WEBVTT - Bloomberg Intelligence: Disney Earnings, Tesla Layoff Fears

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>with Alex Steinhl and Paul'sweeny.

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 2>The real app performance has been the US corporate high yield.

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 3>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical business.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 2>These are two big time blue chip companies.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 4>The window between the peak and cut changing super fast.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steinel and Paul's Wheenye on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big business

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 2>stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Each and every week, we provide research and data on

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 4>some of the two thousand companies in one hundred and

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 4>thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Today, we'll look at why Tesla Stiff are said to

0:00:58.200 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 2>be bracing for potential job.

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 4>Cuts, discuss why warre in the Middle East is hurting

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 4>McDonald's sales.

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 2>For first, we dive into Walt Disney. Earlier in the week,

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 2>the company reported better than expected earnings for its fiscal

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 2>first quarter and issued an upbeat profit outlook for the year.

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 4>For more on all of this, we were joined by Githerang,

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 4>Na than Bloomberg intelligence analyst on US media, and we

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 4>asked her why there is reason for optimism at the company.

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 6>Disney is definitely back back with the bank. One of

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 6>the big pain points with Disney has really been the

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 6>lack of streaming profitability. But now there seems to be

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 6>a clear path to the streaming business kind of getting

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 6>to that profitability metric. So we saw the losses come

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 6>in way below expectations. It was sixty five percent below

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 6>what people were projecting. They're still kind of guiding to,

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 6>you know, hitting profitability by the September quarter, but most people,

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 6>I think on the street expected to happen much much sooner.

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 6>And then Hugh Johnston, who was the new CFO and

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 6>this was his first call with Disney, basically said that

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 6>look to or expect double digit operating margins in the

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 6>streaming business. And I think that was something that was

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 6>really really powerful because we know that, you know, the

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 6>number that we're all chasing is that twenty percent operating

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 6>margin where you know, Netflix has been I think the

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 6>one area that we kind of still need clarity is

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 6>how all of this the streaming bundles are going to work.

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 6>So it's really good to see them kind of be

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 6>proactive and go out with their own solution. So they

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 6>have that sports super app that's coming out a little

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 6>bit later this year in conjunction with Fox and Warner Brothers.

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 6>They have their own ESPN Plus standalone app. Again a

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 6>little bit of you know, we're not really sure whether

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 6>those are necessarily going to cannibalize each other. I don't

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 6>think so. I think really Disney what they're trying to

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 6>do here is kind of create this this super bundle

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 6>because they know that, you know, content bundling works and

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 6>everybody's kind of looking aggregation is the holy grail, and

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 6>I think Disney wants to be at the forefront of it.

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 6>But definitely we need a little bit more kind of

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 6>clarity at least around like what the financial value creation

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 6>is going to be.

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 2>How about the theme park business that seems to continue

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 2>to be a really solid business for them, and I

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 2>know they you know, they announce several months ago that

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 2>they're really stepping up their investment in their theme parks

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 2>and their cruises and all that kind of stuff. How

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 2>did that business do very very well.

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 6>So again, operating income was for the quarter was well

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 6>above three billion dollars. That was again above what the

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 6>street was expecting. And really what we're seeing is a

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 6>lot of momentum at the International parks. So they opened,

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 6>you know, they've opened so many new attractions in their

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 6>overseas properties. You have a new Frozen Land in Hong Kong,

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 6>you have the new Zootopia attraction in in Shanghai, and

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 6>both of those are doing really really well for the company,

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 6>and that has really enabled them to take, you know,

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 6>implement all of these price increases. So International parks really

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 6>kind of doing extremely well. Domestically. There's a little bit

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 6>of pressure from wage inflation, there's a little bit of

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 6>pressure from you know, tough comms from like the Walt

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 6>Disney World fifty that anniversary celebration, But again, just transient

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 6>parks are really set up very very well. And you

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 6>mentioned the sixty billion dollar investment. Now seventy percent of

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 6>that capex is going to be towards new attractions, So

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 6>this is really going to be a major major profit

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 6>driver for them going forward.

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 4>Gito, there was a journal article that I just felt

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 4>like helped someone like me who's not seeped in Disney,

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 4>Like you guys understand how they're just seeping in to

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 4>all the Americana.

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 3>That's out there. They said, Taylor, Swift, football and Fortnite.

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 4>But like anywhere that you will want to be or

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 4>listen to or watch, Disney will be there. What did

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 4>you make of the Fortnite investment?

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 6>Super smart move by them, right, It's so strategic, it's

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 6>so smart, and it's still a kind of not a

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 6>huge investment. One point five billion gives them some steak,

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 6>gives them some skin in the game, and there's a

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 6>lot of upside, not too much downside. So I think

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 6>a really good way for them. And remember, Alex, they've

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 6>had this kind of really checkered past when it comes

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 6>to video games. It's not that they haven't been there.

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 6>They were in the publishing business. Didn't really work out

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 6>for them. They exited that business in twenty sixteen started

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 6>licensing out a lot of their content. But you know, licensing,

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 6>you're still kind of this passive participant. They really need

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 6>to be there. They need to be an active participant

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 6>in the video gaming industry. There's so much overlap between

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 6>all of the audiences that go to the you know,

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 6>the Disney parks and the people who are gaming, right,

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 6>it's all these youngsters and they really want to be

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 6>there and this is a great way for them to

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 6>do it.

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 2>What are they saying about the theatrical business, You.

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 6>Know, the content the studio has not really been the

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 6>blockbuster that it was. We've had a whole string of

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 6>misfires over the past few months. But I think what

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.359
<v Speaker 6>bar Baker was saying is they are in the process

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 6>of rebuilding. The whole content pipeline is refilling. They're having

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 6>this really smart move here with this new Taylor Swift

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 6>movie coming out on March fifteenth, and then they spoke about,

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.919
<v Speaker 6>you know, having this new Moana movie. This was originally

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 6>going to be a series on Disney, plus it's now

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 6>going to be a theatrical, full blown theatrical release. And again,

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 6>we're prepping for twenty twenty six, really, which is going

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 6>to be the biggest year for the box office ever

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 6>since the pandemic, and a lot of that will be

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 6>Disney kind of driving the slate right with. You have

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 6>the whole Star Wars coming back with Mandalorian and Grogu.

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 6>You have a whole set of Marvel releases, so it's

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 6>going to be really interesting as we kind of build that.

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 6>So again, nothing really major in twenty twenty four, maybe

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 6>other than you know, kind of the Deadpool movie, but

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 6>we're kind of building to what's a much stronger slate

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 6>I'm in twenty five twenty.

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Nothing big coming except for the Deadpool. Excuse me, I've

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 4>been waiting for this movie for years. Deadpool three.

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 2>You're a big fan of the franchise.

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 4>Definitely not my audience that I'm talking to right now.

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 4>This is the third one having Wolverine make a little cameo.

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Whatever. Anyway, it's gonna be awesome.

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 5>Paul.

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 4>What do you make of like how fast Disney was

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 4>able to move, Well, a lot.

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Of people tell you they didn't move fast enough. But

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 2>it's I think when i Biger came in, I mean, yeah, yeah,

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 2>and it's but the stock's been kind of dead money

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 2>for a while and Githa well knows here. It's just

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 2>a question of when can we get a sense of

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 2>when the streaming losses are going to be in the

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 2>rear view mirror, and you know, bob Byger's surprises. You know,

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess a year or so ago when he said

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 2>some of these assets might be for sale, like the

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 2>ABC networks, some of the cable networks. Any update on that.

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 6>Yes, we did have him kind of say everything's up

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 6>for sale, and then he kind of walked back all

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 6>of that. It's kind of starting to make sense because

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 6>they're obviously taking all that content, they're putting it now

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 6>on the super app, So it makes sense for them

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 6>to still kind of hold on to their linear TV

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 6>assets because they still do have very valuable sports rights

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 6>on there. So I think they're kind of aiming for

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 6>this bigger, kind of grander strategy. I don't necessarily think

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 6>that they're looking to sell any of their linear TV

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 6>networks right now.

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to KEITHA. Rong Andathan Bloomberg, intelligence analysts on

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 2>US Media.

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 4>We turn now to the financial services sector. This week,

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 4>UBS reported a fourth quarter net law, citing higher expenses.

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 4>The bank also announced it will buy back up to

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 4>one billion dollars in shares this year, and this comes

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 4>as UBS seeks to keep investors focused on the upside

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 4>of its complex integration of credits.

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 2>Weeeze for more on this. We were joined by Alison

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Williams Bloomberg Intelligence senior analysts Global banks and asset Managers.

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 2>I asked her what her key takeaways were from this

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 2>week's earnings.

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 7>Investor's got as much as they could. They may have

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 7>wanted a bit more. The one negative thing for the

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 7>outlook is that twenty twenty four estimates are likely going

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 7>to come down a little bit because you know, the

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 7>returns are going to be lower. But that's because I

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 7>think UBS is trying to be aggressive in you know,

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 7>pulling forward those costs. So they did upsize the costs

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 7>on a growth basis, but they're going to invest those

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 7>so not falling to the bottom line, so perhaps some

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.679
<v Speaker 7>disappointment there. They did reiterate their sort of three year target.

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 7>They gave a longer term target that was in line

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.559
<v Speaker 7>with the high end before credits we so I think

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 7>those were all positive. The buybacks also a little bit

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 7>better than expected. The big positive news was twenty seven

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 7>percent increase in dividend. Also fourth quarter, you know, not

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.559
<v Speaker 7>so much great things going on there, so that the

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 7>miss was on costs. Their adjusted costs fell, Their integration

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 7>costs or the restructing costs were much bigger than expected.

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 7>The wealth flows moderated a little bit, and the investment

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 7>buying lost money.

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Allison, what is the new UBS here post Credit Swiss

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 2>and full disclosure on a client of UBS used to

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 2>work at Credit Swiss. So I'm all over the Swiss

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 2>stuff here. But what's where does UBS want to be

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 2>now that they've acquired Credits Swiss? What are their ambitions

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 2>visa a global financial institution?

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.959
<v Speaker 7>So I don't think that the big picture strategy has

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 7>changed much for them, right, So they their focuses on wealth,

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 7>you know, they're the premier global wealth manager. They added

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 7>some assets, they added some relationships with Credit Suite in

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 7>the investment bank. Again, they're still focused on equities. So

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 7>even though profit disappointed, revenue came in about in line.

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 7>So that's that's a positive thing. On the equities trading

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 7>side of things. They did add, you know, some incremental ads.

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 7>There were some numbers around the traders. The Bloomberg News reported,

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 7>We obviously look at the top line of revenue. They

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 7>kept the M and A and the research areas were

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 7>the areas that they added to and those areas did

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 7>pretty well.

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 8>On the corner.

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 4>So what else do you need to hear to get

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 4>more confidence in all of this mean just like a

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 4>kind of holding wait for two more years.

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 7>Basically, I think it is like a show me right,

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 7>So I think it's going to be a step by

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 7>step So Armandi, as you know, said that you know,

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 7>they might sacrifice a little bit of revenue because they

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 7>are focused on profitability. They're focused on doing things right.

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 7>So again like those are the types of things that

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 7>you have to have confidence. He has done a big

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 7>turnaround at UBS before. But I think that it is

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 7>the kind of thing where it's like quartered by quarter.

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.319
<v Speaker 7>Investors have to start to see, you know, some support

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 7>for these estimates. Another target they put out was one

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.599
<v Speaker 7>hundred billion per year for the next two years in

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 7>net new wealth asset. So I think that's a pretty

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 7>good target. But again we saw some slowing in the

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 7>fourth quarter. Some of that was mandates leaving with credit sweee,

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 7>relationship managers still pretty stable. But I think investors will

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 7>want to see you know more so you know, over

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 7>the next few quarters, UBS delivering on its plans.

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 2>So Elison, just, I mean you cover everything the all

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 2>the global big investment banks, commercial banks. Here is the

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 2>global bank is that just left to the Morgan Stanley's

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 2>the Goldman Sachs is or what it doesn't seem like

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 2>anybody in Asia, anybody in Europe can compete against the

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 2>JP Morgans of the world.

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 7>So Paul, it's I mean, it's really been over the

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 7>last decade, you know, ever since you left the business,

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 7>but it was it was last decade, you know, the

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 7>US bank just follow you know, really making those market

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 7>share games. Credit SUITEE was is sort of the latest

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 7>to provide some games to those US players, if you

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 7>will keep in mind that that sale from UBS follows

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 7>them exiting prime brokerage. Before Credit Suite, we had Deutsche Bank,

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 7>who also accident in prime brokerage. They shed parts of

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 7>their fixed income business. If we went back to several

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 7>years prior, there was a lot of the European players

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 7>getting out of fix and you know, keep in mind,

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 7>it is a scale business and I think where banks

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 7>like JP, if you Morgan have been winning at In fact,

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 7>Goldman Sachs has gained the most market share over the

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 7>last several years. Or that they are investing in technology

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 7>that helps them get better revenue, that helps them have

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 7>more money to invest. And so it's really that virtuous

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 7>cycle that some of those big US banks have been enjoying.

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Alison Williams, Bloomberg Intelligence, senior analysts for global banks.

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 4>Coming up, we're going to break down earnings from Caterpillar,

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 4>one of the world's largest manufacturers of heavy machinery.

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing up

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 2>research and data on two thousand companies one hundred and

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 2>thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via b I

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:37.719
<v Speaker 2>go on the terminal, I'll Paul Sweet.

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 3>And am Alex Steel and this is Bloomberg.

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on fo Cardplay and Android

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's turn out a Tesla.

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 4>So Tesla staff are said to be racing for potential

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 4>job cuts, and we're told managers were asked whether each

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 4>of their employees' positions is critical.

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 2>We would join this week by Steve Man Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Global Autos and Industry Research Channels. You're first asked for

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 2>his take on the potential job cuts.

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 5>Job cuts are never good for the employees. But I

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 5>think the investors will probably look at it positively because

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 5>the stock's been down like twelve percent since their last

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 5>earnings call, in thirty percent year to day, and that's

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 5>all because you know, slowing EV sales, price cuts. So

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 5>the company needs to do something to address them of

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 5>the short term challenges they're facing.

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 2>So when I see news like this, it really makes

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 2>me think, Steve, that maybe they see something fundamental in

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 2>their business such that they have to look at a

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 2>big fixed cost like people. What's the company saying these

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 2>days about where they see.

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 5>Well, Man, well, that's a good question. I think you

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 5>got two questions there. First of all, fundamentally, you know,

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 5>they've done a lot of price cutting, you know, in

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 5>their operations, in the administrative side of things, in their manufacturing.

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 5>They plucked out all the low hanging fruits. There's not

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 5>much to cut anymore other than looking at their human resources,

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 5>and that's what they're doing at this time.

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 9>Now.

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 5>Obviously, you know you don't want to cut, but I

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 5>think they have to. If you look at Forge Earning's call,

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 5>the market is really brutal. They've the margins was down,

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 5>like was at negative ninety eight percent for Ford's EV

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 5>business that's worse than their third quarter. So from that

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 5>you can see the whole entire EV market is still

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 5>facing you know, price cuts, slower demand, and that's you know,

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 5>I think that's what Testa is trying to dress for

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty four he Steve.

0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 4>Do we have an idea of when the trough might

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 4>happen for evs? When is it just going to take

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 4>cheaper ones or is it going to be actually more

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 4>hybrid and that trough be really pushed out.

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 5>I think hybrid is a good kind of fill in

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 5>between now and when EV's can take off. Our view

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 5>is actually, you know, around twenty twenty six, because I

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 5>think that's when prices, cost of manufacturing evs will come

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 5>down with localization of battery production, more EV models out there,

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 5>and everyone, every automaker right now is talking about the

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 5>second generation of EV vehicles, the third generation of EV vehicles.

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 5>They're actually designed on a very different platform than the

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 5>ICE vehicles, the internal combustion engine vehicles that is supposed

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 5>to streamline production, cut parts, cut the number of parts,

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 5>and hopefully drive costs down to make it more affordable

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 5>for the consumers.

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 2>So it's a twenty six story. Will the charging infrastructure

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 2>also be a twenty six story?

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, no, there are some spending at the moment to

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 5>increase charging infrastructure. I mean, that's another bottleneck that the

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 5>industry is facing. I think you know, out in the

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 5>West coast, out in the East coast, charging infrastructure are

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 5>not of a big concern, but Central America is. So

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 5>that's where the focus is, I think in the next

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 5>couple of years to really built up the charging infrastructure

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 5>in that part of the country.

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 2>How many charging units do you have at the Princeton

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 2>campus at Bloomberg right now?

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 9>Oh, it's it's interesting.

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 5>If you go out to the parking lot here, you

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 5>think it's a Tesla dealership out here, there's probably you know, fifty.

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 4>Fifty the cars, Like, are the Teslas actually being plugged

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 4>in or ev.

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 9>Oh yeah, oh yeah, oh yeah. You'll see mostly Tesla.

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 5>You'll see a couple of Volkswagen, a couple of Volvols.

0:16:57.960 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 9>But because I that's why.

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 2>When I was at the Princeton campus, Steve, you know,

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 2>I guess I haven't been there since before the pandemic.

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 2>It's called it five years. Five years are gonna be

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 2>ad two? Now you're telling me, we have fifty. That

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 2>is a good barometer. I think Bloomberg is usually on

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 2>the cutting edge of this stuff. But still interesting.

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I wonder like, did you get the idea

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 4>that the charging was there, therefore you brought the EV's

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 4>or it's just a clientele that has the EV's unfair question,

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 4>But like, what do.

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.919
<v Speaker 5>You think that's a good question. It's all about the

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 5>cost of ownership.

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 9>You're right, Alex.

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 5>Having the charging stations here make it convenient for people

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 5>to charge and really cut their monthly costs. Right, there's

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 5>no fuel costs anymore with the evs our.

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Steve Man, Bloomberg Intelligence Global Auto Analyst.

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 4>Now we look at Caterpillar, one of my faves, one

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 4>of the world's largest manufacturers of.

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Heavy machinery, and then early in.

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 4>The week the company reported higher fourth quarter sales and

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 4>his energy and transportation business.

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 2>For more, we spoke with Chris Chilino, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 2>US machinery analyst. We first asked Chris for his key

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 2>tape ways from the earnings results.

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 10>It was a real solid print despite the fact that

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 10>we continued to see these really cautionary signs out there

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 10>of slowing demand. Four key results you know, broadly exceeded

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 10>not only our expectations, but I think Kat's internal expectations

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 10>as well. Pricing continues to surprise to the upside. The

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 10>margin performance was quite good, particularly in their energy and

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 10>transportation business. Retail sales to end users continued to hold

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 10>up reasonably well, orders came in better than we anticipated,

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:32.719
<v Speaker 10>and the cash generation of the business, you know, remains

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 10>very strong. So there's a lot of positives to take

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 10>away from the report, and I think this probably dispelled

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 10>some of those, you know, concerns over a more pronounced

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 10>or near term cyclical downturn, at least for the time being.

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 10>As it appears, you know, twenty four is really shaping

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 10>up to be a little bit maybe more resilient than

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 10>we had anticipated going into the print. That being said,

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 10>you know, we still think there remains risk and it's

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 10>mostly to the downside moving forward here, and we're really

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 10>kind of cautious on the sustainability of this performance, especially

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 10>as the macro backdrop begins to soften.

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 2>So what's the company saying about their outlook? And I

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 2>guess my question A what's the company saying and B

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 2>what's their lead time on they can how far out

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 2>can they see in terms of their orders and things

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 2>like that.

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so they're looking at twenty twenty four's kind of

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 10>being more of a flatish type top line environment. Caterpillars

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 10>notorious for not giving much on the guidance, but they're

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 10>kind of suggesting that the top line will be relatively flatish.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 10>Volumes will be down next year, So this is going

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 10>to be more of a pricing story, and particularly in

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 10>the first half of the year, as we get some

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 10>of those carryover pricing benefits. So I suspect margins will

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 10>come under some pressure and we could see some modest

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 10>contraction on the earnings line as well. In terms of

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 10>the backlog and the visibility, it's above average. The backlog

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 10>continues to be, you know, remarkably strong. You have rough

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 10>twenty seven and a half billion dollars in the backlog.

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 10>I think one of the surprises of this report to

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 10>US was orders orders implied orders only came down about

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 10>four percent, so we saw the decline and the order

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 10>rate moderate. So I think that's another positive sign that,

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 10>you know, we're not looking at this type of draconian

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 10>type scenario for twenty twenty four So.

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Explain this one to me. What about the China factor?

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 4>Because air products, their chemicals business in China did terribly

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 4>and that's why the stock is down so much. I

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 4>appreciate their different industries, but still CAT is very lover

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 4>to China. Also, what did we learn about that?

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 10>Nothing incremental?

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 9>Right?

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 10>So, Caterpillar China. For Caterpillars, historically it's been kind of

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 10>in that five to ten percent of revenues. Twenty twenty three.

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 10>This past year we were below five percent. They're telling

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 10>us that they don't anticipate much change in twenty twenty four.

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:51.479
<v Speaker 10>But if you, if you're a CAT bull, I think

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 10>that's one of the catalysts that you could potentially look at,

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 10>is that if for when we do get this China recovery,

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 10>that would certainly bode well for Cat.

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Chris, I know investors in these types of stocks,

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 2>these industrial stocks, they're used to cycles and they're probably saying,

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 2>but God, we have to have a downcycle coming up here.

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 2>But there's a lot of infrastructure work out there, stimulus

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 2>coming out of the US government out of the pandemic.

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Isn't this going to make this cycle different? Like it's

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 2>going to be longer up for these companies.

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, we hear that this cycle is different

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 10>almost all the time. Right, I'm a little bit more

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 10>in the skeptic camp. Listen, North America was tremendous this

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 10>past quarter. In this year, I think it was the

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 10>only region with positive growth on the top line. We

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 10>saw eleven percent growth here in North America. A lot

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 10>of that is largely driven by non residential and infrastructure

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 10>related spending. So it's certainly been a tailwind, and I

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 10>do suspect that still has some longevity to it here

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.479
<v Speaker 10>over the next few years. But there's a number of

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 10>cyclical factors to your point at play here, and historically

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 10>this stock when the backlock starts to come down, when

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 10>orders inflect, that's not an encouraging sign for future performance.

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 3>But we also have.

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 4>Lots of stuff like the IRA, we have the Semiconductor Bill,

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 4>we have the Industrial Act, sort of reshoring all that stuff.

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 4>We have learned from industrials that booking those getting benefits

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 4>from those pieces of legislation takes a lot longer than

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 4>the market was expecting, like just in the Chips Act.

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 4>Maybe we're seeing some stuff happening, and even that's getting

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 4>pushed out like we saw with Intel. What is Catapillar

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:23.160
<v Speaker 4>saying about that visibility?

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so I think longer term there is certainly an opportunity,

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 10>particularly what they've kind of deemed this energy transition to

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 10>alternative fuels or electrification, there is going to be demand

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 10>for mind commodities, and they anticipate that this shift will

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 10>increase their addressable market. So, no doubt, we do think

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 10>there is a longer term opportunity here. We think it's

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 10>probably still many years out before we start seeing you know,

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 10>more tangible financial impact from some of these infrastructure bill

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 10>is the is the more near term impact that we've

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 10>seen and the results this far, So we think that's

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 10>probably still a little bit longer down the road and

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 10>you know, somewhat difficult to quantify at this juncture.

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 2>So, Chris, you follow all these big industrial companies in

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 2>addition to cat I mean, you know Oshkosh, come Ins,

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 2>you know, Volvo pack Are What are those big companies

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 2>that are so skewed and so exposed kind of the

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 2>industrial side of the economy. What are they kind of

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 2>telling you these days?

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so if you think about all the machinery verticals,

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 10>we were essentially at peak cycle in twenty twenty three.

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 10>Almost all those markets we expect volumes to be down

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.959
<v Speaker 10>in twenty four, some holding up better than others. But

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.199
<v Speaker 10>I think one of the things that we continue to

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 10>hear is that this downturn looks a little bit more

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 10>modest and short lived than what we have seen historically.

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 10>I might say the one caveat to that being on

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 10>the ag side, as we continue to see crop prices

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 10>and farmer incomes under pressure. But at least at this point,

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 10>you know, we see on the commercial vehicle side being

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 10>a little bit more modest, and even on construction equipment

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 10>there's a number of offsets to the more traditional cyclical headwinds.

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 10>So again not looking at this as some kind of

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 10>a steep or severe downturn. It just seems to be

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 10>much more modest than what we've become accustomed to.

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Our Thanks to Chris Ciolino, Bloomberg Intelligence, Senior US machinery analyst.

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 4>All right, coming up on the program, we're going to

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 4>discuss why warre in the Middle East is hurting McDonald sales.

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 2>b I go on the terminal. I'm Paul Sweeney and.

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 3>I'm Alex Steele, and this is Bloomberg.

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and Android

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Just Say Alexa, playing Bloomberg eleven.

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 4>We turned out to the fast food industry. McDonald sales

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 4>missed investor expectations in the fourth quarter as growth accelerated.

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 2>To help REKIP, we were joined by Michael Halen, Bloomberg

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence senior Restaurant and food service analyst. Were first to

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 2>ask Michael for his big takeaway from McDonald's earnings results.

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it was a weaker quarter than most expected.

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:26.679
<v Speaker 9>For sure, sales growth was kind of weak. You know.

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:30.239
<v Speaker 11>They cited the impact from the Israel Hamas war and

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 11>obviously that hurt results in the Middle East, but also

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 11>in a Muslim countries like Malaysia and also countries like

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 11>France that have a large Muslim population.

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 9>It may have impacted sales here in the US a

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 9>bit as well.

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 11>There were some calls to boycott the brand right after

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 11>the start of the Israel Hamas war. Those kind of

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 11>went away in December in January, however, so there could

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 11>have been.

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 9>A mild impact in the United States as well.

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 11>And then in terms of key takeaways from the call,

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 11>you know, they don't like inspect their developmental markets where

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 11>the Middle East is located, to improve really until the

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 11>war ends. And they cited some consumer weakness in the

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 11>United States, which they have before, right, but seems like

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 11>it may be spreading in terms of you know, just

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 11>low income consumer weakness. You know, it sounds like their

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 11>customers right now are managing their guest checks.

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Mike, I'm just looking at the PGeo function on

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg turbine. I see that roughly sixty percent of

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 2>the revenue comes from franchise operated stores, in about forty

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:34.199
<v Speaker 2>percent from company operating stores. How did they make that

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 2>decision about what when they go to a particular location,

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 2>whether the franchise or own it.

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 11>I think a big part of it is return on investment, right,

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 11>So if the returns on the investment are very strong,

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 11>they typically want to hold on.

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:48.240
<v Speaker 9>To those stores or develop stores.

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 11>You know, they'll they'll do some store development in the

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 11>United States and in their more established markets, but it's

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 11>going to be a small percentage of what they're doing

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 11>going forward. You know, most of their growth is going

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 11>to be you know, done by their strong franchise partners,

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 11>particularly in China and some of these other very fast

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 11>growing markets.

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 4>Talk about the input part of the situation in terms

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 4>of their costs, in terms of their labor and all

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:14.719
<v Speaker 4>that kind of good stuff.

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:19.439
<v Speaker 11>Inflation is easing for them this year, but it's still

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 11>probably higher than normals.

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 3>They're looking at cowsman cows.

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 11>That's part of it, for sure. Beef and dairy costs

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 11>are expected to be higher this year. So but they're

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 11>looking at you know, low single digit commodity inflation in

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 11>the United.

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 9>States and abroad.

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 11>Abroad had you know, Europe had very high inflation last year,

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 11>and that that's going to settle down a bit. Labor

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 11>inflation is going to continue to be higher. And a

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 11>big chunk of a big part of that here is

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 11>you know, in the US, you know, their California April

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 11>first puts in the twenty dollars minimum wage for fast

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 11>food workers, and so that's going to impact some of

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 11>their stores, primarily their franchisees. However, so they're still seeing

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 11>you know, higher inflation than you know, we had in

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 11>the twenty teens for sure.

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Mike, I look at the stock, and you know,

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:09.120
<v Speaker 2>I need to pay a twenty two to twenty three

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 2>times earnings for this stock. What am I really getting?

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Is it something more than GDP top line growth? What's

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:17.920
<v Speaker 2>really the call behind this kind of stock?

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, Well, with their global growth, they're going to probably

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 11>grow quicker than GDP. You know, what you're buying with

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 11>a franchise business is you know, pretty stable and predictable

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:33.360
<v Speaker 11>earnings growth, free cash flow growth. There's not a lot

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 11>of operating leverage in the model, and so they're asset

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 11>light and so they can lever the business up and return.

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 9>Cash to shareholders pretty aggressively.

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 11>So it's definitely an attractive model, especially one with the

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 11>strong top line growth like McDonald's has. And they they're

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 11>also most investors can consider them slightly insulated against a

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 11>recession in slower economic times, and a big part.

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 9>Of that is that the is the value that they.

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 11>Offer during the Great Recession, they outperformed the quick service

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 11>industry pretty significantly, acquired a lot of market share during

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 11>that time, and so investors feel some safety investing in

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 11>McDonald's versus some of the other restaurant chains out there.

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 4>But that confuses me with what you said about customers

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 4>watching their checks and their items and what they're buying,

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 4>because you would think if things are hard and people

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 4>are struggling, that you would get more value and people

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.239
<v Speaker 4>would go to McDonald's. But you were mentioning how in

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 4>general people are watching their money more so they're not

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 4>How does that kind of.

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 11>Square Yeah, so what we've seen is a lot of

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 11>traffic deterioration over the last couple of years because price

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 11>increases have been so aggressive and people's spending is being pinched.

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 9>Right.

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 11>But the thing about quick service, you know, they're in

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 11>the lower end of the market, right, and so they'll

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 11>see during an economic slowdown, they'll see higher and middle

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 11>income consumers kind of fall into their bucket. They'll spend

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 11>less at higher cost full service occasions and they'll visit

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 11>McDonald's more often, whereas a lot of the low income

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 11>can uomers will kind of fall out of that bucket.

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 11>And decide to opt for the grocery store more often.

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 11>So they'll lose some traffic on the low end, but

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 11>they'll they'll probably gain some with some of the middle

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 11>and upper income consumers.

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 2>So, my, who's really their competition these days? When I

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 2>was a kid, it was Burger King and Wendy's. But

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 2>now there's so much more out there. How do you

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of slice it?

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's the restaurant business man. It's so fragment that

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 11>there's competition everywhere, man, you know, to your point, convenience stores,

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 11>grocery stores, food trucks, you name it. Still, primarily their

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 11>biggest competition are the fast food restaurants that are located

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 11>closest to them. So it depends on the market. You know, California,

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 11>Jack in the Box is number two, you know, on

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 11>the East Coast, Yeah, you know, Burger King is number two,

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.719
<v Speaker 11>and in most markets, i'd say in the United States,

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 11>Wendy's obviously is a big competitor of theirs. But also

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 11>you know, places like Chipotle and shake Shack are all

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 11>competing for restaurant dollars with McDonald's. But you know, we

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 11>don't look too closely at market share in this business

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 11>because it is so fragmented, and I don't really like

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 11>total addressable market and restaurants because nobody's going to eat

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 11>at McDonald's three times a day, seven days a week.

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Michael Halen, Bloomberg Intelligence senior restaurant and food

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 2>service analysts.

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's go next to the luxury industry. Earlier

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 3>in the week.

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 4>Esday Latter is that it's cutting as many as three

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 4>thousand job positions as part of a broad restructuring plan.

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 4>A plan is aimed at making the cosmetic giant a

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 4>more profitable company.

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 2>And this comes as plumbing sales in Asia have dragged

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 2>down revenue and profit at Esday Lauder in the past year.

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 2>For more on all of this, we're joined by Deb

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Aich and Bloomberg Intelligence senior analyst. It covers global luxury goods, home, beauty,

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 2>and personal care. I first asked her for context of

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 2>the restructuring plan already in play.

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 8>They've raised five hundred to seven hundred million of cost

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 8>on a deeper restructure program to bring up to one

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 8>point four billion through twenty five and twenty six, mostly

0:31:56.000 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 8>twenty five or majority twenty five weighted, So the expectation

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 8>so that's kind of like four hundred million extra on

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 8>what they were expecting before in terms of operating profitability.

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 3>What was the problem that they had to fix by

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 3>doing that? Like why is it so hard to be

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 3>es Da lader?

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 4>I thought everyone would pay a million dollars for perfect skin.

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Not talking my book or anything, right.

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 8>The big thing over the last couple of years that

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 8>we've seen, We've always known that estill Order a very

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 8>premium product, and it did so well for so many years,

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 8>but it had very high exposure in Asia. So we

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 8>ended up a couple of years ago with a stuffed retail,

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 8>duty free travel retail area across China and some parts

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 8>of Asia, which were exacerbated by South Korea also in

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 8>the issues there with the de Goose shopper and what

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 8>we found. And we'd always been saying, you know, there's

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 8>supply side. The way that they organized themselves, the logistics,

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 8>They didn't have the hubs in place in Asia to

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 8>do as much as they were doing, so they were

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 8>caught short or caught overstuffed, so they had far too

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 8>much in trade, and that has taken a long long

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 8>time to temper down and start to normalize, and we

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 8>should return overall to growth this next quarter.

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 2>And dead let's stay with the China stories. I know

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 2>from talking to you over the years and reading your research,

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 2>the China consumer is just critical for luxury shopping. Can

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 2>you give us a sense because I don't. When I

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 2>walk down Madison Avenue or Fifth Avenue, I see all

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 2>the European tourists back. They're back in, you know, in size,

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 2>not so much with the Chinese. What's going on there?

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 9>The big thing.

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 8>We very late in getting visas through the reopening of

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 8>you as we thought from the beginning of last year,

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 8>reopening of travel, but the viewers that travel internationally won't

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 8>come back until the second half the year. And we

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 8>are starting to hear some of those luxury companies sane.

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 8>We're seeing more Chinese, more Asian customers in our stores

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 8>back home. There's a lot more spending, flights are fuller.

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 8>The surveys that we're doing us that they will travel.

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 8>But a lot of that travel so far has been

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 8>across Asia.

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 4>But what's interesting is that not all are created equal.

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 4>I feel like you can Jerry pick a couple of

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 4>luxury stocks that have been somewhat immune and I'm just

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 4>wondering what those are. And I still and in the

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 4>skincare world too, like what is that immune skincare high

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 4>end product? That doesn't matter, We're all buying it anyway.

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.280
<v Speaker 8>I think that you know, there are there's some huge

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 8>numbers in terms of some of the brands within the

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 8>portfolio doing extremely well, lots of the brands of double digit.

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:36.839
<v Speaker 8>But it's that trade that draws down when you look

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 8>at the Europe number for Estill order that's where they

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 8>stock travel retail, that's where it sits in its P

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 8>and L and it's still minus fourteen. But actually Europe

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.399
<v Speaker 8>underline is flat, and it's the same for the North

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 8>American market. Within that there are brands like The Ordinary

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 8>and La Mayor and several of the higher end brands

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 8>doing very very well of double digit. And it's the

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 8>same across if I think about the way actually luxury

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 8>and you know Lorrel aside Loreal is doing phenomenally well

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:07.760
<v Speaker 8>with a high base of its product in moder classes

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 8>as Lorel looks. But let's go to some of the

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 8>luxury companies and the way that LVMH and others are

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 8>building sizeable scale in perfume and cosmetics that's for growth

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 8>of six to eight percent per year and very strong margin.

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 8>So there are a lot of brands out there doing

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 8>very very well. But in particular what has happened is

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:32.879
<v Speaker 8>and stockpicking, cherry picking. It's about the brands who've had

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 8>the portfolio that hasn't had so much Asia travel retail

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:39.240
<v Speaker 8>or where it's really been able to manage that. Because

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 8>even if I think about LVMH within its selective retail,

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:46.320
<v Speaker 8>and it housed dfs due to free stores and Sophora,

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:48.479
<v Speaker 8>and at one point last year they were both down

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 8>and they've now fully recovered. We're starting to see if

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 8>the US some robust numbers coming through even from that

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:58.319
<v Speaker 8>aspirational end. Across the luxury across brands, it's getting a

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 8>little better, but it's going to take time.

0:36:01.120 --> 0:36:03.320
<v Speaker 2>How are the luxury stocks? What's kind of the luxury

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 2>call here? I look at the FA function for Sday

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 2>latter it looks like for your the fiscal twenty twenty five,

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 2>the June of twenty five year, the street's looking for

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:14.360
<v Speaker 2>a big pickup in revenue and profitability for Esday Latterer.

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 8>What's behind that's that's all about that inventory. To put

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 8>that inventory in Asia into context. It's dragged down skincare

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 8>in this quarter organic cells minus ten percent. It's dragged

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 8>down Europe to minus fourteen, where underlying Europe was flat

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 8>because it stores that travel retail. So it's about that

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:37.919
<v Speaker 8>inventory normalizing, and they're saying that that has happened right

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 8>now at the end of two Q, so we head

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 8>into three Q with normalized level and so therefore if

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 8>that is the case, then it's better manage. We should

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 8>start to see double digit growth coming from there. And

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 8>if we were looking underlying without that area, then we

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 8>saw mid single digit growth. So that's what that's about.

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 8>And then also on top of this new restructuring program

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 8>and with some of those benefits to come through twenty five,

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:04.239
<v Speaker 8>we've been playing around on MDL on the calculator and

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 8>what we see there is around an expectation of twelve

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 8>to thirteen percent uplift to that twenty twenty five operating

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 8>profit to hopefully come through.

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:16.280
<v Speaker 4>One consensus our thanks to Debra Agin, Bloomberg Intelligence, Senior Analyst,

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:18.799
<v Speaker 4>Global Luxury Goods, Home, Beauty, and Personal Care.

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 2>That's this week's edition of Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio,

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:24.320
<v Speaker 2>providing in depth research and data on two thousand companies

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 2>and one hundred and thirty industries.

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 4>And remember you can access Bloomberg Intelligence the movie I

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Go on the Terminal.

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:31.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm Alex Steele, Paul Sweeney.

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. Today's top stories and global business headlines

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 2>are coming up right now.

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:44.919
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.320
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Thehart Radio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg Terminal