WEBVTT - Greg Sands Discusses Technology and Investment

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Boomberg Radio.

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I have an extra special guest.

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>His name is Greg Sands. He is the founder and

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>managing partner at Cost to No A Ventures, of venture

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>capital firm that has been around for a decade or two.

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>He was the original product manager at a little firm

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>called Netscape, working with Jim Clark and Mark Andreeson. Uh.

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Not only was he the first product manager, he put

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>together the business plan and he came up with the

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>name Netscape. And he is not just a technologist, but

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a venture investor and a very insightful person who sits

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>really at the nexus of a number of fascinating aspects

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of business, finance, technology. Go down the list. Uh, they're

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>out in Palo Alto. He is an early seed investor. UM.

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't even call it a stage or be a round.

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>He's earlier than that. Uh. They focus on a number

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of really interesting technologies and platforms. If you're remotely interested

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in anything having to do with angel or venture capital investing,

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're intrigued or fascinated as I am about technology

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and how it's going to develop and impact. Uh, the

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>economy and society at large. Then you're really gonna enjoy

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>this conversation. So, with no further ado, my interview with

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>Greg Sands of Costa no Ah Ventures. My special guest

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>today is Greg Sands. He is the founder and managing

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>partner of Coast to Noah Ventures. He was the first

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>product manager at Netscape Communications, where he not only wrote

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the initial business plan in but coined the name Netscape.

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Greg Sands, Welcome to Bloomberg. It's great to be here

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>with you. So you're a founder and a managing partner

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>at a venture capital firm. Is this the sort of

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>career path you were expecting to take? Your background is

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>not quite um total VC, although I guess in hindsight

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>we could say that, well, it isn't what I saw

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>myself doing as a kid. I grew up thinking I

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be the Senator from the great state of Minnesota,

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and much to my surprise, Al Franken holds that job

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>instead of me. So that's funny. I expected to be

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 1>a fighter pilot or an astronaut, so we had very

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>different goals, that's right, absolutely, and so that evolved as

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I as I got into my career. Initially, at a

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>management consulting firm in Boston, made my way to business

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>school in at Stanford, so in the in the heart

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of Silicon Valley, and then just started navigating my way

0:02:56.520 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>through the software. So so from Minnesota to Cambridge in

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>in outside of Boston to southern California. Did you how

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:09.399
<v Speaker 1>did how did that transition go? I'm always surprised at

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.239
<v Speaker 1>how people find their way to California and it's, oh

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>my god, it's beautiful. The geography is spectacular, the weather

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>is great. It's hard to leave there, isn't it. Well, yes,

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and so you know we're we're we're in Palato in

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the in northern California, near near San Francisco. And I

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>ended up, having spent seven years in Boston and Cambridge,

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>having the opportunity to head out there. And I didn't

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>know what I was getting into. I literally told people, Hey,

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm going to Stanford. I'm going to the beach.

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And they said, it's not anywhere near the beach. Have

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you ever been there? And I said no, but it

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>sounds great. The weather, everything is still spectacular. Boston's winters

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>are not not easy winters, well, they're easy when you

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>spent the first eighteen of them in Minnesota. I guess

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>it's all relative, isn't it. So so let's talk a

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.839
<v Speaker 1>little bit about, um, what you were doing at at

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>uh sutter Hill. You started at a very story I

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>guess the first venture capital firms sutter Hill goes back

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to the early sixties. Yeah, that's right, goes back to

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the early sixties, and it's the longest running venture capital

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>firm on the East Coast. There were a couple of

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>earlier firms, but that don't still exist now, don't aren't

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>they also out in Palo Alto or y? I mean

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:26.559
<v Speaker 1>then the original am I misremembering the original Sandhill VC?

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Or or were they not not on sand Hill? But

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you would think of him as basically the original West

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>Coast venture capital firm and a storied firm. Uh. You know,

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a great group of people, very high integrity, great values,

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>performed exceptionally well, incredible companies video and just the list

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 1>of of companies that they backed were astonishing. And you

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>were there for more than a decade. What was that experience? Like? Well,

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I came in having been basically uh GM of business unit,

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>most recently at ne Tscape. So I had never been

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>a professional investor, and I came in there was a

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>group of five partners or managing directors who had all

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>been there at least, you know, really thirteen to twenty

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.239
<v Speaker 1>five years, and so I got to learn the trade

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of venture capital. And so even in our at Coastineau,

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we talked a lot about the old school craft a

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>venture capital and being a partnered entrepreneurs and being a

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>company builder. And I really did get to learn that

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>with an extraordinary group of people and feel really fortunate

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to have been able to do that. What were some

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of the companies you worked on when you were at

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a Sutter Hill so Yoku, which is about the world's

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>third largest video property now owned by Ali Baba, but

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 1>went public on the New York Stock Exchange and was

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 1>had a five billion dollar markets going to say, that's

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a good exit to Ali Baba. That's right now, that's

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>an excellent one. Quinn Street, which is a public company.

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>It was a guy in twenty power point slides. That's

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a performance marketing company. And one that I that I

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>love but isn't very well known as a company called

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>mrs Said Systems. It was a call center performance management

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>software company. That's and we uh, we are they still

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 1>independent or they were brought by Nice Systems, which is

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollar public software company and uh, and one

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of the two founders there is working with us at

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Coast to know Mark selco Oh really, that's really that's

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. I recall you did something with feed burner.

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Was that at sutter Hill. So back at Cutter Hill,

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I was an investor at feed Burner. So Brad felt

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>from founder group and I let around and so I

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>was I was an observer on the board and worked

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>with Dick Costello and team and it was a terrific experience.

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that was very interesting about it

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:49.119
<v Speaker 1>is that Fred Wilson came in a year later and said,

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I turned it down at the last round, but now

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>all of my friends in the publishing industry are using it,

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and I want in. He's a blogger. I've been blogging

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred years. When Google acquired FeedBurner, everybody I

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>know is using feedbourder as a way of shooting out

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>their daily update. To to this was this was back

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>in the day when everybody was using block feeds and

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>not actually going to specific websites. But FeedBurner was a

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>great property and that was a good exit. Was that

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>was a good exit. And yet one of the things

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that I think is most interesting is that the investors

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>actually wanted to keep going. We felt like there was

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a bigger, broader opportunity when we were when we were offered,

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>UH Google UH came and offered to buy the company,

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and Dick Costelo, to his credit, he looked at us

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and we put together basically effectively a competing offer that

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>would provide some founder liquidity. But he looked at us

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and he said, we have in fact won the war

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>for the hearts and minds of bloggers, and we are

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>deployed everywhere, but we haven't yet figured out how to monetize,

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, how to use to insert ads in the

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>RSS feeds. And if we had figured out monetization, I

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>would press on the gas and go for it. But

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we've eliminated that risk in a business,

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, I recommend that we that we

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>take this offer and we sell. And that's I think

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a great example of the partnership between great founders and

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>leaders and great investors, and that Dick Costello has been

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>involved in other tech startups, hasn't he yes, as it

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>turns out he he ended up leading Twitter, and he's

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>now has his own company and is a is A

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>is a great friend and a and a great leader.

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>What does a product manager do in a tech startup?

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So product manager is really the person who connects market

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to technology. So ultimately that person decides what you're going

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to build and then works with the engineering team to

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>make sure that, uh, what you're delivering basically meets the

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>requirements that you've mapped out. So it's a combination of

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 1>making it work, making sure the features are as promised.

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you involved in the branding or marketing or is

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that a different team. It's done differently at different times,

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 1>but mainly mainly not mainly the there's a separate marketing organization,

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and there the product management often does product marketing, so

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>articulating the features and benefits and capabilities of that product,

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>but not of the company as a whole. So you

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>put together the first business plan effectively for Netscape. How

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>what was the thought process like behind it? It was

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>clear that if this worked, it was going to be revolutionary,

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>but how was the company ever gonna make any money?

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>It was fascinating exercise. So we did, in fact have

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the company and innovated on on a whole variety of things,

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>including public beta, including affiliate programs and the like. But

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it really was a very early version of a freemium

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>business model where the product was free for personal use

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and use in educational institutions, but we charge businesses. And

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>so that's basically what we came up with. And I

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>will point out that working with Jim Clark, and you know,

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>with his guidance, we came out and we had a

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>plan that said the first year of revenue we were

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>going to do a little over fifty million dollars. And

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>then they hired three vps who are all much more

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>experienced than I. I was a kid, a puppy dog,

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and they came in and said, you know what are

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>you doing? We actually are going to be responsible for

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>delivering this. This is ridiculous. They lowered the plan to

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>thirty five and then we went out and did eight.

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>So Jim Clark is a fascinating character. I love Michael

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Lewis is the new new Thing. Tell us a little

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>bit about working with Jim Clark. Well, Jim has an

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:43.199
<v Speaker 1>amazing capability of spotting mega trends and assembling incredible people

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to do it before the trends are understood. A well

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.719
<v Speaker 1>known he's we can all see a trend when it's

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>fully robust, but his genius is really this is where

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the trend is going to go. Am I over didn't

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>know it's exactly right. And so to his credit, he

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:02.079
<v Speaker 1>went out and saw this thing coming and he went

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and grabbed Mark and Reason, who was also a kid

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>years old right at the time, and said, this is

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the guy who has been the innovator in the category.

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to work with him. We can go do

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>this together. And there aren't very many people who are

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>already luminaries, who have already started and led public companies

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>who go and look to a twenty one year old

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>right and say we're going to do this together. We're partners,

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 1>and and be right in his selection of people. And

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Andreason was a prior guest. It's one

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of everybody's favorite interviews because he is just fascinating. So

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you were working with him in the early days, tell

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about Mark. What was that like? So, uh,

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it was really clear that not only was Mark brilliant,

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>but he was just learning at an incredible rate. And

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>so I know about you but at twenty one, I

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>had no judgment about anything, certainly not about guilties. And

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>he us was a voracious reader and a voracious learner

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and sought out mentors and got better and better and better.

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.199
<v Speaker 1>And to me, that was really the most striking thing

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>about Mark in those days. That's that's fascinating you say

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that because when I sat down with him out in

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Palo Alto to do our conversation, he described Mark Zuckerberg,

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>founder and CEO of Facebook, as quote a learning machine

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and pretty much that's how you're describing andrees. And it's

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:36.079
<v Speaker 1>interesting each of you have described you describing him, him

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>describing Zuckerberg more or less in the same way. That's right.

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>So so let's talk a little bit about um, the name.

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Where did the name Netscape come from? So the I

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>had been keeping a notebook of possible names. I'd led

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>brainstorming exercises with the engineering team, and we came up.

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 1>We were just coming up with anything. The company was

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>founded as Mosaic Communications. There was saber rattling about trademark

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 1>infringement and lawsuits from from who else, from the University

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:12.719
<v Speaker 1>of Illinois. So Mark had been at the University of

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>Illinois and it created the freeware product Mosaic There gotcha.

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>That's that's not an unreasonable claim on their part. I

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 1>agree with that. And so one day I was Jim Clark,

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Mark and Reason and Mike Homer, who was our new

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>vice president of marketing, pulled me into Mark's office, which

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>was a tiny little office with stacks of paper and

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>boxes of honeycombs everywhere, and they said, this is critical.

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 1>We really need to do something about it. And I've

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>been working on it. We've all been working on it.

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>We had nothing that was any good. And it literally

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>just popped into my head that you've the this visual

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>view of the Internet and the ability to navigate across it.

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>And I said how about Netscape? And everyone looked around

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and they said, yeah, that might be it and we

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>walked out of the room and that was it. Bank

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>just like that. Yeah, that that's unbelievable. So Netscape goes

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>public in nine fourteen months after the company was founded,

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>which is an incredibly short period of time. Uh. People

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>looked a little askance at it, thinking it was well,

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>they have a business model, but look at the valuation.

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>It just blew up on I p O. Was there

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>any sense in that this was starting to become unhinged,

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>or was that still so early days that hey, we

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>rang the bell, let's move on to the business of

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>running the company. It was really more the ladder, I

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>think it was the way I think of it. There

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>were kind of two phases of that bubble, and we

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>were at the beginning of phase one. So we really

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>did have a sense that we were doing something special

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and remarkable, that we were in the right place at

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the right time. And you know, it literally was siege mentality,

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and we were just after it every day, no room

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>for rest, no room to think about it, sitting at

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the eye of the hurricane. But the company, if you

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>think about it in the context of today's internet companies

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and technology companies, it had an eight billion dollar market cap,

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>which is which is a big market cap, a little

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>rich but but enormous potential, but enormous potential. It actually

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>mainly drifted down, and then at the end the acquisition

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>by A. O. L really was about an eight billion

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>dollar acquisition, so it did end up getting back to

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that number, but it pretty quickly drifted down after it

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>after the early days when you were at Netscape, after

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the I P. O. There was a tremendous amount of

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>potential and it looked like, hey, this could be a

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>giant company that really brings the Internet forward to the

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century until the beheamoth from Redmond's Washington named Microsoft,

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>said hey, we want a piece of that. When did

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you guys realize that, oh, these guys is are really

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>going to put a herd on us. It was about

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a year in. It was about a year in and

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>they had started writing a little bit about it, and

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>at some point we saw Bill Gates memo on it,

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and then you could really start to see them attempt

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to make a difference. And it took them out about

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>another year to warm up. But by the end of

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>year two they had gotten their guns trained on us

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and started having a pretty substantial impact on the business.

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>What once they built Internet Explorer into Windows. Every piece

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in the world comes with their web browser. Why would

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>anyone have to download Navigator? Well, it's particularly challenging if

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Steve Bamber Bill Gates is calling the CEO of your

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>hardware manufacturer and telling them if you include Netscape Navigator,

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>they'll stop selling you Windows. And hence the subsequent anti

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>trust trial which ultimately Netscape. Was there a settlement, Well, yeah,

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>there were no Ultimately there there was a settlement. It

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>was frankly long. It was two years after the sale

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 1>to a well, so it wasn't fast enough to have

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 1>any useful impacts as old patent litigation and any trust

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>litigation tends to be um And then eventually the any

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>trust case was settled. And but that created a Cambrian

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>explosion of people freed from the oppressive thumb of Microsoft.

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And at the same time you end up going to

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the starting uh as a venture capitalist. What was it

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:36.440
<v Speaker 1>like in the mid to late nineties when there was

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cash going to startups and a lot

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of innovation and software and semiconductor and hardware. That was

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 1>really you know, it must have been an amazing period

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of time. It was an amazing period of time. So

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I started in September of ninety eight, so I think

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of that, I think remember the Asian Flu that period

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:54.880
<v Speaker 1>in there, so that's right when I started. And basically

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the Asian Flu was phase two of

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the bubble, which is about ten x on phase one

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of the bubble, and it really was quite insane. And

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>did you realize you were in a bubble in real time,

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>because everybody says, well, you know, you can only identify

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it after the fact, but you're right in the thick

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of it is are people looking around and saying, hey,

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>we've valuations have become unhinged from reality. In nine and

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>early two thousand, I think it was pretty clear. And

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 1>so you know, one of my I was sitting with

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a very experienced group of investors and we were just

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at a whole bunch of things where you'd say,

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're not gonna We're just not gonna do it.

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to touch it if it goes into

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>those into those kind of categories. But it's still the

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>case that I can think of one specific example where

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>someone was offering US fifty million dollars for a company,

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>which was an irrationally high price, but that but the

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 1>comps were much higher. In the end, the company turned

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:57.239
<v Speaker 1>down the acquisition and it, you know, ended up being

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>worth less than a hundred million dollars. Regretted, regretted not

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>selling into the bubble. That's right. So there's one of

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>the one of the legends of the of the venture

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>capital industry. When the bubble finally blew up, said basically,

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, thank God had ended, because I was just

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>holding on to my principles, like I was just about

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to let go. I couldn't hold on anymore that that

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>crowd enthusiasm. It's really easy to get swept up, both

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>positively and negatively. When the crowd is surging. It's it's

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a siren call that is really difficult to resist. And

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like you successfully navigated that. I think it's

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>an overstatement to say I said, well, so I you know,

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I was the new guy, and so you were a

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 1>little cautious to begin with. Well, no, I would say

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>that I was the new guy, so I was unencumbered.

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the venture capitalist is most dangerous when they

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 1>start because you don't know very much and you've got

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a clean slate. You're not sitting on ten boards already.

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And I was the guy who knew the internet stack,

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>so I wasn't doing crazy consumer internet things. It's still

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I made I went too quickly. I made nine effectively

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>pre revenue venture capital investments over an eighteen month period.

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Early seed, very early stage. Yeah. Uh, you know in

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine there wasn't anything called the seed financing, so

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>they were you know, Series eight financings and formation just

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>very early. That's right. And so in Quinn Street, which

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>is now a public company with three hundred million dollars

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in revenue, was the one that paid for the other eight.

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.479
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask you, Coast to Noah, there's nobody

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>on your team page named Coasta Noah Where And I

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>keep mangling unfortunately the name Where does the name Coasta

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Noah come from? So the Coast Sinowans are the Native

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>American tribe that occupied from Big Sir all the way

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to the tip of the San Francisco Peninsula. And so

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a way of uh sort of situating both in

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>place and also I think recognizing that, uh, the development

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:57.239
<v Speaker 1>of Silicon Valley is has layers and is built on

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>the shoulders of giants. So we try to on are

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the old school craft of the past as well as

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>having some ways in which we're uh modern and innovating.

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things we always hear about early

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>mover advantages it's the second mass that gets the cheese.

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>How accurate is that? Is there a big advantage to

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 1>being first or is timing more important? So the answer,

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>as in most things that involve investing, is it depends

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>but I and so there are many examples of each.

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's the case that, you know, one

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>of the things, you know, we in investing companies that

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>change the way the world does business, but we are

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to focus on things that have platform capabilities that

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>can build ecosystems. And I do think it is the

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>case that when you're talking about platforms, it is often

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the case that the first mover to be in market

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and start attracting users and the data that comes with

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>it and the applications that get built on top of

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>it really does have a significant advantage. So you say

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>you want to invest in companies that can change the

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>world's of business, in what way? How can a startup

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 1>or an early venture funded entity really have an impact

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:15.199
<v Speaker 1>on the giant world of business. It's amazing, actually the

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>impact that they can have. So, for example, all companies

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that sell the businesses use a form of account based marketing.

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>You sell the companies, not to individuals. And on the

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>other hand, there wasn't really any way to do that

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in the context of online or digital advertising. So demand Base,

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 1>which is a portfolio company, basically identified a way of

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.719
<v Speaker 1>matching those two pieces of data together and by the

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>time they got distributed to hundreds of companies using it,

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it is a self refreshing data advantage. And it is

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>now the platform for account based marketing. And there you know,

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Google isn't doing it, Facebook isn't doing it, Salesforce isn't

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>doing it, Adobe isn't doing it, Oracle isn't doing it.

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>And so it really is the case that you can

0:22:57.119 --> 0:23:00.040
<v Speaker 1>sometimes take this kernel of an insight and turn it

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>into something really special. Would would we call that middlewhere

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>how would you describe what they all know? I would

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>call it a I would call it a business to

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>business marketing application for account based marketing. That that's quite fascinating.

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about some other types of companies that you

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>invest in. Well, so there's another one. We're here at

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and Elation is an enterprise data catalog for data

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:26.880
<v Speaker 1>driven companies. And the problem is that end users, people

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:30.880
<v Speaker 1>who are analytic in nature, spend hours, dozens of hours,

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>sometimes a third of their time looking for the right

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>data and trying to understand what it means before they

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>can do any analysis. And so Elation is a company

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that we incubated from scratch, and it basically helps those

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 1>end users find what they're looking for and understand what

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>it means. And this is an example of something that

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>comes out of ten years of research of looking at

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a field called master data management that I would argue

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally doesn't really work. Master data management, that's right, which

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>is where the idea was, the human are going to

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 1>document all the data and write down what it means.

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out that this is a place where

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the dawn of artificial intelligence combined with humans is able

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to do something that humans alone couldn't do. And as

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a result, it's incredibly useful for companies like eBay and

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 1>uh and other large enterprises who have masses of data

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that the end user can't possibly get their arms around.

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. So let's talk a little bit about not

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>the investing aspect of it, but the business of venture

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>capital investing. You've just raised is it the third fund?

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Third fund? Right? So first to the lay person, why

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>do we keep rolling out different funds if it's the

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>same group of people investing in the same types of technology,

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>What what's the thinking behind this vintage, that vintage and

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the following So it really is a result of the

0:24:56.560 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>fact that limited partners so investors, which are often endowed

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>ments are large financial institutions want to ensure alignment of

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>interests and no conflict of interests, so they generally tend

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to say, hey, we'll make an investment decision up front,

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>and then you invest in a group of companies and

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>support those group of companies all out of one pool

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of capital, and five years later, when you're investing in

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.919
<v Speaker 1>another group of companies, keep those companies together so that

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>you don't use somebody else's money to bail out a

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 1>bad investment earlier. Vintage makes sense, makes a lot of sense.

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So you're running three funds um simultaneously. Some are fully invested.

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>How how long does it take? So here it is

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>let's let's say a new fund launch is January one?

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 1>How long and it's a hundred million dollars? How long

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>will it take to deploy that hundred million dollars? And

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you're fully invested. So the way it works is typically

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in the next three years, will make all the new

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 1>commitments to companies three years three years. So over that

0:25:56.480 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>period of time we will invest in something like seventeen

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:05.479
<v Speaker 1>or eighteen companies, and of that maybe of the capital

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>will be called and already invested in those companies, but

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 1>six will be reserved for follow on rounds in those companies.

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Let me take apart those let's unpack those numbers a

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit. So eighteen companies over thirty six months. That

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>means essentially you're deciding on a company every other month.

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Is it that spread out or is it a little

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>more bunched together? What's the process like to manage? All Right,

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>we're making this decision, we're ending this company. How do

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you paste that? How do you source that? First? We've

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 1>got a team of five person investment team and we

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:44.479
<v Speaker 1>basically work as a team to attack our most important

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunities and talk to customers and prospects, talk to technologists

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to do technical due diligence, spend lots of time talking

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to founders to see how they think because so much

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 1>is unknown that you're fundamentally investing in people and products.

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>And I've heard that repeatedly. Is we're not buying technologies,

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>We're buying a founder. We're investing in a founder and

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>their vision. Is that a fair descriptor? Or are you

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>buying technology? Are you investing in new technologies? I would

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>say we're investing in the founder's vision. And ability to think.

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's the part that I think people don't really

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about because there are all of these. To me,

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the thing that people think of founders as I want

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs, and he's going to be right a hundred

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time over the next twenty years. And

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm just back in his vision. And what we look

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>at is I want Steve Jobs who doesn't have reality

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>distortion field. I want Steve Jobs who is completely immersed

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>in reality, who has situational awareness, who knows what is possible,

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 1>who knows what market needs and can navigate assemble to

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>pieces and get themselves to the right spot. You mentioned

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>when you were at Sutter Hill you did nine investments

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>right away. One of them was really successful, paid for

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the other eight ones not so successful. In general, what

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>do the statistics look like of a hundred investments um

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that are made. How many of your losers, how many

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>break events, how many of your minor winners, and how

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 1>many are the you know, unfathomable home runs that pay

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>for the previous nine nine and then some Well, so

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I can only talk about my experience, which I think

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is frankly different than the industry as a whole, which

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is another question why, but we'll get to that. Yeah.

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 1>So in my experience, I'd say one out of ten

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>are great winners, meaning ten times your money or better

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>ten x wow. Yeah, so on one out of ten,

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and then it really is the case that about uh,

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I'd say, uh, two thirds end up being winners of

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>some you know, of some material variety meaning you know, yes,

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you two x to you know, four or five x,

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't make a venture capital, but it's better than

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a stick in the eye. And uh. And then out

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of you know, out of ten, you'll have to where

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you get your money back and one where you write

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it off. And that is very different than the industry is.

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, mine, you tell me if my

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>understanding is wrong. That or outright money losers, and the

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>next or break evens, and then some more do one x,

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>two x, three x, and then there's that one home

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>run that pays for everything, and then some that that

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a fair assessment of the industry as a whole. I

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>think that's right. The reasons are one that the consumer business,

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>which we don't really do, is much more volatile, is

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>not only a hits business, but it's also a luck

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>business that you know, a great team assembled on a

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>validated problem in the business to business world can usually

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>figure something out right, So so that's certainly one I think.

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>The second is we're as early stage investors were all

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>former product managers. We think like product people, so we're

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>used to doing Uh. It isn't just a hey, let's

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>take a flyer on this. We're asking the same questions

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that the founder should be asking his or herself, which

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is what the customers care about. Is this a big

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>enough problem to be worth addressing? Do the set of

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>technologies that are available at this time can we actually

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.479
<v Speaker 1>solve this problem in a meaningful way. If so, how

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>much is it worth to a customer? And you know

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>so because we both make that set of assessments in

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a really nuanced way up front. And then we've got

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>an operating team that helps these typically product oriented founders

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>build the sales and marketing and commercial infrastructure that they

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>need for their product, their customer, their price point, their market.

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>We think that we have higher ods of success. That's

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating. We have been speaking with Greg Stands of

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>cost to Noah Ventures. If you enjoy this conversation, be

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>sure and check out the podcast extras where we keep

0:30:56.200 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the tape rolling and continue discussing all things venture capital investing.

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:04.719
<v Speaker 1>You can find all the podcast extras wherever fine podcasts

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>are sold Apple iTunes, Overcast, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com.

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Be sure and check out my daily column on Bloomberg

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>View dot com. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>rit Halts. We love your comments, feedback and suggestions right

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to us at m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net.

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:27.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm Barry rid Holts. You're listening to Masters in Business

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. Welcome to the podcast. I don't know

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>why I do that every week. I just it's I

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>like this part of stuff. Greg. Thank you so much

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>for doing this. I've been I've been looking forward to

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 1>doing this. And you know what I forgot to say earlier,

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll say it here just for um completing its completeness

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 1>is say um, my disclosure is we have a mutual

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>friends who is a senior executive at Dimensional Fund Advisors,

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And my disclosure is I'm an investor in d f

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>A funds. My client clients over healths wealth management investing

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>their funds. And I probably should have said that during broadcast.

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I want to move that back

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 1>there or not. But there's the disclosure. Although I make

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>no um that that's fairly well known and fairly public.

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>But we met through someone from dimensional and I always

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>feel better disclosing more rather than less. Let's let's keep

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about venture investing because some of the questions we

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't get to I think are really interesting. Starting with

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you reference luck on the consumer side, the question I

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>have is how important is luck across the board the

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>board when it comes to technology or venture investing. Is

0:32:56.160 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>serendipity all that important? Or is it more rigorous? And

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>here's our process and here's the outcome and randomness doesn't matter. Uh,

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>You're both are true. I mean, look, look place a

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>huge role. It would be completely disingenuous to say that

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. I do think that it has a uh

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that there's an element of you put yourself in lucky places, right,

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and so you navigate to those and you think you

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>way through them, and you work with the best people

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that you can so you can increase your odds of

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>getting lucky. Is that what it's probability plus randomness that

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that's really interested? And I wanted to ask you about, um,

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the companies. We talked about the success ratio.

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about some of the companies

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that got away and what you learned about that, and

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the companies that maybe this wasn't a great investment.

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>So so let's start with the first one. And the

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>reason this question came to mind is a number of

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>venture firms have a page on their site where, hey,

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>we missed this opportunity to invest in Uber. We could

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>have been an early investor in Amazon. We said no,

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like a badge of honor that hey, here's

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>our process. It doesn't lead us here, but we stick

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 1>to the process, and and here's how it didn't work out.

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Any stories along those lines, anybody, Yeah, well, this is

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>this This is a inauspicious time to note that Fred

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Wilson introduced me to Mango dB for its Series A financing.

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Mango dB went public yesterday. I think Dwight Merriment is

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary founder and technologist. Uh. It was based in

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 1>New York. Uh, there was no sort of business partner

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 1>or commercial partner with him at that time. And it's

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>an and and it's an open source company, and it

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 1>is you know, open source doesn't monetize as well as

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 1>what you would think of, as you know, proprietary software,

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and so it has the category has to take off

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and be incredibly important, which no sequel has, and you

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 1>have to win. You can't be number two. And so

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in the end, I you know, for me, the thing

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that I that I learned from that is when you

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:12.919
<v Speaker 1>have a uh an anchor founder who is a great

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 1>technologist and a pied piper for other technical talent, that

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 1>those can be really interesting opportunities. There will be a

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>question over time of how you graft the sales and

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>marketing and business leadership into the company, but that can

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 1>be a very good formula. And that's one that I

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:33.720
<v Speaker 1>missed and I would have imagined that you know, between

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Oracle and Microsoft, isn't that like a giant, and then

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 1>you throw in salesforce. Beyond that is then the of

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the database market or am I naive about that? Oracle

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:47.359
<v Speaker 1>itself is the database market. So so you're running into

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a monopoly. But that is sequel, which is basically a

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 1>very heavy weight UH database. I nine, I I don't

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:56.720
<v Speaker 1>even know what we're up to, probably eleven and right.

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:59.320
<v Speaker 1>But then in the in the world of no sequel,

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and then loop, which is cloud Era and her works

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:07.439
<v Speaker 1>and the like. There's been an explosion of lighter weight

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>databases to manage less structured data and so that that

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:14.839
<v Speaker 1>has been a really important megatrend and they were on

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the front edge of it, and that was So the

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:20.399
<v Speaker 1>question is what was the takeaway? Was anytime there's a fail,

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I always want to say personally or anyone else, So

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 1>what was the lesson from that? What? What did you

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 1>take away from that? One got away? I think it

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>is this idea that, particularly in the infrastructure category, that

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that building the entire company around a great technologist as

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a is a can be a really important way to

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 1>build those companies. So I think the model that I

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.240
<v Speaker 1>grew up in is you build company around great CEO,

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>and so I think the the the idea that you

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 1>can build around great technologists and graft on that business

0:36:55.560 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>leadership over time because in an incredible technology infrastructure categories

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>tend to be driven more by technology than by uh

0:37:06.360 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>than by you know, relationship to to customer. I may

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>be quoting and reason I'm not sure where this came from.

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Actually it is injuries and it's you could possibly teach

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a technologist the CEO and related business skills. But it's

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>all but impossible to teach a CEO that technology visionary insight,

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:32.319
<v Speaker 1>that that is something that you have and can't learn.

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>But hey, many good technologists can learn the business side

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 1>of it. And I'm slightly mangling that, but but absolutely

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:42.799
<v Speaker 1>Mark Mark is absolutely on record on that, and I

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 1>would I would actually, uh for for my purposes and

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>our purposes, i'd actually so there are a few Jensen

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Wongs from Nvidia, but there aren't that many either. And ultimately,

0:37:56.880 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, a technologist to remain CEO needs to go

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>a boot camp on sales, boot camp on marketing, needs

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to own those and off and so ultimately the you know,

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 1>this is what I talk when I talk about grafting

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>those on. They need to know who to hire and

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 1>how to manage them, and so they can, Yes, they

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 1>can often learn it, but they've got to be a

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 1>learning machine like Mark himself was, or like Mark Starberg was,

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 1>and some will end up, uh, you know, some will

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>end up doing that, and some will end up, you know,

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>not succeeding in learning all of all of those skills

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:34.839
<v Speaker 1>and will need a partner in another form. And what

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 1>we try to be is is a UM is a

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 1>great long term partner that helps them understand where they

0:38:41.920 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>are and understand where they need to be in order

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to lead the company. I guess I have to go

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:50.439
<v Speaker 1>to boot camp myself. Then, UM, let's talk a little

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 1>bit about the space. Venture capital and private equity both

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:58.239
<v Speaker 1>seem to be pretty competitive, attracting a lot of UM

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>new and expanded UH players in the space. How competitive

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:07.760
<v Speaker 1>is venture investing these days? Well, it's highly competitive, but honestly,

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it's always been highly competitive. So people will say, oh,

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 1>there's too much money slashing around and then like and

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>my my view is everybody always thinks there's too much

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>money in their own asset class. Welcome to life in

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 1>perfect competition, right, So that that kind of leads to

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 1>my next question. You guys really are an early a

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>or seed investor, meaning you're looking at technologies when they're

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>still very new, when the companies are still very new. UM,

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>there may or may not be any sort of revenue

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 1>yet why that space and does that provide you guys

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 1>with any sort of advantage over some of your peers? Absolutely?

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 1>The I mean the two reasons to be an early

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:50.919
<v Speaker 1>stage investor from a sort of financial or strategy point

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 1>of view, are fundamentally about ownership, you know, being able

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to buy you know, big chunks of companies, and about

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>multiples of capital. And so it isn't a category where

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:04.919
<v Speaker 1>you can invest very much money, where you can raise

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>really big funds, where you can have enormous fee income,

0:40:08.160 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 1>but it is the place where you can earn the

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:12.399
<v Speaker 1>biggest multiples of the capital. Now, I will also point

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>out that personally, the reason why I'm an early stage

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>investor is because that's what I love doing. That's the

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>time in the company's life that I'm most interested in.

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 1>That it's the time where you build the foundational relationship

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 1>with partners, that helping them navigate through this process of

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:32.759
<v Speaker 1>launching first product and great use old three of them. Now,

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 1>who do we hire? Who else can possibly sell this?

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:37.279
<v Speaker 1>And what does that person look like? And how do

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 1>we go do it? That's the most fun that there

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:43.279
<v Speaker 1>is in business. So how intimately are you involved with

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the companies once you found them? It's not here's a check,

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll follow up with you every quarter. You're much

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 1>more hands on. So yes, unequivocally, founders and management teams

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 1>are running companies, you know, Just to be clear, but

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 1>I'll use the example of Elation where they incubated in

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>our office for a year, so they were up to

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:09.319
<v Speaker 1>fifteen or sixteen people by the time they left, and

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>so there was an almost daily interaction and a debrief

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 1>after they came back from customer meetings and strategy conversations

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, all of these team building conversations on

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:23.359
<v Speaker 1>a highly regular basis. And that both is great fun,

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 1>but I think it it really helps because it is

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:29.440
<v Speaker 1>lonely at the top. It's lonely being a founder. It's

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:34.800
<v Speaker 1>lonely being a CEO and having someone who is there

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>but frankly whom you trust and who you're willing to

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 1>be open with and you know, even vulnerable with. I

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know the answer to X. Can you help me

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 1>think about why? Is I think a huge asset? So

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:53.360
<v Speaker 1>what about the macro environments of the economy, the stock

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>market when you're when you're looking at a company a

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>founder of technology, does that come into the calculation or

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is it, Hey, the next five years are gonna elapse

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 1>regardless of where we are with the market cycle. It

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 1>really is more the ladder we are are. Fundamental discipline

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>is micro and bottoms up the way I like to

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:13.360
<v Speaker 1>say that to our team is the company is the

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 1>unit of analysis here, right, and so we go do

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:19.839
<v Speaker 1>those fundamentals. Let me repeat that the company is the

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 1>unit of analysis here as opposed to what as opposed to, uh,

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the market. So there are thematic investors who I think

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 1>sometimes do a very good job at saying we're gonna

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 1>go invest in this category and we're gonna interview every

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 1>company and we're gonna pick one because we're smart enough

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to know that this is the one important thing. So

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 1>it's top down. Hey, the social networking thing is big,

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Let's go find a social company that's right. And so

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the what I refer to as the bulge

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 1>brack adventure firms tend to think, hey, there's you know,

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:54.239
<v Speaker 1>there's something moving in this category, and we've got to

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>have one, and they so they do this top down process.

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 1>And so ultimately, as I as I said, products and people,

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the only way that macro really comes into it is

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 1>UH one, we have to be sure that we can

0:43:10.040 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 1>finance the company. Right, so there'll be other capital available

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 1>and meaning you work with other vcs, well you'll co

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>invest with and I assume you have relationships with people

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:22.279
<v Speaker 1>all over. We have relationships with people all over who

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 1>will lead a B in, a C and a D round.

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's one, and then the second is as we

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 1>work with companies, the question is this is actually where

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the macro environment plays a stronger role. Is ah, how

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 1>willing are you to get over your skis in pursuing

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 1>growth at any price? And I would say that the

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Bulish bracket firms who have big funds, they gotta return

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:51.320
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars if you've got a one and a

0:43:51.360 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 1>half billion dollar fund. And they tell companies your job

0:43:55.120 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is to strap on the rocket boosters, and you may

0:43:57.200 --> 0:43:58.719
<v Speaker 1>go into the side of the cliff, or you may

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 1>get into orbit, but job is to maximize the number

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that get into orbit. And I think one of the

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 1>advantages of a boutique firm like us is that we

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:09.880
<v Speaker 1>can work with founders and say, look, we can, uh,

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 1>let's build on a solid foundation, let's prepare ourselves for

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 1>explosive motion, but let's um be thoughtful about how much

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 1>to invest in growth and and and when to when

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to accelerate, and when to tap on the brakes. And

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we're oftentimes a better partner to companies than

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:31.360
<v Speaker 1>even the biggest names in the business. So you mentioned

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 1>earlier the fee versus the performance side. So with a

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund it's two and twenty. Venture capital is not

0:44:38.760 --> 0:44:41.400
<v Speaker 1>all that different now it's typically two and two and twenties.

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:44.239
<v Speaker 1>So if you're on a hundred times less money, well,

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:46.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're a one of the bulge firms that have

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:51.200
<v Speaker 1>billions and billions of dollars, that two percent is not insubstantial.

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:55.480
<v Speaker 1>When I'm hearing from you as an early investor, A,

0:44:56.560 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 1>there isn't enough capacity to put billions of dollars to work.

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 1>It's that's why these are a hundred and fifty and

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>two hundred million dollar UM funds. And be the upside

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to you is to be right more than wrong, and

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:12.760
<v Speaker 1>it's the performance side. So if they're looking at three

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>x on the performance side, you guys are looking at

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a bigger numbers. That Am I catching that? Right? Yeah?

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:22.319
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it is right that A we are

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 1>striving for higher multiples of capital. And you know, I

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 1>think any of the LPs who actually look at the

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 1>numbers say that people who are raising multi billion dollar

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>funds have a hard time return in Uh, you know,

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:39.799
<v Speaker 1>reacts right, but but yeah, we're you know, we're we

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>are striving for uh, you know for four and five

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and six and seven X. Doing ten X on a

0:45:47.160 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 1>fund is extraordinary. It has been done. But it's an

0:45:50.880 --> 0:45:53.799
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and peoples on or a Facebook or

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 1>a Google or something that's just that's absolutely off the chain. Um,

0:45:57.760 --> 0:46:01.919
<v Speaker 1>what's the process like raising money? Who are the venture investors?

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean by name, but academic endowmonds, pension funds.

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Who who are your LPs? Yeah? So I started out

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>five years ago and I never raised a dime in

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:15.919
<v Speaker 1>my life really and so and so I really went

0:46:16.040 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to co investors who had worked with on boards other

0:46:19.200 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 1>venture capitalists, and a couple of them, people like Fred

0:46:22.920 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Wilson and Bradfeld, introduced me to some of their LPs.

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 1>And then I just anytime someone would refer me, I

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>just kept talking. And it turns out that the university

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 1>endowments and hospital endowments are a big group that there

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:44.759
<v Speaker 1>are uh for small funds. The pension funds really show

0:46:44.840 --> 0:46:47.239
<v Speaker 1>up in the form of fund of funds that effectively

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 1>our wholesalers they disaggregate pension funds just because they have

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:52.400
<v Speaker 1>too much money. Pension fund needs to write a hundred

0:46:52.400 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 1>million dollar check, not a ten million dollar check. UH

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and fund of funds also aggregate money from family offices,

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:02.319
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes family offices come direct. So those are really

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the three main categories endowments, fund of funds, and family offices.

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:10.399
<v Speaker 1>So you said you never raised money before five years ago.

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the exact same situation. What are your experiences

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:19.040
<v Speaker 1>like speaking to investors and prospective investors? How how does

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:22.239
<v Speaker 1>that go? And how you obviously have been very successful?

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 1>How did you learn how to pet that animal? I

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 1>honestly trial and air. I didn't know what I was doing.

0:47:34.320 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I was young and stupid, naive, and I just marched

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 1>into it. And I do think that there's a look,

0:47:39.560 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a great lesson there that you can, you know,

0:47:42.680 --> 0:47:46.840
<v Speaker 1>just learned by doing. I did work with UH, a

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 1>lawyer who was also council that Sutter Hill, so I'd

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:54.440
<v Speaker 1>had twenty years of trust in history and working with him,

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:56.200
<v Speaker 1>who could be a little bit of a river guide

0:47:56.200 --> 0:47:59.799
<v Speaker 1>to that. We didn't use any you know, external consultants,

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think over time I've been able to incorporate

0:48:04.760 --> 0:48:09.480
<v Speaker 1>advice from other venture capitalists, from people on our team

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:13.799
<v Speaker 1>who have helped improve our storytelling around that, because I

0:48:13.840 --> 0:48:16.359
<v Speaker 1>really started out saying I've got a point of view

0:48:16.400 --> 0:48:19.799
<v Speaker 1>of what we want to do and who we are,

0:48:20.320 --> 0:48:23.359
<v Speaker 1>and all I wanna do is authentically represent that and

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:26.160
<v Speaker 1>people for whom that's good enough, great, and where it's

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 1>not good enough, so be it. It becomes a sort

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:32.239
<v Speaker 1>of self selecting group of people. That's right, it's a

0:48:32.320 --> 0:48:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a mutual fit um. And you referenced machine learning

0:48:36.800 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 1>and artificial intelligence earlier. I would really not be doing

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:44.840
<v Speaker 1>my job if I didn't ask you. Lots of people

0:48:44.880 --> 0:48:50.040
<v Speaker 1>seem to be concerned about the upcoming singularity and eventual

0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:54.640
<v Speaker 1>robot revolution. Is are these fears overblown? Have we been

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:59.240
<v Speaker 1>watching too many sci fi movies? Well? I think those

0:48:59.320 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 1>beers are overblown. But I do think that it's right

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:07.439
<v Speaker 1>to say that the the Cambrian explosion in AI, which

0:49:07.440 --> 0:49:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it really is right. People have been working on it

0:49:09.640 --> 0:49:13.640
<v Speaker 1>for decades, but that's you know it really you know,

0:49:13.680 --> 0:49:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the proliferation of data, the availability of huge amounts of

0:49:17.440 --> 0:49:21.719
<v Speaker 1>compute in the cloud, and modest improvement in the algorithms

0:49:22.120 --> 0:49:25.279
<v Speaker 1>have really led us to be able to do a

0:49:25.360 --> 0:49:28.800
<v Speaker 1>different set of things. And so every business application, for example,

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 1>will have AI fully infused, and I do think that

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:35.919
<v Speaker 1>that has employment implications. Were coming off a period where

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:40.239
<v Speaker 1>wage stignation has been a problem for forty years one time,

0:49:40.360 --> 0:49:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that's right, and I think that will there will continue

0:49:43.320 --> 0:49:47.279
<v Speaker 1>to be the elimination of certain job categories. At the

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:50.080
<v Speaker 1>same time, there are extraordinary new opportunities. I'll give you

0:49:50.120 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 1>one example. We've got a company called bug Crowd, which

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is bug crowd bug Crowd which helps companies orchestrate a

0:49:58.560 --> 0:50:01.239
<v Speaker 1>bug bounty program so that so in other words, they

0:50:01.239 --> 0:50:05.160
<v Speaker 1>want users to identify issues with their software so they

0:50:05.200 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 1>could fix them more or less in real time and

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:10.440
<v Speaker 1>so right, so that the good guys can find them

0:50:10.440 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>before the bad guys find them. Is this security specific

0:50:13.120 --> 0:50:15.719
<v Speaker 1>or is it everything? It is security specific. And they

0:50:15.760 --> 0:50:21.759
<v Speaker 1>have over forty security researchers on the platform who are

0:50:22.320 --> 0:50:26.520
<v Speaker 1>working with companies like Visa and Fiat Chrysler and PayPal

0:50:26.880 --> 0:50:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to identify those kinds of vulnerabilities. And there are people

0:50:30.920 --> 0:50:35.680
<v Speaker 1>really making a living really as security researchers. In other words,

0:50:35.719 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to hack a company, and when they identify

0:50:38.080 --> 0:50:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the hack, they let so really, had had one of

0:50:41.760 --> 0:50:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the credit companies um actually right, had Equifax done this,

0:50:47.320 --> 0:50:49.480
<v Speaker 1>they could have saved themselves a lot of time and headachain.

0:50:49.520 --> 0:50:51.200
<v Speaker 1>That's right, And so this is an example of a

0:50:51.280 --> 0:50:54.279
<v Speaker 1>job that didn't exist five years ago. But people can make.

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:59.360
<v Speaker 1>People can make really good incomes and six figures, seven figures,

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:03.080
<v Speaker 1>six figures and uh, you know high five figures and

0:51:03.120 --> 0:51:06.480
<v Speaker 1>six figures, and people can do it at their convenience,

0:51:06.480 --> 0:51:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and they can do it wherever they are, and there

0:51:07.960 --> 0:51:12.280
<v Speaker 1>are examples. Uh, there was a story recently about a

0:51:12.320 --> 0:51:15.840
<v Speaker 1>thirteen year old kid in Bangladesh working out of internet

0:51:15.880 --> 0:51:19.800
<v Speaker 1>cafes who taught himself to hack with YouTube videos and

0:51:20.200 --> 0:51:23.880
<v Speaker 1>he is supporting his family. That's amazing. That's totally amazing.

0:51:24.440 --> 0:51:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So it sounds like you are really focused at a

0:51:27.640 --> 0:51:31.160
<v Speaker 1>very interesting stage of technology. And it also sounds like

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:33.399
<v Speaker 1>you really enjoy what you do. I love what I do.

0:51:33.760 --> 0:51:37.440
<v Speaker 1>So on that note, let's jump to our uh standard

0:51:37.520 --> 0:51:41.239
<v Speaker 1>questions we ask all our guests. UM, let's start with

0:51:41.760 --> 0:51:44.960
<v Speaker 1>tell us the most important thing that people don't know

0:51:45.000 --> 0:51:49.439
<v Speaker 1>about your background. So I didn't know what I wanted

0:51:49.480 --> 0:51:52.319
<v Speaker 1>to do out of college, and so while I was

0:51:52.360 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>figuring that out, my very first job was as the

0:51:55.680 --> 0:51:59.359
<v Speaker 1>receptionist at the Houghton Mifflin publishing company that I got

0:51:59.440 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 1>through a temp agency. Okay, Holton Mifflin was a huge publisher. Yeah,

0:52:03.600 --> 0:52:06.800
<v Speaker 1>so you know, textbook publisher. And to me, the point

0:52:06.840 --> 0:52:10.799
<v Speaker 1>of that is, career is long, and your job is

0:52:10.840 --> 0:52:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to navigate and to learn and to put yourself on

0:52:13.680 --> 0:52:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a path and go on a journey. And your first

0:52:16.640 --> 0:52:20.319
<v Speaker 1>job isn't the destination? Very interesting? Tell us about some

0:52:20.400 --> 0:52:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of your early mentors who helped guide your path. Well,

0:52:24.200 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say coming out of my first real professional job,

0:52:28.200 --> 0:52:32.560
<v Speaker 1>which was at a management consulting company now known as Mercer,

0:52:32.680 --> 0:52:36.680
<v Speaker 1>so one Adaran sly Watsky, who is author of The

0:52:36.719 --> 0:52:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Profit Zone and a handful of other books, really taught

0:52:39.719 --> 0:52:42.800
<v Speaker 1>me to think and understand business. I was a political

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:46.960
<v Speaker 1>science major, so that to me was a real opening

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and I learned a ton. Now. The thing that's also

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:53.399
<v Speaker 1>interesting is that my uh, the other person I'd put

0:52:53.440 --> 0:52:56.759
<v Speaker 1>on that list is Steve Leavitt, author of fre Economics.

0:52:56.880 --> 0:53:00.719
<v Speaker 1>So he was my uh classmate and my colleague on

0:53:00.840 --> 0:53:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that case. And I jokingly say I did some of

0:53:05.080 --> 0:53:07.280
<v Speaker 1>my best work when I was teamed up with Steve Lovett.

0:53:08.080 --> 0:53:09.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I also did some of my best work

0:53:09.680 --> 0:53:11.480
<v Speaker 1>at an escape when I was teamed up with Ben Horowitz.

0:53:11.480 --> 0:53:13.799
<v Speaker 1>It turns out, you know, working with Steve taught me

0:53:13.840 --> 0:53:15.680
<v Speaker 1>how to work with people who are smarter than I

0:53:15.719 --> 0:53:19.759
<v Speaker 1>am and to still contribute and and collaborate in a

0:53:19.760 --> 0:53:22.680
<v Speaker 1>way that is really highly productive. And that's ultimately, I think,

0:53:22.880 --> 0:53:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a really important skill that that's really very interesting. Um

0:53:27.200 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>venture capitalists. Who who influenced your approach to VC investment? Well,

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:37.879
<v Speaker 1>I I've mentioned Fred Wilson before, but he Fred, Fred

0:53:37.880 --> 0:53:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Wilson is in Union Square Ventures and is pointed by

0:53:42.200 --> 0:53:46.239
<v Speaker 1>the way, I'm literally pointing square, that's right, and and

0:53:46.360 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 1>notably the early investor in Twitter, which I also passed on.

0:53:50.960 --> 0:53:56.120
<v Speaker 1>But you know, Fred, there are lots of great business opportunities.

0:53:56.320 --> 0:54:02.200
<v Speaker 1>But Fred helped really teach me the value of platforms,

0:54:03.320 --> 0:54:07.600
<v Speaker 1>platforms and ecosystems. And that's how you take the ten

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:10.680
<v Speaker 1>x opportunity and turned it into the fifty or opportunity.

0:54:10.719 --> 0:54:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Ecosystems and platforms. Yes, that's really interesting, and I'm gonna

0:54:14.480 --> 0:54:17.120
<v Speaker 1>do something I never do. Fred. You keep saying, no,

0:54:17.800 --> 0:54:20.759
<v Speaker 1>I've had Mark on, I've had Greg on, come on,

0:54:21.000 --> 0:54:25.040
<v Speaker 1>step up, let's let's let's get you out of downtown

0:54:25.040 --> 0:54:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and up to midtown for an hour or two. Um,

0:54:28.400 --> 0:54:32.200
<v Speaker 1>this is everybody's favorite question. Tell us about some of

0:54:32.239 --> 0:54:37.080
<v Speaker 1>your favorite books, fiction, nonfiction, technology, venture, investing, or what

0:54:37.200 --> 0:54:42.080
<v Speaker 1>have you. So you know, to me, the book that

0:54:42.200 --> 0:54:46.920
<v Speaker 1>basically every educated adults should read is Sapiens. The predecessor

0:54:47.000 --> 0:54:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of that fifteen years earlier was guns, germs, and steel.

0:54:50.280 --> 0:54:55.880
<v Speaker 1>But to me, those explain who we are as you know,

0:54:55.920 --> 0:54:59.360
<v Speaker 1>as a people and how we got here. And to me,

0:54:59.680 --> 0:55:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in the context of something like Sapiens, it's fascinating to

0:55:04.239 --> 0:55:11.160
<v Speaker 1>look at uh, language and money as early API s right,

0:55:11.239 --> 0:55:16.800
<v Speaker 1>application programming interfaces, ways of exchanging information or exchanging goods,

0:55:17.080 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and so I love having that sort of universal and

0:55:20.239 --> 0:55:23.600
<v Speaker 1>historical perspective. Have you gotten to Homodaeus yet? This is

0:55:23.680 --> 0:55:28.799
<v Speaker 1>follow up? So I found Sapiens to be a little dark. Um,

0:55:28.840 --> 0:55:32.959
<v Speaker 1>agriculture leads to disease. It was a little, But Homodaeus

0:55:33.120 --> 0:55:37.799
<v Speaker 1>is just a little dystopia view of the future of mankind.

0:55:38.000 --> 0:55:41.799
<v Speaker 1>He's a fascinating writer. I love the way he contextualizes

0:55:42.600 --> 0:55:45.239
<v Speaker 1>of physics, biology, and chemistry, the way he puts that

0:55:45.280 --> 0:55:48.560
<v Speaker 1>into a broader context. In the beginning of Sapiens, I

0:55:48.600 --> 0:55:51.480
<v Speaker 1>found that really to be a fascinating thing. Give us

0:55:51.480 --> 0:55:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a guns, germs and steel sapiens. How we got to now,

0:55:55.560 --> 0:55:58.200
<v Speaker 1>which is Steven Johnson, So it basically the second person

0:55:58.200 --> 0:56:01.480
<v Speaker 1>who's recommended that it's fabulous. And so this idea that

0:56:01.560 --> 0:56:06.319
<v Speaker 1>things that we just take for granted were fundamental innovations

0:56:06.400 --> 0:56:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and have had as big and implication implications for uh,

0:56:11.600 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 1>for for the human race as things like transistors that

0:56:15.200 --> 0:56:17.680
<v Speaker 1>are not that that we acknowledge have had. So an

0:56:17.680 --> 0:56:20.960
<v Speaker 1>example would be glass, right, right, you don't even think

0:56:20.960 --> 0:56:23.160
<v Speaker 1>twice about it, that's right, and not not only glass,

0:56:23.200 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 1>but safety glass. Think about what that did for automobiles

0:56:26.719 --> 0:56:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and who even thinks twice about that? Exactly right? So

0:56:29.680 --> 0:56:33.560
<v Speaker 1>but but you know before glass, you were you either

0:56:33.640 --> 0:56:36.440
<v Speaker 1>had light or you were cold. It was one of

0:56:36.480 --> 0:56:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the one. Right, Um, how about not? How about fiction?

0:56:40.400 --> 0:56:44.319
<v Speaker 1>All of us read nonfiction because we can rationalize the

0:56:44.360 --> 0:56:47.040
<v Speaker 1>time as well, it's work related. But how often do

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you step back and read something that's just fiction? I

0:56:50.360 --> 0:56:54.800
<v Speaker 1>would say about what I read is fiction? I basically

0:56:54.840 --> 0:56:57.320
<v Speaker 1>pick about one out of five from my wife's book clubs,

0:56:58.080 --> 0:57:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and there are the person that I so, by the way,

0:57:04.160 --> 0:57:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll read anything that Michael Lewis writes, I'll read UM,

0:57:08.040 --> 0:57:11.759
<v Speaker 1>but I really love Michael Sabone, And for me, that

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:16.000
<v Speaker 1>started with Cavalier and Clay. Michael Sabone, Cavalier and Clay

0:57:16.000 --> 0:57:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I am not familiar with. So it is a so

0:57:19.120 --> 0:57:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it actually is a New York story. But it's two

0:57:21.600 --> 0:57:24.000
<v Speaker 1>kids who start out in Eastern Europe, you know, who

0:57:24.080 --> 0:57:26.560
<v Speaker 1>migrate to New York and then they basically start a

0:57:26.600 --> 0:57:29.960
<v Speaker 1>comic book company and they and they, you know, I

0:57:30.000 --> 0:57:32.240
<v Speaker 1>think they end up on the on the Lower East Side,

0:57:32.240 --> 0:57:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and they navigate their way through and it's uh. But

0:57:35.240 --> 0:57:40.040
<v Speaker 1>he has an amazing human insight and turn of a phrase.

0:57:40.240 --> 0:57:43.920
<v Speaker 1>And so for me, when I'm reading a book UH

0:57:44.080 --> 0:57:48.080
<v Speaker 1>with a truly great author, I find myself periodically I

0:57:48.120 --> 0:57:52.720
<v Speaker 1>just laugh out loud where they just capture humanity in

0:57:52.760 --> 0:57:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a in a way that I had never thought of,

0:57:55.480 --> 0:57:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and it gives unique insight. But it also is just funny.

0:57:58.800 --> 0:58:02.120
<v Speaker 1>It makes my wife crazy when we're we're coming. I

0:58:02.200 --> 0:58:04.920
<v Speaker 1>read Ready Player one on a flight back from Europe.

0:58:04.960 --> 0:58:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I pretty much killed the whole book on a flight,

0:58:07.960 --> 0:58:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and parts of it are really funny and I start

0:58:10.640 --> 0:58:14.440
<v Speaker 1>laughing out loud and she just gets embarrassed. By by

0:58:14.560 --> 0:58:19.680
<v Speaker 1>my Hyena. Like before, in the middle of a of

0:58:19.760 --> 0:58:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a room, I watched her I get an elbow and

0:58:21.960 --> 0:58:24.640
<v Speaker 1>then she turns red and it's actually pretty funny. I'm

0:58:24.640 --> 0:58:27.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to check that book out. That sounds really fascinating.

0:58:28.080 --> 0:58:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Um the venture capital industry, tell us about what's changed

0:58:32.320 --> 0:58:34.520
<v Speaker 1>since you've become a VC. What what are the big

0:58:34.560 --> 0:58:38.080
<v Speaker 1>shifts that have taken place. Well, I think twenty years

0:58:38.080 --> 0:58:41.040
<v Speaker 1>ago it felt much more like an ivory tower where

0:58:41.360 --> 0:58:44.040
<v Speaker 1>people came to pay homage to venture capitalists, and venture

0:58:44.080 --> 0:58:46.440
<v Speaker 1>capitalists made pronouncements about whether or not they were going

0:58:46.480 --> 0:58:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to fund. And I would say that there's been a

0:58:49.880 --> 0:58:55.160
<v Speaker 1>huge so some of there's been a proliferation of seed

0:58:55.200 --> 0:58:57.880
<v Speaker 1>funds and incubators, so there are many more sources of capital,

0:58:58.520 --> 0:59:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and there's a transparency and so there are reputation effects

0:59:02.520 --> 0:59:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and the like which you see in a bunch of

0:59:06.280 --> 0:59:11.720
<v Speaker 1>um you know uh that I think ultimately holds venture

0:59:11.720 --> 0:59:16.720
<v Speaker 1>capitals and and their firms accountable for being truly good partners.

0:59:16.960 --> 0:59:20.240
<v Speaker 1>So certainly that's one. The other is, you know, there

0:59:20.240 --> 0:59:21.800
<v Speaker 1>are two and a half billion cell phones in the

0:59:21.800 --> 0:59:26.760
<v Speaker 1>world right so the markets that we can address are

0:59:26.880 --> 0:59:30.560
<v Speaker 1>much bigger, and I would say twenty years ago the

0:59:30.640 --> 0:59:35.400
<v Speaker 1>only venture capital was really only proven in Silicon Valley Boston.

0:59:35.440 --> 0:59:37.120
<v Speaker 1>At that point, it kind of fallen off the map.

0:59:37.200 --> 0:59:40.960
<v Speaker 1>And there really is there is innovation everywhere, and there

0:59:41.040 --> 0:59:43.800
<v Speaker 1>is and so both in a lot of pockets in

0:59:43.840 --> 0:59:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the US outside of Silicon Valley, but also in you know,

0:59:48.200 --> 0:59:52.480
<v Speaker 1>we found some really interesting investments in Australia. There's obviously

0:59:52.520 --> 0:59:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a ton of work being done in London and Estonia

0:59:55.240 --> 0:59:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and parts of Scandinavia, obviously Estonian Scandinavia. I don't think

0:59:59.520 --> 1:00:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people bowl would think that's obvious. I

1:00:02.160 --> 1:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>mean New York, Chicago, Boston, Austin, San Francisco, Seattle, Shore, Estonia.

1:00:08.320 --> 1:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>What is happening in Estonia? Well, I think so, the

1:00:11.920 --> 1:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the Russian Soviet Empire had a long history of computer

1:00:15.360 --> 1:00:20.479
<v Speaker 1>science and so but there are you know, starting with

1:00:20.840 --> 1:00:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Skype and some and some other companies, there have been uh,

1:00:24.320 --> 1:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>some really impressive companies and even more really impressive technologists

1:00:29.520 --> 1:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that have come out of those places. So often they

1:00:32.200 --> 1:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>will set up end up setting setting up headquarters in

1:00:37.040 --> 1:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley or elsewhere, but that kernel of innovation is

1:00:41.040 --> 1:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>coming from all over the world. So Silicon Valley is

1:00:43.960 --> 1:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>infamous for having the full critical mass of people, capital, technology,

1:00:51.080 --> 1:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>access to universities, access to great companies. It's all right

1:00:55.160 --> 1:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>there in one place. How essential is that? Do you

1:00:59.000 --> 1:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>get that in a New York or Seattle or or

1:01:01.640 --> 1:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>in Essotonia or do you have to have ties to

1:01:05.840 --> 1:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley as as the motherland? Well, I'd say Silicon

1:01:11.160 --> 1:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Valley in its in sort of the breadth and depth

1:01:13.480 --> 1:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of its market is really unique in the world. I mean,

1:01:15.440 --> 1:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it is a very very unique place. That said, you

1:01:18.600 --> 1:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>can build really interesting companies plenty of other places, and

1:01:22.600 --> 1:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, we do have companies all over the country.

1:01:25.160 --> 1:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I think for companies that are even farther away, you know,

1:01:29.760 --> 1:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>so outside the US, it ends up being very important

1:01:33.920 --> 1:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to have some connection to two Silicon Valley and the

1:01:38.680 --> 1:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>ability to do that. Sometimes that's opening up a sales

1:01:42.840 --> 1:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and marketing office. Sometimes it's having headquarters there and keeping

1:01:45.600 --> 1:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>product development where the company was started. But I think

1:01:48.880 --> 1:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>even in Europe, the most successful venture capital firms are

1:01:52.680 --> 1:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>ones that have significant Silicon Valley ties, so they can

1:01:55.640 --> 1:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>help the companies translate back and forth. Very very interesting.

1:02:00.480 --> 1:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>We briefly touched on this before but I want to

1:02:02.840 --> 1:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>revisit it in this context. Tell us about a time

1:02:06.200 --> 1:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you failed personally, I don't mean a failed venture investment,

1:02:09.960 --> 1:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a time you failed, and what you learned from the experience.

1:02:13.480 --> 1:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>We all fail multiple times in our lives, and I

1:02:17.320 --> 1:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>would say, um, the most dramatic one, even though it

1:02:22.120 --> 1:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't actually a failure, was what it felt like raising

1:02:25.600 --> 1:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>fund one for the first time. And you know, I

1:02:28.040 --> 1:02:30.959
<v Speaker 1>talked about not having done it. I had not really

1:02:31.000 --> 1:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>ever had a sales job. I hadn't been turned down

1:02:33.480 --> 1:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that many times in my life, I believe, uh, you know,

1:02:37.280 --> 1:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I had probably about a hit rate, but that means

1:02:41.160 --> 1:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>about turned down, right, And actually it was in its

1:02:45.840 --> 1:02:48.080
<v Speaker 1>own way, it was kind of crushing, and it happened

1:02:48.080 --> 1:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that it happened at a time when there were a

1:02:50.880 --> 1:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of things going on in my family, including a

1:02:53.760 --> 1:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, a young daughter at that time who tore

1:02:55.640 --> 1:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>ra c L and the like. And for me, the

1:02:59.600 --> 1:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate lesson and the of going through that was

1:03:04.040 --> 1:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>really adopting this idea of the growth mentality. So you know,

1:03:08.760 --> 1:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Carol tax book is sort of a seminal piece on

1:03:11.920 --> 1:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that that what's the name of that book. I think

1:03:15.200 --> 1:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it's called I think it's just called mentality, but I

1:03:21.560 --> 1:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>could be wrong about that, but it basically summarizes this mindset.

1:03:25.880 --> 1:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Mindset there you go that your job is just to learn.

1:03:29.760 --> 1:03:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Your job isn't to win, your job isn't to be right,

1:03:32.240 --> 1:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>your job is just to learn. It comes back to

1:03:33.960 --> 1:03:36.479
<v Speaker 1>what we talked about with Andreson and Zuckerberg. Your job

1:03:36.600 --> 1:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is to learn. And so when you basically take the

1:03:39.520 --> 1:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>pressure off because that I, hey, I have to succeed,

1:03:43.080 --> 1:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't fail, ended up being a monkey on my

1:03:45.480 --> 1:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>back and breaking through to the other side to say, hey, look,

1:03:49.160 --> 1:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we're just gonna do our best and we're gonna learn.

1:03:51.280 --> 1:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I'm gonna be better next year

1:03:52.760 --> 1:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>than I am now. And it was really um I

1:03:57.920 --> 1:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>would really recommend that, uh that people pick up Carol

1:04:03.120 --> 1:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Drects mindset And it was a it. It really did

1:04:08.680 --> 1:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>shift the way that I approached my work. Fascinating. Tell

1:04:12.160 --> 1:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>us what you do outside of the office to relax

1:04:14.440 --> 1:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>either mentally, you're feasibly Most importantly, I'm a cyclist, so

1:04:18.600 --> 1:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm a road cyclist. We have, you know, incredible territory,

1:04:22.000 --> 1:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>so I can write up my front door for two

1:04:24.000 --> 1:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to three hours and be you know, up in the

1:04:26.160 --> 1:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Santa Cruz Mountains and uh, you know, surrounded by the redwoods,

1:04:31.600 --> 1:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>which I've decided are my spirit animal. And you know,

1:04:34.840 --> 1:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and I do that most Saturday mornings with you know,

1:04:37.360 --> 1:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a couple of of really good friends. And that's just

1:04:40.200 --> 1:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>my way to decompress and put my life in context

1:04:44.280 --> 1:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and have some fun. So we we hadn't touched on

1:04:47.320 --> 1:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>this earlier. If if a millennial or a recent college

1:04:51.040 --> 1:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>grad came up to you and said, Hey, I'm thinking

1:04:53.520 --> 1:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>about going into filling the blank technology venture investing, et cetera,

1:04:58.640 --> 1:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>what sort of advice would you of them? Uh? Number one,

1:05:02.520 --> 1:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>surround yourself with the best people that you can. And

1:05:05.720 --> 1:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that doesn't mean the most famous people

1:05:08.240 --> 1:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>or the people that other people think are great. Right,

1:05:10.440 --> 1:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>your value system your lens, because that's the only way

1:05:14.040 --> 1:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that your lens will get better over time is to

1:05:16.280 --> 1:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>focus on on that. The second is work on things

1:05:21.400 --> 1:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that you find interesting, because you're never going to be

1:05:25.400 --> 1:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>great at something that you don't love. It just takes

1:05:29.080 --> 1:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>too much time and energy. And then the third thing

1:05:31.800 --> 1:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I just layer back in is uh. And by the way,

1:05:35.160 --> 1:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to a young woman at an event

1:05:37.200 --> 1:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that we held last night on diversity in in Tech

1:05:40.760 --> 1:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>called Seat at the Table and the Life is Long

1:05:46.120 --> 1:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>beyond a journey learn. I like that philosophy and our

1:05:51.040 --> 1:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>final question what is it that you know about venture

1:05:54.720 --> 1:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>investing today that you wish you knew twenty years ago

1:05:58.640 --> 1:06:02.840
<v Speaker 1>when you were first starting. So I will point out

1:06:02.880 --> 1:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that the thing that I was taught very early on

1:06:06.040 --> 1:06:09.959
<v Speaker 1>that's foundational is people, people people, and you know that's

1:06:10.200 --> 1:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>what the sutter Hill orientation. The thing that I didn't

1:06:14.360 --> 1:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>fully understand that I wish I knew was platform, platform platform.

1:06:19.640 --> 1:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the thing that again it takes the

1:06:21.800 --> 1:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>ten x opportunity and turns it into the hundred x opportunity.

1:06:24.760 --> 1:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>And so that is ultimately the thing that we are

1:06:30.520 --> 1:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>most looking for in these early stage companies. You don't know,

1:06:34.360 --> 1:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>but you say, if we're successful, if A and B happen,

1:06:38.840 --> 1:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>can the next chapter be this extraordinary platform opportunity? Thank you, Greg,

1:06:44.240 --> 1:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that that's really quite fascinating. Everybody makes fun of me

1:06:47.560 --> 1:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>for using that word, but it's fascinating. We have been

1:06:50.840 --> 1:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>speaking with Greg Sands of Coast to No A Ventures.

1:06:54.400 --> 1:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoy this conversation, be sure and looked up

1:06:57.160 --> 1:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>an inch or it down an inch on Apple, Itune

1:07:00.200 --> 1:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>or wherever fine podcasts are sold, and you can see

1:07:03.240 --> 1:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>any of the other hundred and fifty nine or so

1:07:06.760 --> 1:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>such conversations we've had previously. We love your comments, feedback

1:07:11.280 --> 1:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and suggestions right to us at m IB podcast at

1:07:15.480 --> 1:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot net. I would be remiss if I did

1:07:18.600 --> 1:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>not thank my crack staff who helped me put together

1:07:22.480 --> 1:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>these podcasts. Medina Parwana is our audio producer and engineer.

1:07:28.680 --> 1:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Riggs is our booker. Michael Batnick is my head

1:07:32.040 --> 1:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of research. I'm Barry Ritolts. You've been listening to Masters

1:07:36.360 --> 1:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in Business on Bloomberg Radio