WEBVTT - Chiefs-Ravens Preview, SF Stars End Holdouts & Take Time Capsule

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jerrel Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Pania, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in What's Driving the Great? Episode two fifty nine

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 2>A ton to do Today. NFL season is fifty eight

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 2>hours away from kicking off. We have, in my opinion,

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 2>the single best and no quarterback in football is about

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 2>to agree to a contract and end his holdout. In

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 2>Trent Williams, we had an awesome college football weekend, but

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 2>we're actually starting with none of the above. We'll tell

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 2>you what we're starting with in just a moment, but first,

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 2>what missed the cut? Patrick Mahomes shouts out Dylan Riola,

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Baby Mahomes, and by the way, Dylan Riola and Nebraska

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 2>are gonna light Colorado on fire this weekend. We will

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 2>discuss that in a bit. Sean Cohn says, the Jags

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 2>team best is the best Jag team ever assembled, and

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Joey just Nutt eats eighty three hot dogs and breaks

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 2>the record. So you know, real quick, deman' say, you

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 2>know how on I think this happens on Instagram? I

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 2>know what happens on Twitter, where if you click on

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 2>one random thing, the algorithm can all of a sudden

0:01:55.840 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 2>think you're really interested in that topic and over index

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 2>you to that exact type of content just because you

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 2>clicked on one thing or watched one video. I really

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 2>do fear that has happened a bit on this podcast

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to the producers funneling Joey chestnut content

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 2>my way, because once upon a time I gave an impassioned,

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 2>brilliant argument as to why he's the world's greatest athlete,

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 2>not because I wanted to, but because I was asked

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 2>to and we were doing Nick Wright Public Defender, and

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 2>I was so good at it that I think the audio.

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>The producers then determined I'm really into this freak, and

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm not. I'm not into him eating hot dogs dipped lemonade.

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm not into him. I'm not into any of it.

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 2>But anytime there's Joey Chestnut news, the producers think of me,

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 2>and they shouldn't. They are human beings who have been

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 2>tricked like an Internet algorithm because of one segment I

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 2>did three years ago. That's that's what's happened here. So

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 2>let that. Let that be known moving forward. But I

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 2>said we weren't starting with any of those things. We're

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 2>also not starting with Joey chestnutt We're starting with the

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 2>w n B A and demands get us started, if.

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 3>You will please.

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 4>So w NBA legend Lisa Leslie Wade in on the

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 4>Caitlin Clark and Angel Reice debate, and she's actually said

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 4>that they both deserve to win Rookie of the Year.

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Why don't we.

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Give you all the rookies? You know what they're all trying.

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Why don't you know why have awards at all? Why

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 2>even keep score? So all right, so here's the deal.

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 2>I and you guys, I know, we have a new

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 2>social team we're building up because the Great Lori reyis

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 2>uh It has left us. Got a great job shout

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 2>out to her. So we'll kind of do this on

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 2>the fly. This entire WNBA, Caitlin Clark, Angel Reese and

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 2>media take you can put on the internet the whole thing.

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:17.679
<v Speaker 2>Because not to be too self congratulatory, we have nailed

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 2>this every step of the way. When there was dating

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 2>back years, when there was clear racism in the coverage

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 2>of Angel Rees and LSU, we discussed it. We leaned

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 2>right into it, and we were not We didn't couch

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 2>our words when there was an obvious double standard in

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Caitlin taunting versus when anyone else taunted. We discussed it

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 2>when Angel a lot, when Angel talked about all the

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 2>she's been through on the internet, and some people, some

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 2>of my colleagues, you know, said basically, buck up, kiddo,

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 2>you talk trash. You got to deal with it. I said,

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 2>I thought they missed the boat on that and didn't

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 2>totally understand what she was going through. We also told

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 2>you three weeks into the season, when everyone was talking about,

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 2>oh my god, the Caitlin Clark Olympic snub, that this

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 2>would be the absolute best thing to happen for the

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Indiana Fever and to Caitlin Clark because the reason they

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 2>were so bad early was because they were playing three

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 2>games and four nights back to backs all the time.

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Their schedule was front loaded with all the best teams

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 2>in basketball in the WNBA, I should say, and we

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 2>told you that after that brutal opening stretch, they had

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 2>no back to backs left, they had no three games

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 2>and four nights left. They got the softest part of

0:05:56.240 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 2>their schedule post Olympics, when Caitlyn would be rested, adjusted,

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 2>finally have time to breathe the first time in probably

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 2>more than a year, and she would go and light

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 2>the league on fire. And that is exactly what's happened, Okay.

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 2>And there were a lot of people loud wrong on this. Now,

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 2>some of them were loud wrong, in my opinion, out

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 2>of yukon loyalty. And these are legends who were loud wrong.

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't mean they're not legends, but they were loud wrong.

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 2>The idea that we if you watched Caitlin Clark and

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 2>we'll get to the Angel Reeves part of this in

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 2>a moment, if you watched Caitlin Clark at Iowa with

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 2>those teammates and thought, oh yeah, I mean when she

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 2>comes to the WNBA, I mean she'll be fine, but

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 2>she's gonna have you know, her rookie season is gonna

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 2>be tough, and you know he's not going to be

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 2>an all star level player. These are grown women than

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion, you either don't fully understand basketball, but

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these people who were saying it, I

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 2>know they understand basketball. So you were allowing your own allegiances,

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 2>whether it's to university, other players, or whomever, to muddy

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 2>your opinion. Geno Oriema maybe knows more about women's basketball

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 2>than any human being ever. He is certainly on the

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 2>short list. Here is what Geno Oriema said to my

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 2>dear friend Dan Patrick early in the season when the

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:51.119
<v Speaker 2>Fever were struggling. Quote the kids on the wrong team.

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 2>She's got the wrong skill set to handle the physicality

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 2>in the league. And she's a rookie. This rookie class

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 2>is even one of the best rookie classes in the

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 2>last ten years. She's not built for the physicality of

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 2>this league, and she's not quick enough to get away

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 2>from the physicality. End quote wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 2>The girl is a superstar, a superstar, and is she

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 2>a perfect player? No? Is she the best player in

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 2>the league. No, that is clearly and unanimously Asia Wilson.

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 2>And that then brings us to the Rookie the Year thing,

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 2>which now, in my opinion, is a different example of

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 2>people embarrassing themselves. Folks have bent over backwards to try

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 2>to explain why what Angel is doing, which is spectacular,

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 2>is on par with what Caitlin is doing, which is historic,

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 2>and it's just not months ago. All of a sudden,

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 2>folks decided, you know, what should be the tiebreaker in

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 2>a Rookie of the Year race in a team sport?

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Team record? Never heard that ever in my life, but

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 2>that was a real discussion. Okay, But now that the

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 2>team records are, Caitlyn's team is seventeen and sixteen, one

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 2>of the hottest and most dangerous teams in the league

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 2>outside of in the WNBA. Listen, there are in my opinion,

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 2>two I guess I have to include the Links, three

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 2>awesome teams in the Liberty, the Sun, and the Lynx,

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 2>and then a team that's won the last two titles

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 2>and has the best player in the Las Vegas Aces,

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 2>and a team that I think will be playing for

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 2>a championship again in the Aces. I would separate those

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 2>four teams from everyone else that the Fever are as dangerous,

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 2>if not more dangerous, than any team outside of that group.

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 2>They're now seventeen and sixteen, and the Chicago Sky are

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 2>eleven and twenty one. The Fever of one four in

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 2>a row. The Sky have lost six in a row.

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 2>So now we're not doing the team record thing anymore.

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 2>And now we're not we are now and again Lisa

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Leslie is a legend, which is why I find so

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 2>much of this commentary so disappointing. Now, what we're trying

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 2>to do, I think is not piss off the shitty

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 2>corners of the internet, because some of the worst people

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 2>on the Internet are stridently in different camps on this.

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Some of the people that don't care at all about

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 2>the WNBA but like the fact that there's this white

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 2>girl that's kicking ass are vocal Caitlin Clark supporters, and

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:05.839
<v Speaker 2>some folks that are are flatly attacking anyone that gives

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Caitlin Clark her flowers, if you will, out of what

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:18.599
<v Speaker 2>would appear to be pure racial allegiance are some of

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:22.559
<v Speaker 2>the most vocal angel Rees supporters in this, And I

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 2>hang a lot of people don't want to get yelled

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 2>at so now all of a sudden, we're doing participation trophies. Now,

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, we are gonna try to pretend

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 2>like Angel, who again is having a ninety one out

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 2>of one hundred rookie season, is on par with Caitlin's

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 2>rookie season, which is one of the greatest rookie seasons

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 2>in the history of the league, if not the greatest.

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 2>And it's just embarrassing, guys, we have to be able

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 2>to have honest conversations about even if it goes against

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 2>some of our priors or some of our allies on

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 2>the internet, and nobody with a straight face can say

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 2>there is a real debate about who the most impactful

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 2>or best rookie in the women's basketball has been this year,

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 2>it's Caitlyn Clark. Angel's rebounding is spectacular and she again,

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 2>I think it is. I think some people go too

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 2>far with it. On the They're like, oh, Angels read

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 2>she's just rebounding her own, missus. That's not true. Oh

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 2>she doesn't have a real impact because look at the

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 2>team's record. That's not true. That team when she's off

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 2>the court gets boat raced. When she's on the court,

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 2>they play people even but Caitlyn Clark's arguably already one

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 2>of the five best players in the league, inarguably one

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 2>of the eight best players in the league. And we

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 2>gotta be able to say that there should be two

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 2>unanimous awards in the WNBA this year. The MVP should

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 2>be unanimously to Asia Wilson every single first place vote,

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 2>and Rookie of the Year should be unanimously to Caitlin

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Clark every single first place vote. And if you are

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 2>approaching this without your own preconceived notions or biases polluting it,

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 2>then I think that's pretty obvious. I have found some

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 2>of this to be really unfortunate. I think the whole

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 2>Cheryl Swoops thing is not great. Now all of a

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 2>sudden we have a Cheryl Swoops Nancy Lieberman beef. These

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 2>are two of the greatest all time legends. I don't

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 2>love that. How much of this has fallen down racial

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 2>lines is just another to me, you know, kind of

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 2>crack in our social fabric, if you will. How much

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.319
<v Speaker 2>of this has been exacerbated by bad actors on the Internet,

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 2>all of it. But what is not up for debate

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 2>is that Caitlin Clark has been as advertised. And I'm

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 2>really curious if some of the biggest skeptics or some

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 2>of the loudest critics who early in the year they

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 2>had access to the same schedule I did, they had

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 2>access to the same date I did. If some of

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 2>those people, if they want to say, either my bad,

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 2>I missed it, I got it wrong, I didn't see it,

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 2>or if they want to say, you know, I let

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 2>my own allegiances, whether it be to yukon other players

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 2>or strangers on my phone yelling at me getting the

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 2>way my commentary. And so this can be a real

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 2>celebration for the league, and it is very important for

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 2>the league that it's not just Caitlin that this whole

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 2>rookie class, but Caitlyn and Angel, you know, are obviously

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 2>the two standouts that you do have potentially two players

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 2>who are so different from each other by the way,

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Caitlyn's a range shooter, amazing passer, week defender. Angel is

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 2>the best rebounder in the league or second best. Already

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 2>very good defender who really needs to work on, honestly,

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 2>just her shot within five feet, and she does that

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 2>between this year and next year. And she's all of

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 2>a sudden one of the best players in the league,

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 2>and those two players being rivals and on ascending teams

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 2>is great for the league. League. But man o, man,

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 2>the Fever dangerous team now, I mean there's just there's

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 2>there's no denying it. You have the number one overall

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 2>pick from a few years ago from South Carolina, the

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why I'm not thinking of her name,

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 2>My apologies Boston, who has been absolutely spectacular, Thank you,

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Eliah Boston. But no, who's been great and quietly or

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe not so quietly, Kelsey Mitchell is the one actually

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 2>leading them in points. So you have three players on

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 2>your team who can go for twenty plus any given night.

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Kelsey Mitchell's been outstanding. Aleah Boston, after a rough start

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 2>to the year, is playing like the player that she

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 2>was in college and the player we know she is.

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 2>And Caitlin Clark's is getting better and better and better.

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 2>And man, oman, if you if, if you are one

0:16:56.600 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 2>of those top four teams. I was talking about the Liberty,

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 2>the Sun, the Links, and the Aces. You do not

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 2>want to see Indiana in round one. And I'm hoping,

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 2>by the way, it's not Aces Fever in round one

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 2>because the Fever of the team I root for, but

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 2>I am fascinated by Caitlin and I want to see

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 2>how far she can take this. I'd love to see

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 2>that somehow in round two that if maybe the if

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the Fever stay the sixth seed, I guess that'd be good.

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 2>If the Fever don't catch the Storm, well no, then

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 2>in that case they could only play in the final.

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they could make the final. It's gonna

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 2>be hard to get Fever aces in these playoffs. But

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 2>I want to see how far each of those teams

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 2>can go. All right, Demanse, there's our WNBA fifteen minutes.

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 2>You got any objection, any take, any problems or anything.

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 3>I said, no, that all set well with me.

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 4>I do think that I'm obviously not as tapped into

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 4>the WNBA as you are.

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 3>When I was telling one of the producers that.

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 4>Just like at fhase for, I think it's obvious that

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Caitlyn Clark deserves Rookie of the Year, like it's I

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 4>don't think anybody could take that from you from her,

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 4>And you did definitely call it like the with the

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 4>after the Olympic break like that was crazy. She definitely

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 4>picked it up started rolling immediately.

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, I just you got to think about it,

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 2>like Caitlin Clark went from unless you were a real

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 2>die hard women's basketball fan going into the NCAA tournament,

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 2>not the most recent one, but the twenty twenty three

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 2>in Cuba tournament, nobody you didn't really know Caitlyn Clark.

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 2>And then that tournament when she you know, ends up

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 2>beating South Carolina, losing to LSU, they have all that controversy,

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 2>carries IOWA to the championship game. She becomes a superstar. Yeah,

0:18:51.119 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 2>from that moment that so March of twenty three until

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 2>July of twenty four, it's just fifteen months of mayhem

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 2>for her. She goes from relative anonymity, you know in

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 2>the national skit stage, to one of the biggest celebrities

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 2>in the female sports world. She's at award shows, she's

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 2>at the ceremonies, she's at gallas, she has endorsement deals.

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 2>She is the bigger, a way bigger celebrity than you

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 2>could have ever imagined on campus. Goes right into the

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 2>college basketball season where once again she has this spotlight.

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 2>Her games are getting huge ratings. Is she breaks the

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 2>scoring record another NCAA tournament. Days after the tournament, WNBA

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 2>draft number one pick. Now she's a private jets or

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 2>not endorsement money boom season starts. Who do you play?

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 2>All the best teams immediately on TV all the time,

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, we're gonna rough you up a bit,

0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 2>all of them in fourteen fifteen months. And and then you know,

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 2>I gotta talk about this. I have to answer for that.

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:08.239
<v Speaker 2>I have to make sure everything I say. And then

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 2>there's three weeks where oh there's no cameras, there's no games,

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 2>there's no interviews. For the first time since I have

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 2>been famous, I can breathe and there's no you know

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 2>what I mean. And so I just think it was

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 2>I think making the Olympic team would have been brutal

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 2>for her. She would it would have been just a

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 2>different circus surrounding her. Instead, she finally got to breathe

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 2>and she's kicking ass man. Good for her and good.

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 3>For the fever.

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 2>It's good for the sport, I think maybe they do,

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 2>but I think for her it was perfect. It's not

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 2>like she would have turned it down and Team USA

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 2>won anyway. Now, the gold medal game was closer than

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 2>it should have been, but they won anyway, and now

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 2>so I think it's great. All right, let's get to

0:20:57.520 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 2>the NFL.

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 4>All right, so we know what what the stakes are

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 4>for the Chiefs this year. They're on the verge of

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 4>a three peat. Would a super Bowl this year make

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 4>them one of the best dynasties or the best dynasty ever?

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 3>So?

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 2>I think it would. So here the real question is

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 2>do you consider the Patriots one continuous dynasty. That's the

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 2>real question because if you do the Patriot dynasty, if

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 2>you do is call it to it's nineteen years. But

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 2>call it, yeah, just I'll call it what it is,

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 2>nineteen year run. In those nineteen years, they made nine

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowls, thirteen conference championship games, made the playoffs seventeen

0:21:55.680 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 2>of nineteen years, won the division seventeen of nineteen years,

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 2>and won six Super Bowls. That's the Patriot dynasty. Keep it,

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 2>You might be like, aren't those numbers short? No, because

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 2>you don't. The Patriot dynasty doesn't get credit for Brady

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 2>with the Bucks that so if that's one continuous dynasty

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.639
<v Speaker 2>in your opinion, then this Chiefs run probably comes in

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 2>second to it. But the issue, if you will, with

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 2>looking at it as one continuous dynasty is from two

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 2>thousand and five through two thy thirteen. Those nine years

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 2>they won zero Super Bowls. So do you have a

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 2>can you have in the in during a dynasty a

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 2>decade without a championship. So if you look at the

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Patriots as two separate dynasty, and those dynasties would be

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 2>one to four, three super Bowls, three super Bowl wins,

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 2>and then twenty eleven to twenty eighteen, eleven to eighteen

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 2>would be eight years, three rings, five super Bowl appearances.

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 2>All eight years you won at least twelve games. All

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 2>eight years you were in the conference championship game. This

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs run would be better than either of those individually.

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 2>I think this Chiefs run will beat the Stealers of

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 2>the seventies. They won two, had a two year break,

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 2>if you will, then one two more so they won

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 2>four and six. The Cowboys of the nineties obviously they

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:49.360
<v Speaker 2>won three and four. The Niners of the eighties they

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 2>won four in nine years or ten years. I think

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 2>in nine years this would be clearly better than all

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 2>of those. If the Chiefs win this, it would be

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 2>three in a row, four super Bowls in six years

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 2>and over a seven year stretch, seven conference championship games,

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 2>five Super Bowl appearances, four rings, and so if they

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 2>win it, they are undoubtedly the second greatest dynasty ever,

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and depending on how you parse the Patriots one, you

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 2>could argue the best dynasty ever. And for folks objecting

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 2>to me saying, oh, how can you call it two

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:39.199
<v Speaker 2>separate ones, well, let me ask you this. If the

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Kansas City Chiefs don't win it this year and they

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 2>don't win another Super Bowl until twenty thirty two, will

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 2>you consider that super Bowl part of this run? I

0:24:56.359 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 2>don't think many people would. And that's what happens the Patriots.

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.400
<v Speaker 2>The Patriots won and O four and then didn't win

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 2>again until fourteen. So like, what is if the Chiefs,

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 2>who won it in twenty three I said twenty thirty two,

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 2>that was wrong, don't win again until twenty thirty three.

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 2>Will you consider that super Let's say the Chiefs don't

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 2>win again and then they went back to back in

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 2>thirty three and thirty four. Will you consider that part

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 2>of this dynasty? I don't think you would. And so

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 2>it's a testament to the Patriots that they had two

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 2>separate dynasties. But I do look at it as two

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 2>separate dynasties, in which case the Chiefs right now this

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:47.399
<v Speaker 2>season can become the greatest dynasty in NFL history.

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 3>All right, next see if they can do it.

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it feels like nine times out of ten when

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 4>these NFL guys hold out the end of getting their money.

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 4>You proved that he just got thirty million a year

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 4>from San Francisco and it's a talk of the town

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 4>as Trent.

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 3>Williams is reportedly getting his deal done today.

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 4>So does this mean that San Francisco is back to

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 4>the runaway NFC favors?

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 2>So I don't. I don't think they are the runaway favorites.

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 2>I do think getting Trent Williams back was an absolute

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 2>must do, and now they are. They are basically running

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:37.479
<v Speaker 2>back a similar team that they had last year. I

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 2>think people slightly overvalue what the Niners did last year

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 2>and talk about them like they were this start to

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:48.439
<v Speaker 2>finish juggernaut. They were really good. I'm not denying that

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.200
<v Speaker 2>they were a really good team, but they were also

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 2>a team that had a three game losing streak and

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:59.360
<v Speaker 2>trailed in every single playoff game they played in. Now,

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:01.199
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't mean they weren't an awesome team, but they

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 2>were a twelve win team. They won the same games

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 2>amount of games last year as the Cowboys did, and

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the Cowboys were really good. I don't

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 2>think they looked at There was only one start to

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 2>finish Juggernaut and football last year, and that was the

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 2>Ravens the Niners. To me, there are two this season

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 2>concerns for the Niners, and then there is an overarching concern.

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 2>This season concerns are since Christian McCaffrey got there, they

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 2>have been incredibly fortunate on injury look with one glaring

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 2>exception being the NFC Championship game against the Eagles, whenever

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 2>all they had no quarterbacks available. So let's just you

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 2>know what, let me rephrase it. Last year, they for

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 2>a team that has older guys and guys with injury history,

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 2>they were pretty fortunate. They lost one guy of their

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 2>key contributors throughout the season in Hufanga, and I think

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Lufanga is excellent. So that's a big loss, no doubt

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 2>about it. But Trent was healthy, Simac was healthy, both

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 2>receivers were healthy. Obviously Brock was healthy. Their whole defense

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 2>of the Hufanga was healthy until the Super Bowl. In

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 2>the Super Bowl, losing Drake green Law is a big loss,

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 2>and so I do have a concern about that piece

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 2>of it. The other concern I have is if, like

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 2>this season is a little rocky, do all these guys

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to climb that mountain all from the very beginning,

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 2>when you've been so close to the mountaintop so many

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 2>times and you just haven't quite broken through. I mean,

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 2>for a team in the same six year stretch twenty

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 2>nineteen to I guess is it six years?

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I guess that's five years. Wow, that's crazy. So in

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the same last five years where the Chiefs have won

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 2>three Super Bowls and been to four, the Niners have

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 2>been to the conference championship game four of those five years,

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 2>been to the Super Bowl two of those five years,

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 2>led in the fourth quarter of the Super Bowl both

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 2>of those times, and they have zero championships to show

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 2>for it. It's just and again to testament to their consistency,

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 2>greatness or roster excellence to coaching. But man o, man o,

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 2>man you having slight technical difficulties. On the other side,

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 2>We'll do some college football stuff and I'll discuss the

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:51.239
<v Speaker 2>long lasting Niners concerned. We'll do that next What's Right?

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 2>All right? Welcome back in What's Right with the Right

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 2>episode two fifty nine. Sorry about that. The point I

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 2>was making about the Niners is for this season, I

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 2>think mostly they'll be fine. I do think that the

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl hangover, particularly when you've been that close for

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 2>that long with this core, if you have a rocky start,

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 2>that can hurt you. The bigger issue for the Niners is,

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I know that it has become trendy for folks to say,

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 2>and I don't want to do a whole salary cap thing,

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 2>but folks be like, the cap isn't real. The cap

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 2>is absolutely real. It can just the ramifications can be delayed,

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 2>and you can kick the can down the road. But

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 2>for the Niners, these are the financial realities of what

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 2>they've done, of the way they have built their team.

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 2>They have right now a player in George Kittle, who

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 2>this year counts twelve million for the cap, next year

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty one million. Trent Williams, who will see what the

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 2>adjusted deal does, but this year ten million, next year

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 2>thirty four million dollars. Nick Bosa this year fourteen million,

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 2>next year twenty one million, Javon Hargrave this year nine million,

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 2>next year twenty eight million dollars. Fred Warner this year

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 2>thirteen million, next year twenty nine million dollars. Uh, So

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 2>they have all those guys whose salaries are jumping. You

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 2>then add to it Chavarius Ward is in the last

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 2>year of his deal. You have multiple starting offensive linemen

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 2>in the last year of their deal. And brock Purty

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 2>you hope plays really well and is in for a

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 2>raise from where he goes from around one million to

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 2>around sixty million dollars. Now that sixty million won't be

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, all hit the cap at one time. But

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 2>still the point being they are nearing the end of

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 2>this iteration of the team. And it's why they were

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 2>so hesitant to pay Trent Williams because the easiest way,

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 2>because Trent's money was not guaranteed at all for next season,

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 2>so the easiest way to carve out cap savings would

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 2>have been to move on from Trent Williams. When he's

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 2>turning thirty seven next year, You're now not going to

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 2>have that operability and you probably don't want to do

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 2>that anyway. Now, will they trade a debo? Probably? And

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 2>so his twenty four million comes off the books. But

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 2>the fact of the matter is this is a team

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 2>that has borrowed from future versions of themselves to keep

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 2>this core together. Eventually, you have to pay the price

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 2>on that, all right, Demonta, it's a little before we

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 2>do college football. Actually, let me remind you, guys about

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 2>my friends at Taramana Tequila. Looking for your next favorite tequila.

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Teamanna is a premium small batch tequila founded by Dwayne

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:13.239
<v Speaker 2>the Rock Johnson. Each bottle of Teamna's meticulously crafted from

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent fully mature agave, slow roasted in traditional

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 2>brick ovens and distilled and handmade copper pots stills. Try

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Teamana today in the People's Margarita, deliciously refreshing drink made

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 2>with Taramanta blanco, lime, agave, nectar and pineapple juice. Tea

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Monta is also the perfect pairing when inviting friends and

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 2>family around to watch sports and celebrate the big games together.

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 2>For more information, visit Teamana dot com and follow on

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 2>social media at at Taramanna must be twenty one years

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 2>or older. Please enjoy responsibly. Tearamana small batch tequila forty

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 2>percent alcohol by volume imported by Cette Buck Spirits, White Plains,

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 2>New York. All Right, we're gonna because I went so

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 2>long in the double NBA, We're gonna kill tennis corner.

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Just suffice it to say I went last week. I

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 2>was also there on Sunday, I watched Coco. Man. I'm

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 2>a little annoyed because I lost money on the match.

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:17.720
<v Speaker 2>But also I think Coco had eight double faults. I've

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 2>never seen her that rattled on her serve. Now, shout

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:27.760
<v Speaker 2>out to Emma Navarro, another American who ended up, you know, winning,

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:29.959
<v Speaker 2>But it's not even like Emma had to play great.

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:32.879
<v Speaker 2>Coco just couldn't get a first serve in to save

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 2>her life. Now, this is a wide open bracket, as

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 2>wide open as I can ever remember, And if so,

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I guess we will do a slight miniature tennis corner

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 2>right now. The smart money, I guess is on sinner

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:58.439
<v Speaker 2>I am. If I were placing a bet, I would

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 2>bet it on. I would bet Meda. But it does

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 2>look like we should hopefully get uh an American male

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:13.399
<v Speaker 2>in the final, be it Fritz or Tifo. Now, Dimitrov

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 2>or Zverev could ruin that, but I would love to

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:21.359
<v Speaker 2>see my I'm rooting for Tifo. I don't think he'll

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 2>get there. Uh My money would be on Medvedev. On

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the women's side of the bracket. I guess we're probably

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna get Sue Tech Sabolenka. It's probably gonna be chalk

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 2>on that. I'd love to see how far Emma can

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 2>take it. And we have two American women left, Pagoula

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 2>whose family owns the Buffalo Bills, and Emma Navarro. But

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Pogula has got her hands full with sweet Tech, and uh,

0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 2>if Navarro gets past her quarterfinal match Sabolenka, You've got

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:58.359
<v Speaker 2>to think is probably too much for her. All Right,

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 2>there's the quaint tennis corner of demand. What game? What

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 2>game were we or no? Before we even do Coco

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 2>had nineteen double faults. My god, I didn't know how

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 2>many it was. It was insane, But uh, go ahead,

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 2>before we get to the game. College football start.

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:18.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so you had some tweets about the Colorado game,

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 4>but you're mostly caught, mostly quiet throughout. What's the biggest

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 4>story of this opening week of college football to you?

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 2>All Right? So the Colorado thing is very simple, and

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 2>that it really does seem like it's rents repeat from

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 2>last year. You have a few your quarterback is a star,

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:38.360
<v Speaker 2>you might have the best player in the entire country

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 2>in Travis Hunter, and Jimmy Horn Junior is awesome, and

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:44.359
<v Speaker 2>the rest of your team stinks. I mean, they just

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 2>don't have big, good linemen offensively or defensively, and because

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 2>of that, I don't know how they're going to be

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.800
<v Speaker 2>able to compete. And so I'm just not going to

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:59.319
<v Speaker 2>buy into the Colorado hype at all because I think

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 2>that this week Nebraska is gonna push him around. The

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:07.799
<v Speaker 2>other big story is is Georgia that much better than

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 2>the good teams in college football? Or is Clemson truly

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 2>fallen off? And I mean that was I mean that

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.360
<v Speaker 2>game was six to nothing at halftime and then Georgia

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 2>just annihilated them the rest of the way. And obviously,

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 2>I think for a lot of people, the other story,

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 2>given last night's game in particular, is Florida State missus

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Travis Hunter in a very real way. And speaking of

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Florida football or the state of Florida football, Miami shout

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 2>out to my friend Mike Ryan. Miami is a team

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:48.400
<v Speaker 2>to be feared this year. One other note, as USC

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 2>beats LSU twenty seven, to twenty, and people send me

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 2>tweets saying it doesn't look like USC miss Caleb Williams

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 2>that much. Here's a fun question, fun fact, Demonse. If

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 2>USC football during Caleb's career allowed twenty points every single

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 2>game he played twenty exactly, how many games do you

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 2>think Caleb would have lost?

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Probably not.

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 2>The answer is won one game. It was one game

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 2>his whole career that if the defense would have done

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:31.319
<v Speaker 2>against just random teams what they were able to do

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 2>against LSU, they would have lost. And that was a

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 2>game they actually won against Oregon State seventeen to fourteen

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:42.839
<v Speaker 2>his second year, his last year, a team that went

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 2>seven and five would have been undefeated if they allowed

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:51.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty points in every single game. So the savior Caleb

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 2>slander for someone else. All right, now, let's go to

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 2>our game. Demonse.

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 3>It's yeah.

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 4>So we're gonna do a preseason t take time capsule.

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 4>So how it works is before the season starts, we're

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:06.919
<v Speaker 4>gonna make a time capsule of takes and we'll dig

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 4>these up later in the season to see how the

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 4>takes have aged. Okay, first off, you got three teams

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:16.240
<v Speaker 4>really stole the headlines this offseason with their players holding

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:19.880
<v Speaker 4>out in Dallas, Cincinnati, and San Francisco. The forty nine

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 4>Ers got their fixed seemingly, and the Cowboys and Bengals

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 4>still have major contract issues. Which of these teams is

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 4>most likely to be impacted by.

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 3>The most by these offseason moves in the regular season?

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, in the regular season, the answers Dallas, because

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:38.799
<v Speaker 2>every single game, Dak's gonna have to answer questions about

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:43.560
<v Speaker 2>his contract after every single day. Long term, the answer

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 2>will Mike McCarthy, By the way, long term, my answer

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 2>is Cincinnati Demons, because this is the canary in the

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 2>coal mine that the Bengals are still the Bengals and

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna be cheap. Did you see? I have to

0:39:55.080 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 2>make sure this wasn't fake news. Bengals selling TVs. I

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 2>have to make sure I saw it. Listen. I saw

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 2>one of those dumb aggregator accounts tweet this out. I

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 2>want to see if I can find Okay, here we go.

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 2>So we are at WCPO, which is the ABC affiliate

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 2>in Cincinnati. So real news, Okay, looking for a new TV.

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Hamilton County is selling more televisions from pay Corps Stadium.

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 2>This county is gearing up to sell another one hundred

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:34.479
<v Speaker 2>and fifty TVs from the Bengals stadium amid multimillion dollar

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 2>renovations to the stadium. These and these are the okay,

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 2>So so it seems like, I mean maybe, now this

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 2>is saying the county is doing it.

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:48.240
<v Speaker 3>So maybe.

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, here's the breakdown of the prices

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 2>to Monday. They are selling fifty six inch to eighty

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 2>five inch TVs for sixty dollars. Okay, So he's got

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 2>to show up in the stadium, stay with a truck

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 2>and cash. And so now if the county is the

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 2>one doing it, I guess I can't bang on the Bengals.

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 2>This is why I wanted to get the actual facts.

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 2>It's not Mike Brown doing it. It does seem a

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 2>little low rent. But if the county is doing it,

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 2>I guess the county owns the stadium. But I just

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:29.200
<v Speaker 2>worry about the Bengals long term finances. But for this season,

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:33.879
<v Speaker 2>the Cowboys coaching quarterback being on lame dunk lame duck

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 2>contracts part of me are a real thing, all right?

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Next, All right, so the Chiefs might not have a

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 4>true rival, but that doesn't mean that they're unbeatable.

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:43.840
<v Speaker 3>So Baltimore, Buffalo.

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:46.359
<v Speaker 4>And Cincinnati have come the closest in the past if

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:48.239
<v Speaker 4>he and the Chiefs, who do you think is the

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 4>largest threat to the Chiefs this season? Baltimore, Buffalo of Cincinnati,

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:55.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, maybe themselves or other.

0:41:56.400 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 2>No, I'll go with Cincinnati. Listen. I don't know how

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 2>much longer this Bengals seems going to be together. But

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 2>they have t Higgins this year, it's probably his last year.

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:08.560
<v Speaker 2>They have Chase assuming he shows up and Joe Burrow

0:42:08.600 --> 0:42:09.399
<v Speaker 2>is awesome.

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:15.960
<v Speaker 3>And one would they'd obviously be a threat at that point, right.

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:22.759
<v Speaker 2>No, No, Okay, this is a weird We'll talk more

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs Ravens on Thursday to Monday. But there's a weird

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 2>spot where for the Ravens it's an absolute must win

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 2>they have to win the game, and for the Chiefs

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 2>it's an absolute can't lose in that who cares. If

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:42.240
<v Speaker 2>they win the game, then great, And if they lose

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:45.319
<v Speaker 2>the game they lost Week one last year and they

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 2>won the Super Bowl. I'm just telling you that's the

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 2>benefit of being the two times Super Bowl champion. It's

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:51.799
<v Speaker 2>just what it is.

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 4>I think win for the Chiefs just because you can't

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 4>have Lamar Jackson going win to the season knowing that

0:42:58.080 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 4>he can beat the Chiefs. I mean, it sucks that

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:03.359
<v Speaker 4>they lost the end of last year, but I don't

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 4>think it will be good for your Chiefs if the

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 4>Ravens have that in their mind, they know, especially if

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:09.320
<v Speaker 4>it's a bad game and then they blow them out.

0:43:09.760 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 2>But okay, well, I don't think all blowouts coming in

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 2>either direction. But I think think I don't think you

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 2>even believe that if the Ravens win this game and

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 2>then they play again in the playoffs, that the Ravens

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:31.360
<v Speaker 2>will have the psychological legend that game. At best, it's neutral.

0:43:32.040 --> 0:43:39.839
<v Speaker 2>At best, it's neutral. And so, no, it's not gonna hurt. No,

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 2>I agree with that. I agree with that entirely. But

0:43:42.760 --> 0:43:50.440
<v Speaker 2>if the Ravens lose this game and Lamar and so,

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 2>but the answer is Cincinnati, since because the difference is this,

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati can lose to the Chiefs in Week two and

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:01.879
<v Speaker 2>still feel like we can beat them in January because

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:05.400
<v Speaker 2>they have Cincinnati is the only team that can be

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 2>like we actually have beaten them in a game that matters.

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 2>They're the only team and so the Chiefs are gonna

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 2>have a massive psychological edge on every other team in

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:16.720
<v Speaker 2>the league. They just are.

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 3>All right next, all right? Yeah, last last year c J.

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:24.880
<v Speaker 4>Stroud and Jordan Love or the breakout quarterback stars of

0:44:24.920 --> 0:44:27.839
<v Speaker 4>the league. You're in on the Texans, but you said

0:44:27.840 --> 0:44:29.120
<v Speaker 4>that you're out on the Packers.

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:30.319
<v Speaker 3>So what is that?

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:32.279
<v Speaker 4>Does it have anything to do with their quarterbacks?

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 3>Like? Which which quarterback? Breakout quarterback? Is legit? Between C J.

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Stroud and Jordan Love?

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:42.279
<v Speaker 2>Before I go? Because you like both of these guys, correct, Yeah,

0:44:42.320 --> 0:44:44.880
<v Speaker 2>you like both these guys a lot. Which guy do

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 2>you are? You do you think is more likely to

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 2>be a perennial superstar?

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:53.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, I just have to go with C. J. Stroud

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:57.680
<v Speaker 4>because a larger sample size at this point. But I mean,

0:44:57.880 --> 0:44:59.759
<v Speaker 4>after this year, I feel like I'll be able to

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 4>give a way better analysis or a more definitive answer.

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I just have to go with CJ. Stroud

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:08.520
<v Speaker 4>right now, just because I've seen more games. But I

0:45:08.560 --> 0:45:10.080
<v Speaker 4>do love Jordan Love. At the end of the day,

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 4>it's my guy.

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I So what's uh? So I agree with you? Even

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 2>though Jordan Love and CJ. Stroud have played basically the

0:45:18.640 --> 0:45:21.479
<v Speaker 2>exact same amount of games, it feels like Jordan Love

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 2>was only good for half a year while CJ was

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 2>good for the whole year. And so even though Jordan's older,

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:33.479
<v Speaker 2>it does feel like we know more about CJ, which

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 2>is counterintuitive, but it's exactly what you said is exactly

0:45:36.520 --> 0:45:40.799
<v Speaker 2>how I feel. I think that I think there is

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:46.279
<v Speaker 2>a chance Jordan Love regresses a bit this year, and

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 2>I just don't see CJ regressing now. It doesn't mean

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna throw four picks again or five picks whatever

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:54.759
<v Speaker 2>he threw last year, but I think CJ is going

0:45:54.840 --> 0:45:57.279
<v Speaker 2>to just be even better this year than he was

0:45:57.360 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 2>last year. I think Jordan could have more fits and starts.

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:04.840
<v Speaker 2>So my answer is CJ. I think CJ is already

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:08.520
<v Speaker 2>a star and I think Jordan is a potential star.

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 2>That's the distinction I would draw. And it is going

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:18.759
<v Speaker 2>to be easier for CJ early on because he's going

0:46:18.800 --> 0:46:21.480
<v Speaker 2>to be so cheap the next couple of years. Jordan,

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 2>because he had to sit, He never really got the

0:46:24.080 --> 0:46:27.880
<v Speaker 2>benefit of that rookie contract supercharge team because they had

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:28.840
<v Speaker 2>to pay him immediately.

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:32.880
<v Speaker 4>All right, next right, Quarterbacks are getting paid all around

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:36.760
<v Speaker 4>the league. Chances are somebody's bound to have some Buyers

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:37.240
<v Speaker 4>or Morse.

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Which team do you think that'll be?

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:44.160
<v Speaker 4>Between Miami, Philly, Jacksonville, Tampa Bay, Detroit.

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, So I don't think including Tampa Bay in

0:46:48.320 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 2>this is fair just because Baker makes so much less

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:55.640
<v Speaker 2>than all these other guys. Baker, I think, got three

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:59.640
<v Speaker 2>years one hundred million. So I think that even if

0:46:59.680 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 2>you think Baker is the worst of the four, of

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 2>the five, it was, Yeah, it was three years, one

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 2>hundred million exactly, He's almost, you know, half the price

0:47:10.080 --> 0:47:12.759
<v Speaker 2>of the other guys, so you can almost take him

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 2>out of it. Of those four, who did you guess?

0:47:16.600 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna say Miami, Miami, no doubt. I just

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:26.280
<v Speaker 2>don't think two is that good. And I think that Miami,

0:47:26.360 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 2>when they have to start pairing away the talent, I

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:30.960
<v Speaker 2>think they kind of deep down know that and they're

0:47:30.960 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 2>worried about it. I'm curious who you think I would

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:39.680
<v Speaker 2>say after Tua is the biggest concern between travel, golf

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:40.520
<v Speaker 2>and Jalen.

0:47:42.520 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, my gut tells me it's Jalen Hurts. But

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:48.279
<v Speaker 4>for some reason, I feel like you might be, you know,

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:52.080
<v Speaker 4>doing some galaxy thing. It might be golf, but no, Yeah,

0:47:53.239 --> 0:47:54.719
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of each list.

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 2>As long as as long as the Lions are able

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:02.320
<v Speaker 2>to keep that offensive line and continue to play indoors golf,

0:48:02.360 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 2>is gonna be fine. He's not gonna be I don't

0:48:04.560 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 2>think he's gonna be a superstar, but he's gonna be fine.

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:10.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm worried about Jalen Hurts this year. I'm worried about

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:15.840
<v Speaker 2>their coaching situation. I'm worried about their offensive line, pardon me,

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:18.280
<v Speaker 2>compared to the offensive lines they've had in years past.

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:22.360
<v Speaker 2>So now people can say Nick that you know what

0:48:22.400 --> 0:48:24.799
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you're biased when it comes to Trevor. Why

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:27.399
<v Speaker 2>are you not concerned about Trevor? And the answer is yes,

0:48:27.440 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm biased. No, I'm not concerned. The guy is gonna

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 2>be a star. Just believe me. I can't prove it

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:36.319
<v Speaker 2>to you, Just believe me. Uh. The best evidence I

0:48:36.320 --> 0:48:39.000
<v Speaker 2>have right now is look at Clemson since he left.

0:48:39.440 --> 0:48:44.759
<v Speaker 2>Tried to tell you guys, he's superstar. But the yeah,

0:48:44.920 --> 0:48:49.360
<v Speaker 2>to me, Tua and Jalen are the biggest concerns are did.

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 3>They of the tush push like it's banned? Right? No? No,

0:48:53.680 --> 0:48:57.840
<v Speaker 3>no, no yet they talked about Vanny or something. They talked

0:48:57.880 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 3>about it.

0:48:58.480 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 2>They decided not to do it, but I do wonder

0:49:01.200 --> 0:49:04.719
<v Speaker 2>if they're going to ban it. I'm sorry, not going

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:06.319
<v Speaker 2>to ban it. That's all I was gonna mint say

0:49:06.320 --> 0:49:09.000
<v Speaker 2>at all. I wonder how effective it's gonna be without Kelsey.

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:11.359
<v Speaker 2>And I also wonder if they're gonna have, say, if

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:14.680
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna have Saquon do it instead of jailing. I

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:17.520
<v Speaker 2>think that would make sense because Jalen was so banged

0:49:17.560 --> 0:49:18.279
<v Speaker 2>up last year.

0:49:18.920 --> 0:49:22.760
<v Speaker 4>All right, Next, there are three teams nobody can figure

0:49:22.760 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 4>out Pittsburgh, the Jets, the Chargers, and the Chargers. Who

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 4>are you sure about between those teams, Pittsburgh the Jets.

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:32.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure about all three of them. The Chargers will

0:49:33.000 --> 0:49:38.239
<v Speaker 2>be significantly better immediately because of the coaching upgrade. They're

0:49:38.280 --> 0:49:40.160
<v Speaker 2>not gonna be a contender, but they're gonna be a

0:49:40.200 --> 0:49:43.480
<v Speaker 2>fringe playoff team and immediately better because of Harball. The

0:49:43.600 --> 0:49:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Jets are once again going to be one of the

0:49:47.520 --> 0:49:51.759
<v Speaker 2>most overvalued preseason teams in the league. And then they're

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:55.880
<v Speaker 2>gonna suffer a couple typical injuries because it's football and

0:49:55.920 --> 0:49:58.520
<v Speaker 2>they're an old team and the and then they're also

0:49:58.520 --> 0:50:00.239
<v Speaker 2>gonna deal with the dysfunction of the co which in

0:50:00.239 --> 0:50:02.400
<v Speaker 2>the quarterback not being on the same page and the

0:50:02.440 --> 0:50:05.120
<v Speaker 2>fact that they have the worst offensive coordinator in the NFL.

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:07.080
<v Speaker 2>And then people are gonna throw their hands up and

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:09.319
<v Speaker 2>be like, who could have seen this coming? And the

0:50:09.360 --> 0:50:12.759
<v Speaker 2>Steelers are gonna have a really good defense and impossibly

0:50:12.840 --> 0:50:16.759
<v Speaker 2>bad offense and win eight games. I feel very confident.

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:20.240
<v Speaker 2>And eight games, by the way, is probably bad for Pittsburgh,

0:50:20.280 --> 0:50:22.560
<v Speaker 2>probably better for them to win four or five games,

0:50:22.600 --> 0:50:27.920
<v Speaker 2>finally bottom out and be able to we finally draft

0:50:27.960 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 2>the quarterback high and start the thing over all.

0:50:31.080 --> 0:50:34.640
<v Speaker 4>Right, next, so we've got a bonus question for you.

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:38.720
<v Speaker 4>By which week will the media start panicking about the Chiefs.

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 2>So here's the thing. I don't think it will happen

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 2>this year because I think everyone feels so burnt by

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:51.680
<v Speaker 2>last year. I think the Chiefs could start zero to

0:50:51.680 --> 0:50:56.239
<v Speaker 2>two and people will still be like they're the Chiefs.

0:50:56.520 --> 0:50:59.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you're gonna see as long as Mahomes

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:07.040
<v Speaker 2>is healthy, everyone is going to be very judicious in

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:09.240
<v Speaker 2>any criticism of the Chiefs.

0:51:10.080 --> 0:51:13.320
<v Speaker 4>So the questions like it's like I thought you saying

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:17.040
<v Speaker 4>they start off zero and two, but like they're saying that,

0:51:17.080 --> 0:51:19.520
<v Speaker 4>when are they gonna start panicking about them. So you're saying,

0:51:19.520 --> 0:51:22.640
<v Speaker 4>even if they're losing, you're gonna be like, yeah, they're

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:23.839
<v Speaker 4>getting there somehow.

0:51:23.520 --> 0:51:26.440
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm saying. Yeah, yeah, I mean they they

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 2>would have to be four and eight for people to

0:51:31.120 --> 0:51:35.960
<v Speaker 2>bail on them entirely. Yeah. So yeah, and that's obviously

0:51:36.000 --> 0:51:38.799
<v Speaker 2>not gonna happen. All right, answer some listener questions next,

0:51:38.840 --> 0:51:46.040
<v Speaker 2>What's right? All right? Welcome back in What's driving? Nick

0:51:46.120 --> 0:51:48.680
<v Speaker 2>right demands Let's do a few listener questions before we

0:51:48.719 --> 0:51:49.319
<v Speaker 2>get out of here.

0:51:50.920 --> 0:51:54.279
<v Speaker 4>Mister Gabe asked, does Robert Salah have the worst job

0:51:54.360 --> 0:51:55.840
<v Speaker 4>in sports?

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:02.320
<v Speaker 2>No, No, you don't have the worst job in sports.

0:52:02.880 --> 0:52:06.480
<v Speaker 2>I Uh, I don't think it's a great job. I

0:52:06.480 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 2>think coach of the Jets historically isn't a great job.

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:13.879
<v Speaker 2>And with the and with Rogers kind of holding these

0:52:13.960 --> 0:52:17.880
<v Speaker 2>dueling you know, press conferences or whatever, it's not ideal.

0:52:18.000 --> 0:52:21.759
<v Speaker 2>But no, I think it's I think the worst that's

0:52:21.760 --> 0:52:25.360
<v Speaker 2>a whole topic, the worst jobs in sports.

0:52:25.400 --> 0:52:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm trying to think.

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Uh, yeah, I'm the Cowboys head coach is not a

0:52:30.520 --> 0:52:33.399
<v Speaker 2>great one. Uh, it sounds like it's a great one.

0:52:33.440 --> 0:52:36.480
<v Speaker 2>But then Jerry is just always holding these press conferences

0:52:36.560 --> 0:52:39.160
<v Speaker 2>and you got to answer for it. I think that

0:52:39.920 --> 0:52:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Alabama football coach is sneaky, not a great job because

0:52:44.840 --> 0:52:48.680
<v Speaker 2>you go, you know, eleven and two and win the

0:52:48.719 --> 0:52:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Iron Bowl and it's a failure because of what Saban

0:52:51.520 --> 0:52:56.239
<v Speaker 2>and Bear Bryan had done, and so like there's yeah,

0:52:56.280 --> 0:52:58.520
<v Speaker 2>it's so but no, it's not the worst job, but

0:52:58.560 --> 0:53:04.400
<v Speaker 2>it's not a great job. Mayo. I well, being the

0:53:04.440 --> 0:53:09.719
<v Speaker 2>guy that follows Belichick, that's probably not ideal, but no,

0:53:09.760 --> 0:53:12.560
<v Speaker 2>it's not the I don't think I don't think Sala's

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:17.080
<v Speaker 2>got the saying worst job in sports for the Thursday topic.

0:53:17.400 --> 0:53:21.239
<v Speaker 2>That's like a March topic, not a first day of

0:53:21.239 --> 0:53:23.760
<v Speaker 2>the NFL season topic. But it is a good topic,

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:25.800
<v Speaker 2>all right, go ahead to the next.

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:27.239
<v Speaker 3>One to Mont Austin, TA.

0:53:27.920 --> 0:53:30.000
<v Speaker 4>How can you tell the quality of the of the

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:33.520
<v Speaker 4>guard spot? And why aren't there a lot? Why aren't

0:53:33.520 --> 0:53:35.640
<v Speaker 4>there a lot of Hall of Fame guards? Is the

0:53:35.719 --> 0:53:38.000
<v Speaker 4>lack of namesake or the nature of the position?

0:53:39.000 --> 0:53:40.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean yeah, I think it's lack of name

0:53:40.760 --> 0:53:43.239
<v Speaker 2>recognition in the nature of the position is and I

0:53:43.360 --> 0:53:46.040
<v Speaker 2>think most people, you know, how do we know who

0:53:46.040 --> 0:53:48.239
<v Speaker 2>the best guards are? We just trust the people who

0:53:48.280 --> 0:53:51.560
<v Speaker 2>evaluate them, you know, and look at all pro voting

0:53:51.600 --> 0:53:54.880
<v Speaker 2>and stuff like that. Yeah, so I think that's I

0:53:54.920 --> 0:53:58.880
<v Speaker 2>think that. Listen, every spot on a football team is important.

0:53:59.239 --> 0:54:04.400
<v Speaker 2>But if you were ranking most to least, I mean, guard,

0:54:05.480 --> 0:54:08.960
<v Speaker 2>inside linebacker, and tight end, are the three that are

0:54:09.000 --> 0:54:12.760
<v Speaker 2>gonna jump out as the least important, probably with safety

0:54:12.800 --> 0:54:15.200
<v Speaker 2>being those in safety. Those are the four spots that

0:54:15.280 --> 0:54:18.839
<v Speaker 2>are paid the least least glamour. And I think we

0:54:18.920 --> 0:54:23.680
<v Speaker 2>know the least about the differences with inside linebacker, tight end,

0:54:23.719 --> 0:54:28.640
<v Speaker 2>and safety. The great, great, great ones have unbelievable stats

0:54:28.960 --> 0:54:29.680
<v Speaker 2>or highlights.

0:54:30.200 --> 0:54:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Safety one, it's a.

0:54:33.080 --> 0:54:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Fun one, but it's just not valued the way it

0:54:35.400 --> 0:54:39.080
<v Speaker 2>once was. And same with inside linebacker, even though Ray Lewis,

0:54:39.080 --> 0:54:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Bryan Rlacker, you know what I mean, some of the

0:54:40.800 --> 0:54:41.680
<v Speaker 2>greatest players ever.

0:54:42.200 --> 0:54:46.640
<v Speaker 4>All right, next, Robbie Ralph, I'm six years into a

0:54:46.680 --> 0:54:48.880
<v Speaker 4>ten year bet that says Lamar will not win a

0:54:48.920 --> 0:54:52.799
<v Speaker 4>Super Bowl? Am I gonna win the five hundred you're

0:54:52.800 --> 0:54:53.800
<v Speaker 4>praying on his downfall?

0:54:53.880 --> 0:54:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Robbie, I mean, that is an odd bet, but I

0:54:58.120 --> 0:55:01.600
<v Speaker 2>mean I would say you're a fa for it, Like

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:03.640
<v Speaker 2>do I think Lamar is gonna win a Super Bowl?

0:55:03.640 --> 0:55:06.120
<v Speaker 2>In the next four years. If I was offered even

0:55:06.200 --> 0:55:09.120
<v Speaker 2>money on that, I think that I would take the

0:55:09.160 --> 0:55:12.640
<v Speaker 2>no side. You're a slight favorite. You were an underdog

0:55:13.719 --> 0:55:17.040
<v Speaker 2>spot four years ago, you know, four years ago, and

0:55:17.040 --> 0:55:18.960
<v Speaker 2>it was like, well, lamar went in the next eight

0:55:19.080 --> 0:55:22.880
<v Speaker 2>years the answer looked like yes, but now a couple injuries,

0:55:23.000 --> 0:55:26.560
<v Speaker 2>another bad playoff performance, and so now it's you know,

0:55:26.680 --> 0:55:30.920
<v Speaker 2>slight to the know all right. Two more questions quickly to.

0:55:30.960 --> 0:55:35.920
<v Speaker 4>Mose Isaiah A, DJ Moore or Roma Dunzay for fantasy.

0:55:36.920 --> 0:55:37.279
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:55:37.320 --> 0:55:40.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't do fantasy questions, but this one slipped through

0:55:40.600 --> 0:55:43.440
<v Speaker 2>DJ Moore without a doubt. DJ Moore is gonna have

0:55:43.480 --> 0:55:46.040
<v Speaker 2>a monster DJ Moore at a monster year with Justin Fields.

0:55:46.120 --> 0:55:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Now that's because Field's only threw in the ball and

0:55:48.120 --> 0:55:50.800
<v Speaker 2>then ran. But DJ, I mean, Dooonday is gonna be

0:55:50.840 --> 0:55:53.319
<v Speaker 2>really good. Roma Doonday's already really good? All right.

0:55:53.400 --> 0:55:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Last one, Danny Tanner.

0:55:55.760 --> 0:55:58.080
<v Speaker 4>If poker were at it to the Olympics, would you

0:55:58.120 --> 0:55:58.920
<v Speaker 4>try to qualify?

0:56:00.560 --> 0:56:04.879
<v Speaker 2>No? I would not be Uh. There's just too many

0:56:05.200 --> 0:56:08.680
<v Speaker 2>players way way, way way better than me. And if

0:56:08.680 --> 0:56:10.319
<v Speaker 2>it were out of the Olympics, would have to be in

0:56:10.360 --> 0:56:13.800
<v Speaker 2>tournament fashion and the greatest tournament players in the world.

0:56:13.960 --> 0:56:17.239
<v Speaker 2>It would be like me trying to qualify for any

0:56:17.320 --> 0:56:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Olympic sport like I wouldn't I wouldn't really have a chance.

0:56:21.520 --> 0:56:26.240
<v Speaker 2>With that said, I'm thinking about cycling because the lady

0:56:26.320 --> 0:56:28.839
<v Speaker 2>who was a grad student or whatever just picked up

0:56:28.880 --> 0:56:31.600
<v Speaker 2>cycling ended up winning the gold. She had just started

0:56:31.600 --> 0:56:33.719
<v Speaker 2>doing cycling in her spare time. She end up winning

0:56:33.719 --> 0:56:36.840
<v Speaker 2>the gold. And I am back on my peloton grind

0:56:37.080 --> 0:56:41.800
<v Speaker 2>and I am crushing people. I mean just absolutely crushing people.

0:56:42.160 --> 0:56:46.120
<v Speaker 2>So maybe I could do like some maybybe not slight cycling,

0:56:46.160 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 2>but like some type of triathlon type, maybe not Olympics.

0:56:52.080 --> 0:56:55.400
<v Speaker 2>The problem with the triathlon is the swimming. I can swim,

0:56:55.400 --> 0:56:58.759
<v Speaker 2>but swimming for a mile seems like an absurd thing.

0:56:59.239 --> 0:57:02.160
<v Speaker 2>It just seems like the But the jogging. I got

0:57:02.239 --> 0:57:05.640
<v Speaker 2>great new running shoes. I'll shout them out in the

0:57:05.640 --> 0:57:07.160
<v Speaker 2>next spot. I don't know if I'm supposed to yet.

0:57:07.160 --> 0:57:09.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if the sponsorships signed, sealed and delivered yet.

0:57:09.960 --> 0:57:12.799
<v Speaker 2>But I got great new running shoes from potential what's

0:57:12.880 --> 0:57:17.920
<v Speaker 2>right sponsor, and the cycling I'm crushing. So yeah, But

0:57:18.000 --> 0:57:20.840
<v Speaker 2>so no, I couldn't qualify for poker in the Olympics.

0:57:21.040 --> 0:57:23.280
<v Speaker 2>You can though, by the way, I'll be able to

0:57:23.320 --> 0:57:25.640
<v Speaker 2>talk about it next week. I'm gonna be playing poker

0:57:25.680 --> 0:57:29.240
<v Speaker 2>on TV again very soon with one of the greatest

0:57:29.280 --> 0:57:32.000
<v Speaker 2>athletes in the last twenty years. He's gonna be alongside me,

0:57:32.160 --> 0:57:34.040
<v Speaker 2>so I'll tell you guys about that at a podcast

0:57:34.080 --> 0:57:39.120
<v Speaker 2>coming up today. Oh, huge day on FS one, new

0:57:39.160 --> 0:57:43.600
<v Speaker 2>lineup out, breakfast Ball has been rolling. The facility is

0:57:43.640 --> 0:57:47.040
<v Speaker 2>going on as we speak. Colin is back from his vacation.

0:57:47.320 --> 0:57:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Our show the new Speak feature and enjoy Taylor. It's

0:57:50.280 --> 0:57:52.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna be great, so check all that out. I'll see

0:57:52.360 --> 0:57:55.080
<v Speaker 2>you guys on with Colin in about ninety minutes. See

0:57:55.080 --> 0:57:56.720
<v Speaker 2>you in my show in a little over three hours.

0:57:56.720 --> 0:58:00.800
<v Speaker 2>What's right? Hey, thanks for watching. If you're still here,

0:58:00.880 --> 0:58:03.760
<v Speaker 2>do me a favor. Hit the subscribe button, then hit

0:58:03.800 --> 0:58:05.920
<v Speaker 2>the bell so you can be notified when we have

0:58:06.040 --> 0:58:09.560
<v Speaker 2>new episodes. After you've done that one more favor, go

0:58:09.600 --> 0:58:13.200
<v Speaker 2>to your favorite audio platform of choice and subscribe there

0:58:13.240 --> 0:58:17.200
<v Speaker 2>as well. Don't forget We're live every Tuesday and Thursday

0:58:17.320 --> 0:58:21.200
<v Speaker 2>ten thirty am Eastern Ish ten thirty five, ten forty.

0:58:21.240 --> 0:58:23.800
<v Speaker 2>It sometimes changes, but that's why you hit the bell,

0:58:24.120 --> 0:58:27.280
<v Speaker 2>You hit the bell so you're notified. You subscribe so

0:58:27.320 --> 0:58:30.160
<v Speaker 2>we can get to two hundred thousand followers. We're right

0:58:30.160 --> 0:58:32.360
<v Speaker 2>around one hundred and fifty thousand. We'd love to get

0:58:32.360 --> 0:58:35.320
<v Speaker 2>to two hundred thousand. Get de Monday another plaque, so like,

0:58:35.600 --> 0:58:38.960
<v Speaker 2>subscribe rate, send a rating to do all that cool stuff.

0:58:39.000 --> 0:58:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks guys,