WEBVTT - Riding Global Tailwinds with EQT's Jean Eric Salata

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm Barry Ridhlts. You're listening to Masters in Business on

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio. My extra special guest today is Jean Eric Salata.

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 2>He is chair of the QT Group, the largest alternative

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 2>manager outside of the US. They manage over three hundred

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 2>and sixteen billion dollars. Previously, he helped set up the

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Bearings Private Equity Asia Group and built it into one

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 2>of Asia's premiere private equity platforms. With no further adoop,

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 2>John Eric Salado, Welcome to Bloomberg.

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Barry. It's great to be here. It's great

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 3>to have you.

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I've been looking forward to this conversation for a while.

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Before we get to EQT, You've a really interesting background

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 2>and I want to dive into that a little bit.

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 2>You grow up in Chile, you go to the Wharton

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 2>School at University of Penn to get a bachelor's in

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 2>finance and economics. Was investing always the career plan?

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:20.479
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 4>I yes, investing was always the career plan. That's not

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 4>how I ended up in Asia, but the idea and

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 4>going to Wharton and becoming an investor was something I

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 4>always wanted to do since I was a young boy.

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 4>I remember reading a lot of biographies when I was

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 4>a kid of business people and being very intrigued by that.

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 4>I remember having my first paper delivery route when I

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 4>was like ten or eleven years old and really enjoying

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 4>the idea of making money, and then actually started investing

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 4>that money as a young kid in the stock market

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 4>as well, and kind of understanding how that worked. And

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 4>then when I ended up at Wharton undergraduate and studying

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 4>finance and management, I got very intrigued with global business

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 4>outside the US. I come from an international background.

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 3>My family.

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 4>We grew up in South America. My grandparents actually came

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 4>from Eastern Europe and were refugees that ended up in

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 4>South America. Some generation a generation, we've been moving around

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 4>quite a bit. I always felt like I had a

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 4>quite a different perspective on life and the world than

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the people I was at school with,

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 4>and so I was interested in pursuing that. And by

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 4>as luck would have it or fate would have it,

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 4>I ended up meeting my girlfriend at the time who's

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 4>now my wife, who's from Hong Kong, and I ended

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 4>up moving there.

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Right after I graduated.

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 4>A year after I graduated from college and ended up

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 4>really building my career in Asia as a result of that.

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 2>And that was Hong Kong before the handover, so Chile

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Hong Kong. You started being as a consultants, end up

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 2>everywhere from Sydney to Boston and then back to Hong Kong.

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.359
<v Speaker 2>Tell us a little bit about that global experience. How

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 2>has that changed how you look at the world of investing.

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I sort of have always felt a little bit

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 4>like an outsider in the way I look at things.

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 4>I never felt like I was exactly part of the

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 4>community or the sort of the.

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Consensus view of things.

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.119
<v Speaker 4>I was always thinking about things a little bit more differently,

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 4>I guess given the background. I was always comparing things

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 4>when I was growing up in the US, I was

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 4>always comparing things in the US to the way things

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 4>were in Chile and saying, Oh, this is different or

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 4>that's different. Then when I moved to Hong Kong, I

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 4>had the same perspective. I was thinking, Wow, there's a

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 4>lot that I see happening all my friends working on

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Wall Street or in private equity firms in the late

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 4>eighties early nineties, that's not yet happening here in Hong Kong.

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 3>It felt like there was a gap. It felt like

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 3>there was a gap.

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 4>There, and that always intrigued me and got me motivated

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 4>and interested in thinking about starting something new that would

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 4>sort of try to take advantage of it, or take

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 4>advantage of that opportunity created by that gap. Of what

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 4>eventually made me coming to Asia, that's already happening in

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 4>the US, and that's sort of what led me to

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 4>eventually leave insulting, get into private equity in the early nineties,

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 4>which was really very early in Asian in in Asian

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 4>context in the private equity industry, and from there sort

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 4>of to start building the business.

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 2>So you leave Bain was the next up AIG Global

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Investment there there? Did you help set up their pe

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 2>arm or was that already up and running.

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 4>No, that AIG was essentially an insurance business.

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 3>AIG.

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 4>Some of your listeners might recall Hank Greenberg, who's sort

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 4>of a legend really kind of started He actually didn't

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 4>start that business, but was really the founder that grew

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 4>the business beyond the founder CV Star's initial starting of

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 4>the business in Shanghai of ball places, and that became

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 4>a large global insurance company. And in those days in Asia,

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 4>there really wasn't a private equity industry, but there were

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 4>insurance companies like AIG that had long dated liabilities and

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 4>they needed to find long dated assets, and so you

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 4>had stock market and fixed income and so on. But

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 4>in the private markets there wasn't really a fund to

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 4>invest in per se, so they started making their own

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 4>investments off their balance sheet into companies to match their

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 4>long dated liabilities. And so it was really working for

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 4>AIG in their internal private equity group that got me

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 4>started in the industry.

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Foundational experience at AIG, that's really in private equity. That's

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 2>a sentence you don't hear of that often.

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was.

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 3>It was early days.

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 4>It was interesting because you know, the whole region was

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 4>really starting to boom. It was the golden period of globalization,

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, with the emergence of not just China, but

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 4>Southeast Asia, Thailand, Indonesia, Taiwan, Korea, all these markets were

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 4>starting to really develop and industrialize and there was a

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 4>lot of requirement for capital for growth, and so we

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 4>were really growth investors in those days, putting money to

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 4>work behind companies and helping them to grow.

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 2>And then you moved from investor to operator you as

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 2>executive president. You run finance for Shoeing Steel that's a

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 2>giant Hong Kong industrial What was that experience.

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 4>Like, Yeah, that actually that happened before I left to

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 4>do the private exit, So it was vain then shoeing,

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 4>and then and then ai G. But the Shoeing experience, it's, uh,

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 4>it's a part of my background that is a little

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 4>bit different because it's really it's a family business that

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 4>is an industrial company, very traditionally run. It's actually my

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 4>wife's family business. So yeah, it's it's really uh, it

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 4>was a very different experience.

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I went from I can imagine, Yes, I went from

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>baning company, you know, sort of business schools down you know,

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>everybody has similar backgrounds, very analytical, to the opposite end

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of the spectrum, which is it's a family business.

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Everybody who's in management is related to each other. And

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 4>then uh, you know, you're making decisions based on sort

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 4>of traditional ways of doing things.

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 2>But this isn't a small little family dry claian Er.

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 2>It's a big business, giant conglomerate. It was a.

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.359
<v Speaker 4>Sizable business and it was a good experience for me

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 4>because it sort of helped me shape in the very

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 4>formative years of my career, an appreciation for both.

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 3>Sides of the spectrum.

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 4>On the one hand, you have the need to be analytical, rigorous,

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 4>understand global trends and sort of the way you look

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 4>at things as a business school student. On the other hand,

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 4>if you're going to do business in Asia, you have

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 4>to be a little more entrepreneurial. You have to listen

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 4>to your instinct. You have to be able to develop

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 4>relationships with people, because ultimately, the decision makers in that

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 4>part of the world, a lot of them have those

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 4>sorts of backgrounds, and so you need to be able

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 4>to understand how they think. And so that was a

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 4>very valuable experience during my formative years. But I kind

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 4>of came to the view that I didn't really want

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 4>to spend the rest of my career in that sort

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 4>of a setup, and so I applied to business school,

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 4>and I got into business school. I got into Harvard

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 4>Business School actually, and I was about to start at Harvard.

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 4>I literally was there registered. I'm actually in the picture book,

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 4>ready to go. And that's when I got the job

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.679
<v Speaker 4>offer to come back and work for this private equity

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 4>division of AIG, which I decided ultimately that's really what

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to do rather go back to school again,

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 4>having gone to undergraduate for a business degree already, and

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 4>so I decided to defer my business school go back

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 4>to work in Asia in private equity, and ultimately I

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 4>actually never ended up really coming back to school.

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 2>So after AIG, you helped launch a regional Asian private

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 2>equity program for Bearing Private Equity Partners, a UK based bank. Right, yeah,

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 2>I have the timeline, right, So I'm fascinated nineteen ninety seven.

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 2>What was the investment landscape in Asia like in the nineties,

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 2>Was that a very underappreciated set of opportunities or had

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 2>people started to sniff out, hey, this area is going

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 2>to be boom.

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 4>It was a very very un volatile period actually, if

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 4>you recall was going on at the time. So two

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 4>things happened in nineteen ninety five. Nick Leeson, this is

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 4>just around the time that I was joining Bearing Private Equity.

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 4>Nick Leeson, who was a name that some of your

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 4>listeners mare may recognize, others may not. He brought down

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 4>this three hundred.

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Year old broke Bearings back.

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 4>He broke the bank out of Singapore actually trading Japanese

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 4>stock futures and kind of covering up his losses, which

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 4>eventually brought the.

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Whole bank down.

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 4>It was a you know, three hundred year old bank

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 4>and one of the most prominent firms. So what ended

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 4>up happening is that the Dutch firm Ing took over

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 4>Bearings Famously for one pound and assumed all their liabilities

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 4>and they took it over. This is around the time

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 4>that I had joined, and you know, at the time,

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 4>I remember thinking this is a very unsettling this is

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, I don't know what I'm going to do.

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 3>I was very worried.

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 4>I just decided to leave AIG and join this new

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 4>company bearing private equity. In hindsight, sitting here today, I

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 4>can say it's probably one of the best things that

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 4>ever happened to me, was to be able to step

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 4>into a situation that was going through a lot of change.

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 4>And I think it is an important lesson in life

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 4>actually that there are these times when you go through

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 4>There's serendipity number one, so luck. There's also the fact

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 4>that you're often thrust into situations you don't expect, and

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 4>it kind of boils down to how you end up

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:29.239
<v Speaker 4>responding to them and looking for the best possible outcomes

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 4>or the best way out of a situation can sometimes

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 4>lead to huge opportunities, which is what happened here because

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 4>that confusion of the takeover by IG of Bearings resulted

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 4>in Bearings essentially figuring that they didn't need.

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 3>To have some of these non core businesses.

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 4>And so I approached the new Dutch owners and asked

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 4>them if it was okay if we spun our business out.

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:53.079
<v Speaker 4>At the time, which we did, it was a very

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 4>small business. It was a twenty five We had twenty

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.839
<v Speaker 4>five million dollars of assets under management, which even in

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 4>those days was not a lot of mine, and we

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 4>were really just getting started. And they agreed, and so

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 4>we ended up establishing an independent, small private equity business

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 4>called Bearing Private Equity Asian.

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 3>So kept the name. We kept the name BPA.

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 2>There was this tremendous transition from what was essentially a

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 2>startup to what eventually became a pretty substantial institution. What

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 2>was that like.

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 4>Initially we were starting off and again it was nineteen

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 4>ninety seven, ninety six, ninety seven, so if he recalled

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 4>nineteen ninety seven was actually the Asian Financial crisis, as

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:39.959
<v Speaker 4>I referred to which was a terrible period of huge

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 4>currency devaluations, starting with a ruble in Russia, but then

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 4>sort of a contagion effect throughout.

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 2>The ruble was worse the following year with long term

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 2>capital management, if my memory is great. So the Asian

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 2>contagion was the tie Bot crisis.

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 4>And it was it was the Indonesian sort of high

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 4>yield market as well that blew up. We're basically borrowing

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 4>dollars because it was cheaper to do so, using that

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 4>money to then invest in their businesses in Asia, thinking

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 4>that they could make the spread and kind of capture that.

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 2>As long as the currency stay stable, which.

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Is okay, but then it isn't till it isn't right.

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 4>So that's what happened, and so that blew out and

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 4>it caused a tremendous financial crisis across the whole region.

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 4>And this is in the middle of when we were

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 4>getting started. So I remember we're writing the first PPM,

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 4>the first private placement memo to go raise capital, and

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 4>the whole story was in ninety six was about growth

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 4>in Asia, the growth story, and halfway through that writing

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 4>the PPM, we had to basically change the PPM and

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 4>change the strategy to become more of a distress strategy

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 4>on how we're going to capitalize on the dislocation in

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 4>Asia to invest in great companies that have bad balance sheets,

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 4>which is sort of what we did with that first

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 4>twenty five million that we started with, because what happened

0:12:51.960 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 4>was that Ing gave us that seed capital to get

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 4>going with, which was the twenty five million. They were

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 4>supposed to give us three hundred but it ended up

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 4>not coming through, so we started with twenty five.

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Why is it that the indications of interest and the

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 2>actual cash there's such as a multiple between the two.

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 4>What happened in my case is that there were supposed

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 4>to be three of us that were coming across to

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 4>start the business. There was two very senior guys from

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 4>AIG actually that were poached by Bearings to start the

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 4>business for them in Asia, and they asked me, the

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 4>young kid who was doing all the number crunching, to

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 4>join them to do the actual work. And I said,

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 4>I'd be delighted to because it's such an exciting entrepreneurial opportunity.

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, here I am.

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 4>A young junior analyst and I get a chance to

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 4>be potentially a partner in this startup, so I thought,

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 4>I raised my hand. As we were about to get started,

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 4>the two senior guys got a counter offer from Hank Greenberg,

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 4>who called them up and say, hey, you guys are

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 4>too important.

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 3>We want you to stay.

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Here's all this money and equity and that, you know,

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 4>to convince you to stay. But he didn't make me

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 4>a counter offer. He just cut me loose. So those

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 4>guys accepted the counter offer. I was there, left on

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 4>my own, and I went back to the IG folks

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:04.719
<v Speaker 4>and I said, here, I am, I'm ready to do this.

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 4>They said, well, you're a little young and inexperience. It's

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 4>not what we're expecting. We're going to slash the capital

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 4>that we commit to this from three hundred to twenty five,

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 4>less than ten percent, said I said. That's good enough

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 4>for me. I said, I'll take that. That sounds good.

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 4>So we started with twenty five and we did five

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 4>deals of five million each, and it turned out that

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 4>because of the cycle where we were, we were lucky

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 4>to be able to buy in at good prices and

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 4>we bought some interesting businesses.

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Huh, that sounds really that got us started. Basically, Yeah,

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 2>that sounds really really quite fascinating. So BPA was in China, India,

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Southeast Asia, Japan, Korea. Here's the thing that I'm fascinated. Okay,

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 2>So maybe New York is different than Florida, is different

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 2>than Texas, is different than California, but we all speak

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 2>the same language more or less. It's the same laws,

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 2>it's the same regulatory structure. When you're working throughout Asia,

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 2>this different legal system, This is a different cultural dynamic,

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 2>they're different political dynamics. How do you build relationships, how

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 2>do you build a knowledge base and navigate? Like is

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 2>from an American perspective? Are those countries more similar than

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 2>we imagine? Or am I teeing this up correctly? Each

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 2>one is its own, independent, unique region.

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 4>You're absolutely right about that, and that actually is the

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 4>key I think to what we've been able to achieve

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 4>over three decades, was that overcoming those barriers, because ultimately

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 4>people think of Asia, they call it Asia, but it's

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 4>really a first of all geographic, it's a huge, huge expansive.

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, from Tokyo to Sydney, it's like a twelve

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 4>hour flight, you know, and from you know, from even

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 4>from Hong Kong all the way to India, it's still

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 4>a pretty long distance and culturally, you're talking about a

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 4>very significant difference in the local culture, the language, the

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 4>ways of doing business. So what we did initially was,

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, and we were actually criticized for this in

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 4>the early days because in those days people just did single.

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Country funds for that very reason.

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 4>You had a China fund, you had you know, you

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 4>had a sort of Japan fund and Korea fund. And

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 4>what we set out to do was to say, okay,

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 4>we're going to create a regional investment program. People looked

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 4>at me and said, what do you know about investing

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 4>in Japan? Or like, what do you know about India?

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 4>You're not even from Asia. And so what I early

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 4>on appreciate it, and this has been an important lesson

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 4>in my career is that actually being a good investor

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 4>is very important for what we do in our industry.

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 4>But if you want to build a company, which was

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.359
<v Speaker 4>always my ambition, if you want to build a business

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 4>out of it, you need to actually build a team,

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 4>not just be a good investor. Being a good investor

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 4>is kind of prerequisite to be in our industry, but

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 4>beyond that, it's really about building a team.

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 3>And so I was lucky.

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 4>Enough to meet and to and to bring on board

0:16:55.800 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 4>some great partners early on, very diverse backgrounds. So you know,

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 4>we have people even to this day and in those

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 4>days from each of these markets. So you know, we

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 4>had great partners from China, from Taiwan on our team

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 4>that we hired early on. We had a very good

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 4>team in India on the ground in Mumbai. We call

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 4>it now local with locals, where you have local teams

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 4>in each market. In two thousand and five, we opened

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 4>up an office in Japan and we hired a great

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 4>team in Japan of great people there. As we're building

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 4>the team a you needed to have people from those

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 4>markets that understood those markets. But the next question is

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 4>how do you stitch it all together? You know, how

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 4>do you create that common thread? And that comes down

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 4>to culture and building a culture of like minded people.

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 4>And so I started to really also gain a huge

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 4>appreciation for the importance of culture in a business. And

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 4>that's something by the way that EQT has I think,

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 4>really excelled in globally. And one of the reasons I

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 4>was ultimately attracted to EQT in combining our business with

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 4>EQT four or five years ago was that Connie Johnson,

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 4>the founder of EQT, early on with the Wallenberg's back

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 4>backing realize that culture ultimately drives performance in an investment

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 4>organization like ours. So built an organization with tremendous culture,

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 4>and our culture was actually somewhat similar. So we were

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 4>able to bring the two cultures together and the cultural

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 4>fit ended up being what made that merger so successful.

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 4>But going back to building the Asia business, building the

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 4>team on the ground, building the common culture, and then

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 4>it was sort of how do we institutionalize this instead

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 4>of just doing deals here, doing deals there, how do

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 4>we create a unified, systematic approach? And this is where

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 4>my main days sort of came in of thinking, let's

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 4>come up with some constructs about how we think about

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.199
<v Speaker 4>capital allocation, how we think about diversification, how do we

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 4>think about macro, how do we think about sector trends,

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 4>how do we think about our investment committee process? How

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 4>do we drive due diligence systematic due diligence in every

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 4>market so we have quality control in each market.

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:54.360
<v Speaker 3>It's not just random.

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 4>Deal makers doing things the way that they want to

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 4>do them on the ground, and so pulling all that together,

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 4>which it took a lot of time. I'm making it.

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm shortening it here, but you know, there was a

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 4>lot of ups and downs. There, a lot of mistakes,

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 4>a lot of setbacks, but eventually we got there and

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 4>we find our strategy over the years and we created

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 4>something that's actually quite hard to replicate, which is this

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 4>regional platform delivering consistent outcomes with a great team of

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 4>consistent of people that have been with us a long

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 4>time and that have a similar approach to underwriting and

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 4>ultimately great performance. And so all that going from twenty

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 4>five million where we ended up. By the time we

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 4>did the deal with EQT, we had twenty five billion

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 4>under management over the spans of what was twenty five

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 4>years of billion.

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 2>The business coming up, we continue our conversation with Jean

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Eric Salata, chairman of EQT Group, discussing the combination of

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 2>BPA and EQT. I'm Barry Ridaults. You're listening to Masters

0:19:51.960 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 2>in Business on Bloomberg Radio. I'm Barry Ridolts. You're listening

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 2>to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My extra special

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 2>guest this week is Jean Eric Salata. He is chair

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 2>of EQT Group, one of the largest alternative managers outside

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 2>of the US, they managed three hundred and sixteen billion dollars.

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about how this all came.

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 2>About twenty twenty two, you merge BPA with EQT. That

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 2>was a seven billion dollar deal that followed about twenty

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 2>five years of independence. What led to that decision to merge?

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 2>What could EQT offer that BPA couldn't build on its own?

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 4>I think what I started to sense in about say

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:59.360
<v Speaker 4>twenty fifteen, was that the industry was changing. Our industry

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 4>was changing global. You started to see global firms moving

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 4>into Asia. You started to see some firms starting to

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 4>go public. You started to see multi product firms developing

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 4>beyond just a single product, single asset class scale. And

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 4>I realized that although we were doing very well and

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 4>we're very successful and growing, if we wanted to make

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 4>this a multi generational business that's going to continue to thrive,

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 4>we wanted to be part of this industry consolidation, put

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 4>this trend towards scale, rather than to be sort of,

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 4>you know, pushed aside by it. And that's when I

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 4>started thinking, what are our options? I mean, one option

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 4>was for us to try to expand beyond Asia and

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 4>to develop our business outside of the region. That was

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 4>going to be pretty difficult at this stage because the

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 4>business is coming so large and entrenched globally. And then

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 4>I started looking at ways of working with others, and

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 4>that's when I met EQT really through their own IPO

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 4>that they had done at the time gone public in

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 4>twenty eighteen twenty nineteen, and I was curious about that,

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 4>and I saw I went to speak to them about

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 4>how they had done that, and we started talking, and

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 4>you know, one thing led to another, and by the

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 4>end of this conversation, it became evident to all of

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 4>us sitting around the table that actually, there's something here

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:21.239
<v Speaker 4>that could be quite powerful if we were to come

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:22.479
<v Speaker 4>bring the businesses together.

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned earlier how important culture is to performance in

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 2>an investment world. I would imagine that a Swedish firm

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 2>like EQT and essentially a regional Asian firm like BPA,

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 2>you would imagine those are very different cultures and there's

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 2>going to be a challenge integrating the two of them.

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 2>What was your experience like trying to get all the

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 2>horses pouring in the same direction.

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think initially you could imagine that would be

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 4>the case, but as it turns out.

0:22:58.160 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 3>I think a few things here.

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 4>First of all, started off as a Swedish firm, but

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 4>it really by the time we met had already become

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 4>a much more global business. So first Swedish, then European,

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 4>expanding into Europe and then expanding into the US. Had

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 4>some presence in Asia, not much. Secondly, EQT is backed

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 4>by the Wallenberg family. The Wallenberg family is a sixth

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 4>generation family from Sweden that has a history of really

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:31.199
<v Speaker 4>doing business globally. Investors in Ericsson, Electroluxe, SOB, many of

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 4>the big Swedish companies Astrozeneca are backed by the Wallenberg family,

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 4>and so they have a very global mindset, I would say,

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 4>in the way they think about doing business.

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Globally and culturally.

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 4>Then I think the other aspect here is there's a

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 4>difference I think between a European firm like EQT and

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 4>say American firms. The European firms already are thinking in

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 4>terms of well, every country is different. You've got you know,

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 4>the Nordics are different than Germany, which is different than France,

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 4>which is different than Southern Europe. And so when they

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 4>come to Asia they have I think a heightened sense

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 4>of appreciation for the diff cultural differences within Asia, and

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:09.679
<v Speaker 4>you know, I think I think that to me was

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 4>really important that they understand that within Asia, Japan is

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 4>very different from India, and India is very different from China,

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 4>and so I felt almost like there was a kindred

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 4>spirit there and understanding that each country, each region, the

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 4>cultures really matter. Then I would say that if you

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 4>look at the histories of the firm, we're both about

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 4>thirty years old at the time, we both had our

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 4>ups and downs, we both kind of built the business

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 4>from a founder of Connie and myself, and you know,

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 4>I think there was a lot of common history, shared

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 4>history there, and ultimately a point boiled down to the

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 4>i'd say, the chemistry of the senior team, but then

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 4>ultimately the culture throughout, and I felt very comfortable with it,

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 4>and we did some spend some time together, meeting with

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 4>the team members, meeting with each other, and we ended

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 4>up feeling like this was going to be a great fit.

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 4>Still taking a chance and coming and bringing the business together.

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 4>But having done it now been together now for nearly

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 4>four years, I can tell you it's been a huge success.

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 4>And it really boils down to the fact that the people,

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 4>the cultural fit was very strong. Maybe the good time

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 4>to talk about the values also of EQT, which are

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 4>similar to the values we had at Bearing Private Equity

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 4>at the time. You know, there's some key values that

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 4>EQT has. Number one, it's high performing, which is, you know,

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:22.479
<v Speaker 4>something that I think most people in the industry are

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 4>going to focus on. But beyond that, it's also we

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 4>focus a lot on transparency, We focus on being informal,

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 4>we focus on being entrepreneurial, and we have another fifth value,

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 4>which is respectful. And if you take all those as

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 4>a package, you know, what you start to sense is

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 4>the sort of people that end up coming to EQT

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 4>staying at EQT. It's not the typical deal maker, kind

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 4>of Wall Street type of deal maker that you get

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 4>in some of our parts of our industry. And I

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 4>think that really appealed to the kind of makeup of

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 4>our firm at the time. You know, having that really

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 4>informal interaction with people that's a little bit of a

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 4>Nordic trade. I would say that this lack of hierarchy.

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 4>You know, you take a look at Connie, he's the

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 4>founder of the firm. He's really opened up the ownership

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 4>of the firm early to all the partners of the firm.

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.360
<v Speaker 4>The fact that he was even open to combining with

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 4>my old business, in a sense, diluting even further on

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 4>a fairly large transaction that as you mentioned, you know,

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 4>that speaks to this kind of expansive view of we're

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 4>trying to build an institution here. It's not about any

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 4>one individual, it's not about sort of creating a legacy

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 4>of any one individual. It's about creating a business that's

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 4>going to last. So that sort of mindset, I think

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 4>really appealed to me and felt like the kind of

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 4>place that was a good home for the company that

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.439
<v Speaker 4>we had built as a partnership prior to that.

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Really really interesting. Let's talk a little bit about how

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 2>the capital has invested. Sixty five percent of eqt's capital

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 2>is in Europe and Asia. How do you think about

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 2>geographic diversification. It's always a challenge.

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 4>I think diverse vacation is becoming more and more top

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.719
<v Speaker 4>of mind for global investors, particularly when we talk to

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 4>our institutional investors. Even in the private world channels. You're

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 4>starting to get a sense that people feel overly concentrated,

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 4>over extended, maybe in US assets not to say that

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 4>US assets are not attractive or that they don't have

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 4>great prospects, which they do. But you know, having eighty

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 4>five ninety percent of your assets tied into a market

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 4>that's already highly concentrated is becoming a little bit uneasy

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 4>for people. So what we're sensing it with our clients

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:35.920
<v Speaker 4>is a desire to get exposure to more global markets.

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 4>And what do you keep. Where we're strong is we

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 4>have two thirds of our businesses outside of the US.

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 3>We're very strong in Europe, were very strong in Asia.

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 4>Within those markets, we are also you know, exposed to

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 4>some of the best sectors. We have a very thematic approach.

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.919
<v Speaker 4>We invest in healthcare, we invest in technology. Actually, we

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 4>just announced yesterday. I don't know when this is airing,

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 4>but we just announced yesterday that we've been awarded the

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 4>Scale Up Europe Fund mandate by the European Commission, which

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 4>is a huge deal. They decided to ward EQT the

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 4>management of what's going to be a five billion dollar

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:14.439
<v Speaker 4>fund that will invest in early stage technology ventures across

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 4>Europe to help them to scale up, so kind of

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 4>series be onwards in areas like quantum computing, AI, life sciences, AI, infrastructure,

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 4>industrial technology, really taking the innovation that exists in Europe

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.679
<v Speaker 4>and scaling it up to compete globally at the global

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 4>scale with some of the innovation you see in the

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 4>United States and in China.

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 3>So we have exposure to some.

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 4>Of these really interesting parts of the global investment landscape,

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 4>and that's very additive to what investors typically would have

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 4>in their exposure in their traditional portfolio would be much

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 4>more heavily weighted towards the US, and this is a

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 4>way to get a little bit broader global diversification in

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 4>that sense.

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Really kind of interesting when we look at the performance

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 2>of various markets, really going back to the Great Financial Crisis,

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 2>it feels like Asia and Europe has very much legged

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 2>the US up until a year or two ago exactly.

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious how you look at some of the macro

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 2>tailwinds that Asia is certainly enjoying, and as we see

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 2>a shift towards China in many many ways, especially leadership,

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 2>and how do you see Europe is some tailwinds to

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 2>some headwinds. They seem to be a little more complex

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 2>than trying to figure out what direction they're heading.

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think what we're starting to see globally right

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 4>now is this capital capex supercycle that is playing out

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 4>with AI infrastructure, but not just AI infrastructure. It also

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 4>feeds into the reindustrialization focus on capex for reindustrialization.

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Reindustrialization meaning explain what that meaning.

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 4>Sort of the investing back in to more of the

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 4>industrial base of say the United States or Europe, away

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 4>from just outsourcing all of that. And so this reindustrialization,

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 4>the AI capex infrastructure, plus you know, the whole power

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 4>energy transition that's going on with electrification, this is resulting

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 4>in much more capital intensive investment than we've ever seen before.

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the sort of numbers that people are throwing

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 4>around are just unprecedented within our lifetimes. We've never it's historical,

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 4>the levels of investment that we're seeing, and that has

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 4>knock on effects. The knock on effects are throughout the

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 4>whole supply chain. A lot of the supply chain actually

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 4>feeds back into Europe, it feeds back into Asia certainly.

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 4>And so this kind of global supply chain of capital

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 4>expenditures is creating new investment opportunities and demand for capital

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 4>that we haven't like we have never seen before in

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 4>terms of the quantum of money that's required to make

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 4>this investment play out. So these are sort of broadening

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 4>that exposure across the regions. Is where we see opportunity.

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 4>If I look at the world today, you know, the

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 4>AI infrastructure opportunity globally is probably the single biggest, most

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 4>interesting investment opportunity for US. It means investing in a

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 4>couple of key areas. One is in the compute or

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 4>data center space. We have one of the largest data

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 4>center businesses in the world called it edge Connects. It's

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 4>active both in the US but also in Europe and

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 4>now increasingly in Asia. We have a joint venture in India,

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 4>for example, with the Adani Group in edge Connects, and

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 4>that that data center business has over ninety data centers.

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 4>It's increased in value. We've owned it now for six

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 4>seven years. I think it's increased by twenty x in

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 4>terms of the total installed capacity of the business.

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 3>We have.

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:47.479
<v Speaker 4>In addition to that, we take kind of an end

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 4>to end solutions approach. So we have the compute but

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 4>we also have about one hundred billion dollars of investment

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 4>into energy. So the energy, the whole energy grid, you know,

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 4>power generation and grid and storage. This is a really

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 4>important part of the comprehensive solution that you need to

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 4>drive AI compute. So we've got the energy, we've got

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 4>the compute, we're also investing in the digital infrastructure to

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 4>connect it all the digital connectivity of all of this,

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 4>and so if you tie that all together, our infrastructure

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 4>business is really riding some of these global tailwinds, not

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 4>just in the US, but really doing this globally. Then

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 4>in addition to that, i'd say the other thing that's

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 4>pretty interesting if you take a sort of non US

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 4>lens at the world, is what's happening in Japan. And

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 4>there the Japanese buyout market is really on a taiar.

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 4>It's being driven primarily by some corporate reforms around shareholder

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 4>reforms and activists, shareholder increasing activism, shareholder activism which is

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 4>supported actually by the Japanese government to improve corporate governance. Essentially,

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 4>that's creating opportunities to really focus on shareholder value and

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 4>to result in a lot more deal flow. The number

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 4>of transactions that we've seen have it's this year to alone,

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 4>it's up sixty percent year to date. The total number

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 4>of activist shareholder campaigns has doubled in the last few

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 4>years fifty to over one hundred a year on the

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 4>back of some of these reforms. So you're seeing a

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 4>whole new market kind of developing there for Japanese buyouts,

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 4>which is very uncorrelated and very complementary to the traditional

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 4>bioopportunities that exist in the United States. And then together

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 4>with the I infrastructure opportunity, which is more global, there's

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 4>just a lot happening in our ecosystem which we see

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 4>as being very additive, very complementary to just the traditional

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 4>bread and butter of US exposure to private equity or

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 4>US infrastructure.

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 2>So I have so many questions to go.

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, maybe just one last year on that, which is

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 4>that you asked. You started the question up by the

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 4>outperformance of the market. So what ended up happening last year,

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 4>as you pointed out, is that you know, the stock markets,

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 4>if you look at listed markets as a proxy, the

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 4>S and P five hundred did pretty well, was up

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 4>sort of eighteen percent of seventeen, yeah, versus thirty three.

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 4>But everything else in Asia was up much more than that,

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 4>as it turned out, either amazing who would have guessed,

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, here is up sixty percent last year, and

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Hong Kong was up, Japan was up in the thirties,

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 4>and you had even europe stock markets did better than

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 4>the US last year. So the idea that having all

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 4>your pension, all your retirement money in one market, it's

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 4>worked pretty well for design being. But the idea of

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 4>the correlation and concentration, and you know, markets don't always

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 4>go up, they go down as well. I think the

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 4>old diversification strategies do play a role in long term

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 4>acid allocation, and that's where EQT, I think has something.

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I have so many questions about Europe and Japan and

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:48.359
<v Speaker 2>Korea and other areas, but I have to come back

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:52.439
<v Speaker 2>to China for a moment, which for the better part

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 2>of the past two or three decades has been the

0:34:54.719 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 2>center of Asia. Feels like the geopolitics, the regulatory environment,

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:06.720
<v Speaker 2>everything has shifted fairly dramatically. How do you look at China.

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Are they still, you know, the eight hundred pound gorilla,

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 2>or are there enough offsetting economies that are really growing

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 2>and seeing gains in their markets that it's not all

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 2>about China the way it once was ten twenty years ago.

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:30.280
<v Speaker 4>The world is geopolitically is becoming more polarized, and maybe

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 4>creating more silos in certain strategic areas like technology and defense,

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 4>as you know, as the winds have shifted.

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 3>That's just the.

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:44.839
<v Speaker 4>Reality of the world that we're living in. Having said that,

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 4>I do think that there's still this underlying ecosystem of

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 4>inter dependence and you know, a desire I think to

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 4>work together. I hope in areas like, for example, in medicine.

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, if you look at the biofarm the biotech industry,

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:03.719
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot going on right now between China and

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 4>the US. A lot of the early stage trials that

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 4>are being done. Many of those are getting acquired by

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 4>US pharmaceutical companies and then being rolled out for the

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 4>benefit of humanity all.

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Over the world.

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:17.319
<v Speaker 4>And these are areas where there's scope I think for

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 4>cooperation and I think everyone can benefit from that. There

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:23.839
<v Speaker 4>are areas that are much more sensitive when it comes

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 4>to technology and ships and semiconductors. But even there, I

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 4>would say that it's important for all investors, for all

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:37.879
<v Speaker 4>business investors, for governments, for policy makers to at least

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 4>understand what's happening in China because I think it's relevant.

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, it has an impact on global outlook. You know,

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 4>you look at evs, you look at the solar industry,

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 4>you look at what's happening in battery storage. You know,

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 4>having access to that sort of know how ultimately is

0:36:57.120 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 4>going to be important for everyone. How you do that

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 4>in a way protects your national interest is a topic

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 4>of the day for policymakers globally, in the US and Europe,

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 4>and I think people are looking at that differently than

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:08.760
<v Speaker 4>they used to in terms of how much they're willing

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 4>to outsource versus how much they want to do themselves.

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, this Scale Up Europe Fund that I just

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 4>mentioned is also a policy response to wanting to create

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 4>homegrown innovation and scale homegrown innovation, which makes sense the

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 4>way the US wants to do that and the way

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 4>that China wants to do that. I think that the

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 4>Chinese economy, it's truly impressive what's happening there in terms

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 4>of innovation, the way the economy is growing, and the

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 4>amount of R and D if you look at the

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 4>patents being filed, the level of innovation, how the innovation

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 4>is being commercialized. But at the same time, there's some

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:46.800
<v Speaker 4>very exciting things happening in Europe and in the United States. Obviously,

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 4>the US is also leading in many ways when it

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 4>comes to AI. One of the things to keep an

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 4>eye on, by the way, is the cost of compute

0:37:55.800 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 4>differential between the US and China. There is a big

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 4>difference there in how compute is generated and ultimately the

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 4>cost of that compute per token to the users, which

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 4>is going to become more of a focus, I think

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 4>going forward than it has been up until now, where

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of been viewed as a must have, almost

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:20.360
<v Speaker 4>free available to all employees, they will be more focused

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 4>on ROI and I think this is where people are

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 4>going to start looking at the competitive position of cost

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:28.439
<v Speaker 4>of compute in different markets versus what's happening in the US.

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Last question of EQT before we start talking a little

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:35.840
<v Speaker 2>more about the environment out there today. How do investors

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 2>in EQT manage their exposure? Are they putting money into

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 2>one fund that has a little bit of everything or

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 2>do people get very granular or a little bit of both.

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:54.760
<v Speaker 4>We have thirty different strategies at EQT across four different areas,

0:38:55.680 --> 0:39:00.319
<v Speaker 4>private equity, infrastructure, real estate, and secondaries. Secondaries is our

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 4>newest area that we've just announced that we've required. Color

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 4>Capital hasn't closed it but we're in the process of

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:06.760
<v Speaker 4>bringing that on board.

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 3>So we have thirty different strategies. I think we have both.

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 4>We have the drawdown funds, which are the main institutional

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:16.760
<v Speaker 4>vehicles for committing traditionally as you would to a fund

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 4>and invest in buyouts or in growth capital, or in

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 4>life sciences or in real estate. But increasingly, and this

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 4>is the higher, highest growth part of our business and

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:30.439
<v Speaker 4>for the industry as a whole, we have the open

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 4>ended structures. Some people call them evergreens. We don't call

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 4>them semi liquids because they're not liquid. They're not even

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 4>semi liquid, but they are open ended. And what open

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:42.919
<v Speaker 4>ended means is that you can subscribe to them every

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 4>month and you can redeem every quarter subject to the

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 4>underlying liquidity availability in the quarter and the You know,

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:55.120
<v Speaker 4>what we're starting to see is there are a couple

0:39:55.160 --> 0:39:56.399
<v Speaker 4>advantages of the.

0:39:56.320 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Evergreen or open ended structures.

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 4>Number One, they do invest across everything, so you don't

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:02.840
<v Speaker 4>have to choose which funds you want to invest and

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:05.200
<v Speaker 4>you get a broad exposure. Number Two, they invest one

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 4>hundred percent of your money immediately into the asset class.

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 4>So we're starting to see institutional investors also use this.

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:14.839
<v Speaker 4>Not just the private clients use this because they are

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:18.280
<v Speaker 4>able to dial up and dial down their exposure instantly.

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 4>So if you want to have a certain percent of

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 4>your portfolio in private markets, rather than waiting for the

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 4>capital to be called over the next two three years,

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:28.239
<v Speaker 4>you could just put it to work immediately into the

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:31.400
<v Speaker 4>asset class through these evergreen structures, which are fully invested

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 4>on an nav basis immediately. So that's one of the

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:38.359
<v Speaker 4>interesting aspects of that. The other interesting aspect of our

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 4>evergreen structures or open endstructures is, unlike some of the

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 4>other products out there which have designated investment strategies or

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 4>investment teams for those open ended structures, our open ended

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 4>structure is essentially a like for like perry pursuit. Alongside

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 4>everything we do, you get exactly the same exposure to

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 4>exactly the same deals and the same pricing and the

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:01.919
<v Speaker 4>same everything that we provide to our sovereign wealth fund

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 4>clients that we provide to our institutional clients.

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:07.800
<v Speaker 3>It's all allocated across equally, so there's no cherry picking.

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:10.360
<v Speaker 4>There's no sort of different strategies for the wealth vehicle

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 4>as there is for the institutional vehicle.

0:41:12.680 --> 0:41:13.720
<v Speaker 3>It's a single vehicle.

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 4>And then I think the other key aspect of our

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:19.959
<v Speaker 4>investment program, which is sort of where why we've landed

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:22.480
<v Speaker 4>where we've landed in terms of our fundraising last year,

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 4>we've you know, for example, we've just announced our closing

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 4>of our Asia Fund, which is a fifteen billion dollar fund.

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 4>It's the largest fund ever raised in Asia, fifteen point

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:32.359
<v Speaker 4>six billion dollars. The reason we've been able to achieve

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 4>this is because of our exits and liquidity.

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Profile of our investment program.

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:40.319
<v Speaker 4>It's been a tough environment for exit liquid It's one

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 4>of the challenges that you read a lot about in

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:44.240
<v Speaker 4>our industry. We actually had a record year for exits

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 4>last year at eqtiion dollars. We had forty billion dollars

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 4>in distributions. It's huge, it's huge, it's a reck It's.

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 2>More than ten percent of total investment dollars. That's tremendous.

0:41:57.160 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 4>It's actually about thirty percent of the navy of the

0:41:59.320 --> 0:42:03.800
<v Speaker 4>strategies that that covers. And if you look at active

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 4>funds and if you look at the liquidity profile there,

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 4>it even included a significant amount of tapping into the

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 4>equity capital markets, the public markets, so we were actually

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 4>the number one ECM firm last year. We had fifteen

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars of equity capital markets activity, ranked number one

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:25.439
<v Speaker 4>by far actually relative all the other private equity firms

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:28.760
<v Speaker 4>out there, on the back of just having some really

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 4>interesting assets that the market.

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:31.359
<v Speaker 3>Was open for.

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:35.799
<v Speaker 2>Meaning when you have a liquidity event, that money just

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:39.840
<v Speaker 2>doesn't sit in bonds, you put it actively into equity markets.

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 4>Now, meaning that we're able to take our companies public

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 4>or sell down through the public markets as an avenue

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 4>of getting liquidity versus just trying to sell to other

0:42:48.400 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 4>buyout funds or sell to strategic buyers. Those deals have

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 4>been a bit slower, and even the IPO markets have

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 4>been challenging, but we were within a challenging IPO market,

0:42:57.440 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 4>we had the highest level of activity of all other

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 4>market market participants.

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:06.799
<v Speaker 2>It's amazing. My bias is not thinking IPO because of

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 2>what we've seen the past five years, but thinking some

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 2>exit and then just parked the cash there. I have

0:43:12.560 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 2>it exactly backwards. You exit through the IPO market and

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:18.799
<v Speaker 2>then you distribute the cash.

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 3>To LPs exactly.

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Our biggest exit last year globally as a group was

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:26.720
<v Speaker 4>a company called Galderma which is a European medical aesthetics

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:31.640
<v Speaker 4>business providing medical asthetic products including things like botox and

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 4>you that have been on the rise and you know,

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 4>completely uncorrelated to AI. This location and an investment that

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:43.919
<v Speaker 4>did extremely well for us. In total over the last

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 4>two or three years since we took it public, we

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:49.879
<v Speaker 4>realized something like twenty four billion dollars of distributions from

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:52.799
<v Speaker 4>that single investment. Last year alone, we sold over eight

0:43:52.840 --> 0:43:56.400
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars in one single trunch, which was the largest

0:43:56.400 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 4>transaction ever completed in the public markets by private equi

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:02.279
<v Speaker 4>be firm. So the point of all this is just

0:44:02.320 --> 0:44:04.960
<v Speaker 4>really to say that in a tough market where liquidity,

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:08.319
<v Speaker 4>where people are looking for distributions, it's nice to be

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 4>diversified globally where you're not tying all your liquidity proceeds

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:16.359
<v Speaker 4>to a single strategy or a single market, but you

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 4>have exposure to multiple markets and you're getting cash back

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:21.600
<v Speaker 4>from different strategies to give you that cash that you

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:24.319
<v Speaker 4>need at a time when you're lacking distributions from other

0:44:24.360 --> 0:44:25.440
<v Speaker 4>parts of your portfolio.

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Really fascinating. Coming up, we continue our conversation with Joan

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Eric Salada, chairman of EQT Group, discussing the combination of

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 2>BPEA and EQT. I'm Barry Ritults. You're listening to Masters

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 2>in Business on Bloomberg Radio. I'm Barry Ridults. You're listening

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 2>to Asters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My extra special

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 2>guest this week is Jean Eric Salata. He is chair

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:12.080
<v Speaker 2>of EQT Group, one of the largest alternative managers outside

0:45:12.120 --> 0:45:16.120
<v Speaker 2>of the US. They managed three hundred and sixteen billion dollars.

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:18.640
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about the state of

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 2>alternatives and markets in the current environment. You mentioned artificial intelligence,

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:31.799
<v Speaker 2>energy transition, healthcare, digitalization. What has you most excited in

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:33.839
<v Speaker 2>Asia over the coming decade.

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:37.360
<v Speaker 4>I think in Asia, as we were touching on a

0:45:37.360 --> 0:45:40.120
<v Speaker 4>little earlier, there's a couple of big themes that we're

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 4>excited about. One is this sort of CAPEC supercycle, which

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 4>is feeding through the Asian supply chain. You know, when

0:45:46.680 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 4>you're talking about building data centers or semiconductor memory chips

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 4>and so on, there's a whole supply chain that feeds

0:45:54.480 --> 0:45:57.320
<v Speaker 4>into that. Whether it's the cooling, whether it's the grid,

0:45:57.440 --> 0:46:01.440
<v Speaker 4>whether it's the capital equipment that's used to manufacture, the

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 4>testing equipment, the services around that. So there is a

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:12.239
<v Speaker 4>whole supply chain that's seeing elevated activity and growth. I

0:46:12.280 --> 0:46:16.240
<v Speaker 4>think the number is something like an incremental five trillion

0:46:16.280 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 4>dollars of CAPEX being spent in Asia within the industrial

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:22.919
<v Speaker 4>supply chain between now and the next Over the next

0:46:22.920 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 4>five years, it's growing at about fifteen percent a year,

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:31.439
<v Speaker 4>so you've got a healthy growth, tremendous CAPEC spend. It's

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:33.480
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of the picks and shovels approach to

0:46:33.719 --> 0:46:36.719
<v Speaker 4>you have this tremendous boom and AI that you know

0:46:36.840 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 4>that's feeding through. There's knock on effects into the supply chain,

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:43.080
<v Speaker 4>and Asia's pretty well positioned to participate in that. You

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:45.880
<v Speaker 4>look at markets like Korea, you look at markets like Japan.

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:49.200
<v Speaker 4>Those are probably two of the biggest beneficiaries certain parts

0:46:49.200 --> 0:46:52.359
<v Speaker 4>of Southeast Asia as well, so we're excited about that.

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:55.279
<v Speaker 4>I think the second big opportunity we touched on it

0:46:55.280 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 4>earlier as well, is just the Japanese bio market. And

0:46:58.800 --> 0:47:01.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, the level of reform that you're seeing there

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 4>driving increased deal flow, driving really what I call the

0:47:07.200 --> 0:47:12.960
<v Speaker 4>excess returns opportunities that private equity really is good at

0:47:13.000 --> 0:47:16.239
<v Speaker 4>and should be focusing on the days of you know,

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:21.800
<v Speaker 4>buying under managed assets, either either changing the management or

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:24.920
<v Speaker 4>enhancing the strategy of the business in order to close

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 4>the gap between the operating performance of the business and

0:47:27.560 --> 0:47:29.360
<v Speaker 4>the full potential of the business. That's kind of the

0:47:29.400 --> 0:47:32.799
<v Speaker 4>traditional playbook of private equity. It's gotten harder to do

0:47:32.840 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 4>in parts of the market that have become more efficient. Globally,

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:38.080
<v Speaker 4>you have a lot of shareholder activism already, so most

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:40.840
<v Speaker 4>public companies are already doing what they should be doing,

0:47:41.320 --> 0:47:44.800
<v Speaker 4>but in Japan they're a little bit still further behind.

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:47.480
<v Speaker 4>And now you see a big push by the Japanese

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 4>authorities and political leadership to drive efficiency in their economy

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:55.200
<v Speaker 4>and to drive corporate governance reforms, which is trying to

0:47:55.239 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 4>close this gap between full potential and performance, and as

0:47:59.160 --> 0:48:03.000
<v Speaker 4>a result, a lot more assets being sold, either corporate divestitures,

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:07.799
<v Speaker 4>take privates, or generational change happening with founder led businesses

0:48:08.160 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 4>where you're buying business and you really see the opportunity

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:14.399
<v Speaker 4>to simplify and improve execution. It's really about that. It's

0:48:14.440 --> 0:48:18.719
<v Speaker 4>about sort of like focusing the business and fewer areas

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:22.760
<v Speaker 4>and then improving execution on management.

0:48:23.040 --> 0:48:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about energy transition. It feels like here in

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:28.759
<v Speaker 2>the United States, we're sort of backing away from a

0:48:28.800 --> 0:48:33.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of alternatives. Asia seems to be full speed ahead.

0:48:34.360 --> 0:48:37.640
<v Speaker 2>What are you seeing as opportunities in that space and where.

0:48:38.520 --> 0:48:41.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we see a lot of opportunities across both Europe

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:45.719
<v Speaker 4>and Asia in the energy transition. It's you know what's

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:47.520
<v Speaker 4>going on now in the Middle East as well. It's

0:48:47.600 --> 0:48:50.320
<v Speaker 4>kind of driving home the point that energy security is

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:54.439
<v Speaker 4>going to be even more critical in the future. There

0:48:54.520 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 4>is a tremendous technological push of innovation coming out of

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 4>China in terms of supply chain for batteries, for solar,

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:07.359
<v Speaker 4>even areas like hydrogen. You're starting to see a lot

0:49:07.400 --> 0:49:12.040
<v Speaker 4>of very interesting scaled up innovation there. We have a

0:49:12.040 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 4>big infrastructure business in Asia that invests in the energy transition.

0:49:16.440 --> 0:49:18.320
<v Speaker 4>We invest in battery storage, for example. We have a

0:49:18.360 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 4>big business in Australia. Now Australia is as big in

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:24.400
<v Speaker 4>this area. We expect to see more opportunities there. Singapore

0:49:24.480 --> 0:49:26.920
<v Speaker 4>has been a leader actually in funding the energy transition

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:31.360
<v Speaker 4>throughout Southeast Asia. Very forward thinking, i would say, in

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:36.640
<v Speaker 4>that regard, and it's just a large investment opportunity that

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:42.160
<v Speaker 4>ultimately with energy transition, with climate related concerns. You know,

0:49:42.239 --> 0:49:46.200
<v Speaker 4>the real catalyst here is ultimately going to be is

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:50.319
<v Speaker 4>already having having to be the market forces that drive

0:49:50.360 --> 0:49:53.480
<v Speaker 4>this forward. It has to be that it's more cost competitive.

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:57.239
<v Speaker 4>It's more cost effective to do things using electricity in

0:49:57.280 --> 0:50:01.000
<v Speaker 4>the grid than it is using fossil fuels. Otherwise, if

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:04.000
<v Speaker 4>it's not more cost effective, the market forces aren't really

0:50:04.000 --> 0:50:06.560
<v Speaker 4>at play, and you're relying on policy or you're relying

0:50:06.680 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 4>on philanthropy. It's just harder to see the sing scale.

0:50:10.760 --> 0:50:13.160
<v Speaker 4>But we're getting to this tipping point where the cost

0:50:13.200 --> 0:50:17.080
<v Speaker 4>curves are coming down, the security concerns are becoming real,

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:21.120
<v Speaker 4>and when that happens, then you know, with scale, with volumes,

0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:24.840
<v Speaker 4>whether it's evy batteries, whether it's solar panels, you're starting

0:50:24.880 --> 0:50:27.920
<v Speaker 4>to see the big uptake and the movement in that direction.

0:50:28.120 --> 0:50:30.640
<v Speaker 2>We're getting a sense in the United States that the

0:50:30.680 --> 0:50:32.840
<v Speaker 2>war and Iran and the shunning of the straight or

0:50:32.920 --> 0:50:39.520
<v Speaker 2>hormos is paradoxically accelerating the move away from gas, oil

0:50:39.800 --> 0:50:45.840
<v Speaker 2>crew coal even towards alternatives. What's the perspective like from Asia?

0:50:46.719 --> 0:50:47.560
<v Speaker 3>I would agree with that.

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:51.320
<v Speaker 4>I think that the energy security is top of mind,

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:55.319
<v Speaker 4>and you know, certainly China has moved very much in

0:50:55.360 --> 0:50:59.640
<v Speaker 4>this direction, have the largest installed base of renewable energy,

0:50:59.680 --> 0:51:03.759
<v Speaker 4>they're the largest investor in renewable energy globally, and they're

0:51:03.800 --> 0:51:08.720
<v Speaker 4>moving in that direction, probably mainly for energy security reasons

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:12.480
<v Speaker 4>as well as global competitiveness reasons. And then eventually it

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 4>also is going to come. I mean, there is still

0:51:14.840 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 4>multi decade run in fossil fuels, for sure that's going

0:51:17.719 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 4>to play out. But ultimately there's going to be a

0:51:21.239 --> 0:51:23.960
<v Speaker 4>cost issue related to fossil fuels. And if you want

0:51:24.000 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 4>to be competitive as an economy, what's your cost of energy?

0:51:27.440 --> 0:51:30.239
<v Speaker 4>You know, what is a scarce resource? If the cost

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:32.799
<v Speaker 4>of energy is going higher and higher versus the other

0:51:32.920 --> 0:51:34.920
<v Speaker 4>alternatives out there, if you haven't invested in that, you're

0:51:34.920 --> 0:51:37.239
<v Speaker 4>playing catchup. It will feed through to the rest of

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:40.239
<v Speaker 4>the industrial base. And I think this is where it's

0:51:40.280 --> 0:51:42.440
<v Speaker 4>important to take a long term perspective and where private

0:51:42.480 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 4>equity can play a role in sort of thinking through

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 4>the next five ten years. How do you make companies

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:50.200
<v Speaker 4>more competitive, how do you drive innovation, how do you

0:51:50.280 --> 0:51:54.759
<v Speaker 4>drive investment in energy competitiveness and the energy transition To

0:51:54.840 --> 0:51:55.879
<v Speaker 4>help this happen.

0:51:56.000 --> 0:52:00.400
<v Speaker 2>We haven't really talked about India, which has always like

0:52:00.480 --> 0:52:02.839
<v Speaker 2>it was, oh, two years away, this is really going

0:52:02.880 --> 0:52:07.120
<v Speaker 2>to be in the next powerhouse economy always feels like

0:52:07.200 --> 0:52:11.160
<v Speaker 2>it's on the verge. What are you seeing there? It

0:52:11.280 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of look feels like one of the more compelling

0:52:13.560 --> 0:52:15.040
<v Speaker 2>growth stories I think.

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:17.280
<v Speaker 4>I like India a lot. We're very, very bullish on India.

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:19.200
<v Speaker 4>It's been the biggest market for US over the last

0:52:19.239 --> 0:52:22.480
<v Speaker 4>five years of where we've invested. Historically, the story has

0:52:22.480 --> 0:52:25.400
<v Speaker 4>been a lot about technology investments in the tech services

0:52:25.400 --> 0:52:29.800
<v Speaker 4>industry primarily, which has been a beneficiary of global investment

0:52:29.840 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 4>in technology and the tech stack and the migration to

0:52:33.120 --> 0:52:35.799
<v Speaker 4>the cloud. That has hit a little bit of a

0:52:35.840 --> 0:52:38.719
<v Speaker 4>disruption now with what's going on with AI, but they're

0:52:38.800 --> 0:52:42.400
<v Speaker 4>quickly adapting to it and using AI tools to actually

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:46.839
<v Speaker 4>make enterprises more competitive and to help diffuse AI into

0:52:46.840 --> 0:52:49.759
<v Speaker 4>the enterprise using the skills. And they have a you know,

0:52:50.440 --> 0:52:56.680
<v Speaker 4>millions of computer technology programmers and labor available to help

0:52:56.760 --> 0:52:58.680
<v Speaker 4>drive AI adoption, which is one of the things that

0:52:58.760 --> 0:53:02.160
<v Speaker 4>India is very comparitive in. But the bigger story in India,

0:53:02.200 --> 0:53:04.279
<v Speaker 4>I think for the next five years is more about

0:53:04.320 --> 0:53:07.600
<v Speaker 4>the consumer and the growth in the middle class and

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:11.720
<v Speaker 4>one of the big beneficiaries of the growing middle class

0:53:11.800 --> 0:53:14.600
<v Speaker 4>as you're now seeing a huge increase now in you know,

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:17.319
<v Speaker 4>it's the largest population in the world, one point four

0:53:17.360 --> 0:53:20.000
<v Speaker 4>billion people. It's also the youngest population in the world,

0:53:20.080 --> 0:53:22.759
<v Speaker 4>so the demographics are very favorable. And one of the

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:24.920
<v Speaker 4>big early beneficiaries that we're starting to see on the

0:53:24.960 --> 0:53:26.640
<v Speaker 4>ground in India is the healthcare sector.

0:53:27.400 --> 0:53:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Housing and healthcare.

0:53:28.760 --> 0:53:30.480
<v Speaker 4>You know, the first thing that people do when they

0:53:30.520 --> 0:53:34.120
<v Speaker 4>start to save and generate a good income, they buy

0:53:34.200 --> 0:53:36.640
<v Speaker 4>home and then they want to make sure their family

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:38.960
<v Speaker 4>as well, look after their parents and their children well

0:53:39.000 --> 0:53:41.800
<v Speaker 4>looked after from a healthcare standpoint. So we're seeing strong

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:46.279
<v Speaker 4>demand for housing, housing, finance, and for healthcare, which is

0:53:46.280 --> 0:53:48.040
<v Speaker 4>some of the areas that we're investing in India.

0:53:48.680 --> 0:53:52.480
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going to paraphrase a quote of yours. Talent

0:53:52.719 --> 0:53:56.080
<v Speaker 2>is the key to unlocking outsize returns and private equity.

0:53:57.280 --> 0:54:00.200
<v Speaker 2>You're looking in India, you're looking in China and Japan, Korea,

0:54:00.360 --> 0:54:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Europe and the United States. How do you find and

0:54:04.480 --> 0:54:11.120
<v Speaker 2>develop management teams in such a broad diverse selection of regions.

0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:14.719
<v Speaker 2>That sounds like that is its own specific challenge.

0:54:15.040 --> 0:54:17.080
<v Speaker 4>It is, and I think one of the things that

0:54:17.160 --> 0:54:20.640
<v Speaker 4>we've learned over the years is the importance of being

0:54:20.680 --> 0:54:22.680
<v Speaker 4>able to be what we call an active owner in

0:54:22.719 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 4>the businesses that we buy, which has really meant that

0:54:25.800 --> 0:54:29.839
<v Speaker 4>we've really migrated primarily to a control biot strategy other

0:54:29.920 --> 0:54:32.239
<v Speaker 4>than in our early stage tech strategies, but in our

0:54:32.239 --> 0:54:35.040
<v Speaker 4>main strategies, we're a buyout investor, which means we have control,

0:54:35.520 --> 0:54:39.600
<v Speaker 4>and I think having control enables you to really affect

0:54:39.719 --> 0:54:42.920
<v Speaker 4>change in the business and collapses this sort of agency

0:54:42.960 --> 0:54:45.799
<v Speaker 4>problem that you see between ownership and management and many

0:54:45.840 --> 0:54:48.360
<v Speaker 4>other markets around the world, and Asia is no exception.

0:54:48.760 --> 0:54:51.120
<v Speaker 4>We're starting to collapse that and see that collapse in

0:54:51.160 --> 0:54:54.640
<v Speaker 4>Asia through the ownership model that the governance modelbly that

0:54:54.680 --> 0:54:57.040
<v Speaker 4>private equity brings when they invest, when we invest as

0:54:57.040 --> 0:54:59.719
<v Speaker 4>an industry, and as a result, as we've scaled our

0:54:59.760 --> 0:55:03.040
<v Speaker 4>business over time, you're starting to be able to really

0:55:03.080 --> 0:55:05.279
<v Speaker 4>develop pools of talent. So, for example, we have seven

0:55:05.320 --> 0:55:09.000
<v Speaker 4>eight hundred what we call industrial advisors across globally across

0:55:09.040 --> 0:55:12.920
<v Speaker 4>EQT from different industrial sectors and different sectors that we

0:55:12.960 --> 0:55:16.040
<v Speaker 4>invest in, and we tap into those to come and

0:55:16.040 --> 0:55:18.640
<v Speaker 4>become what we call our non executive chairs or independent

0:55:18.640 --> 0:55:20.880
<v Speaker 4>non executive chairman, So we have a chairman that we

0:55:20.920 --> 0:55:23.520
<v Speaker 4>bring in from industry. We usually have a CEO, either

0:55:23.560 --> 0:55:25.880
<v Speaker 4>existing CEO or new CEO, and then we have our

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:29.040
<v Speaker 4>deal partner. And that combination of those three people is

0:55:29.080 --> 0:55:32.400
<v Speaker 4>the governance structure for our investments that drive the active

0:55:32.400 --> 0:55:36.799
<v Speaker 4>ownership model for our business. We also are seeing a

0:55:36.960 --> 0:55:39.719
<v Speaker 4>bigger pool of domestic talent now that we're able to

0:55:39.760 --> 0:55:44.960
<v Speaker 4>develop within say Japan, within India through multiple private equity

0:55:45.000 --> 0:55:49.920
<v Speaker 4>back investments that we've made, where the same CEO, for example,

0:55:49.920 --> 0:55:52.080
<v Speaker 4>that we work with before, we can work with that

0:55:52.120 --> 0:55:56.000
<v Speaker 4>same individual again because the model now has been tried

0:55:56.040 --> 0:55:58.560
<v Speaker 4>and tested and been around for a couple of decades.

0:55:58.719 --> 0:56:01.480
<v Speaker 4>So you're developing much deeper bench of talent in private

0:56:01.480 --> 0:56:04.759
<v Speaker 4>equity in Asia than you've had in the past, and

0:56:04.800 --> 0:56:07.040
<v Speaker 4>that's been I think a key driver returns the combination

0:56:07.120 --> 0:56:11.080
<v Speaker 4>of governance through the buyout strategy plus the talent pool

0:56:11.080 --> 0:56:11.879
<v Speaker 4>that's available now.

0:56:12.280 --> 0:56:14.359
<v Speaker 2>I have one last question before we get to our

0:56:14.400 --> 0:56:16.840
<v Speaker 2>favorites that we ask all our guests. What do you

0:56:16.840 --> 0:56:20.280
<v Speaker 2>think investors are not either talking about or thinking about

0:56:20.840 --> 0:56:25.560
<v Speaker 2>but should be when it comes to private equity, Different geographies,

0:56:26.040 --> 0:56:32.040
<v Speaker 2>different regulatory policy changes. What is getting either undernoticed or overlooked,

0:56:32.560 --> 0:56:33.240
<v Speaker 2>but shouldn't.

0:56:34.760 --> 0:56:37.439
<v Speaker 4>I think one of the really interesting developments is what's

0:56:37.480 --> 0:56:41.760
<v Speaker 4>happening in the convergence between both public and private markets,

0:56:41.760 --> 0:56:44.800
<v Speaker 4>so companies staying private longer, and the sort of blurring

0:56:44.840 --> 0:56:46.719
<v Speaker 4>of the lines there. How you get exposure if you're

0:56:46.760 --> 0:56:49.200
<v Speaker 4>an investor to the best businesses in the world, do

0:56:49.239 --> 0:56:51.080
<v Speaker 4>you wait till they become public or do you do

0:56:51.120 --> 0:56:54.560
<v Speaker 4>it before they become public? You know the historically it

0:56:54.600 --> 0:56:57.759
<v Speaker 4>was a very small minority of institutional investors really that

0:56:57.840 --> 0:56:59.360
<v Speaker 4>got exposure to private markets.

0:56:59.480 --> 0:57:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Individual VESH has almost had zero.

0:57:01.640 --> 0:57:03.960
<v Speaker 4>That's changed a lot in the last few years, but

0:57:03.960 --> 0:57:06.040
<v Speaker 4>it's going to change, I think, even more as we

0:57:06.160 --> 0:57:08.239
<v Speaker 4>move into in the coming years and people start to

0:57:08.239 --> 0:57:11.359
<v Speaker 4>participate more. The democratization of our asset class that people

0:57:11.400 --> 0:57:14.000
<v Speaker 4>talk about, I think is a big trend. Related to

0:57:14.040 --> 0:57:17.640
<v Speaker 4>that is the kind of blurring of the lines between

0:57:18.040 --> 0:57:21.800
<v Speaker 4>or convergence between the secondary market and the primary market

0:57:21.800 --> 0:57:24.400
<v Speaker 4>of private equity. You know, those twosed to be viewed

0:57:24.400 --> 0:57:28.160
<v Speaker 4>as completely different things. You invest in a private equity fund,

0:57:28.480 --> 0:57:30.480
<v Speaker 4>if you can't get your money back after seven or

0:57:30.520 --> 0:57:33.040
<v Speaker 4>eight years, you find someone to buy those interests from you.

0:57:33.120 --> 0:57:35.840
<v Speaker 3>And that's a secondary market that has changed.

0:57:36.840 --> 0:57:39.640
<v Speaker 4>If you think about the public markets, when you invest

0:57:39.680 --> 0:57:42.880
<v Speaker 4>in a stock, you're buying a secondary position. You're buying

0:57:42.880 --> 0:57:45.200
<v Speaker 4>when you buy Apple stock today, you're buying from someone

0:57:45.240 --> 0:57:47.800
<v Speaker 4>who's selling it to you. You're buying a secondary You're

0:57:47.800 --> 0:57:49.720
<v Speaker 4>not buying the IPO of Apple. That was a primary

0:57:49.720 --> 0:57:51.800
<v Speaker 4>that happened twenty five years ago. Same things happened in

0:57:51.840 --> 0:57:54.640
<v Speaker 4>private equity is that you know all the companies that

0:57:54.640 --> 0:57:56.920
<v Speaker 4>are private. In order to buy them, you had to

0:57:56.920 --> 0:57:59.040
<v Speaker 4>buy them as a primary through a fund that bought

0:57:59.080 --> 0:58:02.240
<v Speaker 4>the company as a private deal. Well, now we have

0:58:02.720 --> 0:58:05.040
<v Speaker 4>three point eight trillion dollars of private companies out there

0:58:05.040 --> 0:58:08.960
<v Speaker 4>that are unrealized that everybody is complaining about. That actually

0:58:09.080 --> 0:58:13.400
<v Speaker 4>is the foundation of a secondary market now in private companies,

0:58:13.440 --> 0:58:16.840
<v Speaker 4>private assets that you and I and others can start

0:58:16.880 --> 0:58:19.240
<v Speaker 4>to participate in through the secondary market.

0:58:19.680 --> 0:58:22.680
<v Speaker 3>You don't need to find a new deal to buy.

0:58:22.720 --> 0:58:24.880
<v Speaker 4>You can buy an existing business that's privately owned if

0:58:24.880 --> 0:58:27.040
<v Speaker 4>you like it, if it's got great return potential, if

0:58:27.040 --> 0:58:30.400
<v Speaker 4>it's the right price. It's another way to get exposure

0:58:30.440 --> 0:58:34.520
<v Speaker 4>to the asset class through these evergreen structures, for example,

0:58:34.520 --> 0:58:38.520
<v Speaker 4>and particularly through the credit through the secondary markets structures,

0:58:39.200 --> 0:58:41.120
<v Speaker 4>which is the way a lot of institutional investors starting

0:58:41.120 --> 0:58:43.040
<v Speaker 4>to think about it. If I want to dial up

0:58:43.160 --> 0:58:46.000
<v Speaker 4>or dial down my exposure private markets, I can use

0:58:46.040 --> 0:58:48.760
<v Speaker 4>secondary structures. I don't need to invest in a private

0:58:48.880 --> 0:58:50.439
<v Speaker 4>in a private equity fund, per se.

0:58:50.720 --> 0:58:52.680
<v Speaker 3>I can do that through the secondary markets.

0:58:52.800 --> 0:58:55.640
<v Speaker 2>So let's jump to our speed round, starting with who

0:58:55.640 --> 0:58:58.000
<v Speaker 2>are your early mentors who helped shape your career.

0:58:58.440 --> 0:58:59.240
<v Speaker 3>I was very lucky.

0:58:59.280 --> 0:59:01.360
<v Speaker 4>I had a third grade teacher that kind of took

0:59:01.400 --> 0:59:04.440
<v Speaker 4>an interest in me and kept me after school to

0:59:04.520 --> 0:59:07.480
<v Speaker 4>help me work on independent projects and was like an

0:59:07.480 --> 0:59:11.520
<v Speaker 4>outlet from my creativity that I felt was frustrated in class.

0:59:11.840 --> 0:59:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Really amazing teacher.

0:59:13.560 --> 0:59:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about books. What are some of your favorites?

0:59:15.560 --> 0:59:16.520
<v Speaker 2>What are you reading currently?

0:59:17.080 --> 0:59:19.840
<v Speaker 4>I read a great book called Why the West Rules

0:59:19.880 --> 0:59:22.840
<v Speaker 4>for Now, which is a sweeping history of why the

0:59:22.880 --> 0:59:25.560
<v Speaker 4>Industrial Revolution happened in the West and not in Asia

0:59:25.680 --> 0:59:28.800
<v Speaker 4>in the east. But it talks about how going forward

0:59:28.920 --> 0:59:32.560
<v Speaker 4>that could change, and it's if anybody's interested in history,

0:59:32.560 --> 0:59:33.720
<v Speaker 4>I highly recommend that book.

0:59:34.120 --> 0:59:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Really good.

0:59:35.120 --> 0:59:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Final two questions, what sort of advice would you give

0:59:37.640 --> 0:59:42.080
<v Speaker 2>a recent college grad interested in a career in either

0:59:42.160 --> 0:59:43.680
<v Speaker 2>investing or private equity.

0:59:44.920 --> 0:59:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Two things I would say.

0:59:45.800 --> 0:59:48.160
<v Speaker 4>One is you need to be AI native these days,

0:59:48.360 --> 0:59:50.400
<v Speaker 4>which is not the case obviously when I was starting out.

0:59:50.440 --> 0:59:54.439
<v Speaker 4>And secondly, perseverance, don't give up. Stay in the game

0:59:54.560 --> 0:59:57.080
<v Speaker 4>because things come and go, you get knocked down, get

0:59:57.120 --> 0:59:59.880
<v Speaker 4>back up, you stay in the game and new opportunities.

1:00:00.600 --> 1:00:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Final question, what do you know about the world of

1:00:03.720 --> 1:00:08.840
<v Speaker 2>private equity, private real estate, credit, infrastructure alternatives today might

1:00:08.840 --> 1:00:11.280
<v Speaker 2>have been useful back in the nineties when you're really

1:00:11.640 --> 1:00:12.800
<v Speaker 2>getting your legs under you.

1:00:14.120 --> 1:00:16.160
<v Speaker 4>This so called eighth wonder of the world, which is

1:00:16.480 --> 1:00:19.800
<v Speaker 4>the power of compounding. I I wish i'd appreciate that

1:00:19.840 --> 1:00:22.800
<v Speaker 4>a bit more after thirty years of investing, you'd let

1:00:22.920 --> 1:00:25.560
<v Speaker 4>something ride for thirty years. Generally, if it's a decent business,

1:00:25.600 --> 1:00:26.640
<v Speaker 4>it'll be worth a lot of money.

1:00:27.680 --> 1:00:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Jean Eric, this has been absolutely fascinating. Thank you for

1:00:30.960 --> 1:00:34.160
<v Speaker 2>being so generous with your time. We have been speaking

1:00:34.160 --> 1:00:39.320
<v Speaker 2>with Jean Eric Salada, chair of the EQT Group. If

1:00:39.320 --> 1:00:42.000
<v Speaker 2>you enjoy this conversation, well check out any of the

1:00:42.040 --> 1:00:45.800
<v Speaker 2>six hundred and forty we've done over the previous fourteen years.

1:00:46.120 --> 1:00:51.200
<v Speaker 2>You can find those at iTunes, Spotify, Bloomberg YouTube, wherever

1:00:51.280 --> 1:00:54.880
<v Speaker 2>you get your favorite podcasts. I would be remiss if

1:00:54.920 --> 1:00:57.000
<v Speaker 2>I didn't thank the crack team that helps put these

1:00:57.000 --> 1:01:02.040
<v Speaker 2>conversations together each week. Alexis Noriega is my video producer.

1:01:02.120 --> 1:01:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Sean Russo is my researcher. Anna Luke is our producer.

1:01:07.160 --> 1:01:10.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm Barry Ritolts. You've been listening to Masters in Business

1:01:11.360 --> 1:01:12.520
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg Radio