WEBVTT - Martin Lee on CBD: It's a Molecule, Not a Miracle

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Ethan Natalman, and this is Psychoactive, a production

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of My Heart Radio and Protozoa Pictures. Psychoactive is the

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>show where we talk about all things drugs. But any

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of view is expressed here do not represent those of

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>my Heart Media, Protozoa Pictures, or their executives and employees. Indeed, heed,

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>as an inveterate contrarian, I can tell you they may

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>not even represent my own And nothing contained in this

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>show should be used as medical advice or encouragement to

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>use any type of drugs. Hello, Psychoactive listeners. So today

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about c b D everything you ever

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted to know, and maybe we're afraid to ask or

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you're getting good answers about now. My guest

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>is a real expert on CBD who I have enormous

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>respect for. His name's Barton Lee, and I first heard

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>about Martin Lee when he wrote a book in the

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>mid eighties called Acid Dreams, The Complete Social History of LSD,

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the c I of the Sixties and Beyond, which was

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, really became one of the sort of classic

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>books in the field. And then about ten years ago

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>he did another book, an award winning book called Smoke Signals,

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>A Social History of Marijuana, Medical, recreational and scientific um Now,

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Martin in recent years create an organization called Project cb D.

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a fantastic website chock full of tons of information.

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>He's been my go to person whenever I have questions

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>about this. So Martin, thanks so much for joining me

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>on Psychoactive. My pleasure. He's I've been looking forward to

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>this actually, So could you just explain what is c

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>B D well. CBD is short for cannaba dial that's

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the scientific name, and cb D and T and C

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>are both components of the cannabis plant, part of a

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>group of compounds called abinoids. T, C and CBD are

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the most prominent and well known cannabinoids in the cannabis plant.

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.519
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the molecules, you know, the structure

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>side by side, you'd be hard trested to notice the difference.

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>It's it's very, very minor. They they have the same

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>atoms basically in history, and you look at the original

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>strains of cannabis, the so called land race strains. Before

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>UH cannabis became popular in the United States in the

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixties, it was often the case that a variety

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of cannabis would have relatively equal amounts of th C

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and c b D, and these plants were exquisite in

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of the the psychoactive effects they conferred, much loved

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>by people today even still if you can get hold

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of them, names like Acapulco Gold come to mind. Uh.

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>These are the original land race strains, um. But over time,

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>what happened in in the late sixties early seventies when

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>people started to I'm amateur corticulture started breeding cannabis strains,

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>they made an effort, uh, not consciously to breed the

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>cb D out of the strains, but to give a

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of accentuated high, the perfect high they were looking for,

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 1>and they kind of inadvertently pushed the cb D into

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of a recessive genetic mode. So we ended up

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of THHC dominant cannabis, which has significant

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>medical medical properties. But we kind of lost the access

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to CBD over time, and these the CBD was rediscovered,

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you might say, um in around and then began to

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>be reintroduced into the supply. But CBD is not intoxicating,

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>unlike t C, which is an intoxicating compound. But I

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's misleading and incorrect to describe c b D

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>as non psychoactive. That became kind of a marketing slogan.

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I think for the emerging CBD industry they want to

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>distinguish it from th HC So the CBD is non psychoactive,

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>t C is psychoactive. But actually CBD is shown to

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>have anti anxiety properties, antidepressant properties UM and if you

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>consume a compound that can change one's mood and make

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>one less anxious or less oppressive, it's clearly then having

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a psychoactive impact. It's just not an intoxicating impact. And

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an important distinction, because there's been an

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>effort or emphasis on trying to bifurcate CBD. It's separated

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>from T T H c UH, and I think that's misleading.

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the problems there is that you know,

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>initially again that the marketing pitches will CBD it's not psychoactive,

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it will eliminate the high. And originally when we were

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>involved at Project CBD and reintroducing CBD into the medical

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>cannabis supply in California, the emphasis was not so much

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>as that CBD UM didn't get you high. It's that

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>CBD helped manage this psychoactivity, uh, that it can lessen

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the psychoactivity um, but not necessarily eliminate all of it,

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>and that that was the point. To manage the psychoactivity

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of cannabis, which is really the the first challenge for

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:18.559
<v Speaker 1>a person using cannabis for therapeutic use um to limit

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the intoxicating effects so it's tolerable. If indeed that's important

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to the person. If one's taken straight c b D,

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 1>is it possible to get high intoxicated in that sense

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>like marijuana hire or something resembling that. With just straight

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>cb D, even a large amount with no th h D,

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>one shouldn't have an intoxicating effect if you take a

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>straight CBD or pure cbd um. There's a little caveat

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>to that, but maybe we'll get into later in that

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:49.679
<v Speaker 1>when CBD is extracted from the plant, whether it's hamp

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>or cannabis, again, it shouldn't If it's just pure CBD,

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>no intoxication. But if it's made synthetically in a lab,

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 1>which I think is the coming wave in the future

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>for CBD isolets um. Depending how it's made, it actually

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>could have an intoxicating effect. Because not to get too

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>far deep into the science right now, you know there's

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a certain um natural form of t C that exists

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in the plant, all same within CBD, N, T A

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>C both, but when you create it synthetically, it can

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>create versions of c B, d N t h C

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that are non natural versions of the plant. And what

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>happens in the lab when you synthesize it, it creates

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>what's called a racemic mixture. Um So, just to step

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>back for a moment, you know, the CBD and the

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>t C molecule have like left handed and right handed versions,

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 1>and in nature it only curs in one way. But

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:48.039
<v Speaker 1>if you have the non natural version, that can actually

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>have a very powerful effect on on the receptors that

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 1>gets you high. Now are those things out on the

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>market today? I mean, I thought I was at a

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>part of the night and some woman I met with claiming,

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>oh I get high c CBD. Was that just kind

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 1>of imagined on her parts of the placebo effect? Or

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>was there are there actually things in the market that

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>could be doing that Now, I would say it's most

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>likely imagined, but it's possible again if it's a synthetically

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>created molecule. You have not only actually left handed and

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>right handed versions of the molecule which sort of fit

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.559
<v Speaker 1>in differently into the receptor and could do different things.

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, one of the metabolites, it's been shown

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>in a laboratory of these alternative versions of CBD, non

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>natural versions, has a more powerful effect than thh C

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>on the receptor. So it's conceivable that, uh, that that

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>will make you feel high. And I've heard from people

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that they purchase a CBD product. It's advertised as being

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>on a whole plant spectrum, meaning other components of the

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of canvas plant, and they're not just the CBD.

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Yet when we tested some of these, they only had

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>CBD in them um and the person claimed that they

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>got high from it and made them uncomfortable. That this

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>is a person that was and particularly fond of th HC.

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Not everybody is, So I don't know. I think this

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is something that has to be looked at very carefully

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and regulated very carefully because it could be dangerous. So

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>just going back to the the innovation that was happening,

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you know among horticultural is trying to get stronger marijuana.

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Back in the seventies, eighties when they were trying to

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>kick up the th HC, did that sort of inevitably

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>lower Remember hearing this, I don't know as a rumor

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>or not, that when you try to kick up the

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>TC and the plant, it's going to be knocking down

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the cbd um And was that originally true and no

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:34.839
<v Speaker 1>longer true or is that sort of an edible part

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of that process of trying to increase th HC potency.

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of an either or thing. I mean, genetically,

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 1>when when the plant is developing, you know, there's only

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of cannabinoids that can be in the plant.

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Generally we think of it as maybe you can push

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>it up to thirty, but you can't have both. So

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you have certain strains that are kind of half and

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.719
<v Speaker 1>half to fly equal amounts of CBD and t C.

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>But I remember hearing at some point years ago that

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>there were more and more of the very high th

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>HC plants and that was knocking down the cb D.

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.199
<v Speaker 1>If it was an either or factor that was resulting

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in people becoming more anxious and things like that when

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>they smoked marijuana, that sort that was that was that?

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Was there some truth to that? Yeah, I think that's

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>essentially correct with what happened, And it wasn't that it

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>was the people were intending to knock out the CBD.

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Um It's more, you know, the the breeding in those

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>days before we had access to analytical labs that can

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>tell us actually what's in the plant was a lot

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of it was this as much art, if not more so,

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>than science, you know, and people were creating different versions

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of the plant and testing it and see what they like.

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>They they picked and choose, and they sort of inadvertently

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>bred the cb D into very low amounts Genetically. You

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>could think of it this way, if if the th

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 1>C dominant plants or the brown eyes and the CBD

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>plants the blue eyes, they kind of bread the blue

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>eyes out of it, except those genes were recessive. So

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>when you have all this kind of crazy intermixing of

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>so many different strains of being bred, inevitably a few

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>blue eye plants would pop up. And that's what happened

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand nine two ten when we identified a

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>few plants that had a significant amount of CBD in them.

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>And these were plants that were generally what we call

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the type two's of the plants that had roughly equal

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.599
<v Speaker 1>amounts of CB D N t C. Type ones I

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>t C low CBD. Type two is mix of each

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>type three's high CBD low t C. When once once

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the hemp entered the picture, uh, in some ways there

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>was less focus on marijuana plants quote unquote with significant

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>amounts of CBD that kind of fell off the radar

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and got short shrifted a bit, although I think that

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>will come back in the future. I think because I mean,

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, al and hemp. I always thought, you know,

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>hemp was basically to my mind, it was low you know,

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>low th HC marijuana growing wild all over the place

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and being cultivated in many parts of the world, but

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>banned in the US until you know, I guess with

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the farm bill um and often it's being used for

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>industrial and agricultural purposes. But it wasn't the industrial hemp.

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Was it that was being associated with CBD or was

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it originally or was it incorrectly associated with that? What's

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>the story about that hemp plant and CBD relationship when

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you think about it before, when I'm referring to as

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the rediscovery of CBD, industrial hemp around the world, wasn't

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>grown for cannabinoid content. It was grown for fiber, for

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the best heard and also in some cases for the

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>seed oil. But this was not uh, this isn't really

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.439
<v Speaker 1>little to do with CBD or t a C. This

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>was not the focus of of industrial hemp. But what

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>happened is when you consider the different categories of him

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>they were basically two the hemp grown for fiber and

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>hemp grown for seed oil. Hemp grown for fiber is

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 1>really useless in terms of extracting for CBD or th

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>HC or any cannabinoid. These are plants that sort of

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>look like bamboo almost shoots with with just a little

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>bit of foliage. Um. Then you also have the seed

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>oil plants. They're a little bit different. They're a little

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>bit bushier. And if you actually analyze the content if

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the cannabinoids and the seed oil plants, the plants that's

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>grown for extracting oil used for soap or paint or

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>also nutritional purposes, they have a little more CBD than

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the fiber plants, maybe three three and a half percent

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>if you measured it in an analytical lab. But there's

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>always a few outlayers uh that would would pop up

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit higher with the cb D maybe up

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to six or seven percent that kind of a little

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>bit wild in the field, and that's what became the

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.959
<v Speaker 1>cb D from hamp uh those type of plants kind

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of the offshoots of enola or seed other seed oil

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>varietals um and that's what became UM Charlotte's web initially

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and some of the more well known that was the

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>most well known strain of of hemp early on, you know,

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, when it first burst into national consciousness in

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and those same plants had th C in them as well,

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 1>added comparable amounts or what not much. You know, in

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>hemp in general, there's not much resin in there compared

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to a marijuana plant, and that's where the cb D,

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>n t C lives in the plant. In the resin

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>hemp is low resin cannabis. Marijuana quote unquote is high

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>resin cannabis. That's how I distinguished them. Resin is in

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the flower tops of cannabis. You know, that's where the

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>magic is. That's where the cannabinoids are um. If you're

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>getting cb D or thh C from cannabis, it's coming

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>from the resin in the plant. When you go back

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and look get the actual definition of marijuana within age

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>from the Marijuana Tacks Act of seven and the exact

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>two sentenced definition was poured it over to the Control

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Substance Act in nineteen seventy. It mentions resin three times

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>in the definition of marijuana. And it's very clear that

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with the resin was considered illegal. That

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>was prohibited if there was part of the cannabis plant

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>um it was just the stalk and no resin. And

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>if it came from a plant that that was low

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>resin plant, that anything in the plant that had nothing

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to do with the resin that was considered legal according

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to the Marijuanattacks Act. Essentially, it means that CBD was

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>made illegal in nineteen thirty seven according to the Marijuana

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Tacks Act, but it's peculiar because CBD actually hadn't been

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>discovered yet. It was only discovered in nineteen forty by

0:14:56.120 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Roger Adams, the chemist at University of Illinois. So CBD

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>was made illegal before it was discovered, simply because of

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the banning of resident. That Marijuana Tax Act banned anything

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to do with the resin of the plant, any derivative

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>from the resident and the resident itself. But the resident

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>is where ccbd lives in the plant, in residents where

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>th C is in the plant. So anything to do

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>with the resin was considered illegal. Um. And the way

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that the distinction between hemp and marijuana plays out legally

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>now you have an artificial wine drawn across the plant,

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>so that any plant was zero point three t C

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>or less is considered hemp, where if it has more

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>than that amount of t C, it's considered marijuana. But Mark,

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought the entire hemp plant was actually banned for

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>many decades. Welln't because it produced resin, even if it

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>was a tiny amount. I se. So nobody had figured

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>out how to produce hemp plants and hemp stocks or

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>industrial purposes that would consistently be below point three percent.

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>The law didn't say anything to do. It didn't have

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with Europe with that only comes later

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>with the farm bill. Um. You know, the law was

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>all about resident Anything to do with residon is illegal

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>now because the way things played out politically with the

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Federal Bureau of Narcotics and then in its successors, they

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>went whole log and they basically banned hemp even though

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>parts of hemp had no residented UM and which is

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>also why people could you know, import hemp products which

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>were totally sort of you know, cleansed of any th

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>C that was legal, right, Yes, and then when, of course,

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess that was a little historical period during World

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>War Two when he was government encouraged farmers to briefly

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>grow hemp because it was part of the war effort,

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>but then rebanded thereafter, and I guess it essentially stayed

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>on banned until just a few years ago, except for

0:16:56.200 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe some state authorized research programs that age. With that

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>farm Farm Bill from that year, it became legal to

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>grow hemp um, particularly for CBD H extraction, and that's

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>really what motivated the interest in the CBD that that's

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 1>what led to the Farm Bill, that the explosion of

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 1>popular interest in the CBD. But but the Farm Bill

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>is inherently flawed really because I compare it to like

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a software patch that's created two improve or or remedy

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>defective software. In this case, that the fact of software

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is the Control Substances Act, except you can't really fix it. Yeah,

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you can't really fix that with a software patch because

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>it leads to other problems and then you have to

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 1>have another patch that fixed the software patch and add infinitum.

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>What it's done is create a situation where people who

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to grow hemp to extract cannabinoids, in particularly CBD UM,

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>they have a lot of problems they had to face.

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you have a robust plant, a cannabis plant,

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 1>they don't like. It doesn't really conform very easily to

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>this politically correct zero point three limit. You know that

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>it is an artificial limit. You know, in in European

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Union it's zero point two c only that's allowed. In

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Switzerland they allowed one percent. It's it's it's an arbitrary

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>number that doesn't have a scientific basis. UM. That's really

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>imposed in US law, I think to keep quote unquote

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>marijuana illegal, to distinguish hemp from marijuana that way, when

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 1>originally it was about resent content, not about th C content. UM.

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And this has caused a lot of problems in terms

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>of UM, the industry getting off the ground, UM and

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 1>just how it's really how we relate to it legally.

0:18:49.560 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll be talking more after we hear this. You say,

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>there were two farm bills one and one, but you

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>have this explosion right of hemp production happening. I think

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of people trying to get into it for

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 1>industrial purposes, but also I guess CBD purposes. And then

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago you have this explosion of CBD.

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>So are they linked Because most of the CBD then

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>or even now was coming from hemp plants or what

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>plans that were still that were legal under federal law

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>or not. I think that the the the momentum, the

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>popular momentum for CBD had been building for some time.

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>It really ever since the CNN broadcasts that showed children

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>with severe epilepsy or helped by CBD, almost in a

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>miraculous way, and every since that time the CBD pierced

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>national and international consciousness. Prior to then, very few people

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.479
<v Speaker 1>have heard about CBD at all. So um, it had

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>been building and and and it's really what led to

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the passage of the Farm Bills, in which is quite

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>limited what you could do with growing hemp at that point,

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and then which legalized the growing of hemp both for

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>cannabinoid content and the classic industrial purposes. The problem is

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>uh that the kind of hemp that they were allowed

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>people to grow was not the optimal source for extracting CBD.

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>You know it again, when you look back to those

0:20:42.720 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>original noteworthy strains like Charlotte's Webb, you're talking six seven

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>cb D content by Dryway at most. When you compare

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that to a marijuana quote unquote plant with the high

0:20:56.359 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>cb D content um you were talking about, and CBD

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>by Drywaight with about one and one at one t C,

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>which is over the limits for hemp, but still it's

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>it's still very low to h C and it's the

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>best source of CBD. So what you had was people

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>growing hemp um but not optimal to extract, so they

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>always were trying to push the plant for higher cb

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>D content, and eventually what what happened is that they

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>took these um high CBD marijuana strains um and try

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to breed them in such a way as to draw

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>down the THHC levels, and it's very difficult to do that.

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>So farmers were growing these plants and they had to

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>play cat and mouse with the authorities because the plants

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>tended to go hot. You know, hemp plants like that.

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to stay at the point three percent

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>t C. They want to go up to that one

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.439
<v Speaker 1>percent tight C level um. That's the natural form of

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>cannabis for these types of varietals, and um, it really

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>made it difficult for growers. Uh. They would grow plants

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 1>they go that would go beyond the th h C

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>limit and they'd have to destroy them, and you know,

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>it became kind of a mess. And so so they

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>would actually try to cheat the regulators to to keep

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>them in the ground, um, just as long as they

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>could to maximize the cb D content. But then it

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>pushed the THHC too high and uh, and they would

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>try to evade the Agriculture department representatives that would test

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the the plants, and it became very very difficult. Is

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it's still going on now, yes, so to uh, yes

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>it is going on. There was a study published by

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the University of Minnesota scientists working there that concluded that

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the genetics of the so called high CBD hem plants

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>were actually marijuana genetics. UM. And when you're when you're

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>playing with these type of plants, you you can't grow

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>them to full turn. Otherwise again, you you exceed the

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the th AC limits. The longer the plants staying ground,

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the more cannabinoids that are in their more cbdn let's

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:17.479
<v Speaker 1>take a break on this, but let's go to the evidence,

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>because my understanding is that the only f d A

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 1>approved CBD product, right is the thing that GW pharmaceutical

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>started working on twenty five years ago. Right, it's the statotacts,

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess and and epidolens um, which is found you know,

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>helpful in terms of dealing with children's epileptic conditions. Is

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that right? Is that still the basically the only one

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that's approved. Correct. That is a pharmaceutical version of CBD

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that's approved by the f d A specifically to treat

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 1>children with three types of severe forms of epilepsy, and

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>it can only be used for that purpose. Um. And

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a positive development to the extent that

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 1>this can really help children with these terrible diseases. It's

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 1>proven to that they went through all the rigorous tests

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that you have to to be proved by the FDA

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>as a as a pharmaceutical. I don't think that the

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 1>g W Pharmaceuticals, which was formed in the late nineties

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and nineties, was focusing initially on this kind of CBD isolate,

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>which is what epidialects of the pharmaceutical you just mentioned,

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what it is. Initially they were focused on a

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>tincture that had roughly equal amounts of cb D and

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>t C. It's called sat Effects, and it is approved

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>as a pharmaceutical in over a couple of dozen countries,

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>but not in the United States. It's proved for use

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 1>in neuropathic pain, in um, multiple sclerosis, cancer, and other

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 1>conditions like that, but it's not available for use in

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 1>the United States. And it's not your CBD. Sata x

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>is mainly cb D n t C with with a

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>smidgeon of everything else. And you know, frankly, I don't

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>think epidialects is a particularly good medicine in terms of

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>its cannabinot content. It's basically just pure CBD, but also

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 1>has supralose in it, which is an artificial sweetener which

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>disrupts the microbiome, you know, has adverse health effects. So

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:20.880
<v Speaker 1>when they're giving this to children, um, whatever it's doing

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 1>for the epilepsy, it's also doing other things that aren't

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 1>so great. And there was a very interesting study UM

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 1>done out of Brazil. Scientists in Brazil did a meta analysis,

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>which is considered a very you know, kind of a

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>gold standard scientific type of study, and they compare it

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>epidialects its effectiveness to full spectrum c B D rich

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:47.199
<v Speaker 1>oil meaning hemp oil that was hemp derived oil presumably

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>from hemp UH that was mainly CBD, very little th C,

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.120
<v Speaker 1>but a little bit of everything else that's in the plant.

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>And they found that when they compared the full spectrum

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>CBD oil to the isolate, that both were effective in

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>dealing with these catastrophic epileptic conditions remarkably so. And you

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>were talking about children from nothing else helped um, but

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>these isolate required five times the amount of CBD compared

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 1>to what was in the full spectrum products UH to

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>be effective. So when you talk about CBD as an isolate,

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>which is what epidialec says, it might pass muster easily

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>with regulate laters. It might be something that the f

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>d A is won't frown upon that's coming from a

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>cannabis plant or a hemp plant. But it's not necessarily

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the most effective or the best means of using CBD,

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>even for epilepsy. And I think it's important to to

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>highlight because the CBD industry itself in some ways is

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>lobbying for these isolates, particularly in Europe, which is an unfortunate,

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's a game that's played and that's still being

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>played whenever you're dealing with cannabinoids. Well, it's I guess

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the regulatory challenge, right, because if there's

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>reason to believe that it's the entourage effect of the

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.719
<v Speaker 1>multiple of TCCBD and their elements in the cannabis plant

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 1>is probably something that FDA and other regulatory agencies just

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>aren't they good at figuring out how to you know, regulate,

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>how to evaluate. I mean, let's face that the FDA

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>was not established to regulate plant medicine. It was that's

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>not what it's about, UM And interestingly, I don't think

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it should be in the business of regulating plant medicines.

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Probably need another kind of agency or something UM. But yes,

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:38.959
<v Speaker 1>the problem with the FDA now and CBD is that

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the f d A privileges the isolate over these more

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>complex or what they call the the full spectrum or

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the raw plant that has a lot of different components

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.679
<v Speaker 1>in it. This presents problems, you know, for people working

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>in pharmaceutical drug development. They don't generally like carnabinoids. They're

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>messy cannabinoids, and particularly CBD does so many different things

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>in the body that you know, and and pharmaceutical development

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>likes to take one compound and harness it to have

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>one particular effect. With CBD, you're having dozens and dozens

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 1>of effects within the body, you know, even pure CBD.

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>So it just it's it's messier, it's more problematic from

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the pharmaceutical point of view. I personally am not against

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>pharmaceutical versions of cannabinoids. What I find troubling is how

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>they are privileged by the regulatory apparatus to the detriment

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of natural forms of the city. Well, by both the

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>regulatory apparatus and by the fact that it's easier for

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>researchers to focus on individual elements as opposed to looking

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>at entourage as the combinations. Right, It's it's on both sides,

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I mean the earlier today, Martin, I

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>was kind of as I'm looking through your website and

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I looked at clinical Trials dot gov online, which lists

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>studies underway or studies completed. I just popped in CBD

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's at nine. When these six studies around the world,

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean US, Europe, but also Israel, China, a whole

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>range of places going on. So there's obviously a huge

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>amount of research going. But meanwhile, I guess there are

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>no there are a number of other controlled double blind

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>studies and human beings which have shown interesting results. There's

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a bigger number of studies with animals, other animals, UM,

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that have shown promising results. And then a whole bunch

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that's in vitro right, a test tube stuff

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, looking promising, but where it's a

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>long ways to go before we have the kind of

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>controlled double blind studies that we get approved by the

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>f d A. So when we look at the various conditions,

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:42.479
<v Speaker 1>right that are out there, the childhood epileptic conditions are

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the ones that we know about and they have gotten

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>most of the attention, UM. But when we look at

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the other areas where CBD has proven most or CBD

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>CBD in combo, what THHC has proven most promising, UM,

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.479
<v Speaker 1>And where the human you know, control double blind studies, UM,

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you know have produced positive results. What's stands out right now?

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>What stands out in general is we're at this precipice,

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, is over nine hundred clinical trials now

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in effect with CBD. Most of those trials involved just

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>CBD isolates. There's a massive amount of preclinical data, both

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in vitro and vitro and in live animals and just

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>test tubes UM and that's very very compelling data that

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>just begs for clinical trials. So we're finally seeing that

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>starting to take place. In terms of results from clinical experiments.

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>The verdict is out, but I expect that it's quite

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>likely given what we're hearing anecdotally from people who are

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>using CBD products, whether isolates or full spectrum or broad

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>spectrum as it's called, there's enough anecdotal data that's quite

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>compelling and shouldn't be ignored UM that suggests that cb

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>D shows utility and effectiveness and significant benefits in a

0:30:56.240 --> 0:31:01.719
<v Speaker 1>number of areas for neurological diseases, most definitely UM for

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>certain mood disorders like anxiety I mentioned, also depression for pain.

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Also it's it's clear that those are the big three pain, anxiety,

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and depression. So Marty, you mentioned in neurological diseases, but

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that means like Alzheimer's, dementia, Parkinson's MS, all of those

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>things that's showing some promise in either in vivo or

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in vitro, and either you know, uh, you know, lab

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>tests or an animal So far, you know, all in

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of pre clinical work, we all have shown very

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>very interesting possibilities. And again when you match that with

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>anecdotal reports from people who are actually using CBD in

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>one form or another, now it's compelling. But we've been

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 1>largely missing the clinical trials that would prove one way

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>or another if the anecdotal accounts are in fact correct.

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>But we're on the precipice where we're going to get

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>more information and that's exciting. But again, most of these

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 1>studies are with isolates c the islets, which generally are

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>not as effective when you're talking about a full spectrum

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>CBD product and the people playing around with dose, I

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>mean it often helps. It may just be there finding

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>no result if they're just using levels that are too

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>low on CBD. Yes, that's true. Uh, CBD is shown

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to it's a pretty broad range in terms of dosage.

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes very low doses do seem to be effective, not always.

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes higher, much higher dosis are required. And the things

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>like disorders of the stomach of the gut I mean,

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>collitis or Crohn's disease. That's once again it's it's essentially

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>anecdotal evidence with a little bit of labor animal stuff,

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of lab animal stuff actually, and a

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of anecdotal evidence again, but that the missing piece

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>is the clinical side, so that that's uh, and obviously

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a very very important piece, but without it doesn't

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>mean we should ignore the anecdotal accounts, which are voluminous

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and impressive, right right. Diabetes and obesity the same. That's

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a very very interesting area because you know, when you

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about medical metabolic disorders like diabetes and obesity, you're

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about a condition that that the World Health Organization

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>has identified as basically almost of a huge crisis, of

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>global crisis. And uh, diabetes, I mean, I think actually

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot years of life lost, maybe greater now involving

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>diabetes and obesity than even from smoking cigarettes, or at

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 1>least it's neck and neck. I'm not surprised to hear that. Again,

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it's the same situation anecdotally, what we hear from people

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>using CBD relatively small arounds forty to sixty milligrams a day.

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>When they compare the blood sugar levels before and after

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a four weeks of using CBD, um it improves the

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>readings afterwards. So I think that's going to be an

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 1>area in the future that could be a major use

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>for CBD rich products. I also saw on your website

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to mention of skin diseases like acne, dermatitis, and psoriasis. Yes, yeah,

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>again pre clinical that that's what we're seeing also for

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 1>some skin diseases UM in Italy. I believe there's CBD

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 1>rich creams that are available UM that are part of

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a you know, within a frame of pharmaceutical framework. But

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the thing I just need to fla understand.

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:24.959
<v Speaker 1>So we talk about the benefits of CBD. We also

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>time time talked about the benefits of merril water at

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>large with all its constituent elements. We talk about the

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 1>benefits of th HC, But when we're talking about CBD,

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 1>how much of this medical stuff is about CBD entirely

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>isolated from th h D and other elements. How much

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of it is about the combination of the two. If

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.320
<v Speaker 1>we were to ask you which is more medically beneficial,

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>could you say, well, one is more than the other,

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 1>or that in fact was most beneficial most of the

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:52.879
<v Speaker 1>time is the combo of the two. I would think

0:34:52.880 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the latter is correct. It's the combination of CBD and

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>t it C that it will have most therapeutic benefits.

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>And the more th HC one can include in that product, um,

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the more helpful it will be in the CBD rich product.

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>The problem being that the th HC is going to

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>be getting you high untless you develop a substantial tolerance

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to the intoxicating effective t well. This is when it

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 1>comes down to again managing the psychoactivity of th HC.

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>A cb D can be very or the psychoactivity of cannabis.

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>That's where CBD comes in and can be very very helpful.

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 1>And you can get versions of cannabis now that are

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>not intoxicating, but that's not the point of CBD. The

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:37.320
<v Speaker 1>point is not to ablate or eliminates uh the intoxicating effects.

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>It's to manage it because those of the intox because

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>th HC is has very powerful therapeutic attributes, and you

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>want as much as of th HC as possible and

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>your and your product if you're going to use it

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>medicinally issues that some people don't tolerate TC very well,

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>so they have now options. How does this relate to

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with with with psychedellings, right, I mean,

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I think where was I reading that? Is that the

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 1>CBD binds to the same serotonin receptor the five H

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 1>T two A is LSD, mescalin and uh soloson without

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>triggering a psychedelic trip. And you now have in the

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:16.240
<v Speaker 1>psychedelic research field, you know, all sorts of for profit

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>enterprises and maybe some not for profit ones as well,

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that are trying to figure out how to take the trip,

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>how to take the high out of the psychedelic and

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:26.839
<v Speaker 1>isolate out, you know, the elements that can be therapeutic

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>without people going through the big you know, you know,

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>large dose psychedelic trip. Now is there something analogous without

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 1>respect to t HC going on. It's almost to repeat.

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, CBD was hyped as you get the medical

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>benefits of cannabis without the high. Now you have so

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 1>called versions of psychedelic compounds that are being created um

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 1>that confer benefits without the trip. So it's a very

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:56.359
<v Speaker 1>similar type of approach UM with CBD. It's even more

0:36:56.440 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting because CBD it binds too many different type of receptors.

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Not it doesn't just interact with cannabinoid receptors, and it

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>does so actually in a different way that th H

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>C does UM. Cbd actually has a very powerful affinity

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>for various serotonin receptors, including the serotonin to A receptor,

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>which is the so called psychedelic receptor. It's the receptor

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>when LSD binds to it, or mescaline or metabolites of psilocybin,

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 1>it produces the trip, a full blown trip if you

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 1>have it and you know enough enough of quantity that

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you're consuming UM and and CBD binds that same receptor

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>as the psychedelic receptor as l s D binds two.

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>And the question is with why doesn't CBD cause a

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 1>trip UM. It's its a whole interesting area again to that,

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 1>there's actually a study out of China of crystallography study

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 1>within the last year where UM scientists from the Chinese

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Academy of Science were playing around with different psychedelic compounds

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to create versions of them that don't confer the trip,

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 1>and they created a crystallized version of this five H

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 1>two t A the serotonin to a receptor, and they

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>found that it was actually two points, two binding points

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 1>where UH a compound combined with that receptor, and depending

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>which point is being affected, UH, it might induce a

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:29.760
<v Speaker 1>full bone trip, or it might not. But whatever happens

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>when you bind to a serotonin receptor, what whatever point

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of that receptor you're bind to, it does induce um

0:38:37.760 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>neuroplasticity and neurogenesis, which CBD does. CBD is a psychoplastogen,

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 1>but not a hallucinogen. And that's just the type of

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 1>compound that the scientists are now who are working in

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the so called psychedelic field, are trying to create. They're

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to create so called psychedelic compounds um without the trip.

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:04.359
<v Speaker 1>I call those pseudodelic compounds. That's a phrase that David Luke,

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a professor in the UK and the University of Credit,

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>he had that phrase to describe that class of compounds

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>that are being developed by scientists from a psychedelic scaffold,

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 1>but without the hallucinogenic properties. Let's take a break here

0:39:23.600 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and go to an ad. Let's go to the question

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that is really my starting point, and I would imagine

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>as a starting point for most of our listeners. So

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 1>all this hype with the with the topicals and the

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 1>lozenges and this and that, and it seems that when

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you look, I don't see any controlled double blind studies

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. I have no idea how much

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is placebo on on this sort of thing. And I

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:01.720
<v Speaker 1>also assumed that most of the folks manufacturing this stuff

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:04.880
<v Speaker 1>don't really have an interest in having these control studies

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and double blind studies happening because they're making money off

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of the hype. And if they control double blind studies

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>turn out to be, you know, show just nothing better

0:40:12.680 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 1>than placebo. You know, there's stuff can go down the drain.

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 1>What is the story with that stuff? What do you know?

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 1>What can you tell us? You know, I think we

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:29.239
<v Speaker 1>should take seriously reports from that are anecdotal in nature. Yes,

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I do think there is a lot of placebo effect

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>going on here. People. If you spend money on a product,

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to believe it's gonna work. The things did

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>get kind of crazy with CBD when there was this

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:47.320
<v Speaker 1>huge explosion finally in twenty eighteen UM where it seemed

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to become almost intergalactic. CBD became one of the most

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 1>popular health supplements on the planet all of a sudden,

0:40:56.640 --> 0:41:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, really just exploded. Where you did find CBD

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in practically everything. We had a piece we rank we

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 1>call it on the Project CBD website called the CBD

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Silly Season. Well, you're just ridiculous. Obviously, it was just

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 1>used for marketing purposes. If you're putting it in in

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 1>vodka or in clothing, you know, claiming it's going to

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 1>somehow be absorbed with this skin. Uh. And there's a

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of situations where it's just didn't

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 1>seem any apparent reason to include CBD. One example is coffee. Um.

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, caffeine and CBD have opposite effects in terms

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of what they do in the body, and it doesn't

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>really make sense to put them together, really. Uh. Caffeine

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 1>works by blocking a dnascine receptor. A CBD indirectly triggers

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the dentasceine receptor dnasceine involved in sleep regulation and so forth.

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you block it, you get more you feel stimulated,

0:41:57.000 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you feel more energy. That's how coffee works. Well. CBD

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 1>is what you'd call it an end a dentiscene reuptake inhibitor.

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:10.320
<v Speaker 1>It delays the breakdown of the DNA scene in the body,

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:13.680
<v Speaker 1>so there's more of it to bind to their dnascine

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:18.279
<v Speaker 1>receptors a way that's activating it. But but again, caffeine

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 1>blocks it, So why would you put CBD together with

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:24.760
<v Speaker 1>caffeine coffee? It doesn't make any sense. Are there any

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 1>studies at all looking at topical application to deal with

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:33.880
<v Speaker 1>everything from muscle ache to arthritis too, other types of

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, problems. There are studies, again pre clinical mainly

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:43.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe some now are in process clinical, very interesting research

0:42:43.440 --> 0:42:47.760
<v Speaker 1>out of hungry UH CBD for acne, which again showed

0:42:48.200 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a great deal of promise. But um, you know, herbal

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 1>use of topical remedies UH has been, you know, something

0:42:57.520 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that people have been doing for for centuries and typically

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 1>what you see in the products today where CBD is

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 1>part of it a topical application, there are many other

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 1>herbs in there that combine, so it's hard to know

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 1>really what's working and what's not. Is it's the CBD

0:43:15.840 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 1>or is it the other herbs. One thing we do

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:20.720
<v Speaker 1>know in this regard is that CBD is absorbed easily,

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>more easily transdermally than t C. There's been studies, again

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 1>pre clinical studies that indicate that it's about ten times

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 1>easier to absorb CBD through the skin than compared to

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 1>t C. So it would make sense in terms of

0:43:37.239 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 1>cannabinoids in a topical that CBD would be a good candidate,

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:46.279
<v Speaker 1>and there are cannabinoid receptors in this skin which CBD

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:51.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't bind too directly, but it does increase the amounts

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:54.799
<v Speaker 1>of endogenous cannabinoids in the skin, which again could have

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a therapeutic effect. The scientific basis for understanding how it

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>could work is there. The pre clinical evidence is there,

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:05.400
<v Speaker 1>but anecdotal evidence is there. But again we're waiting for

0:44:05.440 --> 0:44:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the clinical studies. And in terms of taking it orally

0:44:08.840 --> 0:44:11.240
<v Speaker 1>where you're having it, you know, just going through your stomach.

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think even even as CBD infused chocolate bars. Oh yeah,

0:44:15.280 --> 0:44:17.960
<v Speaker 1>by all means. You know, it's shown that with CBD,

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:22.120
<v Speaker 1>with other cannabinoids there are more effective if taken in

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>an edible form of taken orally, if they're combined with

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:28.880
<v Speaker 1>some kind of a healthy fat like a coconut choice

0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:32.799
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, there's more CBD that's absorbed that way.

0:44:33.200 --> 0:44:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh so that's better than vaping it, for example, you know,

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 1>vaping it. You know, each of these administration routes that

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:43.120
<v Speaker 1>have their own benefits, our own you know, their own

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:45.920
<v Speaker 1>pluses and minuses. You might say, you know, vaping very

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:49.879
<v Speaker 1>quick the effect and you don't have smokes and that's

0:44:49.880 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 1>an advantage as well. UM, but I caution people it's

0:44:53.680 --> 0:45:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of using vape products CBD v products. Uh.

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 1>I would caution people to steer clear of anybody regulating

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 1>them at this point and not and it's unregulated. And

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of crap in these products. That's what's

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 1>found because there's always a carrier age. It's some kind

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of oil or something in there that CBD, which is

0:45:17.480 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>generally in Iceland, that's put it added on a dollop

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of CBD to some kind of carrier agent. Um. It's

0:45:25.239 --> 0:45:27.719
<v Speaker 1>pretty funky what can be in these products. So so

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:29.719
<v Speaker 1>someone let me ask you this, you know. So the

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:32.720
<v Speaker 1>one product that I've been you know, consuming for years,

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and our listener should know, I don't get paid anything

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>for saying this. I've been used this product for a

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 1>million years is the Kiva chocolate bars that come out

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:41.799
<v Speaker 1>of the Bay Area in California. I think they've got

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:43.920
<v Speaker 1>this great chocolate. They have a reliable effect. I like

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the way they do it. I actually went over and

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:48.399
<v Speaker 1>visited the factory and at the owners some years ago. Um.

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes I'll use a bar that's th HC and sometimes, Um,

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it's split, you know, fifty fift THHC and cb D.

0:45:57.520 --> 0:46:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I'm noticing that much difference. I mean,

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 1>should the difference be fairly perceptible to me? Or is

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 1>it only gonna be perceptible to some people? You know,

0:46:08.600 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 1>when you have a roughly equal amounts of CBD and

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:15.919
<v Speaker 1>th HC, assuming that it's a sufficient quantity, it will

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:20.479
<v Speaker 1>be intoxicating. It's not just well though they're definitely equal,

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean they seem to me roughly equally intoxicating. That's

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 1>what I'm wondering, because when you combine the two, right,

0:46:25.360 --> 0:46:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the CBD is supposed to lessen the high a little

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:32.359
<v Speaker 1>bit in addition to lessening any potential anxiety or inflammation.

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 1>That's my understanding, right, but I haven't noticed a big

0:46:37.360 --> 0:46:41.520
<v Speaker 1>just overall difference in terms of the high the feeling. Um,

0:46:41.680 --> 0:46:43.840
<v Speaker 1>is it this I'm not paying it close enough attention

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 1>or it's a good question. Might have something to do

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>with how the product made, And I agree, I think

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Kiva products are very good. Uh. I found that when

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I smoke a CBD rich variety of cannabis that is

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 1>roughly equal amounts of CBD and t it c It

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>does feel like that that the ceiling of the high

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 1>is lowered a bit, and you don't get that kind

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of antsy feeling you sometimes get from very high high

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>th C of cannabis um As for edibles, you know,

0:47:17.800 --> 0:47:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what's going on here. If they just

0:47:20.000 --> 0:47:24.360
<v Speaker 1>simply added at cbd isolate to the chocolate, that's probably

0:47:24.400 --> 0:47:28.040
<v Speaker 1>what they did. Okay, and listen, there's another isolate kiva.

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:30.239
<v Speaker 1>I think had another candy, but there's another drug that

0:47:30.320 --> 0:47:33.480
<v Speaker 1>has cb N in it. What's the CBN thing about?

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:35.799
<v Speaker 1>Is that like in third place after th HC and

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 1>cbd is being a prominent and promising substance. Um Is

0:47:39.920 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it the one that people use for sleep or other things?

0:47:43.080 --> 0:47:45.239
<v Speaker 1>This is an example of a kind of folklore in

0:47:45.239 --> 0:47:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the cannabis world where cbd N has which is stands

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>for cannabinol. It's really a breakdown product of t c UH.

0:47:54.760 --> 0:47:58.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, when the cannabis is old in your closet

0:47:58.360 --> 0:48:01.719
<v Speaker 1>or something that's exposed to light, um it breaks down

0:48:01.719 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 1>into CBN UM and which to me is an indication

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of it's sort of an old product not as good really.

0:48:09.280 --> 0:48:14.840
<v Speaker 1>CBN has been associated with treatments for sleep. But I

0:48:14.880 --> 0:48:18.680
<v Speaker 1>think there's really no scientific basis for this at all, really,

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's so I think it's a marketing ploy

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:25.040
<v Speaker 1>because the folklore has it the oh CBN good for sleep,

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 1>even though there's no science showing this. UM it's become

0:48:29.120 --> 0:48:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a thing in the cannabis world, so a lot of

0:48:32.320 --> 0:48:35.359
<v Speaker 1>products you know, have this in it. And I think

0:48:35.360 --> 0:48:38.319
<v Speaker 1>it's basically just I don't think it has any There

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be any risk, and there's just a kind of

0:48:40.800 --> 0:48:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a scam or nothing. But it's not

0:48:43.080 --> 0:48:44.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna hurt yet. I don't think it would hurt. No,

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:48.480
<v Speaker 1>it may, you know, a very very mild version of

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:51.160
<v Speaker 1>thh C. You can think of it that way, but

0:48:51.280 --> 0:48:53.439
<v Speaker 1>in terms of getting to sleep, I don't. I don't

0:48:53.440 --> 0:48:55.839
<v Speaker 1>think it has really help. And what's the whole thing

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:59.840
<v Speaker 1>about cb D and pets, Well, there's a whole area

0:49:00.000 --> 0:49:04.400
<v Speaker 1>are about certain veterinarians they are looking into using cannabis

0:49:04.520 --> 0:49:08.719
<v Speaker 1>as part of a veterinarian therapy. UM are very very

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:13.120
<v Speaker 1>excited about CBD. UH. Th HC is a little bit

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 1>more problematic for dogs, for example, they react very strongly

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:21.319
<v Speaker 1>to th HC. So the the emphasis on you know,

0:49:21.360 --> 0:49:26.520
<v Speaker 1>not getting your animal intoxicated. Um. So there's a natural

0:49:26.600 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 1>leaning towards CBD, and I think it's the promising area

0:49:29.760 --> 0:49:34.480
<v Speaker 1>for veterinary science, veterinary medicine. Now, Mart going back to

0:49:34.520 --> 0:49:37.319
<v Speaker 1>the industry here, so I see that on your web

0:49:37.360 --> 0:49:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Frie example, you don't promote any brand, but you have sponsors, right,

0:49:40.960 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and you have I think one or two dozen companies.

0:49:44.200 --> 0:49:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Now do you vet these companies before they can become

0:49:47.480 --> 0:49:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a sponsor? I mean to make sure that they are

0:49:49.680 --> 0:49:51.920
<v Speaker 1>really doing the whole plant thing that they're you know,

0:49:52.000 --> 0:49:53.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean that basically their products are safe and good.

0:49:54.200 --> 0:49:57.359
<v Speaker 1>How do you handle that stuff? You know, it's tricky. Yes,

0:49:57.400 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 1>we do vet them, and we look for certain things,

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:03.279
<v Speaker 1>um about the product themselves. Uh. Some of it just

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:05.800
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. You know if if the products that include

0:50:05.800 --> 0:50:09.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sugar, corn syrup, artificial sweeteners, then we

0:50:09.840 --> 0:50:14.280
<v Speaker 1>steer clear of those brands. Um. If the brands are

0:50:14.360 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 1>interested in other forms of therapy with functional mushrooms or

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:22.239
<v Speaker 1>things like that, it tends to indicate a brought a

0:50:22.239 --> 0:50:26.000
<v Speaker 1>perspective about healing that would be complementary for for what

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:29.839
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for in terms of of a CBD brand. Uh.

0:50:29.920 --> 0:50:32.359
<v Speaker 1>If the CBD brands involved with some of these new

0:50:32.400 --> 0:50:37.480
<v Speaker 1>fangled Delta ten and Delta eight and these uh kind

0:50:37.520 --> 0:50:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of th C knockoffs, we steer clear of them because

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:45.279
<v Speaker 1>these products are not regulated, and again, the the way

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:50.040
<v Speaker 1>they're made, it really raises the likelihood that there's going

0:50:50.080 --> 0:50:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to be contaminants in these products. Um, if there are

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:58.160
<v Speaker 1>helps CBD brand at selling vape products, that's a bit

0:50:58.200 --> 0:51:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of a red flag for us as well. Vape products

0:51:00.840 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and CBD rich vape products sold in cannabis dispensaries. We're

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:07.920
<v Speaker 1>okay with that because again, they go through a testing

0:51:07.960 --> 0:51:11.960
<v Speaker 1>regiment that the hand products don't go through. And generally speaking,

0:51:12.000 --> 0:51:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean when I talk to people who say, you know,

0:51:14.160 --> 0:51:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean marijuana problem with it makes me paranoid. It

0:51:16.520 --> 0:51:19.719
<v Speaker 1>makes me anxious. I sometimes find myself saying, well, why

0:51:19.719 --> 0:51:22.319
<v Speaker 1>don't you try doing something with a high CBD low

0:51:22.360 --> 0:51:25.360
<v Speaker 1>th HC content In addition to changing the set and

0:51:25.400 --> 0:51:27.160
<v Speaker 1>setting and paying attention to that may be the most

0:51:27.160 --> 0:51:30.200
<v Speaker 1>important variable I'm in doing with people you're comfortable with

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and all this sort of thing. But

0:51:32.160 --> 0:51:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, does that make sense that people have had

0:51:34.680 --> 0:51:38.520
<v Speaker 1>negative reactions in the past that maybe switching that ratio

0:51:38.840 --> 0:51:40.839
<v Speaker 1>might be the thing that enables them to learn how

0:51:40.880 --> 0:51:46.919
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy marijuana. Yeah, exactly. Um, that's that's the whole

0:51:46.960 --> 0:51:50.399
<v Speaker 1>point of different ratios of CBD and th HC. If

0:51:50.440 --> 0:51:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of CBD and very little th HC,

0:51:53.239 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it shouldn't be intoxicating. You know, studies have shown there's

0:51:57.080 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a genetic basis for how people tolerate t C. There

0:52:02.440 --> 0:52:06.279
<v Speaker 1>is certain people who just cannot tolerate t C. We

0:52:06.360 --> 0:52:08.840
<v Speaker 1>can be talking about six ft five in sky who's

0:52:08.840 --> 0:52:11.600
<v Speaker 1>two fifty pounds, who will wilt. You don't have to

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:15.520
<v Speaker 1>even near t C. You know. Uh, it doesn't have

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to do with body type or anything like that. But genetically,

0:52:20.440 --> 0:52:25.480
<v Speaker 1>about twenty of Caucasians have what's called a polymorphism, or

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:27.879
<v Speaker 1>you can call it a mutation, but it's a little

0:52:27.880 --> 0:52:31.480
<v Speaker 1>bit too strong a word, where the enzymes, the proteins

0:52:31.560 --> 0:52:36.439
<v Speaker 1>that would normally metabolize THHC and break it down. Um,

0:52:36.480 --> 0:52:40.279
<v Speaker 1>they're different in those people. So it results in his

0:52:40.360 --> 0:52:43.439
<v Speaker 1>ability to break down the thh C in a quote

0:52:43.520 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 1>unquote normal way, and for such a person, they'll have

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:50.560
<v Speaker 1>bad experiences on th HC. So Martin just go back

0:52:50.600 --> 0:52:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna wrap this up shortly. UM. So the

0:52:53.239 --> 0:52:55.680
<v Speaker 1>f d A put out something, I mean, I think

0:52:55.719 --> 0:52:58.200
<v Speaker 1>they're being asked to regulate cb D. I think there's

0:52:58.239 --> 0:52:59.719
<v Speaker 1>many people in city who would like it to be

0:52:59.760 --> 0:53:02.160
<v Speaker 1>regul related. I think consumers would like to have greater

0:53:02.200 --> 0:53:04.719
<v Speaker 1>assurance out there. But the f d A, I think,

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:06.719
<v Speaker 1>to the extent it stepped into it, has said some

0:53:06.760 --> 0:53:09.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty negative things. And we talked before about how they're

0:53:10.000 --> 0:53:12.959
<v Speaker 1>not really cut out to be evaluating, you know, things

0:53:12.960 --> 0:53:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that involve an entourage effect that were's evaluating plans. But

0:53:16.440 --> 0:53:18.840
<v Speaker 1>what is going on with this f d A now

0:53:18.880 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and what do we expect to see happening with them

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in coming years? These a VCBD. Well, FDA is the

0:53:24.120 --> 0:53:27.360
<v Speaker 1>foot dragging administration really, and they're dragging their feet on

0:53:27.400 --> 0:53:31.880
<v Speaker 1>this issue. You know, it goes back to the Dietary

0:53:32.080 --> 0:53:35.799
<v Speaker 1>Supplement Health and that that Act that specifically that there

0:53:35.880 --> 0:53:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is a provision called the exclusionary Provision which states that

0:53:40.719 --> 0:53:46.040
<v Speaker 1>if a compound is approved as a pharmaceutical, it can't

0:53:46.040 --> 0:53:50.160
<v Speaker 1>be included in in dietary supplements. Well, that's really the

0:53:50.280 --> 0:53:53.320
<v Speaker 1>hold up with the FDA because they're sticking to that rule.

0:53:54.080 --> 0:53:55.919
<v Speaker 1>UM as a way of saying, well, we don't move

0:53:55.960 --> 0:54:00.120
<v Speaker 1>on this because because of the exclusionary principle. And and

0:54:01.200 --> 0:54:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a counter push coming that even

0:54:04.680 --> 0:54:07.960
<v Speaker 1>within Congress, even coming from the Red state senators and

0:54:08.000 --> 0:54:12.960
<v Speaker 1>representatives who represents states that are hemp growing states, that

0:54:13.080 --> 0:54:16.000
<v Speaker 1>they want to see the FDA move past this. And

0:54:16.080 --> 0:54:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, the CBD has scrambled the prohibitionist

0:54:20.400 --> 0:54:22.399
<v Speaker 1>narrative in a lot of different ways, and it's sort

0:54:22.440 --> 0:54:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of it's forcing this f D a I think, to

0:54:26.680 --> 0:54:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, to change the way it approaches this issue.

0:54:29.960 --> 0:54:33.440
<v Speaker 1>In this particular instance, there's just too much popular pressure

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:36.200
<v Speaker 1>on this. There's just too much of a need um

0:54:36.280 --> 0:54:40.399
<v Speaker 1>to have a seriously regulated market here for CBD rather

0:54:40.440 --> 0:54:43.360
<v Speaker 1>than the wild West that we're seeing with him CBD.

0:54:44.000 --> 0:54:46.480
<v Speaker 1>And I would like to see the standards raised so

0:54:46.560 --> 0:54:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that the way that the cannabis industry, of the legal

0:54:50.200 --> 0:54:55.240
<v Speaker 1>cannabis industry is regulating um its products, including CBD rich products,

0:54:55.280 --> 0:54:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that everything else rise to that level of safety, which

0:55:00.080 --> 0:55:02.279
<v Speaker 1>that would be I think a positive development, But I

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:05.480
<v Speaker 1>think I'm not sure if that's what the CBD industry

0:55:05.520 --> 0:55:08.040
<v Speaker 1>wants to hear. And do you think that as we

0:55:08.080 --> 0:55:11.920
<v Speaker 1>move towards synthetics, Will they become better at doing not

0:55:12.080 --> 0:55:14.080
<v Speaker 1>just the cb D and TC, but all the other

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:16.600
<v Speaker 1>minor elements of the cannabis plant. Will that will they'll

0:55:16.600 --> 0:55:21.520
<v Speaker 1>be producing synthetically sort of synthetic entourage drugs from the front.

0:55:22.280 --> 0:55:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's getting the entourage effects through synthetics. I

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:28.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know about entourage through synthetics, and I don't think

0:55:28.400 --> 0:55:32.759
<v Speaker 1>you can really create recreate a real entourage effect or

0:55:32.760 --> 0:55:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a full entourage effect just by you know, adding a

0:55:35.400 --> 0:55:38.359
<v Speaker 1>bunch of putting a bunch of synthetics together. But I

0:55:38.400 --> 0:55:44.319
<v Speaker 1>think the potential positive side of this move towards synthetics

0:55:44.840 --> 0:55:50.239
<v Speaker 1>is that minor cannabinoids with with great therapeutic potential which

0:55:50.320 --> 0:55:55.120
<v Speaker 1>would not be possible to to access from the plant

0:55:55.160 --> 0:55:59.759
<v Speaker 1>itself in any significant quantity um, could be made in

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:03.200
<v Speaker 1>efficient quantities to do clinical trials with understanding that that's

0:56:03.200 --> 0:56:06.319
<v Speaker 1>that's the pharmaceutical approach, a reductive approach, that's focusing on

0:56:06.400 --> 0:56:10.160
<v Speaker 1>single molecules. I'm not against single molecules. When I'm against

0:56:10.280 --> 0:56:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is privileging pharmaceutical signal molecules over a full plant. And

0:56:16.280 --> 0:56:19.600
<v Speaker 1>then uh, you know, which is what you're saying, will

0:56:19.640 --> 0:56:23.840
<v Speaker 1>inevitably happen as we move to synthetics. Um. Yes, but

0:56:24.239 --> 0:56:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a matter of you know, we have to stand

0:56:26.680 --> 0:56:32.320
<v Speaker 1>up for artisanal, full spectrum cannabis products. That's it should

0:56:32.360 --> 0:56:34.400
<v Speaker 1>be part of the mix. It's just that the regulatory

0:56:34.440 --> 0:56:38.840
<v Speaker 1>apparatus doesn't favor that type of thing. And that's the problem.

0:56:38.880 --> 0:56:43.359
<v Speaker 1>It's not the intrinsically um single molecule pharmaceuticals are quote

0:56:43.400 --> 0:56:46.640
<v Speaker 1>unquote bad um. They can actually work and help people.

0:56:46.840 --> 0:56:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Epidialects works well. So it sounds like though, as mariana

0:56:50.200 --> 0:56:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is increasingly legalized, though, it's really going to ease the

0:56:52.920 --> 0:56:56.439
<v Speaker 1>way for the therapeutic values of CBD. And since you're

0:56:56.440 --> 0:56:59.640
<v Speaker 1>basically saying that anytime you're taking CBD, you're better off

0:56:59.719 --> 0:57:02.560
<v Speaker 1>take in it where it's got some sidly small amount

0:57:02.560 --> 0:57:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of th HC or even other um elements of the

0:57:06.239 --> 0:57:08.359
<v Speaker 1>cannabis plant in it, I mean that's going to be

0:57:08.440 --> 0:57:10.960
<v Speaker 1>all for the good in terms of making CBD as

0:57:11.040 --> 0:57:14.160
<v Speaker 1>useful as it can be UM for people living here

0:57:14.239 --> 0:57:18.240
<v Speaker 1>or wherever. That's what we would hope. Okay, Well, listen, Martin,

0:57:18.680 --> 0:57:22.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for sharing your insights and wisdom

0:57:22.840 --> 0:57:27.240
<v Speaker 1>about CBD with me. And my Psychoactive audience. Thank you.

0:57:35.560 --> 0:57:39.400
<v Speaker 1>If you're enjoying Psychoactive, please tell your friends about it,

0:57:39.600 --> 0:57:41.840
<v Speaker 1>or you can write us a review at Apple Podcasts

0:57:41.920 --> 0:57:44.680
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts. We love to hear

0:57:44.720 --> 0:57:47.760
<v Speaker 1>from our listeners. If you'd like to share your own stories,

0:57:47.840 --> 0:57:50.959
<v Speaker 1>comments and ideas, then leave us a message at one

0:57:51.200 --> 0:57:56.680
<v Speaker 1>eight three three seven seven nine sixty that's eight three

0:57:56.760 --> 0:58:01.280
<v Speaker 1>three psycho zero, or you can email us at Psychoactive

0:58:01.320 --> 0:58:04.480
<v Speaker 1>at protozoa dot com or find me on Twitter at

0:58:04.480 --> 0:58:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Ethan Natalman. You can also find contact information in our

0:58:08.120 --> 0:58:11.880
<v Speaker 1>show notes. Psychoactive is a production of I Heart Radio

0:58:12.120 --> 0:58:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and Protozoa Pictures. It's hosted by me Ethan Nadelman. It's

0:58:16.360 --> 0:58:20.240
<v Speaker 1>produced by Noham Osband and Josh Stain. The executive producers

0:58:20.400 --> 0:58:24.480
<v Speaker 1>are Dylan Golden, Ari Handel, Elizabeth Geesus and Darren Aronovsky

0:58:24.560 --> 0:58:27.680
<v Speaker 1>from Protozoa Pictures, Alex Williams and Matt Frederick from My

0:58:27.760 --> 0:58:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio and me Ethan Nadelman. Our music is by

0:58:31.720 --> 0:58:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Ari Blucien and a special thanks to ab Ario s

0:58:35.440 --> 0:58:49.560
<v Speaker 1>f Bianca Grimshaw and Robert Deep. Next week's episode will

0:58:49.600 --> 0:58:52.880
<v Speaker 1>be all about I Began I'll be talking with Hattie Wells,

0:58:52.960 --> 0:58:55.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the leading experts in the uses of this

0:58:55.520 --> 0:59:00.880
<v Speaker 1>remarkable psychedelic substance. The piece that I think might make

0:59:01.200 --> 0:59:05.400
<v Speaker 1>ibergain seem somewhat daunting. You are sort of immobilized, so

0:59:05.480 --> 0:59:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you'll be lying down on a bed for at least

0:59:08.360 --> 0:59:12.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of sixteen eighteen hours without moving, and you can't move,

0:59:13.640 --> 0:59:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and that that is definitely an intense experience. Subscribe to

0:59:17.600 --> 0:59:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Pycoactive now see it all, miss it.