WEBVTT - Vanguard’s Bogle Sees Pension Pain in Decade of 3% Bond Returns

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Legendary

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Vanguard founder Jack Bogel sat down with us to discuss

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>his thoughts on the geop plan, Bitcoin and his outlook

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>for the bondom market. We kick things off by discussing

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Jack's thoughts on the e t F business. Where I

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>began was asking him about the freight train that is

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 1>destined to be a ten trillion dollar firm within the

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>next few years Vanguard, and whether he was worried at

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>all about how quickly the E t F industry was

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>amassing assets. Take a listen, Well, those two things don't

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>go to two together very well. Our strength at Vanguard

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>has been the traditional index fund, the S and P

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>five hundered total stock market, which I started way back

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in in and that has been our strength. Were that

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>market and that traditional index fund market. I'll buy an

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>old market broad market is about half of the index

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>business and the E t F business is the other

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>half of the business, and they are totally different. They

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>both have passive investment policies, but the traditional index funds

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>have passive investors, and that the e t f s

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>have active investors. So e t fs have heavy trading

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and they have a lot more speculation. They have a

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>product line so called that that has very speculative funds.

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I wouldn't I wouldn't. I wouldn't predict that

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that that would continue to flourish. You know, we have

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>data here that shows that e t f have had

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>as ten years is a four point seven annual return

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and the traditional index fund about a seven point one

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>percent annual return. There was the e t f s

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 1>have not worked out well for investors. I don't know

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>why nobody knows this. So in a decade, the traditional

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>index funds up about cumulatively and the E t F

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's not that's not a strong record. This

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:26.679
<v Speaker 1>is this is a really compelling point you're making. E

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>t f s have not worked out well for investors.

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Are you concerned that they're going to taint the record

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of indexed funds because they are being treated, uh, synonymously. Well,

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a different, for the want of a

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>better word, a different ethic and e t s. It's

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>by the factors. It's leverage. It's finding narrow niches in

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the market very quickly to see if you can bring

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the sheep in to share them. One

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of the most recent e t F was long electronic marketing,

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>actually your retail marketing. I mean, that's an interesting idea,

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>it might even work, but some entrepreneur jumps on that

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>bandwagon and says, now he can package it for you.

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a very entrepreneurial business, or, to use a phrase

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that the great Henry Kaufman once used, is populated in

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>many respects by financial buccaneers. So it's a different business.

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>It's finding product to sell and because there's a great

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>market among brokers and investment advisers who want to sell it.

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:29.920
<v Speaker 1>When they want something to sell every day, they have

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 1>to sell something every day. And that seeks the sort

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of the rationale for the business trading, trading, trading, and

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you see it most clearly, and it's a little bit

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of an off beat et F to say the least.

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>The spider, but it trades. They brag about it fifteen

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars an hour or something, and yeah, it turns

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>over at about two or three thousand percent a year.

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's banks trading with one And that's that's a

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>very different implication for the future of the E T

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>F business than the than the more or less retail

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>business that people are buying speculatives E T S. Mr Bogel,

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you talk about financial buccaneers. I'm gonna throw a couple

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of topics that you want your thoughts. Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. Well,

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not so good as crypto, but let's talk about bitcoin.

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is a speculation. Why is this speculation because there's

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>no underlying rate of return. Just like gold, stocks have

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>earnings and dividends, bonds have have interest coupons to hold

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>their value up. But the bitcoin has nothing in its

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.239
<v Speaker 1>value except that you want to sell it to somebody

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>more than you paid for it. Well, that's about as

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>good a definition as you can get. It may be

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a great speculation, that's the funny part of it. But

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>as I said the other day, um, and the bitcoin

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:03.600
<v Speaker 1>was then only about ten thousand, and you know, there's

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a speculation that I would have liked to plague, And

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I said, if it gets to twenty thousand, don't talk

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to me. Waitfil it gets back to a hundred, all right,

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>they may not be buccaneers. Much of thoughts on the

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>GOP's tax overhaul plan, as you know it. I think

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it's very unfortunate. I think it has a grave moral

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>issues in favoring the wealthiest people in the country that

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>compared to the people who are doing all the hard

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>work just seems crazy. Uh. I think it's really bad

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>some little pieces of policy. You know, this is a

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>country that's supposed to be helping education, and they put

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>some new some taxes on young men and women who

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>are teachers and get fringe benefits. And then they've they've

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>stopped the deductibility of interest on college loans, and those

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>two things hurt education. Well. And what to what, avail

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I asked? The fusion of wealth, the gap in wealth

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>between the rich and the poor is very upsetting to

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a good nation, a good society, and they made it worse.

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 1>Rubs other than not, I love it real quick. Last question,

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering. You said in recent comments that stock

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>returns are likely to be about four percent over the

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>next decade. What about bonds and where do you think

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>are the most promising assets at this point? Well, stock returns.

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I've been doing this for twenty five years and ten

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>years in ten year in ten year intervals, and my

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>prognostications for stocks have been about correlation with what happened,

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and my view bond views are about of what happened. Correlation.

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>But the reason bonds are really easy. It should be

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>a number of around three percent per year over the

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>next decade because the only return you get on a

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>bond is from the interest coupon. And so you have

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a portfolio half of corporate bonds and half of the

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>ten year the ten year treasury, very conservative with a

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>with a corporate half, and that gives you about three

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 1>percent today and so that that's that's what you will

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>get in the next ten years. Of interest rates go down,

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the prices will go up, but over ten years that's

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>up to even out. That's a huge problem for pensions

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>with an eight a huge problem. It's totally defeating. The

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>pension funds are not going to be able to meet

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>their seven and a half or eight percent obligation. And

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the curious thing is that back in the guess late eighties,

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>don't hold me the exact date when then, when treasuries

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>were yielding eight and the pension plans had about a

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>five percent return projection eight percent for bonds, five percent

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>projection for pensions. And now treasurers are yielding two and

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a half or three depending on whatever you take, and

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>engines are yielding seven. And I think it is almost

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a given that it will end badly, Mr Boggle, Do

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you believe that artificial intelligence and robo advisors will do

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>away with the human touch when it comes to investment advice, Well,

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>they will do away with some of it. Uh but

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>but but what's what's happening mostly in then the robo

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>area is they're using conventional index funds like the S

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and P five hundred Bangardis and P five hundered. I

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's the largest investment at the betterment m or

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and maybe maybe some of the others. So they're they're

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>just it's that they've been doing so far mostly asset allocation,

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and there's no harm done in that. Their asset allocation

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>looks very much like you know, sort of a sixt

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>thing generally up or down, maybe with a age or

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>or aggressiveness of the investor. So maybe it's I think

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it's less art Artificial intelligence than asset allocation is a

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>simple matter. You don't have to beat it to death

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>with data. As for artificial intelligence out there, I read

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:09.079
<v Speaker 1>somewhere that people that are trained in artificial intelligence in college,

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>after a couple of years gonna make a half million

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars a year, And I think that's wonderful. But I

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>keep wondering how much people that have real intelligence will make.

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 1>Now was Jack Bogel. He is the founder and retired

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>chief executive of the Vanguard Group and the author of

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Common Sense on Mutual Funds, New Imperatives for the Intelligent Investor.

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox along with Lisa Bramo wits This is Bloomberg.

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Protests are breaking out in Gaza, Turkey, Germany over President

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump's decision to move the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem,

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>recognizing that as the capital. This, of course the subject

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of a longstanding debate and controversy in the region, given

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the tensions between the Israelis and the Palestinians. Here to

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about it is Daniel Gordis. He is a Bloomberg

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>View columnist as well as a senior vice president and

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>court Distinguished Fellow at shell M College in Jerusalem, and

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>he joins us now, Daniel, thank you so much. What

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is it? Just to start with, what's the mood like?

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 1>There is there an increased kind of tension and expectation

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of violence around UH President Trump's decision. It's an interesting question.

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 1>I think that yesterday, in the advance of the declaration

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and immediately after, there was a pretty widespread sense here

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:43.599
<v Speaker 1>that if there was any violence, it was going to

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>be pretty sporadic and it would pretty much peter out

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>relatively quickly. I think people are a little bit less

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>confident about that right now. I don't think that anybody

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is quite panicking yet. But there have been there have

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>been conflicts all along the border between Israel and the

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>West Bank UM. According to the his reports, several dozen

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Palestinians have been injured. I haven't read of any deaths,

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and I haven't read of any injuries on the side

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of the israelis UM. But colleague of mine who was

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>working from home today, who works in Maldumim, which is

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>UH inside the West Bank. It's a city that's very

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>much controversial because it's gone on an extension of Jerusalem

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.319
<v Speaker 1>into the West Bank. She told me that the city

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 1>was ringed with security people, that they were just making

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>sure that people did not get into the city. So

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 1>I thought my senses and we heard, by the way,

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>helicopter is all in the sky this afternoon. So it

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 1>may be materializing into a little bit more violence than

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>some people had expected. But there's certainly no panic on

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the streets and no panic. And as people are talking,

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Gordis, you know in your good book Israel, a

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Concise History of a Nation Reborn, you talk about the

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>role that Jerusalem plays in the history of the region

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and specifically in the founding of the state of Israel.

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if you could just provide us with some

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>context for Jerusalem, not only as a geographic location, but

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>as a political location. Right. So, Jerusalem was not included

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>actually in the borders that the United Nations gave to Israel,

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and that very famous photo of November nineteen seven, when

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the UN General Assembly created a Jewish state and an

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Arab state, Jerusalem is going to be a kind of

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>an internationally monitored area. The Israelis were very unhappy with

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that because they wanted Jerusalem to be their capital, but

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>they accepted the UN deal. Uh. The Arabs, of course

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>did not accept the deal, launched the war, and in

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the course of that war, Israel captured West Jerusalem. It

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 1>did not capture East Jerusalem, which it did not get

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 1>until the nineteen sixty seven war when Jordan's despite pleas

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>from the Israeli government, decided to enter that war as well.

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>So Israel has always since nineteen forty nine recognized West

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Jerusalem as its capital and as one of the rest

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of the world to recognize it. It's the only country

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>in the world that other countries don't recognize its capital

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>as its capital. When Israelis are always scratching their heads

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>saying West Jerusalem is clearly not going back. So why

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>can't the west of the role just acknowledge West Jerusalem

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>as the capital of Israel and Easter Rusalaman will get

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>resolved when the result, when the situation where the Palestinians

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>gets resolved. Um. And so I think that you know,

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>from a from a religious standpoint, it's very important to Jews,

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it's very important to Moslims, it's very important to Christians.

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 1>But this is what you correctly plant on there's nothing

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to do with the religious issus. It's all about politics.

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think what the President did yesterday was basically

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to say, and he said it himself, you just a

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>matter of recognizing reality. I mean, as he pointed out,

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court is here, the Parliament is here, the

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>President lives here, the Prime Minister lives here, the vast

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>majority of government offices are here. Always basically saying is

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that what we're gonna do is stop capitulating to the

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>fear of violence, and we're gonna call reality what it is,

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>which is that West Jerusalem is the capital of Israel.

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Well here, here's just just to push back on that.

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, a lot of people are saying that this

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>move by President Trump has undermined a US role in

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the peace prod, says has inflamed tensions. Uh Hamas has

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>called for an antifata against Israel this morning, and you

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>have to wonder, at what point is it worth it,

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just for to make a political statement. Well,

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question. So first of all, obviously if

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>this blows up into a major conflagration, uh, then one

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>could very reasonably ask whether it was worth it or not.

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I think most people who are still banking on the

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>idea because it doesn't actually change any reality on the ground.

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Most people are banking on the idea that it's not

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>going to become a major conflagration. But you're right, if

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>this gets out of hand, then the question of whether

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>it's worth it is certainly a very good question. I

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>think that in terms of, you know, the question of

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>whether or not the president has really kind of moved

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States out of being a legitimate arbiter in

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the in the process. I mean, first, well, let's remember that,

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, countless presidents, Republicans and Democrats alike, have seen

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States as an important arbiter and has gotten

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>us nowhere. And I'm speaking as someone who was in

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>favor of the creation of a Palestinian state, as someone

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>who's not a huge fan of the current president. But

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that what he said was, uh, you know,

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>basically true. We haven't we have we as America have

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>not been able to move this process forward and and

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of capitulating to this Palestinian demand that we not

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge West Jerusalem as the capital of Israel has gotten

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>us nowhere. So since it has gotten us nowhere, let's

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>at least call reality on the ground where it is.

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>That's my sense, but obviously reasonable minds cannon do differ,

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and there are both Disraeli leaders and as well as

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>American Jewige leaders on both sides of this divide. Daniel,

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>what has been the reaction, if any, in Arab capitals

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>around the region, and is the status of Jerusalem as

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>important to them now as it once was. Perhaps the

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>reaction is exactly what you'd expect. They're all decrying it

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and saying it's a terrible idea, and so farth that's

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>part of the sort of the ritual that has to

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>get played here. I think the much deeper issue, and

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a sad one for the Palestinians, quite frankly, is

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that the Palestinian issue was simply not nearly as important

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Arab world as the palest Indians wish it

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>would be, and it's not as important to the Arab

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>world as it once was. I mean, take Saudi Arabia

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, which did speak out because that's what it

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>has to do, but Suni Arabia doesn't care one little bit.

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Sni Arab was worried about Iran and it needs American

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and Israeli cooperation on the Iranian on the Irmanian issues.

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>So they'll speak out today, they make sure that they can,

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of make a check mark next do

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>we spoke out against it. But Saudi Arabia couldn't care less.

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Egypt has completely suppressed Palestinian protests in the streets over

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the last few years under LCC. So Egypt's not a

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>big help over the course of the years. Even when

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Saidat and Manacha began negotiated the return of the Sinai,

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>said Dot insisted that if he was going to get

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the sign I back and sign a deal with Israel,

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Israel also not to create a Palestinian state, and began

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>said no, And so that's where we are. Daniel gordis

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg View, Colamus, thank you very much. He's also the

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>author of Israel, A Concise History of a Nation. Reborn

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the founder, one of the co founders and the head

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of a Carlisle Group, the private equity firm. David Rubinstein

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 1>was talking about infrastructure yesterday. He said that he hoped

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Congress would have passed an infrastructure bill by now. Well,

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>let's find out about why that hasn't happened. Perhaps and

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>what could be done to move this along. We have

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>an expert when it comes to infrastructure. Bill Sandbrook is

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the chief executive of the US Concrete and he joins

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 1>us here in our leven three oh studios. Bill, thank

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you very much for it coming in. So what would

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you say to someone like David Rubinstein? He says, Look,

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.400
<v Speaker 1>he says, you've got low rates, But most of the

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>US infrastructure is state and local, it is not federal.

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Why can't we get infrastructure done? No, it's a very

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>good question. We were very hopeful people in our industry,

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>and obviously both parties had platforms that advocated a trillion

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>dollar spend before either winner was announced, and in fact,

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>at President Trump's inauguration, the second thing he mentioned was

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>one of his top was his top priority was infrastructure spent.

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 1>And we have been disappointed that it hasn't been more forthcoming. However,

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>having said that, there were priorities that need to be chosen,

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>and the priorities were health regulatory reform, healthcare reform, taxes,

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>and then infrastructure came forth, and there were fourth because

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and there were reasons for that sequence. So I'm patient

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>this problem has not developed overnight. This problem is not

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be fixed overnight. So if it's pushed a

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>year or a number of months, as it looks like

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be pushed into next year, I'm not

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>despondent about that. The needs continue to grow and I

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>think the federal government's going to have to address it

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>one way or another. And there is by parts and

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>support for it bill. Do you have a sense of

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>how it would take place, how big it would be,

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>as well as where the money would go. Would it

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>go to projects that would apply uh for funding? Would

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>it go to public private kind of partnerships that we

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:06.959
<v Speaker 1>then invest in. What's your sense it's gonna be a

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>combination of of all the above. The public private partnerships

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>are one piece of it. And if you remember is

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>this has transpired, the administration was really hanging the hat

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 1>on that that would be the lynchpin of any further

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>any additional spend or increased spending. That has moderated to

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>some extent, there is talk about gas tax increases. At

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>least the administration doesn't have them dead on arrival. It

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 1>does come down to funding eventually, funding and priorities. There

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is a list of fifty top priority infrastructure projects in

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the country that the governors developed and has been put

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Secretary of Transportation. One critical one. It's the

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Gateway project that links new work in New York City

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>with a new tunnel, a new rail tunnel and whatnot. UM.

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I think over time these things are going to happen.

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>The devil's in the details of funding. And it's been

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>like that since, so no change there. You know, you've

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>been on a little bit of an acquisition trail, and

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if you could describe what you've done, particularly

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in California, but also why why acquire rather than building?

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>That kind of highlights this idea of trying to get

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the permits and trying to deal with local and you know,

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>state municipalace on in order to make you business. You know,

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a very insightful question. Both coasts California particularly, it's

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.879
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to get through any environmental permitting process for

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it be an infrastructure project like a road, an airport,

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>or an industrial manufacturing facility. We operate in heavily urbanized

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:43.400
<v Speaker 1>environments where permitting is extremely difficult UM. And to that end,

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we just made an acquisition on November seventeenth, Polaris Material

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>is a big quarry in Canada. Because California arrogates are

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>being depleted rapidly and there are no new quarries coming online. Therefore,

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the cost of arrogates are becoming ever expensive. We had

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to buy this quarry and ship arrogates down

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>into our facilities in San Francisco so we can be

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>self sufficient. It helps our profitability. Uh and and as well,

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>we got a terminal in in Los Angeles because we

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.159
<v Speaker 1>are growing through acquisition and expansion, which now gives us

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a beachhead into consolidate in the Los Angeles market. Considering

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that you made a purchase in Canada, it's important to

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 1>look at what the trade relationship will be with the

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>US and Canada and elsewhere. And I'm just wondering, have

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the increased tensions around trade affected you at all? Do

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you expect them to affect you? Do you think that

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they have been overblown? Now? I think they're they're valid.

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect them to impact arrogance. Arrogates have been

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:44.719
<v Speaker 1>shipped on both coasts from Canada because of the the

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>inability to get new permits in the New York area,

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>for instance, or in California. The arrogates have to come

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 1>from somewhere. Um, they're very expensive to travel by truck,

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>long distances from inland, so that sheer economics of it

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:01.439
<v Speaker 1>will underpin the ability of it long term. I'm not

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 1>overly word about free trade, the Canadian Trade Pact as

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>it relates to arrogance. Talk about the raising money, whether

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it's in the debt markets, you don't have a lot

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of that. I think about six million in total. Uh,

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 1>easy to access money right now, I mean people throwing

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>money at you to say, g you know, we're looking

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>for yields, so why don't you borrow someone go out

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and buy a bunch of Yeah, that's that's very interesting. Uh.

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>We've been very successful over the last six years with

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:35.719
<v Speaker 1>our strategy. With success comes the the benefits of having

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>people want to loan your money so you can continue

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to be successful. So I think it would be easy

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to access at this time. Whether we would take that

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>on as debt or equity would depend on the amount

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of money we need. And we are a cyclical business though,

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:50.360
<v Speaker 1>so we have to be very cognizant that the good

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>times that we have now, you know, they won't last forever.

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Despite any governmental policy. Despite our hope, construction is a

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>cyclical business and we have to be mindful that real quick.

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 1>When do you think that the cycle will start turning

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 1>well with the tax reform? I continue to move that,

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I continue to move this out. You have to remember

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 1>this has been a historically slow recovery at very low rates,

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>which is act think good because we're preventing new new

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>peaks and new bubbles, and the extent it continues at

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>this gradual pace. I think the tax reform is going

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>to extend in another two years. I'm looking into two.

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>But that's I'm not a I'm not a clairvoyant. Well

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you'll have to I'll pull out by Christo Ball and

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>you can try your hand. Bill Sandbrook, thank you so

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Bill sandbrooks CEO of US Concrete

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>here talking about the infrastructure plans that are evidently in

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the works. We just are going to have to wait

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to see them. A Lisa brom WIT's along with pim Fox,

0:23:49.920 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg. Individual investors are plowing their money into

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 1>US stocks at a record pace, at least by one measure,

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>raising a big question are they coming in too late

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>when the stocks are too valuable and are destined to

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.880
<v Speaker 1>cool off. Here to answer that question is Randy Frederick.

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.919
<v Speaker 1>He is vice president of Trading Undervatives for the Schwab

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Center for Financial Research, which is based in Austin, but

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>he joins us here in our eleven three oh studios. Randy, um,

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>are you concerned about the flood of retail cash and

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>just sort of the general increase and allocations to US equities?

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Not yet? So the question is are they coming in

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>too late? I would say they're coming in late in

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the game, but it's probably not too late. I would say.

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>For the first eight years of this bullmarket, the big

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>question that I got at all the client events I

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 1>got and my counterparts heard the same thing, was what's

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the next shoe to drop? When is this all going

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to in? What's going to cause the max ash. It's

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>only been within about the last quarter, last three or

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>four months that we've actually seen a shift and investor

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 1>sentiment to, oh, this rally is legitimate. This bullmarket does

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 1>have some legs, and part of that, I think is

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 1>that we've got an incredibly solid fundamental backdrop and we

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 1>frankly think that's going to continue at least into the

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>first half of next year. Doesn't worry you that now

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got people who were bearished turning bullish to some extent.

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>It does what. It doesn't mean we're at the end.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>It may mean that we're at the very beginning stages

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of what could end up being the end, but the

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>end could well be a year into the future. And

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>in fact, historically, when you start to see all of

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.479
<v Speaker 1>the even the most ardent skeptics come into the market,

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>it may be the sign of the beginning, but many

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 1>times that has lasted more than a year, maybe even

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a year and a half to two years after that.

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>So it does have some sort of assignment. It does

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely does not point to a top just yet. All right,

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about something that we met

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>we report on on a regular basis, and this has

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to do with the VIX, the volatility index. Does this

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>really matter anymore to people still use the options that

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>are linked to the VIX in order to speculate, or

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:09.199
<v Speaker 1>has this become an indicator whose time is kind of

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 1>come and gone. Well, so, I've been studying the VIX

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>ever since first and came out in fact that it

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>was it was created the month before I started working

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:19.479
<v Speaker 1>with Charles Schwaback in so I've been and being involved

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in derivatives and and volatility and all these things. I've

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of been studying it every day since then. So yes,

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it still matters because what it really tells us,

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and this is where the problem comes in, I think

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 1>with retail investors and some of these products that are

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 1>allegedly linked to the VIX, is that it really tells

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you how much the institutional funds are hedging a large

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>market downturn, and the fact that we've had historically low

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>levels of the VIX forty five days I think it

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is that we've closed below ten this year, where right

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>now just ten point one five roundheard of. It just

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>simply means that those who run the big institutional hedge

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>funds are not concerned of a major downturn. That doesn't

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 1>mean we couldn't get a five percent pullback, and frankly,

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that might even be a healthy thing. But the problem

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>with investors who trade or spec layers who trade products

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>linked to the VIX, whether it's vixed futures, VIX options

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 1>or even a VIX ct F E t in is

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that they think it's tied directly to the VIX index,

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and they don't really understand in most cases that is

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>actually tied to vixed futures, which don't move nearly as

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>much as the VIX. So unfortunately, I when I often

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 1>caution investors about this when I speak at seminars, is

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't spend all of your time trying to predict

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>when the next big VIX spike will happen, because it's very,

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:27.719
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to do. Instead, wait until the VIX happens

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and then take a position that can benefit when the

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>VIX comes back down, because we see the VIX come

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>back down every time. It's bikes pretty much. So, given

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>your experience with derivatives, let's talk about one that's gotten

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention. It's gonna start trading on Sunday.

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 1>It's the Bitcoin futures contract. It's come under a lot

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of criticism by a number of big firms. I worried,

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>are you about this? Well? I think it's again it's

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely a speculative instrument. It's something that we're keeping an

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 1>eye on at Charles Schwab. We we don't aren't prepared

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to make any changes at this point. Um. I think

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>what has been driving the bitcoin price, and the reason

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 1>it's we've seen such a dramatic rise, not just this

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>year it's but in just really the last few weeks

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>is the introduction of the VIX futures. I think those

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>who own I'm sorry, of bitcoin futures. Those who own bitcoin,

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I believe think that that if futures are launched and

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>it provides the avenue for many more investors to get

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>into bitcoin than who are currently in it, that it

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>will likely drive the price higher. That may or may

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:26.919
<v Speaker 1>not be the case, but I think that's what what

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 1>may be driving the price of bitcoin right now. All right,

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>as you are an expert in the world of trading

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and derivatives, have you seen a convergence between futures and

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>options because they used to be pretty separate in terms

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of the way you would position of portfolio and as

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a manager, you wouldn't necessarily mix the two. But that

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>line seems to have been blurred completely. Well. Back in

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the old days, futurest firms were separate and unique in

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>most cases from regular brokerage firms that would typically trade

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>stocks ETFs options, but the futures business was kind of separate.

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>What happened in many cases and and Charles Schwab is

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a good example of that is that firms that were

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>traditionally stock and option and mutual fund brokers have also

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>acquired or gotten into the futures business. We acquired a

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>company called Options Express, with most people know, we recently

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>finished the final integration and so futures is a part

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of our product mix and it's become a much more

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>broadly accepted product to mainstream investors, where in the old

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 1>days it really wasn't in it. I think it was

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the introduction this probably goes back maybe almost ten to

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years, the introduction of the mini stized contracts, which

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>really made futures um accessible to We didn't have to

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>put a huge amounts of collateral and with the many

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>size contracts that's no longer necessary. So that made it

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>really much more acceptable and and really um attainable product.

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>If you will, to a retail investor, do you watch

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the volume levels? Do you watch the interest level that

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>customers expressed by using that that platform. At schwap, certainly

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>we do um. We don't publish those numbers. We try

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to group them all together with our trading ball milliames.

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>But I will say that one thing that has limited

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to some extent the growth and futures to retail investors.

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Is also the introduction of many, many E t f

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>s and e t n s that have access to

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the futures market. So those who don't want to provide

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that ability to trade futures directly can get access to

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that through their regular equity positions using e t n

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>s and e t f So I think to some

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>extent that has cannibalized a bit of the futures business.

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, well done, Thank you very much for

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>being with us. Randy Frederick, vice president of Trading and

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Derivatives for the Schwab Center for Financial Research based in Austin, Texas,

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and you can follow Randy on Twitter at Randy A.

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Frederick and that's F R E D E R I

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>C K. Thank you very much for being here. Looking

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>forward to, of course, so speaking with you in the future.

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bluebirg Radio