WEBVTT - Special Episode: David Quammen & Breathless

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Aaron Welsh, and this is this podcast will

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Kill You. Welcome to the very first episode in this

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>season's mini series of bonus episodes. If you tuned into

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>any of our bonus episodes from last season, you may

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>remember that in each of those episodes, I had an

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>expert guest come on the podcast to help us dive

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>more deeply into an aspect of the topic that we

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>had covered in our previous week's regular episode. We got

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>up close and personal with koala's and chlamydia, explore the

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:19.199
<v Speaker 1>true origins of epidemiology, dug into fossilized poop. And those

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>were just a few of the episodes. This season, though

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing something a little different. We'll still be deep

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>diving into a topic with an expert guest, but that

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>topic will be a book, and that expert guest will

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>be the author. In each bonus episode this season, I'll

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>be interviewing authors all about their popular science books on

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>topics ranging from smallpox inoculation during the American Revolutionary War

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to menstrual periods, the history of eugenics, to why sweat matters,

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and so so much more. I guess you could think

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of it kind of like this podcast Will Kill You

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Book Club. In any case, it's going to be super

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>fun and I can't wait to see where these discussions

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>take us. I am so thrilled to be kicking off

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>this mini series with an interview with one of the

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>all time greatest science writers out there, David Quwaman. Over

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the course of his career, Quamen has published over a

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>dozen books and has contributed to countless magazines and journals,

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>including National Geographic, The New Yorker, Outside Magazine, and more.

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>His books have explored topics such as island biogeography, the

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>history of evolutionary theory, and the spillover of pathogens from

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>domestic and wild animals to humans. That last book, Spillover,

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Animal Infections and the Next Human Pandemic, is actually one

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of my favorites, as well as one of the most

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>terrifying books I've ever read. I suspect many of you

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>have already read it, but if you haven't, made sure

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you check it out. Quaman's latest book, Breathless, The Scientific

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Race to Defeat at Deadly Virus, picks up in a

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.839
<v Speaker 1>way from where Spillover left off by examining not pathogens

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that could cause a pay pandemic but a virus that

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>did indeed cause a pandemic. Of course, I'm talking about

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 1>SARS covy two and the COVID pandemic. While there may

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>be some quibbling over the finer aspects of the virus's

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>pathophysiology or epidemiology, there's at least one thing that the

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>scientific community can agree on when it comes to SARS

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>covy two. We saw it coming for decades. Epidemiologists, disease ecologist, virologists,

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>science journalists like David Kwaman, so very many people have

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>warned that a pandemic was on the horizon, that a

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>virus or other pathogen jumping into humans from animals and

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>then being efficiently transmitted human to human was not just

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>possible but likely, especially given the increasing frequency of interactions

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>among humans, wildlife, and domestic animals. But knowing something is

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>likely to happen is very different than watching your prediction

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>come true before you're very eyes, and the resolution provided

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>by that crystal ball may not be high enough to

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>allow us to turn prediction into prevention, which is part

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of the reason why three years after the COVID pandemic began,

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>we're still struggling to find answers to questions like what

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>animal does SARS covy two naturally reside in? What was

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>the sequence of events that led to the spillover event?

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Was there more than one spillover event? That these questions

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>have yet to be fully answered does not mean that

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>no progress has been made. On the contrary, we may

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>know more about SARS covy two at this point than

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>we do about any other virus on this planet, but

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in particular, the lack of clarity on this virus's origins

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>has led to a fierce, controversial, and highly politicized debate

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that reveals a great deal about attitudes towards science and

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 1>the disconnect between how science is conducted and how it

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>is presented in popular media. This question of where SARS

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>CoV two came from is just one of many explored

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>by Kwamen in his book Breathless. In this riveting, fast paced,

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>and slightly terrifying book, Quaman takes a big picture view

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>of the COVID pandemic as seen by those working most

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:19.799
<v Speaker 1>closely on the disease, the scientists. How did our scientific

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>understanding of this virus, the disease it causes, and the

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>pandemic it's responsible for evolves since those reports of a

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 1>pneumonia of unknown cause began circulating in early January twenty twenty.

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Tracking down the origins of the COVID pandemic means looking

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>beyond where and when SARS CoV two first emerged. It

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>means examining the influence that past epidemics and pandemics have

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>had on the public health policies shaping this one. It

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>means asking ourselves why prediction and surveillance weren't enough for

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>complete pandemic prevention. It means confronting the growing mistrust in

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>science and spread of myths and disinformation that added fuel

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 1>to the pandemic fire. Addressing these elements of COVID is

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>important not just for understanding how we got to where

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.119
<v Speaker 1>we are today, but also to help us be better

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>prepared if or when this happens again. In Breathless, Kwaman

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>expertly weaves an account of scientific discovery as it relates

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to SARS covid two, and also stresses that what we

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>haven't yet learned about this virus, where the gaps in

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>our knowledge lie, is just as crucial to the COVID

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>pandemic story as what we have. But before I get

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>too lost in singing the praises of Breathless. Let's get

0:06:36.400 --> 0:07:03.799
<v Speaker 1>into the interview itself right after this break. David Qualmyn.

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>What an honor. Thank you so very much for joining

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>me today.

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:10.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it's honor or not, but it's

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 2>nice to be invited. Well.

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I am such a longtime fan of your work, and

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I suspect many of our listeners are as well, so

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just wonderful to have you here. Your latest book, Breathless,

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is a fascinating and terrifying exploration of the COVID nineteen pandemic,

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>as scientists sought to understand the inner workings and origin

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of SARS CoV two, which is, of course, the virus

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that causes COVID. When did you first decide that you

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to write a book about SARS COVID two and

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>how did you land on this particular focus.

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Actually, my publisher decided that I wanted to write a

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 2>book about COVID nineteen, and then I did. After they did.

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 2>I was in Tasmania for the month of February twenty

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty as this thing exploded. January, this thing got started.

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 2>I got a call in mid January from an op

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 2>ed editor at the New York Times saying, hey, Kwamen,

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 2>it's about time for you to write another op ed

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 2>on something for us, So why don't you do that, like,

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 2>for instance, I don't know on this virus in Wuhan,

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 2>And I said, yes, I do want to write an

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 2>op ed about this virus in Wuhan because this could

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 2>be serious, and I can think we can loop back

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 2>to how I was confident it could be serious at

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 2>that point mid January, and so I wrote an op

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 2>ed for this editor she was based in Hong Kong

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 2>but working for the New York Times, and it ran

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 2>on January twenty eighth, saying, people, this could be it.

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 2>This could be the next pandemic. This virus, it's a coronavirus,

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, et cetera. Here's why it could be really

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 2>a pandemic threat. And then I got on a plane

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 2>and flew to Tasmania to do research on a book

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 2>that I was working on for Simon and Schuster about

0:08:56.080 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 2>cancer as an evolutionary phenomenon. And Tasmania was important because

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 2>the Tasmanian devil, that little marsupial omnivore that's unique to Tasmania,

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 2>is dying off from an epidemic of genuinely transmissible cancer.

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 2>A transmissible tumor supposed to be impossible, but it's not impossible,

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 2>and it says a lot about how cancer can evolve.

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 2>So I spent my time there crashing around in the

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 2>bush with Tasmanian devil biologists. I had met them before,

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 2>I had written about it before, but now I was

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 2>back for a book. Except that my email lit up

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 2>with requests to flap my jaw about the virus in Wuhan,

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 2>and so I spent half my time doing that, talking

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 2>about this virus while I was in Tasmania. Flew back

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 2>from Tasmania on March second, twenty twenty, then did not

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 2>leave the state of Montana for two years, did not

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 2>leave my town here, Bozeman, essentially for two years. And

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 2>in a late April or so, or maybe it was

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 2>soon after I got back, I heard through my agent

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 2>that Simon and Schuster wanted a pandemic book and would

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 2>David be interested in writing it? Because they knew I

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 2>had already published Spillover in twenty twelve, so they said,

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 2>we want a pandemic book, would you write it for us?

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 2>And I thought very carefully about this for four or

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 2>five seconds and then said yes, But then was faced

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 2>with the difficulty of figuring out how do I write

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 2>a uniquely useful book about something that a lot of

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 2>other people were going to be writing books about, and

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 2>how do I research it without being able to travel,

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 2>which is usually part of my operating principle. Go there.

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 2>If you're going to write about ebola killing gorillas in

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 2>the Congo forest, go there. We're going to write about

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 2>viruses in bats and caves in southern China, go there.

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Couldn't go there, So I spent the rest of twenty

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty trying to figure out how to do this book.

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 2>But I had committed to it to Simon and Schuster

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 2>and committed to it on a deadline of delivery by

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 2>December thirty first of twenty twenty one, so I had

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 2>to figure it out fast. So that was the beginning of.

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 1>This You are certainly no stranger to pathogens of pandemic potential,

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 1>As you mentioned, your excellent twenty twelve book Spillover explores

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>this topic in great depth. Do you remember what went

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>through your head when you first heard about these cases

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of pneumonia of unknown cause in early twenty twenty, When

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 1>did the alarm bell start really ringing for you.

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, I subscribe and have for almost twenty years. I

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 2>suppose to ProMED mail, and you I'm sure know what

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 2>ProMED is. But in case any of your listeners don't,

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:50.439
<v Speaker 2>PROMD is a subscriber list alert service on infectious disease.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 2>So I belong to that, and that means that I

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 2>and eighty thousand other subscribers get numerous emails virtually every

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 2>day alerting us to a child has died of a

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 2>suspicious respiratory disease in Houchimen City, or water buffaloes have

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 2>shown up with lumpy skin disease in Malaysia, or people

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:22.199
<v Speaker 2>are sneezing in Adelaide, Australia. Whatever. So we get emails,

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 2>as you know, get emails, bing bing bing. So you

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 2>get all these emails about all these different kinds of diseases,

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 2>and most of them you're not interested in, so you

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 2>delete them. Boom boom, boom, delete delete, delete some of

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 2>them you read, and then delete some of them you

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 2>don't delete. So I went back to January of twenty

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty to see which ProMED emails I had not deleted

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 2>on this subject, and the earliest one I found was

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 2>one on January thirteenth, twenty twenty, and for the first time,

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 2>it used the word coronavirus, at least the first time

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 2>that I've noticed, And I'm sure that that's the reason

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 2>I didn't delete it is because I read I looked

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 2>at ProMED on the Wuhan virus, and I saw the

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 2>word coronavirus, and that's when I said, boom, this could

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 2>be the one. Because the scientists ten years earlier had

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 2>told me the next one is going to be caused

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 2>by an RNA virus, an RNA virus with a history

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:20.479
<v Speaker 2>of spilling over from animals into humans, So maybe an influenza,

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 2>maybe a PARAMIXA virus, or maybe a coronavirus.

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Many people saw this pandemic coming, or saw a pandemic

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of this kind coming, as you mentioned, yet we were

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>more or less unprepared when it did arrive. What do

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you think are some of the sources for that disconnect

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>between prediction and prevention or prediction and response. In other words,

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess what didn't we see coming about this pandemic?

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Right? One of the things we didn't see coming was obdurate,

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 2>stupid national leaders. Actually we saw them coming too, but

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 2>there was nothing we could do about it. People have

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 2>asked me what surprise you most about this pandemic, And

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 2>what surprised me most was how bad the responses were.

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Not the nature of the virus, not the potential of

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the virus, not the origin of the virus. Nothing surprised

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 2>me at all, except how badly we responded. I said,

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 2>I was in Australias, in Tasmania. I took when I

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 2>flew there on February sixth I took masks with me,

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 2>shoved him in my briefcase. I shoved in some N

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 2>ninety fives, thinking I may need these to get on

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 2>an airplane by the time I come back. But I didn't.

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 2>I thought they will have real time airport diagnostic testing

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 2>by the time I come back if this thing goes big.

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 2>But we did not, not because it's technologically impossible, but

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 2>just because nobody was willing to pay for it. Nobody

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 2>was willing to spend either the financial or the political

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 2>capital to be ready. I asked the same question you

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 2>just asked me. I asked Ali Khan. Ali Khan is

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 2>a great disease scientist I've known for a long time time.

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 2>He's now Dean of the School of Public Health at

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 2>the University of Nebraska. Formerly he was in special Pathogens

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 2>at the CDC. I asked him, Ali, what happened? Why?

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Why were we so poorly prepared? And he said, failure

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 2>of imagination. Wasn't a failure of science, wasn't a failure

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 2>of public health. It was a failure of imagination. And

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty sure what he meant was failure of political

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 2>leadership to realize a that although the scientists can predict

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 2>a pandemic, they can't tell you whether it's going to

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 2>happen between now and the November twenty twenty election. And

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 2>they can tell you that it would cost tens of

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 2>billions of dollars to be adequately prepared, and also political

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 2>capital instituting measures that would be unpopular and would hurt economies.

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 2>And then it takes the imagination of the political leader

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 2>to say, Okay, well, they can't guarantee, but it could

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 2>happen between now and the next election. And although it

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 2>would cost tens of billions of dollars to be out

0:15:59.920 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 2>of ely prepared, it'll cost tens of trillions of dollars

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 2>not to be adequately prepared. And that's what happened, and

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 2>I think Oli was right about that this.

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Is not our first experience with a coronavirus of pandemic potential.

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>We humans have been infected with coronaviruses for a very

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>long time. And then, of course there was STARS in

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and three, which it's often said that we

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>here in the US dodged a bullet with SARS, and

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>in your book you discuss how one consequence of that

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>dodge is that we were potentially less prepared, both mentally

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and practically perhaps for this current pandemic. Can you talk

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a bit more about that.

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, SARS one, as we call it loosely now, SARS

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and three was a very specific warning

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 2>and the disease scientists took it very seriously. I mentioned

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Ali Kahn, he was at the CDC in those days.

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 2>He responded to SARS one in Singapore. He was part

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 2>of the response team there. When I met him. In

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and six, I was interviewing scientists all up

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 2>and down the Special Pathogens Corridor at the CDC for

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 2>a piece that I was writing about zoonotic diseases for

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 2>National Geographics. So I spent two days going up and

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 2>down the corridor talking to people about Ebola, and you know,

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 2>rabies and Marburg and Nepa and Hendra and Avian influenzas

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 2>and all sorts of things. And then Alie took me

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 2>to lunch, and he is he's a very serious man,

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 2>and he has been in all of the difficult outbreak situations,

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 2>and he has great empathy for the human victims. But

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 2>he's also kind of a jaunty guy with a very

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 2>candid sense of humor. So we sit down at lunch

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 2>and he says to me, all right, colmen, so you've

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>interviewed all my people about these emerging diseases. Which one

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 2>of them is your favorite? I gave the entry level answer.

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 2>I said Ebola. Ebola is pretty dramatic. Ebola is a

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 2>very dramatic disease. And Ali said, yeah, I like Ebola

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 2>as much as the next person. But for me, it

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 2>was Sars and he likes Ebola. You know Gallo's humor

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 2>he was at he was at the kickwit Ebola outbreak.

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 2>I think he was he was risking his life to

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 2>save lives during that. So that's the way Ali talks.

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 2>But for me it was Sars. I said, really, Sars, really, SARS,

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 2>he said, yeah, and then he told me why SARS.

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 2>It's coronavirus, single stranded rnavirus, respiratory transmission, high case fatality rate,

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 2>did not burn out. We stopped it because of good

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 2>public health measures and the luck that it spread to

0:18:55.240 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 2>cities with strong governance and strong healthcare systems who stopped

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:08.120
<v Speaker 2>eight thousand cases, eight hundred fatalities, ten percent case fatality rate.

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 2>And Ali said to me, literally, we dodged a bullet.

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Next time it could be a lot worse. How could

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 2>it be a lot worse? Well, for instance, the coronavirus

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:22.239
<v Speaker 2>with that kind of case fatality rate plus transmission from

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 2>asymptomatic cases.

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Boom right, or pre symptomatic as we saw with COVID

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. Yeah, And in your book you talked about

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>how because SARS never really reached the US, that maybe

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>part of our public health infrastructure or preparedness wasn't quite

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>as up to speed as maybe some other countries that

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 1>did have firsthand experience with SARS.

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, right, absolutely, You know, Ali and his colleagues had

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 2>learned the lesson of SARS, absorbed it. He was in Singapore,

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 2>as I say, but there were few, if any cases

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 2>in the US, and I think no fatalities in the US,

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 2>So the the lesson of SARS did not register nearly

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 2>strongly enough on American public health and political preparedness for

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 2>public health emergencies, just didn't register the way it registered

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 2>in Singapore, in South Korea, in a few other places

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 2>who were far better prepared and who took this virus

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 2>very seriously in consequence, and who did not have big

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 2>first waves Singapore, South Korea, although eventually they got hit,

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 2>they got their waves because this is a virus that's

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 2>so enterprising you can't keep it out forever.

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Other countries besides the US, also dodged the SARS bullet,

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>but it could be argued that many of them had

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 1>a more robust response, at least initially, to the COVID

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>pandemic compared to the US. What do you think could

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>account for these different responses? Why did we stumble where

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>others did not.

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, Aaron, That's still one of the big mysteries

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 2>to me is the difference in the geographical patterns and

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 2>who got hit badly and who didn't. Some of them

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 2>are fairly easily explained, you know, Singapore and South Korea

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 2>and Japan and New Zealand did not get hit bad.

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you're New Zealand or if you're Iceland.

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 2>If you're an island, you have a big advantage, especially

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 2>if you're an island that is not an important entropo

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 2>of global trade, so there was an advantage. If you

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 2>were the smart Prime Minister of New Zealand, you had

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 2>an advantage. She had an advantage, and she put her

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 2>advantage to good use and protected her country. So those

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 2>things are relatively easy to explain. And as I said,

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Singapore eventually and South Korea eventually got their turns to

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 2>be hard hit. But then there are other mysteries, like

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 2>most of Sub Saharan Africa, Central Africa, and yet apart

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 2>from South Africa, Africa has not been very hard hit

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 2>at all. The democratic public of the Congo last time

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 2>I checked, has not been very hard hit at all,

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 2>and it's been a mystery that people have tried to explain.

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 2>One of the possible explanations is that the demographics is different.

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 2>The population is much younger than other places. I could

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 2>be part of it. People speculate that maybe a coronavirus

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 2>burned its way through Africa within the memory frame of

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 2>immune systems, but nobody knows. I would love to know.

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 2>I would love to know why South Africa got hit badly,

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 2>and Democratic Republic of the Congo has been relatively spared.

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 2>Italy got hit so badly, especially the north of Italy

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning. I think that was bad luck. I

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.719
<v Speaker 2>think they got heavily seated very early on, because there

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 2>are three international airports around Milan, and there are travelers

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 2>coming in for business from Wuhan, among other places, and

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 2>the population is older and their multi generation households, and

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 2>there's air pollution and there's smoking, all those things, and

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 2>then New York City got hammered and a few other

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 2>places got hammered. We still don't know how much of

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 2>that was determined by differences in public health response, how

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 2>much was determined by differences in the nature of the population,

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 2>and how much was determined by bad luck.

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting to think about the COVID nineteen pandemic

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in comparison to the nineteen eighteen influenza pandemic, as many

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>people have done. But I think what's incredible is that

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 1>despite our many advancements in scientific technology and our understanding

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of viruses, and our greater public health infrastructure. It's still

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>going to take years to untangle some of the mysteries

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of SARS COVID two, as well as the COVID pandemic.

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>We certainly did not dodge a bullet with COVID. In

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>what ways do you think we might be better off

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>with the next pandemic because of our initial mishandling of COVID.

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, we've learned how to make an mRNA vaccine quickly.

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.719
<v Speaker 2>That's a big thing. And we've learned how to make

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 2>some other vaccines. I don't want to omit Sarah Gilbert

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 2>and the Oxford Astrazenica vaccine. I didn't get as much

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 2>as I wish in my book on that. So we

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 2>have the capacity now to create a new vaccine or

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 2>adaptive vaccine quickly to a new coronavirus within the coronavirus

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 2>family whatever. That's been really important. We've got a lot

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 2>of work to do on the rest of it. I mean,

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 2>science denial has just gotten worse and more toxically obdurate

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 2>in the last two and a half years. We've got

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 2>to fix that. I don't know how you fix that,

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 2>but we've got to fix that. We've got to get

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 2>the general public back on the side of science so

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 2>that they trusted, they accept its guidance, and they readily

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 2>pay for it. You know, education of kids is a

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 2>really important part of that. I don't know if we

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 2>can afford to say that it starts with educating kids,

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 2>because we've got to do it now. We've got to

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 2>do it fast. We can't wait for the fifth grader

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 2>who's got a great science teacher to go up and

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 2>become an epidemiologist. We can't wait that long. But that

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 2>has to happen, and we need more surveillance. We need

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 2>more what some people call smart surveillance so that we're

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 2>not waiting for outbreaks to hit us and then try

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 2>to respond to outbreaks where you know, suddenly forty one

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:38.159
<v Speaker 2>people are sick from a new virus in a city

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 2>or in a village somewhere. We got to get there

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 2>before we've got those forty one cases of people with

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 2>human transmission. We've got to get there when it's one

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 2>or two cases, or maybe nobody symptomatic at all. But

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:57.199
<v Speaker 2>a virus that looks like a dangerous virus is detected

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 2>in a poultry work in Arkansas who feels fine, but

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the poultry worker is routinely screened for new viruses because

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 2>he or she is working with two hundred thousand chickens

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 2>and twice a day some wild ducks land in the

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 2>pond where they get their water. So danger of avian

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 2>flu among other things, or some other version of that.

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 2>We need to screen the person who is driving a

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 2>truck that delivers farm raised raccoon dogs and bamboo rats

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 2>from southern China to the city of Wuhan, to the

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 2>markets in the city of Wuhan. We need to be

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 2>screening that truck driver, and the results of that screening

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 2>have to be flowing at the speed of electricity around

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 2>the world to labs all over who are connected, who

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 2>are coordinated to help interpret and respond. We need a

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 2>lot of that, among other things.

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely right, we are going to take a quick break

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>here and when we get back we'll get into more

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of the COVID prediction and response side of things, with

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe a question or two about origins. So stay tuned.

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back everyone. Let's dive back in. In your book,

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you talk about two main strategies when it comes to

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>dealing with pandemics, prediction and prevention versus surveillance and response.

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>We'll always need both, of course, but funds are finite,

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>which creates conflict between the two. Can you talk a

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>bit about the different sides of this conflict and how

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you think the COVID pandemic has affected the discussion of

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>where funding should be concentrated.

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and there is a discussion. I'm not going to

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 2>call it an argument, but there is a discussion among

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 2>scientists about these two different kinds of strategy. And you

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 2>said prediction and prevention. I sometimes and they sometimes raise

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:24.719
<v Speaker 2>it as discovery and prediction versus surveillance and response. So

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 2>discovery and prediction implies sampling animals all over the world,

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of animals, looking for viruses, new viruses that

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 2>might potentially be zoonotic, be transmissible to humans, in particular,

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 2>looking at mammals and birds, because the viruses that take

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 2>hold in us generally, almost without exception, come from mammals

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:57.240
<v Speaker 2>and birds. One estimate there's maybe one point seven million

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 2>viruses unknown viruses in mammals and words capable of infecting humans.

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 2>These are at best orders of magnitude estimates. There was

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 2>a program that was funded for years through USAID called

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 2>the PREDICT Program, was an acronym PREDICT they gave away

0:29:15.080 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 2>two hundred million dollars over the course of ten years

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 2>for this kind of work, sampling, looking for new viruses,

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 2>characterizing new viruses, looking at them to see which ones

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 2>look the most dangerous that we could predict might spill

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 2>over into humans. So discovery and prediction, and Dennis Carroll,

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 2>who has been the lead initiator of what is now

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 2>the Global Virum Project, is I think it's fair to

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 2>say a spokesperson for this point of view discovery and prediction.

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 2>And that's the idea of the Global Virum Project. Let's

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 2>really learn about all the viruses that are out there

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 2>that have any potential to be human pathogens and try

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 2>and predict. But there is overlap between these views. On

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 2>the other side is surveill and response, which says, let's

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 2>don't worry about every virus in every mammal and every bird.

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's worry about the viruses that exist in animals at

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 2>the points where there is ecological disruption and human animal interaction,

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 2>the interfaces. Let's look at the interfaces rather than going

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 2>into the deep forests and finding really really really wild

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 2>animals that nobody ever messes with and see what viruses

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 2>they care So let's look at the interfaces in the

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 2>ways that I was just describing. Let's do zerological sampling

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 2>for antibodies in people who work with wildlife but who

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 2>still feel fine, and let's see what viruses are turning

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 2>up in their bodies. Viruses therefore, that have already showed

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:50.719
<v Speaker 2>the capacity to infect a human, whether or not they

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 2>make that human sick, and whether or not they transmit.

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 2>That's the warning bell to this school of thought. Surveillance

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 2>and then response. When we find like there are three

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 2>poultry workers in Arkansas who have PCR positive tests for

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 2>a new coronavirus that we haven't seen, not this one

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 2>and not stars Won, but a different one, and it's

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 2>in three people but they feel fine, then let's flood

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 2>that situation with resources to contain that situation. Find out

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 2>where it's coming from, how it's getting into those people,

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 2>whether they are showing any symptoms whatsoever, even if they're

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 2>not reporting them, what their viral loads are, whether the

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 2>virus is replicating within them, or maybe it's just you know,

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 2>they've just gotten a big nose full but it hasn't

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 2>been replicating. Let's find that out. So that's surveillance and

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 2>response the idea being that catch the tiny fires, catch

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 2>the tiny spot fires before they grow, and do that

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 2>in the areas where there's a lot of dry tinder,

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 2>rather than walking through the entire rainforest to make sure

0:31:58.880 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 2>that there are no fires.

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I love that analogy. Thinking about this in terms of

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen, if there had been more funds toward the

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>discovery side of things versus more funds toward the containment

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>side of things or initial response slash surveillance, which of

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 1>those approaches do you think could have had more of

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>an effect on the emergence of this pandemic.

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think they both could have, but certainly surveillance

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 2>and response, it's most easy to see how that could

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 2>have made a difference. I mean, if we were doing

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 2>surveillance of the commercial trade in wildlife species for food,

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 2>both caught from the wild and farm raised, if they

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 2>were sampling those truck drivers and sampling those raccoon dogs

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 2>that were coming up out of Yunnan Province, and sampling

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 2>those bamboo rats, they might have spotted this virus before

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 2>it got into forty one people reporting to hospitals in

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the city of Wuhan. And at the same time, I

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 2>mean you can argue that EcoHealth Alliance, the organization based

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 2>in New York. I don't know whether they at this

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 2>point would say we're in the business of discovery and prediction,

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:13.120
<v Speaker 2>or whether they'd say, well, no, we're more targeted than that,

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 2>where we're more in the business of surveillance and response.

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 2>But they were doing this kind of work at one scale,

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 2>not at the scale that we need. They were supporting

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 2>jangle She and her laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Jangly She and EcoHealth Alliance and a number of other

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 2>colleagues for fifteen years have been publishing papers saying, hey,

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 2>there are dangerous coronaviruses in bats in the caves of

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Yunan Province and in botanical gardens flying around in botanical gardens.

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 2>People are in their vicinity. This is dangerous. They've been

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 2>publishing papers on that for fifteen years, and now it's

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 2>sort of a blame the messenger situation because they've done

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 2>that work. They're being accused of having had this virus

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 2>in a lab and let it leak, despite the fact

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:08.879
<v Speaker 2>that there is no evidence whatsoever that they ever had

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 2>this virus, and there is counter evidence to suggest that

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:15.439
<v Speaker 2>if they had had this virus, first thing they would

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 2>have done would have been published a paper in Nature

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:23.800
<v Speaker 2>or Science saying hey, here's a really really dangerous coronavirus.

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 2>We found it. We're getting the publication in Nature. That's

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 2>what we do for a living. That helps our career,

0:34:31.200 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 2>and you need to be aware of it didn't happen.

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>That actually brings me to my next question, which is

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>about the origin of SARS CoV two. Pandemic prevention efforts

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 1>are limited in part by how general our predictions are.

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 1>For instance, we know the circumstances under which spillover of

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>zoonotic pathogen is likely to happen, and we can predict

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:54.399
<v Speaker 1>which groups of viruses might be the likeliest to cause

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic, but making predictions specific enough to enact prevention

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>measures extremely difficult, if not impossible. And I think the

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>ongoing struggle to understand the emergence of SARS kobe two

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 1>reflects this. Can you bring us up to speed on

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:14.359
<v Speaker 1>what is currently known about the origin of this virus, I.

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Can scratch that surface, I carve it deeper and breathless

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 2>in the book, First of all, why is it important?

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 2>Why is it important for us? To know what is

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:26.879
<v Speaker 2>the origin or origins of this virus. And I think

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 2>there are two answers to that. I'll frame this by

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 2>saying I think of there being two primary schools of

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 2>thought on the origins. One is the natural origins school

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:40.240
<v Speaker 2>of thought. This is a natural spillover of a wild

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 2>virus from a bat, possibly by way of an intermediate animal,

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 2>and possibly with recombination, creating a hybrid genome when two

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 2>coronaviruses were replicating inside the same animal, inside the same cell.

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 2>That's the natural origins hypothesis school of thought. And then

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:02.320
<v Speaker 2>there is what I call the nefarious origins school of thought.

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 2>And the nefarious origins school of thought is a basket

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 2>that contains a couple of different hypotheses. One, this is

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 2>an engineered virus that was specifically designed in a laboratory

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:16.800
<v Speaker 2>by evil scientists trying to create a virus and succeeding

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 2>to be released intentionally to cause harm to people. That's

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:27.360
<v Speaker 2>the most extreme form of nefariousness. Second gradation on the

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:30.879
<v Speaker 2>spectrum is well, this is a virus that was manipulated

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 2>in a laboratory, maybe originated as a wild virus, was

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 2>manipulated in a laboratory with gain of function research of

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 2>some sort for supposedly good scientific purposes, but that was

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 2>reckless and should never have been done. And this was

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 2>made more dangerous and more adaptable to humans, and then

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 2>somehow it leaked from a laboratory. And the third version

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 2>is the sort of the mild Lablique hypothesis, which is,

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:01.720
<v Speaker 2>this is a virus, one way or another, was taken

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 2>into a laboratory, was cultured, not just a genomic sequence

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 2>in a sample, but it was grown live. And a

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:14.359
<v Speaker 2>lot of people don't appreciate the huge difference there, that

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:18.320
<v Speaker 2>the importance of that distinction. Lots of sequences are messed

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:20.840
<v Speaker 2>around with in laboratories and that doesn't mean you have

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 2>live virus. So this was a virus that was in

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 2>a laboratory, a wild virus, but a dangerous virus, and

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 2>it was allowed to leak. So those are the nefarious

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:35.720
<v Speaker 2>origins hypotheses. And I don't consider myself an advocate really

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 2>for any of those, or at least I didn't start

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:40.800
<v Speaker 2>out as an advocate for any of those different hypotheses.

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't consider myself a prosecutor. Some people seem to

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 2>perceive their roles as prosecutors in this discussion, particularly on

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 2>the lab Leak side, because they have made a lot

0:37:53.440 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 2>of prosecutorial accusations based on circumstantial evidence, coincidence and absence

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 2>of evidence, a lot of accusations against Peter Dashak of

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Eco Health Alliance, against Jangle Shehi at the Wuhan instant accusation.

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Whether they're right or not, they are assuming a prosecutorial role.

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Seems to me I view my role as a juror.

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm listening to all this and I'm saying, what's persuasive,

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:24.479
<v Speaker 2>what convincing to me? And after two and a half years,

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 2>what is very convincing to me is the natural origins

0:38:27.880 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 2>hypothesis as supported by a lot of very specific work

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:36.800
<v Speaker 2>and evidence gathered and assembled by people like Eddie Holmes

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 2>and Michael Warby and Marian Koopman's in the Netherlands and

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 2>other people that I respect, you know, disease scientists of

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 2>various different sorts, molecular evolutionary virologists, veterinary virologists, epidemiologists, professionals,

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 2>more professionals on that side and more amateurs on the

0:38:58.080 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 2>other side. Because a lot of people have decided that

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 2>there are full time researchers on the Internet. Therefore they

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 2>are knowledgeable about molecular evolutionary virology. I've been following this

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:09.760
<v Speaker 2>stuff for twenty years, and I know I'm still an amateur,

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 2>and I will always be an amateur, so anyway, so

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I perceive myself as a juror. But the preponderance of

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 2>the actual evidence is strongly, strongly, strongly on the side

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:25.440
<v Speaker 2>of natural origins in peer reviewed scientific papers by Michael

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Warby and Christian Anderson and Eddie Holmes and Marian Kopman's

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 2>and angel Erasmus and a number of others. Is a

0:39:33.000 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 2>lablique still a theoretical possibility. Yeah, it's hard to prove

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 2>a negative. Should we still think about, talk about, and

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 2>in some way investigate the lableek hypothesis? Yeah, yep. Does

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 2>that mean equal time, equal resources, equal probability. No, I

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 2>think natural origins is much more probable. But it's still

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 2>important not to close our minds to the possibility that

0:39:57.000 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 2>this other thing might have happened. But we need to

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:01.799
<v Speaker 2>see some evidence, We need to see some data. If

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 2>it happened, and this virus sars kov two cannot have

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 2>leaked out of a laboratory unless it was in a laboratory,

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 2>and we have zero evidence that this virus was ever

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 2>in a laboratory.

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I won't ask you to go in depth about

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the origins of the lableek hypothesis, how it started, or

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:25.640
<v Speaker 1>how it grew. It's all in the book. Everyone go

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 1>check it out. But I do want to ask why

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you think it has persisted for so long or why

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it holds such appeal to people. Is it a matter

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of finding a scapegoat or an easy solution to future pandemics,

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 1>or a further reason to mistrust scientists.

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think that's part of it. For instance, I

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 2>started to say, why is it important for us to

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:51.279
<v Speaker 2>know the origins to learn or keep trying to learn

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the origins of this virus? First of all, because if

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:59.359
<v Speaker 2>this virus has natural origins, then it means we need

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:03.920
<v Speaker 2>more science. We need more surveillance, we need more genomic sequencing,

0:41:03.960 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 2>we need more of all that. We need more sampling

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:11.239
<v Speaker 2>of wild animals, especially in the chain of supply. If

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 2>you think that this virus came from gain of function

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:18.799
<v Speaker 2>work or just growing it in a laboratory, and that's

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 2>crazy and dangerous, than what you're essentially saying is we

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:25.319
<v Speaker 2>need less science so more science or less science. And

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:29.239
<v Speaker 2>the other difference is that it's the difference between did

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 2>we do this or did they do this? If it's

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 2>natural origins, then it leads to an understanding that all

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 2>of the things that all of us do as humans

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:43.720
<v Speaker 2>consumers on this planet put pressure on highly diverse natural

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:47.799
<v Speaker 2>ecosystems and lead to the contact between humans and mild

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 2>animals and their viruses and cause spillovers. If it's a

0:41:52.000 --> 0:41:54.400
<v Speaker 2>lab leak, then it's easy we say they did it.

0:41:54.960 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Those idiots, those reckless idiots over there, they did it.

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 2>So that's a big difference. There are stakes in figuring

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 2>this out. And so why do those people embrace the

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Lablique hypothesis with such passion and they do. It's partly

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 2>that it's partly being able to say they did it,

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 2>those idiots over there, and it's partly that conspiracies and

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 2>dark movements of evil activity are more dramatic, and they've

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 2>always been more dramatic.

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's something that I really appreciate about your book,

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 1>how you went into such great detail about the origins

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of this idea and where it has gone from the

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:37.760
<v Speaker 1>very beginning and the range of nefariousness as you put.

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:40.480
<v Speaker 2>It, And I want to be clear that I try

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 2>very hard in the book to be fair to those people,

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:45.839
<v Speaker 2>because there are some very smart people, including you know,

0:42:45.880 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 2>at least one friend of mine on that side of

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 2>the discussion. There's some smart people, and the fact that

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:57.280
<v Speaker 2>they might believe in a conspiracy doesn't make them dumb,

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 2>but they're sensitive about it. I respect them. I think

0:43:01.520 --> 0:43:06.319
<v Speaker 2>they have good motivations. I think they're intelligent. I just

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 2>think they're wrong and that they don't have any positive

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 2>evidence on their side. They could be right, but as

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:15.759
<v Speaker 2>so far, there's no evidence that they are right.

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Given your background researching pathogens of pandemic potential and

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 1>zoonotic pathogens that are likely to spill over, do you

0:43:25.239 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 1>think that pandemics are preventable or are they inevitable? What

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 1>do we have control over in a pandemic and what

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:33.319
<v Speaker 1>don't we.

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm going to be an optimist, which is not

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 2>natural for me, and I'm going to say that pandemics

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 2>are preventable spillovers. Spillovers are probably not preventable. Given the

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:50.680
<v Speaker 2>fact that we have eight billion people, eight billion hungry

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 2>people on this planet and the number is still going up.

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:57.280
<v Speaker 2>People are still having babies. People are still eating meat.

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:00.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm still eating meat a little bit. People are still

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 2>riding around on airplanes, and all of that squashes viruses

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:12.239
<v Speaker 2>out of the natural world into our ambit. So use

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 2>another metaphor, and as long as that keeps happening, there

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 2>will be viruses infecting a human here there, and a

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 2>couple of people here and there. There will be spillovers.

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:25.240
<v Speaker 2>Michael Warribee I think has said, you know, spillovers are common,

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 2>but pandemics are rare, and we have to keep it

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 2>that way, and we have to make it even more true.

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 2>We have to make pandemics more rare. You know, we've

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 2>had three pandemics three million, million, million killing pandemics in

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:42.719
<v Speaker 2>the last one hundred years, the nineteen eighteen influence a

0:44:42.760 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 2>little bit more than one hundred, the nineteen eighteen influenza,

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:52.800
<v Speaker 2>AIDS and COVID, and they are all almost certainly zoonotic events.

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:57.080
<v Speaker 2>So we need to do that surveillance and response that

0:44:57.120 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 2>I was talking about. It needs to be one of

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:05.040
<v Speaker 2>the highest geopolitical scientific priorities on the planet, surveillance and

0:45:05.120 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 2>response so that we catch the next spillovers before they

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 2>become outbreaks. Of two dozen, three dozen people dying horrible

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:17.360
<v Speaker 2>deaths in an African village, or in a city in

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 2>central China, or in a town in the American Southwest.

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:24.839
<v Speaker 2>We have to catch those early, early, early, and if

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:30.840
<v Speaker 2>we do, if we really saddle up and invest, I

0:45:30.840 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 2>think we can prevent pandemics.

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate the optimism because I have not been feeling

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 1>as optimistic as of late.

0:45:39.080 --> 0:45:41.479
<v Speaker 2>And I should say aarin that I think I say

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:43.840
<v Speaker 2>that a little bit differently. At the end of the book,

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:47.200
<v Speaker 2>I say that you know there are more pandemics coming.

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Probably what I should have said in that particular sentence

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:53.799
<v Speaker 2>is there are certainly more pandemic threats coming. There is

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:56.720
<v Speaker 2>the threat of more pandemics coming. There is the chance

0:45:56.760 --> 0:46:00.920
<v Speaker 2>of more pandemics coming, absolutely, But we can meet that

0:46:01.640 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 2>challenge if we do a lot differently from what we're

0:46:05.120 --> 0:46:05.840
<v Speaker 2>doing right now.

0:46:23.239 --> 0:46:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Wow, how much fun was that. Thank you so very much,

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:29.800
<v Speaker 1>David for taking the time to chat with me today.

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:32.319
<v Speaker 1>I still can't get over the fact that I got

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to speak with one of my psycom role models. If

0:46:35.719 --> 0:46:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you enjoyed the interview and are looking to dig a

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:41.279
<v Speaker 1>bit deeper into the book we chatted about today, check

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 1>out our website. This podcast will kill You dot com.

0:46:44.280 --> 0:46:46.240
<v Speaker 1>We're I'll post a link to where you can find

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Breathless and Don't Forget. You can check out our website

0:46:49.640 --> 0:46:52.920
<v Speaker 1>for all sorts of other cool things, including but not

0:46:53.040 --> 0:46:57.719
<v Speaker 1>limited to, transcripts, Quarantini and Placibrita, recipes, show notes and

0:46:57.760 --> 0:47:01.080
<v Speaker 1>references for all of our episodes, links to merch our

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>bookshop dot org, affiliate account, our Goodreads list, a first

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:08.240
<v Speaker 1>hand account, form, and music by Bloodmobile. Speaking of which,

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you to Bloodmobile for providing the music for this

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:14.800
<v Speaker 1>episode and all of our episodes. Thank you to Leana

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Squalacci for our audio mixing, and thanks to you listeners

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 1>for listening. I hope you liked this bonus episode and

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 1>are now psyched to become part of the TPWKY book Club.

0:47:27.200 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>A special thank you, as always to our fantastic patrons.

0:47:31.560 --> 0:47:36.719
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate your support so very much. Well, until next time,

0:47:37.080 --> 0:48:02.640
<v Speaker 1>keep washing those hands, un