WEBVTT - Can We Upload Our Brains to a Computer?

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey, please take a second and leave us a review

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:06.279
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to the podcast.

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.039
<v Speaker 1>Thanks a lot. Hey, welcome to sign Stuff and production

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of iHeartRadio. I'm Hoar hitch hamp and today we're asking

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>the question can you upload your brain to a computer?

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it actually possible to digitize your mind and who

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you are and have it run on a robot or

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:27.159
<v Speaker 1>a hard drive. Would it be a way for you

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to lift forever or maybe a way to copy yourself.

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk to three experts about this, a mathematician who

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>focuses on emerging technologies, a neuroscientist who studies brain connections,

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and a philosopher who's grappled with the question should we

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>upload our brains? So don't pull the plug and get

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>ready to live inside our electronic mind as we answer

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.959
<v Speaker 1>the question can you upload your brain to a computer?

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Hey?

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Everyone, So today we're talking to three people, a mathematician,

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a neuroscientist, and a philosopher. And they're not going to

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>walk into a bar, but if each spend a lot

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of time thinking about this idea of uploading your brain.

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll start with the mathematician, Professor Ole Hackstrom. Here's what

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>he does. Well, thank you doctor Hagstrom for joining us.

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you glad to be here. So most of my

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 3>every year has been as a mathematician, but since about

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty ten I've gradually become more interested in questions about

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 3>emerging technologists and global risk.

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell us where you work.

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm at Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden.

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we're going to start with the concept of mind uploading.

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell us what it is for those of

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>us that I have never heard of it before.

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 3>So the idea of mind uploading, which is like a

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 3>hypothetic future technology, is that if you make a simulation

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 3>of the human brain, and you make it refined enough

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 3>and accurate enough, it will be as good as the

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 3>real thing. And the hope is that if it's good enough,

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 3>we can use this technology to migrate over to machines.

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Our flash and blood bodies have all kinds of defects

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 3>after one hundred years, so so we tend to disintegrate

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 3>and die. And at least some people hope that uploading

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 3>technology could need to much longer and perhaps in effect

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 3>unbounded life.

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Wow, do you know anything about the origins of this idea.

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>When it started, when people started thinking about it.

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 3>It started in science fiction. Twentieth century science fiction writer

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Stanislav lam certainly wrote about it, and another person who

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 3>helped popularize this concept was a philosopher, Derek Parfitt, who

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 3>thought very hard about a similar concept, which is called teleportation.

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Like you're faxing yourself to another planet exactly, all right,

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the basic idea. Do somehow simulate our brains in

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>a computer to escape our soft, perishable bodies. The next

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>question is, of course, how would this work? What are

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the possible technologies that people have thought about doing this?

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Mind uploading?

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 3>I should emphasize that this is not something we can

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 3>expect in the next decade or so. I think that

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 3>this is probably at least two or three decades away,

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 3>and maybe even further. There are several steps involved in uploading. First,

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 3>you need to scan the brain in extreme detail, and

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 3>the main concept there is that somehow you freeze the

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 3>brain and you cut it up in thin, thin, thin slices,

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 3>and then you scan.

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Each slice whoa.

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 3>And then you have to somehow organize all the information

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 3>you have gotten out of this and use that on

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 3>the machine. That is then meant to run your mind.

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 3>That would be an example of so called destructive uploading,

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 3>which requires that your brain is destroyed.

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it seems you really have to commit to.

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 3>It absolutely, and many people might hesitate about that.

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>So that's option one. Freeze your brain, slice it really thin,

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>scan each slice, and then reconstruct the three D structure

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of your brain, all the neurons and how they're connected

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>to each other. Of course the problem with that is

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that you have to freeze your brain and slice it.

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Fortunately there's option number two.

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 3>But the more ambitious concept if you're worry about having

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 3>your brain destroyed, is the idea of non destructive uploading.

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 3>So that requires figuring out how to do this scanning

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 3>thing with out destroying the brain. That would be to

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 3>have nano robots somehow, maybe through the blood stream, enter

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:11.239
<v Speaker 3>the brain and photograph and otherwise record what is going

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 3>on there in the brain.

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>WHOA, I thought you were going to say something like fMRI,

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 1>like some kind of magnetic scanner somehow reads yourselves. Is

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:21.479
<v Speaker 1>that a possibility?

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:25.679
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. If that were doable, then that sounds

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 3>less invasive.

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>So then idia would be nano robots who'd go into

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>your blood stream. It would get into your brain. And

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>then how do they record all your neurons.

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 3>That's something that has to be figured out, but some

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 3>sort of electromagnetic recording device, and then maybe they can

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 3>transfer this information the radio link or.

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Something that's uption number two nanobots. We'll talk about other

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>ways to scan or capture who you are later in

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the program, but for now, that's pretty good.

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Once you scan your brain, what's thanks? Okay. And then

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>once you scan your brain, you presumably have a picture

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of how all your neurons are connected to each other.

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Right, a kind of three D picture. But the key

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 3>feature is that it's going to contain all the information

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 3>about connectedness between synapses and so on and so forth,

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 3>enough to reconstruct the whole brain state. And then yeah,

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 3>the brain processes, the thinking and so on started on

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 3>the computer.

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating. Okay. So, now, once you have a bottel of

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>your brain, then you would create a new brain, or

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you would stimulate one in the computer.

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 3>The idea would be to run this on a computer,

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 3>and if this simulation is faithful enough, some people hope

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 3>that this would actually be as good as having a

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 3>new brain. Wow, in a sense, even better. If you

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 3>are the kind of person who valuesness, maybe getting your

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 3>robot body as a replacemant for your present and highly imperfect,

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 3>presumably flesh and blood body. Or alternatively, if you want

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 3>to live in maybe other environments than the physical environment

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 3>that you maybe not maybe you could migrate to virtual

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 3>worlds on some really big computer that can host maybe

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 3>emulations of you and your loved ones and fans and

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 3>everybody who wants to join, could maybe live in a

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 3>society on this machine. It's the kind of technology that

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 3>we don't know if it's doable, but we also don't

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 3>have like physical limits that show that it's impossible, so

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 3>it may be worth thinking about.

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, So that's uploading your brain and simulating it

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in a computer, and you can imagine there are several

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>reasons you might want to do this. Maybe you're near

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of your life and this could be a

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 1>way for you to live longer, maybe even forever. But

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>according to doctor Hagstrom, there are other things you could

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>do with this technology, starting with cloning yourself.

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 3>In a sense, a more radical thing you might do

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 3>is that once you have this emulation running on the machine,

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 3>it's an easy thing to copy it, so you can

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 3>have several emulations of yourself running on the machine.

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>WHOA, You could clone yourself basically.

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And it's a much more precise thing than just

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 3>genetic cloning, because if you would, through genetics create clowns

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 3>on yourself, well, that would be persons who would share

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 3>your g you know, but not your upbringing and education

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 3>and so on. So they might be very different people,

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 3>just like identical twins typically somewhat different people. But in

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 3>this case you get a pair of ultra identical twins,

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 3>much much more identical than the identical twins we have now.

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 3>And each one of these simulations would feel like they argue,

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 3>So this would give rise to maybe even legal questions

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 3>about who has ownership to your possessions and if you're married,

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 3>who gets yourselves?

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm not sure my spouse can handle more than

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>one of me. She already gets frustrated enough with one

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of me.

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 3>So it's quite a far out scenario, and it's not

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 3>easy to figure out how we would organize a society

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 3>where we have easy access to this uploading technology.

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, once you're in the cloud, you could copy yourself,

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>and your copies could live in different robots or in

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>different virtual worlds, although this opens up some logistical problems.

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 3>And I give one other example of a legal issue

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 3>that might arise.

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, please, namely if.

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 3>At this future time we still value the idea of

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 3>democracy and every person has one vote, and an argument

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 3>should be made that emulated minds should have the same

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 3>rights as democratic citizens as biological minds, because they are

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 3>as capable as us, and they have the same canceled

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 3>feelings and so forth, so they should really have the

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 3>whole package of human rights. But if there's an election

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 3>coming up and you really root for this candidate rather

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 3>than the other candidate, what is going to prevent you

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 3>then from making a thousand emulated copies on you and

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 3>the collective of you will get one thousand votes in

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 3>this election. How would you construct a system of democracy

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 3>which can function in a world with emulated minds without

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 3>having these manipulations of the system.

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness. Yeah, that would probably blow the minds

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of our current politicians, who can't even handle voting by mail.

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Right, we can do it and Sweden, but I hear

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 3>you have some problems in the United States.

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes, democracy will get kind of sticky once people start

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>uploading and copying their brains. I mean, just think about

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>how many votes you have to count.

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 3>When coppying is cheap. I don't know what will happen

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 3>to the world population. I can imagine that we might

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 3>quickly go from the billions to the trillions or quadrillions

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 3>of people.

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it'll be cheaper to run a person

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>on a computer than to have them be alive.

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. One reason for thinking so is that we have

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 3>this very rapid development in computer efficiency, which doesn't seem

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 3>to be about to start.

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Although on the plus that you wouldn't need healthcare

0:11:55.600 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>only tech support. Hey, today's IT technicians could be tomorrow's doctors.

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Another interesting application of uploading your brain is space travel.

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 3>There is really strong reason to replace these bodies that

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 3>we now have that are extremely ill suited for space

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 3>travel by robotic bodies, and uploading technology could achieve that

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 3>could be a case sep in conquering the galaxy and

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 3>other galaxies.

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>This could be one of the positives of uploading your brain.

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:38.359
<v Speaker 1>If we could colonize space with our emulations of brains.

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, potentially the biggest positives.

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, we could upload our brains and explore the cosmos.

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Your mind could live inside a spacecraft and be powered

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>for thousands of years by a solar or nuclear battery,

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and you could travel and get to distant stars and

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>explore the other side of the galaxy, or visit this

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 1>super massive black hole at the center of it. Or

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you could even imagine traveling to the edge of the universe.

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, The last question I asked doctor Hagstrom was

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>what would it mean if we could do this? What

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>do you think it says that uploading your mind is possible?

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>What does it say about us as humans?

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps if this is true, then it gives reason for

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 3>us to be a bit more humble in realizing that

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 3>our present kind of existence is not as uniquely tied

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 3>to our present bodies as we thought it was.

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>The idea that we can be copied. She tells that

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 1>we're replaceable.

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 3>I guess, which is certainly worrying thought. And I think

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 3>that it's something we should ask ourselves very carefully before

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 3>we launch this technology, because if we don't think about

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 3>these questions carefully and arrive at the solution of how

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 3>to design in the society with uploaded minds that makes

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 3>us happy and satisfied, we might end up with something

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 3>that we would then deeply regret.

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's a pretty good overview of what the technology is,

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>how it might work, and what we could use it for.

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>The next question is can it actually be done. We'll

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>dig into the nitty gritty details of scanning your brain

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>with a neuroscientist, and then later we'll talk to an

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>expert about whether an uploaded you would still be you

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>stay with us, we'll be right back. Welcome back. Okay,

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about uploading your brain to a computer, and

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>so far we've learned what that means and what you

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>could do with it. Next, we're going to talk to

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Professor Dwayne Godwin, a neuroscientist at Wake Forest University, about

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>whether he thinks any of this is actually possible. Doctor

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Godwin and I wrote a book together called Out of

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind, in which we explore this and other fascinating

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>questions about the brain. Here's what he said, what's the

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>current state of the art in terms of scanning your brain?

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>What kind of information into what resolution can we do that?

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 4>So, one of the ways that we can do it

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 4>on the structural side is something called ultra high field MRI.

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 4>There's this giant magnet that's alternating a magnetic field, and

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 4>it's able to compose a functional image as well as

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 4>the structural image of the brain. And it's able to

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 4>do that at a pretty high resolutions. It can resolve

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 4>the living brain at submillimeter detail, so less than a millimeter,

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 4>but not at the level of synapses are on the

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 4>level of microns and nanometers. That's the level at which

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 4>synapses and synaptic protein are operating.

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I see you're not getting the details of like this

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>neuron is sending a signal to that neuron. Right, that's

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>too small.

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 4>That's right, that's too small.

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that can get better over time? Like?

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Are people trying to make that micro level fMRI?

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, everything gets better all the time. I guess the

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 4>question is is the current state capable of doing what

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 4>you posed in your initial question? And I would say no,

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 4>at the moment, it's incapable of doing that. But can

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 4>you imagine that some day in the future there would

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 4>be you know, sufficiently strong magnets or ways to capture

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 4>that information. Yeah, sure, you could imagine that. It's just

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 4>that it's not here yet.

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>All right. That sounds promising. There's also the option of

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>slicing your brain. Would that work to capture who you are.

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 4>So there are methods where you can look at that

0:16:54.040 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 4>level of detail. Unfortunately, those methods require that you die.

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 4>We don't yet have wadys of looking at it without

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:07.239
<v Speaker 4>taking chunks of your brain out, essentially pickling them and

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 4>then slicing them into very very thin sections of brain

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 4>that we then aim an electron beam at in order

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 4>to look at the proteins that are in those very

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 4>fine level synapses. So yeah, it's in principle possible for

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 4>you to capture that level of detail from a human brain.

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 4>We do it from animal brains all the time. But

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 4>what you're getting is the instant after you had actually died.

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 4>So I don't think you want to be necessarily preserved

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 4>in that state, right.

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that would not be my preferred way to scan

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>my brain. And the problem here is also that you'd

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>be scanning a not so fresh brain. Yes, Like the

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>process would have to be like I die and then

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.719
<v Speaker 1>my brain is sliced. It has to be sliced right

0:17:57.760 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>away before it spoils.

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 4>Basically, yeah, it would take many hours most likely before

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 4>I could be placed into a state where my body

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 4>could be preserved in order to be able to make

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 4>those fine sections of tissue. And even then it would

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 4>be after my brain had been deprived of oxygen for

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 4>a while. Things might not be looking so good inside

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 4>my old brain. So bringing me back might bring me

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 4>back to the moment of my demise, and I might

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 4>not be in such good shape.

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Then you might be missing parts of the brain, like

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it might be a corrupted scan of your brain.

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly, all right.

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>So you can't do any of this right now. But

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>as doctor Godwood mention, these are technical problems. You could

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>imagine that in the future we could come up with

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 1>better fMRI technology or figure right away to perfectly slice

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>your brain without any of it going bad. The next

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>question I had for him was would it be enough?

0:18:56.480 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Would a scan of your brain be sufficient to recreate

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>who you are? Well, let's talk a little bit about

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the challenges here. Like, let's say I get an fMRI

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>down to where I can detect neurons and how they're

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>connected to each other, basically the snapshot of the web

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of the network in my brain of neurons. Is that

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>enough you think to recreate me in a computer?

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's think about it this way. By an analogy.

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 4>Let's say you wanted to know how your computer worked.

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what if.

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.400
<v Speaker 4>You could take the very best photograph and the very

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 4>best scan of the structure of your computer right now, Okay,

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 4>down to the level of individual connections and logic gates

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 4>like the circuit. Yeah, like the circuit. Would you be

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 4>able to tell whether your computer was on social media

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 4>or running Microsoft Word versus some other thing that it

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 4>might be doing. So that there's kind of a difference

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 4>here between getting a good picture of the hardware of

0:19:56.600 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 4>the brain and the ability to understand what the brain

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:01.719
<v Speaker 4>is doing at any given moment.

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>What doctor Godwin is saying here is even if we

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>could scan your brain down to the molecular level, that

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean we understand how the brain works. Let's say

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm able to perfectly scan your brain and detect every

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>neuron connection it's in abs Wait, I have all this

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>information about my brain, and let's say it's pretty intact.

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Could I get a computer to run it?

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's always a mistake to say something can't

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 4>be done. The best I can say right now is

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 4>that we're not in a position to do that right now.

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 4>But with some of the new computer architectures and chip architectures.

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 4>You know, there are these things called neuromorphic chips. I

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 4>think we could probably run simulations at some point in

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 4>the future that will almost perfectly emulate a lot of

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 4>the different states.

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Of your brain.

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 4>And I think, you know, looking who knows ten one

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 4>hundred years into the future, when AI is actually able

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 4>to help us, not only mimic the brain, but all

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.239
<v Speaker 4>so help us and tell us the things that need

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 4>to be done to improve resolution and computation, then yeah,

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 4>I could see these things happening in the future.

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were going to say that it was

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>not possible because we don't know all the processes that

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>are happening at the synapse level and the neurons. We

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know yet how to create a simulation of the brain.

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think that's correct that we don't yet know

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 4>how to do that, But I think your question was

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:26.640
<v Speaker 4>broader about will we ever be able to do that.

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm an optimist about these things. I think there could

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 4>be at some point in the future a powerful enough computer,

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 4>enough computational power, enough understanding of how these different elements

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.360
<v Speaker 4>within the brain, the different connections are made, and how

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 4>information flows from one part of the brain to the

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 4>other that, yeah, you could run some sort of simulation

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 4>that is very much like you, but we're aways from that.

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 1>What doctor Godwin is saying here is that right now

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>we just don't yet fully understand how the brain works.

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>But if doctor Godwin said, with more signs, we could

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 1>know all of this in the future. Until then, I

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 1>asked doctor Godwin about an alternate scenario, one in which

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you maybe don't have to scan all of your brain,

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>and that is using AI or artificial intelligence. Okay, next question,

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>do you think you could train an AI to be.

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.160
<v Speaker 4>You could do you train an AI to think like you? Well,

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 4>I think that you could certainly train an AI to

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 4>follow you around, follow your movements, listen to your voice,

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 4>see what you see. Maybe you've written several books, you know,

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 4>the AI could train on that and make an astment

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 4>of what it would be like to have an AI

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 4>Woge or an AI Dwyane.

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Okay, how about this sci fi scenario. What if I

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>create an AI that is conscious, that is like thinking

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and is sentient, but it's sort of like a blank

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>version of a human, And then I can go, Okay,

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:56.959
<v Speaker 1>I make a copy of this and train it on Whoorge,

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>so that it's basically like a sentient being trained to

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>be like Orge.

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's not a bad approach. And I wrote a

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 4>blog post some years ago where I was saying, well,

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 4>maybe this is a path because you know, there are

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 4>probably some aspects of how the brain works that are

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 4>common to almost everyone. So for example, walking walking is

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 4>a thing that people with two legs all do, and

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 4>that program is probably pretty consistent from one person to another.

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 4>So you could see stringing together a number of those

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 4>different things and then say, Okay, let's put that in

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 4>an android brain or body, and then let's just focus

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 4>on the thing that makes four hay or hay interesting.

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Meaning maybe you don't need to upload your whole brain, Like,

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe you don't need to scan every single synapse and

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you're run in your brain just the parts that really

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>make me who I am, so that we can then

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>program that or put that into a generic, hopefully better

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>looking and smarter, perversion of meat.

0:23:55.960 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's not an unreasonable idea, right, So yeah, yeah,

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 4>it might be that you don't need to upload your

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 4>whole brain.

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>You might only need to upload or train an AI

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on the parts that make you uniquely you. Okay, now

0:24:12.359 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>let's say that we could one day scan your brain

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and run a pretty good simulation of it in a computer.

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>What's that program technically be alive? And more important, would

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>it actually be you? In other words, would any of

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>this actually work? When we come back, we're going to

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>tackle this question, and fair warning, it's going to get

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>very philosophical. Stay with us, we'll be right back. Hey,

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 1>welcome back. All right, we're talking about uploading your brain

0:24:56.280 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to a computer, and so far we've learned what it is,

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it could be useful, and whether a brain scientist thinks

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it's possible. Next, we're going to answer the question would

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>this actually work. Let's say we could scan your brain

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>down to the synapse and maybe even the molecular level,

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and let's say we could get a computer to somehow

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>simulate your brain. Well, there are two very big questions

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>about what happens next, and these questions are mainly philosophical.

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.199
<v Speaker 1>So to take us through this, I reached out to

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Professor Qualtiero Piccinini. Well, thank you, doctor Piccinini for joining.

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Us, Thank you for having me. I'm a philosophy professor

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 2>at University of Missouri. So I researched mostly philosophy of

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 2>mind and the mind sciences.

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, the first question we're going to tackle here is

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:56.199
<v Speaker 1>whether the brain that you simulate in the computer has consciousness. Okay,

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean?

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Means that it has a subjective experience, you know, like

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 2>real emotions that it feels, or visual or auditory perceptions

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 2>that it actually perceives, or thoughts that it can access

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 2>and tell you what they are from the inside, as

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 2>opposed to just you know, uttering the words. Sometimes philosophers

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 2>call this phenomenal consciousness or what it's like to be you.

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Consciousness is a very tricky subject, one that we could

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>spend the whole episode talking about, but it's basically the

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>difference between the feeling that you have that you're a

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 1>person and you have thoughts and emotions and a certain

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>self awareness, and a pre programmed machine that only reacts

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to things yourself. Doctor Piccinini puts.

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 2>It, Okay, what I'm saying is a simulation of a brain,

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 2>would that experience anything or would it just be crunching

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 2>some numbers? And then at the end it gives you

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 2>an output that sounds like things that you would have

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 2>said or behaves that you would have exhibited with your body.

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:07.680
<v Speaker 2>But behind that there's no actual subjective feelings or thoughts.

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>But I guess, if it's simulating a brain, wouldn't it

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>have internal states and wouldn't it have representations of feelings

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>If it's going to simulate how we process information.

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it would have representations of feelings. That a representation

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:27.239
<v Speaker 2>of a feeling is not necessarily a feeling, just like

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 2>a representation of a fire doesn't necessarily burn anything, or

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 2>representation of wind doesn't blow anything I see, or a

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 2>representation of volcano doesn't have any real hot lava. It's

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 2>a representation and it's dynamical, it evolves, you know. It

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:46.920
<v Speaker 2>tells you when the volcano is erupting, and when the

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 2>lava is coming out, and how many things it burns

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 2>on its path. But then it's still just a representation

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 2>of all these things. It doesn't destroy anything.

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I see. What doctor Paccinini is saying is that

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it's an open question whether or not a simulation of

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a brain in a computer can be conscious. There are

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of theories about what is needed to have consciousness,

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and some of them say a computer program can have consciousness,

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and some of them say a computer can't. As you

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>put it, a simulation of a volcano is not a volcano.

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>It all hinges on the question of whether consciousness requires

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 1>you to have a body or not.

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 2>A few of these theories do posit that the right

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 2>kind of information processing is sufficient for consciousness, but a

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of them do not, and in fact positive the opposite,

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 2>that something more is needed. A certain kind of physical

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 2>process or a certain kind of living system has to

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 2>be there.

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I see there is something about that computation being in

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a biological system that maybe makes it true consciousness.

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I've seen more people defending the idea that it

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 2>takes more than just computation to generate a real mind.

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 2>And for example, there's a very distinguished psychologist, a neuroscientist

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 2>by the name of Anil Seth, and he has an

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 2>article coming out now in an important journal defending the

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 2>idea that you have to be alive to be conscious.

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 2>So conscious requires a biological system. I don't necessarily agree

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 2>that it has to be biological. I'm not totally convinced,

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:29.479
<v Speaker 2>but one point that I agree with is that it

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 2>takes more than just computation or information processing.

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Now, there's a lot of debate between philosophers and neuroscientists

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>about this, But doctor Piccinini says, there's a growing sense

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that your brain uploaded to a computer wouldn't really be

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a conscious being simply because it doesn't have a body.

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>That maybe there's something about having a physical body that's

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>essential to having consciousness. I wonder what you're saying is

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that we say, somehow need the need to be alive

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>as a functioning biological system in order to have the

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>experience that we know of as the human experience.

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's what Aniel Seth says, that we have to

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 2>be alive. I don't know if we have to be alive,

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 2>but like for us to even be able to process

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 2>information in the right kind of way, all these other

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 2>background conditions have to be in place, and they seem

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 2>to be part of what makes the system be able

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 2>to have experiences, conscious experiences, conscious thoughts.

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Meaning if I lived inside of a computer in a bus,

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be the same experience.

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and maybe there wouldn't be any experience at all.

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 2>It would just be dead sort of states or unconscious

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 2>states of information.

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>So even if you uploaded your brain to a computer,

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it might not work. It wouldn't exist in the same

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>way that you exist right now. And this brings us

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to the second big philosophical question, which is would that

0:30:56.640 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>uploaded you still be you.

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Normally, we can make a simulation of whatever system we choose,

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 2>and we have the original target system, and we're simulating,

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 2>like say the weather, and then we have a simulation

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 2>of the weather, but the weather is still there. That was,

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, We're just trying to simulate it over there,

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 2>and the simulation is a different system. So why would

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 2>anybody think that if we build a simulation of your brain,

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 2>then somehow you enter the simulation instead of staying there

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 2>where you are in your brain. I see, But yeah,

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 2>that's not you, that's a copy.

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Meaning like, there's this fantasy that I would close my eyes,

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I would feel like I'm going through a tunnel and

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>suddenly I'm in a computer. That's the fantasy, yeah, But

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in reality, it's like I'll close my eyes and I'll

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>open them again, and then now suddenly there's something that's

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>like me on the computer.

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think so.

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>But for the thing in the computer, they would have

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the experience of going to the tunnel, wouldn't they.

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, they wouldn't exist before, so maybe they would have

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 2>a memory, you know, like a false memory of that.

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh false a maoun.

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 2>This gets so tricky.

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, this kind of blows the whole idea wide open.

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 1>What doctor Paccinini is saying is that the whole concept

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of uploading your mind is not possible, and that's because

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 1>your mind is not like a file that can be transferred.

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>What you'd really be doing is making a copy of

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>your mind and then uploading that. But you would still

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>stay where you are. You wouldn't leave your body, which

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>begs the question what's the point then?

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 2>And maybe, you know, maybe some people would like to

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 2>have a copy of them made it, and that's fine,

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 2>but let's not confuse that with you surviving in that way.

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's not a way for you to survive.

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 2>That's just the way to make a copy of you.

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I think you're arguing that the words uploading your mind

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>are just false because it's really more like you're uploading

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a copy of your mind. Yes, all right, but here's

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a twist, doct Cappuccinini things there is a way for

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you to upload your brain and have it actually be

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you that gets uploaded. And this is a scenario that

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I had never heard before.

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 2>And the other idea is replacing parts of your brain

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 2>with some microchips a little bit at a time, and

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 2>so nothing of your brain is left anymore and it's

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 2>all microchips instead. So in the case the brain replacement,

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 2>it's actual a little more plausible that if you really

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 2>replace one part of your brain at a time, eventually

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 2>you sort of become all made out of artificial components,

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 2>because it's there's this one you, you know, there's one

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 2>system all along.

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you do it's slow enough, like a

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>ship of pieces, then you could transfer. Yeah, okay, this

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is a scenario where you gradually replace your brain one

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>part at a time, little by little, you would change

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>out parts of your brain with computer chips and computer parts.

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>In that case, you could stay you the whole time,

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and the being that ends up in the computer would

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>technically be a continuation of the you you are right now. Now.

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I have to say this, but

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.879
<v Speaker 1>the technology to do any of this is pretty far

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>out in the future, if it's even possible at all.

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's important to think about the philosophical questions because

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 1>it might help us figure out if it's worth doing.

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:31.919
<v Speaker 2>So, don't fall for it. And if anybody says, oh,

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 2>give us a million dollars and we'll freeze your brain

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 2>and then we'll upload your mind into a computer someday,

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 2>it's a scam. You wouldn't do it. I wouldn't do it. No,

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 2>I'll give a million dollars a charity before I do that. Wait,

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 2>before I do that.

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, spend them on a real person, not a

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>fake version of you. Right, all right, here's what we

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 1>learned today. A lot of smart people thinking about the

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>idea of uploading your brain. And technically there's nothing so

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>far that says that this is not physically possible. You

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>could imagine the science and the technology one day being

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 1>advanced enough to do it. But the bigger question is

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is it worth it? Would it actually be you that's uploaded,

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and with that uploaded version actually be alive and conscious.

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 1>The answer seems to be probably not, in which case

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe the better question to ask is can we upgrade

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 1>our brains?

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 2>That seems to.

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 1>Be something we more desperately need these days. Thanks for

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>downloading us into your podcast player. I'll see you next week.

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to science stuff. The production of iHeartRadio

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 1>written and produced by me Or hitch Ham, edited by

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Rose Seguda, Executive producer Jerry Rowland, an audio engineer and

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>mixer Casey pepperm and you can follow me on social media.

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Just search for PhD Comics and the name of your

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>favorite platform. Be sure to subscribe to sign stuff on

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts,

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and please tell your friends We'll be back next Wednesday

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 1>with another episode.