WEBVTT - Brad Faxon

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to another edition of the Frida Egg Podcast.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode is brought to you by our friends over

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>at b Draddy. I had a great time with the

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>guys from b Draddy and Summit Golf Brands this week at.

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:16.799
<v Speaker 2>The PGA Show.

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>They were really helpful putting this podcast together with Brad

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Faxon as well as last week's with Billy Draddy, and it.

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:27.639
<v Speaker 2>Was a really great time.

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Saw their new product line, lots of great stuff, you know,

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>rolling out their sport polo so b dratty Sport. We'll

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>hopefully have some of that up in our pro shop

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>pretty soon and I should be able to find it

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>at many of the pro shops across the country this summer.

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 2>So it's a great new tech fabric. Uh. Just a reminder,

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 2>the Liam polo is one of my favorites.

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>It's the uh, the Peruvian cotton with a hint to

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>stretch in it that makes you know all the different friends.

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>But one of the really cool things is that you

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>can monogram them so you can get your own initials

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>on this polo if you order through bdraddy dot com. Uh,

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>We've got a new promo code for you guys, so

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want to go get your monogram polo. You

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>get fifteen percent off. You get fifteen percent off all

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>your purchases on bdraddy dot com with the exception of

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>license gear. So use the promo code frieda Egg fifteen

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 1>and that's all caps fried egg and then the number

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and you'll get fifteen percent off your order from

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>bdradty dot com. Now on to our conversation with Brad

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>faxon I.

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Miss the Green. For example, I'm already upset when I

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 3>find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset. And

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 3>when I find my ball in a fried egg Friday

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 3>egg and dreaded Frida egg, Frida egg, Frida egg egg

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Frida egg, bride egg Lie, I'm about ready to run

0:01:54.640 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 3>off of the So you said just the facts. It's funny.

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 3>When I was looking at titles for my show, I

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 3>had done a charity event a few years ago and

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 3>called it Fax and Friends. You know, there's a show

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 3>on Fox called Fox and Friends, the Morning show. I

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 3>worked for Fox Sports. My wife wakes up every morning

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 3>turns on Fox and Friends. So I thought Fax and

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Friends would be pretty good name. And then but just

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 3>the facts spelled Fax instead facts kind of I thought

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 3>that was a better way to go. And I like

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 3>how you just started in because the guys that I

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 3>like on radio, especially the guys I listened to in

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 3>New England when I was living in Rhode Island, that

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 3>there was a show on wee I in the morning,

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 3>The Dennis and Callahan Show was a pretty big show,

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 3>syndicated show, and they just started talking. They didn't and

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 3>everybody on Serious XM on PGA Tour Radio, you know,

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 3>Michael bad, whether it's tailor's ours are they start off talking, Hey,

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 3>it's name of the show station we're on. I mean,

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 3>people know that, you know. I just I think, like

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 3>you just let's have a conversation.

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, so I think about it.

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I had this epiphany when I interview a lot of

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>architects and they talk about constraints like if you put

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a clubhouse here, you got to start here right and

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you got to end here versus.

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 2>And I thought about it.

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I was like, if I do an intro and I

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>introduce somebody, I have to start right there. I don't

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>get the ability to, like, if we have a conversation,

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>like I could cut this out if I wanted to

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>start our conversation fifteen minutes in, because that's where I

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>think it really kicks off. Well, I can't move things

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>around as easily if we do an intro exactly.

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 3>No, that makes a lot of sense to me. And

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 3>if you have something you want to talk about, just

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 3>start talking about it.

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly.

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know, there's too many rules sometimes on

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 3>the radio for my liking, where I have to reintroduce

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 3>the person I been talking to, Like, it just doesn't

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 3>feel right. It's not something we would do sitting on

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 3>this chair and couch together talking to each other.

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it's I mean, how's hosting and doing interviews?

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Ben? After being on the other side.

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's interesting. I went to when I first

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 3>got my card in nineteen eighty four, the PGA tour

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 3>offered some media in PR counseling from a woman named

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Andrea Kirby, and I thought it was a great idea.

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 3>She had been at ESPN for a long time and

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 3>she was Her topic was to help you answer tough questions,

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 3>how to stay on point, how to move the conversation

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 3>in a direction that would benefit you, and ultimately how

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 3>to look good. And she talked about body language and

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 3>how important body language was when you were getting interviewed,

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 3>and she showed us an incredible example of a hockey

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 3>player after he had a game was over. She turned

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 3>a sound down guy had a towel over, and you

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 3>knew it was the end of the game, and you

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 3>just watched him answer this question that took about forty

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 3>five seconds. And then she paused the video and said,

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 3>what do you think just happened to this guy or

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 3>his team? And we all said, well, he got the

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 3>news that somebody's family died. They must have lost, he

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 3>must have given up the winning goal or whatever it was.

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 3>And he had just scored the winning goal in triple

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 3>overtime to win the Stanley Cup. And I'm looking at

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 3>this going she's right, because I never thought body language

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 3>could make such a difference. And smiling is important. People

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 3>like to see people that are happy. And even Michael Breed,

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 3>who has been a great friend to me and you know,

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 3>an advisor, really going on the radio, he says, the

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 3>more you can stand up when you do your show,

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 3>and the more you can smile when you talk, people

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 3>can hear your smile. And I'm going, that's ridiculous, but

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 3>it makes a lot of sense to me. They can

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 3>hear your happiness, your excitement. So I started the JUSTI

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Fact Show almost exactly a year ago. Here at the

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 3>show I signed my contract and I think I learned

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 3>from this woman Andrew Kirby nineteen eighty four. That's a

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 3>long time ago. Yeah, how to speak better, how to

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 3>end a sentence a lot of times. You know. The

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 3>one thing I learned then was you keep talking sometimes

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 3>and you never stop talking. And if you were lucky

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 3>enough to watch Jim Nansen kind of Lisa Rice yesterday

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 3>at the titleist opening, Jim nantz is he's so in control.

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 3>He's never rushed, he's never hurried. He pauses and it

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 3>doesn't feel like you're waiting for him to say the

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 3>next thing, and it's just it's regular, it's normal. So

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 3>long answer to your question.

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's amazing.

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Like people that are very good at asking questions. It's

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a real art because it's their brief but they're like

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>they get their point across so quickly.

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 2>I'm still it's funny.

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I listened to myself self when I'm editing, and I'm like, God,

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>just stop talking.

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and that you know we're talking about my interview

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 3>coming up. Scottie Cameron, and you've got to ask a short,

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 3>open ended question because people want to hear the person

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 3>you're talking to, and you know, you always got to

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 3>the conversation is going to drag in a direction and

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 3>then you got to break it back and you know,

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 3>get a few points across. But I think so your

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 3>original question for me being the host of a show,

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I've had some friends tell me, Look, people

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:26.679
<v Speaker 3>just want to hear what you have to think about

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 3>golf and golfing in the world. You don't need a

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 3>lot of guests. When I'm doing a show by myself

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 3>and not sitting in front of somebody, it's hard to

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 3>talk by yourself. I'm not looking at anybody. I'm looking

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 3>at four walls, so that's more difficult than having somebody

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 3>on the show. I'm lucky because my show's on Monday,

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 3>so there's always something to talk about after a weekend

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 3>of golf on all the tours, but everybody does that.

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 3>So I'm trying to get guests that people don't have

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 3>all the time, or thoughts people don't hear all the times,

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 3>so that show can be a little bit more unique.

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 3>And I'll throw my opinion in there. I'll get on that,

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 3>and I've enjoyed it. But I'm in a really interesting

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 3>part of my career as I've won't winded down from

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 3>playing golf to work in more in media, working for

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Fox at the USGA so and then have my feet

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 3>in the game as an instructor with some top players.

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a few famous ones.

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 3>It's yeah, but I mean it's it's odd because I

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 3>don't know that I've seen a TV announcer that's really

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 3>involved in players games. And it can be I.

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Guess costas a little bit with Paul like and it

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>was always when Paul Casey's coming down the stretch, he's

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about like very intimate knowledge of the swing and

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>what happens to Paul when their pressure gets a little

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I.

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 3>Know in one of my I don't know if you'd

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 3>call this a stick or not. But when I first

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 3>met Rory McElroy, which is almost two years ago, he

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 3>was under contract with another putting and instructor, and I

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 3>was one of those that took a lot of lessons

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 3>and I knew what it was like to cheat on

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 3>an instructor. I wouldn't say cheat, but cheat. I told Roy.

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 3>The first thing I said to him as I said, Roy,

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm not looking for any publicity here. I will never

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 3>say anything to anybody about you and I speaking. If

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:19.959
<v Speaker 3>you go to the press and say something and then

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.559
<v Speaker 3>somebody asks me, I'll just kind of repeat what you said.

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 3>But our stuff is sacred to me and you. And

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that gave him pause to exhale and say

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 3>thank you. And it was uncomfortable because Kenyan, Phil Kenyon,

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 3>who's one of the most noted putting instructors, teaches I

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 3>mean justin Rose, Hendrick Stintson, Western Fleetwood. I'm missing other

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 3>good players Fitzpatrick and and Rory and you know, it's

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 3>it's hard, but and maybe even the stuff that they

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 3>worked on was correct helped his stroke get better. But

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, maybe unlocking the door is what I helped him.

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I've taught.

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I talked with some pros yesterday, some club pros about

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the idea, and I think this is so true with

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>teaching golf, is two teachers can be teaching the same thing,

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>but one it's conveying the message in a in a

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.199
<v Speaker 1>in a way that the pupil understands it. Like you

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>could be teaching the same exact thing, but just the

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>way you convey the information, something clicks with one way

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>versus the other, and that feel or that thought really

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>resonates and all of a sudden it works.

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 3>It's fascinating to me to scheme how players' minds work,

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 3>sometimes in pictures, words or phrases. And I can give

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 3>you a great example of some time I spent with

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Gary Woodland, who is another student now of Phil Kenyon,

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 3>but I spent a little time with him four or

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 3>five years ago. And as talented as Gary Woodland was

0:10:55.520 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 3>and is, he was a young golfer when I first

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 3>to talking to him. You know, he didn't plague golf

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 3>as a kid like most players on the tour do now.

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 3>And we were just having a conversation about putting, and

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 3>we were on a putting green at Old marsh Down

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 3>where I live, a beautiful old Pete Die course, and

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 3>I made a comment to him that when I was

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 3>putting my best, I always had to mark a putt

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 3>when I missed, because it ran far enough by the

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 3>hole that it wasn't a tap him. When I was

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 3>putting my best, I mean, when I'm not putting my best,

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm a little more cautious, and then the speed's closer

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 3>to the hole, and people kind of assume that, oh,

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 3>he's got great touch when it ends up right by

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 3>the cop I think the most the most prolific putters

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 3>hit the ball with a little bit of authority. So

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 3>I just had that conversation. I never really said anything

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 3>more than that to Gary. And then the next week

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 3>he had a great first round and his pressroom comments

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.719
<v Speaker 3>where I talked to Brad Paxton last week he told

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 3>me to hit it harder. Never said that. I didn't

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 3>say hit it harder, Gary, I said just that my

0:11:58.120 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 3>putts always went by the hole a little bit. But

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 3>how he interpreted my little phrase or my comment was

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 3>I need to hit it harder to make more putts.

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting.

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, like I grew up caddy in and played,

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>but when pressure comes putting, you start worrying about the

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>next putt instead of it seems like and it's always

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>pace oriented, right. It's just like whenever anybody has a

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>big putty, it's very rare to see somebody like, you know,

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>hit it with that pace that in most putts like

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>they go in when they go in there, you know

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>they've got pace to them.

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 3>I see that most of all, and look, I'm new

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 3>from the instructor side. I was a player, and because

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 3>you were a good player or a good putter doesn't

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.839
<v Speaker 3>mean you're going to be a good instructor, does it.

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, does Jack Nicholas because he was the best

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 3>player that ever lived or Tiger Woods, does that mean

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 3>they're going to be great instructors. You know, you have

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 3>to have a way about having a conversation or or

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 3>talking to them to help them. And you need to

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 3>learn about the person, the personality, how they think. And

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, I did this for a long time. Well

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 3>I got better as I got older, and I've learned

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 3>a lot now from some of these putting instructors of

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.719
<v Speaker 3>what they look at on the technical side of it.

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 3>And I've yet to have any player, whether they're a

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 3>great player or an aspiring player, come to me and

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 3>say I need more thoughts, I need to take more time,

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 3>and I need to try harder. I've never had any

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 3>great player, talented players say that to me. Now, beginner golfers,

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 3>they need a lot of instruction. And when people ask me,

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 3>is there a secret to this? And I say, it's time.

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's not a shortcut to this. You know,

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 3>You're not going to be a great putter by taking

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 3>two lessons. You know, you've got to spend endless hours.

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 3>And I think later today when I talked to Cameron

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 3>to Scottie about putting, I get insulted when somebody says, well,

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 3>you're just lucky were born that way. And I'm like,

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 3>let's go back to when I was five or six

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 3>years old and first starting and how many hours and

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 3>how many times did I spend hitting putts from all

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 3>distances on all kinds of courses throughout a year. So yeah,

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 3>get me going that way. Yeah.

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I was talking to Billy Hurly last time

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and he was talking about like people that he's played

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>golf with all different walks of life, but success they

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and he was talking about himself, and he said, you

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>know the thing is anybody that has, you know, that

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>reaches a high level of success in a field, they've

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>made a sacrifice that other people didn't want to make,

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>whether it was moving somewhere early in their career to

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>get ahead, like moving to Asia if you're you know,

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in business and getting head that way, or in his case,

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>he's like the amount of time I've spent hitting three

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>foot Putts is something that nobody else would do, like

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>very few people would do.

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, so I can go back. Reminds me of

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 3>in my college days. One of my college roommates was

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 3>on the baseball team. He was a picture for the

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 3>baseball team, and he was a good pitcher, but he

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 3>wasn't an aspiring professional. And the school, Furman University, had

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 3>a decent baseball program for a small Division one Double

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 3>A school. But I was so devoted to the game

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 3>that every class I took at Furman was between nine

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 3>and twelve, so I was always done at twelve, and

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 3>many of the days I'd go hit balls before my

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 3>nine o'clock class, so I didn't go out as late

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 3>as a lot of my friends. I wasn't crazy. I

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 3>mean I had fun certain times, but he didn't say

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 3>an He never said anything about it. And after our

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 3>first full year's room and he was I'm so impressed

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 3>with how disciplined you are, because he says I would

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 3>never be able to do that. And I never thought

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 3>of that as a sacrifice, you know. I thought like

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 3>when my eyes opened, I wanted to be outside hitting

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 3>golf balls. And most of the great players I don't

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 3>see these great players as today getting up at eleven

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 3>o'clock in the morning and trying to figure out what

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 3>their day is going to be, like most of them

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 3>have a little bit of a plan going on.

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it's I mean, that's the thing is all

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the hours that go into it. So you you've talked

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>last night a lot about you know, getting thoughts out

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of your head. And I'm a big proponent of this

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>with putting, how do you how do you get people

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to get stuff out of their head in the first place?

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Like what?

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay? So there's I found there's two really good ways

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 3>to do it. First of all, I've played a lot

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 3>of golf with a lot of thoughts on my head swinging.

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, I went to more teachers than anybody. I

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 3>can guarantee you I would probably lead the tour in

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 3>two categories one and maybe Ben Crenshaw would be ahead

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 3>of me. But I think I've played more of the

0:16:55.800 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 3>top one hundred courses than anybody. I think so. And

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 3>I think I've worked. I know I've worked and paid

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 3>for more instructors than anybody alive over eighty that's a

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 3>lot written checks to eighty different instructors. And I have

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 3>a list somewhere that's pretty funny to see. And I

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 3>get my balls busted all the time about it. So

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 3>I know what it's like to play with no thoughts,

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 3>one thought or fifty thoughts, and in putting, I don't

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 3>know why I was able to separate that and play

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 3>with zero to one, you know, or somewhere in between

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 3>zero and one is the right amount in my opinion.

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 3>So if I have somebody that comes to see me

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 3>and they have multiple thoughts, I kind of look at

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 3>it like if you're a big guy, if you're an

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 3>overweight guy and you're trying to lose weight, you don't

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 3>go from a bacon double cheeseburger to a turkey burger

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 3>or an impossible burger. You just take the bacon off first, right.

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.959
<v Speaker 3>You got to go in layers. And somebody that has

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 3>one hundred thoughts you got to win down. So I

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 3>actually add thoughts to them so they could get rid

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 3>of all the other ones something to hold on to,

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 3>and finding that magic is will take time to do it.

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 3>And then when I have somebody like Patrick Cantley who

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 3>had been to a bunch of instructors and every instructor

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 3>tells him you have a great stroke. Why aren't you

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 3>making putts? You know, that's the hardest thing to figure out,

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 3>because now it's more let's sit down, because every time

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 3>he hits a putt, people say, well, your stroke's perfect.

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 3>All the machines, all the technology tells you face some

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 3>path or square, temple's good, grip looks good. Pat you

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:43.359
<v Speaker 3>know everything, and you're like, holy smokes, this this is

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 3>going to take some time too. So that's the two

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 3>ends of the spectrums. And I rarely see it. And

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm friendly with I know Phil Keny a little bit.

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 3>David Orro is a bit of big help to me

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 3>and learning about biomechanics of the putting stroke, the weight

0:18:56.440 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 3>shifts and everything that happen, wrist angles changes, and I'm like,

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.199
<v Speaker 3>oh my gosh when he starts talking about this stuff.

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 3>He can look at a player in one stroke and

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 3>pick apart the mechanical side of that. But if you

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:14.400
<v Speaker 3>start trying to change a player's older or radial deviation,

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, words that I hate hearing an instructor talk

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 3>about to a player. It can scare somebody. Yeah, you know,

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 3>players don't want to make big changes. They and they

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 3>want to keep their feels and with all the technology now,

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm fascinated with all the informations out there and how

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 3>some of that's transferred to a player, and no wonder

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 3>so many guys are getting afraid of chipping and putting,

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 3>and chipping's become an epidemic. It used to be just

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 3>hit a chip shot, never thought about now like there's

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 3>ten ways to hit one shot.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, what it is a you know, a comment

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>from last year with the rules changed with the pin,

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>and I'll never forget, you know, Adam Scott had a

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 1>great year actually statistically on and around the green and

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>he talked about with putting with a pin and how

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it you know, the pin being in reminded him of

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a kid when he would just go to the practice

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>screen and just hit putts and everything would hit the

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>pin and go in. And it's like almost like you

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 1>could tell it from that comment. It almost freed his mind.

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>That like liberated him and brought back like a much

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>simpler time, because every every professional remembers when they're a kid.

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Somehow golf can get more difficult the more you work

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 1>at it.

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 3>I think every one of us played on a course

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 3>that had a short, little flagstick on a putting green.

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you'd call it a flag stick.

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 3>Whatever that thing was where you had the handle, you

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 3>could pull it up and it was metal, and you

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 3>could hit the ball hard and you could make it

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 3>make a loud noise. And we challenge ourselves, how hard

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 3>can you hit this in and make the ball go in?

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 3>And you know, maybe we're too lazy to pull it

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 3>out of there to hit practice putts, or maybe you

0:20:58.119 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 3>wanted to hit all three of your balls in there

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 3>and scoop it up and catch all three balls at once.

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 3>You know when you did that, And I understand the

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 3>mindset from Adam Scott and how hey, if that brings

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 3>me back to that childlike memories enthusiasm that I had

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 3>or I didn't worry about missing, I think that's cool.

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 3>I hate the rule. I hate the rule. I think

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 3>it's degrading to the game. I can't imagine at the

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Masters this year somebody having a five foot or to

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 3>win and leaving the flagstick in. It's like, what are

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 3>we doing playing a late nine holes? I mean, take

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 3>the flagstick out? Is it really speeding up the game? No?

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 3>As a matter a lot of caddies tell me, you know,

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 3>some guys wanted in, some guys wanted out. We're asking

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 3>questions and it certainly is not growing the game. Do

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 3>you think somebody's ever driven by, you know, a public

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 3>course and said, oh, they leave the flagsticks in, let's

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 3>go play golf today. You know, So why why are

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 3>we doing this? Well?

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 2>And I think this is I get rules.

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Like one of the things that drives me nuts is

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>like interpretation of them.

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>This is a rule that was created for when me

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and my buddy are playing trying to cram in nine

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:12.880
<v Speaker 1>holes at the end of the day, we're chasing the sun.

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm one hundred feet away and I'm putting too a pin.

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I could putt with it in. You know that that

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>was I think, I assume is the attention intention of

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 1>the rule, Like I don't have to go pull the

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>flag out, And because I and but professional golfers their

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>job is to look for ways to get tiny incremental advantages, right,

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>And this is a method of you know, hey, I

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 1>can get a little advantage here if I if I

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.439
<v Speaker 1>some people think I personally believe like I've made putts

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>with it out my whole life. I can't look at

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 1>it and make a putt with it in, because like

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just a foreign thing to me.

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 3>That's so I have so many responses to this. As

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 3>a kid, I was a caddy, My dad was a golfer.

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 3>I grew up with the game. I learned rules, the

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 3>number one rule, play it as it lies. That's the

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 3>first thing we learned about the king. I'm Patrick Reid,

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 3>so that's one thing. And then you know, the flagstick

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 3>was to be removed. I remember playing with a member

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 3>at my club. I was young, and this guy's name

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 3>was Ralph Gunderson. His wife was my gym teacher in

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 3>elementary school, and Ralph was a good player. I caddied

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 3>forim a lot, and it just so happened that he said,

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 3>you want to come play a few holes with me.

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 3>We were in a cart and I'll never forget this.

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 3>I was on the twelfth hole. We were playing like

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 3>an emergency nine, and I had like a thirty footer

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 3>and the flagstick was in and he's just kind of

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:39.479
<v Speaker 3>standing on the fringe waiting for me to putt, and

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 3>I said, mister Gunderson, can you grab the flag for me?

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 3>And I would have never considered even putty. Even this

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 3>was meaningless nine holes with the flagstick in, and he

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of was like, oh, and he walked over and

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 3>took the flag. It was, you know, it's one of

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 3>those things. I followed that rule, and now that it's changed,

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, it's I think it's cheap the game. There's

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 3>no sense in it. And now there's debates about You

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 3>can listen to Mark Brody, you can listen to Dave Pells.

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 3>You can listen to the professor at Berkeley that said

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 3>keeping the flag stick in helps most of the time,

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 3>unless you're going to miss it. Hit the flagstick on

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 3>the low side of a breaking putt has more chances

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 3>to go out than go in. So I'm so confused.

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what's right. But what I do know

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 3>I was in a conversation with Bob Rotella and Dave Pells.

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Now Pells would have been the first guy that studied

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you'd call this science. He likes

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 3>to call himself a scientist, but his opinion was it

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 3>was better to keep the flag stick in when you

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 3>were off the green. I remember that, Remember that I

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 3>had more chances of the ball going in than not

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 3>going in. And Rotella said to him Dave, I just

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:53.479
<v Speaker 3>tell my players, whatever makes you more confident, and Pell's

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 3>got no, it has nothing to do with confidence because

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 3>the ball's rolling. It doesn't know if you're confident or not.

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 3>And Roteller says no, but you have to get the

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 3>ball rolling. And if the flag stick in makes you

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 3>more confident, you have a better chance of making it.

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 3>If the flagstick out makes you more confident, you have

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 3>a better chance of making So I'm a big Rotella guy,

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 3>and I Pels was kind of speechless and get got angry.

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 3>It was funny, And I think.

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>This is like one of the most compelling things with

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 1>golf is hitting on. This is like there's a constant

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>tussle between like the science and the the just the

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>mental aspect of golf, Like is it art or is

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it science?

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 2>And is it like there?

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>And I feel and I'm interested to hear your perspective.

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Working with tour players and being on tour for years,

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>tour players typically fall and there are really analytical ones

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 1>and really just field based players, right, And there's not

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a ton in the middle ground.

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 3>You're saying, there's not a ton in the middle ground. Yeah,

0:25:55.520 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 3>to me, it's it's so individualistic on an how a

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 3>player plays and how they think. And the greatest two

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 3>players we said it earlier, Jack and Tiger. You can

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 3>see them behind the ball, painting a picture, an image

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:16.959
<v Speaker 3>in their mind, and very deliberate, both of them. Tiger

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 3>takes three or four practice swings almost every shot. Jack

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 3>seemed to stand behind that ball all the time. And

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 3>the image of Jack on the eighteenth hole in nineteen

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:29.719
<v Speaker 3>eighty six at the Masters, he was hitting threewood off

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 3>that tee. I don't know if you remember it, but

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 3>he would always picture a shot and he hit this

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 3>beautiful little almost like a pull cut fade all the time.

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 3>And he had teed the ball up fairly high for

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 3>a threewood back then with persimmon, and he always kind

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 3>of walked up with the club dangling in his right

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 3>hand and his left hand kind of shaking as he

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 3>circled into his path to get to address the ball.

0:26:56.840 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 3>And in this particular shot, he got up over, he

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 3>went through his waggles and he stepped away and he

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 3>started looking at his glove like something was wrong with

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 3>his glove, when he clearly wasn't able to make this

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.479
<v Speaker 3>swing because he didn't have the picture and ready, and

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 3>one of the announcers said, oh, Jack's nervous here, you know,

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 3>and people would get concerned when somebody stepped away from

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 3>a shot, And to me, it's like, no, he's gathering

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 3>his thoughts here. And then he piped his three would

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 3>write down the middle, and I'm like, that's a guy

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 3>that is committed. And if you watch Justin Thomas this

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 3>year in the playoff at Kapolua, where both Shoffley and

0:27:41.440 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Reed had missed putts that they said they got gusted,

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Justin Thomas had about a three foot putt to win

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 3>and you saw him step away And I texted him

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 3>afterwards because he texted he said, hey, look the wind

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 3>was blowing. It was gusted. I wasn't going to let

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 3>augusta wind make me blow this put or blow this tournament.

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's what the great players have always

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 3>been able to do.

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's like when the second something that takes you

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>out of that moment, or you think about something other

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>than just what's at hand, you got it to step

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>off because it.

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Breaks the train of thought.

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like nothing ever goes well when you start thinking

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:18.360
<v Speaker 1>about something else.

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 3>No, And for Rory McElroy, last year at the Players Championship.

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean it was to me a monumental occasion. On

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 3>the twelfth hole the final round, it's the driveable par

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 3>four water on the left. It's a newer hole that

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 3>was renovated two years ago. Maybe players can easily reach

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 3>the hole. Rory could do it with the three when

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 3>he left the ball a little bit to the right

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 3>and short of the green off the took perfect t

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 3>shot and the flagstick was left towards the water and

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 3>he chipped it a little bit by maybe ten or

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 3>twelve feet close to the fringe, and he had now

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 3>a kind of an uphill left to right breaking putt

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 3>and it was a pivotal putt. It was critical there

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 3>and maybe a cup's worth of break. And he got

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 3>up over the putt and is we worked a lot

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 3>on routine and then he stepped away and he readjusted

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 3>his line because a lot of times, you know, like

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 3>most players, he had an underread going. And he said, look,

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 3>I knew I needed to play a little bit more break.

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 3>So he went through his routine again and made it,

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 3>and maybe a year before that he wouldn't have done it.

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 3>So as a player myself, that did situational stuff is

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the things we talk about. So it's

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 3>that wouldn't be mechanics, right, but it's like, how are

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 3>you going to respond to something like that? How are

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 3>you going to respond when you've had a series of

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 3>putts that you've hit perfectly that go over the edge

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 3>of the hole and don't go in. How do you

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 3>talk to yourself?

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like that is like it was like

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of for Rory with what he went through the

0:29:45.880 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>last few years with putter, Like that's a monumental putt

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>because if you're not putting, if you're not putting well

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and uphill ten foot good breaking left to right putt

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>as a righty is you know, that's so such a

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>hard put to it because to hit it the pace

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to get that ball to go in because you know

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee has missed it short and right, like we

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about and coming down the stretch and pressure. Do

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a moment from your career that like stands

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>out where you were really working on something and coming

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>down the stretch, you know it clicked and that just

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>set off a really great run of golf.

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 3>I have two putts that I think have helped me

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 3>to understand how good the human body can work and

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 3>the mind works. One of them was in Australia. I

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 3>had a two shot lead at the Australian Open. I

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 3>played the first two rounds of Greg Norman when he

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 3>was number one in the world. It was a Metropolitan,

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 3>a great Mackenzie course, and I had been going down

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 3>to Australia for the past few years and had just

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 3>learned about all these sand belt courses and I'm like, Wow,

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 3>the best greens, hard conditions, firm, windy, and this eighteenth toll.

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 3>If I made five, I was going to win. Part four.

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Hit a three foot off the tee to be saved,

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 3>hit it down the middle, hit it just on the

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 3>right fringe. Most of the trouble in that hole was

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 3>on the left. And I putted it up to about

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 3>four or five feet fast greens. And I didn't care

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 3>if I made this put or not. I really didn't.

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 3>All I knew is if I got it to the lip,

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 3>I could make the next putt. So my thought was

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 3>I want this to get to the front edge and

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 3>trickle in or I'll be There was no ego in

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 3>this putt. I didn't have to make this to win,

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 3>and I hit this putt and it got to the

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 3>edge and it sat there like Tiger's chip on sixteen

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 3>in Augusta, and it fell in. And it's just like

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 3>when you tell your brain when you have that picture

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 3>that's so clear about what you want to do. It's

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 3>amazing how good you can you can feel things. And

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 3>the best golf I ever played in my career was

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 3>the two thousand and one Sony Open at Wili, and

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 3>I shot twenty under par in the last hole I had.

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, I played with L's and Layman, so I

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 3>was playing with top players the last couple of rounds

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 3>and it was just a flall ass around. I eagled.

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 3>There were two part fives. I made an eagle every

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 3>day and I finished it with an eagle on my

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 3>round three times. And the eighteenth hold, the seventy second hole,

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 3>I hit a five or two about eight to ten

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 3>feet under the hole with a left to right break,

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 3>a good amount, you know, a cup's worth of break,

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 3>and another putt that I had no concern about whether

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 3>I made this put or not. You know, all I

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 3>saw was a perfect line. And I remember the feeling

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 3>and all of us have felt it when you hit

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 3>a pot in the exact middle of the sweet spot

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 3>and it leaves, it melts onto the face of the

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:44.719
<v Speaker 3>putter and it goes off and you're like, oh my gosh,

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 3>that felt good. Everything was perfect and the ball rolled

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 3>in a perfect speed, perfect line. And I think you

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 3>can I think you can teach people to feel that

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 3>in practice. You can tell them that they need to

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 3>get there in petition. But I think I've figured out

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 3>a few different ways where I can help people understand

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 3>those feels in their practice, where they can translate that

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 3>to the golf course. And that's I think that's what

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 3>the goal is of everybody is can you play, you know,

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 3>rounds of golf playing in that state of mind where

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 3>there's no concern for the result. I mean, I never

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 3>walk down the street thinking I'm the best putter in

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:30.959
<v Speaker 3>the world. But I was a confident putter, and I

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 3>think for a long time I was able to put

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 3>most putts, taking away the importance down and play the

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 3>importance of the putt, the result, and just really falling

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 3>in love with hitting putts.

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a lot of it.

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 2>I I've always.

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Been like a player that struggled on the greens, but

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of years, I've learned to like

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>love putting.

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 2>And it's amazing how like it changed, like all of

0:33:57.680 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 2>a sudden.

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>People are like, ah, you're a really great potter, and

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just like it was like a mindset switch and

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>now I can't hit the ball.

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 2>But that's golf.

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And people say that all the time. You know,

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 3>when they're when they're hitting it well, they tend to

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 3>not put as well. When they're putting well, they're not

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 3>hitting it as well. And sometimes it's desperation you make

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 3>these putts. And it's interesting to see, like statistics on

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:25.720
<v Speaker 3>the tour from five eight ten feet, how tour players

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 3>make more of those for par than they do for birdie.

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 3>I mean, so is that technical?

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 2>No, it's a loss of version.

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>It's what I did a podcast with an economist.

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 2>It's a loss of version.

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:39.320
<v Speaker 3>So tell me what loss of version?

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:43.359
<v Speaker 1>So people people remember their losses. They did a whole

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 1>study on this. They remember their losses more than they

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>remember They fear losing a shot more than they they

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>want to gain a shot loss of birdie. Okay, So

0:34:56.160 --> 0:35:00.720
<v Speaker 1>they did a study at Oakmont and Pebble with the

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>ninth hole at Oakmont, in the second hole at Pebble,

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>when they switched it from a five to four. Oh so,

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:11.320
<v Speaker 1>by simply switching the par to par four, players scored

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>point two shots better on the hole, same.

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Hole, but par four, same distance.

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Same distance, And I mean they did the whole control,

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>like they looked at it all over the years, historically

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty much the same scoring average. When it switched to

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>par four, the scoring average went down point two. They said,

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 1>if you switched par five, every par five on tour,

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:37.359
<v Speaker 1>I say, par fives don't exist, because you know, when

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you think about par five, is expert player reaches it

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>in three shots? Those outside of maybe fourteen of Pebble,

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, and a few other handful examples, they're all

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>part four. So if a player could convince themselves that

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a par sixty eight.

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 3>Whoever this was that you talk to, would if he

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:56.840
<v Speaker 3>told every player you got to play it as a

0:35:56.880 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 3>par sixty eight, you're going to shoot a lower score.

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>He said, they shoot one shot lower per round point point.

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, that's since she so another row tell his story.

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 3>He was at Jack Nicholas was speaking to a group

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:15.879
<v Speaker 3>of people, and Jack Nicholas was finishing the conversation, the talk,

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 3>and he said, I never three putted the last hole

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 3>of any tournament I ever played in. Never, he said. So.

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 3>There was some questions afterwards, and then Jack and Rotella

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 3>were together and this player came up and said to Jack, Jack,

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 3>I remember the eighteenth hole on Sunday at SO and

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 3>so tournament in Ohio. You definitely three putted the last hole,

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 3>and Jackson, no, I never three putted the last hole.

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 3>And and this conversation went back and forth, and this

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 3>guy got very angry and wrote, I said, let me

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 3>ask you something. Let's call him Bob. Bob, what's your handicap?

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Because I'm sixteen? He goes, do you remember three putting

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 3>year holes? Last holes a lot? He goes, oh, yeah,

0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 3>I remember it all the time. He goes, okay, so

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 3>you're sixteen handicap and remember all those and Jack Nicholas

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 3>is the best player that ever lived and he doesn't

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:05.799
<v Speaker 3>remember that. Which way of thinking is correct? The guy

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 3>walked away angry, So you know, create your own reality.

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 3>You have to do that to be great at this game.

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:12.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 3>I love that story, and I love when people walk

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 3>away all angry. That's something that makes so much sense.

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, last last I I asked about you know,

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>playing an environment of like an urban environment, if it

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 1>was different then But in your response was you know,

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really care as long as it was a.

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 2>Great golf course. To you what is what is the

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 2>golf experience?

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 1>You know at a great golf course, from like an

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:46.320
<v Speaker 1>architectural standpoint, how does it enhance the professional golf product?

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 3>So, being a Rhode Islander native Rhode Islander, I was

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 3>around older golf courses compared to the rest of the

0:37:56.000 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 3>country is Let's say Donald Ross's home was it Rhode

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 3>Island in the summers, a little town called Little Compton,

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 3>and he built a cool little par sixty nine course

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:09.719
<v Speaker 3>called Siconic country Club. The course where I grew up,

0:38:09.760 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Rhode Island country Club, was Donald Ross. There's Wana Moist

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 3>probably the most well known course in the state, Newport

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 3>country Club that Char's US Senior Open host had Donald

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Ross holes on it. So William Flynn was there, Tillinghasse

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 3>was there, Willie Park was in Rhode Island. Rayner was

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 3>there with Wana Moye Billy ANDREI grew up on a

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Rainner of course, and didn't know who seth Rayner was

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 3>Lee Jansen finally told him that. So some of the

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 3>best architects in the world were in Rhode Island, so

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 3>I learned their names, read a lot about architecture. Then, obviously,

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 3>being near Massachusetts, played a lot of courses. The Country

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Club was one of the original five courses. William Flynn,

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 3>who you know, did Shinnecock Hills as well. So I

0:38:57.239 --> 0:39:00.760
<v Speaker 3>started learning and tying all these things together and learning

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 3>what great architecture was by playing them, not by you know,

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 3>trying to become a landscape architect. You know, I just

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 3>saw great golf and how the best holes looked and

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 3>felt and courses were. And then when I got on

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:19.919
<v Speaker 3>the PGA Tour, you know, having watched PGA Tour golf,

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:24.280
<v Speaker 3>you always knew listen to players comments how I loved Riviera,

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 3>how I loved Harbortown, how I loved west Chester. And

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 3>they were always the older colonial, the older courses people

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:34.800
<v Speaker 3>seemed to players seemed to like. And then as the

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 3>game started to grow in popularity and we had to

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:40.399
<v Speaker 3>be concerned about where are we going to put spectators.

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:46.359
<v Speaker 3>Let's create more drama. That's that's the balance. And I

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:49.359
<v Speaker 3>was surprised at how few of the courses we played

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:51.400
<v Speaker 3>on the PG Tour were great. You know, we didn't

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 3>play top ranked, top one hundred courses very often, so

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 3>that was always that made that made a difference, and

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:02.239
<v Speaker 3>but it made less of a difference to players than

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:05.239
<v Speaker 3>I thought, you know, then I thought it should have.

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 3>You do you.

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Think that the great golf courses create a different leaderboard

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>than say, you're run of the mill built for PGA

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to our golf say it, We'll just say like TPC

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans, you know, Louisiana, but like not not I

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 1>don't want to. But do you feel like the Riviera

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Riviera created a different, different type of success from the player,

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:40.439
<v Speaker 1>like asked different questions than you know, that modern course

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that you talked about that wasn't like you know.

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:45.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a good question. That there were so many

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 3>factors that would influence a field. A lot of it

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 3>was tradition, like Riviera had been there for one hundred years,

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Hogan his history there, schedule, where it is the schedule,

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 3>is it a run up to something that was important?

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Perse that was something title, sponsor, where you lived. All

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 3>those things were factors. If you think about the US Open,

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.439
<v Speaker 3>the first one Fox did at Chambers Bay. Of course,

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:14.720
<v Speaker 3>nobody really knew anything about they didn't have any history,

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 3>had a great leaderboard and a compelling finish, didn't it

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 3>ye to watch what happened? It was sensational. So will

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Chambers Bay be another US Open course? Maybe? If the

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 3>US Open were held at TPC at Louisiana, like you said,

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:32.960
<v Speaker 3>would the leaderboard be better than it is as a

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 3>regular tour of one hundred to get the top players there?

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 3>Would they have to change the the golf course with

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 3>firmer conditions and more rough. Absolutely, But you know, every course,

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 3>every tournament doesn't have to have a fantastic leaderboard to

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:56.399
<v Speaker 3>still be a great tournament. As a matter of fact,

0:41:56.760 --> 0:42:01.200
<v Speaker 3>I think it's better that every tournament's not a nine

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:02.360
<v Speaker 3>or ten on the scale.

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:07.080
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting. So Riviera one of my favorite staffs.

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the last player to win Riviera that was

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:14.440
<v Speaker 1>under the age of twenty eight is Adam Scott. And like,

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like maybe thirteen or fourteen years ago now,

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's like something about that place it favor, you know.

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if this is statistically just an anomaly,

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:27.879
<v Speaker 1>but older players seem to thrive there. And I don't

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 1>know if it's something about the game at Riviera that

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 1>you know requires a little bit of thought.

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 2>The more times you go around it, you learn more

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 2>and more.

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:40.480
<v Speaker 1>At great courses, that seems to be one of the

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 1>common threads is like every time you play you kind

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of reveals itself a little bit more.

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:49.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, I have a fun spark spot at Riviera.

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:52.840
<v Speaker 3>My greatest round ever played was there in the PGA

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:58.200
<v Speaker 3>in ninety five, and Bob Roteller wrote a story about

0:42:58.239 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 3>my round. I don't know if I ever saw it

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 3>in golf as game of confidence and I read it

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:07.319
<v Speaker 3>or I show players that I've tough or talk to

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:10.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to brag and say, hey, read this

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 3>because it's about me. But what goes through a player's

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 3>mind when they're playing great is not unique, you know.

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:19.759
<v Speaker 3>It's you still get bad thoughts, you don't hit every

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 3>shot perfectly. You have to manage the emotions of playing

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 3>a great round of golf when you need to. But

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:33.879
<v Speaker 3>Riviera there's subtleties to the course. And if one cour

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:37.360
<v Speaker 3>one hole at Rivia plays easy, like number one, the

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:41.359
<v Speaker 3>short par five down the hill, number two will play

0:43:41.400 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 3>more difficult, depending on the winds, time of day, temperature.

0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, you can play there sometimes when it's cold

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:52.280
<v Speaker 3>and wet and the ball doesn't go anywhere. Uphill shots

0:43:52.680 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 3>play so long. No course makes you turn the ball

0:43:56.120 --> 0:44:00.399
<v Speaker 3>in both directions more than Riviera Rivia does. Those big

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:05.160
<v Speaker 3>yucalyptus trees, the stadium, look of the eighteenth Toll, that's

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 3>just natural. It's hard. I've never met anybody that goes

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 3>from Riverer and goes this isn't one of the coolest

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 3>places I've ever played. That's the look of the bunkering,

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:19.760
<v Speaker 3>the green complexes and George Thomas. I mean, what a combination.

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's the thing.

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 1>George Thomas's might be the most underrated architect.

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:25.040
<v Speaker 2>You look at it.

0:44:25.080 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Every single he didn't do that many projects, but every

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 1>single one home run.

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:33.760
<v Speaker 3>So being a New England guy. There's a great course

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:40.640
<v Speaker 3>in Massachusetts by the Cape called Katans and Katans It

0:44:40.800 --> 0:44:43.279
<v Speaker 3>is hard to get, too hard to find, and you

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 3>got to go through these windy little roads and as

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:49.600
<v Speaker 3>you're driving out towards the peninsula where it is, you

0:44:49.680 --> 0:44:51.920
<v Speaker 3>pass this little course called Marion M A R I

0:44:51.960 --> 0:44:53.960
<v Speaker 3>O N. Have you been there? Oh?

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:54.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:44:54.280 --> 0:44:56.280
<v Speaker 3>And you know there's a little shack or shed whatever,

0:44:56.320 --> 0:44:59.280
<v Speaker 3>and you know, like a gravel pit sort of parking

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 3>lot and stone wall in front of a green and

0:45:02.680 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, I just used to laugh at that. You know,

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 3>you saw pull carts out there so you could go

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 3>pay twelve bucks and pay play your eight or nine holes.

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 3>George Thomas's first course ever and incredible. Yeah, and it's

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:16.200
<v Speaker 3>got great views when you go. Did you you so

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:16.920
<v Speaker 3>you've been out there?

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I played.

0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I played it with a with another with a with

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a architect, young architect.

0:45:23.200 --> 0:45:23.919
<v Speaker 2>It was so fun.

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:26.359
<v Speaker 1>We went out there on our box like if there's

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 1>nobody working there, you check your money in and you

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>know that was That's a really, I think an interesting

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:36.800
<v Speaker 1>course for people to go see because it's like a

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:40.640
<v Speaker 1>glimpse into the first iteration of golf architecture. Yes, because

0:45:40.640 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that was in the rock walls were the hazards, because

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:45.719
<v Speaker 1>it was it was easier to build a rock wall

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>than dig a bunker.

0:45:47.280 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 3>Totally, and there were a lot of rocks around there.

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 3>The Philadelphia Quakers kind of that was a vacation spot

0:45:54.080 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 3>for them. They would come to Jamestown, Rhode Island, they

0:45:56.520 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 3>would come to Cape Cod Thomas never got paid a

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 3>feed to design a golf course. It's fabulous a wealthy guy,

0:46:03.480 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 3>but that's where he learned his craft. And I don't

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 3>know if he took some of that schooling from maybe

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 3>North Barrack that had some rock walls around it. Uh

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 3>and and those walls, you know, part of what farmers

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 3>laid down to divide properties. And then you just put

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:23.640
<v Speaker 3>him up and make the guy hit it over the fantastic.

0:46:24.000 --> 0:46:26.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's it's a neat play. That's like one of

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:29.040
<v Speaker 2>the hidden gems. It's in terms of.

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:32.520
<v Speaker 1>An authentic, unique golf experience, there are a few that

0:46:33.040 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 1>have more kind of character. Like it's not going to

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:39.320
<v Speaker 1>wow you with conditions, but just a neat little spot.

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 2>You shouldn't drive by it, you should stop.

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:43.799
<v Speaker 3>And so if you were going there, you had to

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:44.960
<v Speaker 3>have gone to Catansit.

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:48.319
<v Speaker 2>I didn't go. Oh, I just went to Marian You did.

0:46:48.480 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 3>That's amazing.

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, I was flying into Boston to get to Yale

0:46:55.280 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and I had time for one stop, so I stopped.

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 3>That was your one stop. Now, that's great story. Marion

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Golf Club.

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:05.319
<v Speaker 2>I have a thing for you know.

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, if you're making me jealous, because I want to

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:12.120
<v Speaker 3>go back there. My dad was a good player, and

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:13.799
<v Speaker 3>he was a member when I was a little kid

0:47:13.800 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 3>at Rhode Island Country Club, where I learned to caddy

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 3>and learned the game. But he also was a member

0:47:17.160 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 3>of a place in the Cape called Eastward ho which

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:22.200
<v Speaker 3>has now moved way up in the rankings. Keith Foster

0:47:22.280 --> 0:47:25.800
<v Speaker 3>did a renovation there, cleared thousands and thousands of trees.

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 3>So that is one of the great places in America

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:33.200
<v Speaker 3>that many people don't know about. But there's a town

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 3>called Fall River, Massachusetts. Fall River was a mill town.

0:47:36.680 --> 0:47:39.720
<v Speaker 3>My father was worked at the Far River Gas Company.

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:42.839
<v Speaker 3>And there's an eighteen hole course called Fall River Country Club.

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 3>But the original nine holes there is a sensational nine

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:49.520
<v Speaker 3>holes of golf. I brought Gil Hans there. They had

0:47:49.560 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 3>punch bowl greens, they had dance style green. He goes,

0:47:52.719 --> 0:47:54.439
<v Speaker 3>this is one of the greatest places I've ever seen.

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:59.640
<v Speaker 3>So those little nine hole tracks can be really, really fun.

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we could talk I wanted to talk more

0:48:03.600 --> 0:48:05.799
<v Speaker 1>about golf course. We've bet we ended up on to

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 1>talk about you know, the mind and golf, and but

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 1>like I mean, that's I think one of the neatest

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 1>things about golf is just the exploration and and a

0:48:13.600 --> 0:48:16.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of times the golf courses that you've never heard of,

0:48:16.640 --> 0:48:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Like it's so worth just stopping and getting out of

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:22.440
<v Speaker 1>your car and seeing, like what's going on here, because

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:26.279
<v Speaker 1>like there are cool, little quirky nine hole courses all

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:30.560
<v Speaker 1>over the place, especially in the northeast, you know. And

0:48:30.760 --> 0:48:34.200
<v Speaker 1>uh so it's it's been a pleasure of having you

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:36.279
<v Speaker 1>on and we'll have to do it again. Maybe uh

0:48:36.480 --> 0:48:39.000
<v Speaker 1>if we get closer to uh, you know, may do

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:40.560
<v Speaker 1>something about wing foot.

0:48:40.400 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Or definitely, yeah, let's do something coming up there. Because

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:47.760
<v Speaker 3>I my feeling on this US Open is the usj

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 3>would never admit this, but I think they want to

0:48:50.600 --> 0:48:54.160
<v Speaker 3>really make guys sweat. I think they want to see

0:48:54.160 --> 0:48:57.280
<v Speaker 3>some scores, some traditional US Open golf, I know Curtis

0:48:57.280 --> 0:48:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Strange and Paul As. I want to see guys bloody

0:48:59.480 --> 0:49:00.440
<v Speaker 3>when they finish around.

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:03.160
<v Speaker 2>And those greens are.

0:49:05.280 --> 0:49:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Real quick talk about so you know, wing footscreens on

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:13.920
<v Speaker 1>on a like they would fall if somebody built them today.

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:16.920
<v Speaker 1>They'd be like these greens they're unfair, but like because

0:49:16.920 --> 0:49:20.319
<v Speaker 1>of the tradition, they you know, they are they are

0:49:20.640 --> 0:49:25.839
<v Speaker 1>intimidating as a great putter going to place with with

0:49:26.120 --> 0:49:28.880
<v Speaker 1>very undulating greens, do you feel just like when you

0:49:28.960 --> 0:49:31.440
<v Speaker 1>stepped on a course like that where you're at a

0:49:31.480 --> 0:49:33.320
<v Speaker 1>bigger advantage.

0:49:33.520 --> 0:49:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Definitely. And I think the best putters, the better putters

0:49:37.920 --> 0:49:42.680
<v Speaker 3>like that where it's difficult, challenging on every putt. I

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 3>always put in my best at a place like Augusta

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:53.880
<v Speaker 3>because it made you be more creative. You know you

0:49:53.920 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 3>were you were nervous because putts were so fast. But

0:49:57.080 --> 0:50:00.719
<v Speaker 3>I think the the opposite is true too, Like at

0:50:00.960 --> 0:50:03.480
<v Speaker 3>death Page, everybody said he's the best conditioned. Greens are

0:50:03.520 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 3>all flat, you're gonna put great. I put it horribly there.

0:50:05.680 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't see a picture.

0:50:07.160 --> 0:50:07.360
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Straighter putts are harder for me than breaking putts.

0:50:10.440 --> 0:50:13.479
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because, like I think, one of the things

0:50:13.480 --> 0:50:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that's happened with this green speed's getting so highah is

0:50:16.880 --> 0:50:19.719
<v Speaker 1>that you know, tour doesn't like to put pins on

0:50:20.560 --> 0:50:22.920
<v Speaker 1>much slope because they never want the course to be

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:26.319
<v Speaker 1>part of the conversation. Yes, And what's happened is like

0:50:26.440 --> 0:50:30.319
<v Speaker 1>I was watching even Kapalua down the stretch, I'm like, God,

0:50:30.560 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen a putt that anybody's played outside the

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:36.000
<v Speaker 1>hole from inside seven feet.

0:50:35.480 --> 0:50:38.160
<v Speaker 2>And losing losing slope.

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Slope is the best, you know, having a five footer

0:50:41.880 --> 0:50:44.319
<v Speaker 1>that you're looking at, it's like, well, I could play

0:50:44.320 --> 0:50:46.160
<v Speaker 1>it a ball out and put some paste on it,

0:50:46.280 --> 0:50:47.799
<v Speaker 1>or I could play it a cup out and die

0:50:47.960 --> 0:50:51.319
<v Speaker 1>in the top edge. Like that's where putting ads. There's

0:50:51.360 --> 0:50:52.759
<v Speaker 1>almost an added dimension to it.

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:57.560
<v Speaker 3>So I learned that at a British Open, which traditionally

0:50:57.600 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 3>are flattered greens because of the wins out there when

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:07.560
<v Speaker 3>the weekends came around the RNA who set up the

0:51:07.560 --> 0:51:11.360
<v Speaker 3>golf course where they were always able to find more slope.

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:16.239
<v Speaker 3>So you can make the course play more difficult with

0:51:16.320 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 3>your whole locations. Obviously tucking them behind a bunker or

0:51:20.800 --> 0:51:23.719
<v Speaker 3>by the edges of the green, but put in them

0:51:23.719 --> 0:51:26.600
<v Speaker 3>where there's a lot of slope really is underrated and

0:51:26.880 --> 0:51:28.000
<v Speaker 3>make it much more difficult.

0:51:28.040 --> 0:51:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I agree, yeah, I mean, and it adds a dimension

0:51:31.320 --> 0:51:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to the pro shop when there's more slope because you

0:51:33.560 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 1>can't get above it all of a sudden, then your

0:51:35.760 --> 0:51:38.640
<v Speaker 1>target line is aiming right at it, and having five

0:51:38.680 --> 0:51:41.799
<v Speaker 1>feet all around it becomes oh, I got to stay

0:51:41.840 --> 0:51:44.839
<v Speaker 1>below it, and that bottom part of the circle is

0:51:44.880 --> 0:51:46.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be twenty five feet.

0:51:46.360 --> 0:51:48.480
<v Speaker 3>And that's where, of course, knowledge is really important, you know,

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:50.400
<v Speaker 3>that's a big part of it. Well, thank you. I

0:51:50.600 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 3>really enjoyed.

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:52.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's fun.

0:51:52.560 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 1>So we'll talk soon, and good luck talking to Scotti later.

0:51:57.040 --> 0:51:58.839
<v Speaker 3>I can't wait. I got to get a little bit

0:51:58.840 --> 0:52:00.920
<v Speaker 3>more organized. There's a lot of things you can An

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 3>hour is not long enough to talk to Scotti, Cameron, that's.

0:52:03.040 --> 0:52:18.759
<v Speaker 2>For sure, all right. Thanks Bratt, har Dannie. You've been

0:52:18.800 --> 0:52:22.040
<v Speaker 2>listening to the fried Egg podcast. We do the digging

0:52:22.480 --> 0:52:22.840
<v Speaker 2>for you.