing. I think that's always going to be the case.

0:43:11.960 --> 0:43:14.840
<v Speaker 2>There will be more and more interesting to some extent,

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:18.800
<v Speaker 2>and maybe they will allow more more fans. So again,

0:43:18.960 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, Pete had the idea of sort of unique

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:25.359
<v Speaker 2>to him, these big long waist areas. One of our

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:30.280
<v Speaker 2>discussions yesterday is back in twenty sixteen, the waste areas

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 2>were removed and the ones that were waste areas stopped

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 2>and then the bunker, for a rules standpoint, picked up.

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:42.720
<v Speaker 2>So there was always a separation between the waste area

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:46.359
<v Speaker 2>and the bunker, and those don't exist anymore. So we're

0:43:46.360 --> 0:43:49.319
<v Speaker 2>trying to understand what we would be allowed to do

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 2>to bring back the waste areas and separate them from

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 2>the bunkers aesthetically, rules wise, and again that's very restorative.

0:43:58.200 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we're working on the fourth hole right now

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 2>thinking about all those details. So again as a as

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:08.439
<v Speaker 2>a place to start as an anchor, you know, Pete

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 2>and Alice gave us an anchor from nineteen eighty two

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 2>or three, and we will navigate that whole by whole,

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 2>area by area to get that look and that strategy

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:20.879
<v Speaker 2>into the golf course, which is already there. You can

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:23.800
<v Speaker 2>see it, but it just looks. It looks a little

0:44:23.800 --> 0:44:25.720
<v Speaker 2>bit more perfect than maybe it should.

0:44:27.120 --> 0:44:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you can. You can even see that contrast between

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:32.319
<v Speaker 1>what are intended to be waste areas and what are

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:34.440
<v Speaker 1>intended to be bunkers in the design of the course

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 1>where you have these huge, long bunkers often along the fairways,

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:44.319
<v Speaker 1>and those are now maintained as bunkers and every inch

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of them is has become perfect over time.

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:44:47.920 --> 0:44:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, there's a difference between those and the smaller

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:54.800
<v Speaker 1>bunkers that are off in green Side, and so that's

0:44:54.800 --> 0:44:57.399
<v Speaker 1>that's an interesting contrast to TPC sagrass. And it would

0:44:57.440 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it would seem to stand a reason that you would

0:44:59.560 --> 0:45:04.240
<v Speaker 1>present those two different types of hazards differently. So that's

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:06.279
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty cool. I'm looking forward to to seeing that

0:45:06.360 --> 0:45:09.799
<v Speaker 1>change for sure. Now. The most talked about change at

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:14.880
<v Speaker 1>TPC Sawgrass last year was, as you alluded to, the

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:19.760
<v Speaker 1>replanting of this massive oak tree next to the sixth

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>te so that players were forced to hit a kind

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of relatively low trajectory t shot from a certain tea position.

0:45:28.800 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't all tea positions that were affected, as I

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 1>understand it, but but yeah, so but you know, if

0:45:35.640 --> 0:45:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you put the tea in a certain place, then then

0:45:38.000 --> 0:45:40.640
<v Speaker 1>players kind of they couldn't just blast away with their

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:43.839
<v Speaker 1>towering you know, hit up on it driver. They would

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:46.920
<v Speaker 1>have to to carve a different type of shot under

0:45:46.960 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 1>the tree limbs and add onto the fairway. This was

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a restorative project. This wasn't just a you know, a

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:56.080
<v Speaker 1>funny idea that that you and and love Golf Design had.

0:45:56.120 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>This was there originally, and the and the tree was

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 1>it was I think it had disease or something.

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, the previous one was leaning and leaning, and

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 2>they cabled it so it wouldn't lean too much. And

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 2>then I forget whether a storm or just decay took

0:46:12.040 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 2>it out and it was gone for several tournaments.

0:46:14.920 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, so how do you feel that that change

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:20.880
<v Speaker 1>worked out? What were some of the impressions that you

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 1>got from the tournament about the effects of that replanting.

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, so I'll let the statistics speak for themselves, but

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 2>before I say that, you know, one of the things

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:36.280
<v Speaker 2>I learned, and I didn't know that I was learning

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:39.759
<v Speaker 2>this until well into my career, as I would build

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:43.080
<v Speaker 2>golf holes and take direction from the Dye family and

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 2>my future design partner Bobby Weed. You know, sometimes all

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:50.799
<v Speaker 2>you have to do is get into a player's head,

0:46:51.360 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 2>and especially when you're talking about the highest level, they

0:46:54.239 --> 0:46:58.319
<v Speaker 2>have so much certainty about their game, especially today, that

0:46:58.320 --> 0:47:02.120
<v Speaker 2>the mental part is what you're Realllian challenging. So whether

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:04.960
<v Speaker 2>this was intended on the sixty by Pete or not,

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 2>it was there visually and you know, shot tracker back

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:13.080
<v Speaker 2>in the day would have been really great to you know,

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:15.560
<v Speaker 2>tell us how much did it affect the flight of

0:47:15.600 --> 0:47:19.880
<v Speaker 2>the golf ball. Well, now we know from last year's tournament.

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, prior to the tree being moved and replanted,

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:28.279
<v Speaker 2>I believe that hole played during previous tournament or the

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:31.879
<v Speaker 2>previous year. I believe that hole played thirty under par

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 2>for the field. And then last year with the tree

0:47:36.080 --> 0:47:39.279
<v Speaker 2>in place, and only one player actually hit the tree

0:47:39.320 --> 0:47:43.960
<v Speaker 2>all week, that hole played twenty over par. There's a

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 2>fifty shot difference. And all we did was create a visual.

0:47:48.080 --> 0:47:51.040
<v Speaker 2>We didn't build a bunker, we didn't put a wall,

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:55.760
<v Speaker 2>there's no railway sheds or anything. But it's just the visual.

0:47:56.280 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 2>And now that we do have shot tracer and shot tracker,

0:47:59.680 --> 0:48:03.759
<v Speaker 2>we could kind of predict how it might affect their ballflight.

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:06.959
<v Speaker 2>And everybody hit everything. There were players that hit driver.

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:10.319
<v Speaker 2>I played with a tour player prior to opening the

0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:12.640
<v Speaker 2>golf course and he hit driver, no problem, just a

0:48:12.640 --> 0:48:15.200
<v Speaker 2>little bit lower. But they just had to think about

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:19.799
<v Speaker 2>it so visually, so then mentally, this is where I

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:25.280
<v Speaker 2>guess Pete taught us how to maybe affect a player's

0:48:25.440 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 2>game and the way they think about playing the golf o.

0:48:28.200 --> 0:48:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the psychological dimension of design was something that Pete

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Die thought about a lot and implemented at his courses

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:39.960
<v Speaker 1>better than probably anyone who has ever designed courses for

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:41.280
<v Speaker 1>elite players.

0:48:41.520 --> 0:48:41.960
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:48:42.040 --> 0:48:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Right. He knew exactly how to bother top level players,

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:48.919
<v Speaker 1>and that's right. I think that's part of what makes

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:50.359
<v Speaker 1>his courses stand the test of time.

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:54.279
<v Speaker 2>Right, that's right. And you know I learned early on

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 2>to try to get certainly the best players to think

0:48:59.239 --> 0:49:02.120
<v Speaker 2>about shots. You want to make them move the ball

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:05.640
<v Speaker 2>back and forth with every shot. That's where sort of

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:09.000
<v Speaker 2>the idea of an S shaped golf hole came from.

0:49:09.040 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 2>You want to make the player work the ball in

0:49:11.280 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 2>one direction off the tee and another direction into the green.

0:49:14.800 --> 0:49:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I like to call them switchback holes.

0:49:17.200 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:49:17.719 --> 0:49:19.799
<v Speaker 1>You see a lot of these par fives at Pete

0:49:19.840 --> 0:49:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Die courses that kind of move one direction off the

0:49:23.000 --> 0:49:25.360
<v Speaker 1>tee and then come back the other direction like a switch,

0:49:25.520 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 1>like a you know, switchbacking road going up a mountain,

0:49:27.920 --> 0:49:28.319
<v Speaker 1>that's right.

0:49:28.880 --> 0:49:30.360
<v Speaker 2>And you can go all the way back to a

0:49:30.440 --> 0:49:32.880
<v Speaker 2>place like a teeth of the dog in the Dominican

0:49:32.920 --> 0:49:35.560
<v Speaker 2>and you can see that all over the golf course.

0:49:36.120 --> 0:49:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Even if you want to really study par threes, you

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:41.879
<v Speaker 2>know there are it's always great to have different hole

0:49:41.920 --> 0:49:44.239
<v Speaker 2>locations on a par three. So very often he would

0:49:44.239 --> 0:49:46.680
<v Speaker 2>build a par three that sort of had an S

0:49:46.680 --> 0:49:52.000
<v Speaker 2>shape to it. And at TPC sawgrasp between Dean Beamon

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:56.320
<v Speaker 2>and Pete and miss Alice and Bobby Weed. I learned

0:49:56.320 --> 0:50:01.400
<v Speaker 2>originally his thinking about how to set up greens. You know,

0:50:01.520 --> 0:50:05.120
<v Speaker 2>originally when the greens were built, they were a bit smaller,

0:50:05.800 --> 0:50:09.760
<v Speaker 2>and he had in his mind four whole locations for Thursday, Friday,

0:50:09.800 --> 0:50:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Saturday and Sunday. And he was trying to make you

0:50:14.080 --> 0:50:17.480
<v Speaker 2>realize that it was best to attack a whole location

0:50:17.640 --> 0:50:22.040
<v Speaker 2>with a proper shot shape. And if you didn't, you know,

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:25.560
<v Speaker 2>come into that whole location with the correct shape, it

0:50:25.680 --> 0:50:28.760
<v Speaker 2>might repel the ball. If you use the right shape,

0:50:28.800 --> 0:50:32.160
<v Speaker 2>it might hold the ball in place. And so some

0:50:32.320 --> 0:50:36.400
<v Speaker 2>of that has been lost. We're trying to understand how

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:40.800
<v Speaker 2>what kind of whole location cupping slopes we can create.

0:50:40.880 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, you go to Wingfoot, I don't know if

0:50:43.080 --> 0:50:45.879
<v Speaker 2>there's a two point four percent slope on any green

0:50:46.040 --> 0:50:49.279
<v Speaker 2>at Wingfoot. And we've always i say always for a

0:50:49.280 --> 0:50:53.400
<v Speaker 2>long time we've been concerned about not putting whole locations

0:50:53.400 --> 0:50:56.680
<v Speaker 2>at TPC on anything greater than a two point four

0:50:56.719 --> 0:50:59.440
<v Speaker 2>percent slope. Well, I think we have some freedom to

0:50:59.480 --> 0:51:03.319
<v Speaker 2>exceed that now, regardless of the speed. These players are

0:51:03.320 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 2>so good that's the place to really challenge them at

0:51:07.239 --> 0:51:10.760
<v Speaker 2>the greens. And so we're studying and we have maps,

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:14.840
<v Speaker 2>believe it or not, from nineteen eighty three with shots

0:51:14.840 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 2>of every green meaning great shots of every green and

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 2>the shapes and the sizes. So that's where we're really

0:51:21.239 --> 0:51:26.279
<v Speaker 2>starting to focus on. How do we recapture these compartments

0:51:26.320 --> 0:51:31.680
<v Speaker 2>that Pete had originally, but yet still keep these greens fair.

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:36.680
<v Speaker 1>So will there be anything new at this year's players,

0:51:36.719 --> 0:51:38.719
<v Speaker 1>any changes that have been made since last year?

0:51:39.640 --> 0:51:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Oh gosh, we've been tinkering a little bit this year.

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:48.840
<v Speaker 2>So the twelfth hole is an interesting hole out there,

0:51:48.920 --> 0:51:52.799
<v Speaker 2>and Pete himself changed that booger over and over.

0:51:53.520 --> 0:51:55.640
<v Speaker 1>And just to give people some background here, the twelfth

0:51:55.680 --> 0:51:58.760
<v Speaker 1>hole used to be kind of a drive and pitch

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:04.680
<v Speaker 1>part for with some kind of semi blind elements. It

0:52:04.880 --> 0:52:08.839
<v Speaker 1>was not a particularly popular hole. I would say some

0:52:08.920 --> 0:52:11.920
<v Speaker 1>had some affection for it. I'm probably one of those people.

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I kind of I kind of, I kind of liked it,

0:52:14.120 --> 0:52:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and but it you know, with distance gains it it

0:52:17.080 --> 0:52:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it lost a little bit of its strategy, probably it

0:52:20.400 --> 0:52:22.319
<v Speaker 1>and it just kind of became a drive and pitch

0:52:22.360 --> 0:52:26.080
<v Speaker 1>exercise for the pros. A number of years ago, several

0:52:26.200 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago at this point, it was turned into a

0:52:28.200 --> 0:52:32.120
<v Speaker 1>driveable par four with water along the left side, and

0:52:32.239 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea was that that we would create some excitement here.

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:37.359
<v Speaker 1>So that's the context. But but yeah, I was gonna

0:52:37.360 --> 0:52:39.279
<v Speaker 1>ask about the twelfth hole. Is that what? What are

0:52:39.320 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts about it?

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, so the like on the left at the green

0:52:43.600 --> 0:52:46.560
<v Speaker 2>has now been extended all the way back towards the tea,

0:52:46.719 --> 0:52:50.880
<v Speaker 2>so it's much more visible from the tea up the

0:52:50.960 --> 0:52:55.480
<v Speaker 2>right side. We built a much larger bunker that sort

0:52:55.480 --> 0:52:59.440
<v Speaker 2>of as you talk about angles there, there's now a

0:52:59.440 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 2>bunker in the ridge on the right side. That gives

0:53:02.440 --> 0:53:05.960
<v Speaker 2>you sort of some decision points. Again, you know, I

0:53:06.000 --> 0:53:10.480
<v Speaker 2>always talk about the five decisions on a drivable par four.

0:53:11.040 --> 0:53:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Do you go whatever the hazard might be, do you

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:16.279
<v Speaker 2>go left of the hazard, right of the hazard, short

0:53:16.280 --> 0:53:18.239
<v Speaker 2>of the hazard, over the hazard, or do you go

0:53:18.320 --> 0:53:22.400
<v Speaker 2>for the green and so this is introducing some more decisions.

0:53:22.480 --> 0:53:26.400
<v Speaker 2>So it's a fairly large bunker along the right side

0:53:26.400 --> 0:53:30.319
<v Speaker 2>that is at an angle from the tee, and it's

0:53:30.480 --> 0:53:33.440
<v Speaker 2>reminiscent of a bunker on the sixth hole. And we're

0:53:33.520 --> 0:53:35.760
<v Speaker 2>sort of testing here a little bit, to be honest,

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:38.520
<v Speaker 2>because we're going to have another shot at this entire

0:53:38.560 --> 0:53:42.640
<v Speaker 2>golf hole in twenty twenty eight. So you'll notice that

0:53:42.640 --> 0:53:46.200
<v Speaker 2>the water is much more visible. The bunkers on the

0:53:46.280 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 2>right did not exist before. And you know, all in

0:53:51.040 --> 0:53:54.120
<v Speaker 2>the context of and I know this for a fact,

0:53:54.680 --> 0:53:58.520
<v Speaker 2>sitting with Pete and talking about drivable par fours, he

0:53:58.560 --> 0:54:01.240
<v Speaker 2>would say, well, then it's a par three.

0:54:01.880 --> 0:54:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is what This is what Alice said after

0:54:06.360 --> 0:54:10.080
<v Speaker 1>this version of the whole was initially built. She said, well,

0:54:10.239 --> 0:54:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, Pete didn't didn't really believe in drivable par fource.

0:54:14.280 --> 0:54:16.080
<v Speaker 1>He thought that was just the long part three.

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:23.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, and and so you know I I in my youth, uh,

0:54:23.520 --> 0:54:28.400
<v Speaker 2>and probably improperly said to him, well, then, Pete, how

0:54:28.440 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 2>about the sixteenth hole at TPC Sawgrass. It's a reachable

0:54:32.040 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 2>par five, So do we call it a par four?

0:54:35.120 --> 0:54:38.200
<v Speaker 2>And he scowled at me, And you know, it's it's

0:54:38.239 --> 0:54:40.440
<v Speaker 2>a risk reward. It's sort of the same good.

0:54:40.400 --> 0:54:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Point though, it's a good point. Why why why that

0:54:42.880 --> 0:54:43.600
<v Speaker 1>double standard?

0:54:44.000 --> 0:54:46.719
<v Speaker 2>Exactly? And and so he just sort of scowled at me.

0:54:46.800 --> 0:54:49.920
<v Speaker 2>And so we never really dove into that any further.

0:54:50.760 --> 0:54:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Uh So, suffice it to say, there's a lot to

0:54:53.239 --> 0:54:58.240
<v Speaker 2>study there. You know. Again, there's a lot of constituents

0:54:58.239 --> 0:55:01.400
<v Speaker 2>that that brought that into the into the golf course.

0:55:02.160 --> 0:55:04.680
<v Speaker 2>I think there's some minor things that we will probably

0:55:04.719 --> 0:55:07.880
<v Speaker 2>do once the green is rebuilt, to maybe make it

0:55:07.920 --> 0:55:10.480
<v Speaker 2>feel like it fits in with the golf course a

0:55:10.480 --> 0:55:13.360
<v Speaker 2>little bit better. It's not it's not a complete outlier

0:55:13.560 --> 0:55:15.920
<v Speaker 2>for sure. It's certainly not the golf hole that he

0:55:16.400 --> 0:55:19.520
<v Speaker 2>built originally. And and to give your your listeners a

0:55:19.560 --> 0:55:22.840
<v Speaker 2>little bit of context, that golf hole was somewhat repeated

0:55:22.960 --> 0:55:26.400
<v Speaker 2>multiple times. The original twelfth. You know, there's the fifth

0:55:26.400 --> 0:55:29.040
<v Speaker 2>at Long Cove. It was similar to the original twelfth

0:55:29.080 --> 0:55:32.839
<v Speaker 2>at TPC. I believe it's the fifth at Old Barsh

0:55:33.200 --> 0:55:35.759
<v Speaker 2>was recreated. Yeah.

0:55:35.800 --> 0:55:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Old Marsh is like an alpshole almost, that's right.

0:55:39.280 --> 0:55:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I've seen you know, now, we've worked on

0:55:42.520 --> 0:55:45.560
<v Speaker 2>so many of Pete and Allie's golf courses. We've seen

0:55:46.200 --> 0:55:48.640
<v Speaker 2>some of their I'll put in quotes templates, you know,

0:55:48.719 --> 0:55:53.360
<v Speaker 2>they they did take a general idea, you know, a theme,

0:55:53.400 --> 0:55:57.799
<v Speaker 2>and did variations on that theme and a few few

0:55:57.800 --> 0:56:01.200
<v Speaker 2>different designs. You know, island green. I put in quotes

0:56:01.239 --> 0:56:04.520
<v Speaker 2>that were surrounded by sand or surrounded by water. This

0:56:04.680 --> 0:56:10.719
<v Speaker 2>alpsehole he created, you know, various places. Sixteen at TPC Sawgrass,

0:56:10.719 --> 0:56:14.600
<v Speaker 2>he created various places. So you know, they had a

0:56:14.600 --> 0:56:18.839
<v Speaker 2>theme and a strategy that they would vary everywhere. So

0:56:19.280 --> 0:56:22.239
<v Speaker 2>the twelfth hole is not what it was. But we

0:56:22.520 --> 0:56:25.320
<v Speaker 2>we hear what the tour is saying. We understand what

0:56:25.440 --> 0:56:28.839
<v Speaker 2>the fans like to see. As far as excitement and

0:56:28.880 --> 0:56:32.239
<v Speaker 2>going for the green. I love, I personally love a

0:56:32.400 --> 0:56:36.879
<v Speaker 2>drivable par four. I have been chuckling for a week

0:56:37.000 --> 0:56:40.400
<v Speaker 2>now about this whole discussion of ten at Riviera. You know,

0:56:40.640 --> 0:56:44.880
<v Speaker 2>it has been so revered for so long, and you know,

0:56:44.960 --> 0:56:49.239
<v Speaker 2>our modern tour player is so intent on certainty, you know,

0:56:49.239 --> 0:56:51.399
<v Speaker 2>knowing that if they hit the three hundred and ten

0:56:51.480 --> 0:56:54.160
<v Speaker 2>yard tee shot with you know, only three yards of

0:56:54.239 --> 0:56:56.960
<v Speaker 2>cut or fate, that I'm going to be rewarded with

0:56:57.920 --> 0:57:01.120
<v Speaker 2>a golf shot that goes exactly where I wanted to go. Well,

0:57:01.160 --> 0:57:05.439
<v Speaker 2>the tenth at Rivier is none of that. It might

0:57:05.480 --> 0:57:10.040
<v Speaker 2>repel a perfect golf shot. Okay, that's golf. So that's

0:57:10.040 --> 0:57:12.160
<v Speaker 2>one of the reasons why I love the dragable part

0:57:12.200 --> 0:57:15.640
<v Speaker 2>four because a bad player like me, you know, somebody

0:57:15.680 --> 0:57:18.520
<v Speaker 2>that's a handicapped player, and a tour pro, we kind

0:57:18.520 --> 0:57:21.280
<v Speaker 2>of come together when it comes to that kind of

0:57:21.320 --> 0:57:24.040
<v Speaker 2>golf hole because length is not the determining fact.

0:57:25.360 --> 0:57:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well it'll be it'll be interesting to see if

0:57:28.400 --> 0:57:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the twelfth hole can be manufactured into into something that

0:57:32.000 --> 0:57:35.520
<v Speaker 1>creates that that kind of tension that the tenth hole

0:57:35.600 --> 0:57:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it at Riviera has. It has been tinkered with a

0:57:38.840 --> 0:57:42.600
<v Speaker 1>lot over the past several years. But but I I

0:57:42.640 --> 0:57:44.680
<v Speaker 1>trust that it'll get it'll get figured out in the

0:57:45.120 --> 0:57:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in the next few years. So looking forward to seeing

0:57:48.160 --> 0:57:51.240
<v Speaker 1>those small changes work out this year and then twenty

0:57:51.240 --> 0:57:54.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight, I guess we'll probably see a larger kind

0:57:54.560 --> 0:57:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of transformation of the of the of the entire course,

0:57:57.640 --> 0:57:58.520
<v Speaker 1>not just the twelfth hole.

0:57:59.760 --> 0:58:01.680
<v Speaker 2>That's that's right, and we've done a few other things

0:58:01.720 --> 0:58:05.480
<v Speaker 2>that are you know, less noticeable. Of course, for last

0:58:05.520 --> 0:58:10.200
<v Speaker 2>year's tournament, we restored the right side of fourteen it

0:58:10.240 --> 0:58:14.120
<v Speaker 2>was very gnarly and it had become less gnarly. And

0:58:14.320 --> 0:58:17.960
<v Speaker 2>this year we've done some work at the fifteenth tee

0:58:19.040 --> 0:58:21.200
<v Speaker 2>to get us ready for some work we're going to

0:58:21.240 --> 0:58:24.720
<v Speaker 2>do this summer down by the fifteenth green and starting

0:58:24.760 --> 0:58:29.160
<v Speaker 2>to prepare for hopefully reinstituting some of these waste areas.

0:58:29.200 --> 0:58:33.880
<v Speaker 2>So nothing big like the tree deal on number six,

0:58:34.080 --> 0:58:38.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, previous previously, but this year that's probably the

0:58:38.840 --> 0:58:41.520
<v Speaker 2>biggest change that you will see is at twelve and

0:58:41.560 --> 0:58:44.440
<v Speaker 2>again we're testing a little bit. The twelfth hole is

0:58:45.320 --> 0:58:48.800
<v Speaker 2>sort of the one that's really given us the most

0:58:48.840 --> 0:58:51.680
<v Speaker 2>to think about from the tea to the fairway to

0:58:52.200 --> 0:58:54.800
<v Speaker 2>the green, So we're testing a little bit right now.

0:58:54.880 --> 0:59:03.120
<v Speaker 2>We'll see what happens. I guess really two years from now.

0:59:04.440 --> 0:59:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey, I wanted to jump in here to talk about

0:59:06.640 --> 0:59:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a new partner that we're very excited to be working with,

0:59:10.320 --> 0:59:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the Golf Course Superintendent's Association of America or GCSAA. This

0:59:16.640 --> 0:59:20.360
<v Speaker 1>partnership makes a lot of sense for Friday Golf. GCSAA

0:59:20.440 --> 0:59:25.480
<v Speaker 1>supports more than twenty one thousand members worldwide, from superintendents

0:59:25.520 --> 0:59:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and equipment managers to students and educators. This year, GCSAA

0:59:30.440 --> 0:59:34.120
<v Speaker 1>is celebrating its one hundredth anniversary, and it will continue

0:59:34.160 --> 0:59:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that its members are on the forefront of research, education, innovation,

0:59:39.600 --> 0:59:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and advocacy through a range of programs and services. One

0:59:43.720 --> 0:59:47.440
<v Speaker 1>thing to keep an eye on is the gcsaa's program

0:59:47.680 --> 0:59:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Rounds for Research, where you can bid on more than

0:59:50.680 --> 0:59:53.880
<v Speaker 1>two thousand rounds at some of the most exclusive and

0:59:54.200 --> 0:59:58.360
<v Speaker 1>well known courses in America. Rounds for Research addresses a

0:59:58.400 --> 1:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>critical shortage of fundation for ongoing university based agronomic programs.

1:00:04.800 --> 1:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>You can help foster sustainability with a donation or by

1:00:08.760 --> 1:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>bidding on rounds during the online auction. If you would

1:00:12.920 --> 1:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>like to support GCSAA through Rounds for Research, we'll have

1:00:16.240 --> 1:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>more information on the program in April. In the meantime,

1:00:20.200 --> 1:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>go check out GCSAA dot org. It's a great organization

1:00:24.800 --> 1:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that does a lot for the game. All right, let's

1:00:27.040 --> 1:00:35.959
<v Speaker 1>get back to the episode. Okay, let's chat a little

1:00:35.960 --> 1:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>bit at the end here about Harbortown. Now you have

1:00:40.960 --> 1:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>completed Love Golf Design has completed a big project at Harbortown,

1:00:46.840 --> 1:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, whereas the changes at TPC Sawgrass recently have

1:00:51.040 --> 1:00:54.760
<v Speaker 1>been have been relatively subtle, just targeting certain things, doing

1:00:56.160 --> 1:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>making adjustments here and there, preparing for a large project

1:01:00.760 --> 1:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>down the line. Harbortown happened all at once, basically last year.

1:01:06.360 --> 1:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>This was a major project at a course that the

1:01:09.240 --> 1:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>PGA Tour goes to annually. Now, this was characterized as

1:01:14.680 --> 1:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a restoration of the golf course. So you know, going

1:01:19.800 --> 1:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>into this project, what kind of research did you do

1:01:23.360 --> 1:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and what archival resources were especially helpful, Which era of

1:01:27.360 --> 1:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the course was was especially inspirational, you know, given that

1:01:30.880 --> 1:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>this was restorative work.

1:01:32.480 --> 1:01:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Right well, so there's lots of questions there. We had

1:01:36.760 --> 1:01:40.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of archives. One of the main archives we

1:01:40.680 --> 1:01:44.240
<v Speaker 2>had was a Sports Illustrated article that was done in

1:01:44.280 --> 1:01:48.600
<v Speaker 2>the early seventies that documented photographically the golf course as

1:01:48.640 --> 1:01:51.040
<v Speaker 2>it pretty much was when it opened. And it was

1:01:51.160 --> 1:01:56.240
<v Speaker 2>quite different, quite different, needless to say. Maintenance and all

1:01:56.280 --> 1:01:59.080
<v Speaker 2>of that was one of those things. But it was

1:01:59.120 --> 1:02:02.000
<v Speaker 2>a bit more wild than it is today for sure,

1:02:03.160 --> 1:02:06.000
<v Speaker 2>And as we studied that for years actually, as you

1:02:06.040 --> 1:02:09.640
<v Speaker 2>can imagine, you know, except for the superintendent, John Wright,

1:02:09.640 --> 1:02:12.080
<v Speaker 2>who's been there for a long time, and folks like

1:02:12.160 --> 1:02:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Kerrie Corbett who ran Sea Pines for a long time

1:02:16.080 --> 1:02:19.240
<v Speaker 2>for the owner and John Ferrell. Those folks know that

1:02:19.280 --> 1:02:22.760
<v Speaker 2>golf course intimately and have known it for forty plus

1:02:22.880 --> 1:02:27.160
<v Speaker 2>years intimately. But when it comes to golf designed, folks

1:02:27.440 --> 1:02:31.160
<v Speaker 2>that Mark Love, Davis Love, and Scott Sherman have probably

1:02:31.160 --> 1:02:34.040
<v Speaker 2>spent more time on that golf course than any golf

1:02:34.080 --> 1:02:39.800
<v Speaker 2>design people period, including the mecurate golf construction guys that

1:02:39.840 --> 1:02:42.920
<v Speaker 2>they have worked at Harbortown a long time and they're

1:02:42.920 --> 1:02:46.560
<v Speaker 2>longtime friends of ours and colleagues of ours. So having

1:02:46.600 --> 1:02:49.040
<v Speaker 2>said that, we had a lot of information that we

1:02:49.120 --> 1:02:52.200
<v Speaker 2>already knew. Like I said, I was inspired to reach

1:02:52.240 --> 1:02:55.040
<v Speaker 2>out to Pete Alice the first time when I left

1:02:55.080 --> 1:02:58.400
<v Speaker 2>the fourteenth Green and saw that pop bunker with the

1:02:58.440 --> 1:03:01.000
<v Speaker 2>steps down into it, the latter that was straight down

1:03:01.000 --> 1:03:02.600
<v Speaker 2>into that bunker, I was like, I got to call

1:03:02.640 --> 1:03:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Pete or find out how do you do that? Where

1:03:06.240 --> 1:03:09.240
<v Speaker 2>do I find them? So anyway, we were influenced a

1:03:09.280 --> 1:03:12.080
<v Speaker 2>lot by the original golf course, to be honest with you.

1:03:12.720 --> 1:03:19.640
<v Speaker 2>So for one, there were stack sawd bunkers everywhere, not

1:03:19.800 --> 1:03:23.880
<v Speaker 2>just pop bunkers. There were edges sixteen that the big,

1:03:24.040 --> 1:03:26.720
<v Speaker 2>the original waist bunker of all waist bunkers was the

1:03:26.840 --> 1:03:30.480
<v Speaker 2>bunker on sixteen. Pete named it that for a funny reason.

1:03:30.560 --> 1:03:33.280
<v Speaker 2>He had a pipe break and fill that thing with

1:03:33.360 --> 1:03:34.800
<v Speaker 2>waste and that's where the.

1:03:34.880 --> 1:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Name came from.

1:03:36.320 --> 1:03:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, during construction, I don't know if it was

1:03:39.240 --> 1:03:42.880
<v Speaker 2>a sewer line or a dredge line or whatever, but

1:03:42.920 --> 1:03:45.160
<v Speaker 2>a pipe broke and filled that thing with a bunch

1:03:45.160 --> 1:03:49.160
<v Speaker 2>of waste material, and so he coined the phrase waste bunkers.

1:03:49.160 --> 1:03:52.600
<v Speaker 2>So that's where that name came from. And you know,

1:03:52.680 --> 1:03:55.200
<v Speaker 2>it was a waste bunker for a long long time.

1:03:56.160 --> 1:03:59.400
<v Speaker 2>But the edges there, certainly on the left were stack

1:03:59.520 --> 1:04:02.440
<v Speaker 2>soad edge, and he back in the day used you know,

1:04:02.600 --> 1:04:07.200
<v Speaker 2>real sod, meaning probably centipede and behavio grass and that

1:04:07.240 --> 1:04:10.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of thing. And because it was natural sod in

1:04:10.720 --> 1:04:14.880
<v Speaker 2>the South, it didn't last very long. So slowly, but surely,

1:04:15.440 --> 1:04:17.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, some of the pop bunker, all of the

1:04:17.240 --> 1:04:20.680
<v Speaker 2>pop bunkers, all of the stack side was removed completely,

1:04:22.040 --> 1:04:25.240
<v Speaker 2>and for years they have been thinking about how do

1:04:25.320 --> 1:04:28.960
<v Speaker 2>we bring that back but make it lasting. So we

1:04:29.080 --> 1:04:34.160
<v Speaker 2>identified several bunkers, mostly what I would say are pop bunkers,

1:04:34.200 --> 1:04:39.120
<v Speaker 2>to do a modern version of sod stacking. The industry

1:04:39.120 --> 1:04:43.880
<v Speaker 2>has gotten much better at creating artificial revetting that looks

1:04:44.320 --> 1:04:48.959
<v Speaker 2>pretty natural. It's off colored. We allow it to sort

1:04:49.000 --> 1:04:52.480
<v Speaker 2>of age and you know, get some plant material in

1:04:52.520 --> 1:04:57.000
<v Speaker 2>it or whatever's happening. And what's interesting is at Harbortown

1:04:57.280 --> 1:04:59.960
<v Speaker 2>this is sort of a side thing, but these two

1:05:00.080 --> 1:05:03.320
<v Speaker 2>all bunkers that we did sid stacking on are such

1:05:03.320 --> 1:05:06.880
<v Speaker 2>a contrast between the oversea during the tournament, you know,

1:05:06.920 --> 1:05:09.680
<v Speaker 2>we really we were really trying to think is that

1:05:09.720 --> 1:05:12.320
<v Speaker 2>a good thing? Is that a bad thing? You can

1:05:12.320 --> 1:05:14.480
<v Speaker 2>see them, you don't. You can't miss these things, the

1:05:14.520 --> 1:05:18.400
<v Speaker 2>ones that are visible from the fairway, you can't miss them.

1:05:18.680 --> 1:05:22.080
<v Speaker 2>And if you look at the old photographs, same thing.

1:05:22.240 --> 1:05:26.520
<v Speaker 2>You just couldn't miss those stack side bunkers that lasted

1:05:26.560 --> 1:05:30.160
<v Speaker 2>for a few years in the original Harbor Town. So

1:05:30.920 --> 1:05:34.640
<v Speaker 2>that was a restorative aspect, believe it or not. We

1:05:34.720 --> 1:05:38.959
<v Speaker 2>moved a tree at Harbortown as well, on the fifth hole.

1:05:40.120 --> 1:05:44.200
<v Speaker 2>That's a funny story. Apparently Pete originally built the green

1:05:44.360 --> 1:05:47.680
<v Speaker 2>too close to the property line, and once a house

1:05:47.800 --> 1:05:51.320
<v Speaker 2>was built there years after the green was built, it

1:05:51.440 --> 1:05:55.320
<v Speaker 2>became a problem. So several several years ago he and

1:05:55.440 --> 1:06:00.479
<v Speaker 2>mccurate Golf moved that fifth green to the left, still five,

1:06:01.600 --> 1:06:03.760
<v Speaker 2>but the trees were really not in play like they

1:06:03.800 --> 1:06:06.200
<v Speaker 2>were on other holes. If you think about the second

1:06:06.240 --> 1:06:09.439
<v Speaker 2>hole there, your second shot to number two green, there's

1:06:09.520 --> 1:06:12.360
<v Speaker 2>a big old tree, you know, that kind of hangs

1:06:12.400 --> 1:06:14.840
<v Speaker 2>over and you've got to work your ball around that tree.

1:06:14.960 --> 1:06:18.720
<v Speaker 2>So we moved I guess a fifty foot oak tree

1:06:18.760 --> 1:06:22.680
<v Speaker 2>about thirty or forty feet towards towards the green so

1:06:22.720 --> 1:06:26.400
<v Speaker 2>that it's more intervening and again creating more of that

1:06:26.680 --> 1:06:29.400
<v Speaker 2>s hole or that switchback hole as you call it.

1:06:30.680 --> 1:06:35.000
<v Speaker 2>So we took cues from the old golf course from

1:06:35.200 --> 1:06:38.600
<v Speaker 2>We didn't really settle on a particular era, but we

1:06:39.480 --> 1:06:43.120
<v Speaker 2>stacked up and added up the old and the mid

1:06:43.160 --> 1:06:46.520
<v Speaker 2>life of things that we liked and restored it to

1:06:46.720 --> 1:06:51.320
<v Speaker 2>that degree. As we rebuilt greens, we sped up some contours,

1:06:51.520 --> 1:06:55.200
<v Speaker 2>which is very typical. Those are very small greens, as

1:06:55.200 --> 1:06:57.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, so you have to be very careful about that.

1:06:58.440 --> 1:07:01.440
<v Speaker 2>But by and large, to create some more challenge, we

1:07:01.520 --> 1:07:05.160
<v Speaker 2>actually enlarged some greens. Those greens were small anyway, so

1:07:05.200 --> 1:07:08.840
<v Speaker 2>we needed to get a little bit more space. So gosh,

1:07:09.000 --> 1:07:12.640
<v Speaker 2>except for I would say, well, pretty much every hole

1:07:12.760 --> 1:07:16.480
<v Speaker 2>was touched in one way or another beyond just the reconstruction.

1:07:16.600 --> 1:07:21.400
<v Speaker 2>There was something restorative about every golf hole there and

1:07:21.440 --> 1:07:24.320
<v Speaker 2>some things that we sort of updated. The ninth Green

1:07:24.440 --> 1:07:28.640
<v Speaker 2>was elevated slightly slightly more. Pete elevated it years ago

1:07:29.120 --> 1:07:32.720
<v Speaker 2>in one of his renovations, and we elevated it a

1:07:32.720 --> 1:07:36.640
<v Speaker 2>little bit more, really trying to create a situation where

1:07:36.640 --> 1:07:39.000
<v Speaker 2>the guys stand on the tee and don't just waiale

1:07:39.040 --> 1:07:42.440
<v Speaker 2>away and think that they might hop up there. So

1:07:42.560 --> 1:07:45.520
<v Speaker 2>things like that. But it was all over the golf course.

1:07:46.720 --> 1:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's a really interesting project and not uncommon in

1:07:52.280 --> 1:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>this era of golf course restoration that we're seeing. In fact,

1:07:55.040 --> 1:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>actually Gil Hans's recent work at Oakmont was kind of

1:07:58.720 --> 1:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>took this greatest Hits right where you know, you have

1:08:02.720 --> 1:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>this sort of thirty to forty year period at Oakmont

1:08:05.840 --> 1:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>where the classic course took form but was altered many

1:08:12.400 --> 1:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>times over that period. So you know, do you choose

1:08:15.320 --> 1:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>one year or do you kind of look at a

1:08:18.320 --> 1:08:21.439
<v Speaker 1>range of years and choose what you think are the

1:08:21.520 --> 1:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>coolest features and add up to the best golf course.

1:08:25.479 --> 1:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like you did a little bit of that at Harbortown,

1:08:28.640 --> 1:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>but with the stack sad bunkers specifically. There was some

1:08:32.640 --> 1:08:35.839
<v Speaker 1>chatter online about this when the when the course reopened.

1:08:35.880 --> 1:08:38.599
<v Speaker 1>I guess some people were surprised to see this style

1:08:38.640 --> 1:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of bunker on a Pete Die golf course because he

1:08:40.760 --> 1:08:43.519
<v Speaker 1>didn't often do this later in his career. Though he

1:08:43.560 --> 1:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>attempted to do it a few times early in his career,

1:08:46.720 --> 1:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it just didn't seem to work out practically. You know,

1:08:50.720 --> 1:08:53.719
<v Speaker 1>using some artificial material, you're able to make those bunkers

1:08:53.760 --> 1:08:56.479
<v Speaker 1>more durable, and I suppose that's that's part of why

1:08:56.520 --> 1:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you can do it now. But you know, when you're

1:08:59.600 --> 1:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>making decision to bring back those stacked sad bunkers, you

1:09:05.240 --> 1:09:09.479
<v Speaker 1>are saying, basically, the first few years of the course

1:09:09.640 --> 1:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that these existed is what we're looking at here. That's

1:09:13.960 --> 1:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the source of inspiration.

1:09:15.360 --> 1:09:15.760
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

1:09:16.200 --> 1:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to be considering the changes that were

1:09:19.800 --> 1:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>made later on. And you have to make a lot

1:09:22.439 --> 1:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of judgment calls like this at a Pete Die course.

1:09:24.360 --> 1:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Because he was a tinkerer, he made a lot of

1:09:26.800 --> 1:09:29.479
<v Speaker 1>changes at his golf courses. And so when you're making

1:09:29.520 --> 1:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a decision like that one, how do you differentiate between

1:09:35.280 --> 1:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>the early version of the course and the later version

1:09:38.680 --> 1:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of the course that often die himself oversaw. How do

1:09:43.479 --> 1:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you give more credit to one of those than the

1:09:46.200 --> 1:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>other when making specific decisions.

1:09:49.040 --> 1:09:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, to be deferential to Pete, Alice, I

1:09:54.280 --> 1:09:57.559
<v Speaker 2>can just tell you site visit after site visit after

1:09:57.680 --> 1:10:04.080
<v Speaker 2>site visit, John Fair, Gerrel, John Wright, Davis Love, Scott Sherman,

1:10:04.760 --> 1:10:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Alan mccurric, Tom Webber. Those are the folks that made

1:10:08.160 --> 1:10:12.599
<v Speaker 2>it happen. We stood there together and you know, we

1:10:12.720 --> 1:10:17.040
<v Speaker 2>leaned on each other and just had discussions about how

1:10:17.680 --> 1:10:20.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, we were afraid to make any missteps. But

1:10:20.880 --> 1:10:23.040
<v Speaker 2>on the other hand, the best way to finish a

1:10:23.120 --> 1:10:27.040
<v Speaker 2>project is to start it. So we had to make decisions,

1:10:27.160 --> 1:10:32.040
<v Speaker 2>and we had so much information that we very much collaboratively.

1:10:32.160 --> 1:10:34.760
<v Speaker 2>And I would say the same is true at TPC Sawgrass.

1:10:34.960 --> 1:10:40.200
<v Speaker 2>As you said, the best of versions of Harbortown and Sawgrass.

1:10:40.240 --> 1:10:43.479
<v Speaker 2>We very much thought in those terms and tried to

1:10:45.160 --> 1:10:48.320
<v Speaker 2>as best we could. You can't think like Pete. He

1:10:48.439 --> 1:10:51.040
<v Speaker 2>was original. He thought of things out of the box.

1:10:51.120 --> 1:10:54.360
<v Speaker 2>So we tried to grab things that he himself did

1:10:54.920 --> 1:11:00.240
<v Speaker 2>and institute them, reinstitute them where they were and to

1:11:00.280 --> 1:11:03.080
<v Speaker 2>be honest with you, we had a as always, we

1:11:03.120 --> 1:11:05.439
<v Speaker 2>had about an eighty percent idea of what we were

1:11:05.439 --> 1:11:08.120
<v Speaker 2>going to do hole by hole. But as we stand

1:11:08.200 --> 1:11:10.760
<v Speaker 2>there and as we take it all in, as we

1:11:10.840 --> 1:11:14.960
<v Speaker 2>walk the ground, as we look at this documentation, as

1:11:14.960 --> 1:11:18.320
<v Speaker 2>we talk about our experiences with Pete and Alice on

1:11:18.400 --> 1:11:23.880
<v Speaker 2>that property, decisions came. Sometimes we would build something in

1:11:23.920 --> 1:11:26.080
<v Speaker 2>the dirt and we thought we had a good decision,

1:11:26.400 --> 1:11:28.160
<v Speaker 2>and we'd all get back together and look at it

1:11:28.160 --> 1:11:30.960
<v Speaker 2>and say, Nope, that's not right. That does not look right.

1:11:31.000 --> 1:11:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Everybody will look at each other and say, that's right,

1:11:32.920 --> 1:11:37.000
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't look right. Let's tinker with that. Let's get Victor,

1:11:37.080 --> 1:11:39.479
<v Speaker 2>our shaper, and let's tinker with that. Let's get Tom

1:11:39.520 --> 1:11:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Weber over here, let's tinker with that. So it was

1:11:43.040 --> 1:11:48.040
<v Speaker 2>very collaborative, which in a lot of respects when I

1:11:48.120 --> 1:11:51.000
<v Speaker 2>lead a project on my own, I can make decisions,

1:11:51.080 --> 1:11:55.800
<v Speaker 2>keep moving, throw flags, request things to be done, move on,

1:11:56.000 --> 1:11:59.080
<v Speaker 2>move on, move on. But in this circumstance, there's so

1:11:59.240 --> 1:12:01.600
<v Speaker 2>much we need to consider, and we are committed to

1:12:01.760 --> 1:12:05.519
<v Speaker 2>considering that. It's actually kind of difficult to be honest

1:12:05.520 --> 1:12:08.479
<v Speaker 2>with you. Is there a right answer? No, But there's

1:12:08.520 --> 1:12:11.720
<v Speaker 2>also not a wrong answer. In the confines of what

1:12:11.760 --> 1:12:16.160
<v Speaker 2>we have from Pete's history there and the documentation, we

1:12:16.240 --> 1:12:18.880
<v Speaker 2>have something to choose from, as you say, the best

1:12:18.920 --> 1:12:22.240
<v Speaker 2>of we have something to choose from that we're going

1:12:22.320 --> 1:12:24.600
<v Speaker 2>to use to go back to he's the architect of

1:12:24.600 --> 1:12:28.360
<v Speaker 2>the golf course. And in that context, that's where we

1:12:28.360 --> 1:12:31.120
<v Speaker 2>were able to choose those tools. We didn't run off

1:12:31.120 --> 1:12:34.519
<v Speaker 2>and do something crazy. We didn't go off the script.

1:12:35.439 --> 1:12:37.240
<v Speaker 2>If it were if it was not there in the

1:12:37.320 --> 1:12:41.240
<v Speaker 2>last sixty years, it really didn't get reinstituted into the

1:12:41.240 --> 1:12:45.000
<v Speaker 2>golf course. Now, having said that, we did need to

1:12:45.080 --> 1:12:47.439
<v Speaker 2>deal with some length. We didn't need to get a

1:12:47.439 --> 1:12:51.599
<v Speaker 2>little bit creative. For example, the second t is now

1:12:52.040 --> 1:12:53.880
<v Speaker 2>and has been for a couple of years left of

1:12:53.960 --> 1:12:57.800
<v Speaker 2>number one green, so you hit across the street. The

1:12:57.840 --> 1:13:01.560
<v Speaker 2>part five, you hit across the street now under a

1:13:01.680 --> 1:13:04.920
<v Speaker 2>leaning tree, which was not original, but hey, in the

1:13:04.960 --> 1:13:07.600
<v Speaker 2>context of the fifth hole at Harbor Town and the

1:13:07.680 --> 1:13:10.760
<v Speaker 2>sixth hole at TPC, we were like, that's that's going

1:13:10.840 --> 1:13:14.080
<v Speaker 2>to get into these guys heads. So it adds an

1:13:14.240 --> 1:13:18.679
<v Speaker 2>added difficulty to the golf course. So anyway, again, even

1:13:18.720 --> 1:13:21.200
<v Speaker 2>that decision was we're going to move this back. Pete

1:13:21.200 --> 1:13:23.840
<v Speaker 2>would have added length, and he likes the fact that

1:13:23.880 --> 1:13:26.040
<v Speaker 2>there's something to look at and something to think about

1:13:26.080 --> 1:13:27.160
<v Speaker 2>off the team.

1:13:27.920 --> 1:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Another constituent in this renovation you talked about all the

1:13:32.439 --> 1:13:36.559
<v Speaker 1>voices that were in the room and the trickiness of that.

1:13:37.240 --> 1:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Another constituent is the tour players. The tyre players love Harbortown, right.

1:13:42.240 --> 1:13:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think they like the course so much?

1:13:45.840 --> 1:13:49.800
<v Speaker 2>You know? Gosh, I wish I was of that ability

1:13:50.280 --> 1:13:53.479
<v Speaker 2>to kind of understand it. But having said that, I've

1:13:53.520 --> 1:13:56.519
<v Speaker 2>done this long enough and been around enough good players

1:13:56.520 --> 1:14:02.559
<v Speaker 2>and worked for enough tournament venues, I think Harbortown is

1:14:02.600 --> 1:14:06.679
<v Speaker 2>one of those where almost anybody can win if you're

1:14:06.720 --> 1:14:10.120
<v Speaker 2>playing well. If you know, it doesn't cater to the

1:14:10.120 --> 1:14:15.519
<v Speaker 2>long player, it doesn't cater to one shot shape, you know.

1:14:15.720 --> 1:14:19.240
<v Speaker 2>There we we often say there is a there is

1:14:19.720 --> 1:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>an intangible vibe there, regardless of what the golf holes do.

1:14:24.520 --> 1:14:28.720
<v Speaker 2>There's an intangible vibe on that property that is just wonderful,

1:14:28.800 --> 1:14:32.200
<v Speaker 2>no matter what the golf hole looks like. Over the

1:14:32.280 --> 1:14:35.839
<v Speaker 2>years they have they have curated that play so well.

1:14:36.720 --> 1:14:39.000
<v Speaker 2>And of course Pete set the stage. Pete and Alice

1:14:39.000 --> 1:14:42.280
<v Speaker 2>set the stage and Jack Nicholas set the stage. Charles

1:14:42.320 --> 1:14:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Fraser set the stage for a very natural setting. So

1:14:46.439 --> 1:14:49.360
<v Speaker 2>the setting is is fabulous. But I would say, you know,

1:14:49.360 --> 1:14:52.599
<v Speaker 2>you've got Davis who won five times, very long player,

1:14:53.240 --> 1:14:56.200
<v Speaker 2>but you know also his shot shape tended to be straight,

1:14:57.439 --> 1:14:59.120
<v Speaker 2>so if he was in control of his ball, he

1:14:59.160 --> 1:15:01.519
<v Speaker 2>knew where it was going. And if you're if you're not,

1:15:02.439 --> 1:15:05.799
<v Speaker 2>that's not your week. And again, you know, the greens

1:15:05.840 --> 1:15:09.280
<v Speaker 2>are tricky in that they're small and there's not a

1:15:09.320 --> 1:15:12.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of contour, there's a lot of slow So as

1:15:12.320 --> 1:15:14.479
<v Speaker 2>long as you're in control of your your putting stroke,

1:15:14.520 --> 1:15:16.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, you don't have a lot of crazy double

1:15:16.680 --> 1:15:19.320
<v Speaker 2>breakers and that sort of thing. So I would say

1:15:19.439 --> 1:15:22.880
<v Speaker 2>if you look at both Harbortown and the modern version

1:15:22.920 --> 1:15:26.519
<v Speaker 2>of Harbortown to some degree is TPC sawgrass, lots of

1:15:26.560 --> 1:15:30.080
<v Speaker 2>different types of players can win there. If you're on

1:15:30.120 --> 1:15:33.240
<v Speaker 2>your game, you don't necessarily have to be long, You

1:15:33.360 --> 1:15:35.160
<v Speaker 2>just have to be in control of your golf ball

1:15:35.520 --> 1:15:37.000
<v Speaker 2>in the air and on the ground.

1:15:38.280 --> 1:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm looking forward to seeing this renewed version of

1:15:41.080 --> 1:15:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Harbortown at the Heritage this year. Congratulations on that project,

1:15:45.800 --> 1:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and thank you so much for coming on the podcast.

1:15:48.200 --> 1:15:49.599
<v Speaker 1>It was really fun to chat with you guys.

1:15:49.680 --> 1:15:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh, glad to you. Guys are so prolific and go

1:15:53.439 --> 1:15:56.760
<v Speaker 2>so many places. I'm honored to be included in your

1:15:56.800 --> 1:16:00.320
<v Speaker 2>in your discussions, and I've enjoyed watching where you been.

1:16:00.760 --> 1:16:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it's very kind of you to say thank you.

1:16:09.360 --> 1:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Designing Golf was produced by Will Balsam.

1:16:13.600 --> 1:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Will. If you've been enjoying Designing Golf, then

1:16:17.840 --> 1:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I can just about guarantee that you would love what

1:16:20.320 --> 1:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>we're doing in Frida Egg Golf Club. Go to the

1:16:23.360 --> 1:16:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Frida Egg dot com slash membership to see what it's

1:16:26.640 --> 1:16:29.679
<v Speaker 1>all about. But basically, in Frida Egg Golf Club, we're

1:16:29.720 --> 1:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>bringing together a bunch of avid golfers around our love

1:16:34.479 --> 1:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of the game. We do a lot of architecture content

1:16:37.400 --> 1:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in Frida Egg Golf Club, so you know, specifically related

1:16:40.439 --> 1:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to the topic of designing golf. You'll find a lot

1:16:42.920 --> 1:16:47.519
<v Speaker 1>more in FEGC. We do weekly course profiles on courses

1:16:47.560 --> 1:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that we find incredibly interesting, and I also do regular

1:16:51.640 --> 1:16:57.559
<v Speaker 1>columns and newsletters about ongoing golf architecture news. So all

1:16:57.600 --> 1:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of that's available and more in f e g C. Again,

1:17:01.360 --> 1:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the Friday dot com slash membership go check it out.

1:17:05.280 --> 1:17:07.559
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening, and we'll be back again soon

1:17:08.000 --> 1:17:10.599
<v Speaker 1>with another episode.