WEBVTT - Apollo Global Management CEO & Co-Founder Marc Rowan Talks Increasing Assets Under Management

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to head over to an interview. We all

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>are very much looking forward to Jonathan Farrow just high

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>tail the ADDA here to head over to Apollo sitting

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:11.039
<v Speaker 1>down with Mark Rowan, who is the CEO.

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 2>John take it away, A Lisa, thank you.

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 3>This was the deal we agreed to it. If the

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 3>stock closed, it an all time hard investigate. Mark Rowan

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 3>would show up alongside me and it's a man of

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 3>its word.

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 2>Market morning. It's good to see you.

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, and technically you're here. You came to visit us,

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 4>so thank you.

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. You planned it this way.

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure big target for twenty twenty nine ten billion

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 3>dollars of annual learning. So I think we have to

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 3>start with a pretty broad question. Race are coming down.

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Economy is pretty decent. Let's just call financial conditions easy.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Why people coming to you instead of just issuing a

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 3>bond in public markets?

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:46.319
<v Speaker 4>I think if they come to us, when they can

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 4>issue a bond in public markets and it's cant is

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 4>not that it's not open, It's that they want to

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 4>do something that the public markets will not allow. Public

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 4>markets over the past two decades have become very vanilla,

0:00:59.160 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 4>call it beta.

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 5>If you want to do something unique.

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 4>If you want to finance the next generation of infrastructure,

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 4>you want to build a project, you want to build

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:09.559
<v Speaker 4>data centers, you want to build power, you want long data.

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 4>Do you want special features that's just not available, you

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 4>come to someone like us, and increasingly private markets are

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 4>offering really compelling solutions to investment grade borrowers.

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about some of those days, IC and c

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:28.199
<v Speaker 3>IB and beth Intel recently. What's the common theme behind

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 3>those three companies for you?

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 4>The common theme for US is excess return relative to

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 4>the credit of the underlying borrower. The common theme for

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 4>the issuer is they are achieving something they could not

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 4>otherwise achieve. When we did ABMBV some six billion dollars

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 4>years ago, everyone around us, our peer group, that was interesting.

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 4>That was one off in COVID, You'll never do another

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 4>one another investment grade private deal. One hundred billion dollars later,

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 4>we're still doing investment grade private deals. And I see

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 4>nothing but a long line of of interesting borrowers and

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 4>interesting situations.

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 5>Because think about what we're doing in the world today.

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 4>We are building infrastructure, we are building and changing energy transition.

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 4>We're just at the beginning of this, and we are

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 4>building the next generation of data and power. Every one

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 4>of those things is long dated. Many of them are

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 4>complex financings. Some will go to the banking system, some

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 4>will go to public markets, But increasingly, for these more

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 4>complicated financings and long dated financings, private market investment grade

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 4>is where borrowers are coming.

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:32.839
<v Speaker 3>There was a theme an invested Day, and you've talked

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:37.519
<v Speaker 3>about this with me yourself, privately global industrial renaissance.

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 2>What are you talking about?

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 5>We're talking about is this massive need for capital.

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you can believe or not believe all the

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 4>figures that are out there, but when you add up

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 4>the amount of money that is needed for energy transition,

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 4>the amount of money that is needed to fix our infrastructure,

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 4>the amount of money that will be needed to build

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 4>data centers and power to supply them, much less to

0:02:56.520 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 4>connect and redo our power lines, you're talking about the

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 4>amount of money that's been spent since the invention of five,

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 4>all with the backdrop of the US government borrowing two

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 4>trillion dollars to finance itself. On a current basis, this

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 4>is not a question of will private markets grow. The

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 4>question will be how much, Yes, public markets will continue

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 4>to play a really important role banking system, really important role.

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 4>But this tool, this notion of private investment grade, has

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 4>really not been available to CFOs or others arranging financing,

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 4>and increasingly it will be.

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 2>How labor intensive is this for you?

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 3>And as you do more deals, do you get a

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 3>benefit from that that you better able to replicate things

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 3>and use less and less people.

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 5>This is scars of experience.

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 4>So these are all labor intensive, and that is actually

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 4>what the competitive advantage is. The investment grade bond market

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 4>became so efficient and so low cost that financial firms

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 4>stopped allocating resources to it. There were just not any

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 4>money in doing that, and so the market is very available,

0:03:57.640 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 4>but it is very plain vanilla.

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 5>One has built what we've built.

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 4>When you look at employment at Apollo, the greatest group

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 4>of employment four thousand people, some eight billion dollars that

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 4>we've spent over the past fifteen years all goes to

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 4>what we call origination. Now, not all of these originators

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 4>are out calling on investment grade borrowers. Some are running

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 4>other types of origination vehicles, aircraft finance, fleet finance, receivables finance,

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 4>inventory finance, infrastructure finance.

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 5>Increasingly, this is how America.

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 3>Borrows introduced City and a twenty five billion a dollar partnership.

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 3>What's behind that it's that acknowledgment from you that you've

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 3>got more cash than you know what to do with.

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 4>I think it's an acknowledgment that origination, the control of

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 4>the product is actually what has value. And some of

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 4>that origination we're going to build ourselves, and we've built

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 4>more of it than any But let's face it, we

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 4>a whole industry is short origination. To the extent we

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 4>can find a meeting of the minds with City, that's fabulous.

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 4>And I think the bigger theme here is the banking system,

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 4>particularly one of the big four banks, is actually figuring

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 4>out what we believe all along. We don't want what

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 4>the bank wants. We don't want the bank's customer. We

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 4>want the asset the bank. We can't offer advice, m

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 4>and A, derivatives hedging, foreign exchange payments, credit cards, or

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 4>any other service the bank wants to offer those things.

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 4>The bank sometimes wants the loan, but more often than

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 4>not does not want the loan.

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Who do you think field it?

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 3>The most calls that day when that was announced that partnership,

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 3>was it Jane Fraser an annoyed asset managers or was

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 3>it you an annoyed bankers.

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 5>From the comparing of notes last night? It was Jane.

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 2>It was Jane. Did you get the calls you saw

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 2>from LOX.

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 5>We definitely got a few calls.

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Do you get the sense that this is the beginning

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 3>of something bigger? Twenty five billions the number with citsy

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 3>just give me an idea of what this looks like

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 3>further down the line.

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Does it include other banks too?

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 4>I think it does, and now I think it is

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 4>difficult to serve lots of people in the same way

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 4>with the same terms. But the City partnership is focused

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 4>on a certain type of borrower. I think you'll see

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 4>international partnerships. I think you'll see investment grade partnerships. I

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 4>think you'll see infrastructure related partnerships. I do think that

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 4>we are becoming a partner in some ways to the

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 4>banking system, rather than how it is portrayed in the press,

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 4>which is a fierce competition over everything.

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 3>This conversation so far has really been about how the

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 3>financing of companies, particularly in this country, is changing, how

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 3>the company's doing the financing is shifting. The emphasis being

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 3>on private markets. Part of your vision is how investing

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 3>is going to change as well, So let's spend some

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 3>time on that. How is investing going to change? How

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 3>do we think about public versus private now? And how

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 3>do you hope we're going to think about it in

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 3>years to come.

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 5>Look for me, this is year forty.

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 4>It's sometimes hard to believe I've been doing it this long,

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 4>but we grew up thinking private was risky and public

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:58.119
<v Speaker 4>was safe, and probably forty years ago that was true.

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 4>Private was three products, equity, venture capital, and hedge funds,

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 4>all three of which can be risky, but done the

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:07.239
<v Speaker 4>right way are excellent investments. And public was eight thousand

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 4>public companies, diversified portfolios of stocks and bonds.

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 5>Let's just say that's not how the world is today.

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 4>The world that we see private is safe and risky

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 4>and public is safe and risky.

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 5>And if that's.

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 4>True, everything we know about portfolio management, the way we

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 4>construct portfolios today is going to change. Think of the

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 4>typical investor a very bland I say, a three flavor

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 4>ice cream portfolio, stocks, bonds, and a little bit of alternatives.

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Why well, because when something is risky, you put it

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 4>in a small bucket called alternatives. You watch it carefully

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 4>and you demand high returns out of it. But if

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 4>private is just another form, I think what you're going

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 4>to see is the whole business of what I call

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 4>replacement fixed income, which today means investment grade public credit.

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 4>I think is going to be investment grade public and

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 4>investment grade private teen months from now. I do not

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 4>believe investors will actually know the difference between investment grade

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 4>public and investment grade private. It will not be the issuers,

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 4>it will not be the size, it will not be

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 4>the ratings, it will not even be the liquidity. Everything

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 4>that exists in the public markets, repo borrowing, market making,

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 4>daily pricing, is coming to the private markets.

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.239
<v Speaker 3>What is the total addressable market? What kind of numbers

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 3>are we thinking about?

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 4>We're talking about massive marketplace when we look at the

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 4>entirety of our industry.

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 5>The entirety of our.

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 4>Industry has been built out of the alternative bucket of

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 4>institutional investors. The fixed income bucket, which is the one

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 4>I'm talking about now, is fifty percent larger than the

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 4>alternative bucket and is mostly one hundred percent private.

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 5>Work to me public.

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Investment grade iquitcy different to debt.

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Can you tell me how that's going to be transformed,

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 3>and whether some of the companies that typically would becoming

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 3>public are going to state private. Whether we've got to

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 3>see a big shift in capital markets over the next

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 3>five years or so on that front.

0:08:58.120 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, we're seeing it already.

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 4>So this is this This is a two pronged to answer,

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 4>which is eight thousand public companies? Is now four thousand

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 4>public companies. Fewer than one hundred companies go public every

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 4>year and more than one hundred companies go private. There

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 4>do not seem to be compelling reasons for companies to

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 4>be public, particularly with what's happened on the investing side.

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 4>So much of our market today is indexed and correlated.

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 4>Think of passive now sixty seventy percent of the overall marketplace.

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 4>Active management, which historically has been the buying and selling

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 4>of stocks, has really been a very, very difficult place

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 4>to be, has failed to be at the index ninety

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 4>plus percent of the time for twenty years. I think

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 4>we're going to see an evolution also take place in equity.

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 4>It's going to happen more slowly. In fixed income. We

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 4>are going to see fixed income replacement public and private

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 4>essentially come together. And the reason I know that is

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing it every single day. And in fixed income

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 4>we have arbiters of credit quality rating agencies who tell

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 4>investors that something public and something private is of the

0:09:57.240 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 4>same quality.

0:09:58.280 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 5>In equity, we lack those.

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:04.239
<v Speaker 4>Our But nonetheless, I think investors are beginning to understand

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 4>when ten stocks are thirty five to forty percent of

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 4>your portfolio and four stocks have determined all your returns

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 4>for the past four years, and one stock has basically

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 4>been one hundred percent of your quarter. I mean, think

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 4>of what we've done as a country. We've taken the

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 4>largest pool of savings in the world, four oh one

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 4>k twelve to thirteen trillion dollars from a group of

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 4>people who need retirement savings more than ever.

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 5>What are they own?

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 4>They own daily liquid stock index funds generally S and

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 4>P for fifty years. Why well, we have a mistaken

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 4>belief that public is safe and private is risky. You

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 4>look at the best retirement system anywhere in the Western

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 4>world in Australia, where they've introduced superannuation forty years ago.

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 4>Just a fancy way of saying is they gave the

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 4>equivalent of four oh one k investors access to private markets.

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 4>The returns have been nothing short of spectacular. Outcomes for

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 4>investors can be not a little bit better, fifty and

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 4>sixty percent better.

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 3>You know the view here public is transparent and privates

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 3>a payek.

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 2>How do you change that view?

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think it's going to happen in fixed income.

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 4>I think when you get to daily pricing, when you

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 4>get to daily liquidity, when you can see a market.

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 4>But let's not fool ourselves. Markets are different than we

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 4>think they are. Everything changed in two thousand and eight,

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 4>as it should as a response to the financial crisis,

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 4>but we just did not experience as investors those changes

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 4>because right after we change the rules, we printed eight

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 4>trillion dollars and everything went up into the right. One

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 4>of the most interesting things that changed there is no

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 4>liquidity in public fixed income the SATs I've seen it

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 4>takes five days to sell an investment grade corporate bond.

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 4>So when you see a quote, is that liquid, Well,

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 4>we feel good because it's public, it's there, we can

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 4>see it. I do think we're going to end up

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 4>not caring in fixed income in the next eighteen months

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 4>as to whether something is public or private. The comfort

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 4>that people are developing in private markets on the fixed

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 4>income side, I believe will eventually extend to equity, and

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 4>we will see equity also adopt private side by side

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 4>with public. As I sometimes joke, investors will own equity

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 4>that is private rather than private equity, the difference being

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:17.439
<v Speaker 4>the leverage.

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 3>You say, wait, you mean investors to regulate to say

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 3>it the same way.

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 5>I think they do.

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the conversation with regulators is actually a fascinating

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 4>one because clearly.

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 5>Change is scary.

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 4>But the typical conversation is every dollar of borrowing that

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 4>moves outside of the banking system to the investment marketplace.

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 4>And let's face it, there are only two choices for regulators.

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 4>Money in an economy can come from investors or from banks.

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 5>There's no third choice.

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 4>So every dollar that moves actually delevers the banking system

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 4>and makes it safer, and people recoil and shock. And

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 4>this is just math. A bank is levered twelve to

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 4>fourteen times. The typical institutional investor is levered zero, the

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 4>typical mutual fund levered zero, typical bde levered one point

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 4>five times, typical retirement services company levered eight times. It

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 4>is deleveraging. The second is disclosure. We think it's not transparent.

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.079
<v Speaker 4>The typical bank disclosure says loans to customers and loans

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 4>to companies. You click on our website you can see

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 4>every security we own every quarter. Then you talk about

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 4>maturity transformation. Maturity transformation is really where the economy has

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 4>suffered and financial markets have suffered. Banks are in business

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 4>to do maturity transformation. They borrow shortened form of deposits

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 4>and lend long in form of loans. That's not a

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 4>bad thing, that's just how they're set up. In the

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 4>investment marketplace, generally, you're talking about investors who are matched

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 4>from a maturity point of view. And the final thing

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 4>that I always sit with regulators, what percentage of assets

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 4>in the US banking system are investment grade?

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 5>They don't know.

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 4>We have a perception that they're all investment grade, but

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 4>the reality is about sixty percent of bank.

0:13:57.320 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 5>Assets are investment grade.

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 4>You look at a balance sheet like ours and just

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 4>as an example, we're ninety plus percent investment grade. And

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 4>so it's change, but it is actually changed. That is

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 4>making the system more robust and more diversified. And we

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 4>let's make no mistake we are the envy of the world.

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 4>We the US are the envy of the world. In Europe,

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 4>they are squeezing the banking system through Vaslin game, but

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 4>they haven't yet decided to allow investors to fill that gap.

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 4>And there are questions, why are we struggling with financial markets? Well,

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 4>you're squeezing the banking system and you're not allowing investors

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 4>to fill the gap.

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 3>Have you had this conversation with a senator from Massachusetts

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 3>As that conversation ever happened.

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 5>It hasn't, but I welcome it.

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 4>I've spent I spend lots of time in DC and

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 4>elsewhere speaking to regulators because we are in a really

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 4>dynamic phase. Everything that we think works the way it

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 4>works has changed, and we're about to experience and are

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 4>experiencing the changes that were made in two thousand and

0:14:57.480 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 4>eight in response to the financial crisis.

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 3>Speaking of change, which is Washington, DC is becoming increasingly interventionist.

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 3>You compared some of the benefits of doing business in

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 3>America and doing business in Europe. Doing business in America

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 3>is aren'turally not as easy as it used to be,

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 3>and it may well get harder.

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 2>What's your view on where we're heading.

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 5>You may be right, but it's all relative.

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 4>This is the single best market to be in at

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 4>this point in time, Barnutt.

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 3>When we spoke before Christmas and we talked about the

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 3>choices on the menu, then for the upcoming election, you

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 3>went too impressed.

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 2>The menu's changed a little bit. What's your view?

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, since i'll be under banishment here if I give

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 4>you a direct view, let me to say. The way

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 4>I frame this is you are either more scared of

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 4>four years of the status quo or more scared of

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 4>four years of change. You just have to decide what

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 4>you're more scared of. Me personally, I'm more scared of

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 4>four years of the status quo.

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 2>What's wrong with the status quo?

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 4>I see a direction where the trend is not our friend.

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 4>Right now, we are, as you suggest, we are the

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 4>single best place to do business in the world. We

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 4>are the luckiest people in the world. Can we screw

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 4>it up?

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? We can.

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 4>The notion that we are spending two trillion and excess

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 4>of what we take in in peacetime with full employment

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 4>does not bode well for the availability of capital to

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 4>do what we need to do for the next generation.

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 4>We're spending the next generation's money currently.

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Do you see anyone in the campaign trail that's waiting

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 2>to do And I think.

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 5>About that on the campaign trail, not in reality. Let's hope.

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 5>All we can hope for is better governance.

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 3>I've said repeatedly on Bloomberg Surveymance, on Bloomberg TV, on

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Bloomback Radio for years that America has the privilege, the

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 3>unique privilege of acting recklessly.

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 2>Are we losing that?

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 5>Not yet? We have a long way to go.

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 4>We have lots of examples around the globe of people

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 4>who have acted recklessly for a much longer period of

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 4>time than we have been acting recklessly. But we also

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 4>have obligations that others do not. Right now, we are

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 4>the beneficiary of being the strongest economy, the strongest capital market,

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 4>the strongest.

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 5>Military, and the best place to do business.

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, if you tick off what's happened over the

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 4>past years here, we may not like how we got

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 4>here and how we financed it. Three years ago we

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 4>decided to build infrastructure. We allocated two trillion dollars. None

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 4>of that's built yet, it's all being built. Two years

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 4>ago we spent fifty two billion dollars of semiconductor subsidies

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 4>to build semiconductors here. Not a single plant is open.

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.880
<v Speaker 4>It's all being built a year ago. Inflation Reduction Act

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:32.679
<v Speaker 4>to encourage the manufacturer renewables one point three to two

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 4>point three trillion.

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 5>No one really knows. Not a single plant is opened.

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 4>We are the beneficiary and the largest recipient of foreign

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 4>direct investment three years in a row. So people around

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.640
<v Speaker 4>the globe are actually figuring out we're better off here.

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 5>And something tells me we're ramping defense production.

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 4>All of those things are fiscally stimultive and positive fore employment. Oh,

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 4>by the way, we have no legal immigration. This sets

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 4>us up very well fiscally. A strong economy, which I

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 4>think we're seeing.

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Federal Reserve is kind of interest rates by fifty basis points.

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.679
<v Speaker 3>Are you in Toulston slot camp? And you can agree with,

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 3>agree or disagree with. Tulson of course works here. He

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 3>believes this economy doesn't need rate cuts. We're in a

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 3>great place. Do you share that view?

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 5>I said it.

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 4>I was, I guess unfortunate to be on TV an

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:21.879
<v Speaker 4>hour after the raid cut, and I said, this was

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 4>a very very expensive insurance policy.

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 2>What's expensive about it?

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 5>The notion that we would cut rates.

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 4>Financial markets are wide open, equities are at all time high,

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 4>financing is available, real estate prices are going up in

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 4>every market, and yet we're stimulating, and we're stimulating fiscally.

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 4>It is not clear that we need more rate cuts

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 4>at this point in time. And to the extent we

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 4>encourage growth, and growth was very strong, as you saw

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 4>from GDP for the quarter. To the extent we accelerate

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 4>the economy and have to go in the other direction,

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 4>that would not be a good deck.

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Just pause. You think the Fed might have to start

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 2>hiking interest rates again.

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying that yet. I'm just saying I see

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 4>no reason for the cutting of rates right now. So

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 4>am I in the Torston camp? I'm absolutely in the

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 4>Torston camp and it's my privilege to have him down

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 4>the hall.

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 5>I make sure to check in with him every morning.

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 3>I do as well, Mark, Ryan, this was a privilege,

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 3>a pleasure. Good luck for the next five years. And

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 3>I hope it's told you every year.

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 5>Every year you get to do it.

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank Mark, Thank you, sir, appreciate it.