WEBVTT - Mailbag Monday | Who's Exceeded Expectations?

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>This podcast is part of the seventy Sixers podcast network

0:00:04.000 --> 0:00:09.479
<v Speaker 1>search seventy Sixers podcast wherever you get your pods. The

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:11.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the regular season is almost here, so it

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>is time for us to take some stock on the mailbag.

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Who's exceeded expectations the most? Harris Right's like Crusoe Hanks

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>fire shoot that makes it and the Sixers beat the

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Lakers on a game winning shot by Tobias Harris. We

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of great responses from Tobias Harris to

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Dwight Howard and even a non player as well. Plus

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll give my take match again for three the logo

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>He's got thirty nine your voicemails, DMS and mentions as

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>always here on mail Bag Monday. A busy successful week

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it was for the seventy Sixers since last week Mailbag

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>four wins in between last Monday and this Monday, and

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the seventy Sixers are on a great tear. Season high

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>eight game winning streak continues Lauren Rosen. They get a

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>nice little lull in the schedule before gearing up for

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>their final four games of the season. They're in a

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>good spot for the number one seed. I like where

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 1>things are at I do as well. So its the

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>magic number as of this taping on Monday is two

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 1>wins to secure that one seed once and for all.

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>But of course Brooklyn or Milwaukee or both could help

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>out reducing that magic number of two, and based on

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the strength of schedule Indiana Miami two against Orlando shouldn't

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>be too tall of an order. It's incredible. This is

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>our second to last mail bag Monday of the regular season.

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:44.839
<v Speaker 1>It has zoomed on by this old twenty twenty twenty

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty one regular season, or has it? Has it zoomed

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>or has it not? I think for me, midway through,

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I felt like this was the longest season that has

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>ever existed, and now that we're on the end, I

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>do feel like it's zoomed past. So it's been one

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of those long day's, short weeks types of seasons. Yeah,

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that made sense in my head. I'm not sure if

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it came out articulately, No, for sure. It's being honest

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and upfront, like I feel like there's been a lot

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>this year, and there has been a lot. The games

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>have been played so frequently, essentially every other night, except

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>for a few breaks like the one the Sixers are

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 1>in now. So in that sense, it does feel a

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit long, but right you look back at it

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>and you think, well, Christmas wasn't that long ago. It

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that long ago that my kids were opening up

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a pink pony and a Tyrannosaurus Rex. That doesn't feel

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>too long ago. And that's when the season started. Yeah,

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, but I also do think like you

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.919
<v Speaker 1>have to take into consideration, obviously the state of the world,

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and so I think anything that's going on right now

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:46.239
<v Speaker 1>feels a little bit more labor intensive because of everything

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>else that's going on. So it was a weird year,

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:52.800
<v Speaker 1>but luckily for Sixers fans it has been nothing short

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of an excellent distraction from whatever else is going on.

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:57.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, Lauren, what do we do for this week's

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>mail bag Monday? Do we talk about which players have

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 1>exceeded expects or do we focus on how flawed the

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>seventy sixers have been during an eight game winning streak.

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a hard decision to make. I'm kicking it back

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and forth. I'm not sure which direction we should go in.

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering if you could help salts Wow. So

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>early on a Monday morning, I'm okay with listen. I read.

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I read, I'm a consumer of respected beacons of media

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and journalism. So I saw that and I was like, well,

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe I need to just take a breath and reconsider

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing for the mail bag this week. Well,

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:29.239
<v Speaker 1>I'd be happy to just bring it home and say

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that genuinely, I would prefer to talk about players that

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>have exceeded expectations this season. Yeah, we're the Sunshines and

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Rainbows Pod. That's what we are, and that's what we're

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna do. So let's get the mail bag going. You

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>have one new message. How do we do mailbag Monday?

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>It is quite simple. We encourage you to call the

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>podline any day, anytime, whenever two four zero three seven

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>six three seven two on five four zero three pods.

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Leave us your thought, take, inquiry, opinion, whatever it is

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>about the seventy sixers. As long as it's kosher, we're

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>going to play it and then we'll send you some swag.

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Or you can reach out to myself and Lauren Rosen

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>on social I'm at Brian Seltzer on Twitter, Seltzer six

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>or snaps on Instagram. Lauren Rosen makes it very easy

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>for you, Lauren m Rosen. On both platforms, leave us

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a mention a DM and we'll run that off as well.

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>We also have our Sunday sticker question on the at

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Sixers Instagram story, which this week was which seventy sixer

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>this season has exceeded expectations? Before we really dive deep

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>into the bag, Lauren, do you want to get us started?

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a player in mind? I do. I

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>think I wonder if we're gonna have the same player.

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I have a few in mind, but I

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>think right off the bat, someone who maybe hasn't gotten

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>enough love lately or throughout the course of his career.

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna have to go with Tobias Harris.

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that we knew what Tobias could do, and

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>people hoped that his reunion with Doc, the addition of

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>more shooters some changes to the lineups would unlock another

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>level for Tobias. But I'm not sure that people expected

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>it too. And from the very beginning of the season

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>all the way through, he's been nothing but solid. He's

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>talked about wanting to be a closer. He's been a

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 1>closer early in the season, late in the season, regardless

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>of who's been available. He's been overall the durable Tobias

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Harris that we're used to seeing, but with more efficiency,

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a little more pop, a little more swagger, and I've really,

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I've really enjoyed. So I don't necessarily think that he's

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>skyrocketed over expectations. Tobias. Luckily, you do know what you're

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>getting with a player like him. But he has been

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I think more than people necessarily expected him to be,

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>especially considering the other star power on his team. So

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with Tobias. It wasn't necessarily the I'm

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with Tobias, What about you? I also had

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to Bias number one on my list. I'm going to

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>reserve my comments on it and I'll just try and

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>sprinkle them in when we hear from other people, because

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>they too, there was a lot of love for Tobias. Alrighty,

0:05:57.680 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>let us get to our first entry in this week

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:05.799
<v Speaker 1>mail bag, and sure enough, John Nail's J fifty seven

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>John Nellian on Twitter says, Tobias is the seventy sixer

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 1>who has exceeded my expectations this season. Everybody was ready

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to trade him last season. This season he should have

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 1>been an All Star and the guy it's like guests

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>who didn't vote for Tobias. That's in my favorite game

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in the second half of the season to play because

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you can tell when he has that little extra gone.

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>It makes you think, Billy Donovan, did that guy vote

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>for Tobias? I don't know. The way Tobias played against

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>the Bulls, seems like you had something to prove. I'm

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>with you as well. I've enjoyed the fact that Tobias

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>has a list of names that he's coming for. I

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>think that it's been an interesting spite motivator, and I'm

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>all about motivation. Hey, whatever you need to do. Ten

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 1>seasons in this league, long season's, short seasons, condense season,

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>spread out seasons, He's been through a lot. If that

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>works for you, by all means, Tobias, go get him,

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 1>prove him wrong. He's been doing it all year long,

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and I've appreciated it. Let's run a couple numbers here.

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Tobias's average for the season as of Monday, nineteen and

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 1>a half points in thirty two and a half minutes

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>per game, shooting just over fifty one and a half percent.

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>That is a career high shooting over forty percent from three.

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>This is the second time for a full season is

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>his career that he's shot better than forty percent from three,

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>nearly ninety percent from the free throw and he's just

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a bid over eighty nine right now. That is also

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a career high. And he's been doing great. Three point

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>six assists, that's the best in his career. And also

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>he's tying a career high with point nine steals per game,

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>so just about a steal per game. But I think

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>right numbers are one thing. You can look at that

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and they're really impressive. He's bidding for a potential twenty

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty forty ninety split season, which would be insane. But

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the eye test, I think is probably the most instructive

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>here long. You can just look at him and where

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>he's shown up in games, what he's done on the

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>defensive end of the floor, some matchups he's excelled in.

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>It's just been an all around awesome year for should

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>have been an all start Tobias Harris and all of

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that without mentioning the fact that he is an excellent

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>leader that does a really good job of taking young

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>players and let's say mid veteran players alike under his wing,

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>making sure they feel comfortable, making sure they understand the system.

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>We heard in training camp that he was the Doc

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Rivers translator, helping guys get up to speed with Doc's style.

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>We knew from the moment he got to Philadelphia that

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>he was a big influence on young players. We saw

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it with Mattise Bible last season, We've seen it with

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Tyres Maxie this season. It's been a pleasure to watch

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>him as a leader, and I think that this season,

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>adding Danny Green, adding Dwight Howard, now adding George Hill,

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 1>there are other leadership voices in the locker room. He

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to take it on all by himself, and

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:40.719
<v Speaker 1>it means that we've gotten to see him have a

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit more fun with leadership. You see him cracking

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>more jokes, you see him smiling during warmups. There's more

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>joy coming from Tobias, and I think a joyous leader

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in Tobias is something that we maybe haven't quite seen

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>yet because he takes his job so seriously and he

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>should be commended for that. It's been cool to see

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>him settle in and be comfortable and there's just a

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of joy there. And I really enjoyed watching that.

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't agree with you more. You can tell that

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>he's found a great way to balance the serious side

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of things and in terms of just being able to

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>continue wearing that leadership mantle, but he's also done a

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>great job of mixing it up a little bit and

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>having fun. When you dig deeper, Lauren, into some of

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>these numbers, when you get into some of the quote

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 1>unquote advanced metrics, that's when it reveals itself just how

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>good of a season Tobias is having. And you can

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.199
<v Speaker 1>make the case that even though he's not averaging the

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>highest point totally has in his career, that he's having

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the most efficient season of his career. His true shooting

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>percentage is over sixty percent, his net rating personal net

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>rating is in double figures right around there. So he's

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 1>just been such a complete player this season and so

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>much fun to watch. Our mail bag question who has

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:56.199
<v Speaker 1>exceeded expectations this season? A letter eleven on Instagram says,

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Tobias after a down year last year, he's been outstanding.

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Actually down the stretch, I think last year he had

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>an okay season, a pretty good season in the playoffs.

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:06.079
<v Speaker 1>I feel like That's what a lot of people were

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>clinging onto that it was a tough playoffs, just like

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>it was for the entire team, that Tobias ended the

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>season on a tough note. But the one thing that

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>A Letter eleven points out that, especially down the stretch,

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Tobias has been great. He has proven, like you said,

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Lauren a few minutes ago, to be a bona fide closer.

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Just look at what he did most recently in that

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Pelicans game, two go ahead baskets and the eventual game

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>winner on the corner three to clinch the game. Yeah,

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.199
<v Speaker 1>and I know I say it a lot on this program,

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 1>on our pregame show seven six Live, but it's something

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that he's expressed he's wanted to be able to do

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 1>since he got to the seventy six ers now over

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. He's wanted to be that guy. He's

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>set the bar for himself and he's finally reaching it.

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>On a regular basis. You feel really comfortable with the

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>ball in Tobias's hand late in games, and that's on

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a team that has Ben Simmons, has Joel Embiid, has

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>some really good options. Danny Green has been great late

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>in games for this team. But for Tobias to be

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a primary, secondary, third option in a late in game scenario,

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>game on the line, you just trust him and that's

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>what he's wanted and that's what he's accomplished. So all

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the credit to him for becoming that guy. For seventy

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>sixers who play heavy minutes. The plus minus for Tobias

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and fourth quarters this season is second, just behind Shake

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Milton by a tenth of a point. Tobias behind Joel

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>second on the Sixers and scoring in the fourth quarter,

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>averaging five and a half fourth quarter points per game.

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.959
<v Speaker 1>He's shooting fifty one and a half percent in fourth quarters.

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>His three point percentage amazing, nearly fifty four percent. He's

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>gotten to the line of bits, so he has been

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>someone who has looked right at home taking big shots

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 1>and also making them. I was just trying to think,

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Lauren and do an inventory of big fourth quarter games

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>for Tobias. Obviously the winner against the Lakers. The Pelicans

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>game was big early in the season. I kind of

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 1>remember Boston, he showed up late the first might have

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>been the first home game against Boston. I was trying

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to kick kick my brain. I mean, I'll pull up

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll pull up some metrics for the next pod, but

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I know for a fact as someone that does postgame recap, right,

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>there have been a lot of times this season where

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the team scores ten, twelve, twenty four points in the

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>final period and Tobias scores a majority of the team's

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>points in the final period. I've written it a bunch

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of times, so I can go and find exactly when.

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But it's very common that he is upping or even

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>if he has a slower start, he's upping his productivity

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth quarter. He's not maintaining what he's doing,

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 1>He's doing more, and I think that that's really impressive

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and worth a shoutout and worth better statistics than what

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I was able to give you just now. I think

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Nick's game. In Nick's home game, I feel like he

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of big shots. Like bottom line is,

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen enough to know in our gut, and then

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>also citing some evidence, Tobias Harris has been big in

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter and I think that bodeswell. Can't wait

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to see how that translates to the playoff. The Knicks

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>home game was the I'm in All Star game. Yes,

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that's right, of course, and yes he was elite in

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that one down the stretch. How could we forget the

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>meme now scene round the social world. He deserved it.

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Should have been an All Star next season, Yes, the

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>season before the season I underscore Justin, I says, by

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>far to Bias, is the sixer who has exceeded my

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>expectations the most. He's become one of the most consistent

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and efficient players in the league, no doubts. Moving on,

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you have one new message, Jason underscore two hundred. Who

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>has been the Sixer who's exceeded your expectations the most?

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, Well, I'll just say Joel Embiid was Jason's answer,

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>having an MVP level year and helping his team to

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>be a top five team in the NBA right now.

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that of all the players in the Sixers roster,

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the bar was set the highest by Joel coming into

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>this season. But he has, to his credit, played at

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>such a high level that I think Joel is a

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>very fair answer for this. Joel can totally be an answer.

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess maybe the spirit of the question was thinking

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of some of the maybe non Joel, anyone but Joel.

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think Joel's a fair answer, because he's been

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>so good well, and the more I think about it

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 1>selfs the more I feel like there aren't many wrong answers.

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there are seven, eight nine players that could

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>be correct answers to this question, and those that I

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't mention have also been very good. I mean, this

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is a team that's been holding down the one seed

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>for the majority of this season. Whether or not they've

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>gotten credit for that fact is up to other people,

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>not up to us. But Joel, of course, has been

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the leader of it all. We knew that he had

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the potential to be this good. I don't know that

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>people expected him to actually reach this level and then

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>maintain it for a whole season, but he absolutely has

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>so to me, I think the sustained productivity, the sustained

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>MVP level play. We've seen flashes of excellence from Joel

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>throughout his entire career, but being able to see him

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>string an entire season together where he's been the good

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>has been a pleasure, and I understand how that could

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>exceed expectations just because of how long the streak has lasted,

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's not showing any signs of slowing down. It's interesting, Lauren,

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>where last week when the winning streak started, there were

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a handful of games that you could look at and say,

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't it awesome to see some other guys, with the

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>exception of Joel, be the dominant primary forces in a game.

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny how we can talk about Let's say

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Joel having a seventeen seven and three block game against

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta is being pedestrian for him, or eighteen and six

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>in the second game against Atlanta and say that's pedestrian.

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>But the last three games, he scored one hundred points

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in eighty one minutes. That's nearly a point and a

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>quarter per minute, and he has come back with inventions.

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Just to re mind everyone if they're contemplating talking about

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>media members in the NBA who they're going to vote for,

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>just how dominance and much of a force he can be.

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>He's been awesome the last three games. Well, it's been interesting,

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Cells because his only complaint is that he hasn't been

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>required to play more minutes. He hasn't needed to be

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>out there long term in these lopsided victories. And I

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>think if that's what you're complaining about, you're probably in

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty good shape. And as you said, the per minute

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>numbers that he's been able to put up in the

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>time that he has been a useful person on the

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>court is certainly worth a little bit of praise. As

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of Monday, the player Impact Estimate rankings according to stats

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>dot NBA dot com go as follows Joel Embiid right

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>at the top twenty point eight, Nicola Yokich at nineteen

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>point nine, Janis at nineteen point seven. So some good

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff right there. Joel the highest impact player in the league,

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's worth noting that he's the highest impact player

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>on the best team of those that you listed, So

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>let's just throw that out there. Yes, I think that

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is a great point. It is time to go to

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to the podline for the first time on the program.

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>You have one new message. Hi, the question I had

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>about a player exceeding their's expectations, it's real simple. It's

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Dwight Howard at the start of the season, and everybody

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>worry about what type of players we get when we

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>get the White Howard after we left Orlando, or will

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>we get to Dwight Howard at the beginning of his

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>career in Orlando. Well, we got a little bit of

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>both this year and Thankfully we got a backup center

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that we could trust to help help Joe well during

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the season. He may have been the biggest acquisition so

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:41.199
<v Speaker 1>far of the year. Thanks Hi. I don't disagree with

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that lofty praise for Dwight Howard because what's been a

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>theme that's recurred, unfortunately for the Sixers the past couple

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of seasons when they've gotten the playoffs. Who's backing up

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to L and B. To take nothing away from previous

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>guys who are here, but Dwight has been playing at

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>a different level than what the seventy Sixers had before,

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>coming off one of his best and most productive games

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of the season again it's Detroit on Saturday with nineteen

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen. He has really turned it on Laine during

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the eight game win streak. The Dwight Howard experience has

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.479
<v Speaker 1>been nothing short of amazing. It's been really cool to

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 1>watch him, obviously playing, like you said, playing some of

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the best basketball of his season, if not, let's say

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the latter half of his career. This maybe is the

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>best basketball he's played during that sort of second act.

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>He's been wonderful. He is You just feel really comfortable

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>with him now backing Joel up no shade, of course

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to the likes of Greg Monroe, but that was the

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>last time the Sixers had a long playoff run, and

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>he was relied upon pretty heavily in that run. I

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>take Dwight Howard happily as my option heading into this playoffs,

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's all without talking about the vibes, the leadership,

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the joy that he brings to the court every day

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>that by all accounts, he brings to practice with this

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>team every day. He's a source of light, of fun,

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's been really really cool to watch him make

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>this team his own, coming off the heels of a

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>really strenuous season in LA. He's just he's done everything

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>asked of him and more, and I think it's been

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>really cool to watch. He has looked as fresh as

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.959
<v Speaker 1>fresh could be for a guy who's thirty five and one.

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>On that deep run last year, Nick underscore Buck zero two,

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>zero five says Dwight's been in near prime form. Pe

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy seventy two says Dwight Howard's exceeded my expectations the most.

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>A rebounding machine whose enthusiasm for the game is infectious. Vibes.

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you have a favorite Dwight Vibe moment this year,

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Lauren oh Man put me on the spot, why don't

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>you think? I think for me, it has to be

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the early season that by all accounts was was shut

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>down because they were working too hard. But Dwight coming

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:44.359
<v Speaker 1>out with the young guys to shoot postgame early in

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>the year when he could have been exhausted from the

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 1>season prior. He's taken all the young fellas under his wing.

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>He's taken Ben Simmons under his wing, and seeing them

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>put in an extra time together, especially working on parts

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of his game that Dwight at least doesn't really need

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to be working on, to be putting an extra time

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 1>shooting and then just being with those guys. I know

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that that might not be like a specific Vibes moment,

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's set the tone for what was

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to come. And now you see young players really warming

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>up to Dwight, and I think it's because of the

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 1>tone he set early. Dwight doesn't have to be out

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>there shooting around postgame, but he was doing it for

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>those young guys, and I think that that left a

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>lasting impact. More in the mail bag about who you

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>think has exceeded expectations this season. You have one new message.

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>You got a run on Matise Thible submissions. Nick Man

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve says, Matise for sure, his defense took a big

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>jump and his elite doesn't commit fouls as often this season.

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Matisse is one of the most exciting players to watch,

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's all because of his defense. I feel that

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent. I think people might have been a

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.920
<v Speaker 1>little concerned about Matisse's ability to grow off of where

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>he started, not just because he started on such a

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>high note in his first season, but because he now

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 1>appears on opposing team scouting reports. Now people have to

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.479
<v Speaker 1>look out for him. He's not just this quirky rookie

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>that comes in and reaks a little bit of havoc

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and then goes back to the bench. He's someone that

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>they have to prepare for. And the fact that he's

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>improved despite the fact that teams are ready for him,

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>that might be the most impressive thing of all for me.

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.719
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to Mattie's season, I just don't understand

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:19.719
<v Speaker 1>and maybe it's a testament to how good he is,

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>but it still seems even in the game against Detroit

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend, that teams aren't ready for him? How

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>can he not be a focal point if you're scouting report,

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I think he has to be. Well, the question might be,

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>how ready can you be for someone that's that good

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>at what he does? How much can you prepare for it?

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>If you don't have someone on your team that you

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.479
<v Speaker 1>can run a simulation with of Matisse's bibel defensive practice,

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't really prepare for it. Because of how unique

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>he is. And of course this is a stat that

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>we've been throwing around a lot this week. Matis now

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>third overall in steals, behind only TJ McConnell and Jimmy Butler.

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Matise has one hundred and five steals this season, but

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>he's played about four hundred fewer minutes than either of

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 1>those guys. So the fact that he's hanging at the

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>top of this list playing about twenty minutes a game

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>continues to be incredibly impressive. Look no further than his

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>per thirty six numbers, his per minute numbers, because he's

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>leading the league in about all of the categories that

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>he prides himself in. It's just been it's been a

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>pleasure to watch. Bernie Ticeto on Instagram says matise first

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>team All Defense, Thible, do we think first defense first

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>team defense is going to happen. I feel like that

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>might be a little bit of a stretch, but I

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>do think all defense is not outside the realm of possibilities.

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 1>I really do think that he could make those teams,

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think that if he doesn't, it's only going

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to be because of minutes, and I don't think that

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that's fair based on what we just discussed. I don't

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>always listen to Bill Simmons podcast, but I did happen

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to listen to it this morning, and they were talking

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>about Jimmy Butler's defense, and Bill Simmons, who has been

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in these conversations for years and years, so I'm willing

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to listen to his takes there, said that Jimmy Butler

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>might be the third best perimeter defender in this league,

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>behind only Simmons and Thible, and Bill Simmons, who watches

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole league, did mention that, and I did think

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that that was an interesting shout out for the two

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of them to get. And I do think it would

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>be pretty cool for the Sixers to have at least

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 1>two people on that first team All Defense. But my

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 1>hope is that they'll have three between the two teams,

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>and I do think that that's justified and reasonable. And

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I think, listen, if Matis can somehow break through for

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>any one of the teams in his second season, I

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>think that that is still a really impressive accomplishment given

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the minutes that he plays and that he is at

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>this stage of his career. He's elite. He's a defensive specialist,

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and I mean that's what should be rewarded for those

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>teams recognizing defense and defense alone. I think there's obviously

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>some perennial names that appear on those lists at positions

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that Matisse plays that could make it certainly not impossible

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>at all, but a challenge to break in. So I

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>think that if you were to break in, which I

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>do believe he will, there's something we said for that.

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>I really do. I think that I think he plays

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>first team level defense. But even if he does not

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>get first team, that has nothing to turn your nose

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>up at whatsoever. I figured I had to read this

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 1>one right. Our social media coordinator Ali Pinter says Batist

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Stebel has exceeded my expectations. High Seltz and Lauren, there

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you go, thanks Ali for coming into the mailbag. You know,

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>I love to see my six years ladies in the mailbag.

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, I agree, there's there's no way

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>around it. And Seltzi raised an interesting point the fact

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that he's already in the conversation for an All defensive

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>team in just his second season, and we're seeing him

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>continue to improve. So if he's already All defense worthy

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>as a second year player, just imagine how much better

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>he can continue to grow and how much is still

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 1>there for him to develop. When you look at the

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>blocked jump shots, I think is maybe the biggest area

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that this season has really become an item of finesse

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and an item of efficiency. Last season, he was getting

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>fouled a lot, or he was fouling a lot trying

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to block jump shots, and this season it's he almost

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>never fouls, it's almost always all ball, and it's almost

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>every game. And so I think when we see him

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>start to unlock even more levels to defensive game and

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>his offensive game, he's only going to continue to get better.

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>And it's been awesome to watch, good to see. Lots

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of deserved love for Matisse. Thybal you have one new

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.719
<v Speaker 1>message which seventy six or our mail bad question, has

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>exceeded your expectation. I like, I love it when people

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:22.640
<v Speaker 1>zag a little bit. I always appreciate some zags. Stolt's fuss,

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Collins says Doc Rivers. Doc Rivers has exceeded expectations. Kevin

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Underscore has underscore Friends says Doc Rivers. The talent was

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>always there, but he made embid and our team a condenser.

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 1>I think Doc Rivers deserves the shout outs, of course.

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, there were a lot of changes in

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the postseason, I think, and I don't want to misquote

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Daryl Morey, so I'm hoping that my memory is serving

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>me correctly. But he did say that Doc Rivers could

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>have been the team's most exciting offseason acquisition. That was

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 1>something that was said right and that held up not

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>his because some people said it was Darryl's acquisition, but

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Doc he came before Daryl, so Darrel, I think he

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.640
<v Speaker 1>quickly on his timeline said listen, that was a before

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 1>me acquisition. So I'm not going to take credit for that.

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>But he did say that he felt that it was

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>the biggest acquisition, right, Okay, good. I just want to

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>make sure my memory was serving me correctly. Cool to

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>see that both of them came in and were able

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to make some really actionable and successful decisions, really really

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>early on. So much change in the off season, but

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>by all accounts thus far, they've all been pretty good decisions,

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and the system that's been put in place is working.

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>So Doc Rivers of course gets a ton of credit

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>for that. Kept it simple and effective. That's not to

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 1>say that there aren't subtleties and sophistications within that, but

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the ask of players, I think it's

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>been very straightforward. Joe, get down there and do your

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 1>thing if you're single covered, but if you're double teamed,

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>let's see what else is out there. He's becoming better passer.

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Joel has tobias. We talked about Ben Simmons really trying

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to channel Ben in the mindset of be a force,

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>be aggressive, get downhill, and then let Ben do his

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>thing defensively. I think he is Simples might not have

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>been the right word. I think streamlining things and keeping

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it straightforward and finding the best ways to use guys

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 1>definitely has been a strength of Doc Rivers. Without doubt.

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's try and get one more in here.

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>From the mail bag, Callie Stack twenty one says, Beebaal

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Paul has exceeded expectations. I like that answer. I like

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that answer, Beeball Paul. Of course, the sixers third and

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>final pick in this year's draft, you don't necessarily know

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>what you're going to get from guys in that area.

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Daryl Morey called him quirky, like we weren't exactly sure

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 1>what we were getting here. And the Beeball Paul experience

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.199
<v Speaker 1>has been another tremendous one. It's been really cool to

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>see him grow in the limited opportunities as well that

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>he was able to get. Of course, exceeded expectations in

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the Gubble, getting Rookie of the Year and MVP, so

0:27:57.640 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>that must have been good for his confidence. And then

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 1>to see him bring some of those skills that he

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>developed there back to the team over the last couple

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of months has been really cool to see. Yeah, when

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>he's gotten into games for the seventy Sixers, he's made

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>effective use of his minutes. Sometimes he had ten and

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>nine against Okac in the game that started this winning

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 1>streak for the seventy sixers. So right, I think that

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of reason based on what we

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.359
<v Speaker 1>saw in the preseason that things were quirky about him

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>at times mine looked a little bit herky jerky, or

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that the game looked like it was moving at a

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>very fast pace for him. But to his credit, he's

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 1>used this season to get into a comfort level, a

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>rhythm and a groove, and you can see undoubted potential

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>surrounding Beeball Paul Paul Reid. So yes, a worthy, a

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>worthy name to come up and we're talking about seventy

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>sixers who've exceeded expectations. Oh, Lauren, I also I almost

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>forgot this, but I think we have to include a

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>voicemail when it is as wholesome and feel good as this.

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>You have one new message. Hi, This is Shawnny from

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the block once in my first game to pass Friday

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and maybe a little close for comfort, but I have

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to say it was so electric in the center in

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter, just based on Tobias Harris alone coming

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in clutch, hitting those threes. He's just been so amazing

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>in clutch for us in the fourth quarter. Love to

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:18.959
<v Speaker 1>hear that fans having a great time back of the building.

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>It's been awesome to have their energy back in the building.

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting. As some of you guys know, I'm

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>from Houston and I no shade to the Rockets organization,

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>but they don't bring in fans the way that the

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Sixers are able to over and over and over again.

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, even at this limited capacity, the last couple

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of games have been louder than any Rockets game. I

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>went to pre pandemic. That was my immediate tap feeling

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the energy and the vibes that the fans are injecting

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>into the situation. Again, no shade to the Rockets organization,

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that's just my background. This is all the credit in

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the world to the Philly fans that are coming into

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the building, that are creating the atmosphere that they're creating.

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. I know the team appreciates it. It's

0:29:57.840 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of fun to have them back. Huge

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>shout out to our man Derek Hay's behind the scenes

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>running game presentation for the seventy Sixers, Ryan Colletti, Christian Crosby,

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Archie Antoine Sixers E n T. Great vibes down there.

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>The capacity went up by almost a thousand over the weekend,

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>so nice to see a handful of fans in there

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and making it loud and bringing some good energy in there.

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Glad Shawnee from the block was able to experience that.

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And before we go just there were a couple more

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>names that came up in our submissions for who else

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>exceeded expectations that I also nearly forgot to highlight, but

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's worth mentioning. Danny Green and Tyrese Maxie

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>also both got a lot of love on the submissions

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>for this week. I think Danny he's been really, really awesome,

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>especially since the All Star Game break. He's shooting over

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>forty percent from three point territory for the first time

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in two years. His three point production is as prolific

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about on a per game basis as it's been

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of seasons, ties a career high, matching

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>what he did with the Toronto Raptors in their championship

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>season in twenty eighteen nineteen. So Danny's been great. Danny

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>has been great. Another one that's provided almost as much

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>off the court as he has on the court, if

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>not more. And then my only honorable mention I wanted

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to throw in was just to make sure Ben Simmons

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>got a shout out somewhere on this podcast because of

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>his play on the defensive end. We knew he was

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>an excellent defender. I don't know if we knew that

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>he was what seems like he should be a no

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>doubt defensive player of the year this early in his career.

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Really cool to see him unlock that side or rather,

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>should we say, really lock down that side of his game. Absolutely,

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and then Tyrese Maxie when last we saw him twenty

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>two points, second highest total of the season for him

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>as a rookie. He also had five rebounds, four assists,

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>had seven assists his game before that at Houston with

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a dozen points. So really, Lauren, looking back, he in

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's nine out of his last eleven appearances

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>he has scored in double figures. So Tyrese finding his

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>place as this season has moved along. Yeah, no doubt

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and cool to see Joel give Tyrese a lot of

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>credit following that game talking about how impressed he's been

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>with him all season and how much he thinks that

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Tyrese is going to continue to grow and deserves to

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>be playing. We said it at the top of the pod.

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Could be a lot of candidates for seventy six ers

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>who have exceeded expectations this season. A lot of good responses,

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of valid names. Great year, a great season.

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Does that, agreed Salts. This was a fun one to do, Lauren.

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, appreciate its s and thank you

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:47.719
<v Speaker 1>to everyone out there who submitted responses on Instagram, Twitter

0:32:48.240 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and the voicemails voicemail callers. If we played your voicemail

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>beyond the lookout in a couple of days, we will

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>get in touch. And if there's any other voicemail callers

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>who in recent weeks have not heard from us. Here's

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>how it works. I go into the office to make

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 1>these shipments about once every three to four weeks. I

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>usually get in touch with people right before I go in,

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>so it's the first thing in my emails and my

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>texts or dms, so I don't have to sift and

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>filter through everything. So if you've not yet heard from

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>either me or Larn, do not worry. We keep copious

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>notes about who calls because we do love and appreciate

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the voicemails, and we will be getting in touch with

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you soon. One more very final shout out. I feel

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I've been so shout out happy. This week, we got

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to do it our guy, Christian Crosby. He is performing

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the track you Hear under Us, written sung, produced by

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Christian Crosby. It is called Scrong. Search Christian wherever you

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>stream or get your music these days, Apple, Spotify, wherever.

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>He's a man of infinite talents. He is your entering,

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a seventy six ers host and budding musician extraordinaire. So

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>strong than you, Christian, for our music. We'll talk to

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you next week. See you, m h m m m