WEBVTT - What You Need to Know About the Delta Variant

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovik. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. All Right, Well, among the

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>COVID headlines that we're watching on this Wednesday, concerns about

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the delta variant, it's trajectory, it's impact,

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>it's spread. We're trying to understand it, even for those

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of us who have been vaccinated. We've also heard from

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a dornaust chairman vowing to keep testing the drugmaker's COVID

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>vaccine against variants and advised against putting our guard down

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>as new mutations continue to emerge. That coming from our

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg New Economy Catalyst event. Well, back with US and

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>form voice Dr Dave Westerner, he's professed or biology, david'son college.

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>He's with us once again on the phone from David's

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in North Carolina. Dr west are good to have you

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>here with us. When you hear delta variant, what do

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you say? I calts like to be back. Yeah, it

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>is worrisome. Um. I think this variant, there's clear evidence

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that it's much more transmissible than the the alpha variant,

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>which had been the predominant variant. UM. As we saw

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, it spread rapidly and quickly became the

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>major variant in that country. Um. And right now I

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>think about new infections in the US are caused by

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>by delta and that number certainly is going to do

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that proportion certainly has going to increase in the near future.

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>What does that mean for those of us who are

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>starting to love the world reopening. We're vaccinated check check check,

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>our families vaccinated check check check, and we're going to restaurants.

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>We're living again. That's how it feels. Yet with a

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>cautious eye on what might happen, I don't know in

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a month, in two months, in six months. How do

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>we need to look at this. Yeah, I'm with you there,

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>completely carroling. When the CDC change their mask sidelines, I

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>was all too happy to leave my own home when

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I went to the coffee shop, are or the grocery store. Um.

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think we can't let our guards down

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>completely just yet. I think that's what this this variant

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is is showing us UM for fully vaccinated people, the

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>vaccine is still highly effective against this variant. It's probably

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>less effective against this variants than the original strain, but

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 1>still really effective. UM. One of the questions that's still

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>out there though, is you know, if you are vaccinated,

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 1>can you have an asymptomatic infection and potentially spread it

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to other people who are not vaccinated? You know, I

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>think that question has not been completely addressed yet. Um.

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>And then we have a whole cohort of people who

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>are unvaccinated, especially the younger kids. Vaccines are only available

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to people who are twelve and and up. UM, so

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the the younger younger people, people under twelve. UM. I mean,

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I I'm worried about a big spike in cases among

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>younger people. Well, and I do want to have some

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>family members with some underlying health issues, and the question

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 1>is well, wait, should I go back and start wearing

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>my mask, because maybe I'm a little bit more vulnerable

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>even if I get even though I'm vaccinated, if I

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>get this stronger variant, could I be at risk? Right?

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a reasonable concern to have. You know,

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>there's there's conflicting data so far about whether this variant

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is more severe than the other variants. UM. There's a

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>report from Scotland UM publishing The Landsa just a few

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>days ago in which the researchers concluded that people infected

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>with Delta were twice as likely to be hospitalized as

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>people infected with the previous variant Alpha UM. And that's

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>really troubling UM. But but I think the jury is

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>still out on that. I mean, that was one study

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of relatively small number of number of people. UM. But yeah,

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I think for for all of us, whether you're UM

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>have underlying conditions or not, it's worth being concerned about

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the transmission this variant. Do we also need to think

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>about and even more potent variants still emerging. That's the possibility.

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, virus is mutate all the time. You know,

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we've talked about that before, and you know,

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, we have a fair amount of

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>vaccination somewhere in there. UM. Other parts of the world

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you have really really low vaccination rates, and we see

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the virus um spread occurring dramatically. UM. Anytime the virus

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>is spreading and being transmitted from person in person, the

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>emergence of a new variant is a very real possibility. So, yes,

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Delta is not the last variant we're going to see.

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>How much are you also thinking about booster shots? A

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>s Having conversation with some colleagues earlier, who again we're

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>embracing Wow, I'm going out. I'm really enjoying this UM.

0:04:57.240 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>But do I need to think about when it gets

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>colder again here, certainly on the eastern portion of the

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>United States. Is something going to happen again in the fall? Potentially? Right?

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I think? Sorry to be such a bummer. I'm an

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>optimistic I have that concern, especially as it gets colder,

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>we get into the fall, the early winter, and people

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>are indoors more, UM, in more crowded indoor settings. Are

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>we going to see a resurgence in in cases when

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>kids are back in school, et cetera. UM. In terms

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of boosters, the information so far suggests that the vaccines

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>um provide fairly long lasting protection. What's long, but it's long.

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, we only have six months a year's worth

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of data so far. We can't say these vaccines protect

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>for two years because the vaccines haven't been deployed for

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>for that long. Um, and I think it will get

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>that data as time goes by. A booster shot very

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>well maybe, Um I think that champ to get a

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>yearly booster for instance. Um. Dr western just real quickly

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 1>about seconds. I mean, how will we know when and

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>if we need a booster? Are we just gonna start

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:04.799
<v Speaker 1>seeing cases pop up and we'll and we'll just figure

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:06.239
<v Speaker 1>it out that way. It's gonna be kind of random,

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>just quickly hopefully not random, but you know what I mean, like,

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>how do how does how do you guys assess that

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna need it? And just quick? Yeah, their studies

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>ongoing where the researchers are measuring the antibody level and

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>people who had been vaccinated and they're looking for a

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>decline in that antibody level. Okay, you always cover so much,

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much and clarify so much. Dr Dave Westerner,

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Professor of Biology at Davidson College. You're listening to Bloomberg

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well the fourth annual highst issue

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week magazine. It is at this week,

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>hitting news stands tomorrow, online and on the Bloomberg. One

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of the stories is also among our most right on

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Today. It's about the fall of the billionaire

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Gucci Master. You know you want to know more. Here

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>with more is Business Week freelance writer Evan Ratliffe. He

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>is on the phone in Delaware. Evan, it is an

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>incredible read, an incredible individual. First of all, tell us

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>about who is the billionaire Gucci Master? Thanks the bill.

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>The Billionaire Gucci Master is a guy named Ramona A

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Boss is his real name. He went by Ray Hush

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Puppy online or his handle was hush Puppy Um. He

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>was an Instagram influencer. He had a couple of million followers.

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>He was known for his portrayals of luxury. He was

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>always photographed in designer clothes, standing in front of rolls

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Royces Ferrari's that he had bought. Living a very opulent lifestyle.

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>He lived in Dubai. He had been born in Nigeria,

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>that he had moved to Dubai and Uh, that was

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>who he was for the world. He was kind of

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a small, small celebrity. He hung out with other celebrities. UM.

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>But as it turned out, he is alleged to be

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>also involved in in some of the big cyber scans

0:07:57.960 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of the last few years. I have to say for

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>those of us have to Ron Bloomberg Radio, but we're

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>also on YouTube, and those who are on YouTube can

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>can see. We're just showing some video of him running

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>into a helicopter, sitting down. I think it was a helicopter,

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was a plane. I think, wearing a lot

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of Louis Vuitton, a little Louis Vuitton next to him,

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and eating something on what looked like a private plane.

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>What did he do that put him uh and gave

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>him a place in the heist issue? Well? His his

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>reason for being in the heist issue is that he

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>is alleged by the US government UH to have participated

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in some of the largest cyber scams of the last

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.839
<v Speaker 1>few years under the name business email compromise scams. That's

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>what they're called. UM. And he's alleged to be a

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>person who moved large sums of money as part of

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>these scams. And some of the targets of the scams

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>were enormous, including they were trying to steal a hundred

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>million over hundred million dollars from a Premier League soccer team. Uh,

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>they were stealing from businesses in the US, law firms,

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>other businesses, and they were tracking him. They eventually arrested

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>him in Dubai, and he's facing trial in Los Angeles.

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And I want to bring in the editor of Bloomberg

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>business Week, Joel Webberg. This is just a fascinating tale.

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's not a tale, it's true. Yeah. I mean

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the best part of the about the heist issue.

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Evan um this, as I've tweeted earlier,

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the history of the HIGHST issue, this

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>goes down is like maybe one of the very best

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>HIGHST stories. One of the things that captivated me about

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it is this idea that you know, b EC scams,

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>which I know you you you just briefly hit on here.

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>They're bigger than ransomware, and like no one wants to

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about them because there's such a big problem. Like like,

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>put put that in perspective. I mean, to think about

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>this being bigger than ransomware is a little bit of

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a mind blower, right, yeah, yeah, I mean it really

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>flies under the radar a bit because it's just it's

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't hit the news for one reason. You know,

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>ransomware is very dramatic. You know someone's being held office

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>or behalf for money, and b EC scam is a

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>more it's a or technical scam. We can go into

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>how it works exactly, but part of the problem is

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that if you just transfer money to a scammer and

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you've been tricked into doing it, no, no company wants

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that. If you're a public company, you

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>might have to disclose it them if the number is

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>large enough, but no one else is going to talk

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>about that because then you lose the trust of your customers,

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 1>of your suppliers, of your clients, like you're completely incompetent

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're doing this, when in fact it's a very

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>very clever way to extract money for company. Okay, so

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>let's just talk about it a little bit more because

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it is so simple, right, that's the problem with it.

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like you to defend against this. I mean, it's

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>incredibly difficult because all it takes is somebody changing a digit.

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 1>If you're doing this as a day job, that all

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of these orders are flying around all the time, how

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>how does it? How do they pull it off? So

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the way it works, and it's sort of most simplest

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>form is it's business email compromise. Obviously, they compromise an email,

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's usually going to be they're breaking into a

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>corporate email account at some decently sized company. They want

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to hit someone mid level above, hopefully someone who's interacting

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>with big payments, and they'll research the companies trying to

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>figure out who that is. Once they're inside the email,

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>they're just gonna wait. They're just gonna sit there, watch

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the traffic, watch what comes in and out, try to

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>learn how the payments work. And then when a large

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>invoice hits, let's say a law firm has an invoice

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.599
<v Speaker 1>for a million dollars, then that's when they insert themselves.

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 1>So they know exactly how to create a fake in

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>voice that's gonna look real. They'll immediately send it as

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a follow up. They'll change the bank details to their

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:38.079
<v Speaker 1>own and say here's a new invoice, sorry, that one

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>had the wrong bank details on it. And because they're

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>coming from inside an email account, they have all the

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>details right, they have the language right. Oftentimes, people who

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>are doing these payments just they just overlook it. Uh,

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>they just they're doing many of these a day potentially

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>or at least a week, and so they hit yes

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on the payment, they authorize it to the bank, and

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>then it's immediately gone from the scammer bank account to

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.079
<v Speaker 1>another one overseas, to another one overseas, and the money

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>becomes impossible to trace. So hush puppy, let's bring it

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>back to Uh, can I just say that again, hush puppy.

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring it back to hush puppy. Evan, what is

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>your name? Your code name? Did you have a code

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>name for the story? I didn't use a code name.

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I love Ray hush Puppy. It is just it's so enticing.

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a brilliant Instagram name because it just

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it conveys something that you just want to learn more

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>about Ray hush Puppy. And there are these robes that

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:34.959
<v Speaker 1>he wears and some of the photos that we have

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:36.959
<v Speaker 1>and it says hush Puppy on the back for the record,

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I want a road that says the

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>heist issue, Like I want I want that road. Um so.

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>So Evan, let's talk more about him because one of

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.839
<v Speaker 1>the most fascinating elements of this story is that um

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Hush Puppy came from Nigeria and Legos, which has this

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>history of being a place where you know, Nigerian princes operated.

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>So so how did he, how did he come up

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and how did he break out of all of that? Yeah,

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>he grew up in Legos. I mean he was, you know,

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>by his own account, he was poor growing up. He struggled.

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>He actually had a sister who died of typhoid, you

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>know by his recollection, because they couldn't pay the medical bills.

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Um So, he was someone who very explicitly was trying

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:22.719
<v Speaker 1>to get out and he saw the wealthier parts of

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Legos and he aspired for that. He dreamed of that.

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>He was always interested in designer brands and so he

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>did escape him eventually went to Malaysia and that's when

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>he started building you know, his his influencing and you

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>know the crimes that he's alleged to commit these business

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>and compromise scams. You know, a lot of them do

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>come from Nigeria, but it's a bit of a double

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>edged sword because you know, Nigerians have been accused of

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>these scams for many years, when in fact they come

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>from all over the world. So there's a sort of

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:58.839
<v Speaker 1>stereotype that precedes Nigerians that then you know, he reinforces

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and it becomes this sort of his circle would in fact,

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously there's a Nigerian texting and there's all

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>these people who are very upset that he is in

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>factually importing that idea. Well, to get every juicy tidbit,

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.199
<v Speaker 1>check out the story in Bloomberg Business Week magazine. It's

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>online and at Bloomberg dot com. You're listening to Bloomberg

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. I am Carol Master. Tim is

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>off this week. Well today virtually was the Bloomberg New

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Economy Catalyst event. It highlighted innovators, visionary scientists, policy makers,

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and entrepreneurs accelerating solutions to today's great problems. One of

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>them is Sarah Manker. She's a former commodities trader who

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>worked for Morgan Stanley. She took what she saw, she

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>learned from it, and she founded grow Intelligence, which gathers

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>tons of data and then uses AI and machine learning

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to tackle lots of things, including some really big problems,

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>one of them food and security. And I caught up

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>with her and talked about it specifically what our company

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>does in using AI to look at data and solve

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that problem. Grow Intelligence is a company I founded UM

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand fourteen, and it really is a story

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day that tells the story

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of what on Earth is going on UM. And I

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>say that because, you know, oftentimes we use data to

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to tell stories UM, and oftentimes when we think of

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Earth it you know, we think of satellite images just

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>showing us pictures of our Earth, whereas Earth is sort

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of this interplay between our Earth's actual ecology and our

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>human economy and the inter relationships between the two. And

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>what we've done is we've built a data platform using

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence to capture sort of data around the world

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>about our Earth as well as our human economy, connect

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the dots and start to tell stories about things like,

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, where the trajectory of food security is going,

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>or how to UM become better resilient to climate change

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>UM and and really it's a company focused on tackling

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>these two major problems, which is essentially around food security

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and climate change at global scale. You just use right

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that obviously impact everybody. Data collection can be good, it

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>can be bad, right, it can be biased, So tell

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>me how you go about it. It's garbage and garbage exactly.

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>And so we we say curated by human intelligence, scale

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>through artificial intelligence. And I think this is a really

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>important part of how we do our work. But how

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>AI should be done, which is that you need domain experts.

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>You need humans that first actually assess the data in

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the very early days because as you're collecting data and

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you're getting data, you know, we get data from over

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>forty different sources around the world and it comes to

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>government language, private, public everything, governments, private companies that we

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>license from trade organizations, you know, UM all sorts of

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and then they come in many different formats and languages,

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and you need and experts initially that sort of do

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the assessment of the data. UM that that that documented,

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that that map, the definition of it, that helped create

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the dictionary. And then you start to use artificial intelligence

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to scale the mapping of that knowledge to better understand

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the interconnectedness that exists through the data. But it always

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:24.199
<v Speaker 1>really starts with the human intelligence component that helps was

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of the curation in the beginning, right, and then

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you let the machines take over. And this makes your

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>predictive models work better. It makes the knowledge graphs, the

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 1>systems of sort of how we understand today work significantly

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>better as well. It's a diverse group, I know, speaking

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>many different languages. Very yes, good, right, because you're dealing

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>with the global global issues. Yeah, I always say, um,

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, your team has to resemble the world that's

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>attempting to Mom, I can hear your commodities background playing

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>into this. What was it about your background in commodities

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>and being in the Wall Street financial community that made

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 1>they kind of got you to where you are today

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and said, all right, there are bigger issues, bigger problems,

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>we need the tool to tackle it. Yeah, I mean

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>it played a huge role. Um. I was an energy

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>trader and in the early days of sort of energy trading,

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:19.360
<v Speaker 1>if you had an oil producer that UM would come

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to the market and say, you know, I've discovered oil

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.919
<v Speaker 1>and I need to now produce this oil, and I

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>need some money for it, so therefore I need to

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>sell it forward to you. And selling oil two years

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>forward used to be a struggle by the time I left.

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, oil producers, gas producers, et cetera could sell

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>oil ten twenty years forward, long before it was outside

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>the group, outside the ground. Financial markets enabled that, and

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, for markets to develop, you need trust, you

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>need baseline understanding, and then people have their relative competitive advantage, right,

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>because what that does is it drives capital into markets,

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and capital drives innovation, and innovation drives very long term change,

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>renewable energy, shale oil, shale gas, all of these technologies

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 1>we take for granted had to be funded somewhere. And

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I had seen that agriculture was and still is, frankly

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>where maybe energy markets were in if I'm being kind,

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>like the early nineties. So they're very behind um. And

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 1>so you know, when you think of what happened in

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>COVID last year. During COVID and all of the shocks

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the system experienced, when you know, people were saying, are

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 1>we running out of me? You know, why are you know,

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>certain things just flying off shelves? And is there shortage.

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>That was really a function of how short term the

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>food markets actually behave, meaning decisions are still being made

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>day to day, week to week by grossers um And

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>if you take the most liquid agricultural market in the world,

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>which is corn in the US, you're lucky if you

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>can sell it two years forward. And that was Sarah Banker.

0:19:57.400 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>She's founded to Eve Grow Intelligence. The This is a

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>company that she founded after being a commodities trader at

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley. They gathered tons of data from global sources.

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>They use it using AI and machine learning, and they

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>address things like you heard her talk about food in security,

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the major problems that a lot of countries

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>are dealing already. We saw it through the pandemic where

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>companies UH and countries specifically, if they were a producer

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>some food item, a lot of them stopped exporting because

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:30.239
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to protect their own citizens. So she

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>is looking at that and working with clients, and her clients,

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I've got to say are from all walks of life.

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>They are food producers, their food suppliers, their governments, and

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>they're also the financial world because increasingly we are seeing

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>financial instruments, just like we've seen in the E s

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>G world generally that are looking to create investment vehicles

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that are tackling some of these big problems like food insecurity,

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and of course already we see it with climate change.

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 1>So again Sarah Maker found and see if grow intelligence

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>from the Bloomberg New Economy Catalyst event. You can see

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>that entire interview and more like it at Bloomberg dot

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:07.159
<v Speaker 1>com slash New hyphen Economy. These are thirty one people

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 1>that we've identified at Bloomberg New Economy that are catalysts

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that are charting the global course out of the pandemic

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and really looking at creating a brighter, more sustainable future.

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Some of them are names you know, we mentioned formally

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>um Or earlier, the chairman of Maderna, that individual also

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>at part of this event. But a lot of them

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>are names you don't know, but they're doing some incredible work.

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>So I highly recommend you check it out online and

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>look at those conversations. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well,

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>remember when traders were snapping up shares of Hurts after

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it filed for bankruptcy last year. Well today it actually

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>is exiting from bankruptcy. We've got the ultimate winners of

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>what has happened over the past year. It's all in

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a story by Bloomberg's authority. She is Bloomberg News High

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Yield distressed at in bankruptcy order on the phone from Boston. Hey, Cat,

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>nice to have you here. Um, I feel like Hurts

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>was that original meme stock It really was. And what's

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.880
<v Speaker 1>funny is that all of the gay traders that were

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>buying into the company, they were getting made fun of.

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>People were saying, what, what is the rationale behind this trade?

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Because on on the surface level, a company that is

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>in bankruptcy shareholders are more than likely to be completely

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>wiped out, getting absolutely nothing for their investment, and so

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to buy shares of a bankrupt company is not always

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the best trade. But we've seen some situations where that

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been the case, and it's becoming more and more frequent,

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>even though this is not the norm. Hurts is probably

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>the best example of this. A year ago that the

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>shares when when you mentioned when the Reddit traders first

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 1>getting started getting into the name, the shares were around

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>five fifty and that was considered huge, a big game.

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>And today, just to put it into context, the company

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is exiting UM and the shares are valued some analysts

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>say around fourteen dollars. So that's well over double where

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they were a year ago. Have we started trading yet? Unhurt?

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>So the shares are trading right now. UM. I have

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 1>them up on my screen. They're around nine dollars there

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>a bit, they almost got to about ten UM. But

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll see that the post bankruptcy trading UM more likely

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow the company, this process will be finishing or culminating,

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>let's say today. Okay, that's what I thought. I was

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to understand the trade a little bit here as

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 1>I looked at my Bloomberg it is. You know, it

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>comes down to pure math, right in terms of these

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Reddit traders and how they benefited. So so it does,

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.120
<v Speaker 1>but it also comes down to the business to UM.

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>You we can't talk about this story without talking about

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the boom and travel that we've seen UM. This company,

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>when it filed for bankruptcy, it was because no one

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>was renting cars. There was there wasn't the ability or

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 1>um the the need for for car rentals at the time.

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Now that changed pretty dramatically as folks started renting cars

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>to take uh you know whatever vacations or time away

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that they could um without having to fly or do

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>other things that were limited. So we saw a rebound

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>which has only continued. And then we also have to

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about the price of used cars that has also risen.

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Same reason people are now buying up cars because they're

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>moving out of the city into the suburbs. They want

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>cars to travel to to get between places. Um. And

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and then there's also the shortage of new cars that

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 1>are that are getting put into the market. So Hurts

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>actually benefited from selling a lot of its fleet at

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>top dollar and it used at cash to pay down debt,

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>which has just benefited the company and its investors. Right,

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic just did a one A D for this company,

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>or created a one e D for this company, and

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>did change the fundamentals absolutely. I mean at the beginning,

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Carl Icon was the big investor behind her. He backed

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>out right as the company filed for bankruptcy. He wanted

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with it. And now we've seen this

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>amazing snack back. Um the road to redemption. Uh part

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of my no, it's perfect nice pun I really like that, kudos, Hey,

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>but when you look at the balance sheet, it's a

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 1>different company. So yeah, it definitely is. This company is

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>emerging with less debt. It also has UM, an influx

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of equity and the sponsors UM, Nighthead and Certaris, this

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 1>group that also included Apollo, some of the biggest names

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street. They stepped in to support the company.

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:00.360
<v Speaker 1>They saw the value, they saw the recovery, and they

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be at the forefront. UM and they are

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>behind the business. I spoke with UM the the head

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of of Certarists who who said that the that firm

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is planning on investing in her and improving its infrastructure,

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it's technology so that it has a stronger footing going forward.

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>It is just, you know, staggering. I was often kid

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>on air about Harvard Business School case studies, but this

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is a great one. Who would have thought right? First

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of all, nobody would have predicted the health pandemic, But

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>who would have thought that how that would have changed dramatically?

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>A company, a brand that we've known for a long time,

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's gone through various iterations over its history. Right

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of consolidation in the industry and people being

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>interested or activist investors. But here's the outcome, and I

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>guess the future is still unknown. We'll see what life

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>is like post pandemic. The future is unknown, and we'll

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 1>be following this situation very closely. Cat, great story, uh

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:00.719
<v Speaker 1>and a great read. Cat aority. She's I yield distressed

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>at bank respy reporter at Bloomberg News on the phone

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>from Boston. I'm room marco a journal. Yeah, but you

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>let me drive no, no d home, honey, please, I'll

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>do the right drivel. I want to drive. Just drives,

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>good questions trying. This is the drive to the globe.

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Give me thanks. We'll drying us down on Bloomberg Radio.

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Just about ten and a half minutes left in today's

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>trading session. It is time for the drive to the clothes.

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to it with managing director and see your

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager, Margie Patel over at Wells Fargo Asset Management,

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>ninety billion dollars in assets under management. She's with us

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 1>once again on the phone from Boston. Margie. Nice to

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>have you back here on Inburg Business Week on Bloomberg Radio.

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>So it is an interesting week. We've had very tight

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>ranges when it comes to those major equity averages. Is

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 1>this just a case of pre earnings, pre jobs report?

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>How do you see it? Yes, it's it's a week

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of U macro shifts back and forth. We've had the

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>the the value sector sort of play out when we

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>had a little scare about interest rates moving up. Now

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>we have the tenure well under one fifty, and so

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>it looks like the batas pass back over to the

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>growth sector and some of the tech names. All right,

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>so are there any long term plays that you should

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>be making right now or do we need to wait

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to get through earnings, get into the second half a

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit, maybe even wait till the fall to get

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a better indication of maybe what the FED is up to.

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh our own Mike McKee talking with the Dallas FED

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>president uh Kaplan and talking about you know, he's looking

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>for maybe a tapering happening sooner rather than later, maybe

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>even later on this year. Well, they've talked about that,

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>but I think that overall they are really committed to

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the same course they've been on, which is keeping short

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>rates angrew pretty near zero, continuing to buy securities in

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the long end, and I don't think they're going to

0:29:14.760 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>waiver from that policy. They continue to feel inflation is transitory,

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and as long as they feel that way, that's what's

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>going to determine monetary policy, and and says the markets

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>will continue to move up. All right, So how do

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you play it right now? Well, I think it'll be

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting at mid year. I think that what you're seeing

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>with is switching over a little bit more to growthy

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>names is concerned that the cyclical names are played out

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and their growth will start to diminish in the second half.

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>So what I'm going to be looking for is what

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>are we seeing, especially from the more economically sensitive companies.

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Are they beginning to look forward as slower earnings growth

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>or a little pinch in their margins because of cost pressures,

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>or will we continue to see things looking great across

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the board and another strong core and UH a strong

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>rest of the year. How do we though at some point,

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe we've got to remember we fell off a cliff.

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 1>We're now bouncing back or climbing up that cliff in

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a big way. And that's the distortion that we are

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing in certainly the economic data points and the markets

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>are trying to find their way through it and kind

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of get through that data filter through the data and

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>understand and get some clarity when we get on the

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>other side. Is it going to be though a similar

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>environment to where it was pre pandemic, Where there it

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>was kind of okay growth, you know, that just kind

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of kept muddling along, but it actually turned out to

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>be a fairly decent environment because of the low rate

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>environment for the equity markets. Yes, that's why I think

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll see is continued um growth in the in the

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>moderate range. And I think what you're seeing really is

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a pickup and growth globally. And we aren't just where

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>we were before the pandemic, but in some indicators like

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>consumer wealth, we actually have far exceeded uh the levels

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that we had pre pandemic. So in some ways, economy

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>unbelievably is even better off than it was before we

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>had the COVID crisis. So that's a great foundation to

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>keep moving forward. Right, consumer wealth has far exceeded if

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you happen to be part of that group, as we know.

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, there's incredible gaps in this community,

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's something that the Federal Reserve, led by J. Powell,

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>increasingly is looking at that. How might that impact his

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>moves when it comes to policy in your view. We

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>know they have the dual mandate, but J. Powell and

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>company and others have talked about the importance of when

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>we see the job market come back, that it's not

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>just white color jobs or the high end jobs. It

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>is much more diverse and impacts more of the labor

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>market spectrum. Yes, and actually we have already started to

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>see that. We've already started to see the increase in

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the bottom say to quintiles of the marketplace. Actually as

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>far as those way just actually moving up greater. Of

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>course there are a lot lower than the top quintile,

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>but store actually seeing that turn, and I think that's

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>perhaps somewhat a shortage of labor. I think it's also

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>reflecting globally that depending on the swam back away from

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the emerging markets like China, and it will

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>really benefit our workers long term that we're not having

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>our wages depressed by very very cheap imports. So I

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's good all around fundamentally. One of the things

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that stood out from Michael McKee or Michael McKee's conversation

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>with the Dallas Fed President Robert Kaplan is that he

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>did talk about the virus and the vaccine, saying we

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 1>still have um to weather the virus specifically, and he

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>did say he's watching the delta variant. How many conversations

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>around the zoom table or the virtual table at Wells

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Fargo do you folks talk about specifically maybe what is

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>next when it comes to COVID nineteen and particularly the

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>delta variant and the impact I could potentially have in

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>our society. Well, the conversations that I've had and what

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I've heard from companies are really that their concerns about COVID,

0:32:57.400 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>they always throw it in there is really very very

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>much diminished just because a law of large numbers says

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that more than half of people at least in America

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>have gotten at least one of the shots. Uh So

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that even if you have an impact from the delta variants,

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it's impact, it's going to be relatively small. The other

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>fundamentals are so strong. I think that says the economy

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to power ahead. In fact, it looks if

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 1>anything like we have a labor shortage. So that says

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that the outlook for labor is going to be very good.

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>How quickly does that labor shortage right itself? As are

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Michael McKee reminded it's not new jobs that are being created,

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>we're basically, you know, filling the existing ones that were

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>lost because of the pandemic. Well, that's all fine, because

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it still says every month more and more people are

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>getting hired and the average wages are moving up. So

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a great base to build on. And then I

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>think as we move on, we'll start to see new businesses,

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>new jobs be created and does Okay, So what keeps

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you up at night in terms of when you look

0:33:56.240 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>at the investment markets? Uh, well, I would say that

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>we feel pretty optimistic if we would see after mid year,

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>if we would see a dramatic slow down, because it

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 1>turns out that growth is really being pulled down, maybe

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 1>from COVID around the world, maybe Chinese growth, we just

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>sload a tiny bit decelerates and that pulls down global growth.

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 1>We're not worried at all about inflation. We agree with

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the Fed, maybe not all their policy, but we think

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that we won't see inflation continue at uh at this

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>pace for very long. We think inflational peter out like

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:36.799
<v Speaker 1>a half of the year. Uh. Why because um, I

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 1>think that number one globalization always deflationary technology is deflationary

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and really um when you look at wages, wages are

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 1>growing up three and a half percent, but a lot

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of what people spend the money on cars, housing, have

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>actually gone up fifteen or twenty. So that says the

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 1>consumers may in fact have their real wealth a little

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>bit pinged as we go forward from these input pressures.

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>So we think that ultimately the we'll see declining inflation

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>back to that two percent. When it comes to the

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:09.720
<v Speaker 1>fixed income market, is there a part of the market

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that you like at all? Well, we still like how yield,

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>although it really isn't how yielding anymore. You're talking three

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to four percent. Most bonds trading at a big premium,

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 1>but default rates have gone down to between one and

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>two percent. So it's a market that doesn't seem to

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of risk. As long as economy is growing,

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the Fed keeps liquidity flooded. We think it's the way

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to at least get another one or two percentage points

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>more than higher quality securities. All right, we're gonna run, Hey, Marky,

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, cutting us down to the closing

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>bell on this Wednesday market Bittel, she's managing director senior

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager at Wells Fargo Asset Management. They've got about

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 1>five ninety nine billion in assets under management, joining us

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Boston. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:35:56.160 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, Soundcroud or Bloomburn Job,

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and you can also listen to our radio show at

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:06.840
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News.