WEBVTT - The US Literally Cannot Repay This Debt, We’re In A Debt Doom Loop | James Lavish

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Everybody can feel that things have changed and are changing rapidly,

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:08.159
<v Speaker 1>especially after the COVID lockdowns. They have the sense that

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>something is not the same as it used to be.

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>The FIT is trying to fight inflation, yet it's not

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>really working. It's coming down the inflation rate. And really

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>what it all has to do with, and it all

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>comes down to, is the manipulation of money.

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.639
<v Speaker 2>My bond is paying me five and it's costing me three, Like,

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 2>all right, man, that's two percent spread, Like I'm doing

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 2>pretty good. Or if the S and P five hundred

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 2>is making me eight or ten percent and inflation is

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 2>at three or four, like I'm doing pretty good.

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>But if you're a consumer, go home and do the

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>work and add up all your expenses and compare them

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to last year and the year before and the year

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>before that. It's a lot of work. It's easier just

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to listen to what the pundits tell you.

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 2>And then if we think about the dollar, we also

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 2>have to think about it and measured against other things.

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 2>So if I'm looking at only in dollars, like my

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 2>house is worth, you know it's three hundred and eighty

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars. A couple years ago. Now it's four hundred

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 2>and eighty thousand for like a media in US home.

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 2>But it went down in oil barrels per oil, or

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 2>it went down in ounces per ounces of gold, and

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 2>it went down in bitcoin terms as well. And if

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 2>you think about it again, back to the Bology's point,

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 2>measured in bitcoin, we are seeing hyper inflation.

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And a dollar bitcoin is seen as a risk asset.

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>We talked before about how we're kind of in a

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.559
<v Speaker 1>gambler's economy like there, we have a lot of people

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>out there we just feel like they're getting behind and

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>they're gambling to try to catch back up or get

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>ahead and taking a lot of risk. And so bitcoin

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>is seen that way in a lot of ways. And

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>eyes are the mean coins, and we see the mean

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>coins take off. It's because people are just risking money.

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>They're like, come on, I hope that I can I

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>can catch up the inflation.

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, So James, welcome back to the show.

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>By the way, thank you for having me.

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Glad we can do this in person. I love doing

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 2>it in person, so you know for the audience. You're

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 2>my partner. We have the Bitcoin Opportunity Fund. You're a

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 2>hedge fun guy, you write the newsletter The Informationist, which

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 2>is amazing information on the macro space. But you're sort

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 2>of known, or maybe in my mind, you talk a

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 2>lot about like the debt doom loop that we're in.

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Sort of how not just the US government and the

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Federal Reserve, but really all the nations and central banks

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 2>of the world are sort of in this proverbial rock

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 2>in the hard place that keeps getting closer and closer

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 2>and closer, right, And so we're in this like debt

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 2>doom loop. I want to frame that up and what

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 2>does that mean? How does that progress? Like over what

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 2>time frame? But then I want to bring it down

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 2>into like more practical terms, So like if I'm a

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 2>business owner, like what does that mean to me? Right,

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 2>if I'm an if I'm trying to manage money for

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 2>my family or like make sure I don't go broke,

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 2>what does that mean to me? So then like how

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 2>do we think about measuring that looking at cycles and

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 2>what do we do about that? So let's start up

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 2>with the frame up the debt doom loop for us?

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Sure, Well, first of all, thank you for having me again, Mark.

0:02:57.760 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 3>Always good to be here.

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm on vacation and even my son and the audience.

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we got we have someone in the audience, all right, But.

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>It's always good to have people on vacation in your hometown. Yeah,

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>so I know that coming from Vegas. But the debt

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>doom lop, well, you know, I mean, I do talk

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>about this a lot, and the reason is because everybody

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>can feel that things have changed and are changing rapidly,

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>especially after the COVID lockdowns and uh, and they they

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>have the sense that something is not the same as

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it used to be. And they you've seen the price

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of skyrocket, You've seen homes skyrocket and price and then

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.119
<v Speaker 1>get really I liquid, So they're not moving. Interest rates

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>are up. The FED is trying to fight inflation, yet

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not really working. It's coming down the inflation rate,

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>meaning prices are still going up and and it's confusing

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people.

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 3>And really what it all has to do with, and it.

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>All comes down to, which you and I talk about extensively,

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>is the manipulation of money. And that manipulation of money

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>has been necessary because we've gotten ourselves in this situation

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>where and this has all developed central banks, like we're

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about, they've all gotten themselves in a situation where

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>they're borrowing and borrowing and borrowing so much money that

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they wind up having to manipulate their interest rates and

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>their currencies in order.

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 3>To keep up with that borrowing.

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And just before the show, you were talking about how

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, debt is kind of stealing from the future,

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think about it much in a similar way.

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I think of it more of like it's borrowing from

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the future and you can use it properly. And you know,

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>so if you're an individual and you want to have

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a business, but you don't, you know, you're kind of

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>stuck in your job. You don't really have enough money.

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you've got you want to start a restaurant. It's

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>going to cost you one hundred thousand dollars to start it,

0:04:57.440 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>but you only have ten thousand dollars in the bank.

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And you're like, well, I can continue to work and

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>grind away and keep putting money away, or I can

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 1>use that ten thousand dollars as a leverage for a

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>loan that I can then pull that money into the now,

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>borrow it from a bank, and start the business right away.

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Start buying the materials I need, and the cookware and

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and the ovens, and all and hiring people, start paying salaries,

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and then you open up the restaurant and suddenly you're

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>generating income right away, you're generating productivity. Well, that's borrowing

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 1>from the future. And if you do it responsibly.

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Restaurants.

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I use this example because it's really easy for people

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to visualize not maybe not the best.

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, don't do the restaurant, but don't do the restaurant.

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>But but if you do it responsibly, that's great. You

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you you've built a business, you're producing, You're you're adding

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>productivity into the into the national GDP. Right, but we've

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>gotten ourselves in a situation now. Mark that the entire nation,

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>all of the western nations and developed nations, they're all

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>using debt ad nauseum to paper up inefficiencies, whether it's

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it's energy and efficiencies or it's just capital and efficiencies,

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and they're using that borrowing to close that gap. So,

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for instance, right now, are our federal government is borrowing

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>just about two trillion dollars a year, meaning they're above

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and beyond what they have to borrow to pay down

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>past debt. So we're running two trillion dollar deficits at

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a time that we're not even in a recession. So

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the irresponsibility that's coming out of Washington is monumental. It's

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>absolutely incredible, and it's it's mind numbing for people like

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you and me who have been in business, running businesses,

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 1>and you look at that, it's just it's not only

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 1>is it irresponsible, it's it's putting us on.

0:06:58.480 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 3>A path that's irreversible.

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And so why is that, Well, because we're running these

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>deficits at a time that we're not even officially in

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>World War arguable, but we're not in hot conflict right

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>now somewhere, and so we're borrowing those two trillion dollars

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>from who.

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 3>So we just have to keep borrowing and borrowing and

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.239
<v Speaker 3>borrowing and add to that national debt.

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And so what happens, Well, we've seen the debt grow

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>from just when we talk about the debt spiral.

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 3>You and I talked about.

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>This almost almost two years ago on this and I

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>wrote a piece on it two years ago August about

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>how we are entering a debt spiral where we just

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>can't get out of it, and meaning the US government.

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 3>So what is that?

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>To frame it up, Well, the debt spiral means that

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we have accumulated so much debt that it requires more

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>debt to pay down that old debt and eventually to

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>pay that interest on that debt.

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 3>And we're there.

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>So of those two trillion dollar deficits, we're running one

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars that we're spending a year is on interest

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>on our past debt. So we're bumping up against when

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I wrote that piece, where we had thirty one point

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>four trillion dollars of debt, and now we're just below

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty five trillion in just two years and not even.

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And so we're now at the point where we're spending

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars on interest alone on that debt, and

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>we're spending so much money that we can't close that gap.

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 1>So what do I mean by that?

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 3>Well, if the.

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 1>US government was a company on the New York Stock Exchange,

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>which it's not, I understand because we have the money printer,

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>but just put that aside for a second, we would

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>consider it a zombie company.

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 3>And why is that? Well, if you look at.

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>The national debt and how much we spend, so are

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the amount of money we take in each year in revenues.

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.319
<v Speaker 1>You know the in fact, I can pull it up here.

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>The CBO just updated their estimates for twenty twenty four,

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>so and their estimates are that we're going to take

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eight point five trillion dollars in GDP. Okay,

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>so that's the national productivity. And off of that, we

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>have a tax base, as you will know, that is

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.199
<v Speaker 1>going to be four point nine trillion dollars estimate. Okay,

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>so we're going to the US government has four point

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.959
<v Speaker 1>nine trillion dollars of revenue. We of course the government

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>is not creating anything, they're just taking from our productivity.

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>But they're on the other side of that. The flip

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>side of that is they're spending six point nine trillion

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars and there's your two trillion dollar deficit, which is

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>now seven percent of GDP. That's a bad number. Okay,

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>So why is it a zombie Why would it be considered.

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 3>A zombie company?

0:09:55.520 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, the most important to frame up how to think

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>about those deficits. You have to think about all those

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>expenses that you may be able to cut in order

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to fix it. But the issue here is that our

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>mandatory expenses, which are Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, add

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>up to about four point one trillion dollars. Remember these

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:18.839
<v Speaker 1>are not numbers for me. This is from the Congressional

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Budget Office that puts out this estimate every single year,

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and they do that kind of as a wake up

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>call the Congress and say, hey, this is we need

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to fix some of our policies here because we're we're

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>on a bad path. But anyway, so we're spending four

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>point one trillion. Remember remember we're taking four point nine,

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>so you've got eight hundred trillion dollars left. Well, our

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>defense spending is nine hundred and fifty billion this year

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>that we know of. It could be there, could have

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other expenses tucked in other places.

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 2>And to put that number in relation, not to cut

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 2>you off, but the US spends more on its military

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 2>than the next ten nations combined. So it's not just

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 2>military spending. It's like our military spending is more than

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.359
<v Speaker 2>the next ten nations all put together. So it's an astronomical,

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 2>astronomical number.

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>So now you've got so you've got four point one

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>plus nine hundred and fifty, you're already over five trillion

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars of spending. Then you've got your the net interest

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>because the net interest on your debt. You've got your

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>debt that's over a trillion dollars of interest expenses. You

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>get some back from inter government agencies, let's call it

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:32.959
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred billion dollars. Well, your total mandatory expenses now

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>are over six trillion dollars. And that doesn't even take

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>into account the disgustioning expenses. So your deficit's two trillion dollars.

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>So now you've got to borrow money. You have to

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>issue more debt to pay down debt that's maturing because

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 1>you don't have the money to pay it down, so

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you're borrowing more, which means that when you're running these deficits,

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>mark this this is inflationary. This is money that they're

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>basically just printing and putting into the economy and continuing

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to grind the economy on a nominal basis. And so

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>all we're watching inflation just continue to rise and so

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and as that's occurring, the FED is raising interest rates,

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>which is making the interest payments on that past debt

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>more expensive, which means that they that the government has

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to issue more debt, which means that they have to

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>pay more interest on more debt. And so you get

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>into what's called a debt spiral, and there's really no

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>way out. It's like, you know, if you're you're you're

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to meet your expenses, you're using credit cards, and

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>sooner or later you those credit cards max out because

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you're you're not.

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Making enough money, you're borrowing it, but.

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>You're paying interest on that, and then sooner or later

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have to take on another credit card

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>just to pay the interest on the last credit card.

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's the debt spiral. And so we saw it

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>happen with Greece and a number of other nations in

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty years, and that's where we're at.

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 2>So basically, the debt can't be paid down because of

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 2>the situation that you framed up. Another reason why, though,

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 2>is because of the nature of the monetary system in

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy one, going from like maybe arguably before nine

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 2>seventy one, but going from like an equity based system,

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 2>a gold system, to a debt based system. So the

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 2>debt also has to grow from that perspective as well.

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 2>So we have sort of two reasons why it can't

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 2>go down. We're spiraling out of control. The deficit, the

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 2>amount of debt they're taking on is growing at an

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 2>alarming rate. I think it's about a trillion dollars per quarter.

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Almost the last check, it's about a trillion dollars every

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:44.079
<v Speaker 1>hundred days.

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is just about a quarter. I mean, it's

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 2>just an insane amount. And that is what's causing all

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 2>this to happen. Okay, so that's the debt doom loop. Now,

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of people who have been calling for

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>this to all come to an end for a long time.

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm Peter Schiff, Harry Dents written a number of books

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 2>about it. You know, we can go on and on

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 2>and on, but it seems like they never see, they

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 2>fail to take into account how many more tricks up

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 2>the sleeve that you know, these central bankers can come

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 2>up with. But at the same time, it does seem

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 2>like the walls are closing in the rock and the

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 2>hard place is getting closer and closer together. I mean,

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 2>how do you think about that? How do you project

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 2>that out?

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean you hear a lot of people. You

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 3>hear people say, well, why don't they just cut expenses? Right,

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, clearly, if we're.

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Spending too much, just stop spending so much.

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, you just heard.

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Where are we going to cut Well, in twenty twenty,

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 2>we were spending about what four point six I think

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 2>it was four point six trillions. We've gone from four

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 2>point six to almost seven trillion in just a couple

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 2>of years. And like, the world wasn't catastrophic in twenty twenty, Like,

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 2>why couldn't we just go back to like spending in

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty.

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>There's a number of reasons, but a lot of it

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>has to do with when we had the lockdowns that

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>pulled the a string that caused disruptions in a lot

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of areas that they didn't expect. And one of the

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>areas that it caused disruption is well, they printed so

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>much money because there's so much to dig into in

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the treasury market. But just for suffice to say that

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the treasury market got it was dysfunctional, and so the

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>whole reason we print money is to keep the treasure

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>market going right. So the Fed printed money, it expanded

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the m to the money supply. That caused that, Plus

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the problems with the supply chains caused inflation, and so

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that caused the need to adjust some of the benefits

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>for retirees, so security, and that's a whole nother problem

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that we can talk about, but so security that those

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>benefits were adjusted higher from the cost of living at

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the same time that boomers were retiring en mass because

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>they were like, you know what, I don't need to

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>be in the workforce anymore. My house is worth so

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>much money. Now I've got these retirement benefits, I've got

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>my pension, I've got the Social Security and Medicare Medicaid.

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm set. I'm going to retire. So now they're paying

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 3>out at a.

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Much higher rate than they expected, and so this has

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>caused a massive gap in those in that line item. Yeah,

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that exactly, So that line item jumped higher. So so

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>what do they do if they you heard what we said,

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the mandatory expenses signed into legislation or defense or interest

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>on your debt, you're not going to You're not going

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to default on your debt if you if.

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 3>You issue in your own currency.

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>But where are they going to cut? So that's not

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>really possible. And number one, there's there's really no incentive

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to do it. We can talk about Republicans or Democrats

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>or which parties were that's spending, it doesn't matter. They're

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>all in the same game. They spend to get re elected.

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just we hear Jeff Booth talk about it all

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the time. If you want to, if you want to

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>find where the problem is, look at the incentives, and

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the incentive.

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Is to get re elected.

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>So if the incentive is to get re elected, the

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 1>incentives to then spend money, make sure you take care

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of your constituents, those who are donating to your campaigns,

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:24.199
<v Speaker 1>make regulations good for those companies and those constituents, and

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>then just work it around so you can get re elected.

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>And that all points to spending more money. So we

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>don't like right now, Mark, we don't even have a

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>debt ceiling.

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 3>We paused it.

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>There's no debt ceiling, so we could just keep spending

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and Congress has no limit and that's not going to

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>come up again until January. So we go right through

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>this election just spending ad nauseum.

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 2>So in the last debt ceiling debate, Biden himself, when

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 2>he was still able to talk to someone coherently, had said,

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 2>we have to raise the debt because the US can't default.

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 2>The US is never defaulted, so we need to get

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 2>more debt to pay the existing debt. I mean, he

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:01.199
<v Speaker 2>basically said it.

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Right there.

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 2>But it's not I mean, it's it's certainly not a

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 2>political thing. That's a math thing, right, And so it's

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 2>like we owe the money, the money's got to be paid,

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 2>and we've got to print the money. Now, there's certainly

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 2>a lot of pork, as we call it, right, that's

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 2>that's certainly getting funded as well. But at the same time,

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 2>it's a math problem that we're in. And unless the

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.199
<v Speaker 2>government wants the default, then this is the path that

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 2>we're on. And so when I say default, default to

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 2>the old people that are owed entitlements, right, lou Gramman

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 2>talks about you know, other nations they can't print dollars,

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 2>so they aren't a tough problem. But the US doesn't

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 2>owe dollars either. The USO's like medical services for example. Right,

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 2>Although we do know that the homeless, homeless population half

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 2>of the population are now baby boomers, so we do

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 2>know that those entitlements are being cut somewhat skeeping up,

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 2>they're not keeping up for sure, and so those entitlements,

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 2>those promises that were made to the VA, the veterans,

0:18:57.800 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 2>and to those old people, they're not being met, which

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 2>is why the homeless population is sort of being grown

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 2>from that. Okay, so that's sort of the that sort

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 2>of sums up the problem. Now, correct me if I'm wrong,

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 2>But I mean the US is the cleanest shirt in

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 2>the dirty laundry, so to speak. So we can basically

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 2>take this sort of problem and extrapolate it to.

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 3>The rest of the world.

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Japan, the ECB, Europe, I mean, they're in

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 2>worse situations than the US.

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean we'll go into what you said when

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.479
<v Speaker 1>Biden the last time you talked about the debt, uh,

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the debt spiral. Well, just this last debate, he was

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about how well he's got a solution for you know,

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>fixing social Security and his solutions to raise taxes, raise

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>taxes on the rich.

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh, they don't pay their fair share.

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Now of course, if you but even if you took

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>if you raise taxes on the on the seventy one

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>trillionaires we have in the United States or billionaires you

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>have in the United States, you know you would get

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it like.

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.640
<v Speaker 2>A that was like a Biden moment there, right, A thousand.

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Trillions, a million trillionaires. So but if you raise tax

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>on our billionaires, the seventy one of them that last count,

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you would be able to tax. What if you tax

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>them one hundred percent, you have five trillion dollars. The

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 1>problem is where we have a social security hold that's

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and seventy two trillion dollars. What's so important

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 1>about that is that you're talking about unfunded liabilities on

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>top of debt. We're talking about something that's approaching a

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>quarter of a quarter of quadrillion dollars two hundred and

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty trillion dollars of owing. So debt and unfunded liabilities

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>things that we owe in the future. So taxes, I mean,

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that's clearly it's just not going to work to fix

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>this whole And also if you, as you well know,

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the more you tax, the less you incentivize productivity, so

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>product research and development, investing into productive product lines, hiring people,

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>all that. So you wind up getting higher tax on

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>lower productivity and actually declining productivity.

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 3>So that's not good.

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>So, but just to make to make it clear that

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:11.719
<v Speaker 1>taxes aren't going to work either, So what do you do?

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>You just issue more debt. But if you issue more debt,

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 1>then the only way you can keep that going, that

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>whole charade going, is by exporting your inflation on the world.

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>So all we're doing is we we are creating a

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>situation where we have no choice but to have high

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation in order to have taxes on larger excuse me

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>nominal GDP to pay down past debt.

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 3>And so that's what we're doing. Excuse me.

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 2>So sounds sounds pretty bleik, James, sounds pretty bleak. So

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 2>what I'd like to do is, you know, people hear

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 2>from me all the time, and so I kind of

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 2>give my projection of what I think happens over the

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 2>rest of this decade, but I'd like for you to

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of tell us what you think is the base case. Obviously,

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 2>anything is possible. Let's talk in probabilities. What do you

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 2>think is the most probable outcome over the next what

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 2>do we have, you know, six years at this point.

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 2>Then we're going to talk about, like I said, if

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 2>we're a business owner, like what does this mean for you?

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 2>How do you think about that? And then I want

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 2>to talk about the safety valve that we all have,

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 2>which is bitcoin and stuff that we see happening over there.

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 2>But let's just talk about what is your sort of

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 2>base case for how this continues for the rest of

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the decade.

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, look, we've got a lot of uncertainty

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>right now politically, so we're not You're watching people try

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to sort of figure out in the markets who's going

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to win, whether it's gonna be Trump or what's gonna buy.

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 2>But you said, regardless of the political party, it's more

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 2>of the same.

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>But you're watching Wall Street kind of position themselves. And

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the reality is is that because of what we're talking about,

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>because of them, just the sheer amount of debt that

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>we have, it's so great and those liability are so

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>great that there is no choice but to have that inflation.

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 1>And so you can think about it in this way.

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>We were talking about it before the show, how the

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>sixty to forty portfolio.

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Is kind of dead, and the.

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Reason for that is that who wants to invest in

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a thirty year treasury that they know is going to

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>be worth less on real terms the money they get

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>back from that thirty year treasury in thirty years than

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>when they put in, Like.

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Who wants to do that? You're going to have.

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>So in the next five, six, seven, eight years, I

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>expect us to get into a period of very high inflation.

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>We could see a downturn we're starting to see now

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>data that's showing that the economy is kind of rolling

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of areas. It's confusing because you've got

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the government spending so much money that we've created a

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>situation where this fiscal dominance, and so that fiscal dominance

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.719
<v Speaker 1>is the government is spending and spending and spending like

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>mad and it's creating pockets of expansion at the same

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>time that you've got pockets of contraction in private areas.

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 3>Uh So, any any.

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Business that is that is beholden to or is affected

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>by interest rates, especially these high interest rates, they're starting

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to feel the pinch.

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 3>The margins are compressing.

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Uh they're having to pay more on debt when they

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>when they go out to get a new line of

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>credit or their line of credit resets and it's a

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>higher rate, they're starting to have to pay more interest

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>on that. You're you're not seeing as much hiring and

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>so the job numbers that the job claims, the unemployment

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>is ticking up, and so you're seeing this economy that

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's it's turning over, especially because we got

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers this morning in the services industry, really important part

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of the US economy. And that that feels like it's

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.239
<v Speaker 1>turning over, but we can't have that. We can't We

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>could have kind of a soft landing and continuation on.

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>That will happen if we keep spending money, we keep

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>issuing debt, and we keep creating more inflation. But the

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>reality is if we get into a deep recession, we're

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>going to have to print so much money it's going

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to make your eyes bleed.

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 3>And so how much do we print.

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 2>In twenty twenty eleven trillion and.

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>The FED bought six trillion of that, So really, the

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Fed we're going to have to print multiples of that

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>this time because just the sheer amount of debt.

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 3>So why does that matter?

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 1>What matters is I see a period where, whether or

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 1>not it's because it's blatantly obvious or they admit it,

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have high inflation. And the reason is

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>that we have to keep printing money in order to

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the treasury market remains functional. We've heard

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we've heard Powell talk about it recently, not this last meeting,

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>but the meeting before where he was talking about where

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>does he feel comfortable.

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:04.360
<v Speaker 3>With bank reserves?

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>And as bank reserves get down to ten percent, of GDP. Well,

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>then he starts getting nervous, and we're right about that

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>level right now. At well, actually, bank reserves are up

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>over three trillion. I apologize that's not quite right, but

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>we're getting towards that level. And when the reverse repo

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>where all the excess slashes from that, all that money printing,

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>where it's parked, when that's gone, then they're really watching

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that number because when that treasury market gets dysfunctional, then

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have to print money and make sure

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that that it stays liquid. So we're seeing, Okay, this

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:45.719
<v Speaker 1>all matters, because the big picture is we're seeing little

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>hints that they're getting ready or already injecting liquidity into

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the market. So you saw and the money supply him

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>too is ticked back up in the last six or

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>eight weeks, right, and so how.

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Is that happening?

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, the central banks are finding ways to get money

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>into the system because they know that we can't have

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this hard landing because they don't want to print another

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>ten twenty trillion dollars that would be that would make

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>inflation rip higher again.

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:18.199
<v Speaker 3>But what's the choice?

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, So we're seeing things like is the the the

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>international swaps and Derivatives Association come out with a letter

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that advised that implored the central banks and other authorities

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>here to get rid of the limit of treasuries that

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>banks can own. Basically, what it said was remove them

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>from the risk calculations.

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 3>They could own as many.

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 1>As they want, arguing that treasuries are riskless. We know

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>they're not riskless. Yeah, but well why would they if

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>they do that? Well, that just creates the ability just

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>to keep liquidity going into the system. You don't have

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to have those checks and balance of just how much

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the how how much liquidity the banks have available for

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>their capital base. Right, So that's one thing, and then

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you're watching Janet Yellen do something called this regular treasury buyback.

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Is it really QY quantitative easing? No, but they're buying

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 1>off them, They're buying the off the run treasuries that

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>are not as liquid, just to make sure that there's

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>more liquidity. You know, there's more liquidity, there's hints of

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.679
<v Speaker 1>more liquidity, more liquidity more. So I expect this to

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 1>continue and possibly accelerate, especially as we see you know,

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>some commercial real estate, not all commercial real estate is bad,

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>but there are pockets of of difficult spots, and we're

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>going to see some bank rescues or whatnot in the

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>next six to nine.

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Months, which means more liquidity.

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>More liquidity and all points to what more more inflation,

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>which goes back to your, uh, your point of Okay,

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>what what can individuals do and what can and entrepreneurs

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>do to make sure that they're on the right side

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of this, right So, and that's really the big question.

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>And so for me, I'm seeing that if if you're

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>an investor and you're investing in bonds, well, I mean,

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>God help you, right, I mean like they may be

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a trade, but I would not be investing in bonds

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>long term personally. And if on the flip side, if

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you're an entrepreneur, you know, and you're borrowing, if you

0:29:31.440 --> 0:29:34.959
<v Speaker 1>can borrow at a rate that's fixed and that meets

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>your requirement for your capital requirement, then that's an intelligent

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>thing to do for me. But what I wouldn't do

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>is I wouldn't be beholden to rates that could adjust

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>much higher, because that to me in the in the

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>near future could be a problem.

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 2>So to kind of recite this and sort of recap

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 2>it back because of the debt based montary system and

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 2>the debt dooom loop that we have that you set

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 2>up in the beginning. The system has to continue as

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 2>long as the governments to continue to pay the things

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 2>that they're obligated to pay, then they're gonna have to

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 2>continue to borrow and continue to print money. Of course,

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 2>well theoretically, philosophically, why would you default when you can

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 2>print money? Right, So there's there's number one, number two

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 2>more emperiically, we can see that pretty much every nation

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 2>right now today in the world does that. So you know, Lebanon, Turkey, Venezuela, Argentina, Peru.

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, go down the list. They're all printing and

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 2>using debt to offset this. So there is no historical

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 2>context for a nation just going, well, there's a good run, boys,

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 2>let's fold up shop like there's just no historical context,

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 2>and we see it happening in real time all around

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the world where this is exactly what they do and

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 2>you just print, tell you can't print anymore. And I

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 2>didn't want to kind of go I'm not going to

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 2>go through my whole thesis, but you know, I think

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 2>things end more in a whimper than a bang. Everybody's

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 2>thinking that there's going to be this final days where

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 2>the system is going to crash and the dollar is

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 2>going to die and the FED losers. But it's a

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 2>whimper and we know that just because that's what Zimbabwe does,

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 2>and they obviously inflate a lot faster than in other countries.

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 2>But it's a wimper, not a bang, and so I

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 2>think it continues. So that's sort of my base case

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 2>as well. Now you sort of use like an Austrian

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 2>economics kind of term on inflation, it sounds like because

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about more inflation ahead in terms of money

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 2>printing and not really consumer prices, and maybe you're using

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 2>those interchangeably. I recently talked about on a different video

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 2>how Ledg von Misis in nineteen fifty gave a talk

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 2>of how they were changing the definition of the word

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 2>inflation from monetary inflation to prices, and in nineteen fifty

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 2>he called them out on this and he said, you

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 2>know the reason why is because then they can lie

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 2>to you and hide the true inflation, which is the

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 2>money supply increasing. And so you sort of set up

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 2>why the money supply would increase and say there's more inflation,

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 2>there's more price inflation for a lot of other things

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 2>like having to re onshore near shore, you know, less

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 2>global cooperation and things like that. Okay, so but I

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 2>want to hit on that monetary inflation for a minute.

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Because you talked about why bonds are bad you wouldn't

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 2>buy them, or why entrepreneurs or business owners should think

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 2>about fixing in debt. So if we think about and

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 2>this is where I think most people are completely caught

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 2>off sides by this. So they're looking at the government

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 2>given numbers, the CPI consumer price inflation, which is a

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 2>false number for any number of reasons we can talk about.

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 2>But that number today is in the threes.

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Highly manipulated of course.

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Right, So if you know my bond is paying me

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 2>five and it's costing me three, like all right, man,

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 2>that's a two percent spread, Like I'm doing pretty good.

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Or if the S and P five hundred is making

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 2>me eight or ten percent and inflation's at three or four,

0:32:58.120 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 2>like I'm doing pretty good.

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And if you're a consumer, go home and do the

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>work and add up all your expenses and compare them to.

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Last year and the year before, right, and the year

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 3>before that.

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of work it's easier just to listen

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to what the pundits tell you, right.

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 2>But so the problem why I think most people are

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 2>caught off sides by this is they see their paycheck

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 2>going into this index fund and the S and P

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 2>five hundred is going up at nine ten percent to

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is. But and like I said, inflation's at

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 2>three four percent, like, hey, I'm doing pretty good. To

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 2>your point, if they would do the math, they'd find

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 2>out that it's not. But back to sort of that

0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 2>monetary or that Austrian view of monetary inflation, which is

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 2>the money supply increasing the debasement rate. And so the

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 2>money supply since twenty nineteen through twenty twenty three has

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 2>been increasing in the US by ten percent. So that's

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 2>what we call the hurdle rate.

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>So and since since seventy one, it's it's about seven

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>point one percent on average, Like.

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but when you if you look at a chart

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 2>of you know, M two or FED balance sheet or whatever,

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 2>you can see that the trend line keeps getting steeper steeper, steeper,

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 2>steeper steeper. I think, you know, I don't want to

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 2>go into it. You and I've talked about it, but

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.959
<v Speaker 2>really pretty much most of the financial data pre two

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 2>thousand and eight, doesn't you have to look at it

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 2>with an asterisk. We're in a different environment that we

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 2>are in today, so that trend line has changed. So

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 2>since twenty nineteen, we're at about ten percent. So we

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.439
<v Speaker 2>have the monetary supply, the rate of debasement is moving

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 2>up ten percent, plus we have the inflation, plus we

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 2>probably have to adjust for risk. So I don't know,

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 2>does that bring the hurdle rate up to twelve or

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 2>fifteen percent? Could be, and so then we get four

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 2>or five percent on bonds. And how are you going

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 2>to get four five percent of bonds when we have

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 2>this ten twelve percent hurdle.

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Rate right where you buy a bond at that's that's

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 1>yielding four and a half percent now. And yeah, you

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:50.839
<v Speaker 1>might get a trade here between now and the time

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that the Fed lowers rates and make a couple percent

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>off of that. Mean you could make you know, multiples

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>of that. But the problem is if we get into

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a downturn and that money supply is expanded. Like you said,

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that structural change happened when we printed for the first time,

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you go back, it was really nineteen eighty

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>seven that when that crash, I was in high school,

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>but that the Black Monday occurred and green Span came

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:25.760
<v Speaker 1>out and said, don't worry Wall Street, We've got your backs.

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to let you collapse. We're not called

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the banks collapse. We're going to make sure that the

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>market is okay. And that was just a signal to them,

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't really do anything. Flash forward to nineteen

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight, just eleven years later, and you had the

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Long Term Capital Management Debacle. This is a firm that

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:45.439
<v Speaker 1>was there was a hedge fund that was run by

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>two Nobel laureates and they were these geniuses and they

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:54.479
<v Speaker 1>actually there's a book called When Genius Failed, great book

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>by Lowenstein about what happened there. But what occurred was

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>these guys had so much leverage.

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 3>They had a.

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Billion dollars of investment of AUM in their hedge fund,

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and they had about one hundred billion dollars that we

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:11.359
<v Speaker 1>know of in trades, so they were at least levered

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and one on these spreads that were they

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>were basically shorting volatility the way they were doing interest

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 1>interest rate arbitrage. But they had those trades levered weight

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 1>up way up. Well, the street got wind of it,

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know what happens when the when the sharks

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 1>smell the blood, then they they blew up these trades

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>on them.

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 3>So this this fund, this.

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Fund was going to collapse long term capital management and

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>so but Goldman had massive exposure to them. So Goldman

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sachs CEO went into the New York Fed and begged.

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 1>They're like, hey, we're going to collapse tomorrow unless you

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:51.399
<v Speaker 1>rescue us. And so they didn't print money the first time.

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:54.800
<v Speaker 1>The second time, the New York Fed led a bailout

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>with the other banks for Goldman Sachs basically made sure

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 1>they shored up their balance sheet and so they didn't

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>print money, but they assured that there was nothing that

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:06.439
<v Speaker 1>there was no way they were going to collapse. Right

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 1>then you had the tech bubble and that kind of

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that that deflated.

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 3>A lot of things.

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 1>It was a little bit healthy. And then you had

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the housing crisis. So now you flash forward to nineteen

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight, From nineteen ninety eight to two thousand and eight,

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>ten more years, so you see a pattern here, right,

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>ten more years, two thousand and eight, and we have

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the housing crisis. Well, the housing crisis. Then when that happened,

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 1>it was so great and there was so much contagion

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>with those banks that the FED felt like they had

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 1>no choice and all the central banks, and so what

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>did they do. They printed all that money, which back

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>then a trillion dollars. And so they printed that money

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and I don't remember exactly what the figure is, so

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:54.279
<v Speaker 1>we may have to yank that from the show, so

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't. I don't want to give people the wrong information.

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:02.799
<v Speaker 1>But they print that money and that's the first time

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 1>they really printed money two thousand and eight, which is

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about, q QI, And that's where the

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 1>structure changed, right, So the structure changed when oh, the

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 1>FED put is here. They're going to save us, and

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>there are no consequences. CEO's got their bonuses and payouts.

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Nobody went under. Well, they let a few go under.

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 1>They let Liman go under and bear Stearns go under,

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>but they it wasn't the the enmass slaughter of banks

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that should have been. And so we created an expectation

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 1>from the market that the FED will be there. Flash

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:43.359
<v Speaker 1>forward from two thousand and eight to twenty twenty, and

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got the lockdowns and you've got the danger of

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>collapsing again, banks collapsing and treasury market freezing up. And

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>what do they do They print again, and you know,

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 1>multiples of the last time they printed. And so that's

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of where we're at. And that's what you're talking about,

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 1>where that changeover. Now, what do we do because we're

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:10.280
<v Speaker 1>so indebted? And this isn't just this isn't just the sovereigns.

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:14.280
<v Speaker 1>This goes from sovereigns to the banks, to the companies

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and corporations down to the individuals and consumers. Everybody's got

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, not everybody, but by and large, the average

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of indebtedness is at all time highs.

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:31.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so back to the hurdle rate. So people see

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 2>their s and P five hundred going up about eighty

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 2>nine percent, but they're losing money, so they have to

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of understand this monetary inflation piece. And that's kind

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 2>of one reason why I think it's it's important to

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 2>focus on that, and that's the real number that you're

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 2>trying to beat. There's not a lot of places that

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 2>you can do that today. I'm not sure if you know,

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to put you on the spot, but

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 2>like the definition of hyperinflation is I think fifty percent

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:56.759
<v Speaker 2>inflation month over month over month.

0:39:56.800 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, right, it's an economic economic that's the technical, technical definition.

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 2>I did an interview with Parker Lewis. It's on the channel.

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Did it really good? He said, that's the technical definition.

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:09.359
<v Speaker 2>He said, I would say that hyper inflation is when

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 2>you can really see the price changes in real time.

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 2>It's not like when I was a kid, this bottle

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 2>of water was five cents. It's like, no, last year,

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 2>this bottle was right. So he talks about it more

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:22.279
<v Speaker 2>like that. Not a hard definition. I'm just curious if

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, because I don't inflation month over month compared

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 2>to what so, Like if I'm in Argentina in hyper inflation,

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:36.960
<v Speaker 2>so my currency is inflating. Argentine peso is inflating fifty

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:38.840
<v Speaker 2>percent to the dollar.

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Now it's the it's their inflation rate, it's inflation.

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 2>So whatever there, they're their own CPI calculation. Okay, So

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:49.319
<v Speaker 2>the US could never have high inflation as long as

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:50.800
<v Speaker 2>the US doesn't report high inflation.

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:51.720
<v Speaker 3>That what you're saying.

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Uh. The reason why I asked that is because I

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 2>saw Bilojie and uh. Another one of my good friends,

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Brent Johnson mister Dollar Milkshake, kind of going back and

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:04.280
<v Speaker 2>forth on Twitter, and of course Brent is the Dollar Bowl.

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 2>He's much more reasonable if you talked to him in person.

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 2>But you know, Bolagi said, well, the US dollar has

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:15.400
<v Speaker 2>been in hyperinflation measured in bitcoin.

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's that's absolutely.

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 2>And that's why I was curious measured against one. And

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 2>so the key piece I wanted to kind of transition

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 2>into is that we have to understand that we have

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:28.879
<v Speaker 2>to measure these things in different ways, otherwise we don't

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 2>have a real number. So if you think you're making

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 2>five percent on the treasuries, and that's good because inflation's three,

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 2>or you think you're making eight percent in the index,

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 2>which is good because inflation's three, that the true number

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 2>is much higher. It's ten twelve percent at least. So

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 2>you have to think about how you're measuring these things.

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 2>And then if we think about the dollar, we also

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:51.880
<v Speaker 2>have to think about it and measured against other things.

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:54.360
<v Speaker 2>So if I'm looking at only in dollars, like my

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:56.840
<v Speaker 2>house is worth, you know it was three hundred and

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 2>eighty thousand dollars a couple years ago. Now it's four

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 2>hundred and eighty thousand for like a median home. But it

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 2>went down in oil barrels per oil, or it went

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:08.319
<v Speaker 2>down in ounces per ounces of gold, and it went

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 2>down in bitcoin terms as well. And if you think

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:14.280
<v Speaker 2>about it again, back to the Bology's point, measured in bitcoin,

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 2>we are seeing hyperinflation in the dollar.

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because bitcoin is something can't be that has a

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 3>very very very.

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:26.399
<v Speaker 1>Low inflation rate and it's going it's approaching zero, and

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 1>so the half life of it, so of the of

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin inflation, but just like you said, it's a

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:40.759
<v Speaker 1>great way to measure just how quickly the dollar is expanding.

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at bitcoin, it does follow the

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>expanse of the money.

0:42:45.920 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Supply pretty well.

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's got it's definitely volatile, but the overall

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:52.280
<v Speaker 1>trajectory is very similar.

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 2>And so per Michael Howell, who's a mister Global Liquidity,

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 2>had him on the show a few weeks ago, so

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:01.240
<v Speaker 2>you should go check out that interview. But he says

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 2>that the S and P five hundred is ninety percent

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:07.719
<v Speaker 2>correlated to S and P five hundred, and bitcoin is

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:11.440
<v Speaker 2>about ninety percent core or I'm sorry, eighty percent correlated.

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:14.720
<v Speaker 2>So it has an eight point nine to five time

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:19.760
<v Speaker 2>sensitivity ratio. So for every ten percent increase in global liquidity,

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:23.279
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin goes up by ninety percent. Gold has a one

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:26.360
<v Speaker 2>point five time sensitivity, So every ten percent rise in

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:29.319
<v Speaker 2>global liquidity, gold goes up by about fifteen percent.

0:43:29.560 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Right, Well, and then but that also has to do

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:34.440
<v Speaker 1>with the fact that bitcoin's in the middle of its

0:43:34.480 --> 0:43:38.360
<v Speaker 1>adoption phase, right, So that's also occurring.

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 2>So what does that mean that the sensitivity ratio goes

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 2>down as bitcoin gets bigger?

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:47.320
<v Speaker 1>That I would expect that the that the beta to

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:51.280
<v Speaker 1>risk assets would go would come down for sure.

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so I agree with that, right, So as the

0:43:55.960 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 2>asset gets bigger, as the daily volume gets more, it's

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 2>harder for the price wings to move up and down.

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 2>So when there's you know, ten dollars of trading volume

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:07.359
<v Speaker 2>per day and I buy eight dollars worth, I move

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:10.360
<v Speaker 2>the market. When there's one hundred billion or where we

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:12.359
<v Speaker 2>have hundreds of billions of dollars of trading volume today,

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 2>it's very hard to move the market when it's trillions

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 2>of dollars per day. It's impossible, right, So it's kind

0:44:16.640 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 2>of like that, But it's also the downside is dampened.

0:44:20.960 --> 0:44:23.399
<v Speaker 2>But the upside is dampened as well, so the sensitivity

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 2>is just dropping. I did this video and I was

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:33.799
<v Speaker 2>talking about ways to project bitcoin's future valuation. And you

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:38.320
<v Speaker 2>know most most of your old brothers on Wall Street

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 2>can't seem to value bitcoin because you know, there's no

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 2>intrinsic value, there's no cash flows, blah blah blah. And

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 2>I said, well, there's three ways that we could do it.

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:51.200
<v Speaker 2>So number one we use like Jery and timmor from Fidelity.

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:54.759
<v Speaker 2>He uses like Metcalf's law to sort of measure it.

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:56.400
<v Speaker 2>The second way we can do it is like a

0:44:56.480 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 2>venture capital firm would do it, So what are the

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:03.160
<v Speaker 2>markets we're disrupting? If we pull x amount of five

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:05.200
<v Speaker 2>percent from each of those markets, how much would be worth?

0:45:05.680 --> 0:45:08.280
<v Speaker 2>And the third way would be based off of inflation.

0:45:09.040 --> 0:45:12.839
<v Speaker 2>So if we look at bitcoin moving on liquidity on

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:15.800
<v Speaker 2>a sensitivity ratio of like a nine time sensitivity ratio,

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 2>then to you referenced earlier, like the CBO is projecting

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 2>how much they're going to print. So we sort of

0:45:23.200 --> 0:45:25.359
<v Speaker 2>have an idea which I'm guessing is undershooting the target,

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:27.280
<v Speaker 2>but we have an idea of how much global equity

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 2>is going to increase and we can look at sort

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:33.320
<v Speaker 2>of this way bitcoin moves to that increase of liquidity today.

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that would be a good way to

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:36.239
<v Speaker 2>sort of measure.

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 1>It as a starting point, for sure? But then you

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:40.840
<v Speaker 1>also have to think about the fact that most people

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 1>don't really truly understand what bitcoin is. Yet we're in

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:45.880
<v Speaker 1>our little bubble and we understand it. We talked with

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:50.839
<v Speaker 1>people who understand it inherently. And the issue here is that,

0:45:51.239 --> 0:45:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of different ways you can

0:45:53.440 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 1>measure how many assets are in the world, but let's

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:59.800
<v Speaker 1>just talk Let's just pretend that today there's seven hundred

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:05.480
<v Speaker 1>million dollars of investable assets. Well, bitcoin at this point

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is a fraction of that. It's it's exactly so and

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and so it's not even a percent and of that.

0:46:16.719 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 3>So why is that important?

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:21.279
<v Speaker 1>It's important because right now, as you said, bitcoin is

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:22.760
<v Speaker 1>seen as a risk asset.

0:46:23.000 --> 0:46:24.560
<v Speaker 3>We talked before about how.

0:46:24.600 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>We're kind of in a gambler's economy like there we

0:46:27.160 --> 0:46:28.600
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of people out there who just feel

0:46:28.600 --> 0:46:32.279
<v Speaker 1>like they're they're getting behind and they're gambling to try

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to catch back up or get ahead and taking a

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of risk. And so bitcoin is seen that way

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:40.360
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways. And as are the mean coins,

0:46:40.360 --> 0:46:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and we see the mean coins take off, it's because

0:46:42.160 --> 0:46:44.960
<v Speaker 1>people are just risking money. They're like, come on, I

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 1>hope that I can I can catch up to this inflation.

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:54.239
<v Speaker 1>And so with the broad broadening and deepening understanding of bitcoin,

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:57.080
<v Speaker 1>especially because now that we have the ETFs and you're

0:46:57.120 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're seeing institutions dip in, dip into it, they're

0:47:01.040 --> 0:47:03.799
<v Speaker 1>dipping their toe in, and they're starting to understand it.

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 1>When institutions really do understand it and understand how bitcoin

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is different than every other.

0:47:10.400 --> 0:47:11.319
<v Speaker 3>Of those.

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:16.840
<v Speaker 1>The digital currencies, they'll understand how it can be a

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:20.440
<v Speaker 1>true store value, how it's digital gold two or three

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 1>point zero for so many reasons, the immutability, the transfer,

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:31.799
<v Speaker 1>the ease to create commerce with it, to move it.

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:35.759
<v Speaker 1>You can move a trillion dollars a bitcoin within ten

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:41.879
<v Speaker 1>minutes basically. So, but once they understand that and they

0:47:41.960 --> 0:47:44.880
<v Speaker 1>get to that true understanding of how bitcoin is different,

0:47:45.480 --> 0:47:50.239
<v Speaker 1>then they'll begin to not just allocate it allocate to

0:47:50.360 --> 0:47:53.879
<v Speaker 1>it in their investments as a risk asset, but they're

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:56.560
<v Speaker 1>going to allocate to it as a risk off asset.

0:47:57.080 --> 0:48:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Like they'll start taking money not just from stock portfolio,

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:04.040
<v Speaker 1>but from bond portfolios, and saying, why am I investing

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in this long term treasury bond fund or vehicle when

0:48:09.560 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I should be protecting my capital with this thing that

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:19.799
<v Speaker 1>it's called bitcoin that will rise in price exponentially as

0:48:19.840 --> 0:48:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a dollar false in value exponentially. Why wouldn't I make

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:28.919
<v Speaker 1>that investment instead of hoping that I get a real

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:32.880
<v Speaker 1>rate of return, which is your hurdle rate again that

0:48:33.719 --> 0:48:36.600
<v Speaker 1>beats that rate of inflation or that expansion of the

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 1>money supply. And so the question is what is that?

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:47.040
<v Speaker 1>What is that hurdle rate expansive money supply? If you

0:48:48.040 --> 0:48:50.640
<v Speaker 1>could argue that that's really what it is, and then

0:48:51.360 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin the price will match both that expansion of the

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 1>money supply and that adoption as a way to protect

0:48:59.560 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that money supply. And so you are me, We have

0:49:04.200 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot more of our personal liquidity tied up with

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:14.520
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin invested in bitcoin, invested protected by bitcoin.

0:49:14.560 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Whereas saved in bitcoin saved in bitcoin.

0:49:17.160 --> 0:49:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Where there's a lot of investors out there who have

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:22.480
<v Speaker 1>way more money than you and me that haven't even

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:23.160
<v Speaker 1>thought about it.

0:49:23.640 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 3>And so.

0:49:25.640 --> 0:49:30.719
<v Speaker 1>The way that bitcoin price moves is not really directly

0:49:30.760 --> 0:49:31.799
<v Speaker 1>correlated to just the.

0:49:31.719 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Amount of money comes in.

0:49:32.880 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 1>It has to do with the liquidity too, and so

0:49:36.080 --> 0:49:39.200
<v Speaker 1>there's friction getting in and out of this asset right now,

0:49:39.719 --> 0:49:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and so it's going to get to a point where

0:49:41.960 --> 0:49:44.359
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have that friction, and that means it's going

0:49:44.400 --> 0:49:47.759
<v Speaker 1>to expand quite a bit more in price and an

0:49:47.800 --> 0:49:52.640
<v Speaker 1>asset value, which to me would be approaching the asset

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:55.879
<v Speaker 1>value of gold. And that's where you're getting. Then you're

0:49:55.880 --> 0:49:58.560
<v Speaker 1>getting a lot, well thirteen trillion, yeah, twelve or thirty

0:49:58.760 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 1>years more now yeah, yeah, so yeah, okay.

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So people haven't caught on yet. They seem to

0:50:07.080 --> 0:50:08.919
<v Speaker 2>be kind of coming on one on one on one,

0:50:09.160 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 2>and you know, once everybody agrees with you, then the

0:50:12.120 --> 0:50:14.879
<v Speaker 2>alpha is gone. So the idea is to obviously get

0:50:14.920 --> 0:50:17.760
<v Speaker 2>in before everybody agrees with you on that. On that standpoint,

0:50:18.400 --> 0:50:22.600
<v Speaker 2>So then if to kind of recap this whole conversation,

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:25.920
<v Speaker 2>the debt doom loop tells us, the debt based monitary

0:50:25.960 --> 0:50:27.960
<v Speaker 2>system tells us, and the debt doom loop tells us

0:50:27.960 --> 0:50:30.880
<v Speaker 2>that the monetary system has to continue to expand unless

0:50:30.880 --> 0:50:32.160
<v Speaker 2>the government says, like I said, pack it up.

0:50:32.160 --> 0:50:32.680
<v Speaker 3>It was a good run.

0:50:32.719 --> 0:50:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's shut it down. Otherwise it continues to expand. So

0:50:34.880 --> 0:50:37.359
<v Speaker 2>that's almost all but certain. There's no certaintieson in life,

0:50:37.360 --> 0:50:40.000
<v Speaker 2>but it's almost all but certain. We know that as

0:50:40.040 --> 0:50:43.560
<v Speaker 2>they print money, it's debasing, so prices are going up

0:50:43.600 --> 0:50:46.520
<v Speaker 2>as the rate of money is going or the value

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:49.720
<v Speaker 2>of the money is going down. But not all assets

0:50:49.760 --> 0:50:51.800
<v Speaker 2>go up at the same rate. Some go up faster

0:50:51.880 --> 0:50:54.359
<v Speaker 2>than others, and so the S and P five hundred

0:50:54.440 --> 0:50:57.000
<v Speaker 2>is basically keeping up with it, and some assets like

0:50:57.040 --> 0:50:58.800
<v Speaker 2>gold go up a little bit faster, and some assets

0:50:58.800 --> 0:51:03.319
<v Speaker 2>like bitcoin go up way faster. So Bitcoin is benefiting

0:51:03.360 --> 0:51:06.760
<v Speaker 2>and during timmer from finality makes this case, not only

0:51:06.880 --> 0:51:10.399
<v Speaker 2>is it the network effects, but also the scarcity and

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:13.799
<v Speaker 2>the inflation that are all three driving those And so

0:51:13.840 --> 0:51:16.359
<v Speaker 2>we know scarce SATs move up a much faster. So

0:51:16.920 --> 0:51:20.200
<v Speaker 2>then I guess what you're saying, if I'm paraphrasing, is

0:51:20.200 --> 0:51:22.239
<v Speaker 2>then bitcoin is sort of like this life raft that

0:51:22.280 --> 0:51:25.280
<v Speaker 2>you could go to protect yourself from the incoming tide

0:51:25.280 --> 0:51:27.600
<v Speaker 2>of the money printing liquidity that's coming into system.

0:51:27.760 --> 0:51:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I certainly see it that way, yeah, And I believe

0:51:30.840 --> 0:51:33.279
<v Speaker 1>that that more and more people as they as they

0:51:33.280 --> 0:51:37.400
<v Speaker 1>gain understanding, are going to as well, and so you know,

0:51:37.480 --> 0:51:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I got into got into understanding bitcoin late,

0:51:43.600 --> 0:51:48.680
<v Speaker 1>having just discovered it in twenty twenty, after my son

0:51:48.760 --> 0:51:51.879
<v Speaker 1>actually had said, hey, Dad, you should look at these

0:51:51.880 --> 0:51:56.359
<v Speaker 1>digital currencies or something here, and so, you know, being

0:51:56.360 --> 0:51:59.360
<v Speaker 1>an old Wall Street guy, I ignored it, just like

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:02.200
<v Speaker 1>virtually every single one of my peers.

0:52:02.440 --> 0:52:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Had done and continues to do.

0:52:05.719 --> 0:52:10.399
<v Speaker 1>And so they're slowly coming around saying is there something

0:52:10.440 --> 0:52:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is this something we ought to be checking out? And

0:52:12.360 --> 0:52:14.440
<v Speaker 1>they're still doing from that perspective of hey, is there

0:52:14.440 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money be made here? Instead of hey,

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is this a place where we can safe card our capital.

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:23.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a different mentality. It's going to take a while

0:52:23.080 --> 0:52:27.279
<v Speaker 1>to get there, but yeah, I believe so. And so

0:52:27.320 --> 0:52:30.719
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole lot more capital that's going to come

0:52:30.719 --> 0:52:33.280
<v Speaker 1>into the protocol, which means that it will be worth

0:52:33.400 --> 0:52:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot more in my opinion in the future.

0:52:36.120 --> 0:52:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. One thing I've done is I talk about but

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:42.480
<v Speaker 2>I've shifted my mentality and I don't think about investing

0:52:42.520 --> 0:52:45.880
<v Speaker 2>my money. I think about saving my money, so mostly bitcoin,

0:52:45.960 --> 0:52:47.960
<v Speaker 2>mostly real estate, and I don't invest in real estate

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:50.840
<v Speaker 2>or invest in bitcoin. I save my money into those places.

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I'll do some speculative bets here and there, and some

0:52:53.560 --> 0:52:56.360
<v Speaker 2>early round companies a little bit that might be investing

0:52:56.520 --> 0:52:58.359
<v Speaker 2>or speculating whatever you want to call it. But yeah,

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:01.600
<v Speaker 2>real estate bitcoin, that's where I save it. So, James,

0:53:01.600 --> 0:53:04.480
<v Speaker 2>you're the managing partner, one of the manague partners of

0:53:04.480 --> 0:53:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the Bitcoin Opportunity Fund, and you're sort of taking this

0:53:07.080 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street knowledge and history and brought it into the

0:53:10.120 --> 0:53:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Big One Opportunity Fund, which is closed right now, might

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:16.520
<v Speaker 2>be opening up again here in the near future. Tell

0:53:16.600 --> 0:53:18.160
<v Speaker 2>us about what else you're working on and what people

0:53:18.200 --> 0:53:19.759
<v Speaker 2>could be paying attention to that you're working on.

0:53:20.040 --> 0:53:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:53:20.400 --> 0:53:24.120
<v Speaker 1>So, and you're a partner in the Bigcoin Opportunity Fund,

0:53:24.800 --> 0:53:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and that I mean to us. David Foley and I

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:35.720
<v Speaker 1>are doing the day to day being the institutional.

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Investors for a long time.

0:53:38.040 --> 0:53:43.000
<v Speaker 1>We see this as a way to not just help

0:53:44.440 --> 0:53:48.279
<v Speaker 1>make money for investors and generate profits for them, but

0:53:48.360 --> 0:53:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to help grow the ecosystem, and the bitcoin ecosystem. You

0:53:51.920 --> 0:53:54.160
<v Speaker 1>think about bitcoin, it's just that base layer. There's so

0:53:54.440 --> 0:53:57.239
<v Speaker 1>many other things that are going on in bitcoin, and

0:53:57.680 --> 0:54:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities are in our mind are tremendous, and we're

0:54:01.400 --> 0:54:04.200
<v Speaker 1>super excited about every single day we wake up and

0:54:04.200 --> 0:54:06.440
<v Speaker 1>say what are we looking at to like, how are

0:54:06.440 --> 0:54:10.960
<v Speaker 1>we thinking about? How we and we're inundated with opportunities

0:54:11.040 --> 0:54:14.239
<v Speaker 1>and so but the best thing about is that we've

0:54:14.239 --> 0:54:17.839
<v Speaker 1>got our hurdle rate, which is, hey, what's the risk

0:54:17.920 --> 0:54:20.440
<v Speaker 1>reward of this opportunity versus what the risk reward of

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:23.560
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is? And that's where we see everything. So being

0:54:23.560 --> 0:54:27.400
<v Speaker 1>on the bitcoin standard for us makes it very simple

0:54:27.440 --> 0:54:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for us to look at things that way. And so

0:54:29.719 --> 0:54:33.239
<v Speaker 1>that's what higher bar, Yeah, very high bar. And you know,

0:54:33.280 --> 0:54:36.799
<v Speaker 1>I write the Informationist newsletter which I put out every

0:54:36.840 --> 0:54:40.560
<v Speaker 1>single week, and it just takes one complex topic on

0:54:41.080 --> 0:54:44.560
<v Speaker 1>financial topic and sympathies it for people. And we talk

0:54:44.600 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 1>about things like the Treasury, treasury auctions, the FED, inflation,

0:54:48.840 --> 0:54:51.319
<v Speaker 1>how to look at inflation, how to understand it, how

0:54:51.360 --> 0:54:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to understand the debt problem, how to understand the treasury problem,

0:54:54.719 --> 0:54:57.000
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with social security? Those things, just making

0:54:57.040 --> 0:55:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it simple and for anybody. And we have, like we

0:55:01.000 --> 0:55:05.240
<v Speaker 1>were talking about, we have I have doctors, lawyers, firemen, nurses,

0:55:05.680 --> 0:55:09.520
<v Speaker 1>We've got chemical engineers, we've got aeronautical engineers. We've got

0:55:09.719 --> 0:55:13.680
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of people in there that they're intelligent people,

0:55:13.800 --> 0:55:17.520
<v Speaker 1>but just may not have that experience and that knowledge

0:55:17.560 --> 0:55:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that they should have been taught in school, but they aren't.

0:55:20.960 --> 0:55:22.560
<v Speaker 1>And so that's what that's what I'm trying to do,

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:24.520
<v Speaker 1>is trying to give them that knowledge so they are

0:55:24.640 --> 0:55:26.560
<v Speaker 1>armed with that to understand what to do in their

0:55:26.600 --> 0:55:29.880
<v Speaker 1>own investing in their own portfolios.

0:55:30.080 --> 0:55:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, cool, Well we're gonna wrap it up.

0:55:33.160 --> 0:55:35.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go ahead and we'll link to the informationist

0:55:35.160 --> 0:55:36.520
<v Speaker 2>in the show notes. We'll link to the Big one

0:55:36.560 --> 0:55:38.719
<v Speaker 2>Opportunity fund. It's closed right now, but put your name

0:55:38.719 --> 0:55:40.279
<v Speaker 2>in the pot because we're going to open up second

0:55:40.320 --> 0:55:44.319
<v Speaker 2>fund number two here pretty quickly. Any closing words, Oh,

0:55:44.360 --> 0:55:46.600
<v Speaker 2>that's it. Good to be here and I'm looking forward

0:55:46.600 --> 0:55:48.839
<v Speaker 2>to go hanging out in San Clemente Beach. All right,

0:55:48.840 --> 0:55:51.080
<v Speaker 2>thanks Jam