1 00:00:05,800 --> 00:00:08,720 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox. 2 00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:11,520 Speaker 1: Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we 3 00:00:11,640 --> 00:00:15,120 Speaker 1: bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for 4 00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:17,840 Speaker 1: you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store 5 00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:20,720 Speaker 1: or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L 6 00:00:20,840 --> 00:00:34,240 Speaker 1: Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Legendary 7 00:00:34,320 --> 00:00:37,240 Speaker 1: Vanguard founder Jack Bogel sat down with us to discuss 8 00:00:37,280 --> 00:00:40,400 Speaker 1: his thoughts on the geop plan, Bitcoin and his outlook 9 00:00:40,440 --> 00:00:42,680 Speaker 1: for the bondom market. We kick things off by discussing 10 00:00:42,760 --> 00:00:45,720 Speaker 1: Jack's thoughts on the e t F business. Where I 11 00:00:45,760 --> 00:00:48,560 Speaker 1: began was asking him about the freight train that is 12 00:00:48,600 --> 00:00:50,839 Speaker 1: destined to be a ten trillion dollar firm within the 13 00:00:50,840 --> 00:00:53,239 Speaker 1: next few years Vanguard, and whether he was worried at 14 00:00:53,280 --> 00:00:55,320 Speaker 1: all about how quickly the E t F industry was 15 00:00:55,360 --> 00:00:59,480 Speaker 1: amassing assets. Take a listen, Well, those two things don't 16 00:00:59,520 --> 00:01:02,960 Speaker 1: go to two together very well. Our strength at Vanguard 17 00:01:02,960 --> 00:01:05,440 Speaker 1: has been the traditional index fund, the S and P 18 00:01:05,600 --> 00:01:08,400 Speaker 1: five hundered total stock market, which I started way back 19 00:01:08,440 --> 00:01:13,880 Speaker 1: in in and that has been our strength. Were that 20 00:01:14,040 --> 00:01:17,080 Speaker 1: market and that traditional index fund market. I'll buy an 21 00:01:17,080 --> 00:01:20,720 Speaker 1: old market broad market is about half of the index 22 00:01:20,760 --> 00:01:23,399 Speaker 1: business and the E t F business is the other 23 00:01:23,440 --> 00:01:27,480 Speaker 1: half of the business, and they are totally different. They 24 00:01:27,520 --> 00:01:32,200 Speaker 1: both have passive investment policies, but the traditional index funds 25 00:01:32,520 --> 00:01:36,600 Speaker 1: have passive investors, and that the e t f s 26 00:01:36,640 --> 00:01:39,920 Speaker 1: have active investors. So e t fs have heavy trading 27 00:01:40,640 --> 00:01:43,960 Speaker 1: and they have a lot more speculation. They have a 28 00:01:44,400 --> 00:01:48,040 Speaker 1: product line so called that that has very speculative funds. 29 00:01:48,400 --> 00:01:52,920 Speaker 1: So I'm I wouldn't I wouldn't. I wouldn't predict that 30 00:01:52,920 --> 00:01:55,600 Speaker 1: that that would continue to flourish. You know, we have 31 00:01:55,720 --> 00:01:59,680 Speaker 1: data here that shows that e t f have had 32 00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:03,400 Speaker 1: as ten years is a four point seven annual return 33 00:02:04,080 --> 00:02:06,600 Speaker 1: and the traditional index fund about a seven point one 34 00:02:06,640 --> 00:02:09,200 Speaker 1: percent annual return. There was the e t f s 35 00:02:09,240 --> 00:02:11,519 Speaker 1: have not worked out well for investors. I don't know 36 00:02:11,560 --> 00:02:16,480 Speaker 1: why nobody knows this. So in a decade, the traditional 37 00:02:16,520 --> 00:02:19,919 Speaker 1: index funds up about cumulatively and the E t F 38 00:02:21,480 --> 00:02:24,600 Speaker 1: I mean, that's not that's not a strong record. This 39 00:02:24,680 --> 00:02:26,679 Speaker 1: is this is a really compelling point you're making. E 40 00:02:26,800 --> 00:02:30,160 Speaker 1: t f s have not worked out well for investors. 41 00:02:30,360 --> 00:02:33,400 Speaker 1: Are you concerned that they're going to taint the record 42 00:02:33,560 --> 00:02:38,560 Speaker 1: of indexed funds because they are being treated, uh, synonymously. Well, 43 00:02:38,720 --> 00:02:41,480 Speaker 1: I think there's a different, for the want of a 44 00:02:41,520 --> 00:02:44,120 Speaker 1: better word, a different ethic and e t s. It's 45 00:02:44,200 --> 00:02:49,280 Speaker 1: by the factors. It's leverage. It's finding narrow niches in 46 00:02:49,320 --> 00:02:52,800 Speaker 1: the market very quickly to see if you can bring 47 00:02:52,840 --> 00:02:55,120 Speaker 1: a lot of the sheep in to share them. One 48 00:02:55,160 --> 00:02:59,240 Speaker 1: of the most recent e t F was long electronic marketing, 49 00:02:59,720 --> 00:03:03,040 Speaker 1: actually your retail marketing. I mean, that's an interesting idea, 50 00:03:03,040 --> 00:03:06,160 Speaker 1: it might even work, but some entrepreneur jumps on that 51 00:03:06,240 --> 00:03:08,480 Speaker 1: bandwagon and says, now he can package it for you. 52 00:03:09,160 --> 00:03:12,720 Speaker 1: It's a very entrepreneurial business, or, to use a phrase 53 00:03:12,760 --> 00:03:15,880 Speaker 1: that the great Henry Kaufman once used, is populated in 54 00:03:15,919 --> 00:03:20,120 Speaker 1: many respects by financial buccaneers. So it's a different business. 55 00:03:20,560 --> 00:03:24,079 Speaker 1: It's finding product to sell and because there's a great 56 00:03:24,120 --> 00:03:27,080 Speaker 1: market among brokers and investment advisers who want to sell it. 57 00:03:27,720 --> 00:03:29,920 Speaker 1: When they want something to sell every day, they have 58 00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:33,359 Speaker 1: to sell something every day. And that seeks the sort 59 00:03:33,400 --> 00:03:38,520 Speaker 1: of the rationale for the business trading, trading, trading, and 60 00:03:38,880 --> 00:03:41,560 Speaker 1: you see it most clearly, and it's a little bit 61 00:03:41,560 --> 00:03:43,760 Speaker 1: of an off beat et F to say the least. 62 00:03:44,040 --> 00:03:48,840 Speaker 1: The spider, but it trades. They brag about it fifteen 63 00:03:49,360 --> 00:03:55,160 Speaker 1: billion dollars an hour or something, and yeah, it turns 64 00:03:55,200 --> 00:03:57,920 Speaker 1: over at about two or three thousand percent a year. 65 00:03:58,400 --> 00:04:01,360 Speaker 1: And it's banks trading with one And that's that's a 66 00:04:01,440 --> 00:04:04,040 Speaker 1: very different implication for the future of the E T 67 00:04:04,240 --> 00:04:06,800 Speaker 1: F business than the than the more or less retail 68 00:04:06,880 --> 00:04:11,200 Speaker 1: business that people are buying speculatives E T S. Mr Bogel, 69 00:04:11,320 --> 00:04:14,080 Speaker 1: you talk about financial buccaneers. I'm gonna throw a couple 70 00:04:14,120 --> 00:04:19,760 Speaker 1: of topics that you want your thoughts. Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. Well, 71 00:04:20,440 --> 00:04:23,120 Speaker 1: I'm not so good as crypto, but let's talk about bitcoin. 72 00:04:23,520 --> 00:04:28,279 Speaker 1: Bitcoin is a speculation. Why is this speculation because there's 73 00:04:28,360 --> 00:04:32,240 Speaker 1: no underlying rate of return. Just like gold, stocks have 74 00:04:32,520 --> 00:04:37,520 Speaker 1: earnings and dividends, bonds have have interest coupons to hold 75 00:04:37,560 --> 00:04:42,880 Speaker 1: their value up. But the bitcoin has nothing in its 76 00:04:42,960 --> 00:04:46,239 Speaker 1: value except that you want to sell it to somebody 77 00:04:46,360 --> 00:04:49,040 Speaker 1: more than you paid for it. Well, that's about as 78 00:04:49,080 --> 00:04:51,200 Speaker 1: good a definition as you can get. It may be 79 00:04:51,320 --> 00:04:55,120 Speaker 1: a great speculation, that's the funny part of it. But 80 00:04:55,200 --> 00:04:59,080 Speaker 1: as I said the other day, um, and the bitcoin 81 00:04:59,160 --> 00:05:03,600 Speaker 1: was then only about ten thousand, and you know, there's 82 00:05:03,640 --> 00:05:06,240 Speaker 1: a speculation that I would have liked to plague, And 83 00:05:06,320 --> 00:05:09,080 Speaker 1: I said, if it gets to twenty thousand, don't talk 84 00:05:09,080 --> 00:05:13,080 Speaker 1: to me. Waitfil it gets back to a hundred, all right, 85 00:05:13,120 --> 00:05:15,560 Speaker 1: they may not be buccaneers. Much of thoughts on the 86 00:05:15,640 --> 00:05:20,000 Speaker 1: GOP's tax overhaul plan, as you know it. I think 87 00:05:20,040 --> 00:05:24,040 Speaker 1: it's very unfortunate. I think it has a grave moral 88 00:05:24,080 --> 00:05:27,360 Speaker 1: issues in favoring the wealthiest people in the country that 89 00:05:27,440 --> 00:05:29,320 Speaker 1: compared to the people who are doing all the hard 90 00:05:29,320 --> 00:05:35,040 Speaker 1: work just seems crazy. Uh. I think it's really bad 91 00:05:35,240 --> 00:05:37,520 Speaker 1: some little pieces of policy. You know, this is a 92 00:05:37,520 --> 00:05:41,080 Speaker 1: country that's supposed to be helping education, and they put 93 00:05:41,120 --> 00:05:45,320 Speaker 1: some new some taxes on young men and women who 94 00:05:45,320 --> 00:05:50,160 Speaker 1: are teachers and get fringe benefits. And then they've they've 95 00:05:50,160 --> 00:05:54,400 Speaker 1: stopped the deductibility of interest on college loans, and those 96 00:05:54,400 --> 00:05:57,880 Speaker 1: two things hurt education. Well. And what to what, avail 97 00:05:58,040 --> 00:06:03,000 Speaker 1: I asked? The fusion of wealth, the gap in wealth 98 00:06:03,040 --> 00:06:06,280 Speaker 1: between the rich and the poor is very upsetting to 99 00:06:06,560 --> 00:06:10,480 Speaker 1: a good nation, a good society, and they made it worse. 100 00:06:10,920 --> 00:06:15,479 Speaker 1: Rubs other than not, I love it real quick. Last question, 101 00:06:15,520 --> 00:06:17,679 Speaker 1: I'm just wondering. You said in recent comments that stock 102 00:06:17,720 --> 00:06:21,120 Speaker 1: returns are likely to be about four percent over the 103 00:06:21,160 --> 00:06:25,080 Speaker 1: next decade. What about bonds and where do you think 104 00:06:25,160 --> 00:06:28,960 Speaker 1: are the most promising assets at this point? Well, stock returns. 105 00:06:29,120 --> 00:06:31,080 Speaker 1: I've been doing this for twenty five years and ten 106 00:06:31,160 --> 00:06:35,240 Speaker 1: years in ten year in ten year intervals, and my 107 00:06:36,560 --> 00:06:41,520 Speaker 1: prognostications for stocks have been about correlation with what happened, 108 00:06:41,760 --> 00:06:48,920 Speaker 1: and my view bond views are about of what happened. Correlation. 109 00:06:49,600 --> 00:06:51,839 Speaker 1: But the reason bonds are really easy. It should be 110 00:06:51,920 --> 00:06:54,159 Speaker 1: a number of around three percent per year over the 111 00:06:54,200 --> 00:06:56,960 Speaker 1: next decade because the only return you get on a 112 00:06:57,000 --> 00:07:00,200 Speaker 1: bond is from the interest coupon. And so you have 113 00:07:00,240 --> 00:07:03,360 Speaker 1: a portfolio half of corporate bonds and half of the 114 00:07:03,440 --> 00:07:07,320 Speaker 1: ten year the ten year treasury, very conservative with a 115 00:07:07,440 --> 00:07:10,160 Speaker 1: with a corporate half, and that gives you about three 116 00:07:10,200 --> 00:07:13,440 Speaker 1: percent today and so that that's that's what you will 117 00:07:13,480 --> 00:07:16,720 Speaker 1: get in the next ten years. Of interest rates go down, 118 00:07:16,760 --> 00:07:19,120 Speaker 1: the prices will go up, but over ten years that's 119 00:07:19,160 --> 00:07:22,520 Speaker 1: up to even out. That's a huge problem for pensions 120 00:07:22,960 --> 00:07:29,840 Speaker 1: with an eight a huge problem. It's totally defeating. The 121 00:07:29,920 --> 00:07:31,960 Speaker 1: pension funds are not going to be able to meet 122 00:07:32,000 --> 00:07:35,160 Speaker 1: their seven and a half or eight percent obligation. And 123 00:07:35,200 --> 00:07:38,960 Speaker 1: the curious thing is that back in the guess late eighties, 124 00:07:39,120 --> 00:07:42,560 Speaker 1: don't hold me the exact date when then, when treasuries 125 00:07:43,080 --> 00:07:49,080 Speaker 1: were yielding eight and the pension plans had about a 126 00:07:49,080 --> 00:07:53,280 Speaker 1: five percent return projection eight percent for bonds, five percent 127 00:07:53,320 --> 00:07:57,280 Speaker 1: projection for pensions. And now treasurers are yielding two and 128 00:07:57,280 --> 00:07:59,720 Speaker 1: a half or three depending on whatever you take, and 129 00:08:00,000 --> 00:08:04,000 Speaker 1: engines are yielding seven. And I think it is almost 130 00:08:04,040 --> 00:08:07,120 Speaker 1: a given that it will end badly, Mr Boggle, Do 131 00:08:07,120 --> 00:08:10,640 Speaker 1: you believe that artificial intelligence and robo advisors will do 132 00:08:10,720 --> 00:08:14,880 Speaker 1: away with the human touch when it comes to investment advice, Well, 133 00:08:14,960 --> 00:08:17,960 Speaker 1: they will do away with some of it. Uh but 134 00:08:17,960 --> 00:08:21,240 Speaker 1: but but what's what's happening mostly in then the robo 135 00:08:21,360 --> 00:08:26,520 Speaker 1: area is they're using conventional index funds like the S 136 00:08:26,560 --> 00:08:29,120 Speaker 1: and P five hundred Bangardis and P five hundered. I 137 00:08:29,120 --> 00:08:33,520 Speaker 1: think that's the largest investment at the betterment m or 138 00:08:33,880 --> 00:08:36,720 Speaker 1: and maybe maybe some of the others. So they're they're 139 00:08:36,760 --> 00:08:39,920 Speaker 1: just it's that they've been doing so far mostly asset allocation, 140 00:08:40,600 --> 00:08:43,800 Speaker 1: and there's no harm done in that. Their asset allocation 141 00:08:43,840 --> 00:08:46,320 Speaker 1: looks very much like you know, sort of a sixt 142 00:08:46,960 --> 00:08:49,360 Speaker 1: thing generally up or down, maybe with a age or 143 00:08:49,640 --> 00:08:54,760 Speaker 1: or aggressiveness of the investor. So maybe it's I think 144 00:08:54,760 --> 00:08:58,480 Speaker 1: it's less art Artificial intelligence than asset allocation is a 145 00:08:58,559 --> 00:09:00,760 Speaker 1: simple matter. You don't have to beat it to death 146 00:09:00,840 --> 00:09:05,040 Speaker 1: with data. As for artificial intelligence out there, I read 147 00:09:05,080 --> 00:09:09,079 Speaker 1: somewhere that people that are trained in artificial intelligence in college, 148 00:09:09,280 --> 00:09:10,880 Speaker 1: after a couple of years gonna make a half million 149 00:09:10,920 --> 00:09:13,920 Speaker 1: dollars a year, And I think that's wonderful. But I 150 00:09:14,040 --> 00:09:17,640 Speaker 1: keep wondering how much people that have real intelligence will make. 151 00:09:18,240 --> 00:09:21,079 Speaker 1: Now was Jack Bogel. He is the founder and retired 152 00:09:21,120 --> 00:09:23,920 Speaker 1: chief executive of the Vanguard Group and the author of 153 00:09:24,000 --> 00:09:28,600 Speaker 1: Common Sense on Mutual Funds, New Imperatives for the Intelligent Investor. 154 00:09:29,160 --> 00:09:32,479 Speaker 1: I'm pim Fox along with Lisa Bramo wits This is Bloomberg. 155 00:09:48,800 --> 00:09:53,360 Speaker 1: Protests are breaking out in Gaza, Turkey, Germany over President 156 00:09:53,360 --> 00:09:58,800 Speaker 1: Trump's decision to move the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, 157 00:09:58,880 --> 00:10:02,480 Speaker 1: recognizing that as the capital. This, of course the subject 158 00:10:02,559 --> 00:10:06,960 Speaker 1: of a longstanding debate and controversy in the region, given 159 00:10:07,000 --> 00:10:09,880 Speaker 1: the tensions between the Israelis and the Palestinians. Here to 160 00:10:09,920 --> 00:10:12,160 Speaker 1: talk about it is Daniel Gordis. He is a Bloomberg 161 00:10:12,240 --> 00:10:14,960 Speaker 1: View columnist as well as a senior vice president and 162 00:10:15,040 --> 00:10:18,439 Speaker 1: court Distinguished Fellow at shell M College in Jerusalem, and 163 00:10:18,480 --> 00:10:21,880 Speaker 1: he joins us now, Daniel, thank you so much. What 164 00:10:22,080 --> 00:10:24,040 Speaker 1: is it? Just to start with, what's the mood like? 165 00:10:24,400 --> 00:10:28,319 Speaker 1: There is there an increased kind of tension and expectation 166 00:10:28,559 --> 00:10:34,480 Speaker 1: of violence around UH President Trump's decision. It's an interesting question. 167 00:10:34,480 --> 00:10:38,079 Speaker 1: I think that yesterday, in the advance of the declaration 168 00:10:38,320 --> 00:10:41,480 Speaker 1: and immediately after, there was a pretty widespread sense here 169 00:10:41,880 --> 00:10:43,599 Speaker 1: that if there was any violence, it was going to 170 00:10:43,679 --> 00:10:46,200 Speaker 1: be pretty sporadic and it would pretty much peter out 171 00:10:46,280 --> 00:10:49,680 Speaker 1: relatively quickly. I think people are a little bit less 172 00:10:49,720 --> 00:10:52,120 Speaker 1: confident about that right now. I don't think that anybody 173 00:10:52,200 --> 00:10:55,000 Speaker 1: is quite panicking yet. But there have been there have 174 00:10:55,120 --> 00:10:58,120 Speaker 1: been conflicts all along the border between Israel and the 175 00:10:58,120 --> 00:11:01,160 Speaker 1: West Bank UM. According to the his reports, several dozen 176 00:11:01,200 --> 00:11:03,960 Speaker 1: Palestinians have been injured. I haven't read of any deaths, 177 00:11:04,320 --> 00:11:05,960 Speaker 1: and I haven't read of any injuries on the side 178 00:11:06,000 --> 00:11:09,280 Speaker 1: of the israelis UM. But colleague of mine who was 179 00:11:09,320 --> 00:11:12,920 Speaker 1: working from home today, who works in Maldumim, which is 180 00:11:13,160 --> 00:11:16,240 Speaker 1: UH inside the West Bank. It's a city that's very 181 00:11:16,320 --> 00:11:19,160 Speaker 1: much controversial because it's gone on an extension of Jerusalem 182 00:11:19,160 --> 00:11:21,319 Speaker 1: into the West Bank. She told me that the city 183 00:11:21,400 --> 00:11:23,480 Speaker 1: was ringed with security people, that they were just making 184 00:11:23,520 --> 00:11:25,800 Speaker 1: sure that people did not get into the city. So 185 00:11:25,840 --> 00:11:27,959 Speaker 1: I thought my senses and we heard, by the way, 186 00:11:28,120 --> 00:11:30,840 Speaker 1: helicopter is all in the sky this afternoon. So it 187 00:11:30,880 --> 00:11:34,199 Speaker 1: may be materializing into a little bit more violence than 188 00:11:34,280 --> 00:11:36,720 Speaker 1: some people had expected. But there's certainly no panic on 189 00:11:36,760 --> 00:11:39,240 Speaker 1: the streets and no panic. And as people are talking, 190 00:11:40,040 --> 00:11:43,360 Speaker 1: Daniel Gordis, you know in your good book Israel, a 191 00:11:43,400 --> 00:11:48,520 Speaker 1: Concise History of a Nation Reborn, you talk about the 192 00:11:48,640 --> 00:11:51,800 Speaker 1: role that Jerusalem plays in the history of the region 193 00:11:51,880 --> 00:11:55,880 Speaker 1: and specifically in the founding of the state of Israel. 194 00:11:55,920 --> 00:11:57,760 Speaker 1: I'm wondering if you could just provide us with some 195 00:11:57,880 --> 00:12:04,440 Speaker 1: context for Jerusalem, not only as a geographic location, but 196 00:12:04,640 --> 00:12:10,320 Speaker 1: as a political location. Right. So, Jerusalem was not included 197 00:12:10,320 --> 00:12:13,520 Speaker 1: actually in the borders that the United Nations gave to Israel, 198 00:12:13,559 --> 00:12:16,640 Speaker 1: and that very famous photo of November nineteen seven, when 199 00:12:16,679 --> 00:12:19,400 Speaker 1: the UN General Assembly created a Jewish state and an 200 00:12:19,400 --> 00:12:21,520 Speaker 1: Arab state, Jerusalem is going to be a kind of 201 00:12:21,559 --> 00:12:25,880 Speaker 1: an internationally monitored area. The Israelis were very unhappy with 202 00:12:25,920 --> 00:12:27,920 Speaker 1: that because they wanted Jerusalem to be their capital, but 203 00:12:27,960 --> 00:12:30,880 Speaker 1: they accepted the UN deal. Uh. The Arabs, of course 204 00:12:30,920 --> 00:12:32,760 Speaker 1: did not accept the deal, launched the war, and in 205 00:12:32,840 --> 00:12:35,880 Speaker 1: the course of that war, Israel captured West Jerusalem. It 206 00:12:35,880 --> 00:12:38,079 Speaker 1: did not capture East Jerusalem, which it did not get 207 00:12:38,200 --> 00:12:41,959 Speaker 1: until the nineteen sixty seven war when Jordan's despite pleas 208 00:12:42,000 --> 00:12:44,600 Speaker 1: from the Israeli government, decided to enter that war as well. 209 00:12:45,440 --> 00:12:51,920 Speaker 1: So Israel has always since nineteen forty nine recognized West 210 00:12:52,040 --> 00:12:54,160 Speaker 1: Jerusalem as its capital and as one of the rest 211 00:12:54,200 --> 00:12:56,000 Speaker 1: of the world to recognize it. It's the only country 212 00:12:56,000 --> 00:12:59,280 Speaker 1: in the world that other countries don't recognize its capital 213 00:12:59,320 --> 00:13:01,640 Speaker 1: as its capital. When Israelis are always scratching their heads 214 00:13:01,679 --> 00:13:04,520 Speaker 1: saying West Jerusalem is clearly not going back. So why 215 00:13:04,559 --> 00:13:06,880 Speaker 1: can't the west of the role just acknowledge West Jerusalem 216 00:13:06,920 --> 00:13:09,400 Speaker 1: as the capital of Israel and Easter Rusalaman will get 217 00:13:09,640 --> 00:13:12,520 Speaker 1: resolved when the result, when the situation where the Palestinians 218 00:13:12,559 --> 00:13:15,280 Speaker 1: gets resolved. Um. And so I think that you know, 219 00:13:15,320 --> 00:13:18,080 Speaker 1: from a from a religious standpoint, it's very important to Jews, 220 00:13:18,120 --> 00:13:20,560 Speaker 1: it's very important to Moslims, it's very important to Christians. 221 00:13:21,040 --> 00:13:22,960 Speaker 1: But this is what you correctly plant on there's nothing 222 00:13:23,000 --> 00:13:25,480 Speaker 1: to do with the religious issus. It's all about politics. 223 00:13:25,800 --> 00:13:29,240 Speaker 1: And I think what the President did yesterday was basically 224 00:13:29,280 --> 00:13:31,440 Speaker 1: to say, and he said it himself, you just a 225 00:13:31,440 --> 00:13:33,880 Speaker 1: matter of recognizing reality. I mean, as he pointed out, 226 00:13:33,920 --> 00:13:36,400 Speaker 1: the Supreme Court is here, the Parliament is here, the 227 00:13:36,440 --> 00:13:39,360 Speaker 1: President lives here, the Prime Minister lives here, the vast 228 00:13:39,400 --> 00:13:42,680 Speaker 1: majority of government offices are here. Always basically saying is 229 00:13:42,679 --> 00:13:44,840 Speaker 1: that what we're gonna do is stop capitulating to the 230 00:13:44,920 --> 00:13:47,880 Speaker 1: fear of violence, and we're gonna call reality what it is, 231 00:13:47,920 --> 00:13:50,160 Speaker 1: which is that West Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. 232 00:13:50,559 --> 00:13:53,200 Speaker 1: Well here, here's just just to push back on that. 233 00:13:53,360 --> 00:13:54,959 Speaker 1: I mean, a lot of people are saying that this 234 00:13:55,040 --> 00:13:59,000 Speaker 1: move by President Trump has undermined a US role in 235 00:13:59,200 --> 00:14:03,880 Speaker 1: the peace prod, says has inflamed tensions. Uh Hamas has 236 00:14:03,920 --> 00:14:07,360 Speaker 1: called for an antifata against Israel this morning, and you 237 00:14:07,440 --> 00:14:09,720 Speaker 1: have to wonder, at what point is it worth it, 238 00:14:09,800 --> 00:14:13,120 Speaker 1: I mean, just for to make a political statement. Well, 239 00:14:13,400 --> 00:14:15,760 Speaker 1: that's a great question. So first of all, obviously if 240 00:14:15,800 --> 00:14:19,320 Speaker 1: this blows up into a major conflagration, uh, then one 241 00:14:19,600 --> 00:14:22,080 Speaker 1: could very reasonably ask whether it was worth it or not. 242 00:14:22,120 --> 00:14:23,840 Speaker 1: I think most people who are still banking on the 243 00:14:23,880 --> 00:14:26,920 Speaker 1: idea because it doesn't actually change any reality on the ground. 244 00:14:27,280 --> 00:14:29,520 Speaker 1: Most people are banking on the idea that it's not 245 00:14:29,600 --> 00:14:31,800 Speaker 1: going to become a major conflagration. But you're right, if 246 00:14:31,800 --> 00:14:33,920 Speaker 1: this gets out of hand, then the question of whether 247 00:14:33,960 --> 00:14:37,480 Speaker 1: it's worth it is certainly a very good question. I 248 00:14:37,560 --> 00:14:39,840 Speaker 1: think that in terms of, you know, the question of 249 00:14:39,840 --> 00:14:43,040 Speaker 1: whether or not the president has really kind of moved 250 00:14:43,080 --> 00:14:45,800 Speaker 1: the United States out of being a legitimate arbiter in 251 00:14:45,880 --> 00:14:48,760 Speaker 1: the in the process. I mean, first, well, let's remember that, 252 00:14:49,240 --> 00:14:52,360 Speaker 1: you know, countless presidents, Republicans and Democrats alike, have seen 253 00:14:52,400 --> 00:14:55,040 Speaker 1: the United States as an important arbiter and has gotten 254 00:14:55,120 --> 00:14:57,080 Speaker 1: us nowhere. And I'm speaking as someone who was in 255 00:14:57,120 --> 00:14:59,760 Speaker 1: favor of the creation of a Palestinian state, as someone 256 00:14:59,800 --> 00:15:02,760 Speaker 1: who's not a huge fan of the current president. But 257 00:15:02,840 --> 00:15:05,480 Speaker 1: I think that what he said was, uh, you know, 258 00:15:05,640 --> 00:15:08,200 Speaker 1: basically true. We haven't we have we as America have 259 00:15:08,280 --> 00:15:10,720 Speaker 1: not been able to move this process forward and and 260 00:15:11,080 --> 00:15:14,240 Speaker 1: sort of capitulating to this Palestinian demand that we not 261 00:15:14,480 --> 00:15:17,200 Speaker 1: acknowledge West Jerusalem as the capital of Israel has gotten 262 00:15:17,280 --> 00:15:19,440 Speaker 1: us nowhere. So since it has gotten us nowhere, let's 263 00:15:19,440 --> 00:15:21,240 Speaker 1: at least call reality on the ground where it is. 264 00:15:21,280 --> 00:15:24,240 Speaker 1: That's my sense, but obviously reasonable minds cannon do differ, 265 00:15:24,560 --> 00:15:26,640 Speaker 1: and there are both Disraeli leaders and as well as 266 00:15:26,680 --> 00:15:29,800 Speaker 1: American Jewige leaders on both sides of this divide. Daniel, 267 00:15:29,880 --> 00:15:34,880 Speaker 1: what has been the reaction, if any, in Arab capitals 268 00:15:34,960 --> 00:15:38,800 Speaker 1: around the region, and is the status of Jerusalem as 269 00:15:38,840 --> 00:15:42,720 Speaker 1: important to them now as it once was. Perhaps the 270 00:15:42,800 --> 00:15:45,360 Speaker 1: reaction is exactly what you'd expect. They're all decrying it 271 00:15:45,400 --> 00:15:47,360 Speaker 1: and saying it's a terrible idea, and so farth that's 272 00:15:47,400 --> 00:15:49,560 Speaker 1: part of the sort of the ritual that has to 273 00:15:49,560 --> 00:15:52,040 Speaker 1: get played here. I think the much deeper issue, and 274 00:15:52,120 --> 00:15:55,040 Speaker 1: it's a sad one for the Palestinians, quite frankly, is 275 00:15:55,080 --> 00:15:58,000 Speaker 1: that the Palestinian issue was simply not nearly as important 276 00:15:58,040 --> 00:16:01,040 Speaker 1: to the Arab world as the palest Indians wish it 277 00:16:01,080 --> 00:16:03,240 Speaker 1: would be, and it's not as important to the Arab 278 00:16:03,280 --> 00:16:05,920 Speaker 1: world as it once was. I mean, take Saudi Arabia 279 00:16:05,960 --> 00:16:08,280 Speaker 1: for example, which did speak out because that's what it 280 00:16:08,320 --> 00:16:11,320 Speaker 1: has to do, but Suni Arabia doesn't care one little bit. 281 00:16:11,360 --> 00:16:14,320 Speaker 1: Sni Arab was worried about Iran and it needs American 282 00:16:14,440 --> 00:16:18,160 Speaker 1: and Israeli cooperation on the Iranian on the Irmanian issues. 283 00:16:18,200 --> 00:16:20,320 Speaker 1: So they'll speak out today, they make sure that they can, 284 00:16:20,480 --> 00:16:21,960 Speaker 1: you know, sort of make a check mark next do 285 00:16:22,080 --> 00:16:25,080 Speaker 1: we spoke out against it. But Saudi Arabia couldn't care less. 286 00:16:25,160 --> 00:16:29,480 Speaker 1: Egypt has completely suppressed Palestinian protests in the streets over 287 00:16:29,480 --> 00:16:32,320 Speaker 1: the last few years under LCC. So Egypt's not a 288 00:16:32,320 --> 00:16:34,520 Speaker 1: big help over the course of the years. Even when 289 00:16:34,600 --> 00:16:37,640 Speaker 1: Saidat and Manacha began negotiated the return of the Sinai, 290 00:16:38,280 --> 00:16:40,720 Speaker 1: said Dot insisted that if he was going to get 291 00:16:40,760 --> 00:16:42,480 Speaker 1: the sign I back and sign a deal with Israel, 292 00:16:42,560 --> 00:16:44,760 Speaker 1: Israel also not to create a Palestinian state, and began 293 00:16:44,800 --> 00:16:49,040 Speaker 1: said no, And so that's where we are. Daniel gordis 294 00:16:49,080 --> 00:16:51,400 Speaker 1: Bloomberg View, Colamus, thank you very much. He's also the 295 00:16:51,400 --> 00:16:54,600 Speaker 1: author of Israel, A Concise History of a Nation. Reborn 296 00:17:10,880 --> 00:17:13,360 Speaker 1: the founder, one of the co founders and the head 297 00:17:13,400 --> 00:17:17,120 Speaker 1: of a Carlisle Group, the private equity firm. David Rubinstein 298 00:17:17,440 --> 00:17:20,880 Speaker 1: was talking about infrastructure yesterday. He said that he hoped 299 00:17:20,920 --> 00:17:24,640 Speaker 1: Congress would have passed an infrastructure bill by now. Well, 300 00:17:24,680 --> 00:17:28,000 Speaker 1: let's find out about why that hasn't happened. Perhaps and 301 00:17:28,119 --> 00:17:30,080 Speaker 1: what could be done to move this along. We have 302 00:17:30,160 --> 00:17:33,480 Speaker 1: an expert when it comes to infrastructure. Bill Sandbrook is 303 00:17:33,520 --> 00:17:36,800 Speaker 1: the chief executive of the US Concrete and he joins 304 00:17:36,880 --> 00:17:39,240 Speaker 1: us here in our leven three oh studios. Bill, thank 305 00:17:39,280 --> 00:17:41,840 Speaker 1: you very much for it coming in. So what would 306 00:17:41,840 --> 00:17:44,040 Speaker 1: you say to someone like David Rubinstein? He says, Look, 307 00:17:44,320 --> 00:17:47,400 Speaker 1: he says, you've got low rates, But most of the 308 00:17:47,520 --> 00:17:51,720 Speaker 1: US infrastructure is state and local, it is not federal. 309 00:17:52,080 --> 00:17:55,760 Speaker 1: Why can't we get infrastructure done? No, it's a very 310 00:17:55,800 --> 00:17:58,920 Speaker 1: good question. We were very hopeful people in our industry, 311 00:17:59,119 --> 00:18:03,119 Speaker 1: and obviously both parties had platforms that advocated a trillion 312 00:18:03,119 --> 00:18:07,760 Speaker 1: dollar spend before either winner was announced, and in fact, 313 00:18:08,040 --> 00:18:11,399 Speaker 1: at President Trump's inauguration, the second thing he mentioned was 314 00:18:11,480 --> 00:18:14,359 Speaker 1: one of his top was his top priority was infrastructure spent. 315 00:18:14,760 --> 00:18:18,120 Speaker 1: And we have been disappointed that it hasn't been more forthcoming. However, 316 00:18:18,160 --> 00:18:21,800 Speaker 1: having said that, there were priorities that need to be chosen, 317 00:18:21,880 --> 00:18:26,879 Speaker 1: and the priorities were health regulatory reform, healthcare reform, taxes, 318 00:18:26,960 --> 00:18:29,879 Speaker 1: and then infrastructure came forth, and there were fourth because 319 00:18:29,960 --> 00:18:32,920 Speaker 1: and there were reasons for that sequence. So I'm patient 320 00:18:33,320 --> 00:18:36,159 Speaker 1: this problem has not developed overnight. This problem is not 321 00:18:36,200 --> 00:18:39,240 Speaker 1: going to be fixed overnight. So if it's pushed a 322 00:18:39,320 --> 00:18:41,080 Speaker 1: year or a number of months, as it looks like 323 00:18:41,080 --> 00:18:43,320 Speaker 1: it's going to be pushed into next year, I'm not 324 00:18:43,560 --> 00:18:46,520 Speaker 1: despondent about that. The needs continue to grow and I 325 00:18:46,560 --> 00:18:48,399 Speaker 1: think the federal government's going to have to address it 326 00:18:48,400 --> 00:18:49,960 Speaker 1: one way or another. And there is by parts and 327 00:18:50,040 --> 00:18:53,920 Speaker 1: support for it bill. Do you have a sense of 328 00:18:54,040 --> 00:18:56,080 Speaker 1: how it would take place, how big it would be, 329 00:18:56,119 --> 00:18:58,480 Speaker 1: as well as where the money would go. Would it 330 00:18:58,520 --> 00:19:01,720 Speaker 1: go to projects that would apply uh for funding? Would 331 00:19:01,720 --> 00:19:04,520 Speaker 1: it go to public private kind of partnerships that we 332 00:19:04,640 --> 00:19:06,959 Speaker 1: then invest in. What's your sense it's gonna be a 333 00:19:06,960 --> 00:19:10,280 Speaker 1: combination of of all the above. The public private partnerships 334 00:19:10,320 --> 00:19:13,480 Speaker 1: are one piece of it. And if you remember is 335 00:19:13,560 --> 00:19:16,320 Speaker 1: this has transpired, the administration was really hanging the hat 336 00:19:16,400 --> 00:19:18,879 Speaker 1: on that that would be the lynchpin of any further 337 00:19:19,520 --> 00:19:23,639 Speaker 1: any additional spend or increased spending. That has moderated to 338 00:19:23,680 --> 00:19:27,320 Speaker 1: some extent, there is talk about gas tax increases. At 339 00:19:27,400 --> 00:19:30,040 Speaker 1: least the administration doesn't have them dead on arrival. It 340 00:19:30,080 --> 00:19:34,200 Speaker 1: does come down to funding eventually, funding and priorities. There 341 00:19:34,280 --> 00:19:37,840 Speaker 1: is a list of fifty top priority infrastructure projects in 342 00:19:37,880 --> 00:19:40,280 Speaker 1: the country that the governors developed and has been put 343 00:19:40,320 --> 00:19:44,040 Speaker 1: to the Secretary of Transportation. One critical one. It's the 344 00:19:44,040 --> 00:19:47,040 Speaker 1: Gateway project that links new work in New York City 345 00:19:47,080 --> 00:19:50,240 Speaker 1: with a new tunnel, a new rail tunnel and whatnot. UM. 346 00:19:50,280 --> 00:19:52,920 Speaker 1: I think over time these things are going to happen. 347 00:19:53,040 --> 00:19:55,600 Speaker 1: The devil's in the details of funding. And it's been 348 00:19:55,680 --> 00:19:59,480 Speaker 1: like that since, so no change there. You know, you've 349 00:19:59,480 --> 00:20:02,080 Speaker 1: been on a little bit of an acquisition trail, and 350 00:20:02,119 --> 00:20:05,400 Speaker 1: I'm wondering if you could describe what you've done, particularly 351 00:20:05,440 --> 00:20:11,800 Speaker 1: in California, but also why why acquire rather than building? 352 00:20:11,840 --> 00:20:13,920 Speaker 1: That kind of highlights this idea of trying to get 353 00:20:13,960 --> 00:20:16,240 Speaker 1: the permits and trying to deal with local and you know, 354 00:20:16,400 --> 00:20:20,040 Speaker 1: state municipalace on in order to make you business. You know, 355 00:20:20,200 --> 00:20:24,240 Speaker 1: it's a very insightful question. Both coasts California particularly, it's 356 00:20:24,320 --> 00:20:27,879 Speaker 1: very difficult to get through any environmental permitting process for 357 00:20:28,000 --> 00:20:31,360 Speaker 1: whether it be an infrastructure project like a road, an airport, 358 00:20:31,680 --> 00:20:36,240 Speaker 1: or an industrial manufacturing facility. We operate in heavily urbanized 359 00:20:36,320 --> 00:20:43,400 Speaker 1: environments where permitting is extremely difficult UM. And to that end, 360 00:20:43,440 --> 00:20:46,520 Speaker 1: we just made an acquisition on November seventeenth, Polaris Material 361 00:20:46,560 --> 00:20:50,800 Speaker 1: is a big quarry in Canada. Because California arrogates are 362 00:20:50,840 --> 00:20:54,840 Speaker 1: being depleted rapidly and there are no new quarries coming online. Therefore, 363 00:20:54,840 --> 00:20:57,600 Speaker 1: the cost of arrogates are becoming ever expensive. We had 364 00:20:57,600 --> 00:21:01,800 Speaker 1: an opportunity to buy this quarry and ship arrogates down 365 00:21:01,800 --> 00:21:04,399 Speaker 1: into our facilities in San Francisco so we can be 366 00:21:04,440 --> 00:21:08,440 Speaker 1: self sufficient. It helps our profitability. Uh and and as well, 367 00:21:08,440 --> 00:21:11,240 Speaker 1: we got a terminal in in Los Angeles because we 368 00:21:11,280 --> 00:21:14,159 Speaker 1: are growing through acquisition and expansion, which now gives us 369 00:21:14,160 --> 00:21:17,560 Speaker 1: a beachhead into consolidate in the Los Angeles market. Considering 370 00:21:17,680 --> 00:21:20,680 Speaker 1: that you made a purchase in Canada, it's important to 371 00:21:20,760 --> 00:21:23,679 Speaker 1: look at what the trade relationship will be with the 372 00:21:23,760 --> 00:21:27,800 Speaker 1: US and Canada and elsewhere. And I'm just wondering, have 373 00:21:28,200 --> 00:21:31,520 Speaker 1: the increased tensions around trade affected you at all? Do 374 00:21:31,560 --> 00:21:33,480 Speaker 1: you expect them to affect you? Do you think that 375 00:21:33,520 --> 00:21:37,240 Speaker 1: they have been overblown? Now? I think they're they're valid. 376 00:21:37,400 --> 00:21:40,719 Speaker 1: I don't expect them to impact arrogance. Arrogates have been 377 00:21:40,720 --> 00:21:44,719 Speaker 1: shipped on both coasts from Canada because of the the 378 00:21:44,760 --> 00:21:47,240 Speaker 1: inability to get new permits in the New York area, 379 00:21:47,280 --> 00:21:49,560 Speaker 1: for instance, or in California. The arrogates have to come 380 00:21:49,600 --> 00:21:53,399 Speaker 1: from somewhere. Um, they're very expensive to travel by truck, 381 00:21:53,520 --> 00:21:56,840 Speaker 1: long distances from inland, so that sheer economics of it 382 00:21:56,880 --> 00:22:01,439 Speaker 1: will underpin the ability of it long term. I'm not 383 00:22:01,520 --> 00:22:06,360 Speaker 1: overly word about free trade, the Canadian Trade Pact as 384 00:22:06,359 --> 00:22:10,480 Speaker 1: it relates to arrogance. Talk about the raising money, whether 385 00:22:10,520 --> 00:22:12,040 Speaker 1: it's in the debt markets, you don't have a lot 386 00:22:12,040 --> 00:22:15,720 Speaker 1: of that. I think about six million in total. Uh, 387 00:22:15,920 --> 00:22:18,639 Speaker 1: easy to access money right now, I mean people throwing 388 00:22:18,680 --> 00:22:20,600 Speaker 1: money at you to say, g you know, we're looking 389 00:22:20,640 --> 00:22:22,640 Speaker 1: for yields, so why don't you borrow someone go out 390 00:22:22,640 --> 00:22:25,760 Speaker 1: and buy a bunch of Yeah, that's that's very interesting. Uh. 391 00:22:26,280 --> 00:22:28,720 Speaker 1: We've been very successful over the last six years with 392 00:22:28,760 --> 00:22:35,719 Speaker 1: our strategy. With success comes the the benefits of having 393 00:22:35,880 --> 00:22:38,680 Speaker 1: people want to loan your money so you can continue 394 00:22:38,680 --> 00:22:41,080 Speaker 1: to be successful. So I think it would be easy 395 00:22:41,119 --> 00:22:43,040 Speaker 1: to access at this time. Whether we would take that 396 00:22:43,119 --> 00:22:45,399 Speaker 1: on as debt or equity would depend on the amount 397 00:22:45,400 --> 00:22:47,640 Speaker 1: of money we need. And we are a cyclical business though, 398 00:22:47,880 --> 00:22:50,360 Speaker 1: so we have to be very cognizant that the good 399 00:22:50,359 --> 00:22:52,920 Speaker 1: times that we have now, you know, they won't last forever. 400 00:22:53,040 --> 00:22:58,359 Speaker 1: Despite any governmental policy. Despite our hope, construction is a 401 00:22:58,359 --> 00:23:00,880 Speaker 1: cyclical business and we have to be mindful that real quick. 402 00:23:00,920 --> 00:23:02,919 Speaker 1: When do you think that the cycle will start turning 403 00:23:03,480 --> 00:23:07,399 Speaker 1: well with the tax reform? I continue to move that, 404 00:23:07,560 --> 00:23:09,800 Speaker 1: I continue to move this out. You have to remember 405 00:23:09,840 --> 00:23:14,639 Speaker 1: this has been a historically slow recovery at very low rates, 406 00:23:14,800 --> 00:23:18,600 Speaker 1: which is act think good because we're preventing new new 407 00:23:18,640 --> 00:23:21,359 Speaker 1: peaks and new bubbles, and the extent it continues at 408 00:23:21,400 --> 00:23:23,800 Speaker 1: this gradual pace. I think the tax reform is going 409 00:23:23,840 --> 00:23:28,359 Speaker 1: to extend in another two years. I'm looking into two. 410 00:23:28,680 --> 00:23:33,560 Speaker 1: But that's I'm not a I'm not a clairvoyant. Well 411 00:23:33,800 --> 00:23:35,720 Speaker 1: you'll have to I'll pull out by Christo Ball and 412 00:23:35,760 --> 00:23:37,639 Speaker 1: you can try your hand. Bill Sandbrook, thank you so 413 00:23:37,680 --> 00:23:41,560 Speaker 1: much for joining us. Bill sandbrooks CEO of US Concrete 414 00:23:41,600 --> 00:23:45,720 Speaker 1: here talking about the infrastructure plans that are evidently in 415 00:23:45,760 --> 00:23:47,720 Speaker 1: the works. We just are going to have to wait 416 00:23:47,720 --> 00:23:49,840 Speaker 1: to see them. A Lisa brom WIT's along with pim Fox, 417 00:23:49,920 --> 00:24:10,320 Speaker 1: this is Bloomberg. Individual investors are plowing their money into 418 00:24:10,520 --> 00:24:13,880 Speaker 1: US stocks at a record pace, at least by one measure, 419 00:24:14,400 --> 00:24:17,440 Speaker 1: raising a big question are they coming in too late 420 00:24:17,720 --> 00:24:20,879 Speaker 1: when the stocks are too valuable and are destined to 421 00:24:21,200 --> 00:24:23,880 Speaker 1: cool off. Here to answer that question is Randy Frederick. 422 00:24:23,920 --> 00:24:26,919 Speaker 1: He is vice president of Trading Undervatives for the Schwab 423 00:24:27,119 --> 00:24:29,560 Speaker 1: Center for Financial Research, which is based in Austin, but 424 00:24:29,680 --> 00:24:33,440 Speaker 1: he joins us here in our eleven three oh studios. Randy, um, 425 00:24:33,480 --> 00:24:38,080 Speaker 1: are you concerned about the flood of retail cash and 426 00:24:38,200 --> 00:24:41,400 Speaker 1: just sort of the general increase and allocations to US equities? 427 00:24:42,080 --> 00:24:44,760 Speaker 1: Not yet? So the question is are they coming in 428 00:24:44,760 --> 00:24:46,520 Speaker 1: too late? I would say they're coming in late in 429 00:24:46,600 --> 00:24:49,440 Speaker 1: the game, but it's probably not too late. I would say. 430 00:24:49,440 --> 00:24:51,600 Speaker 1: For the first eight years of this bullmarket, the big 431 00:24:51,680 --> 00:24:53,960 Speaker 1: question that I got at all the client events I 432 00:24:54,000 --> 00:24:56,640 Speaker 1: got and my counterparts heard the same thing, was what's 433 00:24:56,680 --> 00:24:58,480 Speaker 1: the next shoe to drop? When is this all going 434 00:24:58,520 --> 00:25:01,040 Speaker 1: to in? What's going to cause the max ash. It's 435 00:25:01,160 --> 00:25:03,639 Speaker 1: only been within about the last quarter, last three or 436 00:25:03,640 --> 00:25:06,680 Speaker 1: four months that we've actually seen a shift and investor 437 00:25:06,720 --> 00:25:10,360 Speaker 1: sentiment to, oh, this rally is legitimate. This bullmarket does 438 00:25:10,400 --> 00:25:12,199 Speaker 1: have some legs, and part of that, I think is 439 00:25:12,200 --> 00:25:15,439 Speaker 1: that we've got an incredibly solid fundamental backdrop and we 440 00:25:15,520 --> 00:25:17,399 Speaker 1: frankly think that's going to continue at least into the 441 00:25:17,400 --> 00:25:19,760 Speaker 1: first half of next year. Doesn't worry you that now 442 00:25:19,800 --> 00:25:23,280 Speaker 1: you've got people who were bearished turning bullish to some extent. 443 00:25:23,320 --> 00:25:25,600 Speaker 1: It does what. It doesn't mean we're at the end. 444 00:25:25,680 --> 00:25:28,120 Speaker 1: It may mean that we're at the very beginning stages 445 00:25:28,119 --> 00:25:29,720 Speaker 1: of what could end up being the end, but the 446 00:25:29,800 --> 00:25:31,639 Speaker 1: end could well be a year into the future. And 447 00:25:31,640 --> 00:25:34,480 Speaker 1: in fact, historically, when you start to see all of 448 00:25:34,520 --> 00:25:37,479 Speaker 1: the even the most ardent skeptics come into the market, 449 00:25:38,000 --> 00:25:39,840 Speaker 1: it may be the sign of the beginning, but many 450 00:25:39,840 --> 00:25:42,160 Speaker 1: times that has lasted more than a year, maybe even 451 00:25:42,240 --> 00:25:43,760 Speaker 1: a year and a half to two years after that. 452 00:25:43,880 --> 00:25:46,600 Speaker 1: So it does have some sort of assignment. It does 453 00:25:46,760 --> 00:25:49,040 Speaker 1: definitely does not point to a top just yet. All right, 454 00:25:49,040 --> 00:25:50,720 Speaker 1: I want to ask you about something that we met 455 00:25:50,760 --> 00:25:53,560 Speaker 1: we report on on a regular basis, and this has 456 00:25:53,600 --> 00:25:57,520 Speaker 1: to do with the VIX, the volatility index. Does this 457 00:25:57,640 --> 00:26:02,240 Speaker 1: really matter anymore to people still use the options that 458 00:26:02,280 --> 00:26:05,960 Speaker 1: are linked to the VIX in order to speculate, or 459 00:26:06,040 --> 00:26:09,199 Speaker 1: has this become an indicator whose time is kind of 460 00:26:09,240 --> 00:26:11,640 Speaker 1: come and gone. Well, so, I've been studying the VIX 461 00:26:11,680 --> 00:26:13,800 Speaker 1: ever since first and came out in fact that it 462 00:26:13,840 --> 00:26:16,320 Speaker 1: was it was created the month before I started working 463 00:26:16,320 --> 00:26:19,479 Speaker 1: with Charles Schwaback in so I've been and being involved 464 00:26:19,480 --> 00:26:21,840 Speaker 1: in derivatives and and volatility and all these things. I've 465 00:26:21,880 --> 00:26:24,760 Speaker 1: sort of been studying it every day since then. So yes, 466 00:26:24,800 --> 00:26:27,040 Speaker 1: I think it still matters because what it really tells us, 467 00:26:27,080 --> 00:26:28,520 Speaker 1: and this is where the problem comes in, I think 468 00:26:28,520 --> 00:26:31,119 Speaker 1: with retail investors and some of these products that are 469 00:26:31,119 --> 00:26:34,160 Speaker 1: allegedly linked to the VIX, is that it really tells 470 00:26:34,200 --> 00:26:37,200 Speaker 1: you how much the institutional funds are hedging a large 471 00:26:37,440 --> 00:26:39,680 Speaker 1: market downturn, and the fact that we've had historically low 472 00:26:39,760 --> 00:26:42,080 Speaker 1: levels of the VIX forty five days I think it 473 00:26:42,200 --> 00:26:45,560 Speaker 1: is that we've closed below ten this year, where right 474 00:26:45,560 --> 00:26:48,280 Speaker 1: now just ten point one five roundheard of. It just 475 00:26:48,320 --> 00:26:51,400 Speaker 1: simply means that those who run the big institutional hedge 476 00:26:51,400 --> 00:26:53,960 Speaker 1: funds are not concerned of a major downturn. That doesn't 477 00:26:53,960 --> 00:26:55,919 Speaker 1: mean we couldn't get a five percent pullback, and frankly, 478 00:26:55,920 --> 00:26:58,000 Speaker 1: that might even be a healthy thing. But the problem 479 00:26:58,000 --> 00:27:01,160 Speaker 1: with investors who trade or spec layers who trade products 480 00:27:01,160 --> 00:27:04,080 Speaker 1: linked to the VIX, whether it's vixed futures, VIX options 481 00:27:04,160 --> 00:27:05,920 Speaker 1: or even a VIX ct F E t in is 482 00:27:05,960 --> 00:27:08,640 Speaker 1: that they think it's tied directly to the VIX index, 483 00:27:08,880 --> 00:27:10,920 Speaker 1: and they don't really understand in most cases that is 484 00:27:10,920 --> 00:27:13,399 Speaker 1: actually tied to vixed futures, which don't move nearly as 485 00:27:13,480 --> 00:27:16,440 Speaker 1: much as the VIX. So unfortunately, I when I often 486 00:27:16,440 --> 00:27:19,040 Speaker 1: caution investors about this when I speak at seminars, is 487 00:27:19,560 --> 00:27:21,760 Speaker 1: you shouldn't spend all of your time trying to predict 488 00:27:21,840 --> 00:27:24,440 Speaker 1: when the next big VIX spike will happen, because it's very, 489 00:27:24,520 --> 00:27:27,719 Speaker 1: very difficult to do. Instead, wait until the VIX happens 490 00:27:27,720 --> 00:27:29,680 Speaker 1: and then take a position that can benefit when the 491 00:27:29,760 --> 00:27:31,600 Speaker 1: VIX comes back down, because we see the VIX come 492 00:27:31,640 --> 00:27:34,760 Speaker 1: back down every time. It's bikes pretty much. So, given 493 00:27:34,760 --> 00:27:37,520 Speaker 1: your experience with derivatives, let's talk about one that's gotten 494 00:27:37,520 --> 00:27:40,640 Speaker 1: a lot of attention. It's gonna start trading on Sunday. 495 00:27:40,760 --> 00:27:44,880 Speaker 1: It's the Bitcoin futures contract. It's come under a lot 496 00:27:44,880 --> 00:27:48,080 Speaker 1: of criticism by a number of big firms. I worried, 497 00:27:48,119 --> 00:27:51,240 Speaker 1: are you about this? Well? I think it's again it's 498 00:27:51,280 --> 00:27:53,720 Speaker 1: definitely a speculative instrument. It's something that we're keeping an 499 00:27:53,760 --> 00:27:56,119 Speaker 1: eye on at Charles Schwab. We we don't aren't prepared 500 00:27:56,160 --> 00:27:59,360 Speaker 1: to make any changes at this point. Um. I think 501 00:27:59,400 --> 00:28:01,920 Speaker 1: what has been driving the bitcoin price, and the reason 502 00:28:01,920 --> 00:28:04,200 Speaker 1: it's we've seen such a dramatic rise, not just this 503 00:28:04,280 --> 00:28:07,200 Speaker 1: year it's but in just really the last few weeks 504 00:28:07,680 --> 00:28:09,680 Speaker 1: is the introduction of the VIX futures. I think those 505 00:28:09,720 --> 00:28:13,520 Speaker 1: who own I'm sorry, of bitcoin futures. Those who own bitcoin, 506 00:28:13,640 --> 00:28:17,600 Speaker 1: I believe think that that if futures are launched and 507 00:28:17,680 --> 00:28:20,840 Speaker 1: it provides the avenue for many more investors to get 508 00:28:20,880 --> 00:28:23,320 Speaker 1: into bitcoin than who are currently in it, that it 509 00:28:23,359 --> 00:28:25,080 Speaker 1: will likely drive the price higher. That may or may 510 00:28:25,080 --> 00:28:26,919 Speaker 1: not be the case, but I think that's what what 511 00:28:27,119 --> 00:28:29,879 Speaker 1: may be driving the price of bitcoin right now. All right, 512 00:28:29,960 --> 00:28:32,960 Speaker 1: as you are an expert in the world of trading 513 00:28:33,040 --> 00:28:38,280 Speaker 1: and derivatives, have you seen a convergence between futures and 514 00:28:38,440 --> 00:28:41,360 Speaker 1: options because they used to be pretty separate in terms 515 00:28:41,440 --> 00:28:44,680 Speaker 1: of the way you would position of portfolio and as 516 00:28:44,680 --> 00:28:48,880 Speaker 1: a manager, you wouldn't necessarily mix the two. But that 517 00:28:48,960 --> 00:28:52,040 Speaker 1: line seems to have been blurred completely. Well. Back in 518 00:28:52,080 --> 00:28:55,080 Speaker 1: the old days, futurest firms were separate and unique in 519 00:28:55,160 --> 00:28:58,120 Speaker 1: most cases from regular brokerage firms that would typically trade 520 00:28:58,120 --> 00:29:01,640 Speaker 1: stocks ETFs options, but the futures business was kind of separate. 521 00:29:01,640 --> 00:29:03,800 Speaker 1: What happened in many cases and and Charles Schwab is 522 00:29:03,840 --> 00:29:06,840 Speaker 1: a good example of that is that firms that were 523 00:29:07,000 --> 00:29:09,840 Speaker 1: traditionally stock and option and mutual fund brokers have also 524 00:29:10,000 --> 00:29:12,360 Speaker 1: acquired or gotten into the futures business. We acquired a 525 00:29:12,400 --> 00:29:15,520 Speaker 1: company called Options Express, with most people know, we recently 526 00:29:15,760 --> 00:29:18,880 Speaker 1: finished the final integration and so futures is a part 527 00:29:18,880 --> 00:29:21,240 Speaker 1: of our product mix and it's become a much more 528 00:29:21,240 --> 00:29:24,600 Speaker 1: broadly accepted product to mainstream investors, where in the old 529 00:29:24,680 --> 00:29:26,560 Speaker 1: days it really wasn't in it. I think it was 530 00:29:26,600 --> 00:29:29,000 Speaker 1: the introduction this probably goes back maybe almost ten to 531 00:29:29,040 --> 00:29:32,080 Speaker 1: fifteen years, the introduction of the mini stized contracts, which 532 00:29:32,120 --> 00:29:35,680 Speaker 1: really made futures um accessible to We didn't have to 533 00:29:35,680 --> 00:29:38,040 Speaker 1: put a huge amounts of collateral and with the many 534 00:29:38,080 --> 00:29:40,520 Speaker 1: size contracts that's no longer necessary. So that made it 535 00:29:40,600 --> 00:29:45,080 Speaker 1: really much more acceptable and and really um attainable product. 536 00:29:45,120 --> 00:29:47,320 Speaker 1: If you will, to a retail investor, do you watch 537 00:29:47,440 --> 00:29:50,280 Speaker 1: the volume levels? Do you watch the interest level that 538 00:29:50,640 --> 00:29:55,920 Speaker 1: customers expressed by using that that platform. At schwap, certainly 539 00:29:55,960 --> 00:29:58,200 Speaker 1: we do um. We don't publish those numbers. We try 540 00:29:58,240 --> 00:30:00,280 Speaker 1: to group them all together with our trading ball milliames. 541 00:30:00,400 --> 00:30:04,440 Speaker 1: But I will say that one thing that has limited 542 00:30:04,440 --> 00:30:07,400 Speaker 1: to some extent the growth and futures to retail investors. 543 00:30:07,440 --> 00:30:09,600 Speaker 1: Is also the introduction of many, many E t f 544 00:30:09,680 --> 00:30:11,640 Speaker 1: s and e t n s that have access to 545 00:30:11,680 --> 00:30:15,080 Speaker 1: the futures market. So those who don't want to provide 546 00:30:15,120 --> 00:30:18,120 Speaker 1: that ability to trade futures directly can get access to 547 00:30:18,200 --> 00:30:21,000 Speaker 1: that through their regular equity positions using e t n 548 00:30:21,040 --> 00:30:22,040 Speaker 1: s and e t f So I think to some 549 00:30:22,120 --> 00:30:24,560 Speaker 1: extent that has cannibalized a bit of the futures business. 550 00:30:25,000 --> 00:30:26,840 Speaker 1: All right, well, well done, Thank you very much for 551 00:30:26,880 --> 00:30:30,120 Speaker 1: being with us. Randy Frederick, vice president of Trading and 552 00:30:30,120 --> 00:30:35,000 Speaker 1: Derivatives for the Schwab Center for Financial Research based in Austin, Texas, 553 00:30:35,000 --> 00:30:38,080 Speaker 1: and you can follow Randy on Twitter at Randy A. 554 00:30:38,600 --> 00:30:41,920 Speaker 1: Frederick and that's F R E D E R I 555 00:30:42,240 --> 00:30:44,000 Speaker 1: C K. Thank you very much for being here. Looking 556 00:30:44,000 --> 00:30:46,200 Speaker 1: forward to, of course, so speaking with you in the future. 557 00:30:52,560 --> 00:30:55,120 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. 558 00:30:55,440 --> 00:30:59,360 Speaker 1: You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 559 00:30:59,480 --> 00:31:02,920 Speaker 1: or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm 560 00:31:02,960 --> 00:31:06,960 Speaker 1: on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. 561 00:31:07,080 --> 00:31:09,680 Speaker 1: It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us 562 00:31:09,720 --> 00:31:11,280 Speaker 1: worldwide on Bluebirg Radio