WEBVTT - This Is How The Paparazzi Business Really Works

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another edition of the Ad Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Eisenthal. Joe, you know what,

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>my favorite All Thoughts podcasts are definitely all the ones

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>we've done about poker and gambling, right, Yeah, poker and

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>chess episodes, those are my absolute favorites. No, my favorite

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>episodes are actually when we talk to people are fellow

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>colleagues at Bloomberg. I agree. I love those episodes and

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>not to sort of speak about how great things are

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and how great it is here and how great

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>our colleagues are, but it is really remarkable the wide

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>range of backgrounds that people have. Whether we're talking to

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>our colleague who is a cattle farmer or former traders

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it is, or the guy who uh is

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the father of the beige book, it's always interesting. Yeah,

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a large organization. There's a wide range of experiences,

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like a lot of people have very

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>interesting backstories, and we've had some of them on as

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned. But I think I've found the Bloomberg

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>reporter with the most interesting background. Ever. This is going

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to have to be pretty impressive to be the cow farmer.

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>But I guess cow is our commodity, so I guess

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe it does fit in with the Bloomberg bread and

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>butter coverage. Okay, so what is the background of the

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>person we are talking to today? Okay, So our guest

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>for today is Eddie van der Vault. He is a

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>medals reporter for US in London, but before he was

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>covering all things metal, he was actually a paparazzi or

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess I should say paparazzo singular. I am very

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>excited about this. First of all, I'm a big fan

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of Eddie's medals coverage. I love what he talks about

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>gold because all the crazies are in that market. But

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel like a the paparazzi is one of these

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>things that's ubiquitous in modern life, and we basically know

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing about how the business works. And I imagine there's

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of interesting lessons we'll learn about risk taking

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and risk management and all this, and maybe even also

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>digital rights management and intellectual property. So I'm excited about

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>this episode. Okay, Well, we have a lot to cover

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>in twenty or thirty minutes then. I mean. The great

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>thing about Eddie is that He also looks at the

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>paparazzi business model from an economics perspective. I've spoken to

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit about it before, so I think

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you're really going to enjoy this discussion. Bloomberg's Eddie Vanderwalt,

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Tracy, Hi, thank you.

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 1>I guess the obvious question to begin with is how

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>you got into the business of being a paparazzo in

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the first place. Yeah, I mean, I stopped off as

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a student photographer. The dream was to go photograph elephants

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in the serengetti, and you know, nobody told me that

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that people don't pay for pictures of wildlife. And so

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>when I came over to the UK, I kind of

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to work in news, and I had a

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 1>few interviews in the industry, and to be honest, I

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>turned the first time I interviewed it at the company

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that I worked for, which was called Big Pictures, which

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest agencies at the time. They've gone

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>under since, but I interviewed there and I had no

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>idea what these guys did. So I walked into the

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>office and everywhere is just pictures of you know, I

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know people in compromising positions, and you could just

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you just got that got the image immediately that that

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>this was this was their business. Their business was was peparazzi.

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>And so I was a student when Diana died, and

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I remember saying to myself, the one job that I

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>would never do in my life, it works a peparazzi photographer.

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>But I got interviewed by a by a South African

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>guy and he offered me the job, and the first

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>time I turned it down, and then a few other

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>things that I tried didn't come off. So he came

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>back to me about a month later and said, look,

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the guy that we hired at that time didn't work out,

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>but you know, are you up for it? Um? And

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>then the second time around, I took it. And it

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>just kind of sucks you in, the world sucks you

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in because the better you get it, the more you

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the more you know, the characters that work in it,

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and the backstories and so on. The more you get

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to know it, as in any industry, the more you

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>become worth. And so it was much easier to get

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>into it than it was to get out of it,

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, Eddie, A real quick question that I'm

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>curious about. Are the ranks of the paparazzi filled with

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>people who once aspired to what maybe other people would

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>use more noble ambitions like photographing wildlife for people who

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>thought they were gonna be war photographers and things like that. No,

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>not really, you don't. You don't see a lot of

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>serious photographer. You see some serious photographers that that that

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 1>go into that industry, but the photographic skill set that

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>you need isn't as high as it used to be.

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I think in the old days when we were shooting

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>on film and people were developing canisters of film in

0:04:58.279 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the back of the boots of their cars and that

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing, that was different. But nowadays with digital

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>photography and you see the image immediately after you took it.

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>And also the way that you operate, you're you're you're

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>setting up for a specific shot and you take it

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 1>over and over and over again, particularly at night, so

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I worked at nights. The guys who work daytime, they're

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 1>a completely different breed. And the daytime guys they set

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>up with long lenses, they hide in the bushes and

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>so on. Right, the guys who work nighttime, you would

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>have seen them outside of you know, Joe, I'm sure

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you go to these kind of, you know, posh restaurants

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>in New York. Tracy, I'm sure you do too, but

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>actually right, but it's a joke, but it might be.

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think that these kind of restaurants are more

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>prevalent and you get more of celebrities hanging out in

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 1>New York. So you would see these guys on the

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>pavement and they'd have flash guns and it would be

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a pack of guys standing together and they're try and

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>get close in. So to answer you a question, no,

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not really. The skill sets not photographic. The skill

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>set is knowing who's famous, knowing who's hot. How how

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>can you going to sell it? What are people's car

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>registration numbers? Right? Those kind of things. That's what you

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>want to know, and that's what makes or breaks a path.

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>So walk us through the business model. Then you're going

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>out at night, You're sending yourself outside, Um, I don't know,

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Chipriyani's or something in well, I guess this would be London,

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and you're waiting for famous people to come out, and

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>how do you actually make money and how do you

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>differentiate yourself from the other photographers who are standing there waiting. Right. So, Tracy,

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I've met the two of you. You know you would

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>know I'm not six ft five and you know, in

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that sort of scrum situation, you want to get to

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the front, you want to push people out of the way,

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's it's a bit of a rough and tumble.

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you if you watch rugby, it's

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit like a rugby scrum, right, Um, you know

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you're just you're just trying to get to the front,

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to get the picture. And that was never going

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to be my faulte. So that was never really what

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I what I played too. But I think it's interesting

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to talk about what gives a picture it's worth and

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>what makes it what makes a particular picture valuable because

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a lot of things that play. The

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>first one is how newsworthy the event is. Right, So

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>if we think about celebrities as characters, I almost think

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of it is a bit like WWF because it's a

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit made up, it's a little bit real, it's

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and you've got to know, you know

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>what it is that that makes this particular person sellable? Right,

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>So you've got. So let's say we talk about the

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>British Royals. If they show up at a red carpet

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>event where they are opening, you know, a new theater

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>or you know, some sort of event that is characteristic

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of what they would do, that is almost not worth

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>any money, and you almost won't. You might see it

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>in print tomorrow, but it's not going to sell for

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. Now, if they do something that

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is out of character or something that they don't want

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to be seen doing, those pictures are obviously worth a

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>lot more. So it's it's got that story you But

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the real interesting bit I think is what makes the

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>pictures valuable is not whether it's not so much what

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the picture is of, it's it's how many people get

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the picture. It's the exclusivity. So the market structure is,

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>on the one hand, you've got let's say in London,

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe fifty guys who are doing this right, and you've

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>got about six newspapers or so that would buy the

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>pictures tomorrow morning. So you've got an oligopsony buying the pictures.

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you if you're fifty guys giving them the

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 1>same image, they have all of the market power, right,

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>they can buy from any one of you, and somebody

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>might have a slightly different angle or might have a

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>slightly better expression on the face, but essentially you're then

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>selling a commoditized product. If, however, you are the only

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>one who gets the picture, the power shifts completely because

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>then you're running the monopoly and you've got six buyers

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>who we're going to be competing by selling to a

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>mass audience tomorrow. So that's what you're going for. I

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>almost think of it like, you know, there's this debate

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>about diamonds and water. Why is why is diamonds more

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>valuable than than water? Well, it's about scarcity, and it's

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same there, because if you can manufacture a

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>situation of scarcity, you've got a picture that sells for money.

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>So the way you the macro perspective through which you

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>describe the market is intuitive. A rare photo is better

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>than a normal photo, so it's celebrity doing something unusual

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>is more valuable if you're one of the only people

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>who has the photo, versus if the entire scrum is there,

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that's more valuable, and so on. What is the precise

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>mechanism view which the sale is made because it's a

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>quasi auction process. You're describing how is the exact price

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 1>and deal set? As in most markets, there's there's a

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>conception that in the pepparazzi business that the photographers make

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. There are a handful of guys

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>do well and you know, lift slightly above I don't

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 1>know the national average, but it's not it's not a

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>business that will make make a lot of money year

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>in year out, not for the photographers anyway. The guys

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>who make money out of it are the agencies. And

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>so what you would do is you as a photographer

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>would usually have an agent. So my my day usually

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>ended at four am, So four am I would go

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>back home or three am somewhere around that, round about

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the time that the club's closed. The nightclubs close and

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>people get kicked out. After that, I'll take my last pictures,

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>head on home and file it to my agent. And

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the agent um you know, would represent Let's say again,

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>there are about five or so big agencies. The business

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>is consolidated a little bit. I think guys like Getty

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and Rex and so one have bought up a lot

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.959
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of other outlets. But basically they would

0:10:57.800 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that's when your agent gets to work. Some guy would

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>go and in the pictures for you. He would just

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>crop it straight and so on, and caption it. And

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>if it's this kind of commoditized picture that everybody else

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>had it was a red carpet event, he would he

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>would just go, he would caption it up, and they

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>would send it out on a newswire essentially on a newswire,

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and and the newspapers would would be able to look

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>at this, and then they would they would buy it

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>straight off there and and in fact they set the price.

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>And often you don't hear how much you're gonna get

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>paid for a picture until after it was after it

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>was in the publication, right, you have no bargaining power there.

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>But if you had exclusivity, the situation is obviously very different.

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 1>Then your agent would get to work. He would call

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>up the various news desks. He wouldn't necessarily in the

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>first instance, show them the pictures. He would just say, look,

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we have this set of pictures. Are you interested? And

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's actually quite interesting how that pans out, because

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>sometimes now it can take a whole news cycle, right,

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>so so so they would hear early in the morning

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>what you had yesterday where you got last night, so

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the pictures won't get to the newspaper until the following day.

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>In the interim, he's had a discussion with various news

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>desks saying, this is what we have. So so I've

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>often asked the question, why don't these guys just go

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and published, you know, the news anyway? Say, look, you know,

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>ex celebrity got caught with a girl that he shouldn't

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:24.839
<v Speaker 1>have been with, or with a guy who shouldn't have

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>been with or whatever. But the reason they don't is because,

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking at it from a game theory perspective,

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is because these are not one off games, right, So

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that kind of forces it's the idea of honor amongst thieves.

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>If if we were going to play this game once

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and these guys and you just kind of, you know,

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>had a one off picture that you're going to sell

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to them, and they broke the news anyway, without you

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>selling the picture to them, they could, you know, they

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>could walk away and nothing's lost. But because I'm going

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep bringing them new pictures, they won't cheat on

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the game as it were. I love that we're talking

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>about game theory in the context of paparazzi. But any

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned earlier this notion that a exclusive photo of

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>photo that no one else had would be worth more

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>than a commoditized one. In economics we talk all about

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, supply and demand driving price. Was there, ever,

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the temptation to create artificial scarcity for a photo? And

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is that even possible? Right? Exactly, it does happen. So

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the temptation is if if you're two photographers turning up

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>at the same you stumble on the same exclusive or

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>on the same picture. If you were to both sell

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that picture and send it to separate agencies, we would

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>go from a picture that sells for tens of thousands

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of pounds to a picture that sells for you know,

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty forty pounds tomorrow. So the temptation is always

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to work together. And again it's because these are not

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>people that are that inherently trust one another. It's just

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is it works in their favor by game theory, repeat

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>games and all of that stuff to file their pictures together,

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and they often do. You will often see either the

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>two photographers would decide on their own two submit via

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the same agency and split the money, or if they

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have, if they don't both have relationship with the

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>same agency, for the agencies to sell the picture together.

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to something that you said

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>early on because I don't want to forget it. It

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of a recent episode. We were talking to

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Cameron christ here and he was talking about the scrum

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Chicago trading pits and the importance of size

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in that sort of jost and you mentioned in one

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of your early answers that you're not all that tall.

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I am curious about some of the other attributes of

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>really good paparazzi, the degree to which sort of physicality

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>really matters in either being big enough to push people

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>out of the way or small enough to slide through

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>crowds to get that perfect shot. Yeah. Absolutely. I listened

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to that episode and it was It was one of

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>my favorites because because I remember while I was working,

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I used to think this, what I do feels a

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>lot like that kind of business, right, and so definitely,

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>but more than being big, what matters is being able

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to recognize faces at a distance, so good eyesight, but

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>also just knowing that the people the individuals very well,

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>so that that matters more because it's one thing to

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>push somebody out of the way, but it's a lot

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>easier to just be there first, right because the other guy,

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, he may or may not be able to

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>push out of the way. So but I think I

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>think those are the key the key attributes. And for me,

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>what's why I always think that this wasn't such a

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>huge jump to wide of financial markets from the from

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the Parati business is that it is about information and

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it is all about knowing. So I talked about getting

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to know the registration numbers for cars because I worked

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>with Kate Moss a lot and with Amy Winehous a lot,

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>not worked with, but you know, photographed Amy Winehouse and

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Kate Moss a lot. And knowing where they live, knowing

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>what times they go out, knowing what cars they drive,

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and getting to know the drivers, and getting to go

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>know the guys at the nightclub, and being willing to

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>pay for information and those sorts of things. I think

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in this grum situation, it matters being big, and it

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>matters getting close up and so on, but you almost

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>want to win before you get there. That's funny. It's

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like like being at an investment bank and

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>being able to see client flows and having that edge

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in making your own trading decisions. I'm curious, you know,

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a business model that I imagine changed

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>quite a lot, maybe over the time that you were working,

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>but certainly then nowadays everyone has their own digital camera

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>via their phones, for instance, how has the business model

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>changed either while you were working um in it or

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>since then. I trained on film photography and I joined

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>when digital photography was just kind of you know, in

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the early early two thousands, just this digital photography was

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>really taking off and was good enough to be used

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>at that level, and I think that that made it

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that had a huge impact because it it really lowered

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the h skill set that you that you had to

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 1>have to get into the industry. But but you're right,

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not just that, it's it's it's the publication models

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>has changed completely. Once a picture has been placed on

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a website, once it's gone and everybody else on the

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>web can tweet that picture they downloaded straight away, They don't,

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, repeat sales have fallen off a cliff, and

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it it has forced the industy to consolidate a lot,

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, so you've you've seen a lot of agencies

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>either go under or sell out to the big guys

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>or so on. Yeah, definitely, the industry is is still

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>struggling to catch up with it. But that's made having

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>exclusivity even more important because you cannot bank on those

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>repeat sales. I know, in the old days, they were

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the older guys, I used to think of their picture library,

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, as their retirement policy, because the pictures would

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>keep paying. Like it's a lot like the like the

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>music industry, Your your backlog of of works will keep selling.

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>But nowadays that's just no longer the case. You just

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:43.439
<v Speaker 1>don't see people coming back and buying those those old images. Eddie.

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it was a slip, but you

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 1>talked about working with Amy Winehouse and then you said, oh,

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.199
<v Speaker 1>we didn't really work together. You took Now what I

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 1>meant was so, But I wondered when I heard that

0:18:54.880 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 1>about the symbiotic relationship between the paparazzi and a celebrities. So,

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, the sort of cliche is that the celebrities

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>try to avoid the paparati, but obviously the paparazi are

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>key to bolstering their um, their celebrities. So I'm curious

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>about the degree to which you start to establish a

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>rapport relationship or with the people that you cover. Right, Yeah,

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.199
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's quite interesting, actually, I mean it is.

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:29.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a bit like like wrestling or or a pantomime

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>was something where the pepparazzi play the villain, play the

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>bad guy. But but it is absolutely symbiotic, and very

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>often the information about where the celebrity is going to

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>be comes from the celebrity. Very often the celebrity that

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>would tip you off, right, and you kind of get

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>three kind of strata of people that you that you

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>deal with in the industry, and the guys at the

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>bottom will come out of a nightclub and they will

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>spot you and they will come over to you and

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>they will try and strike up a conversation and try

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and get you to photo raft them. And that's fine,

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>and you'll do it, and you know, and you'll submit it.

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're not going to sell a picture, but

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>they because they're building a brand, they are they will pose,

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>They will pose kisses for you. They will do anything

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 1>that you'd like them to do. If they then a

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of years later, they've made it and people know

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:18.199
<v Speaker 1>who they are, and and then they completely shun you.

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>They're almost a little bit nasty when they when they

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>when they're in front of you, because they want to

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>show that they do not need you, right. And then

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the complete A listers, the Madonnas of this world and

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>so on, they're completely professional. They see it as a

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>part of their job. They will come out of the

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 1>other the night the nightclub or wherever it is, and

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>they will look straight down the camera at you, but

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>they won't engage with you. They won't do anything that

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>they weren't going to do anyway. They would just carry

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 1>on with their business, almost as if you weren't there.

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>But they're also they're also a lot more polite than you,

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>than than the than the the kind of mid tier.

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>It's it's really interesting to see to see how people's

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 1>reactions change with time. It's the smile right at the

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>long end and the short end there's a positive interaction

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>and its belly of the curve where you have the

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of right right right Eddie. I have to ask,

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>was there ever a photo that you took that you

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 1>felt guilty about for the do you know? For the

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>most part, no, so I kind of see it as

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, most people sign up for this

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>right and they actively seek fame. You know, there are

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good places in London that you could

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 1>go out and have dinner and not be photographed by

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 1>the paparazzi. And there are a handful of places that

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're definitely going to go and be photographed

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>if you if you come out, there's going to be

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>pops outside. So I always use the example of Sting

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>right Sting. You know, the musician, I never saw him

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>working in London all the time that I was here.

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>He never showed up anywhere, and yet if he wants publicity,

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, he could have it at a drop of

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a hat. But there's one caveat There's two groups that

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>did make me queasy, So not so much an individual picture,

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>but two groups that I didn't like photographing, and that

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is the children of of the famous and royalty, because

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 1>both of those groups have no choice, have no power

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>over this, They cannot walk away from this. The royalty

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 1>see this as a as a part of their job.

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>But I always felt sympathy because I thought, you know,

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:35.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of jobs that I in the world

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that I wouldn't do. And they've got one that they

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>cannot walk away from. For instance, Prince Harry, he doesn't

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 1>like being in front of the camera. It winds him

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>up and you can see it. Okay, well, then let's

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about the flip side. So what was your proudest

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.640
<v Speaker 1>photograph or proudest moment in your paparat. Well we talked

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>about Amy winehows I loved spending time there and Amy

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't think a lot of people know this, but

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>she used to work for a for an agency that

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>sold pictures matrix. I think she did, and she knew

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly how to play the game. So she had a boyfriend.

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>His name was Blake, and he was in prison for

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>a while, and she would come to the door to

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>greet you know, the neighborhood kids who bang on the door,

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>and she would she would turn up with a with

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 1>a with a brooch or something in her hair that

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>would show you know that that had Blake's name in

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it in a heart shape, something like that. Just visualizing

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a storyline. At one point, she was cleaning up her life,

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>so she would come to the door with a with

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a vacuum cleaner, you know, throwing out an old vacuum cleaner,

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>but it really visualized this idea of her trying to

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>clean up her life. Um, you know, we all know

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>how that ended, and it was very sad, but just

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the time spent out there, you felt a lot more

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>like you were working with her. She was given a

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>lot more back and she was incredibly good at it.

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's definitely some of the some of the stuff

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that I was proud of. Random aside here, remember how

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 1>she in addition to her boyfriend named Blake, she had

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>another guy friend who wasn't her boyfriend, who was also

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>named Blake. Yeah, I went to high school with that Blake. Really,

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>he was a friend of my sister's in Vermont. So

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I randomly have a connection to one of the two Blake,

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>well the other I mean I never saw. I never

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>saw Blake. We called him Blake one and Blake two,

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 1>and never really met the first Blake, the one that

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>was imprisoned. But but I met Blake two, and he

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>was he was a nice used to hang out at

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 1>my house when I was a teenage. That's fantastic. But

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean that whole crowd around her, they

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>were decent, down to earth people that happened to be famous.

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>It was, it was, it was fantastic. All right, Well, Eddie,

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>it's been really great to listen to your stories and

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>learn a little bit about the business model of the paparazzi.

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>That's Eddie undervaulved Bloomberg's Medals reporter. Thank you so much, guys,

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Thanks Eddie. That was great. So Joe, I

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>found that conversation really entertaining, and I'm now trying to

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 1>think of ways that i can accessorize my outfits to

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>visualize my personal storyline and got some paparazzi interested if

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.919
<v Speaker 1>anyone could pull that off. Tracy, I know that it's you.

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that conversation as well. And I guess

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I would say every story or every career or whatever,

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 1>there's always some economics markets parallel that you can draw, right.

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>But I was actually I thought that the connection was

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>more in depth than I even was expecting. Whether it

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>was the auction slash market structure of how the photos

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>are sold, whether it was the repeat game theory of

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the relationship between the agency and the producers, whether it

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>was you know, as I put it, the smile in

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of where on the curve and who's nice to you.

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>There's just a lot of really interesting lessons there. Mm hmm. Yeah,

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>the smile was a good analogy. I like that. It

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is a really fascinating dynamic because you think of paparazzi,

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>they're these really competitive guys. Obviously the business is really competitive,

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>really intense. But even there you can find instances of

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>economic cooperation. So maybe that proves uh that, um, some

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 1>economic models work. I guess there is hope after all.

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>That's right, Okay, Well, on that happy note, this has

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>been another episode of the Odd Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Alloway and you can follow me on Twitter at Tracy

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Alloway and I'm Joe Wisn't all. You could follow me

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at the Stalwart, and you can follow Eddie

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at ed Vanderwald. And you should follow our

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>producer to foror Foreheads at foreheads T, as well as

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesco Levie at Francesca Today.

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.