WEBVTT - "Making Money on Space Is Still Extremely Difficult"

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, Elon Muski is now the richest person on the planet.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.039
<v Speaker 2>More than half the satellites in space are owned and

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 2>controlled by one man.

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Starting his own artificial intelligence company.

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, he's a legitimate, super genius.

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Legitimate, he says.

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 2>He's always voted for Democrats, but this year it will

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 2>be different.

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 3>He'll vote Republican. There is a reason the US government

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 3>is so reliant on him. Elon Musk is a scam

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 3>artist and he's done nothing.

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 4>Anything he does is fascinating the people.

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Elon Inc. Where we discuss Elon Musk's fast

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 2>corporate empire, his latest gambits and antics, and how to

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 2>make sense of it all. I'm your host, David Papadopolos.

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 2>On Friday, SpaceX is scheduled to launch its starship spacecraft

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 2>for the second time. The first one went well until

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 2>it didn't. It was detonated within minutes of launch. A

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 2>lot in space travel, of course, can go wrong, and

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 2>has gone wrong. But we also now know from a

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 2>new Reuter's investigation that even when things go well behind

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 2>the scenes, they can get very messy. To discuss this

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 2>and more, we brought in Lauren Grush, who covers space

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 2>for us here and is the author of the six

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:29.919
<v Speaker 2>The Untold Story of America's first women astronauts. Welcome, Lauren, Hello,

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 2>thanks for having me. Sarah Fryar, who oversees our coverage

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 2>of Silicon Valley's biggest companies. Hi, Hello, Sarah. And Max Chafkin,

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 2>senior reporter at Bloomberg Business Week.

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 5>Hey, how's it going? Hello? Max?

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, but we're gonna start back in Texas with you.

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 5>Lauren.

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Just remind us why Starship is so important to the

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 2>company and two Musk's multiplanetary vision.

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 6>Sure, so, I guess you could say Starship is what

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 6>Elon has been working towards since the very beginning. He

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 6>founded SpaceX to start a civilization on Mars, and in

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 6>order to do that, you need quite a large rocket

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 6>to get people there. And so Starship is ultimately that

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 6>transportation system that will take people to deep space destinations.

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 6>Right now, they're kind of working toward the Moon, as

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 6>NASA is looking to go back to the Moon, and

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 6>Starship holds a multi billion dollar contract with NASA to

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 6>take the agency's astronauts to the Moon first, but eventually

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 6>the goal is to take upwards of, you know, hundreds

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 6>of people to Mars and then you know, bring them

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 6>back at some point as well.

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 2>And so back in April you were there. What happened?

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 2>What went wrong?

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 6>Well, a lot of things didn't quite go as planned.

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 6>As I could see as I was watching it launch.

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 6>Multiple Raptor engines on the rocket flamed out. As I

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 6>was watching it, I turned to the person next to

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 6>me and I said something like.

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 3>Uh, is that supposed to happen?

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 6>But the rocket kept climbing, so I just kept filming

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 6>it and watching it. But as it turns out, that

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 6>was not supposed to happen. So multiple engines either failed

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 6>or didn't even start up during the launch, and then

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 6>as it climbed towards space, there's a portion of the

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 6>flight where the vehicle intentionally separates. It's known as stage separation.

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 6>And there are two stages on Starship. There's the Starship

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 6>spacecraft itself, which is the top portion of the rocket

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 6>and that's what would presumably carry people and cargo someday.

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 6>And then you have the booster, what's known as the

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 6>super heavy booster. It's a very long piece at the

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 6>bottom that is needed to really get it out of

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:49.119
<v Speaker 6>the Earth's gravity and get it into orbit. Well, at

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 6>some point, you know, the stages are supposed to separate

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 6>because it gobbles up all the fuel in that super

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 6>heavy booster. When that time came, the vehicle started to

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 6>spin out of control, and then inly SpaceX opted to

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 6>intentionally destroy the vehicle.

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 2>They shut it down essentially, right, Yeah.

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's a precautionary measure with a system known as

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 6>the Flight Termination System. It's embedded in every rocket and

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 6>it's used for this exact scenario. So in case things

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 6>don't go according to plan, they intentionally blow up the

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 6>rocket to make sure it doesn't veer into a crowded

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 6>area and cause unintended damage to public and property.

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 2>After that explosion, they fixed their problem. Since then they're

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 2>ready to go.

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 6>That's what SpaceX says. The FA came up with a

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 6>list of corrective actions that they need to implement. One

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 6>of the biggest updates that you'll see during this flight

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 6>is the addition of what's known as a water deluge system.

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 6>So the way Elon described it is basically a shower

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 6>head but pointed upward. So they've installed these steel plates

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 6>underneath the launch pad or the launch mount that will

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 6>gush water underneath the rocket when the engines fire, and

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 6>that's meant to mitigate and lessen the forces that are

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 6>created when those engines ignite. I mean, you have to remember,

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 6>this is thirty three raptor engines that are supposed to ignite,

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 6>and they're very powerful engines. So and that was ultimately

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 6>what caused all of the destruction. Last time. They really

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 6>didn't have any mitigation measures in place. And so I

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 6>was actually watching the live stream from the original Starship launching.

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 6>I could see the chunks of concrete kind of flying

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 6>everywhere during that initial takeoff. So hopefully the DILUTIONE system

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 6>will prevent that from happening this time.

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Launchpad basically blew up max, yes, which I mean happens

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>when you're launching experimental rockets and like these. You know,

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I almost feel like this is the area where Elon

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Musk is sort of most comfortable, right where he's sort

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of trying to develop a new technology, where he's able

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>to like lower expectations sufficiently, where a little explosion is

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like a bump in the road, right,

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>because they were they were celebrating, Yeah, and I think

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you can argue, I mean, Lauren, correct me if I'm wrong.

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you could argue that it was a success.

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:07.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, right, this is they achieved something that hadn't

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 1>yet achieved and again experimental vehicles, like they don't need

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to get to Mars in one boom.

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, no, absolutely. SpaceX has been very clear that their

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 6>approach to testing and development is very iterative, and you know,

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 6>they like to go and fly things and push them

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 6>to their limits until they break, and that helps them

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 6>to learn and then they come back and do it again.

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 6>The issue that they have though, is that they built

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 6>Starship and star Base, this launch facility that in Boca

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 6>Chica next to a wildlife refuge, and so you know,

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 6>they can blow up their own launch pad as much

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 6>as they want, but you know, when it crosses into

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 6>potentially harming animals in the area or you know, causing

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 6>damage to uninvolved public and property.

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 3>And it did, right, I mean, it would cause tremendous

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 3>of damage.

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I do want to be clear, it was just

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 6>the intense force of the launch itself that caused the

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.239
<v Speaker 6>most damage on the ground. They hadn't put in enough

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 6>mitigation measures that most orbital flights normally do. And this

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 6>is the potentially the largest and most powerful rocket ever developed.

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 2>What does SpaceX say, So, what would its response to

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 2>all this be.

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 6>I would say the response is that they it happened

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 6>exactly as they hoped, you know, they wanted to learn,

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 6>and they are happy to damage and destroy their own

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 6>launch pad as much as possible. I think they obviously

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 6>don't want to cause any unintended consequences to the nearby

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 6>environment or But at the same time, I think they

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 6>they would blow up their launch pad as much as

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 6>possible if it meant learning, you know, new things about

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 6>their vehicle, and they'll happily, you know, rebuild again and again.

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 6>I think in the long term they don't want to

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 6>continue blowing up their launch pad, but in these early

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 6>days of testing, that is just a side effect of

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 6>learning and pushing the envelope forward.

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Now Max More recently, Reuter's published a long investigative piece

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 2>looking into the raft of injuries sustained at SpaceX facilities,

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 2>and so it's pretty much a look at the human

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 2>toll of what we call musk speed, right, that relentless

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 2>drive to get new products ready, get them out the

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 2>doors as fast as possible. I mean. Among the findings

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 2>in their story, there have been six hundred injuries of

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX workers since twenty fourteen. More than one hundred workers

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 2>suffering cuts or lacerations, twenty nine with broken bones or dislocations,

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Sementine whose hands or fingers were crushed, nine with head injuries.

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 2>You had five burns, five electrocutions, eight accidents that led

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 2>to amputations. One man is in a coma, and one

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 2>man is dead. Is this of course at any industrial

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 2>site there will be injuries? Is this abnormal?

0:08:58.400 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I think so two things. One is, like you said,

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX is going to say that they're doing their best.

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're taking appropriate precautions. But we have read

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>stories like this about Tesla, and in some ways it's

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.839
<v Speaker 1>not surprising, especially given what we know about Elon Musk.

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>If you know, if you've looked at the Walter Isaacson book,

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you've seen scenes in which SpaceX engineers are sort of

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>like drinking heavily, doing things in the middle of the night.

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't Now again, I don't think there's any allegation

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that any of that played into these injuries. And even

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>when you listen to things that Musk says about this,

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, Musk talks about, you know, the distinction between

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of regulations that don't have anything to do with

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>physics and laws of physics. You know, laws of physics

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>are requirements. Everything else is a recommendation. Is a line

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that comes up over and over again in the Walter

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Isaacson book. The other thing is, I do think this

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is pretty damaging. Aerospace is an industry where safety standards

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>really matter and where accidents can be super problematic. You know,

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the long term goal is, as Lauren's talking about, is

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to send regular people up in these rockets, and and

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>anything that sort of dents that the aura of safety

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>or reliability or anything like that can be long term damaging.

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 6>I would also mention that, you know, the reason that

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 6>this I think these things happen it stems from the

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 6>culture and the frenzy that Elon creates about the need

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 6>to get to Mars as quickly as possible. He said

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 6>many times before that the window to Mars is open now,

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 6>and it could close, so we need to work as

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 6>quickly as possible to get there, and so that creates

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 6>I think a kind of crazed environment to work as

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 6>quickly as possible to at all costs, you know, And

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 6>that's why we know that SpaceX has a bit of

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 6>a burnout culture, and that you know, people like you said,

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 6>are working through the night and have a lot of

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 6>anxiety just to try and get these things done to

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 6>fulfill that mandate that Elon has.

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think that the Mars rush is sometimes,

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 3>as we saw in the in as the same book

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 3>another reporting, sometimes he just gets in a mood and

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 3>he thinks, I have this new idea, I want to

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 3>fix it now, or I want to change this now.

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 3>We are you know, we had this as our priority,

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 3>but our priority is now this and it starts tonight

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 3>on a Friday night.

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 3>It is just it's just the way he works, and

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 3>I think some employees find that extremely exciting.

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Now, Lauren, if I'm correct here. SpaceX did not comment

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 2>for this story. Did not comment to Reuters for this story.

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 2>In general, their public posture in terms of how they

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 2>treat safety workplace safety at SpaceX is.

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.679
<v Speaker 6>What and I imagine they would say that it is,

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 6>you know, a high priority. SpaceX is one of, if

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 6>not the biggest partner with NASA right now, and when

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 6>it comes to how they work together with the Space Agency,

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 6>you know, safety is very a top priority for NASA

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 6>and so when it comes to at least how they

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 6>certify their vehicles to carry people to space, what is

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 6>involved with making sure that their vehicles and their rockets

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 6>and their capsules are up to NASA's standards. That is

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:29.199
<v Speaker 6>very heavily oversighted. And so you know, there is definitely

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 6>regulation and oversight and a lot of things that SpaceX does.

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 6>It's you know, but there are other things. I'm sure

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 6>you know. NASA isn't there every single day.

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>As I was thinking about this, you know, I was

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking about when you when you take a few steps

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>back from the Elon Musk, like the Elon Musk story, right,

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it's all about applying the lessons of software to hardware,

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and that is like super useful, I think to a point, right,

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>because software is very iterative. You can fix it. You

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>can have little issues, you can have little things break

0:12:58.720 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and no one cares.

0:12:59.600 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>So we're companies all the time, including really big ones

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>like Apple, ship products that are not fully baked or

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that have problems that are being fixed kind of in

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>real time, and that is like a recipe for innovation.

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I just think like this kind of gets at the

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>limitations of this approach and like you can talk about,

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the fail fast mentality or whatever. But when

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you're you know, there's an anecdote in there about somebody

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>dropping like a very heavy piece of untund yeah, one

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred pound chunk of something not concrete, you know, down

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and like at a normal company.

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 2>And like landed at somebody's face. Yeah, it didn't hurt anybody,

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 2>but they were like, my god.

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:37.199
<v Speaker 1>And the story says that a normal company, they will

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>get you fired. At SpaceX, it doesn't. And I think

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>like that is telling and that that allows obviously allows

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you to move faster, but it it it.

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Reaches a faster and also by the way, race ahead

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 2>of Boeing, race ahead of Blue Origin, right, and when

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 2>they are, they are in many ways dominating the space race.

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>We talked about Elon Musk's relationship with workers last week

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>as it applies to Tesla, but you know, you kind

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of see it here too. When you're dealing with like

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>big industrial plants with heavy equipment and things that can

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>kill or maim you very easily, it requires a different approach.

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 2>One last bit of SpaceX news here. So we had

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 2>a story last week showing that revenue it's starlink, the

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX unit that puts small Internet satellites up into space.

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 2>That revenue there is growing, and apparently growing quite a bit,

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 2>so fast that it'll count for more than half of

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX's total revenue by next year. Lauren, this strikes me

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 2>as surprising. What do we make of this?

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think from the very beginning, Starlink was meant

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 6>to be a bit of a money maker for SpaceX.

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 6>I think there were some early documents that came out

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 6>a few years ago before they even started launching, that

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 6>projected very high revenues for Starlink. They're also very tenacious

0:14:56.520 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 6>about finding new businesses for Starlink's so while they have

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 6>the customer consumer facing business, they're also very eager to

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 6>get Starlink government customers and to planes, onto cruise ships,

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 6>things of that nature. So I think if you read

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 6>the tea leaves, it's clear that Starlink is very important

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 6>to SpaceX in terms of being kind of this money

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 6>maker to help generate funds to, you know, for that

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 6>ultimate goal of.

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Sure that they can keep blowing up rockets as they

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 2>push sure higher and hire.

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And find demand for all of these rockets that they

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>want to launch, like they're launching these gigantic, as Lauren's saying, giant,

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>bigger rockets than anyone's ever launched. You know, these enormous,

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>enormous number of launches of the earlier generation of rocket, right,

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>they kind of need something like Starlink to to fill

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>up their boats.

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 6>And I think one thing to keep in mind is

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 6>that while SpaceX is this very successful company and does

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 6>all of these amazing things, it still remains to be

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 6>seen if space is a profitable business. The truth is,

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 6>making money on space is still extremely difficult, and so

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 6>I think SpaceX is trying to find kind of where

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 6>they can create that revenue stream through space so that

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 6>they can support all of these other endeavors. And we're

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 6>still kind of seeing if Starlink will be that money

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 6>maker that they hope it will be.

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 2>The one last thing that's interesting on this though, is

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 2>there at the same time we're talking about potentially spinning

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 2>off Starlinks and an IPO, at which point, sure, you

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 2>get an influx of cash, but I guess your cash

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 2>cow to fund your rockets sky way.

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's not totally clear that it is. I mean,

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>can it clearly is you could generate a lot of revenue,

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's not clear that this is a super profitable business.

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Apparently it's breaking even this year and last year.

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, Musk was complaining that they were losing huge

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>amounts of money in the context of the sort of

0:16:55.960 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>argument over whether he should deploy more devices to Ukraine.

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back.

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Elon is a pretty busy guy. He's running six companies

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 2>and yet he's been spending his time giving multi hour

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 2>podcast interviews, although not to this one. Elon, if you're listening,

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 2>you are always invited. He talked to Joe Rogan for

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 2>close to three hours, and then to Lex Friedman for

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 2>over two Sarah amid all this talk. Tucked in there

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 2>somewhere there were comments on the political evolution of Twitter

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 2>as it became X.

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 5>What did he have to say?

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:39.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, between the talk of aliens and everything else, there

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:43.959
<v Speaker 3>was a pretty interesting quote about X and it encapsulates

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 3>what he said before. Take a listen.

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 4>That's what it was controlled by far left activists. Objectively,

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 4>they would describe themselves as that. You know, so if

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 4>sometimes feel like well hasn't moved to the right, well

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 4>it's moved to the center. So from the perspective of

0:17:57.800 --> 0:17:59.360
<v Speaker 4>the far left, yes, it has moved to the right

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 4>because everything to the right from the fall left, but

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 4>no one on the fall Left that I'm aware of

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 4>has been suspended or banned or de amplified. So, you know,

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 4>but we're trying to be inclusive for the whole country.

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 3>And so what's interesting here is that Bloomberg has actually reported,

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 3>based on third party research that in the month since

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Musk took over Twitter and turned it into X and

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 3>loosen the rules that he thought were liberal activist rules,

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 3>you actually saw an uptick in hate speech and racist speech,

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 3>anti Semitic speech. And that's not so much a thing

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 3>that people care about in terms of politics as much

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 3>as they care about in terms of the user experience.

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 3>People don't want to come to a social network and

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 3>feel bad. They don't want to experience, you know, hate

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 3>and racism in Advertisers don't want to spend their money there.

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 3>It can be you know, a chilling effect on people

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:58.360
<v Speaker 3>who feel like they're in the minority or being being

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 3>attacked to speak there, and we've seen that migration away

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 3>from X and and so I think I think it's

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 3>just worth thinking of those comments in that framing where

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 3>it's like it is a it is a business decision

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 3>and one that's actually gone poorly for him.

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So in this interview Sarah, he also rekindled an

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 2>old feud with Chatchept Sam Alton, and former business partner

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 2>of Musk.

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 5>Now arrival. What's the deal there?

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh, there's some history here. So so open ai started,

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 3>as Musk says in his his chatter about it, and the.

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 4>Name the opening, Opening is supposed to be an open

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 4>source and I was created as a nonprofit open source

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 4>and now it is a closed source for maximum profit,

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 4>which I think is not good comma.

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 3>So the the thing to understand here is Musk was

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 3>a large backer of this open ai project back when

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 3>it was considered a nonprofit, back when they were trying

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 3>to you know, solve solve the issues with with AI

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 3>taking over and doing harmful things and and yeah, it

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 3>has become a for profit company. But the context there

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 3>is is Musk just launched his own for profit version

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 3>of of Grock, which we spoke about in the last episode.

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 3>And so now we've seen this this very public brawl

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 3>between Sam Altman and Elon Musk where they're throwing shade

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 3>on each other through memes on Twitter. You know, Sam

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Altman made fun of of Elon Musk's grock as being

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 3>like the dad joke, the cringey dad joke version of

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Ai and in Musk responded in a way that sort

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 3>of confirmed his hypothesis.

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 2>So, Max, where does the Altman feud rank and the

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Pantheona Musk future? I mean, is this like Zuckerberg level,

0:20:58.720 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 2>AOC level?

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I think this is like a top to top twenty feud.

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely one of the one of the key and

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, I'd say it's like in the top five.

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>But when you when you step back and look at

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the you know, panoply of Elon feuds. I want to

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>offer one update from the world of sports on this

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.360
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast interview, Lex.

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Freed a very broad definition of sports.

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Lex Friedman trained or or you know, maybe wrestled with

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg grappled. There were some pictures

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter and there was no mention none of the

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>cage fight during this entire two and a.

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 5>Half hour podcast. Is that possible?

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Unforgivable? If you ask me.

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 3>So, it's the case.

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I promise an update, but it's it's sort of a

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>non update.

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 5>It's sorry, I can't say.

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I remember it's always about the cage fight for our

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 2>final segment. Today, we've got this biopic coming out, uh

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 2>timeline unknown. But in Muska, I'm sure they're saying it's

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 2>going to come out in two weeks and it'll come

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 2>out in three years.

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 5>It's all about his life.

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Director Darren Aronofsky is said to be working with a

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 2>twenty five were on it, based on the new Walter

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Isaacson biography of Musk. And you know what it's got

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 2>us thinking here is I mean, we need a cast,

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 2>we need a dream cast for this. Okay, So I'm

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 2>gonna start with you Max, Okay, who will play?

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay? I just very quickly want to explain my thinking

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 1>here because Aronofsky is not a funny guy. His movies

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 1>are very dark, surreal, very dark. And I think that's

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of a problem because I think the Elon Musk

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>story needs a little levity. I mean, this is somebody

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>he's not always funny, but he tries to be. And

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>so I think the key here to marry Aronofsky's dark

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 1>aesthetic weirdness is to cast a comic actor in a

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>serious role, which often is Oscar bit So I have

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>two thoughts here. One is I want to start with

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Linda Yakarino, and I think Amy Poehler is the idea.

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>And for Elon, this is very poor casting decision. I

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>think there's going to be lots of other ideas. I'm

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>suggesting Tim Robinson, who's a comedian. If you haven't heard

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of him, but you've seen the gift of a guy

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in a hot dog suit saying we're all looking for

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the guy who did this. He's a sketch comedian, does

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cringe comedy, and I think both in

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 1>spirit and in content, he would be perfect.

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 2>I could go with that.

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 5>Sarah.

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 3>So, I am really really bad at casting decisions. So

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 3>I phoned a friend on this one, and my friend

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.199
<v Speaker 3>Walter Hickey, who just wrote a book on Hollywood, I

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 3>liked his casting decisions for Grimes. He brought up Anya

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Taylor Joy or Lady Gaga. I think they both would

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 3>be really good Grimes. We need someone a little edgy.

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 2>I think Grimes being the on again, off again partner

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 2>of Musques.

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:52.360
<v Speaker 3>And mother of some of Musk's children.

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure that we know the number. If we're honest, well, I.

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 6>Think the latest three as far as we know.

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Laurene Grush, who do you got Yes?

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 6>So I've been thinking about this for a while because

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 6>I put together in terms of just pure likeness, I've

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.719
<v Speaker 6>thought about this one actor for a long time. I

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 6>know he probably has done more, but I know him

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 6>predominantly from the show Lost. If anyone remembers at his

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 6>name is Kevin Durant, and if you google him, I

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 6>think he's the one that looks most like Musk. I

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 6>don't think I'm the only one that's come up with

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 6>this connection either, So just in terms of pure looks.

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 5>I go with I got you.

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say also, I am not the only one

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to suggest Tim Robinson. I saw that on Twitter.

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 5>But I think it's like whoa, whoa, whoa you came?

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:40.959
<v Speaker 2>You stole it from somebody.

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>It seems like Sarah stall I did.

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to count Sarah.

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 2>At least sighted her source mine. For what it's worth,

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 2>I only have one. I've got someone for Musk, and

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna have to bring someone back from the dead, though,

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 2>which if anybody could do it, Musk. I fear like

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Musk will create a company which he brings back people

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 2>from the dead and then sort of in the same

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 2>vein as Mat. I've got Robin Williams.

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 3>WHOA, that's interesting.

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna need a cameo here, and I

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>was thinking, you kind of want like a really hot

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 1>cat turd if you ask me, and so Timothy chalamey

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>as cat turd, just come in and out.

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Enough with the enough with the casting.

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 3>We'll take your ideas though. Listeners, all right, that's it.

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to elon Ink and thanks to our

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:32.120
<v Speaker 2>panel Lauren, Sarah Max, thank.

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 3>You, thank you for having me. Thanks so much.

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 2>This episode was produced by Stacy Wong. Naomi Shaven and

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 2>Rayhan Harmanci are our senior editors. The idea for this

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 2>very show also came from Rayhan Blake Maple's Handles Engineering,

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 2>and we get special editing assistance from Jeff Grocott. Thanks

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 2>a bunch Tolda de Carley and to Bloomberg BusinessWeek editor

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Joe Weber. Our supervising producer is Magnus Hendrickson. The elon Inc.

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Theme is written and performed by Taka Yasuzawa and Alex Subjia.

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.239
<v Speaker 2>Sage Bauman is the head of Bloomberg Podcast and our

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 2>executive producer I am David Papadopoulos. If you have a minute,

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 2>rate and review our show, it'll help other listeners find us.

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 2>See you next week.