1 00:00:02,759 --> 00:00:07,240 Speaker 1: Bloomberg, Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:08,039 --> 00:00:11,680 Speaker 2: Czech Republic prism Petter Povel says he believes his country 3 00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:14,840 Speaker 2: will adot the Euro, but it will take some time. 4 00:00:14,880 --> 00:00:21,279 Speaker 2: He spoke exclusively to Bloomberg's critique dub a subject that 5 00:00:21,320 --> 00:00:23,480 Speaker 2: has been a point of contention here in the Czech Republic, 6 00:00:23,520 --> 00:00:25,960 Speaker 2: which is, of course, the Euro and the potential adoption 7 00:00:26,560 --> 00:00:29,080 Speaker 2: of the Euro. You've talked about this and reopened the debate, 8 00:00:29,360 --> 00:00:31,600 Speaker 2: and I'm curious where you think that debate is going. 9 00:00:33,360 --> 00:00:39,479 Speaker 1: This debate has become truly emotional and irrational. My simple 10 00:00:39,600 --> 00:00:44,839 Speaker 1: argument to our population is that we are dependent on 11 00:00:44,880 --> 00:00:47,680 Speaker 1: your zone, if you like it or not, most of 12 00:00:47,720 --> 00:00:51,960 Speaker 1: our trade is with the euro Zone, and in that sense, 13 00:00:52,240 --> 00:00:57,920 Speaker 1: it doesn't make too much sense. When Eurozone discusses future 14 00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:04,040 Speaker 1: steps and rules, we are behind the door. The sentiments 15 00:01:04,080 --> 00:01:08,720 Speaker 1: are mostly negative because people were told by a number 16 00:01:08,720 --> 00:01:12,800 Speaker 1: of politicians that by adopting Euro they will become poorer 17 00:01:13,440 --> 00:01:16,240 Speaker 1: and everything will be more expensive and we will have 18 00:01:16,319 --> 00:01:21,319 Speaker 1: no freedom and autonomy to adjust the courses. In reality, 19 00:01:22,120 --> 00:01:25,120 Speaker 1: the room for adjusting courses with our own currency is 20 00:01:25,160 --> 00:01:29,319 Speaker 1: so narrow that it really doesn't make too much benefit. 21 00:01:29,840 --> 00:01:35,000 Speaker 1: So sooner or later. I believe that rational reasons will 22 00:01:35,319 --> 00:01:39,240 Speaker 1: bring us to the adoption of Europe, but it will 23 00:01:39,280 --> 00:01:39,920 Speaker 1: take some time. 24 00:01:40,440 --> 00:01:43,880 Speaker 2: How can you sway public opinion from your perch. 25 00:01:45,880 --> 00:01:50,120 Speaker 1: I would say by pointing to examples of countries which 26 00:01:50,440 --> 00:01:56,120 Speaker 1: are often visited by our citizens, like Slovakia. Now Bulgaria 27 00:01:56,160 --> 00:02:00,560 Speaker 1: will also become a country of herosone. And of course 28 00:02:01,160 --> 00:02:06,080 Speaker 1: we look at these countries as some that followed the 29 00:02:06,240 --> 00:02:09,560 Speaker 1: same destiny as we did in the past, and I 30 00:02:09,600 --> 00:02:14,920 Speaker 1: believe if they are successful in adopting euro then why 31 00:02:15,120 --> 00:02:15,799 Speaker 1: shouldn't do we. 32 00:02:17,480 --> 00:02:19,400 Speaker 2: A lot of the strength of the euro at the moment, 33 00:02:20,080 --> 00:02:23,160 Speaker 2: unprecedented strength through the momentum in the last couple of months, 34 00:02:23,440 --> 00:02:26,320 Speaker 2: has come as a reaction function to two key factors, 35 00:02:26,320 --> 00:02:28,359 Speaker 2: and that is perhaps policy decisions coming out of the 36 00:02:28,440 --> 00:02:32,320 Speaker 2: United States and also a massive fiscal impulse from from 37 00:02:32,360 --> 00:02:35,840 Speaker 2: Germany and other countries. As across Europe, where do you 38 00:02:35,919 --> 00:02:39,239 Speaker 2: feel like perhaps the risk is largest from the west 39 00:02:39,520 --> 00:02:40,200 Speaker 2: or from the east. 40 00:02:42,880 --> 00:02:46,519 Speaker 1: They are different these pressures. On the one hand, from 41 00:02:46,520 --> 00:02:52,720 Speaker 1: the East we face a tremendous security pressure, while from 42 00:02:52,919 --> 00:02:56,959 Speaker 1: the West special especially from the United States, it's more 43 00:02:57,320 --> 00:03:02,600 Speaker 1: political financial. Both of these pressures should lead us to 44 00:03:02,680 --> 00:03:06,799 Speaker 1: an understanding that we shouldn't behave as a spoiled child, 45 00:03:07,360 --> 00:03:12,720 Speaker 1: that we have to take care about ourselves economically, politically, diplomatically, 46 00:03:13,160 --> 00:03:19,120 Speaker 1: and even military wise. And in that sense, I feel 47 00:03:19,120 --> 00:03:25,079 Speaker 1: a growing understanding that Europe has to take its own 48 00:03:25,120 --> 00:03:28,840 Speaker 1: destiny to our own hands and to develop our own 49 00:03:29,160 --> 00:03:34,960 Speaker 1: capacities for defense, to develop a further common market, make 50 00:03:35,040 --> 00:03:39,880 Speaker 1: it more efficient and flexible so that we can face 51 00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:44,080 Speaker 1: pressures from any side, and at the same time that 52 00:03:44,920 --> 00:03:49,880 Speaker 1: Europeans should become our own zone of influence. 53 00:03:51,160 --> 00:03:53,680 Speaker 2: The Czech Republic has been crucial in some of that 54 00:03:53,760 --> 00:03:57,520 Speaker 2: aid that you're referencing in terms of Ukraine, specifically in 55 00:03:57,520 --> 00:04:00,560 Speaker 2: the field of ammunition and coordinating some of that. Can 56 00:04:00,600 --> 00:04:02,360 Speaker 2: you talk us about the goals there and what that 57 00:04:02,760 --> 00:04:05,640 Speaker 2: procurement plan basically looks like into going into this year 58 00:04:05,680 --> 00:04:07,080 Speaker 2: but also into twenty twenty six. 59 00:04:08,120 --> 00:04:14,920 Speaker 1: The primary reason for initiating this activity to provide Ukraine 60 00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:19,560 Speaker 1: with ammunition was a feeling of frustration that we cannot 61 00:04:20,320 --> 00:04:23,880 Speaker 1: give them more from our own resources. But we knew 62 00:04:24,440 --> 00:04:29,000 Speaker 1: where this ammunition was to be found, and we found 63 00:04:29,200 --> 00:04:33,279 Speaker 1: the ways and procedures how to deliver it, and we 64 00:04:33,360 --> 00:04:36,279 Speaker 1: got in tounship with partners who were willing to provide 65 00:04:36,360 --> 00:04:41,680 Speaker 1: financial resources and have an oversight of the overall activity. 66 00:04:42,400 --> 00:04:45,000 Speaker 1: And in the meantime we have developed a procedure with 67 00:04:45,040 --> 00:04:49,880 Speaker 1: the involvement of number of allies who are providing significant resources, 68 00:04:51,160 --> 00:04:55,559 Speaker 1: we can ensure a study flow of so much needed 69 00:04:55,560 --> 00:04:59,600 Speaker 1: ammunition to Ukraine. This year, we will't be able to 70 00:04:59,640 --> 00:05:04,080 Speaker 1: guarante the one point eight million rounds of large caliber 71 00:05:04,120 --> 00:05:10,560 Speaker 1: ammunition in average at about eighty thousand rounds one fifty 72 00:05:10,560 --> 00:05:14,599 Speaker 1: five caliber every month, which gives Ukraine a sense of 73 00:05:14,640 --> 00:05:19,599 Speaker 1: stability and guarantee, and of course it gives them clear 74 00:05:21,640 --> 00:05:25,680 Speaker 1: parameters for planning. And we will continue continue that not 75 00:05:25,760 --> 00:05:28,400 Speaker 1: only through this year, but we are also ready to 76 00:05:28,520 --> 00:05:30,400 Speaker 1: continue next year if necessary. 77 00:05:30,960 --> 00:05:32,920 Speaker 2: So it suffice to say that there is a possibility 78 00:05:32,960 --> 00:05:37,279 Speaker 2: this war extends into into twenty twenty six, despite efforts 79 00:05:37,320 --> 00:05:40,160 Speaker 2: from around the world to find a peaceful solution. Talk 80 00:05:40,160 --> 00:05:42,400 Speaker 2: to us about what a peaceful solution looks like. 81 00:05:44,440 --> 00:05:48,080 Speaker 1: I think many of us wish Ukraine in the best 82 00:05:48,240 --> 00:05:52,839 Speaker 1: that means full restoration of their territory, integrity and sovereignty. 83 00:05:53,320 --> 00:05:56,359 Speaker 1: But we are also realistic and we see that it 84 00:05:56,440 --> 00:06:01,560 Speaker 1: will not be possible in full. And that's why we 85 00:06:01,680 --> 00:06:05,719 Speaker 1: understand that part of the territory will be for some 86 00:06:05,880 --> 00:06:10,120 Speaker 1: time temporarily occupied by Russia and that there will be 87 00:06:11,560 --> 00:06:16,000 Speaker 1: necessary concession to be made by Ukraine. But at the 88 00:06:16,000 --> 00:06:20,920 Speaker 1: same time, now I mean all the countries supporting Ukraine, 89 00:06:21,320 --> 00:06:24,279 Speaker 1: we should all collectively strive for the best possible result 90 00:06:24,360 --> 00:06:27,920 Speaker 1: for Ukraine that will be as just for Ukraine as possible, 91 00:06:28,400 --> 00:06:33,200 Speaker 1: recognizing that Russia is an aggressor and Ukraine is a victim, 92 00:06:33,960 --> 00:06:38,280 Speaker 1: and aggressor shouldn't be rewarded for his aggression. And that's 93 00:06:38,279 --> 00:06:44,839 Speaker 1: why we shouldn't allow the situation where Russia would clearly 94 00:06:45,400 --> 00:06:51,839 Speaker 1: declare the victory by imposing all other conditions and Ukraine 95 00:06:51,880 --> 00:06:53,039 Speaker 1: losing almost everything. 96 00:06:53,920 --> 00:06:57,000 Speaker 2: Is a peaceful solution something that can be found without 97 00:06:57,000 --> 00:06:59,400 Speaker 2: the support of the United States. Is this something that 98 00:06:59,640 --> 00:07:01,440 Speaker 2: you're leaders can achieve. 99 00:07:03,480 --> 00:07:08,520 Speaker 1: I don't think so. Russia is a country that respects 100 00:07:09,360 --> 00:07:15,760 Speaker 1: power in all senses of definition, and they see the 101 00:07:15,840 --> 00:07:20,080 Speaker 1: power in the United States, not in Europe. And President 102 00:07:20,440 --> 00:07:25,400 Speaker 1: put In clearly shows that he is only ready to 103 00:07:25,480 --> 00:07:30,280 Speaker 1: talk to his counterpart in the United States, regardless what 104 00:07:30,320 --> 00:07:35,040 Speaker 1: European leaders think. I believe that in that sense, we 105 00:07:35,120 --> 00:07:38,840 Speaker 1: have to coordinate very closely with the United States because 106 00:07:38,880 --> 00:07:42,880 Speaker 1: it is also in their interest not to let Russia 107 00:07:43,400 --> 00:07:47,920 Speaker 1: prevail in this conflict, because otherwise they would see it 108 00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:52,160 Speaker 1: as a confirmation of their approach to foreign policy, to 109 00:07:52,880 --> 00:07:58,040 Speaker 1: their security requirements, and sooner or later it will turn 110 00:07:58,120 --> 00:08:02,760 Speaker 1: against the interests of the United States. That's why we 111 00:08:02,840 --> 00:08:06,160 Speaker 1: are trying to coordinate as much as possible with the 112 00:08:06,280 --> 00:08:12,800 Speaker 1: United States. Our views make our American alliance understanding the 113 00:08:12,840 --> 00:08:18,720 Speaker 1: context in which this war isn't going and what different 114 00:08:18,760 --> 00:08:22,480 Speaker 1: outcomes would mean for United States as well as for 115 00:08:22,600 --> 00:08:28,360 Speaker 1: Europe and the world. Right now, I believe there are 116 00:08:28,360 --> 00:08:33,720 Speaker 1: two major avenues how to push Russia to the table. 117 00:08:34,440 --> 00:08:38,720 Speaker 1: One is obviously on the battlefield, supporting Ukraine militarily and 118 00:08:38,760 --> 00:08:44,200 Speaker 1: financially to hold the territory and hold the defense strong 119 00:08:45,200 --> 00:08:50,240 Speaker 1: to create conditions for peace negotiations that will be favorable 120 00:08:50,280 --> 00:08:53,960 Speaker 1: for Ukraine. And on the other hand, and it's even 121 00:08:54,040 --> 00:08:58,400 Speaker 1: stronger in my view, it's economic and financial pressure on 122 00:08:58,520 --> 00:09:03,160 Speaker 1: Russia to sit to the table because right now they 123 00:09:03,200 --> 00:09:07,160 Speaker 1: are not showing any willingness to negotiate the piece because 124 00:09:07,280 --> 00:09:11,480 Speaker 1: they still see that they can prevailer. 125 00:09:11,040 --> 00:09:13,280 Speaker 2: In the interim. There has been a big conversation, of course, 126 00:09:13,280 --> 00:09:16,440 Speaker 2: about defense spending and ramping it up across the European continent, 127 00:09:16,480 --> 00:09:18,480 Speaker 2: perhaps creating or filling some of the gap that the 128 00:09:18,559 --> 00:09:20,960 Speaker 2: United States has pulled out of ours astempting to pull 129 00:09:20,960 --> 00:09:23,040 Speaker 2: out it. When it comes to NATO spending, I am 130 00:09:23,080 --> 00:09:26,000 Speaker 2: curious though, how long that process will take. A defense 131 00:09:26,080 --> 00:09:28,040 Speaker 2: ramp up, as you know from your former percheon NATO 132 00:09:28,360 --> 00:09:31,360 Speaker 2: can take years. What can the EU and NATO do 133 00:09:31,600 --> 00:09:34,319 Speaker 2: within the next couple of months to affect the outcome. 134 00:09:35,480 --> 00:09:41,959 Speaker 1: Well, first, we will have to preserve unity a NATO 135 00:09:42,040 --> 00:09:47,840 Speaker 1: summit in the Haguen couple of weeks to keep American 136 00:09:47,880 --> 00:09:53,439 Speaker 1: allies engaged in Europe both politically and militarily. And we 137 00:09:53,880 --> 00:09:57,520 Speaker 1: all understand that European allies will have to take a 138 00:09:58,040 --> 00:10:04,240 Speaker 1: much greater responsibility for our own defense. But this transition, 139 00:10:04,760 --> 00:10:08,400 Speaker 1: the handover of responsibility from the United States and more 140 00:10:08,440 --> 00:10:13,480 Speaker 1: to Europeans, will require some time. And even if we 141 00:10:14,240 --> 00:10:18,840 Speaker 1: adopt the decision to increase significantly defense pending, even if 142 00:10:19,040 --> 00:10:24,800 Speaker 1: we apply all the measures of flexibility and efficiency, it 143 00:10:24,880 --> 00:10:31,760 Speaker 1: will really take years to replace some of US strategic 144 00:10:32,120 --> 00:10:39,600 Speaker 1: enablers such as strategic intelligence, communications, logistics, and some others, 145 00:10:40,120 --> 00:10:45,680 Speaker 1: and of course, if we don't want any security gap 146 00:10:45,760 --> 00:10:49,559 Speaker 1: to be created in Europe, we will have to seriously 147 00:10:50,000 --> 00:10:55,560 Speaker 1: negotiate with our American allies about our good transition plan. 148 00:10:56,480 --> 00:11:00,600 Speaker 1: What is realistic to achieve? I understand that United States 149 00:11:01,080 --> 00:11:05,520 Speaker 1: will not try to exert pressure on Europeans to do 150 00:11:05,559 --> 00:11:09,920 Speaker 1: it faster, but even if we do our best, we 151 00:11:09,960 --> 00:11:14,319 Speaker 1: will not be able to do it in just a 152 00:11:14,400 --> 00:11:20,280 Speaker 1: couple of months or or just units of years. Uh. 153 00:11:20,440 --> 00:11:26,600 Speaker 1: Some like strategic intelligence and targeting will may easily try 154 00:11:26,640 --> 00:11:32,439 Speaker 1: to take a decade to achieve that capability. But I 155 00:11:32,760 --> 00:11:36,080 Speaker 1: truly believe that we can achieve good results if we 156 00:11:36,200 --> 00:11:38,600 Speaker 1: have a good and coordinated plan. 157 00:11:39,320 --> 00:11:41,120 Speaker 2: A final question to you, as you say that you 158 00:11:41,160 --> 00:11:43,800 Speaker 2: will be attending that NATO summit, there are reports that 159 00:11:43,840 --> 00:11:46,160 Speaker 2: Donald Trump will be attending as well. What do you 160 00:11:46,200 --> 00:11:48,400 Speaker 2: expect to hear from President of the United States. 161 00:11:50,200 --> 00:11:55,320 Speaker 1: I expect continuation of his approach from his first term, 162 00:11:55,600 --> 00:11:59,880 Speaker 1: which I witnessed in person, uh, and it's even stronger 163 00:12:00,320 --> 00:12:04,280 Speaker 1: now during his second term. He will be pushing on 164 00:12:05,920 --> 00:12:11,480 Speaker 1: European allies and also on Canada to do more and faster. 165 00:12:12,520 --> 00:12:17,240 Speaker 1: So we can expect the push for commitment to defense 166 00:12:17,280 --> 00:12:24,520 Speaker 1: spending at five percent, we can expect some short timelines 167 00:12:24,760 --> 00:12:29,520 Speaker 1: for taking over this responsibility. We can also expect more 168 00:12:29,800 --> 00:12:34,120 Speaker 1: commitments from European allies in terms of support to Ukraine. 169 00:12:34,960 --> 00:12:41,679 Speaker 1: But I personally don't expect any negative surprise because I 170 00:12:41,720 --> 00:12:48,400 Speaker 1: believe that the agenda of the summit is deliberately kept 171 00:12:49,120 --> 00:12:55,360 Speaker 1: to a minimum extent so that we have an agreement. 172 00:12:55,840 --> 00:12:59,880 Speaker 1: And that's that's why I believe that the summit will 173 00:13:01,360 --> 00:13:05,680 Speaker 1: nar iterate unity of NATO, commitment of the United States 174 00:13:05,840 --> 00:13:09,719 Speaker 1: to Article five and a commitment of all of US 175 00:13:09,960 --> 00:13:14,480 Speaker 1: to increase defense spending and overall capability for defense. 176 00:13:15,080 --> 00:13:17,640 Speaker 2: We look forward to seeing what that NATO Summit brings present. 177 00:13:17,640 --> 00:13:19,319 Speaker 2: Thank you so much for your time, a pleasure to 178 00:13:19,360 --> 00:13:20,040 Speaker 2: have this conversation. 179 00:13:20,160 --> 00:13:20,640 Speaker 1: Thank you