WEBVTT - Carmen Li's Plan to Build a Futures Market for Compute

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Out Thoughts podcast.

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Jill.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't thal so Joe. We're still continuing our series. Recorded

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 2>from the live show in New York. We had a

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 2>bunch of great conversations. A couple of them were building

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 2>off of discussions that we had had previously, and one

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 2>of those discussions was in Chicago at another live show

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.279
<v Speaker 2>about six or seven months ago. Back in October, we

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 2>spoke with Don Wilson of DRW about the trading environment,

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 2>but also about his new venture.

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 3>Right and so his new venture is one that actually

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 3>there's quite a bit of competition in and quite of

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 3>excitement in, and it's essentially like okay, GPUs. We know

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 3>they're very important for the AI boom, et cetera. The

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 3>question is can GPU capacity, which is scarce, can it

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 3>become a tradable commodity such that I can buy futures

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:15.479
<v Speaker 3>to lock in my price of access to compute power.

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Could I resell those futures? Will there be speculators speculating

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 3>on the upper down price of like an H one

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:24.120
<v Speaker 3>hundred running an H one hundred in video chip for

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 3>an hour. This is a big question. We know there's

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot of interest in the actual compute, but whether

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 3>there's interested in compute futures. It's tradable instruments is very TVD.

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And the analogy that everyone always uses is compute

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 2>is the new oil, right, so why can't it have

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, a market structure that looks somewhat like the

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 2>oil market. And there are challenges. Fungibility is a big one,

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 2>like one chip might not necessarily be equal to another

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 2>chip or one ship.

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 3>The same chip at one data center might equal to

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 3>the same chip at a different data center exactly.

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 2>And so even if you're not interested in AI, what

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 2>I say here is like the market structure questions and

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 2>the idea of building an entirely new market is really

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 2>fascinating to me, and I think others will find it

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 2>interesting too. And we really do have the perfect guest.

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 2>We're speaking with Carmen Lee. She is the CEO of

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Compute Exchange and Silicon Data. These are the two companies

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 2>that Wilson is invested in, and they've already announced that

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 2>they're doing futures with the CME. So really the perfect

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 2>person to speak to So take a listen. Last October

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 2>we spoke with Don Wilson of DRW fame and he

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 2>was talking to us about his new project, which was

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 2>basically building out this compute exchange. Now we're here with

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 2>you six months later. You're actually the one leading it.

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 2>How far are you in this endeavor? And remind us

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 2>what exactly are you trying to do here?

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so thank you for the the quizing one great audience.

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 4>Before I do that, I actually going to call back

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 4>to six months ago in the DOM podcast you did.

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 4>You asked them question, what if compute prices keep going

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 4>to go up? At the time September October, compute prices

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 4>were going down across our chips. Now see what happened.

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.239
<v Speaker 4>I think you called it. I think you called the

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 4>market called it. So I'm the fund of CEO for

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.679
<v Speaker 4>Cilicond Data, so that's the index provider for GPU indcees.

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 4>We recently announced partnership with CME, so we all been

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 4>launching gp futurning options ME in a couple of months,

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 4>pending the FDIC approval. Obviously that's quite exciting. We've been

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 4>working on GPU indices for past two and a half years,

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 4>starting twenty twenty four April, so it's been a while,

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 4>and we launched for world's first GPU inducees at Bloomberg

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 4>Terminal in twenty twenty five. A year later we launched

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 4>the partnership with CMME, so it's quite exciting. Separately, I

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 4>heard you mentioned Compute Change before, so thank you for

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 4>doing AGIL. I'm the CEO for compute Change, which is

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 4>sport marketplace for GPO procurement. So we do reserve contracts

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 4>for contracts as well as ree for pitch contracts.

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about the variety of options that we have

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 3>to financialize compute and so forth. So this, I mean,

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 3>this came up in our conversation. The first conversation we

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 3>had with we had with Ian Dunning. Who is the

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 3>type of buyer who would want to buy compute on

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 3>a spot market because right you talk about typically we

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 3>think it's like these multi year contracts where some entity

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 3>enters into a contract with a data center or a

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 3>new cloud whatever, and this they have this for a while.

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 3>So who is the market, who is the buyer or

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 3>the user of these instruments that might want to buy

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 3>spot compute or very short term short dated compute futures.

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 4>It's a great question. So the compute market right now,

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 4>for comput change, we have all our provider mostly are

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.479
<v Speaker 4>neo clouds around the world. It's one side. Another site

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 4>is a big variety AI start up. So even though

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 4>they are start up, millions of dollars on GPUs already.

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 4>There are enterprises who are traditional businesses, but they are

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 4>needing a note to notes, a few service here and

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 4>there for their inferencing or I don't know, other deployment needs.

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 4>They are providers. They are influencing providers right they don't

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 4>own GPUs, but they provide open source, open weights model

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 4>support for other use cases. So what see big variety.

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 4>Most North American firms they do a variety of combination contracts.

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Obviously on demand give you the most flexibility. You don't

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 4>pay and you don't use it. However, you're also at

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 4>a mercy of defense. Apply curve at a given time,

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 4>so translate to your price can go from three dollars

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 4>to six to nine depends on demand supply curve shifting,

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 4>so that doesn't help when you can have a predictable margin.

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 4>And also in terms of scarce, you're not guaranteed to

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 4>feel GPU resources for next hour or next month. So

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 4>you see a lot of people shifting from on demand

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 4>to reserve even four contracts right, so full contracts you

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 4>back the lock in a deliverables for next whatever month, right,

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 4>starting in September maybe or starting no member of forbare

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 4>weapons right. So this all comes because of market condition.

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 4>So computing cover that the physical GPO procurement also token,

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 4>so we love to talk about token as well. On

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 4>flip side, who's going to use the future options can

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 4>be a similar set of people.

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.799
<v Speaker 4>You look at oil market, which we all love double

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 4>TM brand. Right, the people use double TM brand. A

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 4>lot of them are naturally long oil. So the shells

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 4>ran the producers. They need to hatch your revenue volatility

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 4>by shorting futures or port options if you're naturally short

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 4>oil americandline right, they want to control their cost volatility.

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 4>They want to obviously use future options as well.

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Simple to the.

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Compute your new cloud or you're at anyone have the servers.

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 4>Ideally you want to have predictable revenue streams.

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 3>So the neo cloud would be the shell on this example.

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 4>Exactly, you have GPS, right, all the banks were GPUs

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 4>on your balance sheet right your long GPUs, then naturally

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 4>you want to make sure revenue right is stable to

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 4>certain degree, and then you want to use future to

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 4>do so. If you are naturally short GPU, which is

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 4>everybody in this room, amas you tell me you have

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 4>GPUs right, then you depends how much you use. If

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 4>you want to control your cost volatility, you want to

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 4>use future to hatch as well.

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Just on the compute exchange side of things, if someone

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 2>is buying like off the spot market, how do you

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 2>guarantee I'm not sure quality is the right word for this,

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 2>but how do you guarantee they're getting what they expect?

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 4>This is a great question. So I canna flip to

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 4>slide if you don't mind. So I usually don't let

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 4>use slides, but this time because you mentioned really good questions.

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 4>So we actually call it GPU lottery. So we published

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 4>a paper earlier this year at GPGPO conference with Jefferson

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Lab on GPO performances. Well actually, so well we can

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 4>have your quit link, you know, to the audience later on.

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 4>We actually this is a one hundred by the way,

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 4>I know we didn't put tang on the day. Is

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 4>a one hundred forty gigabytes memory bandwidth. We prove there's

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 4>thirty eight percent performance variants for the same trip, and

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.880
<v Speaker 4>we decompose it into the chip self, into provider and

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 4>inter provider. And there's many reasons for that, right and

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.719
<v Speaker 4>to your point, you can you don't know until you

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 4>get your GPS. We have a PLAT for GPU. CARFAX

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 4>for GPU depends how to look at it, so we

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 4>in compute change. You actually verify the GPU before delivered

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 4>to you. So basically you are you are. You CANFQ

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 4>for say, hey, I one A two hundred BI two

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 4>hundred notes. Obviously it will give you specs back and

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 4>the commercial back same time, independently verify the performances on flops,

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:04.079
<v Speaker 4>memory bandwidth totals another information as ACE and other things.

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.079
<v Speaker 4>And as a user you can decide is price your

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 4>most important criteria? Maybe it is, or maybe you're willing

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 4>to pay a premium for dual location or the performances

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 4>that you care more about on latency. Right, we believe

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 4>gave people the option and transparency it is the most

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 4>important thing.

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Let's stick with the oil analogy for a second. You know,

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 3>there's a few benchmarks that we all know about. There's brand.

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 3>There's WTI, there's others, but those are the two that

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 3>we talk about. If we transpose this to chips for

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 3>a second, okay, we say you have an H one

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 3>hundred index. We did an episode of the podcast last week,

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 3>I think with the CEO of Servius, which is another

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 3>amazing company. Yep, yeah, but there are different Another type

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 3>of chip for inference is your assumption that these indices

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 3>are going to be close enough to the cost such

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:58.680
<v Speaker 3>that if you're okay, I'm running inference maybe on some

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 3>service or TPUs or training whatever, some of these others,

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 3>that an H one hundred index will be good enough

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 3>as a hedging instrument.

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 4>This is the whole goal for me sitting here. Actually, right,

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 4>there's a meaningful every financial products in the functional reason

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 4>for commodity it is for hadging. Right, This speculation is great,

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 4>but really for people to hatch their relativity, to do

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 4>risk allocation, to do risk transfer, and then asset capitala location.

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 4>If we can't do what you said, then we fail

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 4>at our job. Right, So that's why we when all

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 4>the way back the way we cut we develop our

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 4>index model is not a simple math. It's not Hey,

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 4>you have two h one hundred to simple average, right,

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 4>because then then you compare Apple to oranges, the two

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 4>h one hundred can have different CPU different RAM defend

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 4>this differential location depend memory, bandwidth. You cannot do simple math.

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 4>What we do is we usually collect six months of

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 4>historical training data from over one hundred data sources, and

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 4>we see which factor to have the price differentiation. So

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 4>every day over one hundred and fifty thousand traded prices

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 4>in just our platform, and we normalize the traded prices

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 4>based on the different characteristics of the model itself and

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 4>normalized to a base case. And then we do the

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 4>math of settlement price calculation. Right, So then this price

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 4>will be highly correlated, ideally as much as it can

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 4>to the price you pay at a new cloud for example. However,

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 4>it won't be the same just like basis trading, right,

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 4>like every other commodity is a basis risk. We're helping

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.199
<v Speaker 4>client colpeling the basis risk. So you know, hey, you

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 4>us east, you may be BIPs higher or two than

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 4>there's expectation a manageable correlation understanding of the indicies.

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned volatility just then, I mean the reason people

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 2>need to hedg just because of volatility. Are you seeing

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 2>enough of that in GPU prices that like, this model

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 2>makes sense because if it's just a steady line up

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.319
<v Speaker 2>or steady line down, like it's gonna be a kind

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 2>of boring market.

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 4>So it's interesting. So last year, when GP prices are

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 4>going down, the big conversation is why do you need

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 4>indicies for something price will always go down? And this

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 4>year is why do you want to inducease when price

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.199
<v Speaker 4>always go up? Literally is all the questions.

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:17.599
<v Speaker 1>I get it.

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.199
<v Speaker 4>It's pretty fascinating. So when we will look at volatility,

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 4>we look at daily bomb volatility movement, not the price

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 4>up and down. Right, the daily volatility for eight one

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 4>hundred h one hundred is around twenty to thirty. So

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 4>it's a very healthy commodity volatility range. So I don't

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 4>manage volatility. It just happened to be the volatility that

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 4>can change. It's all because we normalize it. If you

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 4>look at each individual chip configuration at differential location, the

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:48.119
<v Speaker 4>voltity are different. There's some chips with eight percent volatility,

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 4>some chips with over one hundred. Because normalization of indices,

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 4>you actually get very healthy twenty to thirty daily bomb.

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm always fascinated by like, you know, we look at

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg terminal, for example, and there's a price on

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 3>the screen and it's just there, and we started taking

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 3>for granted that like it had to come from somewhere,

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 3>and maybe some commodities have like a you know, there's

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 3>an existing exchange and a public price, and then there's

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 3>also a lot of commodities just bilateral traits. What is

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 3>the actual process by which you collect the most recent data?

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.719
<v Speaker 3>So if you say, okay, an hour of h one

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 3>hundred usage costs x right, whatever it is right now,

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 3>how did you assemble that number? How did you gather

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 3>that information from, say the inference providers?

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 4>So it is a very can be lengthy, depends on

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 4>what data sources, the nature of GPU spawn markets conpictures

0:13:58.080 --> 0:13:59.439
<v Speaker 4>just one of them, and then many of my in

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 4>neoclaushyperscular marketplaces all have very different contras, size, durations, backs,

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 4>and their way to manage their data right, So it's

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 4>a lot of licensing, conversation, negotiation well and also context

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 4>love myself, I don't know, I was used for boomboard data,

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 4>so I was in data basiness for period of time.

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 4>So everything is pretty intuitive to me. It's very important

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 4>to get a variety of data sources, especially for computing.

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Like do you call them up? Like so it's like, okay,

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 3>the price is different on the sum them up.

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, you first of conversations say hey, I love what

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 4>you do. You're bring your cloud? Can I license your data?

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 4>And usually your feedback is what is in for me?

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 4>And I will tell our commercials And then your concern

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 4>could be, hey, you know, if I give you all

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 4>my data, I give my way all my secrets and

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 4>I will go through traditional licensing agreement. What can I disclose?

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 4>What I want from you? What I do not want

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 4>from you? What's the pipeline look like? Are you right?

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 4>You use a street market job? You are running my

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 4>API to yours? Are you running into mind? It's a

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 4>lot of conversations. It's actually pretty standard conversation. And right

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 4>now with eight million pricing points globally around two hundred

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 4>data sources, it's pretty much bau A lot. People will say, hey,

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 4>always bring up you can I have your data? It's

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 4>always my ending.

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, we were talking about GPU indices and you're

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 2>not the only one doing GPU price indices for.

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 4>Sure, not anymore.

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not anymore. But when you look at some of

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the other ones, like sometimes they show different numbers or

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 2>even different longer term trends, what accounts for the discrepancy there?

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 2>What are you doing differently or what are they doing differently?

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 2>I guess.

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 4>So I can't come on other people's mythology because I

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 4>actually don't know different raw data. Different mythology will eventually

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 4>draft different prices. So the way I would look at

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 4>this is, you know, it's always smart for anyone to

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 4>look at multiple data sources and then figure out what

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 4>is the actual decision you have to make, which datasps

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 4>do you trust? The market always volte whilst us things

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 4>start trading. The market will always gravitates what things actually

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 4>help them hatch? Right, if you easily manupulatable, if you

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 4>are not data source people acting actions, do you hatch?

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 4>There was the point a sideh one speculation, right, So

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 4>you know I'd love to say, I mean, I also

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 4>strongly believe what the best but again I will let

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 4>the market decide, which will happen very soon.

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 3>So of course, like yes, there's the economic rationale for

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 3>the existence of a hedging instrument, and we can understand

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 3>that someone who is an entity that from time that

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 3>needs compute their short implicitly short GPUs, they want to hedge,

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. But the liquid markets also really do need

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 3>speculators and they need people betting on price. What are

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 3>you seeing right now in terms of traders or institutions,

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 3>et cetera, who economically can take both sides of the

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 3>trade and how active is this getting where it's just

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 3>a compute trading desk that is separate from their economic needs.

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 4>The conversation has been going on for a very long

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 4>time with various banks, various multi participants, speculators. They are

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 4>very excited. So some banks obviously have those both sides

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:18.239
<v Speaker 4>of the trade right, so they can cross off some

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 4>positions internally. That's great. Always some they have to use

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 4>leverage external products. So that's where we come in. The

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.919
<v Speaker 4>way I encourage them to do is I selfishly, I

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 4>want them to start trading desk and compute. The more

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 4>people trade, the better for me, right selfishly. The same time,

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 4>it is important for people understand GPU trading. It's not

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.919
<v Speaker 4>like you can just move someone from oil electricity with

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 4>no background context jobing to GPU compute futures. There's a

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 4>lot of context where number one GPU it is not

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 4>homogenous product number two. You have to understand the use

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 4>cases of eight one hundred h one hundred right now,

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 4>they are not that correlated. Is that right? Maybe that's

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 4>not right. I don't know. There are use cases which

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 4>they're pretty separated, but maybe their use cases they can

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 4>be transferred and also their software layer to this. Right,

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 4>so right now you can art give sooner use cases

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 4>some large amount of models cannot be deployed and the

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 4>legacy chips, but doesn't mean six months later you cannot

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 4>do so. As the software layer compression model compression gets better,

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 4>optimization gets better, things can change. So really understand not

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 4>just the hardware configuration, this local supply demand curve for

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 4>the service self also software layer that's kind of critical, right,

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 4>that's really changed the supply demand curve and all the

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 4>way to the user behavior. So it's all it's going

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 4>to take some times as we have engaged with a

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 4>lot of participants make sure they have the right set up.

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 2>I have what is possibly a dumb question, but the

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 2>compute futures, how are those actually settled? Because I have

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 2>like images in my mind of taking physical delivery of

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 2>like maybe one of those big.

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 4>Okay, that'll be fun. So for the CME, futures will

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 4>be financially settled just like the traditional oil settlement price.

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 4>That priceis goes four contracts. Well obviously we do four

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 4>right now, I can fut change, but we always open

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 4>to do you know, physically deliver futures, especially given we

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 4>do have silica mark which is GPO benchmarking. So imagine

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 4>the future. You can do, Hey, I want to twenty

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 4>grade A B two hundred, this configuration, this shape of

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 4>servers in US East and then at the end we'll

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 4>get that. Well, usually API costs so you don't get

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 4>physical and it's not as coo as physically give you

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 4>a way way for but you get APIA costs.

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 2>One can dream.

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 3>How do you literally trade it is in like let's

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 3>say there's probably some very bright people in the room

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 3>now with an institution. When it's all listed in everything,

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 3>does it need to go through like a future's broker?

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Is it like a could it be like a prediction

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 3>market if you just go to a website? Like what

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 3>is the actual How does someone actually get in this setting?

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Aside whether they're sophisticated enough of whether they know what

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 3>they're doing a lot of people trade to have no

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 3>idea what they're doing. Yeah, setting all this side. Yes,

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 3>you know, only trade what you know. But like, what

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 3>is it through a prime broker? Like how will people

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 3>actually be able to participate.

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 2>In this market?

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 4>The beauty of CME is you can do the same

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 4>thing you're doing now treating semi products. Okay, the same

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 4>process and processing margin. That's why you get great margin optimization. Right,

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 4>everything is BAU it's no different. We don't have anything

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 4>right now.

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 3>So any commodities broker that someone has, they will be

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 3>able to on that platform. They will have access to these.

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 4>Instruments exactly right. Yeah, we make it easy for people.

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Would you be upset if a prediction market set up

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 2>a GPU price contract of some sort with that into

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:42.640
<v Speaker 2>your business?

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 4>Not at all. So we actually work with poly market.

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 4>Last year someone actually listed my product at polymarket with

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 4>my consent. It's pretty it's always start like that. And

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 4>then someone told me that, and we try to Polymarket

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 4>and say, hey, do you want to do something you

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 4>know more real? So we did. Fabruary settled and April

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 4>settled a few contracts on polymarket. I just with test

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 4>the water right obviously we're exclusively with CME right now.

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, so I think obviously you have to do

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 4>it right, licensing, nonminal, pillared, it all the right things. Yeah,

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, I don't. Mark can do whatever they want,

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 4>and then people will choose the best product for them

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 4>to use.

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 3>Sitting aside the financial instruments for the moment, would people

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 3>think about AI and they think about the use of GPUs,

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 3>they mostly still probably in their mind think of like

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 3>open AI and Thropic and Google basically, and that's kind

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 3>of it. But obviously, as you've stated, like the world

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 3>of entities that serve inference in some form or another

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 3>is much greater than these three companies that we talk about.

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Talk to us a little bit more about what the

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 3>actual world of inference provision looks like outside of the

0:21:58.280 --> 0:21:59.880
<v Speaker 3>big household AI name.

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 4>So the ones you mentioned, they mostly are closed source

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:05.479
<v Speaker 4>models as we call it, right, but they do have

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 4>some open source versions, but they're famous for their closed

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 4>source models. So we actually track three hundred open source

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 4>open weights closed source models globally. Upon pricing and consumption

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 4>point of view, it is really interesting if we have actually,

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, we haven't really formally launched token in disease.

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 4>You can currently look at Bloomberg and it's on Bloomberg.

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting is people are depends. It's all based on

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 4>your choices. Right now. The price actually doubled file indusees

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 4>from now from December first last year. It's like two

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 4>dollars twenty one dollar per million token. It's a mixture

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 4>of input up and token prices reach weighted by consumption

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 4>by buscut models. It's not here. This is a GPU unfortunately, which.

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Are just well, since we have this specific chart up

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 3>right now, what is the y access in this church?

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 4>So you look yet that the per GPO power rental

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 4>rate on demand for three chips. The top one the

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 4>yellow line is B two hundred new cloud on demand

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 4>per flower. So it's a mouthful. The line the air

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 4>line is interesting, right. So every new chip we came

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 4>out based on historical data one hundred usually came out

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 4>to be high and then comes down as more supply

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, came life, and then price came down and

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 4>then stabilizes. So that's the trend we have absorbed for

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 4>A one hundred and for H one hundred. So when

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 4>B two country came out, we pollished the data last

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 4>year at Bloomberg this early this year, the price was

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 4>high and it came down, which is kind of what

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 4>I expected. But the slope was less steep than I expected.

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 4>I was like, hm, that's interesting, the slope wasn't as steep,

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 4>and I'm quickly observed the price just came up and

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 4>now it's higher than the initial opened whatever you call that,

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 4>right launch prices. That shows your demands apply craft in

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:01.239
<v Speaker 4>a different stage than whatever stage we had before. So

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 4>the A one the red line is H one hundred

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 4>neil cloud on demand per jubile power rate. So you

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 4>can see the price came down last year a little

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 4>bit sort about the skill so you don't see much,

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 4>but came down and came back up quite a bit.

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 4>I think the last three months came up to like

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 4>eight percent for AGE one hundred. The one hundred is older,

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 4>oldest chips among the three, right, they're pretty you know,

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 4>put don't you calm audit? At this point the price

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 4>came down, they stabilized, but the price came up about

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 4>ten to fifteen percent for the past three months. Remember

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 4>the A one hundred right there, they're not the latest

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 4>and greatest at all. So this also tells you to

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 4>supply deman croft shifting.

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, actually that reminds me, could you talk to

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 2>us because you're doing refurbishment of chips as well, right, like,

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 2>which seems like challenging in many ways and kind of

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 2>reminds me a lot about like the sort of carbona

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 2>model of compute or something like that. How are you

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 2>actually doing this? Like how does that business work?

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 4>So this is cool in two different things. One is

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 4>for people come to conpect change saying that, hey, I

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 4>want to you know, it's Union Cloud provider. Right, if

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.199
<v Speaker 4>you get a piece of land, you again a g

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 4>CO location, Great, congratulations? Then your option is number one.

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 4>Should I get the latest and greatest, the B three hundred,

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 4>the gbs the roubmen with a few months or do

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 4>you want to get refrabit trips and turn out maybe sooner? Right? Then,

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 4>to you, it's become our I calculation for the most part. Right,

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 4>what's you expected, you know, future revenue generation? What's your

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 4>residual VALUD calculation? How much you can purchase by right,

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 4>it's actually pretty simple cash flow based in our I calculation.

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 4>So the way we approach residual value and refurb trans

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 4>transaction is you know, based on our I you know

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 4>this is your potential break even look at h one hundred, right,

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 4>obviously you're not going to charge its high speed two hundred,

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 4>but your cost base is also lower, so you can

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 4>do the future. You're assume a few years of four

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 4>country's signing three years this kind of cash flowback. That's

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 4>your misgivell now, right, So we do that calculation with

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 4>people so they understand, Hey, what was the value supposed

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 4>to generate? And it was the treating the market prices

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 4>for refurbished or used GPUA and you have to test

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 4>you to make sure things works, and there's out of

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 4>nuances to that. But we helped go to the understanding

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 4>of the whole research of value and that's why the

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 4>whole bubble thinking about but go ahead, what.

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 3>Month was it last year when like everyone got really

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 3>obsessed with like the life span of chips. Remember, like

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 3>tweeted something about He's like, oh the lifespan, They're like right,

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 3>and everyone was free, spent like three weeks free and

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 3>then moved on from that conversation, right, like that was

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 3>what do we know about chip life spans? Are there

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.959
<v Speaker 3>misconceptions out there about the how long yes, these can

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 3>get be productive.

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm going in to view a few times, but I don't.

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm not important. Still, I'm more important, but

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 4>back then that even less relevant. I was telling reporters.

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 4>I was like, look, I don't know what did that

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 4>you're looking at based on my I actually have blocks.

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 4>So my website, which is completely can to search for

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 4>it last year because of that conversation, I want you

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 4>currect later on the second year h one hundred residual

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 4>value of reseal value for refribit chips about eighty five

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 4>cents one dollar, So a year later you can sell

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 4>eighty five to one dollar. That's pretty good. I would

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 4>say the thirty is eighty four cents one dollar, and

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 4>I think my cards appreciate win more than that, right,

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 4>And I enjoined my car forboard every ten ten years,

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 4>So it's I had a data. But again I'm not

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 4>going to argue it against narrative, which is so.

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 3>But there was there's a fairly sived a decent drop

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 3>from year one to year two. That's what after that.

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 3>You see your general level.

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 4>That's November December analysis. Right now, it's a little different.

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 4>I haven't refreshed to study but our code is there.

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 4>If you're my data client, you can around my cold

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 4>you get a number right away. Another thing I want

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 4>to point out is l forties. They're like you know

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 4>the ogs right at that time, the people still use them.

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 4>They charge you hypercure charge your forties as p JB

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.880
<v Speaker 4>per hour. So you know, I don't know about two

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 4>years where's the net number coming from? But I will

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 4>I will do that trade every single day. You sell

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 4>you're two years old at ten cents a dollars, I

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 4>will buy it.

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 2>There's a sort of big question looming in the background

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 2>of a lot of these discussions, which is the B question.

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 2>I guess whether or not we're in an AI bubble right,

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 2>And you sort of touched on it earlier. You have

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 2>all this granular data on how people are actually using compute,

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 2>GPU prices, all of that. What what's your take on

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 2>the big question?

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:35.360
<v Speaker 4>So as an index provider, I cannot give any full

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 4>of guidance, no blamer, nor do I know, right being fairness,

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 4>I know what do I know? So the way I

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 4>look at is we had defined a bubble right, so

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 4>you look at style bubble right and the nest that

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 4>showed up to two hundred percent and came back down

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 4>eighty four percent whatever back. Then that's it's a bubble. Right.

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 4>The way I look at bubble is can is your valiation?

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Can your future cash flows support today's valuation of yours? Right?

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 4>So then I'm not talking about like opening and everyone

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 4>else valuation. I'm not ob busy. I don't. I don't.

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't understand that process. The way I look at

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 4>GPUs the machines, it's actually pretty simple. Look at a

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 4>future cash flow of your forward contracts and then you

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 4>discounted back. Can you get money back for the price

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 4>you pay? Right, It's actually pretty straightforward for the machine level. Right,

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 4>But to your point, right, you can say, hey, what

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 4>happened if demand jobbed? No one gonna use your whatever

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 4>things you have. But remember the four contract is a

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 4>signed contract. If you have that, you can't know obviously

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 4>if you have things, the biggest concern is people have

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 4>over built. You've overbuilt, then by theory, then all your

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 4>prices will calmed down because it over supply of the market. Right,

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 4>So then you talk about supply demain equilibrium. How do

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 4>we know about future demand of GPUs? Right? I don't

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 4>know that everyone's guess is better than mine. Probably the

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 4>way I look at it is not. It's not that

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 4>easy to bring any GP online, right you can use

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 4>you hear all those side big deals in the bill,

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 4>twenty five million dollars invested, but they don't translate to

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 4>immediate GPU availability right in the servers which you have

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 4>to be waylisted if you buy brand new stuff co location,

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 4>you need optic fiber, so there's a lot of unfortunately

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 4>STAR has to be aligned.

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Wait, but people can default on contracts, right, so even

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 2>if you have a long term contract signed like that

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 2>could not work out. Could you envision like credit default

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 2>swaps or something in the compute market like so.

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 4>That happens in every other markets, right, aman market if

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 4>you do OTC trade, you have the rice some monual

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 4>defon you. Doesn't matter who they are, right, So there's

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 4>vary There's a lot of mechanism to hatch that. The

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 4>things you cannot hatch is GPU cost write the price

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 4>you entered. So that's something exactly will seemmy futures for

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 4>you can have a transparency the liquidity and then the

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 4>easiness of treating it out and had your position.

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Carmen Lee, thank you so much for joining us.

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 2>That was our conversation with Carmen Lee of Compute Exchange

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 2>and Silicon Data, recorded live at our New York show.

0:31:36.080 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Follow our guest Carmen Lee at Carmen Lee. Follow our

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 3>producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen armand dash Ol Bennett at Dashbot,

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 3>kil Brooks at Kile Brooks and Kevin Lozano at Kevin

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Lloyd Lozano. And from our odd Laws content, go to

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lads, where the daily newsletter

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 3>and all of our episodes, and you could shout up

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 3>all these topics twenty four seven in our discord Discord

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 3>dot gg slash odd Lots And.

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 2>If you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it when

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 2>we do these live shows and talk about the birth

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 2>of a new market, then please leave us a positive

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 2>review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 2>are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all of

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 2>our episodes absolutely id free. All you need to do

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 2>is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 2>the instructions there. Thanks for listening.