1 00:00:04,160 --> 00:00:07,800 Speaker 1: Welcome to our Bloomberg television and radio audiences. I'm standing 2 00:00:07,840 --> 00:00:11,920 Speaker 1: by with a very special interview and exclusive with James Gorman, 3 00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:16,320 Speaker 1: the executive chairman of Morgan Stanley recently stepped down from 4 00:00:16,320 --> 00:00:19,200 Speaker 1: his post as CEO, and this is the first interview 5 00:00:19,320 --> 00:00:22,520 Speaker 1: in your new role as executive chairman. What's your most 6 00:00:22,600 --> 00:00:23,400 Speaker 1: urgent priority. 7 00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:26,799 Speaker 2: Well, it was obviously to come and do this interview 8 00:00:26,840 --> 00:00:28,640 Speaker 2: with you as my first priority. 9 00:00:30,360 --> 00:00:32,040 Speaker 3: You know, it's just support. 10 00:00:31,760 --> 00:00:35,160 Speaker 2: It and he's a terrific guy, will be a great CEO, 11 00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:38,920 Speaker 2: and my job really is to help him as best 12 00:00:38,920 --> 00:00:40,920 Speaker 2: as I can, but stay out of the road. 13 00:00:41,080 --> 00:00:43,600 Speaker 3: So that's really my priority. 14 00:00:43,760 --> 00:00:46,440 Speaker 1: It's interesting I've heard you used to write a handwrite 15 00:00:46,479 --> 00:00:49,160 Speaker 1: a checklist of priorities at the start of every year. 16 00:00:49,520 --> 00:00:52,720 Speaker 1: If you think about how you change gears into executive chairman, 17 00:00:52,800 --> 00:00:54,480 Speaker 1: what does that checklist this year look like. 18 00:00:54,800 --> 00:00:55,880 Speaker 3: I didn't write it this year. 19 00:00:56,600 --> 00:00:58,640 Speaker 2: I did that when I was CEO for fourteen years, 20 00:00:58,640 --> 00:01:01,640 Speaker 2: and it gave me a framework for focusing on a 21 00:01:01,680 --> 00:01:05,319 Speaker 2: few big things that matter, because in these jobs, there 22 00:01:05,360 --> 00:01:08,560 Speaker 2: are thousands, literally thousands of issues that come at you 23 00:01:09,080 --> 00:01:11,200 Speaker 2: and you can easily lose sight of the stuff that 24 00:01:11,280 --> 00:01:13,640 Speaker 2: actually matters, which is a few big things. So every 25 00:01:13,720 --> 00:01:16,240 Speaker 2: year I would tea up on the first day I 26 00:01:16,280 --> 00:01:18,640 Speaker 2: came into the office, which was yesterday, I came in 27 00:01:19,959 --> 00:01:22,360 Speaker 2: and write down the list of ten things, and you know, 28 00:01:22,720 --> 00:01:25,840 Speaker 2: one of them was always no new mistakes, which I 29 00:01:25,880 --> 00:01:27,920 Speaker 2: defined as things that cost us more than half a 30 00:01:27,920 --> 00:01:31,720 Speaker 2: billion of capital. Sometimes they were personal like stay fit 31 00:01:31,880 --> 00:01:35,640 Speaker 2: or get fit, or sometimes they're about development and leadership 32 00:01:35,680 --> 00:01:39,160 Speaker 2: with our top team. But no different jobs, so different 33 00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:41,399 Speaker 2: you've got you've got to switch. So that's what I've done. 34 00:01:41,640 --> 00:01:43,640 Speaker 1: You know, I'm glad you brought up mistakes because to 35 00:01:43,680 --> 00:01:46,440 Speaker 1: the extent that we learned from life's challenges. I'm curious 36 00:01:46,440 --> 00:01:48,920 Speaker 1: about your single moment. What is the biggest mistake you 37 00:01:48,960 --> 00:01:51,760 Speaker 1: ever thought you've made at Morgan Stanley. You know, this 38 00:01:51,880 --> 00:01:54,200 Speaker 1: is an exit interview. It's a chance to look back 39 00:01:54,440 --> 00:01:55,560 Speaker 1: at the last decade or so. 40 00:01:56,520 --> 00:01:59,080 Speaker 2: You know it might sound I'm modest. I don't think 41 00:01:59,080 --> 00:02:00,840 Speaker 2: we made a lot of big misses. I mean, the 42 00:02:01,960 --> 00:02:04,080 Speaker 2: if you look at the major things that we did, 43 00:02:04,080 --> 00:02:06,720 Speaker 2: whether they were the deals Smith Barney, each trade eat 44 00:02:06,720 --> 00:02:12,160 Speaker 2: advance succession, which is critical navigating through COVID. You know, 45 00:02:12,200 --> 00:02:14,680 Speaker 2: we got frankly most of the big stuff, right. I 46 00:02:14,720 --> 00:02:16,760 Speaker 2: wish we hadn't sold Van Camp and when we sold 47 00:02:16,800 --> 00:02:20,360 Speaker 2: it to Marty Flanagan Invesco, So that was something I 48 00:02:20,360 --> 00:02:23,360 Speaker 2: think it took a little too long to get the 49 00:02:23,400 --> 00:02:26,320 Speaker 2: full team that I wanted in place in the right jobs. 50 00:02:27,600 --> 00:02:30,240 Speaker 2: But you know, you can't do these jobs and not 51 00:02:30,440 --> 00:02:32,520 Speaker 2: make missas. When I see a mistake, I embrace it. 52 00:02:33,120 --> 00:02:37,240 Speaker 2: You know, it's like kipling those travelers of success and failure. 53 00:02:37,240 --> 00:02:40,359 Speaker 2: You to embrace them both because if you're not making mistakes, 54 00:02:40,360 --> 00:02:42,720 Speaker 2: the chances are you're not doing enough. So I never 55 00:02:42,720 --> 00:02:44,600 Speaker 2: see a mistake as a negative. I just see it 56 00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:46,040 Speaker 2: as something you learn from move forward. 57 00:02:46,240 --> 00:02:47,880 Speaker 1: You know, it's interesting you're standing on top of a 58 00:02:47,880 --> 00:02:50,200 Speaker 1: mountain now. You've had a tremendous amount of success at 59 00:02:50,200 --> 00:02:53,160 Speaker 1: Morgan Stanley, but those first couple of years were rocky. 60 00:02:53,240 --> 00:02:55,480 Speaker 1: Were you ever worried in those first few years you'd 61 00:02:55,520 --> 00:02:57,800 Speaker 1: be ousted before you can enact a turnaround? 62 00:02:58,160 --> 00:03:02,839 Speaker 2: No, you know, I thought, listen what I felt back then. 63 00:03:04,680 --> 00:03:06,919 Speaker 2: We had to act, and we had to act aggressively. 64 00:03:07,600 --> 00:03:10,360 Speaker 2: And I knew that whatever we chose to do there 65 00:03:10,400 --> 00:03:13,280 Speaker 2: would be critics. That didn't bother me one little bit 66 00:03:13,800 --> 00:03:17,000 Speaker 2: because we're in trouble as it was, so my job 67 00:03:17,120 --> 00:03:19,000 Speaker 2: was to do something about it, not listen to the 68 00:03:19,000 --> 00:03:20,920 Speaker 2: critics of what we can't do, but figure out what 69 00:03:20,960 --> 00:03:23,840 Speaker 2: we can do. So I was highly confident that we'd 70 00:03:23,880 --> 00:03:25,680 Speaker 2: make choices and I. 71 00:03:25,560 --> 00:03:26,440 Speaker 3: Thought they'd pay off. 72 00:03:26,440 --> 00:03:28,480 Speaker 2: I thought the rebalancing in the business model was the 73 00:03:28,560 --> 00:03:30,880 Speaker 2: right choice, so I didn't I just didn't listen to 74 00:03:30,919 --> 00:03:31,400 Speaker 2: the critics. 75 00:03:31,440 --> 00:03:34,840 Speaker 1: It's funny you kind of got Morgan Stanley at rock bottom, 76 00:03:34,840 --> 00:03:36,839 Speaker 1: if you will. But a lot of investors think Ted 77 00:03:36,840 --> 00:03:38,840 Speaker 1: Pick's job is even harder because he is on a 78 00:03:38,880 --> 00:03:41,160 Speaker 1: high note. What do you think Ted's biggest challenge is 79 00:03:41,160 --> 00:03:41,560 Speaker 1: going to be? 80 00:03:42,080 --> 00:03:44,320 Speaker 2: Oh, I don't think. I don't think it's hard or easier. 81 00:03:44,320 --> 00:03:46,600 Speaker 2: They're just different. You go through different cycles. I mean, 82 00:03:46,640 --> 00:03:48,640 Speaker 2: the Morgan Center I've had for the last five years 83 00:03:49,120 --> 00:03:50,960 Speaker 2: is very different from the first five. 84 00:03:50,840 --> 00:03:53,360 Speaker 3: Or the middle middle four. You know. 85 00:03:53,440 --> 00:03:56,160 Speaker 2: For Ted, he's got one of the biggest and most 86 00:03:56,160 --> 00:03:59,760 Speaker 2: successful companies in the world, phenomenal brand, he's a great 87 00:03:59,800 --> 00:04:02,560 Speaker 2: colture carriers. So I'm sure the cultural stay in track. 88 00:04:02,880 --> 00:04:06,760 Speaker 2: The real choices will be strategic. So when opportunities come 89 00:04:06,840 --> 00:04:09,840 Speaker 2: to move left or move right, how do you do that, 90 00:04:09,880 --> 00:04:11,960 Speaker 2: how aggressively do you do it and when do you 91 00:04:11,960 --> 00:04:14,440 Speaker 2: do it? So's they're really the choices. And in the 92 00:04:14,480 --> 00:04:17,880 Speaker 2: first year while I'm here, I'll obviously share with him 93 00:04:17,880 --> 00:04:21,760 Speaker 2: whatever views I have on stuff if he wants that, 94 00:04:22,160 --> 00:04:24,880 Speaker 2: But in the lady years, he'll have his team working 95 00:04:24,880 --> 00:04:27,400 Speaker 2: with him on that, so I'm confident about that. 96 00:04:27,440 --> 00:04:29,839 Speaker 1: We'll talk more about strategy in a second. But another thing, 97 00:04:29,920 --> 00:04:32,599 Speaker 1: as you transition to executive chairman, you have roles now 98 00:04:32,800 --> 00:04:35,840 Speaker 1: outside of the bank, and succession is arguably one of 99 00:04:35,880 --> 00:04:38,560 Speaker 1: the most important things you could do as a manager, 100 00:04:38,800 --> 00:04:40,680 Speaker 1: and a big new responsibility for you is serving on 101 00:04:40,680 --> 00:04:43,480 Speaker 1: the board of Disney, ironically, where succession has been one 102 00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:46,839 Speaker 1: of the biggest issues. How does Disney live past Bob Iger? 103 00:04:47,560 --> 00:04:50,520 Speaker 2: Well, firstly, I mean Bob Iger is a phenomenal executive. 104 00:04:50,560 --> 00:04:53,920 Speaker 2: I mean he is iconic for a reason. He's led 105 00:04:53,960 --> 00:04:58,320 Speaker 2: that company through so many cycles and really is a 106 00:04:58,400 --> 00:05:01,400 Speaker 2: gifted leader. So it's a great pleasure to work with them. 107 00:05:01,400 --> 00:05:04,000 Speaker 2: But it's not for me to judge Disney's future. I've 108 00:05:04,080 --> 00:05:07,080 Speaker 2: enjoined the board yet. I'm starting I think February fourth 109 00:05:07,120 --> 00:05:10,599 Speaker 2: or February second, I'm sure early February I'm looking forward 110 00:05:10,600 --> 00:05:16,320 Speaker 2: to it. I like dealing with complex situations. The changes 111 00:05:16,360 --> 00:05:20,039 Speaker 2: going on in that industry are profound and there are 112 00:05:20,160 --> 00:05:22,560 Speaker 2: choices to be made, so that to me is very interesting. 113 00:05:22,600 --> 00:05:26,520 Speaker 2: And obviously given the experience I've had leading succession with 114 00:05:26,600 --> 00:05:29,200 Speaker 2: our board here with Dennisonally the head of our comp committee, 115 00:05:29,240 --> 00:05:33,640 Speaker 2: and Tom Glossa, they head lead director, you know, hopefully 116 00:05:33,640 --> 00:05:35,760 Speaker 2: I can add something to the succession committee that I'll 117 00:05:35,760 --> 00:05:36,200 Speaker 2: be joining. 118 00:05:36,400 --> 00:05:40,320 Speaker 1: What about pricing challenges outside of success at Disney? Do 119 00:05:40,400 --> 00:05:43,480 Speaker 1: you think that there's anything that could be immediately addressed 120 00:05:43,800 --> 00:05:45,799 Speaker 1: as they contend with activists? 121 00:05:46,320 --> 00:05:49,719 Speaker 2: Well, you know, and they're always We've had how many 122 00:05:49,720 --> 00:05:52,040 Speaker 2: activists do we have here? We had at least two, 123 00:05:52,080 --> 00:05:54,000 Speaker 2: and I think they each had two bites at the Apple. 124 00:05:55,160 --> 00:05:58,120 Speaker 2: So no, that is not what the focus should be on. 125 00:05:58,160 --> 00:06:00,680 Speaker 2: The focus should be on strategic choices companies make. But 126 00:06:00,720 --> 00:06:03,039 Speaker 2: again I haven't joined the board, so I can't. I 127 00:06:03,080 --> 00:06:06,000 Speaker 2: can't talk about a company I'm not even an insider on. 128 00:06:06,040 --> 00:06:07,160 Speaker 2: That wouldn't be fair to the team. 129 00:06:07,240 --> 00:06:10,520 Speaker 1: More strategic decisions at Morgan Stanley. One massive question. You've 130 00:06:10,520 --> 00:06:13,920 Speaker 1: built this massive wealth management business mostly in the United States. 131 00:06:14,120 --> 00:06:16,760 Speaker 1: You have talked previously about the idea of Morgan Stanley 132 00:06:17,120 --> 00:06:20,600 Speaker 1: internationally expanding more. Do you think Morgan Stanley though, can 133 00:06:20,640 --> 00:06:23,240 Speaker 1: be a giant international wealth manager? 134 00:06:23,680 --> 00:06:25,400 Speaker 3: Oh? Sure, there are a lot of wealthy people in 135 00:06:25,440 --> 00:06:25,919 Speaker 3: this world. 136 00:06:25,960 --> 00:06:29,919 Speaker 2: I think population just tipped eight b and and you know, 137 00:06:30,160 --> 00:06:32,240 Speaker 2: I've just come back from a long trip through Asia, 138 00:06:32,320 --> 00:06:36,120 Speaker 2: through Thailand and Singapore, Hong Kong, and I was in 139 00:06:36,160 --> 00:06:38,800 Speaker 2: Europe last week. I've been all over there. There are 140 00:06:38,839 --> 00:06:41,080 Speaker 2: plenty of pockets of opportunities. So it's a question of 141 00:06:41,560 --> 00:06:43,520 Speaker 2: where you where you pick your shots. I mean that 142 00:06:43,760 --> 00:06:47,839 Speaker 2: where you pick your spots, there are endless opportunities. And 143 00:06:48,279 --> 00:06:50,839 Speaker 2: I think our Asia business, we have a wealth business 144 00:06:50,880 --> 00:06:55,760 Speaker 2: in Asia. It's small ish but growing very fast. Obviously 145 00:06:55,800 --> 00:06:58,400 Speaker 2: that's a focus Japan. I think with our partner AMUFG 146 00:06:58,600 --> 00:07:01,279 Speaker 2: is a tremendous focus that I suspect Ted and the 147 00:07:01,320 --> 00:07:03,520 Speaker 2: team will do even more with which he's already started 148 00:07:03,560 --> 00:07:05,080 Speaker 2: doing on the trading side. 149 00:07:05,839 --> 00:07:08,520 Speaker 3: So there are endless opportunities. I'm not worried about. 150 00:07:08,400 --> 00:07:10,720 Speaker 1: What are the biggest challenges with China in particular, are 151 00:07:10,720 --> 00:07:13,120 Speaker 1: given the rising geopolitical tensions and the state of the 152 00:07:13,120 --> 00:07:15,880 Speaker 1: economy there, or. 153 00:07:15,960 --> 00:07:18,840 Speaker 2: China has you know, China has some fundamental challenges. First 154 00:07:18,840 --> 00:07:23,640 Speaker 2: and foremost is demographics. The one child policy guaranteed the 155 00:07:23,680 --> 00:07:26,360 Speaker 2: population is going to shrink, and right when you need 156 00:07:26,400 --> 00:07:29,640 Speaker 2: more productive working people coming through to support the older generation, 157 00:07:30,440 --> 00:07:32,920 Speaker 2: they've got few of them, and they don't have good immigrations. 158 00:07:33,040 --> 00:07:36,840 Speaker 2: So I think China has some profound challenges on demographics. 159 00:07:36,880 --> 00:07:40,800 Speaker 2: It has profound challenges in terms of building a consumption economy. 160 00:07:42,080 --> 00:07:46,800 Speaker 2: You know that there's still an export savings driven economy. 161 00:07:47,040 --> 00:07:50,240 Speaker 2: So but on the other hand, China's one point four 162 00:07:50,280 --> 00:07:54,360 Speaker 2: bm people, second largest economy in the world and gross 163 00:07:54,360 --> 00:07:59,600 Speaker 2: domestic product. It's it's a key factor in global economic health. 164 00:08:00,000 --> 00:08:03,160 Speaker 1: And so beyond Asia expansion. If you think about the 165 00:08:03,160 --> 00:08:05,800 Speaker 1: wealth management space, even in the US, there's another thing 166 00:08:05,840 --> 00:08:08,680 Speaker 1: that's happening that a lot of financial advisors are thinking 167 00:08:08,680 --> 00:08:11,640 Speaker 1: about in particular, and that is the approval actually or 168 00:08:12,240 --> 00:08:15,520 Speaker 1: the lack thereof, of a Bitcoin spot ETF in the 169 00:08:15,640 --> 00:08:19,600 Speaker 1: United States. When you think about what wealthy clients invest in, 170 00:08:19,720 --> 00:08:21,280 Speaker 1: when you think about the future of wealth management, do 171 00:08:21,320 --> 00:08:23,320 Speaker 1: you think bitcoin is a suitable investment. 172 00:08:24,040 --> 00:08:25,040 Speaker 3: I've never been. 173 00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:31,000 Speaker 2: You know, I've never really understood the value of bitcoin 174 00:08:31,320 --> 00:08:35,680 Speaker 2: as a form of stored value. Others have and others 175 00:08:35,760 --> 00:08:37,480 Speaker 2: have made a lot of money on it. I joked once, 176 00:08:37,559 --> 00:08:39,400 Speaker 2: I wish I bought it at sixty dollars, and I'm 177 00:08:39,440 --> 00:08:43,079 Speaker 2: glad I didn't buy it at sixty thousand. It's clearly speculative. 178 00:08:43,520 --> 00:08:46,040 Speaker 2: I think it should play for wealthy people a very 179 00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:51,000 Speaker 2: small role in their financial fabric because it's so speculative, 180 00:08:51,040 --> 00:08:54,479 Speaker 2: it's so volatile, and again it's going through enormous regulatory 181 00:08:54,559 --> 00:08:58,240 Speaker 2: change and industry disruption is seen with some classic failures 182 00:08:58,240 --> 00:09:01,319 Speaker 2: of late, so some big coints not going away. It's 183 00:09:01,360 --> 00:09:05,719 Speaker 2: not a fad. I just don't think it's a core investment. 184 00:09:05,760 --> 00:09:08,760 Speaker 2: I think it's a speculative asset, of which there are 185 00:09:08,800 --> 00:09:09,640 Speaker 2: plenty of choices. 186 00:09:09,960 --> 00:09:12,839 Speaker 1: Speaking of regulation, you've been very vocal about the new 187 00:09:12,840 --> 00:09:16,480 Speaker 1: regulations being made in the United States about bank capital, 188 00:09:16,880 --> 00:09:20,160 Speaker 1: about operational risk. Do you believe the rules are likely 189 00:09:20,240 --> 00:09:24,000 Speaker 1: to change before implementation based on your recent discussions with 190 00:09:24,080 --> 00:09:25,760 Speaker 1: regulators and what do you think they will look like 191 00:09:25,760 --> 00:09:26,199 Speaker 1: at the end. 192 00:09:26,440 --> 00:09:27,560 Speaker 3: Oh, they'll definitely change. 193 00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:30,000 Speaker 2: I mean they put out an extended comment period which 194 00:09:30,040 --> 00:09:34,080 Speaker 2: got extended further. There have been thousands of comments put 195 00:09:34,120 --> 00:09:38,280 Speaker 2: into the various regulatory bodies led by the FED. It 196 00:09:38,480 --> 00:09:43,679 Speaker 2: was a proposal that I would say was extremely aggressive 197 00:09:44,480 --> 00:09:47,440 Speaker 2: and set a marker. It will not go through in 198 00:09:47,440 --> 00:09:50,760 Speaker 2: that form. If it did, I think it would have very, 199 00:09:50,880 --> 00:09:54,120 Speaker 2: very negative consequences for corporate lending across this country, which 200 00:09:54,160 --> 00:09:55,719 Speaker 2: is not what you want. It's not going to help 201 00:09:55,720 --> 00:09:56,520 Speaker 2: the economy growth. 202 00:09:56,559 --> 00:09:56,640 Speaker 3: Well. 203 00:09:56,679 --> 00:10:00,679 Speaker 1: You've also spoken about the treasury market potential impacts from regulation. 204 00:10:01,000 --> 00:10:03,840 Speaker 1: We've already seen stresses of late in the treasury market. 205 00:10:04,080 --> 00:10:06,520 Speaker 1: Do you have fears that those stresses will be exacerbated. 206 00:10:06,840 --> 00:10:08,960 Speaker 2: I can't tell until I see the actual rules, But 207 00:10:09,000 --> 00:10:12,800 Speaker 2: all I know is what was put out is highly 208 00:10:12,880 --> 00:10:16,120 Speaker 2: highly highly unlikely to be what it's ultimately regulated. 209 00:10:16,400 --> 00:10:16,559 Speaker 3: Now. 210 00:10:16,640 --> 00:10:19,800 Speaker 2: Investors don't necessarily see that or agree with it. But 211 00:10:19,840 --> 00:10:21,880 Speaker 2: in my experience, I've been in this a long time. 212 00:10:22,400 --> 00:10:24,200 Speaker 2: I was on the FED board for six years in 213 00:10:24,200 --> 00:10:27,960 Speaker 2: New York. I chared the fac in Washington. I think 214 00:10:28,000 --> 00:10:31,679 Speaker 2: this is a highly aggressive proposal that will be materially 215 00:10:32,080 --> 00:10:34,319 Speaker 2: wound back when it finally becomes law. 216 00:10:34,520 --> 00:10:38,520 Speaker 1: Regulation now, there has been tighter capital rules posed under 217 00:10:38,520 --> 00:10:42,080 Speaker 1: the Biden administration. There's also been a lot of regulatory 218 00:10:42,120 --> 00:10:45,200 Speaker 1: actions taken against banks. If the Republicans take the White 219 00:10:45,240 --> 00:10:49,280 Speaker 1: House in twenty twenty four, whether Donald Trump or another contender. 220 00:10:49,760 --> 00:10:52,920 Speaker 1: Do you expect that this tighter regulatory environment will just 221 00:10:52,960 --> 00:10:53,760 Speaker 1: fully unwind. 222 00:10:54,160 --> 00:10:56,360 Speaker 3: It's too hard to predict, you know. 223 00:10:56,559 --> 00:11:00,520 Speaker 2: I think we're in you know, you see pendulums, and 224 00:11:00,559 --> 00:11:05,119 Speaker 2: we swung to lighter regulation to I think an excessive proposal. 225 00:11:05,160 --> 00:11:07,800 Speaker 2: I think it'll swing back. So it's heading back to 226 00:11:07,920 --> 00:11:10,640 Speaker 2: more balance regulation, and that's where it should be. I'm 227 00:11:10,640 --> 00:11:14,079 Speaker 2: all about balance. The banking system should not be deregulated. 228 00:11:14,320 --> 00:11:16,360 Speaker 2: That would be a nightmare. On the other hand, if 229 00:11:16,360 --> 00:11:19,160 Speaker 2: you overregulate and you require capital standards that are so 230 00:11:19,240 --> 00:11:22,240 Speaker 2: high that the banks run investable, they can't grow. That 231 00:11:22,280 --> 00:11:23,760 Speaker 2: doesn't serve communities. 232 00:11:23,840 --> 00:11:24,160 Speaker 3: Well. 233 00:11:24,400 --> 00:11:28,760 Speaker 2: You need prosperous, thriving banks to provide lending products for 234 00:11:28,840 --> 00:11:30,520 Speaker 2: small businesses and consumers. 235 00:11:30,720 --> 00:11:32,800 Speaker 1: You know, to the extent we're less than a year 236 00:11:32,840 --> 00:11:36,319 Speaker 1: away from a speed of bank failures, to the extent 237 00:11:36,360 --> 00:11:38,680 Speaker 1: that there are still fragilities in the financial system, what 238 00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:39,160 Speaker 1: are they. 239 00:11:39,440 --> 00:11:41,439 Speaker 2: I don't think they are a speed of failures. Honestly, 240 00:11:41,520 --> 00:11:43,920 Speaker 2: I think there were three banks that got it wrong. 241 00:11:45,000 --> 00:11:47,720 Speaker 2: I've said that publicly. They made choices that were the 242 00:11:47,720 --> 00:11:51,880 Speaker 2: wrong choices. Wasn't complicated. They got washed up and cleaned 243 00:11:51,960 --> 00:11:53,880 Speaker 2: up and folded into other banks and you move on. 244 00:11:54,000 --> 00:11:56,559 Speaker 2: This wasn't People kept telling me we're having a banking crisis. 245 00:11:56,920 --> 00:11:57,400 Speaker 3: No we're not. 246 00:11:57,440 --> 00:12:01,160 Speaker 2: We had a crisis among three banks for their shareholders 247 00:12:01,160 --> 00:12:02,079 Speaker 2: and their employees. 248 00:12:02,320 --> 00:12:04,760 Speaker 3: It's not a crisis for the market. The core banking 249 00:12:04,800 --> 00:12:08,000 Speaker 3: system is in rude good health, to use a British expression. 250 00:12:08,440 --> 00:12:10,439 Speaker 1: Well, you know, it's not just the banking system. If 251 00:12:10,440 --> 00:12:12,680 Speaker 1: you think about the hedge fund industry, regulators are also 252 00:12:12,800 --> 00:12:15,800 Speaker 1: very concerned about some fragilities there. It wasn't too long 253 00:12:15,840 --> 00:12:18,319 Speaker 1: ago that Morgan Stanley lost almost a billion dollars in 254 00:12:18,360 --> 00:12:20,679 Speaker 1: the week of the collapse of Archagoes. Do you think 255 00:12:20,720 --> 00:12:22,840 Speaker 1: that there needs to be more safeguards on the non 256 00:12:22,880 --> 00:12:23,600 Speaker 1: bank system. 257 00:12:24,000 --> 00:12:28,680 Speaker 2: I mean, it's honestly, there's too many participants in the 258 00:12:28,720 --> 00:12:30,720 Speaker 2: non bank system to say yo, So no, you'd have 259 00:12:30,800 --> 00:12:34,000 Speaker 2: to go subset by subset. We talked about payments, we 260 00:12:34,160 --> 00:12:38,559 Speaker 2: talked about private creditor, go through each of the pieces 261 00:12:38,600 --> 00:12:41,959 Speaker 2: of it. But there are always risks when you're dealing 262 00:12:41,960 --> 00:12:44,120 Speaker 2: with leverage and a financial system. But if you don't 263 00:12:44,120 --> 00:12:47,520 Speaker 2: have leverage, you don't have lending so it's a balance again. 264 00:12:47,559 --> 00:12:50,400 Speaker 3: I'm always back to there is a balanced. 265 00:12:50,000 --> 00:12:52,560 Speaker 2: Solution to most of these debates, and you can find 266 00:12:52,600 --> 00:12:54,400 Speaker 2: it with thought full discussion with regulators. 267 00:12:54,440 --> 00:12:57,160 Speaker 1: Speaking of leverage, the cost of leverage is higher today 268 00:12:57,200 --> 00:12:59,400 Speaker 1: than it was a couple of years ago. Where do 269 00:12:59,400 --> 00:13:01,640 Speaker 1: you think interest rates go added into the end of 270 00:13:01,679 --> 00:13:03,320 Speaker 1: the year, and what do you think the market starts 271 00:13:03,320 --> 00:13:04,640 Speaker 1: to look like through twenty twenty four? 272 00:13:04,880 --> 00:13:09,040 Speaker 3: They go down, as simple as that. How far down? 273 00:13:09,160 --> 00:13:10,040 Speaker 3: I've got no idea. 274 00:13:10,080 --> 00:13:13,640 Speaker 2: I mean, I thought that's unlikely the fab would cut 275 00:13:13,720 --> 00:13:17,800 Speaker 2: rates this year, but inflation has moved down pretty materially 276 00:13:18,400 --> 00:13:21,559 Speaker 2: quickly that it's now become more likely. So first half 277 00:13:21,559 --> 00:13:23,320 Speaker 2: of the year, I suspect nothing. Back half of the year, 278 00:13:23,360 --> 00:13:24,959 Speaker 2: they could easily move a couple They could move a 279 00:13:24,960 --> 00:13:28,760 Speaker 2: couple of times. The key point is we started this 280 00:13:28,840 --> 00:13:33,520 Speaker 2: journey with inflation at ten percent, rates at zero, unemployment 281 00:13:33,640 --> 00:13:36,760 Speaker 2: at three and a half percent, and my objective was 282 00:13:36,760 --> 00:13:40,120 Speaker 2: to get us to four four and four four percent inflation, 283 00:13:40,200 --> 00:13:43,880 Speaker 2: four percent rates, four percent unemployment. We're about three percent inflation, 284 00:13:43,960 --> 00:13:45,959 Speaker 2: we're five percent five and a half in rates, and 285 00:13:45,960 --> 00:13:47,600 Speaker 2: we're about three and a half in unemployment. 286 00:13:47,840 --> 00:13:48,840 Speaker 3: So rates will come down. 287 00:13:48,920 --> 00:13:50,520 Speaker 1: Do you think the economy is in at all clear 288 00:13:50,520 --> 00:13:53,600 Speaker 1: when it looks like a soft landing versus a hard landing. 289 00:13:53,640 --> 00:13:56,280 Speaker 1: Do you think that the economy will survive this year 290 00:13:56,280 --> 00:13:57,040 Speaker 1: in good shape? 291 00:13:57,480 --> 00:13:58,600 Speaker 3: Economy is fine. 292 00:13:58,800 --> 00:14:02,640 Speaker 2: I mean there's there's this obsession with the R word recession. 293 00:14:02,679 --> 00:14:04,840 Speaker 2: I mean, you have recessions. They come and go when 294 00:14:04,920 --> 00:14:08,679 Speaker 2: you get imbalances between unemployment rates and economic growth. So no, 295 00:14:08,720 --> 00:14:12,360 Speaker 2: the economy is doing fine. I personally think it is 296 00:14:12,559 --> 00:14:16,040 Speaker 2: unlikely we'll have a recession, very unlikely we'll have a 297 00:14:16,080 --> 00:14:16,720 Speaker 2: hard landing. 298 00:14:17,080 --> 00:14:17,920 Speaker 3: But we'll see. 299 00:14:18,000 --> 00:14:19,960 Speaker 2: But the odds are clearly in favor of seft landing. 300 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:21,280 Speaker 2: I think the Fed's done a great job. 301 00:14:21,800 --> 00:14:25,880 Speaker 1: Now for you, You've told me before that you would look 302 00:14:25,920 --> 00:14:28,560 Speaker 1: to teach in your post life at Morgan Stanley, in 303 00:14:28,560 --> 00:14:30,800 Speaker 1: your life after Morgan Stanley. I want to ask you 304 00:14:30,800 --> 00:14:32,520 Speaker 1: about that for a moment, because there is a lot 305 00:14:32,560 --> 00:14:36,200 Speaker 1: of turmoil on college campuses these days. Do you think 306 00:14:36,240 --> 00:14:38,640 Speaker 1: you would ever take a bigger role at a university 307 00:14:38,720 --> 00:14:41,720 Speaker 1: given all the political pressures and donor activism that you're seeing. 308 00:14:41,920 --> 00:14:42,760 Speaker 3: Well, I'm joining. 309 00:14:43,200 --> 00:14:46,160 Speaker 2: I have been the chair of Columbia Business School for 310 00:14:46,520 --> 00:14:49,160 Speaker 2: many years, several with Henry Cravis's my co chair and 311 00:14:49,240 --> 00:14:52,960 Speaker 2: now chair of the school. I'm looking to get more 312 00:14:52,960 --> 00:14:56,640 Speaker 2: involved at Columbia University in the coming months and I 313 00:14:56,720 --> 00:14:58,640 Speaker 2: think that'd be great to do. I think, you know, 314 00:14:59,280 --> 00:15:03,040 Speaker 2: the importance of high quality education for a well functioning 315 00:15:03,120 --> 00:15:04,680 Speaker 2: society is profound. 316 00:15:04,720 --> 00:15:07,120 Speaker 3: It's obvious. So yeah, I want to be part of that. 317 00:15:07,200 --> 00:15:11,200 Speaker 2: And obviously universities this is not the first time universities 318 00:15:11,200 --> 00:15:14,960 Speaker 2: have been hotbeds of descent and turmoil my whole life. 319 00:15:15,000 --> 00:15:16,680 Speaker 2: They've been that from when I went to university in 320 00:15:16,680 --> 00:15:18,800 Speaker 2: Australia in the nineteen seventies, so that. 321 00:15:19,560 --> 00:15:20,400 Speaker 3: Doesn't bother me. 322 00:15:21,800 --> 00:15:24,800 Speaker 2: But it's important that people are able to have dialogue 323 00:15:24,840 --> 00:15:29,960 Speaker 2: and discussion on campus without intimidation and expressing their rights 324 00:15:29,960 --> 00:15:30,680 Speaker 2: for free speech. 325 00:15:31,920 --> 00:15:36,240 Speaker 1: What is the next big ambition for James Gorman you 326 00:15:36,320 --> 00:15:37,880 Speaker 1: mean today? 327 00:15:38,520 --> 00:15:43,320 Speaker 2: I internally, Morganston is to help TED and to help 328 00:15:43,320 --> 00:15:46,080 Speaker 2: with our clients around the world. I be a very 329 00:15:46,160 --> 00:15:48,280 Speaker 2: large client network that I built up over a long 330 00:15:48,320 --> 00:15:50,320 Speaker 2: career and I think I can help our bankers and 331 00:15:51,080 --> 00:15:54,320 Speaker 2: others in that regard. For me personally, it's to live 332 00:15:54,320 --> 00:15:56,520 Speaker 2: in a little bit of a world of unknown for 333 00:15:56,600 --> 00:15:58,480 Speaker 2: my whole life. I've kind of known what the next 334 00:15:58,480 --> 00:16:01,720 Speaker 2: steps are. As you mentioned, I've I've joined one public company. 335 00:16:01,720 --> 00:16:04,160 Speaker 2: We'll be joining one public company board Disney. I'll be 336 00:16:04,640 --> 00:16:08,240 Speaker 2: getting more involved at Columbia University the months ahead, and 337 00:16:08,280 --> 00:16:09,000 Speaker 2: then I'll take. 338 00:16:08,880 --> 00:16:09,320 Speaker 3: It from there. 339 00:16:09,400 --> 00:16:11,920 Speaker 2: So I don't you know, I want I want balance 340 00:16:11,960 --> 00:16:17,600 Speaker 2: in my life. I've loved being CEO. It's a phenomenal company. 341 00:16:17,680 --> 00:16:20,920 Speaker 2: I'm so proud of my colleagues here, the job that 342 00:16:20,960 --> 00:16:24,280 Speaker 2: they've done. This isn't a one person show. It's thousands 343 00:16:24,320 --> 00:16:27,160 Speaker 2: of people who are really talented doing the right thing, 344 00:16:27,760 --> 00:16:30,360 Speaker 2: and ultimately it's the values of the organization which is 345 00:16:30,400 --> 00:16:32,680 Speaker 2: what drives it. So that's that's what I'm most proud 346 00:16:32,680 --> 00:16:35,760 Speaker 2: of and for me personally, we'll find out. 347 00:16:36,320 --> 00:16:38,640 Speaker 1: James, thank you for your time, your first interview in 348 00:16:38,680 --> 00:16:42,400 Speaker 1: your new role. That's James Gorman, Executive Chairman now of 349 00:16:42,440 --> 00:16:44,520 Speaker 1: Morgan Stanley for Bloomberg Television and Radio.