1 00:00:00,680 --> 00:00:04,200 Speaker 1: Hi, I'm Molly John Fast and this is Fast Politics, 2 00:00:04,400 --> 00:00:07,160 Speaker 1: where we discussed the top political headlines with some of 3 00:00:07,200 --> 00:00:10,880 Speaker 1: today's best minds, and Donald Trump says on stage again 4 00:00:10,960 --> 00:00:13,680 Speaker 1: that he wants to be a dictator. Take him seriously 5 00:00:13,880 --> 00:00:17,120 Speaker 1: and literally. We have such an interesting show for you today. 6 00:00:17,280 --> 00:00:20,560 Speaker 1: The Intercepts Ryan Grimm stops by to tell us about 7 00:00:20,560 --> 00:00:23,520 Speaker 1: his new book, The Squad, AOC and the Hope of 8 00:00:23,520 --> 00:00:27,600 Speaker 1: a Political Revolution. Then we'll talk to Professor Steven Levitski 9 00:00:27,880 --> 00:00:30,440 Speaker 1: about why Republicans have turned against democracy. 10 00:00:30,520 --> 00:00:31,200 Speaker 2: But first we have. 11 00:00:31,200 --> 00:00:34,479 Speaker 1: The host of the Enemy's List, the one, the only, 12 00:00:34,800 --> 00:00:37,279 Speaker 1: the Lincoln Project's own, Rick Wilson. 13 00:00:38,000 --> 00:00:41,160 Speaker 2: Welcome back to Fast Politics. 14 00:00:41,240 --> 00:00:45,160 Speaker 3: Rick Wilson, Mollie Jong Fast, How are you this fine day? 15 00:00:45,720 --> 00:00:49,879 Speaker 2: Just keeping it going? Unlike the United States Congress, you. 16 00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:52,680 Speaker 3: Know, well, unlike the United States Congress, and unlike so 17 00:00:52,720 --> 00:00:55,160 Speaker 3: many arms of our government these days, you are the 18 00:00:55,160 --> 00:00:56,760 Speaker 3: hardest working woman in show business. 19 00:00:57,280 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 1: Well, the bar is very fucking low if we're going 20 00:00:59,800 --> 00:01:00,880 Speaker 1: to come the Congress. 21 00:01:01,160 --> 00:01:03,960 Speaker 2: I've started listening to a lot of podcasts, and I. 22 00:01:03,880 --> 00:01:07,120 Speaker 1: Was listening to a podcast that specializes in Congress and 23 00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:10,160 Speaker 1: is not very liberal. It's very striking them at all 24 00:01:10,200 --> 00:01:14,640 Speaker 1: if even maybe a little conservative, and they were talking 25 00:01:14,640 --> 00:01:18,760 Speaker 1: about how this Congress is the do nothing Congress. 26 00:01:19,080 --> 00:01:19,720 Speaker 2: Do nothing. 27 00:01:20,200 --> 00:01:24,560 Speaker 3: There is a meaningful number of actions Congress could be 28 00:01:24,600 --> 00:01:26,959 Speaker 3: taking right now that would improve the lives of Americans. 29 00:01:27,000 --> 00:01:28,080 Speaker 3: But why would they do that? 30 00:01:28,360 --> 00:01:30,000 Speaker 2: I mean, come on, crazy talk. 31 00:01:30,440 --> 00:01:33,680 Speaker 3: I heard this morning that they're trying to prepare hearings 32 00:01:33,720 --> 00:01:37,959 Speaker 3: on the Taylor swift syop because you know, if you're 33 00:01:38,040 --> 00:01:41,679 Speaker 3: the Republican Party and you want to cause yourself enormous agony, 34 00:01:41,720 --> 00:01:43,400 Speaker 3: you could do one of three things. You could put 35 00:01:43,400 --> 00:01:45,680 Speaker 3: your dick in a meat grinder, or you could attack 36 00:01:45,720 --> 00:01:46,240 Speaker 3: this week. 37 00:01:46,040 --> 00:01:47,600 Speaker 2: You get I love Rick. 38 00:01:48,120 --> 00:01:52,280 Speaker 1: You cannot have Rick on the podcast without the superfluois 39 00:01:52,400 --> 00:01:54,040 Speaker 1: dick meat grounder joke. 40 00:01:54,320 --> 00:01:55,920 Speaker 3: I don't know. It wasn't superfluous though. 41 00:01:55,960 --> 00:01:58,720 Speaker 2: I mean, right, just moving us right along. 42 00:01:59,080 --> 00:02:02,360 Speaker 3: The attacking tailors is like you're shoving a live wolverine 43 00:02:02,400 --> 00:02:04,880 Speaker 3: in your pants. It's going to be loud and messy, 44 00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:07,920 Speaker 3: but it's also got to eventually into nothing but pain 45 00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:08,680 Speaker 3: and suffering. 46 00:02:10,120 --> 00:02:12,240 Speaker 1: So let's just talk about this for a minute. The 47 00:02:12,320 --> 00:02:14,800 Speaker 1: Republicans in the House, you know, I think they have 48 00:02:14,960 --> 00:02:19,240 Speaker 1: like a few days left and do nothing Congress before 49 00:02:19,800 --> 00:02:22,360 Speaker 1: they go out for Christmas, because God forbid anyone should 50 00:02:22,360 --> 00:02:25,760 Speaker 1: work during any holiday ever. But one of the things 51 00:02:25,760 --> 00:02:28,760 Speaker 1: they're really working on is they want to open this 52 00:02:29,360 --> 00:02:32,799 Speaker 1: impeachment inquoy. One of my favorite things is I don't 53 00:02:32,840 --> 00:02:35,440 Speaker 1: know if you heard, because I have no life, and 54 00:02:35,560 --> 00:02:36,880 Speaker 1: I listened to c SPAN. 55 00:02:37,480 --> 00:02:41,639 Speaker 2: I heard what speaker Mike Johnson was trying. 56 00:02:41,320 --> 00:02:44,960 Speaker 1: To get people to vote, and he said, don't vote 57 00:02:45,000 --> 00:02:49,280 Speaker 1: for this because you believe in impeachment. Vote for this 58 00:02:49,400 --> 00:02:53,200 Speaker 1: because you believe in the United States Constitution. 59 00:02:54,040 --> 00:02:59,480 Speaker 3: So what I have questions? Yes, one of which is 60 00:02:59,520 --> 00:03:05,240 Speaker 3: what the fuck? I was like, huh wait what. 61 00:03:05,280 --> 00:03:08,079 Speaker 2: He's almost slick, that guy, but not quite. 62 00:03:08,560 --> 00:03:11,360 Speaker 3: He imagines that he's slick. He imagines that he's some 63 00:03:11,400 --> 00:03:14,280 Speaker 3: sort of like crafty rhetorical player. But let's be real, 64 00:03:14,520 --> 00:03:17,320 Speaker 3: other than being inspired by God himself and being told 65 00:03:17,320 --> 00:03:19,240 Speaker 3: that he's the Moses of our generation. 66 00:03:19,240 --> 00:03:22,760 Speaker 2: Yes, I think God actually spoke to him. 67 00:03:23,160 --> 00:03:25,480 Speaker 3: I think at least they were having a signal chat 68 00:03:25,680 --> 00:03:26,200 Speaker 3: with God. 69 00:03:26,440 --> 00:03:27,320 Speaker 2: Right exactly. 70 00:03:27,440 --> 00:03:30,960 Speaker 3: When you look at Johnson's hubris and that kind of thing, 71 00:03:31,040 --> 00:03:33,440 Speaker 3: it doesn't match up with his ability to move the 72 00:03:33,480 --> 00:03:36,480 Speaker 3: ball at all. So far. He is a guy who's 73 00:03:36,520 --> 00:03:39,000 Speaker 3: walking around with a target on his back. He knows it. 74 00:03:39,560 --> 00:03:41,880 Speaker 3: He knows that the gates is and all the weirdos 75 00:03:41,960 --> 00:03:45,120 Speaker 3: are ready to just leap on him and destroy him 76 00:03:45,120 --> 00:03:46,800 Speaker 3: at the slightest provocation. 77 00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:49,880 Speaker 2: But does anyone think that he would be good at this? 78 00:03:49,960 --> 00:03:51,760 Speaker 1: I mean, I don't think he got the job because 79 00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:53,040 Speaker 1: anyone thought he'd be good at it. 80 00:03:53,320 --> 00:03:56,160 Speaker 3: Moly. I think that's a really good observation, is that 81 00:03:56,320 --> 00:03:59,400 Speaker 3: in some ways he wasn't a compromise candidate. He was 82 00:04:00,040 --> 00:04:03,600 Speaker 3: exactly who they wanted, was somebody who would not resist 83 00:04:03,640 --> 00:04:07,080 Speaker 3: the train wreck, because remember, what they want is the spectacle. 84 00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:11,400 Speaker 3: They want the collapse, the chaos, the ugliness, the train wreck, 85 00:04:11,520 --> 00:04:15,280 Speaker 3: the bullshit. They want all those broken toy moments that 86 00:04:15,600 --> 00:04:18,720 Speaker 3: you know, if you have a party that has been 87 00:04:18,760 --> 00:04:21,720 Speaker 3: replaced by a cult run by mad men, right. 88 00:04:21,839 --> 00:04:24,680 Speaker 1: And I think that's a really good point. And that's 89 00:04:24,680 --> 00:04:27,279 Speaker 1: where we're looking down the barrel of So I don't 90 00:04:27,279 --> 00:04:30,160 Speaker 1: know where this goes next. 91 00:04:30,640 --> 00:04:32,960 Speaker 2: I mean, I don't know, what do you think. 92 00:04:33,400 --> 00:04:36,039 Speaker 3: Look, they have to do a few housekeeping matters before 93 00:04:36,080 --> 00:04:36,719 Speaker 3: the end of the year. 94 00:04:37,000 --> 00:04:41,919 Speaker 1: The enormous supplemental that would save U. Krayon just a 95 00:04:42,000 --> 00:04:44,279 Speaker 1: few housekeeping matters. 96 00:04:44,040 --> 00:04:48,600 Speaker 3: Whilst I am not a Jim Langford fanboy, he's actually 97 00:04:49,120 --> 00:04:51,640 Speaker 3: dealing with the White House to work out a deal. 98 00:04:51,760 --> 00:04:53,920 Speaker 3: The White House wants a deal too, and I think 99 00:04:53,960 --> 00:04:58,000 Speaker 3: it's important that they try to land something. And believe me, 100 00:04:58,080 --> 00:05:01,320 Speaker 3: Langford's not doing this without Mitch mca donald's blessing. They're 101 00:05:01,400 --> 00:05:05,039 Speaker 3: teeing up something that will put Johnson in a very 102 00:05:05,080 --> 00:05:09,560 Speaker 3: bad spot. But real talk, he has no choice. He 103 00:05:09,720 --> 00:05:12,600 Speaker 3: have to swallow hard and vote for this because if 104 00:05:12,640 --> 00:05:15,039 Speaker 3: he doesn't, the rest of the fund stops for the 105 00:05:15,040 --> 00:05:17,640 Speaker 3: Republicans in the House. Because even those guys need the 106 00:05:17,640 --> 00:05:20,480 Speaker 3: supplemental stuff. Even they need it, you know, it's just 107 00:05:20,960 --> 00:05:23,360 Speaker 3: you don't just as like a like blow it off. 108 00:05:23,400 --> 00:05:26,160 Speaker 1: At this point, there are three things in the supplemental 109 00:05:26,600 --> 00:05:32,440 Speaker 1: that Ukraine funding, Taiwan funding, and Israel funding. So these 110 00:05:32,440 --> 00:05:35,320 Speaker 1: are the three places where the world is on fire, 111 00:05:35,600 --> 00:05:39,239 Speaker 1: except Taiwan is to stop the world from going on fire. 112 00:05:39,440 --> 00:05:41,799 Speaker 3: If you're a Republican, do you want your Democratic opponent 113 00:05:41,839 --> 00:05:46,680 Speaker 3: to say my opponent, Republican John Smith is soft on Jina. Yes, 114 00:05:47,120 --> 00:05:51,560 Speaker 3: he voted also Chinese Communist Party in Jina, right, But. 115 00:05:51,560 --> 00:05:55,520 Speaker 1: I also think an important data point here is that 116 00:05:55,960 --> 00:05:59,440 Speaker 1: this is money that ultimately, right it goes to making 117 00:05:59,640 --> 00:06:03,640 Speaker 1: more weapons in the United States because we're sending Ukraine 118 00:06:03,640 --> 00:06:08,320 Speaker 1: our old stockpile, So it's actually money that's going into 119 00:06:08,400 --> 00:06:09,599 Speaker 1: the American economy. 120 00:06:09,680 --> 00:06:11,920 Speaker 2: So there's any number of reasons to do this. 121 00:06:12,320 --> 00:06:15,240 Speaker 3: Two thirds of the spend on Ukraine aid so far 122 00:06:15,440 --> 00:06:19,560 Speaker 3: has been to American defense contractors and American workers who 123 00:06:19,600 --> 00:06:23,320 Speaker 3: are replacing the old crap we're sending over there. By 124 00:06:23,360 --> 00:06:25,320 Speaker 3: old crap, I don't mean it's crappy. I think it's 125 00:06:25,320 --> 00:06:28,080 Speaker 3: just it's stuff that you know. Look, the Abrams tanks 126 00:06:28,080 --> 00:06:30,600 Speaker 3: were sending over there are things that were around during 127 00:06:30,640 --> 00:06:34,840 Speaker 3: the First Golf War and they're perfectly good combat operations things. 128 00:06:35,120 --> 00:06:38,280 Speaker 3: But now we're building new things to replace them. This 129 00:06:38,360 --> 00:06:41,400 Speaker 3: is not a bad outcome for this economy, which, by 130 00:06:41,400 --> 00:06:44,000 Speaker 3: the way, once again, the unemployment rate is now down 131 00:06:44,040 --> 00:06:46,480 Speaker 3: to three point seven percent as of this Friday, and 132 00:06:46,680 --> 00:06:49,520 Speaker 3: two hundred thousand jobs were created. Once again, the Biden 133 00:06:49,600 --> 00:06:52,839 Speaker 3: economy is a healthscape for what's the living in the dead. 134 00:06:53,200 --> 00:06:58,440 Speaker 1: Thoughts and prayers to Maria Bartaromo and all the people 135 00:06:58,480 --> 00:07:00,720 Speaker 1: at Fox and Fox News are going to have to 136 00:07:00,720 --> 00:07:03,520 Speaker 1: pretend that the economy is bad for another cycle. 137 00:07:03,880 --> 00:07:05,920 Speaker 3: By the way, Mawi not to change the subject, but 138 00:07:06,080 --> 00:07:08,440 Speaker 3: I don't know if you caught the Peter Deucy clip 139 00:07:08,480 --> 00:07:12,040 Speaker 3: on Friday morning, where he on the White House lawn 140 00:07:12,080 --> 00:07:15,880 Speaker 3: admitted to a shocked audience back on the Curvy Couch 141 00:07:16,080 --> 00:07:18,280 Speaker 3: that they'd been seeking to try to impeach Biden for 142 00:07:18,360 --> 00:07:20,560 Speaker 3: years and could never find any evidence. How did the 143 00:07:20,600 --> 00:07:23,400 Speaker 3: deep state get to Peter Deucy? My god, does there 144 00:07:23,480 --> 00:07:24,560 Speaker 3: reach no no limit? 145 00:07:29,640 --> 00:07:32,520 Speaker 1: What I love about Peter Doocy is that he's just 146 00:07:32,760 --> 00:07:33,760 Speaker 1: a fucking moron. 147 00:07:34,120 --> 00:07:35,120 Speaker 2: There I said it. 148 00:07:35,440 --> 00:07:37,520 Speaker 3: I don't know if you could even call him a moron. 149 00:07:37,600 --> 00:07:40,280 Speaker 3: It's like an insult to morons to call him a moron. 150 00:07:40,600 --> 00:07:44,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's a good point. That's a very very good point. 151 00:07:44,800 --> 00:07:49,160 Speaker 1: That's a kind of hot take that we at fast 152 00:07:49,200 --> 00:07:53,000 Speaker 1: politics here we really appreciate. So there's this like last 153 00:07:53,080 --> 00:07:56,200 Speaker 1: dash to try to save Ukraine. And by the way, 154 00:07:56,240 --> 00:07:59,760 Speaker 1: the stakes in Ukraine, I mean could not be higher, 155 00:08:00,320 --> 00:08:05,520 Speaker 1: because I mean, this is what's keeping Russia from just 156 00:08:05,720 --> 00:08:07,000 Speaker 1: taking over, right. 157 00:08:07,160 --> 00:08:10,600 Speaker 3: The idea that we would abandon Ukraine at this point 158 00:08:10,800 --> 00:08:13,600 Speaker 3: and hand Vladimir Putin to win in a moment that 159 00:08:13,640 --> 00:08:16,840 Speaker 3: would destroy NATO, and look if you're a Trumper, maybe 160 00:08:16,840 --> 00:08:20,360 Speaker 3: you want to do that. That would shatter America's reputation 161 00:08:20,520 --> 00:08:24,960 Speaker 3: as an ally in the European battle against authoritarianism, that 162 00:08:25,000 --> 00:08:30,520 Speaker 3: would reward Vladimir Putin's war crimes because jd Vance and 163 00:08:30,560 --> 00:08:33,680 Speaker 3: Donald Trump and Steve Bannon want a side with Putin. 164 00:08:33,840 --> 00:08:36,240 Speaker 3: If you're willing to do that, you're a loss. You're 165 00:08:36,240 --> 00:08:38,360 Speaker 3: a lost cause, you're a lost soul. And the fact 166 00:08:38,360 --> 00:08:41,360 Speaker 3: of the matter is the same people right now who 167 00:08:41,360 --> 00:08:44,720 Speaker 3: don't want Ukraine aid. The minute the ukraineate stops and 168 00:08:44,760 --> 00:08:47,920 Speaker 3: the tanks rolling the Kiev will be screaming Joe Biden 169 00:08:48,040 --> 00:08:50,560 Speaker 3: so weak you couldn't stop Putin from advanting to you, 170 00:08:51,160 --> 00:08:54,200 Speaker 3: this is a very dark group of people who who 171 00:08:54,240 --> 00:08:57,600 Speaker 3: are completely in an alliance with Putin, whether they want 172 00:08:57,640 --> 00:09:00,000 Speaker 3: to say it or not. And frankly, some of them 173 00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:03,960 Speaker 3: were in a more there's a whole like weirdo Republican 174 00:09:04,000 --> 00:09:08,760 Speaker 3: alliance with Alexander due getting all these strange Russian nationalist types. 175 00:09:08,760 --> 00:09:15,199 Speaker 1: Even inadvertently or Edvertony, that crew probably would like to 176 00:09:15,240 --> 00:09:20,120 Speaker 1: see Vladimir Putin win. But it's a lot cheaper for 177 00:09:20,280 --> 00:09:24,520 Speaker 1: all parties involved for that not to happen. So the hope, 178 00:09:24,559 --> 00:09:26,200 Speaker 1: I think is that that doesn't happen. 179 00:09:26,520 --> 00:09:29,200 Speaker 3: From what I'm hearing around the feed store, we're getting 180 00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:32,360 Speaker 3: a lot closer than people want to admit. Which is fine. 181 00:09:32,480 --> 00:09:34,959 Speaker 3: You know, it's fine. It's Washington doing what actually is 182 00:09:34,960 --> 00:09:38,840 Speaker 3: supposed to happen in Washington, which is people are negotiating compromises. 183 00:09:38,920 --> 00:09:42,200 Speaker 3: I know this is sort of an astoundingly dangerous concept 184 00:09:42,200 --> 00:09:44,240 Speaker 3: for most people, but yeah, here we are. 185 00:09:44,520 --> 00:09:47,480 Speaker 1: Yeah, so we have that, and then we have the 186 00:09:48,040 --> 00:09:51,720 Speaker 1: incredible stuff happening with Hunter Biden. 187 00:09:52,240 --> 00:09:52,920 Speaker 2: Hunter Biden. 188 00:09:53,280 --> 00:09:57,000 Speaker 1: No one has ever been charged with more things for 189 00:09:57,200 --> 00:09:58,680 Speaker 1: less stuff than Hunter Biden. 190 00:09:58,880 --> 00:10:01,560 Speaker 3: I'm just really terri that this is going to cost 191 00:10:01,679 --> 00:10:04,839 Speaker 3: Hunter Biden in the electoral swing states this year. Because 192 00:10:04,880 --> 00:10:07,920 Speaker 3: Hunter's presidential campaign is just getting off the ground, and 193 00:10:08,520 --> 00:10:11,040 Speaker 3: now that he's going to have these things hanging over him, 194 00:10:11,200 --> 00:10:14,880 Speaker 3: I just don't know he's going to perform in Arizona, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, 195 00:10:14,920 --> 00:10:17,840 Speaker 3: and Michigan. It's just a right. 196 00:10:17,760 --> 00:10:20,120 Speaker 2: But we'll talk. Let's just talk about this. Does this 197 00:10:20,280 --> 00:10:20,960 Speaker 2: hurt Biden? 198 00:10:21,320 --> 00:10:24,160 Speaker 3: No, let me tell you it's already baked in the cake. 199 00:10:24,480 --> 00:10:26,560 Speaker 3: The only people that are that would make a decision 200 00:10:26,600 --> 00:10:29,800 Speaker 3: to vote against Joe Biden because of Hunter. Biden are Trumpers. 201 00:10:29,960 --> 00:10:31,640 Speaker 3: They were never going to vote for Joe Biden in 202 00:10:31,640 --> 00:10:33,439 Speaker 3: the first place. But of course I guarantee you we 203 00:10:33,440 --> 00:10:35,160 Speaker 3: will see a New York Times story the next like 204 00:10:35,360 --> 00:10:38,480 Speaker 3: seven days. These Democrats were considering Joe Biden, but now 205 00:10:38,800 --> 00:10:43,199 Speaker 3: because of Hunter, they've dogged the red hat of Maga. 206 00:10:43,360 --> 00:10:47,079 Speaker 3: We sat down, We sat down with four in cells, 207 00:10:48,280 --> 00:10:50,760 Speaker 3: kind a Dungeon and Dragons party. 208 00:10:51,960 --> 00:10:55,480 Speaker 1: Those dungeons and Dragons people are liberals. But I mean, 209 00:10:55,520 --> 00:10:57,720 Speaker 1: I do think it is really interesting. I mean, like, 210 00:10:57,960 --> 00:11:01,640 Speaker 1: you know, I saw polls this morning on how seventy 211 00:11:01,720 --> 00:11:06,480 Speaker 1: percent of Americans want action on climate seventy percent, fifty 212 00:11:06,520 --> 00:11:10,280 Speaker 1: percent of all Republicans. Okay, we're never going to see that, Poul, Right, 213 00:11:10,320 --> 00:11:12,439 Speaker 1: We're only going to see the poll that says. 214 00:11:12,200 --> 00:11:16,360 Speaker 2: Americans think Biden is too old. Right. That's the only 215 00:11:16,400 --> 00:11:17,440 Speaker 2: pole you ever get to say. 216 00:11:17,760 --> 00:11:20,360 Speaker 3: Mm hmm. It's funny you mentioned that because I talked 217 00:11:20,360 --> 00:11:22,600 Speaker 3: to a friend of mine who a very well meaning 218 00:11:22,640 --> 00:11:25,400 Speaker 3: activist and a smart person the other day. We're talking 219 00:11:25,440 --> 00:11:27,559 Speaker 3: about Trump and you know, Trump winning a second term, 220 00:11:27,559 --> 00:11:29,280 Speaker 3: and she said, you know, my biggest worry is you 221 00:11:29,320 --> 00:11:31,520 Speaker 3: know at that point, we'll we'll never get a climate bill. 222 00:11:31,760 --> 00:11:35,160 Speaker 3: I'm like, let me tell you, I love you and everything, 223 00:11:35,240 --> 00:11:39,200 Speaker 3: but uh, you see, the biggest problem of Trump's second 224 00:11:39,280 --> 00:11:40,679 Speaker 3: term is not getting a climate bill. 225 00:11:40,760 --> 00:11:43,400 Speaker 4: I have some news for you. 226 00:11:42,040 --> 00:11:45,240 Speaker 3: You won't even know about it because you'll be in 227 00:11:45,280 --> 00:11:45,800 Speaker 3: the camp. 228 00:11:47,080 --> 00:11:50,280 Speaker 2: I mean really like, that's the biggest. 229 00:11:50,120 --> 00:11:53,360 Speaker 3: That's your biggest source of worry about the second Trump term. 230 00:11:53,480 --> 00:11:55,360 Speaker 1: Yeah, so I mean that, I think is a really 231 00:11:55,400 --> 00:11:57,480 Speaker 1: good point. And do you think people wake up on 232 00:11:57,600 --> 00:12:00,679 Speaker 1: January first? And I are like, oh fuck, because a 233 00:12:00,720 --> 00:12:02,640 Speaker 1: lot of people don't think Trump's going to be the nominee. 234 00:12:02,640 --> 00:12:05,040 Speaker 1: I mean, I was talking to someone who's a very 235 00:12:05,080 --> 00:12:08,679 Speaker 1: fancy media insider who was saying, fifty to fifty, Nicki 236 00:12:08,720 --> 00:12:10,520 Speaker 1: Haley is the nomination for focks. 237 00:12:10,400 --> 00:12:11,320 Speaker 2: And I thought, what. 238 00:12:13,480 --> 00:12:17,440 Speaker 1: Happen if the Republican Party were so normal that they 239 00:12:17,480 --> 00:12:20,520 Speaker 1: would nominate someone like Nikki Haley despite the fact that 240 00:12:20,600 --> 00:12:22,240 Speaker 1: she you know, her policies. 241 00:12:22,280 --> 00:12:24,840 Speaker 2: Saw the chance of that are zero, Like, there. 242 00:12:24,760 --> 00:12:27,520 Speaker 3: Is no universe. Let me just let me just go 243 00:12:27,600 --> 00:12:32,959 Speaker 3: back to this again. There is not a universe in 244 00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:37,160 Speaker 3: which Nicky Haley, even if she won. Don't like either 245 00:12:37,240 --> 00:12:41,800 Speaker 3: Iowa or New Hampshire wins the Republican primary. She is 246 00:12:41,880 --> 00:12:45,480 Speaker 3: behind Trump in the Super Tuesday states, which comprise over 247 00:12:45,600 --> 00:12:49,480 Speaker 3: twenty five percent of the total on average, by fifty 248 00:12:49,559 --> 00:12:53,280 Speaker 3: two points. Donald Trump could be caught in public fucking 249 00:12:53,280 --> 00:12:56,360 Speaker 3: a live goat, and there is no scenario where Nicki 250 00:12:56,440 --> 00:13:00,760 Speaker 3: Haley suddenly becomes like the anti live goat fucking candidate 251 00:13:00,800 --> 00:13:04,200 Speaker 3: and Donald Trump loses. It's not going to happen. People, 252 00:13:04,440 --> 00:13:08,680 Speaker 3: when somebody who is had by fifty points sixty days 253 00:13:08,720 --> 00:13:12,120 Speaker 3: out from an election, it's not going to change. This 254 00:13:12,280 --> 00:13:17,800 Speaker 3: is not how anything works. Nothing happens this way in politics. 255 00:13:18,920 --> 00:13:21,079 Speaker 2: So you're saying she has a chance. 256 00:13:21,000 --> 00:13:24,760 Speaker 3: Jesus Christ, So oh no, let's be this way, okay, Iowa, 257 00:13:24,920 --> 00:13:27,840 Speaker 3: New Hampshire, South Carolina. She's at a distant third in 258 00:13:27,920 --> 00:13:31,319 Speaker 3: Iowa right now, her numbers are improving, the Santa's are 259 00:13:31,360 --> 00:13:35,520 Speaker 3: slightly declining. She's still going to place second, only thirty 260 00:13:35,520 --> 00:13:39,360 Speaker 3: five points behind Donald Trump. She's doing okay. In New Hampshire, 261 00:13:39,480 --> 00:13:42,640 Speaker 3: she might play second, only twenty five points behind Donald Trump. 262 00:13:42,720 --> 00:13:45,520 Speaker 3: She's thirty points behind Donald Trump. And her home state. 263 00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:50,600 Speaker 3: She's at eight percent in Florida, which is a very 264 00:13:50,600 --> 00:13:54,240 Speaker 3: big prize on March twelfth. She's sixty points behind Trump 265 00:13:54,280 --> 00:13:58,080 Speaker 3: in Texas and California on Super Tuesday. Okay, sixty points 266 00:13:58,120 --> 00:14:01,160 Speaker 3: behind Trump are in Texas and California, and all the 267 00:14:01,160 --> 00:14:04,040 Speaker 3: Super Tuesday states except for like one or two, are 268 00:14:04,080 --> 00:14:06,480 Speaker 3: winter take all and the big states are all winner 269 00:14:06,520 --> 00:14:10,040 Speaker 3: take all. So if you have Trump winning Texas, California, 270 00:14:10,080 --> 00:14:12,720 Speaker 3: and Florida in March, and if he wins nothing else 271 00:14:12,800 --> 00:14:16,040 Speaker 3: right there, he's got thirty percent of the vote, this 272 00:14:16,080 --> 00:14:18,480 Speaker 3: isn't gonna go like she thinks it's gonna go. You 273 00:14:18,520 --> 00:14:20,240 Speaker 3: can put all the money into Nikky Hilly in the 274 00:14:20,280 --> 00:14:23,120 Speaker 3: world you want right now, and I'm sorry, you have 275 00:14:23,400 --> 00:14:25,960 Speaker 3: basically put your cash on a bonfire. Does it fuck 276 00:14:26,000 --> 00:14:28,640 Speaker 3: with Trump? Great? Does it make Trump look a little weaker? 277 00:14:28,880 --> 00:14:29,200 Speaker 4: Sure? 278 00:14:29,520 --> 00:14:32,400 Speaker 3: Okay, none of it, at the end of the day 279 00:14:32,880 --> 00:14:35,080 Speaker 3: is going to make this outcome any different. 280 00:14:35,360 --> 00:14:35,600 Speaker 2: Right. 281 00:14:35,760 --> 00:14:39,280 Speaker 3: Sorry. I'm passionate about the subject because I believe you 282 00:14:39,320 --> 00:14:41,600 Speaker 3: have to hit the monster that's actually out there, and 283 00:14:41,640 --> 00:14:42,480 Speaker 3: that's Donald Trump. 284 00:14:42,720 --> 00:14:45,000 Speaker 2: Yeah. No, I feel like that's a good point. 285 00:14:45,040 --> 00:14:47,960 Speaker 1: I also feel like the thing I'm I see so 286 00:14:48,200 --> 00:14:51,479 Speaker 1: much is that there's so much like media on media violence, 287 00:14:51,800 --> 00:14:54,960 Speaker 1: and so many of these news cycles are driven by 288 00:14:55,240 --> 00:15:00,560 Speaker 1: like fantasy, wish cast god yes, holes that were direct 289 00:15:00,760 --> 00:15:05,280 Speaker 1: by Republican pollsters. You know, I don't think much of 290 00:15:05,320 --> 00:15:08,280 Speaker 1: the organic stuff, but I don't think much of the 291 00:15:08,320 --> 00:15:10,200 Speaker 1: news cycle is organic right now. 292 00:15:10,600 --> 00:15:13,240 Speaker 3: Oh No, As you pointed out in your article about pulling, 293 00:15:13,480 --> 00:15:17,040 Speaker 3: I guess a week ago. Now, these are not real events. 294 00:15:17,080 --> 00:15:20,240 Speaker 3: These are not real things driving the polls. And because 295 00:15:20,360 --> 00:15:23,520 Speaker 3: reporters look at all the polling aggregation sides five point 296 00:15:23,520 --> 00:15:26,680 Speaker 3: thirty eight real clear, all those places, Republicans learn you 297 00:15:26,720 --> 00:15:29,240 Speaker 3: can dump a lot of junk polls into the system 298 00:15:29,440 --> 00:15:32,920 Speaker 3: to get a media narrative running that every young motor 299 00:15:33,000 --> 00:15:36,840 Speaker 3: is a band of Joe Biden over Hamas. No, not true. 300 00:15:36,960 --> 00:15:41,080 Speaker 3: Every Hispanic voter, no, not true. Black men are all that. No, 301 00:15:41,440 --> 00:15:44,760 Speaker 3: not true. All those things are happening in small numbers, 302 00:15:44,920 --> 00:15:47,880 Speaker 3: and they should be concerning. But there's a lot of 303 00:15:47,960 --> 00:15:51,120 Speaker 3: fundamentals out there right now that put Biden in a 304 00:15:51,240 --> 00:15:56,680 Speaker 3: very strong position that is being underestimated and simultaneously underreported. 305 00:15:57,120 --> 00:15:59,960 Speaker 3: But look, Biden is in the middle of a massive 306 00:16:00,280 --> 00:16:03,800 Speaker 3: economic good news story. It's taking long time to trickle 307 00:16:03,840 --> 00:16:05,640 Speaker 3: into the minds and hearts and brains of people. But 308 00:16:05,720 --> 00:16:08,680 Speaker 3: it's happening. None of these things are easy. The facts 309 00:16:08,720 --> 00:16:10,520 Speaker 3: on the ground are starting to make it harder and 310 00:16:10,600 --> 00:16:14,160 Speaker 3: harder for Fox to portray the country as you know, 311 00:16:14,200 --> 00:16:16,920 Speaker 3: an economic healthcape. It's harder and harder for them to 312 00:16:17,000 --> 00:16:20,320 Speaker 3: deny that gas prices are down, interest rates are down, 313 00:16:20,480 --> 00:16:23,360 Speaker 3: the labor market is booming, the retirements are booming, the 314 00:16:23,400 --> 00:16:25,120 Speaker 3: stock market is booming. 315 00:16:24,760 --> 00:16:31,240 Speaker 2: And now we are booming on too far. So Rick Wilson, 316 00:16:31,400 --> 00:16:34,320 Speaker 2: thank you for joining us. You are the best. 317 00:16:34,520 --> 00:16:37,200 Speaker 3: I do my very best each and every day to 318 00:16:37,280 --> 00:16:39,640 Speaker 3: serve and protect this a great democracy of ours. 319 00:16:46,440 --> 00:16:49,360 Speaker 1: Ryan Grim is the Washington Bureau chief of the Intercept 320 00:16:49,400 --> 00:16:52,200 Speaker 1: and author of the Squad AOC and the hope of 321 00:16:52,200 --> 00:16:53,280 Speaker 1: a political revolution. 322 00:16:53,840 --> 00:16:55,600 Speaker 2: Welcome to Fast Politics. 323 00:16:55,680 --> 00:16:57,800 Speaker 4: Ryan, thank you for having me here. 324 00:16:57,840 --> 00:16:59,840 Speaker 2: Molly, talk to me about this book. 325 00:17:00,120 --> 00:17:03,160 Speaker 1: I want first explained to me why you decided to 326 00:17:03,160 --> 00:17:06,840 Speaker 1: write this book. I'm not surprised about the topic and 327 00:17:07,200 --> 00:17:09,280 Speaker 1: why you decided to write it, but I want you 328 00:17:09,320 --> 00:17:10,880 Speaker 1: to sort of talk us through it. 329 00:17:10,880 --> 00:17:13,240 Speaker 5: It's like a sequel kind of to my last book, 330 00:17:13,400 --> 00:17:16,160 Speaker 5: which was called We've Got People, which ran from basically 331 00:17:16,160 --> 00:17:20,680 Speaker 5: the nineteen eighties up until twenty eighteen, tracing the kind 332 00:17:20,680 --> 00:17:24,640 Speaker 5: of arc of the progressive movement. They like little underdog story, 333 00:17:24,800 --> 00:17:28,600 Speaker 5: you know, originating with Jesse Jackson and the Rainbow Coalition 334 00:17:28,920 --> 00:17:32,360 Speaker 5: fighting an outmatched battle against the kind of center left 335 00:17:32,400 --> 00:17:36,040 Speaker 5: wing of the Democratic Party, and then running through Howard 336 00:17:36,040 --> 00:17:40,400 Speaker 5: Dean really giving birth to the kind of online interaction 337 00:17:40,720 --> 00:17:43,320 Speaker 5: and the ability to raise you know, small donors to 338 00:17:43,560 --> 00:17:47,160 Speaker 5: counteract big money in politics, which then really gets turned 339 00:17:47,200 --> 00:17:49,960 Speaker 5: into perfection by Barack Obama in two thousand and eight. 340 00:17:50,000 --> 00:17:53,480 Speaker 5: But then Bernie Sanders in twenty fifteen twenty sixteen exclusively 341 00:17:53,600 --> 00:17:57,040 Speaker 5: runs basically on the famous twenty seven dollars from his 342 00:17:57,080 --> 00:18:00,440 Speaker 5: individual supporters, and the book finishes with the squad getting 343 00:18:00,440 --> 00:18:04,320 Speaker 5: elected to Congress and AOC occupying Nancy Pelosi's office to 344 00:18:04,359 --> 00:18:06,480 Speaker 5: call for a Green New Deal and strong action on 345 00:18:06,840 --> 00:18:09,720 Speaker 5: climate change. So the book had a nice satisfying arc 346 00:18:09,840 --> 00:18:13,320 Speaker 5: to it. The sequel, I think is much less satisfying, 347 00:18:13,400 --> 00:18:16,280 Speaker 5: but I think even much more interesting, you know, in 348 00:18:16,320 --> 00:18:18,800 Speaker 5: some ways, it goes back through the twenty fifteen twenty 349 00:18:18,880 --> 00:18:23,240 Speaker 5: sixteen campaign to kind of find the origins of many 350 00:18:23,280 --> 00:18:25,280 Speaker 5: of the debates that we seem to be stuck in 351 00:18:25,320 --> 00:18:28,560 Speaker 5: a loop on now, and then ends with kind of 352 00:18:28,560 --> 00:18:31,200 Speaker 5: the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act in the mid 353 00:18:31,320 --> 00:18:33,479 Speaker 5: terms of twenty twenty two, and traces the way that 354 00:18:33,640 --> 00:18:37,720 Speaker 5: the progressive wing of the party evolved and transformed over 355 00:18:37,800 --> 00:18:39,359 Speaker 5: a very short amount of time. Like if you think 356 00:18:39,359 --> 00:18:41,639 Speaker 5: about what things were like and who Bernie was in 357 00:18:41,680 --> 00:18:43,960 Speaker 5: twenty fifteen and compare that to kind of where the 358 00:18:43,960 --> 00:18:45,840 Speaker 5: squad is today, a lot has happened. 359 00:18:46,040 --> 00:18:47,880 Speaker 1: So one of the things that I think a lot 360 00:18:47,920 --> 00:18:54,040 Speaker 1: about is how progressives have actually infiltrated the Republican the 361 00:18:54,080 --> 00:18:57,760 Speaker 1: Democratic Party oops the Democratic Party in lots of really 362 00:18:58,240 --> 00:19:01,880 Speaker 1: important ways. And one of them was that Bernie Sanders 363 00:19:01,880 --> 00:19:07,000 Speaker 1: had real par in the Biden administration when it came 364 00:19:07,080 --> 00:19:07,600 Speaker 1: to budget. 365 00:19:07,600 --> 00:19:08,960 Speaker 2: Will you talk a little bit about that. 366 00:19:09,280 --> 00:19:12,560 Speaker 5: It was a surreal moment, I think for Bernie Sanders, 367 00:19:12,560 --> 00:19:16,080 Speaker 5: somebody who had spent thirty years kind of shouting from 368 00:19:16,119 --> 00:19:20,360 Speaker 5: the outside and ran a quixotic message campaign in twenty sixteen, 369 00:19:20,400 --> 00:19:23,359 Speaker 5: Like eventually it caught fire and he started to believe 370 00:19:23,400 --> 00:19:26,080 Speaker 5: that maybe he could actually win the nomination, And certainly 371 00:19:26,119 --> 00:19:28,240 Speaker 5: in twenty twenty he was running to win. But he 372 00:19:28,320 --> 00:19:31,879 Speaker 5: started out just as somebody needs to be out there, 373 00:19:32,160 --> 00:19:34,919 Speaker 5: you know, making these points so that there's a national 374 00:19:34,960 --> 00:19:37,600 Speaker 5: conversation about them. His idea was never that he was 375 00:19:37,680 --> 00:19:40,320 Speaker 5: actually going to be in power, but to be the 376 00:19:40,440 --> 00:19:43,639 Speaker 5: kind of chair of the Budget Committee while someone that 377 00:19:43,680 --> 00:19:47,679 Speaker 5: he likes, John Joe Biden was ushering through one of 378 00:19:47,680 --> 00:19:51,600 Speaker 5: the biggest transformative agendas at least since the nineteen sixties, 379 00:19:51,640 --> 00:19:56,000 Speaker 5: perhaps since the New Deal was just a capstone moment 380 00:19:56,080 --> 00:19:58,800 Speaker 5: for Sanders. For sure, he had never had the ear 381 00:19:58,840 --> 00:20:01,639 Speaker 5: of a president before effort, and now he did. And 382 00:20:01,880 --> 00:20:04,840 Speaker 5: at the same time, Yeah, the kind of rise in 383 00:20:04,920 --> 00:20:08,200 Speaker 5: kind of celebrity of the squad at AOC in particular, 384 00:20:08,400 --> 00:20:12,320 Speaker 5: gave progressives a purchase on kind of cultural power that 385 00:20:12,359 --> 00:20:15,280 Speaker 5: they hadn't really had before either, and that translated into 386 00:20:15,840 --> 00:20:18,040 Speaker 5: ron Klaan in particular. You know, the chief of staff 387 00:20:18,080 --> 00:20:21,159 Speaker 5: for first two years really paying more attention to the 388 00:20:21,720 --> 00:20:24,920 Speaker 5: left of the Democratic Party than basically any chief of 389 00:20:24,960 --> 00:20:25,920 Speaker 5: staff ever probably. 390 00:20:26,160 --> 00:20:28,199 Speaker 1: Yeah, So I want to ask you about that, because 391 00:20:28,240 --> 00:20:31,920 Speaker 1: it does seem like there were a lot of progressive 392 00:20:32,320 --> 00:20:36,000 Speaker 1: piece of legislation. Progressors were able to influence the Biden 393 00:20:36,040 --> 00:20:38,760 Speaker 1: administration in a lot of really cool ways. 394 00:20:39,359 --> 00:20:41,600 Speaker 2: I don't feel like we talk about that that much, 395 00:20:42,440 --> 00:20:43,880 Speaker 2: and I'm. 396 00:20:43,720 --> 00:20:49,959 Speaker 1: Always kind of disappointed that progressives don't get more credit for, 397 00:20:50,560 --> 00:20:54,919 Speaker 1: like we are reopening factors in the United States, right, Like, 398 00:20:55,160 --> 00:20:58,040 Speaker 1: I mean, one of the things people don't talk about 399 00:20:58,119 --> 00:21:01,160 Speaker 1: because they think it's boring, so it's not a pole, 400 00:21:01,320 --> 00:21:03,160 Speaker 1: so you're not allowed to talk about it on television 401 00:21:03,680 --> 00:21:06,080 Speaker 1: is the Chips Act, right, which is like they go 402 00:21:06,240 --> 00:21:09,520 Speaker 1: around the goal is you know, if something happens, you 403 00:21:09,520 --> 00:21:12,560 Speaker 1: won't be getting all of your technological your chips, the 404 00:21:12,600 --> 00:21:15,359 Speaker 1: stuff that runs your cell phone and your watch and your. 405 00:21:15,400 --> 00:21:18,280 Speaker 2: Car from China. You'll be getting it from Ohio. 406 00:21:18,760 --> 00:21:23,800 Speaker 1: And this is like really a kind of tenant of sanders'ism, right, 407 00:21:23,920 --> 00:21:27,280 Speaker 1: is this fiscal populism where you say, you know, we're 408 00:21:27,280 --> 00:21:28,480 Speaker 1: going to bring jobs back, but. 409 00:21:28,440 --> 00:21:31,280 Speaker 2: Then you actually just bring jobs back. R Trump who says, 410 00:21:31,320 --> 00:21:33,920 Speaker 2: you know, we're going to put everyone from Mexico in jail. 411 00:21:34,200 --> 00:21:37,480 Speaker 1: Is this not talked about because it's boring or is 412 00:21:37,520 --> 00:21:40,120 Speaker 1: it not talked about because I always feel like democrats 413 00:21:40,160 --> 00:21:42,440 Speaker 1: are a little scared to say, like we did this, 414 00:21:42,600 --> 00:21:45,639 Speaker 1: and progressives wanted us to like that, they're worried that 415 00:21:45,680 --> 00:21:46,920 Speaker 1: something's going to happen to them. 416 00:21:47,280 --> 00:21:49,879 Speaker 5: There is still a kind of scared of the progressive 417 00:21:49,920 --> 00:21:51,399 Speaker 5: shadow element to it. 418 00:21:51,520 --> 00:21:53,760 Speaker 4: I think that is real. At the same time, cutting 419 00:21:53,800 --> 00:21:54,840 Speaker 4: against it was you. 420 00:21:54,840 --> 00:21:58,040 Speaker 5: Know, Ron Klayan and the Biden administration's real belief, particularly 421 00:21:58,040 --> 00:22:01,440 Speaker 5: in twenty twenty one, that the youth vote was very 422 00:22:01,480 --> 00:22:05,040 Speaker 5: progressive and that the key to unlocking the youth vote 423 00:22:05,200 --> 00:22:08,600 Speaker 5: was both the Squad and organizations like Justice Democrats, and 424 00:22:08,600 --> 00:22:11,240 Speaker 5: particularly Sunrise Movement, which I write about in the book. 425 00:22:11,320 --> 00:22:14,280 Speaker 5: Sunrise Movement had a shocking amount of access to the 426 00:22:14,320 --> 00:22:14,840 Speaker 5: White House. 427 00:22:15,000 --> 00:22:16,639 Speaker 2: Tell us what Sunrise Movement is. 428 00:22:16,920 --> 00:22:19,400 Speaker 5: This was a group of kind of left wing activists 429 00:22:19,400 --> 00:22:23,199 Speaker 5: who came together in twenty sixteen twenty seventeen around the 430 00:22:23,280 --> 00:22:26,760 Speaker 5: issue of climate, but with a lens toward you know, 431 00:22:26,800 --> 00:22:30,359 Speaker 5: economic and racial and social justice, believing that all of 432 00:22:30,440 --> 00:22:32,800 Speaker 5: the kind of big green climate groups that had come 433 00:22:32,840 --> 00:22:36,400 Speaker 5: before them weren't being confrontational enough, weren't aggressive enough, weren't 434 00:22:36,400 --> 00:22:39,960 Speaker 5: taking it seriously enough, weren't taking seriously the deep anxieties 435 00:22:40,200 --> 00:22:43,119 Speaker 5: young people around the world, and that somebody needed to 436 00:22:43,240 --> 00:22:46,439 Speaker 5: channel that and their first cycle in business. You know, 437 00:22:46,480 --> 00:22:48,840 Speaker 5: they endorsed all of the members of the Squad, and 438 00:22:48,880 --> 00:22:52,359 Speaker 5: they were willing to take a very confrontational attitude toward 439 00:22:52,720 --> 00:22:56,240 Speaker 5: the Democratic Party whereas the kind of big green groups, 440 00:22:56,400 --> 00:22:58,920 Speaker 5: you know, the Serah Club and those in that ecosystem 441 00:22:59,040 --> 00:23:03,360 Speaker 5: you have generally become kind of allies of the democratic establishment. 442 00:23:03,520 --> 00:23:07,600 Speaker 5: And so when they decided to occupy Pelosi's office and 443 00:23:07,680 --> 00:23:11,400 Speaker 5: AOC joined them in that protest, it was a global 444 00:23:11,440 --> 00:23:14,879 Speaker 5: media sensation because you had the hallways just filled with 445 00:23:14,960 --> 00:23:19,480 Speaker 5: these sixteen, seventeen, eighteen year olds, maybe some in their twenties, 446 00:23:19,480 --> 00:23:22,160 Speaker 5: but it really symbolized the kind of rise of this 447 00:23:22,359 --> 00:23:25,360 Speaker 5: of this climate generation and put the Green New Deal 448 00:23:25,400 --> 00:23:27,199 Speaker 5: on a map in a way that we may not 449 00:23:27,240 --> 00:23:30,560 Speaker 5: even fully understand, like Spain implemented a Green New Deal, 450 00:23:30,600 --> 00:23:32,960 Speaker 5: like they took the name, Germany took it and called 451 00:23:32,960 --> 00:23:35,919 Speaker 5: it a New Green Deal lost in translation and sheared 452 00:23:35,920 --> 00:23:38,960 Speaker 5: of its connection to FDR. But there was a real 453 00:23:39,000 --> 00:23:42,439 Speaker 5: excitement and energy around this idea that we're going to 454 00:23:42,600 --> 00:23:45,960 Speaker 5: kind of transform our economy and get away from fossil fuels, 455 00:23:45,960 --> 00:23:48,439 Speaker 5: and while we do that, we're going to bring jobs 456 00:23:48,480 --> 00:23:50,240 Speaker 5: back on shore, and we're going to make sure that 457 00:23:50,280 --> 00:23:52,680 Speaker 5: we created a more just society. 458 00:23:52,280 --> 00:23:53,040 Speaker 4: In the process. 459 00:23:53,119 --> 00:23:55,879 Speaker 5: And so you would not have expected when this small 460 00:23:55,960 --> 00:23:58,679 Speaker 5: organization launched that just a couple of years later, they 461 00:23:58,680 --> 00:24:01,440 Speaker 5: would constantly have the ear of the Biden White House 462 00:24:01,560 --> 00:24:04,720 Speaker 5: in helping to shape what then becomes later the Inflation 463 00:24:04,800 --> 00:24:05,520 Speaker 5: Reduction Act. 464 00:24:05,760 --> 00:24:10,120 Speaker 1: But progressives have also been very patient with the Biden administration. 465 00:24:10,320 --> 00:24:12,399 Speaker 1: Like one of the success stories, were not allowed to 466 00:24:12,440 --> 00:24:15,440 Speaker 1: talk about success stories ever in the mainstream media. 467 00:24:15,480 --> 00:24:17,359 Speaker 4: But I won't tell anybody, it'll be our secret. 468 00:24:17,400 --> 00:24:19,719 Speaker 1: But one of the success stories about the Biden administration 469 00:24:19,800 --> 00:24:22,560 Speaker 1: has been that the Biden administration has not been out 470 00:24:22,560 --> 00:24:25,600 Speaker 1: there fighting with Bernie Sanders or fighting with AARC. And 471 00:24:25,680 --> 00:24:28,639 Speaker 1: in fact, I mean there have been moments certainly in 472 00:24:28,680 --> 00:24:31,880 Speaker 1: this administration where Progressives have not been happy, but they've 473 00:24:31,880 --> 00:24:35,320 Speaker 1: been able to sort of work with the administration as 474 00:24:35,359 --> 00:24:38,120 Speaker 1: opposed to you know, on the Republican side. And again 475 00:24:38,160 --> 00:24:40,840 Speaker 1: I don't want to compare Republicans to Democrats because they've 476 00:24:40,840 --> 00:24:44,639 Speaker 1: become authoritarian, many of them, so it's not the same. 477 00:24:44,720 --> 00:24:48,320 Speaker 1: But you definitely see, you know, the Republicans recently got 478 00:24:48,400 --> 00:24:52,359 Speaker 1: rid of their speaker, right, there hasn't been Dems in Disarrye. 479 00:24:52,880 --> 00:24:55,800 Speaker 5: I tell an interesting story that wasn't reported at the time, 480 00:24:56,200 --> 00:24:58,919 Speaker 5: of a rare way that the kind of you know, 481 00:24:59,040 --> 00:25:02,960 Speaker 5: super angry the online left the squad and Bernie Sanders, 482 00:25:03,200 --> 00:25:06,480 Speaker 5: the Congressional Progressive Caucus, and the party leadership kind of 483 00:25:06,760 --> 00:25:10,920 Speaker 5: all worked in unison to make the American Rescue Plan 484 00:25:11,200 --> 00:25:14,000 Speaker 5: as good as it was and beat back objections from 485 00:25:14,080 --> 00:25:16,560 Speaker 5: Joe Mansion. Basically what happened was, if you remember, there 486 00:25:16,600 --> 00:25:20,200 Speaker 5: was this ridiculous, outrageous thing where the parliamentarian comes in 487 00:25:20,240 --> 00:25:22,720 Speaker 5: and says, ah, you can't do a minimum fifteen dollars 488 00:25:22,760 --> 00:25:26,480 Speaker 5: minimum wage through reconciliation. Bernie holds a vote, you need sixty. 489 00:25:26,480 --> 00:25:28,640 Speaker 5: At that point he doesn't get He only f forty eight, 490 00:25:28,840 --> 00:25:31,080 Speaker 5: and so there's no fifteen dollars minimum wage. 491 00:25:31,240 --> 00:25:32,000 Speaker 4: People are livid. 492 00:25:32,200 --> 00:25:36,000 Speaker 5: Meanwhile, you've got Joe Manchin coming in saying these unemployment 493 00:25:36,040 --> 00:25:38,879 Speaker 5: benefits are too generous, These these checks are going to 494 00:25:38,880 --> 00:25:40,800 Speaker 5: too many people. You know, we need to trim this 495 00:25:40,920 --> 00:25:44,000 Speaker 5: back heavily or I'm out of here. Primila Jayapaul, who 496 00:25:44,040 --> 00:25:47,399 Speaker 5: had developed a relationship with Chuck Schumer over the years, 497 00:25:47,880 --> 00:25:50,040 Speaker 5: was able to go to Schumer and say, if you 498 00:25:50,119 --> 00:25:53,040 Speaker 5: cave to Mansion on these demands, the squad is going 499 00:25:53,080 --> 00:25:55,280 Speaker 5: to walk. They're out of here. And you see the 500 00:25:55,280 --> 00:25:57,639 Speaker 5: pressure that they're under like they will walk. And it 501 00:25:57,680 --> 00:26:01,280 Speaker 5: was the first time in decades that the left, the 502 00:26:01,320 --> 00:26:04,639 Speaker 5: Progressive Caucus could deliver a credible threat from the left, 503 00:26:04,680 --> 00:26:07,040 Speaker 5: because usually in the end, the left says, you know, 504 00:26:07,080 --> 00:26:08,840 Speaker 5: if I don't have X y Z in this bill, 505 00:26:08,880 --> 00:26:10,840 Speaker 5: I'm against it. But you don't get X y Z 506 00:26:10,960 --> 00:26:13,320 Speaker 5: and it's still decent bill. So you're like, okay, find 507 00:26:13,320 --> 00:26:15,520 Speaker 5: them voting for it. And so the left then has 508 00:26:15,520 --> 00:26:18,080 Speaker 5: no leverage in any of these negotiations. Finally they had leverage. 509 00:26:18,160 --> 00:26:20,479 Speaker 5: So Schumer went back to Mansion. He's like, Joe, I 510 00:26:20,520 --> 00:26:22,840 Speaker 5: can't do this, Like this is what you have to 511 00:26:22,880 --> 00:26:24,520 Speaker 5: take when it comes to unemployment, when it comes to 512 00:26:24,560 --> 00:26:26,640 Speaker 5: these other things, or you have to take the whole 513 00:26:26,680 --> 00:26:29,040 Speaker 5: bill down because we don't have the votes in the 514 00:26:29,080 --> 00:26:31,879 Speaker 5: House if you get your way, and Manchin thought about it, 515 00:26:31,920 --> 00:26:35,200 Speaker 5: any caved. And so there is a world in which 516 00:26:35,480 --> 00:26:38,640 Speaker 5: all of these kind of forces within the Democratic coalition 517 00:26:38,680 --> 00:26:42,000 Speaker 5: can work together against the kind of center right pro 518 00:26:42,040 --> 00:26:44,520 Speaker 5: corporate wing of it. But it's very hard to keep 519 00:26:44,560 --> 00:26:47,040 Speaker 5: that coalition together because there's so much suspicion. And I 520 00:26:47,040 --> 00:26:49,560 Speaker 5: hope one thing that this book does is help readers 521 00:26:49,560 --> 00:26:52,880 Speaker 5: across the kind of democratic spectrum get a better understanding 522 00:26:53,080 --> 00:26:55,280 Speaker 5: of the kind of AOC wing of the party. 523 00:26:55,720 --> 00:26:59,439 Speaker 1: Yeah, that is I think really such an important point. 524 00:26:59,600 --> 00:27:03,720 Speaker 1: It's certainly what I think about when I think about 525 00:27:03,960 --> 00:27:07,320 Speaker 1: all the stuff that's going on under the surface, like 526 00:27:07,400 --> 00:27:09,359 Speaker 1: the docks paddling. 527 00:27:09,160 --> 00:27:09,960 Speaker 2: So I wondered. 528 00:27:10,040 --> 00:27:14,199 Speaker 1: Also, it does seem like this squad started as a 529 00:27:14,240 --> 00:27:22,320 Speaker 1: group four had expanded in twenty twenty, added. 530 00:27:22,040 --> 00:27:24,480 Speaker 4: Corey Bush and Jamal Bowman in twenty twenty. 531 00:27:24,520 --> 00:27:26,119 Speaker 2: Talk me through where they are now. 532 00:27:26,520 --> 00:27:30,239 Speaker 5: In twenty twenty two, Summer Lee, who was elected in 533 00:27:30,320 --> 00:27:33,359 Speaker 5: twenty eighteen to the Pennsylvania State Legislature the same year 534 00:27:33,400 --> 00:27:36,040 Speaker 5: the squad was elected nationally and she was a Pennsylvania 535 00:27:36,080 --> 00:27:38,560 Speaker 5: wide story like, wow, look at Summerlee. And also she 536 00:27:38,640 --> 00:27:41,879 Speaker 5: was elected with Sarah Enamorado, who is now the Allegheny 537 00:27:41,920 --> 00:27:44,879 Speaker 5: County executive, so that they've both risen up together. And 538 00:27:45,000 --> 00:27:48,280 Speaker 5: so summer Lee won despite getting hit with like three 539 00:27:48,280 --> 00:27:52,280 Speaker 5: million dollars in APAC and DMFI Democratic Majority for Israel 540 00:27:52,280 --> 00:27:55,040 Speaker 5: money telling voters that she wasn't a good enough Democrat. 541 00:27:55,600 --> 00:27:59,040 Speaker 5: What I love about that criticism from APAK is not 542 00:27:59,080 --> 00:28:03,080 Speaker 5: only that they supported one hundred plus Republicans you know, 543 00:28:03,119 --> 00:28:07,360 Speaker 5: who were insurrectionists. And then after she wins the primary, 544 00:28:07,440 --> 00:28:10,199 Speaker 5: apag turned around and spent money on behalf of the 545 00:28:10,240 --> 00:28:13,399 Speaker 5: Republican so not just Republicans around the country. They even 546 00:28:13,760 --> 00:28:16,119 Speaker 5: try to get a Republican to beat her in that 547 00:28:16,240 --> 00:28:18,400 Speaker 5: very district where they were saying she wasn't a good 548 00:28:18,480 --> 00:28:20,600 Speaker 5: enough Democrat. So none of this is on the level, 549 00:28:20,760 --> 00:28:22,720 Speaker 5: but not that anybody thought it was to begin with. 550 00:28:22,840 --> 00:28:27,800 Speaker 6: As a Jew myself, the whole idea that somehow Republicans 551 00:28:28,359 --> 00:28:33,840 Speaker 6: are against anti Semitism while supporting a guy who told 552 00:28:33,880 --> 00:28:37,680 Speaker 6: me I was a bad Jew for voting Democrat because 553 00:28:37,720 --> 00:28:40,000 Speaker 6: he's an anti semi And that is one of the 554 00:28:40,040 --> 00:28:43,760 Speaker 6: best anti Semitic tropes you know, is that you know, 555 00:28:43,840 --> 00:28:46,040 Speaker 6: if you don't vote for Israel, you're not a good Jew. 556 00:28:46,320 --> 00:28:49,400 Speaker 2: I mean, it's just sort of mind blowing. 557 00:28:49,480 --> 00:28:52,960 Speaker 5: But anyway, the level of anti Semitism that comes out 558 00:28:52,960 --> 00:28:55,640 Speaker 5: of Trump's mouth is just startling. And when we almost 559 00:28:55,680 --> 00:28:58,600 Speaker 5: like don't even hear it anymore, it's just so blatant 560 00:28:58,720 --> 00:29:01,520 Speaker 5: to see them pretending out they're somehow concerned about that. 561 00:29:01,560 --> 00:29:04,000 Speaker 5: But what Trump says is fine is yeah, it's a 562 00:29:04,000 --> 00:29:06,040 Speaker 5: little bit too much to handle. Then you also had 563 00:29:06,160 --> 00:29:09,320 Speaker 5: in twenty twenty two, Greg Kassar winning an Austin seat, 564 00:29:09,400 --> 00:29:11,000 Speaker 5: and you know a lot of people consider him kind 565 00:29:11,000 --> 00:29:13,840 Speaker 5: of squad adjacent or kind of a squad member, and 566 00:29:13,880 --> 00:29:16,560 Speaker 5: maybe and maybe Becka Ballot, who would be I guess 567 00:29:16,680 --> 00:29:19,720 Speaker 5: the first white member of the squad if you considered 568 00:29:19,760 --> 00:29:22,760 Speaker 5: her and so. But now the question is do they 569 00:29:22,840 --> 00:29:25,480 Speaker 5: shrink radically in size or do they expand in the 570 00:29:25,480 --> 00:29:28,240 Speaker 5: face of this. So you've got APEX threatening to spend 571 00:29:28,360 --> 00:29:31,240 Speaker 5: one hundred million dollars in the twenty twenty four race 572 00:29:31,480 --> 00:29:34,320 Speaker 5: to knock out as many of these squad and squad 573 00:29:34,320 --> 00:29:36,920 Speaker 5: adjacent members as they possibly can. That would be the 574 00:29:37,040 --> 00:29:40,400 Speaker 5: by far, the biggest super Pac spend in congressional history. 575 00:29:40,560 --> 00:29:43,280 Speaker 5: Though they did come in. You know, they and DMFI 576 00:29:43,320 --> 00:29:46,080 Speaker 5: and another alley groups came over with forty plus million 577 00:29:46,280 --> 00:29:48,480 Speaker 5: last time, so jumping to one hundred wouldn't be that 578 00:29:48,520 --> 00:29:49,000 Speaker 5: out of it. 579 00:29:49,200 --> 00:29:53,440 Speaker 1: There's a lot of wanting to primary some of these 580 00:29:53,480 --> 00:29:56,360 Speaker 1: Democrats because they did not vote. 581 00:29:56,760 --> 00:29:58,520 Speaker 2: I mean, I thought it was interesting. I want to 582 00:29:58,560 --> 00:29:59,280 Speaker 2: talk to you about this. 583 00:29:59,360 --> 00:30:03,840 Speaker 1: So there was a vote against anti semitism in the 584 00:30:03,920 --> 00:30:08,040 Speaker 1: House last week and that vote there some people voted present, 585 00:30:08,320 --> 00:30:11,680 Speaker 1: a lot of people voted yes. There were some I 586 00:30:11,720 --> 00:30:15,600 Speaker 1: don't know exactly who voted what, but mostly people voted 587 00:30:15,800 --> 00:30:18,640 Speaker 1: against anti semitism as well they should of course Thomas 588 00:30:18,680 --> 00:30:21,840 Speaker 1: Massey voted now. But then there was another vote there 589 00:30:21,920 --> 00:30:27,400 Speaker 1: Republicans brought up that said anti Zionism is anti Semitism. 590 00:30:27,000 --> 00:30:29,000 Speaker 4: Just straight upset it, Yeah, because. 591 00:30:28,680 --> 00:30:32,120 Speaker 1: The goal here is not about protecting Jews, right, The 592 00:30:32,160 --> 00:30:35,440 Speaker 1: goal here is to get to try to make it 593 00:30:35,480 --> 00:30:38,360 Speaker 1: look like some of these Democrats are anti Semitic. 594 00:30:38,880 --> 00:30:42,440 Speaker 2: That's the goal, right, This is bullshit, And so in 595 00:30:42,480 --> 00:30:44,400 Speaker 2: that vote, this was set. 596 00:30:44,200 --> 00:30:47,920 Speaker 1: Up to make people who are progressives on the left 597 00:30:48,000 --> 00:30:50,800 Speaker 1: look bad. And I just want to sort of speak 598 00:30:50,840 --> 00:30:53,120 Speaker 1: to that for a minute, because you know these people, 599 00:30:53,280 --> 00:30:55,800 Speaker 1: I mean, it's a very tough situation there in but 600 00:30:56,080 --> 00:30:58,280 Speaker 1: this is just yet another target. 601 00:30:58,080 --> 00:31:01,480 Speaker 5: Right, right, And you had people like Jerry Nadler coming 602 00:31:01,520 --> 00:31:05,280 Speaker 5: out and helpfully explaining to the uninitiated it is just 603 00:31:05,480 --> 00:31:07,200 Speaker 5: I think, as he put it, it's either it's either 604 00:31:07,280 --> 00:31:11,280 Speaker 5: factually wrong or it's intellectually disingenuous to make this claim, 605 00:31:11,440 --> 00:31:13,080 Speaker 5: and for some of them it might be both, Like 606 00:31:13,160 --> 00:31:15,720 Speaker 5: you can't underestimate the amount of ignorance that there might 607 00:31:15,760 --> 00:31:17,800 Speaker 5: be over on the other side of the Aisle. But 608 00:31:17,840 --> 00:31:20,600 Speaker 5: for many of them, it's just completely disingenuous, and like 609 00:31:20,640 --> 00:31:24,280 Speaker 5: you said, it's not about doing anything about anti Semitism. 610 00:31:24,280 --> 00:31:25,520 Speaker 4: In fact, it probably. 611 00:31:29,600 --> 00:31:30,640 Speaker 2: Trump voices. 612 00:31:31,040 --> 00:31:33,560 Speaker 1: My word to the Proud Boys is stand back and 613 00:31:33,600 --> 00:31:34,200 Speaker 1: stand by. 614 00:31:34,400 --> 00:31:37,320 Speaker 2: Those are not ourn't people the Proud Boys. When you're 615 00:31:37,320 --> 00:31:39,280 Speaker 2: telling the browd boys to stand. 616 00:31:39,000 --> 00:31:41,480 Speaker 4: Books, yeah, you've kind of lost your privilege to say. 617 00:31:41,520 --> 00:31:43,560 Speaker 4: I think at that point, right, those. 618 00:31:43,320 --> 00:31:45,560 Speaker 2: Guys are not friends to the Jews. 619 00:31:45,680 --> 00:31:48,280 Speaker 1: I mean, it's funny because it's like my grandfather, Howard 620 00:31:48,320 --> 00:31:52,880 Speaker 1: Fast Jewish Communist House on American Activities, sent to jail 621 00:31:53,160 --> 00:31:58,440 Speaker 1: fighting with the certain conservative Jew over like whether we 622 00:31:58,520 --> 00:32:01,360 Speaker 1: get to be called Jews or not, because you know, 623 00:32:01,600 --> 00:32:04,560 Speaker 1: we are not Zions. I mean, I believe in the 624 00:32:04,720 --> 00:32:06,960 Speaker 1: State of Israel one hundred percent and I'm a Jew, 625 00:32:07,040 --> 00:32:07,520 Speaker 1: but I. 626 00:32:07,560 --> 00:32:09,120 Speaker 2: Do not believe that. 627 00:32:09,400 --> 00:32:13,320 Speaker 1: Zionism should be connected to Judaism. It's not the same thing, 628 00:32:13,560 --> 00:32:16,680 Speaker 1: you know, it's conflating two totally different things. And so 629 00:32:16,960 --> 00:32:19,120 Speaker 1: I just think that, you know, if I have to 630 00:32:19,160 --> 00:32:22,960 Speaker 1: fucking fight with that same family for three generations, we're. 631 00:32:22,800 --> 00:32:26,040 Speaker 2: Fighting with each other by dianu, as we say. 632 00:32:26,000 --> 00:32:29,560 Speaker 4: Right, And so going back through the brief history. 633 00:32:29,760 --> 00:32:31,880 Speaker 5: When I was read reporting this book, it was interesting 634 00:32:31,920 --> 00:32:34,920 Speaker 5: to see, you know, how quickly and how dominant this 635 00:32:35,040 --> 00:32:39,840 Speaker 5: issue became. In January twenty nineteen, that's when Mark Mehlman 636 00:32:39,920 --> 00:32:42,760 Speaker 5: stood up Democratic Majority for Israel. And Mark Melmon's a 637 00:32:42,800 --> 00:32:45,920 Speaker 5: long time kind of APAC advisor. He's also a consultant 638 00:32:46,200 --> 00:32:50,360 Speaker 5: for the Yaye Lapede, prominent Israeli politician, and he told 639 00:32:50,400 --> 00:32:54,400 Speaker 5: me that his work against the progressive left in the 640 00:32:54,520 --> 00:32:57,400 Speaker 5: US was aimed at I'm curious for your take on 641 00:32:57,440 --> 00:33:00,240 Speaker 5: his rationale was aimed at defeating that Yahoo and his 642 00:33:00,360 --> 00:33:03,960 Speaker 5: argument was Netanyahu holds up the squad and people like 643 00:33:04,040 --> 00:33:06,520 Speaker 5: them in America and says, you know, this is why 644 00:33:06,560 --> 00:33:09,400 Speaker 5: we can't elect somebody like yere Lapede, and you have 645 00:33:09,480 --> 00:33:12,080 Speaker 5: to stick with me and the far right over in Israel. 646 00:33:12,200 --> 00:33:15,520 Speaker 5: This kind of interesting bank shot, which also is kind 647 00:33:15,520 --> 00:33:17,760 Speaker 5: of an admission that the work he's doing in the 648 00:33:17,880 --> 00:33:21,000 Speaker 5: US is on behalf of a foreign agent, which is 649 00:33:21,120 --> 00:33:24,560 Speaker 5: completely another question. It's like, okay, well, that's interesting. They 650 00:33:24,640 --> 00:33:28,080 Speaker 5: launched DMFI in twenty nineteen in direct response to Ylan 651 00:33:28,160 --> 00:33:32,719 Speaker 5: Omar and Rashida Talib being sworn into Congress and josh Gottenheimer, 652 00:33:32,800 --> 00:33:35,760 Speaker 5: who was kind of connected with no labels and founds 653 00:33:35,840 --> 00:33:38,720 Speaker 5: the problem Solverri's caucus in the US House makes it 654 00:33:38,760 --> 00:33:41,560 Speaker 5: his mission to kind of marginalize as much as possible 655 00:33:41,680 --> 00:33:44,480 Speaker 5: to leave in omar, and so you saw that developing 656 00:33:44,600 --> 00:33:48,000 Speaker 5: very early and really never taking a break from then 657 00:33:48,080 --> 00:33:48,840 Speaker 5: up until now. 658 00:33:49,160 --> 00:33:52,560 Speaker 1: This was so interesting. I really appreciate you, Ryan. I 659 00:33:52,600 --> 00:33:53,440 Speaker 1: hope you'll come back. 660 00:33:53,600 --> 00:33:54,160 Speaker 4: I would love to. 661 00:33:56,360 --> 00:33:59,960 Speaker 1: Steven Lebitski is a professor of government at Harvard University 662 00:34:00,120 --> 00:34:03,600 Speaker 1: an author of Tyranny of the Minority, How to Reverse 663 00:34:03,600 --> 00:34:07,160 Speaker 1: an Authoritarian Turn and Forge Democracy for All. 664 00:34:07,680 --> 00:34:10,799 Speaker 2: Welcome Too Fast Politics. 665 00:34:10,040 --> 00:34:11,480 Speaker 4: Steve, Thanks for having me. 666 00:34:11,640 --> 00:34:14,120 Speaker 1: I want to talk to you about what it means 667 00:34:14,160 --> 00:34:17,759 Speaker 1: to have a political party that no longer believes in 668 00:34:17,840 --> 00:34:22,480 Speaker 1: the tenants of democracy, because this is something I've observed 669 00:34:22,880 --> 00:34:26,160 Speaker 1: casually and then I heard you talking about it on 670 00:34:26,280 --> 00:34:31,120 Speaker 1: c SPAN because I'm very exciting, and it was like, Oh, 671 00:34:31,440 --> 00:34:35,400 Speaker 1: that's exactly what I have been casually observing in a 672 00:34:35,600 --> 00:34:39,759 Speaker 1: more intellectual framing. So explain to me a little bit 673 00:34:39,760 --> 00:34:42,879 Speaker 1: about what that looks like and what these tenants are. 674 00:34:43,200 --> 00:34:45,759 Speaker 4: Sure. Well, first of all, I'm so excited that you 675 00:34:45,880 --> 00:34:47,799 Speaker 4: heard about Sea spit At didn't begin any bit. 676 00:34:49,640 --> 00:34:50,960 Speaker 2: It's me. It's just me. 677 00:34:51,360 --> 00:34:56,400 Speaker 4: Secondly, this is a really big deal. Democracies cannot survive 678 00:34:57,200 --> 00:35:00,680 Speaker 4: if one of two parties in a two parties system 679 00:35:00,960 --> 00:35:04,040 Speaker 4: is not committed to democracy. This is a big problem 680 00:35:04,080 --> 00:35:06,680 Speaker 4: that I think as a society we have not come 681 00:35:06,760 --> 00:35:09,240 Speaker 4: to grips with because it's more than just Donald Trump. 682 00:35:09,320 --> 00:35:13,280 Speaker 4: In our book Tyranny of the Minority, we argue, drawing 683 00:35:13,320 --> 00:35:16,520 Speaker 4: on the Great twentieth century put beside this que lens 684 00:35:16,840 --> 00:35:20,320 Speaker 4: that for a party to be committed to democracy, For 685 00:35:20,400 --> 00:35:22,080 Speaker 4: us to be able to say that a party is 686 00:35:22,080 --> 00:35:26,520 Speaker 4: committed to democracy, it needs to do three really basic things. 687 00:35:26,800 --> 00:35:30,040 Speaker 4: First of all, the party needs to accept the results 688 00:35:30,080 --> 00:35:34,520 Speaker 4: of elections, win to lose. Needs to unambiguous publicly accept 689 00:35:34,560 --> 00:35:38,080 Speaker 4: the results of elections, win to lose. Secondly, party needs 690 00:35:38,120 --> 00:35:43,320 Speaker 4: to unambiguously renounce and denounce the use of political violence. 691 00:35:43,560 --> 00:35:48,040 Speaker 4: And third party needs to break completely and unambiguously with 692 00:35:48,480 --> 00:35:52,400 Speaker 4: anti democratic extremist forces. So parties need to accept elections, 693 00:35:52,480 --> 00:35:55,240 Speaker 4: they need to reject violence, and they need to break 694 00:35:55,280 --> 00:35:58,600 Speaker 4: with anti democratic extremists. When Danie and I wrote How 695 00:35:58,640 --> 00:36:01,719 Speaker 4: Democracies Died, I was public just twenty eighteen. We wrote 696 00:36:01,719 --> 00:36:05,440 Speaker 4: it in twenty seventeen, we believed that the Republican Party 697 00:36:05,600 --> 00:36:08,640 Speaker 4: was still committed to democracy. We thought it'd made a 698 00:36:08,719 --> 00:36:12,120 Speaker 4: huge mistake in allowing Donald Trump to be their nominee, 699 00:36:12,120 --> 00:36:14,720 Speaker 4: but that the party was committed to democracy. But since 700 00:36:14,840 --> 00:36:18,400 Speaker 4: twenty twenty, it's become clear that that is no longer 701 00:36:18,440 --> 00:36:22,080 Speaker 4: the case. The bulk of the Republican Party no longer 702 00:36:22,160 --> 00:36:24,400 Speaker 4: checks off any of those three boxes. 703 00:36:24,680 --> 00:36:25,839 Speaker 2: So interesting. 704 00:36:26,400 --> 00:36:29,200 Speaker 1: One of the things that I think enables people not 705 00:36:29,480 --> 00:36:35,040 Speaker 1: to see this slide into autocracy that the entire party 706 00:36:35,400 --> 00:36:40,360 Speaker 1: has engaged in or been victim to, however you want 707 00:36:40,440 --> 00:36:43,759 Speaker 1: to give them credit, which I do not, is that 708 00:36:43,880 --> 00:36:47,440 Speaker 1: I don't think and again this is like my own subpositions, 709 00:36:47,480 --> 00:36:53,279 Speaker 1: but I don't think they got here because they were malevolent. 710 00:36:53,480 --> 00:36:57,160 Speaker 1: I actually think they got here because they were cowardly. 711 00:36:57,880 --> 00:37:00,600 Speaker 1: Not that that matters, but I mean, do you think 712 00:37:00,640 --> 00:37:04,200 Speaker 1: that's true? And it's like, there's been an important slide 713 00:37:04,360 --> 00:37:07,279 Speaker 1: since Trump was president, but then it's been worse since 714 00:37:07,320 --> 00:37:08,560 Speaker 1: Trump has not been president. 715 00:37:08,600 --> 00:37:11,320 Speaker 4: On Yeah, it has radicalized, it has gotten worse. I 716 00:37:11,360 --> 00:37:14,080 Speaker 4: think a lot of us assumed that after the election, 717 00:37:14,320 --> 00:37:19,040 Speaker 4: especially after January sixteentynty one, that the Republicans would sort 718 00:37:19,080 --> 00:37:22,319 Speaker 4: of deradicalize or come back down to earth, and that 719 00:37:22,400 --> 00:37:26,800 Speaker 4: has not happened. I think your basic pre subposition is correct, Molly. 720 00:37:26,840 --> 00:37:31,200 Speaker 4: It's not malevolence on the part of most Republicans. I 721 00:37:31,239 --> 00:37:35,560 Speaker 4: think Trump is a is an openly authoritarian figure. But 722 00:37:35,800 --> 00:37:40,839 Speaker 4: most Republican leaders even today, don't want to kill democracy there. 723 00:37:41,120 --> 00:37:43,359 Speaker 4: That's not what they're setting out to do. What they 724 00:37:43,719 --> 00:37:46,359 Speaker 4: want to do is keep their careers golled. They want 725 00:37:46,440 --> 00:37:50,200 Speaker 4: to get ahead in Republican politics. That's their job. They 726 00:37:50,239 --> 00:37:53,399 Speaker 4: have calculated and this is a serious problem, but they've 727 00:37:53,440 --> 00:37:56,440 Speaker 4: calculated that in order to get ahead, in order to 728 00:37:56,600 --> 00:38:00,840 Speaker 4: keep their job, in order to aspire to a higher office, 729 00:38:00,840 --> 00:38:04,120 Speaker 4: in order to maybe keep from getting shouted down by 730 00:38:04,120 --> 00:38:07,720 Speaker 4: the base or Fox News, that they need to enable 731 00:38:07,960 --> 00:38:12,480 Speaker 4: Donald Trump. They need to be complicit in this authoritarian urn. 732 00:38:12,600 --> 00:38:15,319 Speaker 4: So in the book, in Tyranny of the Minority, we 733 00:38:15,360 --> 00:38:18,360 Speaker 4: have a chapter on what is called semi loyal Democrats, 734 00:38:18,360 --> 00:38:19,880 Speaker 4: and this is small D democrats. 735 00:38:20,000 --> 00:38:23,000 Speaker 2: Can you explain the difference between small D Democrats? 736 00:38:23,040 --> 00:38:26,239 Speaker 4: Just for my dad, A large D Democrat is a 737 00:38:26,239 --> 00:38:28,560 Speaker 4: member of the Democratic Party. I'm not talking about the 738 00:38:28,600 --> 00:38:31,520 Speaker 4: Democratic Party. I'm talking about democrats in the sense of 739 00:38:31,640 --> 00:38:36,000 Speaker 4: are you committed to democracy or not? And a semi 740 00:38:36,160 --> 00:38:38,880 Speaker 4: loyal democrat is someone who meets all three criteria that 741 00:38:38,960 --> 00:38:42,160 Speaker 4: I just talked about. Always accept someone, always rejects violence, 742 00:38:42,960 --> 00:38:47,720 Speaker 4: always rejects anti democratic extremists. Van Lenz, the Spanish political scientist, 743 00:38:48,080 --> 00:38:51,759 Speaker 4: use the term semi loyal democrat to describe someone who's 744 00:38:51,800 --> 00:38:56,080 Speaker 4: a regular politician, not someone storming the capital on January sixth, 745 00:38:56,080 --> 00:38:58,480 Speaker 4: but rather one of the folks in a suit inside 746 00:38:58,480 --> 00:39:01,840 Speaker 4: the capital on January sixth, looks, dresses, talks like a 747 00:39:01,880 --> 00:39:10,680 Speaker 4: regular politician, but is willing to cooperate with condone enable authoritarians. 748 00:39:10,840 --> 00:39:14,920 Speaker 4: Authoritarians like Trump cannot kill democracy by themselves. They require 749 00:39:14,920 --> 00:39:20,400 Speaker 4: accomplices among mainstream politicians. And that is what the vast 750 00:39:20,440 --> 00:39:24,840 Speaker 4: bulk of Republican leaders, from Mitch McConnell to Lindsey Graham 751 00:39:25,000 --> 00:39:28,319 Speaker 4: to Kevin McCarthy to Alice stephonic and you can go 752 00:39:28,360 --> 00:39:30,759 Speaker 4: down and down and down the line. That's what they've done. 753 00:39:30,800 --> 00:39:34,319 Speaker 4: They have quietly enabled Trump in different ways. They have 754 00:39:34,440 --> 00:39:38,640 Speaker 4: condoned his behavior, they have protected him. The Senate vote 755 00:39:38,640 --> 00:39:42,000 Speaker 4: to acquit him after the second impeachment was crucial because 756 00:39:42,000 --> 00:39:45,000 Speaker 4: he would not be a candidate today had they vote 757 00:39:45,000 --> 00:39:48,640 Speaker 4: simply voted to convict him. It's that enabling behavior which 758 00:39:48,719 --> 00:39:52,000 Speaker 4: is done. You could say it's political cowardice. There's also 759 00:39:52,280 --> 00:39:55,480 Speaker 4: an increasing amount of information coming out, and we see 760 00:39:55,520 --> 00:39:58,520 Speaker 4: this in both Admit Romney's biography that came out several 761 00:39:58,520 --> 00:40:01,440 Speaker 4: months ago, and also in Chinese book is about to 762 00:40:01,440 --> 00:40:04,239 Speaker 4: come out that many Republican leaders not only that they 763 00:40:04,239 --> 00:40:07,160 Speaker 4: fear a primary, or that they fear you know that 764 00:40:07,360 --> 00:40:10,160 Speaker 4: somebody on Fox News is going to criticize that they 765 00:40:10,200 --> 00:40:14,200 Speaker 4: actually fear physical retribution if they they take god Trump, 766 00:40:14,280 --> 00:40:17,160 Speaker 4: if they voted to convict Trump, for example, or voted 767 00:40:17,200 --> 00:40:19,759 Speaker 4: to impeach him in the House, they feed, or that 768 00:40:19,920 --> 00:40:22,560 Speaker 4: something would happen to them or their families, their kids. 769 00:40:22,760 --> 00:40:26,080 Speaker 4: There is a level of violence percolating the Republican base 770 00:40:26,400 --> 00:40:29,880 Speaker 4: that is affecting the behavior of Republican leaders. It's fear 771 00:40:29,920 --> 00:40:31,360 Speaker 4: in a very real sense. 772 00:40:31,520 --> 00:40:34,920 Speaker 2: So the original sin here is that quote from the 773 00:40:34,960 --> 00:40:38,680 Speaker 2: Republican in the New York Times, the unnamed Republican who 774 00:40:38,760 --> 00:40:44,040 Speaker 2: said in twenty twenty, he's just playing golf. Let's just 775 00:40:44,160 --> 00:40:44,719 Speaker 2: humor him. 776 00:40:45,120 --> 00:40:47,520 Speaker 1: It's not the original sin, but it's one of the 777 00:40:47,600 --> 00:40:49,560 Speaker 1: later original sense. 778 00:40:49,719 --> 00:40:51,840 Speaker 4: They've been committed a sin since he came down the 779 00:40:51,880 --> 00:40:55,560 Speaker 4: Golden Escape. Yeah right, Oh, you know, take him seriously, 780 00:40:55,600 --> 00:40:58,799 Speaker 4: don't take them literally. He'll grow in the office. It's 781 00:40:58,840 --> 00:41:03,200 Speaker 4: not that ads doing this from the very beginning. 782 00:41:03,560 --> 00:41:05,920 Speaker 1: Can you talk a little bit about sort of how 783 00:41:05,960 --> 00:41:10,320 Speaker 1: you got into studying democracy, because it's really interesting. 784 00:41:10,760 --> 00:41:12,880 Speaker 4: I'm a political scientist. At my day job is to 785 00:41:12,880 --> 00:41:15,759 Speaker 4: study Latin American politics. I've been a student of Latin 786 00:41:15,760 --> 00:41:19,000 Speaker 4: American politics since the nineteen eighties. And I got into 787 00:41:19,040 --> 00:41:22,200 Speaker 4: this game as it literally as a teenager in college 788 00:41:22,440 --> 00:41:25,399 Speaker 4: at a time when Central America was in civil war 789 00:41:25,800 --> 00:41:29,360 Speaker 4: and when South America was just coming out from under 790 00:41:29,520 --> 00:41:33,560 Speaker 4: the most brutal period of military deputation in that region's history. 791 00:41:33,840 --> 00:41:39,200 Speaker 4: And so my introduction to democracy was studying the absence 792 00:41:39,239 --> 00:41:42,760 Speaker 4: of democracy and the achievement of democracy at great cost 793 00:41:42,920 --> 00:41:44,560 Speaker 4: in Latin America in the nineteen eighties. 794 00:41:44,600 --> 00:41:45,799 Speaker 3: And I learned my. 795 00:41:46,160 --> 00:41:50,560 Speaker 4: Teachers, my professors, and their colleagues were people who had 796 00:41:50,600 --> 00:41:55,040 Speaker 4: directly suffered at friends and cousins and brothers and sisters, 797 00:41:55,160 --> 00:41:57,880 Speaker 4: who had been exiled and jailed and tortured, in some 798 00:41:57,960 --> 00:42:01,359 Speaker 4: cases disappeared in life in America and I learned from 799 00:42:01,360 --> 00:42:05,400 Speaker 4: them directly what it was like to lose a democracy, 800 00:42:05,480 --> 00:42:08,840 Speaker 4: and that those lessons, for whatever reason, stuck with me 801 00:42:09,200 --> 00:42:12,919 Speaker 4: my whole career, and I've been a student of democracy 802 00:42:12,960 --> 00:42:16,600 Speaker 4: and committed to learning how to preserve a democracy, how 803 00:42:16,600 --> 00:42:19,920 Speaker 4: to not lose a democracy again my whole career. What 804 00:42:19,960 --> 00:42:22,400 Speaker 4: I did not expect was that I would be studying 805 00:42:22,400 --> 00:42:24,479 Speaker 4: this in the United States and I would be talking 806 00:42:24,560 --> 00:42:27,720 Speaker 4: about this in the United States. It's only in twenty fifteen, 807 00:42:27,760 --> 00:42:31,319 Speaker 4: twenty sixteen, maybe a little early. I think we saw 808 00:42:31,719 --> 00:42:33,880 Speaker 4: glimpses of this with the Tea Party, but really with 809 00:42:33,920 --> 00:42:36,920 Speaker 4: the rise of Trump, I started to see my co author, 810 00:42:37,000 --> 00:42:40,120 Speaker 4: who studies the breakdown of democracy in Europe in the 811 00:42:40,120 --> 00:42:44,200 Speaker 4: twenties and thirties, we started to see and hear language 812 00:42:44,200 --> 00:42:46,799 Speaker 4: and behavior in the United States in twenty fifteen and 813 00:42:46,800 --> 00:42:50,560 Speaker 4: sixteen that we'd seen in our own regions, that I'd 814 00:42:50,600 --> 00:42:53,080 Speaker 4: seen in Latin America. And I started to feel like 815 00:42:53,200 --> 00:42:56,560 Speaker 4: I'd seen this movie before and that it doesn't end well. 816 00:42:56,960 --> 00:43:00,720 Speaker 4: And so it was that that's what got me early 817 00:43:00,760 --> 00:43:05,279 Speaker 4: on in twenty sixteen thinking about the coming crisis of 818 00:43:05,320 --> 00:43:07,440 Speaker 4: democracy in the United States. We started to see the 819 00:43:07,480 --> 00:43:11,240 Speaker 4: warning signs, And I never ever imagined that I would 820 00:43:11,239 --> 00:43:13,880 Speaker 4: think about applying lessons that I learned in Latin America 821 00:43:14,040 --> 00:43:15,960 Speaker 4: to the United States. But here we are. 822 00:43:16,440 --> 00:43:18,920 Speaker 2: Yeah, do you see similarities there? 823 00:43:19,440 --> 00:43:23,320 Speaker 4: Sure, there are a bunch of similarities. First and foremost, 824 00:43:23,400 --> 00:43:27,160 Speaker 4: I mean, Donald Trump would be a great tinpot dictator. 825 00:43:27,239 --> 00:43:30,480 Speaker 4: We have in the United States, very many figures like Trump. 826 00:43:30,640 --> 00:43:34,600 Speaker 4: Trump is a is an authoritarian through and through. He's 827 00:43:34,640 --> 00:43:37,440 Speaker 4: someone who thinks that who thought when he came to 828 00:43:37,480 --> 00:43:41,839 Speaker 4: the presidency that all of the machinery of government and 829 00:43:41,880 --> 00:43:46,840 Speaker 4: the agencies of the state ought to be deployable for 830 00:43:46,960 --> 00:43:50,160 Speaker 4: his own personal and political use. That's not not even 831 00:43:50,160 --> 00:43:54,600 Speaker 4: addicted tinpot dictators like Somosa or Tohieu in mid twentieth 832 00:43:54,600 --> 00:43:57,760 Speaker 4: century Latin America, they were able to use the entire 833 00:43:58,280 --> 00:44:02,280 Speaker 4: state apparatus, the entire machine government for their own personal 834 00:44:02,560 --> 00:44:05,840 Speaker 4: and political ends. And that's what Trump's instincts are. It 835 00:44:05,880 --> 00:44:07,919 Speaker 4: took us a while to come to grips with that here, 836 00:44:08,000 --> 00:44:11,640 Speaker 4: because most of our politicians, even our nastiest politicians, sort 837 00:44:11,640 --> 00:44:14,319 Speaker 4: of respect that they can't do whatever the hell they 838 00:44:14,360 --> 00:44:17,080 Speaker 4: want with the state. But that's not Trump. Another thing 839 00:44:17,120 --> 00:44:19,880 Speaker 4: about Latin America is if you go back to the 840 00:44:19,960 --> 00:44:25,680 Speaker 4: nineteen seventies, we see what happens when politics becomes extremely polarized, 841 00:44:25,840 --> 00:44:29,200 Speaker 4: when parties begin to see one another not as rivals, 842 00:44:29,280 --> 00:44:31,840 Speaker 4: not as people they disagree with and don't like or 843 00:44:31,840 --> 00:44:34,360 Speaker 4: don't like their policies, but when they see their rivals 844 00:44:34,400 --> 00:44:38,680 Speaker 4: as an existential threat, as enemies, as forces that are 845 00:44:38,880 --> 00:44:42,719 Speaker 4: so noxious that we need to use any means necessary 846 00:44:43,000 --> 00:44:46,160 Speaker 4: to prevent them. American politics has been there before. We 847 00:44:46,160 --> 00:44:48,040 Speaker 4: were there in the eighteen fifties. We were there in 848 00:44:48,080 --> 00:44:51,760 Speaker 4: the seventeen nineties, but nobody alive in the United States 849 00:44:51,800 --> 00:44:55,520 Speaker 4: remembers our parties being so polarized that they can no 850 00:44:55,600 --> 00:44:59,240 Speaker 4: longer accept the other side winning that the nineteen sixties 851 00:44:59,320 --> 00:45:02,200 Speaker 4: seventies he didn't and well, and in many cases in 852 00:45:02,239 --> 00:45:06,400 Speaker 4: military dictatorship and heavy repression. And that's where we've gotten 853 00:45:06,520 --> 00:45:08,759 Speaker 4: in the second decade of the twenty first century in 854 00:45:08,760 --> 00:45:12,399 Speaker 4: the United States. I'm not predicting civil war or military too, 855 00:45:12,440 --> 00:45:14,719 Speaker 4: but we are a polarization. 856 00:45:15,160 --> 00:45:17,920 Speaker 1: One of the problems I've had throughout this period is 857 00:45:17,960 --> 00:45:20,399 Speaker 1: that there has been on the left and the right, 858 00:45:20,480 --> 00:45:24,479 Speaker 1: there has been a sort of hope wish casting, which 859 00:45:24,560 --> 00:45:28,480 Speaker 1: hasn't worked of this fantasy that eventually things. 860 00:45:28,280 --> 00:45:29,360 Speaker 2: Will go back to normal. 861 00:45:29,600 --> 00:45:32,440 Speaker 1: Right, Maybe then there's a conversation about how normal was 862 00:45:32,480 --> 00:45:37,080 Speaker 1: never good, but that eventually, you know, the norms will 863 00:45:37,160 --> 00:45:39,520 Speaker 1: the guardrails. I mean that's my favorite. You know, the 864 00:45:39,520 --> 00:45:43,319 Speaker 1: guard rails will hold. The guardrails have held. But we're 865 00:45:43,360 --> 00:45:47,120 Speaker 1: looking down the barrel of a Trump nomination, right, I 866 00:45:47,160 --> 00:45:50,719 Speaker 1: mean bearing some kind of media or Trump is going 867 00:45:50,800 --> 00:45:53,560 Speaker 1: to be nominated, So we're going to have another year 868 00:45:54,000 --> 00:45:59,799 Speaker 1: of real anti democratic speech and ideas. And so even 869 00:45:59,840 --> 00:46:02,000 Speaker 1: if he doesn't win, and if he does win, I 870 00:46:02,000 --> 00:46:05,239 Speaker 1: think we're all just completely fucked. But if he doesn't win, 871 00:46:05,360 --> 00:46:09,960 Speaker 1: we still will be one step closer to autocracy, right, 872 00:46:10,040 --> 00:46:10,560 Speaker 1: I mean. 873 00:46:10,560 --> 00:46:13,359 Speaker 4: There's a slow process. So we do have a very 874 00:46:13,760 --> 00:46:18,520 Speaker 4: strong constitutional order, a very stable democracy, strong institutions, and 875 00:46:18,560 --> 00:46:21,279 Speaker 4: a strong opposition, all of which serves us well. So 876 00:46:21,320 --> 00:46:25,200 Speaker 4: we're not immediately going to slide into Russia or Venezuela 877 00:46:25,719 --> 00:46:27,759 Speaker 4: or even hungry. We do have a lot of guard 878 00:46:28,000 --> 00:46:31,720 Speaker 4: but guardrails eventually wear down if you assault them over 879 00:46:31,840 --> 00:46:35,920 Speaker 4: and over again. And we have both informal and formal guardrails. 880 00:46:35,920 --> 00:46:39,680 Speaker 4: Informal guard rails are the norms of mutual toleration, and 881 00:46:39,760 --> 00:46:42,560 Speaker 4: forbearans that we write about how democracies die, those have 882 00:46:42,640 --> 00:46:46,960 Speaker 4: been pretty much beaten to smithereeds. We also have important 883 00:46:47,080 --> 00:46:52,600 Speaker 4: formal guardrails the Constitution, a very strong independent judiciary, federalism, 884 00:46:53,040 --> 00:46:56,720 Speaker 4: Bill of Rights. Those things, for the most part, have help, 885 00:46:57,200 --> 00:47:01,080 Speaker 4: but we have tested them in ways that we never 886 00:47:01,200 --> 00:47:06,360 Speaker 4: ever imagine. I'm considered a pessimist. Some people consider me 887 00:47:06,360 --> 00:47:10,040 Speaker 4: an alarmist about the state of US democracy. I never 888 00:47:10,160 --> 00:47:12,799 Speaker 4: expected that there would be a serious effort by an 889 00:47:12,800 --> 00:47:16,880 Speaker 4: incumbent president that would almost succeed to overturn the results 890 00:47:16,920 --> 00:47:19,359 Speaker 4: of an election. And yet there we were. We had 891 00:47:19,400 --> 00:47:22,200 Speaker 4: in the summer of twenty twenty political deaths. People kill 892 00:47:22,239 --> 00:47:25,600 Speaker 4: each other on the streets for political reasons. So the 893 00:47:25,640 --> 00:47:30,240 Speaker 4: guardrails held at some level, but they clearly have been weakening, 894 00:47:30,400 --> 00:47:34,560 Speaker 4: and they're continued to weaken. And another Trump presidency, it's 895 00:47:34,600 --> 00:47:38,319 Speaker 4: impossible to predict exactly what would happen, but there's no 896 00:47:38,560 --> 00:47:41,680 Speaker 4: question that Trump learned a bunch of lessons from his 897 00:47:41,719 --> 00:47:44,799 Speaker 4: first presidency. He learned that he really needs to go 898 00:47:44,880 --> 00:47:48,640 Speaker 4: out and purge and pack the administration in order to 899 00:47:48,640 --> 00:47:52,080 Speaker 4: wield state institutions the way that he wants to, He 900 00:47:52,120 --> 00:47:52,960 Speaker 4: will try to do that. 901 00:47:53,000 --> 00:47:54,040 Speaker 3: He will throw. 902 00:47:54,040 --> 00:47:57,160 Speaker 4: Many, many more punches at our democratic system than he 903 00:47:57,200 --> 00:48:00,680 Speaker 4: did the first time around. The Republican Party, we know, 904 00:48:01,440 --> 00:48:05,520 Speaker 4: very very clearly will back him with much greater loyalty 905 00:48:05,920 --> 00:48:08,719 Speaker 4: than in the past, because all of the dissidents in 906 00:48:08,800 --> 00:48:12,160 Speaker 4: the party have essentially left. There are very few remaining, 907 00:48:12,520 --> 00:48:14,920 Speaker 4: and so you know how much damage will do, how 908 00:48:15,000 --> 00:48:18,080 Speaker 4: many of those punches will land, how much damage will 909 00:48:18,120 --> 00:48:21,400 Speaker 4: be done when he lands these blows very hard to predict, 910 00:48:21,440 --> 00:48:24,560 Speaker 4: but I think the second presidency will be much much worse, 911 00:48:24,960 --> 00:48:26,439 Speaker 4: much more dangerous than the first one. 912 00:48:26,480 --> 00:48:31,279 Speaker 1: I think another year of Trump campaigning will further radicalize 913 00:48:31,320 --> 00:48:35,319 Speaker 1: the Republican Party and make them more anti democratic. 914 00:48:35,520 --> 00:48:37,959 Speaker 4: Think about what we're getting used to, right, it's now 915 00:48:38,040 --> 00:48:42,560 Speaker 4: become socialized in the Republican subculture. Among two thirds of 916 00:48:42,600 --> 00:48:47,279 Speaker 4: Republicans that the twenty twenty election was still and that 917 00:48:47,400 --> 00:48:52,160 Speaker 4: it's okay to reject the results of elections again the 918 00:48:52,200 --> 00:48:56,200 Speaker 4: cardinal rule of democracy. Only way democracy works is if 919 00:48:56,280 --> 00:48:59,400 Speaker 4: all the major political parties accept the results of elections, 920 00:48:59,520 --> 00:49:02,840 Speaker 4: whether they win or lose. And what Trump twenty twenty 921 00:49:03,160 --> 00:49:07,360 Speaker 4: and subsequent has done is socialized within the Republican Party 922 00:49:07,840 --> 00:49:10,719 Speaker 4: is break that norm right, is say that not only 923 00:49:10,800 --> 00:49:13,000 Speaker 4: was the election stolen, but it's okay to reject the 924 00:49:13,080 --> 00:49:17,640 Speaker 4: results of elections. And now the Republican Party is rallying 925 00:49:17,640 --> 00:49:19,640 Speaker 4: behind his I agree with you. He is almost certain 926 00:49:19,719 --> 00:49:24,320 Speaker 4: to nominate a president who tried to overturn the results 927 00:49:24,360 --> 00:49:26,880 Speaker 4: in the election, who tried to effectively lead a whop, 928 00:49:27,320 --> 00:49:32,320 Speaker 4: who says openly that he will use the Justice Department 929 00:49:32,360 --> 00:49:34,879 Speaker 4: to go after his rivals. Let me smike a point here. 930 00:49:35,080 --> 00:49:39,320 Speaker 4: I can't think of any candidate in any competitive political 931 00:49:39,400 --> 00:49:43,040 Speaker 4: system since World War Two that is as openly nakedly 932 00:49:43,120 --> 00:49:47,839 Speaker 4: authoritarian promising to engage in authoritary behavior as openly as 933 00:49:47,880 --> 00:49:51,720 Speaker 4: Donald Trump. Not Victor Orban, not Air Towan, not open 934 00:49:51,760 --> 00:49:55,000 Speaker 4: when he was first elected, not Ulu Chavez. None of 935 00:49:55,040 --> 00:49:59,640 Speaker 4: these guys were as openly telling voters as openly as 936 00:49:59,680 --> 00:50:02,560 Speaker 4: Donald Trump how authoritarian they're going to be. Most of 937 00:50:02,520 --> 00:50:05,480 Speaker 4: them hight it. Trump doesn't even hide it. So Republicans 938 00:50:05,520 --> 00:50:09,080 Speaker 4: are getting used not only to not accepting results, not 939 00:50:09,120 --> 00:50:12,319 Speaker 4: only to not believing electual results, but they're getting used 940 00:50:12,320 --> 00:50:16,440 Speaker 4: to backing a candidate who's openly authoritarian. You got to 941 00:50:16,440 --> 00:50:19,040 Speaker 4: go back to the nineteen thirties to find this kind 942 00:50:19,080 --> 00:50:21,840 Speaker 4: of behavior in Western democracies. 943 00:50:21,440 --> 00:50:24,320 Speaker 2: And it's not good. I did not end well for 944 00:50:24,480 --> 00:50:29,719 Speaker 2: my people. No, Steven, thank you so much for joining us. 945 00:50:29,960 --> 00:50:33,440 Speaker 4: Thanks for having me pleasure. 946 00:50:33,600 --> 00:50:38,920 Speaker 1: No moment, Wick Wilson, our special guest for fuckery. 947 00:50:39,400 --> 00:50:41,600 Speaker 2: Do you want to know what my moment of fuckery is? 948 00:50:41,800 --> 00:50:42,880 Speaker 3: I do, go ahead. 949 00:50:43,239 --> 00:50:47,439 Speaker 1: Mine is the Great State of Texas. I mean that ironically, 950 00:50:47,600 --> 00:50:53,759 Speaker 1: Ken Maxton, he is suing a pregnant woman to make 951 00:50:53,760 --> 00:50:56,799 Speaker 1: sure she doesn't have an abortion, despite the fact that 952 00:50:57,040 --> 00:51:00,040 Speaker 1: her baby's going to die if he is about to die. 953 00:51:00,280 --> 00:51:01,120 Speaker 2: Or maybe dead. 954 00:51:01,840 --> 00:51:05,680 Speaker 1: Forcing a woman to carry a dead or dying baby 955 00:51:06,360 --> 00:51:11,160 Speaker 1: because of life. Again, I could read this, but it's 956 00:51:11,480 --> 00:51:14,200 Speaker 1: just Ken Paxton shoots back with more. 957 00:51:14,320 --> 00:51:17,040 Speaker 2: You're not allowed to have control of your own body. 958 00:51:17,239 --> 00:51:21,840 Speaker 1: And for that, Ken Paxton and his band of Republicans 959 00:51:22,280 --> 00:51:26,080 Speaker 1: in the gynecological chair, they are my moment of fuckery. 960 00:51:26,040 --> 00:51:29,240 Speaker 3: And rightly so. My moment of fuckery are the college 961 00:51:29,239 --> 00:51:33,200 Speaker 3: presidents of Harvard, MIT and Penn. Now, look, I am 962 00:51:33,239 --> 00:51:35,800 Speaker 3: not an e least stophonic fanboy by any stretch of 963 00:51:35,840 --> 00:51:39,120 Speaker 3: the imagination. She's the Gretchen Wieners pick me girl, of 964 00:51:39,280 --> 00:51:43,359 Speaker 3: Republican politics. But when she asked them this week, individually 965 00:51:43,440 --> 00:51:46,720 Speaker 3: and collectively if calling for the genocide of the Jewish 966 00:51:46,800 --> 00:51:50,120 Speaker 3: people violated their speech codes and their harassment codes on 967 00:51:50,160 --> 00:51:53,120 Speaker 3: their universities, every single one of those people hemmed and 968 00:51:53,239 --> 00:51:58,120 Speaker 3: hawed and smirked and gave smug, discursive, evasive answers. It 969 00:51:58,360 --> 00:52:02,200 Speaker 3: weirdly united America in a weird moment, left right and 970 00:52:02,320 --> 00:52:06,839 Speaker 3: center of absolute loathing of how these university presidents who 971 00:52:06,960 --> 00:52:10,839 Speaker 3: if someone said I want genocide for all trans Americans, 972 00:52:10,960 --> 00:52:15,839 Speaker 3: or genocide for all African Americans, or genocide for indigenous 973 00:52:15,880 --> 00:52:19,640 Speaker 3: people or anything close to that, they would be expelled 974 00:52:19,680 --> 00:52:22,279 Speaker 3: and thrown off campus in a hot second. But somehow 975 00:52:22,320 --> 00:52:28,200 Speaker 3: it requires these elaborate, jesuitical answers so baroque and complex 976 00:52:28,239 --> 00:52:31,279 Speaker 3: and evasive when it comes to saying it's not cool 977 00:52:31,320 --> 00:52:33,680 Speaker 3: for anyone on our campuses to call for the genocide 978 00:52:33,680 --> 00:52:36,080 Speaker 3: of the Jewish people. That's how you get the genocide 979 00:52:36,080 --> 00:52:39,040 Speaker 3: of the Jewish people, you Fox, that's my moment of fuckery. 980 00:52:40,520 --> 00:52:41,840 Speaker 2: Thank you, Rick Wilson. 981 00:52:42,360 --> 00:52:45,280 Speaker 3: A lot of fucks in the show today. Sorry about that, folks. 982 00:52:45,640 --> 00:52:46,400 Speaker 2: People love it. 983 00:52:47,040 --> 00:52:51,359 Speaker 3: I think, all right, guys. 984 00:52:52,000 --> 00:52:55,359 Speaker 1: That's it for this episode of Fast Politics. Tune in 985 00:52:55,400 --> 00:52:58,640 Speaker 1: every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday to hear the best minds 986 00:52:58,640 --> 00:53:01,840 Speaker 1: in politics makes sense of all this chaos. If you 987 00:53:01,960 --> 00:53:04,640 Speaker 1: enjoyed what you've heard, please send it to a friend 988 00:53:04,719 --> 00:53:08,280 Speaker 1: and keep the conversation going. And again, thanks for listening.