WEBVTT - How Does Iambic Pentameter Work?

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff, a production of I Heart Radio,

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey brain Stuff. Lauren Vogelbaum here. If you've ever studied Shakespeare,

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:14.159
<v Speaker 1>you're probably familiar with or have at least heard of,

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>iambic pentameter. While the term may sound intimidating, it's just

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a rhythm and length of speech that comes pretty naturally

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in the English language. Shakespeare used iambic pentameter because that

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>natural rhythm replicates how we speak every day, with those

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>singsong quality. That also makes it easier to memorize and perform,

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>especially when it rhymes a little. To begin to understand

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>iambic pentameter, first consider that there are two basic types

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of writing, poetry and prose. Before the article. This episode

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>is based on how Stuff Work. Spoke with Paul Voss,

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>associate professor at Georgia State University in Atlanta, who specializes

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in Renaissance literature and Shakespeare, and to explain the difference.

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>He said, simply, rows is the language of everyday speech.

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>By contrast, poetry often has a type of rhythm or

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>beat like a song. This rhythm is called meter. Poems

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>also have verses, which are lines or other groupings of

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>words in a poem, Definitions for the subtypes of verses

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>depend on whether they rhyme and have meter. Rhymed versus

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>both rhyme and have a meter, blank versus don't have

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a rhyme but do have a meter, and free verses

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>have neither rhyme nor meter. Metered verse is made up

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of units called feet. Each foot will consist of stressed

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and unstressed syllables, not stressed as in oh, I have

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a deadline and I'm running behind, but stressed as in

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>verbally emphasized or accented. Different types of feet include, for example,

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the trophy, which consists of one accented syllable followed by

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>one unaccented syllable. You can hear this in ed Girl, Impose,

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the raven, and the silken sad uncertain rustling of each

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>purple curtain. Another type is the dactyl, which is one

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>accented syllable followed by two unaccented ones. Meanwhile, as spondi

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>has two accented syllables, and an I am has one

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>unaccented syllable followed by an accented one. But when you

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.959
<v Speaker 1>write a poem in metered verse, you use mostly one

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>type of foot throughout to create a rhythm. This might

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>all sound complicated, but languages like English, how these stresses

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>built in. Think of how the word is languages not languages.

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>The word itself three syllables, one accented and two unaccented,

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is a dactyl. The word carrot, for example, is a tropy,

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and the word describe is an i am a single

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>syllable words can fill in for either a stressed or

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>unstressed part of a foot, depending on the con text. Okay,

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>so iambic verse is metered verse made up of feet

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that are unaccented than accented. But what about the pentameter part.

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>The prefect's penta is Greek for five, so pentameter means

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>five meter, which means there are going to be five

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>ft to this meter before the pattern repeats. So a

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>line of iambic pentameter has five ft made up of

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>two syllable sequences that follow an unaccented than accented pattern

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>for a total of ten syllables in each line. A

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>meter can come in different lengths. U trimeter has three

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>ft per line, haptometer has seven, and the different lengths

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>can have different effects. In poetry, Voss pointed out that

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the lower the number of feet, the more sing songing.

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>A poem will usually sound higher numbers of feet more

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>closely mimic colloquial English language speech. I think of Jack

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and Jill, which is in trimitter, versus say, Annabelle Lee,

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>which is in heptameter. To identify a type of verse,

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you can count the syllables and look or listen for

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>where the accents fall, Just to be careful that you

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>pronounced the words as the writer intended. In the case

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of Shakespeare, that might mean speaking differently than we do today,

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>or even just from region to region. I think British

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:23.679
<v Speaker 1>versus American English, and sometimes the writer sort of cheats by, say,

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>combining two syllables into one. I think of over versus

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 1>or in that way, it can be a bit of

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 1>a puzzle, but it can also help you find what

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>words a poet meant to emphasize. So Shakespeare did write

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmingly in iambic pentameter. Take famous Sonnet eighteen, Shall I

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>compare thee to a summer's day? Though are more lovely

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and we're temperate? Ref wins do shake the darling buds

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of May? And summer's lease hath all too short a date.

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Back in the late thirt hundreds, Jeffrey Chaucer wrote the

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>Cannabury Tale in iambic pentameter, and he's sometimes credited with

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>inventing it, but it was English playwright and poet Christopher Marlowe,

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a contemporary of Shakespeare in the late fifteen hundreds, who

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>first brought iambic pentameter and blank that is, unrhymed first

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to the stage. According to Voss, thanks to Marlowe, iambic

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>pentameter became the go to rhythm for both tragedy and comedy,

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 1>and Elizabethan and Jacobean dramatists are known for it, and

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>probably based on Marlowe's influence, Shakespeare chose to have characters

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>speak in iambic pentameter, but not all of his characters did.

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Remember that iambic pentameter is more formal sounding, so when

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare wanted to show a less educated character or give

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the impression of buffoonery, he included limericks and prose as dialogue.

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>But there are many other examples of iambic pentameter from

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that era. A Pureitan poet and Brad Street used it

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in to My dear and Loving Husband, published in sixteen

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight. If every two were one, then Shirley we

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>If ever man were loved by wife, then the if

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>ever wife was happy in a man, Compare with me,

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you women, if you can. But you don't need to

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.799
<v Speaker 1>return to the fifteen and sixteen hundreds to find examples

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:22.119
<v Speaker 1>of iambic pentameter. Owed to Autumn by John Keats, written

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen nineteen, also used this type of verse. To

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>swell the gourd and plump the hazel shells with a

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>sweet kernel to set budding more and still more later

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>flowers for the bees until they think warm days will

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>never cease for summer has or brimmed their clammy cells.

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Poets a whole century later used it too, like Robert

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Frost and his poem After apple Picking from nineteen fourteen,

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>though he mixes pentameter with a few lines of other

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>lengths for a more natural speech sound or for emphasis

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>or well, you'd have to ask him. Here's an excerpt.

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.679
<v Speaker 1>My instep arch not only keeps the ache, it keeps

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the pressure of a ladder round. I feel the ladders sway,

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is the bows bend, and I keep hearing from the

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>cellar bin, the rumbling sound of load onload of apples

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>coming in. But iambic pentameter has largely fallen out of

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>use today. The majority of today's fiction is written in prose,

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>not verse, and even poetry is often written in prose.

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Vus said, the novel has obliterated almost every other type

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of writing. If you are using iambic pentameter today, it's

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>almost like using a fountain pen. To be fair, I

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>know both publishing poets and people who use fountain pens,

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>but the major exception for iambic pentameter seems to be

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in popular music. You can find iambic pentameter in songs

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>from the likes of One Direction and Taylor Swift. The

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>day's episode is based on the article Shakespeare wrote an

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>iambic contameter, But what is that? On how stuff Works

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>dot Com written by Carry Whitney. Brainstuffs production of I

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio and partnership with how stuff Works dot Com,

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's produced by Tyler Clang. For more podcasts my

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio, visit the I heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.