WEBVTT - 03/25/21 DPS Best Of

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio. NHL announced yesterday that referee Tim Peel will

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>not be calling games now or in the future. That's

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of a polite way of saying you're fired if

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you missed the story. Peel was caught on a broadcast

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>saying that he wanted to call a penalty against Nashville early.

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>His language was more colorful. It didn't help that the

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>story blew up, but also assigned to the times because

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in every sport, officials used to be more colorful. When

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you go back in baseball, Joe West or Eric Greg

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>ed Hockley in the NFL, Joey Crawford in the NBA,

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>colorful characters they thought you were paying to see them.

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>There's old school umpires and referees who probably had no

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>problem with the profanity that was used by Tim Peel.

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>But it's a bigger issue now. Mike's are catching everything,

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>players have more power, There's calls for transparency, more transparency

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.680
<v Speaker 1>because of legalized gambling, and all of this means that

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>there's less tolerance bad behavior, and unfortunately it means Tim

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Peel will not work in the NHL. Again. We've been

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>discussing this. We probably spent about twenty minutes on this

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>this morning. We're just sitting around talking about it. I

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>need a little more information here. I don't know what

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>his reasoning or motivation was to say, Hey, I'm going

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to call penalty on the predators. And we did reach out.

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Fritzie reached out to Tim to see if he wanted

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to tell his story on the show. We have not

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>heard back from him, but that offer still stands if

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>he wants to join us and talk about this, because

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the context is. I have a

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>four second clip where he's saying, I want to, you know,

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I gotta call a penalty on the predators. What did

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>he say prior to that? What happened prior to that?

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>What did he say after that? What happened after that?

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Was he trying to police the sport. Was he trying

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to say, guys, I'm not going to let you get chippy,

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>or I don't like the direction of what's going on

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>right now. I don't know any of those things. And

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought he would at least now. I know he's

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 1>retiring this year, like in a month, but he still

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>got fired. And I just want to have context, what

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you said, how you said it, why you said it,

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>when you said it, had something happened with the predators

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>before a previous game, whatever that is. I understand the

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>sensitivity of this. I understand if you're the commissioner, Gary Bettman,

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't have any doubt when you go to a

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>game about the officials. We've had doubts. I think we

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>all feel like referees are out to get our player

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>or our team. There's a bias. I understand all of that.

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And they're human. I truly believe that you have baseball

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>umpires who don't like certain players and may call the

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>game accordingly consciously, subconsciously. I really feel that way. Not pretty,

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's real there. You can't go into the game.

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.239
<v Speaker 1>I know that they're professionals. They're told to be professionals.

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Act professional without having the human side of this. And

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>if there's history Joey Crawford through Tim Duncan, Tim Duncan

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>out of a game for laughing from the bench like

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>they're just okay, how do you explain that? I mean,

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>imagine if Joey Crawford said to another official, Hey, if

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Duncan keeps laughing over there, I'm going to run it

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>like the personal side of this. That's what I want

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>to know. Do I think that this happens without verbal acknowledgement.

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I do, and I've been doing this a long time.

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a strange story. I see both sides. Tim Peel

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>could be saying without saying it. You know, I'm gonna

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>stop this now. I don't like where this is going.

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't like what the predators are doing. It's just

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>he said it. The verbal acknowledgment is what cost him

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>his job. Do I think officials get together and they

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>say things like this. Imagine this baseball game. You get

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>ready to start the game. Let's say there's a fight,

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 1>bench clearing, brawl, three game series, this is the last game,

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>and you say to start the game to both managers

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and both pitchers. I'm not putting up with any nonsense.

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>So now I'm not calling the game as if it

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>was just a standalone game. I'm bringing something into this.

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:04.679
<v Speaker 1>But if you say, hey, look if Trevor Bauer throws inside,

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm running him. So both sides know this. Everybody knows this,

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's how you're going to umpire the game. Imagine

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>if an umpire would say to another umpire man. I'm

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 1>sick and tired of this. You know his nonsense out there.

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>You know I'm going to run him. Now that's different.

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>That's you inspiring with another umpire, Then it's different. Do

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Tim Donneghee is a standalone rogue official in

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the NBA? I don't. Maybe I'm naive that. I don't

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>think he was a standalone rogue official. They're human. Tim

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Peel made a mistake, he'll pay for it. But I

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>think in fairness to him, I would love to know

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>exactly what happened, what led up to it, Why did

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you feel that way, Why did you say that? Why

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>did the other official agree with you? You? I just

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>want the story. That's it, and they may not change

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>my mind, But I think in fairness to these stories,

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 1>all of it, all of these stories we cover in sports,

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Watson prime example, you've already made up your mind.

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I haven't. I just want to know what's involved here,

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the whole story, both sides of the story, and the

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>same with something like this with Tim Peel who lost

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 1>his job, Deshaun Watson, who could go to prison, varying

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>degrees here of what's going on and listening to both

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>sides of the story. And it's hockey and people may

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>not care. But I look at this as don't look

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.359
<v Speaker 1>at it as the sport of hockey. It could be

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>any sport. It could be soccer in the Premier League.

0:06:55.600 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>It could be baseball, basketball, college basketball. Eight seven seven

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>three DP show email address DP at dan Patrick dot com,

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitter handle at DPS show. Say good morning to Pecan.

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>They carried this program all three hours, coming out hot today,

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>coming out hot, Yes, one little thing because you said,

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you want more context, you want more story. The NHL's

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>release when they fired Tim Peel said, quote, there's no

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>justification for his comments, no matter the context or his intention.

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>They have no interest in the context or releasing it

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>or investigating it. They fired him within I think a

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>day and a half of the game. You know, the

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>action came less than twenty four hours after he officiated

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the game. They should actually do the opposite and make

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>him do an interview, or have him do an interview

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't appear that it's gambling related now. Shortly after,

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the players for Nashville was whistled for a

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>tripping penalty on a Detroit player. The rink side TV

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>microphone picked up the official Tim Peel saying it wasn't much,

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>but I wanted to get a bleeping penalty against Nashville. Early,

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the NHL determined that the voice was Peels and said

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that the ref would no longer be working NHL games

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>now or in the future. And then the NHL came

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>out and said, you know, nothing's more important than ensuring

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the integrity of our game. Okay, I don't know if

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a makeup call. I don't know if this

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is a call to just I want to establish this

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>happens in the NBA, happens in baseball. But an umpire

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>or an official will warn you. A lot of times.

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>You'll hear the officials say to a player, Hey, I'm

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>not putting up with that. Hey, I'm going to call

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that like. They will give you the benefit of the doubt.

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Not always, but players will tell you. Officials will give

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:53.959
<v Speaker 1>you heads Hey, I'm gonna call holding on that, all right.

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>They try to be fair to you and they will

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>give you a little bit of a head up. I

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know what else happened here. I don't know if

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>there was something that was so egregious where Tim Peel

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>missed a call and then said I got to make

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>up for it, or to me, it feels like I'm

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>not going to put up with any of this nonsense

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>here between you guys and Hey, it wasn't much, but

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to call it because I don't like the

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>direction this game is going is That's the feeling I had,

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know what else was said after that.

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the only piece of audio I've heard about with

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, Tim Peel's voice attached to it. That's it.

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>But he doesn't even get a hearing. It's like nope.

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, okay, you take him off the ice.

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't referee a game. You at least let him

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>have his day and you're sending him into the penalty

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>box as a referee. He got a time out, but

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that's all. If it was another sport, imagine this is

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. NFL it would be on national news. This

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>would be huge. If you had an official who said

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to another official, you know what, I'm I gotta it's

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 1>not that bad, but you know he's still he hit

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:15.599
<v Speaker 1>Brady again in the head, and uh, you know, I

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm you know, I gotta call it. I mean, we

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>can fill in the dialogue and then it would mean

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>more if it was a different sport. This has happened

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in tennis, where you've had players who have thrown matches

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>or do you have you know, an umpire who's on

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the take, Like it's going to happen. The amount of

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>money that's attached to this, it's only going to get

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>worse because these officials are probably going to say, these

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>guys are making all the money, and the league's making

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>all the money, and here I am, I'm the one

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>that's running the game. Here, just look at the human

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>side of this. What's it going to take? How much's

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>it gonna take? Hey, and plus In hockey, if I

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>call a penalty, Let's say there's five power play opportunities

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>for a team and I call two of those in

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a game, that's a big advantage. In the NFL, I

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>don't take a player off the field, and hockey, I

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>send you to the bench. Power play goal Now, all

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, if I have two of those and

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you have I'm responsible for two of the five, could

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>change the game. Yeah, Bully, I had an idea years ago.

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Instead of sending the player to the penalty box, he

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>just has to play the shift without a stick. I

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>mean that would really be fast. He's just skate around.

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you should play without skates. Rights. Yeah, you're

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a stick, but no skates there. Thanks for

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>listening to The Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>catch us live every weekday morning nine to noon Eastern

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>or six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio. Find

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>your local station for The Dan Patrick Show at Fox

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio dot com, or stream us live every day

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app by searching f s R or

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>streamers live on the Peacock Act. What's up, everyone, It's

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>me three times NFL All Pro Sean Mariner and I

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>have a new sports podcast called The lights Out Podcast

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>with Sean Mariner. This podcast especial to me is I

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>get a chance to talk to some of the best

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>who've ever done it on a field or to track.

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 1>So whether it's talking to a Super Bowl champion or

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a NASCAR Cup Series champion, the Lights Out Podcast will

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>bring it to you the only way I know how to.

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving you the best insight from the best we've

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>ever done it. Listen to Lights Out with Sean Merriman

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcast.

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Talking to a source last night and I'm just curious

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen with the Jets, And I said,

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think the Jets will go with Zach Wilson?

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>And my source said, it's too early to be giving

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>up on Donald, especially with a team around him. But

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the GM didn't draft him. I would think that they're

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>hoping to trade out. There are a lot of people

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>who really like Wilson in striking distance for the second pick.

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>The Jets really improve with the deal with numerous picks.

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>He also says they have a good amount of cap space.

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>New head coach will listen to the front office. I

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>think picks is what they would prefer to do, but

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>was told if there isn't a blockbuster deal involving that

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>second pick, overall, the GM will take Wilson, who he

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>thinks is great. It's bringing Albert Breer, senior NFL reporter

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and of course lead content strategies for the Monday Morning Quarterback.

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Where do you think we stand with the Jets there? Albert,

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I think they're still open to moving Donald. I think

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>if somebody had given them their price, they may they

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>may have moved him. Already, and I think that price

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is probably around a second round pick and something else

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe in between, like what the Niners got for Alex

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Smith all those years ago, which was two twos, and

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>what the Cardinals got for Josh Rosen twenty nineteen, which

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>is a two and a five. So, you know, I

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>think they're still, you know, very open to listening to offers.

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Eight teams have called them on Sam Arnold, so there

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>has been some level of interest, you know, and I

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>think for the new GM Joe Douglas, who's been there

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of years now, actually the new coach,

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Robert Sala, you know, really the ideal for them was

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to be able to see the quarterbacks throw live and

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>get all of their medicals before moving Darnald or making

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>a final decision to move Darnold. And Zach Wilson throws tomorrow,

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Justin Fields throws next week, So by the time we

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>get to the middle of next week, the Jets are

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>going to have seen everyone throw live, and I think

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have a better idea of what they're looking

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>at with the BYU quarterback, with the Ohio State quarter back.

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>They've obviously already seen Trey Lance throw. So I still

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>think the likelihood as they take Zach Wilson and find

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a way to move Sam Darnold. But they've been trying to,

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, like kind of I guess, maintain some level

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of flexibility here until they actually get to see these

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>guys throwing. Its important to remember Dan too. It's a

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>very different year. Scouts really weren't on the road in

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the fall. There was no combine, so you know, oh

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Douglas physically has not been eye to eye with Zach

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Wilson or Justin Fields yet, and making a final decision

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>on one of those guys without actually being able to

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>size them up, you know, with your own eyes, to

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>tie your job security to that guy, which is what

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you're doing if you take a quarterback second. Overall, it's

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a scary thing to do. So these are an important

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>couple days ahead for the Jets, but also leverage wise

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that you don't want to chip your hand if you're

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, that you still want to have that mystery

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of are we keeping Darnald? Do you want that number

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>two pick? If you trade Darnald, then everybody knows what

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you're doing with the number two pick, right, And I

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>think they mean they still really like Darnald, you know,

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>like that's the thing about it. They really do like Sam.

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think they just feel like at this

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>point they either have to go all in on him

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>or cut the chord. And really that's logistically where they

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>are in the contract. You know, after three years, you know,

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the way these contracts work with with first round picks,

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that's where the decision point comes. That's when you have

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to make a decision on the fifth year option. These

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>guys become eligible for long term deals at the same time,

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>so you know, you're sending a signal what you think

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of the guy after year three because you have to

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>make the decision on the fifth year option and you

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>have to make a decision on whether or not to

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>extend him. And so that's sort of why I think

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>they are where they are with Sam. Would they like

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to see him for a couple more years, sure, you know,

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>like if they had him at a good rate, that'd

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>be fine. The fact is they're gonna they'd have to

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>pay him almost twenty million dollars to keep them in

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, which makes that decision I think a

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>little more difficult. But you know, to your point, you know,

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>maintaining you know that the mystery till Draft day, I

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>might be the smart move. It's what the Cardinals did, right.

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals wouldn't I wouldn't tip their hand to anybody. Now.

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I think some of us knew that Kyler Murray was

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be a big pick for a couple

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of weeks leading up to that draft, but they held

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>on to Josh rose and all the way up until

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Draft Day and didn't move him actually until the day

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>after they took Kyler Murray. I was also told by

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>source the safest pick in the draft aside from Trevor Lawrence.

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to guess besides Trevor Lawrence, Yes, Kyle Pitts,

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Curtain Okay, yeah, okay, yeah, said that that's interesting,

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>like Curtan's interesting, and that he's got NFL bloodlines. He's

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 1>like his tape is like very very clean. What they

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>say about certain is that maybe he doesn't have the

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 1>ceiling that Virginia Techs Caleb Farley or South Carolina's JC

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Horn have, Like he's not quite the freak athlete that

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>those guys are. But I think, I mean, I think

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>whoever told you that, Dan see what they're saying, because

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's sort of I mean just I mean,

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine you find too many NFL people that

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>would look at him and not think this guy's a

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>ten year starter in the league. Now, will he become

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Darrell ReBs? You know, maybe Horn or Farley have a

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>better chance of being that sort of player. But I

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's any question that there's a consensus that

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>Curtain's going to step into the NFL and be a

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>really solid player. I'd explain to me what's going on

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>with Green Bay because it feels like it's either something

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>good for Aaron Rodgers or it's something bad for Aaron Rodgers. Yeah. Well,

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I'll the talk of the um, you know,

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>the of the renegotiation. And I think one thing we

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>all have to remember here, when when players restructure their contracts,

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>they're really not giving up anything, right, Um, They're basically

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>moving money around and sometimes they're getting the cash in

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>their pocket faster, which can help the team from a

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>cap standpoint. That's all that's really happening in most of

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>these cases. There are cases where they're pay cuts. This

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't going to be one of those, and there are

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.959
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of cases, um, you know, triggers in

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the in the players contract where they can do these

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>things automatically. I think that the Packers, if they're going

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>to restructure Aaron Rodgers, they're going to go to him first.

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>And to me, like this would seem to be like

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>an elegant solution, right Like if you go to Aaron

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers and you say, okay, like we're going to continue

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>building the team that we've built, and we're gon we're

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>not going to veer off of the way that we've

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>tried to put this whole thing together, but we're gonna

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>work with you. So we're gonna restructure you. We're gonna

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>get some money in your pocket a little bit earlier

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.439
<v Speaker 1>than you would have gotten out otherwise, and we're going

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 1>to use the cap savings to go add player X,

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>player why or player Z. To me like that, that

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>would be a very elegant way of addressing the concern

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that Aaron Rodgers has that the Packers aren't working with

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>enough urgency, working with say the urgency the Chiefs have

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>with Patrick Mahomes or the Buccaneers have with Tom Brady

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and saying like, okay, like we've got X amount of

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>cap space. We're going to work with you to try

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and improve the team, but we're still not going to

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>veer off of what our principles have been in putting

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing together. But at some point, what are

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the Packers doing with Jordan Love? Because the benefit is

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>the rookie contract, but we don't know if he can play,

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.959
<v Speaker 1>And at some point don't either you admit you may

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a mistake, or you say to Aaron Rodgers after next year, Aaron,

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you, But now we got it. I mean, this

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>is the reason why you moved up in the draft

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to get him in the first place. I think the

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>comparison that you want to look at here, like everybody

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>out there listening wants to look at, was the Patriots

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>drafting Jimmy Garoppolo in twenty and fourteen. When the Patriots

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>took Jimmy Garoppolo, Tom Brady was getting older, he wasn't

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 1>pleased with his contract situation, and like I think the

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Patriots knew that was going to go up tom Brady's

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>tailpipe at that point. One of two things was going

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to happen, right okay, Either a Tom Brady was going

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to be reinvigorated and challenged and play at the top

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 1>of his game, or B Brady was going to age

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>and they were going to have a guy in place

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to replace him. I think the exact same thing applies here.

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the logic for the Packers and taking Jordan

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Love last year was identical. You bring him in, right,

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and you hope that maybe where the relationships gotten a

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>little strain. Now you get a supermotivated player. What happened,

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>he was the MVP of the league then, right, and

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>so like you get the supermotivated player and going forward,

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>now you also have the potential successor on the roster,

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 1>and so if he falls off at all over the

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>next two or three years, well then you know you've

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>got a tough decision to make. But at least you're

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>not in the wilderness looking for a quarter quarterback. You've

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>got an answer there on the roster. And like, what's

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the worst case scenario? The worst case scenario? I like,

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and I don't even want to call this the worst

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>case scenario. I mean, in Brady's case, what happened Brady

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>kept beating Garoppolo out. I mean Belichick started to build

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a team for like the Brandon Cooks trade when they

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:52.199
<v Speaker 1>trained for Brandon Cooks. That was for Jimmy Garoppolo. That

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 1>was a receiver that fit Jimmy Garoppolo's skill set, and

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Brady kept playing at the level that he had been

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>playing over the course the first fifteen years of his career.

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 1>After the Jimmy Garoppolo trade, Tom Brady won three Super

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Bowls in five years and the Patriots wound up having

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to trade Jimmy Garoppolo. So that would be like, I mean,

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>like to me, it's like, it's either a Rogers ages

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>out and you've got Jordan Love on the roster to

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>replace him, or b Rogers places his ass off, and

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>now all of a sudden, two years from now, you're

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in a position where maybe you have to think about

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>trading Jordan Love. Albert Breer, the senior NFL reporter for

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 1>the MMQB, I was wondering about the Texans situation with

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Watson. I don't know what they knew and when

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>they knew it, because let's say in January they knew

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.199
<v Speaker 1>that this was lurking, this was on the horizon, or

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>they didn't know. Imagine if they had traded him in January,

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I know, and then it came out now, Albert, that

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>did the Texans know, Like could you avoid a deal? Like,

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm just curious about the timing of

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>all of this and what the Texans knew and that

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>they didn't, you know, trade him at that time. Yeah,

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I have a hard time with it too,

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not sure what they knew either. And I

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's hard to have a take on this because

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>either A m if you have a hard if you

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>have a take on it, either A you're indicting Watson,

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 1>which isn't fair, especially considering you know what sort of

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>citizen he's been prior to all of this, both as

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>a college player and his pro player, or you're b

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>not taking the allegations seriously enough. And so you know,

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to let this play out. I

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 1>wish I could tell you what the Texas knew in

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>December January. I haven't gotten any indication that they knew

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>this was coming, and I think that the like nikkos Sario,

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I could tell you what nikos Sario has

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 1>told teams when they've called on Deshaun Watson, which is basically,

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you can ask me about any player on the roster

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>except the quarterback, So they flat out haven't made him available.

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>If they had an inkling that there was trouble coming

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>down the line, maybe they would have. I'm not sure,

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>but I do know that this puts everybody in a

0:23:57.560 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>really difficult spot because the text sin cannot justify moving

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>on from a twenty five year old franchise quarterback without

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>getting a historic haul in return. And on the flip

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 1>side of it, if you're the Broncos or the Panthers,

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 1>or the Jets, or the Dolphins or the Niners at

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 1>this point, can you part with a historic hall to

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>get Deshaun Watson without clarity in this situation. I've talked

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 1>to a couple of teams that are involved in this

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 1>DAN that have said flat out no, like, we can't

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>do it right now. We have to wait, and because

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 1>our owners not going to let us do it, and

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't. We can't put our jobs on the line

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that way. So we have to kind of let this

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 1>thing play out and get some clarity in this situation

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>before we go forward. So you never say never, because

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe something happens and somebody takes a wild

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>swing it to Shaun Watson thinks they can get a

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>bargain now in the Texans field, like it's time to

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>move on. I don't know, but I mean, for the

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>most part, like the way I see it and people

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I've talked to over the last week about this, I

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>think it effectively is going to freeze the trademarket for

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Watson. But if the season starting, he would be

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>on the commissioner's example list. I'm guessing yeah, I mean

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I would think so, I would think, so why isn't

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>now because he doesn't have to be because the commisier

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>because the league, the league right now doesn't have to

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>make a big deal out of this because there's nothing

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>going on, you know, like there's no I mean, he

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>can't like offseason programs and we don't know if they're

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:25.120
<v Speaker 1>going to start, but the Texans offseason program can't start

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 1>till a week from Monday, So, you know, I think

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the way the league sort of proceeded in cases like

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>this more recently, you know, and there was that time

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 1>when you know, it was you know, commissioner. You know,

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the commissioner was sort of like the hammer in these

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>sorts of cases. And I think that they've taken going

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>back maybe to Antonio Brown, they've taken like a little

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>bit more of a rehabilitative stance in these things than

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a punitive stance, And so I think they've been sort

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of careful to punish players when they don't necessarily have to.

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 1>And I think at this point the league stance and

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>probably would be for right now at least, we don't

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 1>have to do anything now. If we're going to open

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 1>up offseason programs on April fifth, which is a possibility

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 1>for teams with new coaches, the Texans fit into that category.

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Maybe at that point we have to do something and

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 1>say something. But I mean, like, even then, we know

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Watson's not going to show up. You know, we've

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>already had We've already established that. So I think the

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>league hasn't done anything at this point because really they

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have to do anything. I'll leave you with this

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>talking to a source and he said, there is an

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>outlier who's gonna come up to the top five. Somebody's

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>coming into the top five in the draft. Now, if

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I say that, what would be the team that would

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>be the outlier that you think might be trying to

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>get into the top five even higher? I'm told, who

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>would that be? Okay, So I think everybody knows Caroline

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>is very quarterback hungry, right, So they're not now, not them, Yeah,

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not them because we know that they're I've been

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>told their owner is quote unquote obsessed with getting a quarterback.

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 1>So I'll give you two teams Dan that I think

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>like people maybe aren't talking as much about. One would

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>be the New England Patriots because they've built up their

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:18.479
<v Speaker 1>roster to a point where where I feel like they

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have as many holes, you know that they have

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to fill as they had maybe two weeks ago. And like,

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>although Bill's history is to trade down, he has taken

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to move up in the past, and if you

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>remember in twenty twelve, they traded up twice to get

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Chandler Jones and Dante Hi Towers. So when they see

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>something they think is really special, they'll go and get it.

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>The other team that I think is lurking out there

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is the Denver Broncos. I think the Broncos could get

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 1>aggressive with a quarterback if they see one that they

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>really believe as a superstar. And so maybe they're the

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>team that jumps from nine to three to go get

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>like a Justin fields and part of the reason why

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>they've got a new general man during George Peyton, who

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>isn't tied to Drew Locke. If you think about it,

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>there are major league questions about whether or not there's

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be any first round quarterback prospects in the

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two draft. So if you're a first year GM,

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at it right now. Maybe you're lukewarm on

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Drew Locke and you say, Okay, if we don't get

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 1>one this year and there isn't going to be one

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 1>next year, now, I could be going into year three

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>as a general manager still looking for my guy, and

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 1>so I just keep an eye on the Denver Broncos,

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe getting aggressive there within the top ten. By the way,

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the answer. I was just told that

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>there is an outlier that you know, Denver qualifies an outlier. Yeah, yeah, okay,

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I would think so San Francisco would qualify. San Francisco

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is another one. Yeah, I mean I think San Francisco.

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I think San Francisco is tied to Jimmy until they

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>can find what they feel like, until they can find

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>they feel like it's a significant upgrade. And I've been

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>consistent on that. I don't think they're moving. They were

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:00.719
<v Speaker 1>never moving off of Jimmy. For they're not moving off

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of Jimmy for Gardner Minshew. If Gardner Menshew's coming in there,

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>it's as a depth piece because they feel like they

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>need better depth at that position. But like I've maintained

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>this all along, like I really feel like if there

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>was a significant upgrade, they would consider it. Great to

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again, Albert, thanks for joining us. All right,

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Dan, That's Albert Breer, the senior NFL reporter lead

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>content strategist for the MMQB. Thanks for listening to The

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Dan Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to catch us live

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>every weekday morning nine until noon eastern six to nine

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Pacific on Fox Sports Radio, and you can find us

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app at FSR or stream us live

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>on the Peacock app. Did you add some new music

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to the library? Seaton, M No, I didn't add these.

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>These are probably some old ones that's coming back around.

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's curious here. Tribe called Quest. Yeah, I didn't

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>know that, but thank you. I'm aware of tribe called Quest,

0:29:57.280 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know any of their songs. Now you

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>know too, I do. Yeah, this one and the last

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>one I put okay, Oh so that was tribe called

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Quest two. I did love the name tribe called Quest. Yes, yes,

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I've driven around the other day and I heard a

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>little Big Daddy Kane early eighties millions, really good rapper. Yeah,

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not familiar. You don't a Big Daddy Kane. I

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>know the name, but I don't know my very talented rap.

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>My knowledge of rap is not that good. Your window

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of music is really what like seven late sixties to

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>late seventies? Is that like your wheelhouse? I love a lot.

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I love a lot of music. But um, but if

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you were saying the music I grew up on was blank,

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, it's sixties seventies. But yeah, I mean Tupunk Uh?

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Who else? Uh? Biggie. I think Biggie's the best rapper

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I ever heard. I got the way he sounds. But yeah,

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm not a big rap Yes, what about

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bismarckie and rock him? You know ll cool J though, Yeah,

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I know who he is, but I don't know it.

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the music makes me sad? Why it

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>makes me sad? But you you all you listen to

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that Billy Joel and Hall and own cruise around with

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the Beastie Boys. You don't like Springstein, you don't know Zeppelin,

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you don't know the Stones, you don't know the who like.

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel sad for you. Yes, I've said it before,

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but driving in the car with Todd and letting his

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, iPod or whatever kind of music player he

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>has just go on shuffle is fascinating because you'll get

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Biggie Smalls followed by air supply, followed by

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 1>like a Guns and Roses song or something. You're like,

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>what the music meil sedaka Barry Manilow all that stuff. Yeah,

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I don't. I don't know most of that

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Public Enemy right after that, and you're like Public Enemy

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>into survivor no kid it? Wow, all right, yeah, let's

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>do it. Public Enemy. I get, I get their impact

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on music society. But yeah, Biggie Smalls two punk. You know,

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in Frank. I sold he'd be the guy

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk to when it comes to music, Like, there's

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Frank you you want to add anything to this? I

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>figured it was the natural segue. He were talking hip hop,

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>so why not why not bring me on? I like

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 1>all those guys that you mentioned. I'm like you, Dan,

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I know the songs, I just don't know who played them.

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I went to a YouTube concert years ago. I flew

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>out to Portland. It was gonna be the final night

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:28.959
<v Speaker 1>of their US tour. It was like three days before Christmas.

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>My wife's still not talking to me about this because

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I went and Kanye West was the warm up act.

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>And we got out there and we were probably like

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>we were standing up and we were like three people

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>from the stage. He was unbelievable. He was so good.

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>He played for about ninety minutes. He was great. And

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you two him up there too. You two has always

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>been great. I saw them when they had Muse opened

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>up for them and Kings of Leon opened up for them.

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I saw that one too, Yeah, yeah. And I saw

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>them with Damien Marley once, you know, like the reggae. Yeah,

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>he was outstanding, really good. All right, Frank, Well, that

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>was it. We appreciate you. I'll see you guys. Woods

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>just reported that the Bulls landed uh Nicola Vussevic a

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>couple other players for Otto Porter Wendell Carter Junior in

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>two first round picks here and the Chicago is still

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in the chase for Lonzo Ball. Why is it that

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>other teams want Lonzo Ball but New Orleans doesn't want

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Lonzo Ball. I think it's because they're gonna eventually have

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to pay Lonzo Ball. But there is a lot of

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>interest in him, and you think about he's improved a lot.

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I think his shot has improved a lot. He's a

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>big time athlete. He's not going to be better than

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>his brother, but his brother has a chance to be

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a parential All Star. I kind of liked that deal

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>though for Chicago Vussovic. There was a good stat that

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 1>somebody just had. There are four guys in the NBA

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 1>this year averaging at least twenty four points and ten

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>rebounds Nicola Yokich, Jannisanetakumbo, Joel Embiid. All three of those

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 1>guys whore MVP candidates. Now you have Vussovich, who's putting

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>up those numbers on a losing team. I get that,

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>but you put him with Zach Levine, and obviously the

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Bulls aren't done. I think this is a team that's

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>headed in the right direction with that new management team

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and obviously with Billy Donovan as the head coach. Let

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>me go back to New Orleans and the Pelicans. When

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I watch, they're a blow average team. Frank like, I

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>don't understand what is missing here? I don't understand this well.

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 1>For one, they don't play enough defense. And I think

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Zion Williamson has been terrific, but on the defensive end,

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>he's not good. And you know, we just mentioned LaMelo Ball.

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>But one thing that sticks out for me the most

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 1>about LaMelo Ball is he got to Charlotte. He's putting

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>up good numbers and the team has been winning. Now

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I get it, he's in the Eastern Conference, so it's

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit different to me. That's still going to

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>be the measure in the impact that you're really going

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 1>to have on a team, And maybe there still needs

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to be some growth that has to happen there because

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:42.479
<v Speaker 1>it is a very young team and it's probably gonna

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.359
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to get older anytime soon, and they're

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>just trying to navigate their way through the Western Conference.

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:49.399
<v Speaker 1>The West is tough. I think a lot of people

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:51.359
<v Speaker 1>are disappointed. I think they should be a little bit

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 1>further along. But defense is the problem with that team.

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.799
<v Speaker 1>They just don't guard anybody. Are the Clippers interested in

0:34:56.880 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Lonzo Ball, Like, what's the likelihood, where's his landing spot? Well,

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a you know, a few teams. I

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 1>think the Knicks, believe it or not, are still interested

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:07.839
<v Speaker 1>in him. I think if he went to a team

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>like the Clippers, I think he could help them. The

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>problem with the Clippers is they would love to have

0:35:12.640 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Kyle Lowry. But I just don't think

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>they have enough to give the Clippers back, not only

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of assets, because remember they made those

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 1>trades to get Paul George. They gave up all their

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>first round picks. But I don't even think they have

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>enough to give back in terms of contracts. So to me,

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Lowry, the perfect fit for him would be the Clippers.

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>You put him there, That's what they need. A leader,

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 1>a guy that's been through it before, a tough guy.

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:36.759
<v Speaker 1>He take He's flopping all over the court, he knows

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:39.240
<v Speaker 1>how to draw fouls. That would be the perfect player.

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Lonzo Ball could help them, But does it take them

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 1>over the Lakers if Lebron and Anthony Davis comes back,

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure about that. What about Kyle Lowry to

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers? Do they have the pieces that's that would

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>be a big time move for them. And that's the

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 1>thing when you when you have Lebron and your team,

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:57.359
<v Speaker 1>and who knows, he'll probably play until he's fifty, but

0:35:57.600 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have to look at it like you

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:01.839
<v Speaker 1>have a golden opportunity right now and if they can

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>get him, that would be some move. I think Kyle,

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>from what I had heard the last couple of days

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 1>from a guy that's close with Kyle Lowry, is that

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you know he really if he's not going to stay

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in Toronto, he'd like to go to Miami. I think

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 1>that's something that appeals to him. But I think the

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Lakers have always been out there and he fits in

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>so perfectly with that team in terms of his toughness

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:22.959
<v Speaker 1>and his leadership could knock down a three point shot.

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Anybody that plays with Lebron is going to be that

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.839
<v Speaker 1>much better. And you put Kyle Lowry and Anthony Davis there,

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>come on, that's a pretty formidable team. Aaron Gordon, once

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 1>out of Orlando, where do you think he ends up? Ye, Dan,

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>there was a great story. Should look up the quotes

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 1>from Aaron Gordon. He said that he had a meeting

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 1>with management and the expressed frustration with the losing and

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the way that the team has been playing. Yes, that's

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>why they paid you the money, so you're the one

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that's supposed to do something about the losing. Imagine how

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>frustrated management must be that they're paying you all this money.

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's some meaning to have. You know that.

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 1>I got a kick out of that. You know, the

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>problem with a lot of these players, you know, can

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:01.479
<v Speaker 1>they be the third best player on a championship level team?

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>That's to me what you're looking at. I don't think

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Gordons could be your second best player and you

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>could be a championship team. Anthony Davis with Lebron Absolutely,

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Davis when he was in New Orleans got out

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of the first round just one time. So Aaron Gordon,

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I would think the ceiling for him is the third

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>best player in a championship team. And I'm not so

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 1>sure where that fits right now. Frank Iasli joining us

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:25.399
<v Speaker 1>NETS studio host on Yes, he's got the NBA radio

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>this starting lineup and you can see him on around

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>the horn and pardon the interruption, Are the Clippers a contender? Like?

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>It feels like we don't talk about them the way

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 1>we did, say a year ago, Yeah, I think you're right,

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and the way that everything ended in the bubble for them,

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>it's nobody's going to take them seriously until we see

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 1>them as an organization finally get to a conference final,

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:48.800
<v Speaker 1>which is something they've never done before. So Paul George

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is playing well and everyone's saying, talk to me, come

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>playoff time. And then the guy that kind of you

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>know got off Scott free a little bit here is

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Kawhi Letter. He was the one that came in and

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:00.399
<v Speaker 1>had them move heaven and earth to bring and Paul

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:03.919
<v Speaker 1>George and listen, he did play well against Denvery didn't

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>have a great game seven, But I don't know if

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 1>that's Lebron James and he doesn't have a great game seven.

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 1>We're still talking about it today. So you have to

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:13.439
<v Speaker 1>put a lot on Kawaie. And here's a crazy thing, Dan,

0:38:13.880 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>he could be a free agent. He could leave. Can

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you imagine everything they did to get Kawhi Leonard and

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 1>everything he wanted them to do, and then come the

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>off season whatever that is this year, maybe in August,

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 1>he tells them, I'll see you later. I'm going someplace

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 1>else where. Does that lawsuit stand with the guy who

0:38:30.239 --> 0:38:34.120
<v Speaker 1>said he helped facilitate kawhide to the Clippers with Jerry West,

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can't imagine it's gonna go very far.

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Was Jerry West probably speaking to somebody who's close friends

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>with Kawhi Leonard? Absolutely? But did this person have anything

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:48.799
<v Speaker 1>to do with Kawhi going there? I highly doubt that.

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Dan People were talking about this all throughout the season

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in Toronto. I thought that Toronto was going to be

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>able to resign him, not only when they went to

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the finals, but when they won a championship. I figured,

0:38:58.040 --> 0:38:59.439
<v Speaker 1>you out, what, maybe he'll stay one or two years,

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:02.280
<v Speaker 1>then he'll go out to the Western Conference. But everyone

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>was saying Clippers or Lakers all throughout the year. So

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 1>how much did this person have to do with it?

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Just because you had a couple of conversations with Jerry West,

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not buying that. What about the Nets with what

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:17.400
<v Speaker 1>they're doing, well, James Harden is doing with Kyrie out,

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Durant still out. Did they do anything at the trade deadline? Well,

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>they could be a team in the buyout market that's

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 1>been talking about. Maybe JJ Reddick, you know, JaVale McGee

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>now was off the board. He got traded. Andre Drummond

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 1>is still out there. The one thing about Brooklyn if

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:32.719
<v Speaker 1>you look at James Harden what he has done so

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 1>last night, they held him out of the game. And

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Steve Nash after the win against Washington the other night

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:39.359
<v Speaker 1>and Harden took a knock to the head. He looked

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 1>like he was out of it. His neck was hurt him.

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 1>He started the second half. I was surprised that he

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.479
<v Speaker 1>played in that game. He played against Portland, but Nash

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 1>had said, I'm concerned about the minutes. I don't know

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>what to do about it. I think they held him

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>out of the game last night. He was in uniform.

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 1>To me, that's a player's way of saying, they're holding

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:56.839
<v Speaker 1>me out. He didn't feel like he needed to get

0:39:56.880 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 1>dressed up and wear some crazy outfit that he's putting

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>on a fashion show on the bench. To me, he

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be out there. He's carried the team. Kevin

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Durant is their best player. The face of the team

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:07.879
<v Speaker 1>right now is James Harden. Do you know that he's

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 1>played thirty games. Kevin Durant in his Nets career has

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>played nineteen, Kyrie's only played thirty one. This guy missed

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the first thirteen games of the season with the Nets,

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to end up playing more games than

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>both Kevin Durant and Kyrie Irvan. But do you think

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it's Harden's team? I do from this stampoint, he's been

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the one carrying them. Now when they get Kevin Durant.

0:40:29.320 --> 0:40:31.080
<v Speaker 1>And this is the thing about the trade deadline today,

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's going to be trying to make moves. We're assuming

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:35.799
<v Speaker 1>the Nets are going to get Kevin Durant back. They're

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 1>saying it's only a hamstring injury, and I think now

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>they're just being extra cautious. Nobody is acquiring a player

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.240
<v Speaker 1>like the Nets are going to get back and Kevin Durant.

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>And Kevin Durant is invested from this stampoint. He knows

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:51.040
<v Speaker 1>there's one result that he can get. You either win

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:52.800
<v Speaker 1>or it's been a bus doesn't mean you can't go

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 1>back next year and try to win it. There's a

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of pressure on them. He is so happy with

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the way that Harden has played, and Hardenes is the

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>same way Harden forced his way out of views. He

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 1>knows what his reputation was he knows there's only one

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 1>satisfactory result, and that's winning. That's why this team has

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 1>been all in. Charles Barkley said recently that Harden's best

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>player in the game and talked about, you know, just

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 1>what he does offensively, it's unlike anybody else, which I look.

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:19.799
<v Speaker 1>I agree with the offensive side of this. I don't

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>think he's the best player in the game, but he's

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 1>on the short list there. He could have played back

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:29.239
<v Speaker 1>in the eighties or nineties with the physicality there. I'm

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 1>just curious what Jordan and Kobe some of these players. Now,

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Kobe had a little bit of this era, but yeah,

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, spread spread the floor, can't put your hands

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:42.319
<v Speaker 1>on anybody. They would have developed into better three point

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 1>shooters because your offense almost calls for that. I said earlier,

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, Mike and Kobe average at

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 1>least forty a game at the peak of their careers.

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:57.839
<v Speaker 1>In today's NBA they average high thirties. You know, back

0:41:57.840 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 1>in then another era. What do you think, you know

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:03.239
<v Speaker 1>when you we love to compare arrows there. But if

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I put Jordan in some of these other players in

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:08.719
<v Speaker 1>today's game, how much does their game change evolve and

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 1>what do you think they average? Well, you were living

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:13.479
<v Speaker 1>through it when Michael Jordan was going was playing, and

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you remember Doc Rivers about what six foot five Derek

0:42:17.080 --> 0:42:19.279
<v Speaker 1>carp or six foot three, both strong, and they're both

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 1>putting their hand right on Michael Jordan's hip and trying

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to guide them to where they want to take him.

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You were allowed to be really physical with him and

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>he still is leading the league in scoring and he's

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 1>winning championships. Can you imagine him in today's NBA with

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 1>how many times they call fouls? He would spend the

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:36.840
<v Speaker 1>entire game at the free through line seat. For me,

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit different, and I'm sure you're the

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:40.880
<v Speaker 1>same way. I think Michael Jordan's the best player of

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 1>all time. I just I never felt you were going

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 1>to beat him four times in a playoff series. So

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I think if you put him in today's NBA, if

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to and he had the same drive that

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 1>he had back then, because today with the load management,

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 1>who knows how he would be. But if he was

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:55.959
<v Speaker 1>willing to play eighty games a year, eight to eighty two,

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:58.400
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna average thirty to thirty five points and he's

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna win MVP every year. Yeah. I remember Phil Jackson

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:06.399
<v Speaker 1>came in, he was promoting his book, and I said,

0:43:06.400 --> 0:43:08.839
<v Speaker 1>what would Mike average now? And he said he could

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:11.839
<v Speaker 1>see him average forty forty five points. Again, but that's

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're coach. If if Michael was playing for the

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Rockets where D'Antoni was his coach, then Mike could average

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever he wanted average, because that's what James was allowed

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to do. Yeah, you're one hundred percent right. And I

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:25.879
<v Speaker 1>think ever since Harden got to Brooklyn, if you look

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:28.239
<v Speaker 1>the other night, he had seventeen assists. He's the when

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.880
<v Speaker 1>he grabs a rebound, much like Lebron, his head is

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 1>up and he's looking to throw the ball ahead. So

0:43:33.480 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I get it. And Houston, they wanted him to play

0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:37.279
<v Speaker 1>a certain way, and all he did was dribble the

0:43:37.280 --> 0:43:39.279
<v Speaker 1>ball for basically twenty two seconds on the shot clock.

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Then he would take the step back three. But he's

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>been an unbelievable leader on this team. He's always looking

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to get guys involved. In Layton games, when he feels

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>like he has to take over, he puts his head down,

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 1>he drives to the basket and he makes that floater

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and if the defense commits, he flows, he throws the

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 1>ball up for now you It's amazing how he reads

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the games. He sees the players developed like a split

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 1>second before everybody else. It's the mark really of a

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 1>brilliant player. And it's the one thing that is probably

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 1>not highlighted with Harden because we look at him as

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a gunner, a volume shooter. His ability to and you

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:16.240
<v Speaker 1>say this, keep his head up and see the floor

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and see a play before it develops. That's rarely highlighted

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 1>with James Harden. Yeah, and I think too if you

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 1>look at Mike D'Antoni, he had in Phoenix Steve Nash

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 1>or two time MVP in the league, and I think

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Nash was the same obviously the same way. The difference

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is that Harden at any point could just dominate a

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:36.759
<v Speaker 1>game scoring. That's what makes them so tough. So if

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:39.319
<v Speaker 1>they get Kevin Durant back and Kyrie Irving is going

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to be around and he's going to play in every game,

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:43.719
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be so difficult for any team in

0:44:43.719 --> 0:44:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the Eastern Conference to beat them. Now, Milwaukee with PJ Tucker,

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 1>now that true Holiday is back. Look the way that

0:44:48.760 --> 0:44:50.239
<v Speaker 1>they've played I think it's now eight in a row.

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:53.480
<v Speaker 1>So they'll be a tough team. Philadelphia has done really

0:44:53.480 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 1>well and beat and beat us, dominated the nets a

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:59.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of times this season, so they'll present challenges. But

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 1>if and I understand it's a seven foot you know,

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:05.040
<v Speaker 1>if that's Kevin Durant in his health. But if he's healthy,

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know how you can beat that team

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:10.840
<v Speaker 1>because with Durant and Durant and hard and they're unstoppable.

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Then you throw Kyrie into the mix, who, by the way,

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>has played really well the last three weeks. He's just

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>not with the team now the last couple of games.

0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:19.839
<v Speaker 1>I'll leave you with this, if the Bucks had won

0:45:19.880 --> 0:45:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the championship last year, would the MVP voters be looking

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:28.200
<v Speaker 1>at the Greek freak differently and maybe a three peat

0:45:28.520 --> 0:45:31.960
<v Speaker 1>against being held against him? Hey, I think you're right.

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I always say that two about the voting. You know,

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the media votes for it, and we all kind of

0:45:35.520 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 1>like a story. It was like Karl Malone winning that

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 1>one year when you probably could have given it to

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Michael Jordan, Like you could give it to Michael Jordan

0:45:41.920 --> 0:45:43.320
<v Speaker 1>every year. You can kind of give it to Lebron.

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 1>But remember though, we did vote based on the season ending.

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it was March eleventh or March twelfth, whenever,

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 1>it was last year, and at that point Jannis had

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:53.520
<v Speaker 1>done more, the team had the best record in the league.

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 1>From the bubble, Leon Lebron was the best player. So

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Lebron is bringing up an argument which really didn't hold water.

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 1>We had voted in March. But I do think you're right,

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think sometimes there's a little voter fatigue with

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 1>an MVP. That's why maybe this could be the year

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>for a guy like Damian Lillard, maybe Nicolee Yokich, James Harden.

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:12.439
<v Speaker 1>So that's the thing to the media might be thinking

0:46:12.440 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>out of the way that you handled your exit and

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:15.799
<v Speaker 1>you said, I don't like it either, But come on now,

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the guy is certainly an MVP canate. But with mbiad

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:22.360
<v Speaker 1>out right now and Lebron out, it's kind of wide

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:24.960
<v Speaker 1>open and the honest certainly is making a move right now.

0:46:25.320 --> 0:46:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that Lenn Bias's jersey behind, Yes, the great Len Bias.

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:34.319
<v Speaker 1>What's the reason behind me? I went I went to Maryland. Yeah,

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I was a freshman with his last year. What a

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:39.840
<v Speaker 1>senior year he had. They went down to Carolina. Carolina

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:41.720
<v Speaker 1>had never lost, they were number one in the country.

0:46:41.880 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 1>They had never lost a game yet in the deemed

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:46.839
<v Speaker 1>home right. Yeah, and that's when len Bias went down.

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:48.920
<v Speaker 1>And that was that great play where he has he

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:51.960
<v Speaker 1>hits the three, then he steals the inbound from Kenny

0:46:51.960 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Smith and dunks the ball backward. I mean, come on, now,

0:46:55.280 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty good college. How would you describe him?

0:46:57.600 --> 0:47:00.400
<v Speaker 1>For those who didn't see len Bias, I think, you know,

0:47:00.440 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 1>if he asked Michael Jordan, he would I'm not going

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:04.359
<v Speaker 1>to say it's on Michael Jordan's level, but if he

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:07.239
<v Speaker 1>had played for the Boston Celtics when that group still

0:47:07.280 --> 0:47:09.840
<v Speaker 1>had a lot left, I don't think it's much of

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a reach to say that he would have been that

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 1>they would won another championship. He went to Duke sor

0:47:14.600 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 1>So his senior They beat number one Caroline and Carolina

0:47:17.880 --> 0:47:19.720
<v Speaker 1>where you know they get every single call, Dean Smith

0:47:19.920 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>standing up the whole time complaining about traveling. They went

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:24.799
<v Speaker 1>down to Duke and I think he had forty or

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:28.480
<v Speaker 1>forty one, and the Duke students were balanced in they

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 1>were they were doing this so like people knew that

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Lin Bias was a different kind of player. Frank, thanks

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:36.399
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Enjoyed the day and we appreciate you

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:40.239
<v Speaker 1>spending time with us. Thanks Dan Good Senior. That's Frank Gisli.

0:47:40.560 --> 0:47:42.880
<v Speaker 1>He is a studio host with the Nets and also

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:47.400
<v Speaker 1>part of Sirius XMNBA Radio the starting lineup. Fox Sports

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Radio has the best sports talk lineup in the nation.

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Catch all of our shows at Fox Sports Radio dot

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:57.040
<v Speaker 1>com and within the iHeart Radio app search f SR

0:47:57.160 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to listen live.