Speaker 1: And Happy Monday, and we're glad you with us. Straight
Speaker 1: down our toll free telephone number, it's eight hundred and
Speaker 1: nine four one Sean. If you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of this extravaganza fascinating breaking news, we're gonna break
Speaker 1: it right here on the program today. You know, when
Speaker 1: you look at polls and you look at demographics and
Speaker 1: you look at elections, it's that this is what people
Speaker 1: look for trends. One of the things that I despise
Speaker 1: more than anything from every single solitary election season is
Speaker 1: this false narrative, this false characterization about what it means
Speaker 1: to be a Conservative. I'm a registered Conservatives. Too many
Speaker 1: Republicans are weak in spinals. To me, I cannot be
Speaker 1: a member of that party. I just refuses. You're leaving already,
Speaker 1: We're bored. Yeah, So I just hated that they do
Speaker 1: this every year. You know, look at Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney,
Speaker 1: nicest guy in the world. Well he had women's resumes,
Speaker 1: has bind and when he had the binders inside the
Speaker 1: that it's misogynistic. He's trying to hire women. He wants
Speaker 1: equality in his campaign and if he became president, and
Speaker 1: it's it's just the way the Democrats are and they're
Speaker 1: not gonna stop. But now they've taken it to this
Speaker 1: whole other level. And anyway, so we have a study
Speaker 1: when can Republicans when will they get credit record low unemployment?
Speaker 1: Hispanic Americans, African Americans, Asian Americans, women in the workplace,
Speaker 1: you know, and then you compare it to Obama, Biden
Speaker 1: or Biden Obama. It was the worst recovery since the forties,
Speaker 1: adding millions to poverty and millions on food stamps as
Speaker 1: a result. So John McLaughlin, our poster friend, and John
Speaker 1: Jordan of Team Together, and we'll get to that later
Speaker 1: in the show. Today also knew Ingridge is going to
Speaker 1: stop by. We also have a lot to get to.
Speaker 1: The big news to come out today on the investigation
Speaker 1: into the investigators is it looks like all these Russia
Speaker 1: Gate documents that Trey Gaudy calls game changing. I've been
Speaker 1: saying it for two years. They are game changing. Now,
Speaker 1: remember Gaudy has seen it. We've met, we have a
Speaker 1: lot of sources that we have used with our ensemble team.
Speaker 1: And I'm not mentioning someone because everyone Judge Janine, Joe Degenevo,
Speaker 1: Sarah Carter, John Greg. I mean, there's so many that
Speaker 1: did this and they really deserve a lot of credit.
Speaker 1: Now we have told you about the five buckets of
Speaker 1: information that we want to come out, that will come out,
Speaker 1: and yes it will be game changing. This is not
Speaker 1: an over promise under deliver scenario. Can you imagine if
Speaker 1: you're a viewer to fake news CNN today, Can you
Speaker 1: imagine if you're a viewer of conspiracy TV MSNBC. YouMagine
Speaker 1: you have been lied to on a level that has
Speaker 1: never been seen for two plus years, You've been lied to.
Speaker 1: We're about to find out if the new president of
Speaker 1: our country is going to do what Russia wants. As
Speaker 1: if there are no shoes on the Trump human centipede
Speaker 1: that are not about Russia. Russia, Russia, Russia, this cloud
Speaker 1: about collusion with Russia will hang over him no matter
Speaker 1: where he stands. I think they're shocked that the news
Speaker 1: is tightening. It's clear that Muller is now connecting the
Speaker 1: dots between a massive obstruction intended to hide the truth.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's done. He's done, There's no question about. He's
Speaker 1: got to know his future looks like it's behind bars.
Speaker 1: We have a treason as president we now have to
Speaker 1: figure out how to deal with a president of the
Speaker 1: United States who wittingly or unwittingly, has been compromised. Presidency
Speaker 1: is effectively a Russian up. Oh excuse me, all of
Speaker 1: that never came to be true. Four separate investigations. You know,
Speaker 1: there was a part of me for a long time
Speaker 1: heading into the twenty eighteen election, the midterms, where I'm like,
Speaker 1: we got to release the FISA warrant application, we got
Speaker 1: to release the Gang of Eight information, the three h
Speaker 1: two correspondence, the exculpatory evidence with her, we got to
Speaker 1: release all of this. In retrospect, I'd say, no, it
Speaker 1: would have been too early. And the decision I think
Speaker 1: is the right one, and that was to hold it
Speaker 1: because now that Mueller's done, and they're having a hard
Speaker 1: time accepting that part of it, the reality of today.
Speaker 1: Now that Mueller's done, there's nothing left for them, I mean,
Speaker 1: and to watch, you know, the flailing of Jerry Nadler,
Speaker 1: who's demanding that the Attorney General of the United States
Speaker 1: break the law and release grand jury materials. How do
Speaker 1: you asked, how do you ask the Attorney General of
Speaker 1: the United States to break a law? Because you are
Speaker 1: acting like a phony somehow that the Attorney General didn't
Speaker 1: hand over and it's not available to you all but
Speaker 1: one full sentence of the Mueller Report and seven partial
Speaker 1: sentences of the Muller Report. It's not like it is
Speaker 1: ninety nine point nine nine percent. They can see and
Speaker 1: they're acting like, you know, like they usually do, petulant
Speaker 1: children at this point that just can't get their way.
Speaker 1: So Mark Meadows was on Fox this morning. The delay
Speaker 1: is over, he said, the President serious. I've spoken to
Speaker 1: him recently, and I think declassification is right around the corner,
Speaker 1: and hopefully the American people will be able to judge
Speaker 1: for themselves. Now Gaudy has seen the documents, and as
Speaker 1: Meadows has pointed out, but we have come to the
Speaker 1: same conclusion, and that is Indeed, George Papadopoulos was actually
Speaker 1: taped and recorded saying that the documents would expose exculpatory
Speaker 1: information on the question of possible collusion between Trump campaign
Speaker 1: and Russia. The Trump campaign and Russia, Well, if that
Speaker 1: existed the whole time, and they've known it has existed
Speaker 1: the whole time, then how do you not hold the
Speaker 1: people responsible for this? You know, just like Struck in
Speaker 1: page in a moment of honesty with each other, laughing
Speaker 1: at the idea that this is any kind of real
Speaker 1: investigation into Hillary Clinton's email server and obstruction of justice.
Speaker 1: And I keeps telling you that if they cared about collusion,
Speaker 1: they'd be looking at Ukraine that has actual evidence and
Speaker 1: DNC emails and a whole story to tell us. They
Speaker 1: don't care about collusion. They only care about nailing Trump.
Speaker 1: They cared about obstruction. Donald Trump spoke out frequently that
Speaker 1: he's innocent. Okay, turns out, yeah, he was exonerated. Now
Speaker 1: for the fourth time with the Muller report, as it
Speaker 1: relates to any conspiracy to collude with the Russians and
Speaker 1: steal the election from Hillary, now we know just the
Speaker 1: opposite was true. I mean, how the operation crossfire her
Speaker 1: came becomes operation Boomerang. And the fact that here we
Speaker 1: have one campaign she was allowed to continue as the
Speaker 1: nominee because the FBI rigged that investigation. They knew she
Speaker 1: violated the Espionage Act. And with all the intent you
Speaker 1: could ever muster thirty three thousand subpoened emails, we know
Speaker 1: what happened to them too. That was to destroy the evidence.
Speaker 1: And they acted They don't care about obstruction. If it's Hillary,
Speaker 1: it's only Trump, just like they don't care about you know,
Speaker 1: all this talk about I believe we need to believe women.
Speaker 1: Only if it's Cavanaugh on high school, but not the
Speaker 1: current lieutenant governor in the state of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Speaker 1: It's ridiculous. A. Meadows also revealed that he and Papadoppolus
Speaker 1: have spoken about possible declassification, that if Trump declassifies the records,
Speaker 1: the American people will be astonished to see not only
Speaker 1: what was going on, and the President was right, he
Speaker 1: was actually taped and recorded, but other than that, he
Speaker 1: was not colluding with the Russians and they knew it
Speaker 1: early on. You know, So what was this all about.
Speaker 1: This was about literally saving one favored candidate, who again
Speaker 1: is not the loathsome Donald Trump, but the favored candidate
Speaker 1: that should win one hundred million to zero and whose
Speaker 1: voters are not smelly walmart people and irredeemable deplorables that
Speaker 1: cling to God, their Bibles, their guns, and religion. No,
Speaker 1: they they they set the path for Hillary now ignoring
Speaker 1: the fact that she did and pretty much rigged the
Speaker 1: system against Bernie Bernie had no shot. The whole thing
Speaker 1: was wrapped up behind the scenes. You can. They controlled everything.
Speaker 1: So it's gonna be a game changer, and it's gonna happen,
Speaker 1: and it's gonna happen quicker than you think. I am.
Speaker 1: We are any day week now away from this total
Speaker 1: avalanche of information. And I know the Democrats they can
Speaker 1: go on whatever. You know, Look at Joe Biden. Joe
Speaker 1: Biden announces that Pennsylvania's key for him to be elected
Speaker 1: president if he were to ever get the nomination. All right,
Speaker 1: so he has a big another big Philly campaign kickoff,
Speaker 1: and you know, Donald Trump gets these arenas a twenty
Speaker 1: twenty five thousand people and they're packed every time. And
Speaker 1: Trump supporters that appreciate the state of the economy and
Speaker 1: the president's leadership and fearlessness and taken on the fake
Speaker 1: news industry, they love to go see him. You know.
Speaker 1: It's like he's the only guy that doesn't play pianos,
Speaker 1: singing or a guitar drum that could captivate people to
Speaker 1: stand all those hours or wait out in the rain
Speaker 1: for twelve fourteen hours, as has happened many many times.
Speaker 1: But anyway, so Biden did another Philly rally again when
Speaker 1: he was there. The first time, you had job fairs
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania prisons going on. They have so much opportunity.
Speaker 1: They don't have enough workers in Pennsylvania. In large part
Speaker 1: because of the fracking industry and the good economy. The
Speaker 1: steel industry has come back. The President's fighting against these tariffs,
Speaker 1: against these countries that take advantage of us. They're not
Speaker 1: using our products and not buying our cars and not
Speaker 1: buying our steel. But we're letting all that crap into
Speaker 1: this country. And you know what that means, American jobs.
Speaker 1: We need an equal playing field. It can't have a
Speaker 1: five hundred billion dollar trade deficit with China anyway. So
Speaker 1: maybe crowds don't matter, crowd size don't matter. But I'm
Speaker 1: gonna tell you something. You go back and look at
Speaker 1: Obama and his run, and it's pretty trade's parent that
Speaker 1: there was something serious in terms of a movement for Obama.
Speaker 1: We tried to do our very best and vet him
Speaker 1: when others would not. Anyway, so Biden's press accounts, you know,
Speaker 1: they put the audience at six thousand people, which was
Speaker 1: less than half the number of supporters. Trump routinely against
Speaker 1: for just an average rally. And while speaking, you know, well,
Speaker 1: I guess a stone's throw from your movie Rocky. They
Speaker 1: have a statue there in Philadelphia for the launch of
Speaker 1: his campaign, this was the birthplace of our democracy. Well,
Speaker 1: the crowd numbered less than six thousand. It had a
Speaker 1: capacity crowd for one hundred thousand. That's pretty embarrassing. That
Speaker 1: looks pretty bad. And so yeah, old Joe was up
Speaker 1: against some pretty tough competition. He was up against the
Speaker 1: Italian Market Festival. I guess he didn't didn't He wasn't
Speaker 1: the big draw that weekend. So I think that's all
Speaker 1: of this is playing into account here. It's got to
Speaker 1: be taken into account. We're gonna have a quintessential compare
Speaker 1: and contrast election. This is what we call a choice election.
Speaker 1: You have the Biden Obama failed policies of the past,
Speaker 1: or you stay the course. Are you better off than
Speaker 1: you were four years ago? And are you better off
Speaker 1: dramatically so four years ago with Donald Trump's plans and
Speaker 1: those that were most disproportionately negatively impacted in the Biden
Speaker 1: Obama years. Minorities, Asian Americans, African Americans, Hispanic Americans, and women,
Speaker 1: they are leading the charge and getting the most benefit
Speaker 1: of the Trump economic policies. By the way, Jason Amasha
Speaker 1: already has a primary challenger for being He's an idiot.
Speaker 1: He's always been an idiot. I'm justin Omasha. Sorry. All right,
Speaker 1: we got some AOC news and we have these polls.
Speaker 1: We're gonna go over. I think that the person that
Speaker 1: captured what's really gone on as it relates to post
Speaker 1: Muller report that part of Trump's presidency is Byron York.
Speaker 1: I'll share that with you today. New Gangridge is going
Speaker 1: to check in and we have a brand new study
Speaker 1: on the Hispanic American community and Donald Trump and what
Speaker 1: opportunities lie are available for him. And there's a ton
Speaker 1: all right. Congresswoman, well really speaker, because Nancy Pelosi's speaker
Speaker 1: in name only. The speaker of the House of Representatives
Speaker 1: is Congresswoman Nicasio Cortez. And she's now issued a retraction
Speaker 1: regarding her big prediction and policy pronouncement, and she now
Speaker 1: says she does not believe that the world is going
Speaker 1: to end in twelve years unless we adopt her green
Speaker 1: New Deal. I think that the part of it that
Speaker 1: is generational is that pennials and people and you know,
Speaker 1: gen Z and all these folks that come after us
Speaker 1: are looking up and we're like, the world is going
Speaker 1: to end in twelve years if we don't address climate change.
Speaker 1: And your biggest issue is your biggest issue is how
Speaker 1: are we going to pay for it? And like this
Speaker 1: is the war, this is our World War two sounds
Speaker 1: pretty real to me. Sounds like doom and gloom and
Speaker 1: the end of the world as we know. But why
Speaker 1: do we have to if the world's going to end
Speaker 1: in twelve years, why do we have to give up oil, gas, cows.
Speaker 1: I want my steak, my last meal. I want to
Speaker 1: be a cow. I want cows for everybody when the
Speaker 1: world's going to end, one last flight on an airplane
Speaker 1: before we go under. Anyway, now she's saying, this is
Speaker 1: a technique of the GOP to take dry humor and
Speaker 1: sarcasm literally and fact check it. Like the world ending
Speaker 1: in twelve years thing you have to have, you know,
Speaker 1: the social intelligence of a c sponge to think it's literal.
Speaker 1: And she wrote in a tweet published on Mother's Day, anyways,
Speaker 1: she I think she meant it. By the way, Adam
Speaker 1: Schiff says, a Trump is reelected. We're done, We're finished.
Speaker 1: And then Acasio Cortez says, the GOP doesn't care about babies.
Speaker 1: They want hell on Earth. That's a that's how does
Speaker 1: she don't wake up every day? I want hell on Earth?
Speaker 1: She's right, everyone does, right, all right, twenty five till
Speaker 1: the top of the hour, eight hundred nine four one Sean,
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's funny to watch just how radically left
Speaker 1: this new Democratic Party has become. And yeah, I mean
Speaker 1: there's things you can joke about. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: AOC held onto that stupid idea for the longest time.
Speaker 1: You know, the world's ending in twelve years, but we're
Speaker 1: gonna do it in ten. I'm like, okay, why all
Speaker 1: the work if there's only two extra years left? Anyway,
Speaker 1: and it didn't make sense, and then she starts with
Speaker 1: this I guess this was over the weekend, and it
Speaker 1: just it's mind numbing stupidity. But it also shows what
Speaker 1: where the Democrats heads are. You know, Harry Reid, I
Speaker 1: remember after they beat Mitt Romney, it was directly he said, hey,
Speaker 1: he had problems with his taxes. Remember he attacked his
Speaker 1: business and he made a definitive statement. It was a
Speaker 1: total lie. And then he goes, do you have any
Speaker 1: regrets at all about telling people that something is true
Speaker 1: and it's not. He goes, we won, didn't we? And
Speaker 1: that's that's why every two to four years you get
Speaker 1: the same pattern. She says to the GOP extremist trying
Speaker 1: to invoke the unborn to jail people for abortion. Where
Speaker 1: are you on climate change? Oh? Right, you want to
Speaker 1: burn fossil fuels till the there's hell on earth? Oh?
Speaker 1: Is this more hyperbole on her part or is this
Speaker 1: how she really feels? You know, if they were painful,
Speaker 1: you want, you know, hell on earth, If they were
Speaker 1: truthful about their motives, they'd be consistent in their principles.
Speaker 1: They are not. No Republicans. Putting Alabama and that issue
Speaker 1: aside for a second. Roe v. Wade is the law
Speaker 1: of the land. I can tell you with a thousand
Speaker 1: percent certainty that anybody in New York, New Jersey, California, Illinois,
Speaker 1: and many other states, if they want an abortion, that is,
Speaker 1: whether Roe stays or not, that is the law of
Speaker 1: the land. What Roe would do it be allow the
Speaker 1: states to decide. Well, look at the state of New York.
Speaker 1: Look at the governors in look at Newsome Mountain, California.
Speaker 1: I know people are leaving in droves because of the
Speaker 1: financial situation they put people in. But this is what
Speaker 1: you get. This is the you talk about demonization. This
Speaker 1: is what Accascio Cortez does. This is what all of
Speaker 1: the Democrats do. What are they providing in terms of
Speaker 1: anything that will improve the lives of the American people?
Speaker 1: The one issue alone, we can get more. We kill
Speaker 1: more birds with one stone than any other, and that's energy.
Speaker 1: We don't have to rely on countries that hate us,
Speaker 1: the guaranteed instability in the Middle East anymore. We are
Speaker 1: now energy independent for the first time in seventy five years.
Speaker 1: We're now a net exporter of energy. That means a
Speaker 1: lot of money coming into our country. That will also
Speaker 1: help fix the trade imbalances. If you want to bring
Speaker 1: Putin to his knees, this is the way to do it.
Speaker 1: Because as soon as we can figure out a way
Speaker 1: to cheaply get energy, oil natural gas to our allies
Speaker 1: in Europe, guess what, they don't have to rely on
Speaker 1: the hostile regime of Vladimir Putin in Russia. That and
Speaker 1: think what happens here? You know, eighty thousand dollars a year,
Speaker 1: ninety thousand dollars a year if they train you to
Speaker 1: drive a truck and all the overtime you can handle. Well,
Speaker 1: what does that mean if you're making thirty five or
Speaker 1: forty grand, Well, that means you doubled your lifestyle and
Speaker 1: you're probably living in an area that is more affordable
Speaker 1: for you and your family. Two pipelines now on track
Speaker 1: to be built. Anmar is opened up. Regulation after regulation
Speaker 1: is you know, gone because of the President, not because
Speaker 1: of the Republicans. And you know, why is it that
Speaker 1: this for? How do you get to say they want
Speaker 1: dirty air and dirty water? Remember Obama said their plan
Speaker 1: is for dirty air and dirty water. I drink the water,
Speaker 1: and I breathe the air, and my kids drink the water.
Speaker 1: That's my plan, A plan. Got their plan, which is
Speaker 1: let's have dirty your air, dirtyr water less people with
Speaker 1: health insurance. All right, so so far, at least I
Speaker 1: feel better about my plan. I feel better about Yeah,
Speaker 1: every parent I know that's a good servative wants dirty
Speaker 1: air and water for their kids. Everybody. It's true, he's there.
Speaker 1: They're telling the truth. Every Republican. They don't want to
Speaker 1: heal Grandma. They want to take Grandma for a walk
Speaker 1: and find a big cliff and throw Granny over the cliff.
Speaker 1: That's what they want to do. And they don't care
Speaker 1: about anybody else but themselves. This is what they'd have
Speaker 1: you believed. And Acacio Quartet is perfect latest example. She said,
Speaker 1: the GOP doesn't care about babies at all. Well, I
Speaker 1: would say that maybe the governor and the Commonwealth of
Speaker 1: Virginia that says, well, first you'll deliver the baby. If
Speaker 1: a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly
Speaker 1: what would happen. The infant would be delivered, the infant
Speaker 1: would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if
Speaker 1: if that's what the mother and the family desired. And
Speaker 1: then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother, Oh,
Speaker 1: make the baby, come to deliver the baby, make it comfortable,
Speaker 1: and then the mother decides, ah, I know, I keep
Speaker 1: this one or not. Let me make a decision here. Look,
Speaker 1: there are differences. Most people that I know in my
Speaker 1: life now now understand, I know a lot of people
Speaker 1: in New York. They would identify and say that they
Speaker 1: are pro choice. When they hear this, they are disgusted.
Speaker 1: That is murder and infanticide. That is not abortion at
Speaker 1: that point, now, when does life begin? Well, everybody's gonna
Speaker 1: have to make up their own mind on that. What
Speaker 1: I would prefer is an educated population where people understand
Speaker 1: consequences for their many decisions, because everybody has a choice
Speaker 1: in the process of leading up to the act that
Speaker 1: causes the baby to be born or one some type
Speaker 1: of embryo to be formed, and there are ways to
Speaker 1: prevent it. There's a lot of way to prevent it.
Speaker 1: You don't have to, you know, worry about it, but
Speaker 1: that's up to other people. But that this is where
Speaker 1: they go. And she said if they cared about babies,
Speaker 1: they'd co sponsor the Green New Deal or at least
Speaker 1: have a real climate plan, guarantee healthcare so all can
Speaker 1: get prenatal care, not stand for the death and caging
Speaker 1: of babies on our border. The one guy that changed
Speaker 1: that policy is in the White House now because the
Speaker 1: previous two presidents didn't change the policy. But you didn't
Speaker 1: care then because their last name wasn't Trump. So again
Speaker 1: it's it's more fein selective moral outrage. Havanaugh care about.
Speaker 1: I believe every allegation. And almost every weekend they were
Speaker 1: drugging girls, lining up in the halls and systematically gang
Speaker 1: raping them every other weekend, and nobody ever told the story.
Speaker 1: Then the lady gets in every well. I never saw
Speaker 1: him spiked the punch. I did see him with a
Speaker 1: red Solo cup. He was near the punch bowl. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he was in a hall. I saw him in the hole.
Speaker 1: He wasn't lined up in the hall. And I believe,
Speaker 1: I believe. I believe there's no eye believers violent rape
Speaker 1: and violent sexual assault by credible women that told the
Speaker 1: friends they have at the time what had happened. I
Speaker 1: don't hear any eye believers for the Lieutenant Governor of
Speaker 1: the Commonwealth for Virginia. It's just it's phony, hypocrisy. It's
Speaker 1: just a political game to them. They know that there
Speaker 1: was no collusion with Russia. They know if they really
Speaker 1: cared about collusion, they would be demanding the Ukraine handover
Speaker 1: that which they want to give us, which proves collusion
Speaker 1: on the part of the DNC to create chaos and
Speaker 1: help Pillary win and get dirt on Paul Manafort. Going
Speaker 1: back all those years, you have one liberal all third
Speaker 1: this fran Lebowitz suggesting Trump deserves the same gruesome fate
Speaker 1: as Saudi journalist Jamal Kashagi. Wow, what a nice, kind
Speaker 1: hearted liberal she is. Oh, and this is really so powerful.
Speaker 1: When dozens walk out of Mike Pence's commencement speech at
Speaker 1: Taylor University, I can't. You can't even such a snowflake.
Speaker 1: You can't even listen to other people's points of view.
Speaker 1: Who's more open minded? I have plenty of liberals. I
Speaker 1: debate all the time, and I'm confident that if you're
Speaker 1: a fairly informed conservative and you're having a debate with
Speaker 1: any liberal that on substance, you are going to win.
Speaker 1: When conservative of principles are applied by leadership, in this
Speaker 1: case it's Donald Trump. It works. We need a less
Speaker 1: activist court, so he is picking constitutionalist originalist for the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court. By the way, a promise he made, a
Speaker 1: promise he kept. John Kennedy did it, Ronald Reagan did,
Speaker 1: and now Trump is doing it. Largest tax cuts in
Speaker 1: American history, the greatest amount of deregulation that has happened
Speaker 1: in a hundred years. And look what's happening to the economy.
Speaker 1: We have one point seven million jobs available, more jobs
Speaker 1: available than we have people on unemployment. Why isn't that happening?
Speaker 1: By the way, early polls show always show Republicans are behind.
Speaker 1: If you look at the history, they're gonna tell you
Speaker 1: that whoever the Democrat is, they're trying to push this
Speaker 1: Mayor peat guy, he's just the radical leftist extremist. You
Speaker 1: know that looks like he's, you know, hanging out at
Speaker 1: some IVY school fraternity party and nobody's looking at his record.
Speaker 1: Nobody knows anything about him except Mayor Pete. Well, they
Speaker 1: don't treat Trump like Mayor Pete, and I don't know. Well,
Speaker 1: we're gonna watch all of this. But he defends a
Speaker 1: Buddha what's his name, Buddha. Judge defended a woman's right
Speaker 1: to third trimester abortion. He played said it this weekend. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he become president of policies, would you put in place
Speaker 1: to protect every woman, regardless of her zip codes, right
Speaker 1: to have an abortion? Thank you? So. I believe that
Speaker 1: the right of a woman to make her own decisions
Speaker 1: about her reproductive health and about her body is a
Speaker 1: national right. I believe it's an American freedom, and I
Speaker 1: believe that should be enjoyed by women everywhere. Do you believe,
Speaker 1: at any point in pregnancy, whether it's a six weeks
Speaker 1: or eight weeks or twenty four weeks or whenever, that
Speaker 1: there should be any limit on a woman's right to
Speaker 1: have an abortion. I think the dialogue has got so
Speaker 1: caught up on where you draw the line that we've
Speaker 1: gotten away from the fundamental question of who gets to
Speaker 1: draw the line. And I trust women to draw the
Speaker 1: line when it's their own. So just a big clair,
Speaker 1: just a bit clair. You're saying that you would be
Speaker 1: okay with a woman well into the third trimester deciding
Speaker 1: to abort her pregnant. Look, these hypotheticals are usually set
Speaker 1: up in order to provoke a strong so it's not hypothetical.
Speaker 1: There's six thousand women a year who got abortions in
Speaker 1: the third that's right, representing less than one percent of cases.
Speaker 1: It how do you get that heartless? The woman, if
Speaker 1: you remember, in the House of Commons in Virginia that
Speaker 1: was producing this bill the day she was the one
Speaker 1: that testified, Well, she asked the question, well, what if
Speaker 1: a woman's giving birth, what if the woman's dilating? Dilating
Speaker 1: means you are now in the birthing process. Kathy Tran
Speaker 1: I think it was her name. The same day she
Speaker 1: she also sponsored a bill to save the butterflies the
Speaker 1: same exact day. How late in the third trimester could
Speaker 1: have a physician perform an abortion if he indicated it
Speaker 1: would impair the mental health of the of the woman
Speaker 1: or physical health. Okay, okay, I'm talking about the mental health.
Speaker 1: So I mean through the third trimester. The third trimester
Speaker 1: goes all the way up to weeks okay, but to
Speaker 1: the end of the third trimester, yep. I don't think
Speaker 1: we have a limit in the bill. So where it's
Speaker 1: obvious that a woman is about to give birth, she
Speaker 1: has physical signs that she is about to give a birth,
Speaker 1: would that still be a point at which she could
Speaker 1: request an abortion if she was so certified she's dilating,
Speaker 1: mister chairman, that would be a you know, a decision
Speaker 1: that the doctor, the physician and the woman understand that.
Speaker 1: I'm asking you if your bill allows that. My bill
Speaker 1: would allow that. Yes, it allows a baby the moment
Speaker 1: it's being born to be killed. Do you really do
Speaker 1: you identify with this party? Do you identify the no
Speaker 1: more oil or gas the life blood of our economy
Speaker 1: is going to be no more combustion engine. Every house
Speaker 1: in building would be retrofitted. We can't ask how we're
Speaker 1: gonna pay for all of that, and then we're gonna
Speaker 1: eliminate airplanes and cows and get These people have lost
Speaker 1: their minds. But it's not just a few. It is
Speaker 1: now the mainstream of the Democratic Party and their base.
Speaker 1: It's just like byron Yorke writes, this piece was an
Speaker 1: amazing piece that he wrote. Muller changed everything. You know
Speaker 1: they change is very simple. Muller could not establish there
Speaker 1: was any conspiracy or coordination between Russia and Trump and
Speaker 1: the campaign to fix the twenty sixteen elec That's why
Speaker 1: they're not going to admit in the media or in
Speaker 1: the Democratic Socialist extreme Radical Party that they were wrong.
Speaker 1: They're just gonna keep well, let's let's see as taxes now.
Speaker 1: Let's demand that Don McGann, who is the White House counsel,
Speaker 1: appeared before Congress. Let's demand Don Junior come back. Let's
Speaker 1: bring everybody back so they can answer the same questions
Speaker 1: again and you get the same answers. None of this
Speaker 1: is happening. That's a good part. You know, without the
Speaker 1: judgment of conspiracy in the case of Russia or collusion,
Speaker 1: everything else has shrunk. As Byron York has put in there,
Speaker 1: they were so convinced in their own line and their
Speaker 1: own anonymous sourcing, their own hysterical reporting, their own I've
Speaker 1: never seen anything like it. They're so convinced to this day.
Speaker 1: They can't handle the truth that Trump won, and they
Speaker 1: can't handle Muller didn't deliver, and they just hate this
Speaker 1: guy so much. There's nothing that they're going to stop
Speaker 1: at when it comes to denying Donald Trump reelection victory.
Speaker 1: Whinny wins reelection, and he has a very good shot.
Speaker 1: I don't like to predict this far out in advance.
Speaker 1: We don't know what the issues that define this upcoming
Speaker 1: presidential election will be until like the day before. That's
Speaker 1: why I hate a lot of early voting. What if
Speaker 1: something changes last second. As they say in My Big Business,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna I'm gonna give you the whole load. Today
Speaker 1: I got the first sort of mainstream African American who
Speaker 1: is articulate and bright and clean and myce locking guy.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's a story book you're telling me. We
Speaker 1: got to go spend money to keep her going bankrupt.
Speaker 1: I don't know my state. My state was a slave state.
Speaker 1: My state is a border state. My state is the
Speaker 1: eighth largest black population in the country. My state is
Speaker 1: anything from a northeast liberal state. You cannot go to
Speaker 1: a seven eleven or Duncan Donuts unless you have a
Speaker 1: slight Indian accent. I'm not telling me is mom lived
Speaker 1: in in Long Island for ten years or so. God
Speaker 1: rest her soul and uh um, although she's wait, your
Speaker 1: mom's still Your mom's still alive as your dad passed,
Speaker 1: God bless her soul. A man who will be the
Speaker 1: next President of the United States America, Hillary Clinton, is
Speaker 1: as qualified or more qualified than I am to be
Speaker 1: Vice President United States of America. Let's get that straight.
Speaker 1: And quite frankly, it might have been a better pick
Speaker 1: than me. So let me say it again. Thank you, Terry,
Speaker 1: and thank you doctor Pepper, and thank you Chancellor. Doctor Paper.
Speaker 1: Romney wants to let the he said in the first
Speaker 1: hundred days, He's gonna let the big banks once again
Speaker 1: write their own rules on chain Wall Street. You're gonna
Speaker 1: put you all back in chains. Think about what happened
Speaker 1: out in We're Dad be different. My good friend was shot,
Speaker 1: I mortally wounded. Well, I say, they're going to start
Speaker 1: to see unemployment grow this spring, going to take employment grow.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. Number one job facing the middle class, and
Speaker 1: it happens to be, as Barrock says, a three letter
Speaker 1: word jobs job. See. I went to the big guys
Speaker 1: for the money. I was ready to prostitute myself and
Speaker 1: the men and men in which I talked about it,
Speaker 1: Chuck Graham, State senators here stock stand up, shock, don't
Speaker 1: see it? Oh God, love you? What am I talking about?
Speaker 1: I tell you what you're making everybody else stand up? Though? Pal,
Speaker 1: you know if Donald Trump said any of this crazy
Speaker 1: stuff that you hear out of creepy crazy, well lazy
Speaker 1: uncle Joe, he just can you imagine, man, for the
Speaker 1: first time ever you have a mainstream African American who
Speaker 1: is articulate and bright and clean. I'm like, yeah, good
Speaker 1: Donald Trump ever says that God help us, and then
Speaker 1: of course everyone forgets it was Joe Biden. Well, he didn't.
Speaker 1: He wanted to keep segregated schools. Joe Biden and Anita Hill. Oh,
Speaker 1: let me go on another apology tour. But I don't
Speaker 1: even think that's what's going to define the twenty twenty election.
Speaker 1: All of this Russias stuff happened on their watch. They
Speaker 1: all were worn They let it happen, and Devin Newness
Speaker 1: was warning them in twenty fourteen. Then you got the
Speaker 1: crappy economy, which I've been talking about today that they
Speaker 1: left us. And you know what, we're gonna go over
Speaker 1: a study that's out there today, those people that were
Speaker 1: most negatively impacted by the Biden Obama years and their
Speaker 1: horrible economic plan. Thirteen million more Americans food stamps, eight
Speaker 1: million more poverty, and the worst recovery since the forties.
Speaker 1: You gotta remember, we now have millions of Americans off
Speaker 1: of food stamps, out of poverty, getting career jobs built.
Speaker 1: We're at near full employment, with three point six being
Speaker 1: the number of unemployed, the lowest that's been in decades.
Speaker 1: Like every other low record, low unemployment, African Americans, Hispanic Americans,
Speaker 1: Asian Americans, women in the workplace, youth unemployment. You know,
Speaker 1: they've got a run on this record. And Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: everyone says, well, he's the favorite. Right now. I'd like
Speaker 1: to hear him defend it, because I don't think he
Speaker 1: can and then how does he deal with the fringed
Speaker 1: lunatics that want to get rid of oil, gas, cars,
Speaker 1: combustion engine and oh, cows and planes and everything else
Speaker 1: is free anyway? Joining us former Speaker of the House,
Speaker 1: nuke Ing Gingrich is now best selling book. It's called Collusion,
Speaker 1: Ripped from Today's Headlines, a novel that he co wrote
Speaker 1: with Peter Early. How are you, my friend, Good to
Speaker 1: have you back. I'm doing well. Let me ask you this.
Speaker 1: So I've talked to you a lot about the deep state.
Speaker 1: We talked about Russia. We now everything that happened was
Speaker 1: under Obama's watch. It seems now we're in the office
Speaker 1: of the Attorney General at the time, Loretta Lynch, Biden
Speaker 1: and Obama, we know they were Oval office meetings about it,
Speaker 1: then the economy, then foreign policy. Well, how do they
Speaker 1: win when we compare and contrast the records of Trump
Speaker 1: to the record of Obama and Biden. Well, when I say,
Speaker 1: first of all, I do hope that both Senator Lindsey
Speaker 1: Graham an Attorney General bar are going to follow the
Speaker 1: lines you're outlining. And I hope that over the next
Speaker 1: year we're going to learn a great deal more about
Speaker 1: how really sick the system was, how close we were
Speaker 1: to a coup data, and how far they went to
Speaker 1: protect Hillary Clinton, who was clearly engaged in behaviors that
Speaker 1: were felonies. But having said that, I think the challenge
Speaker 1: that you and I face, and I say this from
Speaker 1: being out here. I'm talking to you from from Los
Speaker 1: Angeles today and talking to people all over southern California.
Speaker 1: We represent the party that thinks that facts matter. They
Speaker 1: represent a party of pure emotion, and so their hope
Speaker 1: is that they can somehow, you know, cry at the
Speaker 1: right moment and illustrate the passion and depth of their
Speaker 1: sincerity so that we will then overlook the fact that
Speaker 1: they're crazy. And I think that's that's the heart of
Speaker 1: their appeal. It's not a fact, And I think that's
Speaker 1: why we sometimes have debates where you have two totally
Speaker 1: different languages. We use the language of fact. They use
Speaker 1: the language of emotion, because it's all emotion and facts
Speaker 1: no matter. They can lie enthusiastically, so you hear. I mean,
Speaker 1: some of the things Biden has said, for example, are
Speaker 1: so disgusting and so destructive. Anybody says them while saying,
Speaker 1: you know, we need to really come together, and then
Speaker 1: he says three or four really divisive things in a
Speaker 1: row as part of his idea of how we come together.
Speaker 1: You look at the nutty positions that all of these
Speaker 1: candidates are taking right, A lot of it is and
Speaker 1: I think you're right. Emotionally, people can be sold. Well,
Speaker 1: if you're going to take care of my child's daycare
Speaker 1: and you're going to send my kid to nursery school
Speaker 1: and we're gonna have kindergarten through the end of college,
Speaker 1: and I'm going to get a guaranteed job. I'm going
Speaker 1: to get a guaranteed vacation from the government, guaranteed healthy
Speaker 1: food from the government, and you know, I mean, whether
Speaker 1: I'm willing or unwilling to work, every person has the
Speaker 1: natural stress in their lives of providing and working and producing.
Speaker 1: To me, you're literally ripping the guts out of somebody's
Speaker 1: somebody's natural talents that will never come to fruition because
Speaker 1: they won't feel the stress and pressure that it makes
Speaker 1: us great, It makes us take deep. But I think
Speaker 1: part of the problem we have and you and I
Speaker 1: have known each other for many, many years, and we've
Speaker 1: both been deeply concerned about this conservatives don't have the
Speaker 1: guts to be as emotionally intense as liberals. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna steguing example, I'm gonna stay right now. I'm
Speaker 1: in the Los Angeles, sixty thousand people on the streets.
Speaker 1: That should be totally unacceptable, and yet that's what the
Speaker 1: giant government of California has produced Nancy Pelosi's hometown. I
Speaker 1: did research over the weekend, and it helps explain how
Speaker 1: nuty Pelosi is in San Francisco. If you walk your
Speaker 1: dog without a pooper scooper, there's a three hundred twenty
Speaker 1: dollars fine, But if you defecate on the street, it's okay.
Speaker 1: So if you're walking your dog and you get your
Speaker 1: pooper scooper and the police walk up and you're next
Speaker 1: to a bunch of poop, you're supposed to say, oh,
Speaker 1: I did it, it's not my dog, I did it,
Speaker 1: and summarily that's okay. Just explains half of the insanity
Speaker 1: of this party, mister speaker. I sent my cameras twice
Speaker 1: to Pelosi's district, literally outside her walled in gated community
Speaker 1: of really wealthy Silicon Valley folks, and she's bore tens
Speaker 1: and tens of millions of dollars one mile less than
Speaker 1: a mile from there, and on the other side of town,
Speaker 1: less than a mile from her office. We have shown
Speaker 1: needles everywhere. We have shown human feces all over the streets.
Speaker 1: The conditions are squalor. And I said, well, I know
Speaker 1: liberals are only generous with other people's money. But can't
Speaker 1: she say, I'm going to give a million knock on
Speaker 1: the door of every neighbor. Can you you give me
Speaker 1: a million? These people are loaded? And why don't we
Speaker 1: build a homeless shelter that provides counseling, you know, a
Speaker 1: few hot meals in a shower for people. Let's start
Speaker 1: with that. But but well, but I also think we
Speaker 1: ought to say to people, you know, just understand the
Speaker 1: Pelosi Democrats want to do for you what they've done
Speaker 1: for the poor in San Francisco. Yeah, exactly. There's a
Speaker 1: great point or Los Angeles. How why are all of
Speaker 1: these states New York, New Jersey, Illinois and Law and California.
Speaker 1: Why are they losing so much population? In Texas and
Speaker 1: Tennessee and Florida and the Carolinians? Why are they gaining
Speaker 1: so much population? Right? And I think that's why we
Speaker 1: have to drive home and then frankly the other place
Speaker 1: where we got to be just tougher. It really hit me.
Speaker 1: I had a speech last night, was about eight hundred
Speaker 1: people at the Republican Jewish Coalition, and as we were
Speaker 1: talking about what's going on, it occurred to me, you know,
Speaker 1: we need to say anti Semitism is evil. Anti Semitism
Speaker 1: led to the Holocaust. Anybody in the Congress is anti
Speaker 1: Semitic should be stripped of all of their committee assignments
Speaker 1: because what they're advocating is genuinely evil. It's not just bad,
Speaker 1: it's not just wrong, it's evil. They don't have the
Speaker 1: courage to do it. They're never gonna do it. No,
Speaker 1: But but that ought to be the standard that we
Speaker 1: in the country set. And then if they want to
Speaker 1: say no, we'd rather protect evil. Let's be clear where
Speaker 1: the Democrats are at. I mean, if they want to
Speaker 1: protect evil, that's their prerogaties, but I don't think they
Speaker 1: can sustain that in most of the country. I don't think. Look,
Speaker 1: the question then becomes, this is going to be regardless
Speaker 1: of who the Democrats pick, this is going to be
Speaker 1: a classic choice election. Two very different competing visions for
Speaker 1: the future. Now, I could see people saying, well, if
Speaker 1: you guarantee me healthcare, well, how to keep your doctor
Speaker 1: plan and save money, work out. But you're gonna guarantee
Speaker 1: me Medicare for all. You're gonna guarantee edge action through college,
Speaker 1: starting with that daycare. You're going to guarantee me a job,
Speaker 1: Guarantee me healthy food, guarantee me all of this. And
Speaker 1: when you ask these people how they're going to pay
Speaker 1: for it, they can't answer because the medic care for
Speaker 1: all part of it would take up ninety percent of
Speaker 1: the budget in the ten years you're going to do it.
Speaker 1: But I think I think we should champaign, having the
Speaker 1: country choose between winners and whiners. If you want to
Speaker 1: be a winner, if you want a chance at a
Speaker 1: better future, if you think you can do better than
Speaker 1: some bureaucrat controlling your life, you ought to be with us.
Speaker 1: But if you approach life whining all day every day.
Speaker 1: If you think going to the Civil Union for a
Speaker 1: honeymoon and really loving Joe Stalin is a cool thing,
Speaker 1: you ought to be for them. You shouldn't run just
Speaker 1: because of the fact he looked naked in that picture.
Speaker 1: I'm like, oh gosh, what is he doing? Well, what
Speaker 1: are they doing over there? All right, quick break, We'll
Speaker 1: come back more with New king Ridge's new book Collusion,
Speaker 1: out in books is everywhere now bestseller. You're gonna love it,
Speaker 1: ripped from the headlines of today and will continue. I
Speaker 1: would continue the former Speaker of the House, New king
Speaker 1: Rich his new book Collusion. By the way, it's on
Speaker 1: Hannity dot com, Amazon dot com, bookstores, everywhere. You know,
Speaker 1: you all us talk about Russia, you know how we
Speaker 1: would bring putin the hostile actor that he is in Russia,
Speaker 1: the hostile regime to their knees. It's called energy. Remember
Speaker 1: you had a campaign, what was it, the campaign called
Speaker 1: pay less? I think I think it's fair now, I
Speaker 1: think it's fair to say we had a campaign. We
Speaker 1: did you drove it to a national importance? Was drill here?
Speaker 1: Drill now? Pay less? Right? Obama attacked me personally and said,
Speaker 1: this is terrible demagoguy because they wrote a book called
Speaker 1: gasoline two fifty a gallon, So that's impossible. You know,
Speaker 1: we have peak oil. We will never do this. I
Speaker 1: kept saying, there's this thing called fracking. But again, they
Speaker 1: are the party of emotional sentiment with zero knowledge. I
Speaker 1: think they literally didn't believe that it was possible to
Speaker 1: generate franking in North Dakota alone, jump their proven reserves
Speaker 1: from eight hundred million to twenty four billion in North
Speaker 1: Dakota alone. We're now the dominant energy producer in the world,
Speaker 1: first time in seventy five years. We're energy independent, We
Speaker 1: don't have to beg those countries that hate us for anything,
Speaker 1: and a net exporter of energy. The challenge for me
Speaker 1: is how do we get it to Western Europe Asia
Speaker 1: cheaper than Putin. We think we solve that problem. Putin
Speaker 1: is on his knees. Rush is done as we know it.
Speaker 1: That's right, and that's why we actually have a big
Speaker 1: program on liquefied natural gas doing precisely that and offering
Speaker 1: an alternative to relying on the Russians. But I also
Speaker 1: think we want to say the average American, you want
Speaker 1: to live in a country that is the dominant energy
Speaker 1: producer in the world, that creates jobs in the energy field,
Speaker 1: lowers the cost of energy In the US, it's eight
Speaker 1: times as expensive to use natural gas for manufacturing in
Speaker 1: Tokyo as it is in the United States. Now you
Speaker 1: like the jobs in Ohioland by the way, Ohiolands get this.
Speaker 1: Ohio's gone from being a marginal state to being a
Speaker 1: solid Trump state because they're seeing how many jobs are
Speaker 1: coming into Ohio. These are high paying career jobs. Truck
Speaker 1: drivers in the oil and natural gas industry are being
Speaker 1: trained starting at eighty grand ninety grand a year and
Speaker 1: all the overtime you can get. And if we mainstream
Speaker 1: that in this country, we will see a rising tide
Speaker 1: and literally lifting to people to a brand new level
Speaker 1: of wealth and happiness. Sean, do you realize what a
Speaker 1: vicious thing you're saying. I'm a horrible person. They won't
Speaker 1: need food stamps, okay, public housing, they won't be on Medicaid,
Speaker 1: and they'll take vacations and buy a house and send
Speaker 1: their kids to the school they dream of. Yeah, that
Speaker 1: would be cool for everybody, wouldn't it. So if you're
Speaker 1: a liberal, so let's think about how horrifying this is.
Speaker 1: I gotta go though, all right. The book is called Collusion.
Speaker 1: Mister speaker, thank you. We'll see you on Hannity tonight
Speaker 1: nine Eastern Fox News. We'll take a quick break when
Speaker 1: we come back. We'll get to the phones and then
Speaker 1: our news round up information overload. We've got new data
Speaker 1: on how the trends look demographically when you break down
Speaker 1: demographics for elections, with the Hispanic community looking pretty good
Speaker 1: for Trump and a lot of opportunities there. Straight ahead,
Speaker 1: all right, twenty five now till the top of the
Speaker 1: all right, as we've been telling you last week, Ethan
Speaker 1: who works with us, he's just a great kid and
Speaker 1: he all right, enough with the baby noise there is.
Speaker 1: We told everybody that there is a new addition to
Speaker 1: the Hannity Show family. And Ethan and his wife just
Speaker 1: had a beautiful baby, seven pounds ten ounces, Caleb Joseph Keller.
Speaker 1: Only took them like four days to pick the name.
Speaker 1: After the kids come on, it's their first him. Give
Speaker 1: him a little leeway. How long did it take you
Speaker 1: and your wife to pick up the kids names? I
Speaker 1: don't remember. I just don't. But you know, it's an
Speaker 1: important decision. I mean, sometimes I hear names that people
Speaker 1: want want to name their kids. I'm like, oh, no,
Speaker 1: that kid's gonna be ridiculed for the rest of They're
Speaker 1: just glad it's not another John or another Michael. That's
Speaker 1: just anyway. Congratulations to everybody, and when they come back,
Speaker 1: we'll ask Jason what he'd name his child. Yeah, what
Speaker 1: would you name your child? Jason? You don't you don't
Speaker 1: want kids? All right? I didn't say I don't want them,
Speaker 1: It's just that I would take Well, how many years
Speaker 1: have we been together? And even when we didn't you know,
Speaker 1: you've known me since nineteen ninety eight, right, but for
Speaker 1: all these years I know you as the concert You're
Speaker 1: the perpetual bachelor. You're you don't want to get married
Speaker 1: because you have a million chances to get married. You
Speaker 1: don't want to say a million, but there have been opportunities,
Speaker 1: and right, marriage is just marriage just seems to be
Speaker 1: like a very miserable proposition for people. Oh boy, well,
Speaker 1: we have a picture of the baby, Caleb Joseph Keller
Speaker 1: and mother and baby are doing great, Thank goodness. And
Speaker 1: by the way, we got to honor. Linda's not here.
Speaker 1: When is she back this week? Do we know? Anyway?
Speaker 1: So there is this thing called the Alliance for Women
Speaker 1: in Media. It's an organization for women by women. What's
Speaker 1: really cool about this is she got the Woman of
Speaker 1: the Year award. It's called a Gracie named after Gracie Allen.
Speaker 1: This is like, this is like a big deal because
Speaker 1: every radio person, it doesn't matter what position and radio
Speaker 1: you happen to have. I mean, to get number one
Speaker 1: considered for this as huge and then her getting this
Speaker 1: honor is unbelievable. So she's out on the West Coast
Speaker 1: with her you know, family and friends, and we're just
Speaker 1: really proud of her. I mean, we have a really
Speaker 1: good team here, all right. It's the best. Don't you
Speaker 1: think She may ask for a raise though that may
Speaker 1: listen shocking, but you know what, I couldn't go to
Speaker 1: a nicer person, a more hard working and advancing person.
Speaker 1: She puts her heart and soul into the show and
Speaker 1: we're very thankful, by the way. Only Blair and I understand.
Speaker 1: Where was it when we got on the air, like
Speaker 1: a minute before airtime? I think it was London, Yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: And you remember the hotel we had a switch rooms
Speaker 1: from one hotel to another hotel, grab all the equipment.
Speaker 1: I mean, we had a ton of equipment. It was
Speaker 1: Linda's hotel too, which was kind of weird. Remember that
Speaker 1: hotel was the strangest. Yeah, the plates of naked women
Speaker 1: on the walls. It was the weirdest place in the world.
Speaker 1: But there are no hotel rooms for anybody, so we're
Speaker 1: spread out all over the place, obviously because of the
Speaker 1: President's visit there. And but sure enough, what was it
Speaker 1: about two minutes to airtime? We got up about sixty seconds. Yet, well,
Speaker 1: you gotta give me credit that day. I said, look,
Speaker 1: if you don't get up, you don't get up. Everyone's
Speaker 1: trying their best. These things happened, and you were the
Speaker 1: least panicked out of everybody. Yeah, I kept saying that, everybody,
Speaker 1: It's okay. It was stuck to the ceiling. She was.
Speaker 1: I was crawling all over there. You out of your mind, James.
Speaker 1: James with his bad hipp and back. It's like lifting
Speaker 1: the heaviest equipment. I'm just trying to help whatever way
Speaker 1: I can and take the pressure off it, take us
Speaker 1: out for beers. And I almost thought for a second there,
Speaker 1: I'm just like this. I honestly said, if we can't
Speaker 1: get up and running and we can't do the show,
Speaker 1: we tried our best. We set up two separate lines
Speaker 1: and two separate hotels, and it wasn't working. No fault
Speaker 1: of ours, Like I said, Well, I guess We're gonna
Speaker 1: go get some beer and maybe a couple of chicken
Speaker 1: wings and hang out for the rest of the afternoon.
Speaker 1: But those are what we call memories. We learned and
Speaker 1: then it wasn't in Hellsinki. She was racing out in
Speaker 1: wonder and in stilettos down to the Yeah, she loves
Speaker 1: telling that story. It's that story is hilarious. All right,
Speaker 1: let's get to our calls here. Eight hundred and nine
Speaker 1: four one. Sean Randy is in New York, the all
Speaker 1: New AM seven ten war. How are you so glad
Speaker 1: you called? Hey, Sean, It's good to talk to you.
Speaker 1: I wanted to let you know the rest of the
Speaker 1: country is still with you. We're very happy that you're
Speaker 1: keeping track of my god, probably three or four pages
Speaker 1: worth of problems that have been going on with the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party in that last election. I wanted to just
Speaker 1: mention kind of hope that Donald Trump must have his
Speaker 1: reasoning for not declassifying right away. He must be timing something.
Speaker 1: Who knows what his reasons are? I say this. I
Speaker 1: wanted the FISA applications out. I wanted the three O
Speaker 1: two's out. I wanted the exculpatory information emails out all
Speaker 1: the things we talk about. I wanted it out before
Speaker 1: the election. I know in retrospect though I would say
Speaker 1: it would have been it would have been buried. Now
Speaker 1: that the Muller Report came out. Now that this the
Speaker 1: opening act or page two, the second chapter begins, and
Speaker 1: Muller's dead, I think it has that much more impact.
Speaker 1: Holding it was smart, There was a huge impact, and
Speaker 1: I think everybody from Manaport to Flynn to Papadopolis will
Speaker 1: probably be completely vinified. There's no reason that when any
Speaker 1: DA prosecutes any case in this country, if they have
Speaker 1: a police force and the police force uses them or
Speaker 1: gives them bad information, and they use bad information to
Speaker 1: get a bad warrant from a judge, everything that they've done,
Speaker 1: I don't care if they've found murderers or rapists. If
Speaker 1: they're damn fools enough to have used a false warrant
Speaker 1: or false information to get the information, everything's thrown out
Speaker 1: and those people will walk free. Well it should be.
Speaker 1: You know this case down in Florida that they supposedly
Speaker 1: we're taping all these customers and Robert Kraft went in
Speaker 1: for a massage. By the way, I've known Robert Kraft.
Speaker 1: There's a behind the scenes story about him that nobody
Speaker 1: would ever This guy was so in love with his wife,
Speaker 1: lost his wife I think of forty eight years. But
Speaker 1: you can't go in with a blanket non warrant situation.
Speaker 1: Tell the story the spa that I guess you're having
Speaker 1: an emergency and then anybody that goes in there, you're
Speaker 1: being videotaped. Well, don't you have to have a warrant
Speaker 1: for the videotape of any individual that's in there? To
Speaker 1: me that that shocked me because you know, here we
Speaker 1: go more. It's kind of that's the abuse of power.
Speaker 1: And you've got to have cause to get a warrant
Speaker 1: to spy on somebody. Now, if they want to spy
Speaker 1: on the people in the spa, that's fine. But the
Speaker 1: people that go in I just I'm not a massage person.
Speaker 1: But other people I know swear by it. They love it.
Speaker 1: It's the greatest thing in their life. Some people love yoga,
Speaker 1: some people love acupuncture. I don't have time for any
Speaker 1: of this stuff. You know. Right now, I got a
Speaker 1: belt on my back so tight because I threw my
Speaker 1: back out. I'm not going to a chiropractor I'm going
Speaker 1: to suck it up until the pain goes away. So
Speaker 1: I just think that, you know, we've got to be careful.
Speaker 1: These warrants are critical. These are our constitutional rights here.
Speaker 1: The key to this democratic republic is the rule of law.
Speaker 1: And if you have justifiable cause for a warrant, you
Speaker 1: got to take it to a court, and you better
Speaker 1: not lie to the court, and you better not lie
Speaker 1: by omission and withhold exculpatory information or information that would
Speaker 1: change a judge's outcome. And that's what happened here. And
Speaker 1: we all know that they were warned about all of this.
Speaker 1: It's scary Randy run rough shot route over top of them.
Speaker 1: They said no. She said no to the FBI, and
Speaker 1: they walked away. I mean the same thing with Muller.
Speaker 1: She absolutely ignored information on uranium one. These guys are
Speaker 1: all thick as steeves during that Obama administration, and the treason,
Speaker 1: that truly is treason happened. Yep. If we know the results,
Speaker 1: we know how bad the ring irranium one deal was,
Speaker 1: So there is reason to look into this, and I
Speaker 1: hope they do. I hope when these I think there's
Speaker 1: about five special prosecutors that are needed, But I hope
Speaker 1: these guys could do their job. Sean. We all do. Yeah,
Speaker 1: me too, you know, And I really do mean it
Speaker 1: when I say the ninety nine percent that are great
Speaker 1: people that serve us in the intel community, in the
Speaker 1: criminal in law enforcement. I hate that that some feel
Speaker 1: tarnished by the actions of a very few. It just
Speaker 1: so happens. In this case. The very few we're talking about,
Speaker 1: we're at the very top and had all that power
Speaker 1: that they could do a lot of damage to the constitution,
Speaker 1: the rule of law, equal justice, and it happened. And
Speaker 1: I think there's going to be a lot of fall out.
Speaker 1: It's all coming out. There's nothing. Nobody's going to be
Speaker 1: able to stop it at this point. Anyway, Let's go
Speaker 1: to Carols in Florida. Carol, Hi, how are you welcome
Speaker 1: to the program? Hi? Sean, My husband Don and I
Speaker 1: really love you and the Island Group and we really
Speaker 1: appreciate what you're doing for American Americans and especially supporting
Speaker 1: President Trump. And I wanted to make a point today
Speaker 1: because I don't think you're quite on board with this,
Speaker 1: but I think you need to maybe pray about it
Speaker 1: and think about it a little deeper, because the whole
Speaker 1: attitude right now is that the Democrats are clueless, they
Speaker 1: don't get it, they don't want to accept the election results,
Speaker 1: and on and on and when in truth, almost all
Speaker 1: of the leaders of that party, a lot of them
Speaker 1: are republic I mean, our lawyers, so they understand the law.
Speaker 1: They understand they're not going to be able to get
Speaker 1: Trump as far as being able to impeach him. They
Speaker 1: understand that he's done nothing wrong, but they don't care
Speaker 1: because we have to know our enemy, Sean, and our
Speaker 1: enemy is they're fighting a war of propaganda, and they're
Speaker 1: trying to sway the public opinion. And we already know
Speaker 1: from one of the polls that they had a while
Speaker 1: back that forty eight percent of the people believe that
Speaker 1: the Russians did impact our election results, even though there's
Speaker 1: never been one shred of evidence. So I think we
Speaker 1: ought to start calling them out as propagandists. We ought
Speaker 1: to stop thinking that they just disliked Trump because of
Speaker 1: the way he tweets. They dislike him because they're globalists,
Speaker 1: and because they don't like what he's doing for America
Speaker 1: and Americans and they're trying to stop him. Sean So
Speaker 1: what we need to do is learn to fight our
Speaker 1: enemy on their ground by calling them out and stop
Speaker 1: coddling them as though they're all a bunch of ideologues
Speaker 1: that are idiots. They're with their program, Sean, but we're
Speaker 1: not with ours. And that's really what I believe. I
Speaker 1: believe we ought to. Let let me tell you something.
Speaker 1: The one thing the president is not going to allow
Speaker 1: to happen. He's not going to let people take shots
Speaker 1: at him. He's just not for no reason at all,
Speaker 1: and not fight back. And I know that is you know,
Speaker 1: I'll look at Mitt Romney for example. Mitt Romney is
Speaker 1: a very nice, kind, gentle human being, and they turn
Speaker 1: this guy into a misogynist, a violent young adult who
Speaker 1: actually cut the hair of a fellow student in high school.
Speaker 1: He was a racist, I mean, and the media loved
Speaker 1: John McCain too, loved him when he was a liberal,
Speaker 1: But as soon as this guy ran for president, he
Speaker 1: was satan. If Donald Trump cures cancer, if Donald Trump
Speaker 1: were to give every American five million dollars, if Donald
Speaker 1: Trump adopted their stupid New Green Deal agenda, they'd still
Speaker 1: hate him. They can't help themselves there. This is such
Speaker 1: a psychological downturn for people on the left. They are unhinged,
Speaker 1: they have lost it. It is a psychosis. It is
Speaker 1: rage at a level that is so irrational. But the
Speaker 1: thing is this, they are playing right into Donald Trump's hands.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump lives in the minds of every fake news
Speaker 1: media outlet in the country, lives there. They can't help
Speaker 1: but react and respond like little Alka Seltzer tablets and water.
Speaker 1: They bubble and they they can't handle his iconoclastic nature.
Speaker 1: All right, we'll take a break. We'll come back. A
Speaker 1: lot more of your calls, News Round Up, Information Overload
Speaker 1: hour coming up at the top of the next hour.
Speaker 1: John McLaughlin and John Jordan have done an exhaustive study.
Speaker 1: What are Donald's Trump's chances of getting thirty three percent
Speaker 1: of the Hispanic vote in twenty twenty. We do everything
Speaker 1: demographically when we take polls under this economy, it's looking
Speaker 1: really good. A lot of opportunity. I like to study
Speaker 1: research all the time. All right, as we get back
Speaker 1: to our busy phones here, Colleen is in Long Island. Colleen, Hi,
Speaker 1: how are you, and welcome to the program. Glad you called.
Speaker 1: Oh hi, Sean, thanks for taking my call and I
Speaker 1: want to thank you for everything you do. I think
Speaker 1: the country should be very grateful for everything you're doing
Speaker 1: right now. Thank you. No, you're welcome. But I just
Speaker 1: wonder why everybody assumes that the Democrats and the FBI
Speaker 1: and the CIA, we're only spying on Trump when he
Speaker 1: was the least likely person to be to win the
Speaker 1: nominee and the least likely person to win the presidency.
Speaker 1: Why would they put all the references to spying on him?
Speaker 1: Why warrant? Why doesn't anybody assume that other Republican candidates
Speaker 1: were being spied on as well? Well, we don't have
Speaker 1: evidence of that now, do I think this happens all
Speaker 1: the time? Yeah, but you know, think of what a
Speaker 1: third rate robbery ended up with Nixon and Watergate, and
Speaker 1: and here you have so much into They rigged a
Speaker 1: primary against Bernie Sanders, then they rigged an investigation. Hillary
Speaker 1: broke the law, Then they rigged they lied to afis
Speaker 1: A court again and again and tried to rig the
Speaker 1: general election. They wanted all that salacious information out. Then
Speaker 1: they tried to bludgeon him with the insurance policy. Muller
Speaker 1: two years for investigations clear Trump of any collusion truth.
Speaker 1: It just doesn't seem to matter to these guys. Quick break,
Speaker 1: we'll come back, we'll continue. It's the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: President of Policies, Would you put in place to protect
Speaker 1: every woman, regardless of her zip codes, right to have
Speaker 1: an abortion? Thank you? So. I believe that the right
Speaker 1: of a woman to make her own decisions about her
Speaker 1: reproductive health and about her body is a national right.
Speaker 1: I believe it's an American freedom, and I believe that
Speaker 1: should be enjoyed by women everywhere. Do you believe, at
Speaker 1: any point in pregnancy, whether it's a six weeks or
Speaker 1: eight weeks, or twenty four weeks or whenever, that there
Speaker 1: should be any limit on a woman's right to have
Speaker 1: an abortion. I think the dialogue has got so caught
Speaker 1: up on where you draw the line that we've gotten
Speaker 1: away from the fundamental question of who gets to draw
Speaker 1: the line. And I trust women to draw the line
Speaker 1: when it's their own. So, just to be Clair, just
Speaker 1: to b Clair, you're saying that you would be okay
Speaker 1: with a woman well into the third trimester deciding to
Speaker 1: abort her pregnice. Look, these hypotheticals are usually set up
Speaker 1: in order to provoke a strong moment alight, so not hypothetical.
Speaker 1: There's six thousand women a year who got abortions in
Speaker 1: the third representing less than one percent of case. All Right,
Speaker 1: News Round Up and Information Overload hour on the Sean
Speaker 1: Hannity Show. Look, the the twenty twenty candidates are coming
Speaker 1: out as hard left as they possibly can. New Green Deal,
Speaker 1: which we have discussed exhaustively. What nobody seems to ever
Speaker 1: focus on is Okay, Well, we had the Obama Biden economy.
Speaker 1: We had the Obama Biden you know, dump of one
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty billion dollars in cash and other currency
Speaker 1: on the on the tarmax for Mulla's of Iran. And
Speaker 1: now now we have a record to compare it to.
Speaker 1: And one of the things that has been so standout
Speaker 1: in this Trump recovery, which they didn't have. The recovery
Speaker 1: in the eight years of Biden Obama was the worst
Speaker 1: recovery since the forties, lowest labor participation rate that we've
Speaker 1: had since the seventies. You know, all these statistics. I
Speaker 1: gave out thirteen million more Americans on food stamps. That's
Speaker 1: a lot of people, eight million more in poverty, and
Speaker 1: but the record of Trump when you compare and contrast,
Speaker 1: and that's what every election kind of should be about,
Speaker 1: a choice that people make two competing visions for the
Speaker 1: future of the country. You see record low unemployment for
Speaker 1: African Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans, women in the workplace,
Speaker 1: and youth unemployment and everything else has been every other
Speaker 1: economic record has been shattered. Now unemployment at three point
Speaker 1: six percent. Now the President getting trade deals done with
Speaker 1: countries we didn't think we'd ever get done. China's not
Speaker 1: done yet. By the time I think these negotiations are over,
Speaker 1: China will will capitulate, you know, the five hundred billion
Speaker 1: dollar trade deficit that favors them. So of course they're
Speaker 1: going to be resistant. But if Donald Trump didn't show
Speaker 1: them that he's serious, how do you get to that point? Well?
Speaker 1: How will we always break down in politics along? And
Speaker 1: it's not identity politics, okay, but you break down age,
Speaker 1: you breakdown. Are you African American, a white American, Asian American,
Speaker 1: Latino American? And John McGlocklin, the poster founder of McLoughlin Associates,
Speaker 1: and John Jordan, a Republican strategist an attorney. They have
Speaker 1: a brand new poll out and that they are releasing
Speaker 1: right here on this show exclusively that uncovers just how
Speaker 1: much of the minority base is being untapped by the
Speaker 1: Republican Party. In other words, now that policies are in
Speaker 1: place that are giving people more hope, more opportunity than
Speaker 1: they ever got in the Obama Biden years, will this
Speaker 1: translate to votes to the Republicans? For example, Hispanic Americans.
Speaker 1: They just did an entire study as it relates to this.
Speaker 1: So many Hispanics have the same values of conservative but
Speaker 1: they feel that not being heard, and the poll shows
Speaker 1: us how valuable that pocket of voters truly is in
Speaker 1: this coming twenty twenty election season. John and John, welcome
Speaker 1: both of you to the program. I have the study
Speaker 1: here in front of me. I think it's pretty phenomenal.
Speaker 1: Instead of me going over at John McLaughlin, why don't
Speaker 1: you lay out what you found? Well, I think I
Speaker 1: think John Jordan should tell you why he sponsored this
Speaker 1: project and it was done with the Pinue Latinus. But
Speaker 1: it was a very In terms of this survey, I'll
Speaker 1: just lead up a little bit. Thirty eight percent of
Speaker 1: the interviews were done in Spanish. Eighty five percent at
Speaker 1: least speak some Spanish, and fifty seven percent speak about
Speaker 1: equal amounts of English and Spanish. So and it's, by
Speaker 1: the way, it's a heavily democratic poll too. And over
Speaker 1: half the voters are Democrats and only eighteen percent were Republicans.
Speaker 1: So John did this study, and what the amazing thing
Speaker 1: is on policy, they agree with Donald Trump on a
Speaker 1: lot of issues. And I know from being in the
Speaker 1: lay campaign that Donald Trump got twenty nine percent of
Speaker 1: Hispanic vote. Clinton only got sixty five percent. We did
Speaker 1: net eight points better than Mitt Romney. And here it
Speaker 1: is Trump's poise to really raise that number. So let
Speaker 1: me punt at John Jordan on that one. N Well,
Speaker 1: what we wanted, what I wanted to do here was
Speaker 1: challenge certain assumptions. You know, so much is said in
Speaker 1: the mainstream media about Latino voters and the rising Democrat
Speaker 1: electric that's going to swamp conservatism and destroy the Republican Party.
Speaker 1: I'm an economist by trade and a lawyer. In the economics,
Speaker 1: you study change as much as anything else. So we really,
Speaker 1: Sean really wanted to examine these questions objectively, not as
Speaker 1: a campaign poll, not as a politically the media poll
Speaker 1: per se but to really dive deep into the all
Speaker 1: of these numbers, these attitudes and how they relate to
Speaker 1: each other, and to have a more granular, deeper understanding
Speaker 1: of where the president stands and where his strengths, weaknesses
Speaker 1: and opportunities are. And the results were just astounding. The
Speaker 1: quality of pulling in the past has been problematic. Right
Speaker 1: before the election, Latina diseasonest Latinos did a survey which
Speaker 1: showed Trump at eighteen percent, and I've obviously gotten into
Speaker 1: the very very high twenties. Um Obama got six seventy one,
Speaker 1: Clinton got sixty five. If President Trump can cross thirty
Speaker 1: two percent, the math on this it becomes catastrophic for
Speaker 1: the Democrats going into the next election. It puts away Florida,
Speaker 1: North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, and it really very much puts
Speaker 1: in play Nevada and Colorado. So the pathways getting narrow.
Speaker 1: If if President Trump can grow by just five or
Speaker 1: six points. You know, maybe one of the reasons last
Speaker 1: week that Joe Biden came out with an AD, a
Speaker 1: Spanish speaking AD. I happen to know it well because
Speaker 1: I was attacked in that ad. Is that mean maybe
Speaker 1: they figured out what you are study here found they
Speaker 1: probably have done some is like this. Right now, the
Speaker 1: Democrats are in primary mode, so they're looking at Democrat voters.
Speaker 1: They're probably not looking at the swing voters or the
Speaker 1: larger voter universe. But I would bet you're absolutely right, Sean.
Speaker 1: That's a really good point. I didn't think of that
Speaker 1: that they probably are stumbling across or at least got
Speaker 1: a whiff of some of the problems that they have
Speaker 1: in their coalition. So what do you see is the
Speaker 1: weaknesses for the president, the problem the president has. You've
Speaker 1: got to think about this from their point of view,
Speaker 1: the Latino point of view. I'm a Spanish speaker. I
Speaker 1: live in California. These both on Spanish speaking media. It
Speaker 1: was a vision. For example, the president is being trashed daily.
Speaker 1: There are no or almost no real advocates for him
Speaker 1: in the Spanish speaking media world, so his brand has
Speaker 1: been tarnished, not necessarily by anything he's done, but by
Speaker 1: how he has been characterized personally. In our survey, we
Speaker 1: found that forty one percent of Latino's forty one percent
Speaker 1: approve of his policies, but only half of that would
Speaker 1: really think highly of him personally. So there's room to grow.
Speaker 1: If he can just get half of that, that would
Speaker 1: really up end the Democrats in a lot of these states.
Speaker 1: But if the problem, the challenge the president has is
Speaker 1: the perceptions of him, not his policies. All right, let's
Speaker 1: go over the survey and the methodology. Give us the
Speaker 1: five biggest findings you found. Well, a lot of them
Speaker 1: seemed to be in contradictory. Forty six percent of Latinos
Speaker 1: say the economy is had in the correct in the
Speaker 1: right direction. Fifty two percent give President Trump credit, while
Speaker 1: thirty eight percent give Obama credit. Here's a shocker, fifty
Speaker 1: nine percent prefer free market capitalism to big government socialism.
Speaker 1: That's a thirty nine per points swing. Sixty five percent
Speaker 1: support tougher enforcement of the border to keep undocumented immigrants
Speaker 1: coming out. However, seventy one percent agree this is where
Speaker 1: it seems to be in conflict. Support legalization or a
Speaker 1: path to citizenship for illegal immigrants already here. So there's
Speaker 1: seemingly some tension between some of these things. But I
Speaker 1: think it can be best understood if you look at
Speaker 1: it like a lot of Latinos here, by family, by community,
Speaker 1: by connections, want to support their friends and families here
Speaker 1: and don't want them thrown out, but understand intellectually that
Speaker 1: this can't continue. Well, John McLaughlin, I guess we lost
Speaker 1: your for a second, but welcome back. I'm looking at
Speaker 1: these numbers, all right, right direction, wrong direction, forty six
Speaker 1: forty three Trump. That's a you know, and compare that
Speaker 1: they credit Donald Trump and not Obama fifty two thirty
Speaker 1: eight percent. That's not good for Biden and the free
Speaker 1: market capitalism findings that John Jordan just talked about. You know,
Speaker 1: that's a big number. Fifty nine to twenty percent prefer
Speaker 1: you know who prefer big government socialism, fifty nine percent
Speaker 1: prefer capitalism, and seventy seventy one percent support legal status
Speaker 1: for undocumented immigrants. The majority fifty percent agree that it's
Speaker 1: unfair to allow undocumented undocumented immigrants to jump the line.
Speaker 1: I mean, so, you know, now, let's talk about the
Speaker 1: opportunity side of what you found here. There's a lot
Speaker 1: of by the way, on the policy side, and plus
Speaker 1: it's a pro life sample. There's fifty two to forty
Speaker 1: pro life versus pro choice, and they opposed laws allowing
Speaker 1: late term abortion sixty one to twenty eight. So it's
Speaker 1: not just on immigration, but on a lot of cultural issues.
Speaker 1: The Hispanic vote is not it's not a monolithic Democratic
Speaker 1: vote the way they want us to believe this, And
Speaker 1: they actually agree with the President and a lot of
Speaker 1: Republicans on policies where even like you verified two thirds
Speaker 1: support you verified. These are you know, these are legal citizens,
Speaker 1: registered to vote, likely to vote. They have strong issue
Speaker 1: appeals where they like the fact that the Republicans or
Speaker 1: the President share their issue. So there's a potential upside
Speaker 1: here for a November twenty twenty and that generally freak
Speaker 1: sattle how to democratic. But let me go back to
Speaker 1: my original premissag is Okay, the economy is light years
Speaker 1: better under Republican and Trump policies. I mean, at what point,
Speaker 1: you know, if you're at go through the Obama Biden years,
Speaker 1: what do you have disproportionately negatively impacted the minority communities
Speaker 1: in America, those that are benefiting the most in spite
Speaker 1: of the propaganda, who are seeing the largest wage increases,
Speaker 1: biggest lifestyle changes, more opportunities provided them. I mean, when
Speaker 1: you lose a couple of million people on food stamps
Speaker 1: and in poverty, that means opportunity has come and we
Speaker 1: now have one point seven million more jobs available than
Speaker 1: we have people on unemployment, where it's three point six
Speaker 1: percent unemployment. We're getting to the point of full employment
Speaker 1: in the country, which means opportunity. People now pick and
Speaker 1: choose where they want to work, the benefits to pay.
Speaker 1: It just comes, uh, you know for them a buyer's
Speaker 1: market exactly, absolutely, absolutely, Sean. You know, we're starting to
Speaker 1: see wages. I mean just here in California and in
Speaker 1: my other company. Um, you're having to compete for workers
Speaker 1: up and down the pay scale. Now, well, I mean, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's the point. And you know, maybe what the President
Speaker 1: outlined with his immigration plan last week, how does that
Speaker 1: dovetail into all of this, you know, merit based immigration. Well,
Speaker 1: I'll tell you it's going to be interesting to see
Speaker 1: how that plays out. We did not we were not
Speaker 1: able to examine merit based immigration in this survey, but
Speaker 1: I would imagine that it would pull very high. Um.
Speaker 1: I would imagine that you know, people, there is a
Speaker 1: fundamental sense of fairness and you know, we care about
Speaker 1: what's best for us in this country on the Latino side,
Speaker 1: So I think that that would end up pulling very
Speaker 1: very well. Yeah, John, what do you want to add
Speaker 1: to that? And their top issues the leading issues or
Speaker 1: healthcare twenty three percent, economy twenty one percent, education twenty percent,
Speaker 1: Immigration reform is seventeen percent. Again, these voters have been
Speaker 1: here for years or and they also they have the
Speaker 1: same concerns as everybody else. I mean, they're worried about
Speaker 1: their jobs, their healthcare, their education. Then comes immigration reform.
Speaker 1: All right, quick break more with this blockbuster new poll
Speaker 1: that has helped John McLaughlin McLaughlin and associates and John Jordan,
Speaker 1: Republican strategist and attorney, and we'll come back on the
Speaker 1: other side. Your calls coming up at the bottom of
Speaker 1: the half hour. We have an amazing Hannity tonight, nine
Speaker 1: eastern on Fox. All right, as we continue with John
Speaker 1: McLaughlin and John Jordan, this new major poll and findings
Speaker 1: they put together about Hispanic Americans and voting patterns that
Speaker 1: we might begin to see trends going in. If Biden
Speaker 1: gets it, does he get held accountable for the Obama
Speaker 1: Biden economy? Does he get held accountable the Russia stuff
Speaker 1: that happened on their watch? Does he get held accountable
Speaker 1: for given the mullows an Iran one hundred fifty billion.
Speaker 1: Are people going to look at the economy under those
Speaker 1: two and say, no, it's much better. Now I'm voting
Speaker 1: for this guy. I don't know that what foreign policy
Speaker 1: this is a particular import and it's certainly not a
Speaker 1: question that we examined. The one kind of tangential exception
Speaker 1: rubs up against some of the cultural issues. You start,
Speaker 1: you see an our save some of the public safety concerns,
Speaker 1: and that obviously is related to immigration. The a lot
Speaker 1: of the MS thirteen and the crime and the drugs
Speaker 1: when they come across the border, they affect overwhelmingly Latino neighborhoods.
Speaker 1: And we see that in our survey of forty six
Speaker 1: percent oppose and then support ending catch and release a
Speaker 1: purity more than a strong plurality support of continuing ice
Speaker 1: and not abolishing it. So you see a tension point
Speaker 1: between the real life public safety can spread and butter
Speaker 1: concerns of Latino voters that are that are completely at
Speaker 1: odds with what you see on Rachel mad Hour. The
Speaker 1: mainstream media are the New York Times, are the you know,
Speaker 1: the white coastal liberal positions on a lot of these issues.
Speaker 1: It's very different when you have to live it, and
Speaker 1: these numbers bear that out. Yeah. Well, I mean I
Speaker 1: think that's that's the main crux of it. I think
Speaker 1: people vote their pocketbooks. It's the economy, stupid piece and prosperity,
Speaker 1: and I think if them right now, the president is,
Speaker 1: you know, light years ahead of what Biden Obama gave us.
Speaker 1: That has to be factored in. Thank you both, John McLaughlin,
Speaker 1: John Jordan, great work. Eight hundred and ninety four one,
Speaker 1: Sean Tolfree telephone number. You want to be a part
Speaker 1: of this program, Your calls coming up in the final
Speaker 1: half hour. Next we'll continue fold inspired Solutions for America.
Speaker 1: This is the Sean Hannity Show, all right, twenty five
Speaker 1: now till the top of the hour. Eight hundred and
Speaker 1: nine four one Sean, if you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. Interesting AOC at AOC on Twitter.
Speaker 1: Alexandreo Casio Cortez retracts the claim now that the world
Speaker 1: is going to end in twelve years. If it didn't
Speaker 1: make sense, she wanted the New Green Deal done in
Speaker 1: ten and I'm like, oh, if the world's gone in twelve,
Speaker 1: why don't we all just quit and celebrate and have
Speaker 1: one big party for twelve years. And she said, this
Speaker 1: is a technique of the GOP to take dry humor
Speaker 1: and sarcasm literally and fact check it. I like the world,
Speaker 1: like the world ending in twelve years thing. You'd have to,
Speaker 1: you know, have social intelligence of us C sponge to
Speaker 1: think it's literal. She stood by it. That was the problem.
Speaker 1: You didn't say is the day after anyway, she wrote
Speaker 1: in a tweet published on Mother's Day. Oh she did
Speaker 1: say this. I'll wait for the retraction in about six months.
Speaker 1: She said about the GOP, they don't care about babies.
Speaker 1: They want hell on Earth and a Christian theocracy. Who
Speaker 1: is she talking about? Nobody does what is she talking about?
Speaker 1: They don't care at all about babies, especially brown, black,
Speaker 1: or poor ones. If they did, they'd co sponsor the
Speaker 1: New Green Deal. Oh, we're gonna tie it into what
Speaker 1: getting rid of cows and planes and the combustion engine
Speaker 1: and oil and gas. Okay, if I otherwise, you don't
Speaker 1: love children? What do I say every two and four
Speaker 1: years on this program, over and over again, every two
Speaker 1: four years, You're racist, sexist, misogynist, homophobic, xenophobic, islamophobic, you
Speaker 1: want dirty air, water, and you want to kill children.
Speaker 1: So a buddy of mine is in the studio here. No,
Speaker 1: you're not getting away that quickly. So I my radio career,
Speaker 1: I never thought i'd be this blessed in my television career.
Speaker 1: I never thought all these crazy, wonderful things would happen
Speaker 1: to me. I never have taken for granted the audience.
Speaker 1: You make it possible. If you're not listening and watching,
Speaker 1: then you're only going to be having one choice conspiracy TV,
Speaker 1: lies and hoaxes throwing at you from every other media outlet.
Speaker 1: And we do pride ourselves in being right more than
Speaker 1: they are. A couple of people very instrumental in my career.
Speaker 1: One was when I got my first page job in Huntsville, Alabama,
Speaker 1: and it was a small market and I had a
Speaker 1: much thicker New York accent than I do now, and man, Hannity, Man,
Speaker 1: welcome to Huntsville, but you talk funny. It was a
Speaker 1: little bit of a culture shock. I became well, sort
Speaker 1: of well known as who's this crazy shock shock from
Speaker 1: New York hanging up on people, which I used to
Speaker 1: do a little more of at the time. And then
Speaker 1: I had an opportunity, got a call after two years
Speaker 1: in Ville from WGST in Atlanta, and a guy that
Speaker 1: has since become a dear friend, Neil Boorts, was leaving
Speaker 1: WGST the ex wife and moving to the ever so
Speaker 1: powerful number one station in town, which is WUSB, which
Speaker 1: we happened to be on as well. Now at this point, anyway,
Speaker 1: the guy that hired me is in studio with us.
Speaker 1: I've had a remarkable thing happened in my life. I
Speaker 1: have stayed friends with every boss I've ever had in media,
Speaker 1: and the same with you know, Roger els I got
Speaker 1: along famously because I always felt they took a chance
Speaker 1: on me and sluggo you're in the big city. How
Speaker 1: are you? I am well, I am well. It's good
Speaker 1: to see you here. I never would have imagined what No, yeah,
Speaker 1: you never, This shouldn't have happened, right. We have some
Speaker 1: fun stories because we had a couple of moments. After
Speaker 1: my first year on GST. The numbers were great, we
Speaker 1: were pulling really strong numbers on the show. Then Boarts
Speaker 1: makes the announcement, I'm listening driving to going on my
Speaker 1: first vacation, and he goes Sean Hannity I know you're listening.
Speaker 1: I'm like, how the hell does he know I'm listening
Speaker 1: and your phone's about to ring? He goes, and it's
Speaker 1: gonna be sluggo telling you to get your ass back
Speaker 1: to from vacation. Um. And then he said because he
Speaker 1: had gone when he moved his time slot on the
Speaker 1: my station now he went up against rush right noon
Speaker 1: to three right and said he was a morning guy.
Speaker 1: He didn't like doing that those hours. I'm coming back
Speaker 1: Monday morning and I'm taking my whole audience back with me.
Speaker 1: I called you, I say I'm coming back, and you
Speaker 1: would not let me wanted That was dumb. You should
Speaker 1: have let me. If a guy wants to come back
Speaker 1: and work and fight for his audience, he should have
Speaker 1: let me come back. I was concerned about you, but
Speaker 1: I didn't know how you're gonna obsess about it on vacation.
Speaker 1: So I hope do you think that was a great vacation.
Speaker 1: I hope that you would not, that you would really
Speaker 1: get away enjoy yoursel Oh yeah, I'm just sat in
Speaker 1: the sun like I always do when I go to
Speaker 1: the beach. I sit in the sun for hours to
Speaker 1: drinking beer. I can't stay five minutes in the sun.
Speaker 1: But we had some great times. You did have to
Speaker 1: um my first year. This was a big market. And
Speaker 1: after a year you did a perceptual study on the
Speaker 1: station correct and one day you call me in the audience,
Speaker 1: and the message was clear. People like what you're saying,
Speaker 1: they agree with your politics, they like you personally, but
Speaker 1: they think you're too harsh. Because I had grown up
Speaker 1: listening to New York and Boston talk radio, throat radio
Speaker 1: here in New York, and hey, get off my phoe,
Speaker 1: you creep, you know, or go gargo with razor blades.
Speaker 1: And I told you you're in the Deep South. You
Speaker 1: need to be a little mellower, you know, bring it
Speaker 1: down just a little. But it took the research. He
Speaker 1: didn't say it, he didn't see say exactly like that.
Speaker 1: It was much more. I remember sitting in your office
Speaker 1: and you would tell him this. I said, you lost
Speaker 1: confidence in me. I remember I said those very words
Speaker 1: to you, and Nancy's ntact. But I had not lost
Speaker 1: confidence in you. You know the research. You want to
Speaker 1: get to the research, ye what it says? Yes, yes,
Speaker 1: all right. So I knew you did a research project,
Speaker 1: and I said to you Okay, can I read it?
Speaker 1: And you said no, correct. We got you down to
Speaker 1: a misdemeanor after breaking into the promotion director's office one
Speaker 1: Friday night and getting in the research and taking it
Speaker 1: home and reading it. And you saw that little excerpt
Speaker 1: where it said you might consider replacing Sean Hannitt, you
Speaker 1: might need to reconsider. I remember the exact verbiage. I
Speaker 1: will call Joel Lendon get a copy of it. That
Speaker 1: didn't scare me. That's not what impacted me the most.
Speaker 1: At the end of a what they do is they
Speaker 1: will sample the audience of your station and they have
Speaker 1: what they call verbatims at the end of the study,
Speaker 1: the exact words of listeners. They it was universal and
Speaker 1: I saw, Wow, I thought I was doing it the
Speaker 1: right way. I'm not. And that changed me. The audience
Speaker 1: changed me. But for the most part, you were. You
Speaker 1: were doing it the right way. And there was no
Speaker 1: intention to ever even consider that recommendation. Oh you know
Speaker 1: you signed me to a three year extension. It just
Speaker 1: it just didn't make any sense. But you saw what. Look,
Speaker 1: I made so many changes on that station over a
Speaker 1: period of time, and it's a very intimate audience. You
Speaker 1: know what happens in doc radio. You make a small change,
Speaker 1: they notice and they come out of the wood work
Speaker 1: at you. When I put Rush Limbaugh on that radio,
Speaker 1: so oh you took a lot of health. Oh wow,
Speaker 1: and butt he became beloved just like you. Yeah, you're right.
Speaker 1: There is a certain period of time where you've got
Speaker 1: to And I always thought I always thought Neil was
Speaker 1: one of the top posts, and going up against him
Speaker 1: was great for me because I'll you know the story.
Speaker 1: I was driving into work one day. It was six
Speaker 1: fifteen in the morning, Borts is on. He went on
Speaker 1: at eight forty five to get it fifteen minute jump
Speaker 1: on me, So I guess they viewed me as a threat.
Speaker 1: He would give away at six fifteen am his entire show,
Speaker 1: and then Eric Stangers the next room was been with
Speaker 1: me all these years, and we would say, Okay, how
Speaker 1: are we going to do it better than him? And
Speaker 1: he didn't do guests, so he mentioned all these people
Speaker 1: the news we'd have him booked and on the year
Speaker 1: before he talked about it, well, there's one particular guest
Speaker 1: that he remember that, yes, I do a story that
Speaker 1: was after Robert Shapiro, who was part of the Dream
Speaker 1: Team in the O. J. Simpson case comes to town
Speaker 1: and anyway, I mean, Boarts is announcing he's gonna be
Speaker 1: on my show at ten o'clock this morning, promoting it,
Speaker 1: promoting it, and I get Stager. Stager goes, well, he
Speaker 1: was just on ninety nine X and let me call
Speaker 1: over and see if I can get him. Now we
Speaker 1: knew he was on boards at en. We got him
Speaker 1: at nine at nine, and then towards the end of
Speaker 1: the interview, I said, you know, this is one of
Speaker 1: the best interviews I've ever done. Would you mind staying
Speaker 1: a little longer, you know, maybe another half hour. We
Speaker 1: kept him forty five more minutes. And the backstory is
Speaker 1: he goes over to boards the show, borts raises out
Speaker 1: to the parking lot and says, get the by bleep
Speaker 1: and he'd bleep and he bleep out of here because
Speaker 1: he knew he had been on my show the whole time.
Speaker 1: Both furious. That's great radio wars. Listen. I was competitive.
Speaker 1: I am competitive still. We knew when I first heard
Speaker 1: your tape and you were still in Huntsville. This is
Speaker 1: right in our wheelhouse. This young man is right in
Speaker 1: our wheelhouse. Diamond, Diamond in the and that's right. I
Speaker 1: was quoted as saying that, and one day you will
Speaker 1: be refined in a real diamond. But we knew, we
Speaker 1: knew very well what we were getting, and it was
Speaker 1: just a look. When you find somebody like you with
Speaker 1: the passion you had then, and and if anything, your
Speaker 1: passion's more intense today than it was then. There was
Speaker 1: no question. Here's the interesting relationship, though, that I have
Speaker 1: with you to this day. If I'm doing something on radio,
Speaker 1: you don't like you call me in the middle of
Speaker 1: the show like you did, I'm like, I love you, slugo,
Speaker 1: you're killing me. I checked you these exactly. Somedays my
Speaker 1: text doesn't work, but I know you do it. What
Speaker 1: do you remember them? I remember. One of the hardest
Speaker 1: things is when I got the offer at Fox because
Speaker 1: I had been flying up pretty regularly. I was doing
Speaker 1: CNN a lot because they were in Atlanta, and then
Speaker 1: CNBC on the weekends a couple of those shows. That's
Speaker 1: where Roger right, and he said to me the first time,
Speaker 1: don't sign another contract till you talk to me. And
Speaker 1: that's when he was preparing for Fox News and you
Speaker 1: came to my home. I went to your home was
Speaker 1: a September of ninety six. Yeah, and I was leaving.
Speaker 1: My contract was up a bit in like December. Actually
Speaker 1: it was probably October, but maybe it was December. Right, Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm older than you. I forget things, okay, And you
Speaker 1: were sweating bullets. Yeah. I didn't want to do I
Speaker 1: didn't want I wasn't looking forward to say, I'm leaving.
Speaker 1: Sat down in my living room and you told me
Speaker 1: what was going on. And I said, John, you're under
Speaker 1: contract to me, but you gotta go do this. It
Speaker 1: was you gave me. And by the way, other people
Speaker 1: within the company were not as gracious as you. You know,
Speaker 1: but nobody knew what Fox would become Sluggo right, We
Speaker 1: had no idea. Yeah, but it was for you. It
Speaker 1: was coming home and there's also going to be radio
Speaker 1: on your plate. Radio was in the carts for New
Speaker 1: York at the same time, which I liked a lot.
Speaker 1: And but you know, you've been very instrumental. Honestly, there
Speaker 1: are key people, a key moments of my career that
Speaker 1: helped me get better. And I don't think I told
Speaker 1: you till after I left that I had read the
Speaker 1: whole perception. Oh yeah, you told me. You were broken
Speaker 1: into the office, and I told you after after I
Speaker 1: had left, right, statute of limitations that passed by then. Right,
Speaker 1: But there was another study follow up you did the
Speaker 1: year later, I believe maybe it was two years later,
Speaker 1: and it changed perceptions. It showed dramatic improvement. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: ever since then, I get I demand to read research
Speaker 1: on myself. Oh, you used to get the ratings before
Speaker 1: I did. Oh no, you you drove me nuts because
Speaker 1: I would go in when they were good and I'd
Speaker 1: hied when they were bad, you know, and the air
Speaker 1: checks that I had on your show, they seemed to disappear. Well,
Speaker 1: there were days they didn't want me to talk about
Speaker 1: politics as much as I did, which was what I loved.
Speaker 1: I mean, I think of all the memories of Atlanta.
Speaker 1: I'm the MC the night new King which becomes speaker. Um.
Speaker 1: I got to meet Maynard Jackson of the Atlanta mayor
Speaker 1: at the time, welcomed me to his city on day one.
Speaker 1: When I was on that station. I got to know
Speaker 1: Joseph Lowery, love Joseoh Williams, you know, crazy Tom howk
Speaker 1: Right loves a guy and all these personalities, but also
Speaker 1: the Andy Young's the real people that had the most courage.
Speaker 1: At a time, John Lewis got hit with a brick,
Speaker 1: you know, and they marched with Doctor King. And it
Speaker 1: was such a big enrichening experience for me because I
Speaker 1: got to know these guys and had a good I thought,
Speaker 1: a good relationship with well, you had history at your
Speaker 1: fingertips and they still living still are, yeah, and you
Speaker 1: had access to that and you took advantage of it.
Speaker 1: They were wonderful people for the most I mean, Joe
Speaker 1: Lowry and I would have these fights, but we liked
Speaker 1: each other, and I thought I knew how brave he was.
Speaker 1: Those people that went in those marches, going up against
Speaker 1: fire hoses and rocks and dogs, animals you know that
Speaker 1: are just not even human beings on the other side.
Speaker 1: It was terrible, and they did it fearlessly, and I
Speaker 1: learned that lesson and I admired all of them still
Speaker 1: due to this day. But any other All right, So
Speaker 1: did I turn out all right? You're you're you're doing okay?
Speaker 1: All right? Look, I but you didn't pay me well,
Speaker 1: only because I didn't want you to get spoiled. I'm
Speaker 1: here in New York visiting you and some other friends
Speaker 1: and some relatives. And it's hard for me to describe
Speaker 1: the pride I feel in what you've become, what you're doing,
Speaker 1: and the fact that we are close friends. You you
Speaker 1: you to this day. You know a very small group
Speaker 1: of people in radio, Phil Voice, Greg Mo, Sherry just don't.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna miss names now, so I'm gonna stop. But
Speaker 1: Bill Donovan, if it wasn't for you, I don't, I'm
Speaker 1: not here. You all made me better and gave me opportunities.
Speaker 1: So I can't thank you enough. And your dear friend,
Speaker 1: I love you dearly. And yeah, you have to pay
Speaker 1: for dinner. All right. That wraps things up for today.
Speaker 1: Letting out your Heartbey Trouble. We are loaded up tonight
Speaker 1: on Hannity Nineties Sternam, Fox News. We have some breaking
Speaker 1: news as it relates to the deep State. We will
Speaker 1: bring you that report. Sarah Carter, Greg Jarrett, also Congressman
Speaker 1: Matt Gates, Larry Elder, Rachel Compost, Stuffy and much much more.
Speaker 1: That's all happening the latest developments, Yes Act two. The
Speaker 1: curtain is up and now America gets the truth. All
Speaker 1: happening on Hannity in Easton. Have a great night, we'll
Speaker 1: see you, then back here tomorrow