WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week: Bastian, Spak, Brouillette

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week. What's the state of

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>corporate governance? The deficit is a real issue. The US

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>economy continues to send mixed signals to the financial stories

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that cheap our world fed action to con concerns over

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>dollar liquidity and encouraging China data. The five hundred wealthiest

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>people in the world. Through the eyes of the most

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>influential voices Larry Summers, the former Treasury Secretary, star Ward, CEO,

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Johnson, sec Chairman J Clayton, Bloomberg wool Street Week

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. When it comes to technology,

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not just social media and artificial intelligence and five

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>G the United States is competing with China over. It's

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>also energy and the race to develop new ways of

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>generating energy, ways that go well beyond traditional fossil fuels.

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I talked with the U S Secretary of Energy, Dan

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Briette about the energy race, and he said we should

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>be concerned about the competition. The global energy landscape has

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>changed dramatically over the last few decades, and our position

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>as the United States has changed within that landscape. Eight

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, in that time, we've seen a dramatic shift

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in the flow of US resources to developing economies all

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>across the world. And I was looking at some statistics

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>earlier today. You know, back in nineteen sixty nine of

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the monetary flows back then were categorized as official development

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>assistance by the US government, and in two thousand and

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>five eight instead came from the private capital market. So

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, that's that's an intense shift away from

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>government resources to the private sector. And that was fifteen

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>years ago, so I'm sure that number could be even

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>higher than today, but it clearly ended, you know, illustrates

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that the private sector is playing a bigger role in

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the international arena. And one component of our mission here

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>at the Department of Energy is to reach out and

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>engage with these increasingly important global actors. And with that

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>in mind, our department d OE Department of Energy is

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>leading some efforts to develop what we think are cutting

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>edge public private partnerships and they'll help achieved results in

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the very dynamic energy landscape. And we're doing that with

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>our partners and within the inter agency, primarily the UH

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 1>what's known now as the dfc UH, the old OPEC,

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the old Overseas Private Investment corporation. We've been working very

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>closely with them. But you know, we're very excited about

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>these partnerships because they not only yield economic growth, but

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>they enable the US to strengthen its ties to international

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>partners and to provide new opportunities all across the world

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>for American businesses. And UH. I just talked to a Dr.

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Fatti Barole at the International Energy Agency and he tells

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>me that is now set to see the loclent and

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>energy investment on record. Obviously due to the pandemic, but

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a reduction of roughly one fifth, or almost

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.959
<v Speaker 1>four hundred billion US dollars, and that's in capital spending

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 1>compared to capex as well, as we call it. I

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>e A is reported on the opportunity for policy actions

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>UH and and we've we've worked closely with them. They're

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 1>targeting energy investments to boot growth, boost growth, to create

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>even more jobs, and to continue reducing energy related emissions.

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>And even more, there's real potential here to expand energy

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>access by nearly two hundred and seventy million people and

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>provide cleaner cooking solutions to nearly four hundred and twenty

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 1>million people all across the Globe is my predecessor, Rick Perry.

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Rick Perry said, you know, there's still so many

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>people around the world without access to commercial energy, and

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>we want to help fix that problem for them and

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>create opportunities for us here in America. But um, you know,

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>as we know, and as we've discussed in the past,

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>governments alone don't have the resources for all of those investments.

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna we're gonna rely upon and it will require,

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, very strong public and private partnerships based on it. Well,

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>we refer to here in the United States as a

0:03:56.040 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>bottom up energy philosophy, one that supports free markets, It

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>funds scientific research, and it honors the choice of producers

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and consumers alike. Um. So, with our private sector counterparts,

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be focusing here on things like nuclear technologies

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and working to develop new reactors and new fuels for

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>those reactors, fuels that are accident tolerant and non prolifferent.

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>We're also focusing on wind and solar technologies, which is

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a priority for our department, and a large portion of

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>our R and D budget here at the Department of

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Energy will be spent on the work that's coming out

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of our National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden Colorado. In

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 1>that vein, we're gonna be pursuing some new battery technologies,

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and all of our innovators here and entrepreneurs in the

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>private sector, we're working lockstep on some new carbon capture,

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 1>utilization and storage process projects. So in short, you know,

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the government and DEWE can and we should play of

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>very crucial role in helping to bring all of these

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>new projects over the finish line. Um. So, David is exciting.

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.119
<v Speaker 1>It's an exciting time to be in the energy business.

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>It's an exciting time to be an energy policy and

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>as the world changes, so will we. It was very

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>helpful and it's clear you want more energy, and you

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>want to achieve, you want more investments, you want some

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>private investment in particular. We've talked before, as you said,

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and you tend to say it's all of the above

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to energy. As I try to get

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a choice between renewables versus fossil fuels, things like that

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>give us a sense of what that really means in practice.

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't the government have to pick some with it winners

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and losers. Well, look, winners and losers or something we

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>avoid in the marketplace. We don't as a government, we

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>don't want to pick individual players, um, but as technology

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>picking winners and losers and technology it's not something that

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 1>we want to engage in either. What we want is

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to pursue as you and I have discussed and all

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of the above strategy and uh, you know the President

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>has talked about this publicly and those words mean exactly

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>what they are. We're gonna pursue renewable technologies very very aggressively.

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>We just announced on the West Coast a brand new

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>facility at one of our laboratories there that's gonna allow

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>us to develop greer scale storage battery storage. This is

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Tony Mega Watson above. It allows us to develop the

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>next generation of battery stores that will allow renewables to

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>be integrated into our current electric grid much more easily

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and much more efficiently. That was Dan Briette, US Energy Secretary,

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>coming up. Corporate America isn't just looking inward, it's also

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>looking at the outside world to see what it can

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>do to move us forward on the pressing issues of

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>our time. Just ask ed Bastion, the CEO of Delta Airlines.

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>That's next on Wall Street Week on doom This is

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Will Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio.

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>The aftermath of the killings of Brianna Taylor and George

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Floyd made all of us face the deep divisions in

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>our country and the ways we've fallen short of making

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>this a more perfect union. Ed Bastion, CEO of Delta Airlines,

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>has been addressing what a major public and traded company

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>can and should do to address the need for societal

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>change since he first took over as leader of Delta,

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and he was thrust in the controversial issue of gun regulation.

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>We spoke to at the Virtual Blue Brig Equalities on it.

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>The bottom line on this is that we have a

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>responsibility at our company to be not just a great

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>airline but also a great steward of our resources and

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>help build up our own people opera adoptunes for our

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>own team, as well as within our community where we

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>fly and where we invest our time. UH And one

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of the things the pandemic has shown to us is

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the vulnerable have become even more at risk and it's

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>it's led to their voices being heard. It's been an

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting phenomena where has everything has quieted down as the

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>world has had to come to us stop. It's allowed

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>us opportunity to listen to those people that are actually

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>have been speaking to us for some time, and maybe

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>we've been too busy to listen. And I know at

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Delta that's been the case. And we've had a renewed

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>focus on on racial equality, systemic bias, and injustice and

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>all the things that we can do as corporate leaders

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to make a difference in our community. And in your

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>statement you actually referred to the need to listen as

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you just said, and talked about having town hall meetings

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and things like that to really learn more from the

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>people at Delta. Have you done that yet and what

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>have you learned Because you knew about this issue before,

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>what perhaps new did you find out from that? We

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>we have done a lot of that. We've had regular

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>town hall meetings on large company wide tens of thousands

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of people as well as on small scale matters, and

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.719
<v Speaker 1>we're doing it in many, many parts of our company.

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>And you're right, David, we've been focused on diversity inclusion

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>for a long time and we've got a pretty good

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>track record. We've been making progress. But the one thing

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that that I have paid a lot closer attention to

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>is disaggregating the information Diversity inclusions abroad umbrella. It includes gender, race, ethnicity,

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and in other areas of opportunity. But when you look

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>at the information and you see underneath the specific groups

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 1>that are potentially not keeping up with the broader economy

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>or our corporate opportunities, it's been the black community with

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>within at least within Delta, we've got twenty percent of

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>our employees are are black, yet only seven percent of

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the top leaders in the company are and that's a

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty wide gap that we need to commit to close. Well,

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that's something that we see replicating a lot of you

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>as industry. I suspect certainly in industry. I know about it. ABC,

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>we had those challenges. How is the African American situation

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>somewhat different from other people of color? I mean, there's

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>an issue for all, but as you said, it's went

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>different perhaps because we have four years of slavery. There's

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>history of slavery to account for. Yeah, that's this. This

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>has been going on for not just decades, but centuries.

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>And the thing that we've we've learned here at Delta

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is that we all have a role to play to

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to owning the issue. You know, it's one thing to

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>say that we've got to get better. It's one thing

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to to acknowledge the numbers. As we said, it's it's

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>important to be transparent about the numbers, but to really

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>understand the reasons and the rationale and put yourself in

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>someone else's shoes. That's where the listening and the understanding

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and the reflection have coming are coming from. And one

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we've talked a lot about Delta

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 1>is also being truth tellers, acknowledging the fact that our

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>company does not have a great record on this in

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the past and may have some challenges it needs to

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 1>correct for in order to be a more just company

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>going forward. And while the leaders of the company may

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>not have been here at the time some of those

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>inequities were first initiated, we have to go back and

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>reconcile and make sure we understand what our company's responsibility is,

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>not just our individual responsibilities. And part of the challenge

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>we have for all the society, business, I think, and

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>perhaps even the Delta is it's not just enough to

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>say going forward, we're going to be even we've got

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>some history, we have to make up for How do

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you do that without alienating people who are not benefited

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>by them by the actions. Well, it's a great question,

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and you're right, there's a lot of people wondering, well,

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>what about me, you know, or does that mean I'm

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna now be by by implication, disadvantaged relative to to

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>an African American colleague. And the answer is no. The

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>answers We've got to raise the bar for everybody we

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>there are. There are plenty of great talented leaders within

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>our African American community that we need to invest more

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>time and more understanding in. And when you look around

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the room, you see the room is filled with with

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>people that look just like you and me. So it's

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>clear that we've had advantages. We may not have uh

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>been explicit about it, but implicitly we've had advantages. And

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 1>we've got to bring others along with us too. And

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you've mentioned the numbers a couple of times. How do

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you measure success? How will you know when you've achieved

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>what you need to achieve? And is it basically based

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>on numbers? It's it's not based on numbers, David. But

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that I know within Delta and

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>as well as within the corporate community. Is when you're

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>transparent and you're held accountable, things get done. You know,

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>people pay attention. And we never want this to be

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.839
<v Speaker 1>seen as a quota system or or lowering the bar

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>as as one would might say, Uh, this is about

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>ownership and accountability and being able to measure that the

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>success that we're having. So numbers are, it's it's an outcome,

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not not the not the driving force. But when

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>we do see that gap closed, and in the memo

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you referenced, I've committed to close that gap in half

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>over the next five years, so it's not a lot

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 1>of time to make some pretty good difference. That will

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>be one measure of success. But when I hear from

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>our our black community within Delta that the opportunities, the discussion,

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the sense of of of belonging and opportunity is greater

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>than it was, that will tell me that we've really

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 1>made that difference. When you talk about closing the gap

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>for those who haven't had the opportunity dis memo and

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I recommend it to people, you disaggregate those numbers as well.

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>You have the overall population of the Delta employees. But

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>then you have management and then you have a smaller

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>group at the very top. Are you committed to closing

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that gap across the entire set of different groups, Yes,

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I am David Uh. In total, we have about of

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 1>our our team are people of color, about thirty percent

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in the in the low thirties are actually UH. In

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the leadership ranks of the company. More broadly speaking, from

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>front line leaders on up are people of color, and

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>about eighteen percent of our pusers are people of color.

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>But when you figure out what the black component, the

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>African American component of the same population skill set, is

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>half of our people of color black, but only a

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>third of our top leaders are black. So you can

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>see that there's been even within the designation of people

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of color, there's been some inequity in imbalance there, and

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>that's what we've got to focus on how we can

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>do better. That was Ed Bastion, CEO of Delta Airlines,

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>coming up the Tesla underwhelmed with its battery day and

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the wheels started to come off at Nicola. As its

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>chairman stepped down, we talked with Joseph Stack of RBC

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Capital Markets about the tech side of autos. That's next

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Wall

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. In the

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>great tradition of startups, we started Apple because we wanted

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the product ourselves. There is one person or two people

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>who are both the creator and the market so that

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>they know the marketing requirements intuitively because they're the market themselves.

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>So gradually we were pulled into business. It wasn't We

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't start out to build a large company. We started

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>out to build a few dozen computers for us and

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>our friends. That was Apple co founder Steve Jobs back

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in talking about how he came to create computers for

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the masses. This week, another high tech entrepreneur who dropped

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>out of college made news, but of a very different sort.

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Milton didn't come up with his one big idea

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>right away. He tried an alarm sales company, an online

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>classified website, and an energy storage company before fastening on

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>his one true passion, making big trucks with zero emissions.

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>He called it Niccola, after Nicola Tesla, who basically invented

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>alternating current. Starting only five years ago, Milton built his

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>company rapidly, taking a public just last June and seeing

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>its market cap briefly exceed at a Ford Motor Company.

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>But then, like Icarus, maybe he climbed too close to

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the sun. He made a big deal for GM to

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>buy eleven percent of his company, which triggered the short

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>seller Hindenburg Research to call it all quote an intricate

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>fraud built on dozens of lies, including a claim Nicola

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>really was nothing more than a licensee and packager, which

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Mr Milton vigorously denies. Here's the important thing to know.

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>We've already built the Badger from the ground up ourselves,

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>so everything in it is owned by Nicola. What we

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>decided to do is leverage common parts with GM. I'll

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>tell you for those who don't know, General Motors has

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the best purchasing power pretty much in the world. They

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>their parts are cheaper than When I see cheaper, they

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>mean they pay less for their parts than anyone else

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>in the world, pretty much with exception to make me Volkswagen.

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>So if you think about that, being able to leverage

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>all their parts, we can commonize things so like a

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>window regulator or an inverter. I mean, why why spend

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand dollars on an in burger if you can

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>pay four hundred bucks for it or five for it,

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it is, that's the value you get with GM.

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean that there that we're that we're not

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>doing anything. It means we're commonizing parts and o EAMs

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>do this all the time. The SEC and Justice departments

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 1>started investigations, the stock fell, and Mr Milton had to

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>quit as chairman. We don't know where this will all end.

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Mr Milton says he'll defend himself against what he calls

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>false allegations, and GM insists it did all appropriate due

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>diligence before it made the deal, leaving us all the

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>wonder whether Mr Milton will ultimately be proven to be

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the revolutionary innovator he claims to be, or an extremely

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>good salesman whose marketing prowess got the better of him.

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Nicola's goals have caused it to be compared with Tesla,

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>but there are some key differences between the two. We

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>asked OURBC Capital Markets analyst Joseph Spack, what exactly Nicola

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is trying to do? Yeah, Nicola is, um, you know

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I think of a misunderstood story. Um,

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely a lot of noise around the name. I

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>think the short report brought out a lot of issues

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.480
<v Speaker 1>which um you know, I'm certainly not going to defend here,

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think that when you look at the crux

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>of what Nicola was trying to do, they were trying

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to bring together a whole bunch of partners from the

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing side, from the fuel cell and battery side, and

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>from the infrastructure side to be able to offer their

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>customers a point A two B route that they can

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>take over for them, UM, make green and efficient with

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen fueling technology, uh, and be able to offer a

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>fuel cell lease. Now, if you can build out a

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of A two B back and forth routes

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 1>where you can get customers to sign up for that,

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>slowly but surely, you can build out efficiently hydrogen charging

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure network and that helps solve the chicken and egg

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>problem that exists with hydrogen. But clearly, um you know,

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the issues that that have been brought up,

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and not a cloud that surround the company, I think

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>he's putting some of these partnerships and potentially customers at risk,

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and it does mean that the whole idea or concepts

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>can fall apart. So we've heard in the past about

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities and hydrogen fuel self for long haul so

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 1>to speak, in the big trucks going in long distances,

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>that that might well make sense. So that's not a

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>new thought. What is it that's new that Nicola brings

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to the party. Yeah, I think UM. I think first

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of all, you're right, I think you know, battery electric

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>vehicles UM for for commercial trucks as it stands today,

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:33.719
<v Speaker 1>with the current state of battery technology, UM makes a

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit less sense for the longer range because of

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a number of issues including recharge times, battery degredation, and

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>just the weight of battery. So fuel self seems like

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to get it to work a more ideal solution. UM

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the UM why now or why Nicola? Because I think

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.479
<v Speaker 1>what Nicola was trying to do was come up with

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 1>more of a business model innovation again what they're trying

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to accomplish with their customers. And they had this pilot

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 1>program with Anheuser Busch which is UM, you know, we

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>will UM lease, we will sell you this fuel truck's please.

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>That includes both the truck, all the fuel and the

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>service and maintenance and so the effectively, like I said,

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>they take over that that dedicated route, that a tow

0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>B route for Anteuser Busch and if they know they

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>could get a lot of route, put a lot of

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.919
<v Speaker 1>density on that route. Um, it's sort of de risks

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure build needed for hydrogen because they can use

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the the proceedge from the fuels at least to help

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>build out the infrastructure. That was Joseph's back of RBC

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Capital Markets. Coming up, we wrap up the week with

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>our special contributor Larry Summers. This is Wall Street Week

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Weston from Bloomberg Radio. Well, we had a week gre

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>going uncertainty about the return of the virus, about whether

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get more fiscal siminis, than about the looming election,

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>with President Trump adding that we this might not go

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>when he was told to go. He might not conceive

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.439
<v Speaker 1>that election that if it goes against him. The more

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty there is, the more that we help from our

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>special contributor Larry Summers of Harvard. So, Larry, great to

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>have you here. First of all, start with that election,

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>because we have a lot of people now the markets included,

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>starting to be concerned about whether we're gonna have some

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.719
<v Speaker 1>chaos after the election. Are you concerned about that? Of

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>course I'm concerned, and there's a risk. But my best

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 1>guess is right now that we're gonna know who won

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the election by on election night, because the returns are

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>going to come in from Florida and they're going to

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>suggest that Joe Biden won Florida. And when that happens,

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>there's not gonna be much question about the overall outcome. So, yes,

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it certainly could go close. It certainly could be terrible

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>in a variety of ways. But my best guess right

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>now is that we're gonna know before we go to

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>sleep on Wednesday night, on Tuesday night, what the result

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 1>of uh the election has been. I think things are

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>moving uh in that way. So let me ask a

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>question that has some travesty to it. We all know

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that you basically are in favor of foreign Vice President

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Biden gett elected. How much difference does it make? I mean,

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>does the particular policies we took a president at this

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 1>point make that big a difference? Or are we facing

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 1>bigger problems than that with, for example, a pandemic. Look,

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot that's not even our control. Does the

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>virus UH mutate, How aggressive does China choose to be,

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>What are the consequences of climate change? How much does

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence turn out to exacerbate UH inequality. So it's

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a mistake to think that who the president is and

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>what the policy is are is the only thing that's

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>going to determine how good the next four years are.

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 1>That said, there is an enormous amount to be gained

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:14.919
<v Speaker 1>from a restoration of normality. Normality in the sense of

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>comedy and decent relations with other countries. Normality in the

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>sense of a president who seeks to bring Americans together

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>rather than pit racial groups against each other. Normality in

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the sense of a president who respects UH the law,

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>who respects UH scientific expertise, who values a competent civil service.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>In UH government, there are a whole set of issues

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>which go beyond and come logically before the issues where

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Republicans and Democrats have different views where there will be

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a huge difference if things turn UH in UH this election.

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Differences between democratic and Republican policy are well down in

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the list in terms of what's at stake in this election. UH.

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>That's I imagine why John McCain's widow endorsed Joe Biden.

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>That's why all kinds of former military figures who usually

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>stay out of politics or tend to the Republican side,

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>have endorsed UH Joe Biden. That's why people like UH

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Bill Crystal and Lincoln Project, which is made up of

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>really staunch Republicans, the kind who loved George W. Bush

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>when Democrats were very bothered by things he was doing,

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 1>have endorsed UH Joe Biden. I think there's a ton

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that said stay in normality and normality and reasonable process.

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Is that much more important given how much that we

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>can't control that's coming down the road. At least we

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>have to be competent and caring with respect to the

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>things that are within our control. I want to pick

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>up on one thing you refer to, which is climate.

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>The issue of climate. We had a remarkable announcement out

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 1>of President g in China this week basically saying we're

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna get the carbon neutral by what did you make

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of that? Two things, Uh? One that China is buying

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>for global leadership, It is doing the kinds of things

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that the United States once did making forward looking commitments,

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and the other in the hope that others will follow

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>and trying to set the terms of the global debate,

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and so in many ways, the fact that they were

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>making this kind of forward looking UH statement said more

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:09.719
<v Speaker 1>to me about our China policy than it did about

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>our environmental policy. It said to me that China is

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>not an issue for the defense budget, It is not

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:23.959
<v Speaker 1>even an issue just for the conduct of our diplomacy,

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>but it is something on which we are going to

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>have to organize our effort for domestic renewal if the

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>United States is going to maintain the kind of position

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and the leadership of leadership in the world that most

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Americans I believe very much want the United States to have.

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>It also pointed up to me the essential role of

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>renewal of energy systems worldwide, whether it's the discovery and

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 1>implementation of at our battery technologies, David, whether it's moves

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:10.679
<v Speaker 1>on carbon pricing, which I think are very very important. UM.

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Whatever the particular steps UH are, we are gonna have

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 1>to as we renew our country's infrastructure, pay very close

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>attention UH to UH energy issues. There may be there

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of things that I think are wrong

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and overdone in some of the green new Deal proposals,

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>which seems to me go way beyond UH climate change.

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>But we're certainly gonna need a new deal on green

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 1>issues and do things very differently. And that's one of

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 1>the things that I hope will start to happen in

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the next several years. So learn as you know. Every

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>week we like I'd like to finish the week with

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a lightning round of Larry says. Let me start out

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>way asking what was the biggest disappointment for you this week?

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>The failure to failure to move forward on stimulus at all,

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 1>and that stimulus is a low priority, but appointing a

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court in the month before an election is a

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 1>high priority. I have to say, as an economic policy maker,

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I worry that a president who makes a travesty of

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 1>reasonable process with respect to the Supreme Court can hardly

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 1>be counted on to respect the independence of the Fed

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>when it counts. So if that's a disappointment, what was

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>encouraging for you this week? Even Mitch McConnell basically made

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>clear that the president had gone way beyond the lines

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>when he threatened to stay in office even if he

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>lost UH the election. The absolute clarity with which even

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the people who inexplicably to me have been loyal to

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the president made it clear that if that happened, enough

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>would be enough. Okay, and we had those two. Let's

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about what the biggest mistake was you saw made

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>this week? Probably probably uh no, no, uh no forward

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>movement on stimulus, on stimulus at a time when we

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>hugely need an insurance policy against a double dip for

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the economy. The labor market is slowing down. UH. Landlords

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>are having much more difficulty UM paying rents uh to.

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Tenants are having much more difficulty paying rents uh to

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>uh landlords. Firms are getting ready as they realize this

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to go on for a long time, to

0:29:54.200 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>pay off um to layoff workers. And above all, David,

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>people are just wishing COVID was over and acting like

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it was even and look at your ape, and look

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.719
<v Speaker 1>at your many look at Europe. Okay, many things. Now

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the special Wall Street can we contribute he is, of course,

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Larry Summers. Finally, one more thought. The least dangerous branch,

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what Alexander Bickle called the federal judiciary. It doesn't

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>have the power of the purse, it doesn't command any armies.

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>This week we lost the very embodiment of that least

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>dangerous but all important branch of our government. Ruth Bader

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Ginsburg stood barely over five feet tall. She weighed all

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of a hundred pounds. Her stellar record in law school

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't give her a place in a powerful law firm

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>for one reason. She was a woman. It was Ruth

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Bader Ginsburg who thought that the U. S. Constitution should

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>treat every American equally, regardless of genders. But in the end,

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>she showed them all. She showed us all all, almost

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>by herself. She changed the course of the law, particularly

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>when it came to the role of women, something we

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>continue to struggle with. And now, ironically, in her passing,

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>she poses for us the most fundamental question about the

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>role of the judiciary she so loved, for the very

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>power of the least dangerous branch lies in the fact

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that it is not political. We don't elect our judges.

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>They have no fixed terms. They are the keepers of

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>principles rather than expediency. We are now in the midst

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of an intensely political fight over the branch of government

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that is not supposed to be political. And if in

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the end the Supreme Court is seen by us all

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>as yet another expression simply of our extreme partisan politics.

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Then does the Supreme Court, even our Supreme Court, have

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the same not power but authority that the framers intended

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it to have. That does it? For this episode of

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Week, I'm David Weston. This is Bloomberg. See

0:31:55.080 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you next week. S