Speaker 1: Strike Force Energy veteran owned, American made, and one of
Speaker 1: the hottest new energy products on the market. Strikeforce Energy
Speaker 1: was developed by veterans for one simple reason. The fight
Speaker 1: will always follow you, and it waits for no one
Speaker 1: buck sex in here force strike Force, and I invite
Speaker 1: you this summer to join us in giving back to
Speaker 1: America's troops. Over the last three years, strike Force Energy
Speaker 1: has shipped millions of packets to our troops, both at
Speaker 1: home and abroad. And now we're bringing this battlefield proven
Speaker 1: liquid directly to your door. Strikeforce Energy Liquid packs, available
Speaker 1: in four flavors, have zero sugar, zero calories, and are
Speaker 1: made with only the finest ingredients. For the fuel to
Speaker 1: power through your toughest fights, simply adds strike Force to
Speaker 1: sixteen to twenty ounces of water, tea, lemonade, yogurt, even
Speaker 1: a nice cold beer. Go to strike Force Energy dot com,
Speaker 1: enter discount code buck at checkout, and for every packet
Speaker 1: you buy, we will donate a packet to military members
Speaker 1: around the globe. Strike Force Energy dot com discount code buck.
Speaker 1: Because strike Force Energy is the fuel for the fight
Speaker 1: you are entering. The freedom hunt, the media is in
Speaker 1: the midst of a tsunami on ignorance when it comes
Speaker 1: to plastic guns. We will discuss that and also the
Speaker 1: latest on the immigrations and customs enforcement debate. Should ice
Speaker 1: be abolished? Of course not, But there's a lot more
Speaker 1: to the story than just that. And the Mueller probe
Speaker 1: is looking like it's gonna be winding down or is it.
Speaker 1: We've got that and more coming up on The buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show. This is the bus Sexton Show where the
Speaker 1: mission or mission is to decode what really matters with
Speaker 1: actionable intelligence. Mag no mistake, American, You're a great American Again.
Speaker 1: The buck Sexton Show begins a Sexton Buck Sexton. The
Speaker 1: democratization of guns online, giving people the ability to three
Speaker 1: D print their own guns, would make it feasible for felons,
Speaker 1: miners mentally ill to have access to firearms. This is
Speaker 1: about weapons of war being made in people's living rooms
Speaker 1: and in the living rooms of foreign terrorists abroad. People
Speaker 1: who want to have these guns will be able to
Speaker 1: get past security, whether it's airports security, so the risk
Speaker 1: of a hijack plane goes up. Political events where there's
Speaker 1: frequently uh security. Uh, You'll be able to slip past
Speaker 1: um with a gun and perhaps assassinate a public public figure.
Speaker 1: Terrorists will want them. Uh, criminals will want them. Coming
Speaker 1: to a theater near you, coming to a school near you,
Speaker 1: coming to a sports stadium. These ghost guns are the
Speaker 1: new wave of American gun violence. You will see them
Speaker 1: around our streets, in our airport courts, are trained stations.
Speaker 1: They are undetectable, untraceable. Forget about the t s A
Speaker 1: guarding the plane that you board. Welcome to the Buck
Speaker 1: Sex and Show. Oh my it is It is rare
Speaker 1: that we can start off the show with so much
Speaker 1: wrong in such a short period of time. Uh. And
Speaker 1: we had all these different all these different democrats say,
Speaker 1: I didn't think this is gonna be such a big deal.
Speaker 1: People have norn about this for a while. There's been
Speaker 1: a court case stretching back a long time. And you've
Speaker 1: got this is not a new issue. We covered three
Speaker 1: D gun printing on Real News on the Blaze TV.
Speaker 1: I want to say, in twenty twelve, so six years ago.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is not new, folks. This is nothing
Speaker 1: new and different. It's just the court case about this
Speaker 1: and the possibility all this information getting out there now
Speaker 1: and oh my us they're downloading these schematics. I would
Speaker 1: like to see one of these journalists who is complete
Speaker 1: or they're completely apoplectic about this right now. I mean
Speaker 1: they'll forget about it in today, you know, there'll be
Speaker 1: a Stormy Daniels interview. They'll focus on that. I would
Speaker 1: want to know how well they think they do if
Speaker 1: they try to three D print in a R fifteen.
Speaker 1: I keep saying, there's they're there are a thousand people
Speaker 1: who have downloaded how the three D print the a
Speaker 1: R fifteen. You can read the studies of this and
Speaker 1: those of you have who have and a lot a
Speaker 1: lot of people listening to show not only have extensive
Speaker 1: background in uh in firearms themselves, but you know are
Speaker 1: are are true experts in shooting and tactics and the
Speaker 1: manufacturer firearms. And I am none of those things. But
Speaker 1: unlike a lot of journalists out there, have actually trained
Speaker 1: with weapons, lots of different weapons, fired all kinds of guns.
Speaker 1: I mean, gosh, I fired. You know, I see everything
Speaker 1: from a pistol up to uh, you know, squad automatic
Speaker 1: weapon forty uh forty mike Mike grenade launcher, you know,
Speaker 1: all kinds of fun stuff. Um, and you know, I
Speaker 1: sit around here and there, something like Buck, why didn't
Speaker 1: you get up on the two forty golf? I also
Speaker 1: got up on the two forty golf ones. Don't worry
Speaker 1: that happened to um. So, you know, I sit here
Speaker 1: and I think to myself, what are they really? What
Speaker 1: is the point they're trying to make it? And I
Speaker 1: think that there's a lot. There's a lot going on
Speaker 1: here about why they're so upset, because when you look
Speaker 1: at the individual arguments, they don't make any sense. First
Speaker 1: of all, you've seen a lot of people be clowning
Speaker 1: themselves today. And when I say people, I don't just
Speaker 1: mean random strangers. I mean members of Congress, people who
Speaker 1: are supposed to know the law. No about the law. Right,
Speaker 1: if you're writing the laws and you're talking about the laws,
Speaker 1: hopefully you understand what you're talking about. But a lot
Speaker 1: of them don't. Really. You get a lot of people
Speaker 1: out there running around, and certainly journalists. Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: when when journalists come to guns, all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: it's like I just like, I don't understand why people
Speaker 1: need to have like automatic Bazuka semi auto silencers when like,
Speaker 1: all you really need is like what Elmer fudd has
Speaker 1: like the shotgun that you can get bugs bunny with,
Speaker 1: Like that's all you need. They it's it's because it's
Speaker 1: a cultural thing. You know, I grew up as a
Speaker 1: young kid. I grew up you know, my dad would
Speaker 1: take me target shooting when I was a kid. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is just and for so many people, you know,
Speaker 1: I think I've even posted photos like I'm like ten
Speaker 1: or eleven years old, you know, holding up my little target.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is just some of us grow up
Speaker 1: with this. And and for other people just guns are
Speaker 1: ikey and I just they don't go with my shoes.
Speaker 1: I hate them, you know that they don't like guns
Speaker 1: because guns are a cultural marker. Well, once you start
Speaker 1: to see the whole firearms debate, as in the Second
Speaker 1: Amendment to all of that as just a a proxy
Speaker 1: fight for all of the cultural stuff that's attached to it,
Speaker 1: then it starts to make more sense. How can people
Speaker 1: that know nothing about guns be so opposed to guns?
Speaker 1: How can people who live in areas where guns are
Speaker 1: all ready effectively banned hate guns so much and hate
Speaker 1: lawful gun owners that don't live in areas where guns
Speaker 1: are banned. You know, you got people in like Chicago,
Speaker 1: where you basically can't have a gun. I mean there's
Speaker 1: some hoops or us. I'll say New York. That's better
Speaker 1: because I actually know the laws in New York. Well,
Speaker 1: in the New York City basically can't have a handgun.
Speaker 1: And you have all these people that I know in
Speaker 1: New York who live in a place where you really
Speaker 1: can't legally have a hand I mean, you can get
Speaker 1: a premise permit. It takes five months and five dollars,
Speaker 1: and it has to have a trigger guard, and the
Speaker 1: rules are absurd. I mean, if somebody breaks into your
Speaker 1: home in New York and you happen to have a
Speaker 1: premise permit for a firearm, your most effective self defense
Speaker 1: tactic is going to be throwing the safe. You have
Speaker 1: to keep both the gun and the ammunition in separately
Speaker 1: and locked. Mind you at that burglar. So hopefully you've
Speaker 1: got an arm like Nolan Ryan or else you're in
Speaker 1: some trouble. But I know all these people in New
Speaker 1: York and they don't know the first thing about guns,
Speaker 1: you know, they really are. They're just terrified about the
Speaker 1: scary looking chainsaw bayonets that they've seen, and they don't
Speaker 1: want to get chopped up by the little chainsaw bayonet,
Speaker 1: and so they want people to ban all firearms or
Speaker 1: or as many firearms as possible. You think yourself, well,
Speaker 1: they already live in a place where you really can't
Speaker 1: have guns, and they're still gun violence or they're still shooting.
Speaker 1: There are not very many in New York, a lot
Speaker 1: more in Chicago and other places per capita. And they
Speaker 1: never think that this is an issue where they have
Speaker 1: to educate themselves. And that's what I find so fasting.
Speaker 1: And you see this once again with a plastic gun debate.
Speaker 1: It's just about taking the side that you think your tribe,
Speaker 1: that your side is on. It doesn't matter how embarrassing
Speaker 1: your lack of knowledge. Maybe it doesn't matter how incredibly
Speaker 1: um ignorant you you know, the left is on anyone side.
Speaker 1: But that just I hate guns, le muc band guns.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's the approach. And you see this with
Speaker 1: with the plastic gun debate. I mean, here's what they
Speaker 1: what they don't know, and what we should all know.
Speaker 1: We talked about this because this is now become by
Speaker 1: the way, and some of you're gonna point out, you know, Buck,
Speaker 1: the President tweeted out, Yeah, the President tweeted out that
Speaker 1: he'll look into this seems strange to him. I think
Speaker 1: when the President gets a little more I don't. I
Speaker 1: don't think he's been paying very close attention to this.
Speaker 1: And that's okay because it's not that important. But when
Speaker 1: you look at this a few things. First of all,
Speaker 1: it has been legal from the earliest days of this
Speaker 1: country to build your own firearms. You can, in fact
Speaker 1: do that. You're allowed to build a gun. You're not
Speaker 1: allowed to sell a gun, but you can build a gun,
Speaker 1: that's right. And a lot of drones like, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: you can build a gun, like how like does Michael
Speaker 1: Cores make guns? Like I don't understand, Like, you know,
Speaker 1: they seem to think that there's a way that or
Speaker 1: that that there's no way that somebody could come up
Speaker 1: with building a gun on their own. And people have
Speaker 1: been doing this for a long time. In fact, I
Speaker 1: saw a fastening video to get today of a guy
Speaker 1: who uh built a lower received ever for an a
Speaker 1: R with old aluminum cans that he smelted down. It's
Speaker 1: pretty pretty cool video. Actually, It's like, Wow, this guy's
Speaker 1: got skills. You can build your own firearm. You can
Speaker 1: do that. The lower receivers, you all know, is the
Speaker 1: part of it that is considered a gun by the
Speaker 1: a t of Everything else is cosmetic and an accessory
Speaker 1: or or an accessory. Rather it's not. But the lower
Speaker 1: receiver is the gun. That's the gun gun, right, that's
Speaker 1: the part of it that has a serial number. And
Speaker 1: and up until this point, you know, there's been all
Speaker 1: this debate and discussion about what happens when you start
Speaker 1: having people looking three D print plastic guns. First of all,
Speaker 1: I've never even seen a three D printer. Okay, they're
Speaker 1: very expensive and pretty unwieldy, and not a lot of
Speaker 1: people have so this is not in common usage yet,
Speaker 1: and everyone needs to just calm down about that. But
Speaker 1: you can make and I think it's called the uh forget.
Speaker 1: There was a name of one that they I wanted
Speaker 1: to see, the Equalizer. But that sounds like a show
Speaker 1: with is that with like Kelly Savalis or something? Who's
Speaker 1: in the producer Mike? Who's the equalizer? Isn't there? Well,
Speaker 1: there's a movie out now Denzel Washington. Oh, it's Denzel Washington.
Speaker 1: I thought it was like an old show. But did
Speaker 1: they maybe they remitted as the movie. I don't know,
Speaker 1: I don't know what I'm talking about. I don't watch
Speaker 1: enough cop shows. Okay, So anyway, the equal what's the
Speaker 1: name of the gun that the guy made? You know,
Speaker 1: the one who's at the center of this, the libertarian,
Speaker 1: quasi anarchist guy who uh, you know, he made a
Speaker 1: there's one prototype of a and it's like Cody Wilson, right, yeah,
Speaker 1: Cody Wilson. Yeah. Well, what's the name of the guy
Speaker 1: the gun that he made? I want it's like the
Speaker 1: Defender or something, but I forget what it's called. But
Speaker 1: you know, it's this very rudimentary plastic handgun that you
Speaker 1: can make, and it's big, it's bulky, and let me
Speaker 1: tell you, most plastic guns that have been made via
Speaker 1: three D printers have at least a substantial risk of
Speaker 1: blowing up in your hand. The moment that you're introducing
Speaker 1: is it called the Defender, the Liberator, the Liberator? I
Speaker 1: was close, the Liberator, that's right. So but but but
Speaker 1: the moment that you're introducing gunpowder into something that's entirely plastic,
Speaker 1: you know, good luck. Uh. Now, there's so many different
Speaker 1: layers of this. I mean, the first layers. Is three
Speaker 1: million guns already in circulation the country, a lot of
Speaker 1: ways to get guns that are a lot easier than
Speaker 1: three D printing them already. Liberals one day will tell
Speaker 1: us it's easier to get a gun that it is
Speaker 1: to buy a stick of gum, like it's so easy,
Speaker 1: and then you know the next day we're being told,
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, everyone's gonna gone three D print them
Speaker 1: now because it's like all the gun restrictions. Well, which
Speaker 1: is it? Which is it? Is it hard to get
Speaker 1: a gun? Is it too easy to get a gun? Uh?
Speaker 1: You know they've they've said it's too easy, and now
Speaker 1: they're saying, well, it must be kind of hard because
Speaker 1: everyone's gonna buy super expensive printers and build really crappy
Speaker 1: firearms on their own when they could just go buy
Speaker 1: a like really excellent block for you know, something like
Speaker 1: that and some of your like buckets more like six
Speaker 1: or seven. It depends where you are, and you know,
Speaker 1: as it used and are we talking on ninety six?
Speaker 1: And what are we what are we working with here?
Speaker 1: But the plastic gun terror is not something that we
Speaker 1: need to be nearly is worked up on just based
Speaker 1: on the technology where it is so far just based
Speaker 1: on on what you're really able to do, as I said,
Speaker 1: and no one's gonna be able to build an a
Speaker 1: R fifteen. I think that is that is successful from scratch.
Speaker 1: Using this, Now, can people build a lower receiver that
Speaker 1: will go into an a yard. Yeah, I don't think
Speaker 1: it's gonna be a very good one. But I'd also
Speaker 1: note that it's illegal for anyone to have a gun
Speaker 1: that they build themselves if they're a prohibited possessor. So
Speaker 1: the same laws are all in place. So now it's
Speaker 1: just a question if somebody is legally able to have
Speaker 1: the metal version of a gun, they could theoretically plastic
Speaker 1: print a a crappier version of the gun, but maybe
Speaker 1: they wanted for collectible purposes or something else. And the
Speaker 1: liberal response to this right now, and the gun control
Speaker 1: response is what we want to to ban the information
Speaker 1: and allows you to do this, which creates a whole
Speaker 1: other issue, not just content. Two chip away at the
Speaker 1: Second Amendment. Liberals now, because they hate guns so much,
Speaker 1: are willing to create a massive loophole in the First Amendment,
Speaker 1: it seems, and we will get into we we have
Speaker 1: more of this. Whatever happened to liberals and the First Amendment.
Speaker 1: I thought, free speech, what's all that's right? Not only
Speaker 1: they not wanted on college campuses and safe spaces and
Speaker 1: deep platforming and all the rest. Now they're worried about
Speaker 1: information about how to build a gun, which a lot
Speaker 1: of you are like, Buck, I know how to build
Speaker 1: a gun. I had. I had a listener years ago.
Speaker 1: He had an FFL. I mean he was a professional,
Speaker 1: but you know he He's like, I want to send
Speaker 1: Glenn a custom built a R fifteen that fits into
Speaker 1: a briefcase. And where I was like, well, you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I figured maybe maybe he was, you know,
Speaker 1: and Glenn I saw him one day all in air
Speaker 1: like assembling it. I'm like, oh, I guess the custom
Speaker 1: build they are got through. You know, you got a
Speaker 1: lot of gun experts in this audience, but this plastic
Speaker 1: gun I thing. Man, they're just they're terrified of of
Speaker 1: weapons that look. I'll walk through some of how Yeah, Okay,
Speaker 1: the metal issue is their metal on these we're metal
Speaker 1: detectors and everything else. So we'll talk metal detectors, we'll
Speaker 1: talk First Amendment. There's some additional layers of this that
Speaker 1: I think, because you're gonna hear a lot about this. Now.
Speaker 1: This has become a thing because the media is freaked
Speaker 1: out about it. It's now a thing we'll discuss. Uh.
Speaker 1: And it's also a lot more interesting than manaforts taxes,
Speaker 1: which they're all obsessed with now, so manaforts attacks cheat allegedly. Okay,
Speaker 1: there are a lot of people. We'll get to some
Speaker 1: of that. Eight four four five eight four, buck, can
Speaker 1: you hear from them? A gunsmith's out there if you've
Speaker 1: got thoughts on this whole three D printing thing? Have you?
Speaker 1: Have you ever fired a plastic three D printed gone
Speaker 1: to be very curious to hear from you. I'm guessing
Speaker 1: it's probably a crappy experience, but maybe it's fun. I
Speaker 1: don't know. I wouldn't do it. If someone handed me
Speaker 1: the the Liberator and said, buck, fire this, I wouldn't
Speaker 1: do it. It's not worth it. I wanna get a
Speaker 1: shard of hard plastic in my eye. Of course i'd
Speaker 1: be shooting with ipro, but that's a whole other thing. Alright,
Speaker 1: team eight four to five, we will be right back.
Speaker 1: We now live in a world where a three D
Speaker 1: printer cartridge has become as deadly as a gun cartridge.
Speaker 1: And that's because these downloadable firearms are available even to
Speaker 1: those who could not pass a background check. It's the
Speaker 1: ultimate gun loophole. Why buy them if you can print
Speaker 1: them at home instead? Why why buy them when you
Speaker 1: can get a cartridge. It's like a guy's gotta be
Speaker 1: where is he from? Up in mass Is that where
Speaker 1: he's from? Where I'm with the College of the Massachusetts cartridge? Uh?
Speaker 1: That was I don't want to some member of Congress.
Speaker 1: I forget which one he's talking about this? Oh, Senator, oh,
Speaker 1: Senator Markey. Is he from? Where is he from? No,
Speaker 1: he can't be. Why is he saying cartridge? He's from
Speaker 1: the north the mess Oh yeah, yeah, he's got to
Speaker 1: be from it all the only people say cartridge from messagery.
Speaker 1: All right, that's what I thought. All my people in
Speaker 1: Boston say, hell, what's up everybody up there? Uh? So
Speaker 1: back to uh oh wait, we got a caller wants
Speaker 1: to talk about this before we get the break. Jody
Speaker 1: and salt Lake, Hello, hey, buck Ossy talk. So not
Speaker 1: only do we have First Amendment implications, but I thought
Speaker 1: this um, this uh shuttlement, I guess is what you
Speaker 1: would call it. Between Cody Wilson and the d J
Speaker 1: through Defense distributed his company. I thought part of it
Speaker 1: was that an A R fifteen was no longer designated
Speaker 1: as a military style gun or an assault gun, but
Speaker 1: that it was a sporting gun by definition in the settlement.
Speaker 1: And if I'm wrong, please correct me. But I thought
Speaker 1: that was part of it. So I don't know. I'll
Speaker 1: have I'll hand that off to Yeah, Jody, I'll hand
Speaker 1: that off the producer Michael. Actually don't know off top
Speaker 1: of my head if that's in any way involved in this.
Speaker 1: I do know that one of the fixes that they
Speaker 1: came up with for the Liberator was that you had
Speaker 1: to put a metal piece in it so that you know,
Speaker 1: because this is one of the problems every saying oh
Speaker 1: now there will be you'll be able to sneak these
Speaker 1: on the planes and get through metal detectors with them.
Speaker 1: A few things about that. One is is ammunition is
Speaker 1: still metal generally. I've yet to find anybody who can
Speaker 1: come up with a plastic a fully plastic cartridge and
Speaker 1: uh and bullet right, So I don't think that's I
Speaker 1: don't know, it's not as easy as just well, I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna have a plastic gone and metal bullets and
Speaker 1: it's not gonna bean. You know, you can maybe have
Speaker 1: a piece of plastic that has no bullets in it.
Speaker 1: That's one part of it. It's also bulky because to
Speaker 1: have the to be able to handle the you know,
Speaker 1: for the plastic gun not to absolutely blow up in
Speaker 1: your hands, it's got to be a pretty big piece.
Speaker 1: It's not like this is small, so it's not easy
Speaker 1: to it's not as easy to conceal, at least not yet. Now.
Speaker 1: The technology, Jodie may advance and get better, and we
Speaker 1: may get to a point where the plastics and the
Speaker 1: polymers are so strong that this is not really an issue.
Speaker 1: But then we get to the whole notion of well,
Speaker 1: you're gonna ban the information? What is what is that
Speaker 1: gonna do? It's already out there right now, you're just anyway,
Speaker 1: let's Jodie, thank you for calling in OSS squad where
Speaker 1: we're gonna deal with this part of this, the First
Speaker 1: Amendment implications of this. But folks, this is getting bigger
Speaker 1: with every passing hour here today that they've decided to
Speaker 1: make this I think abolished ice. They realized was a
Speaker 1: loser of an issue for them, so they're not trying
Speaker 1: to get the left wing base fired up over the
Speaker 1: ban on plastic guns and three D printing of plastic guns.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about the First Amendment implications and uh, then
Speaker 1: we got a whole lot more. So stay with me.
Speaker 1: He's holding the line for America, buck Sexton his back.
Speaker 1: I don't know what liberals really still will defend at
Speaker 1: this point other than illegal immigrants, abortion, identity politics, class warfare.
Speaker 1: You know what, what really gets? What can you count
Speaker 1: on them? What will liberals say? Even if I don't
Speaker 1: like it, I'll defend it because I understand the underlying principle.
Speaker 1: The First of Hendment doesn't fall into that category anymore,
Speaker 1: It just doesn't. They believe in deep platforming, which is
Speaker 1: just a dressed up way of saying preventing people from
Speaker 1: being able to speak in places where they're invited guests.
Speaker 1: But they don't like the ideas. And I heard this.
Speaker 1: I saw this link of a of a professor Jordan
Speaker 1: Peterson from Toronto. I saw this link of a speech
Speaker 1: that he gave. It was a speech for a while ago.
Speaker 1: I mean, Professor Peterson is a very thoughtful, interesting guy.
Speaker 1: I would note that we had him as a guest
Speaker 1: on the Buck Sex and Show before like anybody even
Speaker 1: knew who he was. And now he's, you know, of course,
Speaker 1: gotten huge, and he's all over the country, all over
Speaker 1: the world, and congrats to him for for doing the
Speaker 1: work to get there. But I saw this speech he
Speaker 1: gave a while ago, and and I was because this
Speaker 1: is what I do. I'll tell you one of the
Speaker 1: things that I like on the weekends. Maybe this is
Speaker 1: my way of nording out when I'm not reading history books.
Speaker 1: And my Cortez history book is going very well, by
Speaker 1: the way, I'm really enjoying that. But I listened to
Speaker 1: speeches given by UH academics thinker as people that are
Speaker 1: people that I respect or even sometimes opposite people that
Speaker 1: I disagree with, but want to hear their arguments so
Speaker 1: that I can slice and dice those arguments when I
Speaker 1: come on radio later. So I like to listen to
Speaker 1: speeches as I'm doing things around the house. And I
Speaker 1: was unpacking this weekend from my move down to d
Speaker 1: c X. I'm now a full time swamp resident, folks,
Speaker 1: I know for crazy UH. And I was listening to
Speaker 1: Peterson and there was this noise that I kept hearing,
Speaker 1: and I thought, oh, man, you know, this is what's
Speaker 1: this bad audio quality we've got during this Peterson speech.
Speaker 1: Couldn't they couldn't the University of Wherever do a better
Speaker 1: job recording this? I mean? And then I realized, Oh,
Speaker 1: now that's not an audio quality problem. That is a
Speaker 1: pack of morons who had been removed from the removed
Speaker 1: from the auditorium, who were outside pounding on the doors
Speaker 1: for the whole speech. Folks. I mean, you know, just
Speaker 1: pounding on this thing whenever they could, as long as
Speaker 1: they could. Pounding on doors to stop someone from being
Speaker 1: heard in an auditorium didn't stop him from being heard.
Speaker 1: It just meant that you heard this weird rumbling sound
Speaker 1: in the background. It's like, this is a really this
Speaker 1: is like a commercial for the regressive and intolerant left today.
Speaker 1: They and they think they're heroic for doing this, so
Speaker 1: they have no real devotion to free speech anymore. Culturally,
Speaker 1: progressives and leftists do not believe in free speech anymore.
Speaker 1: They don't, they don't. They They have all these carve
Speaker 1: outs and cutouts and uh and back backdoors on this.
Speaker 1: You know, there's hate speech, and there's uh, there's deep platforming,
Speaker 1: and they're safe spaces, and there's all this stuff that
Speaker 1: they used to essentially shut down speech that they don't like,
Speaker 1: and I would know that. You know, for a while,
Speaker 1: my opinion on all this had been that we should
Speaker 1: never we shouldn't engage in the same tactics of name
Speaker 1: and shame that they do. And some people are saying, no, buck,
Speaker 1: mutually assured destruction is the only way to get them
Speaker 1: to stop. So you've got to go through the tweets
Speaker 1: of of prominent leftists and and call them out for
Speaker 1: their hypocrisy, because if you don't inflict pain on them,
Speaker 1: they'll never stop. I don't know if that will get
Speaker 1: them to stop either, but you know, I understand why
Speaker 1: people are willing to try it, because the left has
Speaker 1: really embraced this idea of of destroying people's careers in
Speaker 1: their livelihoods by in many cases misconstruing what they've said
Speaker 1: and and finding ways to shun them from the public space.
Speaker 1: What gets me thinking about all this, of course, here
Speaker 1: we are wherever he's talking about pre venting three D
Speaker 1: gun printing information from being able to be shared, and
Speaker 1: there's this in court right now, and there's all these issues, uh,
Speaker 1: surrounding it, and ultimately what they're really talking about here
Speaker 1: is stopping the passage of information from one person to another.
Speaker 1: They're doing it under the guise of anything you put
Speaker 1: on the internet is a four. It's a say it
Speaker 1: has to do with and my terminology here the specifics
Speaker 1: don't hold me to the specifics of the word in
Speaker 1: because I forget. But it's a essentially a foreign export
Speaker 1: restriction that by putting the ability to make a three
Speaker 1: D gun online, you're violating export restrictions on firearms. So
Speaker 1: they are treating the knowledge about how to build a
Speaker 1: firearm as the same as a firearm. Which where does
Speaker 1: that stop and start? By the way, Yeah, and you
Speaker 1: look back at some of the cases in the past
Speaker 1: where people I think, uh, somebody printed a manual about
Speaker 1: how to be a hit man and then someone used
Speaker 1: it in the murder. I heard about that. Today you
Speaker 1: get all these lawyers, and all these lawyers are popping
Speaker 1: up on tv DA talking about this. I saw a
Speaker 1: piece that there was a guy who put the the
Speaker 1: basics of how to build a hydrogen bomb online and
Speaker 1: then they realized and they wanted to prosecute him or
Speaker 1: make him stop of course, once you put it online,
Speaker 1: it's online, right, there's no there's no put in the
Speaker 1: the genie back in the bottle. By the way, is
Speaker 1: is genie in the bottle? Is that a Is that
Speaker 1: a microaggression? Can we can? We got a ruling on that, producer, Mike,
Speaker 1: Are we allowed? Um, he's he's busy answering phone calls?
Speaker 1: I think yeah, he's he's busy. The lines are lit up.
Speaker 1: Every wants everyone wants to talk about three D guns.
Speaker 1: I'll get you guys in in a second. You gotta
Speaker 1: gotta be patient. I got I got a lot to say,
Speaker 1: and I'm greedy with the microphone today. So where was I? Oh? Yeah,
Speaker 1: you can't put the genie back in the bottle. Back
Speaker 1: to my microaggression. And they're trying to stop the spread
Speaker 1: of this information. That's not gonna work, folks, It's just
Speaker 1: not gonna work. And in fact, what they do here
Speaker 1: is create a greater interest in this. They create a
Speaker 1: sense that you know, this is now forbidden information, forbidden knowledge,
Speaker 1: which means a lot of people are just gonna want
Speaker 1: to download it just because. But what could you extend
Speaker 1: this to beyond? You know, we've had this debate before
Speaker 1: is the society. By the way, the hydrogen bomb guy,
Speaker 1: it was all already online. He just pulled it together.
Speaker 1: So I don't think they were able to really you
Speaker 1: know where we're gonna start throwing people in prison for
Speaker 1: setting Wikipedia. I don't. I don't think so. Um. I
Speaker 1: think there's one of there, one or two other cases.
Speaker 1: But how let's let's really think about this for a moment.
Speaker 1: If we take the libs seriously here, which we should
Speaker 1: not do because their libs and we we we prefer
Speaker 1: to own the libs. But if we take them seriously,
Speaker 1: what about information online? What about detailed information online about
Speaker 1: um pathogens? Uh? And what about microbiology things that can
Speaker 1: be weaponized that are far more terrifying, I would note
Speaker 1: than anything you could do with a plastic three D
Speaker 1: three D printer. Do we restrict that information too? What
Speaker 1: about the basics of building explosives. We're gonna start to
Speaker 1: throw people in prison for downloading the anarchist cookbook. We're
Speaker 1: going to tell people that the basics of chemistry that
Speaker 1: are necessary. I mean, I there was a time when
Speaker 1: I knew how to build homemade bombs. I was trained
Speaker 1: actually how to build a homemade Bob had forgotten. Now
Speaker 1: it's you know, I didn't have to build me any thankfully,
Speaker 1: so um, but I you know, it's it's something that
Speaker 1: I had familiarity with. It was something that I did
Speaker 1: train with. And I will say that firearms training was
Speaker 1: always was always there was a part of me that,
Speaker 1: you know, shooting guns. I like shooting guns. But bomb
Speaker 1: making is I always put me on edge. I I
Speaker 1: did not you know, handling the C floor and handling
Speaker 1: the uh what is it? The T A T P
Speaker 1: and all this stuff that was not The detonators in particular,
Speaker 1: detonators not something you want to make any missteps with.
Speaker 1: They're real small. But get me the detonators. Let's see
Speaker 1: who can get that? Quote? By the way, where are
Speaker 1: my detonators? Why do you will a couple of you
Speaker 1: will a couple or true quote ninjas? But I don't
Speaker 1: I don't know how many people are actually gonna be
Speaker 1: able to lay into that one. Um, And I'd give
Speaker 1: you more, but then I would give it away. So
Speaker 1: but we're gonna criminalize that. The spread of information online,
Speaker 1: that's the very troubling you know, we only do that
Speaker 1: in very specific circumstances. You do it in the case
Speaker 1: of some national security information. But I would note only
Speaker 1: if you are a party to the legal um uh
Speaker 1: receipt of that national security information, meaning that if if
Speaker 1: you put national security information out there that you have
Speaker 1: access to, you go to prison if other people take
Speaker 1: that information though and run of it. And they didn't
Speaker 1: never have a clearance, so they didn't never have a
Speaker 1: you know, a a a government non disclosure agreement that
Speaker 1: they had to sign. They're not gonna get in trouble,
Speaker 1: so they know even with that, and then the the
Speaker 1: other one and the big, you know, the big bright
Speaker 1: line that we have in society now is on you know,
Speaker 1: on underage pornography. That's a place where people will just
Speaker 1: say it's information, But the spread of that information is
Speaker 1: a is a very very serious federal crime. And it's
Speaker 1: because of the the continued victimization that he that happens
Speaker 1: through the spread of those of those images and all
Speaker 1: the rest of it. Um. But we don't do that
Speaker 1: with weapons, we don't do that with tactics. We don't
Speaker 1: do that with information that can be misused. And he's
Speaker 1: in the and and it's up to the user how
Speaker 1: it is misused and That's why that you get to
Speaker 1: a very fundamental debate about liberty and the individual in
Speaker 1: the state here with whether or not you can say
Speaker 1: that the government will restrict this, and this is not
Speaker 1: Remember this is not government information. So they really have
Speaker 1: they have no right under national security grounds because they're
Speaker 1: not the originators of this, they have no right to
Speaker 1: restrict it. They're telling private citizens. You can't tell people
Speaker 1: about this thing. And the thing is a plastic firearm, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, you know you can make a plastic
Speaker 1: gun without a three D printer. Folks, This is not
Speaker 1: revolutionized it. Maybe it makes it a little easier. You
Speaker 1: gotta spend a lot of money get the printer. But
Speaker 1: this is not the the terrifying moment in tom that
Speaker 1: I was like, Oh, it's gonna be used. I'm seeing
Speaker 1: who was it, uh, some member Congress saying it's gonna
Speaker 1: help terrorists. I just saw this. This is a flash
Speaker 1: that got sent to me the last few minutes. Oh
Speaker 1: it's gonna help terrorists. Um, you know, terrorists have been
Speaker 1: trying to come up with bombs. I can get through
Speaker 1: scanners and stuff for a long time. By the way,
Speaker 1: anybody scanner in an airport the ones you go through
Speaker 1: now that they'll pick, there will be a big bulge
Speaker 1: on you now where you're trying to get your plastic
Speaker 1: firearm through. But this is not new. There are lots
Speaker 1: of ways you can mold the manipulate plastic that don't
Speaker 1: evolve a three D printer. And think of the precedent
Speaker 1: that we would be setting if all of a sudden
Speaker 1: we were saying that because information can be acted upon
Speaker 1: and then misused, we're going to have federal restrictions lists
Speaker 1: we're gonna want. We're gonna send people to prison for
Speaker 1: printing three D H three D gun specs online. We
Speaker 1: really gonna do that? How are we gonna enforce this?
Speaker 1: And of course it's gonna pop up overseas countries where
Speaker 1: they either don't have the will or the ability to
Speaker 1: regulate the internet as tightly as as we do, and
Speaker 1: the ability to prosecute people like we do. They're they're
Speaker 1: not gonna be able to stop this. So it's just folks,
Speaker 1: it's anti gun hysteria. And it all goes back to
Speaker 1: the stuff that I've been telling you about how most
Speaker 1: anti gun opposition you come across in the media and
Speaker 1: from people on the left is much more about antipathy.
Speaker 1: It's much more about the dislike that those people have
Speaker 1: for the kind of people who own guns, then for
Speaker 1: guns and violence and all the rest of it, because
Speaker 1: they don't like, you know that the coastal elitist types.
Speaker 1: They don't like you know, guys named you know, Billy Bob,
Speaker 1: who I want to just have a room full of
Speaker 1: shotguns or something. I mean, they have this very caricatured
Speaker 1: view of what if, you know, they don't realize, they
Speaker 1: don't even know that there's, gosh, I don't know, fifty
Speaker 1: or sixty million gunners the United States roughly something like that.
Speaker 1: They don't even know. Uh, they have no understanding. And
Speaker 1: what's worse, in some ways, they don't even care to understand.
Speaker 1: They're not even embarrassed when they get this stuff really wrong.
Speaker 1: When you see journalists who are saying, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: people can make their own firearms now, it's like they
Speaker 1: already anyone can already make their own firearms. It's just
Speaker 1: a question if this is an additional technology that would
Speaker 1: allow it and allow you to make it not a
Speaker 1: very good gun, by the way, and all the same
Speaker 1: restrictions apply around this gun and around a plastic gun,
Speaker 1: as would apply around everything else. You know, do I
Speaker 1: think the technolog she's gonna get to a point where
Speaker 1: the guns will be pretty good. Yeah, that's gonna happen.
Speaker 1: But we also realized that prohibition, prohibition of firearms is
Speaker 1: an unrealistic goal in this country anyway. So there's that
Speaker 1: eight four four five eight four four nine. Buck your
Speaker 1: thoughts on this, and then the Mueller probe, Oh my,
Speaker 1: so much more coming your way. Stay with me, all right,
Speaker 1: lines are lit. Let's talk three D gun folks. We've
Speaker 1: got Shawn in North Carolina who has some real expertise
Speaker 1: in three D printing. Sean, thanks for calling in. Hey,
Speaker 1: buck um die hard by the way, but the accent
Speaker 1: was a little white um on the quote. Okay, you're
Speaker 1: correct on the quote. To tell me about three D printing,
Speaker 1: you know about this, I'm told so, Yeah, I I
Speaker 1: make I make tools for in special education, like education,
Speaker 1: national tools for people to use, and so I spent
Speaker 1: a lot of time three D printing things, everything from
Speaker 1: my lightsaber to like Greek statues a lightsaber what yeah, yeah, wow, Okay,
Speaker 1: it doesn't work. I mean, yeah, I figured, buddy, I
Speaker 1: like it. Tho'll go ahead. Um. And the thing is,
Speaker 1: whenever you take one of these plans and you put
Speaker 1: them in, it always prints every object internally hollow. So
Speaker 1: if you try to just take a plan offline, if
Speaker 1: you didn't know what you're doing with settings and everything
Speaker 1: else with the printer, it will print it internally hollow.
Speaker 1: So there's not going to be enough material behind the
Speaker 1: explosive end of the bullet to do anything. It's just
Speaker 1: gonna blow out the back and blow your face off
Speaker 1: like a really bad dip gun. You'd be better off
Speaker 1: modifying a cap gun from the Yes, you're telling me
Speaker 1: that this whole plastic guns, they're not even good guns
Speaker 1: that people will be making on this thing. Well yeah,
Speaker 1: and and and the plastics shatter really easily with any pressure.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just it's just bloody dangerous. But it
Speaker 1: was funny when someone sent me an email asking me
Speaker 1: if we could make it in a college department and
Speaker 1: watching everyone's just like heads catch on fire when they realized, like, oh,
Speaker 1: it was hilarious about three or four years ago, So
Speaker 1: it was it's old dudes. Um. And yeah, I'm I'm
Speaker 1: a Pacifist and a Quaker, and I would look at
Speaker 1: the thing and go, that's stupid. See that. The quaker
Speaker 1: with three D printing expertise says, no big deal, folks,
Speaker 1: Hey Sean, thank you for calling him man. She'll sorry.
Speaker 1: I appreciate it. Let's take Rob in Mississippi. Hey, Rob
Speaker 1: shell time, Bob. Sorry I've read that wrong, Bob. Good
Speaker 1: to have you. Well Rob, Bob, close it off. What's up?
Speaker 1: Same thing? Well, she'll tie, she'll tie to you. I
Speaker 1: can't tell you how easy it is to make a
Speaker 1: zip come. I grew up in an orphanage in Chicago,
Speaker 1: and we made zip comes all the time, and none
Speaker 1: of them ever blew up. The key to it is
Speaker 1: use a low powder ground. Yeah. Up close, he'll kill
Speaker 1: somebody very easily. I mean people. The people forget that.
Speaker 1: We used to go to the old hair airport where
Speaker 1: the rabbits are all deaf, and and you know, go
Speaker 1: hunting because we needed the meat. Believe it or not. Wait,
Speaker 1: you used to hunt rabbits with your zip gun because
Speaker 1: they were deaf from the planes at O'Hare Airport. It's
Speaker 1: quite a story. Yeah, you could sneak up behind them
Speaker 1: if you were down landing. You know, this is amazing
Speaker 1: you know, deeps hitting them with a rock, you know, so, yeah,
Speaker 1: you're kicking an old school How do you mean? How
Speaker 1: how quickly could I if I gave you them a cheerus?
Speaker 1: How quickly could you assemble a zip gun? Rob? Bob? Sorry?
Speaker 1: Ten minutes? Yeah, maybe even less and it would work
Speaker 1: constantly for a very long time. And do you have
Speaker 1: but you have to use metal parts in a zip gun? Right? Oh? Yeah?
Speaker 1: You take a copper tube the size of you, put
Speaker 1: it in a black pipe of galvanized pipe, and then
Speaker 1: your mouth that with some you boats to a flat
Speaker 1: piece of wood, and your mouth that piece of wood
Speaker 1: to a handle, which is simple screws. Take a piece
Speaker 1: of spring steel, throw it on the back and and
Speaker 1: screw it into the wood and then bend it down
Speaker 1: and pull it back. All right, Well, Bob, thanks for
Speaker 1: sharing the expertise. My friend gonna talk to you Shields
Speaker 1: High team. Our two is coming upon us. It's gonna
Speaker 1: be amazing. A lot of you listen to this show
Speaker 1: are fortunate enough to have uh furry friends, to have
Speaker 1: a dog or a cat. Uh, and you got a yard.
Speaker 1: But then you get a problem that comes along with
Speaker 1: all that, right, because your dog may decide that it's
Speaker 1: time to dig and digging something. That's some dogs just
Speaker 1: like to do. It's in their nature, right, it's instinct.
Speaker 1: You're not gonna train the dog to stop digging, but
Speaker 1: you can stop them from being able to dig under
Speaker 1: your fence in the yard. That's what dig defense does.
Speaker 1: But you dig Defense extends the protection of your fence underground.
Speaker 1: You can install it at the base of any fence
Speaker 1: to protect your property and your pet. All you need
Speaker 1: is a hammering gloves, no more chasing after fin oh,
Speaker 1: after he gets out of the yards. Runner on the
Speaker 1: whole neighborhood calls in mayhemmer right right now. Dig Defense
Speaker 1: is available online at Lows Tractor Supply Menard's Wayfair and
Speaker 1: Stop the dig dot com and now for the month
Speaker 1: of July visit stop the dig dot Com. Use promo
Speaker 1: code buck for ten percent off. That's stop the dig
Speaker 1: dot Com and use promo code buck for ten percent off.
Speaker 1: Your buck Sexton mission to coding the news and disseminating
Speaker 1: information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a
Speaker 1: great American Again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. Activity Analyst.
Speaker 1: No the panic over three D printed guns, continues, My friends,
Speaker 1: this joe Us happened, breaking news for all of you
Speaker 1: as we are on air. A federal judge in Seattle
Speaker 1: blocks release of blueprints for three D printed guns. Let
Speaker 1: me say, this is stupid, this is lawless, this is counterproductive.
Speaker 1: But we are dealing with liberals, so I guess that's
Speaker 1: all we should expect. I thought we were gonna move
Speaker 1: on other topics. But because of this breaking news here
Speaker 1: about this federal judge, we got a little more to
Speaker 1: dig into here. I didn't give you all of the
Speaker 1: background for how we got to this point. As I
Speaker 1: mentioned you, I I interviewed when I interviewed Cody Wilson
Speaker 1: for the first time on real news in the Blaze
Speaker 1: TV about his Defense Distributed project and Defense Distributed back
Speaker 1: was under the Obama administration found to be in violation
Speaker 1: of the International International Traffic in Arms Regulations or IR.
Speaker 1: I don't know, you say it because it had published
Speaker 1: downloadable plans for three D printed guns. Folks, those files
Speaker 1: and producer Mike which need to be the break He's like,
Speaker 1: what do they think that? This isn't closing the barn
Speaker 1: doors after the horses have left. This is like the
Speaker 1: horses have gone off to other counties, had more horses,
Speaker 1: had nice horse lives. Some of them ended up getting
Speaker 1: sent to the glue factory because they got so old,
Speaker 1: I mean, and then closing the barn doors is way gone.
Speaker 1: And I was kind of sad about the glue factory.
Speaker 1: I should you know, I like I like the horses. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Here here, here's what Cody Wilson was saying about his
Speaker 1: project play. Who have more than twenty states trying to
Speaker 1: block you from making these directions available online? So what
Speaker 1: do you expect to happen? They won't win. We've already
Speaker 1: published the file, so I don't know how they could
Speaker 1: give me to stop publishing the funds. President Trump tweeted
Speaker 1: that he's looking into three D plastic guns. He said,
Speaker 1: this doesn't seem to make And so what's your response
Speaker 1: to the President. I don't sell three D guns, So
Speaker 1: the President will understand that in time. Are you worried
Speaker 1: that the government will reverse its decision? Like I told you,
Speaker 1: aority uploaded the plans. I mean, you know it's the
Speaker 1: ship is sale. It's publicly any information now, it's irrevocable.
Speaker 1: No one can take it back. Believe an access information
Speaker 1: is ever tremendously negative or a bad thing. I know
Speaker 1: that people can use information for bad things, but this
Speaker 1: isn't a justification to what stop a publisher from speaking.
Speaker 1: He's a smart guy, folks, Now, he knows his stuff.
Speaker 1: He's always stayed within the law, by the way, at
Speaker 1: all of this, he's been very very you know, does
Speaker 1: not sell these things? Is you know he never gets
Speaker 1: caught up and not having an FFL license or you know,
Speaker 1: he knows what he's doing. And here we are with
Speaker 1: the fact that the files are download over a hundred
Speaker 1: thousand times. All those people could have posted them all
Speaker 1: over the world. We don't know. You can't stop this.
Speaker 1: What the heck is this all about them? What do
Speaker 1: people think they're accompan wishing here? So but back just
Speaker 1: for the background here, so we're all on the same page.
Speaker 1: So the International Traffic in Arms Regulation, they were saying
Speaker 1: that by putting information about how to build a gun online,
Speaker 1: that was effectively legally the same as if you were
Speaker 1: trying to like send guns overseats and they were stopping
Speaker 1: you preemptively from doing that, saying you can't sell guns overseas.
Speaker 1: You can't put this information online because then it allows
Speaker 1: people overseas to build guns, to build their own guns,
Speaker 1: which is quite a stretch. And so then there was
Speaker 1: a legal battle over this, and of course you get
Speaker 1: the Brady Center and every town gun safety and all
Speaker 1: all these different groups are all all getting fired up
Speaker 1: over this thing. But then there was a settlement that
Speaker 1: was reached where the Defense Distributed which is Cody Wilson's organization,
Speaker 1: was going to be able to freely publish their gun designs. Again. Um,
Speaker 1: But according to a release from the Washington State Attorney
Speaker 1: General's office, the agreement, which wasn't made publican Chulduly tenth,
Speaker 1: was done in an arbitrary and capricious fashion by the
Speaker 1: Trump administration and violates the Administrative Procedure Act. This is
Speaker 1: all from the Seattle Times. There is no indication in
Speaker 1: the settlement agreement or else where that any analysis, study,
Speaker 1: or determination was made by the government defendants in consultation
Speaker 1: with other agencies, says the release from the Internal General's Office. Folks,
Speaker 1: this is lawlessness, Okay, this is this is not up
Speaker 1: to some judge somewhere to weigh in on and say, yeah,
Speaker 1: I don't think the federal government, in reaching this settlement
Speaker 1: did a good enough job, so I'm gonna block this.
Speaker 1: You know, do do federal judges think they can overrule
Speaker 1: anything that the federal government does? Is that now the
Speaker 1: new anyone federal judge can say no, you can't go
Speaker 1: to war with that country because I say so, because
Speaker 1: I don't think it's a good idea. This is what
Speaker 1: you get this. You know, you look out at the
Speaker 1: Ninth Circuit and some of these some he's very liberal, uh,
Speaker 1: some of these very liberal appellate courts, and you get
Speaker 1: these guys who on gals, these judges who think that
Speaker 1: there their role is to be hashtag resistance and to
Speaker 1: prevent the American people from having to suffer the consequences
Speaker 1: that come from the elected officials that they voted for.
Speaker 1: That's what's going on here. You got all these different
Speaker 1: states that are suing. To quote, the multi state lawsuit
Speaker 1: alleges the settlement between Wilson, his company and the Trump
Speaker 1: administration did not get the approval of the Department of
Speaker 1: Defense and didn't give Congress thirty days notice before agreeing
Speaker 1: to allow Defense Distributed to begin publishing three D gun
Speaker 1: files by creating a special exemption for Wilson's company at
Speaker 1: the in the ETAR. The lawsuit also says the settlement
Speaker 1: in fringes on states rights to regulate firearms, therefore violating
Speaker 1: the Tenth Amendment. I mean, this is just kitchen saying
Speaker 1: pathetic stuff. This is they're just throwing everything at this.
Speaker 1: What do they think they're going to accomplish. This is
Speaker 1: creating a massive gun control straw man and then gleefully
Speaker 1: dousing it in gasoline and setting it on fire and
Speaker 1: thinking you're doing something useful. Hundreds of thousands of people
Speaker 1: already have these files around the world. It's the Internet.
Speaker 1: Technology is passing by these status progressives in their desire
Speaker 1: to regulate everything. This is amazing. A temporary restraining order
Speaker 1: from this judgment for this just happened. Federal judge in
Speaker 1: Seattle's put out a temporary restraining order to stop the
Speaker 1: release of these three D blueprints. Remember this is Cody Wilson,
Speaker 1: the whole organization. At this point, they're just trying to
Speaker 1: make a point. The point is the government can't just
Speaker 1: control information because it doesn't like what some people will
Speaker 1: do with that information. That's not that's not a a
Speaker 1: a legal justification for censorship, which is what we're talking
Speaker 1: about here that would survive strict scrutiny. You know, so
Speaker 1: this is this is a failure of the liberals are
Speaker 1: failing here on every level. This isn't the threat they
Speaker 1: think it is. They're willing to throw the First Amendment
Speaker 1: under the bus for this. They don't understand the real
Speaker 1: implications of this technology. They can't stop this technology. They're
Speaker 1: just it's just flailing. It's just this, this this rage
Speaker 1: effort here. Mike, who who do we have? We got
Speaker 1: lines a little over the place I wanted. We got
Speaker 1: a lot of people want to call it on this one?
Speaker 1: Who do we havent? Wants to talk guns? All right?
Speaker 1: Bill in uh? Bill in Mississippi? What's up? Oh in Florida? Sorry,
Speaker 1: live Oak, Florida. My bad? Go ahead, Bill, that's okay.
Speaker 1: I don't make any difference, you know, these stages, Uh,
Speaker 1: they can do what they want with them as far
Speaker 1: as trying to pull stuff off. But it's gonna get
Speaker 1: over ruled anyway. But you know, make weapons and I
Speaker 1: worked in the apartment corrections and stuff like that, and
Speaker 1: they could make a weapon out of an apen. You know,
Speaker 1: all they had to do is get ahold of a
Speaker 1: bullet that's not a big deal. The governor back here
Speaker 1: about till I'm gonna say about twenty five years ago.
Speaker 1: Uh he he is on a podium and the Florida
Speaker 1: Highway Patrol at HP making sure of his security. He's
Speaker 1: come up with a spud gun. Now do you know
Speaker 1: what a spud gun is? Uh? Is it a gun
Speaker 1: that fires potatoes? That you're exactly correct? Okay, that's a thing.
Speaker 1: I didn't know that was a thing. Yeah, And it's
Speaker 1: very quiet. It's like you know, if you if you
Speaker 1: shot somebody with a bow and arrow with people seem
Speaker 1: to forget about that type of thing. Those are silent,
Speaker 1: silent killers, you know. So it's you know, there's a
Speaker 1: lot of weapons, a lot of a lot of ways
Speaker 1: to hurt people. And I was saying this before. Why
Speaker 1: was you I was trained in how to make you know. Look,
Speaker 1: it's very I don't want to get into this right
Speaker 1: because people getting yell at me. But they are very
Speaker 1: easy ways to make the equivalent of homemade napalm, to
Speaker 1: make essentially a sticky, viscous Molotov cocktail that not only
Speaker 1: will it explode on impact and spread as an incendiary,
Speaker 1: but it's very hard to get off. It kind of
Speaker 1: sticks to you almost like a like a gelatinous, super
Speaker 1: hot plato. It's not hard to make it all, folks,
Speaker 1: It's it's a couple of ingredients. I've worked in law enforcement.
Speaker 1: A matter of fact, I'm fixing to go down to
Speaker 1: uh the border down there wants to dust settles when
Speaker 1: they quit fighting all this stuff to work for international
Speaker 1: customs enforcement. That's what ICE is. A lot of people
Speaker 1: don't even understand the definition of it, but that's what
Speaker 1: it is, international custom enforcement. So I'm fixing the head
Speaker 1: that way out of Florida to hit to New Mexico
Speaker 1: Arizona line down there, just slightly north of the border,
Speaker 1: and watch and see what happens, you know, which I
Speaker 1: will get paid well for that. Well there we go.
Speaker 1: Well good, you know when you make that track. Good luck,
Speaker 1: my friend, and thank you for thank you very much
Speaker 1: for your call man, producer, Mike. Who else we I'm
Speaker 1: in my my call screens down here, so I gotta
Speaker 1: ask him who else we have on the lines? We had,
Speaker 1: we had everything lit before we enter the break, and
Speaker 1: then I talked for a lot, I know, so people
Speaker 1: get bored of me talking or not bored of me
Speaker 1: talking to get bored of hole. Hopefully that doesn't happen
Speaker 1: they get bored holding while I am talking. Um, But
Speaker 1: look at this this gun thing, this this three D
Speaker 1: pretty gun thing. It's just another another instance of the
Speaker 1: knee jerk and reactionary anti gun view that is so
Speaker 1: so dominant on the left. Now, this information is already
Speaker 1: out there, it's all over the place. You're not going
Speaker 1: to stop it. It's not even particularly valuable or dangerous information.
Speaker 1: And the fact that the Obama administration took this position
Speaker 1: before is preposterous. And all this is doing is highlighting
Speaker 1: the work that Cody Wilson has done and teaching a
Speaker 1: lot of people out there, a whole lot more about
Speaker 1: three D printed guns. This is gonna make it a
Speaker 1: a form of kind anti status protests now to learn
Speaker 1: how to make your three D printed gun. And what
Speaker 1: are they gonna do. They're gonna start throwing people in
Speaker 1: prison for downloading a file? Does that? Is that what's
Speaker 1: gonna happen. They're gonna download a file about how to
Speaker 1: build an inanimate object and you're gonna go to prison
Speaker 1: for that. Now, how do they think they're gonna stop
Speaker 1: this it's it's good. By the way, you know what's
Speaker 1: gonna happen, And Mike, I'll make a prediction right now,
Speaker 1: someone's gonna, you know, just print this is gonna share
Speaker 1: the link in a very public place just as a
Speaker 1: as an extended solitary finger to the federal government. Right now,
Speaker 1: That's what's gonna happen, right I mean, why not anyway,
Speaker 1: you know, Wiki leaks, one of these organizations will just
Speaker 1: put something up like here you go, information terrorism. That's
Speaker 1: what they're gonna say, eight four or four nine eight
Speaker 1: to five eight four four buck. I will talk about
Speaker 1: the Mueller probe a little bit at least, we'll get
Speaker 1: into that. So stay with me. I know you want
Speaker 1: a home security system, and you want the best. You
Speaker 1: want something that will cover you top to bottom and
Speaker 1: you don't have to worry about getting locked in us
Speaker 1: some long term contract or being with some kind of
Speaker 1: shady company that's just about squeezing dollars out of you
Speaker 1: instead of keeping your dollars safe and your family safe
Speaker 1: at home. Simply safe checks all the boxes, folks. It's
Speaker 1: simply the best home security system out there. Gives you
Speaker 1: fantastic protection. It's easy to use. You know, I've known
Speaker 1: these guys a long time. Simply safe you suld just
Speaker 1: be five guys working together, and they came up with
Speaker 1: this idea because one of them had been burglarized. So
Speaker 1: they know what's at stake here. They really do. The
Speaker 1: system is easy to use. I've got it at home,
Speaker 1: and let me tell you it is so user friendly.
Speaker 1: You download an app. Everything everything you need to do
Speaker 1: you can do remotely. Right, go order it yourself now,
Speaker 1: go to simply safe dot com slash buck. That's simply
Speaker 1: safe dot com slash buck. My listeners will get free
Speaker 1: shipping and free returns are going to simply safe dot
Speaker 1: com slash buck. So I believe we'll come into it again.
Speaker 1: And so I'm talking to some people don't involve in
Speaker 1: the original part of the of the investigation. I thank
Speaker 1: John for all of the cooperation he gave them, because
Speaker 1: he puts us in a position where we don't have
Speaker 1: to cooperate. We gave them one point four million documents,
Speaker 1: thirty two witnesses. President Trump has answered every question and
Speaker 1: now they look at his tweets to investigate him for
Speaker 1: trying to influence structurejics by tweet I prosecutive structure of justice.
Speaker 1: If they're gonna do structure justice by tweet to impeach
Speaker 1: your president, God bless us, because I've seen this game
Speaker 1: played many times before. Uh, there's a stall game going
Speaker 1: on at d J and FBI. They're trying to stall
Speaker 1: as much as they can, hoping and betting that Republicans
Speaker 1: would lose the House in the fall. And if that happens,
Speaker 1: then you essentially it shuts down everything. Rod Rosenstein will
Speaker 1: not be held in contempt, FBI will not be held accountable.
Speaker 1: All these investigations will shut down, Everything will be buried,
Speaker 1: and you'll be left with media narratives saying, oh, what
Speaker 1: the public can't read, what you really can't read, what's
Speaker 1: locked out? That's the really bad stuff against Carter Page
Speaker 1: and the Republicans and the Trump campaign. That's why the
Speaker 1: sooner the president he classifies this, the better. And I
Speaker 1: think the American people need to understand how important it's
Speaker 1: going to be to get out and vote in this election.
Speaker 1: It's very important. Stuff from Congress of Newness there, very important.
Speaker 1: I've been saying this too. Don't think that just you know,
Speaker 1: you had Rudy there starting off with the whole Mueller
Speaker 1: and the President shouldn't sit down with them. But also
Speaker 1: people are saying that that it's coming. You know, he
Speaker 1: said that he thinks it's coming to an end, and
Speaker 1: then really, you know, let's say in the next six
Speaker 1: months the Mueller probe is coming to an end. But
Speaker 1: that's not that's not enough for a lot of us.
Speaker 1: It's not just that we want the Muller probe to
Speaker 1: come do it. I want answers. I want to know
Speaker 1: how it got to this point, how it got to
Speaker 1: this place. I want to know what is blacked out
Speaker 1: in that phase application that Congress. The new nest told
Speaker 1: me to my face is as bad, if not worse
Speaker 1: than the stuff about the dossier. Well, what could that be?
Speaker 1: The you know stuff that We'll make it very clear
Speaker 1: that there was political targeting going on, that there was
Speaker 1: abuse of power. There'll be no way around it. And
Speaker 1: people have to come to grips with the reality that
Speaker 1: the FBI was weaponized by the Hillary Clinton campaign using
Speaker 1: foreign cutouts and foreign sources against Trump. I don't just
Speaker 1: want this thing to go away. I also want justice.
Speaker 1: And justice means a full accounting. It means answers as
Speaker 1: to how we got to this point, don't You're gonna
Speaker 1: see CNN it's just going to kind of slink away
Speaker 1: from this whole thing too once the alert pro wraps
Speaker 1: up and act like they haven't been essentially promising their
Speaker 1: audience that there would be this massive Russia conspiracy proven
Speaker 1: that involved the Trump administration. Don't let them get away
Speaker 1: with this. Oh, look at all the indictments of the
Speaker 1: Russian trolls. It's it's nothing and it doesn't mean anything.
Speaker 1: It's meaningless. Yeah, how many how many Russians have been
Speaker 1: hauled in the US courts to face face justice for
Speaker 1: setting up some stock poppet accounts on Twitter? Answer? Zero.
Speaker 1: That's not going to change anytime soon either. So this
Speaker 1: has been a whole lot of smoke screen, a whole
Speaker 1: lot of sore loserism about Hillary. And that's what motivates this,
Speaker 1: Not Oh, it's about democracy and defending the country and
Speaker 1: the institutions are under assault. That's not what motivates this.
Speaker 1: You can pretend that that's what's necessary. They've pretended they've
Speaker 1: created this this top cover for themselves under that whole pretense,
Speaker 1: but the reality is that they want to bog down
Speaker 1: the Trump administration, which they've been somewhat successful in doing,
Speaker 1: not entirely, and they want revenge for Hillary's loss. That's
Speaker 1: what is driving this, and so that's what's at stake here.
Speaker 1: I'm not even you know what. Maybe we'll talk more
Speaker 1: about Manafort tomorrow. The most interesting thing about the Manaphort
Speaker 1: trial so far is that the guy spent fifteen thousand
Speaker 1: dollars on an Ostrich jacket. Producer Mike, if I gave
Speaker 1: you sixty million dollars tomorrow for hanging with shady Russian
Speaker 1: and Ukrainian oligarchs. I do not think that an Ostrich
Speaker 1: jacket for fifteen grand would make it into the producer
Speaker 1: Mike budget. I don't think so. No. Yeah, maybe maybe
Speaker 1: a crocodile coat, kind of like Morpheus and the Matrix.
Speaker 1: That was pretty boss, you know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: He were like that or allegating, not crocodile, allegant whatever,
Speaker 1: some kind of like lizard skin coat. That's some next
Speaker 1: level stuff. But an Ostrich I don't even know what
Speaker 1: an Ostrich coat would look like this, folks. This was
Speaker 1: read out today the prosecutors to really just make Manif
Speaker 1: look like a greedy s O. B. They they talked
Speaker 1: about his fifteen thar Ostrich coat. Think of all the
Speaker 1: ostriches that went into making that. Oh no, you know
Speaker 1: what ostriches are mean? Tell you that not nice. They're big,
Speaker 1: they're fast, they'll peck at you, they'll kick you. So
Speaker 1: you know, I think they raced them in some parts
Speaker 1: of the world to their ostrich races or is it
Speaker 1: EMUs they race. I can't keep it all straight. I know,
Speaker 1: I'm an amateur zoologist here in the Freedom Alright, alright, immigration,
Speaker 1: I've got folks, I've got some stuff to tell you
Speaker 1: about immigration and ICE and abolist ICE that that I
Speaker 1: don't think you'll hear anywhere else, and it's very, very important,
Speaker 1: So please stay with me. That's coming up in just
Speaker 1: a moment. Yeah, we're not gonna provide them additional information
Speaker 1: so they can go out and round up people. If
Speaker 1: I could abolish ICE, I would, um, But we can
Speaker 1: abolist this contract and we are. That's the uh. The
Speaker 1: Philadelphia mayor there, Jim Kenney producer, Mike, Do you know
Speaker 1: this guy? I do? What's what's his what's his deal?
Speaker 1: He's a progressive, leftist liberal mayor of the city of Philadelphia.
Speaker 1: So so you're telling me he's he's incompetent, makes promises
Speaker 1: that he can't follow through on, and basically panders to people. Yes, yes,
Speaker 1: and yes, I had a feeling feeling well, but I
Speaker 1: guess at least he roots for the Eagles, right, So
Speaker 1: we've got that going. That's in question to me. I
Speaker 1: don't know Mike. Mike would even give him that one. Now.
Speaker 1: It's like in the beginning there he was singing about
Speaker 1: it's a little hard to hear, but he was singing
Speaker 1: about being named the sanctuary city. And in the video
Speaker 1: he's actually dancing. Wow. Yeah, very interesting. You know, I
Speaker 1: saw I had to talk today with a a very see.
Speaker 1: He was actually acting Director of Immigrations and Customs Enforcements,
Speaker 1: So I can tell you exactly who was under the
Speaker 1: Obama administration now. Now, Immediately when I sat down and
Speaker 1: talk this guy, I figured, okay, because I was doing
Speaker 1: an interview, and I figured he's he's an Obama error guy,
Speaker 1: so he's gonna now he you know, he was a
Speaker 1: little more favorable to some of the Obama decisions than
Speaker 1: I would be, if I get that. But he also
Speaker 1: gave some very interesting context. Let me tell you some
Speaker 1: important things. Here are some things you're not gonna hear
Speaker 1: from probably anybody else about what's going on really with
Speaker 1: this whole abolished Ice movement and all the rest of it.
Speaker 1: First of all, this guy agreed, and he was acting
Speaker 1: ICE director, so I'm not surprised to say this. He's
Speaker 1: the whole abolished Ice chant. Thing is this is for idiots.
Speaker 1: This is this is idiotic. This makes no sense, It's
Speaker 1: not serious, and it's really unfair, you know. It's it's
Speaker 1: you've got people who are maligning immigrations and customs enforcement,
Speaker 1: which involves a lot of veterans. I think about thirty
Speaker 1: veterans in terms of the overall organization. And and then
Speaker 1: there are there are two other areas that where I
Speaker 1: was talking to this guy and about the whole Abolished
Speaker 1: Ice movement that I thought were really interesting. And he's
Speaker 1: a this guy have been a lawyer for a long time.
Speaker 1: He knows the ins and ounce of it. So I
Speaker 1: was really able to push him on some stuff. So
Speaker 1: here's the thing there, there's the whole notion of catching
Speaker 1: release in sanctuary cities. Let me deal with the what's
Speaker 1: really going on with catching release? So he says that
Speaker 1: there is a He said that that the policy of
Speaker 1: the abodministration was not you know, there wasn't the same
Speaker 1: scale of people who are coming over. So that's one thing, um.
Speaker 1: But what what Obama was was doing was that they
Speaker 1: were giving people because I said, look, no one shows up.
Speaker 1: What Obama was doing was, hey, okay, we'll process you
Speaker 1: and we'll give you a court age to determine your
Speaker 1: asylum claim, but you get to stay in the United
Speaker 1: States if you come with a kid while we make
Speaker 1: a determination about your claim. And I said, well, come on, man,
Speaker 1: like no one's showing up for those hearings. He said, actually,
Speaker 1: that's not really true. People will show up for the hearings.
Speaker 1: And I and then I pushed a little more, said, okay,
Speaker 1: hold on a second, buddy. Remember this was Obama's acting
Speaker 1: Immigrations and Customs Enforcement director. Is very senior guy in
Speaker 1: Obama said okay, well, hold on a second. How quickly
Speaker 1: do those hearings happen? He goes, well, four or five
Speaker 1: years out a lot of the time. That's okay, Okay,
Speaker 1: now we're getting somewhere. So the Obama see that this
Speaker 1: is what they do, and this is why we can't
Speaker 1: have a serious discussion with the Omama people about immigration.
Speaker 1: This guy, he answered the questions. I'll give him credit,
Speaker 1: but you see the hid in the hand here of
Speaker 1: what Obama was really up to, what is administration was
Speaker 1: really trying to accomplish. They say that they're just letting
Speaker 1: people wait for their hearings. They say that there's a
Speaker 1: high percentage of people showing up for the hearings. What
Speaker 1: they don't want to say and they hope no one
Speaker 1: figures out, and journalists are all, I supologize, they're crying
Speaker 1: with anything. Well, they hope that they don't figure out
Speaker 1: is that they delay the hearing so far into the
Speaker 1: future that no person realistically and he admitted this. He
Speaker 1: admitted this, no person could believe that there would be
Speaker 1: a deportation of anyone who had been in the country
Speaker 1: and not committed additional crimes after four or five years
Speaker 1: if they showed up to their asylum hearing. So you see,
Speaker 1: what it allows them to do is create the ties
Speaker 1: into America and the backstory where once again they're dreamers
Speaker 1: or parents of dreamers or parents of U. S. Citizens
Speaker 1: because they've had kids in the last four or five years.
Speaker 1: They allow that's the scam. I see it now. No
Speaker 1: one else talking about this, no one else focused in
Speaker 1: on this problem. I thought this was so interesting because
Speaker 1: you know that that you know, Obama is a pro
Speaker 1: illegal guy. The Democrats their mindset, they are pro illegal immigration.
Speaker 1: They're not trying to limit it. They're not trying to
Speaker 1: stop it. They're trying to cover it up and turn
Speaker 1: a blind eye to it. But they want more of it.
Speaker 1: You know. The Democrats are like the kid who opens
Speaker 1: the back door to his parents house and wants as
Speaker 1: many of his buddies to come up and party, you know,
Speaker 1: in the in the apartment over the garage as possible,
Speaker 1: but doesn't want mom and dad to know how many
Speaker 1: people over right. I mean, that's what Democrats are doing
Speaker 1: with illegal immigration. They're just waving everybody into the house party.
Speaker 1: When mom and dad aren't looking, it's like, oh no,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm not inviting people over and that. So there
Speaker 1: you go. That's you know that, there are so many
Speaker 1: ways they've they've been scamming the American people, and that's
Speaker 1: really what Obama is doing a immigration. When you dig
Speaker 1: into it, the whole thing of Obama Deporter in chief,
Speaker 1: that never made any sense right, it didn't make any sense. Oh,
Speaker 1: that's right. The way they created a perception of Obama
Speaker 1: as strict on the border, as the quote Deporter in
Speaker 1: chief was to say that if border patrol, oh that's right,
Speaker 1: they patrol the border. Immigration and customs enforcement has a
Speaker 1: separate function about law enforcement and processing and immigration courts. Uh.
Speaker 1: But border patrol catches somebody and then turns them away
Speaker 1: at the border. That's considered a deportation under the Obama
Speaker 1: era rules. So that's just increases that, you know, that
Speaker 1: just increases their numbers without actually increasing any enforcement or
Speaker 1: anything else, and just changing the definition. So there's the
Speaker 1: perception of of additional scrutiny and strictness of the border. Okay,
Speaker 1: So the delay though with the hearings that was I said, Okay,
Speaker 1: now it all makes sense. Folks. You know this listing.
Speaker 1: You think after some who's gonna go in front of
Speaker 1: immigration judge after five years of being in the country
Speaker 1: claiming that they need asylum from Central America, do you
Speaker 1: think these immigration judges are gonna say, sorry, you gotta
Speaker 1: go i O. By the way, if they say that,
Speaker 1: you really think that they're gonna they're gonna get deported immediately,
Speaker 1: they'll probably at the end of a backlog of deportations.
Speaker 1: And then it's just the whole the thing, the whole thing. Yeah,
Speaker 1: the system is only broken because people are breaking it,
Speaker 1: because they're breaking the law. So so you have all
Speaker 1: all of that, and uh, then you have the issue
Speaker 1: of sanctuary cities. And you know what, let let me
Speaker 1: I want to I want to come back to this. Actually,
Speaker 1: let me come back to sanctuary cities either side, because
Speaker 1: this was really interesting and it's something no one else
Speaker 1: is gonna talk to you about, at least not that
Speaker 1: I think, and I details on this. And then also
Speaker 1: we've got we got a senator today who just showed
Speaker 1: you what she does not know about immigration, which is
Speaker 1: the first thing she does not know, the first thing
Speaker 1: of immigration. We'll get more of this. Stay with me.
Speaker 1: Just send your child to again. I think we're missing
Speaker 1: the point. These individuals are there because they have broken
Speaker 1: a law. There has to be a process. They have
Speaker 1: broken a law only as deemed so by the President
Speaker 1: with his no man, they're they're there for violation of
Speaker 1: Title eight of the Immigration of the US and Nationality Act. Okay,
Speaker 1: there eight. UC's Eleeland try is both a criminal and
Speaker 1: civil violation. They are in those f r c s
Speaker 1: pending the outcome of that civil immigration process. They have
Speaker 1: broken the law. Well, these are mainly My understanding is
Speaker 1: that under the zero tolerance these are no longer civil
Speaker 1: civil proceedings, but in fact we're coming up proceedings. They're both.
Speaker 1: They were criminal proceedings when the Border Patrol prosecuted them,
Speaker 1: but at the conclusion of that process, once the individual
Speaker 1: came into ice custody, they would go through administrator proceedings.
Speaker 1: I'm confused, Yes she is, oh man, that was Democratic
Speaker 1: Senator Herono. Who Youmanice, She's like, well's they're not breaking
Speaker 1: the law. Yeah, actually, U s Senator. It is breaking
Speaker 1: the law to enter the United aids illegally. That is true.
Speaker 1: That is a thing that's real. And you'll notice the
Speaker 1: Democrats now have gotten so caught up in their rhetoric
Speaker 1: and the nonsense and all the stuff that there's that
Speaker 1: that they don't seem to really believe anymore that illegal
Speaker 1: aliens are committing an illegal act. They believe this these
Speaker 1: slogans like no person is illegal, which is just brainless.
Speaker 1: These things people say, there's no such things as a
Speaker 1: person who's illegal. Well, yeah, I mean, you know, you
Speaker 1: can call a person someone who is is trespassing while
Speaker 1: carrying your private possessions, or you can say they're a burglar, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, technically the problem is the things they're doing.
Speaker 1: But you're still gonna refer to somebody as a burglar
Speaker 1: if they are trespassing and taking your stuff. I don't
Speaker 1: think we have to refer to them as stuff takers
Speaker 1: who happen to be in a place that they're not
Speaker 1: legally entitled to be, who have who have gone on
Speaker 1: to your private property. Burglar is fine, Trespasser is fine.
Speaker 1: You know, one who commits the illegal act does get
Speaker 1: tainted by the verbiage of the illegal act. That's just
Speaker 1: the way it is. And you see this with the Herodos.
Speaker 1: She's like, wait, folks, these are the people writing the
Speaker 1: immigration laws. These are the Senator Roto Visa. She said,
Speaker 1: I'm confused. She doesn't know what's going on our own
Speaker 1: members of Congress. And I would tell you this if
Speaker 1: we were able to do one of those kind of
Speaker 1: man on the three things the members of Congress and
Speaker 1: ask them an immigration law. You know, how many members
Speaker 1: of Congress do you think that aren't sitting on a
Speaker 1: certain subcommittee or aren't involved in this, you know, as
Speaker 1: as a major part of their portfolio. Know that a
Speaker 1: country that a foreign country that does not take people
Speaker 1: that we deport willingly, and and and as a partner
Speaker 1: in that process, we we have a we have the
Speaker 1: legal right to ban all visa US from that country.
Speaker 1: In fact, that is the prescribed punishment for that offense
Speaker 1: for another country. So if Guatemala doesn't take back all
Speaker 1: the people we want to deport to Guatemala, the State
Speaker 1: Department the United States government supposed to say no more visas,
Speaker 1: that's in law. How many members of Congress even known that.
Speaker 1: How many members of Congress knew that it is an
Speaker 1: additional penalty. It becomes a felony if you are deported
Speaker 1: from the country and re enter illegally. In fact, a
Speaker 1: lot of conservatives saying we did a pass a law
Speaker 1: that makes it no there already was a law. People
Speaker 1: will know. This is part of the devolution that happens
Speaker 1: in our public consciousness around the issue of immigration. When
Speaker 1: laws are not enforced, When some laws are not enforced,
Speaker 1: we have asked the question, which laws do we take seriously?
Speaker 1: And no one really has the answers. Now, before we
Speaker 1: went into that quick moment with our wonderful sponsors, I
Speaker 1: I was telling you about how the catch and release
Speaker 1: process really works and what the what the scam is
Speaker 1: the delay In a lot of cases, it's the delay
Speaker 1: and the hearings because there never they're either not gonna
Speaker 1: show up. If they do show up, so much time
Speaker 1: will have passed, they're never gonna get deported. And then
Speaker 1: you have the sanctuary city component of this. And this
Speaker 1: is really important, folks, This is really interesting, and I
Speaker 1: am not hearing about this from anyone else. There are
Speaker 1: seven thousand or so criminal investigators attached to Immigrations and
Speaker 1: Customs enforcement who do not do immigration specific enforcement. They
Speaker 1: do transnational federal criminal issues that happened to coincide with
Speaker 1: the you know, illegal flows into this country. Stuff having
Speaker 1: to do with cartels, child trafficking, uh, you know, any
Speaker 1: form of human trafficking, you know, major criminal act activity.
Speaker 1: And because of the zealotry behind some of these sanctuary
Speaker 1: jurisdictions like New York and San Francisco in Chicago, because
Speaker 1: of the ideological commitment to this notion of sanctuary cities,
Speaker 1: it's not just that local and state law enforcement are
Speaker 1: being told in these places you cannot, I mean California's
Speaker 1: past laws to make it a criminal offense to try
Speaker 1: too hard to help law enforcement. You can't make this
Speaker 1: stuff up. But it is not solely that they are
Speaker 1: blocking enforcement in illegal alien havens and illegal alien communities
Speaker 1: with regard to immigration specific crimes. These sanctuary jurisdictions are
Speaker 1: blocking the criminal investigators of Immigrations and Customs enforcement who
Speaker 1: are involved in stopping people that are trafficking children for
Speaker 1: sex across state lines, stopping people who are trafficking drugs,
Speaker 1: stopping any federal crime that crosses over into the immigrations
Speaker 1: and cross the customers of force and radar. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, there's a lot of coordination between these different
Speaker 1: law enforcement agencies, and the fact that you have local
Speaker 1: law enforcement being told oh sorry, uh Ice. You know
Speaker 1: the ICE Criminal investigators, Um, you know h s size
Speaker 1: what they're called here. Let me just tell you that
Speaker 1: hs I. This is from the ICE dot com website.
Speaker 1: Criminal investigators all sufferred as special agents conduct criminal investigations
Speaker 1: involving national security threats, terrorism, drug smuggling, child exploitation, human trafficking,
Speaker 1: illegal arms, export, financial crimes, identity fraud, benefit fraud, and more.
Speaker 1: H s I Special Agents have the opportunity to work
Speaker 1: regularly with federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies, including
Speaker 1: the FBI, e A, U S. Marshal Service. They have
Speaker 1: the opportunity to participate in special task forces or Fugitive
Speaker 1: Operations teams. They are essentially federal auxiliaries of the various
Speaker 1: missions of d e A and FBI and others who
Speaker 1: also bring access and expertise to the immigration and international
Speaker 1: transnational component of things. And folks, these people are being
Speaker 1: told and this is what they're not you know. They
Speaker 1: would say, oh, well, you know, we don't want we
Speaker 1: don't want local law enforce and to be doing immigration work.
Speaker 1: We don't want local law enforcement. And that's the line
Speaker 1: you hear. Well, these thousands of Homeland Security investigators, uh,
Speaker 1: these these these criminal investigators with the Homeland Security Department
Speaker 1: under remember Immigration and Customs enforcement is under Homeland Security.
Speaker 1: They are getting the stiff farm from local law enforcement
Speaker 1: to they are being told, sorry, can't help you, can't
Speaker 1: work with you on this issue, can't share informans with you,
Speaker 1: can't share information if it's going to possibly cross over
Speaker 1: So when people like Trump are saying that these sanctuary
Speaker 1: jurisdictions are aiding and abetting ms, their teen and and
Speaker 1: the worst of the worst, the baddest of the bad,
Speaker 1: it's true. It's true because they're so concerned with the
Speaker 1: optics and the perception of Oh, we're welcoming to illegals
Speaker 1: and they're not illegal, they're undocumented. Do not cave on that.
Speaker 1: Do not allow them to get you saying it's happened. Occasion,
Speaker 1: I'll blurt out like, yeah, I mean the undocument I
Speaker 1: mean illegal alien. I mean, you know, do not let
Speaker 1: the propagandas seep into your brain. They're working very hard
Speaker 1: at it, They're they're really pushing hard enough. And and
Speaker 1: these other clown show places, Uh, they don't do the research,
Speaker 1: they don't do the work. They don't know what they're
Speaker 1: talking about an immigration and customs enforcement, And there are
Speaker 1: real efforts, there are real problems where there's a blockage
Speaker 1: of cooperation on on the most important kinds of criminal
Speaker 1: investigations because these jurisdictions won't work with immigrations customs enforcement period.
Speaker 1: That's what I was told today by the acting ICE
Speaker 1: director under Obama. And that's a story. People need to know.
Speaker 1: That's a truth that needs to get out there, needs
Speaker 1: to become a part of this discussion. Uh, and I'm
Speaker 1: gonna do my part to get the word out. We
Speaker 1: got a big third hour coming up. Team got an
Speaker 1: update for you on a gee Hottis who was saved
Speaker 1: several times by the West and repaid that debt with
Speaker 1: a suicide bombing. Vile scum will delve in his ideology.
Speaker 1: Stay with me. You are now entering the Freedom Tital
Speaker 1: Operations Center. Falls visitor programs musty kept strictly. Need to
Speaker 1: know Team Buck is cleared and ready for the Buck Brief.
Speaker 1: The Manchester suicide bomber who killed twenty two people at
Speaker 1: an area on a Grande concert in May. It turns
Speaker 1: out he was rescued by the British Royal Navy a
Speaker 1: few years earlier. This is one of these cases where
Speaker 1: it's just so clear to me that it's not about
Speaker 1: poverty or deprivation or isolation from society or any of
Speaker 1: these other additional factors that can lead someone to become
Speaker 1: a jihadist. It is about a belief in jihat. That
Speaker 1: is the that is the precursor, the precondition. You must
Speaker 1: have a belief in jihad to act in this way,
Speaker 1: you must truly think that it is the truth that
Speaker 1: you are a holy warrior for Mohammed and fighting for
Speaker 1: Allah and all all the stuff that they always say
Speaker 1: and they put in their martyrdom videos. So this guy,
Speaker 1: Salmon Abetti, who was born in Manchester, Okay, he was
Speaker 1: born in Manchester in the UK because his parents fled
Speaker 1: to the United Kingdom and were given uh safe haven there.
Speaker 1: So you know, his his family owes their lives to
Speaker 1: the generosity of the United Kingdom and the people of Britain.
Speaker 1: And then his father returned. His father returned to Libya,
Speaker 1: Inn after rebels over through the government and then the
Speaker 1: sun here. Salomon of Eddie was in Libya and was
Speaker 1: rescued because things got so things got so hot during
Speaker 1: the civil war in Libya. Was rescued by the British
Speaker 1: Navy and then proceeded to go and blow up a
Speaker 1: pop concert, an Areata Grande concert. Killed twenty two people.
Speaker 1: I mean, just in one of the as as unspeakable
Speaker 1: and horrific and senseless and act of violence as any
Speaker 1: human being could ever could ever engage in. You know,
Speaker 1: that's one of the parts of this whole immigration and
Speaker 1: asylum to bait as it involves the the Islamic world
Speaker 1: is you know, you would think that there is a
Speaker 1: sense of gratitude from people who flee to the West
Speaker 1: because we've given them safe haven. But you have to
Speaker 1: remember that there is an entire ideology of radical Islam
Speaker 1: that and in Islamism that blames all of the problems
Speaker 1: of the Islamic world on the West. So essentially, essentially, effectively,
Speaker 1: eighties are fault. The dysfunctions that they think they are
Speaker 1: fleeing in the Middle East are a result. They will
Speaker 1: be told by radicalized moms, by their own government media
Speaker 1: in many cases, by mainstream papers, by Western papers, by
Speaker 1: by leftists in Europe and in America that there was
Speaker 1: the dysfunction that they are suffering in the Islamic world
Speaker 1: is our fault, and so why while and look, I
Speaker 1: understand that we're speaking in the in broad strokes here
Speaker 1: and that there are lots of people who are incredibly
Speaker 1: grateful to be here. And you could probably tell me
Speaker 1: stories about either refugees who live in your hometown wherever,
Speaker 1: who are you know who are great and they've become
Speaker 1: great Americans I think I get that, but there's something
Speaker 1: specific the same way that there's a unique threat posed
Speaker 1: to civilization by the ideology of radical Islaman and jihadism.
Speaker 1: It is a unique threat. I'm not saying it's the
Speaker 1: only threat, but it's a particularly poignant one. There's also
Speaker 1: something unique in this moment in time, in this ideology
Speaker 1: where we, as the societies that are bringing people in,
Speaker 1: have to be on guard for those who aren't going
Speaker 1: to be grateful. In fact, we're going to view this
Speaker 1: as a point of weakness. I'm reminded of that interview
Speaker 1: that I did on air uh not long ago with
Speaker 1: a doctor Bennard. I don't know how many of you
Speaker 1: recall this, but she she had written this piece, and
Speaker 1: she's a fluent German speaker who is who spent lots
Speaker 1: and lots of time in Afghanistan as well. I believe
Speaker 1: she speaks Pashto fluently, although I'd have to check to
Speaker 1: make sure about that, but she is married to an
Speaker 1: Afghan and she did this whole study on Afghan refugees
Speaker 1: in Austria and how these horrific, uh, these horrific acts
Speaker 1: of violence. This was back in the summer of seventeen,
Speaker 1: she published this in the National Interest. Cheryl Bernard was
Speaker 1: her name. Afghan stand out among the refugees committing crimes
Speaker 1: in Austrian elsewhere. Why and said, is because they they
Speaker 1: have been trained both at home and then by fellow refugees,
Speaker 1: and then in once they've been accepted in the host
Speaker 1: country to hate the country that has taken them in.
Speaker 1: And with Salomon A. Betty, the suicide bomber from the
Speaker 1: area on a Grande concert whose family was saved by Britain,
Speaker 1: and then who once he decided to go fight in Libya?
Speaker 1: People say, oh, buck, but that war, you know against Kadafi,
Speaker 1: the West and NATO and Britain. You know, we were
Speaker 1: all involved that, okay, But so Rory was um. I
Speaker 1: don't think that was a good idea. That was a
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton thing. And that's a whole whole separate discussion
Speaker 1: we could get into. But are we now to believe
Speaker 1: that Kadafi was that the Libyan people would have been happier?
Speaker 1: Kadafi could have slaughtered the people of Benghazi. I I
Speaker 1: just you know, it's always we're damned if we do,
Speaker 1: damned if we don't. People are just looking for excuses.
Speaker 1: They're looking for ways to blame the dysfunctions of their
Speaker 1: society on the West, on the freest, most prosperous, happiest,
Speaker 1: best places which are which is the Western world, which
Speaker 1: I would not It is not really a geographic determination anymore.
Speaker 1: You know, a lot of people would say that Japan
Speaker 1: and South Korea are part of increasingly part of Western civilization,
Speaker 1: um and certainly Australia, which is by no in no
Speaker 1: geographic way in New Zealand and no geographic way united
Speaker 1: with us, but they're definitely part of Western civilization, right.
Speaker 1: So it's more about ideals, rule of law, and culture
Speaker 1: than it is about actual geography. When refer to the West,
Speaker 1: the west has become a pretty imprecise term, and as
Speaker 1: a lot of people would note, the parts of Africa
Speaker 1: are way far west of parts of Europe, So it
Speaker 1: doesn't really make any sense to geographically. It's it's more
Speaker 1: of a of an ideal of uniting factors around a
Speaker 1: whole bunch of of different different countries. But this is
Speaker 1: something we really have to pay attention to because you know,
Speaker 1: the previous the history of the United States taking in immigrants,
Speaker 1: particularly in moments of crisis for them is gratitude for
Speaker 1: the to the host country, you know, gratitude to the
Speaker 1: host country for saving them, for taking in you know,
Speaker 1: the from the poem right, the poor, the week younger,
Speaker 1: all that, even though that's not official U S policy
Speaker 1: and hasn't been. You know, there's some sentimentality that I
Speaker 1: guess has a validity there about how we just taken
Speaker 1: people from all of the world based on a whole
Speaker 1: bunch of different facts. But with the Islamic world, as
Speaker 1: we see from Salomon at Betty, there can be people
Speaker 1: whose families are saved by the West, who then they
Speaker 1: themselves are personally saved by by Western forces as they
Speaker 1: escape a conflict where Western forces. You know, if you're
Speaker 1: I'm really trying to add this all up right, and
Speaker 1: I know I'm I'm giving you a stream of consciousness here,
Speaker 1: and and I need to tighten this sense that the
Speaker 1: tightened this analysis up for you a little bit, so
Speaker 1: it's very clear where I'm going. But you got a
Speaker 1: guy whose family was saved by the UK, who then
Speaker 1: went to fighting the conflict where the UK was involved
Speaker 1: in trying to save more Libyans for humanitarian reasons, and
Speaker 1: then things get too hot there for him, so he
Speaker 1: has to be saved from a you know, sinking boat
Speaker 1: in the Mediterranean by the British Navy. So his family
Speaker 1: saved by the Brits. Then the Bridge try to save
Speaker 1: probably his extended family in Libya, and then they saved
Speaker 1: him specifically when he's escaping the conflict where they're trying
Speaker 1: to save his extended family Libya, after his family went
Speaker 1: back there. After the Brits saved his family in the
Speaker 1: first place. Right, they see this big circle of just
Speaker 1: the West just helping this guy out, and he returns
Speaker 1: so many straps on a suicide invest and kills twenty
Speaker 1: two people, young girls trying to enjoy a pop concert. Um.
Speaker 1: This this is a a a true uh and and
Speaker 1: very dark form of brain of brainwashing geared towards evil.
Speaker 1: That that's what happens with the jihadest mindset. Anything becomes
Speaker 1: permissible to them so long as they could fitted into
Speaker 1: this rubric of of jihad and and any act of
Speaker 1: violence against their perceived opponents. In this who's everyone, which
Speaker 1: means really everyone who doesn't agree with them is more
Speaker 1: is not just morally acceptable. What has a divine right?
Speaker 1: And that's What is different about radical Islam from a
Speaker 1: lot of other things, the notion that Allah is a
Speaker 1: essentially a guarantee of more righteousness, despite the heinousness of
Speaker 1: any particular act. Whatever you do under this banner of
Speaker 1: radical Islam, under the banner of jihad is is inherently
Speaker 1: justified because it is part of the is Part of
Speaker 1: this struggle is divinely ordained struggle. And I will tell
Speaker 1: you that we are at a period right now where
Speaker 1: it feels like there's a lull, and I don't think
Speaker 1: it has nothing to do with Trump too. I'll tell
Speaker 1: you that I think that the bad guys know that
Speaker 1: if they give they step out a line at the Jihada,
Speaker 1: step out of line, they give Trump an opportunity, He's
Speaker 1: just gonna drop the dropped the hammer on them like
Speaker 1: it's never been dropped before. Um. You know, I think
Speaker 1: that there is that the symbolism of some of Trump's
Speaker 1: bigger strikes as commander in chief against the Islamic worlds terrorists.
Speaker 1: Safe havens have had real effect and impact. But you know,
Speaker 1: Al Qaeda is resurging right now, and yeah, in nobody's
Speaker 1: talking about Yemen. I'm thinking I'll probably do a Yemen
Speaker 1: deep dive here on the show tomorrow. It's the biggest
Speaker 1: humanitarian crisis in the world, folks. No, you know, all
Speaker 1: these media talking hands are all blah blah blah. We
Speaker 1: care so much about people and why Republicans are mean
Speaker 1: and all this other stuff. Right, nobody's talking about the
Speaker 1: fact that Yemen is on the brink of of of
Speaker 1: a complete catastrophe right now, meaning that there's a blockade
Speaker 1: and they're they're running out of food. We haven't seen
Speaker 1: anything like in a forced mass starvation on the scale
Speaker 1: that you'd be seeing in Yemen in decades. And the
Speaker 1: only thing that that comes to mind that would really
Speaker 1: come close would be Somalia. You remember, there's a U.
Speaker 1: S Military intervention Somalia, you know, under U n auspices
Speaker 1: black Hawk down having because people are starving. That's happening
Speaker 1: right now and Yemen. But the media would rather tell
Speaker 1: you about Michael Avanati and Stormy Daniels and Cohen and
Speaker 1: all that. That's what they're focused on. That's the awareness
Speaker 1: raising they're doing, not fact that Yemen's about to collapse.
Speaker 1: All right, We've got much more teams there right there.
Speaker 1: The FBI calls home title theft one of the fastest
Speaker 1: growing crimes out there. And you have to brace yourself, folks,
Speaker 1: because if you've ever had your credit card soon as
Speaker 1: I have, it's nothing compared to what you're in for.
Speaker 1: The hell you're in for if an identity thief takes
Speaker 1: control of your home's title. It's so easy to do
Speaker 1: this online, folks. I've seen the demo home title Lock.
Speaker 1: Folks have walked me through it. They get access to
Speaker 1: the necessary information about your home's title. Then they create
Speaker 1: an online forgery. They printed out, they get it notarized,
Speaker 1: and bam, all of a sudden, they can start record.
Speaker 1: They can start getting loans against your property, against your equity.
Speaker 1: You find out about this when you get the payments.
Speaker 1: Don't let this happen to you. For just pennies a day,
Speaker 1: Home title Lock protects my most viable asset, my family's home.
Speaker 1: Registered now for a free analysis and discover if your
Speaker 1: home's title has been compromised. That's a sixty dollar value. Free.
Speaker 1: Visit home title lock dot com. That's home title lock
Speaker 1: dot com. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she
Speaker 1: isn't going anywhere anytime soon. The Justice reportedly said yesterday
Speaker 1: she hopes to stay on the bench for at least
Speaker 1: another five years. The five year old told Sie end quote.
Speaker 1: My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, stepped down when
Speaker 1: he was ninety, so I think I have about at
Speaker 1: least five more years. At least five more years, that's
Speaker 1: the plan for the US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Speaker 1: A lot of eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg's workout regimes
Speaker 1: because well, we'll see lot Hinton valence. They call her
Speaker 1: the notorious RBB for a reason. She sets the standards
Speaker 1: and working out being smart. You know, well into your
Speaker 1: late eighties, she's physically active. Jonathan RBG five more years.
Speaker 1: We've seen the workouts. Progressives who desperately want um RBG
Speaker 1: to stay. I sometimes envisioned or hope that Ruth Bader
Speaker 1: gains Justice Ginsburg. Uh sleeps in bubble wrap, walks around
Speaker 1: in bubble rap because I want nothing to happen to her.
Speaker 1: I mean this, Oh my gosh, it's pathological. Folks. They're
Speaker 1: so terrified of what would happen if they lost their
Speaker 1: super legislature. Uh, they're super legislature, that is the Supreme court,
Speaker 1: which has handed the Left victory after victory for decades,
Speaker 1: and now that we're kind of now that we're hip
Speaker 1: to the scam and it may no longer work for them,
Speaker 1: they're particularly upset. But this whole notion of of Ruth
Speaker 1: Bader Ginsburg as a pop culture hip hero is another
Speaker 1: one of these incredible media constructs. I mean, there's this
Speaker 1: whole cult of the RBG, of the Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Speaker 1: work out. I mean there's a lot of of pieces.
Speaker 1: If you go up and you google, uh Ruth Bader
Speaker 1: Ginsburg work Out, a lot of things pop up and
Speaker 1: people talk of out this and they talk about it
Speaker 1: like the RBG, like the notorious b i G, which
Speaker 1: was Biggie Smalls. This is all the construct folks. This
Speaker 1: is all out of nowhere because they're they're creating this
Speaker 1: persona for Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who is you know, a
Speaker 1: an older woman who I I don't think you can
Speaker 1: say it's particularly tied into the pop culture of the moment,
Speaker 1: but this is what happens. This is the treatment you
Speaker 1: get from the left when you give them what they
Speaker 1: want politically, they'll make you cool even if you're not cool.
Speaker 1: They'll make you a hip even if you're not a hip.
Speaker 1: They'll create the perception that you do these super hardcore
Speaker 1: workouts that like nobody else can do. I mean, this
Speaker 1: is a piece on Politico. I did Ruth Bader Ginsburg's workout.
Speaker 1: It nearly broke me. Pumping iron with rbg's personal trainer
Speaker 1: is no joke. I mean, Ruth Bader Ginsberg. I'm happy
Speaker 1: that she's staying, you know, healthy and all this stuff,
Speaker 1: but I gotta be honest with you. You know, she's
Speaker 1: kind of a all old woman. I mean, can we
Speaker 1: can we stop with this Ruth Bader Ginsburg superhero cult nonsense.
Speaker 1: But there is a there is really this weird panic
Speaker 1: from Democrats because you know, Kennedy retired officially today. See
Speaker 1: how the Supreme Court opening. I I I got Ron
Speaker 1: Johnson coming on the show on Not This Show on
Speaker 1: Rising tomorrow, or asked him about McConnell, McConnell saying that
Speaker 1: it's clear sailing here on getting kavanall through Kavanaugh. There's
Speaker 1: nothing they can come up with that's going to derail
Speaker 1: this nomination. They're trying so hard, but it's pathetic and
Speaker 1: they are completely paddick about Ginsburgh. I mean Ginsburg coming
Speaker 1: out now and saying that she's gonna be she's good
Speaker 1: for another five years. Let me just also point out,
Speaker 1: and I'm not look, I wish no person ill health
Speaker 1: based on their politics because I'm not. I am not
Speaker 1: actually a savage. I'm not a leftist. I'm not a collectivist.
Speaker 1: Uh bled Ruth Bader Ginsburg. You know, she doesn't know
Speaker 1: she'd to know what the years? You know, she's eighty.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, she's eighty five. I thought she was
Speaker 1: late seventy and pardon me, I didn't realize she's eighty
Speaker 1: five years old. Mike. Yes, now you know, eighty five
Speaker 1: is the new seventy five. I get that, But still
Speaker 1: that's you know, she's she's up there. Um, you know,
Speaker 1: she's gonna wait till ninety before she retires. And there's
Speaker 1: clearly a political reason for this, folks. I mean she
Speaker 1: I think she understands in the back and in the
Speaker 1: back of her mind, I think she realizes Trump's gonna
Speaker 1: be present for a long time. You know, Trump is
Speaker 1: going to break in the liberal media over time, whether
Speaker 1: they like it or not, because he's gonna be around
Speaker 1: for quite some time. But that she's here saying that
Speaker 1: she's going to last through the Trump presidency is a
Speaker 1: signal to the left right, and she's trying to calm
Speaker 1: their fears. I suppose keep in mind, folks that once
Speaker 1: you're eighty five, you know, you don't know, you don't
Speaker 1: know what five years you know what? Really, the few
Speaker 1: none of us really know what what five years of old. Gosh,
Speaker 1: I hope I'm healthy in five years, healthy in five months.
Speaker 1: But here, here we are, with the Supreme Court battle looming,
Speaker 1: seeing how the veil has been lifted from all this
Speaker 1: stuff they talk about openly on TV. Liberal versus conservative justices.
Speaker 1: That's not the way this is supposed to happen. That's
Speaker 1: not how all this is supposed to work. I'm supposed
Speaker 1: to have liberal and conservative justice. We're supposed to have
Speaker 1: judges who interpret the law based on what the law says.
Speaker 1: The notion that this is like draft picks for two
Speaker 1: different teams, Team Liberal and team Conservative just shows you
Speaker 1: how politicized the court has become. It. It's at this point,
Speaker 1: I think, irretrievably politicized unless you get just all constitutionalists
Speaker 1: who would fall into the rubric of conservatism and as
Speaker 1: far as the left is concerned on the court, it's
Speaker 1: just gonna keep being this game of, well, how do
Speaker 1: we get enough leftists who are committed idealogues, who will
Speaker 1: interpret the law in accordance with their policy preferences. How
Speaker 1: do we get enough of them? We can get what
Speaker 1: we want. That's the way the liberals have been playing
Speaker 1: the game for decades. And they have created this pop
Speaker 1: culture hero of Ruth Bader Ginsberg and the Notorious RBG
Speaker 1: and all this stuff. It's just it's weird, it's cultish,
Speaker 1: it's kind of pathetic. Uh, you know, there's there's nothing.
Speaker 1: I mean, most people, most people that are walking around
Speaker 1: turning about the Notorious RBG don't even I honestly believe that.
Speaker 1: They don't even know what she sounds like. You know,
Speaker 1: they can't even think of what the last time they
Speaker 1: heard her speak. And you know, look, I I she's
Speaker 1: a frail old, frail older woman. I don't know if
Speaker 1: the whole thing strikes me. It's very very strange. And
Speaker 1: their obsession on her health andever it's just creepy. It's
Speaker 1: just creepy. Um. But it shows you how desperate they are,
Speaker 1: it really does. That's that's a a part of this
Speaker 1: whole discussion right now that you can't avoid. And Ginsburg,
Speaker 1: what is she like? Chief counsel for the a c
Speaker 1: l U. You couldn't find somebody who is a more
Speaker 1: committed liberal than Ruth Bader Ginsburg. And she got confirmed.
Speaker 1: You know, they they put her through on the court. Uh.
Speaker 1: It's just so much nonsense these days, really is It's
Speaker 1: it's getting crazy out there, folks, all right, eight eight
Speaker 1: to five eight four d buck, you go on a
Speaker 1: chat before we close up shop tonight in the Freedom Hut. Also,
Speaker 1: don't forget Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton. That's where
Speaker 1: you send me messages. We will be right back. That
Speaker 1: comedians do their job, because let me explain something to you.
Speaker 1: You're not letting comedians do their job, and you're miserable.
Speaker 1: Not miserable, because laughter is a release, just like watching acting,
Speaker 1: just like listening to music, just like looking at art.
Speaker 1: Laughter is a release that you are now cutting off.
Speaker 1: Stop walking around so offended. You're not going to survive
Speaker 1: life if you walk around. Now. While I don't find
Speaker 1: Leslie Jones even a little bit funny as a comedian,
Speaker 1: I have to say I agree with their insight here,
Speaker 1: and that people need to stop acting like there's some
Speaker 1: terrible uh there, there's some terrible act that's been committed
Speaker 1: every time somebody makes a joke about anything. The left
Speaker 1: really is in the process of killing comedy entirely. Nothing
Speaker 1: is allowed to be funny anymore. For a while, they
Speaker 1: figured that just making fun of white people, white Christians
Speaker 1: and white racism was gonna just sustain comedy and Trump
Speaker 1: and Trump supporters. But now I think there's a fatigue
Speaker 1: those jokes, even if you think that those are the
Speaker 1: only things you should be making jokes about, which is idiotic.
Speaker 1: But a lot of leftists think that way. Those jokes
Speaker 1: are now stale. Those jokes are no longer amusing, even
Speaker 1: to the people who really just want to be snyde
Speaker 1: and mock others because they've heard them so many times.
Speaker 1: And this is one of the this this is one
Speaker 1: of these moments where you look at what's happened in
Speaker 1: recent weeks with O'casio Quartez, for example, on that satirical
Speaker 1: interview clip where they had Alibeth Stucky from CRTV and
Speaker 1: doing the sit down with with a Kazi Quartez, it
Speaker 1: was clearly meant to be a joke and it was cut,
Speaker 1: and you had many people on the left who think
Speaker 1: that their hip and think that they're really with it,
Speaker 1: freaking out about it, you know, becoming agitated, becoming angry
Speaker 1: over what what had transpired, and I just think it
Speaker 1: is completely and utterly uh well, it's nuts for one thing,
Speaker 1: but but also when you look a little deeper into it,
Speaker 1: we're we're losing something as a culture. Man. I come
Speaker 1: on this radio show and there's so many times and
Speaker 1: I feel badly because I feel like I'm depriving not
Speaker 1: just you but myself of the release of just letting
Speaker 1: a rip and making some jokes. There's so many times
Speaker 1: when I think that would be funny. But I just
Speaker 1: air on the side of all right, don't don't push
Speaker 1: it too much, because you know, I don't need the uh,
Speaker 1: the disgusting smear merchants of media matters and and others
Speaker 1: you know coming after me. I just don't need it,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't find it. I don't think it's
Speaker 1: a trade off that I want to make. So you know,
Speaker 1: I I just look at all this stuff now and
Speaker 1: I wish it were different. And so with that in mind,
Speaker 1: that we all need a little bit of comedy. I
Speaker 1: wanted to share something with you that I think is
Speaker 1: is the the funniest thing that I've heard in quite
Speaker 1: a while. Just without further ado, please play clip I'm
Speaker 1: not that damn smart. You know how easy this is, Jesus,
Speaker 1: but no one wants to do it. No one has
Speaker 1: the instinct or the whale to execute anything real. They
Speaker 1: only execute failure. I are Can you just play the
Speaker 1: beginning of that again? It's my favorite. I'm not that
Speaker 1: damn smart. You know. Oh man, he's amazing. You couldn't
Speaker 1: You couldn't construe a character that was more rich in
Speaker 1: unintentional unintentional satire than than Mr Mr Jones over there.
Speaker 1: It is. It is incredible. Uh. I like his do
Speaker 1: we have his ever a while ago? Just I like
Speaker 1: to eat meat. I like to make children. You know,
Speaker 1: it's like whoa settle down there, buddy. You know, I
Speaker 1: used to think that he was a lot older than me,
Speaker 1: just because I think he looks quite a bit ab.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's not that much. He's maybe I think
Speaker 1: he's has like early forties. So we're not contemporaries, but
Speaker 1: we're pretty close to be contemporaries. Uh, and he is.
Speaker 1: He's a wild man. So I just thought that was
Speaker 1: something I wanted to brighten your day a little bit
Speaker 1: because there's not enough comedy going around or we're not
Speaker 1: allowed to make enough jokes. I'm also thinking that it
Speaker 1: would be fun if I could set up a podcast
Speaker 1: or something where we just we just called it the
Speaker 1: Unsafe Space, and we people could just basically say anything,
Speaker 1: and the idea would be that you're you're not allowed
Speaker 1: to get in trouble for it, Like there's some you
Speaker 1: can indemnify yourself. There's some way that you could sign well,
Speaker 1: like I'm not I'm not saying that this is okay
Speaker 1: or put it correct. I'm just saying that this is
Speaker 1: a thing that But there is no such thing. You
Speaker 1: cannot create an unsafe space right now without the risk
Speaker 1: of tremendous media backlash and people coming after you with
Speaker 1: all kinds of stuff. So it's a shame, but at
Speaker 1: least we got Alex Jones to keep us entertained. Facebook's
Speaker 1: apparently banned im which or bandom temporarily or something, which
Speaker 1: I suppose they have the right to do. But it
Speaker 1: is a little bit. It is a little bit troubling
Speaker 1: that they are taking that approach to things. Uh, but
Speaker 1: LEASTI he does. He does come up sometimes with with
Speaker 1: comedy Goldberg, your Illuminati and you know, Queen of England
Speaker 1: and all that stuff. It's I give the guy for
Speaker 1: for a lunatic. He's very entertaining. We have roll call
Speaker 1: coming up here in just a moment, team, so stay
Speaker 1: with me. The show ain't over yet, folks, keeping it real.
Speaker 1: It's time for roll call up. Oh it's so jazzy.
Speaker 1: So some of that license free music that you get
Speaker 1: is uh, it's got some got some groovy tunes to it.
Speaker 1: Got some groovy tunes to it. By the way, if
Speaker 1: any of you have suggestions for uh a place I
Speaker 1: can find a really good workout music list? What do
Speaker 1: you call that playlist? Music list? Gosh, I'm I'm listening
Speaker 1: to say And by the way, don't give me Welcome
Speaker 1: to the Jungle and a c D. I already have
Speaker 1: all that. I've already got all the basics covered. I
Speaker 1: need something that's probably from the last ten years, you know,
Speaker 1: because I know all the classics. Okay. I the Tiger
Speaker 1: has been on my playlist since I've had a playlist
Speaker 1: I'm looking for new stuff that will get me kind
Speaker 1: of fired up. So no classic rock because I already
Speaker 1: have all the classic rock. If you've got any ideas
Speaker 1: at me on Facebook dot com slash bucks excident. Let's
Speaker 1: get two. I have not been working on enough these days. Man,
Speaker 1: I'm turning into a pasty, a pasty pile of goo. Uh.
Speaker 1: T J writes Buck. I have to say you're a
Speaker 1: better man than me. Not true, t J. Plus, you
Speaker 1: wear shields high in your photo on Facebook, which makes
Speaker 1: me just heart you tremendously. The fact that you're able
Speaker 1: to keep a straight face, not to mention, keep from
Speaker 1: bursting into laughter following that Nancy Pelosi interview on Rising
Speaker 1: this morning that took some serious reserve. Also, do you
Speaker 1: really think Nancy can remember something? And count? I hate
Speaker 1: to be degrading, but honestly, he doesn't. Look at the interview,
Speaker 1: I seriously question or competency to hold any public office.
Speaker 1: Not to mention speaker, just saying from t J. T J,
Speaker 1: Nancy wants to tell you to go and shove it.
Speaker 1: That's that's the That's what Nancy has said. She gets feisty. Man,
Speaker 1: you'll mess with Nancy. Dennis next up here, thank you
Speaker 1: for the interview with Beth Lindstrom. Can you interview Tracy Lavron.
Speaker 1: She's running against Jim McGovern one of the others that
Speaker 1: needs to go. Personally, I'm a modern I'm probably a
Speaker 1: moderate Democrat, but I do like seeing you on Fox. Well, Dennis,
Speaker 1: thank you. You know, look, I I try to be reasonable,
Speaker 1: even affable in the way that I make my case
Speaker 1: for what I believe. UM, So, I I do really
Speaker 1: appreciate it when Democrats listen. I like when independence listen.
Speaker 1: And and you know, I I have had back in
Speaker 1: the day when I used to do CNN, when it
Speaker 1: was still a network that tried to have both sides
Speaker 1: of the story. UM, I had people coming to me
Speaker 1: and say, you know, I'm a Democrat, but I really
Speaker 1: like I like the way you present your case on TV.
Speaker 1: I was thought that was it was very generous of
Speaker 1: them to say. And you know that was in the
Speaker 1: pre Trump era, though, I think right now be a
Speaker 1: little bit different. Alright, Next up here, Rachel, Right, how's
Speaker 1: it going, Buck? I was listening to you talking about
Speaker 1: the name change in Austin, Texas, and I couldn't help
Speaker 1: but think about Germany. They haven't done this sort of thing,
Speaker 1: have they? Only in leftist America? Keep up the great work, Rachel. Well, Rachel,
Speaker 1: if you mean renaming stuff, yeah, I mean I think
Speaker 1: deutsch Land was deutsch Land before, during, and after Hitler's rise,
Speaker 1: So I mean, I don't think that they've changed names,
Speaker 1: although I doubt that after the Second World War. I mean,
Speaker 1: look here, I don't think they named anything after Hitler.
Speaker 1: I guess it's maybe one of the main one of
Speaker 1: the main distinctions that you'd have to point to you here.
Speaker 1: I don't think that there was any uh that there
Speaker 1: was no fondness for what had happened with the Third Reich,
Speaker 1: and amongst the Germans especially concerned they lost that war.
Speaker 1: So I don't think that there was anyone naming, naming,
Speaker 1: editing after after Hitler. Um, But I don't. I don't
Speaker 1: really know, Rachel. That's an interesting question. I mean, you
Speaker 1: think about the Soviet Union. There's still plenty of stuff
Speaker 1: about Lenin and plenty of vestiges of their Soviet past
Speaker 1: in Russia today, So interesting, jar Rights, I have to
Speaker 1: counter the taekwondo comment and its applicability and self defense.
Speaker 1: I used to train in krav maga under a man
Speaker 1: who is one of the top twenty people when it
Speaker 1: comes to ascension in the largest taekwondo association worldwide. He
Speaker 1: will be the first one to tell you that taekwondo
Speaker 1: has very little application in self defense. You know, jar,
Speaker 1: I don't want to get in the middle of this one.
Speaker 1: I don't want to catch an axe kick to my temple.
Speaker 1: But I will just say that. You know, I've I've
Speaker 1: seen a lot of taekwondo, and I've very rarely seen
Speaker 1: taekwondo work. That said, just being able to throw a
Speaker 1: solid punch and having those basic mechanics of self defense,
Speaker 1: I think that's certainly worthwhile. But you know what, what
Speaker 1: every I've never seen a fight. I'll say this, and
Speaker 1: I've seen my fair share of fights, actually, believe it
Speaker 1: or not. I don't send me like buck Really. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I used to run with kind of a kind of
Speaker 1: a fast crowd back in the day. It's a lot.
Speaker 1: I was really in a high school. I saw a
Speaker 1: lot of fights in high school. Um, not so many
Speaker 1: in college and and then as an adult fighting Oh gosh, no,
Speaker 1: none of that. Uh not savages. But I've never really
Speaker 1: seen a fight that had two people stand and trade
Speaker 1: strikes for more than a few seconds. It always would
Speaker 1: turn into grappling, tackling, and and it's sort of wrestling
Speaker 1: and punching. I've rarely seen it ever turned into just
Speaker 1: trading standing strikes. So you know, with taekwondo, I know
Speaker 1: there's some grap Anyway, people like Buck stop talking about
Speaker 1: martial arts. I really want to have you know what
Speaker 1: I'll bring on someday, somebody who's a martial arts expert.
Speaker 1: We can talk about the applicability of some of the
Speaker 1: different styles here, and we talk about who shoo style
Speaker 1: and praying mentis style, and you must you must learn
Speaker 1: to fight. I mean stuff like that. That'd be fun.
Speaker 1: I the wo sho is Yeah, no, that's Chinese. I'm
Speaker 1: trying to remember now, praying mantis. I used to play
Speaker 1: a lot of these martial arts video games too, misspent youth, Um,
Speaker 1: here we go. Mud is the name of this person? Hi? Mud,
Speaker 1: My name is Bucks. So I can't I don't cast aspersions. Buck,
Speaker 1: love your show, love your vocals, and love you found
Speaker 1: Miss Molly. We have a lot in common and maybe
Speaker 1: even a kindred spirit. I'm a disabled Marine Corps combat
Speaker 1: veteran who mouthful. Huh. I was intelligence analysts for years.
Speaker 1: I loved it, all said aspirations of stepping up to
Speaker 1: the bigs. I'm Catholic and filled with guilt and blatant
Speaker 1: dynasty like brutal, yet thinly masked with humor. Uh not Irish. Worse,
Speaker 1: I'm Scottish. They both speak gibberish. I love history, nowhere
Speaker 1: near your level, sorrowfully, A re modeled impressionist after I
Speaker 1: broke my neck, lost my voice for a year, and
Speaker 1: I'm still learning to generate inflections. A trivia aficionado, including
Speaker 1: movie quotes, though I bet I could rival even Uh
Speaker 1: you ever try the bacon game? Uh? Both dig the
Speaker 1: do I'm freaking bald, and then follically challenged what's in
Speaker 1: the box? Well that's from seven? All quotes are my
Speaker 1: own cheers. Uh Matt oh, Matt. I don't know why
Speaker 1: I said mud there, but Matt hey, Matt. First of all,
Speaker 1: thank you for your service, man, and thank you for
Speaker 1: your your note, your your humanity, your sense of humor,
Speaker 1: and your kind words about what I'm doing here. Does
Speaker 1: sound like we're kindred spirits and it Uh. I appreciate that.
Speaker 1: I appreciate you listen to the show Shield Times coming
Speaker 1: back because I said this month we're gonna do the
Speaker 1: Siege of Malta. I think I'm gonna break it up
Speaker 1: into two parts, and you know, I'm gonna do it,
Speaker 1: and you know, maybe a lot of people will listen.
Speaker 1: Maybe we'll have like a football stadium or two or
Speaker 1: the people listening again this time, or maybe it'll just
Speaker 1: be you know, friends and family. But I just think
Speaker 1: that's the fun thing to put out there. I like
Speaker 1: to do it, and especially as the new cycle slows down,
Speaker 1: and think it'll be a lot of fun. Thank you
Speaker 1: very much the Matt for your kind note. Brian Right
Speaker 1: wrote the following, Buck, just watch yesterday's Rising and I
Speaker 1: love that you got in that job on Austin Washington,
Speaker 1: d C. And a racing history to the left, just
Speaker 1: saying Yale named for a slave trader and president of
Speaker 1: the East India Trade company, Mike Drop. Do you have
Speaker 1: the demographics back on political leanings of the viewers of Rising?
Speaker 1: Is it split even as you're trying to target You know, Brian,
Speaker 1: that's a really good question. We don't have demo info
Speaker 1: yet on the show. We probably will in the fall.
Speaker 1: Um when we just I know that the two biggest
Speaker 1: audiences are in New York and California, So I don't
Speaker 1: know what that means. It could be concerned, you know,
Speaker 1: there could be some Roadue conservatives in those two states
Speaker 1: that are listening, or or perhaps we're getting a lot
Speaker 1: of Democrats that are watching. I don't know. Uh, it's
Speaker 1: it's all very new and very experimental, but I'm having
Speaker 1: fun with it, and I do appreciate that some of
Speaker 1: you take the time to watch. It's nice to have
Speaker 1: some members of the team in support. Hill dot TV
Speaker 1: Slash Rising. If you want to check it out, we
Speaker 1: have with some fun segments. Definitely check out some of
Speaker 1: the panel segments. I think those are and then the
Speaker 1: towards the end of the show, we do something called
Speaker 1: before you Go, where we just run down some stories.
Speaker 1: I think those are the most fun parts of the
Speaker 1: show and so those of you haven't been exposed to
Speaker 1: it before, I think that's probably where I would I
Speaker 1: would start and let we're or a big interview. We
Speaker 1: get big. We got Senator Ron Johnson on tomorrow. That'll
Speaker 1: be really interesting. Uh, Dan right, buck Love your show
Speaker 1: missed several episodes. Tuning in online though maybe have comments soon.
Speaker 1: Interactive listeners, that's what you like, right Dan? Well, Dan,
Speaker 1: obviously I'm reading a comment from an interactive listener right now,
Speaker 1: So there you go. Um, and then what do we
Speaker 1: have here? Uh? Almost this is from Michael almost forgot.
Speaker 1: I have to laugh every time you come with the
Speaker 1: lame reasons why you don't like having guests on too
Speaker 1: often admitted bub. The only reason is you like to
Speaker 1: hear yourself blab for two for three hours. Michael Guilty
Speaker 1: has charged, Bro Guilty has charged I. I am. I
Speaker 1: am greedy with this audience. I do not like to
Speaker 1: share this audience unless I have a really good reason,
Speaker 1: because I have so much that I want to tell you.
Speaker 1: I get to read in all day. At the time
Speaker 1: I come on this radio show, I've just been thinking
Speaker 1: all day about things that I can talk to you
Speaker 1: about and make this as worthwhile, interesting and insightful as
Speaker 1: I possibly can. Um. But thanks Michael for the always
Speaker 1: salty interactions. I appreciate it. You know. It's once in
Speaker 1: a while, like like before Christmas and my birthday, Michael
Speaker 1: was like, You've done an okay job this year. I'm like,
Speaker 1: thank you, Michael, so sweet of you, Sue. Next up here,
Speaker 1: real life experience of paying for medical insurance through husband's
Speaker 1: employer and seeing the benefits customers of my retail liquor
Speaker 1: store received free. The benefits customers of my retail liquor
Speaker 1: store received free while I suffer and pay, but they
Speaker 1: get treated like royalty. You know, Sue, you know you
Speaker 1: bring this up and and this is something that happens
Speaker 1: where people see that they're very much struggling to be
Speaker 1: self sufficient with their health insurance and pay their bills,
Speaker 1: and then other people there's a tremendous effort to find
Speaker 1: some way to get somebody else, meaning the government, to
Speaker 1: pay for them. Um. So you know that's that's a
Speaker 1: thing that happens. It is people don't really like to
Speaker 1: talk about it, but I think it is. Uh, it's commonplace.
Speaker 1: So anyway, Uh, thank you for your thoughts. Team, great
Speaker 1: to have you with me here in the Hut. We're
Speaker 1: gonna have Raheem Kasam on the Freedom Hunt podcast this week,
Speaker 1: so that is exciting. Get ready for that one. Please
Speaker 1: do check out some of our wonderful sponsors here in
Speaker 1: the Freedom Hunt. I will see you tomorrow. Chill to
Speaker 1: my alarm goes off at five o'clock in the morning
Speaker 1: every morning, and I usually finish up at round nine
Speaker 1: thirty at night after to radio, folks, it's a long day.
Speaker 1: How do I power through it? Strike Force Energy. Strikeforce
Speaker 1: is veteran owned and American made, and it's one of
Speaker 1: the hottest energy products on the market today. You see,
Speaker 1: strike Force Liquid comes in a packet. You just pour
Speaker 1: a little bit a little bit of it in water, tea, lemonade, yogurt,
Speaker 1: and it gives you that extra push through your day.
Speaker 1: It's available in four flavors, zero sugar, zero calories, and
Speaker 1: right now, if you go to strike Force Energy dot com,
Speaker 1: enter discount code buck at checkout. For every packet you buy, folks,
Speaker 1: Strikeforce will donate a packet to military members around the globe.
Speaker 1: That's right, They'll send this to them down range. Strike
Speaker 1: Force Energy is fuel for the fight. To go to
Speaker 1: Strikeforce Energy dot com, enter discount code buck and send
Speaker 1: it to our troops overseas.