WEBVTT - Super Bowl Preview, DFS Advice, Best Bets and More

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess dude Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy best

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever, Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:54.720 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Don too. Yeah, as the Fantasy fast Friends

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Forever here at the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. I'm sad

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 1>for Reggie Stample. I am Greg Sausman. Freggie will be

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>here in just a moment. Of course. Today on the program,

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it's all about one thing, and that obviously is super

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Bowl fifty three is not really about one thing because

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I need to give Frank an opportunity to to go

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>off right after yesterday's trade for the Knicks, I would

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like it wouldn't be fair to go all in

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>with the Super Bowl and not have the ability to

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>give Franky the opportunity. It made me really to give

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you my thoughts on this deal. We're really get in

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl. Obviously, we're gonna give you our DFS picks.

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Frank will let you know what he bet on yesterday

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in Jersey. You'll be able to ask him exactly how

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>he feels now that he's eating bread, he's eating bacon,

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>he's drinking beer, that life is good and Frankie's back

0:01:58.080 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to normal again. You'll get to hear all of this

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>over the next hours hour And with that, I have

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>one question, what's going on? Reggae? Reggy? The truth is

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I got held up in the bathroom because I've been

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>consuming too many carbs. My body wasn't ready for it.

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>It was not ready for it. How do you feeling that? Oh?

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>And what's lunch? Mixed? I honestly I feel mixed. There's

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on. I don't want to touch too

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>much on like the portazinguis trade, because I want to

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>get into the Super Bowl. This is your chance though.

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, there's a there's a lot going on between

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>between the NBA, between the NFL. Beer back in my life, bread,

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.399
<v Speaker 1>back in my life. There's a lot going on, Greg,

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>So what's for lunch? I don't have anything planning yet.

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.519
<v Speaker 1>I have apples in my bag. I think yes or

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to Yang City's gonna buy me lunch? I have to

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>ask you serious, I'll take a free lunch, all right

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:49.959
<v Speaker 1>before we get into the super Bowl. I want to

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>go water wall honestly with super Bowl, of course, before

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 1>we get into it is well thought about that you

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>don't forget about our guy, Jim Day. Sorry Jim. Hey guys,

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>how are you doing? Happy Friday? And we get football

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of days. I can't wait. How did

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you sleep last night? I slept really good the last

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>two nights, actually because I met. I was pounding it

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a few days before that. So lasterday nights I've gotten

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.959
<v Speaker 1>some nice early sleep and I'm good to god. You

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>did you you something to help enhance your sleep? No, no,

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>I never take anything go to sleep, all right. That

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>was my attempt at some kind of frenzy goon squad reference.

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>We're sorry, you know you didn't know. I don't usually

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>have that problem. After the last couple of days, I

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>definitely didn't have that problem. I had that bed. I

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>was done. Yeah, So before we end the super Bowl,

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>gym and I'm sorry to interrupted this, But Frank, I

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>gotta get your thoughts. What happened yesterday, you were on

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the air. You went nuts yesterday off the air, on

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the air. Now's your chance, your show man, take it away. Yeah,

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I've had a little bit more time to reflect on

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it regarding Oh, look, there's a lot of moving parts

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to this trade with stops porzingis to

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Mavericks. Obviously, if you're a Mavericks fan, if

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about becoming a Mavericks fan, uh, it's a

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>good time to do so because they have a great

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>young core between Luca don Check and Kris stops porzingis.

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Rick Carlisle was on a radio show yesterday in Dallas

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and said he's hoping that these two can be the

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>next coming of Dirk Navitsky and Steve Nash, except only taller.

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>So great for them. I joked yesterday on a Twitch

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>show about potentially moving to Dallas, and I'm still looking

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>into that, but from a Knicks perspective, And I don't know,

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe I was a little bit premature when I killed

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the Jets for signing Adam Gaze, because because ultimately you

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 1>gotta see what he does on the field, like, the

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>results are gonna speak for themselves one and that will

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>really determine what that signing was. And I think the

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>same holds true for this trade, right, Like, there's there's

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a huge amount of risk involved trading away your best

0:04:56.640 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>player probably since Patrick Ewing. I'm Hewing now your best

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>player that they've drafting. We're calling Patrick Hewing is best,

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the best player they've had since Patrick Hewing? Why why

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>do you keep calling Patrick Hewing? How Patrick Ewing? I

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>know that, and that's just how I say it. What

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you're really gonna interrupt my analysis? Not trick Healing? That

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was crazy. Continue. I don't even want to do it anymore.

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead, talk come on then. Anyway, there's a lot

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of risk involved when you trade away a player of

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>this caliber just to clear up the books. That's basically

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:35.840
<v Speaker 1>what they did. This is a salary dump and you

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>trade away the best player that you've drafted since Patrick Ewing.

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>There it is um and you're doing so because of

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>mistakes that you've made yourself or maybe that Phil Jackson

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>mad like that's the staff. That's what we're still suffering

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>from because they need to trade away a guy like

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Courtney Lee and Tim Harway Jr. Remember they signed those contracts.

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>It is not like they took on those contracts from

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>someone else. They signed those contracts, and now all stimately

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>they paid the price by trying to get those contracts

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>off their books, by trading away one of their best players,

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>uh that they've drafted absolutely basically like this was a

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>guy who kind of like brought hope back to the

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>organization the unicorn, right, but there you know, the risk

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is you're doing so hoping that you can sign guys

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>like you don't have a verbal commitment. Now, I will

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>say this, if a guy like Kevin Durant or Kyrie

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Irving does end up in New York, that is evidence

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that tampering does exist, because there's no way you make

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a trade like this unless you have some kind of

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>deal behind closed doors, some handshake agreement, something, unless you're

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the Knicks, Unless like they legitimately are just doing this

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>hoping that they get someone. And we joked about it yesterday,

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>they probably end up with guys like Tobias Harrison, like

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Chris Middles, like the Marcus Cousins, and it's like all

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>this was for nought, but really we won't be able

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to judge this trade until free agency and see what

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>they're able to do, because that's the hope. In terms

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of the package they brought back really underwhelming, obviously to

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>expiring contracts. I was hoping that they would at least

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>be able to get a young asset that has a

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:01.799
<v Speaker 1>right or future. I don't know the Dennis m Jr.

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that player. They do get two first round picks.

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>One is a top ten protected first round pick. One

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is unprotected. So that's pretty cool. Um, yeah, you won't

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>be able to judge it until you see what they're

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>able to do in free agency. But ultimately, the Knicks

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>is traded away their best player since Patrick ewing Eing

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>because of a salary dumb move. Now, I think you're

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you're your idea of this trade is pretty spot on, right,

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Like your analysis is right there, and I agree with that,

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And it's very frustrating that you have to use your

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>best player to ultimately don't salary that you yourself created

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and brought on the books. Like that's what's very frustrating.

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>If it wasn't the Knicks, you would look at this

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>trade be frustrated by Porzingis. But like what they're doing,

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>they're clearing cap space. They got two first round packs

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>rather than training picks away for once, one of which

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>is completely unprotected potentially in one pending that the Mavericks

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have a top five draft pick this year, because

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the only way it's protected. The fact is, you

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>get two first round picks, you get loads of cap

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.119
<v Speaker 1>space you have then you have the number one overall

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>pick potentially this year. There could be an influx of

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>talent in the garden. And if they bring in two

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>big time names, I'm talking Kyrie and Durant. I'm talking

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>about Kemba and Jimmy Butler. I remember talking at like

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>big time names. You bring in big names here with

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the two first round picks coming, you would like it.

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean theoretically, any other team you would like the move.

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>But with the Knicks, they have not gotten the trust

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of the New York fans, their owned fans. You don't

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>give them the benefit of the doubt, and you're right

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>not to do it. They have not earned that. After

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>legitimately your entire life, all twenty seven years of your life,

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>they've been horrific. Every decision they made has been wrong.

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>They were actually pretty good, but I was too young

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to even remember stuff, right, twenty years eight years old, right,

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>So the last twenty years of your life, they made

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>every wrong decision you could possibly make, over and over

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and over again. In they cleared all the space for

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Lebron and as you pointed out all week, they got him.

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Are Stodemeyer if they're doing this again and clearing out

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>all this space and they don't actually have a shot

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>at Kyrie or don't actually have a shot at Kevin Durant.

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>This is a joke. Now, Kyrie every thinking about today

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:10.559
<v Speaker 1>and say listen, I'm gonna do its best for me.

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>He did not say anything I've ever asked me on

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>July first, at the previously saying he wants to resign

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:19.559
<v Speaker 1>with Boston. He ain't resigning with Boston. And you know

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people have talked about maybe him going

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>back to UH to l A. Imagine all along like

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:26.079
<v Speaker 1>this was kind of something that they knew, like it

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>was not we'll meet up again in l A one day,

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Like don't worry about it, man, I remember, like unlaid

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these guys. Kyrie is ah, I mean,

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>you know it's Australian born, but New Jersey he's a

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>he's a little kid. A buddy of mine used to

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.559
<v Speaker 1>play against him in au growing up. Very cool, very cool.

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Durant has always been an East Coast guy before

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Golden State. Honestly, Washington Kembas from the Bronx, So, like

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, I would be very surprised if

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Kemba in a lonesty, If Kemba or Kyrie doesn't end

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 1>up in New York, there's very surprised. There's also a

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of risk in this trade regarding the Doubts match. Remember,

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're taking on a seven foot three player

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>returning from a c L injury that has never happened before.

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of risks there. And you know,

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>history is playing against porsing this here because seven foot

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>three guys have not fared well in the NBA in

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of being able to stay healthy. That's what a lot,

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>A lot that I've read says that behind closed doors,

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the Knicks are very worried about his long term health.

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:24.719
<v Speaker 1>And you've kind of seen that the first three or

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 1>four years he's he's constantly in and out of the

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>mental health because he he hated the Knicks. Nicks hated

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>him and that and that was kind of the end

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of that. I don't blame Poring, by the way, all

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 1>of course, because they created this culture, this dysfunction. I

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 1>mean it started with Isaiah Thomas and Phil Jackson, and

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, James Dolan is obviously the ringleader of all this.

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Like they've created dysfunction, they've welcomed it. They always want

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to be in the papers, they always want people talking

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>about the Knicks, and at some point there's a price

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to pay for that, and yesterday they paid that price

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 1>when they traded away Christops Porzing is because he didn't

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 1>want to be part of the organization. And there's a

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>lot that goes on find closed doors here, like did

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>they set up this meeting, but did they have trade

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>already set up in place before? And like that came

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>out afterwards Frankie that they met with Christmas. There's always

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of politics, and they met christas using his

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>last week I think, and basically five minutes later didn't

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>realize that they're trying to make him look like the

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>bad guys. Of course they are, of course they are,

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.719
<v Speaker 1>don't That's what they do. Um. I will say this,

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>coming in the year, I was pretty high on Dennis

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Smith Jr. Like I drafted him in fantasy. I wanted

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>him in our team in fantasy. Didn't what we didn't

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>wind him getting him? But I was in on Dennis

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Smith Jr. Are we gonna, let you know, a couple

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of bad months, say we Dennismith Junior sucks? Now, this

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>is what twenty years old like. That's not fair. I

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>get what you're saying, but a lot of this is

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy when you wanted on the Knicks last year,

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you want him to draft to him. I didn't hate

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the Frank pick at the time. It doesn't look very

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>good right now you want didn't you want ds J Moore?

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it was already Like I wasn't really sold

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>on either. And for people out there who were saying,

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>like we should have taken Donovan Mitchell, like that was

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>never gonna like the Jazz just look, you fell into

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>their lap, so credits of the Jazz, But that was

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>never gonna happen. Um. I do think people are maybe

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>writing him off a little bit too early, correct, but

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the concerns with his games, like doesn't play defense, Yes,

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>he has athleticism, Uh, the jump shot is a little

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:15.599
<v Speaker 1>spotty here and they're like, it kind of fits the

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>mold of an NBA player, But is he ever going

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 1>to be an All Star? I don't know, Probably not.

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably take the under on All Star appearances with

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Dennis Smith Jr. If I'm just being honest. A lot

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of people I watch a lot of basketball, but there

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:32.199
<v Speaker 1>are people who watch even more basketball than me and

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 1>study the game, and I would value their opinion more.

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Who don't like the prospects of Dennis Sman Jr. Being

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a long term great NBA player. It's fair, an, It's annoying,

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's fair. Jimmy thought, Yeah, yeah, he's basketball. Who

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>are the Knicks had to ask? Not worries, guys, you're

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>doing fun, jim Can you ever remember it doesn't even

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>have to be just bas more related a team trading

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>away their best player, just just as a salary dump

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.719
<v Speaker 1>like I couldn't and I'm sorry, I think it makes

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:10.719
<v Speaker 1>all the sense. It makes all the sense in the

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>world for a lot of different reasons. First of all,

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:15.719
<v Speaker 1>clear cap space, which is what they needed. They get

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>two future First, one, like you guys have already been

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about, is unprotected, could be gold. Um, you know

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 1>they're they're tanking right now the season to try and

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>get that number one pick. You know, they're doing all

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:30.199
<v Speaker 1>those things to get there. They they are in fact rebuilding.

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>So at that point, yes, look, the guy doesn't want

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to be here, You don't want him here, you have

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.959
<v Speaker 1>long term concerns about his health. If all of that

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff is indeed true, then absolutely it's get him out

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>of the door. Let's build for the future. And that's

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing. It's not like he's winning them games now. No,

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, of course not. And it is a little

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>bit different because their best player has been out all

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>year a c L and the best hats them. So

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like when you've seen some of these other trades

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of superstars around the NBA, And I M not saying

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.599
<v Speaker 1>the superstar like Chris Paul Livil superstar, when you're saying, like,

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>trade these trades, where do they get back? Right? Like

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the times you do get back future

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 1>picks and cap space. That's what the Thekees. That's so

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the Knicks ultimately did. Now, Dennis Smith Jr. You know,

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.079
<v Speaker 1>probably you're right, probably won't be an All Star, but

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>he's the maverage were not. You're not getting but wait, wait, wait, wait, wait,

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>let's back off of that for a second, because you know,

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>right he may not never be an All Star. But

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>if this trick moved, you know, if this trade works

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the way they wanted to, and you know you were

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about this earlier, Frank, if it gets them to

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>bring in some big names into the team, maybe the

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>kid doesn't have to be a superstar to be a

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>good player in this league. What if he's a good

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>compliment to the big names that you already bring in,

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and they in fact bring him along and he just

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>gets a little better. You know, I don't see the

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>downside to having him here, especially at his age, you know,

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean that Jim said that kind of just popped

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>into my mind. Is what if he turns into the

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>next Lou Williams. Is out of the realm of possibility, Greg,

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>why like a solid six man option off the bench.

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>He's twenty years old, So again, give him the benefit

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of the doubt. Let him prove it at the NFL,

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>at the NBA level. Um, give him some minutes, give

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>him some opportunity and see what he could do. And

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you've got to do the same thing with

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Frankiela keen as well. Let these guys play now second

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>half of the season and to see, you know, let

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>them develop and see what they could turn into. I

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>think at the least they could be rotation level NBA players.

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Any maybe they turn into even more. And if you

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>really think about it, they want to sign a guy

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>like Kyrie Irving or Kemba Walker anyway, and Smith Jr.

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Isn't gonna be the starter. So really all you need

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to be as a competent bench player. Sham has just

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>tweeted Anthony Davis is focused on the Lakers as his

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>top preferred destination, but the Knicks are also preferred landing

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>spot and try to make the post for New Orleans

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to go trade with the Knicks. So A d you

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>can play in New York. We'll take that. We'll that

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl talk the rest of the way after this,

0:15:57.600 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you know that You can listen to this

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>show live on the old award winning Fancy Sports Radio Network.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Listen on the I Heart Radio app to tune in

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>radio app, or download the Fancy Sports Radio Network app.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>The Fancy Sports Radio Network is the only totally free,

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>seven three sixty five fancy sports network of his kind

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>without a subscription. Check out YouTube Live want the Fancy

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Sports Network YouTube page and participating in the program in

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>there where you can ask questions discuss the topics with

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>other fantasy enthusiasts. I'll tell anyone that you disagree. Call

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>into your favorite show and ask your question. The number

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is A four four A four f N T s Y.

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>That's eight four four eight four three six eight seven nine.

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Defenci Sports Radio Network. You're free. Fancy Source twenty four

0:16:40.760 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>hours a day. Back with you, Fantasy best Friends Forever,

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Radio Network, Greg Suspan, Franky Stample, Jim Day

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>hanging out with us today on a Friday. Jim, I

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I read earlier you have announcement to make on a

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Frenzy today. Yeah. I got something I gotta say, but

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:16.959
<v Speaker 1>I'll just save that till later. Sorry, guys, That's why

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I said, I you have announced with Ton on the

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Frenzy today. So what I'm saying, yes, yes, yeah, I

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>gotta get it out of get it off my chest.

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>All right. We'll be honest with you, a lot of

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>people expect me to know things around here. I don't.

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>I do not know what Jim's announcement is. I think

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with he's got a new drum

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>set er. Some could be, could be you never know.

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>By the way we have Astor doing once again, are

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>doing a super Bowl contest here and you can participate

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>over on fandals we do all year long. Five bucks.

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Let us know. Tweet at us if you want to play.

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of you guys have already signed up or

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>not technically engine made a line up yet if you

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>played our last contest, but it's on Fandel right now. Um,

0:17:58.040 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>if you want to get in, just tweet at Frank

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.479
<v Speaker 1>or myself and we will get you in there. Obviously,

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>single game format is only one game, an m VP

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 1>at one point five times the points. Everything else is

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>just a flex. So basically, if you've been in the

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>contest throughout the playoffs, you're already in it. You just

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>have to set your line up. So shout out to

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>our guy. I believe his name is Andre. Can you

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>catch up? I think he's won it twice in the playoffs.

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Are in articulous, so shout out to him. He's been

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>doing a great job. But for anyone else who's out

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>there who wants to join, I mean there might be

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 1>people By Sunday who don't set their line up. So

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>if you want to invite um and their spots available,

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll be sure to get you in. But again, if

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you're inside the contest, just make sure to set your

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>line up before Sunday. Greg's right, there's one m VP

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>slot where you get one point five times the fantasy production,

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and then there are four other spots spots that you

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>need to fill, so it's just five flexes. If you

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 1>haven't played the single game format before, you can use kickers.

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>You can use any wide receivers, running backs. You can

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>use both quarterbacks if you want to, which of course

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>makes things a little bit harder because they are both

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the two highest salaried players. You have sixty grand to spend,

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and obviously all the prices are much higher in the

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>single game format. Frankie mentioned Brady and gothel fifteen. I

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>don't every buddy Jim SNAs he kind of always recommends

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>using a kicker. They always yeah, So something I would, uh,

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I would recommend before setting a single game lineup is

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>our own. Drew drink Meyer of Daily Rodo just joined

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the DFS EDGE Daily Fantasy Edge podcast, very popular. Adam

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of a Tan left Adam Levitan and they kind of

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>they went in depth on Showdown slate strategy and who

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to use as your m v P, and a lot

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of talk about correlation. And again I think we'll do

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:38.439
<v Speaker 1>that again today when we were talking about like our

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 1>best bets some prop bets that I made yesterday. Is

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to correlate your prop bets with how you think

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the game flow is gonna go. The same thing goes

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>with this single game Showdown, and maybe you know, if

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you play in a bigger field contest, you'll make multiple

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.239
<v Speaker 1>line ups with the same game flow. Like there can

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.719
<v Speaker 1>be there could be like a game flow you think

0:19:57.800 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>is gonna happen, but it could play out two different

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>ways in terms of, all right, the rams are playing

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>catch up. But I'll make one lineup where I think

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks is gonna get a lot of the production.

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll make another lineup where I have Jared Goff and

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woods. You know, so, like, know what you think

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the game flow is going to be. And then I

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>would say, kind of make your single game lineups base

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>off that game flow. Does that hold true, Jim, even

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>in a even in a I guess um, in a

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>single game format, I hear Frank saying, but when it's

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>a smaller const like what we're doing twenty people, right you,

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I know, a lot of times a fane you trot

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>or in DFS rather you kind of try to balance

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it out what you're doing. It's like, all right, let me,

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting like Brady and Edelman. Maybe I should get

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley. So it's like kind of even out in

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a smaller context, it makes sense to do it that

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>way or kind of go Frank was saying, go all

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in on what you believe the game flow is and

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily trying to even it out just in case. No,

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the going with the game flow thought

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.919
<v Speaker 1>process because if your game flow thought processes off right

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>from the get go, you're done. Um. You know, if

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you expect the Rams to get out to a lead

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and you're expecting Brady and the team to come back

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and have to throw a lot, you know, if they

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:11.360
<v Speaker 1>come out of the gate running the ball right down

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to ramstroats, you're off your game already. So not a

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 1>big fan of that. I mean, I get the idea,

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 1>but I also think there's gonna be a lot of

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>people running their teams that way. For me, I like

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to just pick the random players that I think are

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>likely to have good games that I could fit into

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>my lineup. Um, and you know I'm gonna take shots

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>on guys in my captain role that you know I'm

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking most people won't be on, at least not

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>as heavily owned as others, because let's face it, at

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>this point, you're trying to pick the players that nobody

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 1>else is really on, and there's not enough players to

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>really get that far out, So you gotta you gotta

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>take some chances that you know, I get the fact

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that you know they always want to have a kicker

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in there, but you're kind of limited with zirline being,

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, not in practice all week. What if he

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>goes out there, tries to make the first kick and

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.439
<v Speaker 1>he's on, um, and then you're screwed. I mean, if

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna go with kickers, I think you have to

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>go with Kaskowski in this one. It's just hard to

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>take that chance on their line. Um, you know without

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you No, I don't know that One's bothered me a

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I'm a little worried about zir line, do

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:19.719
<v Speaker 1>you And I think it's fair it's kind of crazy,

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but you you realize, like, were you you made a

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>bet on zir line? Maybe the m v P on

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl? Right, it's a five dollar wage. I

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>got this thousand dollars. It was five dollars, risk five

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars to win one two hundred and fifty. So I'll

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>risk five dollars for that. And it was one of

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>those things where the Vandal Sports book gave me like

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>ten free dollars to play with. So I'm playing with

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>house money. Might as well use it on something crazy.

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>And you are a buddy in our chat. I believe

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it was Ron C earlier in the week, So you

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>put thirty dollars. I'm probably not doing that. I like,

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I like where your head's at, Like, like, I'll throw

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>five ten dollars on this. That's on the off chance.

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Again it's kicker has never been the m v P

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of the game. But I think we're missing out though,

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we should be taking side bets on all

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>these all these crazy props. Um, you know what a

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>ron you want to send me thirty bucks, I'll take

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that bet on their line. Yeah, I got a bad point, Jim.

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I Also it's it's funny when it goes to your

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 1>props and get back to the def has one sec.

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>But I was looking at some props this morning, Frank,

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and you're right, man, you were right. Like every you

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you see, every one of these props, you always want

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to take the over like that is your initial instinct

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>is to always take the over because no one wants

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to root for the under of everything, and that's where

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the money is. Man, Your thousandersn't right with that? Yeah,

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>People who are a lot smarter than me, things that

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I've things that I've listened to regarding like former odds

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>makers and stuff, they say, you know, most of the

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 1>money is made and this is where like the sharp

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>guys come in where they just hammer under the hammer

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of nose on these props, especially during the

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl, because you get props available to you that

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>aren't normally available because on any given week you're not

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>getting a James Devlin plot, no doubt. That's why, Like

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm jumping in on a James Devlin prop in the

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl because his over under arn yards is four

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>and a half. How often is James four and a

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>half totally yards? Now? It could be over in one play.

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I realized that, But how likely is it that James

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Devlin even gets the ball outside of like a third

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and one, a fourth and one a four, like you know,

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a goal line conversion five yards on that? A lot

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of money is Frank, I would be

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>totally with you if it wasn't Bill Pellichick, because you know,

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>while everybody else is thinking the same thing, you are

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Bills thinking something different. How many times you think James

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Devlan has gone over four and a half yards this season, Frank,

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I was just about to have it up, Uh, well,

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>including the playoffs four times. Unfortunately it was six times,

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>six times. Six times he's gone over four and a

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>half yards including the playoffs, six out of eighteen weeks.

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Six weeks, He's go on over. I'll take those odds

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>every time. There you go. So I'm getting twelve out

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of eighteen times he's gone under four and a half

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>yards and I got that, and I believe like minus

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>one thirties, So I think the odds are in my favor. Perfect.

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Good thanks, but no, seriously, just getting back to the

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 1>props as well. There's just there's more stuff available this

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 1>week than like normally you'll see, um, the biggest name receivers,

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>biggest name rushers, like the offer props for that, especially

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 1>on like single games like Thursday night games, Sunday night,

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Monday night games. You'll get that. But we're getting like

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:39.400
<v Speaker 1>any prop imaginable you could think of when it comes

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to kickers, when it comes to Jared Goff rushing yards,

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady, when it comes to forget, that's a lot. Like, dude,

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>there's so much easy money to be made this week

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to Tony almost saying Hotlanta, like just take the hot

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you take no on everything this week. It's getting excited.

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Can you take the note and the under on everything?

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee you would be more profitable than not this weekend?

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 1>How about how about Tom tom Brady's rushing yards at

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>one and a half. But Frank made a good point, man,

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Frank made the point of all points that if he

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>does rush for that one yard right, or rushes for

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>does it twice and fourth and one, you're at two.

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:22.959
<v Speaker 1>When he kneels down at the end of the game,

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna lose the yard. And that's how you're gonna

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>lose this bet. Honestly, I'd probably take the under put right.

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>He was great it was a great call. I like,

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>I like Jared Goff under it's like eight and a

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>half rushing yards. Take the under there, Like, how has

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>he done that this year? Like? Look, I took why

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:44.400
<v Speaker 1>did you reveal all your problem girl's longest rush under

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and a half yards? Just because you don't know

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>how healthy is he hasn't been breaking off long runs recently.

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>I think they are going to try and get him

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the ball a little bit more here it's a do

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>or die game. But again, how healthy is he? And

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure the Patriots are going to zwn in

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>on trying to stop the run. I think they want

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff to try and beat it. So I take

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>the longest rush under seventeen and a half yards. I

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 1>took Tom Brady over twenty five and a half, I

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>revealed earlier on the week. I know I'm talking a

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>lot about unders, but this just seems too easy here.

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean the first two games, where their game plan

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 1>was more so to run the football. He has had

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty and thirty four completions respectively in the first two games.

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>And I looked at the past Super Bowls and he's

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>gone over twenty five and a half um pretty regularly

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:27.959
<v Speaker 1>in the Super Bowl. So I like that New England

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and l A rams under twenty seven and a half

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>first half points. I mentioned coming into this Super Bowl.

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>The past eight Super Bowls that the Patriots have been

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter, they've combined for three three points. So, um, yeah,

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>there could be some point scored in the in the

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>second quarter for sure, but I'm still taking the under

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven and a half in the first half. But

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>but to that point, Trackie and you mentioned about you know,

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Patriots last year scoring three points. All the other Super

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Bowls they've had, they've scored zero in the first half

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter. Man, I want to bet a

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in the first core for the paths so bad

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:03.919
<v Speaker 1>you're probably getting good odds in it right now, right

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>when numbers are you looking at? Uh, that's what I

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't really got to that one yet. I've been doing

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of other stuff, but that's probably what I'm

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be spending my entire day tomorrow. I was looking

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>at those But if they give me one that's a

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>decent number for that, I'm definitely gonna take it. Yeah,

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it just comes down to value too, Like if you

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 1>see a number that seems off to you, like Jim saying,

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and you're if you're getting plus money on the path

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Patriots and score touchdown in the first quarter,

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>then again it says a lot of these problems again

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>are also value based, right look at the look at

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>how much juice you're laying. If there's something to you

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that seems like it should be more even or even

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>like favored in your opinion, and you're getting that plus money.

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I remember yesterday the really as longest rush under seventeen

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half. I got that at plus money, Greg,

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:47.959
<v Speaker 1>And that's something that I was talking about the other day.

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 1>He loved it that I was. I was pretty much

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in on on that. And then I think it was

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the over two and a half players with past attempts,

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>something that I've talked about, which has I like, that's

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>hitting me in the past five Super Bowls. Uh. And

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you know we've seen trick play from the Patriot in

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the past, you know, getting Ms Julian Edelman involved throwing

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the ball the Rams punter um. You know, I could

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>just see somebody else throwing the ball here in this game.

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Over two and a half players with past attempts. I

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>got that at plus money as well, and it's something

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that I feel pretty good about. And then the final

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>one that we've referenced is James Devlin under four and

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a half total yards. Those are the five props that

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I hit on yesterday when I was in Jersey. Fair enough,

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>there you go. Did you have a beer when you're

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in Jersey? I did not? Did you have you buy

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a water? I ordered a sprite which was two dollars,

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and I gave the bartend a three dollars sip and

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I just asked if I could sit here and put

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>my bets in and had no problems with it. Great,

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>that's great. I'm glad. I'm glad it worked out for you.

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I knew all along it was going to great, but

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks for being concerned. Hey man, I just want to

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>make sure you can always tell a person who's worked

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>as at a bar, as a bartender or server, you

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>know what kind of tip they leave. Well, three dollars

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>on a two dollars sprite is a very generous tip,

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it is, but it's comes from somebody who's been on

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the other side and no knows what you know, what

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like to be on the other side, I've seen

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Greg not tipped when getting a beer. I'm with you, Frank,

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big tipper. I like to tip they usual. Greg.

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>This is a trick, and I know because I was

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a bartender. You instead of giving the one dollar per

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>beer that you're gonna do over the course of drinking

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>five beers at night, right, you give the five dollars

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>first and foremost. Then that bartender will always be looking

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>your way if you need a beer. And not only that.

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>You know when it comes to like buy backs, if

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>they are a bar that you know, hey, you buy

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>three beers, you get your fourth one free. Whatever, They're

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep you in mind because you give them a

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>five dollar Sure, I know, I hear that. I understand that,

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and I understand it works. But it's not a very

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.479
<v Speaker 1>crowding bar, and I'm not worried. It's there's no one

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>there and I'm just just just us. I probably just

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>hit a dollar at a time I wanted to. Well,

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I hear on that. I'm absolutely I'm always at least

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>giving a dollar. Chip. You give me a dollar per drink, right,

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>You're not giving a dollar, are you? Or a dollar

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>per order? No per drink, so if I'm buying me

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and you a beer, I'm given two dollars. That's that's

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the lowest you could go. I would say, bar etiquette,

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you got to give at least a dollar per drink.

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what I was appreciate talk. Yeah, I was brought

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>up like that as Well's it's nice to know you

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>learn something new every day. Greg happy to help. I

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>feel you they're going a terrible tipper. I didn't say it.

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually in the back of your mind. You must

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>be self conscious about it, honestly, very good tipper normally. Yeah, no, yeah,

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I know that you're a big you know, very generated

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>for the service that you get. So if you get

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>good service, you probably tipped well. And you know what,

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I just the problem is, even when I get bad services,

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I like feel bad, Like this guy isn't that bad.

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>He works on tips, probably don't make a lot of money,

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>like do it at this job. He relies on it,

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So I ultimately feel bad. And Judy is like the

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>ruthless one. What's that famous scene. It's in a movie

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>where like they argue about their inside of a diner

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and they're arguing whether or not you should tip well

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and He's like, well, they get paid to be you

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>know it or a waitress, so why am I going

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to tip them for doing their jobs. It's a famous scene.

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what sing you're talking about, but I

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>also understand that mindset, like that it kind of used

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 1>their job to serve. Yeah, but they also get paid

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>super cheap because they work off tips. I agree, Listen,

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>they don't even make minimum weight. I hear you, man,

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and I agree that. There's a lot of stuff that

0:32:17.400 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>bothers me. It's like I asked for something and then

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I just totally forgets that's not acceptable, like writing down

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>if I if I ordered her if I don't mean.

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I have a terrible memory. So I used to ask people.

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I used to like tell their order back to them

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>when I would work at the barty, Like they're like, oh,

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you know they're ordering for a group of this this

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is I'll be like, all right, so just so I'm

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>clear you want this? Yeah, I might even come back

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>then be like is what you wanted? Right? So I

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>make sure I get it right. So last night, for instance,

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>from It's from Reservoir Dogs by the very famous. So

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>last night I went to dinner, I went out for

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>dinner and I ordered some pasta and I ordered a

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>ginger le What said pasta? Interesting mix? I was in

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the movie for Soda when No Draw, No Jan Drew.

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm halfway through my pasta, and I'm like, are you

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a gin droll? It wasn't like, oh, that's a bad job.

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't like, oh, I'm so sorry. I was like, oh, yeah,

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>no problem. Are you kidding me? Like you did order

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it with your meal? I ordered it right at the beginning. Greg.

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>While we're on the discussion of people who like not

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>get paid a lot when they're like either a bartender

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>or a waiter or a waitress or an analyst, let's

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>save that for a different day, Jim. But I'm sorry,

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>did that come out up loud? I was just thinking, Man,

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Greg. I worked. I worked based off of

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a shift pay, and I think a lot of I

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>worked in like a like an old old style Irish bar,

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>dive bar or whatever. I would work based on a

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 1>shift pay, and everything anything I made on tips on

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>top of that was what I was able to take home.

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>What do you think my shift pay was? And I

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>would work anywhere from six pm two if it was

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a busy night four am. If it's a slow night,

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll close up at one am. Okay, So I work

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 1>anywhere from like a seven to ten hour shift shop.

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 1>I would say ten bucks an hour my shift paid.

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>My shift pay was forty dollars flat and everything I

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 1>made on top of that was sip. Just to put

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that in perspectively, discuss that was about like five years ago,

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and it would still have nights where like it was

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:24.840
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty good, like take like a hundred and fifty night,

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>so it's not bad like one night at work. But

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you also need good tippers to be able to make

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 1>I read a story on the Athletic the strippers are

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>making ten tho dollars a night, So what are you

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 1>doing here? Greg? No idea. When we come back, we'll

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:39.359
<v Speaker 1>go over the price to give you the DVS picks

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and make our final picks both Sunday from the NFL

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to the NBA. Daily Roado dot com is the place

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to win millions in daily fantasy. You can get the

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:51.359
<v Speaker 1>best DFS NFL coverage all season long for a price

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of or dominate the entire Daily Fantasy Sports realm with

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:58.959
<v Speaker 1>the Elite Package at months if you use the promo

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>code f n T S why you get ten percent

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:04.359
<v Speaker 1>off your Daily Rodo package. Go to Daily Rodo dot com,

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 1>pick your nfl orlid package, enter promo code f n

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:09.360
<v Speaker 1>t s Y, and you'll be on your way to

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>becoming the next Daily Rhodo millionaire. I love you, shout out,

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I really really. Let's go to the Day studio. Oh hello,

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Jim Day Drum loves is. Kevin Mathan loves it by Day.

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I do do like Kenny Bloggins. So let's Kenny Logans

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:47.879
<v Speaker 1>and Kevin making him big and dance to this. Yeah

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that Kevin Magan. The one before that, Kenny Loggins. Henny

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Loggins just reminded me of the Jets. Who at you, guys?

0:35:55.760 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Logans utter Mine is better than your. The NBA has

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:03.439
<v Speaker 1>added two future Hall of Famers, Durko Bisky and Dane

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Weight as special roster additions to the All Star Game.

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get one of those spots per year. Now

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 1>moving forward? Is that thing last year two? I think

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Kobe Bryant was like the last one who was voted

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in who shouldn't have been, but just because it was

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:18.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's farewell to what kind of thing like I

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 1>don't do. You're probably who cares. Whatever. It's like, it's

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the Alstar game. It's an exhibition game. All right, guys,

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:28.320
<v Speaker 1>let's get in dfs um for this weekend. That's to exploit.

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what we're like, really got to get

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 1>into it. Okay, um magic to exploit. Let's let's let's

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>let's get right into it. The week part of the

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Patriots defense, Jim is what oh huh wow. The way

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>they're playing right now, there's not many Um. I'd say,

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 1>if you really want to push it, you know, defensive

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>back can be can be taken advantage of, but you

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:56.839
<v Speaker 1>gotta have time to do that. They're gonna really need

0:36:56.880 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep that that rush off of golf. Okay, so

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>keeping the rush off of golf, that's the outlets of

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>line has been lauded and they both have been We

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 1>talk offensive lines in this game have been great. We

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 1>talked once in the playoffs Tom Brady zero. We talked

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 1>to Marshall Falk about this and he basically says the

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Patriots offensive lines bums. And now that they start SCARNECKI

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>either offensive line coach is just unbelievable at what he does.

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 1>The question becomes sustained success there absolutely is he going

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to be able to scheme well enough to stop Aaron

0:37:28.000 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Donald and Domalkin, Sue and the rest of the defensive

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>line in Los Angeles from getting to Tom Brady? That's

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the question. Now. The offensive the Patriots have used Frank

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>throughout the playoffs is ride Sony Michelle early on and

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 1>make things easier for Tom Brady? Is that the way

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:44.959
<v Speaker 1>you expected to go? Again? I think it's a little

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:47.759
<v Speaker 1>bit tougher this week, tough sledding for Sony Michelle and

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:51.800
<v Speaker 1>sorry Greg and the new Patriots rushing attack. If you

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 1>look at what the Rams defense has been able to do,

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>and I've talked about this, I asked Marshall about it

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit yesterday. If you're Wade Phillips, what are

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you trying to take away in this game? Because what

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>he's been able to take away the first two playoff

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>games that they've played in is against Ezekiel Elliot. I

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 1>believe he ran for forty yards or somewhere around there.

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:12.439
<v Speaker 1>So they were able to limit him. They were able

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to limit one of the better offensive lines in football,

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the better running backs. Very next week, they

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 1>were able to limit mark Ingram and Alvin Kamara. From

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a rushing perspective, Avan Kamara still caught a lot of balls.

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 1>We talked about that this week as well. There was

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>one drive where basically they threw it's him every time.

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he had like three or four catches for

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards on one drive. So that might be I

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>guarantee you that's gonna be something that stands out on

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:36.799
<v Speaker 1>film for Josh McDaniels and the New England Patriots tending

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:40.320
<v Speaker 1>into this game. So if you're looking at matchup, sweet sploit,

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'll tell you right now he I already have

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>him inside my lineup. I'm using James White because I

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>think he might be the one, and we've seen it

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in the Super Bowl. And I know, you know when

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about James White props earlier on in

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the week, it hasn't been every like it hasn't been

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 1>consistent throughout his postseason career that he dominates a little

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>bit different. Remember that game against the Falcons where he

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:05.359
<v Speaker 1>should have been the Super Bowl V get three total

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in that game. I think James White is the

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:13.439
<v Speaker 1>more effective from a fantasy perspective running back in this game.

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Then Tony Michelle or even Rex Burkhead just because he

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 1>scored two touchdowns last week, I think it's worth mentioning.

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I think once again, the Rams are going to try

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and stop the run, which is crazy because it's basically

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you're inviting Tom Brady to beat you. But if you

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 1>play it right and you are sending safety help, you're

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 1>knocking Julie Edelman off his routes a little bit, and

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you're telling Tom Brady to beat you with his outside weapons.

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the way that the Rams defense should

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 1>be attacking this game. Doesn't matter, Jim, do you keep

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to leave? Of course a former New England Patriot? Will

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that help him A don't. I'll help him in the coverage?

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Will that help their knowledge at all? Now? He's been

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>done too long and Belichick is gonna definitely change things

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:56.360
<v Speaker 1>up just for that reason, know who he's going against.

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, they they've definitely got new wrinkles involved. And

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you know my problem with with counting on James White

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:04.800
<v Speaker 1>this week, especially in DFS, is everybody else will be

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's where you know, you have to try and

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:10.719
<v Speaker 1>figure out some way to separate yourself. And I just

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 1>figured that James White is probably gonna be when one

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of the bigger chalk plays of the week, just because

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:18.320
<v Speaker 1>everything's Frank's talking about. You know, they should probably pass

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to him a lot, get a lot of work in

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. But again, and this is where I

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:26.759
<v Speaker 1>go crazy personally as an analyst, is Bill Belichick because

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I try to get into his head and then I

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 1>get lost in my own head and I'm trying to

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:33.839
<v Speaker 1>figure out this side and that side, and meanwhile he's

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:37.359
<v Speaker 1>doing the exact opposite, and it just drives me nuts.

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>But I could easily see them using James White is

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a decoy in this because the defense is going to

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>be looking for the same exact thing. Right. We have

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Sawn angled downstairs on the ones and twos, and I

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>believe a famous saying of his father, father the King,

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:56.479
<v Speaker 1>it's over analysis leads to paralysis. It does. It kills

0:40:56.520 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 1>me sometimes the phrase Jim for but Jim in that

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>same regard that you're talking about with James White. I

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:07.839
<v Speaker 1>think people are gonna look at what Sony Michelle has

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>done the first two games of this playoff, and I

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 1>think he'll be quite highly owned as well. Don't you

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 1>like They're gonna look at the first two games, and

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna say, look at what look at the way

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 1>they've been using Sony Michelle. I think that they're gonna

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 1>use Sony Michelle this way again in the Super Bowl.

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you think a lot of people are gonna have

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that logic as well? I don't not to interrupt you,

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Jim before your answer. I don't, man, I think more

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:28.840
<v Speaker 1>people just look at the Patriots. I think people remember

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 1>what they see last though, right, isn't that like Dave

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about that a lot from a betting so he

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 1>don't remember what they see last. So I've seen it

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>now two games and no, I hear you, and I

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:40.800
<v Speaker 1>think I understand your logic were it comes to the Patriots.

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just a little bit different because the Patriots,

0:41:44.200 --> 0:41:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the first name that you rattle up your tongue is

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 1>always going to be Tom Brading no matter what. Right,

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>when you think of the Patriots and all their history

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:52.399
<v Speaker 1>in the Super Bowl, you don't think of a back

0:41:52.440 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>getting them all thirty times, rushing for a hundred yards

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 1>and getting touched out or two. You know, you never

0:41:57.360 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 1>will think of that when it comes to the pass.

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 1>And I totally recognize that is at exactly how they

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>started the game each of the last two games that

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they rode Sony Michelle, particularly in the first half of

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>both games. Before when you have a little bit we

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>both remember that. Wherever two weeks past that, and if

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:12.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about these two teams and something that sticks

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in my mind first instinct, right for the Patriots, it's

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady. For the Rams, it's Todd Gurling sitting on

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the sidelines or five plays. I'll remember that when it

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to the Rams or sitting on the sidelines, uh,

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 1>being in the game for five plays, That's where I'm

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna remember. I'm not remembering, in all honesty, how great

0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle has been. So I don't think Sony Michelle

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to be over over own. I'll think of

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the under owned. I think more people will realize, oh,

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 1>James White, he's past catching back. I remember when he

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:39.840
<v Speaker 1>did in the Super Bowl two years ago. I know

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I love James White. I think that's the direction where

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:46.800
<v Speaker 1>people going. Now, Greg, does this change your mind? Michelle

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:51.880
<v Speaker 1>four thousand five on Fandel is the third highest priced

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:53.840
<v Speaker 1>player on this single game slate. So when I was

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:56.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at getting James White at two thousand dollars less

0:42:56.640 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 1>when I was looking at the slate this earlier, that

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:01.799
<v Speaker 1>did change find some thousand per seven in James White?

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Then are you kidding me? Thousands? Like two thousand dollars less?

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Of course I am. Everybody's but everybody's going to but

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 1>two thousand dollars less. You just talked about like find

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:13.720
<v Speaker 1>when he keeps props right, like find something you believe

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in and if the odds are in your favor, like

0:43:15.040 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 1>go for it. That's what it is with James White.

0:43:17.200 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I like James White more from a DFS perspective, and

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 1>he's cheaper. Why wouldn't I put him in him? Um,

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 1>do you have anything on that? I mean regarding Sony Michelle,

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:27.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think he'll be higher owned? Because that's what

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 1>we've seen. I'll also throw this your way just because

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:33.080
<v Speaker 1>James White is chalk. If it's a single game lineup,

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you do need to have to talk like you do

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 1>need to have the guys that are going to produce.

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:38.360
<v Speaker 1>So if you do think James White is going to

0:43:38.440 --> 0:43:40.399
<v Speaker 1>produce even though he's gonna be chalk, it comes down

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:42.319
<v Speaker 1>to like those fringe players who are going to make

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the difference, and maybe we'll get into some of those

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. Some of some of the low salary guys

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>who are gonna make the difference here could also signed him.

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:52.399
<v Speaker 1>But couldn't also the difference who you choose as your

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:54.800
<v Speaker 1>as your m v P, right, Like, couldn't that be

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the difference? Or you're just being like, listen, let me

0:43:56.520 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>just pick Tom Brady, picked Jarry Goffam. Worry about it

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the goodest. Look, I'm just kidding, Jim. No worries because

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 1>um look this is you know, I keep coming back.

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I think James White is going to be more owned

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:16.279
<v Speaker 1>than Sony Michelle. I get what you're saying, Frank, but

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 1>especially on DraftKings in the full PPR. You know, James

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:22.400
<v Speaker 1>White to me is gonna be chalking. You're right, you

0:44:22.480 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 1>do have to have some chalk. You have to pick

0:44:24.760 --> 0:44:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the right chalk that you want to use, because just

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:29.279
<v Speaker 1>because a player is chalk doesn't mean they're gonna end

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:32.239
<v Speaker 1>up giving you the numbers you're expecting or better. And

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I have concerns with James White. We've seen

0:44:35.719 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Rex Burkhead get a little bit more involved lately. I

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:41.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised at all if White is the decoy

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden, Birkheads getting a lot of

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 1>that work. Um, you know, and you're talking about a

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:48.319
<v Speaker 1>guy who's you know, a couple of grand cheaper than

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 1>even White is. So you know, it really comes down

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to you. You want to pick the players you think

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna have a good game. I get all that,

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time you have to you know,

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and not so much. It's not so different in it

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:04.799
<v Speaker 1>twenty guide league, like the ones you guys are doing.

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:06.840
<v Speaker 1>But if you're playing in trying to play in a

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:09.719
<v Speaker 1>big tournament, I mean, you have to take shots at

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 1>guys that just aren't gonna be there for a lot

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:16.279
<v Speaker 1>of people, guys like Dorset or Reynolds or somebody that

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:19.279
<v Speaker 1>just has a chance to differentiate you if they have

0:45:19.360 --> 0:45:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a good game. Let's get into some of those players.

0:45:22.560 --> 0:45:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Who's some of these lower salary players we think and

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:28.239
<v Speaker 1>make the difference. I'll tell you the one that I

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 1>have in my lineup right now. So I haven't I

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 1>haven't made my lad of yet, but the guy at

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:36.000
<v Speaker 1>first comes to mind, this is a different it's different

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:38.720
<v Speaker 1>one good good what we're talking about. It's Rex Burkhead

0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and he's ten so he's ten thousand dollars, still really expensive,

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 1>though he's only five dollars less than Robert Woods was

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:49.640
<v Speaker 1>so much more of I would say, solid role in

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the game plan. And I think if we're just talking

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:55.879
<v Speaker 1>about matchups that they're gonna exploit. Once again, I've talked

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:58.360
<v Speaker 1>about this corner for the Patriots, it's j C. Jackson,

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:00.359
<v Speaker 1>who teams have kind of been picking on here, who

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:02.720
<v Speaker 1>they've been calling penalties against. We know they're very strong

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:07.320
<v Speaker 1>with outside corners in terms of have Stefan Gilmore and

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 1>they have Jason mccordy on the outside. Those guys are

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:13.520
<v Speaker 1>very strong. Now, Robert Woods doesn't solely play in the slot.

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, him and Josh Reynolds rotate, but they

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 1>move these guys around. But Robert Wood still plays thirty

0:46:20.360 --> 0:46:22.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe of his snaps in the slot, and I think

0:46:22.800 --> 0:46:24.640
<v Speaker 1>he'll have some places where he can exploit here. So

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:26.839
<v Speaker 1>if you're telling me you're getting Robert Woods only five

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 1>more than a guy like Rex Burkhead, I'm gonna lean

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Robert Woods. But like it's not impossible that Rex Burkehead

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't have another game like he did last week.

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Going back to what Jim said, look, it's Bell, it's Belichick.

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Who is the one that who was it? Jake says,

0:46:43.640 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bela tricks. Probably that's so gross. Um, I think so.

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I think like if you just look at the prices

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:54.440
<v Speaker 1>on Fanduela, there's only four guys that play at all

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that could be can cherry and I mean literally unless

0:46:57.080 --> 0:46:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you go with one of the Rams tight ends. You

0:46:58.440 --> 0:47:00.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the Rams tight ends. Have fun Tyler be

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:02.880
<v Speaker 1>six general every six, so have fun with that. But

0:47:02.960 --> 0:47:05.359
<v Speaker 1>like other than that, you have grantins under ten grand.

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>You have Philip Door said at eight five hundred, Josh

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:09.839
<v Speaker 1>Reynolds everyone's talked about for literally the last three weeks

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in DFS eight five hundred, and then Chris Hogan at

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:13.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy five hundred, which people have talked about for the

0:47:13.920 --> 0:47:15.800
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks as well. People keep going back to

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:19.320
<v Speaker 1>these Josh Reynolds and Chris Hogan wells and hope it

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:21.759
<v Speaker 1>works that the people keep doing it. And I'm sure

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I'll do it in the Super Bowl because their price

0:47:23.680 --> 0:47:25.480
<v Speaker 1>where they are, like, everybody will have one of these

0:47:25.520 --> 0:47:28.800
<v Speaker 1>guys in their lineup, gentlemen, every single person. Now, I

0:47:29.400 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 1>just and this is one of the things that kind

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:33.719
<v Speaker 1>of sets me off on FanDuel DFS. Is you know,

0:47:34.480 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the salaries on Fandel, then look

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:40.560
<v Speaker 1>at the salaries on DraftKings. I mean, on Fandel you

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:43.759
<v Speaker 1>just just said if Burkehead is five hundred dollars less

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:46.960
<v Speaker 1>than Robert Woods, I mean I don't get that. I

0:47:47.000 --> 0:47:48.640
<v Speaker 1>don't get that at all. I mean you look, you

0:47:48.760 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 1>go over to Draft Kings and you're looking at a

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:54.440
<v Speaker 1>few thousand dollar difference three thousand to be exact, between

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Woods and Burkehead. So you know, some some of these

0:47:57.440 --> 0:48:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Vanduel prices to me just seeing way all from the

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:03.880
<v Speaker 1>get go, and I think that's something that you can

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:06.320
<v Speaker 1>exploit to Jim. I mean the way there are people

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 1>who are profitable betting greg who literally open up tabs

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of twenty different sports books and they'll just compare numbers

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and say, I like the under on this player, Where

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:21.160
<v Speaker 1>can I find the highest number? That's the board. So

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:24.319
<v Speaker 1>you can use the strategy like Jim is presenting here

0:48:24.360 --> 0:48:28.080
<v Speaker 1>where and you have to kind of you have to

0:48:28.200 --> 0:48:32.320
<v Speaker 1>do the calculation yourself because DraftKings is PPR and Fandel

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is half PPR, so they care a little bit more

0:48:33.880 --> 0:48:36.319
<v Speaker 1>about players who can score touchdowns. But again he's right,

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:39.400
<v Speaker 1>like the disparity should not be three thousand dollars on

0:48:39.520 --> 0:48:42.040
<v Speaker 1>draft Kings of Robert Woods is three thousand dollars more

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:45.439
<v Speaker 1>than Rex birkehead. Robert Woods should not only be five

0:48:45.840 --> 0:48:48.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars more on fandoms. So you can kind of compare

0:48:48.360 --> 0:48:50.759
<v Speaker 1>draftings and fandel prices and you use it for for

0:48:50.840 --> 0:48:53.200
<v Speaker 1>both ways and say, who are some of the guys

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:56.880
<v Speaker 1>who are undervalued or overvalued based on their salaries on

0:48:57.000 --> 0:48:59.840
<v Speaker 1>respective sites. You can kind of hit those two against

0:48:59.880 --> 0:49:01.239
<v Speaker 1>the other. I think I think it's a great point.

0:49:01.520 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 1>With that, we sign off of YouTube for today. Up

0:49:04.080 --> 0:49:07.319
<v Speaker 1>next Fantasy Football Frenzy with Corey Parsing, our our buddy,

0:49:07.400 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Jim Day and of course Chris Ventra, who all have

0:49:10.280 --> 0:49:13.319
<v Speaker 1>all the final Super Bowl analysis. They're like, subscribe, rate

0:49:13.440 --> 0:49:16.360
<v Speaker 1>us five stars and leave a comment. Subscribe to the channel.

0:49:16.640 --> 0:49:18.720
<v Speaker 1>We always appreciate your support. We're live on the radio

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:23.520
<v Speaker 1>for another three minutes or so. Right, who is of

0:49:23.880 --> 0:49:27.040
<v Speaker 1>this group? Actually go to Jim first, Jim who is

0:49:27.680 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 1>of Gronk Doorset, Josh Reynolds, Chris Hogan, these are all

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 1>nine thousand dollars or less. You're gonna have to have

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:36.160
<v Speaker 1>at least one, maybe two of these players in your

0:49:36.200 --> 0:49:38.160
<v Speaker 1>single game lineup, if you want to be able to

0:49:38.239 --> 0:49:40.359
<v Speaker 1>get a quarterback in there, if you want to get

0:49:40.360 --> 0:49:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a girlie, if you want to get into Julian Edelman,

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:45.880
<v Speaker 1>If who is the one or two guys between Gronk,

0:49:46.000 --> 0:49:48.920
<v Speaker 1>doorset Reynolds and Hogan where you are most likely to

0:49:48.960 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 1>have in your line up. Rock Definitely, I think that

0:49:52.440 --> 0:49:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Gronk's going out with a bang. We saw, you know,

0:49:54.920 --> 0:49:57.200
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago. He had a really good game, first

0:49:57.239 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>game in a while, uh Taddy, he really stepped up,

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think that it happens again. I think he

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:05.080
<v Speaker 1>gets in the end zone in this one. Um. I

0:50:05.239 --> 0:50:06.719
<v Speaker 1>just think he's gonna go out with a bang, and

0:50:06.760 --> 0:50:08.640
<v Speaker 1>he's just gonna leave it all on the field, because

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I do think he's gonna retire after this year and

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:14.839
<v Speaker 1>go start making movies or whatever he wants to do. Um.

0:50:14.960 --> 0:50:16.800
<v Speaker 1>So I like Gronk, and you know, maybe that's my

0:50:16.880 --> 0:50:18.719
<v Speaker 1>head speaking. I've always been a Gronk fan, but I

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:21.239
<v Speaker 1>like Gronk. I think he's gonna go out there. I

0:50:21.320 --> 0:50:24.160
<v Speaker 1>got him in a few lineups in the captain role

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:26.840
<v Speaker 1>because I think he's gonna go out big, you know.

0:50:26.920 --> 0:50:30.160
<v Speaker 1>It's it's interesting. Gronk was given interesting answers this week

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:32.920
<v Speaker 1>when talking about his future, and he's like, listen, man,

0:50:33.280 --> 0:50:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you just get hit so hard and you go full

0:50:35.239 --> 0:50:36.640
<v Speaker 1>speed and all you do is get hit and you

0:50:36.680 --> 0:50:39.120
<v Speaker 1>get beat up, and you get injured and you get hurt,

0:50:39.320 --> 0:50:41.399
<v Speaker 1>and two days later you expected to practice at full

0:50:41.440 --> 0:50:44.080
<v Speaker 1>speed back in the field. He's like, it's exhausting. It's

0:50:44.120 --> 0:50:46.800
<v Speaker 1>like bodies are not meant especially what he does to

0:50:46.960 --> 0:50:48.680
<v Speaker 1>blocking as much as he does. Like he's in the

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:51.680
<v Speaker 1>trenches more than you know. Bottom wide receivers and running

0:50:51.719 --> 0:50:54.800
<v Speaker 1>bodies are not built for that ultimately, and that's what

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:57.400
<v Speaker 1>That's what Gronk said. He's not wrong. I agree with

0:50:57.560 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Jim out of these guys, Frank, that Gronk has the

0:51:01.600 --> 0:51:04.040
<v Speaker 1>most ability I think to really explode. I think with

0:51:04.160 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Chris Hogan, with Josh Reynolds, you're hoping for a big play.

0:51:07.560 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 1>None of these guys are gonna be featured. There's a

0:51:09.200 --> 0:51:10.880
<v Speaker 1>chance that Rob and Cossey, he could wind up be

0:51:11.000 --> 0:51:12.560
<v Speaker 1>featured in this game, that he could be a big

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:14.879
<v Speaker 1>part of the offense. Chris Hogan, Josh Reynolds, Filid door Set,

0:51:15.160 --> 0:51:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not happening out of that crew drunks the answer.

0:51:20.080 --> 0:51:24.279
<v Speaker 1>We'll say. Chris Hogan in Doorset are interesting to me

0:51:24.400 --> 0:51:28.799
<v Speaker 1>just because I think Marcus Peters a guy who likes

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:30.759
<v Speaker 1>to bite a lot and could be prone to give

0:51:30.760 --> 0:51:34.720
<v Speaker 1>being up the big play. These are the outside wide receivers.

0:51:34.760 --> 0:51:37.160
<v Speaker 1>To them. We know Julian Edelman works mostly in the slot,

0:51:37.440 --> 0:51:40.360
<v Speaker 1>drunk slot. Sometimes they move him outside. We all remember

0:51:40.440 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Romo pointing him out at the top of the screen.

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh he end up catching a long pass down the field.

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:48.960
<v Speaker 1>But I do think, you know, I think Josh Reynolds

0:51:49.120 --> 0:51:50.440
<v Speaker 1>is the one that I'm least likely to used. To

0:51:50.440 --> 0:51:53.399
<v Speaker 1>be honest, I think between Doorset and Hogan, as cheap

0:51:53.480 --> 0:51:56.160
<v Speaker 1>as they are, I think one of these guys can

0:51:56.360 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 1>have maybe a few twenty thirty. Like yesterday, I was

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:03.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna take the under on Chris Hogan or Dorsets longest

0:52:03.400 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 1>catch because I believe Hogan's was like nineteen and a

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:08.200
<v Speaker 1>half and Dorsets was a little bit higher than that.

0:52:08.320 --> 0:52:11.600
<v Speaker 1>But then I thought about it, and I thought, well,

0:52:11.880 --> 0:52:14.080
<v Speaker 1>with a guy like Marcus Peters who likes to take chances,

0:52:14.320 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 1>he's able to get beat deep sometimes like This isn't

0:52:17.239 --> 0:52:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the safest bet because I could see one of these

0:52:19.000 --> 0:52:21.680
<v Speaker 1>guys maybe doing something and popping off Philip Dorset, a

0:52:21.680 --> 0:52:23.439
<v Speaker 1>guy who has scored a touchdown in three straight games.

0:52:23.600 --> 0:52:26.440
<v Speaker 1>But it is worth mentioning that Chris Hogan is the

0:52:26.480 --> 0:52:29.200
<v Speaker 1>one that consistently plays more so. He's played seventy of

0:52:29.239 --> 0:52:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the snaps each of the past three weeks, so he's

0:52:31.160 --> 0:52:34.080
<v Speaker 1>on the field more than a guy like Dorsett isn't

0:52:34.080 --> 0:52:35.759
<v Speaker 1>on the field as much but has the ability to

0:52:35.840 --> 0:52:38.600
<v Speaker 1>make bigger plays. I do like the Grandcola as well,

0:52:38.800 --> 0:52:41.960
<v Speaker 1>just from a personnelity perspective. Brands gave up the eighth

0:52:42.000 --> 0:52:44.759
<v Speaker 1>most Fantasy points that tight ends this year, probably going

0:52:44.800 --> 0:52:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that way. Jim will save your official prediction for the Frenzy.

0:52:47.480 --> 0:52:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Frank your final score please New England. I said it before,

0:52:51.800 --> 0:52:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll say it again. You're going thirty four one. Adrius

0:52:56.239 --> 0:52:59.759
<v Speaker 1>win again. Frenzy's up next. We'll see on Monday. We

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:00.200
<v Speaker 1>help