WEBVTT - Microsoft and Amazon Downsize Staff

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>And Caroline hired at Bloomberg's world headquarters in New York

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and Imed Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>coming up. Tens of thousands more tech employees are out

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of a job after Microsoft and Amazon start downsize today

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>as employers reduced headcount. Is the pandemics moment of worker empowerment?

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Over and universities in Texas are taking action against TikTok,

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>with Texas A and M and Texas University reportedly blocking

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the app from its WiFi networks as part of the

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>governor's orders. Could this be the start of a greater trend?

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And do you want one of Twitter's officers neon signs

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>or a white board or a giant refrigerator. Twitter has

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>resorted to auctioning office items will show you what was

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>up for grabs. But first we want to talk about

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the key issues that off sometimes bring, certainly

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:06.199
<v Speaker 1>for plenty of chief technology and chief security officers, because

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>there are security concerns around all of this. Disgruntled workers

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>for examples, maybe they take corporate secrets with them when

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>they get laid off, or maybe they get a bit

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>careless about them. Margie Murphy has a great story on

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>all of this, and just tell us a little bit, Margy,

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>about how companies are starting to prepare themselves as they

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>know they're going to make layoffs. How do they ensure

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that the data that they have remained secure. Yeah, it's

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a real problem because around the time that layoffs are happening,

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.559
<v Speaker 1>obviously everyone's trying to tighten their belt, and that's when

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>security budgets might be cut a little bit. But companies

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>are looking at things like new software that's around to

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>track whether employees are are using data exfiltration methods um.

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>And they're also trying really hard to just give out

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>the messaging and reminding people that things that they're working

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>on belong to the company, not to themselves. Um I

0:01:55.960 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned data exfiltration, and that's when people toward emails to

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>their personal accounts or maybe a copy and paste of

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>spreadsheet with contact details or client contracts, and that puts

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>companies at risk of obviously losing business if that person

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>takes that with them to another company, but also regulatory

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 1>and confidentiality issues as well, Margie, we we've got to

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>ask ourselves why we're discussing this story. Fantastic work in

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>business Week magazine and an analysis of what happens when

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>we hear about jobs being cut layoffs in the technology

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>industry to the tunes of thousands, the kind of the

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>anecdote that you guys uses coin based right when it

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>announced its layoffs and Brian or Armstrong basically explaining that

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the day, UH employees would receive

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>notifications their personal email addresses, and it was very abrupt

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and he said, look, we kind of have to do

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>this because our customer information is key. We have to

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 1>protect that customer data. What kind of serious steps have

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you report it on that companies are taking to kind

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of safeguard themselves and their customers when they go through

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a random lyoffside this. Well, yeah, as you mentioned the

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>case with coin base, it was, you know, employees were

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>waking up to already having their email shut off, which

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>sounds incredibly callous and was criticized, you know for kind

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of having lacking that personal touch to realize that you've

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>been completely wiped from a company. But more and more

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>companies are having to do this because the risk is

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>just so high. It's so easy for employees to just

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>simply forward an email, you know, they if they've got

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a few hours left, they'll just be kind of sending

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff to to their own personal gmails and not. You know,

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you've got some people who are obviously irritated that they're

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>fired and maybe want to do something really kind of

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>bad with that and leak it. But often people don't

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>even realize that what they're doing is it is against

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>their employment contract, and they simply want to kind of

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>better themselves and then next employment because they're scared they've

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>they've just been let go. Um. But largely we're seeing

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>companies just really cracked down and shut down from the

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>minute people are being laid off and being very very cold,

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess, but but extremely secure just because the risks

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>are so high. We've seen issues with coin Base, um,

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, it had that an employee was accused of

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>insider trading because they were sharing some information. That was

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the famous case with Waymo, which was Google's driverless car

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>arm Anthony Levandarsky he famously went to ub was defected

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and he took company's secrets with him and it was

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>an extremely long court case and had serious ramiflications for Google.

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So the stakes are really really high, alright, Bloomberg Margie

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Murphy just terrific reporting on air and also in business.

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>We check out that story on Bloomberg dot com. Now,

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>as we've been discussing, Amazon and Microsoft are laying off

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>some of their work force. This is part of a

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>wider wave of job cuts that are hitting the tech

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>industry right now, already facing of course, the chance of

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>recession globally. Here's what some of our guests across Bloomberg

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Television have been talking about. We've not been positive on

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Big Deck for I don't know a year, a year

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half. We do believe that there is still

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>some deflation to come out of this market after the

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>exuberence of twenty one. I actually think that the tech

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.239
<v Speaker 1>sector is one of the few sectors that is really

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>discounting a recession in its outlook. The longer the macro

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>volatility persists, we do expect early stage and seed to

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>start to see that crunch that the late stages is

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 1>seen right now, and there is going to be some

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>amount of normalization of the demand. Uh. Quite frankly, we

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in the tech industry will also have to get efficient, right.

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:49.919
<v Speaker 1>It's not about everyone else doing more with less. We

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>will have to do more with less. All right, So

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in Bloomberg's Austin car who has been writing

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>about why behind the job cuts, and you heard their

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>auster and from a rural range of names across venture

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>capital public markets also sat in Adela on why we're

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing these layoffs in the technology industry. Rapp all of

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>this together, because you've been writing about this also in

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. So what we saw over the last year

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>or two was just as one of those analysts had

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>noticed at this exuberance coming out of the COVID nineteen pandemic,

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>where the tech sector, more than any other industry, had

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>really bet big on this new revenue acceleration being permanent.

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen that course correction happened quite harshly in

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>more recent days and months, with Amazon and Microsoft announcing

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of headline grabbing uh layoffs in the you know,

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 1>ten eighteen thousand range figures. And what's totally remarkable about

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that is how it compares to the rest of the

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>US economy. Job cuts in two were actually up and

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 1>the tech sector six compared to the previous year, whereas

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in the rest of the economy was only the layoffs

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>we're only up. So what you saw is all these

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 1>tech companies betting huge on that COVID error growth remaining

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and and being a much longer term phenomenon, and we're

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>now seeing a sort of big course correction from other

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies, and only is trying to understand firstly

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a bell weather, but also also why it's

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>not really showing up in the big data at the moment.

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Many hypothesize that these people are highly talented, highly skilled,

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and people still want them in the other industries, so

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>they're snapped up very quickly rather than showing up in

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the BLS data for example. But go to also where

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>they might add jobs, because I thought that was interesting

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>from SATI in a data and Amazon and Microsoft at large,

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>they are still going to be hiring in some spaces, right, Well,

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the narrative that they sold Walter on this sort

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of high growth, higher risk, big return investments. So they

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>can't just stop all of those moonshots that they've been

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>investing in for the last couple of years and let

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>go of that very high caliber, expensive engineering talent. So

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing sort of this balance between tech companies trying

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to give off some signal that they're going to be

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more financially prudent and conservative while not

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>giving up on some of those longer term bets. With Microsoft,

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>for example, such an Adela saying we're going to double

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>down in core businesses, but we're going to continue to

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>invest in high growth areas like AI or with Amazon,

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>they're seeing layoffs happen in the retail division or in

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>some of their devices, sort of the risky or hardware

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>bets that they've been making with Alexa Advices. But at

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the same time he's also saying Andy Jassy, the CEO,

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>has said we're still going to invest in high growth

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 1>areas like groceries or B two B services, third part

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of party seller markets, So they're really trying to sort

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of balance that that sort of risk and reward. Right now,

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring up this terminal chart again which

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>we showed earlier in the show. Um Amazon's total global

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>head count, right so eighteen thousand jobs. It's it's a

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>striking headline, but it's one percent of its global workforce.

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.599
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's discussion about this from market participants

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in our in our reporting, right Austin, what does that

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.479
<v Speaker 1>what does that tell us the difference between the headlines

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and the reality and how this period, this economy of

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>three might be different to the dot com bubble, even

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand and eight financial crisis. Yeah, it indicates

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>so far that just given how wired big tech is

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>into the rest of the global economy, it's a lot

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>different than it was during the dot com crash two

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>decades ago. Uh. You know, all these companies around the

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 1>world are much more dependent on Silicon Valley software, their hardware,

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>their chips, their cloud computing services, their enterprise services as well.

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's not the case that as much as these

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>headline grabbing numbers are are pretty massive, there's still a

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>small percentage of of Amazon's overall workforce, or for Microsoft,

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the ten thousand cuts that they announced, that's I think

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>only five percent of their overall workforce. So it's a

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>lot smaller. Uh. And it's also in specific areas, at

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>least from our sources we're hearing from HR and recruiting

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.439
<v Speaker 1>rather than some of the high, high caliber, expensive talent

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and engineering. They're sort of can double down for their

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>core businesses that they want to continue invest in. But

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>again it's always that balance. With Mark zucker Burke, he said,

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we're still going to invest more. We're

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 1>going to reprioritize our adversis, but we're still going to

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 1>make that that bet in engineering talent, our metaverse, which

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.439
<v Speaker 1>is that longer term bet that they're they're making. It's nuanced,

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and you do it so well for us, Austin, thank

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:16.439
<v Speaker 1>you very much. Indeed, Austin car it's a great read. Meanwhile,

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll one sector in technology that's really been letting go

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of staff is crypto, and in fact,

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>crypto firm Genesis is one of those, and it's also

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>said it's preparing now we understand for bankruptcy filing as

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>early as this week. They're lending unit of Barry Silbert's

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Digital Currency Group. Genesis is in confidential negotiations with various

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>creditor groups amid a liquidity crunch. Genesis suspended withdrawals in November,

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>soon after ft X men bankrupt course. On Tuesday, Digital

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Currency Group told shareholders that it's suspending quarterly dividends in

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>an effort to conserve cash. Coming up, Well, now, what

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>access to TikTok at universities in Texas? What impact could

0:10:53.120 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that ban have? We'll discuss this Blue beg I think

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>the national security issue of our time is the technology

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>competition with China. We've already seen that around things like

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>five G Semiconductors were now looking at issues like new

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>energy and synthetic biology because in China we have a

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>competitor that's investing at a rate that's commensurate with what

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>we're investing. And uh, I'm all for innovation, but I've

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>been particularly concerned about TikTok. My fears one TikTok collects

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>more information about you as a user than virtually any

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>other site around your keystrokes, your facial expressions, and I'm

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>horribly afraid that that's being stored somewhere in besion. I'm

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>also concerned about it being an ability to manipulate um

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the flow of information to you. I was Senator Mark

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Warner that and look, speaking of TikTok, some universities in Texas,

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>like the University of North Texas among others, there are

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>said to be blocking access to the video sharing app

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>TikTok on its WiFi and wide networks to comply with

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>quote Governor Abbot's directive to all state agencies banning employees

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>from using or downloading TikTok on all state issued or

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>managed devices and environments. That's according to a statement shared

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg. Now, Rumberg's Alex Brinka is here to break

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it all down. And what's so interesting to me, Alex

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>is basically the university's front running the rest of the state. Oh,

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got a technical glitch. We're gonna be

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>getting to Alex in a moment. Who's out in l A.

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>But ed, first, let's bring in what our audience said,

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>because yes, it seems as though we're seeing a front

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>running in certain institutions in a state versus the state

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>itself and states themselves front running the federal government. But

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we are sked ultimately our audience as to whether this

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to make any difference. And well, many seem

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to think VPNs are going to come to the rescue

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in some way. Yeah. Look, there's two sides to this debate.

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Right in Texas, what you see is university is essentially

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>public entities enacting the directive from the governor and putting

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that into practice. And that manifests itself by the universities

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>not allowing students or anyone on campus to access the

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>TikTok app through the WiFi network. Well, they can probably

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>still access if they turn off WiFi and use their

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>five G network. But it's it's the debate around who

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>should be acting on this, because the buying administration and

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the federal government have been leading a security view of

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and other cyber screty threats for some time. And

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>there's the answer, right Carol. For the eight percent of

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the respondents we polled said this isn't going to fix

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>anything bank the specifics of not allowing TikTok access on

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>campus in Texas universities. But they are following through in

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the governor's directive. They are, And let's get to Alex. Now,

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I think technology issues solved on this technology show. Tell

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>us Alex about whether you're surprised that some of these

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>institutions are going headlong into these sorts of bands. It

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is a little interesting how they're interpreting this right. They

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>actually University of Texas at Austin, for example, doesn't have

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a specific directive to move forward in this um. In

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>this way, Texas Tech is waiting until they get more

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>guidance from the state. So it's interesting to see Texas, Georgia,

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Alabama really being front footed here. And following along what

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>we heard at the top from Senator Warner basically saying,

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>we're worried about data sharing on TikTok and potential data

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>sharing with the Chinese government, and we're going to lock

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>this down now. Ed what you said, um about students

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>potentially looking for workarounds accessing TikTok on their cellular data

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and not on the WiFi words band, That's exactly what's happening.

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I've been chatting to folks who are on the ground

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>at u T Austin in particular, who have said, look,

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>we have other ways we're gonna access this app. I

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>use it for entertainment, I use it for educational content.

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So they're on TikTok anyways, even if it's not on

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the WiFi at the university. Yeah. Quite. I think it's

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>also an educational issue, right understanding why is this a

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>security skin and conveying that to uses of all social

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>media platforms. That seems to be what we're hearing from

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>users of that particular platform. Bloombergs, Alex Barrinka, thank you

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>very much. Now. Cisco CEO Chuck Robbins spoke to Bloombergs,

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>David Weston and Davos about tech layoffs, the impact of

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen on the tech sector, but first about their

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>investment into software. Have a listen. Well, there's a few

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>things we've done. We've added a lot of our cybersecurity

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>technology is just pure software, right, I mean, that's just

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the industry and how we're defending against threats.

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Collaboration is a lot of software. Our web ex portfolio

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and the meeting capability, so those are just natural software

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>products that we then also begun to sell subscriptions on

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>our hardware platforms, and that's been a transition we started

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>back in two thousand, seventeen or eighteen and uh last quarter,

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>recurring revenue including software and services represented our business, which

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is significantly different than where we were five, six, seven

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>years ago. You mentioned earlier the pandemic and what that did. Intact,

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't change your business, and maybe over the longer term,

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe not just over the short term, but we're their

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>fundamental shifts in the use of technology that fect Cisco. Well,

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it became clear. I really believe that prior

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to the pandemic, every executive believed technology was strategic. Right.

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>We've a decade or fifteen years ago, we moved from

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it being an operational productivity driver to really being a

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>strategic enabler and a strategic differentiator for our customers. During

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, it just elevated. I mean everyone's eyes were

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>open as to I mean, we kept the world running

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>when everyone was at home, We kept everyone productive, and

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I think no one believed that was possible, including a

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in tech, and uh, we've never tried

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it before, so doing it at that scale, and I

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>think what that did is it gave So I think

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it gave our customers this incredible confidence and investing in

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>technology and listening to their teams who are bringing them

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>these new, crazy creative projects around what they want to

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>do with technology, and they go, well, I've seen this,

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it work here, so I'm gonna trust you

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 1>and believe you. So I think that's one piece of it.

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think from a cultural perspective, I think every

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:15.640
<v Speaker 1>company's culture was magnified during the pandemic, and I think

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that we'll never go back to the way we were.

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, we're gonna operate in environments where employees

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>want to have human, authentic conversations, just like we did

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>over video while everybody was at home, and so I

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>think it changed how we engage with our employees as well.

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Tell you what new crazy creative projects in teach. There's

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of talk around here about open AI, artificial

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>intelligence and by the way, quantum computing. I'm not sure

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly what those mean, but there's a lot of talk

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>about them. Is that going to fundamentally change your business? Well,

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it's we're working on quantum networking today because when you

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>have big networks of quantum computers, you have to be

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>able to connect them and actually move the bits at

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>at rates that are commensurate with the speed of the computers.

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of research that we're engaged in

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. So we're in the early days. We have

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>team of people doing research on quantum networking, so absolutely

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>that will be a part of our business. And then

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>these open AI and things like chat, GPT, and then

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that's something that I actually had a conversation with my

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>team about and I think it's it's amazing how fast

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 1>it went from sort of being exposed to all of

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a sudden My guess is my next board meeting, we'll

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>have a conversation about chat GPT and open AI, and

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>we think we're there's lots of great use cases that

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>we can leverage that technology for, and there's also a

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of uh under probably some understood and some not understood,

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>unintended consequences from that technology. Think you'd very fundamentally disruptive. Absolutely,

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any doubt. Want to own a

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>piece of Silicon Valley history, Maybe you now do. Because

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter was opening off it's old office supplies at the

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>six thirty one lots on offer, and some of them

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>went the tens of thousands of dollars, for example, a

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>blue Neon light, the Twitter about itself, maybe an apt

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>sign that was a planter, all of these going for

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>big bucks. The auction house behind it says that this

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 1>isn't actually to secure the financing of Twitter itself, although

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>we do know is in a relatively precarious situation at

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>least to be paying down debt, and Elon Musk himself

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>is or not paying some of the rents over in

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. But for now the auction is done, and

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe you now have a piece of corporate history and

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 1>you've checked it out, because I think it's stopped the

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>auction twenty seven hours long, finished at ten am Pacific time.

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Your time ed right thirty two thousand or there or

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>thereabouts for that Neon sign. This is kind of trophy stuff,

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>particularly if you work there. So I love that you

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>focused on kind of more glitzy, shiny items. What I

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>loved was just the endless thumbnails showing tables and chairs

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 1>and if you really wanted, you could buy a full

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>office set to furnish your office from Twitter issue. I

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>actually know a guy who's been in that building a

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>few times, Bloomberg Newses Kurt Wagner, who joins us now.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Because on top of that news, the report by the

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Information that Twitter's revenue dropped as much as thirty five

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>percent last quarter from the same period a year ago. Goss, Twitter,

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 1>You and I we've had a rough two navigating this.

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's start with the financials and we'll get to

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the furniture. A drop in revenue as reported by the Information,

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's happening in sure? Yeah, I mean we've

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>been talking about this for a while, right, which is

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that roughly of Twitter's revenue comes from advertising, and if

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 1>you're an advertiser right now, Twitter is a sort of

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a scary place. It's not a comfortable, a safe environment

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to be spending your money. Um, And so I don't

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>think any of us are shocked. We've we've seen the

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>headlines and news about a lot of these big advertisers

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>who are step have stepped back from Twitter, and so

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 1>the reality that this hit them very hard, especially in

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter, when you know a lot of the

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>marketing budgets usually come about, is not a super big

0:20:55.320 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>surprise to me. How is Twitter in chief dealing all

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 1>of this because many it sort of commented that the

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>tweets coming from Elon Musque have got a little less

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>well controversial, shall we say, of late, But how is

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>he trying to ensure that people are coming back to

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the platform wanting to advertise for him. Yeah, it does

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>seem like he has sort of maybe redirected some of

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>his attention, right and and perhaps that means to Tesla. Obviously,

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the year beginning of this year,

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of um frustration from Tesla investors

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that that he was not paying closer attention to the company.

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>And so this may just be simply that you know,

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>he he got there, He did a lot of the

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>budget cuts that he was planned, the layoffs that were planned,

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and now he feels like he can sort of redirect

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>attention elsewhere, right, But I think like bringing people back, unfortunately,

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that just takes time and it takes trust if you're

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 1>an advertiser, and I'm not sure that Twitter has really

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>earned um the trust back from those big brand marketers.

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's probably the kind of thing that will take

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a while and they'll have to watch and say, like,

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is Ellen just taking a couple of weeks off of

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>tweeting controversial things or is this the new normal for

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>him moving forward? And I don't think we can say

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that just yet. I want to dig deep into financials.

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about the world's second richest man

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and how he's going to bring advertise this back. But

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to ask you about that. You want

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to know about the chairs chairs. I want to know

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 1>about this auction. You're right, did you buy anything or

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't buy anything? Um, maybe a high top table.

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>You and Caroline can come over for dinner sometime. That

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>would be quite fun. But no, I mean, like it's sad,

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>right it is. There is a serious point behind this,

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 1>which is that many people lost their jobs, that building

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>was once full. It makes sense from a logistic standpoint, right,

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>if your Twitter used to have close to thousand employees

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>um and you now have of that, you don't need

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>all this office space, you don't need all this office furniture.

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't need five hundred white boards or five hundred

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>standing desks or whatever may be, right, So it makes

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>sense that they would get rid of this. But I

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>think you know what a lot of people are seeing, right,

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is sort of like a yard sale from this company

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that had UH for a long time, like a very

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>visible culture, probably more than most tech companies, right with

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the AT symbol or the big neon bird, Like these

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>are the things we would see pictures of at like

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 1>the office holiday party or whatever. Right, So I just

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like maybe there's a little bit more UH kind

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>of connection to Twitter's culture than most companies, just because

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>so much of it plays out on the service itself.

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>So looking at the stats, the bird statue went for

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand in the auction, but Heritage Global Partners,

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>who is behind the auction, kept saying that this isn't

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>for the finances. Why do it then, and why do

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it say publicly? Well, I think to do it is

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>again sort of like a space thing, right, Like if

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you're really getting rid of offices in the way that

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we've seen Twitter get rid of close the Seattle office.

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there was a Singapore office as they that

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>they closed last week as well, Like you've got to

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 1>do something with all the stuff that's in those offices. Right,

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 1>there's a logistics part of this where they no longer

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>have the space to hold it, So I think that's

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>probably part of it. Now doing it publicly, I guess,

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>how are you going to get the most bang for

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>your buck? Right? You have to make sure people know

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to go bid on this thing. So I'm sort of

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>speculating here, right because we haven't heard Eylan say here's

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the strategy behind the auction, But my guests would be

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that that's why they want to do it the way

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that they've been doing it all right. Bloomberg's Curt Wagner

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:13.439
<v Speaker 1>covering every twist and turn inside and outside of Twitter,

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. I actually want to turn to

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the latest on Apple because another day, another scoop, and

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>it's taking on Amazon and Google, according to sources, by

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>expanding their in home product lineup. Meanwhile, Apple still planning

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to unveil its first mixed reality headset this year, but

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the plans for a lightweight augmented reality glasses have been postponed,

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>sources say, due to technical challenges. Bloomberg's Mark German broke

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>both of those stories in the space of a single

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>working day, and I'm delighted to say, joys, Caroline and I.

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Now let's let's start with the in home devices, because actually,

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>when I was at CS in Vegas recently, that was

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a big theme for many of the consumer electronics companies.

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>What are the details you've reported? So, actually, this morning

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple rolled out a new home pod, right, it's basically

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the return of the original home Pod. It's a bit

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>lower cost because they've rolled it out at three instead

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of the original three fifty of the home Pod, there's

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>a few there's fewer microphones and tweeters inside the device,

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>so not as powerful as the previous one. And it

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>uses an Apple Watch processor instead of an iPhone processor,

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 1>so you have a little bit of a shift there.

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:26.640
<v Speaker 1>But for audio fans, you're really not getting better than

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>an Apple home Pod, the big one at three bucks

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>in your home. So I know a lot of people

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>are looking forward to that product. Now they're working on

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a few other devices. They're working on a faster Apple

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>TV for next year, though it won't have eight K functionality,

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and they're also working on a new low end iPad

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>for the home smart home appliances, using it to FaceTime,

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>using it to watch some video. So that's the smart

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>home strategy for Apple moving forward away from smart home

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.239
<v Speaker 1>to a r VA. Just tell us a little bit

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>about the strategy there, because it looks as though they're

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:00.719
<v Speaker 1>struggling with the glasses at least. So Apple has been

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>developing it's a r VR strategy for north of six years,

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>seven years, eight years at this point, and for a

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>long time the strategy was twofold. We're first going to

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>roll out this high end halo device that's going to

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>be a mixed reality had set merging virtual reality and

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>augmented reality, a very complex, expensive three thousand dollar device

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that will cast a shadow over the a r v

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>R market, and then as early as a year later

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 1>we would roll out glasses. These are lightweight, a our

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:31.360
<v Speaker 1>only glasses. That plan has changed. The mixed reality had

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>set the high end one the reality pro that's still

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>coming this year, but instead of the follow up product

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>being the AAR glasses. The successive product is going to

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 1>be a new low end version of the mixed reality

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>head set, so one that's probably about half the price.

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Somewhere closer to the same price is the high end

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Meta quest Pro head set. Now, the bigger news those

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>are glasses. Those are not coming anytime soon. Those have

0:26:56.840 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>been pushed back indefinitely. Lots of technical challenges, lots of difficulty, right,

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the big headset is going to have about two hours

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of battery life. The a R glasses or something you

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.199
<v Speaker 1>need to wear all day without needing to recharge them

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>until nighttime, like a phone or an Apple Watch. If

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the high end device is getting two hours, how could

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 1>a device with even less space for components inside be

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>worn all day. There's also challenges related to the displays, right.

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>That's called a wave guide technology. To be able to

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 1>see things in front of you while also being able

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to glean information off and displays. They'll have to be

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.120
<v Speaker 1>connected to cellular radios and WiFi, AM Bluetooth at all times.

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>So much complexity in that product. So it's gonna be

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>many years before we see augmented reality glasses from Apple.

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>Expertly analyze for our smart gum and thank you as always,

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>will let you get back to your scoop getting Meanwhile,

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>coming up, Netflix picks up steam ahead of its earnings

0:27:50.040 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>all important for tomorrow this bring back Netflix earnings as

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>usual will focus on the company's new subscribe account. Every quarter,

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 1>it is that way investors always thinking subscribeer growth, did

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it go up? Did it go down? But this time

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>around they'll also be looking to initiatives to increase revenue,

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and of course all the rage in the world of

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>streaming is add supported tiers, which Netflix launched in November.

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt Spiegel, executive vice president of the Media and Entertainment

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Verse call a TransUnion, joins us, it's that interesting dynamic.

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 1>We are obsessed with subscriber growth at all streaming platforms,

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>but particularly Netflix. Yet this quarter we're gonna ask ourselves

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>how successful as Netflix been in attracting US customers in

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 1>particular to an ad supported tier. Is that the focus

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>for you? Yeah? Well, thanks for having me. It certainly is,

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and I quite frankly think it's going to be a challenge,

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>but that's ultimately because they're a victim over their own success.

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you look at how big Netflix is in the US,

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they really have more subscribers than really any of the

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>stream players in the country, and so really the hard

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>part is how do you get that penetration to shift

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to add dollars or to an add experience. And the

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>likely reality is most of us who have Netflix accounts

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to do that, and so my guess is

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>over the short term it's going to take a little

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>while for them to get to the numbers they expect

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>on the add model. I think over the long term

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll be fine. But you know, if i'd make a

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>predictionable here tomorrow, my guests is less AD users than

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>they might have ultimately hoped for um, but we'll build

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>over time. I actually have some some sympathy to to Netflix,

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>so I know have frustrations about how micro focused we are.

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Consensus is for new subscribe editions around four point five million.

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>But Karen, I have talked about this in the past.

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>There's a whole generation of user out there, many of

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>them young people who have never seen ads. They grew

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>up where they could stream whatever they wanted whenever they wanted,

0:29:56.640 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>add free, and I wonder if that is a big

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>factor here, not just for Netflix, for Disney the attractiveness

0:30:03.960 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of an ad supportive product, many people just don't want it. Yeah, listen,

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. Certainly, no consumers says they want ads. But

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>if you look at really what happens in the entirety

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of the media ecosystem, there's always a balance there. The

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>practical reality as we as consumers can only spend money

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>on so many things to really subscribe to. But and

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we're really willing to actually exchange our time, uh, in

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>exchange for really subsidizing that experience. Think about certainly the

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>cable experience and the linear experience will much less prevalent

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>than it was, there are still times we do that,

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and so I don't think we have a question of

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>whether advertising is part of the ecosystem or not. You

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>really have You've got premium content creators, Netflix being one

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of them, which is always going to look for an

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to make additional revenue and by the way, very

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>highly a creative revenue when its scales in the form

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of advertising. So that balance between subscribers and advertising, I

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's going anywhere. And sure many consumers won't

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 1>always want advertising, but my guess is you'll you'll always

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>find a market somewhere one of those markets. I mean,

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the only time I want advertising is when I'm watching

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl, right, So Matt, to that end, what

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>about sport? What about live events? Is that how we're

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:14.959
<v Speaker 1>going to see the actual product and some of the

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>content they provide its rate over a Netflix Listen, I

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's exactly right. What we're really talking about is

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>netflixs becoming a media company much like the others, right,

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>different from a streaming content company that was all about subs.

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>You're now talking about having to attract the type of

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>eyeballs at one time in scale to balance that ad model.

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>And you're right. You're seeing them already invest in or

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>reportedly invest in the opportunity to take sports right, and

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that will be something they'll continue to do.

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>You've clearly seen that work well with an Amazon crime

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately, if you want to be in the media

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>business inclusive advertising, you need to have those quote water

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>cooler moments. It's not only sports, but it is clearly

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>heavily dominated by sports these days. Those live moments really

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>do matter, and that's really what all the media companies

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>are finding that right. Balance right, The linear model clearly

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>is shifting. Uh, it's not going to die for a while.

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Streaming will be the dominant form of distribution those time

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>goes on, but that can be on demand, it can

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>still be what really feels like a linear TV ad

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>business just in a streaming environment, which is things like

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>live sports and balancing all those things is going to

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>be what companies like Netflix have to do to compete.

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Listen that they are absolutely in competition for against the

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Disneys and the Warner Brothers of the world, and that's

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 1>part of the ecosystem and kind of I wonder what

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:33.959
<v Speaker 1>sets them apart from some of the competitors is that

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they get they've got technology in their bones. They all

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>group of engineers. They're sort of a tech first but

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>also media player, and I'm interested as to whether that

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>sets them apart. Can they win the personalization race, if

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>perhaps at all putting back on content spend now, Yeah,

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's gonna have to be part of it. Um.

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Certainly there are other companies that have good technology as well,

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 1>but Netflix, to your point, has that at their bones.

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's gonna impact not only their content strategy

0:32:57.840 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>but also their ad strategy. You really got to give

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>them credit for how they've approached the ad business so far,

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>some really gate you know, senior hires in that team

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a partnership with Microsoft, which makes a ton of sense.

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>And so while we're certainly gonna, like I said, I

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 1>expected a short term, it's gonna be a harder ramp

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>for Netflix to get to the point where their ad

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>business is as scaled as they hope. Um. But having

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that DNA, which is part content, part technology, I agree,

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 1>can only help. You know, certainly, the ad business is

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>one where the mix of scale and precision matters right.

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Advertisers are absolutely absolutely looking for that balance and a

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Netflix who can hopefully invent in the right ways to

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>provide both a scaled audience but doing that in a

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>real targeted way with interesting new add creative which again,

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>let's be clear, this is gonna take time. It will

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>it will be an evolutionary process, but there's a lot

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to be excited about for Netflix over the long term.

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Now speak of great to have you on that look

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>ahead to the earnings. Executive vice president at TransUnion, I mean, well,

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 1>let's pivot back to Switzerland the out to doubles because

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>HCl Tech the software giant and it's based in India

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is coming over to talk about how they're focusing on

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>s G or nonlinear growth in the long term. Then

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's has an endarm and discussed the company's priorities. When

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the HCl Tech chairperson, that's what's yourn email Hotrah. So,

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, we've got a couple of five

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>strategic objectives, the first one being we are an IT

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 1>services group and we cover UM digital engineering, cloud as

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 1>well as software. So we want to be able to

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>lead with differentiated products and services. We want to be

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>able to be a preferred digital partner for global two

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand companies in preferred geographies. UM. You know, I think

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:46.760
<v Speaker 1>weaving E s G into a lot of the business

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 1>strategy is absolutely critical for us. UM A c L

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Technologies hires two five thousand people across the world and

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the average age is twenty seven and below. So I

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>think today their strategic priority for a company has to

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>be to be a preferred employer. And and then lastly, UM,

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I think if we're able to meet these strategic objectives,

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>then you know, delivering the highest shareholder return in medium

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to term it should be the ultimate strategic direction. There's

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>so much uncertainty there's so much disruption, what's use strategy

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to stay relevant? So I think, like I said, I

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>think one part of it is technology, and what's the

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>growth strategy. I think the growth strategy is investing in

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:39.839
<v Speaker 1>our people and investing in skills. Um you know, like

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I said, we've got twenty five thousand people all over

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the world. Technology is moving a lot faster than the

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>skills can keep up. We do about two million to

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 1>three million hours of training a quota, and that is

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:56.879
<v Speaker 1>only going to grow. We also have to find non

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>linear ways of growth. So if you look at our

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>software portfolio, which is quite unique to eight sale technologies,

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:08.399
<v Speaker 1>it's about two billion of our twelve billion revenue. It's

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>much more non linear. So while the balance ten billion

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 1>would have more than a hundred and fifty thousand people

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 1>working on it, are two billion in software will have

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>about five thousand. You talk about being a twelve billion

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>dollar company, how do you take it to thirty? How

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:27.839
<v Speaker 1>do you take it to fifty? When can you get there?

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know when we're going to get there. I

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 1>think I can only talk about our strategic vision in

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 1>the next five to seven years. But the investment that

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>we made in eight c L software, which is a

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>two billion that we get from you know, five thousand

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 1>engineers is a non linear growth and I think that

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>as we go forward, we're going to want to grow

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that business as well. Indian ID executives lament that there

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:59.800
<v Speaker 1>is a gap between engineering education and what the industries

0:36:59.840 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>are actually need. How do you bridge that gap, especially

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>now that you're part of the thin M T. S

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Dean of the Global Advisory come, thank you so. Um.

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, there are a couple of experiments that we're

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>doing in eight c L. I of course talked about

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:26.320
<v Speaker 1>investing in a lot of training, which you know, closes

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the gap between fresh engineers and what they need to

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 1>do to deliver to customers all over the world. We're

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>also doing something very interesting, which is we've got eight

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand UM fresh school graduates in the eighth c L

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>system and we've partnered with university so that on the

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>weekends they can pursue an undergraduate education, but Monday to Friday,

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>these are eighteen year olds, their digital natives. Um, you know,

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 1>we got them from grade twelve. We've got fifty percent women,

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 1>young women as part of this cohort and after you know,

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:04.840
<v Speaker 1>eight to nine months of training, they're ready to deliver.

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's also looking at alternate talent calls. And you know, um,

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 1>as you go forward in the world, you're going to

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 1>realize that there are more people who don't pursue higher

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>education than those who actually do, because higher education is

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:22.879
<v Speaker 1>becoming prohibitively expensive. So how do we actually tap into

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:26.320
<v Speaker 1>different talent calls? And so I think that's quite unique

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to a cl tech going viral today? What was the

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>fear of opening your bank account to see a negative balance?

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Dozens of Bank of America customers using the transaction service

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>zell they were tweeting about how their funds Sunday disappeared overnight,

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 1>although they had trouble logging into the Banking Apple tool.

0:38:51.440 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Now the website down detector had hundreds of reports. Then

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:56.319
<v Speaker 1>there were issues with zul. Take a look at this

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 1>chart and app similar of course, the vemmo built by

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a group of news biggest banks like Bank of America.

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:05.799
<v Speaker 1>Those reports they seem to have died down by Wednesday afternoon. Now,

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:09.240
<v Speaker 1>according to American Banker, Zel runs more than one point

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollars in transactions daily. This is heavily lent

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>upon an overall, I know that I use it. I

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:19.320
<v Speaker 1>know that many many person uses to log on and

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>does see negative also freaked out. Yeah, I mean then

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>saying as P s A. I guess three pm Eastern

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 1>this was resolved. But you know, if if Instagram goes down,

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Twitter goes down, whatever, your bank account goes down and

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>then shows missing funds, that's different and seeing social media

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>response savage. Yeah, I have to say some of the

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 1>memes are pretty great. Go and check them out on

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter or on Instagram. Meanwhile, that does it. From the

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>addition of technology, Thursday, we'll share new data about crypto

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 1>launderings from chain analysis. Don't forget the problem.