Speaker 1: See It's Trand one day.
Speaker 2: Since you guys did me Hello the Internet and welcome
Speaker 2: to this episode of It's Trand, you guys to me, Sorry,
Speaker 2: I forgot I did the Hello the Internet up top.
Speaker 2: I've only done this show three thousand times.
Speaker 1: My name's Jack.
Speaker 2: That over there is Miles and these are some of
Speaker 2: the things that are trending. That uh, It's Trand is
Speaker 2: courtesy of Vanadium Silver the Discord. Okay, always on point
Speaker 2: with the trending titles. And yeah, that's you're You're welcome
Speaker 2: for putting that song.
Speaker 3: In your head. Yeah, I love those songs. I was
Speaker 3: just thinking I saw it of I don't know why.
Speaker 3: I just popped up on my feet of Blues Traveler
Speaker 3: performing on Howard Stern.
Speaker 1: That is unshakeable. He was hitting the hook so the.
Speaker 2: Ring, I mean, they knew that shit was hooky and
Speaker 2: they need the song after it They're like, and yeah, motherfucker.
Speaker 3: Is talking about a shepherd is he talking about? Uh?
Speaker 3: Like performing on the at the Apollo Theater And.
Speaker 2: You get as I don't think those Travelers ever performed
Speaker 2: at the Apollo weirdly, which is weird.
Speaker 3: You would have expected John Popper, bro you could get
Speaker 3: in there. You can get in there with that voice
Speaker 3: and your harmonica skills.
Speaker 2: Come on, now, I've talked about my kid's favorite musician,
Speaker 2: Perry Gripp, who has a bunch of songs that are
Speaker 2: just manufactured ear work like it seems like his music.
Speaker 2: He used to be in a band that a lot
Speaker 2: of people know. That's name is escaping me right now.
Speaker 2: But when I brought him up, people like, are you
Speaker 2: talking about this guy? He's a child children's musician now
Speaker 2: he is, and his songs oh nerf hearder, Yes, his.
Speaker 1: Songs Sillsbury Grip is his name.
Speaker 2: His songs seem like they were manufactured by the CIA
Speaker 2: for the purposes of like enhanced interrogation. They're hell yeah,
Speaker 2: my kids fucking love them. There's one like a turtle, Turtle,
Speaker 2: don't dump that turtle. Dam d d dum dum dude.
Speaker 2: That's a tortoise. Turtle turtle, and I haven't stuck in
Speaker 2: my head every morning when I wake up.
Speaker 3: Turtle. That's Jerry Ferrara.
Speaker 2: All right, Uh, we we introduced ourselves. Let's get into
Speaker 2: some of the things that are trending.
Speaker 3: Well, allow us to reintroduce ourselves.
Speaker 2: My name is Jack oh to the b Ryan to
Speaker 2: the all right, we're tuping in.
Speaker 3: Yeah, all kinds of trends. I mean, look, I think
Speaker 3: the one let's start off with a bit of good news,
Speaker 3: right because right now, from everything we read in the
Speaker 3: words that Trump says out of his mouth, it feels
Speaker 3: like he's gape, getting gaping, he's gaming gaping mouth, he's
Speaker 3: gearing up to potentially never listen to a judge ever again.
Speaker 3: But for the moment, some of the courts are able
Speaker 3: to at the very least delay some of this bullshit
Speaker 3: until the Supreme Court probably hears it. But for now
Speaker 3: that's fine. But with specifically Trump's anti trans military band,
Speaker 3: it just got fucking destroyed in court by Judge Reyes.
Speaker 3: They they had the fortune of this, uh, this case
Speaker 3: being heard by d C's first openly gay federal judge,
Speaker 3: and she wasn't having any of this bullshit. I just
Speaker 3: want to read a few excerpts from the court transcripts.
Speaker 3: So first, it's just like again, the whole thing is
Speaker 3: about pronouns or trans people being in the military actually
Speaker 3: is bad for everything. So that's why it can't it
Speaker 3: can't have That's why we need discrimination. So this is
Speaker 3: Judge Rays, Attorney Jason Lynch absolutely absolutely be very nervous,
Speaker 3: to be very nervous. Here we go, Judge Rays. Can
Speaker 3: we agree that the greatest fighting force is not going
Speaker 3: to be impacted in any way, in any way by
Speaker 3: less than one percent of the soldiers using a different
Speaker 3: pronoun than others might want to call them.
Speaker 1: Well, now, I can't agree with that here, Okay.
Speaker 3: Would you agree with me that if the military is
Speaker 3: negatively impacted in any kind of way that matters from
Speaker 3: the use of pronouns. We all have a lot of
Speaker 3: bigger problems than pronoun use. We have a military that
Speaker 3: is incompetent. Any common sense, rational human being knows that
Speaker 3: it doesn't. It is pretext. It is frankly ridiculous. If
Speaker 3: you can get me an officer of the United States
Speaker 3: Military who is willing to get on the stand and
Speaker 3: say that because of pronoun usage, the US military is
Speaker 3: less prepared, I will be the first to give you
Speaker 3: a box of cigars.
Speaker 2: Ooh, a box of cigars. Now you're talking about language. Okay,
Speaker 2: that wasn't in the transfer, That was not a transcript.
Speaker 2: The judge did say, like, I'll give you ten fucking days,
Speaker 2: go ahead, like, I'll even let you try and find
Speaker 2: someone that will debase themselves in front of the court
Speaker 2: like this.
Speaker 3: Go see, go see what you got. Then went on
Speaker 3: to then talking about this isn't even like half the
Speaker 3: fucking wild ship that was coming out of this exchange.
Speaker 3: Another one was talking about because there's all this stuff
Speaker 3: about quote, radical gender ideology in the executive Order. This
Speaker 3: is what the judge asked Jason Lynch of the DJ
Speaker 3: If you can't articulate what radical gender ideology means, how
Speaker 3: is the Defense secretary going to know what it means.
Speaker 2: I'm really low to speculate what the President had in
Speaker 2: mind when he signed this order.
Speaker 3: Okay, well, it's not like I randomly picked you off
Speaker 3: the street. You're the government's representative here.
Speaker 1: That's not like r.
Speaker 2: That's here to argue that ship. Are simply could not
Speaker 2: to speculate, countryman.
Speaker 3: Yeah, holy shit, And then goes on to just talk
Speaker 3: about like the animus of all of it, and then
Speaker 3: just saying like, in this executive Order, you're calling people
Speaker 3: who are trained gender or have different or want to
Speaker 3: use different pronouns described as dishonest, dishonorable, undisciplined, immodest, lack integrity,
Speaker 3: like goes on to like all these things like how
Speaker 3: is this like how is this not expressing animus? And
Speaker 3: he's like, well no, and just it's like, let me
Speaker 3: answer this for you, and then just continues to cook.
Speaker 3: Right now, this is obviously this this is still being heard,
Speaker 3: so we don't have any sort of conclusion to this,
Speaker 3: but it feels like this is not going to go
Speaker 3: the way that the transphobes wanted to. And also a
Speaker 3: federal judge did grant a preliminary injunction because the Bureau
Speaker 3: of Prisons was again they wanted there was another order
Speaker 3: that would require like transgender women to be in like
Speaker 3: male in like inmate facilities, and that those, thank god stopped. Yeah,
Speaker 3: like just non stop violence.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: And so Trump's response to this is to write an
Speaker 2: executive order being like I'm king, actually right, nothing applies.
Speaker 1: I say, what the law is is that basically.
Speaker 3: So that like the headlines were new Trump Executive Order
Speaker 3: that only he and the Attorney General will are that
Speaker 3: like basically the arbiters of what the quote law is.
Speaker 3: And a lot of people took that because of everything.
Speaker 3: And Trump is saying to mean he will decide which
Speaker 3: laws apply to him and which laws do not apply
Speaker 3: to him?
Speaker 1: But what is that?
Speaker 3: Yeah, where's Rob Schneider for that comic relief next to him?
Speaker 3: But anyway, what this EO is about specifically is like
Speaker 3: basically taking away any independence from agencies like the SEC.
Speaker 3: So what he's saying here is that like they will
Speaker 3: have final say over what these agencies decide what new
Speaker 3: regulations and laws are, rather than rather than these agencies
Speaker 3: having the independence to do that in terms of what
Speaker 3: is the best for X, Y or z. So that's
Speaker 3: that's what he's saying. He's basically again saying, no, I
Speaker 3: get to tell everyone what to do. Sorry.
Speaker 2: It really is interesting all the ways that like a
Speaker 2: mayor's soft, like just all of the bad habits that
Speaker 2: we've been in for the past decades, just thinking about
Speaker 2: the Judge Dread thing that like Judge Dread is explicitly
Speaker 2: a movie or a comic series that's about fascism, and
Speaker 2: where Judge Dread is like bad guy, and then there
Speaker 2: made the Hollywood movie version of it, and they're like, well,
Speaker 2: we got to make Stallone the good guy, and so
Speaker 2: they just make a movie about how fascism is good, right,
Speaker 2: and that's what we have as like our main touchstone.
Speaker 2: For a guy screaming I am the law?
Speaker 3: Was it one of the guys, like like the one
Speaker 3: one of the judges who had half a brain, They're like,
Speaker 3: all right, you got you got to go to the
Speaker 3: Curse of Earth. Bro. We've heard enough of you. We
Speaker 3: heard enough of you.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, it's pretty pretty bad. We've been pretty
Speaker 2: lazy for a long time. Our ideas, the ideas we
Speaker 2: let get through are pretty fucked right, and so I
Speaker 2: feel like we're super set up. We've been nicely tenderized
Speaker 2: for this fascist roasting that we're about to undergo. I
Speaker 2: don't obviously, I'm not a chef, so I knowe that
Speaker 2: culinary metaphor probably didn't make sense. But anyways, Hey, here's
Speaker 2: some good news, miles. iPhone is releasing a new iPhone.
Speaker 2: I love because it's going to be the cheapest one
Speaker 2: that they're offering. It's got cheapest in the headline, which
Speaker 2: might lead you to believe, wait a second, to iPhones
Speaker 2: just get cheaper. Unfortunately, no, they did not, So Apple
Speaker 2: just announced It's interesting how this is framed. Apple just
Speaker 2: announced its most affordable phone will now be the iPhone
Speaker 2: sixteen E.
Speaker 3: Which will cost five hundred and ninety nine dollars in future.
Speaker 2: Their AI system that they go AI now stands for
Speaker 2: Apple Intelligence because they got a AI in the iPhone
Speaker 2: and it works, It works good and never gets anything wrong.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's like one hundred and fifty dollars I think
Speaker 3: more than the last se Yeah, of like model device,
Speaker 3: like the comparable device, and they're trying to fucking wow.
Speaker 3: People have been like, well, it's got AI, and yet
Speaker 3: nobody fucking uses I have it, and all it does
Speaker 3: is tell me weird summaries of text threads of things
Speaker 3: that have happened, like our friend Daniel joined some celebrity
Speaker 3: entourage when that didn't happen. But that's what the AI
Speaker 3: summary said when I didn't read the texts.
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, they just get They also summarized a series
Speaker 2: of BBC News stories with this Luigi Mangione shoots himself
Speaker 2: Syria mother hopes Hassad.
Speaker 1: Pays the price. People are like, wait, what, huh?
Speaker 2: How it shoots himself in prison? Got that incorrect, didn't
Speaker 2: didn't quite nail it. Apple Intelligence hasn't exactly been a
Speaker 2: slam dunk, but yeah, just so it's the least expensive
Speaker 2: model currently on offer. It is forty percent more expensive
Speaker 2: than the last introductory model, which is I think that's inflation,
Speaker 2: and they are that's what we'll call it, But they're like,
Speaker 2: how does this not get called inflation? They're choosing to
Speaker 2: charge more because people are buying fewer iPhones. They're not
Speaker 2: like charging for a new, better feature, Like nobody wants
Speaker 2: the fucking.
Speaker 1: Eye I have you heard?
Speaker 3: It's at Apple Intelligence. You can do like fucking creepy
Speaker 3: images of your kid with the Image Playground, and your
Speaker 3: kid can be playing Mortal Kombat with a friend in
Speaker 3: Vietnam if they wanted to.
Speaker 2: Just don't understand how like what the disconnect is between
Speaker 2: like stories like this where it's like, yeah, now it's
Speaker 2: going to be forty percent more expensive, but it's the
Speaker 2: least expensive model, so just think of this as inexpensive.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And then when.
Speaker 2: People are like I think inflation might be caused by
Speaker 2: corporations choosing to charge more, people like that is a
Speaker 2: child's understanding of what inflation is, right, How do.
Speaker 1: Are you cool?
Speaker 2: Well?
Speaker 3: I mean because I think at this point it's stories
Speaker 3: like this and just generally looking at our own media
Speaker 3: literacy in this country and what the media is doing.
Speaker 3: It's not it's not real like there are journalists out there.
Speaker 3: But for the most part, these are communication pr machines
Speaker 3: for corporations to tell consumers what's happening in the world
Speaker 3: rather than community like not, rather than things that consumers
Speaker 3: think they need to know from us, like just other
Speaker 3: people being like what the fuck, Like there's MSNB season,
Speaker 3: Like what the fuck? Why is this thing more expensive?
Speaker 3: This sounds like greed. They're gonna like they'll be like, wow,
Speaker 3: it's got the oh I love playing with d image
Speaker 3: playground all right, yeah, good story. So gazas, but are
Speaker 3: gonna be a casino? Don't we love it?
Speaker 1: Okay? Next love it folks.
Speaker 2: Yeah, look at these pool designs that they have for
Speaker 2: a gaza. Like people are doing the research, you know,
Speaker 2: because obviously these companies are doing research behind closed doors,
Speaker 2: asking like man, like you're I had always assumed, Okay,
Speaker 2: people are excited about AI. The way these corporations are acting,
Speaker 2: people must be fucking psyched about AI, and so people,
Speaker 2: you know, the media has like gone out and done
Speaker 2: the polling, and the research has shown that consumers don't
Speaker 2: give a shit about having AI.
Speaker 3: And their phones.
Speaker 2: Right, They basically their sales are down two percent from
Speaker 2: their peak in twenty twenty two, and they need something
Speaker 2: and they don't have anything else. Yeah, and so they're
Speaker 2: just going with this thing that is contributing to climate change,
Speaker 2: the climate catastrophe.
Speaker 1: Pet. But yeah, Pet, like the surveys.
Speaker 2: Have found, AI hasn't been a major reason that people
Speaker 2: are buying new phones. The research director at Counterpoint Research said,
Speaker 2: people are buying phones for the same reason they always have.
Speaker 2: The battery isn't recharging, or the phone is aging and
Speaker 2: not working.
Speaker 3: That's yeah, just go back to your planned obsolescent model.
Speaker 3: That's don't even fucking yeah, just make my phone break
Speaker 3: so I have to go to the fucking store and
Speaker 3: get another one because no one. Look at the polling around,
Speaker 3: no one fucking wants.
Speaker 2: Yeah Starty from last year found that seventy three percent
Speaker 2: of iPhone users think the AI features quote add little
Speaker 2: to no value to the product.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean yeah. Brian in the chat also raised
Speaker 3: the point, Yeah, like the tariffs and component costs, those
Speaker 3: are going to go up, so of course they're being
Speaker 3: passed along. But again that's another dimension of a store
Speaker 3: you can bring up too. It's like, yeah, well, President
Speaker 3: Aswig decided to just go fucking full on, like fuck
Speaker 3: the economy up mode. That's another reason on top of
Speaker 3: corporate greed is the malfeasance of the president. But anyway,
Speaker 3: uh right, yes, exactly.
Speaker 1: Let's take a quick break.
Speaker 2: We'll be right back, and we're back. There was another
Speaker 2: plane crash. So I do feel like we're at the
Speaker 2: point with the plane crashes where we're now reporting every
Speaker 2: plane crash. And so there was a private lane crash
Speaker 2: in Arizona.
Speaker 3: Messed it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, they're like somebody found a screw.
Speaker 2: I'm not saying definitely, the air travel has grown way
Speaker 2: more precarious. I just want to distinguish between the commercial
Speaker 2: air crash in d C and uh, you know, the
Speaker 2: commercial plane flipping over after doing a belly flop in Toronto,
Speaker 2: and then you know when they're private plane crashes.
Speaker 1: I just feel like.
Speaker 2: Those are uh more, those those were happening for the
Speaker 2: past decade, that those hadn't been made obsolete. It the
Speaker 2: whole system is a fucking disaster and is vastly underfunded
Speaker 2: and underemployed, and they don't have enough people. And obviously
Speaker 2: Trump is to blame for that, but I just also
Speaker 2: want to make sure that we're viewing all the stories
Speaker 2: in the proper context, right right, right, yeah, yeah, So
Speaker 2: obviously never want.
Speaker 3: To lay off trump Man.
Speaker 2: To lay off Trump and let him cook with these
Speaker 2: National Parks. I do just want to talk about the
Speaker 2: National Parks. You know, lots of different parts of the
Speaker 2: federal government are continuing to be dismantled by.
Speaker 1: Trump and Musk.
Speaker 2: But they just fired one thousand employees from the National Parks.
Speaker 2: Then they're reinstating five thousand seasonal jobs which were rescinded
Speaker 2: during last months hiring freeze, which makes sense to me
Speaker 2: because it feels like they're trying to turn working for
Speaker 2: the National Parks into like seasonal gigwork like they do
Speaker 2: with everything.
Speaker 3: It's like if they got one cushy federal job, no,
Speaker 3: they should be flipping around cobbling together three two to
Speaker 3: three jobs to survive.
Speaker 2: Yes, yes, And then our employment numbers go up, so
Speaker 2: it seems like things are going well while the jobs
Speaker 2: just get fucking way way worse. That's something that both
Speaker 2: the Democrats and Republicans can agree on. Mm hmm, but yeah,
Speaker 2: I mean Democrats sent a letter warning that the freeze
Speaker 2: meant the national parks would be short staffed in the summer,
Speaker 2: which would lead to potentially life threatening situations if anyone
Speaker 2: needed medical attention. And so they're like, fine, you can
Speaker 2: have these five thousand gig workers, right, And yeah, I
Speaker 2: mean but people like workers at Yosemite are talking about
Speaker 2: how this is going to kill the long term health
Speaker 2: of the parks.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and just the shit that they have to forego
Speaker 3: because of these cuts, like they have actual they have
Speaker 3: to do like burns, controlled burns to help the shit
Speaker 3: from fucking erupting in flames. And they're like, we can't
Speaker 3: even We had to put that off because they just
Speaker 3: cut up. They just cut the money off. So now
Speaker 3: we're sort of at higher risk now because of all
Speaker 3: of this bullshit.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we will be more vulnerable to a catastrophic fire
Speaker 2: in the future as a result of not being able
Speaker 2: to do the prescribed burns. A federal firefighter with direct
Speaker 2: knowledge of the situation set so a bit of good news,
Speaker 2: some have theorized, and by the way, this good news
Speaker 2: is completely fictional. Some have theorized that Trump's plan will
Speaker 2: be to give the parks back to indigenous nations, which
Speaker 2: is a good idea that activists have been pushing for
Speaker 2: for years. Shockingly, that doesn't seem to be his actual plan.
Speaker 2: He has previously announced his intention to exploit federal lands,
Speaker 2: including national parks, for resources, including oil, and he's already
Speaker 2: signed an executive order that allows them to do this,
Speaker 2: which was easy to miss in the flurry of evil
Speaker 2: executive orders.
Speaker 3: That's one of the things that it is wild.
Speaker 2: Though.
Speaker 3: The thing about like sort of the pseudo land back
Speaker 3: aspect of returning national parks to like indigenous Americans is
Speaker 3: it feels like the way the language is sort of
Speaker 3: presented feels like someone trying to convince a conservative to
Speaker 3: do it. They're like, yeah, and then give it to
Speaker 3: them because then it's going to be there fault, So
Speaker 3: then maybe that'll work. I don't know, just an idea.
Speaker 3: I don't know. Maybe it's not coming from a good
Speaker 3: faith place. But anyway, I'm an oil lobbyist, and can
Speaker 3: you make me in charge of the Bureau of Land Management? Oh?
Speaker 1: Yes, great, thanks, yes.
Speaker 2: So the plan to like open it up to drilling
Speaker 2: is straight out of Project twenty twenty five and specifically
Speaker 2: a chapter that was written by William Perry Pendley who
Speaker 2: is basically Daniel Plainview from There will be Blood.
Speaker 3: Deny sue Paul Thomas Anderson because he said he was
Speaker 3: completely ripping off his whole life.
Speaker 1: That's my shit, dude, that's my duel. Shit.
Speaker 3: You just I fell down a tiny mind shaft and
Speaker 3: broke my arm in the opening scene.
Speaker 1: Opening scene, I beat a guy to death with a
Speaker 1: bowling pin.
Speaker 3: Spoiler alert.
Speaker 1: But yeah.
Speaker 2: He once argued that all public land in the West
Speaker 2: should be sold off to private investors.
Speaker 3: I totally shit.
Speaker 2: The national parks are like one of the really good
Speaker 2: things about America, like that, it's amazing that we have it.
Speaker 1: And that's what That's really what Trump just wanted to watch.
Speaker 3: There's a manifest destiny, dude. That is the sickest prize
Speaker 3: for manifest destiny for all the fucking parks. Bruh. Yeah.
Speaker 2: According to one environmentalist, this chapter of the Project twenty
Speaker 2: twenty five is an oil lobbyist fever dream straight out
Speaker 2: of the nineteenth century. Pendley was Trump's acting director of
Speaker 2: the Bureau of Land Management from twenty nineteen to twenty
Speaker 2: twenty one, and he was so corrupt that his list
Speaker 2: of quote potential conflicts was seventeen pages long, and a
Speaker 2: judge ruled he was occupying the position illegally, but he
Speaker 2: refused to leave.
Speaker 3: No squatting. Okay, okay, yeah yeah. The new BLM director
Speaker 3: again Bureau of Land Management is Kathleen Scamma. I thought
Speaker 3: it said Schmegma Scamma, and again currently the president of
Speaker 3: an oil and gas lobbying firm. So I don't yeah, yeah,
Speaker 3: uh huh. We'll see what happens there.
Speaker 1: We'll see what again.
Speaker 2: It's like national parks are It's not just me saying
Speaker 2: national parks are nice to have.
Speaker 1: They're hugely popular.
Speaker 2: So like when families start rolling up to parks only
Speaker 2: to find that they're like just full of oil drills,
Speaker 2: like pump jacks and like and on fire, maybe that
Speaker 2: will move the needle for Trump.
Speaker 3: But I don't know.
Speaker 2: We're so deep into the President Biff timeline from Back
Speaker 2: to the Future too. I just feel like we're everyone's
Speaker 2: just like.
Speaker 3: Okay, there's not gonna be a moment where you're gonna
Speaker 3: be able to look at MAGA and say, dude, look
Speaker 3: what this folded? Now?
Speaker 1: Do you get it?
Speaker 3: No, the human ego prevents that from happening, especially people
Speaker 3: who are this all in on their backwards idea, Like
Speaker 3: they're not going to fucking see the light like that
Speaker 3: at all. I don't, I'm at least I'm not convinced
Speaker 3: of that. I think it's because they're just gonna find
Speaker 3: a way to say that it's fucking anyone but their fault,
Speaker 3: or anyone but Trump's fault, it's Joe Biden. Well, actually this,
Speaker 3: if you could, you could trace this back to Bill Clinton.
Speaker 3: There's always some weird you know, uh, casual cliche, thought
Speaker 3: killing cliche they can like you know, lean on to
Speaker 3: completely just pivot away from arriving at the truth. And
Speaker 3: I think, sadly, I think maybe it's really only this
Speaker 3: I don't even know how many people, because you even
Speaker 3: think about people who had family members die of COVID
Speaker 3: and that just made them go harder in the other direction,
Speaker 3: like rather than being like, holy shit, I can't believe
Speaker 3: what's happened. Like my concern here too is even the
Speaker 3: people that are getting affected by the backwards policies of
Speaker 3: Trump will find a way to say, actually, this was
Speaker 3: a win for me. But I don't know, I mean,
Speaker 3: it's it's usually been not at the scale of you
Speaker 3: have no job, you have no medication? Yeah, now can
Speaker 3: you can you? Does that maga hat bring your A
Speaker 3: one C to the proper levels? I don't know, yeah,
Speaker 3: but I think you're right.
Speaker 2: I mean, they still haven't even admitted they lost the
Speaker 2: Civil War or that they were wrong about the Civil War,
Speaker 2: So I feel like that's that's probably not going to
Speaker 2: admit they're wrong about the election that they actually won.
Speaker 3: I think it's like a hard experience, maybe the only
Speaker 3: teacher that people are going to understand or somehow find
Speaker 3: a way to communicate to them in a way that
Speaker 3: isn't as like in this same vernac like this political
Speaker 3: lexicon that they're so used to seeing, and like that
Speaker 3: immediately shuts their brains off and to get people again
Speaker 3: more interested in class than politics because the politics route,
Speaker 3: you're not going to get there logically at all. And
Speaker 3: I'm sure you know you saw a moment of it
Speaker 3: with Luigi Mangioni. You saw a moment of it. But
Speaker 3: then Fox really turned up the heat on that, and
Speaker 3: now a lot of conservatives are like, yeah, he did
Speaker 3: it because the lap is making people fucking wacky. That's right,
Speaker 3: all right.
Speaker 2: Those are some of the things that are trending on
Speaker 2: this Wednesday, February nineteenth.
Speaker 3: We are back tomorrow with.
Speaker 2: A whole last episode of the show, really fun one.
Speaker 2: Until then, he kind to each other, be kind to yourselves,
Speaker 2: get the vaccines where you still can, get your flail shot,
Speaker 2: don't do nothing about white supremacy, and we will talk
Speaker 2: to you tomorrow.
Speaker 3: Bye bye