WEBVTT -  Ron Howard: “Understand the entertainment value of an idea.”

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Math and Magic, a production of iHeart Podcasts.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Where is there alignment there your sensibilities and an audience's sensibilities.

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 2>I think if you want to be a filmmaker, it

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 2>all starts with understanding what you love and what audiences love,

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 2>and how you can connect these things, these truths. I

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 2>am Bob Pittman.

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to this episode of Math and Magic, Stories from

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 3>the Frontiers and Marketing. Today, we're going to explore storytelling

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 3>and the business of movie and TV production with a

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 3>focus on creativity and audience engagement, and we're going to

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 3>learn from one of the greatest directors of our generation,

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Ron Howard. Ron was born in Oklahoma, grew up in

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 3>LA was an amazingly successful child actor, starting with his

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 3>character on the long running Andy Griffith's Show, but continued

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 3>that momentum with his roles in American Graffiti and Happy Days.

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 3>He then did what few actors do. He made the

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 3>jump to director, and he did it at a super

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 3>young age.

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 2>With a body of work that has geen.

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Re versatility and huge box office success as well as

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:13.119
<v Speaker 3>critical acclaim. He's won Academy Awards, Emmy's Golden globes and more,

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 3>and he's got a lot to tell us about connecting

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 3>with audiences, effective storytelling, and collaboration the most important. He's

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 3>one of the most thoughtful and nicest.

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Power players in Hollywood. Ron welcome, well, thank you. Thanks

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 2>for that. Intro don't know if I can live up

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:29.759
<v Speaker 2>to all that, but we'll see what we can.

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Do before we dig into the meaty stuff. I want

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 3>to do you in sixty seconds, Ready to go?

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 2>All right? Try me? Cats are dogs? Oh you see,

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm not such a black and white guy. If I

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 2>really had to choose, I'll go with dog. But I've

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 2>got a lot of affections for cats.

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 3>I won't tell any of the cats you decided against

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 3>them Early Riser Er, night Out, early.

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Riser, City or country. I love people, and there's more

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 2>of them there in the city, East Coast or West Coast.

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I prefer the East Coast for you. An introvert or extrovert,

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 2>introvert happy to talk to people, just a little socially reluctant.

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Fiction or documentary. I love the docs. America graffiti or

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 2>the studio. Well, American graffiti holds a very special place

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 2>in my heart. Directing a comedy or drama. Drama. I

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 2>just love the simple truth of it. What's your favorite

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 2>all time movie? I keep going back to one floor

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 2>over the Cuckoo's Nest. Biggest lesson from fifty years of

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 2>marriage talk, even when you do not want to know,

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 2>you can solve the problem if you are willing to

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 2>face the conversation. You just saved everybody a lot of

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 2>money on marriage counseling. Thank you.

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 3>So before we jump into the real meaty stuff. After

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 3>watching your episode on the studio, one question, is it

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 3>really that hard for studio executives to give notes to

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 3>the big directors?

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, not me, unfortunately, and I don't talk to people

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 2>that way, nor have I ever thrown my hat all.

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 2>I will own up to the fact that that was

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 2>my improvised moment that Seth Rogan agreed to. And then

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 2>between the rehearsals and the shooting I must have thrown

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 2>my hat in his face a dozen times. But he

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 2>laughed every time. That great Seth Rogan laughed. So that

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 2>was a fun day. You know. It does depend that

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 2>was a loaded situation that they created where a director

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 2>has a deep emotional connection to an aspect of the

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 2>movie that they feel needs to be edited or even xcize.

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 2>That's a challenge. And then when you're taking on a

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 2>director who has final cut, who could basically say screw

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.119
<v Speaker 2>it and walk away and enforce it, it's tricky territory.

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 3>So now let's jump into the real stuff. You and

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 3>I are about the same age. I grew up in

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 3>rural Mississippi in the fifties and sixties. The Andy griff

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 3>of the show was the first show I can remember

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 3>that connected with me. I could see myself in the

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 3>town and with the characters, including yours. And in those

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 3>days we only had three TV networks, and actually in

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 3>my town we can only pick up two of them.

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure exactly what the impact your show had

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 3>on us from disenfranchised to America, but I know it

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 3>was powerful. Did the people on the creative side doing

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 3>that show have any idea of that real impact and

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 3>any deliberate focus on the heartland? I think it was

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 3>really interesting that that show seemed to have such respect

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 3>for rural America.

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, you're very perceptive. I more than once

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 2>remember Andy Griffith after a read through, always cutting out

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 2>jokes that he thought were sort of farcical or vaudevillian,

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 2>and I remember him killing a joke that the writers loved.

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 2>He said, look, the South is plenty funny without stooping

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 2>to that sort of character assassination to try to get

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 2>a joke and try to get a laugh. And so

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 2>he understood where the humor was and he built his

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 2>career on it. And yes, Bob, that tone that you're

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:08.279
<v Speaker 2>talking about is something that he helped define to begin with,

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 2>and protected and built throughout the eight years. And the

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 2>remarkable thing about Andy Griffiths show is even as times

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 2>changed and the show shifted with it. The show went

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 2>from black and white to color. Even some of the

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 2>themes and the lessons that were taught and shared, they

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 2>even shifted with the tumult of the sixties because our

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 2>show started in sixty and we went off the air

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 2>in sixty eight. But interestingly, in nineteen sixty eight, three

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 2>years after Don Knots had left, after the show had

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 2>been on for eight years, we actually were the number

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 2>one show in the entire country for the entire season,

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 2>and that was the year that Andy retired the show.

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 2>But I just will never forget him sort of defending

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the characters yet loving them when they were funny, loving

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 2>them when they were silly, as long as they remained honest.

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 3>As a director and a creative I think everyone would

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 3>point out that you have this incredible sense of what

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 3>we'll call real America. Do you think that it's rooted

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 3>in the show that you did early on or was

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 3>it something else that gave you that sort of insight

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 3>which you carry with you today.

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it definitely was rooted in this show.

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Everybody took it very seriously. There was a lot of laughter,

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 2>and in fact, I learned that the environment could be playful,

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 2>people could be having a good time, but there were

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 2>also moments to buckle down and make sure that we

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 2>were delivering for the audience and that we were maximizing

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 2>the entertainment value and the ideas behind each story. And

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 2>so as gentle and easy going as all those episodes seem,

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 2>there was a lot of effort that went into it.

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 2>So I got to witness that balance, and I try

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 2>to carry that attitude and that approach with me as

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 2>a filmmaker, and even that collaboration, that spirit of collaboration,

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 2>because while there was a director and there were producers,

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 2>and the buck stopped somewhere, it wasn't in the actors' hands.

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Actors were allowed to contribute, encouraged to contribute. I try

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 2>to keep that environment going in my work as well,

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 2>and I really, in fact, I think it's one of

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 2>the things that keeps me going is the array of

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 2>collaborators from all walks of life in every corner of

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 2>the planet that I get to engage with. It just

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 2>keeps it really fresh and exciting, and I keep learning.

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 2>But my parents were very earthy. With my dad, my

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 2>brother Clint, and I would often refer in later years

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 2>to his sort of approach to life as kind of

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Midwestern zen. There's a go with the flow, sort of

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 2>a recognition of what you can and can't control, and

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 2>what are the limits of your strength, and yet a

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 2>willingness to assert kind of everything you have as long

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 2>as you can control something. And I think he just

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 2>learned that as a farm boy growing up. He also

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 2>really learned how to work. I don't think he was

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 2>allergic to the idea of Clint and I working at

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 2>a very early age, because he was doing real chores

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 2>at age five, with a real responsibility, like don't break

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the eggs and make sure the cow gets milked. So

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 2>I think both Clinton and I just grew up around

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 2>that kind of mentality and also that post World War

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 2>two optimism that everyone is so nostalgic about.

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's interesting I think you mentioned and it

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 3>just comes to mind. I was living in a very

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 3>small town in Mississippi and in the fifth grade I

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 3>was hired by a men's clothing store to sweep out

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 3>and clean up the store every day after it closed.

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 3>I think, I mean, that's be thrown in jail for

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 3>child labor, but to me it didn't seem so weird,

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 3>and I got spending money. But that was obviously another time,

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 3>and that was really rural America with a different set

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 3>of values.

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 2>And I think that kind of sense of responsibility. I mean,

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 2>it's sort of difficult to impart in this day and age,

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 2>and it's not like we want ten year olds cleaning

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 2>out the store. But it's also one of the reasons

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 2>that I believe, when well supervised, that being a child

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 2>performer can be a healthy experience. It's challenging. I didn't

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.839
<v Speaker 2>let my kids act as kids, even though several of

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.079
<v Speaker 2>them clearly had the talent, and my oldest daughter, Bryce

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Bryce Dallas Howard, you know, it's been her career and

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 2>now she's also directing. But you know, I'm very grateful

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 2>for the fact that at an early age I learned

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 2>how to be a part of something that was productive

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 2>and creative and exciting. You know, I've built my whole

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 2>adult life around that feeling. Can you talk a.

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Little bit collaboration. You've mentioned that's a word that's often

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 3>used with you. Seems to be a very powerful weapon

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 3>in your arsenal. I mean, you've had some great partnerships

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 3>over time. Can you tell us a little bit about

0:09:56.520 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 3>how you think about collaboration and what spokes not understand

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:05.079
<v Speaker 3>about how to make collaboration work. What's that common mistake

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 3>that needs to be avoided?

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean it was a mistake that I think

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 2>I was making early on as a director because I

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 2>was so young. You know, I began directing my first

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 2>professional film the day after my twenty third birthday, and

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 2>for that and the next couple of films, as sort

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 2>of generally the youngest person on the set yet in charge,

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 2>I think I felt like I had to have all

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 2>the answers and make them be decisive and make them

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 2>quick and stick to them. And I slowly but truly

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 2>began to realize that I was short changing myself, and

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 2>as I began to listen a bit more, my work

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 2>got so much better. The other thing that I learned

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 2>at a certain point is that if as a leader

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 2>and look, everybody sees the director as the needed authority.

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 2>It's not a democracy. Films and television shows they need

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 2>to be led. It's very dynamic. Decisions are made quickly.

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 2>A lot of money is being spent very quickly, so

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 2>they look to the director. They want the director to

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 2>be right. But I found that when I invited input

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 2>more the way it was invited on The Andy Griffith

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Show during the rehearsals, that not only was I getting

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot of great ideas that I could use that

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 2>was exciting, but two things happened. One, the ideas that

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 2>were arrived at, the decisions that were arrived at that

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 2>were born of somebody else's suggestion, there was a little

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 2>X factor there. They understood it in some intrinsic way

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 2>when they owned the idea. There was something a little magical,

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 2>some intangible something that I really witnessed over and over again.

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing is that when they know that

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 2>you're excited, not only willing, but actually excited to say

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 2>yes and include them in the process. It's so much

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 2>easier to say no. They recognize that there's an editorial

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:02.079
<v Speaker 2>process underway.

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Is that the way you keep collaboration from becoming consensus

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 3>and watering down your vision.

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 2>Yes. Often there are suggestions that at first glance they

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 2>feel right or there's a consensus. Yet when you really

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 2>put it under the microscope, you recognize that that's actually

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 2>sacrificing a value, a deeper value, a theme, you know,

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 2>an aspect of a character that needs to evolve and

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 2>pay off in a particular way. And so people may

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 2>wish for a specific moment at a specific time, and

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 2>they might all agree that they really wish this moment

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 2>you liked the character instead of dislike the character, or

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 2>it was funny instead of sad, for example. But you

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 2>may need to go against that in order to protect

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 2>a more important moment down the road. And so that

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 2>becomes this process of evaluating input, and that's a little exhausted.

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 2>There are times when I think to myself, man, there

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of voices we're weighing options. I just

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 2>need to cut through the clutter here and make a

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 2>call and you know, I do that, and it's fine.

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned that it's easier to say no once you've

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 3>said yes and bit inclusive in the process. How is

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 3>that part of or how do you handle dissent in

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 3>this creative collaboration when somebody fundamentally disagrees, Well.

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 2>It depends who they are with actors, and I value

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 2>actors and their contributions to the absolute max. I will

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 2>often take the time for them to be able to

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 2>try a shot or scene or choice their way, and

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 2>then also ask them to give the version that I'm

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 2>looking for as well. And the caliber of actors that

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.839
<v Speaker 2>I work with that I'm lucky enough to work with,

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 2>they never sandbag that. I tell them very honestly. I

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 2>will take both to the editing room and really seriously

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 2>consider it, and I'd say it's about fifty to fifty

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 2>as to which choice I take in the final cut,

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 2>and as long as it achieves the objective. You know

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 2>what I do in these situations where it's kind of

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 2>in either or if it achieves the narrative goal or

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 2>the entertainment value that we're looking for in a moment

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 2>or a scene. If it's funny, if it's sad, if

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 2>it's scary if it's surprising and the actor's choice is

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 2>different than mine in terms of how to get there,

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 2>but what they achieve is the same. The function is there.

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 2>I always go with their idea. I always go with

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 2>their idea. Again, back to that notion that well, they

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 2>own that one. They understand that right to their core.

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 2>It almost always benefits the scene. But there are times

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 2>when's not a consensus and I say, no, I just

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I really feel this way about it. Hope you understand,

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 2>And they really always do. I can't really think of

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 2>a situation where I haven't gotten the takes that I

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 2>thought I needed to tell the story in the way

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 2>that I believed was most likely to work. But I

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 2>also can't begin to count the number of times I've

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 2>benefited from saying, yeah, let's try it that way. Moral Mathemagic.

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Right after this quick break, welcome back to mathem Magic.

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Hear more from my conversation with Ron Howard. This podcast

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 3>is rooted in marketing, and one of the essential skills

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 3>for marketers is being able to tell the story of

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 3>the product or brand. You are an extraordinary storyteller. What

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 3>advice would you give them on how to construct the

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 3>most compelling story to connect to the audiences.

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Wow, Bob, you know, I wish Brian Grazier was on

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 2>this podcast with us because our partnership, which is coming

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 2>on to forty years formally just since we formed Imagine,

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 2>is kind of brilliant and exactly what you're talking about.

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's one of the reasons we've had

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of successes with Imagine is he's able to

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 2>understand that kind of the artistic value of an idea,

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 2>the entertainment value of an idea, but also innately just

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 2>have a sense of how it might reach an audience

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 2>and what it might mean to an audience. To try

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 2>to answer your question, I think you always want to

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 2>get down to the essence of what the story is,

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 2>what the narrative is. And by the way, in recent years,

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 2>we've started working with brands a lot. We have a

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 2>division to Imagine that Mark Gilbar runs it that works

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 2>closely with brands. But one of the things that Brian

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 2>found first and I'm on board with and agree with

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 2>completely is often the brands do offer a set of themes, values,

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 2>a history that suggests certain narratives that are pretty entertaining,

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 2>and so we don't do TV commercials, but we've been

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 2>able to find ways to sort of build on those

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 2>narratives in fun ways and do a lot of work

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 2>with brands that I really enjoy. But I think when

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 2>you get at that essence, you understand what the relationship is,

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 2>what the proposition is for your customer. In our case,

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 2>it's an audience. So what is the utility and what

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 2>is your promise? And how do you deliver? And why

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 2>is it special? You want to be able to answer

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 2>those questions about a movie project or a television show.

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 2>You want to understand what the possibility is to live

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 2>up to that. Why can you be special? Why will

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 2>you mean something to an audience member who takes the

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 2>time and spends the money to watch the story you're telling.

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, with Brian, it is one of

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 3>the things I didn't mention here but should is that

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 3>you also built a business structure around what you do.

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 3>You and Brian would imagine and for people who are

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 3>not my age, who are very early I can remember

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 3>when You Guys first came out.

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 2>It was maybe one of the hottest IPOs.

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 3>You couldn't buy stock, everybody who was clamoring for it,

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 3>and you really set a standard that I think a

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 3>lot of folks tried to copy after that, but you guys.

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 2>Were really the innovators there. I always wanted to be

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 2>a producer as well. I was always interested in having

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:03.680
<v Speaker 2>as much control and autonomy, and I think a lot

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 2>of that came from the fact that growing up in

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 2>my father was an actor and a writer, but always

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:13.360
<v Speaker 2>freelance and always waiting for that phone during and I

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 2>wanted to be involved in a company, in a partnership

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 2>that would help generate that workflow with as much control

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 2>as possible. So when Brian and I came together, we'd

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 2>each had small companies of our own, so it was

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 2>in a way it was kind of a little merger

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.719
<v Speaker 2>and began to build. Imagine you know, it was an

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 2>exciting time. We've had a long journey, eventful in a

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 2>lot of ways, plenty of ops, some challenges too, and

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 2>yet this is such an exciting moment for a company.

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 2>It's hell if you're a platform or a studio or

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 2>a network trying to figure out what to invest in.

0:18:53.720 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 2>But if you're a creator, just believing in ideas, aggregating talent,

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 2>finding great collaborators and getting stuff made, it's pretty thrilling.

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 2>That's what we're finding out. The hard work still sure

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 2>hasn't gotten any easier. In fact, it seems like we

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 2>keep having to reinvent ourselves every few years. But maybe

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 2>that's what keeps it fresh and fun for us.

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 3>You made this improbable jump. I mentioned it in the

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 3>opening from actor to director. How did you make that jump?

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 2>It was very unlikely in those days. People stayed in

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 2>their lane. There were a few examples before me on

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 2>the Andy Griffith Show. Most of our directors had been actors,

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 2>so I did recognize that that was a possibility, and

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 2>at a very early age, some of those people who

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 2>I respected said to me, starting around age nine or ten,

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I bet you're going to be a director. I just

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 2>see the way you're watching and the way you work,

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 2>and I just have a feeling of someday you're going

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 2>to want to be the director. And I just fell

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 2>in love with the idea of being a director, and

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 2>by the time I was in my mid teens, it

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 2>was really all I thought about. And the only real

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 2>example just before me, Alan Alda was directing some of

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 2>the Mash episodes and also starting to direct features. Woodie

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Allen was an actor who'd become a director, Michael Landon,

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 2>who did Little House on the Prairie. He directed not

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 2>only that show, but often a television movie almost every year.

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 2>And so there were these examples, and I was just

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:36.439
<v Speaker 2>determined to follow it. But everyone was very patronizing about it.

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean they'd sort of say, well, cute kid, hang

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 2>in there, and maybe in your thirties or forties, somebody'll

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 2>let you direct some TV or something. But that wasn't

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 2>what I had in mind. Well, it certainly worked out

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 2>for you. Roger Corman was the key. Roger Corman was

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 2>a very interesting guy, a great, great low budget B

0:20:55.000 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 2>movie producer director. When I was struggling to get anyone

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 2>to take me seriously, and I was making short films

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 2>on the weekends and even beginning to make a short

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 2>feature film in sixteen millimeter, one day Roger sent me

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 2>this script to act in. Now Happy Days was becoming

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 2>a real number one show, but I wasn't being offered

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of great roles to act in. And it

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 2>was called Eat My Dust. I read the script and

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 2>didn't care for Eat My Dust. But I knew a

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.239
<v Speaker 2>lot about Roger Korman. I knew that Roger Korman had

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 2>given Francis Koppol his first movie. He'd given Martin Scorsese

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 2>his second movie. The list went on and on. So

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.120
<v Speaker 2>when I met with Roger, I said, I don't really

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 2>love eating my dust, but what I really wanted to

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 2>do was direct. And I handed him a script that

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 2>my father and I had written together and some short

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 2>films that I'd done, and he said, I'll look at

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 2>him and i'll read. He called me back and he said, well,

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 2>I can see that you can direct, and the writing

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 2>is good. It's not the kind of movie that I make.

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 2>That's a slice of life character movie. I would want

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 2>you to do an action film or a genre picture

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 2>of some sort. But if you'll act and eat my dust,

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 2>and if it's successful, I'll let you develop a project

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 2>with me, and if I do it, you'll direct it,

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 2>so long as you're willing to be in it. If

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 2>I choose not to do it, here's the guarantee, I'll

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 2>let you direct the car crash unit on an action movie. Well,

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't exactly everything I was dreaming of in the

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 2>way of a guarantee. It wasn't going to be Citizen

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.959
<v Speaker 2>Gain or some other remarkable first film, But it was

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 2>the first serious opportunity that had ever been offered me,

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 2>and I grabbed it and Eat My Dusk was successful

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 2>enough that Roger wanted to make another car crash comedy.

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 2>We cooked up a storyline that we could call Grand

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Theft Auto, which was a title that he thought would

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 2>be commercial. It was the fastest green light I ever got,

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 2>and a few months later I was directing my first film.

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 3>Well it's a great story. You've directed a variety of genres,

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 3>including true stories. You've never been to space, but you

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 3>directed Apollo thirteen a mathematician. But you made a beautiful Mind.

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 3>How do you make sense of these worlds?

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 2>You know? I was not much of an academic. I did, okay,

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, better in history in English than certainly in

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 2>math and science. I think I managed to scrape out

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 2>a B in tenth grade algebra and maybe an AS

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 2>in eleventh grade geometry, and that was the end of

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 2>my education. There. Now I had a chance to direct

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 2>a beautiful Mind. This was about mathematicians. Russell Crowe was

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 2>cast to play the brilliant John Natsh. You know this

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 2>theoretical mathematician. Now again, I know nothing about it. I

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 2>was meeting with mathematicians and trying to understand what they

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 2>thought when they were creating and when they were trying

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 2>to problem solve and trying to come up with ways

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 2>to cinematically evoke that. But I got Russell to come

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 2>with me one day to visit this doctoral advisor who

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 2>i'd met, who was working with a couple of his

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 2>PhD candidates. They've got the chalk flying and they're erasing,

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 2>and I mean, it's utter Greek, of course to me,

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 2>but you know, I'm fascinated. I'm taking notes, I'm leaning

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 2>in and I noticed Russell's sitting on the other side

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 2>of the room, not near me, but he's getting kind

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 2>of fidgety. Now we stop, we take a little break,

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 2>we're outside, and Russell comes up to me and he

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 2>kind of looks a little panicked. He says, I have

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 2>no fucking idea what they're saying, do you, because if

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 2>you do and I don't, I'm not sure I can

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 2>even do this movie. I said, Russell, believe me, I don't.

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't. But look at the way they're holding the chalk.

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 2>And I said, and look, here's what I'm beginning to understand.

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Notation is a language Russell's also a musician. I said,

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:48.920
<v Speaker 2>do you read music? He said yeah. I said I don't,

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 2>but you do. That's their music, those are their words,

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 2>this is their language. They're communicating, they're creating. And he

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 2>went back in and slowly but surely he began to

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 2>understand what it was I was looking for and what

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 2>we could fake, recreate and fool people with. Because at

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.479
<v Speaker 2>the end of the day, it's all an illusion, it's

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 2>all a magic act. That's as close as I ever

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 2>came to even vaguely understanding anything about math.

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 3>But what I love about that is this whole podcast

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 3>is about math and magic. It's about the intersection of

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:28.360
<v Speaker 3>the creative, the magicians, and the mathematicians the data, and

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 3>that's what makes great marketing today.

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 2>It's what makes amazing business.

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 3>And obviously for you, it made a spectacular movie. Let's

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:40.880
<v Speaker 3>jump to today and the future AI everyone's talking about.

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 3>It's definitely not going away, only it's more powerful. How

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 3>do you harness it? How does it change what you do?

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 2>So far? It's a really interesting tool. The most important

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 2>thing is to protect copyright and to protect jobs to

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 2>some extent, but I really feel that at this moment

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 2>it's offering a lot of expediency. I don't think it's

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 2>threatening to replace creators in any significant meaningful way. It

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 2>is showing some promise, particularly an animation, a kind of

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 2>expediency and cost cutting to a massive degree that while

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 2>it will still need key creative people, the process may

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 2>be simplified and sped up to the point where people

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:33.640
<v Speaker 2>can make animated films for a lot less even what

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 2>might look like a live action movie. It's not going

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.479
<v Speaker 2>to be generated by a series of prompts. It just

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 2>isn't working out that way. But through a series of prompts,

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:50.360
<v Speaker 2>ideas may emerge and feed human imagination in a compelling way.

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 2>But even those films I think will just become the

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 2>hyper realistic version of animated production. I think people will

0:26:56.640 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of sense that's not really a live action project,

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 2>but that'll be okay if it's great, if it's a

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 2>great story, that'll be fun. But I think there's still

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 2>going to be plenty of room for projects where you're

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 2>seeing a performance. It's just like going to the theater

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 2>or live concerts. But it's definitely undeniably going to be

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 2>a game changer and have an impact on the film, movie,

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 2>and television economy.

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 3>I want to end with you giving some advice. One

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 3>you really do have a special sense about real America,

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 3>what's really going on, not a victim of being one

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 3>of the coastal elites. Any advice for advertisers trying to

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 3>stay that tuned into America.

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 2>How do you do it? Oh man? I think again

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 2>it gets back to sort of what is the story

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 2>you're trying to tell, because I think there are two

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 2>stories that are valid. One is the simple one for

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 2>certain individuals, a very simple set, basic set of aspects

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 2>of our culture are very very important, and I think

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 2>you need to know who you're speaking to. But I

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 2>also think surprise, the surprise is how broadly sophisticated the

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 2>population can actually be. And if you step away from

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 2>sort of politicizing a point of view or diminishing something

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 2>else in favor of an approach to life, I think

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.880
<v Speaker 2>we're a lot more blended than we even realize. And

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that stories that suggest that I'm just going

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 2>to catch our eye a little bit more, they're just

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 2>going to feel a little fresher. So there's kind of like,

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 2>let's be really familiar in nostalgic, or let's recognize what

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 2>the future holds, what the cutting edge is all about.

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's a good idea to recognize which

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 2>one of those lanes you want to be in.

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Second piece of advice, there are people who obviously would

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 3>love to have a career like yours who wouldn't. What

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 3>advice do you have for directors, even creative they're at

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 3>the beginning of their career.

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, I have a grandson who was just accepted to

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 2>a usc film school and as a budding filmmaker, so

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 2>we're kind of having these conversations, thank you, thank you.

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 2>He's a talented young guy. It's story. It's story. And

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 2>the other thing is is that technology is definitely going

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 2>to be a game changer in a lot of ways.

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure that the big giant production with one

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 2>hundred technicians and associates, I'm not sure that's going to

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 2>be the main stay. I think it's going to be

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 2>about small groups of collaborators who know really how to

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 2>work together. Something tells me that the future holds kind

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 2>of an environment with almost like a lot of little

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 2>feuter productions who are independent, independent production companies who are

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 2>in the business of building ideas and getting them finance.

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 2>And so I feel like that while big streamers, big

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 2>studios and so were the they're not going away. But

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 2>in terms of making a career, I think the first

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 2>thing is really understand story your relationship to audiences through narrative,

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 2>where is there alignment. They're your sensibilities and an audience's sensibilities.

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Understand that, even if it's a small audience but a

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 2>passionate one, connect with that. Whereas YouTubers and the TikTokers

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 2>they sort of do it through their personality. I think

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 2>if you want to be a filmmaker a storyteller, you

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 2>need to think about narrative, not just personality, and go

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 2>beyond that and try to look around and find your

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 2>group and rally together and make stuff. And if the

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 2>studios and the platforms find you and want you, then

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 2>you have leverage. But I think you can find a

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 2>way to make a living. You may have to hustle,

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 2>you may have to scramble, but I think small groups

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 2>can figure out how to make a living together or

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 2>will be able to in the near future. So that's

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 2>my advice. But it also are so with understanding what

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 2>you love and what audiences love, and how you can

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 2>connect these things. These truths.

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 3>Final piece of advice, you could go back in time

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 3>and give some advice to your twenty one year old self.

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 2>What would that advice be. I wish I was a

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 2>little more fearless about collaboration. I did spend a few

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 2>years being afraid I'd look bad, people would think I

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 2>was stupid or green. And I slowly but surely kind

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 2>of earned this credibility. And that's fine. I love where landed,

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 2>but I feel like I spent some years fearing criticism

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 2>instead of trusting my creative instincts and who I was

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 2>to actually seek out collaborators who I knew were more

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 2>experienced than I was, or smarter and more dynamic and

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 2>more effective. I think I steered away from some opportunities

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 2>to work with some pretty interesting actors early on because

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I was afraid I couldn't control them, and so I

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't call it a regret, but that would be the

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 2>advice I would give young Ron.

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Ron, you have an amazing gift to find the heart

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 3>in every story. You have had such diverse experiences and successes.

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 3>Thanks so much for sharing the wisdom and insights that

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 3>come from that with us today.

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh, thank you, thank you. Fun to talk about this stuff.

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Here are a few things I picked up from my

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 3>conversation with Ron. One, A great leader welcomes input from

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 3>their team. As a director, Ron gets final say on

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 3>what goes into his films, but when he accepts a

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 3>collaborator's idea, they understand and execute it an authentic way

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 3>That can lead to magic. When you're excited to give

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 3>your team ownership an idea, it creates a unified vision

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 3>and makes the final product even stronger.

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Two.

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Great marketing needs to have a y. Ron is a

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 3>master storyteller, and what makes those stories successful is the

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 3>connection he creates with his audience. If you can identify

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 3>the core values and themes of your message.

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 2>You can also figure out what makes it special.

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 3>Even in a creative industry, you need a great pitch

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 3>to sell something meaningful to your customers. Three seese the

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 3>big opportunity, even if it's not exactly what you hope for.

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 3>When Ron got an offer to act and Eat My Dust,

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 3>he wasn't eager about the role, but he saw a

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 3>chance for leverage to direct. Ron didn't have many guarantees

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 3>going in, but he was soon directing his first film.

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 3>A green light doesn't come around. Often, if a door

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:45.719
<v Speaker 3>to your dream cracks open, you have to grab it

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 3>and then work to make it something special.

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm Bob Pipman. Thanks for listening. That's it for today's episode.

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much for listening.

0:33:56.320 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>To Math and Magic, a production of iHeart Podcasts, is

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>created and hosted by Bob Pittman. Special thanks to Sidney

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Rosenbloom for booking and wrangling our wonderful talent, which is

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>no small feat. The Math and Magic team is Jessica

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Crimechich and Baheed Fraser. Our executive producers are Ali Perry

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:15.280
<v Speaker 1>and Nikki Etoor.

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Until next time