WEBVTT - Feb 27th, Hour 1: Mid-tier outfielders, Puig, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy best

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever, m to to to to too, to die,

0:00:54.480 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>too too to din too yeo, says the Fantasy best

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever Here the Fantasy Sports Radio Network, alongside Fraggy Standfeld.

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I am Greg, So what's going on? Reggy? Happy hump

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>day here on a Wednesday, February continue talking about outfielders today.

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Should be a lot of fun, lot of hyped up

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>guys that we need to get to and whether or

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>not the hype should be real? Should it be in

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>this range? How do you attack these these tears of outfielders?

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>When do you draft him? So on and so forth.

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But before all that, Greg, how did you sleep last night? Bud?

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So great? It's great. This guy, No problems sleeping, It

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>was sus smeicster usually black night, Frank, has that ever

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>been a thing? A su smeister? How did I sleep

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>last night? Actually? Not too bad, not too bad? Better

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>than that? Did you having a while? It was? It

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>was better, It was better than usual. How do you feel?

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel? Lay? Do you feel like? Feel right? Yeah?

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel I feel right. I feel yeah, energized up,

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm good to go. Kna is out of town next

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>two nights. A lot of gears no, no, A lot

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of starting pictures, studying. That's that's what

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you got coming up here, all right. So I am, um,

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm engrossed in many things to day. Anything I know,

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:19.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just you know, I walk in. Greg is

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>just in his corner. He's doing his thing. He's not

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>talking to anybody. Usually a little bit more social, very

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>antisocial Greg today. So he's working on a lite. He's

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>got a lot on his mind. We got we go on.

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>We got a lot to go down the network. A

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of planned stuff coming up down

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the pipeline, which is awesome. Um, working with my blue

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to plan some draft stuff. But I'm also speaking

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of football. Uh, Dave Gentleman and Pat Sherman, we're speaking

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.519
<v Speaker 1>at the Combine today. We're gonna actually do as I

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>said yesterday, Combine show with Venture and Jim Day tomorrow

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>for the second hour. Jim Day trying to learn how

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to play Fortnite needs needs Chris Venture's help, So please

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>please get an update on that tomorrow. Yes, you know,

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll talk about the Combine, get everything down, but I

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>want to know about Jim Day's Fortnite career and how

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Back's coming along as well. Sure, I'll ask him. He

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>basically so that Pat Shermer basically came out and said, hey,

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 1>we want Eli Manning back like he's pretty good. I'm

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>just like, what the hell is going on? And then

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Dave Gentleman came out and I was like, yeah, I

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know yet. That's kind of interesting. Yeah, we get

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>draft somebody, we can sign somebody. I don't know. Yeah,

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of interesting. That's that's what Giants seven engrossed

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 1>in that. There's also a testimony going on that that

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I've been paying attention to as well. I did see

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 1>that you were watching that first thing when I walked

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in today. You did, did you see that some kind

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of political thing I thought I saw in your laptop. Yeah,

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the the former lawyer for President Trump is testifying at

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Congress today. I sorry, I expect you to have the input.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I was just I'm just letting you know what. Somebody

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in Congress evidently just said the words liar, liar, pants

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>on fire. So things seemed to be going great. That's

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>where that's where our government is today, where people are

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>saying liar, liar, that's on fire amazingly. All right, So

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>on the show today, very exciting. We're going to go

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>back into the out fielders where we were yesterday. Frankie.

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>We got through a bunch yesterday, which I feel good about.

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>We have through almost twenty. We have their nineteen out fielders.

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Pretty good for us. That's pretty over two hours, it's

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. Almost ten an hour, so that's pretty good.

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully we'll get to like another twenty today before

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you go. Frank is off tomorrow. So for the first hour,

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna wrap up outfielders with Venture. He doesn't know

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that yet, but then our number two Venture and Jim

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Day will join me to talk fantasy football from the combine.

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>What we're learning things like the Eli Manning UM press

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>conference that we just heard about. Uh, where certain prospects

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you can end up. We can try to work in

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>some guests for that as well, So we'll see if

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I can make that happen. But when it comes to outfielders, Frank,

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to with like guy just see a lot

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 1>of hype this year if you don't mind the guy

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that you said came off the board pretty early in

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>your UM Great Fantasy Baseball Invitational and someone that obviously

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of months ago I was very out

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>on and I want to see if you can get

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>me in on him. And that's y'r c l Pueak,

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>starting outfield with the Cincinnati's in a contract year. He's

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>going off the board right now over the last two

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>weeks or so any n FBC at around pick seventy

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>round Pick seventy in the NFBC over the last two

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>weeks or so, that's right around the guys we ended

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>with yesterday, the Lorenzo Kane, George Springer, and Tommy Fham.

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>And then right before guys like David Doald, Marcel Ozuna,

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Nick Castianos, Mitchi Hannager, and Eddie Rosario. Right spot, Frank,

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 1>and what do you think of y'all? C L. Peak.

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a problem with where he's going. I've

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>seen him go a lot of fifth round range in

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>fifteen team leagues. But I do think, you know, fifth

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>six round even if you're playing a twelve team or

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense. There's a lot of upside

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>here with ya. C L. Pleeak. I agree that there's

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>also some downside because of you know, he's kind of

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>he's a personality. You know, he's he's had some you know,

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>disciplinary issues over the past couple years with the Dodgers.

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe there was a quote that came out the

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>past couple of days that you know, Week said, you know,

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I was never really trying when I was in Los Angeles,

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 1>So you always have to worry about that aspect when

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Peek. But I if he is trying,

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>if he is motivated, you got yourself a hell of

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a ballplayer here in YAC Peak and when to Cincinnati,

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a better ballpark then Los Angeles. I mean, there's

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about that. Pretty damn good lineup here with

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the Reds from Joey Vado and Scooter Jeannette and and

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Jesse Winker and all these other guys that were getting

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>excited about a U. Henio Suarez y Peg is one

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of these guys in the middle rounds where he doesn't

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>really hurt you anywhere. Greg, you know, he's gonna hit

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty home runs. I think he has the upside to

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>hit thirty plus home runs this year in that ballpark.

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>And if he does that in that lineup, which if

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>he's in the middle of that lineup, we're looking at

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>good counting steps. I mean, eighty five nine r b

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I s a pretty solid run scored as well, and

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>he's not a zero on the base pats either. He's

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you twelve to fifteen stolen bases. I think

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the upside for Puig is, you know, to eighty thirty

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>plus home runs, good counting stats, fifteen stolen bases. What's

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>not's not? Like I think too, I think I think

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the upside could be even I think it'd be higher

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>than that, Greg, Like, I think there's another level that

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been reached yet with that we haven't really seen

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>since like his first second year when when he kind

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of like took the league by storm. I think two

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>eighties probably not realistic. He had just batted over two

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>eighties fourteen. That was five years ago already, Frankie, So

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know if two eighties realistic to me.

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Over the last three years to sixty three to sixty

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>three to sixty seven, that's pretty indicative. Like that hitter,

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>he is seventy career hitter. That is because you've had

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a three nineteen first two years after that it was

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>all downhill. Yeah, but that's what that's what his upside is.

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>That's that's where his talent level could be hadn't motivated

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of years. And you have to

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>think about it like this. You kind of a lot

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of back and forth between him and the Dodgers, like

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't play him every day. You know, they were

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to send him messages by disciplining him and you know,

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>not putting him in the lineup every day. He's going

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to play every day for the Reds. You're kind of

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>given me the narrative that we've but like, I feel

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>like what you're doing a little bit, frank is the

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>narrative who we always here around Yeastale Peak and there's

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>motivator's not motivated. He's playing for this, he's playing for that.

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>He said, had all this playing time this year, just

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>like you didn't get it last year. Na. We've heard

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>this a lot when it comes to Peak with the Dodgers.

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Will it change with a change of scenery perhaps, or

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>will it all be a debacle perhaps. I don't think

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>there's any sort of guarantee. I could say this to

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you if the Reds. No guarantee with anyone, no doubt.

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 1>But if the Reds are Reds are competing this year

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>or trying to compete, if they fall out of contention,

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Peak is a prime trade candidate for somebody in the outfield,

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about that. If as here, I mean there's

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of but everybody in this in this tip.

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>I actually think that the Reds are going to be

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. I think that they're going to be close

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 1>to a team. So you think even over that's a

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>significantly better than his then he put a hundred two games,

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>homer seventy seventy and fift last year games. He almost

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>matched that. I think he has the upside to be

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>better than that. I do. I do think that the

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>talent is there. You know. I think again, thirty home runs,

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>he could be eight and both at least if he's

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>batting fift in the Red's lineup, Gregg, look at this lineup.

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>If he's hitting right behind Votto, Suarez, Janette, which is

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>what roster resource has right now, or even if it's

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of even if it's Janette too and Votto three

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and Suarez four, he's hitting between three really good players

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and Jesse Winker if he leaves off, even if it's

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>not him, if it's Jose Pros, this is a great

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>lineup and it's a lot better ballpark then playing out

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>there in Los Angeles, and if he's motivated, I believe

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>this is a contract year from two. It is. That's

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:53.839
<v Speaker 1>why I say he's a prime train cadet, because a

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>contract year. Well, even if he gets traded somewhere, he's

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an everyday player maybe, but I don't think

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna getraded again. I think that. I think the

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Reds are gonna I think they're gonna take a step

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>up this year and they're gonna be better. I know

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you've said a lot about that. The Reds in general

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>are are going for it. I don't know that they

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>have the pitching to get it done. Obviously, Alex Woodsonny

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Gray are now there. Um, But the outfield, and we've

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>spoken about this before, there's a lot of names in here.

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of guys. A player that is going

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:23.719
<v Speaker 1>to be motivated to play for a contract, you'd think so.

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot of names. And I'll go through

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>with with you for a moment if I if I

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>may Yasuee, Scotty Chevler, Jesse Winker, Nick Senzel. They said

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>they're going to play in the outfield, right, that's four

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 1>guys right there. Winker and Cenzel are part of the future.

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>You would think, h he's Queen's Scott Cheveler part of

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the future. Probably not? Probably not. Who else is on

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that scene, anybody? I'm kempt Kemp Kemp part of the future. No,

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>but there's another there's another guy. There's another guy that

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>we help them win. Now you're talking about them winning. Now,

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that's another guy. That's five outfielders we just named. Ke

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Senzel has to get playing times somewhere in no way,

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.599
<v Speaker 1>shape or form, in danger of not playing. He's not.

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>We've said this before with the Dodgers. Man and then

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>you have guys like Scott Dance, like and Andrew Tooles

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>start for him. He's gonna play? Is playing this here

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>for a contract? I understand. Look, I know it's narrative.

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Even if you don't want to go by narratives. If

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you look over the past couple of seasons, he's worth

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>where he's being drafted. If he's giving you twenty five

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>runs in fifteen stolen bases with a two six seventy averards,

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>he's still worth being drafted where he is. And you

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>bacon the fact that he has this immense upside if

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>what he's saying is true about how he hasn't been

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>trying in the Red's lineup this year playing for a contractivations,

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't been trying. Come on, then the seventh game

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of the World Series, he wasn't trying. I mean maybe

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>he was trying hard in the playoffs, like whatever, I

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>don't buy any of that, man, I don't buy that. Now.

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers messed around him for so long over the past

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, and maybe he was warranted. Oh maybe

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it probably was probably over me. But they had they

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of had like a back and forth, like definitely

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>hate relationship to the he said the Miners got a

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>new start Cincinnati. Look, even if it's narrative driven, I'm

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying it. I'm in if I'm if I'm in

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the fifth round and I need a second outfielder and

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Tommy Fam is gone. Peak is the next name that

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at. You're pulling up Tweak over George Springer,

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>over Lorenzo Cane. You just told he's the next name

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at after Tommy Fam and you have Springer

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.839
<v Speaker 1>and Cane after. It's an active target, though, and I

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>think if you don't actually based on a DP, Tommy

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Fam goes after Springer and learns Okane. Anyway, it's not sure.

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Recording the n FBC over the last two weeks, Fams

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 1>at fifty nine, Springs at sixty three, Canes at sixty six. Okay,

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I have it in my rankings. I have Fam, Springer, Bryant,

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Lorenzo Cane, Pueak Pueeks after all of those guys. So

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>he's not the next target. He's after Lorenzo Caine, He's

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>O the four guys. Yes, Okay, so it's not My

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>point is he's not the next active target by any

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>means there's a lot of guys after that. I mean,

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't really I don't really want Springer like I'll

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 1>take him. If he's there, maybe I should just move

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>him up. All right, I'll do it, Greg, great, ware

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>you moving him to I can't move Brant, Okay, right,

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll just leave there. Okay, who's right behind? Who's right

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 1>behind your sale? He's not right behind Tommy fam I

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>just put him there. You said I'm not gonna move

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>my thought. I didn't realize you moved him and then

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>said not moving him. After that you're yelling at me.

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Then fine, that's that's what you're gonna do. Move them.

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 1>So you don't want your peak, you're out. I don't

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>want I'm out. But like the guys who talked about yesterday, Springer, Kane, certainly, Bryan,

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I want those guys ahead of the sale peak. Okay,

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>what does George Springer do better than the peak? Let

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>me pull up his fans. Don't mind runs scored, that's it.

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Let me hold on maybe one second, and I want

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to have the accurate information. I'm telling you what it is. Greg.

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I know swort Springer score a hundred runs. That's the

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>only category that he's better Thanagan the only category. There's

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 1>nothing else. Gave me a second. Here is going to

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>hit around the same home runs. He has the upsides

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to hit more home runs a bother outside from way

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>more RB with all those out fielders there can't hit

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>lefty seas well. I mean he does have like a

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>reverse split thing going on. But no, it doesn't worry Like,

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>who who are they gonna put in that so much

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>better against left teas Greig? Are they are they gonna

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>bench Yail Peak for Matt Camp? Yes, no they're not. Yes,

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it's possible. It's not possible. I'm telling you right now,

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not possible. You're not doing that. Ye Peak is

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>playing every single day. I think you get burned by

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Pea this year. I think it's a big burnability factor

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>here now that there's not for all of the guys

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in the area. Like that's what I like. That's what

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I like about like like like the Lorenzo Cane a

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit more like versus George Springer outside of runs,

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>What is George Springer better at? Not average, But they're

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be similar average, And I think Peak has I

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>think the upside too, And I think you could say

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the same thing about Spring about two three last year. Again,

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Pea hasn't batted over two eight and five years, right,

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>similar batting averages, similar batting average expect through to seventy.

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's say at A you're giving the home you're giving

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the home runs to. Even if that's similar, that's fine.

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that similar runs you're given the Springer. Yes, definitely,

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>RBIs definitely batting fifth in the red line up ringf

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>bringers beating leadoff. Okay, r bis for Springer stolen basis,

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you're definitely you definitely give thee no doubt about definitely

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>stolen basis. Springer, what is he gonna? Pretty similar? They're similar,

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty similar, but you have RBIs and stolen basis, but

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>they should be going into similar range, which which they are.

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I like Springing more because I don't think there's plain

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>tymeles I'll take. I'll take these stolen bases with who

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>don't it ranking first? By the way that I had,

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>did I that Cane in front of Sringer was also

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Remember I have Lorenzo Cane a little bit further behind.

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean the ten home runs and thirty eight RBIs

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>from last year. He gives you three categories that are

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>hard to come by. Can you give you said basis?

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>But it's a little bit harder to swallow those those

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>ten home runs thirty d r bi's with Lorenzo King,

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you have Pweak? Who do you have after Pweak?

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Right after before you moved him? Do you have after

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Peak head right after him? Conforto? Doll, Eddie Rosario. Let

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>me start with So Conforto is interesting because Conforto in

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the NFEC you get much later. You can get him

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty five picks after l Peak, David Dallas kind of

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>right after. Let me start with Doll and then we'll

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>get to Bed in just a moment, and I'll let

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you know this. Conforto is a guy that is shooting

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>up draft boards in industry and expert drafts. You know,

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>in your standard home league, whatever, non industry, non high

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>stakes draft, you're probably be able to get Conforto, you know,

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>round seven, round eight, something like that. I know Modica

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>every like if if Conforto is available in the fifth round,

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Motica takes him every time. There's eight outfielders right now

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in the NFBC over the last two weeks that are

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>in between ya C. L. Peak and like a good

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>farto in the draft, which is very interesting. Like I

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>said about five picks was a breaker right real quick.

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>David dal Marcello, Zudo, Nick Castianos, Adye Rozario, Bitch, Hanager,

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Joey Gallo, Justin Upton. And here's the interesting one, Victor Roadless.

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>You hold those eight guys. That's what we're gonna talk

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>about when we come back. Well, Myers coming up at

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>some point today as well. Michael Brandley and A. J. Pollock,

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>our Nicks as well. We have a lot of guys

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to get to. We'll do our best here. I'm the

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy best Friends rout Daily roado dot Com learned from

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the game's best DFS players. We don't just give you advice.

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>We play every day, all major sports, all year round.

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and custom projections,

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>and now the Daily Roado dot Com Optimizer in minutes

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>build an optimized line up for cash games and tourneys.

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Learned from the game's best DFS players joined Daily roado

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com. The following ad contains wocking material. Listener discretion

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is advised. Is someone in your family playing a dangerous

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>game of Russian roulette. Over forty three thousand people die

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a year from drug overdose, a hundred and twenty people

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a day, five people every hour, one person every twelve minutes.

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Eight thousand people die every year from alcohol abuse. Over

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and forty people a day, ten an hour,

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>one person every six minutes. Somebody you know. Maybe next

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>learn how to help someone you love get away from

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the drugs, alcohol, and bad influences. With the f m

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:40.239
<v Speaker 1>l A, people can take a leave of absence from

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>their job and still keep it. Call now and learn

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>how a week can help you. Eight six six four

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>eight four nine six two one eight six six four

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>eight four nine six two one. That's eight six six

0:18:55.359 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 1>four eight four ninety six twenty one Scout Fantasy Sports

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Byron Buxton has two home runs and ten r b

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I s after two games. What round would you take

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>him in? I took Buckston and I think in the

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>f S t A like around twelve or thirteen. I

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>thought that was a good time to take him there.

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>His dadp is absolutely going up. People say the spring

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. They're full of crap because they're already boosting

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 1>him up based on two games week days to the

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 1>four pm Eastern on the Fantasy Sports Network and on

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>your popular podcast providers. If the Incubus fan you'd like

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>some nineties alternative, alternative, alternative pop, I guess yeah, right,

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>big fan, it's my music. Man game Morancy is in

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>or out? What was the what was the feel of

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the vibe that you got from gibe? You know this genre?

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:01.479
<v Speaker 1>How do think he hates as much as you think

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 1>he would. I would just me personally, I would imagine

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>that he would hate it. I don't think so, because

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you know he's a big he's a big metal head.

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Obviously you've ever heard any of his music. Doesn't really

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>sound like bring Back the Rope, Bring Back the Rope,

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't It doesn't really sound like like Gin Blossoms or

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>count just thinking it'd be all right, just karash hit

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>on that cut his mike. That not great, Bob, not great, Craig.

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Not to say that. I'm not a fan of the

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>music that Big likes either. Like the music he's produced,

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, big metallic guy. Yeah, I like everything Greg

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>bring back the Rope, please all please, all part everything,

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think Dave Matthews guy no, no, definitely out

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:53.959
<v Speaker 1>on that. Not not a big country music fan. Definitely

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>out on country music. A lot of you know, Flora

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Flora has me appearing in the show cups here. Hopefully

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>he's got him in here here. Isn't it too big

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>for us? True? He's too big, He was too big

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of a head, big time Michael Floria what he is? Yeah,

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>big time. Probably it's probably getting up there. He's engaged out.

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>He'll probably forget about his bff he's eating, of which

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 1>I texted the bff chat last night. No response from anybody,

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.959
<v Speaker 1>he did, you know? I also I texted you last night.

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I texted you last night directly response about what it

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>probably didn't happen region Jack here you cars ready, h

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you texted me immediately obviously I responded, because you sent

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>me like five in a row. No no, no, no, no, no, no,

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>forget those forget those wrestling ones? Would you you know?

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>It was fine? Didn't care about that seven pm? I

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>texted you. I didn't. Yeah, I didn't know what that

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>was about. Are you kidding me? He just made it up?

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Wilma Flora Flora bomb yesterday? Well, yeah, it was probably

0:21:56.359 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>off some you know high eight No, no, no, to

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>loot that up now, like Wilmer Flores is hitting bombs

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>off good pitchure. He's gonna be on our teams to

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>get ready next week with drafting him. You know that, right,

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't be more clear. You should occupy your middle

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>infield spot with someone that can at least contribute and

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>stone basis, I'd say Wilmor was not gonna do it.

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>His basis clearing double. Excuse me, a bassis clearing double?

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>All right? Who did it come against Cubs? Picture? Hang

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>on video? Is he dr Wish? Now? You know his

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>hands are gonna be Dr Wish? Fross his name is

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>f Ross. He's regulated to Tyson Ross and Joe Ross. No,

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>like his last name is e F f R. O Oh,

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>he he's a spot. Scott FROs is a star prospect. No,

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>he's not sure. I'm not sure he's a that's who

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Wilmer Flores. I think he's a big s here. I

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>think he's a big time proms. Look at Zach Godliess

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>day picking up right where he left us three walks

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and three. Scott Ross last year was in double A.

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Scott Frost. By the way, yesterday Scotts had a five

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:07.239
<v Speaker 1>point nine and seven r A double A last year.

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's great for Scott. Hopefully one with

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Florence can face him every day. Greg God, it will

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>got it Will Okay, doesn't seem David dal. I think

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a perfect name. He gets you because it doesn't

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 1>even Doll was a hype guys the last year two

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:23.479
<v Speaker 1>years ago. I don't even remember two years years ago.

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 1>It was two years ago. He's a huge hype guy.

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>It's twenty two years old and I was saying, well,

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>this guy I probably not gonna start, and he didn't.

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>He got hurt. It was a completely lost year. Last year.

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Got an opportunity to play, and there was a little, hey,

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:36.679
<v Speaker 1>come back guy in David dom and it took him

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a while, but when he finally came up for good,

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>he produced, for the most part, sixteen home runs in

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven games, betting two seventy three at forty eight Ribbies,

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty one runs scored, and five stolen bases. The thought

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>is that Will been everyday player in the outfield this year,

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and he plays for Colorado. So, barring Carlos Gonzalez returning

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>to Colorado in some storm of fashion, some sort of fashion,

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Tal is expected to start every day, are you buying

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>back in the hype. I like David Doll. I don't

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>know that I love him as much as everybody else does.

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I kind of get it with davidal obviously

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>he plays in Colorado. I worry about I worry about

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the injuries, Greg, because you know, with David Doll, he

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>played seventy seven games last year in two thousand and eighteen,

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and then he played a total of nineteen games in

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the minor leagues, and in sten he played you know,

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 1>sixty three games at the major league level. He also

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>did play in the minor leagues that year. But I

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>worry a little bit about the injury risk here with

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>David dal thirty seven percent hard hit rate last year

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>looks sixteen home runs in seventy seven games. You know

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone's looking, ah, well, you know you just multiplied that

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>by two. He's gonna play a hundred fifty games. Is

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna hit thirty home runs in the Rockies lineup. There's

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely upside here. The battleball profile is solid, line drive

0:24:56.000 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 1>ratey percent fly balls. I like David Doll. I don't

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>know that I love him as as much as everyone else.

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm just a little bit more realistic with

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>David dal Like he'll probably have a d L stand

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>at some point this year, but twenty five home runs

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>with a two seventy five average, ten stolen bases. He's

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of a similar player what we expect out of

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>your pleague, except I think there's a little bit more

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>injury risk. You know, the upside is they're playing in Colorado.

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>He's projected to bat clean up in this lineup, so

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the RBI opportunities are going to be there. I will

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>say this, he's um. He's struggled against left handed pitching

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 1>so far in his career at the in the majors,

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:38.680
<v Speaker 1>he's um. He's a seven ten OPS guy against lefties,

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>whereas he is a nine oh four ops against right

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>handed pitching in his career. So he's got some struggles

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.479
<v Speaker 1>against lefties. Roster resource doesn't have him as a platoon.

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>They expect him to play every single day. You know,

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I think to seventy five to eighty uh Homeme runs,

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>ten stolen basis, solid counting stats. It's fine. You know,

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.199
<v Speaker 1>I like David Doll. I don't know that I love

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>as much as everyone else. I think David is fine. Ultimately,

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I got we gotta haven't done this in a while,

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>but one word to describe David dollas like it's fine

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to me, He's fine. There's there's nothing wrong with taking

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>David Doll. I don't know that the upside is as

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:13.959
<v Speaker 1>high as many people or many experts want to tell

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you it. You want to see I want to see

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>him stay healthy. Here's the thing. If he stays healthy

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>for an entire year, plays a hundred fifty games, and

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>then takes off, then you're not getting him at the

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>same price next year. Then we're looking at davidal next

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:27.640
<v Speaker 1>year as a third round pick as opposed to where

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>you're getting him now in the sixth round. So that's

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>what you know. Sometimes you gotta you gotta try and

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>buy in on the upside before before it happens. You

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>have to take that risk. I mean, it comes down

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to Rochester construction. You need some other guys on your

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>team already that are that are safer. Look, when I

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 1>get to this tier a David dal in team league

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna end up being your outfielder too. I feel

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>much better about him as my outfield three. And and

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the point I really wanted to hammer home today, Greg

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is when I get to this tier right, which I

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:00.200
<v Speaker 1>have it as tier four, which is kind of want

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of in this range from Lorenzo Kane, Canford, oh Doll, Rosario, Haneger,

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Castano's Zuna Upton, I want one of these guys to

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>be my outfielder three. Like to me, this is the

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>last tire before you really get into there's a little

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a few more question marks in the next tier.

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>So I want I want at least you know, I

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>want a really good outfielder in in rotal legue. I

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>want someone that we spoke about yesterday in the first

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 1>two rounds, maybe like a like a black Man or

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a Harper or one of the Yankees guys, or or

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Yellow or a kunya Um. But at this point in

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 1>the draft, I want one of these guys to be

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 1>my third outfielder, or even if I get two of them,

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I get to like this is the

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>cut off where after this tire is gone, I want

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 1>to have three outfielders. And I can use, you know,

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 1>my Great Fantasy Baseball Invitational team as an example. I

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>drafted Harper, I drafted Haneger. I have two outfielders. I'm

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>we're about to be in the twelfth round. I don't

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:58.880
<v Speaker 1>have a third outfield yet, and I don't feel great

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>about it. So if if I would have taken you know,

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I keep saying one of the things I regret is

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I took labor Touris in the fifth I should have

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>taken one of these outfielders in the fifth round, and

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>then I would have have I would have had like

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Hannegger the next round as my third outfielder, and then

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>also would have had like doll Or Confordo, and I

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>would have felt a lot better about that, because you know,

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>once you get into these like Ian Desmond, Ramon Oriano,

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you know if you don't, you don't Dickerson, you don't

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>love those guys. Jesse winker Uh, you know some of

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>these players have upside, But do you really want you

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>want to fill out your OUTFITL four and five spots

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>with those players? Now your outfield three spot, I want,

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want three at the top. Let's say

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty five. As as my top three outfielders. You mentioned

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that Michael Confordo was around here as well. I said

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it was thirty five picks away when it came to

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the NFBC ADP as of now, but as Frank mentioned,

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>it is rising becauld f twenty five years old that

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a breakout starring campaign in team where he has seven

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>home runs in a hundred nine games, hurt his shoulder

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of the year, came back last year,

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>was not the same early on due to that shoulder injury,

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>played in a hundred and fifty three d games, though,

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>came back in early April and wound up hitting twenty

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>eight home runs. He walks a very good amount at

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>thirteen over strikes out around five percent, but the average

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>plummeted last year from eight to around two three O

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>b P three four to three fifty. A lot of that,

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, is due to what he did early in

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the year, where he simply was not healthy. He's pretty

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>much the same guy against left these in righties, which

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you obviously like. If you look at the first half

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the second half, that's where you'll find the stark difference.

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>In the first half he only bet at to sixteen,

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>had eleven home runs in the second half in less games,

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>more home runs, a better average. I think the second

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>half is more indicative of what Michael Conforto is And

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>for those that think that Michael Confordo could be an

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 1>over thirty home run guy that could have close to

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a hundred RB I I don't. I don't see anything

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that would change my mind about that. I think the

0:29:56.360 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>player that Conforto is and we one him to be,

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>isn't necessarily our in judge. I don't think he has

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that kind of ceiling. But I do think he is

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a guy that he's better than he's shown as long

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>as he can remain healthy, and I expect he did

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that last year. But three games last year after missing

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the first few in April. Once he got healthy in

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the second half and we know shoulder injuries ken Linger

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>for a little while, he seemingly was back to normal.

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I like Michael Goodford a lot, and I think he

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>deserves to be in this tier. Yeah. I like him

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot as well. Not gonna give you anything really

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in the stolen base categories, but really, what he did

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>in that second half, I agree with you, Greg. It's

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>closer to the player that I expect him to be,

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>even dating back to his days in college. This guy

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is a professional hitter. I trust against lefties. I trust

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>him against righties as well. I don't think that the

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>splits are going to be, you know, all that bad idea.

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna play every single day for the New York Mets,

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a lineup that's getting some hype here in the preseason

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Greg with Robinson Cano and Wilson Ramos and Pete Alonso

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and Jeff McNeil and all these guys, it's an improved lineup.

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And you know that second half where he hit to

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>seventy three with eighteen home runs, that's what you know,

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I think to seventy that that's kind of a spot

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>that where living in here with a lot of these

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>aut faelers that we're gonna talk about. To seventy to

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>two seventy five solid doesn't really help your batting average

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:09.479
<v Speaker 1>all that much, but doesn't hurt it either. It's kind

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 1>of like we're right around where you want your your

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>batting average to be in Rohto, you know, Rhoto, you

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>really want your average to be, you know, I two

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>seventies to you know, to seventies six to seventy eight,

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>around that area where I do think a lot of

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>these out feelers that we're talking about are going to

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>be this season, But in seventy to seventy five, I

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>think it could be a thirty home run hitter in

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the second half lest year, the hard hit rate goes

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>up to thirty percent. He was he was rushed back

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>last year. He had major offseason surgery going from between eighteen.

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>He kind of rushed himself back, and he was affected

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the batting average, the power, everything was affected early on

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in the season last year because of that shoulder injury.

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I trust more what we saw in the second half

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Greg as a and it's not just me carrying over

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the second half numbers. I think there was there's a

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>legit reason to carry over the second half numbers because

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>he got healthier as the season went on last year

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and we to see more of the real player that

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Conforto is. I like him really really regardless of format too,

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>because even in points leagues, Okay, he'll strike out a

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:10.719
<v Speaker 1>decent amount, you know, but he also walks a lot.

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>So he's gonna walk twelve thirteen percent of the time.

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>He's a professional hitter. I trust him Greg, and you know,

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I actually trust him a little bit more than uh

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>then David Dald because I think there's a little bit

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.040
<v Speaker 1>more uh, there's a little more injury concern exact. David

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Doald I get it's the course field thing. I have

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Conforto once spot hiher, He's he's my outfield twenty two.

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I would be pretty excited about him. Looking at this,

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I would actually prefer to have Michael Confordo the David

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Doll as well. I think the upsides higher, I really do.

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>And maybe it's the injuries. Maybe, And I know the

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>ballpark is obviously a big thing, city field versus course field,

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>but runs twenty runs back to back years. Let's see

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 1>davidal gets twenty five right, like the same sting, healthy

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 1>enough and has done a little bit more. He's a

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>little more established, he's still younger, like a good Porto

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>just twenty five six on Friday. He has another step

0:32:57.680 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that he can take. And you know, I've talked about

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>this a lot. I don't know how translatable it's gonna be,

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>but I think, you know, Conforto having a guy like

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Robinson Canoe in the lineup, approven lefty, that another professional

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>hitter in his major league career, I don't think that hurts,

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I kind of buy in on some of

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>these narrative things where you know, if they bring in

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a veteran who can be relatable for a young player

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to kind of learn from. I think it makes sense.

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I think robertson Cano being in the lineup for the

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Mets and having that veteran presence he's been around a

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>long time, especially playing in New York before, Like he

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>knows kind of what's expected of you to play in

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 1>New York and perform. And I think he's gonna be

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>able to help Kimforto. So I kind of like that too.

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Fan Gufts loves David duhl u Conforto. They say he

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>hits into the shift a lot. It's a summary. Well

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of a trend for all left handed hitters,

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>is you know again we you know, we kind of

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>spoke about this yesterday where with the shift, they're putting

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>an extra guy in right field and a lot of

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>people are trying to hit over the shift. My Goodfordo

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>is a guy that does hit a lot of line drives,

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>so I try, you know, and he's a guy that

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I trust um a little bit more to go to

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>all fields. I know you didn't necessarily see it last

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>year with Kinfordo, I mean pull rate, but look, ineen,

0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 1>when he was actually fully healthy, hit seven home runs

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and a hundred and nine games. His pull rate was

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>only he hit a lots to center field of the time,

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and he also went op so in Porto was a

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>professional hitter. I know he pulled a lout last year,

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 1>but as you know, as he gets further away from

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that surgery, you're gonna see more and more that he

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>is a professional hitter. Where if teams are going to

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>try and shift him, I think that he's a guy

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that can actually go the opposite way and kind of

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 1>take what the what the what the shift is giving him.

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:45.359
<v Speaker 1>So I don't really worry about that all too much.

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 1>With Kinfordo, not a high praise here for Mike would

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>be happy Florida store right now, allow Mike, your guy

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 1>last year was Nick Castianos, Big Nikki C. Who falls

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>into this right. We had Big Nicky teen Florio gave

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the nickname Big Nicky T. It sounded like sound like

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the lead singer of a boy band. Now we got

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Big Nikki C. So Nick Castianos in the last two

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 1>years back to back years of a hundred and fifty

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 1>seven games played. His year in early similar to that

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>year in seventeen, he had three less home runs but

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 1>had fifteen more runs scored, he had twelve less r

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>V I is probably directly recorrelated to me. Barramis in

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the entire season didn't really strike out, walked up. Okay,

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:36.399
<v Speaker 1>him out seven percent last year six percent the year before.

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Average jumped up twenty six points, directly correlated to his babbit,

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>which jumped about fifty points. Direct correlation there. Cassiano is

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>going in this range despite having a hard hit rate

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:54.760
<v Speaker 1>at almost forty eight percent, which obviously helps the babbit.

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:57.799
<v Speaker 1>His groundball rate dropped for one year one a year

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 1>two thirty five percent, and the home run a fly

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>ball ratio, you know, kind of similar as well. You'd

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>like Castianos to hit a bit more home runs. Maybe

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 1>he gets trained, he goes to a better part, he

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>will do that. The Castiano is another one of those

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 1>guys that I like. You know, sure, nothing wrong with

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the Castianos. How do you compare him to a guy

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:22.239
<v Speaker 1>like davidl and a guy like Michael Conford? So I

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.879
<v Speaker 1>have him a few spots behind. I think we kind

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of know who can Castianos is at this point. I know,

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you see the three sixty one bad from last year

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of jumps off the page. But forty eight percent

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 1>hard hit rate and a twenty line drive rate. So

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Castanos is one of the best line drive pure hitters

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 1>in the game right now. Where Okay, if he's hitting

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the ball hard and hitting that many line drives, like,

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:45.359
<v Speaker 1>of course, he's gonna have a high bad he's gonna

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>have a high batting average. You know, the past two

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 1>of the past three years he's been to eighty five

0:36:50.000 --> 0:36:51.840
<v Speaker 1>or higher. I do think that's kind of that's closer

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to the player he is. I think he's a to

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>eighty to nine, five to three hitters. If he would

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 1>ever learn to lift the ball a little bit more

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and hit more flyballs, I think he has the upside

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to be like a three hitter with thirty home runs

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and a hundred RBIs. But he kind of is who

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>he is at this point. Has nearly three thousand plate

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 1>appearances the major vue level runs five and eighty five

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>with a near three under batting average WRED category player

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:23.879
<v Speaker 1>in round six. I'm fine with it. It's good. We'll

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 1>break it down. Continue to do it. The Fantasy Sports

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 1>Network is hitting you from all angles with the best

0:37:30.880 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 1>fantasy sports and betting analysis. You can catch the latest

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 1>programming on so many platforms. There's no way you'll miss

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 1>out on any of the award winning programming we pump

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 1>out every single day. You can listen through the f

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>t s Y Radio app, iHeart Radio, tune in Radio, Stitcher,

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:47.880
<v Speaker 1>download our podcast through iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Audio Boom,

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and you can watch select programming on the f T

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>s Y YouTube channel. The Fantasy Sports Network your only

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 1>source for fantasy sports and wagering any time and anywhere.

0:37:57.480 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Warri Salon two thousand and fifteen to the was in

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the sixteen European Long Drive Tour Champion two thoeventeen World

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 1>number one. Be personally, I keep my game face on

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>me all the time, especially coming out of the bunker,

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 1>leaving the right range, or even leaving the boys. What's

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:24.839
<v Speaker 1>your story? Go to game based grouping dot com from

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>all your athletic facial wipes and body cleansing kneed brings,

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 1>make it rain. No other league holds guys accountable for

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>smoking weed. The NBA does, in Major League Baseball, does

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>in hockey, does in and the Cowboys Now they're gonna

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>have this suspension, right DeMarcus Lawrence, and nobody knows what's

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen, with him. So now all of a sudden,

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys defriends went from being pretty damn good

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:47.400
<v Speaker 1>now I don't know what the hell of Dallas Cowboys

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 1>are going to be. And it's all because the NFL

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>is got their head up there weekdays six and nine

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>am Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking on your popular podcast.

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:59.799
<v Speaker 1>Providers can't get enough fantasy football road To Experts as

0:38:59.840 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>long's there. NFL three six five Fantasy Football package, which

0:39:03.120 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>includes the best math based seasonal projections they're making, is

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 1>available anywhere on the Internet. Davis Madigan the Rohto Experts

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:12.720
<v Speaker 1>are providing dynasty, season long betting, best ball, and NFL

0:39:12.840 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Draft content every day of the year to give you

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:17.799
<v Speaker 1>an edge regardless of what type of fantasy football you play.

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Say temper cent at roto Experts dot com with the

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>promo code Evan T s Y. It's the NFL three

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:27.919
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football package only at Rhoto Experts dot Com. Joined

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:30.479
<v Speaker 1>the Experts live on the air every day by calling

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 1>in at April four, six, seven nine to join the

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Network. This is one of the songs where

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and everyone was like you and me, we come from

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:03.279
<v Speaker 1>differing world you like loving me as a look at

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the girls. Sometimes you're crazy and I want to I'll

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:13.919
<v Speaker 1>social baby. Yeah, the dolphins make me cry. Well, there's

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 1>nothing I can do. Oh, we gotta set up a

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>karaoke night. I want to see Gabe at karaoke. That's

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:30.759
<v Speaker 1>what I think. I don't think that that's necessarily the case,

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 1>but if we, if I could get some video of

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Gabe doing like Slayer, Hey Slayers, an example where there

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>we've got you covered, by the way. The Fantasy Sports

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Network live programming from six am through eleven pm Eastern

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Time cut up. Next, it's Scout Fantasy with Ronus and

0:40:45.680 --> 0:40:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Dr Rhodo, game Rezzi Cam Stewart take over at four

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>game time Decisions, you hear the Fantasy Sports in your Network.

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Seven PM, will the NBA takeaways Chris Welsh and Bogman.

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Seven thirty you get the Fantasy Mules Dusk with Dan

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Shuffer from eight to eleven PM called the Shots on

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>our guy, Keith Irizari. And then tomorrow morning six and

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:07.879
<v Speaker 1>nine Joe and Dane will be back for making rain

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and nine It twelve Joe will heal the game MORENCY

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 1>four the morning after and then check it out. That's

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 1>sports where your network. I just pulled up Big Nikki

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>ce that's Nick Castanos's Baseball Savant stat cast page. And

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:23.840
<v Speaker 1>each of the past three seasons, his expected batting average

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 1>has been to eighty eight or higher. So he's been

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in the top seven percent of the league in that

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 1>category in each of the past three years. So if

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you're in those middle rounds, round six, round seven range,

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 1>and you know you need you want to four you

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 1>want solid home runs, RBIs and runs. But someone who's

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:42.959
<v Speaker 1>actually going to help your batting average too, who's gonna

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:45.840
<v Speaker 1>give you a you know, to ninety ish batting average.

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Nick cas Sano says, your guy. But just no, you're

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:51.479
<v Speaker 1>not getting any stolen basis from him. But again, something

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 1>that I should have stressed more throughout this draft that

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing right now is batting average. I I gotta

0:41:56.800 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I gotta scour the batting average landscape years to rout

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the draft because I just didn't stress

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 1>it enough. So that that is me giving you my

0:42:05.280 --> 0:42:07.839
<v Speaker 1>wisdom and learning from my own mistakes. Here is, if

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you play in a rotal league, make sure you stress

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 1>outfield and batting average early on in your drafts. All right,

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 1>there you go, the Castianos. One of these guys later

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 1>on you can draft on the wrong. Nothing wrong with them,

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 1>not wrong at all. How many times can we use

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the word fine to describe a player? Because I think

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Cassano is fine, kind of like David dal who would

0:42:28.640 --> 0:42:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you have? You have dollar like ten more stone basis

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing you think he's like, you think he

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:40.280
<v Speaker 1>had twelve little basing David, I think, okay, definitely doable. Interesting.

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:43.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, Another guy that's around this tier is the

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 1>guy that you drafted in the Great Fantasy Baseball Invitational,

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 1>and it's Mitch Hanneger. Twenty eight years old. Is Mitch

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Hannegar now and last year was the first time in

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 1>his career he played a hundred games. In fact, he

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 1>played a hundred and fifty seven of them, and they

0:42:57.040 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 1>were a hundred fifty seven pretty good games for the

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Marrigers. Wenty six hovers, ninety runs, score, ninety three ribs,

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 1>eight stolen basis. He batted two eighty five, walked over

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>ten percent at the time, struck out a bit over

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty one percent at the time. The hard hit rate,

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 1>it's over league average. Live drive rabies about while his

0:43:16.520 --> 0:43:18.480
<v Speaker 1>home in the fly ball ratio remained the same from

0:43:18.920 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 1>seen to It's a long time for Mitch Haniger to

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>finally break out he did last year for Seattle, if

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 1>you believe it, Why is he going behind some of

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the guys that we've named. People are worried about the

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Mariners lineup, and I can't really defend it all

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:40.319
<v Speaker 1>of that much, especially when they're likely expected to trade

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Edwin Incarnacion at some point, but not yet. He's still

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:46.440
<v Speaker 1>on tea. Yeah, still on the team for now, right,

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:48.759
<v Speaker 1>So I'll run through this lineup. I don't I don't

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 1>think it's as bad as everyone is saying. Right, So

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:54.839
<v Speaker 1>you have Malix Smith, Mitch Hanneger, j Bruce, Edwin Incarnacio,

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and Kyle Seger, Domingo Santana who's getting high fit and

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 1>having a good spring, Omart Vias, Tim Beckham, and D Gordon.

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at Handegar batting second, he basically

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 1>has two back to back leadoff men like once they

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>get through the lineup, once he has D Gordon and

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:14.920
<v Speaker 1>then Malex Smith hitting ahead of him. So I still

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:16.960
<v Speaker 1>think the RBI opportunities are going to be there. Look,

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the lineup is not as good as it has been

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 1>in years past. I realized that there's no Robinson can know,

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:23.719
<v Speaker 1>there's no Nelson Cruiz, but they've done their best to

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of replace those guys Edwin and Carnacione. He's about

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:30.360
<v Speaker 1>as close to Nelson Cruz as you're gonna get, right, Like,

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna probably still hit thirty to thirty five home

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 1>runs this year. J Bruce a little bit worse than

0:44:36.040 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Robinson can know. I think we can say that. So

0:44:38.840 --> 0:44:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I think people are worried about the Mariners lineup, and

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that's why he goes a little bit later. He's a

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:46.280
<v Speaker 1>guy who I think Handeger is safe for two seventy

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>five to eight d batting average. You know, the hard

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:51.800
<v Speaker 1>hit rate was above league average. The county stats probably

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>take a little bit of a step back. They were

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>both ninety runs and ninety RBIs last year. That's probably

0:44:56.040 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>closer to eight runs and a d r BIS this year.

0:44:58.280 --> 0:45:03.160
<v Speaker 1>But you home runs with eight to ten stolen bases

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in a in a two seventy five batting average, He's fine.

0:45:06.960 --> 0:45:09.399
<v Speaker 1>This is the fine tier. Like if you're really worried

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:11.840
<v Speaker 1>about the Mariners line up, and that's why you're probably

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 1>taking somebody else in this range over him. And to

0:45:14.719 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 1>be fair, you know that the only big concern here, Reggie,

0:45:17.800 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>that you're concerned with the Mariners line up. That's it,

0:45:19.800 --> 0:45:22.360
<v Speaker 1>That's all you got, Yeah, I mean, what else is

0:45:22.400 --> 0:45:24.359
<v Speaker 1>wrong with him? Nothing? That's on my point that he's

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 1>really good. Yeah, there's nothing else that worries me about him.

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>He's but like okay, in games in seventeen, he was

0:45:30.040 --> 0:45:32.279
<v Speaker 1>an eighty three OPS player. Last year in a hundred

0:45:32.320 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven games, he was player. It's kind of who

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 1>he is. But the other but the other guys that

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:40.759
<v Speaker 1>you the other guys that you mentioned, David Dald major

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 1>injury concerns and the Rockies are always flifty, but higher

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 1>upside and better line up. Sure, yeah, yeah, they're kind

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of similar in their line is terrible. Well, I have

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 1>hanneger one so could for you like the line up

0:45:58.120 --> 0:45:59.799
<v Speaker 1>and you think the upside higher again, I guess yeah,

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:02.480
<v Speaker 1>he's still younger, you know, Hannager is not old by

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:05.520
<v Speaker 1>any means either. All right, a little bit older than

0:46:05.560 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought. Kind of a late bloom prospects here. Um

0:46:09.360 --> 0:46:12.279
<v Speaker 1>came over in the what was that right from the

0:46:12.400 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 1>from the Diamondbacks. Yeah, and he was Hannager was a

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 1>guy in the minor leagues who this is kind of

0:46:17.200 --> 0:46:18.960
<v Speaker 1>who he was to like you know, twenty like a

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit of pop, a little bit of speed. I

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:22.960
<v Speaker 1>don't expect a lot of stolen bases, you know, eight

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to ten. But again, like if he has de Gordon

0:46:25.920 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and Malex Smith hitting ahead of him, there's still gonna

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:31.719
<v Speaker 1>be some RBI opportunities here. That's why I don't want

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to That's why there's my trade off. Like all their

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 1>pieces come like all star break around, like you know,

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 1>trade deadline that they might get some of these guys.

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 1>They won't give it to Hannegar. He's fine, that would

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>like him before as my outfielder. Three though, So you

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:47.640
<v Speaker 1>know in the if you're in those middle rounds and

0:46:47.680 --> 0:46:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you can get or doll or even you know me personally,

0:46:51.600 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I would love to get Tommy fam Or if you

0:46:54.120 --> 0:47:00.200
<v Speaker 1>could get fam We Lorenzo Kane or you know, could

0:47:00.239 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 1>four to or dollars or outfield too. I think a

0:47:03.000 --> 0:47:05.200
<v Speaker 1>guy you know coming back around maybe the next round

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 1>or two, if you could get Casteano's or Hanniger, someone

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in that like those guys, is your outfield three. I

0:47:12.480 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's really good roster construction. I like that a lot.

0:47:15.920 --> 0:47:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I can see us in our auction, by the way,

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:19.359
<v Speaker 1>just drafting two of these guys as our outfield two

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and three. Realistically, Yeah, I can see us doing that well,

0:47:22.560 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 1>assuming they don't get too much hype. We'll take you

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 1>like him a lot. Marcelo Zuna is an interesting name

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:33.239
<v Speaker 1>that that's going around here as well. Frankie Um as

0:47:33.280 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 1>soon as another A little more concerned here with me. Yeah,

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Morricello is soona. He's kind of a mystery right now.

0:47:38.239 --> 0:47:40.560
<v Speaker 1>You don't that's he hasn't been on the field, So

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that's my shoulder surgery. Morricello Zuna is very good. Last

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 1>year is eerily similar to the Marlins, like earily similar,

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 1>played in at eight games in each year, hit exactly

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:59.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty three home runs in each year to sixty six average.

0:47:59.400 --> 0:48:05.319
<v Speaker 1>It's when you say sixteen to eighty average. Looking at

0:48:05.360 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>these numbers, do you think that the player that we

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:12.759
<v Speaker 1>saw last year, the player we saw that sixteen is

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:15.799
<v Speaker 1>the real Marzello Zuna or is it the breakout guy

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that we saw played a hundred fifty nine games, seventeen

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:21.280
<v Speaker 1>almost forty home runs with almost a hundred thirty rives

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 1>batting over three hundred. Like, what do you make of

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Marzello Zuna. I do think he's better than what he

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:30.799
<v Speaker 1>showed last year, but he has to be healthy, which

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:32.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe this is one of the questions for

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:37.360
<v Speaker 1>dr A Tomorrow. Um. You know, we haven't seen Marcello

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Zuna in spring training yet and Cardinals manager Mike Schiltz

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 1>said on Monday that the timeline for Ozuna is to

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 1>play left Uh, the timeline for Ozuna to play left

0:48:48.040 --> 0:48:54.200
<v Speaker 1>field is quote unclear, So that is that's worrisome. Again,

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 1>he had offseason shoulder surgery in October. Um, you know,

0:48:57.760 --> 0:49:00.279
<v Speaker 1>shoulder is something that could affect the power, and I

0:49:00.320 --> 0:49:01.760
<v Speaker 1>think that was something that he was kind of playing

0:49:01.800 --> 0:49:04.320
<v Speaker 1>through last year too. I think he's better than what

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 1>he told last season, but he has to be healthy.

0:49:06.080 --> 0:49:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Do I know that right now? I don't like if

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I knew he was healthy though, based on what he

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:12.040
<v Speaker 1>did last year right like he was playing through injury.

0:49:12.160 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>He had a forty hard hit rate. Greig, you know

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that that's that's elite, that's very good. You know, a

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:20.920
<v Speaker 1>forty percent hard hit rate, although he still hits a

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:23.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of ground balls. His home run A fly ball ratio,

0:49:24.440 --> 0:49:25.839
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that he hit the ball as hard

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:28.440
<v Speaker 1>as he did, should have been higher than four. So

0:49:28.680 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he's probably closer to a thirty home run hitter.

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 1>And the Cardinals line up with Paul Gelschman in it,

0:49:33.600 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a very good lineup, so Izunna expected to back

0:49:36.640 --> 0:49:39.520
<v Speaker 1>clean up here. He he has upside to be, you know,

0:49:39.680 --> 0:49:41.719
<v Speaker 1>to eighty to ninety with thirty home runs and a

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:46.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred RBIs he has a little bit more or category

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:48.359
<v Speaker 1>upside than some of these other players in this range.

0:49:48.920 --> 0:49:51.120
<v Speaker 1>But I have him behind all of them just because

0:49:51.160 --> 0:49:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't really know much about the shoulder

0:49:53.640 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. I don't. I don't think anybody does. So

0:49:56.120 --> 0:49:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that kind of injury risk and I guess

0:49:59.239 --> 0:50:03.000
<v Speaker 1>ambiguity he's the word. Um is why I have him

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:04.520
<v Speaker 1>ranked behind the rest of these guys. I would agree,

0:50:04.560 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that his upside is higher than some

0:50:06.080 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of them. Well, we've seen it. Well, I don't think

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you can argue because you've seen it before. He runs

0:50:09.520 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and thirty r V I like we know

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it is. There's a lot of question marks when it

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:16.560
<v Speaker 1>comes to mar Marzilla Zoo who never ultimately see some

0:50:16.760 --> 0:50:19.520
<v Speaker 1>very comfortable in St. Louis. Last year the phone line

0:50:20.560 --> 0:50:23.319
<v Speaker 1>six seven nine, let's go to Stephen Massachusetts. What's up Steve?

0:50:26.280 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 1>He do we have Steve? Steve? A Hey, Steve, what's

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:38.320
<v Speaker 1>up man? What's up? Man? Hey? What's going on? Guys?

0:50:38.760 --> 0:50:41.359
<v Speaker 1>And I noticed that you guys are talking about I'll

0:50:41.440 --> 0:50:43.680
<v Speaker 1>feel this, So I wanted to know what you guys thought.

0:50:43.719 --> 0:50:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm like these guys because I noticed that you guys

0:50:46.080 --> 0:50:48.279
<v Speaker 1>are trying to like talk about rocks that construction for it.

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:52.320
<v Speaker 1>So what about like guys like Austin Meadows, Uh Ian

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:57.000
<v Speaker 1>happ and uh Brandon numo because I know you guys

0:50:57.040 --> 0:50:59.880
<v Speaker 1>are talking about conflorido and uh what you could do? What?

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh you? I think you broke out Conda last year

0:51:03.000 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Speaker 1>like he had some decent stats. Are you guys going

0:51:05.400 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 1>going in on any of those guys out on I

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and Hap. I will tell you this. Austin Meadows is

0:51:11.040 --> 0:51:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a hype guy right now. He is climbing up draft

0:51:15.040 --> 0:51:17.520
<v Speaker 1>boards very quickly, and I know Roster Resource has him

0:51:17.560 --> 0:51:19.680
<v Speaker 1>as a platoon player right now. He is a lefty,

0:51:19.800 --> 0:51:21.959
<v Speaker 1>but he actually held his own against left handed pitching

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:24.960
<v Speaker 1>last year, and they traded away Chris Archer to get

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:27.200
<v Speaker 1>both him and Tyler Glass. Now, in my opinion, I

0:51:27.239 --> 0:51:29.000
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna play him every day. I don't really

0:51:29.040 --> 0:51:32.040
<v Speaker 1>worry about the platoon Alston Meadows, and he showed me

0:51:32.080 --> 0:51:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit last year. Like remember, he was pretty

0:51:34.440 --> 0:51:37.160
<v Speaker 1>hot for a for a decent amount of time with

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the Pirates last season. I think he's a player who

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 1>can give you fifteen twenty in both home runs and

0:51:42.600 --> 0:51:45.480
<v Speaker 1>stolen bases, and I think the batting average is not

0:51:45.520 --> 0:51:47.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna hurt. I think he's gonna be like to seventy

0:51:47.760 --> 0:51:50.719
<v Speaker 1>issue or maybe two seventy five. So he's someone who

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is climbing up draft boards right now and there's a

0:51:52.560 --> 0:51:55.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of hype behind and I am in I like him.

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't want him as one of my top three outfielders. Ideally,

0:51:57.680 --> 0:51:59.880
<v Speaker 1>if I get him as like my outfield four to

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:02.919
<v Speaker 1>make some shot on the upside there, I'm not doing

0:52:02.960 --> 0:52:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it because strikes out a lot. I have the playing

0:52:05.040 --> 0:52:07.680
<v Speaker 1>time concerns with the Chicago Cubs. I need to see

0:52:07.760 --> 0:52:09.840
<v Speaker 1>more from Ian Hap first. And the other name you

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:13.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioned was Brendan Nimo. Like Brandon Nimo a lot in

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:16.760
<v Speaker 1>points leagues and OBI p leagues, because I was tweeting

0:52:16.800 --> 0:52:20.439
<v Speaker 1>out some stats yesterday about Nimo. He was elite greg

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:24.719
<v Speaker 1>against right handed pitching. Some of these numbers at six

0:52:24.840 --> 0:52:29.279
<v Speaker 1>o p s against right handed pitching last year, four

0:52:29.440 --> 0:52:34.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty four on base percentage, so walk great. I like

0:52:34.840 --> 0:52:36.560
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit more on points leagues. He's got

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:39.279
<v Speaker 1>to get better against left handed pitching. If I'm ranking

0:52:39.360 --> 0:52:45.600
<v Speaker 1>those three, it's it's Austin Meadows gap, Brandon Nimo huge gap,

0:52:46.120 --> 0:52:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and then Ian had fair enough. We appreciate that. We

0:52:49.880 --> 0:52:52.400
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the time. Stephen. I wanted to one more outfielder,

0:52:52.600 --> 0:52:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Frank before we hit the break that's in this to

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:57.960
<v Speaker 1>me in this area, and then we'll bring that draw

0:52:58.040 --> 0:52:59.960
<v Speaker 1>on and we'll talk and maybe have another special gap

0:53:00.280 --> 0:53:06.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. Eddie Rosario was a forgotten man last year, bros.

0:53:07.400 --> 0:53:09.880
<v Speaker 1>That was was that a thing that was the thing

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that was made at my at my drafts last year,

0:53:14.840 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>my buddy bit drafted him one league and then four

0:53:17.920 --> 0:53:22.239
<v Speaker 1>draft him another one. They said, we are quote Rosario, bros. Everyone.

0:53:22.600 --> 0:53:25.160
<v Speaker 1>It was the guy that lasted like ten rounds too

0:53:25.239 --> 0:53:27.160
<v Speaker 1>long in my draft. I remember sitting next to the

0:53:27.160 --> 0:53:29.520
<v Speaker 1>person that drafted. It was like, this guy really here, Yeah,

0:53:29.520 --> 0:53:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't really want him. I don't really want theim.

0:53:31.000 --> 0:53:32.640
<v Speaker 1>We waited like five more rounds. He's like, I'm just

0:53:32.680 --> 0:53:35.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna take him, and it's any Rosario. I did not

0:53:35.280 --> 0:53:37.719
<v Speaker 1>take him first. Next year, we took him. Back to

0:53:37.800 --> 0:53:41.400
<v Speaker 1>back years. Home runs, back to back years, batting essentially

0:53:41.480 --> 0:53:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to ninety doesn't really walk, struck out seven only seventeen

0:53:46.040 --> 0:53:48.120
<v Speaker 1>points six or seven of the time, r b I

0:53:48.239 --> 0:53:49.640
<v Speaker 1>s and runs similar to the last two years. You

0:53:49.680 --> 0:53:52.719
<v Speaker 1>gotta get them eight to ten stolen bases or so.

0:53:53.320 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 1>In a better Twins line of Eddie Rosario is what

0:53:55.960 --> 0:53:59.080
<v Speaker 1>he is, which is pretty dang good. Why is he

0:53:59.200 --> 0:54:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in this range? Why is he behind some of these guys?

0:54:01.560 --> 0:54:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Why do you believe he is? He's dragging where he

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:06.879
<v Speaker 1>should be drafted. So with Eddie Rosario, it's the tale

0:54:06.920 --> 0:54:08.759
<v Speaker 1>of two seasons. If you look at the first half

0:54:08.840 --> 0:54:11.160
<v Speaker 1>orts the second half last year, three eleven hitter with

0:54:11.480 --> 0:54:13.759
<v Speaker 1>nineteen of his twenty four home runs in the first half,

0:54:14.080 --> 0:54:17.800
<v Speaker 1>second half five home runs to forty batting average. We

0:54:18.080 --> 0:54:20.439
<v Speaker 1>we want to see consistency from first half to second half.

0:54:20.680 --> 0:54:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I like this Twins line up a lot. I've already

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:24.799
<v Speaker 1>been on record saying that, so maybe I'm a little

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:27.760
<v Speaker 1>bit more excited about Eddie Rosario than others. But again,

0:54:27.800 --> 0:54:30.200
<v Speaker 1>great back to back years of two eighty eight or

0:54:30.280 --> 0:54:32.400
<v Speaker 1>better batting average. He'll chip in, you know, eight to

0:54:32.520 --> 0:54:35.120
<v Speaker 1>ten stolen bases. I think if he can find some

0:54:35.239 --> 0:54:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of that consistency from the first half to the second half,

0:54:37.560 --> 0:54:40.359
<v Speaker 1>he could be closer to a thirty home run hitter. Uh.

0:54:40.480 --> 0:54:42.839
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't struggle against lefties either, as a left handed

0:54:42.840 --> 0:54:47.239
<v Speaker 1>bat eight four against lefties last season two. There's a

0:54:47.239 --> 0:54:50.320
<v Speaker 1>lot to like here. You know, normally, when when I

0:54:50.400 --> 0:54:51.880
<v Speaker 1>look at a left handed bat, I want to make

0:54:51.920 --> 0:54:54.799
<v Speaker 1>sure that you know that they're not pulling the ball

0:54:54.880 --> 0:54:58.520
<v Speaker 1>all too much. And at their they don't struggle against lefties. Um,

0:54:58.640 --> 0:55:00.920
<v Speaker 1>so you don't have to worry about that. I just

0:55:01.040 --> 0:55:03.279
<v Speaker 1>need to see consistency more from the from the first

0:55:03.360 --> 0:55:05.080
<v Speaker 1>half of the second half. But I like the Twins

0:55:05.160 --> 0:55:07.160
<v Speaker 1>lineup a lot. Um. I like him a little bit

0:55:07.200 --> 0:55:09.320
<v Speaker 1>more in Rhodo because he doesn't really walk all that

0:55:09.440 --> 0:55:11.879
<v Speaker 1>much for points leagues. He's right around a five percent

0:55:11.960 --> 0:55:14.560
<v Speaker 1>walk right for his career. But batting average is gonna

0:55:14.560 --> 0:55:17.799
<v Speaker 1>be really good man right around two ninety. I like him.

0:55:18.880 --> 0:55:22.160
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel about Eddie ros Areo? So last year,

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:24.319
<v Speaker 1>as I said, I didn't have no injuries, I didn't

0:55:24.320 --> 0:55:27.120
<v Speaker 1>want any twins guys, I didn't like him. But now

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:28.400
<v Speaker 1>he's done it two years in a row, and a

0:55:28.440 --> 0:55:31.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of that's trying to compete. I think he's real. Like,

0:55:31.600 --> 0:55:34.040
<v Speaker 1>why wouldn't you like any Rosario with these numbers? I

0:55:34.080 --> 0:55:35.960
<v Speaker 1>have him just ahead of Hanneger and Cassiano. Is that

0:55:36.000 --> 0:55:38.120
<v Speaker 1>too aggressive? I don't think it is. I don't think

0:55:38.160 --> 0:55:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it is. I think I like the Twins line exactly

0:55:41.239 --> 0:55:42.959
<v Speaker 1>what I was gonna say. You obviously like the Twins

0:55:43.040 --> 0:55:45.600
<v Speaker 1>line of more than marriage that everything else with him

0:55:45.680 --> 0:55:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and Hanneger is pretty similar, except you're going to get

0:55:48.080 --> 0:55:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a betting average better batting average for embody Rosario. I

0:55:52.920 --> 0:55:55.520
<v Speaker 1>don't get it weird, Like it's cold in Minnesota early

0:55:55.560 --> 0:55:56.880
<v Speaker 1>on in the season, but he was so good in

0:55:56.920 --> 0:55:59.719
<v Speaker 1>the first half last year, so in the months where

0:55:59.760 --> 0:56:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it warmed up, he got worse. I know what that

0:56:02.480 --> 0:56:05.279
<v Speaker 1>means anything, It doesn't really. Yeah, the ball doesn't fly

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:08.840
<v Speaker 1>out well in Minnesota in the early months, especially anywhere

0:56:08.840 --> 0:56:12.719
<v Speaker 1>in the al Central right like Chicago Chicago in the

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:15.520
<v Speaker 1>early months, the ball should not fly out that well.

0:56:15.640 --> 0:56:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that nineteen one runs in the first

0:56:18.000 --> 0:56:21.000
<v Speaker 1>half last year and then kind of slowed down. I'm

0:56:21.040 --> 0:56:23.279
<v Speaker 1>pretty excited about anywhars Areo. I like him, man, I

0:56:23.520 --> 0:56:25.520
<v Speaker 1>like him in this range too. I think he's just

0:56:25.600 --> 0:56:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the unheralded dude. And you know, if David dal wasn't

0:56:28.640 --> 0:56:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in Colorado, like I'd probably move them ahead of him.

0:56:30.920 --> 0:56:35.279
<v Speaker 1>I just don't say the same thing Dollar or Mitch

0:56:35.320 --> 0:56:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Haniger or David Dollar ANYWARS area. I mean, I probably

0:56:38.200 --> 0:56:43.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have ANYARS area. I know, I know, I know.

0:56:44.000 --> 0:56:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what's getting everybody like. These are all again,

0:56:47.880 --> 0:56:50.880
<v Speaker 1>these are all fine outfielders in this range where if

0:56:50.920 --> 0:56:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you miss out on fam or Springer or Lorenzo Kane,

0:56:53.920 --> 0:56:55.440
<v Speaker 1>try and snake two of these guys to be your

0:56:55.480 --> 0:56:58.360
<v Speaker 1>outfield two and your three. There's so many outfielders to

0:56:58.440 --> 0:57:02.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about it. So how many we've done, like seven

0:57:03.040 --> 0:57:06.600
<v Speaker 1>so far on to three or four or five, six, six,

0:57:06.760 --> 0:57:09.080
<v Speaker 1>we've done six, a lot more to come. Let's try

0:57:09.120 --> 0:57:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and get through like top forty at least here, Yes

0:57:11.320 --> 0:57:14.400
<v Speaker 1>as well, try fantasy best Friends forever, fantasy sports right,

0:57:14.520 --> 0:57:16.560
<v Speaker 1>no one do