WEBVTT - crime stat numbers under trump jack smith congress

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in his verdict with Center, Ted Cruz Ben Ferguson

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:06.400
<v Speaker 1>with you, and it's so nice to have you with

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>uespecially if you are listing on the radio around the country.

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>We've got a lot to discuss it happened this last week,

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:16.479
<v Speaker 1>including some incredible crime stats that the media is not

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>connecting back to the policies of the Trump administration.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, we have a big show today. We start with

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 2>the numbers that were just released that show murder rates

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.319
<v Speaker 2>in the United States dropped more than twenty percent. That

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 2>is on top of data that just came out that

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 2>show drug overdose deaths dropped more than twenty percent. Both

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 2>of these this year compared to last year. We're going

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 2>to break down those numbers. We're going to talk about

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 2>why that's happening and how literally tens of thousands of

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 2>Americans are alive today because President Trump was reelected and

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Republicans have control of both Houses of Congress. We're also

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 2>going to talk about Jack Smith's disastrous testimony before the

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 2>House of Representatives. He got up and brazen lead tried

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 2>to defend his abuse of power, and it did not

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 2>go well. We're going to give you all the details.

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to take a quick moment and talk to

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you about an incredible organization and it is called Compassion

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>International and how you can get involved. I want you

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to meet Maria. In fifteen years, she'll be a nurse

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>bringing healthcare to her village. Right now, she's eight and

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>she just needs someone to believe she can get there,

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>someone to help her stay in school, someone to tell

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>her she's capable of extraordinary things. I want you to

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>meet James, a future engineer. He'll design clean water systems

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>for his community. Today he's learning multiplication and dreaming big.

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>But he needs more than dreams. He needs nutrition, he

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>needs mentorship and someone who won't give up on him.

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Meet Sophia. She'll become the first in her family to

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>graduate university. She'll teach dozens of children who remind her

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of herself. But right now, at age ten, she's at

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a crossroads, and your support could be what tips the balance.

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Through Compassion International, you're not helping a child survive poverty.

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>You're investing in who they'll become. The teacher, the leader,

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 1>the parents who will change their family's story forever, impact

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the world, one child at a time. Learn how at

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Compassion dot com. That's compassion dot Com. All right, Senator,

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>so let's just get back to this headline. A lot

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of people not paying attention to it because why well,

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>no one's covering it because it's good news. There are

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>fewer Americans that are becoming victims of crime, fewer people

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:49.959
<v Speaker 1>in America that are being murdered. All of this because

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of Donald Trump's leadership and trying to go into danger

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>cities and make them safer for all Americans.

0:02:58.040 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with crime, and what was released this week

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 2>is the latest murder rates, and the murder rates across

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 2>the United States decreased nationwide roughly twenty percent. And let's

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 2>put that in specific numbers. If you look at January

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 2>through October of twenty twenty five, and you compare it

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 2>to the same time period in twenty twenty four. In

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five, approximately five nine hundred and twelve murders

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 2>were recorded in the US In that same time period

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty four, seven three hundred and sixty nine

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 2>murders were recorded. In other words, there are about fourteen

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 2>hundred people one thy four hundred people alive who were

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 2>not murdered because of common sense law and order policies

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 2>because of not releasing murderers onto the street, because of

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 2>deporting murderers and violent gang members. And let's break the

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 2>numbers down. Chicago the murder rate dropped thirty percent. New

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 2>York City the murder rate dropped twenty percent. Birmingham, Alabama,

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 2>it dropped forty nine percent. Albuquerque, New Mexico, had dropped

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 2>thirty two percent, Baltimore, Maryland it dropped thirty one percent, Atlanta,

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Georgia twenty six percent, Oakland, California, thirty three percent, Washington,

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 2>d C. Where President Trump deployed the National Guard thirty

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 2>one percent. These are historic lows, and if these trends continue,

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 2>the US may record its lowest murder rate since nineteen sixty,

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 2>that is sixty six years ago. That is a stunning result.

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:44.799
<v Speaker 2>By the way, border crime, border crime, other violent crimes

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 2>also decreased in twenty five, including a twenty five percent

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 2>drop in motor vehicle theft, an eighteen percent drop in robberies,

0:04:55.160 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 2>and an eight percent drop in aggravated assaults. Now these

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.720
<v Speaker 2>data are being reported, and what is really quite interesting

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.600
<v Speaker 2>is the media is doing everything they can to cover

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 2>it up. So Axios wrote the first story on this,

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 2>and they talk about the murder rate has fallen, but

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 2>they say, well, it's unclear that this has anything to

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 2>do with Donald Trump or DOJ or the FBI or

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 2>policies that Republicans have put in place deporting violent criminals

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 2>and murderers and gang members, which is truly, it is

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 2>a level of dishonesty that is incredible. And I want

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 2>to give you some of the raw backgrounds that explains

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 2>why the murder rate has dropped so profoundly. Here are

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 2>some raw numbers, and this was put out by FBI

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Director Cash Betel of what has happened that would explain

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 2>why is it that we've seen a twenty percent drop

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 2>in murder rate in the last year. We've seen an

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 2>increase in violent crime arrests. What rate do you think

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 2>the increase violent crime arrest has been?

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 4>What has it been? I have no clue.

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 2>One hundred percent?

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 4>Wow? All right?

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 2>How about this? Gangs and criminal enterprises disrupted? What rate

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 2>do you think that that increase has been.

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna guess it's got to be significant.

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 2>Two hundred and ten percent a total of one thousand,

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 2>eight hundred gangs and criminal enterprises disrupted? All right, fetanyl

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.480
<v Speaker 2>more than two thousand kilos of fetanyl sees. That's up

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 2>thirty one percent. That's enough to kill one hundred and

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 2>thirty million Americans. There've also been more than six thousand

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 2>child victims located. That's an increase of twenty two percent.

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 2>There have been more than one thousand, seven hundred child

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 2>predators arrested. That's an increase of ten percent. There have

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 2>been more than three hundred human traffickers arrested. That's up

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 2>fifteen percent. There's a thirty five percent increase in espionage arrests.

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 2>And four of the FBI's top ten most wanted fugitives

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 2>were captured. And to give you a sense of that,

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 2>in one year, do you have many how many of

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 2>the FBI's top ten lists were captured in the four

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 2>years of the Biden presidency.

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna guess it's less than five.

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Four So in one year they captured as many on

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 2>the top ten list as Biden did in all four years.

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 2>And the media want to do everything they can to say, no, no,

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 2>this drop in the murder rate. It just happened magically.

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 2>It's probably due to global warming or something. It has

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 2>nothing to do with arresting murderers. It has nothing to

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 2>do with deporting murders. It certainly has nothing to do

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 2>with MS thirteen gang members being put in jail and deported,

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 2>despite the fact that the way you join MS thirteen

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 2>is by murdering someone. And this is real results. And

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 2>then you put on top of it, put on top

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 2>of it the drop in overdoses. And when we come back,

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 2>we're going to give you the drop in overdoses, which

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 2>is even more profound. Even more lives have been saved

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 2>in the past year.

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>We also have some incredible data when it comes to overdoses.

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>This country saving counts lives by securing the border but

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>also going after the cartels and doing everything we can

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to stop the floid drugs in this country, and it's

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>working quickly.

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're right, although the one thing I'll disagree with

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 2>you on, as you said countless lives, We actually can

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 2>can count the lives that have been saved, and the

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 2>lives that have been saved are staggering. We just discussed

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 2>how the murder rate has dropped twenty percent in the

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 2>first year of the Trump administration to the lowest rate

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 2>since nineteen sixty The lowest rate in sixty six years.

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 2>That means roughly one thy four hundred Americans are alive

0:08:56.320 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 2>today who would have been murdered if Joe Biden and

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 2>the Democrats soft on crime open border policies were still

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 2>in effect. Now, that's a lot ony four hundred people

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 2>still alive. Nobody knows who it is. It may be you,

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 2>it may be me, it may be our family are

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 2>loved ones. We don't know who it is that would

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 2>have been murdered, but there would have been more murders.

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 2>As big as that is, that's not even close to

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 2>the biggest decrease in deaths because of President Trump and

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 2>because of common sense policies. The biggest decrease in deaths

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 2>comes from the drug overdose deaths numbers. And I want

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 2>to pause for a second and ask everyone listening to this.

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Have you seen this on the six o'clock news? Have

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 2>you read this of the New York Times? Have you

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 2>seen the corporate media covering this? They don't want to

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 2>cover this. Here are the stats. In twenty twenty five,

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 2>drug overdose deaths in America dropped roughly twenty one percent.

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Now what does that mean? That means in twenty twenty four,

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 2>there were nine twenty one thousand, six hundred and ninety

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 2>four deaths from drug overdoses ninety one thousand, six hundred

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 2>ninety four same time period, and that's actually a year

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 2>long projected looking at the data from January to August,

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 2>and this is from the CDC ninety one thousand, six

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 2>hundred ninety four and twenty twenty four. What do you

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 2>think they were in twenty twenty five. Well, the answer

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 2>is seventy two thousand, eight hundred and thirty six. In

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 2>other words, the deaths fell from ninety one thousand, six

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 2>hundred ninety four to seventy two thousand, eight hundred and

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 2>thirty six. That means they're about nineteen thousand people who

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 2>did not die because of drug overdoses. And what are

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 2>the policies that led to it? Well, Number one, securing

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 2>the border. We've seen a ninety nine percent decrease in

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 2>illegal crossings. Number Two, targeting the drug traffickers. All of

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:56.959
<v Speaker 2>the images you've seen of the administration taking out Venezuelan

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:00.079
<v Speaker 2>drug boats filled with drugs, those drugs are not arriving

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 2>in the United States at nearly the same rate. And

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 2>they're nineteen thousand Americans who are alive today. These are

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 2>sons and daughters, These are husbands and wives, brothers and

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.839
<v Speaker 2>sisters that are alive that did not die. You combine

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 2>the decrease in deaths from drug overdoses with the decrease

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 2>in deaths from murders, and you're looking at more than

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty thousand Americans that are alive today. And so you

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 2>may not think that government policies necessarily impact your life,

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 2>but they're twenty thousand Americans, and none of us will

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 2>know for sure who those twenty thousand are that are

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 2>alive today because the administration is rightly focused on public safety,

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 2>rightly focused on locking up violent criminals, on putting murderers

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 2>in jail, on putting rapists in jail, and putting child

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 2>molesters in jail, and on deporting violent criminal illegal immigrants

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 2>and gang members. And America is much much safer as

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 2>a result.

0:11:57.640 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>You know what's interesting about this, Senator, and I just

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:04.079
<v Speaker 1>talk about a comparing contrast. Donald Trump comes in and

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>we lower crime statistically nationwide, and it's in a level,

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned earlier, that we haven't seen in decades.

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>You compare that to what Democrats were doing to lower crime.

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>They were just lying about the crime stats. Washington, DC

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>is a prime example of this. Before the election, they

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>want to look like crime had gone down. They straight

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>up lied about the crime statistics. We've seen this happen

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in other cities around the country where they got busted

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>lying or recategorizing certain crimes and putting them in different categories.

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 1>They wouldn't be reported the same way to make it

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>artificially look like crime had gone down. And the difference

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>here is one party really fights crime and goes out

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 1>to the criminals and wins, and the other one says,

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>when you do a crime, will make it look safer

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>by altering the numbers. That is a difference between the

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.599
<v Speaker 1>Republican the Democratic Party on the issue of crime in

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:00.319
<v Speaker 1>America today.

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly right. And and and you also have, uh,

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 2>you have the media deliberately lying. So for example, this

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 2>past week, uh that there was a story that was

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:16.239
<v Speaker 2>breathlessly reported, which is that the Trump administration has arrested

0:13:16.320 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 2>a five year old. Ice is targeted a five year

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 2>old and there's an adorable picture of a little five

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 2>year old and and and the left went crazy with that.

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Twitter went crazy with that that there are multiple reports

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 2>it turns out that the five year old what happened

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 2>is his father was an illegal immigrant. ICE showed up

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 2>to arrest the illegal immigrant father, and the father abandoned

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 2>the kid. He ran off, and so the ICE agents

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 2>understandably stayed back with the five year old kid because

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 2>the father had just left him alone. Uh And and

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, I guess the alternative, which which which the

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.079
<v Speaker 2>media would want want ICE to do, is just to

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 2>let a five year old kid be alone on the

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 2>streets and freeze to death like like it is. The

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 2>level of of duplicity, the level of mendacity, the level

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 2>of just flat out lying is astonishing. And why is that?

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 2>It is because the Democrats and the media, although I

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 2>repeat myself, do not want you to know that the

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 2>people they're showing up and arresting are overwhelmingly violent criminals.

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>They're not five year old kids. In this instance, the

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 2>five year old child was abandoned by his father. And

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 2>by the way, there are instances all over the country

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 2>where if you have someone who's pulled over on the

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 2>side of the road and they have a child in

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 2>the car and the adult abandons the child, law enforcement

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 2>will always take care of the kid. That's what your

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 2>father's been in law enforcement his whole life. That's what

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 2>your dad would do. It's what any law enforcement would

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 2>do if a parent abandons a child, And it is

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 2>fundamentally dishonest to claim, aha, what they were doing was

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 2>arresting the child. That's not what they were doing, and

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 2>the media knows it.

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>The Ferguson family got bigger over the holidays with a

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>new puppy, and I can tell you how having one

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>dog that is over a decade old and a new

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>dog that's just months old, there's one thing they both

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>have in common. I want them to live a great

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>quality life. And that is exactly why I give them

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>rough greens. Now, I've been telling you about my older

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>dog and some of the symptoms that he was having,

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>slowing down and itching and having bad breath, losing interest

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>in playtime. That is just part of the aging process,

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't have to be. And after just a

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>few weeks of rough greens we start to see a

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>real difference. This stuff is truly amazing, and if you

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>have a dog you love, you've got to try rough

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>greens for your dog for life. It not only supports

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>long term health by providing live bioavailable nutrients including essential vitamins, minerals, probiotics,

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and digestive enzymes, as well as omega oils. The ingredients

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>work together to improve nutrition absorption and maintain joint and

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>muscle health and enhance overall vitality and you can witness

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>it happen over weeks. So if you love your dog

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and you are ready to get your dog back to

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the way maybe he used to be and was more playful,

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>then check out Roughgreens.

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 4>It's so easy.

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>You just put it on top of your traditional dogfood

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and that is it, and dogs absolutely love it. Go

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to Roughcreens dot com. That's r u ffgreens dot com.

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Use the promo code verdict and you're going to get

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a free Jumpstart Trial bag. All you gotta do is

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>add Roughgreens to your dog's food so you cover the shipping.

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>That's it. Promo code verdict to claim you're free Jumpstart

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Trial bag at Roughcreens dot com. That's r u F

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>F G R E E N S dot com. Promo

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>code verdict. All right, I want to get to another

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>big story center and it deals with Jack Smith.

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 4>He was in front of Congress.

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I would assume ninety audience does not know that he

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>had to testify before Congress this week, not because they're uninformed,

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>because the media refuses to cover this.

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 4>They think this is old news and just.

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.199
<v Speaker 1>Hashing out something had happened a long time ago, so

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>no one should care. I think we should remind people

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of why accountability is still so vitally important and what

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Jack Smith was a part of. Can you just give

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a quick synopsis to people so that people remember who

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is Jack Smith, what was he doing to abuse power,

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and just how corrupt was his quote investigation to Donald

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump and.

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Others, Jack Smith was the point of the spear on

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 2>the greatest abuse of power we have seen in modern times.

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 2>And to put it in context, what Jack Smith did

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 2>was orders of magnitude worse than what the Nixon administration

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 2>did during Watergate. During Watergate, you had a couple of

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 2>half rate burglars break into the to the headquarters of

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 2>the DNC, the Democrat National Committee. In this instance, jack Smith,

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.360
<v Speaker 2>what he did was orders of magnitude worth. He went

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 2>directly after President Trump indicted him multiple times. He did

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 2>so for a very explicit reason, because he wanted to

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 2>prevent the American people from re electing him. It was

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 2>an effort directly to subvert democracy. It was the first

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 2>time in the history of the United States that a

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 2>president or former president has been indicted. Jack Smith did

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 2>it twice, and then he also teamed up with his

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 2>rogue Democrat local prosecutors to do it two more times.

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 2>He also subpoenaed the phone records of roughly twenty percent

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 2>of the Republicans in the Senate in a fishing expedition,

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 2>he targeted over four hundred Republicans. It was a political persecution.

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 2>If you're a fan of lame is, Jack Smith would

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 2>make Javert blush. He was out of control and he

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 2>continues to be brazen. And I will tell you his testimony.

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 2>He testified for the House of Representatives. It was a disaster.

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 2>Jim Jordan your friend of mine. He's been again on

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 2>the Verdict podcast. Before Jim Jordan shaired the hearing. He

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 2>opened the hearing by pointed out that the FBI when

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 2>it rated mar A Lago, that it searched Melania's closet

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:15.439
<v Speaker 2>because apparently her clothing and underwear is a matter of

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 2>national security, according to Jack Smith and the Biden doj

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 2>and it searched Baron Trump's bedroom, because you know, going

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 2>after a teenager is really the best use for the

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Department of Justice, and I guess it is if you're

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 2>willing to abuse your power. I want you to listen

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 2>to Jim Jordan talking about Jack Smith at the hearing. Here,

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 2>give a listen.

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:38.160
<v Speaker 3>Jenal yields back.

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 5>Mister Smith, is Cassidy Hutchinson a liar. She was their

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 5>star witness January sixth Committee, their star witness in one

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 5>of those staged and choreographed hearings they paid the former

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 5>president of ABC News to put together. She was in

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 5>fact the only witness at this special prime time hearing Tuesday,

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 5>June twenty eighth, twenty twenty two, eight o'clock in the evening,

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 5>and she told some stories. I mean, these were these

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 5>were some stories she talked about President lunsed across the

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 5>back seat, grabbed the steering wheel, tried to drive the

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 5>car to the Capitol.

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 3>And I just want to know you think she was lying.

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 6>Chairman Jordan.

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 7>My assessment of that particular issue is that with respect

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 7>to the testimony about someone lunge of the president lunging

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:33.199
<v Speaker 7>towards the driver, my recollection of her testimony about that

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 7>is that it was secondhand. She said she'd heard that

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 7>from somebody.

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 5>You familiar with the name Tony Ornado. I'm sorry, you

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 5>familiar with the name Tony Ornado? Yes, White House Deputy

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 5>chief of Operations, Deputy chief of staff for operations. Right.

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 3>You remember what he said about it?

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 6>As I said here right now, I do not.

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he said it didn't happen. How about Bobby Ingle?

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 5>Are you familiar with that name? Yes, I am Secret

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 5>Service agent who was actually in the car that day.

0:20:59.200 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 3>You know what he said?

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.239
<v Speaker 5>He said it didn't happen. And they both said the

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 5>first time they ever heard this story was when miss

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 5>Hutchinson testified in the prime time hearing as their star

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 5>witness of the January sixth committee.

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 3>By the way, do you.

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 5>Ever confirm her testimony about this particular incident?

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 7>We conducted, as I said, before, our own independent investigation

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 7>of all aspects of the case that we thought was relevant.

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 6>We attorneys from my office.

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Did you ever confirm it? That's a simple question.

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 7>We interviewed her, I should say, attorneys in my office.

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 5>But did you ever confirm the president leaping across the seat,

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 5>grabbing the steering wheel. This whole concoctions she brought up

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 5>in the January sixth hearing, do you ever confirm that.

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 7>We interviewed another firsthand witness who was in the car

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 7>who did not confirm that that happened.

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 5>But also your deposition to the committee last month, mister Smith,

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 5>you said this my recollection with miss Hutchinson was a

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 5>number of the things that she gave evidence on we're

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 5>second hand hearsay. Your remembers making that statement to us

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 5>last month in the deposition.

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 7>I did, and I was referring particularly to what we're

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 7>talking about now.

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And you also said miss Hutchinson, regarding this particular claim,

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 5>was a second or even third hand witness. We ask you,

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 5>if you were a defense attorney, how would you handle

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 5>cross examining her if she was on the witness stand?

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 5>And you said, if I were a defense attorney, miss

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 5>Hutchinson were a witness, the first thing I would do

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 5>was seek to preclude her testimony because it was here

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 5>say you remember saying all that.

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 6>Yes, that's correct, so that's correct.

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 5>Were you gonna put her on the witness stand if

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 5>you ever got to trial.

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 7>We had not made final determinations as to who we

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 7>were going to call as a witness. We had a

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:40.479
<v Speaker 7>large were still considering her. We had a large choice

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 7>of witnesses in this.

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 5>Are you familiar what Washington Post reporters Carol Lenning and

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 5>Aaron Davis said in their book? They did his book

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 5>three hundreds on pages book on chronicle and the whole

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 5>investigation of the Justice Department, And here's what they said.

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 5>On page three ten, they said Jack Smith had wondered

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.640
<v Speaker 5>whether some of Hutchinson's claims might be relied upon a trial. Still,

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 5>at one point, Smith told the elections team he wasn't

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 5>ready to give up on Hutchinson's account. Ultimately, however, Trump

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 5>administration officials uniformly fiercely disputed her accounts under oath. Prosecutors

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:13.479
<v Speaker 5>on your team told Smith they wouldn't want to use

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 5>Hutchinson as a witness in court, and Smith agreed. Are

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 5>Caro Lenning and Aaron Davis who wrote this or they lion?

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 7>My recollection is that I certainly had not made any

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 7>final determinations about.

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 6>In who we were going to call.

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's the point.

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 5>That is the point, the fact that they used her

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 5>in a primetime hearing, and you won't rule out using her,

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 5>didn't rule out using her putting on the witness stand

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.479
<v Speaker 5>when everybody knows she wasn't telling the truth.

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 6>That says it all.

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 5>That's the degree the Left and Democrats were willing to

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 5>go to get President Trump putting on the witness stand

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 5>someone everybody knows is making it up.

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 6>Everybody knows that, and.

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 3>You were willing to do.

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 5>By the way, you know how many times Cassidy Hutchinson

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 5>was mentioned in their report, the January sixth report, Any idea,

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 5>mister Smith, I do know one hundred and eighty five

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 5>times someone that the whole country knows wasn't telling the truth,

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 5>and you were still considering putting her on the witness

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 5>stand because you had to get President Trump. And everybody

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 5>can see that.

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 4>Senator.

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>You listened to that line of questioning, and that's just

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 1>five minutes of pure facts and gold from Jim Jordan

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>reminding people what they were trying to do on the left,

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.479
<v Speaker 1>even when they knew that things were being made up,

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that lies were being told. And this is no different

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>than Russian collusion. Back in sixteen, when the FBI had

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 1>already declared that they thought that the Stele dossier was

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>quote user generated, and they used it anyway that's exactly

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 1>what was happening here with a special counsel. It was

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>weaponize and do whatever you want to do to try

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.919
<v Speaker 1>to stop Donald Trump from becoming president again.

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, and what Jim Jordan did there was also highlight

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 2>the willingness to rely on people that were lying, that

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 2>were obviously lying. I will say it's interesting Cassidy Hutchison.

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know her personally. Before she worked in the

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 2>White House, she was apparently an intern in my office.

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 2>I have no recollection of her. We have lots of

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 2>interns who come in and out of the office. We

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 2>tend to have interns in the spring semester and the

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 2>fall semester and also during the summer, and typically I

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 2>will sit down with the group of interns that are

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 2>with us for like a twenty minute meeting in my office,

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 2>and I'll talk with him a little bit. So I

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 2>assume I met her when she interned, but I don't

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 2>remember her. She wrote a book right after her star testimony.

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 2>She wrote a book of all of her stories, and

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 2>in it she describes this exchange with me, this conversation

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 2>that she says happened with me. That is truly fantastic

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 2>because it never occurred, and it was an exchange that

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 2>she said occurred after she went to the White House,

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 2>and the dialogue back and forth she makes up has

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 2>me kind of like tugging on her shirt sleeve and

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 2>asking for her help, and it has her like strongly

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 2>like sticking it to the Senator. And I have to admit,

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 2>so I didn't read her book, and I think very

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 2>few people actually did. I did what's called the Washington

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 2>read when someone writes something about you that's sort of

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 2>making a little bit of news, which is I went

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:19.199
<v Speaker 2>and read the page where she talks about it, and

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 2>I literally laughed out loud at the exchange because it

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 2>it was truly fiction. And the fact that she was

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 2>willing to fictionalize a conversation with me that that did

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 2>not occur tells me that the other pages of the

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 2>book are quite likely to be fiction as well. And

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 2>it speaks volumes that both Jack Smith and the Democrats

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 2>running the January sixth Commission were perfectly happy to rely

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 2>upon a fabulous whom they knew was not telling the truth.

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Senner, one of our good friends, actually did a great

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>back and forth in this hearing. Brandangil, a guy who

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>his tone is demeanor is always cool and calm and

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of quiet, but very direct, and it's a personality

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that I love watching because of the way that he

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>asks questions and gets answers. And he did a really

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 1>fabulous job in this situation as well.

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 2>As you know, Brandon Gill is a good friend. He's

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:21.239
<v Speaker 2>a freshman representative from Texas. He's someone I supported when

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:23.919
<v Speaker 2>he ran in a very crowded primary. He had a

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:26.239
<v Speaker 2>big win, and I told the voters of Texas if

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 2>they elected him, he was going to be a leader

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 2>in Washington, and already, just in his first year plus

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 2>on Capitol Hill, he's already proven to be a leader

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 2>in Washington. Here he's cross examining Jack Smith about Arctic

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 2>frost and in particular his willingness to trample on the

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Constitution to target both the Speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy,

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 2>and also roughly twenty percent of the Republicans in the

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 2>United States Senate. Give a listen to this exchange and

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 2>how ridiculous Jack Smith's responses are to Brandon Gill's questions.

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:03.360
<v Speaker 5>The gentleman from Texas, mister Gill was recognized for five minutes.

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 8>Mister Smith in January of twenty twenty three, did you

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:12.360
<v Speaker 8>subpoena then Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy's toll records?

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 6>Yes, sir, we.

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Did, Yes, you did.

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 8>And the subpoena covered the time period between November twenty

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 8>twenty and January twenty twenty one.

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Is that right?

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 6>I'm sorry, sir. Could you say that again?

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 3>We're not going to delay like this.

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 8>The subpoena covered the time period between November of twenty

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 8>twenty and January twenty twenty one. How many days after

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 8>Kevin McCarthy was sworn in his speaker did you subpoena

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 8>his records?

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 6>I don't recall, but those two things had nothing.

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 8>It was sixteen days after becoming the highest ranking Republican

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 8>in the House of Representatives, usubpoenaed his toll records. Do

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 8>you agree that that might reasonably be considered a violation

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 8>of the speech or debate clause?

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 6>I do not, and I want to be clear that

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 6>the till.

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 8>We were collecting months worth of phone data on the

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 8>Republicans Speaker of the House, the leader of the opposition,

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 8>right after he got sworn in as speaker, all around

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 8>the time of a major vote that sounds like a

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 8>flagrant violation of the speech or debate clause to me,

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 8>and I think most people agree with me. And Speaker

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 8>McCarthy had no recourse, did he? Because you issued a

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 8>non disclosure order ensuring that neither he nor any of

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 8>the American people knew about the subpoenas.

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Is that right?

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 7>The toll record, the non content toll record subpoena is

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 7>we did secure non disclosure orders for those subpoenas.

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 3>You did.

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 8>And let me ask you, mister Smith, at the time

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 8>you secured those non disclosure orders.

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Was Speaker McCarthy a flight risk?

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 7>The non disclosure order was based on concerns about it.

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Was Speaker McCarthy a flight risks?

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 6>Was not?

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 3>He was not?

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:50.959
<v Speaker 8>Then why did your non disclosure order refer to him

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 8>as a flight risk? It says right here the court

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 8>finds reasonable grounds to believe that such disclosure will result

0:29:57.840 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 8>in flight from prosecution.

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 7>Sir, When securing a non disclosure order, the risks don't

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 7>have to be associated.

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 8>I think that the Speaker of the House is risks

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 8>this question, No, this is not your time, this is

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 8>my time. You think the Speaker of the House is

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 8>a flight risk? You think he's going to hop on

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 8>a plane and leave the country.

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 7>No. What I was trying to explain is, with respect

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 7>to a non disclosure order, the risks aren't necessarily associated

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 7>with the subscriber to the phone, the risks to okay mitigation.

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 8>I think that you were using this is clearly in

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 8>reference to Speaker McCarthy, and you were using clearly false

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 8>information to secure a non disclosure order to hide from

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 8>Speaker McCarthy and from the American people the fact that

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 8>you were spying on his toll records.

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 3>But I've got more more, so let's move on.

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 8>In May of twenty twenty three, you also issued subpoenas

0:30:56.000 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 8>for toll records of nine US senators and an additional representative.

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Is that right?

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 6>In May of twenty three, we did issues.

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 8>You did, and there were non disclosure orders in conjunction

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 8>with those subpoenas as well.

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 7>Right, that's correct, consistent with Department policy, right law.

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 3>So again, nobody would know what you were doing.

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:17.959
<v Speaker 8>The senators would, and the representatives would, and the American

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 8>people wouldn't know what you were doing.

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Is that right?

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 7>The toll records that we secured in the non disclosure

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 7>orders were consistent with policy, and.

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 8>You knew whenever you were doing that that there was

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 8>a risk you were violating the speechure debate clause.

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 3>Is that right?

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 7>The toll record subpoenas that we secured were with the

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 7>concurrence of the public context.

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 8>Your own analysis says that you knew there was a

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 8>risk you were violating the speech or debate clause.

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 3>I have it right here.

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 8>This is an email from John Keller at Public Integrity

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 8>Section to your team. As you are aware quote, as

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 8>you are aware, there is some litigation risk regarding whether

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 8>compelled disclosure of toll records of a member's legislative calls

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 8>violates the speechure debate clause in the DC circuit. That's

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 8>from your own analysis right there. So you did know,

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 8>didn't you.

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 7>So with respect to the item you just put up

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 7>on the screen, the last sentence states.

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 8>Uh, oh, we're going to get to the last sentence. Okay,

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 8>We're going to get to the last sentence, and you

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 8>cite case Lawn here. Quote the bar on compelled disclosure

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 8>is absolute?

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Is right? Is that right? Or do you think that

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 3>you didn't have to abide by that precedent?

0:32:25.040 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 7>To be clear, this is not this statement is not

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 7>from my office. This is the statement.

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 8>This is this is your justification for those subpoenas and

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 8>indios that you ordered. This was part of your analysis.

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 8>It's a cursory analysis. I think it's worth noting. Well,

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 8>let's get to that last sentence then, quote, given my

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 8>understanding of the low likelihood that any of the members

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 8>listed below would be charged, the litigation risk should be

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 8>minimal here. In other words, you're using a novel legal theory,

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 8>which you knew was novel, has never been tested by

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 8>any court. You're not charging any of these members. Nobody's

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 8>going to know about it because you issued indio. Nobody's

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 8>going to sue about it, So sue this.

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 3>So who cares? We're going to do it.

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 8>Anyways, You walked all over the Constitution throughout this entire

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 8>product ven the Gentleman's Times sighclared members of Congress, and

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 8>you know it.

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 3>It's absolutely disgraceful.

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>It's incredible when you when you hear just how out

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of control our government was under the direction of the

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration and Jack Smith and the unlimited powers that

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>clearly he believed he had to just do and create

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever he wanted to try to bring down Donald Trump

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and anyone around him.

0:33:35.280 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, Jack Smith knew that what he was doing was illegal,

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 2>that it violated the Constitution, that had violated the speech

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 2>and debate clause. But as that email exchange indicates that

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 2>that Brandon Gill read, he was counting on the fact

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 2>that no one would ever know about it, that it

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 2>would stay secret, that it would never be made public,

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 2>so he could violate the law. And his objective was

0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 2>to prevent the American people from re electing President Trump.

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 2>And let's be clear, if Kamala Harris is DOJ we

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 2>were in office, we wouldn't know about this. Nobody would

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 2>know about this. He would have succeeded. You know, he's

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 2>like the villain and Scooby Doo. You know, he would

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 2>have gotten away with it if it weren't for those

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 2>meddling kids. And by the way, by the meddling kids,

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 2>he means the voters of America who decided, no, we've

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 2>had enough of this dumpster fire. We'd like to get

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 2>back to common sense. And I got to say, Jack

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Smith is just calmly telling Congress that he went but

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 2>went before the judge, and he lied, he lied over

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:36.320
<v Speaker 2>and over again. I thought the exchange. Is Kevin McCarthy

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 2>a flight risk? He says no, Well, then why did

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 2>you tell the judge he was a flight risk? And

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:43.879
<v Speaker 2>he has no good answer. Well, well, you know we're

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 2>not referring to the actual target of the subpoena. It's

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 2>complete nonsense. He also told told the judge that every

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Republican that he subpoenaed was was likely to destroy evidence,

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 2>completely made up, false statements, and it's an abuse of power.

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 2>And and Jack Smith is completely unapologetic, incredible.

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 4>Don't forget.

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 1>We do this show as a podcast three days a week,

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>so make sure you hit that subscribe or auto download

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>button wherever you get your podcasts.

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 4>So that you don't miss a single episode.

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>And the Center and I will see you back here

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>on this radio station next week and on your phone

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts as well this week,

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:21.839
<v Speaker 1>all week long,