WEBVTT - School of Golf Architecture: Routing with Jeff Mingay, Part 2

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the School of Golf Architecture is brought

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to you by our friends over at b Dradty. So

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:09.960
<v Speaker 1>just like the best golf architects, b Drotty is all

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>about the details, details that most companies choose to overlook.

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Take the Russell quarter Zip, which is my go to

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>for this time of year. The front pouch is sewn

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>into the garment, not just sort of put on top,

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and that allows for a slimmer, less bulky fit. If

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you're a fan of great golf courses, I think you'll

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>appreciate b Draddy's devotion to smart design and how they

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>really think through every aspect of their product. Shop the

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>entire b Droddy line at bdradty dot com and receive

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent off with our exclusive discount code TFE

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:46.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. That's b Dradty dot Com code TFE two five.

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>The fried egg requires a different technique. What you need

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to do is actually square the face so it'll dig

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>down underneath that bad lie and propel that ball right

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>out onto the green.

0:00:59.240 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Here's the take.

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Saying out of a buried lion of bunker is completely

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 3>different than playing out of a night and clean lion.

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 3>A greenside bunker.

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 2>You'd need to be aggressive on any show. Weather it's

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 2>sitting cleanly for its Friday Egg.

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, we've all faithed it. The dreaded fried egg not

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>to be cleared, though it's actually a pretty easy shot

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to hit. Welcome back to the School of golf architecture

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.759
<v Speaker 1>on the Frida Egg podcast and to the second part

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>of my discussion with architect Jeff man Gay about golf

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>course routing. I'm Garrett Morrison. Now i'd recommend that you

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>go back and listen to part one if you haven't already.

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>That episode lays a lot of groundwork for what we

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>discuss in this one, But just to recap, we defined

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>routing as the way in which architects lay out golf

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>holes on the land, or, in other words, the positions

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>they choose for each team and each green. Jeff and

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I identified three main aspects of a routing that any

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>golfer can see and understand while playing around. One, whether

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the walks between greens and teas make sense. Two, whether

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.679
<v Speaker 1>the holes use the best pre existing features of the property.

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>In Three, whether the routing has a sense of drama

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>from beginning to middle to end. In this episode, Jeff

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and I apply these criteria to a few different well

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>known routings. This is, first of all, a way of

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>demonstrating how you can read the routing of any given

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>golf course, but it's also an opportunity to explore the

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>evolution of routing through history. How have methods of routing

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:39.119
<v Speaker 1>golf courses changed over time and does the future hold

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>any new possibilities. Starting with the Old Course, we've talked

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>about some of the inherent flaws of the out and

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>back routing in the sense that it doesn't provide much

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>variety in the relationship of the holes to the wind.

0:02:57.760 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>But what do you think are some of the merits

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 1>of the out and back routing? You know, just what

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>do you what do you think of that as as

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>an example of how to rout a golf course.

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's a bit of a coincidence that we can

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 3>criticize the out and back routing of the Old course,

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 3>mostly because of the lack of variety in terms of

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 3>how how the course tacks into the.

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Wind and away from the wind. But I'll tell you what.

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 2>The best thing about that out and back routing is.

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 3>That it allows the golf course to pretty easily be

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 3>played reversible, which is something that I can't believe hasn't

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 3>gotten more traction in the last hundred years of golf architecture,

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, we I mean, the benefits of having one

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 3>golf course that can play two ways are pretty obvious, right,

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 3>huge benefits the ownership they get to basically get two

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 3>courses for the price of one. They also get two

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 3>courses that can be maintained for the price of one,

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 3>and the environmental benefits that come along with that as well.

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, you got thirty six holes basically being maintained

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 3>as eighteen. It's a it's a it's a wonderful concept

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 3>that again, I mean there's a few golf courses have

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 3>been the loop. I think Frank Pont's done to at

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 3>least one or two, and in Europe. It just the

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 3>concept makes so much sense, yet it's been done so

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 3>few times to this point. It's it's it's puzzling to me.

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it takes a client that understands the concept.

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 3>It takes the correct piece of ground too. You know,

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 3>you're on a piece of ground that's hilly, it's going

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 3>to be pretty difficult to find find a way to

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 3>get it to play in reverse rele you know, comparatively,

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 3>when you look at a piece of ground like Saint Andrew's,

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 3>it's it's it's basically flat and rumpled. Although I hear

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Sylvie's Ranch works pretty good and there's some pretty hilly,

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 3>hilly spots there.

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>You were just there, right, yeah, I was just there.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'd love to talk about that one later as

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>an example of along alongside the loop, as an example

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of what might be next in routing. But Sylvie's Valley

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Ranch certainly has a very clever approach to the reversible

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>routing in that it has twenty seven greens and not

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>all the greens are in play every day. But it

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>makes the routing work on a very hilly piece of property,

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>which is which is quite an accomplishment. And you know,

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that makes the reversible routing at

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the Old Course work is that, you know, it's a

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>rumpled piece of land, but it's not a hilly piece

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of land, right, you're not. You don't have to go

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>back up a big hill that you've gone down the

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>day before. Now, Okay, So there's this wacky theory I

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>have about about the Old Course routing as it relates

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to what we are discussing in the you know, the

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:47.119
<v Speaker 1>storytelling or the drama aspects of routing a golf course.

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, to me, that old course routing is very

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>elemental and primal in a way. You start from the

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>town basically, and you can just imagine the initial golfers

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>there saying, okay, we start here because this is where

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>we are. This is where the town is, and where

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna head just straight out to uh to the

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>river Eden, you know, that's where. That's where we're gonna

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>head out to. We're gonna go out there, and then

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>once we get there, we're going to kind of hang

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>out there for a second. Right, that's the Shepherd's Crook

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:19.359
<v Speaker 1>part of the routing. We're gonna hang out in this

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>nice little gathering spot because this seems like a nice

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 1>place to be. We've gotten here, we want to spend

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of time here, and then we're gonna

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>go back. We're going to return home. There is a

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>natural sense of drama to me about that routing. That's

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>basically the plot of the Hobbit right there and back again.

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>And and so I want, I wonder if it feels

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that way to you when when you're playing the Old Course.

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>That there's a there's a sense that you're taking it

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>a journey out to something, staying there for a bit

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and then coming back.

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's it.

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure I've heard to describe exactly that way,

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:56.559
<v Speaker 3>but I agree, and I love that description. I also

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 3>believe that that's got to be true, right, that the

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 3>other thing that is piece of lynx Land, you know,

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 3>it is a thin strip that, just as you just described,

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 3>took off from town, stopped at the river and came back.

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 3>And it'd be interesting, I mean, this is completely impossible,

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 3>but it would certainly be interesting to go back in

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 3>time and see who decided to put the quote unquote

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 3>greens where they went and where they are today. Right,

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 3>somebody had to go out there and say, well, this

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 3>is a reasonably flat spot here where we can cut

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 3>the hole in the ground and putt So my suspicion

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:38.119
<v Speaker 3>and I should go back and read Scott McPherson's book

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 3>on the on the evolution of.

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 2>The Old Course to see if this is right or wrong.

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 3>But twenty two holes existed at the Old Course way

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 3>back when it first started. Somebody had to have gone

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 3>out there and picked those, you know, eleven sites or

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 3>whatever it was where they were going to try to

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 3>get to, you know, to to finally arrive with those

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty two holes. A guy you from town out to

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 3>the river back. That's golf architecture routing.

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And you have to think that it was by committee

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and that it was gradual, you know, and that's maybe

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the best way to do it. You know, they've played

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>over that little piece of land a bunch of times

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and eventually figured out where the best places were to

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>cut the holes.

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I either haven't thought about it this

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 3>way or haven't thought about it this way in a

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 3>long time.

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 2>But essentially the evolution of the.

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Old course definitely involved picking those sites that were the

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 3>best green sites, which is what golf architecture.

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Still begins with.

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 3>You get out on a raw piece of ground. I mean,

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 3>the first thing we do as designers is start to

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 3>look at where's the best places to put the greens,

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 3>and the questions are.

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 2>Which are the most beautiful sites, Which sites will.

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 3>Allow you to connect them in a way that you're

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 3>going to end up with the best variety of holes,

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 3>both looks, distances, everything that lends to variety, But most

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 3>of all, you're looking for places where you're going to

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 3>relatively easily build a green.

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, you don't want to build a green.

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 3>On a hills on a hillsite that's forty five degrees slope,

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 3>it's just hard to build a green there, and it

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 3>takes a lot of fill and it's more expensive. So again,

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 3>looking for those sites that are naturally greens or require

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 3>comparatively minimal work to create.

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 2>A green is what we're looking for.

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 3>And getting back to the old course, I'm sure that

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of years ago, that's exactly what they were doing.

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they didn't have much equipment out there to

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 3>manipulate things, so they were looking at spots.

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 2>It literally made sense to be a putting green.

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>So now let's go to the next stage of the

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 1>evolution of routing a golf course, which I think is

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 1>represented well by Merefield, which feels a lot more intentional

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in the way that it's routed as opposed to kind

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 1>of natural and by committee. It feels like the routing

0:09:56.360 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>at Merefield was very expertly done. Did you talk about

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the Merefield routing a little bit and what makes it

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>so kind of historically important, especially as compared to the

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>out and back routings that we've been talking about.

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, when Harry Gold showed up at Mierfield, there was

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 3>a pretty rudimentary, I guess you'd say, in comparison, a

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 3>rudimentary old Tom Morris course there. And like Saint Andrew's

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 3>and a number of the early links, it had more

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 3>of an out and back, not not at vary as

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 3>varied a routing as you see at Mierfield today. And

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 3>that's what the lesson that Mierfield taught in the early

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 3>days of routing golf courses is how to lay out

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 3>holes again with with that wind consideration in mind, where's

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 3>the prevailing wind? You know, what does it do a

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 3>majority of the time, And how can we get these

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 3>holes to confront that wind at varying angles, hole after

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 3>hole after hole. The only two holes in Deerfield that

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 3>run consecutive in the same direction on the compass are

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 3>four and five. Otherwise you play each hole with the

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 3>wind coming at.

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 2>You from a different angle.

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 3>And you know, over the years there's been a lot

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 3>of a lot of discussion about that routing in golf

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 3>architecture circles for that reason, and when where and when

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 3>it's possible, you know, a good routing.

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Is going to turn you in into different direction from

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 2>hole to hole to hole.

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>So just to be clear about what the Mirfield routing

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>is for those who are unfamiliar with it, the front

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>nine goes around the perimeter of the property and the

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>back nine basically is set within the front nine, and

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>so you've got these these kind of you know, almost

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>concentric circles. Though of course the holes, especially on the

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>back nine, often reverse in order to fit in. But

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine it as as kind of you know,

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>outer and inner routing. And you know, we've seen architects

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 1>basely adapt that routing to a number of different sites.

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I know that Ross did it a lot, and tilling

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Hast especially did it quite frequently. And it's and it's

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>very clever because you've got those returning nines and you

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and you've got the different relationships to the wind, and

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you're constantly kind of revisiting sections of the property that

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you've seen before, but you're you're coming at them from

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a different direction. How much better can routing get from there? Honestly, No, that's.

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Still you know, that still ranks up there as one

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 3>one of the ones you're trying to be inspired by

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 3>for sure.

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit about Cypress Point. What

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are familiar with the basics of

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that routing, but what makes it special and how does

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>it kind of fit into some of the principles of

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>routing that we've been talking about.

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think the biggest thing with Cyprus Point is

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 3>I really believe that that Alistair mackenzie was truly trying

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 3>to celebrate that really one of a kind site.

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, you're dealing with dunes.

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Beautiful cypress for coastal bluffs. He does a wonderful job,

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:08.439
<v Speaker 3>starting the golf course in the dunes, taking into the forest,

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 3>leaving the forest back into.

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 2>The dunes, one more trip to the forest, back into.

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 3>The dunes, and then eventually coming down thirteen and fourteen

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 3>you see the Pacific Ocean. It's getting closer and closer.

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 3>And then another one of those wonderful little walks and golf.

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, we talk about connectivity and golf courses, you

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't say that fourteen Green and fifteen Tea are very

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 3>well connected. You get a long walk, you get across

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:37.839
<v Speaker 3>what might be one of the most you know, the

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 3>busiest roads in America these days, but the walker. Once

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 3>you get across the road onto the ocean side, the

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 3>little trail that takes you over to fifteen T and

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 3>turn the corner and see that hole for the first time.

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 3>It's one of the most exhilarating experiences. And I'm sure

0:13:54.679 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 3>that trail was cut purposefully to wait for that review,

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, as long as they could for you to

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 3>turn the corner and get on fifteen T and then

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 3>finally playing playing the coastal holes at Cypress as the

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 3>big conclusion, I'm not sure it gets much better, and

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 3>people have people complain about the eighteenth tool, you know.

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 3>I was reading about that the other day again. I

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 3>came across it that someone had said that Cyprus points

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 3>the best seventeen whole course in the world because eighteen

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 3>turns you around from the ocean and takes you through

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 3>the trees again back up to the clubhouse. I don't

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 3>agree with that. I think eighteen is actually one of

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 3>the most unique golf holes you'll ever see in your

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 3>entire life. Again, as part celebrating that wonderful property, I

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 3>think I think the doctor wanted to take you through

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 3>those beautiful cypress trees. I mean, these cypress trees at

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Cyprus Point are some of the most beautiful natural things

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 3>you'll let's see anywhere, and I think his eighteenth hole

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 3>there celebrates that.

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it definitely features those I mean, and there's so

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>much to talk about here. For one thing, you know,

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I should mention that there is some doubt as to

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>whether SETH Rayner or Alistair McKenzie is most responsible for

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the routing at Cypress Point. You know, obviously McKenzie is

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the architect of record, but there is an ongoing debate

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>about who did the original routing and how much of

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that original routing made it into the to the final

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>golf course. We don't need to get into that here.

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>That's that's a topic for podcasts by our friends over

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the Society of Golf Historians. I think that's more more

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a subject for Connor Lewis. But in any case, the

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>routing of Cyprus Point is so rich and it represents

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>all the things we've been talking about. You know, you've

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>already talked about the variety of landscapes at Cyprus Point.

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>You've got the woods, and you've got the dunes, and

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you've got the ocean, and it's hard to imagine a

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>routing using those three places better or with more variety,

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>or you know, more different parts of the round. You've

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>got the sense of drama, like you talked about going

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>out to the ocean at the end and really coming

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to a culmination. There the great connectors between the fourteenth

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Green and the fifteenth Tee and between the fifteenth Green

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and the sixteenth t longish walks, but nobody would want

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>those not to be there. And then I think, you know,

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a perfect story in many ways because the eighteenth Hole,

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>even though it's underrated, as you say, and has many

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>things to recommend it, there is a sense of kind

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of calming down from the sixteenth and seventeenth holes. And

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that's how a lot of structure, great stories are structured.

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Where the climax isn't at the very end, The climax

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't the last paragraph. The climax comes a few pages earlier.

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>And then there's what English teachers will call a den umont.

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a there's a calming down and a sense of

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>resolution and a sense that okay, now life is going on.

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the eighteenth Hole at Cyprus Point

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>delivers that. One thing we haven't talked about is the

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>gathering points at Cyprus Point, which are some of the

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 1>I guess we touched on it briefly earlier, but some

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 1>of the best anywhere, right, I mean, you know that

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of really dramatic landforms at Cypress Point

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of holes. Oh yeah, you're showing me

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>right now. I have look at this. So what we're what? What? What?

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>What Jeff and I are showing each other right now?

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Are are respective copies of the World Atlas of Golf,

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>which we just happened to both have right next to us.

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>And we've got the old green cover. We don't have

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that new abomination. We've got we've got the old edition

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of the World Atlas of Golf. So we both had

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that book next to us. It has a great map

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of Cypress Point. Gathering points at Cypress Point are congregation points,

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I think is what you called them. Uh, tell me

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>about some of those at Cypress Point and how they work.

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Well. One of the really cool spots at Cyprus And

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 3>it's a really great example of you know, using a

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 3>single natural feature to work off of and into is

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 3>a big duneline that bisects the property where three green

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 3>twelve t or sorry, three green four T eleven green,

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 3>twelve T nine green, ten T six green, and then

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:19.959
<v Speaker 3>one of the best part of threes ever seven plays

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 3>off of it and eight plays off of it. So

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 3>you're talking about I wish I had a measurement here,

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 3>but you're talking about a single dune ridge that cuts

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 3>through the property.

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 2>I guess would be over on the east side of

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 2>the property.

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, far away from the ocean. But to work

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 3>what one, two, three, four, five, six, seventy eight nine

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 3>holes off of a single dune ridge, you know. And again,

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 3>most people who play Cyprus Point, they're enjoying the holes,

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 3>they're not thinking about the fact that McKenzie used that

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 3>one ridge to work that much of the golf course

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 3>off of and onto in such a dramatic fashion.

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 2>And all of those holes are they couldn't be more different.

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 3>And they all use that single natural features as as

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 3>the main feature of the hole.

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Incredible, It's genius and it works practically too, right, You're

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>not at no point, you know, when you when you

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>jam that many holes around one feature, often you create

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 1>safety problems, you create routing problems where you're you know,

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:29.159
<v Speaker 1>where there might be weird walks or connectivity issues. But

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>there's none of that in these holes. Somehow they all

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>work even though they're all congregated around this one place.

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's it's incredible And another great example of that,

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 3>what did we determine congregational routing?

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 1>So you know, there's so many other routings that that

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we could talk about. You know, so far we've talked

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>about the old Course, Miarfield, Cyprus Point. These are really

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>well known ones. One that I think people aren't as

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>familiar with but you are, and that I'm not familiar

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>with because I have not into this course, but Highland's

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Lynx and and to me, that's a fascinating sounding routing.

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.360
<v Speaker 1>You've you've touched on a few aspects of it already,

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>but could you tell me about that one and what

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you think makes it distinctive?

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what makes.

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 3>Island's links most distinctive, again similar to Cypress Point, is

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 3>that is that the golf course traverses three or four

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 3>very distinctive environments and it's actually an out and back routing.

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 3>You know, one leaves the little protop, plays down the peninsula,

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 3>starts out of the ocean, takes you to the forest

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 3>and by the time you get to nine Green, you know,

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 3>you're ten kilometers from where you began. The tenth is

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 3>still out in the in the river valley. Thirteen takes

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 3>you back to the ocean again, just traversing beautifully distinctive landscapes.

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 3>But Stanley Thompson did the same thing that Aliston McKenzie

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 3>did at Cypress Point too. Sure he was celebrating these

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 3>these distinct environments and these beautifulties, but he didn't forget

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 3>about the golf either, And Highland's Links, like Cyper's Point,

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 3>is relentless in terms of the.

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Quality of the holes from the first.

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 3>Tee to the eighteenth green, very distinctive, as beautiful as

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 3>you can get in terms of a natural environment for golf,

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 3>and a very simplistic layout where he really truly did utilize,

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, the inherent landscape in the best way possible

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 3>for golf. Set you up to enjoy views of the ocean,

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 3>enjoy views of distant mountains, to play down the fifteenth

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 3>hole with an old church in the foreground and the

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 3>ocean beyond. You know, real heavy stuff in terms of

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 3>again focusing on building really really good golf holes, but

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 3>then tying all that other stuff into it as well.

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, so that people can enjoy nature. And again

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 2>that involves some views that are directly attributable to the routing.

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 3>It involves walks that that one between twelve and thirteen

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 3>along the Clybourne River. So again find find in a

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 3>variety of holes and making them interesting as one thing,

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 3>but then to take it to that to that next

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 3>level with celebrating nature and creating a bigger experience than

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 3>just hitting the golf ball is what those guys were

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 3>able to do so so brilliantly at Highland's Lengths in

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Cyprus Point.

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's interesting that it's an out and

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>back routing, you know, because uh, there's there's i think

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a false sense out there that the out and back

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>model is antiquated or that that we moved beyond it.

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>But Highland's Lengths does have roughly an out and back routing.

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>But I'm wondering, I'm curious, when you're playing that course,

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>does it feel like it's an out and back routing

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 1>or do you kind of lose sight of that as

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 1>you're going along.

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 3>That's a great question, because you know what, I've played

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Highland's Links enough to confidently say that it does not

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 3>feel like an out and back rounding at all at all,

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not sure I've ever thought about it that way.

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, I've studied the routing map so much,

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 3>and I've looked at aerials in the golf course.

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 2>I can see it plain as day.

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, when I'm out on the golf course playing there,

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.959
<v Speaker 3>you feel like there's enough change in direction. You're getting

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 3>a huge variety of views, so you don't actually, you know,

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 3>at Saint Andrew's, especially when you're coming in, you kind

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 3>of know you're coming in on a direct line because

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 3>the town's there and you're getting closer and closer. You

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 3>don't have any consistent views at Highlands Links because you're

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.400
<v Speaker 3>in valleys and then up and looking at the ocean

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 3>and looking at mountains, and that detracts from the fact

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 3>that it essentially is an out and back routing. Stanley

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 3>Thompson used out and back routing at baff as well.

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, in the old days at Bamp Springs they've

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 3>changed the sequence of play, unfortunately since Thompson's day, But

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 3>in the old days you're teed off in the shadow

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 3>that that beautiful old hotel and really played out through

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 3>the river valley turned around, came back.

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'd like Saint Andrews.

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 3>There's a couple of little crooks here and there, but

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 3>you're you're effectively out and back at theaf too, which

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 3>is a great experience in terms of leaving the hotel

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 3>and returning. I often wonder, if you know, if I

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 3>could ask Stanley Thompson Saint Andrew's crossed his mind. I'd

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 3>love to hear what his answer is, because when I

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 3>think of baff I, I always think of Saint Andrews

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 3>leaving town, leaving the hotel and coming back to town

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 3>and coming back.

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:26.479
<v Speaker 2>To the hotel.

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that again. You know, I've said this before,

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 1>but it but it strikes me again that that that

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 1>model of routing. You know, you can you can do

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>it in different ways. Obviously, you can do it in

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 1>ways that, as we've been saying, don't feel necessarily like

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:42.919
<v Speaker 1>a repetitive out and back routing. But there is a

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>natural sense of going on a journey, reaching a point,

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>and then returning home. And all of those things have

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>an emotional pull. There's the mystery of the journey, there's

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the there's the yearning to get out to that point,

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that distant point, and then once you get out there,

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 1>once you've spent your time there and seeing what you

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>need to see, then there's an equal emotional poll that's

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>drawing you back home right homeward bound. I think these

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 1>are things that tug at us in a in a

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>really primal way, and and these routings, when well done,

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:17.719
<v Speaker 1>can do that.

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 3>I agree, And in Saint Andrews and Banff for even

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.719
<v Speaker 3>the way I was just enthusiastically talking about both, it

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 3>is an experience that does that you remember. I mean,

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 3>it's it's a you're never going to forget those two

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 3>experiences for sure, for those for that very reason, and

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 3>it's again directly attributable to the to the routing.

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 2>The other interesting thing.

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 3>About that journey at Saint Andrews, which which I again

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 3>I think for sure, that's how how golf developed there.

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, let's keep playing, play and playing, we can't

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 2>go any further. We got to go back.

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Is how many holes does it take to get out

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 3>there and come back on the available piece of ground?

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, for for guys like us who simply love

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 3>to play golf, do I really care if I'm playing

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 3>fifteen holes to get out there and come back they

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 3>played twenty two holes originally and went out and came back.

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Now it's eighteen. Another interesting question, you know, in terms

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 3>of routing, what fits best? You know, on any particular

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 3>piece of ground, there's there's not always eighteen holes. Sometimes

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 3>there's more than eighteen holes.

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 2>But being able to go.

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 3>Out there and find the best routing is, you know,

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 3>the ultimate dream without having.

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 2>To worry about anything, really just go find the best holes.

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Here's how many holes.

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 3>We were able to fit on the available property, and

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 3>let's play golf.

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to know how many holes Bryson to Shambeau

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>would need to get out to the river at St. Andrews.

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe three out and three backs something like that.

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Not as many as me, I know that.

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>So the last thing I'd like to talk about, and

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 1>this is less about a particular course or a specific example,

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and more about kind of what's next in routing, or

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>whether there are some unexplored or less explored concepts in

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:12.879
<v Speaker 1>routing golf courses that we can begin to get into

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:17.360
<v Speaker 1>as golf architecture I hope continues to develop. And I'm

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking of the Loop, I'm thinking of Sylvie's Valley Ranch.

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of Uhopie Match Club. But there are probably

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of other examples. But I'm just I'm just

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:31.879
<v Speaker 1>curious about what you think we as routers of golf courses,

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>whether are architects as routers of golf courses? What what

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 1>things they haven't explored enough? What habits we might need

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to break or re examine, and how we can then

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>break into new territory in routing. What do you think

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 1>is there?

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 3>Well, i'll tell you what I when I heard that

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 3>the loop was happening, that's suppose as excited. Actually, you know,

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 3>the other thing the most excited I probably ever was

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 3>is what high point opened when I was the kid

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 3>after reading about what Tom was doing there?

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 2>Tom delk of course.

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 3>And the next most exciting thing I think I heard

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:11.640
<v Speaker 3>was that Tom was doing a reversible course in Michigan.

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 3>So I followed its development and I've played it now

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 3>both ways and walked it, and I'll tell you what.

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:22.919
<v Speaker 3>It just strikes me, as I said earlier, that the

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 3>concept of reversible course or a course that functions multifactly?

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Has it? Is that a word.

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>Multi multi multifacetedly? Yeah? Why not?

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 3>But of course that functions in more ways than one,

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 3>I guess is the way to describe it. I'm just

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 3>shocked at that concept hasn't been pursued more diligently over

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 3>the past even half century. You know, again, the benefits

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 3>of having two courses in one like the old course

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 3>shows us. And now what the loop's doing is there's

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 3>so many benefits to it. And when you talk about

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 3>a whoopie, similarly, it's not a reversible golf course, but

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 3>they've got some extra holes there so you can play

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 3>alternate routings, alternate sequence of play, which reminds me of

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 3>another great routing at Los Angeles Country Club, the North

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Course there the George Thomas laid out in the mid twenties.

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 3>He famously came up with a concept that he called

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 3>courses within a course. How do you build or I

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 3>should use, I should say route? How do you route

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 3>a golf course? Route eighteen holes that could function in

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 3>multiple ways, not just as a traditional eighteen whole golf course.

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 3>And again, I just think that golf has been lacking

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 3>in terms of that type of creativity until recently. Because

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 3>it's so exciting to hear, you know, the loops done.

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, I've heard other guys including Frank Pont in

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 3>Europe and Dan Hickson out at Sylvie's Ranch. You know,

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 3>let's figure out how these golf courses can be played

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 3>in reverse, how we can set these holes up so

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 3>that they're completely different.

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 2>From one day to the next.

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 3>And I'll never forget what Tom Doak said, you know,

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 3>he said, if we're going to build a reversible golf.

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Course, it better be good both ways.

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 3>You can't have one course, you know, be significantly better

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 3>than the other course, because then people would just come

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 3>and play the good course and not not the other way.

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 3>And sadly, I think that's what happened in the old

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 3>course over the years. Not not that the reverse course

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 3>is necessarily any worse than the course we know, but

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 3>after a number of British Opens we played there and

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 3>not much history was made there. If you know, people

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 3>from around the world are coming to Saint Andrew's to play.

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:44.320
<v Speaker 3>They want to play the open course, they want to

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 3>see the they don't want to be there the day

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 3>that you.

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Can't play the road all the way that we know

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 2>it and see it on television.

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Or the Edenhole or I mean or the fourteenth there

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>are Yeah, those holes have become utterly iconic people would

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>be in aged if they showed up and they're one

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>day there. They didn't get to play those right.

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 3>So if the black course that the Loupe had more

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 3>iconic goals in the red course, the business.

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Model that they built it on wouldn't work as well.

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:15.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you got to want to play them all. And

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>here I want to shout out Dan Hickson, who I

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 1>think might be the most underrated architect in the United States.

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's done most of his work in the

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Pacific Northwest. But Sylvie's Valley Ranch is a brilliant concept.

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a reversible routing, but it has twenty seven greens,

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and the ways that it's made to work on that

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>hilly piece of property are so complex and varied, you know.

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>And there's one section of the course where basically the

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>fairways kind of form a series of triangles. You know,

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you play one hole and the next hole kind of

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>goes off in the opposite direction, except at a kind

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of forty five degree angle, and then the next hole

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>does the same thing. So what you're left with, if

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you look at it from above, is a kind of zigzag,

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and you can play the zigzag in both It really

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:04.719
<v Speaker 1>does work as a reversible routing. And you know, I

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>looked at it both ways, and there are really good

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>holes on both courses. There are really good arguments for

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>playing one course over the other, or really playing both courses,

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and it just works. And I think that, you know,

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that made that happen was not

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>being too wedded to the idea that I've got to

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>have a pure reversible course. There's got to be eighteen greens,

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>just realizing that there are many ways to do it.

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>There are so many ways to rout a golf course.

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>There are so many ways that you can configure holes

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>on a golf course and make it do different things,

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>And for whatever reason, we just haven't explored those. You know,

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the LACC you know Thomas's concepts there are fascinating. Have

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you seen that anywhere? And I just wonder why we

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>aren't doing these things? It does it have to do

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>with rankings, Does it have to do with just golf's

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of tentativeness to try something new? You know? What

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>is it that's holding us back?

0:32:58.120 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Here?

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 3>I find And this is more prevalent at private clubs

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 3>obviously than resort courses and public courses, But I find

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 3>that golfers are are just married to their handicaps, which

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 3>is something that is always just made me shake my head.

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I just want to play interesting golf. And

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 3>there's always a way to raid a course, you know,

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 3>even if even if you said it, if you're able

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 3>to set it up as varied as lacc North, there's

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 3>a way to rate a golf course on which a

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 3>part three is a part four the next day. We

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 3>just got to think outside of the box and be

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more innovative about how we're doing things.

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 3>But most golfers, they want the tea's in the same

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 3>spot and the pin in the same spot every day

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 3>because they think that little marker is where the course

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 3>was raided from, and that's going to maintain my handicaps

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 3>so that when I play my friend, you know, they're

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 3>not thinking about interesting golf holes as they as much

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 3>as they are their own score and the bets have

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 3>going on that day, which are depending on consistency, you know,

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 3>and and really the last thing we want is consistency.

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 3>You go you go to forest Dune to stay out,

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 3>play the black Horse, sleep, you know, go to sleep

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:14.239
<v Speaker 3>at night and then play the red course the next day.

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 3>That's not consistent, but it's super fun, you know. And

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 3>same at L A C C. When number six is

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 3>a long part three and then you show up one

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 3>day and then you show up the next day and

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 3>it's playing as a short part four. I mean, those

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 3>are the types of things in routing I think that

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 3>we need to golf. Golf really needs, you know, I

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 3>think I think these short courses, these reversible course ideas,

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:37.720
<v Speaker 3>it's it's sort.

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Of spark more interesting golf course architecture.

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 3>I think it's made a lot of people think differently about,

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, where they want to play and how the

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 3>game is played, and.

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 2>How the game is played in the most fun way possible.

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite things about golf is that the

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 1>playing fields are not standardized. A course can have thirteen

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>par threes like Pan and Preserve or five long holes

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 1>like the original leaf Links in Scotland. There's no rule

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 1>saying those routings don't qualify as real golf courses. But

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>as Jeff and I discussed towards the end of our conversation,

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>modern courses just haven't taken the invitation to be whatever

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 1>they want to be. Instead, they've become more and more

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>wetted to the championship model of eighteen holes in a

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 1>par between seventy and seventy two. I think that's gotten

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 1>in the way of the best practices of golf course routing.

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>An architect should just be focusing on how to get

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the most out of a piece of land, not on

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 1>achieving a certain number of holes or a certain par

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Those are just arbitrary restrictions that we've put on ourselves.

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>So I wonder, and this is where I want to

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.479
<v Speaker 1>hear from you, what's it going to take for weird

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:54.240
<v Speaker 1>golf course routings to go mainstream? And I'm not talking

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>about it fancy clubs or resorts, but at your local union.

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:01.400
<v Speaker 1>What's preventing it from having seven cool holes and like

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a souped up driving range or something. Maybe developers are

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>too tentative, maybe architects are, but really I think it

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>has to start with our own habits and attitudes as golfers,

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>with realizing that not every score needs to count toward

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>our handicaps, and that no matter what the routing is,

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:19.839
<v Speaker 1>no matter how many holes it has or what part

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 1>it is, we can simply enjoy trying to hit good shots,

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 1>or maybe trying to win a match against a friend.

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:30.800
<v Speaker 1>If you want to dig deeper into the topic of

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>golf course routing, I've put together a post for this

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>episode on the Frida egg dot com. You can also

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>find us on Twitter at the Friday Egg with underscores

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>between each word, and Jeff at Jeff Underscore Mingay, let's

0:36:43.120 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>keep the conversation going.