WEBVTT - The Lie Behind "Having It All" + the Real Gender Gap Nobody Talks About With Corinne Low

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>No one has all the answers, but when we ask

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the right questions, we get a little closer, closer to truths,

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>closer to each other, even closer to ourselves. I'm journalist

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Danielle Robe, and each week, my guests and I come

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>together to challenge the status quo and our own ways

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of thinking by daring to ask what if, why not?

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 2>And who says?

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 3>So?

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Come curious, dig deep, and join the conversation. It's time

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to question everything. Hello, my friends, I hope you're having

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful week. I am recording this from Tucson, Arizona.

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I met Kenyon Ranch for a three day respit. I

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>am getting massages and relaxing and trying to recover. I

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>know you can probably hear in my voice that I'm

0:00:57.720 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>still a little under the weather. And then I've had

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a straight to New York for Tribeca. So next week

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll keep you posted on how all of that was.

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Last time I was there, I got to interview Robert

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>de Niro, which was spontaneous and so fun. He started Tribeca.

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>He co founded it, which is a fun fact I

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>didn't know years ago when I started going. Okay, I

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>want to jump into today's episode because it well, it

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>blew my mind. My therapist said something to me recently

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that I have not been able to stop thinking about.

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>She said, Danielle, you are not the problem. You just

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>want to date like a man in a society where

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you're a woman.

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Stay with me.

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>You all know I'm obsessed with my work, and I've

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>always been obsessed with my time. I guard my calendar

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>like it's Fort Knox. I travel constantly, I disappear into projects, and.

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 2>I want a big career. I want to build things.

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I want autonomy, I want purpose, and I also want

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to be married with kids. And every once in a

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>while I find myself thinking, oh my god, I'd make

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a great husband. And not because those are male qualities.

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 2>They're not.

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>But historically, the person who got to organize their life

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>around ambition and independence was usually the man. Someone else

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>was often absorbing the invisible work, the scheduling, the remembering,

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the emotional labor, the listening, the birthday gifts, the childcare,

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 1>the grocery list, the doctor's appointments, the making life actually work.

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't have to list it off.

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I know every single person listening knows what I'm talking about,

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and That's where today's conversation begins, because one of the

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>biggest lies that women have been sold is that equality happened,

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that it already happened. We entered the workforce, we got degrees,

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 1>we started companies, some of us became breadwinners. But at home,

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the social contract didn't evolve nearly as fast. Women still

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>perform trillions of dollars worth of unpaid labor every year.

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>And I know, unpaid labor sounds like one of those

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>buzzy academic phrases, and everybody sort of like nods along

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>without really understanding, or at least I do, But I

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>want to make it tangible.

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Most studies suggest.

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>That men enjoy nearly four hundred more hours of leisure

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>time every year than a woman. That's ten extra forty

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>hour work weeks ten weeks. Imagine someone handed you ten

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>additional weeks of your life every year.

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 2>What would you do with them?

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Build a business, write a book, sleep, exercise, knit, stare

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>into space. I mean, lots of us aren't even imagining

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>what we would do with those hours because many women

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>are already spending them. We're just spending them on care,

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>which means many women aren't working one job they're working two, three,

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>or four and they're trying to do all of them

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>exceptionally well. But what changes this dynamic, Well, if you're

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>married a true partner.

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 3>You're not just shopping for sexy, because sexy is going

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 3>to wear off when you're cleaning his toothpaste off bathroom sink,

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 3>like he's not going to be sexy in the same

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 3>way anymore. And what's going to be sexy is somebody

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 3>lightening your load so that you can be a full person.

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's where our guest today comes in. Karin Low

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>is an economist, professor, and author whose work explores what

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>she calls the economics of being a woman. Her book

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Having It All, What Data tells Us about Women's lives

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and Getting the Most out of Yours reveals something that

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>many women feel every day but really struggle to explain.

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>We're doing more than ever before, and yet somehow still

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>feel like we're falling behind. Karin says, it's the trap.

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 3>Ultimately, your marriage cannot be happy if both people are

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 3>not self actualized, because if somebody doesn't feel like this

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 3>partnership supports them and becoming the person that they want

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 3>to be, then ultimately it is really hard to sustain

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 3>that love and affection to that person who's actually kind

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.799
<v Speaker 3>of become the headwind or the forest that's holding you back.

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>My mind was blown when she said that, because we've

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 1>had conversations about invisible labor on the pod before, and

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 1>I always feel really connected to them, but also like

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a bunch of data where it can feel man

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>hatary or anti marriage or complaining, and I don't want

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>it to be any of that. And Karin put into

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>words what I've been searching for. It's really about being

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>able to become. And whether you agree with her or not,

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>our conversation today centers on a question that I think

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>only you can answer for you. What does becoming and

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>having it all look like for you? And what are

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you willing to trade for it? Because every life has

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a series of trades, and sometimes, whether we realize it

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>or not, women are making trades inside a social contract.

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 2>That we never actually agreed to.

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>So today we are talking about the economics of being

0:05:53.200 --> 0:06:02.119
<v Speaker 1>a woman. It's time to question everything with carinla Courin.

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm so happy to have you here today.

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Thanks so much, can't wait to dive in with you.

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, you and your work really embody the idea of

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>questioning everything. You're turning so many of our societal norms

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:18.919
<v Speaker 1>on its head, and you're using economics to do it.

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>And I became particularly interested in this book because you

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and I met at a Gloria steinem event. But I

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>threw a separate event with this woman, Susie Welch, who's

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a professor at NYU, and you know her.

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 2>She has this class by Becoming You.

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So I love the class so much that Susie and

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I threw an event together for a bunch of New

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>York influencers to experience. It was one day and there

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>was probably ninety people there. And one of the questions

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that Susie asks is sort of a pun or a

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>play on whose line is it anyways?

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 2>And it's whose life do you want? Anyways?

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>And you pick people whose lives look interesting to you,

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>and you have two columns you say, here's what I

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:00.040
<v Speaker 1>like about their life and here's what I don't I

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>don't find interesting or want about their lives. So, just

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>for an example, I said Hillary Clinton as one of mine,

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and I said, you know, she was a question asker,

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a culture changer. She pushed for change with her intellect,

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>she wanted to spread good ideas, And then in the

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>column of what I didn't want was like, I don't

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>want to marry a politician. I don't want scandal if

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I can help it, you know. So I have a

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>whole list of what I do like and what I

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>don't like. And out of the ninety women there, who

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>were all ages, all races, all ethnicities, all religions, I

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>would say seventy five of them had Emma Greed's name

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>written down on whose life they wanted.

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh and here's what I found so interesting.

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>The reason that they had Emma Greed's name was an

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>assortment of reasons. Some people said, she has this big

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>career or a husband or kids, but ultimately it.

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Came down to she had it all.

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>She had the big career and a husband who she

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>seemingly loves, and children, and she looks glam doing it,

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and she has a nice house with art on her walls,

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and she's traveling and seemingly healthy and has friends, etc.

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>And your work indicates that having it all is basically

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a trap.

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 2>So I have to dig into it with you.

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Before you wrote this book, were you striving to have

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it all?

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean absolutely, I was striving for a life it

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 3>didn't have trade offs because I didn't think when I

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 3>looked to my male colleagues or when I looked to

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 3>successful people, and I didn't think of myself just as

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 3>a woman. I thought of myself as someone who could

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 3>be successful in my own terms, and I didn't see

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 3>that you had to have these intense trade offs, you know,

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 3>between investments in your career, investments and family. So I

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 3>wanted a life where I got to go shopping in

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 3>the grocery store for the career that I wanted, a

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 3>family life. I wanted the relationship that I wanted, right,

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 3>And I think one of the things that really like

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 3>in the case of Emma Grade's life, really masks a

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 3>lot of those trade offs is a tremendous amount of wealth.

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 3>And you know that wealth like can lessen some of

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 3>those feelings of trade offfs some of those feelings of

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 3>like the squeeze, right that I talk about in my

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 3>work about how we often feel squeezed and that we

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 3>can't put time into everything that we want. So, yes,

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 3>I think that that's really interesting because I absolutely think

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 3>that that's something that she's been projecting, is that there

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 3>don't have to be trade offs. Like when she goes

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:33.839
<v Speaker 3>around on interviews, she's saying, well, women just can't sit

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 3>in their living rooms. They've got to get out to

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 3>the office, and you know, they've got to just work

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 3>harder to be successful. And then you can be like me.

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 3>And it's like, but we can't, Emma, because people are

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 3>struggling to afford childcare. You know, people maybe like need

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 3>to be spending that amount of time with their kids,

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 3>and you know, they are facing these trade offs they

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 3>don't maybe have the support of a partner. And then

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 3>she's also you know, I've been going by about this

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 3>three hour parent thing, saying, you know, she only wants

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 3>to spend three hours with her kids on the weekends.

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 3>And there is a place where you know, I always

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 3>caution to people that you have to understand the values

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 3>behind the life that somebody is living. And so for me,

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 3>that's not consistent with my values, like I want to

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 3>spend a lot of time with my kids. I want

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 3>to spend much more than three hours with them on

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 3>the weekend, and that is going to create trade offs

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 3>in other areas of my life. That that is time.

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Time is a limited asset, the same as money. I

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 3>can only invest in so many places, and so if

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm making that choice that that's time that I value,

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 3>then I'm not spending my time budget someplace else. So

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 3>I think she really is going on this press tour

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 3>that's saying there doesn't have to be trade offs, and

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 3>so I'm not surprised that it's aspirational. But I love

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 3>your answer, Hillary Clinton, because I think basing that aspiration

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 3>around someone who's beautiful and rich and everything feels seamless

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 3>and without trade offs is like continuing to sell that

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 3>lie to women and ultimately making it harder for us

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 3>to have our version of it all.

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>You know where I get stuck, and I think so

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>many women get stuck based on that room that I

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>was in, was I know it's a trap, Like I

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>totally recognize that it's a trap, and I still want

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it all.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 3>But what you want is to be happy, right yeah,

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 3>because I do, Like, for example, my life doesn't look

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 3>anything like Emma Greeds, right this idea, and Emma Greed's

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 3>life does not look anything like Emma Greed's. Okay, her

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 3>real life behind the camera is not on Instagram, does

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 3>not look anything like what you see. And so first

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 3>let's start there. Anytime you're comparing your whole, messy reality

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 3>to somebody else's highlights, right, you're gonna feel this dissonance

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 3>of like, well, I just wish I was in cute

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 3>outfits all the time. It's like she's not in Q

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 3>outfits all the time. Right places in her house where

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 3>there's a mess, or there's a housekeeper who she's able

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 3>to afford full time who just cleaned it up, and

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 3>her and her husband fight, right, and some times her

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 3>kids have meltdowns, and none of that is on the GRAM.

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 3>But totally, my life doesn't look anything like Emma Greeds.

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm not effortlessly perfectly rich, thin, glamorous. I constantly feel

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 3>like my house is too messy. I'm like struggling so

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 3>hard to like me and my wife together, trying to

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 3>like landscape our backyard, and it just is like such

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 3>a like and I'm sure like she would snap her

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 3>fingers and like somebody would be there and it would

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 3>already be done right, So like, my life doesn't look

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 3>anything like Emmagreeds. And my life is rich and happy

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 3>and full with a career that I love where I

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 3>get to do work that I feel like is really

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 3>high impact with kids that I get to spend time

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 3>with and raise the way that I want to with

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 3>a partner who I love and have a great relationship with,

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 3>which is all hard one. If you read the book,

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 3>it's like, how did we get here? It's like a

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 3>very long journey, right, Yes, But I think for your

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 3>life to be happy and full and for you to

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 3>have that like it all of like a successful career

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 3>and a successful family life, it still doesn't have to

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 3>look like Greeds and I just totally by holding ourselves

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 3>up to that standard, we're offering our own unhappiness. In

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 3>the same way that I think all of this stuff

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 3>that we're chasing of again really wealth, like the consumer goods.

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 3>It's like that I've got to have her wardrobe and

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 3>handbags and my house has to look like that. Like

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 3>all of that is eating away at the joy that

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 3>we can experience from like the real life that's right

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 3>in front of us.

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So I want to go backwards because you mentioned that

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you have this beautiful life built on the values that

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you hold true, but you didn't always have that. You

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>start the book in the bathroom of an Amtrak train, pumping,

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>crying and realizing that you won't make it home in

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>time to put your son to bed, and you have

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a version of an adult meltdown.

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.079
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, so can you tell me about that?

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Yes, So I told you I had dreamed of this

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 3>life for myself that didn't have these trade offs, and

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 3>I just found this idea deeply unfair and I still

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 3>do find it deeply on But like you know, I

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 3>was the twelve year old feminist who was signing petitions

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 3>to say that girls and boys shouldn't be treated differently,

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 3>and so, in my view, like I was going to

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 3>have the career that I wanted, and I didn't really

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 3>think about how a partnership intersected and a marriage intersected

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 3>with that. I just kind of took each decision as

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 3>it came. It was like this guy's nice, and I

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 3>married him, and you know that was like, okay, and

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 3>now I kind of want a baby. Let's have a baby,

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 3>and we'll make it work because our lives are working

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 3>so far. And you know, I say gave birth to

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 3>my son, and I gave birth to a midlife crisis

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 3>because everything that was working, which was me commuting from

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 3>New York City to Philadelphia for my job and being

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 3>on the tenure track at Wharton, which means you have

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 3>to publish a certain number of papers before you come

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 3>up for this tenure review or you literally get fired,

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 3>right you have to find a new job. So all

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 3>of that stuff that was working and my marriage stopped working,

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 3>and I felt like I was falling behind my male

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 3>colleagues at work. I felt like my home life didn't

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 3>look anything like what I wanted it to look like.

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't effortless, it wasn't perfect. We were, you know,

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 3>struggling for money because we both had good jobs at

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 3>the time. He later left his job, adding to the strain.

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 3>But even when we both had good jobs, you know,

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 3>we were in New York City where you know, you're

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 3>constantly kind of struggling to keep up with the joneses. Yeah,

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 3>and just the basic cost of living. But what does

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 3>it cost to have an apartment and to have you know,

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 3>childcare and all of those things. And I was surprised

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 3>by my when I talk with those values, like I,

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 3>as this staunch feminist, never thought I would be the

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 3>mom crying because I'm not going to make it home

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 3>to bedtime. I never thought I would be the mom

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 3>pumping on the Amtrak bathroom because I was that committed

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 3>to breastfeeding and to making that work even after going

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 3>back to work, and I had to go back to

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 3>teaching classes like a couple months after my son was born,

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 3>because of course, we don't have real family life in America, right,

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 3>So I just never thought that that was going to

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 3>be me. I never thought those trade offs were going

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 3>to be so big, And then I felt all of

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 3>them kind of crushing down upon me at the same time,

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 3>and I started to question everything, maybe more so than

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 3>some other people, you know, using the tools of my discipline,

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 3>saying why is this so unfair? Why is this not

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 3>adding up for me? And I started looking at women's

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 3>time use and finding that as women were taking on

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 3>more at work, men weren't taking on more at home,

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 3>and so there was kind of like no place for

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's no pressure release valve on everything that

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 3>we were kind of adding to our lives. We were

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 3>just trying to do more, and parenting had become much

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 3>more intensive from the time when I was a kid, when,

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 3>like I joke, my bedtime routine was go to bed.

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 3>It was like there wasn't this like elaborate ritual of

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 3>every part of parenting, so you're expected to be there

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 3>for your kid more than ever. Working moms today spend

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 3>more time with our kids then stay at home moms

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 3>a generation ago. You're expected to be there more than ever.

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>So working moms today spend more time with their kids

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>now than stay at home moms did in the seventies.

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, wow, yeah. And so when you're feeling like it

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 3>doesn't add up and you're like, but wait, even if

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 3>you had a working mom, you're like, but my mom

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 3>was a working mom. She made it work. Am I

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 3>just a failure? No, Like what it all is has

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 3>changed and it's just misfailing and it's become really unsustainable.

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 3>So my questioning everything included my marriage and I ultimately

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 3>ended up getting divorced, moving to Philadelphia, eventually getting remarried

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 3>to a woman because by part of how I decided

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 3>I was going to make it all that up was

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 3>get those gender roles out of my life, of this

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 3>expectation that I was going to do more just because

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 3>I was the female partner.

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>And wait, Kurin, were you bisexual or lesbian before this

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>or did you marry a domestic partner?

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 3>So I I was identified as not I was not

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 3>queer because I think I sort of defaulted into heterosexuality

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 3>because we don't question enough things in our life, right,

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 3>I think I sort of had defaulted to be pterosexual.

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 3>And like I said, I had crushes on boys, assumed

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 3>that I liked men, and then gradually, like over the

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 3>course of my marriage, I think the unfairness of the

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 3>gender roles actually started to impact my attraction. And so

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 3>when I had this like that people talk about, you know,

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 3>when you know your marriage is over, it's like when

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 3>you start really thinking about like life after marriage, you

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 3>start thinking about other people. Right, all of my crushes

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 3>were on women, Like I could not picture being attracted

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 3>to a man like it was just that it was

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 3>dead to me. So like I guess I was always

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 3>a little bit in the middle of the spectrum, but

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of pushed more to one side by that experience.

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 3>So once I got separated, I only dated women. And yes, no,

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 3>my wife and I are very much in love have

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 3>a full relationship. But that's what If you were asking

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 3>if it's like every like you know, just like co

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 3>parents and friends.

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, I didn't know if you were in a

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>romantic partnership or if you like based on the analysis

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of your time, decided Okay, I'm gonna be in a

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 1>domestic partnership.

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah no, So I will say that, I mean was conveniently,

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 3>but it's actually attracted, right, because I think I've heard

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of women say like, oh my god, I

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 3>wish I could do that, which, let me just say, ladies,

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 3>like at least go on a date with a woman

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:56.679
<v Speaker 3>at some point in your life, like as part of

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 3>this like you know, idea of like upending the defaults.

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 3>We fall into these defaults too much, and it's like,

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 3>why not, why not try that and see you know,

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 3>and I never did until after I got divorced. But yeah,

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 3>that was, albeit, I admit, an extreme solution and one

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 3>that's not available to everybody.

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know what's funny about that Current is a

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:19.439
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine heard you speak in person at she

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>works at the Milinda.

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Gates at Yeah.

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And so she texted me after because she knew

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we had met at the Gloria event and she was like,

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Current showed us a bunch of charts and research that

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>she'd done and basically the economic impacts on a hetero

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>sexual relationship, a gay and lesbian relationship and she was like,

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>it made.

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Me think I should be with a woman.

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 1>So the stats are actually quite convincing, I would say,

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think what is so moving about the way

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you write that first chapter is that there's so much

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>grief there, and there's so much what's the word burnout

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that you feel when you're writing it. That's a very relatable.

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 1>But be what I think was so interesting is you

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>decided this wasn't a scheduling issue, because I think a

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people would think it was. How did you

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 1>decide this was more than a scheduling issue?

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think my first instinct was to try to

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 3>make those like little tweaks and corrections and try to

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 3>be like, Okay, let me make a chart and like

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 3>you're going to do this stuff, and I'm going to

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 3>do this stuff, or you know, try to correct those things.

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 3>And it was only after a lot of trying to

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 3>make it work and make those corrections that I realized

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 3>that there was something more fundamentally amiss. And I am

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 3>not at all saying that, like know, hoterosexual marriage can work,

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 3>but I think what I found is that ultimately my

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 3>acts who you know, I co parent my son with

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 3>and he's a great co parent now that we're divorced.

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 3>But he wasn't willing to reconsider his gender role within

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 3>the marriage, and that wasn't going to work for me

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 3>as somebody who was in some ways violating gender roles

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 3>by having a big career, being on the tenure track

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 3>at Wharton, being the breadwinner. And at that point, by

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 3>the time I finally left my marriage, I was the

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.719
<v Speaker 3>sole breadwinner, so my you know, paycheck was covering all

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 3>of our bills. And he really wasn't willing to reconsider

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 3>his role, and so ultimately that didn't leave space for

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 3>the adjustments that needed to be made. And that's not

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 3>going to be everybody's reality. And I think there's a

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 3>lot of men who would, you know, maybe things aren't

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 3>working right now. And statistically, for a lot of women,

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 3>the division of housework it is unfair and a lot

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.239
<v Speaker 3>of hetero sexual relationships. But I think there's a lot

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 3>of men that can like get on board with having

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 3>that conversation and trying to go deep on themselves and

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 3>question their own gender role in the relationship.

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>So there was an alarming statistic in your book about

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>women who are breadwinners, and you say that the imbalance

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is not naturally curing. We have to do something at it.

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 1>But will you share what that statistic is?

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.959
<v Speaker 3>Yes? So I think this is when we met at

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 3>this event, right, Eve Rovsky has all of this work

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 3>on the imbalance and how much more women are doing.

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 3>And Eve was like, I can say that like this

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 3>is imbalance, but like there's always going to be somebody

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 3>who's going to say, well, like it makes sense because

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 3>he earns more money, so she's doing more with the kids,

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 3>or she's doing more at home. Right, And the key

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 3>thing with my research is that I show that even women,

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 3>women are the breadwinner, they still do dramatically more, dramatically more,

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 3>And so I can look at couples and their division

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 3>of earnings and I can go from you know, he

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 3>earns eighty percent of the household income, and that's when

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 3>you're going to be like, you know, the man's planner

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 3>is gonna be like, it makes sense that she's doing more.

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 3>He's earning eighty percent of the household income. He's doing

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 3>about this much housework. And then I can go, okay,

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 3>here in seventy sixty fifty forty thirty twenty percent literally

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 3>the amount of housework he does at home doesn't change.

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 3>He does the same amount of housework no matter how

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 3>much he's earning, what percent of the household income he's earning.

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 1>So in the book, you say that women who are

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the primary breadwinners do almost twice as much cooking and

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>cleaning as their male spouses. And I've seen other studies

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>about how even if men are laid off, they don't

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 1>do the dishes, they don't pick up more housework generally,

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 1>so there's a huge imbalance.

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so often if men are laid off, we see

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 3>them do more childcare. It might be easier to kind

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 3>of lean into that role of dad. But then it's

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 3>the housework. It's the routine, on glamorous work of keeping

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 3>a household, you know, cooking and cleaning that we see,

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 3>you know, women still hold.

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know.

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>You talk about women's time constraints throughout the book too,

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and you say that they're just fundamentally different than men's.

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 2>There's no amount of leaning in that can fix this.

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I do want to talk to you about lean in after,

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but tell me about some of the time constraints and

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the economic differences between being a man and being a woman.

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I charted this. This is part of the

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 3>research that I did for the book was looking at

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 3>time use across the life cycle, and I literally made

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 3>a graph that was women's minutes per day minus men's

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 3>minutes per day. Okay, so how much more time are

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 3>women spending than men on four categories housework, childcare, work,

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 3>and leisure. And this graph shows that over the life cycle,

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 3>women are spending way more time on housework and childcare,

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 3>and it peaks during this period of called the squeeze

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 3>when your kids are young and they're spending way less

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 3>time on work and leisure. So then, if you picture

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 3>a woman who's an executive, that female breadwinner, right, if

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 3>you have a man in her position, that man probably

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 3>has a stay at home wife. And if he has

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 3>somebody whose career is a second priority and she's doing

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 3>the majority of the household work. If you have a

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 3>woman who's a female executive or high powered career, her

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 3>husband's career is probably equally important or treated with equal

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 3>importance in the household, and guaranteed she is doing more

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 3>at home. And that creates a real imbalance in how

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 3>we can invest our time at work because on the margins, right,

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 3>are you going to say yes to the work trip.

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 3>Are you going to say yes to that you know,

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:06.880
<v Speaker 3>extra project that you know has a lot of nights

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 3>and weekends. Are you going to say yes to that

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 3>client dinner when you are carrying so much more of

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 3>that load at home. And that's why we see such

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 3>a huge wage gap open up between men and women

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 3>over their careers, and it opens up even for the

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:24.479
<v Speaker 3>highest performing women. So another study that I point to

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 3>that's not my study, but one of the authors on

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 3>it is Nobel Prize winner Claudia Golden, shows that by

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 3>twelve years after earning their MBAs, the female ninetieth percentile

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 3>of earnings is the same level as the men's mean.

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 3>So the ninetieth percentile of women, which is the top

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 3>ten percent of women, is earning the same as the

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 3>average man the mean for men, and that top ten

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 3>percent of women are the women who are leaning in.

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 3>And that shows you that individual ambition is not going

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 3>to solve this for us, that these are really structural constraints.

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>I love the way you say individual ambition will not

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>solve this, because there are are always people who feel

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>as if I can outwork this issue, or I'm different,

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>or you know, people just don't work hard enough, Like

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>there's all these excuses that we all make, and it

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 1>truly is a structural problem, and it's I think it's

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>hurting people more than we think when I would think

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>about equal pay. At one point, I was making sixty

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:25.879
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars less than my male co host at a

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>morning show, and I was so upset, but I knew

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it going in, and I was like, I want this job,

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 1>and you know this job is worth more than sixty

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars to me. I'll do it for a year

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll see how it goes. And it's not

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>just the sixty grand. It compounds over time, and so

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we're losing out over millions of dollars in a lifetime,

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>which is millions of dollars not just that you can

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>add to your household or to make your life easier,

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>but also to communities right like to philanthropy to it's

0:26:58.000 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>just which women actually do.

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 3>I mean you just about like Pivotal Ventures, and I'm

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 3>thinking about all these amazing female philanthropists, and it's like

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 3>money being in women's hands filters down differently than money

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 3>being in men's hands. And then yes, to that other point,

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 3>we know there's discrimination and so there's a wage gap.

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 3>And so now imagine right that your male co host

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 3>goes home and it's like, well, whose career should be

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 3>the priority? And it's his because he's earning a lot.

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 3>You go home, right, and there's this discrimination disparity between

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 3>you and your male co host, and I was like, well,

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 3>whose career should we invest in more? And it's like, well,

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 3>you're making less, so maybe you know, the extra hour

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 3>of time should really go towards you know, this hypothetical

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 3>partner's career, right, And I think that's some of the

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 3>times the conversation that's happening in households is that like,

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 3>she's already hitting a glass ceiling because of discrimination at work,

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 3>and then she comes home and she can't get that

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 3>support at home because his career is taking off because

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 3>those same forces aren't holding him back.

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 1>So Jada Pinkett Smith was on the podcast after she

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 1>wrote her book Worthy, and one of the most interesting

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 1>aspects I thought about the book, because it's really interesting

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 1>to watch it play out on a large scale, is

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that she had this career that she was pursuing and

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:10.199
<v Speaker 1>because they were married and had kids, will Smith was

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>becoming an a list actor and his career was blowing up,

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 1>and so she took a back seat, and I don't

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>think she ever got over that resentment. Like that was

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>one of my takeaways from that interview, and so similar

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to what you shared about your own life.

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 2>That resentment starts to build and build.

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I was looking up all the studies say twenty five

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>percent to fifty six percent of divorces stem from chores,

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and they it's a big gap because they can't totally point.

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:40.719
<v Speaker 2>To one thing or another.

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>But I'm wondering if domestic labor truly was shared, what

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you think would change in partnership.

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think you've got to listening to Jada's story,

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 3>you have to link that chore gap, which sounds so trivial,

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 3>to a gap in self actualization, because that's what she's

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 3>really pointing to, right, is that he got to become

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:04.959
<v Speaker 3>to become right, and she did like she was like

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 3>stopped short. She was held back in that process of

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:13.719
<v Speaker 3>self actualization, and ultimately, your marriage cannot be happy if

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 3>both people are not self actualized, right, And that's where

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 3>you get twenty years down the line and love starts

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 3>to fade no matter how much attraction you started with

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 3>because if somebody doesn't feel like this partnership supports them

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 3>and becoming the person that they want to be, then

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 3>ultimately it is really hard to sustain that love and

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 3>affection to that person who's actually kind of become the

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 3>headwind or the forest that's holding you back.

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I got chills when you said that she didn't get

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to become That is exactly it. And everybody just wants

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to become who they are meant to be.

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 2>In the world. Wow.

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>So you're a mom of two and you're still right

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>in the thick of things, you have two young kids,

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and you've mentioned the squeeze a few time, But will

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you sort of define it for everybody because it's a

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>big aspect.

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So I joke that the research question that started

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 3>the book is why am I so tired all the time?

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Because that pumping in the abstract bathroom bad embodies the squeeze.

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 3>It's where you are trying to make investments in your

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 3>home life and your career at the same time, and

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 3>so you just feel like there's not enough of you

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 3>to go around. And if you don't have generational wealth

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 3>or you didn't you know, marry a hedge funder or whatever.

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Right often you feel the financial squeeze too, because you're

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 3>not at the point in your career where you can

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 3>just say, well, like, forget it, we'll just like hire

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 3>three nannies, or we'll just like you know, have the

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 3>housekeeper do it, or I'm gonna snap my fingers and

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 3>the garden's gonna be landscaped. So I see that in

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 3>the data that basically, while time on childcare and housework

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 3>is at its peak, income is still growing. Your financial

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 3>investments in your career haven't paid off yet, and so

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 3>later on you're gonna have more time and you're gonna

0:30:57.600 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 3>have more money. But right now you're in this crunch

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 3>and knowing that I think can help women sort of

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 3>prepare if you're in the earlier side right of things,

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 3>and you're not then the squeeze yet and you want

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 3>to have kids, which if you don't, you know, there's

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 3>there might be other things that bring you to that

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 3>crunch period, and career investments can be like that anyway.

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 3>But if you want to have kids, right thinking about

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 3>what can I do now that I'm in my twenties,

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm time rich to prepare for that. And one of

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 3>the things I was just thinking because I give a

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of relationship advice in the book, and one thing

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 3>is really choosing that partner who is going to support

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 3>you in becoming who you want to be. And so

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 3>not just the partner who laughs at your jokes and

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 3>has good taste in movies right now, right, but the

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 3>partner who says, like, yes, if one of the kids

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 3>is sick, I will be the one to stay home

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 3>because I never want you to feel like you didn't

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 3>get to achieve what you wanted to achieve. Right. It's

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 3>not about like lip service to like you know, oh

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 3>of course women should have careers, right, It's about what

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.320
<v Speaker 3>are you willing to do? And I tell people there's

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 3>a list of questions in the book, but I'll give

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 3>you one of them because it will start a conversation.

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Is if I got a job offer in another city

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 3>that was going to increase my salary by half, right,

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 3>give me a fifty percent raise, but you would have

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 3>to look for new work. How would we decide whether

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 3>to move? Well, so, like, if there really is true

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 3>off because there is, and in the data, we see

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 3>that couples move for men's jobs and they don't move

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 3>for women's jobs, right, how did I end up on

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 3>that train commuting from New York to Philadelphia? Right, So

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 3>have that conversation and choose the partner who is going

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 3>to make investments in you and also make investments in yourself.

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 3>So one of the things I talk about is thinking

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 3>about your career, your job as a money machine. It's

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 3>a way to convert your time into money. And you

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 3>want to spend as much of your effort and time

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 3>as you can upgrading your money machine before you're in

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 3>the squeeze, because once you're in the squeeze, time is

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 3>that much more costly. Right, So what can you do

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 3>to upgrade your money machine and what can you do

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 3>to make financially prudent decisions? And that's where I hate

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 3>the Instagram culture of you know, chasing what the influencers have,

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 3>because I think it encourages us to put money into

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 3>places that ultimately are not going to pay off in

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 3>terms of our happiness. And for a lot of young women,

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 3>that's getting into a lot of consumer debt to kind

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 3>of chase that lifestyle, and then when they enter the squeeze,

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 3>now you don't have some of those you know, financial

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 3>resources because you're paying a credit card debt you're paying

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 3>you know Klarna and after pay, which is just consumer debt, right,

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 3>And so now things that you could have done to

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 3>make your life easier, like you know, pay for a

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 3>meal service or pay for somebody to help clean the house,

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 3>you know that money has been eaten up by these

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 3>earlier financial decisions and purchases that you make. So it's

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 3>like thinking about your life across the life cycle and

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 3>knowing what the data show is kind of being strategic

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 3>at every turn.

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm smiling as you're sharing these because I'm single and dating,

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and I personally come up against so much of what

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you talk about in the book when I'm dating. There's

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>one story that I'm going to tell you very quickly,

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I tell everyone listening. So as a kid, I felt

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 1>like my time was worth so much, Like I've been

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with time my whole life. And my dad would

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:18.800
<v Speaker 1>joke with me like, Danielle, your time is literally worth nothing,

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:20.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, And he wasn't being rude, but.

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 2>As a kid, he was like, you're not working. It's

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 2>not worth anything.

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>And as I got older, he started being like, Okay,

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>your time's starting to.

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Be worth something.

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, it's worth something now, but I always felt like

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it was worth something. So fast forward, I'm dating somebody

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:40.479
<v Speaker 1>and I have probably the most important interview I've ever had,

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm in another state, and the interview meant a

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>lot to me. There was a lot on the line.

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I had a gift for the person that I was interviewing,

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and the guy I was dating he had like beautiful taste,

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 1>great aesthetics, And I said, can you please go grab

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:58.919
<v Speaker 1>a gift box and a card for this? I need

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:01.839
<v Speaker 1>this hour to study. And he was like, I don't know,

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>like what you'll like. I don't want to get the

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 1>wrong thing. Why don't you just like come with me?

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, no, anything you pick is fine.

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not about the tape, Like I need this hour,

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and He's going back and forth with me, and I

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>got so frustrated. I just said, Okay, let's get in

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the car and I got the gift box and I

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the hour and I was mad the whole

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>day and the whole night, and I needed that hour. Anyways,

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>after the interview, he came by the hotel I was

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>at and said, do you want to like go to dinner?

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 1>And I was like not really, I'm like so angry,

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 1>and he was like, let's go to dinner and talk

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>about it. So ultimately he basically says to me, he

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:41.439
<v Speaker 1>feels that his time is worth more than mine.

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 2>And that's what it came down to. Once I asked

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 2>a million questions, Right, it didn't go there right away.

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Why wouldn't you do this for me? Yeah?

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And that's when he lost me. I just could

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 1>never get over that.

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, I love your story. I love your story because

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:59.320
<v Speaker 3>that is actually like why did my marriage end? Because

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 3>that was what my husband was telling me in all

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 3>of the choices he was making that even though I

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 3>was making more money, his time was still worth more

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 3>than mine. Right, Yes, And I think men are endowed

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 3>with this sense that their time is important. And kid,

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 3>you had it right, because as an economist, your time

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:18.359
<v Speaker 3>is worth something, whether you're making money with it or not,

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 3>because your time can be used to make what economists

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:25.839
<v Speaker 3>call utility, which is like joy, happiness, fulfillment. Right. So,

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 3>however you spend your time produces value. It's not just

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 3>spending it in the labor market. Right. And if you

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 3>don't have that career you want to have yet, then

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 3>spending that hour investing and trying to get it even

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 3>though you're not getting paid for it. Right, that's valuable too,

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:42.399
<v Speaker 3>So you are one hundred percent right that your time

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 3>always had value. And I think you've really put your

0:36:46.600 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 3>finger exactly on the thing that I think is holding

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 3>so many relationships back is that it is an unspoken

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 3>assumption that his time is always worth more, no matter what.

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's really covert in a lot of

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 1>relationships because men can talk a big game, they can

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:07.399
<v Speaker 1>say things that are very kind. Of course I don't

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>think that, but take all the words away, Yeah, what

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>are their actions saying? And I love how you say

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in the book that marriage really hasn't caught up to

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 1>modern life, Like the real issue for women is time.

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:20.839
<v Speaker 2>It's not about ambition, you know.

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess to link it back to what we talked

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>about with Emma, because I think it's like a good

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:30.319
<v Speaker 1>personification of some of these issues is she's saying that

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>like you can fix it as being an individual, but

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not. It's the system, right, Like do you think

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:39.399
<v Speaker 1>that when you run a big company the way she

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>does that, like she can change the system, or if

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 1>she just saying to all of us, like I'm not

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>saying that the game is right, this is just how

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the game is played.

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, I would be interested to hear if she is

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:53.879
<v Speaker 3>trying to fix that system for the company that she runs, right,

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 3>because there are some companies that they worked with where

0:37:57.239 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 3>you see that like, oh, a woman is in charge

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 3>and they're really trying to make this add up. You mentioned,

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 3>like Pivotal Ventures, And you know, when I went out

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 3>there for that talk, I brought my wife and my

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 3>one year old daughter with me because it was my

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 3>one year old's first birthday. And they were like, well,

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:14.280
<v Speaker 3>you obviously can't leave her behind, right. That was clearly

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 3>part of the values, right, that they were exhibiting in

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 3>their work. And you know, I think that I don't

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 3>know that those are the values that Emma is exhibiting.

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and who knows if there's a distance between

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 3>public and personal right, But in her public persona, it's

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:35.840
<v Speaker 3>women need to be trying harder, you know, And so

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 3>is that what the message is to employees? And sometimes

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, you see it where women who had to

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:45.839
<v Speaker 3>fight an unfair system to get ahead, then sometimes they

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 3>are not allies of the women who come after them

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 3>because they're just like, well, I had to make all

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 3>these sacrifices, so you should too, And it's like, well, no,

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 3>none of us should, actually.

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And then I get confused because I'm like, well, why

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:58.759
<v Speaker 1>do we expect women to change the strata for not

0:38:58.800 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>expecting it from men?

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but really I just want it from everyone. I

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 2>want the system to change.

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 3>That's right, that's right. And if you are in the

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 3>position of somewhat of power and privilege and you have

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:11.839
<v Speaker 3>a microphone, which she does, right, she has an enormous microphone,

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 3>then you can use that to change because there are

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 3>other people who are less powerful than you. So yes,

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 3>even though you as a woman, you know, there's ways

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 3>in which men are still having power over you. And

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 3>as a woman of color, right, there's ways in which

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, she is marginalized. There's still Right now, you

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:30.839
<v Speaker 3>have a microphone and you can use that to try

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:44.439
<v Speaker 3>to break down that system.

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So when you say in the book to optimize for

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:51.720
<v Speaker 1>joy and for meaning, how do we do that while

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 1>realistically optimizing for achievement and finance as well? Because you

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>are still a very ambitious person, how have you personally

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:01.439
<v Speaker 1>thought about it all?

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think the key is and this is where

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 3>I'll get into this more kind of technical definition of

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 3>like how do you measure when I said, like my

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 3>values versus Emmagred's values, like how do you measure that?

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 3>So kind of must have this idea of your utility function,

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 3>which is everything that brings you jolly's. It's everything that

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 3>the end of your life you would give points to.

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 3>You would say, yes, that was a life well lived.

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 3>You would look back on and say, I'm glad that

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 3>I made that decision.

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 2>And does everybody have different utility function?

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 3>Everybody has a different utility function. And so the key

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 3>lesson if people take one thing for my work and

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 3>for my book, is to not think of achievement or

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 3>financial success as ends in themselves, to instead think of

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 3>those things as vehicles to increase your utility. Whatever you

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 3>get utility from. So let's take an example where you

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:54.839
<v Speaker 3>could be super super successful, right, but you would only

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 3>get three hours a day with your kids, with doing

0:40:57.440 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 3>what you love, with doing hobbies, of reading a book,

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 3>whatever it is, right, But you would be like amazingly

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:05.680
<v Speaker 3>financially successful. I would be like for what, right, Like

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 3>what is all that money good for? If I can't

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:11.800
<v Speaker 3>afford my own time spent? The way that I choose

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 3>to spend it, right, So I reframe, And I think

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 3>it's different for women because we have been trained to

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 3>think to be ambitious and to say like, oh, don't

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 3>hold yourself back and dream big and all of that.

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 3>And yes, sure, but I think always ask for what.

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 3>I reframe a career as, like I said, a vehicle

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 3>to turn your time into money ultimately to buy happiness, right,

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 3>And if it's not buying me happiness, then it's not working.

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 3>So how is whatever my financial goal is, whatever my

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:44.799
<v Speaker 3>career goal is, how is it supporting what I ultimately want?

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 3>So for you interviewing for this job that you were

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 3>interviewing for example, right, if you get that, it becomes well, oh,

0:41:51.160 --> 0:41:53.399
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to have a better conversion of my time

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 3>into money because I could put the same amount of

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 3>time in get more money back, and then I would

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:00.759
<v Speaker 3>be able to, you know, instead of having this, I'd

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 3>be able to like pursue this other thing I'm interested in,

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:05.239
<v Speaker 3>or you know, work on starting the family that I

0:42:05.280 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 3>want to start. Right, So it's like, how does that success?

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:12.279
<v Speaker 3>How does meeting that milestone? How does it actually help

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:14.840
<v Speaker 3>me craft the life that I want to craft? And

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 3>it's staying laser focused on that instead of just on

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 3>success for success sake.

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you make this sharp point about how women used

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to be the release valve, basically like putting the husband

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 1>through school while working as secretaries, and you mentioned that

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 1>your own grandmother did exactly that. And now women are

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:40.240
<v Speaker 1>making these big early career investments in themselves. Nobody's releasing

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the valve for them. That's part of the squeeze, right.

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 1>And so if marriage is a deal where the data

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:49.799
<v Speaker 1>says I'll carry the worst end and kids are the

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that triggers that squeeze, then like a clear eyed

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 1>woman who actually runs the numbers like you did might rationally.

0:42:58.680 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Choose me neither.

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:02.759
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's sort of what we're seeing right

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 1>now in the data. Right there's a lot of women

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in their thirties and forties who are not married, not dating,

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and actually not even looking to That's like what I'm

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 1>seeing all over my TikTok.

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And I think we have to be careful to

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 3>like say, what is like a true what is a

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 3>true trend versus there's like a of course social media

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 3>phenomenon or whatever.

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But I do think TikTok is not your economic studies.

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but I think that we are seeing like more

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:31.840
<v Speaker 3>delayed marriage and partnership. We're also seeing a decline in

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:34.839
<v Speaker 3>teen births, which is part of what's driving the fertility decline.

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:37.719
<v Speaker 3>But I think ultimately there are some women who are

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:40.319
<v Speaker 3>saying this deal isn't adding up for me, and I

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 3>think it's more likely to be women. So if you

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 3>are a super ambitious woman, but you're still going to

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 3>actually marry somebody who's like more financially successful than you,

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 3>that could still add up because like, for example, he

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:56.400
<v Speaker 3>could become like somebody who finances whatever your dream is

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 3>that could support your career right.

0:43:58.239 --> 0:44:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Right, or hire the help that's necessary, rights allowed.

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's the Emma Gred lifestyle right a

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:06.880
<v Speaker 3>little bit. So I think the onom who are funny

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 3>it's not adding up is the women who are really

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 3>financially successful themselves, and then they're meeting men who like

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 3>aren't like stratospherically successful, right, They're just kind of doing okay,

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:18.319
<v Speaker 3>but they expect that to be enough because all their

0:44:18.360 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 3>lives I've been told all you have to bring to

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 3>the table is a paycheck, and these men are just

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 3>doing the bare minimum. They will not go get in

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 3>god damn gift box, right they've asked them to get

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:29.319
<v Speaker 3>because they've always been told like, you're just all you

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 3>have to do is provide for the family, that's it.

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 3>And these women are saying, I don't need a paycheck

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 3>from you. I have my own paycheck. I need a

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:41.360
<v Speaker 3>real full partner, right, And so I think they're saying, like, look,

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 3>this isn't enough, this deal is not working for me anymore.

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 3>And so my work is not about discouraging people from

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:49.839
<v Speaker 3>getting married or having a family. I mean, I personally,

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:52.440
<v Speaker 3>I love being a parent and that's such an important

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 3>part of my utility function. Yeah, and I can't imagine

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 3>life without having the kids that I have, including you know,

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:01.360
<v Speaker 3>marrying the wrong person first, but having an amazing child

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 3>who I couldn't regret a single moment of that. But

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 3>I do think if men are lonely, which like we

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 3>keep hearing about how they are, right, the way to

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:16.439
<v Speaker 3>overcome that is for men to figure out, like how

0:45:16.480 --> 0:45:18.759
<v Speaker 3>do I give women what they need? Right? How do

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:21.319
<v Speaker 3>I show up as more of a full partner. And

0:45:21.400 --> 0:45:24.360
<v Speaker 3>so I think the work is not incumbent upon women

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:27.719
<v Speaker 3>to solve the fertility crisis. It's incumbent upon men to

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:31.080
<v Speaker 3>figure out, like where are they falling short?

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 2>WHOA I've not heard that.

0:45:34.520 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I call it an argument or

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a thought or perspective, but I've not heard that.

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm very aligned with it.

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 1>How can they become full partners the way women have

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 1>had to become full people in every sense of the.

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Word, every domain.

0:45:50.239 --> 0:45:52.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's been required of us, and we always sort

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of step up to the plate.

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:45:55.160 --> 0:45:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I was curious about your thoughts on marriage because like

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it could be sort of taken that a ambitious woman

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:06.279
<v Speaker 1>should go find a traditional nineteen fifties housewife, i e.

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:08.360
<v Speaker 2>A man who's willing to do all that labor.

0:46:08.560 --> 0:46:11.520
<v Speaker 1>But you're saying that's actually not the answer either, Like

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 1>we are looking for full partners, and how can we

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:15.760
<v Speaker 1>raise boys to become full partners?

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think like if you are, like if

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 3>you're an ambitious woman and you find a guy who

0:46:20.719 --> 0:46:25.120
<v Speaker 3>is ambitious about being a father and ambitious about taking

0:46:25.160 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 3>care of the household, like that could be an amazing match.

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:30.719
<v Speaker 3>And there I think there is sometimes you know, I

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:33.240
<v Speaker 3>talk about the evolutionary impulses in the book that sometimes

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 3>lead us astray. Yeah, And I think one of those

0:46:35.760 --> 0:46:38.399
<v Speaker 3>is that, like our genes are trained to like look

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:41.240
<v Speaker 3>for the provider, the hunter who's gonna slay the wooly

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:45.320
<v Speaker 3>mammoth for us or whatever, and that might be maladaptive

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:47.800
<v Speaker 3>in this world where like what we need is somebody

0:46:47.840 --> 0:46:51.360
<v Speaker 3>who's going to like want to put together, ikea furniture.

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 3>I never like, you know, want to like, you know,

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:58.120
<v Speaker 3>pack a toddler lunchbox. So I think that women should

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:01.399
<v Speaker 3>be more expansive in like what traits they're looking for.

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:04.840
<v Speaker 3>And remember that, like you're not just shopping for sexy,

0:47:04.960 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 3>because sexy is gonna wear off when you're cleaning his

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 3>toothpaste off the bathroom sink. Like he's not going to

0:47:10.160 --> 0:47:13.080
<v Speaker 3>be sexy in the same way anymore. And what's going

0:47:13.160 --> 0:47:16.200
<v Speaker 3>to be sexy is somebody lightening your load so that

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:18.880
<v Speaker 3>you can be a full person.

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Right, so that you can become Yes, yeah, this is

0:47:23.960 --> 0:47:25.719
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit of a departure. But I was

0:47:25.800 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 1>so fascinated by this one study that you ran that

0:47:28.719 --> 0:47:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask you about dating apps. So you

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:33.800
<v Speaker 1>every year that a woman ages from thirty to forty,

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you found that she has to earn seven thousand dollars

0:47:36.120 --> 0:47:39.759
<v Speaker 1>more to be rated equally desirable on dating apps? Can

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you explain what's what's beneath that study.

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 3>So I have a more positive take on it, which

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:47.239
<v Speaker 3>is what's underneath this study is something that I call

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 3>reproductive capital, and I wanted to show that reproductive capital

0:47:51.640 --> 0:47:54.239
<v Speaker 3>was valuable and it's something that women have and men

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:56.239
<v Speaker 3>don't have. What do I mean by that? Because you

0:47:56.320 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 3>might be like, well, it takes a man and no

0:47:57.600 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 3>woman to make a baby. Think about your single girlfriends

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 3>and think about how real of a possibility it is

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:04.200
<v Speaker 3>for them that if they don't find the male partner

0:48:04.239 --> 0:48:06.640
<v Speaker 3>they're looking for, they could have a baby on their own. Right.

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:09.120
<v Speaker 3>And after I got divorced and I was dating women

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 3>but hadn't found like a life partner, I was very

0:48:10.960 --> 0:48:12.880
<v Speaker 3>much thinking about just having the second baby that I

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:16.319
<v Speaker 3>wanted on my own. Your male friends do not have

0:48:16.400 --> 0:48:18.880
<v Speaker 3>that same option because to have a baby on their

0:48:18.920 --> 0:48:22.400
<v Speaker 3>own would require several hundred thousand dollars because you have

0:48:22.440 --> 0:48:26.240
<v Speaker 3>to replace this incredibly valuable commodity, reproductive capital. It's somebody

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 3>who's going to, you know, spend their eggs, right, so

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:32.040
<v Speaker 3>you have to pay for egg donation, which is a

0:48:32.200 --> 0:48:35.360
<v Speaker 3>you know, very like long process. It's not like sperm donation.

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Sperm donation takes twenty minutes, right, it's a bunch, you know,

0:48:39.000 --> 0:48:41.399
<v Speaker 3>longer process. It's like a surgery. You have to find

0:48:41.400 --> 0:48:43.719
<v Speaker 3>someone who would be a surrogate to carry that child

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 3>for nine months.

0:48:44.640 --> 0:48:44.799
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:48.120
<v Speaker 3>So women contribute so much more reproductively, and so this

0:48:48.280 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 3>was part of my dissertation that I wanted to prove

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 3>this hypothesis I had that reproductive capital was valuable. And

0:48:54.160 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 3>so of course if we're going to convince people that

0:48:56.520 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 3>something's valuable, I have to convince people that men value it.

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 3>So I ran in this study Maris, well, you know,

0:49:02.560 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 3>reproductive capital is declining between thirty and forty because it's

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 3>becoming harder to have kids. So I randomized ages on

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 3>dating profiles and showed that when randomly, you know, it's

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:14.479
<v Speaker 3>the same picture, the same profile, but when her age

0:49:14.520 --> 0:49:18.239
<v Speaker 3>is higher, that she's getting rated lower. And I put

0:49:18.280 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 3>that in monetary terms, you know, in terms of how

0:49:20.680 --> 0:49:22.480
<v Speaker 3>much money more she would have to earn. Because, by

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:25.399
<v Speaker 3>the way, also men do value women's income. I think

0:49:25.400 --> 0:49:26.919
<v Speaker 3>it's a little bit of a myth that men don't

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 3>want women to earn money. They do want women to

0:49:28.560 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 3>earn money, they just also want them to do everything

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 3>around the house. So that allowed me to then say, like,

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 3>reproductive capital is valuable, and I could link it specifically

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 3>to fertility, because if the man already had kids from

0:49:39.680 --> 0:49:43.760
<v Speaker 3>a previous relationship, he didn't show this gradient with age,

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:46.680
<v Speaker 3>he didn't respond to the randomly at the men who

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:48.000
<v Speaker 3>were kind of looking to have kids.

0:49:48.239 --> 0:49:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Hold on, I want to make sure that I'm understanding this.

0:49:50.600 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 1>So men who already have kids had no bias against

0:49:55.440 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 1>women and their age.

0:49:56.640 --> 0:49:58.560
<v Speaker 2>It was just about reproduction for them.

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And because remember the photo was being held constant.

0:50:01.120 --> 0:50:03.120
<v Speaker 3>You may say there's other things that normally change with age,

0:50:03.120 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 3>but here I'm holding everything constant, right and interesting, there

0:50:06.120 --> 0:50:08.760
<v Speaker 3>wasn't wasn't a relationship if you weren't interested in having kids.

0:50:08.800 --> 0:50:10.799
<v Speaker 3>But the reason, I'll what the positive spend Because there's

0:50:10.840 --> 0:50:12.960
<v Speaker 3>the maddening piece of end I'm like, how women are devalued?

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:14.799
<v Speaker 3>Does the age and how something I'm forty one, right,

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:17.560
<v Speaker 3>I am feeling all of these things. But the positive

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:20.440
<v Speaker 3>spin on it is that you are endowed. Women are

0:50:20.520 --> 0:50:24.880
<v Speaker 3>endowed with this incredibly valuable reproductive capital. And this is

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:28.799
<v Speaker 3>why queen's historically, even though they didn't work, they didn't

0:50:28.800 --> 0:50:31.240
<v Speaker 3>do anything around the house, but they still were treated

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:34.680
<v Speaker 3>like royalty, just like kings, because they were contributing their

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:39.439
<v Speaker 3>reproductive capital. And so you have this, and if you're

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:41.960
<v Speaker 3>going to make a deal with somebody to share your

0:50:41.960 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 3>reproductive capital with him, the terms of that deal better

0:50:45.719 --> 0:50:47.279
<v Speaker 3>be very favorable to you.

0:50:47.719 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So speaking of deal, this is the one part

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:53.719
<v Speaker 1>of our conversation where I want to sort of give

0:50:53.719 --> 0:50:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you a to be sure argument because as I was reading,

0:50:57.440 --> 0:50:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking to myself, Wow, maybe I'm complicit in

0:50:59.719 --> 0:51:03.440
<v Speaker 1>my own oppression. So I'm going to push back, and

0:51:03.480 --> 0:51:07.160
<v Speaker 1>please push back on me. So you say in the

0:51:07.160 --> 0:51:09.640
<v Speaker 1>book for all of us to ask ourselves when we're

0:51:09.719 --> 0:51:11.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at our lives and our marriages, to look at

0:51:11.920 --> 0:51:15.280
<v Speaker 1>them as a deal, a contract, And you write, ask yourself,

0:51:15.320 --> 0:51:16.640
<v Speaker 1>am I getting a good return?

0:51:17.040 --> 0:51:21.680
<v Speaker 2>A job, a relationship? Kids? Am I getting a good deal? Now?

0:51:22.360 --> 0:51:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that a lot of.

0:51:23.640 --> 0:51:27.160
<v Speaker 1>People who read that or listen to this conversation are

0:51:27.239 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 1>going to say, well, you know, love is not really

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the error term, like love is the whole point? What

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:37.960
<v Speaker 1>if I'm optimizing for love like, what if you CARINLO

0:51:38.400 --> 0:51:41.640
<v Speaker 1>have the equation upside down? What if that's the variable

0:51:41.680 --> 0:51:43.719
<v Speaker 1>that actually matters. What do you say to that?

0:51:44.320 --> 0:51:46.759
<v Speaker 3>Well, yes, I'm not as cynical as I sound. I

0:51:46.800 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 3>absolutely think that love matters. And I like describe my

0:51:50.239 --> 0:51:53.360
<v Speaker 3>experience of with wearing this analytical hat and trying to

0:51:53.400 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 3>like date post divorce and being like, this time, I'm

0:51:55.600 --> 0:51:57.040
<v Speaker 3>going to do it right. This time, I'm going to

0:51:57.120 --> 0:51:59.200
<v Speaker 3>have my checklist and I'm going to make sure that

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 3>this person. And then I like met somebody who's amazing,

0:52:03.080 --> 0:52:05.799
<v Speaker 3>was a good friend now who like hit every point

0:52:05.800 --> 0:52:08.200
<v Speaker 3>in the track list, and like I was not attracted

0:52:08.280 --> 0:52:11.120
<v Speaker 3>to them, right, And it's like, oh darn it, Like

0:52:11.239 --> 0:52:13.359
<v Speaker 3>you know, that's actually not how this works, right. So

0:52:13.800 --> 0:52:16.719
<v Speaker 3>what I say is like, attraction and love is a

0:52:16.880 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 3>necessary condition. You need it to even start the conversation.

0:52:21.719 --> 0:52:25.120
<v Speaker 3>Can we have a relationship, But it's not a sufficient condition.

0:52:25.360 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 3>It's not the be all and end all, right, And

0:52:29.200 --> 0:52:31.640
<v Speaker 3>I think the mistake that we get is by believing

0:52:31.640 --> 0:52:35.200
<v Speaker 3>these cultural scripts that love should be enough. And I'm

0:52:35.239 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 3>sure when Jada met Will Smith that she loved him right,

0:52:39.560 --> 0:52:42.080
<v Speaker 3>and later on in that marriage, as you said, there

0:52:42.120 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 3>was something else there. There was resentment. Right when I

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:47.319
<v Speaker 3>met my ex husband, I did love him, and I

0:52:47.520 --> 0:52:50.400
<v Speaker 3>followed like my heart. I followed love right, and we

0:52:50.440 --> 0:52:53.440
<v Speaker 3>loved each other so much, and we loved each other,

0:52:53.480 --> 0:52:56.600
<v Speaker 3>and I loved him so much until the point where

0:52:56.600 --> 0:52:59.239
<v Speaker 3>I was getting none of my needs met in the relationship,

0:52:59.360 --> 0:53:02.960
<v Speaker 3>and then that little by little eight away at that

0:53:03.080 --> 0:53:07.279
<v Speaker 3>love until there was nothing left. So I think if

0:53:07.320 --> 0:53:10.000
<v Speaker 3>you want to sustain the love that you start out with, right,

0:53:10.040 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 3>and you go into every relationship with love, of course

0:53:12.719 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 3>you should go in with love. But if you want

0:53:14.080 --> 0:53:17.200
<v Speaker 3>to sustain it, you need more there. Right. It has

0:53:17.320 --> 0:53:19.239
<v Speaker 3>to be that both people's needs are getting met. It

0:53:19.320 --> 0:53:22.200
<v Speaker 3>has to be that both people are getting a good deal,

0:53:22.360 --> 0:53:25.120
<v Speaker 3>that both people are getting that chance to self actualize.

0:53:25.120 --> 0:53:26.600
<v Speaker 3>And I think when you put it in those terms

0:53:26.760 --> 0:53:29.239
<v Speaker 3>of its being about self actualization, it's not just about

0:53:29.239 --> 0:53:33.480
<v Speaker 3>the financial contract, right, And it's about becoming your true self.

0:53:33.600 --> 0:53:36.760
<v Speaker 3>Of course, a relationship should support that. And if somebody

0:53:37.160 --> 0:53:39.160
<v Speaker 3>loves you and you love them and you have a

0:53:39.200 --> 0:53:41.600
<v Speaker 3>great sex life, but they won't get you the gift

0:53:41.640 --> 0:53:44.439
<v Speaker 3>box so that you can spend an hour studying, right,

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:47.000
<v Speaker 3>it's going to turn off your attraction to them, and that's.

0:53:47.200 --> 0:53:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was gone then right, Oh my god, I

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:52.160
<v Speaker 1>did not want to have sex with him? Yes, yes,

0:53:52.239 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent, and it turns off like a light switch.

0:53:55.680 --> 0:53:56.320
<v Speaker 2>It's crazy.

0:53:56.920 --> 0:54:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes. And so that, like love and attraction, is thanked

0:54:00.400 --> 0:54:02.680
<v Speaker 3>to actually getting our needs, Matt. And so I want

0:54:02.719 --> 0:54:05.279
<v Speaker 3>you to shop for the partner who, yes, you feel

0:54:05.320 --> 0:54:08.680
<v Speaker 3>that insane chemistry with, but you also are able to

0:54:08.680 --> 0:54:12.319
<v Speaker 3>sustain that chemistry because that partner is your biggest fan

0:54:12.440 --> 0:54:15.400
<v Speaker 3>and your biggest cheerleader and wanted you to ace that

0:54:15.480 --> 0:54:17.480
<v Speaker 3>interview more than you even wanted it.

0:54:18.120 --> 0:54:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh, thank you for putting it into those terms. I

0:54:20.160 --> 0:54:22.239
<v Speaker 1>think that's really a beautiful way of looking at it.

0:54:22.320 --> 0:54:25.279
<v Speaker 1>And also your idea of thinking about what our own

0:54:25.400 --> 0:54:29.920
<v Speaker 1>values are is so helpful, because if somebody's value is

0:54:29.960 --> 0:54:32.840
<v Speaker 1>like I want to be a stay at home parent

0:54:33.040 --> 0:54:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and I want to be the person like holding down

0:54:35.400 --> 0:54:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the fort, then you're not saying don't do that. If

0:54:37.960 --> 0:54:40.719
<v Speaker 1>that's how you are self actualizing, amazing. But if you

0:54:40.760 --> 0:54:44.279
<v Speaker 1>are going into this relationship wanting other things, you need

0:54:44.280 --> 0:54:46.799
<v Speaker 1>a partner that's going to help facilitate that.

0:54:47.239 --> 0:54:49.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so poor you where you are, and that's why

0:54:49.440 --> 0:54:51.759
<v Speaker 3>this idea of like finding your own utility function. And

0:54:51.800 --> 0:54:54.400
<v Speaker 3>when you find your own utility function, it's actually going

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:57.080
<v Speaker 3>to cure that jealousy that we started with this idea

0:54:57.120 --> 0:55:00.160
<v Speaker 3>of wanting somebody else's life, because you're going to look

0:55:00.160 --> 0:55:02.239
<v Speaker 3>at somebody else's life and you're going to say, I

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:05.400
<v Speaker 3>could have more of that, but that's not my utility function.

0:55:05.520 --> 0:55:07.120
<v Speaker 3>I would have to give up this other thing that

0:55:07.160 --> 0:55:10.239
<v Speaker 3>I want right I could be more successful, I could

0:55:10.320 --> 0:55:13.279
<v Speaker 3>be thinner, I could be richer, but I would have

0:55:13.360 --> 0:55:16.080
<v Speaker 3>to focus on that to the exclusion of other things

0:55:16.080 --> 0:55:18.560
<v Speaker 3>that I value. And I'm who I am. So when

0:55:18.600 --> 0:55:21.319
<v Speaker 3>you really tap into your utility function, you will not

0:55:21.520 --> 0:55:25.719
<v Speaker 3>feel that constant need to want to be someone else.

0:55:38.760 --> 0:55:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I know you shared such a great question earlier about

0:55:41.680 --> 0:55:45.720
<v Speaker 1>like would my partner move if there's somebody listening right now.

0:55:45.800 --> 0:55:47.839
<v Speaker 1>We have listeners who are single, who are married, who

0:55:47.880 --> 0:55:49.920
<v Speaker 1>are career oriented, who are stay at home parents.

0:55:49.960 --> 0:55:50.880
<v Speaker 2>It runs the gamut.

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Is there a question that you think every woman should

0:55:54.200 --> 0:55:55.680
<v Speaker 1>be asking herself right now?

0:55:56.320 --> 0:55:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Hm? I love that question. I think the how am

0:55:59.680 --> 0:56:04.480
<v Speaker 3>I in investing my time? Question of recognizing that your

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:07.440
<v Speaker 3>time is extremely valuable. Your time is your scarcest asset,

0:56:07.640 --> 0:56:11.120
<v Speaker 3>and so how much are you investing and giving away

0:56:11.600 --> 0:56:15.239
<v Speaker 3>for other people for what serves their utility function? Your

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:18.280
<v Speaker 3>boss wants to make more money. You know, your kids,

0:56:18.320 --> 0:56:19.719
<v Speaker 3>if you have kids, are always going to want more

0:56:19.760 --> 0:56:21.640
<v Speaker 3>of you. Your partner is going to want this, and

0:56:21.760 --> 0:56:23.920
<v Speaker 3>that your friends are going to want this, Your community

0:56:23.960 --> 0:56:25.840
<v Speaker 3>is going to have these needs. How much are you

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:29.560
<v Speaker 3>investing your time in everything that everybody else needs versus

0:56:29.600 --> 0:56:32.640
<v Speaker 3>in what you hold most dear? And when I talked

0:56:32.640 --> 0:56:36.160
<v Speaker 3>about your time being intrinsically valuable, that's a reframe I

0:56:36.200 --> 0:56:39.640
<v Speaker 3>want everybody to make that. It's like if you say, like, Okay,

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:41.120
<v Speaker 3>I know what my utility function is, but how do

0:56:41.120 --> 0:56:43.759
<v Speaker 3>I get more of it? Right? Everybody can get more

0:56:43.840 --> 0:56:46.399
<v Speaker 3>utility right now. And there's one thing that you can do.

0:56:46.800 --> 0:56:49.719
<v Speaker 3>Write down the two or three things that bring you

0:56:49.760 --> 0:56:51.719
<v Speaker 3>the most joy, that you feel the most at peace

0:56:51.760 --> 0:56:54.080
<v Speaker 3>when you do that, you feel the most like yourself

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:57.200
<v Speaker 3>when you do, and then do those things do the more,

0:56:57.360 --> 0:57:00.000
<v Speaker 3>put them on your calendar, carve them out, block them out,

0:57:00.840 --> 0:57:04.560
<v Speaker 3>and recognize that that is a valuable use of your time.

0:57:04.680 --> 0:57:08.359
<v Speaker 3>That's not laziness, that's not like, oh I didn't feel

0:57:08.360 --> 0:57:12.840
<v Speaker 3>like being productive. That's you being extremely productive making utility

0:57:12.920 --> 0:57:15.160
<v Speaker 3>with your time, which ultimately is what we're here on

0:57:15.200 --> 0:57:15.600
<v Speaker 3>earth to do.

0:57:16.600 --> 0:57:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I tell me if you think this is true, I

0:57:18.320 --> 0:57:21.280
<v Speaker 1>think what partners are like. What coincides with that is

0:57:21.680 --> 0:57:24.080
<v Speaker 1>being willing to let other things fall by the wayside.

0:57:24.120 --> 0:57:26.480
<v Speaker 1>So like I want more time to work out, I

0:57:26.520 --> 0:57:28.920
<v Speaker 1>may not have like the perfect host gift for everywhere

0:57:28.960 --> 0:57:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I go, or the like I may not get birthday

0:57:31.440 --> 0:57:32.400
<v Speaker 1>gifts from my friends.

0:57:32.400 --> 0:57:35.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, Like what am I willing to sort of release.

0:57:35.120 --> 0:57:38.000
<v Speaker 3>When I say block it out on your calendar? It's

0:57:38.080 --> 0:57:42.400
<v Speaker 3>to acknowledge this idea that whatever will fill the available space.

0:57:42.560 --> 0:57:44.880
<v Speaker 3>And what we do as women is we often let

0:57:44.920 --> 0:57:47.840
<v Speaker 3>ourselves claim the scraps, right, So it's the crumbs in

0:57:47.880 --> 0:57:50.200
<v Speaker 3>the bottom of the cookie bag instead of that first

0:57:50.240 --> 0:57:53.280
<v Speaker 3>big bite of a cookie, you know, in a crusty edge, right,

0:57:53.520 --> 0:57:55.240
<v Speaker 3>we get the crumbs that are left over. And so

0:57:55.320 --> 0:57:58.120
<v Speaker 3>what I'm saying is give yourself that first big bite

0:57:58.160 --> 0:58:00.360
<v Speaker 3>for the thing that you value the most, and let

0:58:00.360 --> 0:58:03.080
<v Speaker 3>everything else claim the crumbs, and it will all get done.

0:58:03.160 --> 0:58:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Like the things that are truly important, the things that

0:58:05.040 --> 0:58:07.360
<v Speaker 3>are must us and muskets done this week they will

0:58:07.400 --> 0:58:09.920
<v Speaker 3>get done, and some other things like that email might

0:58:09.960 --> 0:58:12.920
<v Speaker 3>go unanswered, or that you know, perfect hostess gift might

0:58:12.960 --> 0:58:15.080
<v Speaker 3>not get bought, and it might be a bottle of

0:58:15.080 --> 0:58:17.880
<v Speaker 3>wine you know, quickly on the way and SE's regifted.

0:58:18.040 --> 0:58:20.560
<v Speaker 2>I might even gift champagne over and over again.

0:58:20.880 --> 0:58:23.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it just is cycling between other people's houses, right,

0:58:24.240 --> 0:58:27.120
<v Speaker 3>and that is okay. Give me and my friends we

0:58:27.200 --> 0:58:29.320
<v Speaker 3>joke that like no one has bought a new gift bag,

0:58:29.520 --> 0:58:31.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, in like years, it's just like the same

0:58:31.960 --> 0:58:35.640
<v Speaker 3>gift bag totally. And that is going to be okay.

0:58:35.720 --> 0:58:39.520
<v Speaker 3>That's going to be enough because you invested your time

0:58:39.560 --> 0:58:40.760
<v Speaker 3>in what was most valuable.

0:58:41.000 --> 0:58:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes, wow, so well said.

0:58:42.560 --> 0:58:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm gonna ask you some rapid fire questions because

0:58:45.560 --> 0:58:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be a drain on your time.

0:58:47.360 --> 0:58:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Current.

0:58:48.600 --> 0:58:51.840
<v Speaker 1>What's the most overrated piece of advice ever given to

0:58:51.960 --> 0:58:52.520
<v Speaker 1>working women?

0:58:53.560 --> 0:58:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh my gosh, so many of them. But this idea

0:58:56.040 --> 0:58:58.080
<v Speaker 3>that you have to act like a man to get ahead,

0:58:58.120 --> 0:59:00.560
<v Speaker 3>so you've got to like negotiate harder, be more aggressive.

0:59:00.600 --> 0:59:02.640
<v Speaker 3>There's no evidence to back that up. I have studies

0:59:02.640 --> 0:59:04.640
<v Speaker 3>showing that women are better negotiators than men.

0:59:05.000 --> 0:59:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, love that Okay, one thing you tell

0:59:07.760 --> 0:59:10.600
<v Speaker 1>single you that married you had to learn the hard way.

0:59:11.160 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 3>That the extent of gender roles acting on you and

0:59:15.880 --> 0:59:18.720
<v Speaker 3>your spouse is going to surprise you. And there are

0:59:18.800 --> 0:59:22.640
<v Speaker 3>so many defaults in marriage in parenthood that you have

0:59:22.680 --> 0:59:25.680
<v Speaker 3>to swim upstream against, and so you need to prepare

0:59:25.720 --> 0:59:29.800
<v Speaker 3>for that now by choosing a partner and by negotiating

0:59:29.840 --> 0:59:32.920
<v Speaker 3>the terms of the deal with that partner before those

0:59:32.960 --> 0:59:35.240
<v Speaker 3>defaults kind of sweep you away in their tide.

0:59:35.920 --> 0:59:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Finish this sentence, having it all actually means.

0:59:39.760 --> 0:59:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Having it almost, which is the version that works for you.

0:59:44.680 --> 0:59:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Whatever you know you value most, having that and letting

0:59:49.480 --> 0:59:52.240
<v Speaker 3>the rest be messy and imperfect, because that's life, and

0:59:52.280 --> 0:59:54.960
<v Speaker 3>this isn't Instagram. This is real life. And only in

0:59:55.000 --> 0:59:57.840
<v Speaker 3>real life. Can you actually taste that peach? Can you

0:59:57.880 --> 1:00:01.600
<v Speaker 3>actually hug that child? Can you act actually smell that meadow?

1:00:02.040 --> 1:00:05.760
<v Speaker 3>And let's not miss that the wonderful experience of living

1:00:05.760 --> 1:00:09.400
<v Speaker 3>our full, messy, complicated lives chasing an aesthetic that was

1:00:09.440 --> 1:00:10.560
<v Speaker 3>never real to begin with.

1:00:11.360 --> 1:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the things I learned about Girl

1:00:13.880 --> 1:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Boss is that a big part of it was aesthetic.

1:00:16.400 --> 1:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's sort of coming up again in a new way.

1:00:20.120 --> 1:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Not to blame, I'm agreed. I think she's a symptom

1:00:22.240 --> 1:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of it.

1:00:22.600 --> 1:00:24.760
<v Speaker 3>But yes, I totally agree.

1:00:24.840 --> 1:00:27.240
<v Speaker 2>There's this new aesthetic. It's very big, and.

1:00:27.120 --> 1:00:29.280
<v Speaker 3>It's polarized because right now it's like we're torn between

1:00:29.320 --> 1:00:32.040
<v Speaker 3>these two impossible realities of like Emma Greed on one

1:00:32.080 --> 1:00:34.480
<v Speaker 3>hand and then like Ballerina farm on the other, and

1:00:34.520 --> 1:00:36.720
<v Speaker 3>we're like twisting ourselves into a pretzel trying to be

1:00:36.800 --> 1:00:40.160
<v Speaker 3>both and it's just like, no, like just delete Instagram

1:00:40.200 --> 1:00:41.960
<v Speaker 3>off your phone for a couple of weeks and start over.

1:00:43.320 --> 1:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned just a minute ago about putting certain

1:00:46.680 --> 1:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>things on your calendar.

1:00:48.080 --> 1:00:50.080
<v Speaker 2>What's something what's a swap that you made?

1:00:50.640 --> 1:00:53.920
<v Speaker 3>So it's more of just the commitment because I don't like,

1:00:53.960 --> 1:00:56.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't feel like the tradeoffs are not that real,

1:00:56.520 --> 1:00:58.960
<v Speaker 3>because the trade off is really like you have less

1:00:59.000 --> 1:01:01.960
<v Speaker 3>time for email, the house is a little bit less clean,

1:01:02.720 --> 1:01:04.800
<v Speaker 3>like or you maybe you have less time to scroll

1:01:04.840 --> 1:01:06.240
<v Speaker 3>your phone at the end of the day because you

1:01:06.240 --> 1:01:07.959
<v Speaker 3>put some of your valued first. But it's like being

1:01:08.040 --> 1:01:10.320
<v Speaker 3>committed to like even when it feels hard and you're like,

1:01:10.360 --> 1:01:12.080
<v Speaker 3>how am I going to make time for yoga or

1:01:12.280 --> 1:01:14.440
<v Speaker 3>right now for me and my wife, like trying to

1:01:14.440 --> 1:01:16.200
<v Speaker 3>figure out how to get time with each other with

1:01:16.240 --> 1:01:18.920
<v Speaker 3>like two very busy careers and two kids. So it's like,

1:01:19.120 --> 1:01:22.040
<v Speaker 3>really that commitment, that practice of being like this is

1:01:22.080 --> 1:01:24.320
<v Speaker 3>not negotiable. This time has to be preserved.

1:01:24.640 --> 1:01:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what's something that every woman should try? Once?

1:01:29.040 --> 1:01:30.600
<v Speaker 3>I said, going on a date with a woman. Just

1:01:30.640 --> 1:01:30.960
<v Speaker 3>try it.

1:01:32.240 --> 1:01:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Just class out, because you know.

1:01:34.280 --> 1:01:36.760
<v Speaker 3>There's just who knows who you're attracted to. And again,

1:01:36.800 --> 1:01:39.600
<v Speaker 3>there's so many defaults, right, So it's not that I'm encouraging,

1:01:39.640 --> 1:01:42.320
<v Speaker 3>and I'm not saying that secretly everybody is, you know, gay,

1:01:42.440 --> 1:01:44.040
<v Speaker 3>or everybody could be a lesbian. I don't think that

1:01:44.080 --> 1:01:47.200
<v Speaker 3>everybody's necessarily flexible, but I do think that we shouldn't

1:01:47.240 --> 1:01:49.720
<v Speaker 3>just let the default drive our decisions. We should explore.

1:01:50.400 --> 1:01:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I agree.

1:01:51.200 --> 1:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, Ashland Harris basically said the same thing to

1:01:53.640 --> 1:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>me on the pot. She was like, everyone needs to

1:01:55.200 --> 1:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>kiss a woman once. Tell me about a book you

1:01:57.760 --> 1:02:00.160
<v Speaker 1>read that changed your life, something that everybody should read.

1:02:00.720 --> 1:02:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So, first of all, I love fiction, and so

1:02:02.960 --> 1:02:04.600
<v Speaker 3>if you look at what's on my nightstand, it's always

1:02:04.600 --> 1:02:05.840
<v Speaker 3>going to be in a fiction book. And there's so

1:02:05.840 --> 1:02:08.120
<v Speaker 3>many authors that I love because I feel like fiction

1:02:08.240 --> 1:02:11.800
<v Speaker 3>is always about identifying truths within ourselves. But if I'm

1:02:11.800 --> 1:02:14.360
<v Speaker 3>going to be really honest and really nerdy answering this question,

1:02:14.640 --> 1:02:18.920
<v Speaker 3>I would say it was like principles of microeconomics because

1:02:19.400 --> 1:02:22.120
<v Speaker 3>when I was in college, I started taking ECON and

1:02:22.200 --> 1:02:24.720
<v Speaker 3>it became this framework that I used to understand the world.

1:02:24.760 --> 1:02:26.880
<v Speaker 3>And so this idea of utility function, it's like this

1:02:27.240 --> 1:02:29.600
<v Speaker 3>ECON one oh one like way of solving problems and

1:02:29.760 --> 1:02:32.640
<v Speaker 3>understanding like is the consumer going to like buy less

1:02:32.680 --> 1:02:35.080
<v Speaker 3>tomatoes when like the price of tomatoes goes up? Right?

1:02:35.440 --> 1:02:39.600
<v Speaker 3>But it became to me this really amazing metaphor for

1:02:39.720 --> 1:02:41.600
<v Speaker 3>seeking what we most value in life, that we are

1:02:41.640 --> 1:02:44.960
<v Speaker 3>maximizing utility. And so you know, a little bit of economics,

1:02:44.960 --> 1:02:46.640
<v Speaker 3>I feel like, and if people are interested in that,

1:02:47.000 --> 1:02:49.120
<v Speaker 3>I if you follow my sub stack, I feel like

1:02:49.120 --> 1:02:50.560
<v Speaker 3>I try to do that. Is like teach people a

1:02:50.560 --> 1:02:52.640
<v Speaker 3>little bit about basic economics because I think it is

1:02:52.680 --> 1:02:54.240
<v Speaker 3>such a life changing way to view the world.

1:02:54.680 --> 1:02:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it really is.

1:02:56.160 --> 1:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I was a political science major, and every professor I

1:02:58.840 --> 1:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>had said, if something can feel uses you, and POLY

1:03:00.960 --> 1:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>say follow the money. So that's right, okay, question everything

1:03:06.360 --> 1:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>tell me when to stop?

1:03:08.560 --> 1:03:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Noh?

1:03:09.800 --> 1:03:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what's one thing you are trying to or need

1:03:12.480 --> 1:03:13.000
<v Speaker 2>to let go.

1:03:13.040 --> 1:03:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Of that need for things to be perfect and for

1:03:16.240 --> 1:03:18.880
<v Speaker 3>things to be done right now, because it's so hard, right.

1:03:18.920 --> 1:03:21.000
<v Speaker 3>I think so many women lessening probably relate. It's like

1:03:21.040 --> 1:03:23.160
<v Speaker 3>you're so driven in like your career life, and you

1:03:23.160 --> 1:03:25.600
<v Speaker 3>always have your checklist, and then like you just want

1:03:25.640 --> 1:03:28.000
<v Speaker 3>everything to be done, everything to be perfect. It's like

1:03:28.040 --> 1:03:30.880
<v Speaker 3>you want your house to look amazing all the time,

1:03:30.920 --> 1:03:33.800
<v Speaker 3>and then the clutter is constantly like re emerging. You know,

1:03:34.200 --> 1:03:36.240
<v Speaker 3>I want my flowers to already be planted in the

1:03:36.280 --> 1:03:41.160
<v Speaker 3>backyard now that it's like ninety degrees right, And the

1:03:41.200 --> 1:03:45.320
<v Speaker 3>reality is that, like life is messy, and you're not

1:03:45.360 --> 1:03:47.560
<v Speaker 3>going to really get more joy out of those things

1:03:47.600 --> 1:03:49.760
<v Speaker 3>being done right now, and it's not worth the trade

1:03:49.760 --> 1:03:52.240
<v Speaker 3>off of going to the park or going for a walk.

1:03:52.360 --> 1:03:55.280
<v Speaker 3>So I am constantly trying to let go of needing

1:03:55.280 --> 1:03:59.160
<v Speaker 3>things to be perfect, done, complete, neat all of that.

1:04:00.440 --> 1:04:00.640
<v Speaker 2>You know.

1:04:00.760 --> 1:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Usually I could end an interview by saying thank you

1:04:02.760 --> 1:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>for your time, but it means something different in this one,

1:04:05.400 --> 1:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>so truly thank you for your time and good advice.

1:04:08.840 --> 1:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I love that it's rooted in economics, but it really

1:04:10.720 --> 1:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>does feel like advice.

1:04:12.000 --> 1:04:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much. Danielle and baby Danielle had it write.

1:04:14.600 --> 1:04:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Your time is incredibly valuable, every minute, and I hope

1:04:17.400 --> 1:04:20.120
<v Speaker 3>you find somebody who values it as much as you do.

1:04:20.400 --> 1:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. That's such a beautiful wish. I'm gonna hold that. Okay,

1:04:28.600 --> 1:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what time it is. Today's a good day,

1:04:31.400 --> 1:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to have a good day. I'll see you next week.