Speaker 1: Thank you, Scott Channon. Thanks to all of you for
Speaker 1: being with us. Here is our toll free telephone number
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program
Speaker 1: as eight hundred and ninety four one Shawn, if you'd
Speaker 1: like to join us. We got a lot of news
Speaker 1: we're going to get to today, updates on the battleover
Speaker 1: tariffs and the president. Want to start with one interesting
Speaker 1: side note. If you've been a long time listener to
Speaker 1: this show, you know we spent about three years with
Speaker 1: a very small ensemble cast and my great staffs on
Speaker 1: radio and TV unfeeling the onion as it relates to
Speaker 1: the Russia hoax, and now John Solomon Washington Times has
Speaker 1: picked up on it as well. Have gotten a hold
Speaker 1: of these documents and one of the things that really
Speaker 1: interested in me. If you want to know whether or
Speaker 1: not there's a deep state in this country, let me
Speaker 1: go to the Washington Times. We told you about John Stalomon,
Speaker 1: just solomon story yesterday, the top brass in the FBI
Speaker 1: that intelligence community was so determined from the get go
Speaker 1: to stop President Trump from winning the White House in
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen, and then as soon as he won, it
Speaker 1: wasn't four months in they were talking about removing him
Speaker 1: from office, according to newly released documents. In one newly
Speaker 1: released memo dated May twenty seventeen, four months into Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's first term, the Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and
Speaker 1: acting ATBI Director Andrew McCabe, they discussed quote, the president's
Speaker 1: capacity and the possibility that he could be removed from
Speaker 1: office under the twenty fifth Amendment. At the time, the
Speaker 1: Justice Department was reeling over Trump's firing of James Colemy
Speaker 1: mister higher honor. Now just to backtrack, mister higher honor,
Speaker 1: No reasonable prosecutor would prosecute mister higher honor that signed
Speaker 1: in spite of warnings and admonitions in August to twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen not to signed them and using the Russian dirty
Speaker 1: disinformation Hillary Boughton paid for dossier. They were warned not
Speaker 1: to trust it, that it was a political document. He
Speaker 1: signed three of the four by his applications, Rosenstein signed
Speaker 1: at least one that I recall and anyway. At the time,
Speaker 1: the Justice Department was reeling over this and weighing the
Speaker 1: appointment of a special counsel to oversee the FBI's probe
Speaker 1: into allegations later proven absolutely bogus that Trump colluded with
Speaker 1: Russia to win the election. They knew it was false.
Speaker 1: They knew the dossier was bought and paid for, They
Speaker 1: were warned about it in August to twenty sixteen, long
Speaker 1: before the election. And don't forget they used that as
Speaker 1: the basis for four separate fys of warrants for Canadate
Speaker 1: Trump Transition Team, Trump and Trump as president. Rosenstein said
Speaker 1: he believed that he might have already have two supporters,
Speaker 1: and that would have been the Attorney General Jeff's Sessions
Speaker 1: and Homeland Security Secretary at the time, John Kelly, who
Speaker 1: later became White House Chief of Staff. And I don't
Speaker 1: think either one of them are particularly fond of Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: How early this was all happening is unbelievable. And what
Speaker 1: do we talk about when we talk about a deep state?
Speaker 1: We talk about those unelected people that think that they
Speaker 1: know better. And that's that gets into the whole, you know,
Speaker 1: putting cinder blocks on the scales of elections in this country.
Speaker 1: And that is exactly what they did with, you know,
Speaker 1: the the FBI pre bunking the very real Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: laptop that they knew in March of twenty twenty was real,
Speaker 1: and then meeting with every big tech company on a
Speaker 1: weekly basis in the lead up to that election, and
Speaker 1: every other nefarious thing that went on, and then of
Speaker 1: course the intelligence community, the Intel community and fifty two
Speaker 1: former Intel officials saying, oh no, no, it's all the
Speaker 1: markings of Russian disinformation, and not one of them ever
Speaker 1: examined the laptop. Knew a damn thing about the laptop.
Speaker 1: All they knew is they got a political call from
Speaker 1: winkn Tony Blinken to sign this thing, to give Joe
Speaker 1: Biden a talking point and the lead up to a
Speaker 1: very important debate prior to the election in twenty twenty
Speaker 1: with Donald Trump that would have been a game changer,
Speaker 1: and by the way, Poles proved that to be true.
Speaker 1: A new survey dailymail dot com Jail Partners finds that,
Speaker 1: in spite of what you were hearing from the state
Speaker 1: run legacy media mob, Lowe's approval rating, ever, he's upside down.
Speaker 1: The president's approval rating sits of fifty four percent. That
Speaker 1: is a tie with his all time highest rating for
Speaker 1: all the events in the past ten days. He got
Speaker 1: the president's approval rating unchanged and add its joint highest ever.
Speaker 1: According to the poster James Johnson. During those ten days,
Speaker 1: Trump planned need to implement these across the board tariffs
Speaker 1: and that is either free and fair trader or reciprocal tarror.
Speaker 1: Most countries will have the choice. And that created drops
Speaker 1: and then a spike on the market. But polling showed
Speaker 1: most voters were unfazed among the noise the criticism. There
Speaker 1: does seem to be a simple truth that the more
Speaker 1: coverage there is of Trump's changes, the more voters reward
Speaker 1: him for what they see as the pace and purpose
Speaker 1: that many of them voted for anyway. So I mean
Speaker 1: that's one poll. You know, do with it what you will.
Speaker 1: But there's definitely a massive effect here, and there's definitely
Speaker 1: a great divide in the country in this sense. There
Speaker 1: is Wall Street, there are the coastal elitists that would
Speaker 1: be San Francisco, La New York, that would be DC
Speaker 1: and versus Main Street. And the difference couldn't be any
Speaker 1: more stark or clear. And what's emerging now politically in
Speaker 1: the country is pretty profound, and that is that the
Speaker 1: movement under Donald Trump has become the party of working
Speaker 1: men and women in this country, and that The Democratic
Speaker 1: Party represents woke DEI obsessed and New Green Deal and
Speaker 1: climate change obsessed and transgender obsessed and everything woke obsessed
Speaker 1: radical left in the country. And they're not changing. There
Speaker 1: is no course correction, there's no introspection, there's no thought
Speaker 1: behind where they stand, and they find themselves on the
Speaker 1: precipice of becoming a party that is irrelevant. Now, does
Speaker 1: that mean that anything that Donald Trump is doing is easy,
Speaker 1: as a matter of fact, not at all. It is
Speaker 1: the most ambitious and most difficult, you know, agenda that
Speaker 1: I've ever seen any president take on in our lifetime
Speaker 1: and historically any president I can think of in the
Speaker 1: last one hundred years. And I was a huge fan
Speaker 1: of President Reagan. I mean, just on the issue of
Speaker 1: securing our borders and deporting illegal immigrants. I mean, I
Speaker 1: can't believe that now the party that defends the right
Speaker 1: of men to play women's sports, that puts the rights
Speaker 1: of illegals over your safety. And we did have a
Speaker 1: conviction in the Rachel Moren case. By the way, her
Speaker 1: mother will be on with us on Hannity tonight exclusively
Speaker 1: for her first interview since the conviction of the person
Speaker 1: responsible for killing this mother of five who will never
Speaker 1: see her children, or children will never see their mother again.
Speaker 1: They're the party that thinks that it's a constitutional crisis
Speaker 1: if you discover one hundred and fifty billion dollars waste, fraud, abuse,
Speaker 1: and corruption. And they're the party of pechelant children that
Speaker 1: can't stand for mothers that lost their children, or stand
Speaker 1: for a young man that beats cancer, or the wife
Speaker 1: of a slain hero officer, or a young man that
Speaker 1: was commissioned to West Point after losing his father, and
Speaker 1: they just hang up, hold up their bingo cards. Now,
Speaker 1: there is a lot happening that's good in the economy
Speaker 1: that nobody in the media wants to really talk about.
Speaker 1: Nobody on Wall Street wants to talk about. We see
Speaker 1: that inflation, as we pointed out in the last week,
Speaker 1: is cooled off somewhat dramatically, which I think is good
Speaker 1: news for every American because we've had nothing but high
Speaker 1: inflation under Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. Gas prices are
Speaker 1: down pretty dramatically. Airline fares are down, hotels, motels, cars,
Speaker 1: truck rentals, everything down across the board. And the number
Speaker 1: of jobs that have been created ended up coming in
Speaker 1: more than twice of what predictions were made out there. Now,
Speaker 1: do I think that this is going to be an
Speaker 1: easy negotiation with countries? Some will be easy and some
Speaker 1: will be more difficult. I think the big headline that
Speaker 1: most people are not understanding is that since the President
Speaker 1: began discussing the issue of reciprocal tariffs, that you have
Speaker 1: seen major, major movement in the marketplace, and that is
Speaker 1: a committed Well now we're up to after Navidia yesterday,
Speaker 1: eight trillion dollars in investment in manufacturing around the country. Now,
Speaker 1: if you look for those of you that think it's
Speaker 1: a big deal about, you know, standing up to China, Well,
Speaker 1: China's separate and apart from the rest of the world
Speaker 1: as far as I'm concerned. But why is it that
Speaker 1: are partners that rely on the United States for their
Speaker 1: security that has paid the bulk of freight for NATO.
Speaker 1: Why is the European Union, you know, so held bent
Speaker 1: on putting massive tariffs on American products and wanting free
Speaker 1: access and fair trade on their end in terms of
Speaker 1: exporting products to America. I mean, with friends like that, right,
Speaker 1: who needs enemies? And if you look at every single
Speaker 1: tariff that China's gotten away with. You know, at some
Speaker 1: point you've got it. It's pretty much everything that America sells,
Speaker 1: and we've allowed them to get away with it. Now,
Speaker 1: the good news is we have over one hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty countries now I'm sorry, one hundred and thirty countries
Speaker 1: that have committed to investment and manufacturing here in America.
Speaker 1: We have some updates on that. Today. Reuters had an
Speaker 1: interesting piece out a number of these overseas companies. They
Speaker 1: now want to shift their operations to the US to
Speaker 1: mitigate the impact of Donald Trump's tariffs. That's a good
Speaker 1: thing for America. BMW, for example, they now want to
Speaker 1: add shifts in their Spartanburg plant in South Carolina to
Speaker 1: boost output by eighty thousand units. That's good for American workers,
Speaker 1: that's good for prices. And Honda's doing the same thing.
Speaker 1: They plan to move production from Mexico and Canada into
Speaker 1: the US. They want to make sure their goal is
Speaker 1: ninety percent of cars sold in our country are produced
Speaker 1: in our country. Ayyende, We've discussed them, the South Korean automaker.
Speaker 1: They want to further localized production in the US make
Speaker 1: hybrid vehicles, at the new factory in Georgia, and they're
Speaker 1: investing tens of billions of dollars. Same with Nissan Motors,
Speaker 1: and they are considering shifting domestic production of US bound
Speaker 1: vehicles and start building those vehicles right here in the US.
Speaker 1: We see it happening with semiconductor companies and so on
Speaker 1: and so forth. Yesterday we announced about nit Navidia that
Speaker 1: they're advancing their US manufacturing infrastructure for their AI supercomputers
Speaker 1: and semiconductors and chips into the United States, some a
Speaker 1: five hundred billion dollar commitment over four years. So I think,
Speaker 1: what's gonna happen. I'm hoping what's gonna happen. I'm guessing
Speaker 1: what's gonna happen is that America is is going to
Speaker 1: see these deals unfold and it's going to be deal
Speaker 1: after deal after deal, and it's going to be good
Speaker 1: for the country, and that will be win after win
Speaker 1: after win for the American people. And I think that
Speaker 1: it's just going to take a little bit of time,
Speaker 1: a little bit of adjustment, a little bit of change,
Speaker 1: a little bit of thinking out of the box. Otherwise
Speaker 1: America is going to be subject to the whims of
Speaker 1: people that don't want free and fair trade. Why is
Speaker 1: this country allowed allies, friends and foe alike to take
Speaker 1: advantage of us on such a massive level for the
Speaker 1: better part of fifty and sixty years and nobody ever
Speaker 1: thought that maybe free and fair trade and demanding it
Speaker 1: would be a good thing. You know, the fact that
Speaker 1: a Chinese official is warning Donald Trump today about extremely
Speaker 1: shameless terwer for this is a war that they've been
Speaker 1: waging on us now for a long time. Let those
Speaker 1: peasants in the United Sates states well in front of
Speaker 1: the five thousand years of Chinese civilization. Okay, so that
Speaker 1: quote the Washington Post. And now China thinks that they
Speaker 1: can ratchet up the pressure. Now a lot of people
Speaker 1: don't know this only because of radical environmentalists. Have we
Speaker 1: not been doing our own mining in this country? But
Speaker 1: now China thinks that they have some leverage, and they
Speaker 1: have stopped shipping some heavy rare earth metals and magnets
Speaker 1: critical to US production from cell phones to fighter jets,
Speaker 1: just to up the ante in the trade war. And
Speaker 1: China decided to halt or stop Boeing jet orders. And
Speaker 1: Boeing has been a top US exporter, and I how's
Speaker 1: that going to benefit China in the long run. And
Speaker 1: if President Chi thinks that he can go around the
Speaker 1: world and convince people he's a good trading partner, good
Speaker 1: luck with that. I predict that at some point China's
Speaker 1: going to realize that they're going to want access to
Speaker 1: American markets and they're going to want to make a deal.
Speaker 1: The only question is how deeply they paint themselves into
Speaker 1: a corner before that moment, you know, finally dawns on them.
Speaker 1: And in the meantime, I think the most critical thing
Speaker 1: that the president can do, and his administration can do,
Speaker 1: and his economic team can do is to get with
Speaker 1: those one hundred and thirty countries and sign deal after
Speaker 1: deal after deal, and Americans will be able to create
Speaker 1: a new normal. Is that you don't no longer get
Speaker 1: to rip off the United States, take advantage of us
Speaker 1: and frankly abuse the American consumer and American workers in
Speaker 1: the country in general. And I think everybody in the
Speaker 1: end will be better off and they'll adjust to the
Speaker 1: new normal. It just takes a while for people to
Speaker 1: wrap their minds and heads around a new idea. What
Speaker 1: I'm having a hard time understanding is and I get
Speaker 1: Wall Street people. They are naturally afraid of their own shadows.
Speaker 1: We'll get analysis sober analysis with a historical perspective from
Speaker 1: New King Rich coming up later on Steve Moore as well.
Speaker 1: I have a hard time understand what concept why people
Speaker 1: don't understand. But fifty sixty years of America has been
Speaker 1: ripped off, treated unfairly, abused, and nobody's challenged it. And
Speaker 1: that America asking for free or fair and fair trade.
Speaker 1: Why is that complicated? And why does that scare everybody?
Speaker 1: And why isn't the status quo, especially from countries that
Speaker 1: count on us but their national security and defense. I
Speaker 1: don't understand why that's complicated.
Speaker 2: Working every day to remember the forgotten man. This is
Speaker 2: the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: All right, twenty five now till the top of the
Speaker 1: hour are tot free numbers of eight hundred and ninety
Speaker 1: four one shown if you want to join us. Israel
Speaker 1: is still under attack and we even have news on
Speaker 1: that issue today, which not particularly good for the Iranians. Now,
Speaker 1: remember we have six B two bombers that are armed
Speaker 1: with bunker busters within range of Iran right now. We
Speaker 1: also have an aircraft carrier that was sent to the
Speaker 1: Middle East, and now we have news today that a
Speaker 1: second US aircraft carriers operating in Mid East waters ahead
Speaker 1: of the next round of talks, which is this Saturday.
Speaker 1: The first round of talks. We had Steve Witcoff on
Speaker 1: last night discussing it between Iran and the United States
Speaker 1: over what is Iran and then Mulla's rapidly advancing nuclear program.
Speaker 1: Now the operation of the US S Carl Vinson and
Speaker 1: its strike group is in the Arabian Sea, and it
Speaker 1: comes as suspected US air strikes pounding parts of Yemen
Speaker 1: controlled by the Iranian BAC twoty rebels overnight into Tuesday.
Speaker 1: And Steve Widkoff, who was in fauks and Oman with
Speaker 1: the Iranians, separately signaled that the Trump administration may be
Speaker 1: looking at terms of a deal. However is he said
Speaker 1: to me last night it's going to be trust to verify.
Speaker 1: Very clear today in comments that he made that they
Speaker 1: can't have any nuclear in Richmond at all. I asked
Speaker 1: about US inspectors any place, anywhere, anytime, and he said, trust,
Speaker 1: but verify. But the reality is is the world cannot
Speaker 1: risk lunatics that believe in a caliphate of convert or
Speaker 1: die ever having the chance of nuclear weapons, or we
Speaker 1: will risk and likely have a nuclear holocaust in our lifetime.
Speaker 1: You just can't risk it. And I say this in
Speaker 1: light of Israel being under NonStop attack even today, missiles fired.
Speaker 1: You know, we have there fighting the Huti rebel is Ballah,
Speaker 1: Islamic jihad Hamas the Iranians. It's like a seven front war.
Speaker 1: They're under their enemies are seeking their destruction around calls
Speaker 1: for the for death to Israel, death to America. And
Speaker 1: you know, we we thankfully we're not living under a
Speaker 1: constant threat of radical Islamic terrorists and NonStop rocket attacks,
Speaker 1: but we have to be forever vigilant. We know Joel
Speaker 1: allowed in known terrorists into the country, but imagine the
Speaker 1: reality that's Israel every day, and it's happening now and
Speaker 1: tens and tens of thousands of Israelies have been displaced.
Speaker 1: The need for humanitarian assistance is so great, and that's
Speaker 1: why we have proudly partnered with the International Fellowship of
Speaker 1: Christians and Jews to help provide life saving humanitarian and
Speaker 1: security essentials. And whatever gift you can give is needed
Speaker 1: and will instantly be put to use not only for
Speaker 1: humanitarian purposes, but for bomb shelters, flackjack kids, full of proof,
Speaker 1: vest for first responders, armoured security vehicles, ambulances, and so
Speaker 1: much more. Anyway you can make a gift, you can
Speaker 1: call the IFCJ eight eight eight four eight eight IFCJ.
Speaker 1: That's eight eight eight four eight eight IFCJ or online.
Speaker 1: It's one word SUPPORTIFCJ dot org. That SUPPORTIFCJ dot org.
Speaker 1: Today we do have a lot of very bizarre thinking
Speaker 1: from the left in America. What do I keep saying
Speaker 1: that the party that champions the right of men to
Speaker 1: play women's sports, we saw that in the Senate vote
Speaker 1: a couple of weeks ago. They are the party of
Speaker 1: climate environmentalism, radicalism, by the way, which made us wholly dependent.
Speaker 1: We have rare earth minerals that we could be mining,
Speaker 1: but environmental extremism has prevented us from doing so. It
Speaker 1: was Donald Trump that brought America to energy independence for
Speaker 1: the first time in seventy five years because of radical environmentalists,
Speaker 1: and it's the lifeblood of the world's economy. Now he's
Speaker 1: pushing towards energy dominance, and slowly but surely, I believe
Speaker 1: not well not only achieve it, but we're going to
Speaker 1: get rich as a country as a result of it.
Speaker 1: They're the party that you know thinks it's a constitutional
Speaker 1: crisis if Doge and Eli Musk identify waste, fraud and abuse.
Speaker 1: You know, they're the party that you know, obviously has
Speaker 1: no compunctions at all when it comes to remaining silent.
Speaker 1: When radical leftists on campus are out there, you know,
Speaker 1: announcing and screaming and chanting and singing about their support
Speaker 1: for Hamas, a designated terrorist organization whose charter calls for
Speaker 1: the destruction of Israel, they stand silent. They have people
Speaker 1: in the halls of Congress that are virulent anti Semites.
Speaker 1: The leadership of the Democratic Party remain silent. You have
Speaker 1: radical leftists supporting Luigi Mangioni, and the left leadership remained silent.
Speaker 1: We've had all these domestic terror attacks against Tesla, and
Speaker 1: the left remain silent. We've had the attack now on
Speaker 1: Governor Josh Shapiro's house, and I've yet to hear anybody
Speaker 1: on the left say this, This virulent anti Semitism has
Speaker 1: to stop. And we have a you know, I have
Speaker 1: a whole pile of news here today about the radical left.
Speaker 1: You got a new Mexico guy that was wearing black lipstick.
Speaker 1: What do you think I looked? Would I look good
Speaker 1: in black liftstick?
Speaker 3: Linda?
Speaker 1: What do you think? Absolutely? And you think so?
Speaker 4: You I mean salt and pepper hair, nice black sweater.
Speaker 4: I mean I could really see how the black lipstick
Speaker 4: could work for you.
Speaker 1: You know, Hannity goes goth. Anyway, this guy was arrested.
Speaker 1: This guy gets I'll get the piercings next. He's been arrested.
Speaker 1: By the way, this is going to sound terrible, and
Speaker 1: it was mostly done as a joke. Have you ever
Speaker 1: talked to your kids about tattoos? Me and I don't
Speaker 1: have a problem with people that get tats, I really don't.
Speaker 1: I just don't want my kids to get them. I'd
Speaker 1: rather they not get them. Do you ever talk to
Speaker 1: your kids about them?
Speaker 4: So two of my sons have tattoos.
Speaker 1: They I don't have a problem with them, and I'm trying.
Speaker 4: To make a giant christ head on his shoulders. So
Speaker 4: we've got a lot of tattoos in our family. I
Speaker 4: personally do not like them at all. They are not
Speaker 4: for me. I don't care for them. And my father
Speaker 4: told me if I ever got a tattoo would be
Speaker 4: the last thing I ever did. So I never got one.
Speaker 1: Well, that's kind of what I didn't say that to
Speaker 1: my kids. I was a little I was a little
Speaker 1: less severe. I just said I I'd use acid and
Speaker 1: burn it off. Oh yeah, that's far less severe, far
Speaker 1: less severe. Now they know that I'm half joking about it, obviously,
Speaker 1: But anyway, I move on to the story because it's
Speaker 1: actually a serious story. This New Mexico man with black
Speaker 1: lipstick arrested in connection with a string of arson attacks
Speaker 1: on Tesla vehicles as well as local GOP headquarters. I'm
Speaker 1: glad they got this guy arrested after he left a
Speaker 1: trail of clues behind at the scene that matched objects
Speaker 1: seized during a raid of his home. Thank goodness, we
Speaker 1: got this guy. He got the Harrisburg fire chief calling
Speaker 1: for the Governor's mansion firebomber to be jailed in an
Speaker 1: Al Salvador hellhole. Boy. The left freaked out when President
Speaker 1: Trump said, well maybe some of them are Well, maybe
Speaker 1: we'll dour sit to Salvador and these notoriously rough prisons.
Speaker 1: The left wing firebomber of the Governor's mansion, the guy
Speaker 1: accused of fire bombing Josh Shapiro's mansion was out on
Speaker 1: bail when he allegedly carried out the arson. And this
Speaker 1: is the guy that also wanted to do this. He
Speaker 1: had an ulterior motive, and that was to go after
Speaker 1: and get President Trump, as we told you about yesterday.
Speaker 1: And anyway, the former mechanic said he's now jobless, penniless,
Speaker 1: lives with his parents. Was free after making bail for
Speaker 1: assault charges. According to court records. In that case, he
Speaker 1: was accused of stomping on a ten year old his
Speaker 1: ten year old son's broken leg, and battering his wife.
Speaker 1: Why wasn't that guy in jail? It's inexcusable. A man
Speaker 1: arrested in Georgia for threats against Tulsei Gabbard, her husband.
Speaker 1: This guy, Ali Yakbar Mohammed, called Gavard's home a legitimate target.
Speaker 1: I mean, these threats are just you know, going through
Speaker 1: the roof. Threats against Elon Musk's life. Just over the weekend,
Speaker 1: two specific threats against Donald Trump. Nancy Mace targeted by
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania man arrested for threatening Trump. And all of this
Speaker 1: violence and all this rhetoric is coming from the radical
Speaker 1: left in this country, the rise of left wing radicalism.
Speaker 1: We'll get to it later, but Piers Morgan confronted Taylor Lorenz,
Speaker 1: the former Washington Post the New York Times person for Oh,
Speaker 1: he's so handsome and he's such a moral man. Where
Speaker 1: did that come from? About Luigi Mangioni. I love that
Speaker 1: Harvard rejected the deal with the Trump administration, which is
Speaker 1: great because now we don't know why would we we
Speaker 1: be funding these Ivy League institutions when they have billions
Speaker 1: of dollars in endowment's number one? And why do taxpayers,
Speaker 1: Why do mechanics and brick layers and construction workers and
Speaker 1: nurses and you know, the average hardworking American have to
Speaker 1: pay for an Ivy League education for somebody, we shouldn't
Speaker 1: be giving them one red cent. Now, if you want
Speaker 1: to help people with education and maybe help community colleges out, okay,
Speaker 1: I'd be more amenable to that. I'd be amenable to
Speaker 1: sending people to trade schools. Whether there was an article
Speaker 1: about how the next generation of millionaires are going to
Speaker 1: be people that have trade skills. And by the way,
Speaker 1: an arsonist that the one the targeted Joshapiro claimed online
Speaker 1: that he was a registered socialist. There is a political
Speaker 1: component to that, but this, this is it. Now, look
Speaker 1: at what's happening on the immigration front. You have an
Speaker 1: Obama appointed judge shutting down Trump's mass deportation plan for
Speaker 1: nearly half a million across the entire US. On the
Speaker 1: on the good news front, although there's no good news
Speaker 1: if you're a mother and you lost your daughter and
Speaker 1: a child and you lost your mom. Rachel Morin in
Speaker 1: that her case, the mother of five a Juri found
Speaker 1: the illegal immigrant guilty of killing Rachel Morin. Her mom
Speaker 1: will be on Hannity tonight. Now this gets very interesting
Speaker 1: on the radical left side. It was pretty funny yesterday,
Speaker 1: by the way, when the Salvadorian president was asked if
Speaker 1: he would return a trende Aragua. All right, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: an MS thirteen member that was sent by the Trump administration.
Speaker 1: Now this came up in a Gago yesterday and anyway,
Speaker 1: because you now have a top Democrat, Chris van Holland
Speaker 1: is vowing to personally travel to Al Salvador to free
Speaker 1: this Venezuelan gang member and bring him back to America.
Speaker 1: He said that this guy never should have been abducted
Speaker 1: and illegally deported, and the courts have made clear the
Speaker 1: administration must bring him home. Now he's fighting for a
Speaker 1: guy that we now know was a gang member and
Speaker 1: was found to be a gang member in court. When
Speaker 1: this came up yesterday, the President deferred to Pam Bondi,
Speaker 1: Marco Rubio, and Stephen Miller. Here's how it went down
Speaker 1: to the question from this very low rated anchor and.
Speaker 2: To ask presidentially to help return the man who you're
Speaker 2: going to station says was mistakenly deported, the man who
Speaker 2: was mistakenly deported to El Salvador.
Speaker 1: Well, let me ask Pam, would you ask to answer
Speaker 1: that question?
Speaker 3: Sure? President, First and foremost, he was illegally in our country.
Speaker 3: He had been illegally in our country. And in twenty nineteen,
Speaker 3: two courts, an immigration court and an appellate immigration court
Speaker 3: ruled that he was a member of MS thirteen and
Speaker 3: he was illegally in our country. Right now. It was
Speaker 3: a paperwork, it was additional paperwork had needed to be done.
Speaker 3: That's up to El Salvador if they want to return him,
Speaker 3: that's not up to us. The Supreme Court rule President
Speaker 3: that if as El Salvador wants to return him. This
Speaker 3: is international matters, foreign affairs. If they wanted to return him,
Speaker 3: we would facilitate it, meaning provide a plane.
Speaker 1: Stephen Miller, wait a minute, could you just also respond
Speaker 1: to that question, because you know it's asked.
Speaker 2: By CNN, and they always ask it with a slant,
Speaker 2: because they're totally slanting because they don't know what's happening.
Speaker 3: That's why nobody's watching them.
Speaker 1: But would you answer that question?
Speaker 2: Also, So, as Pam mentioned, there's an illegal alien from
Speaker 2: El Salvador, So with respect to you, he's a citizen
Speaker 2: of El Salvador. So it's very irrogant, even for American
Speaker 2: media to suggest that we would even tell El Salvador
Speaker 2: how to handle their own citizens as a starting point,
Speaker 2: as two immigration courts found that he was a member
Speaker 2: of MS thirteen. When President Trump declared MS thirteen to
Speaker 2: be a foreign terrorist organization, that meant that he was
Speaker 2: no longer eligible under federal law, which I'm sure you
Speaker 2: know you're very familiar with. The iron eg that he
Speaker 2: was no longer eligible for any foreign immigration relief in
Speaker 2: the United States. So we had a deportation order that
Speaker 2: was valid, which meant that under our law, he's not
Speaker 2: even allowed to be present in the United States and
Speaker 2: had to be returned because of the foreign terrorists designation.
Speaker 2: This issue was then by district court judge completely inverted,
Speaker 2: and a district court judge tried to tell the administration
Speaker 2: that they had to kidnap a citizen of El Salvador
Speaker 2: and fly back here. That issue was raised to the
Speaker 2: Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court said the District court
Speaker 2: order was unlawful and its main opponents were reverse nine zero,
Speaker 2: unanimously stating clearly that neither Secretary of State nor the
Speaker 2: President could be compelled by anybody to forcibly retrieve a
Speaker 2: citizen of El Salvador from Al Salvador, who again is
Speaker 2: a member of MS thirteen, which is I'm sure you
Speaker 2: understand rapes little girls, murders women, murder's children, is engaged
Speaker 2: in the most barbaric activities in the world. And I
Speaker 2: can promise you if he was your neighbor, you wouldn't
Speaker 2: move right away, So you don't, Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: I have an idea. Let's move him into Chris van
Speaker 1: Hollins House. By the way. Joe Biden will return sometime
Speaker 1: today or tonight and deliver a speech to disability advocates
Speaker 1: in Chicago about social security and protecting him from Republicans
Speaker 1: who have done nothing but sworn to detect it. By
Speaker 1: the way, article in The Hill today buzz builds around
Speaker 1: AOC's future. Well, she run against Chuck Schumer in primary
Speaker 1: him or maybe he wants to run for president. Now,
Speaker 1: there was an interesting poll that came out in terms
Speaker 1: of who Democrats currently want to run and it's pretty interesting.
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris at twenty eight percent. Booker was second at
Speaker 1: eleven percent. Pete Buddha Judge seven, AOC seven. Let's see
Speaker 1: Tim Walls five, Gavin Newsom at five, and then they
Speaker 1: had John Stewart at three, and then they had very last,
Speaker 1: which was interesting. Steven A. Smith I talked to Steven A. Smith.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you what this is. This is the
Speaker 1: Democrat's way of sending a message to him, to deflate
Speaker 1: him and say we will destroy you if you run.
Speaker 1: Is the last thing that party wants to do is
Speaker 1: hear from anybody that's saying, well, you need to moderate
Speaker 1: your policies somewhat orals. You're never going to have any
Speaker 1: election wins in the future. Anyway. He'll be on Hanniday
Speaker 1: Tonight nine Eastern also