WEBVTT - (UPDATED) Mailbag Monday | To Be or Not to Be "Overrated"

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>The seventy Sixers have made a statement to start the

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.319
<v Speaker 1>second half of the season, and they've done it shorthanded.

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>One thing we can say for sure, right here, right

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>now in this podcast, Ben Simmons is not overrated. I

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's see volumes when you look at the All

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Star Game voting returns when the fans didn't vote him in,

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>but it was a coach just steaks volumes. For the

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>people that actually have to plan for heads, they don't

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 1>have to spend too much time talking about this pretty

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>civil why he's not overrated. Also, this past week, fans

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>returned to the Center and the atmosphere was fantastic as

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers continue to show why they're one of the

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>best home teams in the NBA. I missed most about

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>whom being It's so loud and it's just beautiful, Like

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to see the fans bank. I'm going

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to be so heavy. Your calls, your dms. Lauren Rose

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and I run through them every week right here on

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:57.639
<v Speaker 1>a mail bag Monday, Lauren Rosen, we are back from

0:00:57.640 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the All Star break, and not only are we back

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>from the break, the streak is over. This is a

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>merry mailbag Monday, we are doing a mail bag following

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a win for the first time in a while, at

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>least two. I think, what an impressive set of games.

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I have so enjoyed watching these three games, winning each

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>by twenty two points or more. I believe, two without Ben,

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>two without Joel, two on the road, three massive wins.

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I love it. I love what I've seen. I really

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.959
<v Speaker 1>really do talk about not skipping a beat the seventy

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>six ers. I was looking this up earlier. In their

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>three games since the break, they're averaging well. First of all,

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>like you said, they haven't had both of their all

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>stars available in the same game, not once, and they

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>won't for a little bit. But they're averaging nearly one

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty points on offense, shooting fifty four and

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a half percent from the field, forty three and a

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>half percent from three, over eighty one percent from the line,

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>while at scoring their first three opponents by eighty three

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>points combined for a net rating of roughly twenty six

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and a half by far and away the best since

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the break. It's amazing, and again without their two anchors. Yes,

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>they're doing all of this behind really solid stuff from

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Tobias Harris exactly what we're used to seeing in what

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 1>we need from him as a city. When I say we,

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean the city of Philadelphia and the reserves, I

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>mean what a stretch for fur con cork mause, for Matisse, thyble.

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>My goodness, they've been so good, Tony Bradley stepping up.

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>It's been really fun to watch these last few games,

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and it leads me to believe that this team really

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>might have what it takes. If they're able to put

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff together like this against adversity, a very good sign

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>amen to that. It is a mail bag Monday. What

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>do we do? How do we do it? We respond

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to your voicemails and your DMS or mentions. Getting in

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>touch with us is simple. The pod line It's always

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>open twenty four seven three sixty five two on five

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>four zero three seven sixty three seven two on five

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>four zero three pods put in your phone, save it.

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Whenever you have a seventy six or thought, take question

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>or comment, call us. We will get to it. The

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>voicemail is the preferred way for you to reach us.

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>We love hearing from you. In addition to reading from you,

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you can also get us on Twitter. I'm at Brian

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Seltzer and then on Instagram I'm at Seltzer six or

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 1>snaps Lauren is very easy and efficient Lauren Mrosen on

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>both platforms hit us up with whatever thought inquiry you

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>may have. So the two themes Lauren I wanted to

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>set for this week's mail bag is number one, your

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about fans being back in the arena. Maybe you went,

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe you're going, you have a ticket lined up for

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>this homestand great, what have you missed the most about

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>not being at a game in over a year. And

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>then the other question was tell us why you think

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Ben Simmons is not an overrated basketball player? Is that

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a fair two questions for the week? No doubt, No doubt.

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't usually do this. I think you know

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>me well enough by now you out there the listener

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>probably knows me well enough. I'm not usually want to

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>get on a soapbox. I don't give many takes, I

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>don't rant or ramble. I'm just gonna say this, hopefully

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I can do it in just a few minutes. And

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Laren, I'm just I'm gonna hog some mic

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>time here, do it. I'm ready, So justin Kutcher. I

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>actually met him about ten years ago when I was

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>doing games on the radio for pant I worked for

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the University of Pennsylvania before the Sixers. I called games

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>for basketball and football, and Justin was working for some

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>TV outlet and he called a couple of penn games

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and I had the chance to meet him, talk with him.

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Super helpful, really nice. Just seemed like a genuine good dude.

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>So fast forward ten years later here we are. Didn't

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>stay in touch with him, kind of followed his career.

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Clearly has done some great stuff. But I think this

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>is a situation and the reason why it frustrated me

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and it still frustrates me so much, is that it's

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a presumption of power or authority with a position of stature.

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>So if I unpack that just a little bit, there's

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>only thirty NBA TV announcing jobs calling games in the

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>entire league. Justin's got one awesome, great resume, credentials to

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>back it up. But just because you are in a

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>position like that does not necessarily mean you have the

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>authority to speak about things and make bold, reckless claims.

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think, listen, you've been in the NBA and

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>AP for three years. I've been doing this for almost

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>ten years now, and I think we would never either

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of us say we're X and O experts or anything

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>like that. But we talk to enough people, we hear

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>enough things to be able to inform our opinions, to

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 1>try and give responsible, fact based statements and opinions when

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>we're pushing content out there. I just can't imagine, quite frankly,

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that anyone in the league talking about players, coaches, executives,

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>would go on record or even off record and suggest

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that Ben Simmons is one of the most overrated players

0:05:57.640 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>in the league. I mean, look at how some of

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the players Ben's peers responded on social media when they

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>saw that clip of Justin saying what he said during

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the game. Thinking back to what Doc Rivers told the

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>media about how when he went to make phone calls

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of Ben Simmons and Tobias Harris for All

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Star reserve spots. The coaches around the rest of the

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>league they laughed Doc off the phone because they were like,

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>what are you calling us about Ben? For? Of course

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>he's an All Star. He's that good. So that brings

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 1>me back to this, what could that statement that Justin

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>made have been based on other than just reckless, baseless

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>opinions or views, something that he wanted to throw out

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>there and that I think is irresponsible, and that is

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>perhaps abusing a bit of the influence and reach that

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>his platform has, and that for me was the point

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of frustration. I'm with you, Selt. When I listened to

0:06:55.920 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the clip, I was confused and immediately thought that this

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>is just someone who hasn't been watching Ben over the

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years, who hasn't looked at the stats.

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I could be wrong. I don't want to assume that

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>someone isn't doing their research, but I just don't think

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>that that's a claim you can make having done your

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:19.239
<v Speaker 1>research and having watched the tape. If anything, I believe

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Ben Simmons to be underrated. The only maybe maybe redeemable

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>part of what he said was that Ben takes attention

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>away from Tobias. But even that I'm not sold on

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>because I hate the narrative of disparaging someone to put

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>someone else up. Ben and Tobias have both been All

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Stars this year. It is not mutually, it is not

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>exclusive to to one or the other. The fact that

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the thesis or his closing point was that it takes

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>away too much attention from Tobias Harris. Okay, maybe he's

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>saying something nice about Tobias in there, but I don't

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>like the way that he got there. I believe them

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>both to be All stars, and to be honest, I

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>believe I'm both to be underrated, period. That's how I feel.

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I like that taking the opposite rate, you're going under

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>instead of over, which I would agree with. Look, and

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>this isn't meant to be some ran about whether or

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>not play by play announcers are qualified to make statements

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>evaluating the talents and abilities and skills of players. Not

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>in the least. I mean. Listen, Let's take Tom McGinnis

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>for example. Tom's been in the NBA for over twenty

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>five years. He knows the game, he's seen it, he's

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>talked to people. Sure, if Tom's going to say something

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>about a guy, give an opinion or a stance and

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a player, great, all for it. It's rooted in something

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:43.959
<v Speaker 1>Sam goes from Mark zoom Off. If Mark says on

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the broadcast, well I think so and so about this

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>player from that team. Are you gonna listen to it?

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>And should you put credence into it. Of course, Mark's

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>been in the league for like Tom nearly three decades,

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think that's part of the problem here. Justin's

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>been in the NBA calling games in the league for

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>not even four months. And that's not to say he

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>can't do a great job saying that, Hey, this guy

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>made that shot or missed that shot, but that's only

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>part of the gig. When you have a platform like

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 1>that that has such a reach and influence and people

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>presume you to be an authority, you just got to

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>be more responsible than that. I think anyone who follows

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>this game, follows this league, understands how good Ben Simmons is.

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I know Greg Popovitch doesn't know much and he hasn't

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>done much in his career, but I kind of like

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>what Greg Poppitch had to say about Ben Simmons. I

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>did as well. I liked that everyone has sort of

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>sounded off and when they've done so, they've they've come

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to the same conclusion that Ben not in fact overrated.

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I also in general celts and it just rubbed me

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>this way. I don't like opinions presented as facts. I

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>think it happens a lot in our industry and It's

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>fine if that's how you want to present your opinions.

0:09:57.640 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>But when you mentioned Mark Zumoff, you mentioned Tom McGinnis.

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>They present opinions, it's very clear that their opinions, and

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not trying to present opinion as fact. And that's

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>just something that I try to look out for. Not

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that anyone wants to know what my tricks to the

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>trade are, but I don't like when people present opinion

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>as fact, especially when the opinion like this one was wrong. Yes,

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know what, Justin on social media, he doubled

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 1>down on a statement. Good for him, but I was

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>also pleased to see that if people had counterthoughts on that,

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>people have engaged with his account and certainly made known

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>what their opinions and thoughts about his take was, not

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the least of which Ben Simmons on his Instagram story.

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So that's I apologize on. I apologize for hagging the mic.

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I apologize to you listeners out there for going on

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that rant. I just felt I had to do it.

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>All due respect to Justin. He was a great guy.

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I have nothing against him personally. I'm just reacting to

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a statement that was made. It happens to be a

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>person that I met once or twice. No Ill Will,

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>but I just felt I had to do it well

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>add that as well, No Ill Will. It's a tough

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>job play by play covering this league. It's not easy

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to do. Gotta give a little bit of leeway maybe

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>for some types of takes. This one just not a

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>great one. But wish him the best and hope that

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>he improves his takes. At the end of the day,

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>mail bag money is about you the populace out there,

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>so let's get to it right now. You have one

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>new message at jaw five nine eight two zero zero

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>nine nine on at Twitter. Ben Simmons is not close

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:34.559
<v Speaker 1>to overrated. He is the best defender in the NBA

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>guards one through five. Even though he does not shoot

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>anything outside the paint, he rebounds FA till states and

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>gets sixteen points per game. His role can become a

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>bit bigger now with him beat out ghost sixers hashtag

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>here they come. I'm with it. The guards one through

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 1>five thing is an underrated plotline. Who else in the

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>league can as successfully guard one through five as a

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>guy like Ben Simmons. That is so hard to do.

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>He's a big guy who can absolutely put the clamps

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>on little guys, and he's a big guy who can

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>fight up in the post against big guys. Nobody else

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in this league does that, certainly not the way that

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Ben does it. Guards one through five, maybe best defender

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in the league. Great teammate, makes his teammates better appreciated

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>by his teammates. The list goes on. I'll save you

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>from the rest of it. I'm gonna call for a

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>vibe check here Ben Simmons vibes in that game on

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Sunday against the Spurs. Honestly, I don't think I've seen

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>anything like that from him in the time that he's

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>been with the team. He was, you know, looking up

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to the crowd, playing the crowd the whole time. Maybe

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it was easier because there were fewer fans in attendance,

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>but just his energy in that game was tremendous. Well,

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 1>Ben has been training a lot with Dwight Howard and

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>there are some good things he can learn from Dwight Howard.

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe one of them is showmanship, because both of them

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>were so excited to see the fans. They were doing

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it all, they were showing off. It was cool to

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>see Ben engage with this group it's clear that he

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>missed them. He's been a little bit more demonstrative this season,

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, and it was cool to see him

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 1>be demonstrative, be expressive, be emotional and have fans like

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>feed into it. And then Ben kept typing it up

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and the fans kept typing him up. It was really

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>cool to see. It's reminding me now of all the

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>conversations we've had about how excited we are for things

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to start going back to normal. And while last night's game,

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>by no means it did not feel normal to me,

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>but there were little moments where I don't know if

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I appreciated an interaction between a player and the fans

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in the room enough in the past. It was cool

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to not take that type of thing for granted. It

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>was cool to watch Ben loved it, the crowd loved it.

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I loved it. It was really cool. To the podline,

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>we go, you have one new message. Ben Simmons is

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.479
<v Speaker 1>not one of the most how ready plays in NBA.

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 1>He's not one of the most overready plays in the NBA,

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>because if he was, he would not be winning actual

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>awards they actually haven't. He would not be averaging sixteen

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.719
<v Speaker 1>eight and eight, and he would not be averaging twenty one,

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>seven and seven for the Muffle February. He would just

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>like to look at box score and numbers and just

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>do that. Oh but Simmons hasn't improved since you got

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>into the NBA. And Simmons is twenty four years old

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and he's made aught MBA thirteen and aught NBA Defensive

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>First Team. That is incredible. He's only stepped his defense

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>up this season. He's looking everybody down and he's improving

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>his supporting game. He had forty two against the defensive

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Player of the Year. That's incredible. So I know he's

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>going to step it up and beat out and everybody's

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>just going to see, Oh, maybe Ben Simmons is not

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the most over eighty players NBA. He's incredible.

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Rack Dad call that was tremendous. We were getting stats

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>spat at us left and right, and I think two,

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Ben is going to step it up with Joel out.

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he's shown that in the past. I was

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>like reading a resume and I was impressed. I would

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>hire the person with that resume to play basketball. Setting

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>not overrated. I agree the awards don't tell the whole story.

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>They never do. But when you're getting them at the

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>rate that Ben Simmons is getting them, at the age

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that Ben Simmons is incredible stuff. The best is yet

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to come from Ben, especially if this year is any

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>indication He's gotten better on a lot of levels. And

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm very excited to see how the resume continues to

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>fill itself out over the next few years. Yeah, pretty

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>much since February, Ben off the charts his last fifteen games,

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and a half points, nearly sixty three percent, shooting

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>almost seventy percent from the line, seven boards, seven and

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a half assists, and one and a half steals per

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>game with three double doubles. You love to see. It's

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you have one new message. The other question we asked

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>this week, especially on the Sixers at Sixers Instagram story sticker,

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>which you can look for every either Saturday or Sunday.

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Going into our next mail back, mondays, what are you

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>most looking forward to about being back at the center

0:15:58.000 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>should you be fortunate enough to go to a game?

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Alana Robbins says, stoked to be part of why the

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>team has the biggest home court advantage in the league.

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>With the angry snorting emoji face Lauren. The game on

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Sunday makes the Sixers now forty six and five at

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the Center and games played in South Philly since the

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>start of the twenty nineteen twenty season. Notable that one

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of those five they had seven players like I don't

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>even know if we should really be counting that right anyway.

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>So cool to have those fans back. I can't say

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it enough. I remain cautious about the safety. I want

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that I'm promoting mask wearing and promoting

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>distancing when we talk about fans on this show. But

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>it was so great to see them back, even in

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a limited capacity. They made such a difference. The guys

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>set it after the game. Doc Rivers set it after

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the game. It was really really cool to have them there,

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and even though their number was smaller than usual, maybe

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>they were mightier than usual. It was a really cool feeling.

0:16:58.160 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>We asked on Instagram, what are you most looking for?

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Two about coming back to the Center? K Cam seventy

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>one says Chickie and Pete's see Franco one two two

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>nine says flying back from Miami for one. It's been

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>so long. Love that loyalty. I love it as well.

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>There's so many things that make these types of moments

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>special to people. So whether that's chickens and PiZZ or

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>who you go with, or what time of year you go,

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>there are so many emotional associations to seeing games in person,

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>and I think, especially now, like we've already said on

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>this pod, you're going to start to appreciate things that

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 1>you used to take for granted a little more. And

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that sense of just sheer joy, happy to be there

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>was on everybody's face last night, and that was really cool.

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Only one dot Joseph three, Oh god, I don't know everything.

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm looking forward to about being back, looking

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>forward to everything. I would agree. Tierny Morrison says, welcoming

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Tyrese Maxie to Philly last night, he got a great

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>ovation against the Spurs coinciding with a frosty freeze out possibility.

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>What a great set of circumstances for the man featured

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 1>in our latest here they come presented by Geico Video

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Series Tyrese Maxie to get out on the floor in

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>front of fans. I think they really do love him

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and it was nice to see that against the Spurs.

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>It was cool and Tyrese was robbed of the traditional

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>first intro to the fans experience that we've seen other

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>rookies get over the last few years. Philadelphia is thrilled

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to have Tyrese Maxie as part of the family, and

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it was cool for Tyrese to have the opportunity to

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>feel that in a very sensory way. People were so

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.239
<v Speaker 1>excited to see Tyres and the other rookies that got

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to join the fun last night. We actually got the

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 1>submission before the game on Sunday was played. Diehard Philly

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>told us an igs what is he looking most forward

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>to about coming back to games? Channing, I thought, this

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>is ironic refu suck that did happen at the end

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.719
<v Speaker 1>of the first half and they Hey, the fans did

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>not miss a beat. They were back and better than ever.

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>They remembered all they were up to their old tricks

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>in the best way. It was great. It was really nice,

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and it was also great to hear some of the

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>players just shout out the fans after the game. And

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>compared to how the energy was at such a higher

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>level at the Center compared to other atmospheres on the road.

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>How about this one, Lauren, the last one from our

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Instagram submissions, Bree Hornberger says, I'm looking forward to going

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to my first game with my best friend who made

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>me a fan during the bubble. I love that new fans.

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>There are people, there are Sixers fans with new children

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that they didn't have last time they were at games.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>We're going to see some new baby and toddler Sixer

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>fans in the coming weeks and months, and I'm very

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>excited to welcome that submission and everybody else into the family.

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's switch over to our Twitter mansions at

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Medina GRN six O nine n J says, and this

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>was in response to Tobias Harris's remarks about not making

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the All Star Game. Bro, you got game. We all

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>know you're nice, Stay hungry, stay tenacious, get it done.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>When you're on the floor, come playoff time, you will

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>wreak havoc on the opposite Asians. So that was in

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>response to a tweet that Lauren you and I put

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>out there about Tobias Harris him summing up his thoughts

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on not making the All Star Game. He said it

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>was disappointed, but essentially, and this was part of the

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>quote that he's going to put a bounty on the

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>heads of the coaches and media members who did not

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>show him enough respect in his mind, and he's played

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>like it so far. I love that attitude, and it's

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>nice to hear the fans supporting him as well well.

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>So you're the one that has pointed out this statistic

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>all along, But since Tobias was not officially not named

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to the All Star team, the Sixers have not lost

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>a game, and that's independent of personnel, opponent. Home wrote,

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>they have not lost a game, and that is worth something.

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Tobias Harris has always been motivated, He's always been driven.

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>He's always brought the utmost professionalism and class to his job.

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>And now he's bringing a little more edge, a little

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 1>bit of a chip on his shoulder, something to prove.

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>He's taking names, and I'm okay with it. I promote it.

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I am happy for him. I love seeing him succeed

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>this way, and hopefully, as Doc Rivers has suggested, you

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>have suggested Celts, as he has suggested, this could all

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>turn into an All Star bid the next time they're available.

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>You know one else I really like to one of

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>his former coaches, Danna Orlando stand the man, stan Van

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Gundhi a great Twitter follow if you do not already

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>shouting out to Bias as well, saying that Tobias no

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>doubt about it, an All Star and he represents everything

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 1>that's right about the NBA professional working, get better as

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a person, great teammate, cares about people. I thought that

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>was nice. I'm with it as well. Always good to

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 1>see respected figures offer takes that are similar to our selts,

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>but offer any positive reinforcement for guys that are no

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>longer necessarily parts of their day to day lives. Stan

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to say any of that. You know he

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>means it because he doesn't have to say any of that.

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I liked seeing that endorsement as well. All right, one

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:52.400
<v Speaker 1>more to pull from the mail back for this week.

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>You have one new message at MS sports with Z

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>two one five says, do we still need an insurance

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>pols to make a move by the trade deadline for

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 1>one more player? Question mark? Hopefully not breaking up too

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>much the second unit or bench players. I don't know,

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe offering up some future draft picks and money to

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 1>shure up the quest to win the title this season. Listen,

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that I always think that Daryl Morey speaks

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>true words, but I forget where it was. I don't

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>know if it was on Twitter or in an article.

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm wrong, Lauren, you can check me on this.

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>But didn't he say, He hopes that people focus on

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the team and the players the Sixers have now, rather

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>on what they could get as we draw closer and

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>closer to March twenty fifth, and listen, I think the

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>bench right or wrong. They are playing like a group

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>where no one wants to leave this team right now.

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Since the All Star break, they've been amazing, for sure,

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's been really interesting to hear from the high

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>up folks, from Darryl Moorey, from Doc Rivers, it's dangerous

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to disrupt the vibes, and the vibes have never been better.

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>These guys really get along, They support each other, they're

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>enjoying their time together, and they're winning. What else can

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you ask for? Understand a reluctance to make a move

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>when things are going well. How many times do we

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.959
<v Speaker 1>have we heard the cliche saying if it's not broken,

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>don't fix it. This is a team that's working really

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.679
<v Speaker 1>well together, And honestly, maybe you're right. Maybe they were

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>playing like a group of guys that didn't want to

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>be moved, and if they're doing that, it's because they

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be moved. It's proof that they're enjoying

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>each other, that they're enjoying this team, that they're enjoying

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>this run. I don't know what else you could ask

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>for at this point in this specifically difficult season. Let

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>me tell you, if there's a Twitter follow that you

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have out there, you gotta get on AT six

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>or stats. Quite the engaging account this year. I'll tell

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you there's been an evolution of engagement in AT six

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>or stats this year. More personality, not just numbers. Love

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing. But this number Sixer's bench has scored

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>at least fifty five points into the last three games.

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just the second time since bench stats were first

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>tracked in nineteen seventy seventy one that the Sixers bench

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>has pieced together such a streak. The only the time

0:23:55.920 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>was in the middle of March nineteen seventy eight. Stuff,

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm with it, the bench, Great stuff from the bench.

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>We've believed in them all along. Selts, I have to say,

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:10.239
<v Speaker 1>of course we did. Yes, never a doubts. All right,

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you mail bag participants and those of you who submitted.

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:16.719
<v Speaker 1>And before we go, Lauren, I'm just gonna apologize one

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>more time for that rant and rave at the beginning

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of the podcast it. I had to get it out

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of my system. I tried to flush it away ever

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>since it happened, I had three or four days to

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:27.959
<v Speaker 1>do it. Look, Seltz, he used his platform and now

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you've used yours. I don't think there's anything wrong with that.

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'll say this, these are my opinions. They reflect

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>no one but yours. Truly. This might be my last

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 1>mailbag Monday. I don't know. Stop ditto. I'm with you,

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>all right. Thanks to everyone who's submitted, Lauren, thank you.

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll do it again Friday with the von Gibbons for

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the Friday Deep Dive Awesome thank You sets and also

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Programming doc this week for the seventy six

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>ers podcast network. We should have the latest episode of

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Tom's Talks with Tom mc ginnis available on Thursday. If

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you missed the last couple episodes, some great chats back

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in our back catalog and listen to Tom's interviews with

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to the new Sharpshooters for the seventy Sixers playing greats

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>as of late. Danny Green and Seth Curry, thanks so

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 1>much for listening to and participating in Mailbag Monday and

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>check your DMS if you are a winner of a

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>swag bag. We will soon be in touch. See you later.