WEBVTT - Waiver Wire, MNF Recap, and Roman Reigns

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess dude Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy best Friends Forever, m Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Don do Yeah, this is the Fantasy best

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever here on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network alongside

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Frankie Stamvill, I am Grass. What's going on? Bunday? Ray?

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>What is up? My man? Giants Falcons? Last night? Yeah,

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it was a big It was a big day yesterday

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>overall between going on that door cover, last second, crazy,

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a Fantasy matchup, all the way down on the wire too.

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>It was great. So I so remember going to last night,

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I told you I don't know if it's on the air,

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.479
<v Speaker 1>off the air um that I had. I was up

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>five with se Kwan and Calvin Ridley versus Matt Ryan Okay,

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>so I literally had said I was down after Squan

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>caught a pass and lost seven yards on it. I

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>was down point three at that point, so I kept saying,

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>all I want is a Falcon's rushing touchdown. So it

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>would just be dump off the c Kwon, dump off

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the se Kwan, dumb off the Kwan, and that's exactly

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>what I got. And then the next play after that

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>was a fifty yard dump off the c Kuan and

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>we never looked back. Okay, you could always depend on

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a ton of dump off passes to say Kwon Barkley

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that you know what, congrats buddy, What does that make

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>your record? That my record will be? This week? Said

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>we're five and two and two. Yeah, I just had

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of really bad teams. No, I only have

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>one really event I just talked about that on the

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>most I only have one really bad team. Actually have

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good year. Um Gs two were three and four,

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>climbing back into it, slowly climbing before going the right way.

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 1>We're we're in the playoffs right now, came out of

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:32.239
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. We're right there. We're like tied for the

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>last playoffs. We're the we're in the mix. We're in

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the mix, uh Cartins League. I'm I'm around three and

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>four or four and three something like that. UM five

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and two in my homely league one one where of that?

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And then UM flex, I think I'm the five and

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>two and flex right, pretty sure? Yeah? I think I

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>think I'm five inutes. What the heck you are? I

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>think I'm five and two in both flex and five

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and two in flexes and the fish bowl. So I'm

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>not having a bad here, oh Greggy, Yeah, stepping it up? Yeah, man,

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>because you have Robert Woods everywhere. Well, what do you

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 1>think about last night's game? Outside of obviously you are

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you winning there? Look, you needed a lot of late

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>production from s Kwon Barkley for most of that game.

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you were worried about what you're getting at

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:23.239
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was a little frustrating the Giants offense,

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least for their skill position players and

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.639
<v Speaker 1>for fantasy purposes. Bounced back. I mean Odell Beckham and

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Sterling Shepherd both cleared a hundred and forty yards each. Obviously,

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Beckham had that touchdown late on a on a great catch,

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>should have had the two point conversion as well. I

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you want to get into the whole

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>two point conversion talk. We were just talking about it downstairs.

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's freaking out. Why did they go for to Like

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>there are analytics that show that when you're down fourteen,

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you score a touchdown. Going for two is the smarter play.

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you want to get into that

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>or not. So I don't want to get into it

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>because I agree and I gotta I gotta fight my

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>friends last night about this because they're say how stupid

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>giants are for that, blah blah blah, and they weren't

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and in the Eagles of the that for weeks now

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's Super Bowl winning Eagles, Like Doug Peterson is

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a smart head coach. So I sent an article that

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that was written last year about why the brown should

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>have done this Actually last year it's pointed out the

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>same if they've been doing it this year, like Hugh

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Jackson has been trying to do this this year. So

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I've wrote I said out the article, um, speaking of

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>that those analytics and Hugh Jackson's on the cover, my

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>friends on Hugh Jackson will cover up. I'm not agreeing

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>with anything like it literally says that he's an idiot.

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Just read the read the article. Uh so they're all

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>screaming at me how I can think, how I can

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>be so dumber? Just like I'm just telling you what

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the analytics saying. Man, like this wire's football baseball now,

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:37.359
<v Speaker 1>like because data matters, like it doesn't matter what support

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>it is or what uh really what entathy it is.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>In politics, it's the same way. We're all using data

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and why wouldn't you use all the tools that you

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 1>have and the data says that you should go for

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>two because basically, in Lehman's terms, I'll just do it

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 1>very quickly because I don't don't want to dive into it.

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>But Lehman's terms, going for two from the two yard

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>line is a proposition. Technically it's only forty seven point

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>eight percent, but essentially it's fifty fifty, which means you're

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>going to make it one out of two times. So

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>if you go for two when you are down fourteen

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>on the first um on the first time and you

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>miss it, the odd state that you will make it

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the second time when you need it. So if your

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>defense holds, you're down eight, you missed the first, you'll

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.559
<v Speaker 1>make the second you'll tie the game, you go to overtime. Fine,

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.359
<v Speaker 1>if you make the first one, all you need is

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>an extra point and you win the game. The goal

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of the game is the goal of every game is

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>to win, as Herman Edwards once told us, so by

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>doing that, it puts you in a better position to

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>win over time is essentially a fifty fifty toss as well.

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.039
<v Speaker 1>You want to avoid that. I believe by going for two,

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>if you make it, you have like a sixty chance

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>of winning or something along those lines. Like it was

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 1>a no brainer, not no brainer decision, but when you

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>look at the analytics, it makes plenty of sense. Going

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>for two wasn't the problem of Pat Shermer last night.

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>The problem with Pat Shermer was two fold. Number one,

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.039
<v Speaker 1>two quarterbacks sneaks the game on the line with the

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>there's no game on a lot. But I don't think

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that's Pat Sremer's fault, though I think it's I think

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 1>it's I think that's ELI, because they were even talking

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>about that last night during the game, Like, I think

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>they got that wrong. Well, Booger and test Tour, I

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>think they all got that right. I don't know. I

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think Eli's calling himself a quarterback sneak. He's never

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>done that in his life. This is the first This

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>year is the first time he's been sneaking. I mean,

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>once you get that first down, the first thing you

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>should do is just spike it. Yes, spike it, just

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, stop the clock. Um, So I think that.

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's my number one. Number two. Because people are

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>focused on the quarterback sneak, and people are focused on

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the two point inversion, they're missing the real point. And

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I told Gabe this the first thing this morning. I

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't think you wanted to hear it from you, honestly, um,

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>because I was like, people are gonna be talking about

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the right thing today. He's like, all right, what are

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they talking about. I'm like, I shouldn't. I shouldn't do this.

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't tell people what to what to say. You know,

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>these are my opinions. I don't care if one conversion

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>because it was right. I don't care for the quarterack

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>sneak because the game was over anyway, because you you know,

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>hit the fifty six yard field goal. The problem was

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the atlant of Facons. As we stated yesterday in the show,

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst defenses in the NFL, their secondary,

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>their linebacking corps. It's horrible. They're averaging like thirty two

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>points a game allowed or something along those lines. The

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>first quarter they have more points than anybody. Gisque none.

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Actually in the first quarter, the Giants against this worst

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>defense in the NFL, had six points until garbage time.

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Six two field goals. Eli had three completions. Have the

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Odell touchdown. Three completions in the red zone all night.

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>He was three in the red zone. They got there

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>and they couldn't convert. It's pathetic when you go an

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>offense and Odell Beckham and say Koon Barkley to score

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>six points before garbage time is unacceptable. And this is

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the Giants weekend and week out. And yeah it's Eli

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>because he's terrible, but it's also on Pat Srmer horrible,

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>horrible job. Yeah, they had six points going into the

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter yesterday, and you can't really blame the offense

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of moving the ball. They were able to

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>move the ball, couldn't score once they got in the

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>red zone. That's just more of the same look. Sterling

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Shepherd a hundred and sixty seven yards, Odell Beckham a

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty yards, Like these guys did their job.

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Take one Arkley, Obviously, we were expecting a better performance

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>out of him, but look forty rushing, another fifty one

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>receiving so close to a hundred yards from scrimmage, and

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown, So take one. Yes, you want him to

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>be better overall, you want the Giants whole offense to

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>be better once they're in the red zone. I think

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.679
<v Speaker 1>that was obvious there. Um. Kevin Coleman on the other side,

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>did his part, scored a long touchdown. I think we

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>were expecting more from Matt Ryan overall as well. Three

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine yards. Yes, that's great, but only one touchdown. Look,

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.239
<v Speaker 1>another game in the NFL, another week goes by, another

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>week without a touchdown. He was great, And if you

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>watched the post game afterwards, when ESPN is talking to him,

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 1>he's completely selfless, like he doesn't care if he scores touchdowns.

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>He said that time and time again, like I don't know, man, Like,

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>what are you gonna say he won? If they would

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>have lost that we've been a different conversation obviously, But

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean they've been losing more than they've been winning

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>this year, So it's I'm saying this game in this interview.

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not like he's freaking out and coming out and

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 1>saying like, oh uh, you know, we're not winning because

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not scoring touchdowns, or at least from what I've seen,

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen him actually complained about that. But look

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>still great for PPR nine for one oh four. I

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>think Edo Smith was a big leftown yesterday. Seven carries

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>for sixteen yards. He was involved in the past game,

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>only had two receptions for twenty nine yards. I think

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>we were expecting more of him overall. Um, you know,

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>he was a Netflix discussion coming in. But Tevin Coleman

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>did his job. Not really much else to go around here,

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Like everyone who was supposed to do what they were

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do pretty much did that. Calvin Redley returned,

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Was that all right? Five three? Great? One? Yeah, you

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>know it's always wrong with the turf. I thought last night,

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>se Kwan trip the bunch. Calval Ridley tripped the bunch. Yeah,

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times, So I thought that was okay.

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought, listen, both teams are able to move the ball,

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>no problem, Um, do their do their things. Of course,

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta was was obviously able to see that they were

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>going to dump it off a sea kwan a lot

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and they lunched it through the line. Um elik Like

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I said, it was terrible, um and that was the

0:09:55.760 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>second biggest story. Indeed, it well it's great. Yeah. So

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I was out last night and uh he who must

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>be named kid next to me and he's like, hey,

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>are you watching Raw? And I was like, I go

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>giants Han, but oh well, no, do you see the

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Roman Reigns interview? I go, no, I passed forward through

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>over Roman Reins in your views. Uh so no, even

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 1>if I was watching RAW, I would not have seen this.

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>And he tells me Roman Rains is leukemia and he's

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna like this chill that I just got again. I'm

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>like what, And it's true. Man. What's said is that

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it's extremely sad. And obviously, you know, a guy like

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in the prime of his career, not just like wrestling career,

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>but overall like his career, like he's getting it done

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. Obviously a huge name in Roman Reigns. Apparently

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>he's been battling this for eleven years. So I assumed

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:50.439
<v Speaker 1>it's gone into like remission and then it's come back,

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and now it seems like it has come back and

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>he had to relinquish his championship. I mean that's obviously

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 1>on the back burner. Who cares about that? Obviously, all

0:10:57.480 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we're hoping for is for him to you know, get

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>better and you know maybe one day because return. But

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's that's on the back burner now. But yeah,

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it really, it really is just uh it's it's crazy. Yeah, yeah,

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's you wouldn't even expect either, right, like

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>for a guy like in that good of shape, like

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's just like the last thing that you

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>would expect, right, Yeah, it was crazy, you know he

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>he I was telling Judy actually last night that he

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>missed HOW shows and like Boston over the weekend. Everyone's like,

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 1>what the hell is this? I got like a Bleacher

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Report update yesterday it was like Roman Reign's injured question mark. Yeah,

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>because he missed, he missed. No one knows what's going on.

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>It was the weekend in Boston and he doesn't really

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>miss HOW shows. It was like, what's going on? Like

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>why wasn't he around? And right, he's that raw, so

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess there's no big deal and he just took

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the weekend offers from family stuff and he comes out

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>like in street clothes. It was like, oh, this is nice.

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.959
<v Speaker 1>He's like not wearing this stupid shield gear. And then

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>he makes his announcement. He's like, hey, my name is Joe.

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh boy, I mean I already knew

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the answer because Jake told me. But like it was sad.

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>It was really sad. Obviously got booed out of the

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>arena when he walks in and then cheered out of

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the arena right for so um as he walked out

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and actually come back from commercial and the announcers I

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>was trying. They had to obviously know, I think, but

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it sure seemed like they didn't really know what was

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>going on. Um, just be how their emotions, how they

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>were like building up romans announcement like in storyline. They

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>came out and they were in tears after that. Uh,

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Corey Grahams were ever a young and Um and Michael

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Cole and it was weird. It was It was just weird,

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>really really weird. A night Aura And in the background

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of all that, the crowd chance and cancer sucks because

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it does. Evan suck. Um tough night Man, Tough Night

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>It sucked. Yeah, yeah, it definitely does. But you know,

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>shouts rom regns uh get better and hopefully hopefully we'll

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>see you again in the future. Not to not to

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of build on um, but it has to be

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>really serious. Like it's obviously serious because leukemia, but like

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>it has to be really serious that as he was

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the champion, that he couldn't wrestle like one more matches

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and to lose the belt, like you knew he he

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>had this big thing, uh in Saudi Arabia, which is

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a whole other problem, but like they have they have

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a big event in sort of Arabian two weeks and

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>this has to me that serious that he couldn't either

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you go to that or b wrestle because he's a

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>champion whatever he even if he hasn't you watch just

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:19.319
<v Speaker 1>lay down and he get pinned. Whatever. This is immediate serious,

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, crazy yeah, this because hopefully he could get

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>he'd get back on track. Man. That's uh, that's that's

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty much it, right, yeah, m all right. So from

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>there we will move on to the third biggest story

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a Monday Night, which is the Knicks losing again. I'm

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>just kidding. You know, in the end your recap you

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>said that that was not a close game. It was

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>actually very close until like the last two minutes again,

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 1>was tied with like three minutes left. Yeah, but like that,

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't yeah, but it was. It was closer than

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you led to believe, Like you know, you know, it's

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>just completely destroyed the Knicks last night. He didn't really.

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I was watching that for when I saw the game

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>was tied going the fourth quarter, because at halftime they

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>were down by like twenty, like, all right, well, wow

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>they came. They battle all the way back. They tied

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the game going into the fourth court. Let's see what

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>they have to offer. And then it was just the Knicks.

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>You know. Chris Middleton was great. Chris Midleton is always great.

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>He was, he was awesome. Good job I haven't updated,

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, I meant to pick up somebody off Fantasy

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Basketball waiver wire and I forgot today. Well but in

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>all seriousness, the other big story that we wanted to

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>get to you was a Mari Cooper being traded yesterday

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>for a first round draft pick. That have an after

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>our show yesterday, what were your thoughts? And then what

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts now? Frank? So everyone's bashing the Dallas

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys for giving up a first round pick for Marie

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Coop while the Patriots fleeced the Cleveland Browns and got

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Josh Gordon for a fifth round pick. And then, you know,

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I just saw a few people talking about this on Twitter.

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Imagine the backlash you know, people would have had on

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys if they were actually the ones to

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>trade for Josh Gordon. Like everyone praises this move because

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it was the Patriots who it and they're like, oh,

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots gotta steal. But if at the time the

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys were the team to trade for Josh Gordon, I'm

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>sure they would have got backlash regardless. So, yes, the

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>first round pick is a lot to give up for

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a Marii Cooper And based on everything else that we've heard,

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the other teams there was no other

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>team willing to give up a first round pick. We

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>were just talking to Corey about this downstairs. Uh, they're

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna use that first round pick this path this

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>upcoming season to draft a wide receiver anyway. And you

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>know it is different because that wide receiver would be

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>playing under a rookie contract, obviously would likely be younger

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>than a Mary Cooper, but people don't realize the Mary

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Cooper is still only twenty four years old. He's younger

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>than Cooper Cup. I've seen some people, you know, point

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that out on Twitter. They desperately needed to make this move.

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>They have Cole Beasley, who's like the underneath slot receiver,

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>but by no means should he be the top receiver

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>on this team. They now get that guy on the

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>outside who can stretch the field, who can make the

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>place or hope or at least we hope he can

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>because you know, he's been given opportunities in the past

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and actually had a Stat of the day for the

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>first time in a while. Great. It's kind It comes

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>via Scott Barrett, So it's not really my stat of

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the day. It' Scott Barretts Stat of the Day, which

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I stole what I'm giving credit four. So so it's okay.

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Among all sixty one wide receivers to see at least

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>one and fifty catchable targets in Marie, Cooper ranks dead

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>last and drop rate thirteen point one percent. To put

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that in perspective, Doug Baldwin dropped one pass every thirty

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>eight catchable targets. Cooper has dropped one every seven point

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>six catchable targets, so that's you know, that's a that's

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a thirty catch difference between Doug Baldwin and Mari Cooper

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how often they dropped the ball. So

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>he look, I guarantee if you asked the Marie Cooper,

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>he would tell you I need to be better in

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of his fantasy value here. I think the targets

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>go up. Will probably see more consistent targets. But remember

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys don't pass the ball all that much in

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of play volume, Like they're going to run the

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>football a lot still with Ezekiel Elliott there, you know,

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>they throw the football the fifth fewest times in the

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>NFL to this point the season. So you can see

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>more consistent targets out of Mamori Cooper. I just I

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think this moosts value all that much. He's in

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver three discussion from the value changes all

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 1>that much. Either. I'll break it down my thoughts and

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>hell your place them we go to the waiver wire.

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll do that when we come back to waiver wire Tuesday.

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Who to add, who to drop? The BFF to break

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it down for you next Daily Rodo dot Com learned

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players. We don't just give

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you premier advice. We play every day, all major sports,

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>all year round. We never stopped industry leading DFS tools

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and custom projections, and now the Daily Rodo dot Com

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>optimize in minutes building, optimize line up for cash games

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>and turneys learned from the game's best DFS players. Joined

0:17:49.720 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodo dot Com Fantasy best Friends Forever, Fantasy Sports

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Radio Network back with you d lead at indeed um.

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoy playing daily Fantasy sports but are sick

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>of dealing with the professionals using algorithms to select hundreds

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of lineups and entries trying to prosper with the tool

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>at my Bookie dot ag, we're gonna have to create

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>multiple lineups, ditch the hassle of dealing with late line

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of scratches and avoid express winning any percent of the money,

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>investing the players that you want without salary caps. And

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>if you sign up for a new account using the

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>promo code f n T s Y, you can receive

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a fifty positive bonus. No more deal with laid lineup scratches,

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>no experts to compete against because you and the prop

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that you choose through my Bookie dot a G. The

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>promo code is F ANDCS. Why when you sign up

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and choose your matchups using the Promise Builder tool that's

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>my Bookie dot a G, the promo code is F

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and T S Why. Okay, Frank Mary Cooper heads to

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:59.479
<v Speaker 1>Dallas and me personally, I don't like the trade for Dallas.

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the side of they give up too much.

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:03.479
<v Speaker 1>It's the first round pick, and I understand they're more

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>desperate necess than the Patriots were. And Josh Gordon certainly

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>has more issues than a Maori Cooper does off the field.

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And despite Cooper dealing with the concussion, still a young

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 1>guy and he can improve, no doubt. But give me

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>up that first round pick. That bothers me because I

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>gets you gotta givote something to get something. But next

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.679
<v Speaker 1>year is his option year and he's gonna want to

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>get paid. And if he balls out as Dallas hopes

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>he does, they don't know him a lot of money.

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:32.640
<v Speaker 1>And as we've seen with some of these teams with

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>UH store wide receivers, the Giants and the Bucks for instance,

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the last two to do it. When you play these

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>all but tross contracts. These wide receivers, you gotta save

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>money elsewhere, and it hasn't exactly worked. So, yeah, Dallas

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>has the young quarterback under the rookie contract right now,

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>but that goes away to next year, I believe. I

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>mean after next year they gotta get Dack an extension.

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know, I don't know the long term,

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the right mover for Dallas. Obviously Jerry Jones

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>will pay, but it's a salary cap you gotta worry about.

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 1>So question more que the nazis for me with the Cowboys, Yeah,

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I understand from that perspective. Um, yeah, they're gonna They're

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to pay Dak Prescott as well. Um look,

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>look if if they end up having to pay a

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Mari Cooper, that's gonna because he, you know, performed well

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>for them. So I mean, if that's how they want

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to look at it, it just seems like they were

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the biggest problem with giving up the first round pick.

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>It just seems like they were bidding against themselves, like

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>who else was going to give up a first round pick?

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I saw that the Eagles were involved. I know there

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>were a few other teams that were talking trying to

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>get a Mari Cooper. But I just who else was

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 1>willing to give up a first round pick. I I

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>don't really think there was anybody. I think a second

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>round pick probably could have got this done. Yeah, I

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>think so too. I think ultimately something pick would get

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>it done. But I'm sure Reggie mackenzie asked for a

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>first and Stephen and the rumber one Stephen Jones called

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 1>him out and said, all right, you got it. No

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>back and forth, huh, just the take the It's like

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy, like you're throwing out a terrible trade off

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>route there. It's like the first trade offer just for

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>like you know, the feeling out process, like hey, I'll

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>give you a Raheem Mostter, you give me Kareem Hunt,

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>like you know, let's just let's just get the talk started. Yeah,

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>now I'll take that trade. I'll take that. Now I

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>want I want Raheem Moostar for for Kareem Hunter. Yeah.

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I just I just really want them on my team.

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's basically how it went down. Oh, by the way,

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I just a screen shot. Um Dan Dugan, his Giants reporter,

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>just tweeted this out that the Sakwan Barkley sa Kwan

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Barkley t D was not reviewed. The Giants have the

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>p A D D out there, and then Sherman was like,

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, we should go over to Gosh. So Mark

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Cooper heads to Dallas and that brings us to our

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire pickups for this week. Lots of Oakland Raiders,

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>lots of Oakland Raiders and and if you watch the

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>fandwel hurry up later on today, it will be filled

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>with Oakland Raiders, but never a good thing. No, it's

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>probably not. But they have to replace Marshawn Lynchon in

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the starting lineup, who's out for a while. They now

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:57.479
<v Speaker 1>have to replace Mark Cooper in the starting line up,

0:21:57.520 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 1>who's out for good because he's on Dallas. Let me

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>just start with replacing Amari Cooper. Who gets the biggest

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>bump with a Cooper trade? I think undoubtedly it's uh,

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>it's Jordy Nelson and Jared Cook. I think those are

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>the first two names. But unfortunately those two are likely

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>owned already. You could go out, I mean go ahead

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>and check your waiver wire just in case, because they

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>were on a by this past week in Week seven,

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, Fantasy owners needed that roster spot.

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>They might have got rid of Jared Cook, they might

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have got rid of a Jordy Nelson. But if you remember,

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>we actually told you to hold onto Jordy Nelson throughout

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the buy in case Amari Cooper was traded, which seems

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to be the case. But I do think that it's uh,

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's more Jordy Nelson targets. It's more Jared Cook.

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:38.959
<v Speaker 1>And look, there's still a chance that those guys can

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>get traded too. I know that today is the trade deadline,

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>so we'll see what happens. There's only a few hours

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>left until then. Today that it was next Tuesday. I

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody told me yesterday that it was today. I thought

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it would be wrong, could be wrong. You look that

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>up anyway, It's alright, so it's next week next So

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>it looks like, you know, we'll have Jordy Nelson for

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 1>at least another week. But I think it's Jordy Nelson,

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it's Jared Cook. In deeper leagues, you're gonna see Martavis

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Brian available. Obviously, he's owned pretty much. I mean, he's

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>unknowned across the board. I think he more so just

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 1>steps into that Marii Cooper role where the down the

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>down the field threat, the big receiver type of role.

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>But as we've seen out of Mary Cooper for you know,

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 1>the past year and a half now, that is a

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>very inconsistent role. So r Tavis Bryant will have a

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>little bit more upside. He'll be on the field a

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>little bit more, he'll see more targets, but like a

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Marii Cooper, he's going to be very boom er bust.

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a lot of I think it's a

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of Joy Nelson, a lot of Jared Cook, and

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>then once we get into the running backs, um, you

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>might even see more targets out of Jailan Richard from

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a guy who was seeing a pretty safe floor of

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>targets every single week before this trade and before the

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>injury to Marshall Lynch. So it's Jordy, It's Cook, it's

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>Jaylan Richard who I think see the biggest upticks in

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>the past game. Okay, so Jaylan Richard, I want to

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 1>get to him in a second. Martavis Bryant you also mentioned,

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:58.959
<v Speaker 1>and he's the one I'm looking at. The two obvious

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers Marte of is Brian and the architect Seth Roberts. Um,

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Martavis Bryant only on in seven percent of Yeah, he's

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>out there everywhere. He's out there everywhere, and he's at

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 1>least in the past shown something. Um. I think he's

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>shown some talent this year as well. And I think

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>ultimately Seth Roberts is what he does his cat a

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit right, He's not nearly as talented as Brian.

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>That could be more consistent maybe because maybe he goes

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>right in that slot and through the years he has

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>been the one that has taken, uh, taking time and

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>taking opportunities away from Muri Cooper. So maybe Seth Roberts

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>is a sneaky one, But I think Martavis Bryant is

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a more exciting option, and I would go with him.

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>How much you bidding Martevis Bryant, I mean, I'm not

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you might feel differently. I'm not going too hard for

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>this again. I just think there's gonna still be a

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of mouse of feed from the guys that I mentioned,

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, I know there's a lot of mouse.

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>There's there's he's gonna he's gonna step into that Mr.

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Cooper role, but that has been an inconsistent role, so

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>tend a twelve percent is too much. That's probably the

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 1>range of I'm okay with that. I'm okay with that.

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not breaking the bank for Mortavis Bryan because I

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's it's a lock, um, But I think

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it's fine. I'm fine with that. See, I think there's

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>other wide receivers that we're going to discuss that I

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.479
<v Speaker 1>would like more than him. Really, okay, are you bidding

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>on Seth Roberts in a deeper league? You could definitely

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:25.360
<v Speaker 1>throw you know, a few bucks there or whatever. Three

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to five percent bid just because the reasons you mentioned.

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>If he steps into the slot, we've seen in years

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 1>past that they like to use him in the red

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>zone as well. Uh, not necessarily the case this year.

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't have that many red zone targets, but in

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:39.919
<v Speaker 1>years past he was used in that capacity. So, you know,

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>three to five percent. He's one of those those wide

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>receiver flyers you just throw a little bit on, but

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you just don't just don't spend too much on. Okay, Um,

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>he's an end of the bench, sticking with sticking with

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders. Before we move on, you mentioned Jalen Richard

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and Jayla Richard obviously gets above in the receiving game,

0:25:57.320 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and he also gets a bump in the running game

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>with Marshawn Lynch out for the month, if you have

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to choose between Doug Martin and Jaylon Richard, and I

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>know this happened that this news came out last week,

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>but it was after some of the waivers run waivers rans,

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:10.479
<v Speaker 1>and these guys could be out there for you. Um,

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 1>if you have to choose one between Rochard and Martin,

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>which one would you go with? It's the cop out answer,

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>but this is what it has to be for this situation.

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's situationally dependent. So in full point PPR, I'll

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 1>take Jaylon Richard in non PPR, and even half PPR,

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I will still take Doug Martin. I think he steps

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>in as the lead running back here. And if you

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>look at what Marshawn Lynch had been doing, uh, he

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 1>played fifty point three six percent of the snaps on

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>the season, So that's likely the role that Doug Martin

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>steps into. Maybe that that many snaps. Maybe he doesn't

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>get fifty percent, but you know, maybe in that forty

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>percent range Marshall Lynch had been you know on a

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>per game basis a top twenty four running back this year.

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 1>He had fifteen red zone carries, which was inside the

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>top ten for running backs this season in terms of

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>red zone carries. So Doug Martin I think just pretty

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>much takes on that role in non pp R and

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>half PPR. I'll take him in full PPR. I'll take

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:04.360
<v Speaker 1>jail on a chard, But I do like for Chard

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot. He's only had his season high is twenty

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>four rushing yards. He doesn't do anything there, but he's

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 1>had at least six receptions in four out of six games.

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>The targets have been very consistent. From a PPR perspective,

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>he has been um. He's just provided a very safe floor.

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think with Mark Cooper gone, with Lynch gone,

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that floor is even safer now and we might even

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>see even more upside because he's gonna be on the

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:32.199
<v Speaker 1>field more. H Yeah, I think that. I think that

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. Here, Oh, here we go. There's been a trade.

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I got a text. Now it's all of my timeline.

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 1>The Giants have trade in cornerback Eli Apple in the

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Saints. Wow, that's interesting. Well, you know, say

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the Saints played against the Giants called weeks ago Eli Apple.

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:49.439
<v Speaker 1>I think we missed that game. We knew that they

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>needed a cornerback. But hey, okay, maybe the Giants doing

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>something smart. Okay is that smart though? I mean Eli

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple's pretty young and he was playing well this year

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:03.719
<v Speaker 1>when he was on the field. Resources man need resources

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to rebuilds. Yeah, it depends what they get for him,

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>so that'll be interesting to see. But listen, they couldn't

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>give this guy jets. I mean, they couldn't give this

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:14.199
<v Speaker 1>guy away. It's good for the Giants, but um be

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see. Yeah, interesting to see what happens. Doesn't

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>really affect fantasy all that most. Sorry, it was just

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a definitely worth bringing up. Other wide receivers also something

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that happened after Waivers RAN's head again out for the

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>season with New Orleans, which means Tray Kuan Smith the

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>next guy up. He plays significantly over Cam Marioth over

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. From Smith's out there, how much is spending Frankie,

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>He's likely in that same range as Martavis Bryant. I

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people are very excited about Trey

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Kwan Smith over the weekend, and I get it. He

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>has big play potential. He has upside, but again the

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Saints offense, it runs through who it runs through, and

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that's Michael Thomas, that's mark Ingram, that's Alvin Kamara. We

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>even saw Ben Watson involved again this week. Six targets

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>called all six altos. I had a touchdown in this game,

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 1>so well, I do like the big play upside of

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 1>trade Kuan Smith. Again, this was a guy who people

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>fantasy analysts were very excited about in the preseason. He

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>made some noise, he had that big game before the

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>bye week. I just don't know that there's gonna be

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of consistency there. So he's in that same

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>range as Mark Tavis Bryant. I would kind of put

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>them on the same level. Um, but I don't want

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to jump the gun or anything as there was the

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>other that would be crazy the the if the Packers

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers were dropped during the um during the bye week,

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>those are really the guys that I'm looking at. Because

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Randall Cobb owned I So I agree with you. Normally,

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>anything like below sixty I think it is worth talking about.

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>So I I agree with you, but I will say

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have any confirmation that these guys are healthy, like,

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>there's been no indication that they're back. We assume they

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>are because we thought they were most of playing in

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the Packers last game two weeks ago, but we have

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>not been given any indication that they're healthy ready to rock.

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Just say yeah right out of the gate. They Who

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>knows if they'll be able to help you in Week eight.

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Act certainly trust Roonomo Allison much more than I do

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Randall Cob. It's just it's just been seasoned after season

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that Rando Cobb continues to get hurt now, and we

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>know that Allison was dealing with that significant concussion. But

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that role, that number two wide receiver role is up

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>for grabs, and we've seen, especially the past couple of

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>weeks m v S Marquez Valden scant Ley has made

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the most of that opportunity. I wouldn't drop him yet either,

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>because there's still a chance that he is the number

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of two wide receiver on this team. But you want

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to take a shot if those guys were dropped, because

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>if they do emerge as that wide receiver to then

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at a legitimate, you know, high end wide

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>receiver three for fantasy purposes, Yeah. Absolutely. Um. I love

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Jeronimo Allison. I own him everywhere. As you know, Randall

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Cobb when he's healthy, is worth it. But the thing is,

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Frank today, Martamos Bryant's out there right, Jack Blain Smith's

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>out there. Would you drop m the s in order

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to get one of those guys? If you are anticipating

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that Cobb and or al So are healthy, you may

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>not with with some of these byeways, you may not

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>have some room to drop. So would you drop and

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the s for one of these guys? I would do

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it for Geronimo Allison. I wouldn't do it for Randall

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 1>cop What about for Trade Kwon Smith? What about for

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Martavis Bryant? No, I wouldn't. Okay, because there's still a chance.

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's like the GI So you're saying there's

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a chance, Like with Marcus Valve Scandling. You know I

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>said this before the bye. I mean they could have

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 1>watched film. He could have talked with Aaron Rodgers, the

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>coaching staff, whatever it was, they could have realized, all right,

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>like we want to continue to give this guy a shot,

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Like let's see what he can do. Maybe, you know,

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the first game out of the by the three wide

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>receiver sets are Davantae Adams, MVS, and Alison Maybe Randall

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Cops just kind of phased out here. We already saw that,

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were trying to cut him. They were

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to trade him before the season. So I would

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>not drop MVS yet for either trade Kwan Smith or

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Martavis Bryant, because again with the Saints bottom mouths to

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>feed with the Oakland Raiders, I just don't know what

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the consistency is gonna be. Like this team could trade

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr. It just seems like they're trying to get

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>anything that they can get for anything on that team.

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>So um, I just I'll trust the Packers passing attack

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>more so than those others. Okay, other wide receivers that

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>are out there from New Orleans from besides the Green

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>May guys, besides Martavis Bryant and besides Tray Kwan Smith. Uh, Frankie,

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Courtland Sutton. He's Marius Thomas and or Emmanuel

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Sandras gets traded only abou. Yeah, I'm very excited about

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>this one too, because I do think a trade will

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>happen here. I can see to Marius Thomas getting shift

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>out for you know, a third whatever, the third round

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>pick whatever that might be. The Emmanuel Sanders I think

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>is the guy that sticks around so Um, obviously we

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>need him to get healthy for fantasy purposes. But Cortland

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Sutton has flashed a little bit here already this season.

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>He has a few games with touchdowns. They use the

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>second round pick on him, so they're obviously very excited

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 1>about him. They use that draft pick knowing that, okay,

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be part of this wide receiver corps

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>for the future, whether it's him and Emmanuel Sanders. They

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>also use the draft pick on day Shawn Hamilton's so

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're play in deeper leagues, he's another name to

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>pay atten into here. But very excited about Courtland Sutton.

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I do think whether it's if it's not this week,

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 1>next week to Marius Thomas has traded from the team,

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Courtland Sutton just steps in as that outside wide US

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>leader two for this team. I agree, and you do

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it now, if Frankie, you do it now before we

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>cost you everything next next week. Uh, two more guys,

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to get you in the wide receivers and

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll move on to the running backs. UM and they

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>both play the same team, Jachim Grant and DeVante Parker.

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>This team is going to be without Kenny Stills because

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>they play on Thursday, and they're out without Albert Wilson

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>most likely for the rest of the season. Bar Rock

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>has to throw to somebody, and I understand maybe Danny

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Amondola should be on this list as well. He's got

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to throw to somebody. There is no tight end worth it.

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>H Kenny and Drake fine, but which wide receiver, if any,

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>do you want to pick up in Miami. So again,

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>if Danny Amandela was healthy, you know, because he's banged

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>up again. He got banged up in that game. If

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>he were healthy, and we knew that he was going

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to play in that Thur'say Night game, and there's no

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>indication that he's not going to play yet. But what

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>was his injury? I believe it was a shoulder. I

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>saw he was definitely banged up. Either left that girlfriend

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 1>push pictures of him on the beach, so he seems okay.

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>When when did that happen? Yeah, probably like an older picture,

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 1>probably laying an hostle bed somewhere. He's he's limited with

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 1>a shoulder injury in Monday's practice, it looks like he's

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna go. He's the guy. Danny Amndol is the guy

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're hurt on bye week, because again we have

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>four teams on a buy, and it's teams that you

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>might have been using their wide receivers. It's you know,

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons with Julio Jones, Calvin Ridley, Mohammed sanw Uh

0:34:39.160 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 1>if you were using Cold Beasley. The Cowboys are on

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a buy, Corey Davis is on a buy, and then

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Keenan Allen has also on to buy. So we're gonna

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>be hurting four some wide receivers here. If you're playing PPR,

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>we just saw Danny Amndola targeted seven times, had the

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 1>six receptions for eighty yards. I think the way to

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 1>attack the Texans is through their secondary So Dani A.

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Mendole is the guy. I think Jachem Grant is more

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of the boomer Bus. He is electric, like he is fast,

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>but I just don't know that the target share is

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 1>going to be there. Um Devanta Parker too, like I'm

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.240
<v Speaker 1>not fooling round Vanta Parker. I just think Danny Amundel

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is probably the safest of the buck. I think Avandula

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 1>is the safest of the bunch, but he's also the

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.760
<v Speaker 1>most likely to get injured of the bunch. You start

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 1>in desperation on Thursday, he lasts one play. If I

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys, I'm going to keep Grant. Like

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you said, he's electric. We've seen some of these big plays.

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>In order to went out Thursday, you're gonna have to

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>get some big plays. And I think Adam Gaze, who

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't trust at all, I think he utilizes Jakeem

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Grant on Thursday night. I really do. We can agree

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 1>that Devantay Parker is just not even in the mix

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 1>here right, Yes, keep the same. She keep happing for me,

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Danny avandelavver Frank. We move on to the running backs

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in the tight end when we come back. Stick around more.

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>You be a fast right after this. If you're someone

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that needs fantasy sports advice every day, the Fantasy Sports

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Radio Network has you covered. When you download the n

0:35:58.000 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 1>T s Y Sports Radio Network GAP, you get the

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 1>fantasy advice every single day right through the weekend, and

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:04.880
<v Speaker 1>be sure to listen to our weekend warriors like College

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Football Today. Welcome to College Football Today weekend fantasy Updates.

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>They call me the fantasy Jesus in this league is

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>never short of exciting at I T L and so

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:15.879
<v Speaker 1>much more down know the Fantasy Sports Radio Network gap

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 1>in the iTunes and Google play store now and keep

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the best fantasy experts right in your pocket all day

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>long and all week long. The Daily Run dot Com

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>lineup Optimizer is available, oh right now. That means you

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to use to seem too conjections at Daily routor dot com.

0:36:43.440 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>NFL subscribers use and are you using it in each

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and every week for NBA DFS. Cool is that, Frank?

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>We use it every day. Only three games on the

0:36:53.640 --> 0:37:00.959
<v Speaker 1>slate tonight, so little short slate actions totally. My Denver

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Nuggets are next. My Denver Nuggets got like five teams, now,

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:09.879
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting, the Bucks, the Nugs, seventies sixers. I'll find

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a few more. Well, you know my team elegants. I've

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 1>been all. I've been on it, man, I've been on it.

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I've been on it. You have so anyway, go to

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the other orter dot com. Use a promo code F

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 1>and T s Y when you check out, and he's

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 1>especially discout Deverter dot com, the site where millionaires are

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>made The promo code is F and T s y

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>let's getting some of the drawing backs pick up cool? Yes, sir,

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned Doug Martin and we mentioned Jalen Richard before

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:43.400
<v Speaker 1>we do what we did A ready, I spent twenty

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>two dollars on Doug Martin over the season. Over the weekend,

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>they spent too much twenty two out of fifty nine

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:50.359
<v Speaker 1>on my remaining dollars. So I told you to use

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty two because it was his number, right, That's not

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:56.320
<v Speaker 1>why I did it. That's why I just randomly, I

0:37:56.360 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>don't know this one with two two at a fifty nine,

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>it's like probably remaining budget. How much was the next

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>HIGHS bid? I don't think you can see that on CBS, alright,

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 1>can see the next Highes bid. It's probably for the best.

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean not being able to see the next bid.

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 1>I want to see. I want to know how. Yeah,

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it works out, but sometimes it'll be like, all right,

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 1>the next closest bid was like three bucks, and I'm like,

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:23.879
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather not Nope, all right, so I'll just let

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:26.319
<v Speaker 1>it rock. Did you trade too much? Did you spend

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>too much desperately? I mean, it all comes down how

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>desperate you from running back. So my running backs are

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson. Can you didn Drake Isaiah Crowwell and Duke Johnson,

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So I could use the running back. He's running back

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:42.280
<v Speaker 1>when I have I have Mozart have most started Giants.

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:45.319
<v Speaker 1>The Giants re sid a fourth and a seventh for

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a former first round pick. Pretty good, pretty good, pretty

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:54.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty good, Mary Cooper, former first round pick, got a

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>first round pick. Too bad. You guys can trade with Dallas.

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 1>There's two years ago, right, Yeah, sure was the guy

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:05.880
<v Speaker 1>they actually wanted in that draft. Wasn't it like Leonard

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Floyd or something? Was that the draft? Yes, Jack Conklin, Yeah,

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:16.879
<v Speaker 1>and that was is your former GM. Okay, Reese doesn't

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 1>like to trade up in the draft to get his

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:21.279
<v Speaker 1>guys down. When you don't get we'll just stay right here,

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:25.839
<v Speaker 1>and who's best player available? Eli Apple? Here's our guy. Yeah,

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that's how he felt he's gonna come play for the

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Big Apple. Right, it makes a bunch of sense. Let's

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 1>draft him and let's trade him. By the way, the

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Giants two thousand and sixteen first round, it was Eli

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple was Eric Flowers. Things going well? We Eric Flowers

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:43.560
<v Speaker 1>over Todd Gurley, I mean, we'll just never get over

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that one. I mean, like the Jets are the best

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>drafters either, I mean bunds of stuff you can make

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>fun of for them too. Yeah. Uh So back to

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:52.319
<v Speaker 1>Doug Martin, if he's out there this week, you played

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:55.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine dollars, Like, I think he's out there in

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of leagues for sure, And so I guess

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 1>based on how much I paid for him, Like looking

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 1>at is, that's that's too rich. It seems rich. It's

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Doug Martin count stinks. Yeah, I'd rather Jaitlyn Rechard. The

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Raiders stink, and I know you're gonna be playing from

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 1>behind exactly, and they just lost your top receiver. Give

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>me Jaylen Richard Man, all right, Like I would pay

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:21.720
<v Speaker 1>like I play, I would pay him or so for Richard.

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:25.320
<v Speaker 1>So you're probably close to like the fifteen for Doug Martin. Yeah,

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>all right. I think it was starting running back. They

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 1>used Marshawn Lynch a lot. If Doug Martin just stepped

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 1>into that role, then I think he'll at least have

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>like high in flex potential. But we'll see. Would you

0:40:37.080 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>rather start? Haven't really done once the past couple of years,

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubting that. Would you rather start Doug Martin

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 1>or pick up Doug Martin rather or Ronald Jones. You've

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:48.919
<v Speaker 1>got a touchdown on Sunday, Peyton Barber is banged up, Greg. Yes, Frank,

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:52.239
<v Speaker 1>how many shows have we doneerated this season? You know

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.879
<v Speaker 1>how I feel about Tampa Bay running like they can't

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>run the football. He scored a touchdown, He's still he

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>rushed like six times for seventeen yards. He had one

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>reception for fifteen yards. They don't use their running backs

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:08.360
<v Speaker 1>all that often in the past game. They can't run block.

0:41:09.000 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>The Tampa Bay Bucks are an absolute mess. I'd rather

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 1>have Doug Martin Ronald Jones. I mean, look, I just

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 1>put them on the list because he could potentially be

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a starting running back because Peyton Barber is dealing with

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 1>an undisclosed injury, which apparently Doug Dirt Cutter is not

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>revealing to create competitive edge, so that the Bengals don't

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>know which running back they're gonna like. It doesn't matter.

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>You can't run the football. Who cares what running back

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna use? I would take I would take either

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Raiders running back over Ronald Jones. I'd probably take rahem

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Mozart over freaking Ronald Jones. I mean, that's what ire

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 1>well on the days most there, it's our guy, who

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>has a very nice schedule coming up. By the way,

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you've seen this, Greg the Cardinals, Raiders, Giants,

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and Bucks. The next four games for the San Francisco

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners, Brida once again dealing with that ankle injury

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>which reoccurred over the weekend. And then Alfred Morris just

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 1>isn't great and this is a team, you know, why

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't the forty Niners at least see what they have

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:14.320
<v Speaker 1>in this kid? You mean, he's younger than Alfred Morris

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:16.360
<v Speaker 1>um and he has a hundred and forty six rushing

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 1>yards on just nineteen carries over his last two games

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>at seven point seven yards per carry. Also saw a

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 1>season high thirty eight percent of the snaps in weeks seven.

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I'm kind of excited about Mozart just based

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:30.520
<v Speaker 1>on the upcoming matchups. I don't think any of those

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 1>teams are teams that are gonna blow them out either,

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Like the forty Niners are a bad team, yes, but

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals, the Raiders, the Giants, maybe the Bucks get

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 1>like a big lead in that game, but the other

0:42:40.640 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>three teams like they're all bad, so those could be

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 1>close games. From where Mozart is potentially the starting running back,

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 1>that Brida has that ankle injury in and out of

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the lot, and there's most of their kids talented. Now,

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:52.719
<v Speaker 1>they did go back to Alfred Morris a bunch. He

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 1>was actually had the most carries in the game last

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 1>week for San Francisco in the game that they were

0:42:57.640 --> 0:43:01.400
<v Speaker 1>down up most of So, you know, I think, unfortunately,

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a three headed I don't work called a monster. It's

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a three headed committee. It's the opposite of a monster

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>cone committee. Grossness. Um, so you know, most just whatever.

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Then he had two there's two more guys. I I like,

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 1>you have a couple more guys on here anyway, Frank

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Chris Ivory, he's owned. He's available pretty much everywhere unless

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the Shan McCoy owner owns him. But McCoy concussion is

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 1>that right, a head injury? But yet so he's got

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a concussion. Who do the Bills play this week? Patriots?

0:43:31.719 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 1>It's an issue where they are fourteen point home underdogs,

0:43:35.400 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 1>seems like an issue, but nobody circles the wagons like

0:43:38.040 --> 0:43:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo Bills, Greg, because everything they got blood last week.

0:43:42.640 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing, Like, that's what you're looking at. They

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 1>lost the game thirty seven of five last week, he

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:48.839
<v Speaker 1>still rushed sixteen times for eighty one yards, that's four

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry, and he had six targets three receptions

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 1>for twenty five yards. So again, every single week, we're

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:58.479
<v Speaker 1>struggling to find running backs and whether you're missing out

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:01.800
<v Speaker 1>on you know, Tevin Woman being on a by, Ezekiel Elliott,

0:44:01.840 --> 0:44:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon, Austin Ekeler, there's a lot of running backs

0:44:04.320 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 1>on a bye, even Dean Lewis and Derrick Henry like

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:08.840
<v Speaker 1>those aren't great options, but they might have been flexi

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 1>options for you in the past. If Chris Ivey's available,

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:15.720
<v Speaker 1>which he widely is, he's only sewn on CBS Sports

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, and you are potentially getting a starting running

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 1>back for this week. The only issue with this is

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that they play on Monday night, Greg, So if it

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 1>turns out that Lashawn McCoy is questionable and we don't

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>know before lineup lock on Sunday morning, and there's still

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a chance that McCoy can play, and if he does,

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 1>Chris Ivory is giving you next to nothing. Really, Sunday Night,

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Monday Night, Monday Night, right, right, right, right? Which whose

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:45.200
<v Speaker 1>idea was it? Like I understand you want to get

0:44:45.239 --> 0:44:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots in prime time, but like, even if it

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 1>was Tom Brady versus Josh Allen, dude, I mean it

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 1>could have been a j McCarran, the Bills were dude,

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the Bills are a playoff team. Last year, the Bills

0:44:55.160 --> 0:44:56.839
<v Speaker 1>were not going to be good. There was no way.

0:44:56.960 --> 0:45:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Greg They had the lowest gain total over under mean

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to the season, yet dropped like five and a half.

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I get it. Their playoff team. The atmosphere in Buffalo,

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you like that, we got it? Like I just explaining

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that prospering it. There's no no, there's no there's no

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 1>rationale here with her into hats and Bills like it's

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a division game. That's it. Like there's no other reason,

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Like unless you're gonna show people going through tables in

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:24.319
<v Speaker 1>the preseason, like in the pregame for this game. That's good.

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>That might be the most entertaining part of this whole

0:45:27.719 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 1>night on Monday Night, Patriots Bills four team point home dogs.

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I want I want to see people go through flaming tables.

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what I want to see. Greg. I don't want

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to watch Chris Ivey rom the football, so I just

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:39.719
<v Speaker 1>turn on Monday night Row. I don't want to watch

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that either. Watch whatever crappy Knicks games on next one day?

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:48.799
<v Speaker 1>All right, does a bad job, man, Even if you're

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 1>making the schedules like seven eight months ago, I will

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:56.600
<v Speaker 1>say this hold on Next Monday is the finale season finale,

0:45:56.680 --> 0:46:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Holloe making championship, just saying there anyone else you want

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to pick up this week? And one more one more guy,

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:05.920
<v Speaker 1>one more guy and that or more. Actually, let's let's

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:11.840
<v Speaker 1>hit in the Jets your team. M okay, okay, uh No,

0:46:11.960 --> 0:46:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't have I'm sorry, I don't have

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a J E. T. S and me this week? How freezing?

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:22.080
<v Speaker 1>How serious is the injury to Bob how uh Well,

0:46:22.760 --> 0:46:25.719
<v Speaker 1>normally when a player gets hurt inside within a game,

0:46:25.920 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 1>they like take him to the back and it'd be like, oh,

0:46:27.560 --> 0:46:29.800
<v Speaker 1>his questionable was to return. They rule him out of

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:34.799
<v Speaker 1>that game almost immediately, So take that for what it's worth.

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:36.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he hasn't been ruled out yet for this week,

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:40.520
<v Speaker 1>but I would probably be surprised if he plays so again.

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Trenton Cannon just he was the Jets leading receiver last week.

0:46:44.840 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 1>He was a guy who flashed a little bit in

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the preseason. Just if you're really really desperate and like

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 1>PPR leads, he might be a guy that could catch

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a few passes. They're not going to give Isaiah Crowell

0:46:53.840 --> 0:46:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a full workload by any means. They haven't done that

0:46:56.520 --> 0:46:59.280
<v Speaker 1>this year. He's been dealing with a foot ankle injury

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 1>as well, so they're not gonna give Isaiah Corol twenty touches.

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Trenton Cannon is a name he's not owned anywhere. He's

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:09.360
<v Speaker 1>literally owned zero percent of leagues. I also wrote Elijah

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 1>McGuire's name down on the rundown because he's eligible return

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:14.600
<v Speaker 1>in Week nine. Um, and this was a guy who

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 1>flashed a little bit last year. We know is he

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:21.279
<v Speaker 1>still expected to come back. He practiced last week, so

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:23.080
<v Speaker 1>he's expected to return. So this is just like a

0:47:23.280 --> 0:47:25.839
<v Speaker 1>deep stash. Interesting, you just want to throw it out there.

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:28.200
<v Speaker 1>They gave him some work last year. They were actually

0:47:28.239 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 1>excited about him during the preseason. Remember remember there were

0:47:31.560 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 1>reports that the Jets could have cut the wall pale

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 1>throughout the preseason and just rolled with Isaiah Crowell and

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Elijah McGuire as there as their two running backs there. Um,

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:42.719
<v Speaker 1>So that's he's just kind of like a really a

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 1>deeper league stash because he's eligible to return a week nine. Um.

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And our guy Emery Hunt was very very excited about

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Elijah McGuire last season, as was he for treco In So, um,

0:47:54.360 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, We'll see if Elija McGuire gets some work.

0:47:56.520 --> 0:47:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure he will over the last you know,

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:01.479
<v Speaker 1>over the second half of the season, he'll get work.

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:04.320
<v Speaker 1>The Jets want to use him there, I think. So

0:48:04.920 --> 0:48:07.280
<v Speaker 1>right now is Isaiah what is Isaiah Cruel? How comfortable

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:10.479
<v Speaker 1>are you starting him? He's a flex He's a low

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:13.239
<v Speaker 1>end flex option every week, That's what he is. Maybe

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:16.000
<v Speaker 1>he's a high end flex option. No, because I mean,

0:48:16.400 --> 0:48:18.279
<v Speaker 1>even in the games that blaw power mrs, do you

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:20.480
<v Speaker 1>really think that they're going to give him a a

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:23.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty touch workload he had, Like that's that hasn't been

0:48:24.000 --> 0:48:25.799
<v Speaker 1>his m O all year. Like even in the games

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:28.920
<v Speaker 1>where he's had these big breakout touchdowns, he he hasn't

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:31.759
<v Speaker 1>gotten a lot of work this year. So even if

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:34.560
<v Speaker 1>blal power Mrs time. I don't think that they're gonna

0:48:34.600 --> 0:48:37.879
<v Speaker 1>put that burden on Isaiah Crowell. He's he's a flex

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:40.319
<v Speaker 1>option every single week, and the weeks where he does

0:48:40.400 --> 0:48:43.040
<v Speaker 1>have these monster breakout games, you're gonna be annoyed that

0:48:43.080 --> 0:48:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you didn't start him. But leave me. The thought process

0:48:46.120 --> 0:48:48.400
<v Speaker 1>was right. He hasn't had more than sixteen carries in

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:52.960
<v Speaker 1>any game this year. Any thought here on Chris Herndon.

0:48:54.360 --> 0:49:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Chris Herndon Um again, Chris Herndon is um. He's the

0:49:03.480 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 1>guy who's scored a touchdown in two straight games, saw

0:49:06.000 --> 0:49:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a career high in terms of a season high, career high.

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:11.879
<v Speaker 1>He's a rookie in targets this past week with seven

0:49:11.920 --> 0:49:14.799
<v Speaker 1>and receptions with four. He actually should have had two touchdowns,

0:49:15.320 --> 0:49:17.920
<v Speaker 1>but it actually, you know, he was ruled out at

0:49:17.960 --> 0:49:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the one yard line. His foot touchdout of bounds, So

0:49:20.160 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever it was, they're starting to use him more, and

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:24.359
<v Speaker 1>they used the draft pick on him. We spoke about

0:49:24.400 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>this with Christian Kirk and Josh Rosen. You know, two

0:49:27.080 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>rookie offensive skilled position players coming into the league together

0:49:30.840 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of growing together, and I think we're seeing that

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit with Sam Donald and Chris Herndon. So again,

0:49:36.280 --> 0:49:38.640
<v Speaker 1>this is just like a deep like anytime a tight

0:49:38.719 --> 0:49:41.400
<v Speaker 1>end pops up, Like a couple of weeks ago, it

0:49:41.560 --> 0:49:44.279
<v Speaker 1>was you know, Van's McDonald, it was eg Usama. Now

0:49:44.360 --> 0:49:46.840
<v Speaker 1>those guys, you know, our guys might actually be starting.

0:49:47.160 --> 0:49:49.359
<v Speaker 1>So that's why it's worth picking up. Chris Herndon. All right,

0:49:49.560 --> 0:49:51.520
<v Speaker 1>with that, we signed off of YouTube right now, The

0:49:51.560 --> 0:49:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Frenzy comes your way next Chris Ventra, Jim Day,

0:49:55.000 --> 0:49:57.839
<v Speaker 1>and the Fantasy executive Corey Parson. If you're listening live

0:49:57.880 --> 0:49:59.680
<v Speaker 1>on the radio, will go for another five minutes or so.

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:02.160
<v Speaker 1>If you're listening to the podcast, we appreciate all of

0:50:02.200 --> 0:50:05.720
<v Speaker 1>your support. Please rate, subscribe, like, and leave a comment.

0:50:05.760 --> 0:50:08.879
<v Speaker 1>We need five stars from you. Thank you very very much.

0:50:09.160 --> 0:50:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Five minutes ago, Frank, let's get into the players to drop.

0:50:13.120 --> 0:50:15.680
<v Speaker 1>We give you a bunch of kind of mediocre players

0:50:15.719 --> 0:50:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to pick up tendant twelve percent, nothing more really significant

0:50:18.480 --> 0:50:20.600
<v Speaker 1>other than the Packers guys, and the Raiders and the

0:50:20.680 --> 0:50:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Raiders running backs. Right, speaking Raiders running backs, can you

0:50:24.239 --> 0:50:27.520
<v Speaker 1>drop Marshall Lynch. He was placed on i R. He's

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 1>eligible to return on Christmas Eve, December, but I'd be

0:50:31.160 --> 0:50:33.760
<v Speaker 1>surprised if he plays again this year, I wouldn't hesitate

0:50:33.840 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 1>dropping him. I agree with that, and Marshall lys Droppable

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree. So we both did Can you drop

0:50:39.600 --> 0:50:44.160
<v Speaker 1>your boy, Corey Davis? This is one of those where

0:50:44.840 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to, but if you're really hurt by

0:50:47.200 --> 0:50:48.759
<v Speaker 1>the bye weeks, Like if you drafted a team that

0:50:48.840 --> 0:50:51.920
<v Speaker 1>has Keenan Allen and Corey Davis, hey, you're probably like

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:57.640
<v Speaker 1>two in five. You did that, um, But if you

0:50:57.719 --> 0:50:59.880
<v Speaker 1>need the roster spot, you need the roster spot again.

0:51:00.160 --> 0:51:03.680
<v Speaker 1>You don't get fantasy production for upside, for potential. He's

0:51:03.719 --> 0:51:06.120
<v Speaker 1>had one great game this year where he was targeted

0:51:06.160 --> 0:51:08.560
<v Speaker 1>fifteen times against the Eagles, nine receptions, a hundred and

0:51:08.560 --> 0:51:11.200
<v Speaker 1>sixty one yards in a touchdown. Every other game he's

0:51:11.200 --> 0:51:13.360
<v Speaker 1>had sixty two yards of west. He only scored a

0:51:13.400 --> 0:51:16.000
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in that game. Marcus Mariota and him don't seem

0:51:16.040 --> 0:51:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to be on the same page. You just saw Taj

0:51:17.719 --> 0:51:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Sharp have the big game this past week. Their past game,

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:23.400
<v Speaker 1>their offense overall has not looked great. If you need

0:51:23.440 --> 0:51:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the roster spot, I try and find someone else. But

0:51:26.480 --> 0:51:27.880
<v Speaker 1>if you need the roster spot, I would drop him.

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to hold on if I can, I agree,

0:51:30.800 --> 0:51:32.319
<v Speaker 1>but I thought it was worth throwing his name out.

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I agree. It's a discussion for sure. You wrote cute

0:51:35.320 --> 0:51:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Cole on here, I'll drop dropped him this past week.

0:51:37.960 --> 0:51:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Probably picked up Doug Martin over the weekend. No problem

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:42.720
<v Speaker 1>with that. Albert Wilson who got hurt and Mary welcome

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:44.359
<v Speaker 1>as the rest of the season, I'll drop him too.

0:51:45.080 --> 0:51:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll drop Mike Williams who wrote down here, No problem

0:51:47.200 --> 0:51:51.320
<v Speaker 1>with that. When it comes to some of these other players,

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Frank or Keyhote and my end Mike Williams. Corey Davis

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:01.360
<v Speaker 1>isn't even ranked inside the top up fifty and Fantasy

0:52:01.440 --> 0:52:08.520
<v Speaker 1>points wide receiver. It's awful, not good, not good, Buddy,

0:52:08.640 --> 0:52:13.560
<v Speaker 1>not good, Bob, not great Bob. Yep, it's okay, um oh,

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:15.920
<v Speaker 1>he's actually when you turn into half point PPR, he's

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:20.200
<v Speaker 1>actually number fifty's that's great Bob wide receiver fifty in

0:52:20.320 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 1>points per game, right behind Allen Robinson, Mark he's Goodwin,

0:52:24.880 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Stills, Marvin Jones, Cold Beasley. That I mean a

0:52:29.280 --> 0:52:32.160
<v Speaker 1>lot have underperforming wide receivers this year. Not great. The

0:52:32.239 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 1>other guys in your list, you Cottle dropping them, we

0:52:36.080 --> 0:52:39.719
<v Speaker 1>have because I would drop drop Mike Williams, Frank Or

0:52:39.760 --> 0:52:42.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't perform in the good matchup against the Detroit Lions.

0:52:42.560 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Like when else are you gonna feel good about? Got

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:49.239
<v Speaker 1>banged up in that game? Did not? Everybody saw that

0:52:49.320 --> 0:52:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and noticed that. But he got banged up. Yeah, but

0:52:51.239 --> 0:52:53.160
<v Speaker 1>like based on the running backs that we brought up,

0:52:53.160 --> 0:52:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I've dropped. I would drop him for any of the Raiders.

0:52:55.280 --> 0:52:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I would drop him for Mozart. I would drop him

0:52:59.000 --> 0:53:04.360
<v Speaker 1>for Ronald Jones. I guess if you need, if you

0:53:04.400 --> 0:53:09.200
<v Speaker 1>need to start, like Chris Ivory. Sure, we dropped him

0:53:09.200 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 1>for the wide receivers we mentioned too. Drop him for

0:53:12.760 --> 0:53:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Jordy Nelson, any of the Packers, guys Court and Sutton.

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll take that shot. Creakwan Smith, he's very dropping. Hum,

0:53:22.200 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you do with may hang on Ki? He's

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:27.040
<v Speaker 1>not gonna play Thursday. They have the bye next week.

0:53:27.120 --> 0:53:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we have what they don't the boy because

0:53:29.120 --> 0:53:33.360
<v Speaker 1>it's Thursday, so they have a mini by Essentially, I

0:53:33.480 --> 0:53:35.920
<v Speaker 1>think I hold on a Kiki. I think he's worth it.

0:53:37.280 --> 0:53:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I would drop him for Jordy Nelson if you were available,

0:53:39.760 --> 0:53:43.839
<v Speaker 1>or the Packers, that's fine, fine that um you could

0:53:43.880 --> 0:53:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you could also drop the rat the rat that's your guy, Greg.

0:53:47.800 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Some DST streamers got Damian Ratley, and you could drop

0:53:50.320 --> 0:53:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Josh Raynolds and those are your guys. Steelers versus the Browns,

0:53:53.760 --> 0:53:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals against San fran You can start both of those

0:53:55.880 --> 0:53:59.280
<v Speaker 1>defense forty Niners against the Cardinals, Patriots at Buffalo, Texans

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:01.680
<v Speaker 1>against Miami. There you go. The Frenzy's up next with

0:54:01.760 --> 0:54:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Frankie Standfeld. My name is Greg Susman. Thank you so

0:54:03.920 --> 0:54:06.359
<v Speaker 1>much for watching and listening to the fantasy best Friends Forever.

0:54:06.640 --> 0:54:10.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll do it all again tomorrow, we hope. H