WEBVTT - Smart Talks with IBM - Unlocking Data Strategy: Data Literacy for Better Business

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>This season of Smart Talks with IBM is all about

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>new creators, the developers, data scientists, c t o s,

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and other visionaries creatively applying technology in business to drive change.

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>They use their knowledge and creativity to develop better ways

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of working, no matter the industry. Join hosts from your

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite Pushkin Industries podcasts as they use their expertise to

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:37.480
<v Speaker 1>deepen these conversations, and of course Malcolm Gladwell will guide

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>you through the season as your host and provide his

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>thoughts and analysis along the way. Look out for new

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.480
<v Speaker 1>episodes of Smart Talks with IBM on the I Heart

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and learn more at IBM dot com slash smart talks. Hello, Hello,

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Smart Talks with IBM, a podcast from Pushkin Industries,

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio and ib M. I'm Malcolm Glamo. This season,

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>we're talking to new creators, the developers, data scientists, ct

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>os and other visionaries who are creatively applying technology in

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>business to drive change. Channeling their knowledge and expertise, they're

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>developing more creative and effective solutions, no matter the industry.

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Our guest today is Nicholas Renaut, Senior Data science and

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>AI technical specialist at IBM. Nicholas's job is to help

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>companies formulate a data strategy that streamlines the way they

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>do business and prepares them to use sophisticated AI technologies.

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>But beyond his day to day, Nick is also a

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>content creator on YouTube, where his channel has over a

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand subscribers. His videos explain computer science concepts in

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a way beginners can understand, and he often demonstrates how

0:01:56.280 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to use machine learning and data science to solve novel problems.

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>On today's show, How Nicholas Learned Data science from the

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>bottom up, the fundamentals of data management, and how an

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>innovative data strategy can help businesses create novels solutions, Nick

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 1>spoke with Ronald Young Jr. Host of the Pushkin podcast Solvable.

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>Along with being a frequent contributor to NPR, Ronald also

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>hosts and produces the podcast Time Well Spent and Leaving

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the Theater. Okay, let's get to the interview. So tell

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit about how you got into data

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and when you found out like the power that it

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>really harnesses. Do you have a story or anything that

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like when you first pique your interest in data.

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>My first interaction with data and with coding was actually

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 1>when I was around about eleven years old, So this

0:02:56.520 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>was really just getting started with just looking at spread sheets.

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>So my dad would come home and after working a

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>nine or five job, he actually started working with investing

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>in stocks and doing value based trading that way. I'll

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>always remember I walked up to his desk one time

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and he said, Nick, if there's one thing that you

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.399
<v Speaker 1>should learn, I'm seeing all these people work on these

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>things called macros in spreadsheets, and these people like wizards

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>inside of my business. I know that you're still you're

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>still in high school, but I really think you should

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>learn this stuff. And I started doubling in some Excel

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>spreadsheets and started just recording macros and tweaking stuff, and

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that that's where it all started. But from there, it's

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it's always been a recurring vein throughout my career that

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I've done some sort of wizardry with data, whether it

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>be coding or business intelligence or data views. It's it's

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>always had a bit of a strain throughout throughout whatever

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I've done, whether based start ups so YouTube or what

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing now at IBM. Your dad was right. Let

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>me just say that, because that's someone who's trying to

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>put together a spreadsheet just to manage my personal finances.

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Trying to look up the formula to actually bring a

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>value from what what uhet to another is enough of

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a struggle for me. So I'm glad to do. Really

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:24.799
<v Speaker 1>is it's like it's absolutely is uh so like knowing

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that you know, this was how you started getting into spreadsheets.

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>You know you're looking at stocks and all of that. Um,

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>can you talk to me about how you found out

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the importance of data literacy, how you begin to value

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>understanding what the numbers meant and what power that could have.

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I got a cadet ship at one of the big

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>four accounting firms and started out as an orditor there,

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty much data focus. So I saw that

0:04:54.880 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>these numbers ultimately fed into a significantly big at PA Chill,

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>which was a formal annual report, and numbers being wrong

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in an annual report can move markets, right, those numbers

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>need to be absolutely bang on. But I think that

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>is sort of where it started. Where it really culminated

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>was when I started doing some work at the Reserve

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Australia. And those numbers don't just impact the

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>metrics for a particular organization, they impact the entire countries metrics.

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Getting those numbers wrong on a particular chart, or getting

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>them right on a particular chart can move entire organizations,

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>or can shift an entire country. It's kind of crazy

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>what the value that doing things correctly with data has.

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>So when you're presenting a metric, you have to ensure

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that you are portraying the appropriate message. It's not just

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>about the wrong number, because correlation does not necessarily imply causation.

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>So understanding what it is that you're saying is so

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>so important, and it is so much more powerful now

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that we've got so much more data available at our fingertips.

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>It's really easy to go and grab a bunch of

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>metrics and go, hey, I'm going to grab this data

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>from over here, and grab that data from over here

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>for a measured together. Hey, look, these two lines follow

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the same trend. They must be related. Do you find

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>yourself ever looking at data points and say those this,

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>How do I don't understand this chart? Why did they

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>where did they pull this from? Do you find yourself

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>doing that a lot of your regular life. Oh yeah,

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>that There's there's some great charts out there as well

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that you always see, and they they plot like the

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>number of Nicolas Cage movies against the g d P

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of Bolivia or something, and it's like, well, they're going

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in the same direction. They must have some relationship. But

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>people can really quickly look at a picture and go

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and make an assumption about what that is saying without

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>actually interpreting. Hey, are these on the same scales? Are

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>they what time period is being displayed? What am I

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>actually looking at here? And I find myself doing this

0:06:58.160 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>more and more often when I just see a child

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.799
<v Speaker 1>them like, hold on, let's just not make any assumption.

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 1>What is this chart actually trying to say? What is

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it actually trying to portray? Because you can lie with

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>statistics if you know what you're doing. It is they're

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>so powerful and people can gloss over them so quickly.

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>We've got attention spans that are so much shorter these

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>days that it can be very very easy to take

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>away the wrong message. So you also produce content across

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>various platforms, including YouTube and your personal blog. UH as

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a content creator, how did you get started in that

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>field and what type of content are you creating? Yeah,

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a crazy story, right. So I always wanted to

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>get into tech and said, hey, I'd really really like

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to work for IBM. I saw what they were doing

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>with Watson, and I'm like, why are people talking about

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>this more? And I had no affiliation with with IBM

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and I'm like, well, this is so cool.

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>There used to be this thing or or this service

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>available on the cloud platform called Personality Insights, and you

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>could plug in a little bit of text and from

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that piece of text, it would analyze that particular person's

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>personality based on the Big five personality traits. And there

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>actually used to be this demo app where you could

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>cook it up to a Twitter account, so I could

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>pass through Oprah's Twitter account or Lebron's Twitter account and

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it would actually analyze their profiles. And this is so cool.

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>It was nuts, and I was like and a lot

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of people don't know how to use this. So that

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>was quite possibly one of the first true toils that

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I made on YouTube, and actually used a bunch of

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>videos that I made following after that too. Finally land

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a job at IBM. I actually spammed a bunch of

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>links in my resume and my coverle that I was like, hey,

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm already working with this stuff and I could do it.

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 1>And the person that hired me, she actually said that

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that was like such an amazing way to portray what

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>what you love about what you do, that that that

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>had such an influencing factor in actually getting the job.

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I did it because one the tech was

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>so cool and I thought it was so interesting and

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>so powerful, and yeah, eventually that helped me land that job.

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>So you do a lot of tutorials where you're you're

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>breaking down complex topics to kind of a wider audience.

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Why is that important for you to do? Yeah? I

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>think one of the amazing things about knowledge is it's

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that you can give away and

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 1>never lose, right, And I think one of the trickiest

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>things about the whole data science and machine learning field

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>is that it can be pretty tricky to get started,

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes we get hung up with learning from the

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:02.599
<v Speaker 1>bottom up right, And there's nothing wrong with learning fundamentals

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and learning foundations and really getting stuck in. But in

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.119
<v Speaker 1>order to stick with something, you have to find it interesting.

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 1>So if you can see the end result and then

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>work your way back up and work out how that's worked.

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Then it is so much more attractive because you get

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that instant gratification and go, hey, I've just built this

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>machine learning app that is able to decode sign language.

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>It's so cool. Now I'm going to go and work

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>out the tech behind it. Admittedly, not everyone goes and

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>works out the tech behind it, but what I'm trying

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to do is make it so that more people can

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>get involved and get started with it. Lately, I've been

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>doing these things called code that challenges, and they're kind

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of crazy, right, but I love doing them. So I

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:48.359
<v Speaker 1>have to build entire machine learning or data science applications

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>without looking at any reference code, stack overflow, or looking

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>at any documentation within fifteen minutes. So it is literally

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 1>just a trial by fire. I'll have my phone, I'll

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>set a time, and I'm like, all right, guys, we're on.

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Like the edit is literally just cording NonStop and me

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>explaining on the go. But it allows people to see

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.839
<v Speaker 1>and explain my thought process as I'm developing it. Um.

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>That's obviously super fun, right because it's highly engaging and

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>it shows people that, hey, you can get cited in

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>this relatively quickly. Nicholas is the kind of person whose

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>passion for data science is so great it spills over

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.959
<v Speaker 1>from his professional life onto his YouTube channel. But when

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>he's not making videos, he's using that same expertise to

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>help his clients make their businesses work better. At IBM,

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas works with businesses to formulate a data strategy, preparing

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>them to get the most out of technology like machine

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>learning or deep learning. He explained to Ronald why thinking

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>critically about the data it generates can help a company

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:59.079
<v Speaker 1>run more efficiently. So there's a quote that you've used

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in your presentation say their firms are trying to become

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>insights driven, but only one third report succeeding. What is

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the role of creativity in the successful one third and

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 1>how are you at IBM helping to increase that number.

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember going to a talk by our previous CEO,

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:22.559
<v Speaker 1>and she said that there's a large number of organizations

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that are just experimenting with random acts of digital So

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 1>they're just testing out some of these news technologies are

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing kind of what's possible. But the ones that are

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>truly being successful are the ones that are getting there

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the data ready their data strategy in play. They're the

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>ones that are starting to collect their data. They're starting

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to get it ready and organized. They're starting to take

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a look at it and starting to iterate and prototype

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and in a structured manner. They're starting to roll this

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>stuff out. The journey to get something as sophisticated as

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.719
<v Speaker 1>machine learning into production is a lot more difficult than

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think people realize because you're now building a box

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that has its own rules. You haven't defined those rules yourself,

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>So how do you explain that when something goes right?

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>But how do you explain when something goes wrong? And

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>having governance around that is absolutely critical, which is really

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>whether the data strategy does come into play. So let's

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>let's get into more business focused data strategies. Why is

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it so important to have a data strategy in place

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to fuel AI modeling and how does data literacy play

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>a role in getting value from these models. We've got

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>algorithms left, right and center these days, but I think

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the thing that people forget is that you can't use

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>any of these algorithms unless you've got data. So ensuring

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that you have a structure in place too one collect

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>your data to organ is it three, analyze it, and

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>then or infused to machine learning or deep learning into it.

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Is absolutely critical because if you don't collect it, you

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>can't do anything with it. If you don't organize it,

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you can't discover what you've actually got, what the quality

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>looks like. You don't analyze it, you don't know whether

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>or not you can trust it. Um and then he

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>infused is always like the icing on the cake, right

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to the machine learning, the deep learning, all the cool

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>buzzwords that people throw around. That is like the last step,

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and it is always the coolest step. But you can't

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>ever get to that last cool step unless you've gone

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>through that the hard work that that's come before. Let's

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>like expand a little bit on the pain points for

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>companies when they're developing or implementing a data strategy. What

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>do those pain points look like? Honestly, the biggest pain

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>point that I see organizations actually the top two that

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I see them coming back to over and over again,

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and is collecting and organizing their data. So let's say,

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, you've got a manufacturing type organization and what

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>they want to do is they want to improve the

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>production quality on a particular manufacturing line. So ideally, if

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>they see that they've got defective products on the manufacturing line,

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>they want to get rid of those sooner rather than

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>later because they don't want to be shipping him out

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to the customer going through the whole warranty and claims

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>process that just costs a ton of money. So they're like, well,

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>it would be great to use some computer vision or

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>some deep learning to detect when we've got defects on

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the product line, and then we can grab those and

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>rip them out. Somebody along the line is like, great,

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>let's go and do it. The first stumbling block that

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you're going to trip up at is, hold on, do

0:15:56.000 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you have any images of defective products from example cameras

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that are looking at that production line. So if you

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't gone and collected images of that or video of that,

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>there is no way in hell that you can actually

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>go and build that system to improve your organizational productivity.

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>So knowing well in advance what data you're likely to

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>need is absolutely critical. It is the first step in

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the data science life cycle. So collecting, understanding, and exploring

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>your data is the absolute first step. The second one

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit more interesting. So let's say, for example,

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you sort of want to get in on the craze

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that is data science or machine learning, and you bring

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>on a data science team. The next biggest stumbling block

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that I find a lot of organizations trip up on

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is discovering their data. They've got a ton of data,

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>but nobody knows what they've got. So being able to

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>find so to discover, rate, review, and rank that information

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 1>is paramount because you'll have people come in and go okay.

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>So a line managers approached me and said that we

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>want to take a look at our top performing customers

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and we want to build a retention strategy so we're

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>not losing customers anymore. Well, your data scientists is then

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>going to go, well, do we have data of customers

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that have left previously. If you can't easily search and

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 1>find out what you've got, that makes it pretty hard

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>to go and build those models. So collecting, organizing, and

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>discovering really absolutely critical, but that they can be a

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit tricky to handle in a large number of organizations.

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>What kind of supporting technology and new solutions do we

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 1>need to meet growing data management issues? It really comes

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>down to two a few things. So ensuring that you

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>can one collect the types of data that you're looking at.

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.959
<v Speaker 1>So I think when people think of data, they're always

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking of hate it's just going to be a bunch

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of spreadsheets. It might just be stuff that we can

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>throw into a database. But there is so much more

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 1>out there. Right, there's video, how do we store that?

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>How do we hold that? There is images, there's natural text.

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 1>Like we're just talking about ensuring that you've got appropriate

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>processes in place to be able to store holding catalog

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that I think is absolutely critical. We talked a little

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>bit about data cataloging and the need to be able

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to search and discover that data that is absolutely paramount.

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 1>Once you've got it collected, how do you find it?

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>What is IBM's unique approach to facilitating access to data

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 1>within companies. So one of the biggest things, and one

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of the my favorite things that I get to work with,

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.479
<v Speaker 1>is a particular tool set, right, and this tool set

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>is called cloud Path for Data. So, without getting too

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 1>pitchy that the absolutely amazing thing about this is that

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>those stages that I was talking about, right, so collect, organized, analyzing, infused,

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it actually helps facilitate each one of those stages, right,

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>So you can actually collect, store, and hold your data

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>in a secure and government place. You've got data catalog

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in capabilities which allows you to search. Like one of

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>my favorite things is that you might have a data set, right,

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So I might be a data scientist, and then we

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>might have another data scientist on the team. I can

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>have a data set inside of there, and I can

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>actually rank it and add comments and go, hey, just

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>be wary of this column with lot certain features that

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>you need to be mindful of, and that provides additional

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>metadata understand what is what my data actually looks like

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and and things that I should be mindful for. So

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm Joe employee. How can data be helpful to me?

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Great question? So, I mean data is impacting everyone, right,

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>whether you you like it or not. Um and more

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>often than not, what you're going to find is that

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you can improve whatever it is that you do by

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>by looking at that data, whether it's let's take an

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>organization out of it. If you use sleep trackers, you

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>can begin to see when you're sleep or when you're

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>getting good quality sleep versus when you're getting bad quality sleep.

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>If you start to collect additional data points like hey,

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>am I drinking enough water during the day, am I

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>doing certain things like looking at my phone just before

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.199
<v Speaker 1>I go to bed? Are these things influencing my sleep?

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>And is that causing a negative impact on my quality

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of life? So that's taking a broader view of it.

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>But when you step into a team or a business view,

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:52.959
<v Speaker 1>data can can make your life a billion times easier.

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>If you know that there's a particular issue in a

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>system earlier on in a data pipeline, before something crosses

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>your desk, you might go and say, hey, look, if

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>we just changed how we collected these pieces of information,

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 1>if we just transformed what we actually did with it,

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>this is going to streamline my entire workflow and and

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.439
<v Speaker 1>help me out. But not only that. Right, So I

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>work a little bit with the automation team, and they're

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>really big on robotic process automation. Let's say you're doing

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>something each and every single day. You're copying a far

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>from here to there. You're grabbing some information from a website,

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 1>You're throwing it into a form, and you have to

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>do that twenty times a day. There are tools that

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>can automate that entire process for you, and they're smart.

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 1>They're not just looking at where you're clicking on the page.

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.479
<v Speaker 1>They're looking at what applications you're opening, They're looking at

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>what fields you're pulling data out of. You can automate

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 1>those entire workflows. That means that you don't have to

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>do that repetitive, kind of boring work that you don't

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>really want to do. You can palm that off and

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>do the robot and do the stuff that you actually

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>really want to get involved in. As Nicholas said, the

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>way a company leverages this data has an impact on

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>every level of the business. Data informs how we do

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>our jobs day to day and how we plan for

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the future. Having an open mindset about data makes it

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>easier for a business to come up with creative solutions.

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>In the next part of their conversation, Ronald asked Nicholas

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>how data science and creativity come together. So let's talk

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about creativity. We talked a little

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 1>bit about your YouTube channel, UH and how you use

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that to help people get started with data science. What

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:35.879
<v Speaker 1>does creativity mean to you and do you see your

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>work as creative? I definitely say my work as creative,

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think creativity is truly thinking outside of the

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>box and looking at just different ways of doing things.

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest thing that I try to embody

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>is having an open mindset and really in never being

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>willing to shut something down or not look at a

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>particular solution or option, because you really never know where

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a particular solution might come from. If you look at

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>where some of the advancements in that the medical field

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 1>are coming from, it's because they're being open to new ideas,

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>new materials, new ingredients, new recipes, new technologies. Having an

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 1>open mindset really helps improve that that that ability to

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>solve complex problems. And I think for me, creativity is

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>really just having that that open mindset. Tell me a

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit about how you approach novel problems. What do

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you do when you get stuck? I think the most

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 1>important thing I really like when I push myself to

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:55.479
<v Speaker 1>do something that I've personally never done before, and a

0:23:55.520 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of the time that yields new solutions to problems

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that that that might be really difficult to solve. It

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily need to be using this particular set of techniques.

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>It's what else can we do to solve this problem?

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes like it'll be staring you in the face

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and you'll just have no idea until you go, hey,

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to throw everything out of the box and

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>just give it a crack and see what is possible. Um.

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes it does require that that little bit of

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>grit to to push yourself to see just what is possible.

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's when I've come up with some

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite things that I've ever done, so something

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>that I'm trying to adopt in my in my daily life.

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And I'm reading a lot more about stoicism and philosophy,

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm seeing that you kind of really just got

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to push through sometimes to to see what what's on

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the other side. We talked a little bit earlier about

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>how folks can take bits of data and kind of

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>tell their own story with it, especially if they if

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.679
<v Speaker 1>they know the story that they're trying to tell. But

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about using that for good. How does creativity

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>play a role in data storytelling. I think there's just

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>so much good that you can do with data that

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>if you have that in your core ethos, then the

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 1>world's your oyster, right. I always come back to my

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 1>favorite project that I've ever done, and that was using

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>computer vision to try to decode sign language. It is

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>by no means a state of the art model. But

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I forget hold on why is never nobody ever approached

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 1>this or at least shared how they've tried to do it.

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 1>And I've kind of just had to get real creative

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and trying to build that I had. I literally spent

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>weeks just trying to install stuff then trying to get

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>it running on my computer before I even got anywhere

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>near building that particular model. And and it's super hardcore

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of trying to get it set up. But

0:25:56.520 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>there's so many opportunities for good, whether that's improve accessibility

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to certain technologies, improving the quality of life for people

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that could benefit from us using data a little bit better.

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:12.919
<v Speaker 1>There's a large body of work with a bunch of

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:18.400
<v Speaker 1>different data scientists where they're actually building language translation models

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>for languages which aren't hyper popular or aren't as widely

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 1>spread as we might see in our day to day lives.

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:31.719
<v Speaker 1>If you look at India, there are a turn of dialects.

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>If you look at even where my parents from Mauritius,

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a whole completely separate dialect where if you've

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>never heard it before, you were like this just slang French,

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:48.120
<v Speaker 1>but no it's it. It's like um, it's its whole

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>separate language that obviously allows or improves the ability for

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>people to to tap into data and do a little

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>bit of good. But there's so much I mean, people

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>are using medical image data to improve medical segmentation and

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>improve diagnoses. There's just so much amazing work that that's

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 1>happening in that space. There is obviously the temptation or

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>used data for bad, but I'd like to think that

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the large majority of the community are really trying to

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 1>use it for good. You started talking about a little

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 1>bit just now, But what are some future trends and

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>challenges and future topics or projects you're excited about anything

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 1>in particular looking real further forward, what I'm super excited

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 1>about And I still don't know how it's necessarily going

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to impact me, whether or not that's going to change

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 1>my experience as a developer or not. That we've got

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 1>quantum computers coming right, there's a ton of work that's

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>happening in that space. It's going to radically shift how

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:55.120
<v Speaker 1>large a machine learning model we're able to create, how

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 1>fast we're able to train them. I'm just excited to

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>see what happens in that space. I'm not a quantum

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 1>physicist by any means, but I'm still excited to see

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:07.199
<v Speaker 1>what I'll be able to do with him in the future.

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I love that, as you'all contingent filt this technology, you're

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>excited to play with it after it's built, which I'm

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to have to build it. Nicholas for

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>not thank you so much for a talk of me today.

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>It's been an absolute pleasure. Thank you so much for

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:31.360
<v Speaker 1>your insightful questions. It's it's been awesome. Ronald Nick made

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a point that I think is important to remember when

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it comes to technologies ability to improve our businesses, or

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>make our jobs easier, or even do social good, A

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful data strategy is always the first stepping stone. Without

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>good data, using machine learning or artificial intelligence to create

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>innovative solutions becomes much much harder. Our technology gets more

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated every day, but that doesn't mean we should lose

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>sight of the fundamentals. If we want to get the

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>most out of smarter technologies, better business decisions, more optimized technology,

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>fresh and unexpected insights, we're going to need smarter data strategy.

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>On the next episode of Smart Talks, with IBM the

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>power of Salesforce to transform the customer experience. We talked

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>with Phil Weinmeister had a product for Salesforce America's at IBM,

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>consulting about transforming digital experiences with the power of Salesforce

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and IBM. Smart Talks with IBM is produced by Matt Romano,

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>David jaw, Royston Deserve, and Edith Rousselo with Jacob Goldstein.

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Were edited by Sophie crane Are. Engineers are Jason Gambrel,

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Brugare and Ben Holliday. Theme song by Granmascope. Special

0:29:56.680 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Carlie mcglory, Andy Kelly, Kathy cal Hand and

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the eight Bar and IBM teams, as well as the

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin marketing team. Smart Talks with IBM is a production

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of Pushkin Industries and I Heart Media. To find more

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin podcasts, listen on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts. Hi'm Malcolm Gladwell. This

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>is a paid advertisement from IBM.