WEBVTT - TechStuff Tackles Wikipedia

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tex Stuff from how Stuff,

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>What's dot com either everyone, and welcome to tex Stuff.

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jonathan Strickland and I'm Lauren Vocoma. And today we

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk a bit about a subject that's kind

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of a sore subject among among writers, teachers, teachers especially,

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I would say, yeah, sometimes librarians, uh, anyone involved in

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>heavy research. Yeah. And and it's a matter of some

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>debate among lots and lots of people online, and there

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>are good points and bad points. We're going to cover

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>them all. We are, of course talking about Wikipedia. And

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.599
<v Speaker 1>you guys who are longtime listeners of tech stuff might

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>remember that Chris and I did an episode about wikis

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and we touched upon Wikipedia a little bit. But that

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>was many years ago. Other stuff has happened, as things

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>are wont to do on the course of time, and

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>we decided we wanted to really look at what made

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia what it was and what it is, and how

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>has it changed over the time that it's existed, and

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and some of the reasons why Wikipedia is a very

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>useful tool and some reasons why people either maybe maybe

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>not dismiss it, but but but in some ways that

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>it could perhaps be improved. Yeah, and and reasons why

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>some people, uh suggest extreme caution before relying too heavily

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>upon it. Um and and before we get really into

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>this at all, you know, I used to write for

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>how Stuff Works dot Com a lot. I occasionally still do,

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>but I mostly do podcasts now and things like that.

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Blogs are about about the writing level juncture, right, But

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:51.559
<v Speaker 1>but I used to write these these a long articles.

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And one of the policies and How Stuff Works, UH,

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is that you do not use Wikipedia as a source.

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I used to be an editor before I

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>was a podcaster in social media person. And yes, that

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>was one of the things that we very firmly enforced

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:09.119
<v Speaker 1>are still do. And and really the reason for that

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with whether or not the infant well,

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it has something to do with whether or not the

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.399
<v Speaker 1>information you find on Wikipedia is reliable. But more importantly,

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia is a dynamic thing, right. It can be written

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and edited by anybody at any time. And so when

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you sit there and cite something from Wikipedia, it maybe

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the next time someone visits that particular entry, the the

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>information has changed, and it may be that the information

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.239
<v Speaker 1>now is more accurate than it was, or maybe less

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>accurate at any rate. The things that make Wikipedia a

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>useful tool in day to day I need to get

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>this information are the same things that make it a

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>dangerous tool if you are writing in any sort of

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>academic or professional capacity. Apacity. Yeah, thank you editor for

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>giving me the word that I don't have. But but really,

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>before we get into all the pros and cons that

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I've already just touched on, uh, let's talk about the history.

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>So before there was a Wikipedia, back when there was

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 1>just barely a web. Yeah, yeah, it was more more

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>local networks of computers and some of them could you know,

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 1>key into other local networks. Yeah, we we did have

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>an internet. Uh, and the web was a thing, but

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it was very young. But back in so you know,

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the web essentially is introduced, right, so web has not

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>been around for very long. Rick Gates comes up with

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>this idea. He says, Uh, you know what would be

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>really super awesome if if we were to build an

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>encyclopedia that lived on the Internet, and if you made

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that encyclopedia something that anyone could contribute to, so that

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>way you could tap into the world's knowledge and people

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>who are really experts in whatever field that they're in

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>they can go in and share that knowledge, right, and

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and then you have the hitcharch Guide to the Galaxy, right,

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>except it's really the Hitchicker's Guide to Earth. Uh. So

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it would be more than mostly harmless Earth in a

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>small amount of the surrounding galaxy. Sure. Yeah, But essentially

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the sum total of what human knowledge is could go

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet and be in a database that you

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>could search, and it would be the world's most complete encyclopedia. Uh.

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>A fellow by the name of R. L. Samuel came

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>up with an idea to call it Interpedia, and it

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>was kind of this interesting point of discussion, but it

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 1>never went beyond that. It was just one of those Hey,

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 1>any cool, Yeah exactly. Maybe if someone who has more

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>time and resources could do this, it would be awesome. Uh.

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And then in a very important development happened. And I

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 1>was amazed that it happened this early because this was

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the development of the Wicki platform, and the fact that

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>it happened in ninety four amazes me because I was

0:04:55.360 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>largely unaware of wikis until Wikipedia came along. Yeah as well, So,

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean I had been on the web since the

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>early nineties, but I just didn't know about wikis for

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>many years, I mean almost a decade. Uh, and it

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>was and when I finally did start to learn about wikis,

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>they were strange and unusual to me because it was

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>a different experience than your average website. Right. Yeah, Usually

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.679
<v Speaker 1>most websites and most books are based on this idea

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that there is one expert who is who is this

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>terrific expert and is talking to you about this thing. Yeah,

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>and that's and that's where it starts and stops. You know,

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>no one's arguing with them, particularly, right. There might be

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>some form of comment ability on a site where people

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>can contribute into the discussion, but in general, the content

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of the site itself is created by a person or

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>an organization, but no one else. It's not like, you know,

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Bob can just log in and put in Bob's section,

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and then Joe over here logs in and puts in

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Joe's section. It's Bob and Joe can't do anything because

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>they can just go and view the site. Well, the

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>wiki was based on a completely different idea, and it

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>was designed by a guy named Ward Cunningham and his

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 1>first one was First Software Developers. Yeah, yeah, he was.

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>He worked for a software consulting company that he was

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a partner in. It was Cunningham and Cunningham also known

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>as C two dot com, and he was developing this,

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>uh this platform for Portland Pattern Repository and he called

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>it wiki wiki web right, based on the Hawaiian word

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>wiki or wiki wiki, which means um, quick quick, Yeah.

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a the wiki wiki Shuttle in Honolulu, which is

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>an airport shuttle. I've been on the shuttle and I

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>remember my wife being really amused every time she saw

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the wiki wiki shuttle. She just loved wiki wiki. Obviously

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I've married the right woman. So, uh so, Ward Cunningham

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>comes up with this idea for the wiki and essentially

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>what a wiki is is it's a website that has

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>collaborative editing tools built into the side itself. So you

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you navigate to the site through a browser, and within

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the browser you can make changes to the site collaboratively.

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>So depending upon the level of administrative power you have,

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you can you can edit things, you can add things,

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you can delete things. And it's since it's all within

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the web browser, you're using a basic markup language or

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe some sort of rich text editor, and it'll let

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>people collaborate on projects, even if they had different machines. Right,

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>So if Lauren's using a Mac and I'm using a PC,

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>not only do we hate each other, but often we

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>can't work on the same thing because our platforms are

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>so different. But this is web based, so all we

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>have to do is use whichever browsers and then we

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>navigate there and we can make these changes and build

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>our collaborative I hate you website together and other people

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>can join in and explain why they hate everybody too.

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know why I'm so negative today, but

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>apparently that's how this is gonna work. I think Cunningham

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>develops this wiki technology, which is what makes Wikipedia possible.

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>But we're not at Wikipedia yet now, right, because yeah,

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>well go ahead. Oh, I was just gonna say, that's

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>when we start talking about Jimmy Wales, who is kind

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of the face of Wikipedia, right right, Yeah, I was

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna say that. At the same time around was when

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Wales had dropped out of college. He he had

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>started um started a couple months or for a finance

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>PhD from Indiana University and wound up instead of doing that,

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>going to Chicago to be a futures an options trader

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 1>and supposedly much like Elon Musk, who we have previously profiled,

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Wales noticed that, you know, Netscape went public and

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and what quadrupled in value overnight? Netscape did well, yes,

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>they did good. Um, and and took note of that

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and said, hey, this internet thing that I've been kind

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of playing around with for a few years, I think

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that this could be a thing. Yeah, this this might

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>go places. And of course from this is all before

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the dot com bubble burst too, so back then it

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>was all opportunity and wild west and no one was

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>really sure and bright shining dreams. Yeah it was. It

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>was interesting. Uh. You know, the the roads weren't paved

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>with gold, but they were paved with stock options. Uh.

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Wales has this thought while he's working for a well,

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>he's part owner of a company called Bomus dot com,

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>which is a search engine. Yeah, and he owned that

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>with two other joint owners, Tim Shell and Michael Davis.

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Comes up with his version, his idea for a free

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>collaborative encyclopedia, and he taps a guy named Larry Sanger

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to be the project lead for this new encyclopedia. Now

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>he knew Sanger from mailing lists, because this isn't that

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>long after the fact that people were just using things

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.439
<v Speaker 1>like Usenet and mailing lists instead of the Web. And

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>uh so he got in touch with saner and and

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>convinced Singer to head up a project, this this collaborative encyclopedia,

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>which at that point did not have a name, right right, Yeah,

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know that they've been thinking, I've read about

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>open source software and and how open source culture could

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>also be a thing and and and a beautiful thing

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and so and yeah, and that was kind of when

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you look back at Tim berners Lee, who's the guy

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>who essentially created what we know of as the Web.

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>That was sort of his approach to He thought that

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>open was the right way to go, that the open

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>collaborative way would mean that the Internet becomes the world's tool,

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>not any one company or government's tool. And so, uh

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 1>this was sort of the idea of of let's make

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:50.479
<v Speaker 1>an encyclopedia that follows those same kind of philosophies. Yeah,

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and so, so Wales and Sanger and a few others

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>start to form a project that they call new PDA

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>in U p E. D I A. And this is

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a peer reviewed encyclopedia that they were going to put online.

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>And you know, because they wanted that they wanted that

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>expert opinion to come in, and they wanted everything to

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>be as as factual and reliable as possible. Exactly in

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>fact Singer that was he was passionate about this. He

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>said that, you know, you could create an online encyclopedia

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>where everyone just contributes, but if you wanted to be

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 1>a reliable resource, you need that peer review step in there.

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So and it turned it turned out to be extremely

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>slow to to a get people to submit anything at all,

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>because it was it was intimidating and and be to

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to you know, find the correct expert to to look

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:39.959
<v Speaker 1>it over. And also, yeah, the review process was, as

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Singer would describe later, laborious. Um so two thousand is

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>when nupedia starts, and it starts in the middle of

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand or so, and uh, they had an advisory

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>board of a sort of a peer review board made

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>up of PhD volunteers. So these are people who are

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>not even being paid, theirvolunteering their expertise to review papers

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that they are they're ready for publications.

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>So this is like if you were to submit a

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>paper to an academic journal or a scientific journal. You know,

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it's something that it's not just automatically going to get published.

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.559
<v Speaker 1>It has to be reviewed and pass review. There might

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>be a lengthy revision process before we'll ever be published.

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.839
<v Speaker 1>So there were seven steps in this review process for

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>new Pedia, and they did. They didn't think that that

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it would work. I read somewhere that that Wales really

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>thought that, you know, it had been in conversations with

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>people on the internet and had realized that if it's

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>something that they feel passionate about, that they're usually really

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>willing to engage in that conversation and to help. Yeah.

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>So the idea was that, you know, you get people

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>who are really smart. A lot of really smart people

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>enjoy spreading knowledge. Not that we would know anything about

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>wanting to show off knowledge. Yeah, I mean, I'm not

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>really smart, but I still like to do it. So,

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's why I played trivia is really just

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to show off how smart I am. But I know

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that ppared to these people, I was and still am stupid.

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, so or at least okay, anyway, thank you,

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's special and nobody is um. So yeah, the seventh

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>step process to publish to review before you would publish

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>an article. It turned out that this was a bit

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of a bottleneck um and the very first Newpedia article

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that was ever published was written by Kristoff Hust and

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it was about a tonality and it was published in

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the summer of two thousands, so it was early two

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand when they started working on new Pedia. At that time,

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the entire submission and review process was all through mailing lists.

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>It was. There wasn't a web based version yet, and

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>so the fairst article publishes in the summer of two thousand,

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>it was either June or July. According to Sanger, who

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>wrote about this I found it on slash Dot. He

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>wrote a two part piece that was essentially about the

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>whole beginning of Wikipedia, which started with this new Pedia thing. Well,

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in January two Sanger and Wales meet up with a

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>guy named Ben COVID's at the infamous Taco stand meeting.

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Taco stand meeting. Yeah, they were in California and they

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>were at a taco stand. They started talking and COVID's

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>told Whales and Sanger about Cunningham's wiki Wiki web platform

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and they thought about this as being a tool that

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>would allow for collaborative work and make it much easier

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to get articles. And and Sandor was still thinking about

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>this peer review process, right, right, But they were thinking

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that in order to get more submissions, in order to

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>make it a little bit less intimidating for people to,

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, to to submit an article to this crazy

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>peer review thing, yeah, to say, like, don't worry so

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>much about the quality, just submit stuff. Because it turned

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>out that, uh, you know that one of the things

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>they were worried about was that they needed to have content.

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>And part of the philosophy was that if we can

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>fix content, if the content it's not perfect, we can

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>still edit it once we get it. But if we

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>never get any content, there's no encyclopedia, right, because I

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>think at the time they had they had maybe twenty articles,

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean something, you know, a very low number. Yeah,

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't it was. It was twenty five articles by

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the winter of two thousand one. So summer two thousand

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>their first article publishes. More than a year later, they

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>have twenty articles on new media, which is more articles

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>than I write in a year. But I mean, there

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>was fewer than what I wrote in a year. In

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a year, I would write around a hundred articles. So

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's kind of you know, but that's that

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>shows you there was this bottleneck process and and you know,

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you find out that a volunteer might love their field

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of expertise, but they're still a volunteer, so there's still

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>they're still limited by the fact that they have to

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>do other things, most of them, unless they're independently wealthy,

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>they have other responsibilities they have to attend to. But

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>while they were thinking about this, they decided to launch

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a wiki for Newpedia. And they launched that wiki on

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>January two thousand one. So newpedia is still a thing,

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>but they launch a wiki for it with the idea

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of making it this faster way to contribute articles. And

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it actually goes live on January. If any

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of you know about Wikipedia Day and are going like

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't on the tenth, well that's the here's why

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the wiki goes live on the tenth. The advisory board says,

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want anything to do with that. Like essentially

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>what happened was the peer review board looked at the

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>wiki and said, look, we have these other backlog of

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>articles that we're still reviewing. We cannot deal with this nonsense.

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>So what happened was the new Pedia Wiki split from

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Newpedia and became its own thing, and on January fifteenth,

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that became Wikipedia. So Wikipedia began as a branch of

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>new Pedia where it was all going to be puer reviewed,

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>but then became its own thing where the peer review

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of went away. The idea was that the community

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>would review, and so it wouldn't be peer reviewed in

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the sense of an official board of experts. It would

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>be the community of Wikipedia collectively would be able to

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>review and edit the content that was being uploaded. And

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 1>and that that kind of spread of the workload was

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>really important, because they had a hundred and fifty entries

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>by the end of February. Yeah, it was, and it

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>went really pretty crazy. The according to Sanger, he said

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>by the end of January two thousand one, there were

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 1>six hundred articles on Wikipedia. But that's Singer this and

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that was from memory, So you gotta keep in mind

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>this is Saner writing in two thousand five about what

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>happened in two thousand one. So Sanger says that by

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the end of two thousand one there were six hundred articles,

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and by March or by end of January two there

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>was six hundred articles by marchd by April and by Madred.

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>So not only were more articles coming online, but it

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.439
<v Speaker 1>would growth rate was increasing over time, not exponentially, but

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty regularly. So it was very quickly becoming popular.

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And uh uh. And April two thousand one, that's when

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Wales decided to to to post a thing where

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>he defined that the Wikipedia voice was to be one

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of neutral point of view or n p o V

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and uh. Sancer actually objected to this as well. Not

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that he objected to the idea of neutrality, he thought

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that was important. He objected to the phrase point of

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>view because he said that it still means that the

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>article has a point of view, and it shouldn't Sander

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>in some of his points. I was reading in this

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff I saw and slash dot, I was thinking, this

0:18:43.240 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>is getting to be a little bit about semantics. Weird,

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, a little bit. I respect a lot of

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>what he was saying, but I think it's something and

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that that you know, pedantic has its place

0:18:56.040 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet, absolutely does. Whenever I'm in a comment, uh,

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>it's my first weapon of choice. Um. Anyway, So by

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the winter of two thousand one, that's when only articles

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>had published on Newpedia, and the approval process moves so

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>slowly that even when the tools to review and approve

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>articles moved from email to web based clients, it just

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't doing very well. And because it was such a

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>slow process, more and more of the people involved in

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it began to neglect it and drop off of it.

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:31.959
<v Speaker 1>And Wikipedia, but at that same time, was getting more

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and more popular. So yeah, so Sander's responsibilities were starting

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to shift more towards Wikipedia than Newpedia, simply because that's

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>where all the action was. So by two thousand one

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.679
<v Speaker 1>and into two thousand two, Newpedia activity had slowed dramatically

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and uh and also the the bubble. By then, the

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com bubble had burst, which really kind of wiped

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>out a lot of the folks who were contributing in

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>some way. So that kind of all uh made the

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>funding kind of dry up for Newpedia. Wikipedia, by the way,

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.719
<v Speaker 1>was existing at that time and still is to this

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>day on donations. UM. So the Newpedia was trying really

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>hard to redefine the rules that were needed to review

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>submissions so that they could streamline the process. But by

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that time it was it was too little, too late.

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and it gets really sad in another year.

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>But when I get there, I'll mention it. So um.

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Even at this early stage of Wikipedia, Sanger was really saying,

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.360
<v Speaker 1>let's pay attention to what experts have to say. Let's

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:42.199
<v Speaker 1>give them special attention and respect, and make sure that

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>their voices are the ones we pay the most attention to.

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 1>Not that we won't accept submissions from the general public,

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 1>but that we should pay more attention to things that

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>are coming from people who are recognized. Because again, this

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is this is Sander saying that in order to be

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a credible resource for people, you have to have some

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 1>form of review or or you know, you have to

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:11.239
<v Speaker 1>have some way of of saying the information here is

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>from right right, the same way that scientific journals won't

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>just you know, accept accept research that has not been

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.479
<v Speaker 1>checked over by a peer review system because least it's

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>ideally ideally if you ever hear. In fact, this is

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>just a little side note. Uh, this is important if

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you're reading something on Wikipedia and you look at the references.

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>It's something that Lauren and I do a lot. Uh,

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>It's important also to pay to what the references are

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>because there are scientific quote unquote scientific papers out there

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that are actually blogs that aren't scientific papers. So then

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you will quote unquote have a paper published in a

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>scientific journal, but it's not a peer reviewed scientific journal. Correct.

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I see this with a lot of free energy papers,

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>where free energy is one of those things where like,

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 1>well it was published in such and such, like, yeah,

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I check that out. That's that guy's personal blog. He

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>called it the Journal of Nuclear Physics, but it's just

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>live journal. Yeah. Yeah, we we just did an episode

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>about about nuclear power, not fusion power, and yeah there

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>was cold fusion and cold fusion and there was a

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of that, so that that that's stuck in my head. Yes, exactly.

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>If you do research on cold fusion, you'll find quote

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.479
<v Speaker 1>unquote papers, but they are posted on online resources that

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>turn out to be not an actual scientific journal. That

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily mean that the research is unreliable. It just

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>means that you don't have that peer review to really

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>be sure that it's past muster. And and also before

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I was an editor here, I was actually an editor

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:39.479
<v Speaker 1>for a medical research journal UM about rheumatism, and so

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>so I am intimately acquainted with the peer review process. Yeah. Uh, well,

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 1>moving on talking about the difference between Wikipedia and peer

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>review Sanger actually talked about how he had suggested a

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 1>rule called ignore all rules, and in his two five

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>recounting of the beginning of Wikipedia, he said that the

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia community might be surprised to hear that he was

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the one who's who suggested that, because you know, against

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Sanger was the one who was all about pure review,

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and here he is saying ignore all rules. And his

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>his philosophy was that again, they wanted to get as

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>much content on Wikipedia as possible, and if the rules

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 1>intimidated someone so that they did not feel like they

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>were qualified or capable of posting, he wanted to take

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that barrier away. But he thought of that as a

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>temporary measure, something to to get Wikipedia going, to get

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the ball rolling, and then nodded something that would wind

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>up being one of the continuing five pillars, not a

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>central central tenant of the entire of the entire size. Yeah,

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>so ignoral rules. He kind of later on said that

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I I kind of regret saying that now because he

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 1>felt that that was one of the past yeah, of

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of him there was a little bit of a falling out,

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. There's Yeah, Sander Singer definitely, Uh. If you

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>read his stuff, you see and I mean there's there's

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of rancor on both parts, right. Uh.

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Sander has a lot to say about the direction that

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia took and uh, and it it's pretty clear that

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>he feels that it's not ideal. I mean, he doesn't

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>outright come out and say that this is uh, it's

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>it's useless or anything like that, but he has a

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of criticisms. Meanwhile, the Wikipedia community, in turn, has

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of criticisms that they direct to Singer, and

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>they both sides have relevant points. So even though I'm

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>talking a lot about Singer, it's mainly because that's that's

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the account I went with, uh for the history. Yeah,

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 1>it's not that It's not that I necessarily side with Singer.

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not that far to that extreme. Uh. Anyway, a

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of the the policies of Wikipedia actually came out

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 1>of the community. It became sort of communal decisions of

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>how the site should work, which was kind of interesting

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 1>because they had originally thought of it being sort of

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>again an extension of New Pedia but this became more

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of the open communal approach to the Internet, which again

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is more of the Tim Burners Lee approach, which makes

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it a lot harder to direct. You know, you can't

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you've got a group of fifty people

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>who have all decided they want to go left, it's

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>really hard to make them go right, you know, when

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you're one guy. Yeah, yeah, And you know, and there's

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>there's voting systems in place, there's you know, even back

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in those days, there were a lot of a lot

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of ways for people to communicate with each other. These

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:35.239
<v Speaker 1>ideas that they had for the community. Uh, they had

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>decided that that Wikipedia content would always remain free for

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>others to read and edit, uh, meaning that there would

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 1>never be a point where there'd be a paywall or

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>subscription for Wikipedia. And uh they also, you know, we're

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>putting in those policies that allow people to publish rough

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>drafts or rough ideas that could be polished over time,

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 1>either by themselves or by other people. And then Google

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>started to include Wikipedia and its search results for different topics,

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>which meant that there was suddenly a huge rush of

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>news people. Yeah, and and Sanger noticed like as more

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 1>people were coming to visit Wikipedia more than we're getting

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>involved as editors and contributors. So that meant that even

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that as the Wikipedia traffic was increasing, so was the content.

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:26.360
<v Speaker 1>You were suddenly seeing even faster growth as far as

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 1>how much information was being contained within Wikipedia. Um and

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the summer of uh, well, one of the before I

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>get to the summer two thousand one one thing Sander

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't note was that even in those early days that

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>he was starting to notice that people who were difficult

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and who were persistent, Uh, we're sometimes irritating very valuable

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>members of the Wikipedia community. And the valuable members were like,

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't need this, never mind, I'm a volunteer sia,

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and they just left. And then uh, so that meant

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that you started to have more of the persistent, difficult

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>type and fewer of the valuable expert types. Uh. And

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Sender saw that as another kind of downfall of Wikipedia,

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 1>and there there was there wasn't really any way to

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 1>counteract that without essentially violating kind of those philosophies that

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:23.159
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia was founded upon, right, and you know, one of

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>those philosophies is definitely that the editors and contributors should

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>be polite to each other, which happens sometimes, but yeah, exactly,

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's human error. Yeah, I mean the vast

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>majority I think. I think the vast majority of people

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>who are regular contributors to Wikipedia are in general very courteous.

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>But all it takes are a few trolls to really

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>stir things up. And uh and trolls who are particularly

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>effective can cause huge amounts of frustration in a community.

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Um and in fact, that's that's why they do it right.

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>With a little effort, they make a big impact. And

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>uh boy, we did a whole episode on how trolls work.

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:08.239
<v Speaker 1>It was a great one. You guys should go back

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and listen to that one. But in summer of two

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand one, someone ended up using the editing tools to

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>vandalize the front page of Wikipedia, because that was one

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of the ones you could edit back in those days.

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And uh, and so they vandalized it, and then someone

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:25.679
<v Speaker 1>tried to archive the vandalized page, so Singer when end

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>deleted the archive. So then they kind of reposted the

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>archives somewhere else and Singer went in and deleted that,

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and this became a big kerfuffle between Singer and the community.

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>The community not the entire community. But there were sections

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of the community that said, you are overstepping your balance, right,

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>this is not yours to do this with your abusing powers. Yeah,

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you have the ability to do that

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that you are that you should do that.

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Like you, you are capable of doing that, but you

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:56.959
<v Speaker 1>should not do it and uh and Singer was like,

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of silly. The whole point of this

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is that we don't want the vandalized version of Wikipedia

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a representation of Wikipedia. We don't want that

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to come up in search because it hurts the community.

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't see where the problem is. And others were saying, no,

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, that's beside the point. It doesn't matter what

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the content is. It is the matter. The matter is

0:29:14.480 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that you've deleted it. You've overset. If you start deleting,

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>then where does it end. Right, You've bypassed the whole process,

0:29:20.600 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and by bypassing it, you've rendered the process meaningless. And

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>it went from kerfuffle to shenanigans. Well in uh in

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousand two. February two thousand two, Singer is laid

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>off of Wikipedia. At that point, the dot com bubble

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>bursting had really started to take its effect. Newpedia essentially

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>was petering out at that point, and uh and at

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>first Singer was had his had his salary reduced a

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of times I think, and then he was laid off.

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>He continued to work in a volunteer capacity for a

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>little while. Also in February two thousand two, the Spanish

0:29:56.680 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>language version of Wikipedia forked off of the main version

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and became Encyclopedia Libre. And the reason for the split

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>was that the the people working on the Spanish side

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>were worried that there was going to be problems with censorship,

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, things like Saner deleting stuff. And also there

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>was worry that Wikipedia would soon start to institute advertising

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>on its site to monetize Wikipedia, and that there was

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a worry there that by monetizing Wikipedia, you would compromise

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the site's integrity, which is something that Saner was saying

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't exist because of the lack of peer review. So

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of this interesting like you're you're you're going

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to ruin the integrity of the site, and Sanders like

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>what integrity? Uh So that was an interesting discussion, and

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>in August of two thousand two, Jimmy Wales said that

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia would never run ads on its site, and in fact,

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that's also when Wikipedia dot com became Wikipedia dot org

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>as sort of an an example of this is this

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is who we are. We are not We're not a

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>we're not a company, We're an organization. Uh. In December

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of that year, in two thousand two, they launched wctionary,

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of funny because there was a whole

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>page on Wikipedia about how Wikipedia is not a diction dictionary,

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>so they did dictionary. Now, Lauren, let me ask you this.

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you think now I can understand the value of

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>an open source, crowdsourced encyclopedia because there are huge disciplines

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of knowledge out there. There are people who are experts,

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and there are people who have experience with it, their

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>researchers who really know what they're doing when they're looking

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>into that sort of stuff. And the more minds you

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>bring into an encyclopedia, the better chance you have of

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>getting a fuller picture of whatever it is. Right, do

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you see the same thing being valuable in the dictionary? Well, okay,

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the thing about dictionaries I think now that you ask me,

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>is that, um, you know, there are these really terrific,

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>very thorough sources like the Oxford English. It's probably the

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>pinnacle of English dictionaries. If if I'm allowed to make

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that kind of qualitative statement right now, American heritage myself.

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>But you know, well I said that about you, John,

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I support my I support my country. Why do you

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>hate America? Lauren? What do you hate America? But well,

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>because okay, so so they're they're the there are these

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>large resource dictionaries that have a terrific wealth of historical

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>information behind them. Um, however, they are a little bit

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>slow on the uptake of new words, I see. So

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you would see the value of dictionary being something that

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>could incorporate words that are entering the lexicon that would

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe take five to ten years to start at at

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the at the fastest speed possible, five to ten years

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to be incorporated into a dictionary classic dictionary. Right And

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>also you know, to to do it in a way

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that is that is, you know, a not branded because

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>because as as as much as I as much as

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I do love very specific dictionaries, they're their brands, their companies.

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>They're they're out there to make a profit. Um at

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, and so so having an

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>open source one is a really terrific idea, and having

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>one that's perhaps better policed than, for example, Urban Dictionary.

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's a good a good thing

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to do. Okay, although to be fair, it's still community police.

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Well it is, but I would say that the quality

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of policing on Wictionary versus Urban Dictionary is um, that's fair.

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>That's fair. I I can I can agree to that

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>because I don't know if any policing that happens on urbans,

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that that's a thing. So June two

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand three, Whales announces the Wikimedia Foundation, which is a

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>nonprofit that administrates Wikipedia, And in September two thousand three,

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Nupedia's servers crash and it never comes back. Yeah, it

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>just shuts down. The computer failed. So we're just gonna

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>believe it. I don't think it ever really got more

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>than those articles. That was I think that was about it,

0:33:57.280 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of the peak. Yeah. Wow, So new Pedia was

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a failed experiment. Wikipedia, the what was originally going to

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 1>just be a little offshoot of Newpedia was already a

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>rousing success. Yeah. Yeah. There were many other non English

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>sites that were that were launching around that time, I

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:14.399
<v Speaker 1>think that not all of them had officially split off yet,

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>but there were there were at least seventeen different languages

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 1>being worked on within Wikipedia. Well, We've got a lot

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>more to talk about with Wikipedia, but before we do,

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break to thank our sponsor. Alright,

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.319
<v Speaker 1>now back to Wikipedia. Okay, So we just talked about

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand three. Do you have anything between two thousand

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>three and two thousand five, because otherwise I'm just going

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:35.399
<v Speaker 1>to skip around ahead. Um. I believe that in two

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand four, Wikia was founded, which is which is the

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>for profit uh kind of branch of Wikipedia that um,

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that maintains a whole bunch of of entertainment mostly related wikis. Um.

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that the the Wikipedia is among

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 1>them stuff like that. Okay, And you know, those are

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the wikis that I've recently become more and more familiar with,

0:34:56.239 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>because you know, pretty much any kind of entertainment thing

0:35:00.320 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>out there has its own wiki, to the point where

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I can't believe this has a wiki. I

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 1>can't believe tech stuff doesn't anyway, But so so in

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:14.200
<v Speaker 1>these these are ads supported, um, however, they're still community

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>run and uh, you know, yeah, right right, so so similar.

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>But again this is following moral on the Wiki lines

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of philosophy rather than the Wikipedia one. Because again, one

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of the things Stanger also said in his in his

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:31.360
<v Speaker 1>talks or in his writings was that, um, you know,

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:34.879
<v Speaker 1>he he saw that the Wicki philosophy was kind of

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>counter to that of an encyclopedia, like the two did

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>not did not move, you know, I didn't mention a

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>very very seamless way, and that uh, that that was

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a concern to him, but that he felt that because

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia was specifically supposed to be an encyclopedia, it helped

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>guide the policies, uh, for better or for worse. So

0:35:56.719 --> 0:36:00.879
<v Speaker 1>it's the community on Wikipedia is not exactly the same

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 1>as what you would find on your average wiki because

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the process is slightly different because it has a very

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>specific purpose to be an encyclopedia. Well. Uh. In two

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand five, Wired published a report that said that Jimmy

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Wales had done something that's generally frowned upon within the

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia community, and that is to edit your own page

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>eighteen times. Apparently, and supposedly the edits that were made,

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 1>um were removing things like, uh, like Sander's involvement in

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the early genesis of Wikipedia. Yeah, essentially, there was there

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 1>was a charge that Wales had removed a sentence that

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>had referred to Sander as a co founder of Wikipedia. Um.

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And then there were other things as well. That's that

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Wales said was it was just an attempt to remove

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:55.280
<v Speaker 1>some inaccuracies. It wasn't. He wasn't trying to white washing

0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>anything or cleaning it out according to what he was

0:36:57.640 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 1>saying anyway, but still defends this, by the way, right

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in general, that that's considered bad form on Wikipedia. It's not.

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not explicitly against the rules. If you're not, you're

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 1>generally I mean you're you're generally if if you find

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>it an accuracy about something that concerns you due to

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>an end they have an acrony important and all. Um Uh.

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>It is the conflict of interest a bit of it

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that that, Yeah, that you're supposed to submit it to

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>an editor who can then make a non conflict of

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:29.279
<v Speaker 1>interest judgment call about whether or not that it needs

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to be made. That's interesting that particular sequence is going

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to play an important part towards the end of this

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 1>timeline conversation, definitely, because it turns out some people have

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>taken advantage of that particular approach to the point where

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 1>they have been able to inserta misleading information or at

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 1>least leaving out important truths in the process of quote

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>unquote correcting or adding to an article. But we'll get

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 1>to that in a moment. Yeah, so Wales ends up

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 1>getting heat for this. Uh, even though to this day

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:05.920
<v Speaker 1>he says that it wasn't it was not a big deal.

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not that he doesn't even say he didn't do

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:10.919
<v Speaker 1>anything wrong. He's like, I don't understand what the big

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>deal is here was fixing errors? He's He's like, yeah,

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:15.759
<v Speaker 1>I did it. There was nothing wrong with what I did,

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>So calm down. But then, you know, other people would say, well,

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>if you had just gone through the regular channels, then

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:24.359
<v Speaker 1>it would have been another story. Uh. May of two

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 1>thousand five was when we had uh an anonymous user

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 1>who was later identified but I'm not going to say

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the name here, but he posted comments in an article

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>about Segon Dollar, John Seon Dollar, saying that he was

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a suspect and the assassinations of both John and Robert Kennedy.

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Segon Dollar as a journalist and was a friend to

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Robert Kennedy actually one of his palm bearers. So Segon

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Dollar said that this amounted to Internet character assassination. The

0:38:57.239 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>comments were a hoax. It was supposed to be a joke,

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 1>although I don't know who would find this particularly Yeah,

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 1>but the hoax. It was made in May, but it

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:10.919
<v Speaker 1>wasn't discovered until September of two thousand five, and then

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream media caught hold of the story and began

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to cover it. And this ended up being a big

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>black eye on Wikipedia because everyone ran with the story saying,

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>how can you trust a resource that anyone can go

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 1>into and change and vandalize or create a hoax like this,

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:33.320
<v Speaker 1>create a joke, Yeah, insert completely false information, or delete

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:37.320
<v Speaker 1>something so that whatever is left is not an accurate

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>portrayal of the actual subject. Crow the entire side is useless. Yeah,

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you know what, the facialist media is kind of right, right.

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 1>It definitely escalated to from hey, sometimes you can't trust

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>what's on Wikipedia to Wikipedia is bad because people are

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 1>evil and they will mislead you. Uh. And and by

0:39:57.200 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, I don't really think either extreme is healthy.

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 1>While I often will dismiss Wikipedia in any sort of

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:10.239
<v Speaker 1>academic approach. I am not one to say that it's all.

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 1>There's some things about Wikipedia that I find genuinely amusing,

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:17.879
<v Speaker 1>and there's some things I find genuinely helpful. But but yeah,

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I would never go so far on either side. It's

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:25.279
<v Speaker 1>good to know. So April two thousand six, we have

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 1>another scandal. A guy from Glasgow whose name I will

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:35.479
<v Speaker 1>not be able to say, Alan mickel Wraith, mickil Wraith.

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be mckil wrath. Have it in front of me.

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 1>That's it's got to be mickil rayth m c I

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 1>l w R a I t H mckill wraith. So

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>he created a Wikipedia entry about himself that betrayed him

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 1>as a decorated army officer, something that he was not.

0:40:54.760 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 1>And again the mainstream media picked up on this and said, like,

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 1>here's a guy who was promoting himself. Uh, created a

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 1>false identity for himself and uh, and this shows that

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't trust what's on Wikipedia. Yeah. Meanwhile, all this

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:15.719
<v Speaker 1>bad press was not particularly affecting the growth of Wikipedia.

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:17.920
<v Speaker 1>By by mid two thousand six, I think that they

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:21.839
<v Speaker 1>had five million articles. Yeah, this is they went from

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 1>uh they had one million in English. But probably five

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 1>million I think total total. Yeah, so right, right, yeah,

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:30.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit of debate about well yeah, because

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I got confused. I saw at one point, like in

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:34.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand four they hit one million articles, and then

0:41:34.080 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I read later like in two thousand and six they

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:38.840
<v Speaker 1>hit one million articles again, and then I realized, oh wait,

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the first one two thousand four was one million articles

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:44.720
<v Speaker 1>total across all languages. Two thousand six was one million

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 1>in English. But it was the growth was incredible. Uh.

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 1>And in two thousand seven we have another scandal. This

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is when it was discovered that a Wikipedia editor who

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>was using a handle called s J E S. S

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 1>J A Y was discovered to have also created a

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>false identity. In this case, s J had been uh

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:14.440
<v Speaker 1>posing as someone who held a PhD uh in uh

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in theology, I assume, because he was saying that he

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>was a tenured professor with an expertise in Kennon law,

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:23.759
<v Speaker 1>and in reality he was a twenty four year old

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:28.399
<v Speaker 1>guy who had been to several colleges in Kentucky. An

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:32.080
<v Speaker 1>expert perhaps, but objectively speaking, he was saying that he

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 1>had created this identity in order to give himself a

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 1>buffer so that people who disagreed with him would not

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 1>be able to attack him personally. So, in other words,

0:42:40.640 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>he was just creating a handle. It's just a little

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>bit more, uh more involved than just a handle. But

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 1>here's the problem. He was also using his fake credentials

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:54.399
<v Speaker 1>to back up his arguments whenever he was making edits. Yeah,

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:57.439
<v Speaker 1>that's that's that, that's going beyond. He's saying, like, because

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:00.040
<v Speaker 1>of my expertise in this field, I know that this

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 1>particular thing should be worded this way rather than that way.

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And he didn't hold those credentials. So the New Yorker

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:10.360
<v Speaker 1>writes about Wikipedia, and they write about s J before

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:14.800
<v Speaker 1>finding out that s J is not who he claims

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:18.719
<v Speaker 1>to be. Then the information breaks that s J is

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:22.720
<v Speaker 1>actually someone else, and the New Yorker ends up writing

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty strongly worded response to that, and again mainstream

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 1>media blows up, and online it blows up. The community

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 1>begins to sift through all the edits that s J

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:38.000
<v Speaker 1>made on Wikipedia, particularly in the places where he was

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 1>using his false credentials to bolster his arguments, because now

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the community has the responsibility to fix this, or if

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>if in fact needs to be fixed, they have to

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 1>address it. So that they can again show that Wikipedia

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:53.880
<v Speaker 1>is something you can rely upon at least or that

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it's at least useful and not just be raised to

0:43:57.320 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the ground. Yeah, it's not just a database of information

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you cannot really be sure is accurate or not. Uh,

0:44:04.320 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it was, you know, it was fighting a powerful perception problem,

0:44:08.680 --> 0:44:12.239
<v Speaker 1>right right right? That was also, did did you? Uh?

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:14.040
<v Speaker 1>That was also the year two thousand and seven that

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Virgil griff Griffith released wicket Scanner. I don't know about

0:44:17.600 --> 0:44:20.359
<v Speaker 1>this one, okay, so so so Wicker Scanner Um was

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 1>this you know, terrific little program that he wrote that

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 1>whenever an unregistered anonymous user edits Wikipedia entry, the site

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 1>logs the user's IP address, and and this can come

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in terrifically handy because you know, it's not not all

0:44:35.719 --> 0:44:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the problems are with people pretending to be who they aren't.

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 1>When an anonymous user can log in and talk about

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:44.719
<v Speaker 1>anything that they want to, you know, for the kind

0:44:44.719 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of things that we're coming out of this Wicker Scanner

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:50.800
<v Speaker 1>business were facts like people from Apple I p addresses

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 1>had been editing Microsoft pages on Wikipedia and vice versa,

0:44:55.880 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 1>which is another reason why we find Wikipedia. It's it's

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 1>one of those reas. Why it's hard to trust stuff

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 1>because sometimes people with an agenda will go in and

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:10.280
<v Speaker 1>adjust a uh AN entry, either to make one party

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and it look better than than it would otherwise have

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:17.759
<v Speaker 1>looked or look worse, depending upon the person's agenda. Sure, yeah, yeah,

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I member, you know, and and Democratic Party member's IP

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:24.799
<v Speaker 1>address was traced to edits about Rush Limbaugh that we're

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:29.759
<v Speaker 1>extremely unflattering. Yeah, this is This has happened any election year.

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:33.400
<v Speaker 1>This stuff runs rampant, to the point where sometimes Wikipedia

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:37.799
<v Speaker 1>will lock down a particular page about a subject in

0:45:37.880 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>order to avoid the crazy number of edits that different

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:44.560
<v Speaker 1>sides of a debate will will put onto a page

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:46.879
<v Speaker 1>in order to support their side. I mean, then think

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:48.879
<v Speaker 1>about it. This is kind of crazy, right. It's like

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 1>if I if I have a disagreement with Lauren about

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a particular subject, and then I go to Wikipedia and

0:45:55.160 --> 0:45:57.080
<v Speaker 1>edit a page so it supports my argument, and then

0:45:57.120 --> 0:46:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I cite Wikipedia as a support for my argument. That's

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:04.359
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty insidious. That's dirty pool, that's what that is.

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And I don't want to say that all anonymous Wikipedia

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 1>editors are are bad or doing nefarious thing, not at all.

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:12.560
<v Speaker 1>For example, A couple of the other things came out

0:46:12.600 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of this is that they found out that a UM

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:17.720
<v Speaker 1>someone from the CIA contributed a really long entry about

0:46:17.840 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 1>lightsaber combat, UM someone from DARPA had written fairly extensively

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:25.600
<v Speaker 1>about Schila booth. I mean, you know, it's it's just stuff.

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not always bad, right, Yeah, But and

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:30.600
<v Speaker 1>we don't mean to suggest that it's always bad or

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that this happens all the time. It's the fact that

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it happens that's the problem. And you don't, you know,

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:40.399
<v Speaker 1>unless you are actually adept at looking at the edits

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:43.279
<v Speaker 1>page and understanding what that means, you may not be

0:46:43.320 --> 0:46:46.759
<v Speaker 1>aware of something that's going on that's not quite right.

0:46:47.200 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 1>And so uh. While while the odds of that actually

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:54.240
<v Speaker 1>happening on any given page on any given day maybe low,

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:57.279
<v Speaker 1>because you're talking about lots and lots of people using

0:46:57.280 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 1>this resource and lots of opportunities to fiddle with it,

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:03.360
<v Speaker 1>it does happen. That's that's why you're like, you know,

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the answ are with you that you're going to be

0:47:04.960 --> 0:47:08.120
<v Speaker 1>fine whenever you use Wikipedia, but they're still there are

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:12.319
<v Speaker 1>like thousand regular contributors and seventy seven thousand regular editors

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 1>on Wikipedia as so, and after that whole UH, that

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:20.920
<v Speaker 1>whole problem with Seagan Dollar where the the quote unquote

0:47:20.960 --> 0:47:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the joke about him being a suspect in the assassination

0:47:24.320 --> 0:47:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Kennedy's UH, Wales had instituted a new policy

0:47:27.880 --> 0:47:31.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that unregistered users can no longer post new articles

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>at all, because that was that he wanted to head

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 1>off that problem, and then by registering he hoped that

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that would UH create more accountability. Now, of course the

0:47:40.680 --> 0:47:43.839
<v Speaker 1>s J issue showed that there were other problems, and

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Wales came down pretty hard on that to Once all

0:47:46.160 --> 0:47:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the facts came out in two thousand nine, the Arbitration

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Committee had to restrict access to its site from the

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Church of Scientology I p addresses and also banned several

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 1>anti Scientologists edits because the two sides were both manipulating

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the same articles to either post Scientology and a positive

0:48:06.920 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 1>or a negative light. Obviously when that that was around

0:48:11.040 --> 0:48:14.480
<v Speaker 1>when UH Anonymous I believe was really involved in in

0:48:14.520 --> 0:48:17.479
<v Speaker 1>their crash campaign, so that the thing that was coming

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:19.600
<v Speaker 1>up into question was the neutral point of view here,

0:48:19.680 --> 0:48:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and both sides were trying to use Wikipedia to bolster

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 1>their own arguments. Uh, and whether you side with one

0:48:27.239 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 1>or the other, it was clear that both sides had

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 1>agendas and uh, you know, some of those people may

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:35.800
<v Speaker 1>have been trying very hard to create an objective post,

0:48:36.160 --> 0:48:37.880
<v Speaker 1>but there were a lot of people who really weren't.

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's where the banning and the and the IP

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 1>address blocking came in. And that same year, Wikipedia became

0:48:45.160 --> 0:48:49.720
<v Speaker 1>licensed under a Creative Commons right yeah, yeah, UM, which

0:48:49.760 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 1>which basically just means that it's it's licensed under their

0:48:52.800 --> 0:48:56.560
<v Speaker 1>UM share and share like yeah. So in other words,

0:48:56.600 --> 0:49:01.360
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to worry about, uh, get ing chased

0:49:01.440 --> 0:49:04.760
<v Speaker 1>down by lawyers when you're reusing this material and another

0:49:04.800 --> 0:49:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and you cannot, like a person who contributes to Wikipedia

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:10.440
<v Speaker 1>cannot claim that work to be their own at all.

0:49:10.480 --> 0:49:13.680
<v Speaker 1>They have they have essentially signed off right right, you know,

0:49:13.880 --> 0:49:17.799
<v Speaker 1>it's the content UM is still technically owned by the contributors,

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>but it is freely reproducible and distributable. Yeah, and when

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:22.960
<v Speaker 1>anyone can go in and edit it. Actually, that was

0:49:23.000 --> 0:49:24.719
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that people worried about early on

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in Wikipedia said, wait a minute, I'm an awesome writer.

0:49:27.840 --> 0:49:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I write awesome things. My officer of credit for my

0:49:31.000 --> 0:49:33.760
<v Speaker 1>awesome things or or I even if I don't get credit,

0:49:33.840 --> 0:49:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I certainly shouldn't be subjected to seeing other plebeians coming

0:49:37.239 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in and editing my awesome prose where I wrote this

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:45.840
<v Speaker 1>amazing piece on Optimus Prime and his importance to Western culture,

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:48.879
<v Speaker 1>and some idiot came in and said that he turned

0:49:48.880 --> 0:49:52.120
<v Speaker 1>into this model of of a of a Semitruck, when

0:49:52.160 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 1>clearly it was this other model of Yeah, that's that.

0:49:55.640 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 1>That was like an actual argument that happened on Wikipedia, early, early, early,

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:02.280
<v Speaker 1>early on. Um. But people have to let go because

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the way Wikipedia works. And as a writer,

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:07.719
<v Speaker 1>I can completely understand what the people who get really

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:10.879
<v Speaker 1>antsy about that. Although I would often turn my writing

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:14.120
<v Speaker 1>assignments into Chris and then never see them again until

0:50:14.200 --> 0:50:15.719
<v Speaker 1>they were published on the page, and I was all

0:50:15.800 --> 0:50:18.880
<v Speaker 1>right with it. Uh, you learned to let go here

0:50:18.880 --> 0:50:20.839
<v Speaker 1>and how I learned to let go? And I learned

0:50:20.880 --> 0:50:22.399
<v Speaker 1>that this way, I don't have to look at those

0:50:22.400 --> 0:50:24.880
<v Speaker 1>red marks all over my paper because Chris just fixed

0:50:24.880 --> 0:50:27.279
<v Speaker 1>it himself. It was awesome. It made me feel like

0:50:27.280 --> 0:50:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I was a better writer than I actually was. Uh.

0:50:29.719 --> 0:50:32.120
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand and twelve, do you have anything between

0:50:33.320 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 1>actually we're going to wrap up the timeline pretty soon.

0:50:36.200 --> 0:50:38.440
<v Speaker 1>The two thousand and twelve the big story I have was,

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of course that Wikipedia took place in the blackout day

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 1>on January And yeah, Pippa, Sorry, it's fine, you haven't.

0:50:48.719 --> 0:50:51.839
<v Speaker 1>You haven't been through the whole ordeal of talking about

0:50:51.840 --> 0:50:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Sopa and Pippa. I called it Pipa for about three

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:58.600
<v Speaker 1>weeks until everyone else in technology just consistently called it Pippa.

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's alright, final, I'm been wrong this whole time.

0:51:01.680 --> 0:51:03.960
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, Sopa and Pippa. Those were, of course the

0:51:04.080 --> 0:51:08.320
<v Speaker 1>online Piracy Acts that were in consideration in Congress in

0:51:08.360 --> 0:51:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the United States, and several sites ended up doing blackouts

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to protest this proposed legislation, UH, to bring more attention

0:51:16.400 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to it, and say, these the way these these laws,

0:51:19.600 --> 0:51:22.799
<v Speaker 1>or these these potential laws are worded, they could seriously

0:51:22.960 --> 0:51:26.560
<v Speaker 1>harm the operation of the Internet and and cause trouble

0:51:26.680 --> 0:51:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to lots of people and lots of organizations, and they

0:51:29.640 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 1>should not be turned into law. UH. And then in

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand thirteen, Oh but but before before we leave,

0:51:35.640 --> 0:51:39.400
<v Speaker 1>two important cultural note. That is the year that Encyclopedia

0:51:39.440 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Britannica ceased publishing on paper after two hundred and forty

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:45.520
<v Speaker 1>four years of doing so. You know, it's also kind

0:51:45.520 --> 0:51:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of interesting. There was I remember, and I didn't write

0:51:48.680 --> 0:51:50.880
<v Speaker 1>this down in my my research because it didn't actually

0:51:50.920 --> 0:51:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it didn't occur to me while I was researching it.

0:51:52.680 --> 0:51:56.239
<v Speaker 1>But I remember specifically there was a time when Wikipedia

0:51:56.320 --> 0:52:02.560
<v Speaker 1>was starting to consider looking for experts to send in articles,

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:04.680
<v Speaker 1>just like the old New PDIA days. They were they

0:52:04.719 --> 0:52:07.880
<v Speaker 1>were actually thinking about going to experts to get expert

0:52:07.960 --> 0:52:11.319
<v Speaker 1>subject matter experts to write information for Wikipedia. At the

0:52:11.400 --> 0:52:16.320
<v Speaker 1>same time, Britannica was looking at the possibility of crowdsourcing articles.

0:52:16.320 --> 0:52:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So it looked like for a moment that these two

0:52:18.040 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 1>models were about the flip flop that didn't actually happen

0:52:21.600 --> 0:52:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that way, but I remember hearing about that or my

0:52:25.080 --> 0:52:28.400
<v Speaker 1>brain just inventedive one of the two. Also interesting cultural

0:52:28.440 --> 0:52:30.840
<v Speaker 1>point in between two thousand eight and two thousand twelve,

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>this kind of dead space that that we have created,

0:52:33.160 --> 0:52:36.160
<v Speaker 1>first of on our timeline here, um, the Wikimedia Foundation

0:52:36.200 --> 0:52:39.200
<v Speaker 1>total assets went from five point six million to about

0:52:39.280 --> 0:52:42.319
<v Speaker 1>forty nine point three million. And again it's existing on

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:45.480
<v Speaker 1>donations and donations only and and so, and that's that's

0:52:45.960 --> 0:52:49.799
<v Speaker 1>fabulous for the concept of shared knowledge, I think. Right,

0:52:49.880 --> 0:52:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that also really interesting to see what kind of I

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 1>mean to know exactly what they mean when they when

0:52:54.120 --> 0:52:57.560
<v Speaker 1>they have those giant banners every year to beg for money, right, Yeah,

0:52:57.600 --> 0:53:01.000
<v Speaker 1>when you see Jimmy Wells face on their saying every page, yeah,

0:53:01.280 --> 0:53:04.080
<v Speaker 1>give money so that this can continue to exist. I mean,

0:53:04.280 --> 0:53:06.319
<v Speaker 1>and not that you shouldn't donate. I just you know,

0:53:06.360 --> 0:53:09.359
<v Speaker 1>I just think that it's it's an interestingly, it's it's

0:53:09.360 --> 0:53:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a really cool number. Yeah, And I think it's it's

0:53:12.080 --> 0:53:14.279
<v Speaker 1>it's cool that they took that approach. I mean, it

0:53:14.320 --> 0:53:17.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely gives them the benefit of saying, look, we're not

0:53:17.640 --> 0:53:21.359
<v Speaker 1>beholden to any organization or company. We are accepting their

0:53:21.440 --> 0:53:24.680
<v Speaker 1>nation crowd crowd source, and this this is really meant

0:53:24.760 --> 0:53:29.839
<v Speaker 1>to be a tool to enrich the human race. Really,

0:53:29.880 --> 0:53:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's meant to really make things better for everybody.

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:37.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's not meant to be the platform for one

0:53:37.280 --> 0:53:40.080
<v Speaker 1>company to say, hey, by our stuff instead of that

0:53:40.120 --> 0:53:43.840
<v Speaker 1>other guy's stuff. One two the teams speaking about companies.

0:53:44.520 --> 0:53:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's this year. Earlier this year a story broke

0:53:48.840 --> 0:53:53.239
<v Speaker 1>that British Petroleum or BP, I should say BP. The

0:53:53.600 --> 0:53:56.919
<v Speaker 1>Brits hate it when I say British Petroleum, because they said, look,

0:53:56.920 --> 0:54:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't bring us into this fault. The story was

0:54:00.920 --> 0:54:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that BP had edited its own Wikipedia page. Uh, maybe

0:54:04.920 --> 0:54:08.759
<v Speaker 1>rewriting up to the content in order to make the

0:54:08.960 --> 0:54:13.439
<v Speaker 1>environmental impact at the oil spell Yeah, the deep water

0:54:13.520 --> 0:54:18.480
<v Speaker 1>horizon and the Gulf to make that seem less bad.

0:54:19.239 --> 0:54:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's kind of hard to word this properly, but

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:27.920
<v Speaker 1>essentially that they had sort of whitewashed the disaster and

0:54:27.960 --> 0:54:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the follow up to it. Uh. And here here I'm

0:54:31.960 --> 0:54:35.279
<v Speaker 1>quoting this directly from c NET, which reported on this.

0:54:36.120 --> 0:54:39.200
<v Speaker 1>BP is not directly editing its page, but instead has

0:54:39.239 --> 0:54:44.160
<v Speaker 1>apparently inserted a BP representative into the editing community who

0:54:44.160 --> 0:54:48.640
<v Speaker 1>provides Wikipedia editors with text. The text is then copied

0:54:48.760 --> 0:54:52.800
<v Speaker 1>as is onto the page by Wikipedia editors, while readers

0:54:52.800 --> 0:54:56.600
<v Speaker 1>are none the wiser that sections pretending to be unbiased

0:54:56.600 --> 0:55:00.320
<v Speaker 1>information are in fact vetted by higher ups at EP

0:55:00.719 --> 0:55:05.360
<v Speaker 1>before hitting the page. BP's image clean up cleverly skirts

0:55:05.360 --> 0:55:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia's editorial rules, wherein Wikipedia editors are using text that

0:55:10.280 --> 0:55:13.960
<v Speaker 1>VP posts on Wikipedia itself as the source, although the

0:55:14.000 --> 0:55:17.799
<v Speaker 1>text is not published on BP's website. This way, the

0:55:17.840 --> 0:55:21.360
<v Speaker 1>significant involvement of BP in its own entry is completely

0:55:21.440 --> 0:55:25.640
<v Speaker 1>hidden from Wikipedia readers, while Wikipedia editors, as usual argue

0:55:25.640 --> 0:55:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and attack each other over editorial policy, while BPS favorable

0:55:29.160 --> 0:55:34.000
<v Speaker 1>pr editing continues, right and uh, alright, so so there

0:55:34.080 --> 0:55:37.400
<v Speaker 1>there's really one person who was submitting these changes. Uh,

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:41.200
<v Speaker 1>someone by the name of Arturo silver Silva pardon me, um.

0:55:41.280 --> 0:55:44.719
<v Speaker 1>He was from the corporate communications department in Houston and um,

0:55:44.760 --> 0:55:47.799
<v Speaker 1>and he was actually going through the correct channels to

0:55:48.040 --> 0:55:51.800
<v Speaker 1>submit these changes. He he suggested the changes to editors.

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:55.200
<v Speaker 1>He identified himself as a BP employee to those editors.

0:55:55.320 --> 0:55:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So essentially what was happening was that he was playing

0:55:58.360 --> 0:56:02.280
<v Speaker 1>by the rules. It was technically in good faith, aside

0:56:02.280 --> 0:56:05.640
<v Speaker 1>from the part that that you know, it was still whitewashing,

0:56:05.760 --> 0:56:08.839
<v Speaker 1>whitewashing the whole, the whole situation. Right. So so these

0:56:08.880 --> 0:56:11.200
<v Speaker 1>are like when we were talking about earlier about how

0:56:11.680 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jimmy Wales had edited his own, uh, his

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:17.640
<v Speaker 1>own article, and that he should have gone through the

0:56:17.640 --> 0:56:20.640
<v Speaker 1>proper channels. These are those channels that we were talking about.

0:56:21.000 --> 0:56:23.600
<v Speaker 1>This is what the VP person was doing, but it

0:56:23.719 --> 0:56:27.279
<v Speaker 1>was still putting in possibly you know, you might say

0:56:27.320 --> 0:56:31.440
<v Speaker 1>biased information is clearly clearly biased. It's from the company

0:56:31.480 --> 0:56:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that the page is about, So you can't you know,

0:56:34.640 --> 0:56:37.000
<v Speaker 1>there's no way it could be unbiased. If I write

0:56:37.040 --> 0:56:39.560
<v Speaker 1>my own Wikipedia page, that's going to be biased. Even

0:56:39.560 --> 0:56:41.600
<v Speaker 1>if I think I'm being objective, I'm still going to

0:56:41.640 --> 0:56:44.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about how freaking awesome I am. You know, so right,

0:56:44.600 --> 0:56:46.279
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I don't know, like like at that point,

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I would personally, and this is speaking as an editor,

0:56:48.400 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 1>so I might be a little bit upity about it.

0:56:50.560 --> 0:56:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I would blame the editors at that because because if

0:56:53.160 --> 0:56:55.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not if they're not going like, yeah, this is

0:56:55.280 --> 0:56:57.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe not the right source to trust this information from

0:56:58.040 --> 0:57:02.160
<v Speaker 1>UM and this is going beyond a factual a clearly

0:57:02.239 --> 0:57:05.800
<v Speaker 1>factual change. They're not showing good editorial judgment. Correct, Yeah,

0:57:06.000 --> 0:57:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I I agree with that. And uh and so you know,

0:57:09.800 --> 0:57:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Wales actually came down again and said that that

0:57:13.239 --> 0:57:16.280
<v Speaker 1>while BP is saying essentially that they totally played by

0:57:16.280 --> 0:57:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the rules, he said, that's not what the rules are

0:57:18.320 --> 0:57:21.400
<v Speaker 1>there to protect. The rules are there to protect against

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the kind of stuff that this this company is pulling.

0:57:23.760 --> 0:57:26.840
<v Speaker 1>It's just this company is pulling the tricks within the

0:57:26.840 --> 0:57:30.200
<v Speaker 1>context of the rules, which either means that the rules

0:57:30.240 --> 0:57:33.400
<v Speaker 1>themselves are faulty or the people who are who are

0:57:33.480 --> 0:57:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in charge, like the editors like you were saying, Lauren,

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:38.840
<v Speaker 1>are faulty at any rate. This is something that if

0:57:38.880 --> 0:57:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I don't want to put words into

0:57:40.520 --> 0:57:43.280
<v Speaker 1>wales His mouth, but I assume from what he has

0:57:43.320 --> 0:57:48.360
<v Speaker 1>said he would not want this to have happened. Um So, anyway,

0:57:48.480 --> 0:57:51.000
<v Speaker 1>all of that being said, there's an awful lot of

0:57:51.080 --> 0:57:54.680
<v Speaker 1>information on Wikipedia, and a lot of that over two

0:57:54.760 --> 0:57:59.360
<v Speaker 1>million articles in two languages in fact, and that there's

0:57:59.360 --> 0:58:02.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff on there. It's incredibly useful. I mean I I

0:58:02.760 --> 0:58:08.280
<v Speaker 1>use Wikipedia casually all the time, probably every day. It

0:58:08.480 --> 0:58:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly useful. Um But because of what we've talked about,

0:58:13.400 --> 0:58:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's why a lot of teachers and and publications like

0:58:17.320 --> 0:58:20.760
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works say you cannot use Wikipedia as a source.

0:58:21.000 --> 0:58:23.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's because of the reasons we've listed. It's not

0:58:23.800 --> 0:58:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's a bad thing. I actually think that Wikipedia

0:58:27.320 --> 0:58:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is an amazing idea and it's it's actually phn novel

0:58:30.320 --> 0:58:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to me that's worked as well as it has, right, right,

0:58:32.960 --> 0:58:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, considering that that certain certain portions the Internet

0:58:35.600 --> 0:58:37.640
<v Speaker 1>can definitely be a wretched have of scummon villainy, right,

0:58:37.880 --> 0:58:40.000
<v Speaker 1>if you look at YouTube comments and then you think,

0:58:40.920 --> 0:58:43.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the same This is the same world that

0:58:43.440 --> 0:58:45.920
<v Speaker 1>we live in where we can go to Wikipedia and

0:58:45.960 --> 0:58:50.320
<v Speaker 1>read an article about something, you know, something really technically advanced,

0:58:50.360 --> 0:58:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and get a really good understanding of it. Uh, and

0:58:52.920 --> 0:58:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it's this is a collaborative effort on the part of

0:58:55.840 --> 0:58:59.080
<v Speaker 1>possibly hundreds of people. And then you go to YouTube

0:58:59.080 --> 0:59:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and you read the comments and you think, how is

0:59:00.520 --> 0:59:05.320
<v Speaker 1>this the same world? How what happened? Uh? So you know,

0:59:05.400 --> 0:59:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing. But there are also some things that you

0:59:07.720 --> 0:59:10.080
<v Speaker 1>can poke some fun at, like, uh, there was a

0:59:10.640 --> 0:59:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could remember which web comic this was,

0:59:13.000 --> 0:59:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and listeners, if you happen to know what I'm referring to,

0:59:15.560 --> 0:59:18.000
<v Speaker 1>if you've been reading web comics forever and the strikes

0:59:18.040 --> 0:59:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a chord, let me know. But I remember reading a

0:59:20.280 --> 0:59:24.120
<v Speaker 1>web comic ages ago where was a whole series about Wikipedia,

0:59:24.560 --> 0:59:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and one of the things they pointed out, very snarkily

0:59:27.320 --> 0:59:33.800
<v Speaker 1>was if you were to assume that the the the

0:59:33.960 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 1>entries that have the most words are the most important

0:59:36.600 --> 0:59:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to the human race, then Optimus Prime would be way

0:59:40.160 --> 0:59:43.320
<v Speaker 1>more important than Neighbraham Lincoln. I feel like that was

0:59:43.360 --> 0:59:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Penny Arcade somebody, somebody, please please write in and tell

0:59:46.360 --> 0:59:48.720
<v Speaker 1>me that. I can tell you it was not Penny Arcade. Well,

0:59:48.760 --> 0:59:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Penny Arcade very well may have made that

0:59:50.960 --> 0:59:53.480
<v Speaker 1>same joke, but I don't read Penning Up Penny Arcade,

0:59:53.800 --> 0:59:56.200
<v Speaker 1>so I know it wasn't Pinning Arcade. All right, Well

0:59:56.200 --> 1:00:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. I'm not I'm not criticizing p Look, I

1:00:00.320 --> 1:00:03.000
<v Speaker 1>don't read any web comics anymore. I just don't have

1:00:03.040 --> 1:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the time. But I used to read a lot of them.

1:00:05.760 --> 1:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I recall. I recall seeing that that as well. At

1:00:08.280 --> 1:00:11.240
<v Speaker 1>any rate, whoever created it, somebody, somebody writing and tell

1:00:11.280 --> 1:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>us because it's gonna bug otherwise. I used to. You

1:00:14.840 --> 1:00:17.240
<v Speaker 1>know what's worse, I used to have these pinned up

1:00:17.240 --> 1:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in my cubicle. They're not up there anymore, but I

1:00:19.280 --> 1:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>used to. I can't even remember, but I used to

1:00:21.160 --> 1:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>have them. There's a whole bunch of them. Um. But anyway,

1:00:24.000 --> 1:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>that's one of those things. That's one of those things

1:00:26.000 --> 1:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that you could joke about, is that that seemingly irrelevant

1:00:31.800 --> 1:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>things would get a huge amount of attention because they

1:00:34.960 --> 1:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>were they were interesting that, you know, especially stuff in

1:00:37.680 --> 1:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>geek culture that people are really really passionately uh, interested

1:00:43.400 --> 1:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in like you know, which again shows you why they're

1:00:46.800 --> 1:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>these wikis now that exist all around these properties, right right,

1:00:50.640 --> 1:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's a perfect format for that kind of level

1:00:53.440 --> 1:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of minutia of interstory detail. I mean, it's ridiculous when

1:00:57.520 --> 1:00:59.959
<v Speaker 1>I can look up a comic book character and see

1:01:00.160 --> 1:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>every single iteration of that comic book character, and then

1:01:03.000 --> 1:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I look up and someone who was fundamentally important in

1:01:07.000 --> 1:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>some huge moment in history and they have a fraction

1:01:10.640 --> 1:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of that Not that you not that you couldn't cover

1:01:13.560 --> 1:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the important contributions of that person in that amount of space.

1:01:17.120 --> 1:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>You might be able to, but it just gives you

1:01:19.360 --> 1:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>this weird feeling like if I were to put these

1:01:21.680 --> 1:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in scales, this one so heavy. Any But yeah, and

1:01:26.640 --> 1:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what Wikipedia is as as of January, fifth

1:01:30.760 --> 1:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>most popular website in the world, behind only Google, Yahoo, Microsoft,

1:01:34.920 --> 1:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook, and in fact ahead of Amazon, Apple, and eBay.

1:01:39.760 --> 1:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>So I yeah, I mean they're doing and again there's

1:01:43.880 --> 1:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of valuable stuff on there. So I know

1:01:46.600 --> 1:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that we definitely kind of criticized Wikipedia quite a bit

1:01:49.560 --> 1:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in this this podcast, but keep in mind we're talking

1:01:52.240 --> 1:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>about specifically in the use for things like academic like

1:01:55.280 --> 1:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>academic research, and I do want to say what we

1:01:57.920 --> 1:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>do what Jonathan and I both do. I think, um,

1:02:00.480 --> 1:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll did we say this already? We we we we

1:02:02.440 --> 1:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>go to Wikipedia and we go straight to the resource section.

1:02:05.360 --> 1:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>You look at the references and you take a look

1:02:07.200 --> 1:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and take a look and see like because there you

1:02:09.520 --> 1:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>can learn more about you know, go to the places

1:02:13.760 --> 1:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>where the people who have written the article on Wikipedia,

1:02:16.280 --> 1:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>where they got their information from. Because I mean that

1:02:18.640 --> 1:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>also allows you to remove the interpreter as well, right,

1:02:22.720 --> 1:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>because anytime you're reading an article in Wikipedia, you're reading

1:02:25.000 --> 1:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>an interpretation of someone else's stuff. Because you know, that's

1:02:28.360 --> 1:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>another thing we didn't mention on Wikipedia. You do not

1:02:31.120 --> 1:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>publish primary information. You don't publish information for the first

1:02:35.080 --> 1:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>time Wikipedia specifically against the rules. Yeah, you have to.

1:02:38.160 --> 1:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>You have to. If you're going to present a fact

1:02:41.720 --> 1:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that someone could look up and verify or reject, you

1:02:45.840 --> 1:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>have to be able to cite it. And you cannot

1:02:48.120 --> 1:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>just do primary publication right there. You know, it can't

1:02:51.840 --> 1:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>be like this is this is original research and publishing.

1:02:54.640 --> 1:02:58.920
<v Speaker 1>You can't do that. Um. And so it's in theory,

1:02:59.320 --> 1:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>everything that's verifiable fact within a Wikipedia entry should be

1:03:03.040 --> 1:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>referenced somehow. This can also get kind of ridiculous when

1:03:06.400 --> 1:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you start reading things that are, you know, demonstrably true

1:03:09.560 --> 1:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and everyone knows it, and then at the very end

1:03:11.320 --> 1:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of the sentence you see site yeah, like like need citations?

1:03:17.160 --> 1:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Know that the sun, the sun exists. I know that

1:03:19.840 --> 1:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't need a citation. Yeah, And sometimes I wonder

1:03:22.760 --> 1:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>if that's just trolling as well. Sometimes I'm sure editor

1:03:26.080 --> 1:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>trolling where it's like, could you can you provide me

1:03:28.680 --> 1:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>with a site citation to prove that this thing that

1:03:31.760 --> 1:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows is actually a thing. Anyway, So that's our

1:03:35.120 --> 1:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>discussion about Wikipedia. Uh. If you guys have suggestions for

1:03:39.440 --> 1:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>topics we should cover in future episodes of tech Stuff,

1:03:41.760 --> 1:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend you get in touch with us and

1:03:43.560 --> 1:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>let us know. You can say us an email or

1:03:45.920 --> 1:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>address is tech stuff at Discovery dot com, or come

1:03:50.040 --> 1:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>visit us on Facebook or Twitter because we're so lonely.

1:03:53.880 --> 1:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Our handle at both those locations is text Stuff H.

1:03:56.760 --> 1:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>S W and Lauren and I will talk to you again,

1:03:59.160 --> 1:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>really singing for more on this and thousands of other topics.

1:04:08.440 --> 1:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that how stuff works dot Com