WEBVTT - Gospel and Progressivism - Jack Jenkins on the Religious Right

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to PM Mood then No Talking Points, no Bullshit

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast that takes you behind the curtain, off the red carpet,

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>and to the front lines of progress with change makers

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and innovators that are doing the work to shift our

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>culture and expand their social impact. I am so excited

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to welcome to PM mood. Friend of mine. We will

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>also have to talk about our travels Jack Jenkins, who

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>is the author of the new book American Prophets, The

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Religious roots of Progressive Politics and ongoing fight for the

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Soul of the Country. It's so funny, Jack, because when

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>we talk, it's like we consistently are talking about the

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>soul of this country. I gotta tell you, I feel like,

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>on a regular basis it's dead. You are I would

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:12.119
<v Speaker 1>assume maybe a lot more hopeful than I am about religion,

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>about the separation between church and state, but about the idea,

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>it's almost to me that progressive politics progressive religion almost

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>seems like an an oxymoron because of how we have

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>been inundated with the religious right. So talk to me

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>about the religious left and what led you to the

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>development of this book, American Prophets. I'll start with the

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>second question, that leads into the first, which is that

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>for me, when I first started doing reporting at Religion

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>News Service years ago as an intern, I was assigned

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to try to find a faith story in the Occupy

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street movement, which was happening at the time, and

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I went I was near the Occupy Boston encampment in Boston,

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and I I stumbled over there, and what I found

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>when I got there was there was this whole inner

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>faith tent where there was all of these activists, and

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of the people who were helping organize

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the encampment were seminarians and divinity school students, which I

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>thought was interesting. And then a lot of the people

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that they were bringing in to speak to kind of

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 1>like critique capitalism and you know, try to critique the

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>verious different you know in results of capitalism with labor rights, etc.

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>They were bringing in these kind of faith leaders or

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>people who were attached to religious institutions, and so I

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:33.080
<v Speaker 1>was like, you know, I had run into this in

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a vague since before. But what struck me was that

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I was the only reporter following that with a you know,

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>religious lens. Now that's not because I was special, because

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I was assigned that by my editor. But it was

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>one of those things where I was like, that's interesting

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that there's this dearth of people kind of looking into

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>this group. And so as I continued to stay in

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>journalism and I ended up in I think progress years later.

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, basically my job there was equally split my

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 1>time between covering the religious right and then also kind

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of looking at these you know, more progressive faith communities

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that were advocating for you know, better housing, for communities,

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>for a better rent control, you know, to try to

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>push back against predatory lending practices, to you know, talk

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>about you know, immigrant rights and indigenous rights and fighting

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>against climate change, and they're all doing it and they

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 1>would have gatherings with hundreds of people, and then I

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>would be the only reporter there. So it's just why,

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>why would you think? Why why was that? Why Why

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>were you the only one that was interested in covering

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and covering this. So I think there's that goes back

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to your to your first question, which is what happened?

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Why we did this dynamic come to be? And so

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the religious left has always kind of been

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>around in American history and various forms or that that

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>was the abolitionist movement or the civil rights movement as

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>one people often point too, and also around the turn

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of the twentieth century, and the Social Gospel movement, which

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>still influences a lot of Christian traditions today, was actually,

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the pre eminent religious movements in

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the country and actually had disproportionate influence over American politics.

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>And they kind of won. It was the New Deal

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>was directly influenced by the Social Gospel movement that was

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>critiquing capitalism and the aftermath of the Industrial Revolution. But

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>after they won, the fundamentalists, Christian fundamentalists of that time

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of, you know, also lost in public. And this

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit of a simplistic retelling, but they

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of pulled back from politics a little bit and

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>started creating their own institutions. They created their own schools,

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>created their own magazines, their own publishing houses, their own

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>radio networks, and their own television network. So by the

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>time you got to the seventies, eighties, and particularly the nineties,

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>when they decided to re enter politics in a really

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>big way, they were bringing with them this huge media

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>apparatus that kind of helped funnel and fuel a lot

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of their activism, and they know, kind of really dug

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in around two issues in particular, opposition and same sex

0:04:56.360 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>marriage or just all LGBTQ relationships and identities and or shit,

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 1>and those issues kind of became the lynchpin throughout the

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>nineties and into the two thousands, and it's how George W.

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Bush was able to secure such an arousing amount of

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>support among Wine Evangelical Protestants in particular in two thousand

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand and four. What had happened in the

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>meantime is that while religious activists had never stopped doing

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>what they do, you know, in terms of progressive faith

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>activists fighting for racial justice, for instance, or for immigrant rights,

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>those movements actually continued to exist. A lot of those

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>large institutional organizations that had been mostly attied to white,

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>even white mainline Protestantism, because that was what was really,

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, understood to be the big political crew in

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the early twentieth century, they had kind of atrophied and died.

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Whereas and so secular you know, we saw this group

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of this growth of the religiously unaffiliated people who don't

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>claim one religious group or another, you who may worship

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>or go to church on regular basis, but don't claim

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a faith tradition or they're atheists or agnostic. That group

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 1>became the largest single sub set of the Democratic Party.

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Fast forward to two thousand and four or two thousand

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and eight, and while the Democratic Party remained mostly religious

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of people were saying they believe in God

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>or affiliate with the faith tradition, the power of these

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>activists had changed dramatically. They had they didn't have this

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of access to power that they once did. And

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the left in general, nothing on the left looks like

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the religious right, and because it's now more of a

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>coalition of coalitions as opposed to like one white group

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of Christians yelling at another white group of Christians. And

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>so we have this different system for what the left

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>looks like today, and that's where the modern religious left

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of emerges. And that's kind of what I cover

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 1>in my book. You know, it's so interesting because one

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 1>of the chapters that I really do want to dig into,

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>just given the current climate that we're in, is chapter three,

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>when God chooses a Leader. And I think that what

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>has become so troubling about the religious right, aside from

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>them being zealous. In my opinion is the weaponizing of

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>religion and the idea that they have the power white

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>evangelical Christians to anoint right a leader. And what we

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>have heard over the past three and a half years

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>under Donald Trump in so many from so many different people,

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>from religious leaders, but then from people withinside of his

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>cabinet is referred to Donald Trump as the chosen one,

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>referring to him as the one, as the leader that

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>God chose for this movement. You open up the chapter

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>with talking about Jerry Folwell Junior and Liberty University and

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the speech that Trump gave there and he would later

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>come out, you know, obviously to endorse him, and he

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>has come out in fervor for Donald Trump. Talk to

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>me about the idea of like this deity's deity, this

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>idea of like deitizing political leaders and in crowning them

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in some way as if they are above reproach, because

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that's what it seems to me. It was like at first,

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>we have these issues, we are singled issue. We don't

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>want abortion, so anyone that is against abortion we're going

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to be behind. There's something different about what is being

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>done at this particular time with Donald Trump as opposed

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to what happened with the Bushes before him and the

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>religious right right, and I think there's a lot of

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>different factors going in there, but I think the core

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 1>of what I hear you talking about is this one

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that's actually kind of flummoxed a lot of US religion

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>reporters as well, particularly early on in the Trump era,

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is that we're used to one version of what the

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>religious right looks like. There's these key actors and theological thinkers,

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and some of them really don't like Trump, and so

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 1>when they came out really hard against him during the

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen campaign, we expected there to be some movement

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>among white evangelicals to say, hey, maybe we'll let you

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>go back a third party candator kind of looked like

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the way Mormons did. Members of the Church of Jesus

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Christ of Latter day Saints actually did pull away from

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Trump at some level, more so than Why Evangelical Protestants

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>by far, but instead he's still some Trump still was

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>able to lock in eighty to eighty one percent of

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Why Evangelical Protestants. And as we've gone back and looked

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>through that campaign and also looked at his presidency since then,

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>what you see is a lot of appeal to Christian nationalism,

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>and that is arguably less a theology and more an identity.

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>It's more of a marriage of this idea of what

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it means to be an American and an idea of

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>what it means to be a Christian. And while there

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.839
<v Speaker 1>are some people who make theological arguments about that or

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>like kind of they kind of retell American history in

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 1>a very specific subjective way. One of those figures is

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Roy Moore, for instance, the failed Alabama sent a candidate,

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>former judge down there in Alabama. He's kind of one

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of these people who might make a theological or historical

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>argument for a lot of Americans, and in white Evangelical

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Protestants in particular, this idea of Christian nationalism. When Donald

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump hugs an American flag or then says, you know,

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't worship government, we worship God, that's a not

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>so subtle dog whistle to these communities that say, hey,

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that's what I am. Now. Some of these people have

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>been to church and years, some of these people are

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>are active worshippers, and but for them there's that shared

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, longing for this very particular idea

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of what it means to be a Christian that often,

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, when they did a bunch of polls around

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the twenty sixteen election and after that about people who

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>would might identify with Christian nationalism, and what you found

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>was that these people, disproportionately, compared to the rest of

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the population, say, had negative feelings towards immigrants, had negative

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>feelings towards refugees in particular, or to Muslim Americans. They're

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>disproportionately more likely to say the police are doing the

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.319
<v Speaker 1>right thing went in their interactions with people of color

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>than if they're doing the wrong thing. All things, when

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you start to think about it, are kind of these

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>pillars of Trumpism that he used in his campaign in

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen. And so it was actually an in phenomenon

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that's happened that happened around the Trump rise where some

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of the traditional actors the religious right actually kind of

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>got unseated and left adrift because they realized they the

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>flock that they thought they had who they could you know,

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>push in a theological direction, were more driving force behind

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:21.359
<v Speaker 1>them was more this Christian nationalism rhetoric than the theology

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that they were preaching at say, Wheaton College, and so

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump's been a really interesting figure that way. And it

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>comes back to exactly what you were saying. Trump's a

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>person who can go down to a disaster site in

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the South and meet a bunch of white Christians and

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>they hand him bibles for him to sign, to sign,

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to sign. Yeah, I don't understand that. And you have

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>You've had you figures like Paula White And who is

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>this preacher out of Florida who's some many label as

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a prosperity gospel preacher? Which is this this form of

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Christianity that often says if you believe hard enough, good

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>things will come to you, and that often those that

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>are those that are wealthy, Right, those are wealthy are

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>then perceived to be better if you are. That's how

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I have always broken it down in very basic terms,

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is that if you are wealthy, then that means that

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you are good. That means that you were closest to God.

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>And which kind of makes sense in terms of the

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 1>way that poor people are treated in this country right

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>by our government. If you are if you are poor,

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>being poor is a product, is a failure, is a

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>personal failure, right, It is about your laziness. If you

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:35.119
<v Speaker 1>work hard and you are wealthy, right, then you are rewarded.

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So this intermingling of this idea of prosperity as it

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>perceives as it pertains to faith, and then that as

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it pertains to the policies that we put together for

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>poor people seem to me to be so disconnected from

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the foundation of Christian faith, right, which is this idea

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of serving most in need. How do we straddle that

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>very incredible and working it in America that about poverty

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and about in general. Yeah, I think, you know, to

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>tap into a little bit of what you were saying,

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, that campaign that there was this conversation that

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>developed basically from nineteen seventies on where there are you know,

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>there were people in religious contexts referring to the deserving

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and basically undeserving poor. If you're poor, there's that's a

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>consequence of capitalism. But the great the people who achieve

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>in a capitalist mindset are blessed quite literally the idea

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that that is that is an evidence of their faith.

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>And in what it has done is, you know, it

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>shores up a very specific capitalistic system. And and actually

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the one thing when I talked about that gap between

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>when the fundamentalist Christians kind of lost in the early

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century, and that came back in the seventies and eighties.

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>There was a thing that happened in between that in

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the thirties that I think is really important, which was

0:13:55.920 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that there was this effort by businesses to back against

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the social Gospel and the results of the New Deal,

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and so they started developing these preaching groups where they

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 1>would rap them preach these sermons that melded capitalism and

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of Christian faith and said that both of them can

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>be good. And then they attached a patriotic or nationalist

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>identity to that. And that movement grew to thousands and

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>thousands of pastors throughout the country, and one of the

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>earl in its it was the breeding ground for some

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of the earliest prosperity Gospel preachers in the United States,

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>including a guy named Norman Vincent Peale, who was who

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>wrote this. He was this successful pastor who many people

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>call as one of the first prototypical examples of a

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>prosperity Gospel preacher. And he was at one point Donald

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump's pastor, and he is one of the only faith

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>leaders that Donald Trump has mentioned by name. From his

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>past and to be able to reflect on his sermons. Now,

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Norman Vincent Peale might even be weak compared to some

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of the modern prosperity Gospel preachers. But that's one of

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the that some historians that help explain how when Trump

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>came into office, these prosperity Gospel pastors and this whole

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>strain of Christianity that had not been really politicized, Trump

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>brought with them because it you know, some one argument

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>is that it reflected his own mindset, his own worldview,

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and it also may have reflected many conservative policies that

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>again defend capitalism not only as a virtuous system, but

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>are you, but they are you as a Christian system.

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And as they've continued to shore that up, the religious

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>right aiding them along and along. You know, this is

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>why many of the activists you have seen among the

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>religious left, whether it's William Barber who's helping lead the

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Poor People's Campaign with Reverent Theo Harris, or Alexandro Accassi

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>or Portz who is a Democratic Socialist and decided to

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>run for office after attending the Standing Rock demonstrations and

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>having a spiritual experience and has since been talking about

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>on the stump, you know, fusing faith that appeals to

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the least of these, to the poor, to the destitute,

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you basically have Now we re entered a conversation that

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>happened in the beginning of the last century, where the

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>poor are saying, maybe these policies aren't working out for me,

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>these religious poor, and some folks who have didn't defending

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>capitalism under a Christian context are just literally lifting up

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump as the chosen one. And these are two very

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>different conversations. They're so different, and they're so contradictory to

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>one another. And I really don't and I think to me,

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, personally, religion has always been something that I

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>have kept at Bay. I guess I would consider myself agnostic.

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm a verially spiritual person and believe in the connectivity

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>of the universe and all people and living things. But

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>prescribing to a certain religious ideology has always been something

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that I've kept at Bay because of the way that

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>it's constantly weaponized. It's weaponized against the poor, it's weaponized

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>against black people. Martin Luther King once said, the most

0:16:55.880 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>segregated time right in America is high noon on Sunday, right, right,

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, as we are kind of moving

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>through what I have been talking about multiple pandemics in

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 1>this country right and witnessing them. We are living through

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the coronavirus, which is an actual global health crisis, but

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 1>has revealed to us the inner workings of the racial

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and racist pandemic that we have been living in in

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>this country. And then the capitalist structure that feeds into

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>all of that, keeping some at the bottom, namely black

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and brown people, and then the wealthy people at the top.

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>But when you have this justification right of prosperity and

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 1>wealth being associated with good, right and godly, how do

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you even come together? How do you bring these two

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>very different faiths together in order to even begin to

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>save the soul of this country? Like? What is that? Honestly,

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>what does that even look like? Right? Because we've been

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>battling for the soul of this nation since oh, I

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know, the Pilgrims stole it from the Native Americans.

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's like in every generation, at every time, we

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>are at war right with this idea of what America

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>should be, could be, what we want it to be,

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and what it actually is. Right, I think what's a

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating tention that you're pointing out is that, you know,

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>there's this concept of Christianity, right, and people always like

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to remember the abolitionist movement, how many faith leaders are

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>were a part of that, and they just leave out

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the part where there was a bunch of pastors who

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>propped up the institution of slavery to begin with, right,

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you were saying that this was God's will, and then

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.479
<v Speaker 1>that when we talked about the labor movement, it were similar.

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>There were these social gospel types they were arguing for,

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of liberating the worker. And then there

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of people that's saying that, you know,

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe the workers deserved it and like. And so there's

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>been this constant conversation between religious groups for quite some

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>time here in the United States. And then you have

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>faith groups, for instance, talk about in the book Indigenous

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>rights activists, for whom they say that their faith isn't

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>even recognized by culture in general. You know, they say

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that when they're fighting for sacred land and standing rock,

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>or protests in the construction of a telescope on the

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>top of Mount Chaa in Hawaii, people just don't even

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>see their faith is equal as one that they could

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>have a con when they're talking about, say Christianity or Judaism.

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>And so it's one of those things where we're having

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>this debate where there's a reason you have heard of

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>people on both sides of this debate, whether it's William

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Barber or someone like Jerry Foward Junior or Robert Jeffries,

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>whose sermon when God Chooses a leader, by the way,

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 1>is the sermon he delivered to Trump on his inauguration day,

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>where there have been comments where like they both kind

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>of infer that the other is a heretic. And the

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 1>implication there is that, you know, these might be very

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>different strains of Christianity for whom you know, finding that

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of reconciliation. This is just in a Christian context.

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 1>We're not even including the multiple parts of the religious

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>left that are not Christian at all, you know, finding

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the reconciliation across difference. There. They they're you know, they're

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.360
<v Speaker 1>they're praying very different prayers, they are preaching to very

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>different groups of people, and even during this this pandemic,

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, to your point, one of the fascinating things

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I've seen develop is there's essentially been two strains of

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>religious activism in the United States. One Christian conservative, there

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>have been transaggressions of social distancing across the religious spectrum.

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Conservatives in particular have taken it up as a cause,

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know, saying that these these you know, lockdowns

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 1>on their houses of worship have been you know, unfair.

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>They've been pastors in Louisiana and Florida that have been arrested,

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and conservative groups like the Liberty Council have come to

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>their defense to sue local or state authorities for cracking

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.959
<v Speaker 1>down on worship communities. And then meanwhile, you have groups

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>like a Poor People's Campaign launching an initiative called Stay Home,

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Stay Alive because they oppose the reopening of these of

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>these states and worship houses of worship, they say, because

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>he will disproportionately impact the poor. Or a Union seminary

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 1>in New York teaming up with the ACLU to run

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>ads calling for the release of prisoners who are disproportionately

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>at risk of contracting the virus, noting that the largest

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>COVID clusters in the United States are usually in prisons,

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 1>or the you know, the Jewish group Never Again action

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that was helping organize for the release of immigrant TEA

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.719
<v Speaker 1>detainees who are also disproportionately at risk of contracting this virus.

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And you see the President this past week when he

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>released this statement saying that, you know, he wanted to

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>push push governors to reopen churches. You know, he's only

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>responding to one of those streams of activism and the

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:32.479
<v Speaker 1>other one that's calling for, like, you know, to pay

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 1>attention to you know, what Christians might call the least

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.479
<v Speaker 1>of these, the poor, the prisoner, the immigrants. That's just

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a it's a completely different theological conversation than the one

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>conservative Christians are having right now is calling against these

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>shutdowns and for you know, this religious liberty quote unquote

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>for worship services, and they're just I know, it's a

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>long window way of saying, I haven't even seen many

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>conversations happening between these groups when I've gone to some

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of these demonstrations, some of which I chronicle in the book.

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>When people, for instance, when protested near Liberty University, these

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>red letter Christians, these more progressive evangelicals, they wanted to

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.360
<v Speaker 1>pray with Jerry follow Junior, and instead he put out

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 1>in a restaurant for one of the main organizers. So

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, that's how big the divide is between

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>these computers. And I feel like between that divide, America

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>is falling in the cracks, right like, because you know,

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 1>one of the most disturbing images that I've seen, and

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I've seen, you know, several from these reopened protests that

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.919
<v Speaker 1>are happening is a sign that was held by this

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>young white girl that said, don't wear a mask. God

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:39.360
<v Speaker 1>has you covered. And I looked at this image and

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking to myself, Oh, there's nowhere for us to

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>go from here, right Like, you can't you can't rationalize.

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>You can't come up with a factual argument to somebody

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>who is telling you that they don't need man made protection,

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>They don't need ppees, they don't need masks and gloves

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and sanitizer. You just need to believe in God. The

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>assumption would follow. Then what that the hundred thousand people

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>who have since died to date of the COVID virus

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>are what are all heritas are all exactly? I don't understand.

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, I mean that that is the implicit message

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>of that of that message is that all of the

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>all of the people who have died, were you were

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they not protected? By God, and I think again, I

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to rationalize with people who, to me

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>seem incredibly irrational. Right. And you know your book, I

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I love it because it presents like a different view

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>from me. Right, And I'm sure many people about religion

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and the purpose and the role of religion in politics

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 1>because we are so broken and so so shattered as

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>a country. I'm assuming the answer is yes, but I

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>want you to dig into it more with the removal

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>of religion from our government, from our systems be a

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:13.199
<v Speaker 1>way to begin to heal this country, because if you

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>choose one side of the other, one is a losing

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to knock people's faith, but I want

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to challenge like the foundation of their thinking and who

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>they shut out with it. You know, we're supposed to

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>have a separation of church and state. We're supposed to

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>have these things, but we don't. We and we never have, right,

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>And so I feel like different activists who respond to

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 1>your question differently, because it really kind of depends on

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:44.479
<v Speaker 1>what we really mean by the separation of church and state. Right,

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Because there's one thing to say, you know, no violations

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>of the Establishment Clause. A part of our constitution that

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>says you can't establish one religion, and that's sometimes been

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>interpreted to mean any like religion. In general, you can't

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>get preferential treatment to religion as opposed to those who

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>are non religists, who often in polling or you know,

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>fall behind every other religious category in terms of what

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody would vote for. You know, if you're an atheist, um,

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you were, you were, you know, according to polling, significantly

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>less likely to be elected than if you were religious

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of almost any other any other religious identity. And so

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that there has been this sort of frustration

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:23.239
<v Speaker 1>among a lot of secular activists saying like, look, you know,

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>even even when looking at the religious left, saying, look,

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're we're excited about the causes you're you're

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>supporting we have, we also share a lot of these

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>progressive values. But if we just trade the religious right

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>for the religious left, then we're just going to end

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>up with this other community that occupies space in spaces

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>of power that you know, well, the gateway to entries

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to believe in, think like I do, and um,

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and if that's the gateway to entry, then then we're

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>not going to be there. This is me speaking hypothetically

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of a secular activist. And to be clear,

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>some people who are people of faith hold that exactly.

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>You are just articulated. You know, They're like, I go

0:25:57.760 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>to church every Sunday, but I really don't want you

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to preach it me from a presidential podium, right. But

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I think what some of the religious left activists that

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I've spoken to argue is that because the religious left

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 1>in its current iteration is so fundamentally different than the

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>religious right, and that the left in its current iteration

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is so much, so much fund elimentally different from the

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>religious right, because it is this coalition of coalitions. You

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 1>cannot win unless you get enough of these different groups

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>on board that there's significantly more negotiation and compromise and

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, just working together to get a goal occurring.

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Then the religious right, ever has to do. The religious

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>right cannot compromise. It can just not compromise and still

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>influence the Republican Party every election cycle, whereas the religious

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 1>left has had to learn how to like being able

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to be in conversation with atheist agnostics and you know,

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>try to elevate them. There are definitely critiques that they

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>are not elevated enough even within these movements, but the

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>fact that you're hearing people like you. For instance, Peo

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Budh Judge got a lot of attention for talking about

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>his faith this last go round. He would begin every

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>one of those conversations by saying, but I want to

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>be a president of people of all faith and no faith.

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>You heard that similar lines articulated by Hory Booker or

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris or Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders. Because they

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>understand that you're going to have a hard time winning

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 1>if you're not also able to appeal to secular voters

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>who would occupy, who would go to the voting booth

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and vote for a Democrat, and so you know, whether

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>they would I think a lot of these activists would

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>say that you shouldn't. You know, the removal of religion

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>from politics, I'm sorry, the removal of church from state

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is like a foundational tenant. Whether you can extricate faith

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.959
<v Speaker 1>from politics, though, is a significantly different conversation. That's like,

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, how could you As long as there are

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>religious human beings, religion is in and of itself and

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>often a political act. You know, when you organize when

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you make an economy, when you make your own schools,

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>when you have your own books that you read, that

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>will often have political implications, and so I think it

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>would be really difficult to fully ever extricate faith from politics.

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think from the activist's point of view, you know,

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>they show up to support immigrants because of their sacred texts,

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>they show up to support sacred land and indigenous activists

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>because of the spiritual beliefs from which they were raised.

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>So it really kind of comes down to a negotiation,

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>I think, among progressives and the country in general, about

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>where is that line where what your religious freedom means

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>can impinge on my freedom to do other things. And

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the left is having a different version of

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that conversation and the conservatives are, but I would expect

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and I actually this is an interesting question because how

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the religious left has kind of risen into prominence in

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the last three years under Trump. Were Joe Biden the

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>presumtive Democratic nominee to become president, I'm curious of whether

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>or not that coalition stays together, that religious left coalition

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>stays together, and whether a lot of the secular activists

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>have been relatively less critical of their activism during the

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump era, if we renew that same conversation that I

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>heard you having a few minutes ago, to say, hey, look,

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I get it. You're religious, you're showing up, You're you're

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>supporting the same cause as I am. But I do

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>not want to live in a theocracy, and I don't

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>want to live in a universe that only privileges people

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of faith, even if they know they have different faiths.

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>So how do we have that have a society where

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>where my rights are just as protected as yours? And

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an ongoing conversation, you know, because one

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of the really eye opening things that I have come

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to realize in this current political time is that the

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 1>right right, whether it be the religious right or the

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>political right, and the left are so different in their

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>discussion and understanding of liberty and what justice actually looks like,

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and what faith actually is and what I have come

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to understand and I talk I talk about it, spoken

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 1>about it with with several people on PM Moved but

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>also also on woke. A f is that it seems

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to me that the right and the religious right, in particular,

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>their desire and their understanding of liberty is about their

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>ability to persecute and oppress others. Right, it's about it's

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>about their freedom to tell other people what they can

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and can't do with their body, what they can and

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>can't do with their land, what value they do or

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>do not offer to society based on how much money

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>they have in their bank accounts. It's the ability to dictate.

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>And for me, I don't see there being any reconciliation

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>because the religious left has come to the understanding of

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>liberty and faith as you being able to practice what

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it is that you choose or do not choose. Right.

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>But let's but let's fundamentally connect to the principles of

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>uplifting all people right and recognizing that all people are

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>human right and should have inalienable rights. And so it's like,

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we again the you know, the battle

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>for the soul of the country, it's something that you know,

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden has used that this is his call this

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>is this is his calling card for I want to

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>point out that before, but he uses it. He used

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it in his opening political ad about the battle for

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the soul of this country, and we hear it all

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the time. So I just want you know, in our

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in our last few minutes together, you to tell me

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>what you mean by the battle for the soul of

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>America and what that looks like today for you. I'm

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>really glad you asked this question, because other people just

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>skip over that because they assumed it's a it's a

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a presumed understanding, you know, like battle for the soul,

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>like whatever. And obviously there's a religious connotation, right, and

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that there is this sort of debate happening between religious

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>conservatives and religious liberals, progressives, um leftists about what it

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:56.479
<v Speaker 1>means to not only to be an American, what it

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>means to be a religious American. And you can even

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>go all down all the mutations, say what does it

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>mean to be a specific kind of Christian or not?

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>And so those all all those those theological debates and

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>battles are happening at the same time, and they affect

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>one another. Right, when Catholics fight amongst each other, that

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>can have national implications. In fact, the opening chapter of

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>my book is about how Catholic nuns and Catholic groups

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in particular had a disproportionate impact on getting the Affordable

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Care Act passed, but they only did that by defying

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the Catholic bishops who were not supportive of the final

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>version of the Affordable Care Act, and the nuns came

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>out and gave a lot of Catholic lawmakers covered. So

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>those inner fights, that those internal debates, even within religious traditions,

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>can have very large impact. But I think what it

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>means to have a soul of a country obviously that

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>has both a explicitly religious definition as well as this

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>more rhetorical definition, and I think they overlap, and that

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>whether you come to that conversation from a perspective of

0:32:57.600 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>faith or spirituality, or whether you come to that conversation

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 1>with trying to, you know, from a more secular mindset,

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>what we're really talking about here is that how are

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>we allowed to treat each other? And how are we

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>allowed you know, what are their priorities? And who are

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>their priorities that we are going to lift up in

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this country? You know, the people that I talk about.

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason I call the book American Profits, and

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that's because the religious left often uses the mechanism of protests.

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>That's what it's been most successful in wielding. And part

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of the reason for that is that while the religious

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>right has been very successful at the ballot box and

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:35.479
<v Speaker 1>in the courts. And to be clear, there are elements

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of the religious left in which they have been successful

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>in certain scenarios when it comes to showing up on

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>election day. But the part of the reason they are

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>using the vehicle of protests is that that is the

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 1>vehicle of influencing power that those who often don't have

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>power still have access to. They're able to influence institutions

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>through protests because they're not the institutions don't recognize their

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>power reflexively to begin with, you know, That's where we're

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>going back to. It's like, these are people in communities

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>clamoring for society and for the powers that be to

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>even recognize the validity of their faiths and the validity

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of their people. And that's what I think a battle

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>for a soul really is is is what are you

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 1>willing to you know, whether that's a religious soul you know,

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>which you answer to a higher power, or a secular

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>soul that answers to everybody immediately around you. The effect

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>is very similar, which is that what are you willing

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to be as a country and who are we collectively

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>going to decide to care about? Well, that is a

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:39.320
<v Speaker 1>question that I feel like will almost never be answered,

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you know. To be honest, I feel like each generation,

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:47.879
<v Speaker 1>each administration, has their own idea of what that means. Right,

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Who is deserving? Who isn't? American prophets, Jack, I'm so

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>proud of you. This is amazing. I want to tell

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>folks so that they know that I met you five

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 1>years ago on a trip that we were both on

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 1>to Israel and Palestine, which forever changed my perspective on

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things. Who was It was a hard

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>fucking trip? It was. It was tough. It was exhausting mentally, emotionally,

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 1>experience was like every everything it was. Yeah, it was

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a tough trip. Have you been back? I have not

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>been back. I've wanted to. Have you been back? Since? No,

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>I have not, and I have, and I honestly I

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>have wanted to. When we left, I said that I

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>would never go back because of how traumatic the experience was.

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Just I just have you know, and this is going

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to sound very interesting in this particular moment, being a

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>black queer woman in America, I had never seen such

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>overt discrimination and oppression in my entire life, and that

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>means a lot coming from me. I had never and

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it was just like one of the most and the

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 1>way in which religion again was used, is used to

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>do that, to create one group that should be oppressed

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>because they're deemed as voler less than has always sat

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:05.839
<v Speaker 1>with me so like so deeply. Yeah, it was. It

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting experience. Yeah, I carry it with me.

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:12.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean I've I've written many stories based off of

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the reporting I did in that trip and and it

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>has informed a lot of things I've done since then

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 1>as well. And I think it's, you know, it's one

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 1>of those things where as a reporter, you know, I'm

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 1>a religion reporter, so understanding relation it's really important for

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a variety of reasons. And just going is not reading

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:31.240
<v Speaker 1>about it on the news or you know, watching videos.

0:36:31.239 --> 0:36:34.720
<v Speaker 1>It's just not the same as going. And it makes it. Yeah,

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>it does well. Everyone needs to pick up American prophets,

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>religious roots of progressive politics and the ongoing fight for

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the soul of the country. Jack, thank you so much,

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for having me. Thanks for listening

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to this week's PM mood. My political podcast, Woke af

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Daily is on Patreon for just five dollars a month.

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 1>That's five new our law shows every week for just

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:06.239
<v Speaker 1>five dollars a month. Join the conversation now at Patreon

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash woke AF and you can continue listening

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to PM mood every week absolutely free. Now more than

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>ever we see the importance of independent media, so thank

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you for your support, and as always, stay in the

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:22.720
<v Speaker 1>PM mood to change the world.