WEBVTT - Listener Q's: Bird Robots, Two Headed Snakes!

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Creature Feature production of iHeartRadio. I'm your host

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of Many Parasites, Katie Golden. I study psychology and evolutionary biology,

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and today on the show, it's a listener's Questions episode.

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I love to answer your questions. It always sends me

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>on a really interesting research trip. I go to the library,

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>and by library, I mean I send my Piamazon, go

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>on to Google scholar and el Sevier, etc. Make sure

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I am answering your questions with as much accuracy as possible.

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you have a question and you're like, hey,

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, I want that answered by Katie, you

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>can send it to me at Creature Featurepod at gmail

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Any questions about evolutionary biology, your pets, ammals,

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.279
<v Speaker 1>I will do my best to answer them as an

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>armchair zoologist. All right, so let's get right into it, Hi, Katie.

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Let me start by saying that Death Bloat Corpse Parade

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 1>is actually a really good pretend metal band name. I

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>have a question about bird sounds. Some birds can mimic

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>or have calls that sound almost mechanical or robotic rather

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 1>than melodic. Does that have something to do with the

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>mechanics of how birds produce sound. I've wondered this for

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a while, but the recent mystery sound White Bell Bird

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>reminded me. Thanks as always for the great show, Carolyn. So, Carolyn,

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a great question and one I've wondered about

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>many times myself. I think what have come to the

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>conclusion is that the reason they sound more mechanical is

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>how they can produce crisp sounds with rapid trills and

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>fluctuations that are loud, clear, and distinct, as well as

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>producing more than one note at a time. So when

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>human singers produce trills, there's a sliding between notes. Now

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a singer, please don't laugh. This is what

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it kind of sounds like for you. And you're like, oh,

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have this sort of like in between

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the notes. It's not like, oh, although really skilled operatic

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>singers can do that quite fast, not as fast as

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a bird can, which makes it sound mechanical right, like

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like a keyboard or an instrument. It doesn't

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>sound like something biological because it's so fast, it's so precise,

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's no sliding around. So yeah, a bird can

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>go from one note to another extremely quickly without having

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to make that slide in between the notes. So the

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 1>question is this a mechanical or learned difference in bird's

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>song versus human sounds or other mammal sounds. So surprisingly,

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it's actually kind of a combination of the two. It's

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>not purely mechanical, but the mechanics are really important. It's

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>also how birds learn. Song Birds have a syrinx instead

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of a larynx. The syrinx is the sound producing organ

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>in birds, whereas the larynx is the sound producing organ

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in humans and other mammals. There are some physical and

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>mechanical differences between the syrinx of a bird and a

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>larynx that allows birds some special techniques. So the syrinx

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of songbirds actually splits into two bronchial tubes, each of

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>which can operate independently of one another. That means they

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>can produce two notes simultaneously, something that is very difficult

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>for a human to do. There are actually a few

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>exceptions to this in terms of humans being able to

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>produce two notes at once. Tuven throat singers and other

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>overtone singers can produce two notes at once. This is

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>accomplished by an extremely skillful manipulation of the tongue and

0:03:54.840 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>throat while singing to create a base, humming and overtone simultaneously.

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>It's really really cool. It takes a lot of skill

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to master. Birds, of course, can do this more naturally.

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>They also have a lot of other mechanical differences, right,

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>They don't have lips or the shape of their mouth

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>openings that well. They do in a certain ways, so

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>like a large mouth that they can open really wide

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>can produce a louder volume. That's the case for the

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>white bell bird. But the precise control of shaping the

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>sound with like our mouths that we do with human language,

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a bird can't do. They don't have the lips for it.

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>They also don't use their tongues as much as humans

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to manipulate sounds, or as much as other mammals. They

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>do use their tongue sometimes to shape sounds, especially parrots

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>when they're mimicking human speech, they can use that tongue

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>in a much rougher less We're much more skilled. We

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>have more muscles and fine motor control over our tongues

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>such that we can produce much mo more complex sounds

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>with our tongues, whereas birds can't do that. On the

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>other hand, they can produce very complex sounds through the

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>contraction of muscles inside the syrinx, which changes how the

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>sound vibrates. We also do this. You can experience it

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>yourself by humming with your mouth tightly closed. Clamp it shut.

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>You start to hum. All of that is coming from

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>your vocal cords, right, the vibration of your vocal cords,

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and you can hum pretty complex, right mmmm. It's all

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>coming from those vocal cords. None of that is really

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>coming from your lips or your tongue to produce that sound.

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So birds are the masters at this muscle manipulation. Their

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 1>syrinxes are also longer and thinner than mammalian larynxes, which

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>makes the production of sound more efficient, so they can

0:05:56.080 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>produce really complex, precise sounds that doesn't have as much

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of the fluidity perhaps as human speech. Right, Like, we

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>have this sound that we kind of shape with our

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>mouths and our tongues and it comes out. And for birds,

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.799
<v Speaker 1>they can just kind of hit that note with shifting

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of those muscles from one vibration to another, which is

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>quite uncommon for humans to be able to do. We

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>can't a bit though, with and there are certainly people

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>who can mimic the sounds of birds through impressive larynx control.

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite recent news stories is about a

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 1>little boy who learned to mimic birds in a way

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that I've personally never heard before. I'll try to play

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 1>a clip for you right now.

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 2>That is not a blue jay you're hearing, not a robin,

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 2>nor a tufted titmouse. Those sounds are all coming from

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 2>a Samuel an eleven year old Samuel Henderson.

0:06:57.000 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I actually quite enjoy this. I actually think it's not

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>super surprising that a child is capable of doing this.

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think this child in particular is really

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>really talented, But children are really really good at language

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>acquisition and learning how to manipulate sounds. And for a

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>kid to learn how to do this, right, I think

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it's actually more likely a child could learn how to

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>do this, given the interest in it, than say, if

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>an adult wanted to suddenly learn how to do bird calls.

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>It would be more difficult for us to learn that,

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>because as we get older, that kind of language ability,

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the ability to manipulate sounds and learn how to manipulate sounds,

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it just gets harder. It's not impossible if you want

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to learn how to do bird calls. Don't be discouraged

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're older. But yeah, it is easier as children,

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>which is interesting because birds are the same way. Young

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>birds can learn how to make really complex song, but

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>there's this crystallization period and after which birds really can't

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>learn that. They're not that good at learning new songs

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>or new noises. Parrots are something of an exception. There

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>are some birds that can learn into adulthood new sounds,

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>but younger birds are really really the best at it,

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and for some songbirds that's really the only period of

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>time where they can learn new sounds. Unlike humans, where

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>we can be learners our entire lives. It just does

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit harder. Maybe when we're adults we

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>have to as it's not necessarily harder to learn, because

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>we do learn how to learn better as we get older,

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>but it is less. We don't absorb things as instinctively

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>as adults. We're not like a sponge, especially in terms

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of acquiring languages, which I'm learning as someone trying to

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:47.559
<v Speaker 1>become good at Italian. It's so much harder now as

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>an adult trying to learn Italian, even though I've learned

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:53.839
<v Speaker 1>how to learn. I'm probably more disciplined than I used

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:55.839
<v Speaker 1>to be in high school. But when I was in

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>high school, with that younger brain, language acquisition was just

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot pastor came a lot more naturally to learn

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>these things and just have them sink in. So, if

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>there are any kids listening, if you want to learn

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>an instrument or learn a language and you're still a kid,

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you know now is the best time to do it.

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>But it's never too late. That's the cool thing about

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>being human is we do have a lot of neuroplasticity

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>all throughout our lives. So it's actually it's actually fine.

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>If you miss your chance to learn how to play

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the violin, you can learn as an adult. It's just

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a little more challenge. Onto the next listener question. Hello,

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I always enjoy learning about animals, which is why I'm

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a big fan of Creature Feature. Thank you, thanks for

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 1>doing the show. Well, thank you for listening. I've also

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>been watching some VET shows and a recent episode that

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I watched had a baby two headed snake. I was

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>wondering how common are situations like that? What would cause

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a snake to be born with two heads? Are other

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>animals ever born with two heads. Any information would be great.

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>And here are a couple photos of my sne headed kitties, Erica, Erica,

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I have to admit I misread your email. At first,

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought you were saying here's a couple photo of

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>my two headed kitties. And I was aghast and I

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh my god, how do you have multiple

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>cats with two heads? Because it is very very rare

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>for animals to be born with two heads, particularly mammals,

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>but it does happen. Any animal can be born with

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>two heads. It can happen in any species, although it

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is extremely rare and even rarer for the individual to

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>survive past gestation. So the key thing is it's not

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>really one organism that has somehow decided to grow an

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>extra head. Right, we don't really have like a headbud,

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, Like it's sort of like with there are

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>certain types of having an extra something that can happen,

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>like if you have an extra finger, you know, that

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>can happen in humans, where like with polydactylism, or you

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of have like an extra site where you have

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>like stem cells creating another finger. Right, that's not really

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the case for heads, for having an entire extra head.

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 1>For both humans and any other animal, you really need

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to have a specific situation that would result in what's

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>called polycephaly having more than one head. So during embryonic growth,

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a few things can happen to create an extra head.

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.959
<v Speaker 1>And it's the same types of situations that can also

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>create conjoined twins. So an embryo while undergoing division and

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>development can sometimes make an error and partially split. So

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a full splitting of the embryo might result in identical twins,

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>but a partial splitting can result in conjoined twins or

0:11:56.200 --> 0:12:00.040
<v Speaker 1>an individual that seems to have two heads. Right. In

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>that case, it's actually conjoined twins, but they're really limited

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in terms of having like one body and two heads,

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>but they're still conjoined twins. Another situation is two embryos

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that form at the same time that merge together. So

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>normally embryos developing together that didn't result from one embryo

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 1>or one blast is splitting in two are fraternal twins,

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>so they're non identical twins. It could be a boy

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and a girl, they could look a little bit differently,

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>but they are developing at the same time in utero,

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and so this happens with you know, it's pretty rare

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that that happens. But it's even more rare that these

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>twins will actually kind of push it into each other

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and sort of merge during development. Actually, there are some

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>cases in which one of the twins it's kind of

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a miss. Like sometimes I hear like, oh, a twin

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>eats another twin in utero. It's not eating. What happens

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>is one twin absorbs the cells of the other twin

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>almost entirely. It's called a vanishing twin. And then you

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>really only discover it if you find maybe part of

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>like the twins cells or organs inside the living twin

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>later on. So it's not really eating another twin in utero.

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing intentional about it. It's just at that point

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>cells absorbing other cells. So for an animal with two heads,

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>what could happen is these two embryos mostly merge, except

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>for partially, you know, the part of it where they

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>have two heads. And so again it is a case

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of conjoined twins, but in an extreme case where you know,

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>there's basically one body and two heads. So these types

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of genetics shenanigans are really rare. It's rarer still that

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>one would survive two fetal maturity, and even rarer that

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the newborn individual would survive past that to the complications

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:05.199
<v Speaker 1>that arrived with conjoined blood vessels and a single heart

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>pumping for more organs or body parts than it bargained for.

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>So having two heads is a problem, mostly in terms

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of those structural issues that would usually result in a miscarriage.

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>But even with a newborn it's going to make it

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>really hard for it to thrive. But interestingly so snakes, turtles,

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and other reptiles seem to have this sort of two headed,

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>conjoined twin situation more than we see in other animals,

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>at least like more in terms of what we observe.

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Why this is, I'm not one hundred percent certain. It

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>could be that there's an increase in probability of there

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>being an incident. Given that reptiles lay eggs. They lay

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of eggs, and so there's two things that

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>go on with that, or actually three things. One is

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that eggs are exposed to an environment more than say

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>an embryo that's developing in utero. The embryo developing in

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>utero is exposed to whatever the mother is exposed to.

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Through eating, but an egg can be more directly affected

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>by environmental conditions like temperature, by pollution, et cetera. The

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>other thing is that in utero, right, one of the

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting benefits of having a live birth is that the

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>animal can, the organism can kind of determine whether this

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>embryo is viable or not and whether it wants to

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>spend the resources on it. So in some cases, the

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>maternal body will not consciously just decide that the embryo

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is not viable and will do a spontaneous abortion. And

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a natural process that happens in all mammals. All

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>animals that are live give live birth, And this might

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of cases, say, happen in the case

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>where you have like some sort of abnormality with an embryo,

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>like an embryo splitting partially or merging or something, it

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>may result in a miscarriage in a library animal, whereas

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe that happens less often that like in an animal

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that lays eggs. Obviously it's not going to necessarily miscarry

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>during the during the development of the egg, just whether

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the egg continues to develop or not. Write the maternal

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the mother's body doesn't really have any say in it

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>at that point. So also they lay you know, large

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 1>clutches of eggs, so you just have more chances for

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>something interesting to happen. Now, we probably only see a

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>great number of two headed reptiles due to the frequent

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>breeding and key being of reptiles. I think otherwise we

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't see that. There may be also an element

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of safe we're breeding them selectively, right, there might be

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>some inbreeding. I'm not really sure. There's not like great

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 1>research on this that I could find, and I was

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>curious in say, other examples of egg laying livestock or

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 1>domesticated eggling animals. It is true that like chickens will

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 1>have high rates of sort of conjoined twin cases, but

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>usually they're not viable. Usually it's something where they either

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.199
<v Speaker 1>don't hatch or they die pretty shortly after hatching. So

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it is really interesting to me that with reptiles there

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>does seem to be more, say snakes and turtles especially

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that actually survive at least a few months, if not longer,

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>with having two heads. I don't know exactly why that is.

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't find good research on that. My guess would

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>be it has something to do with the circulatory system

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>being more amenable to having that extra pressure of having

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>two heads, right, and somehow it being easier to bifurcate

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 1>those blood vessels. That does not arise in greater fatality rates.

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>But I really don't know. It's a really interesting question. So,

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>but to answer your question, it can't happen in any animal.

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>It's just very very rare. And the situation itself when

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>that could happen is very rare of embryos conjoining or

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>partially splitting, but it's even more rare that that pregnancy

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>would come to full term, or that the egg would

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>even hatch, and even even more rare that this animal

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>could live, you know, and be able to say, eat

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>or breathe normally. So yeah, very very rare, but it

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>does happen, which is pretty wild. And I mean, there

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>are cases of conjoined human twins where it's they essentially

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 1>have one body and two heads and you know they're conjoined.

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Twins are two individual people who do have complex situation

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of internal organs, but it's not like it's

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>not I want it to be clear that it's not

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>like a two headed person. These are two people and

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>they just are conjoined, but in a very complete way

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.120
<v Speaker 1>where really they cannot be separated at all, right, because

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>they're sharing a lot of organs and so it seems

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>like it's a two headed person, but it's really two

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>people conjoined twins. So onto the next listener question. Hi,

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>while listening to the most recent episode, I immediately recognize

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the American woodcock. Please be sure to mention their flexible

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>beak when talking about them. I adore them. My question

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>may be strange, but as someone who's around all kinds

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of animals during my life, I desperately need to know

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>if they recognize when we repeat or mimic their sounds

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>back at them. I'm mainly curious about cats for this question.

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>I have a few in the home and a feral

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.199
<v Speaker 1>population nearby, and I'm always curious to know if they

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>judge me or enjoy when I repeat their sounds back.

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>But I'd love to know if different animals have different

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>understandings or reactions. This is from Max. My max great

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>point about the woodcocks, So this is true. The tips

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.919
<v Speaker 1>of their beak have a bit of give to it,

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>which allows them to open up just the tip of beaks,

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:42.719
<v Speaker 1>so like you press your fingers together kind of tightly,

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>like your two index fingers together. You can kind of

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>just open the very tip of your index fingers together,

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and so remember that sort of feeling of like opening

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>your index fingers together fully and just the just kind

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of the tippy tip of it. So this this is

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>called disto. This is called distal rinko kinesis, and it's

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>also common among sandpipers. And the reason they have this

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>features that they can then dig their beaks into the

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 1>sand and open just the tips of their beak to

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 1>grab earthworms or other kinds of insects. And it makes

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it a lot easier, right, like if you're looking at

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>your fingers right, it takes a lot less effort and

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 1>force to just open the very tips of your fingers

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>versus the whole like opening up. And if you combine

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 1>that with, say you have a bunch of pressure of

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>packed sand, bird's not necessarily going to be able to

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 1>open their beak fully under the ground or in sand,

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>especially a long, thin beak, but they could just open

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that very tippy tip of the beak and then that's

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they do to snatch up their prey from

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>inside sand or inside dirt. So onto your question. There

0:21:56.560 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>are definitely ways to kind of mimic animal sounds or

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>gestures that they can understand as being in their sort

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 1>of way of communication, right, including cats and dogs. So

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever slowly blinked at a cat and you

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>see it blink back, that's a form of communication it understands.

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a way of saying like, I'm chill,

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm relaxed, how about you, And if it blinks back,

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of saying, yeah, I'm chill, I'm relaxed. It's

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a show of trust of you know that things are cool,

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>like you're not anxious. Everything's cool. If you've ever fake

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 1>sneezed at your dog, I mean I highly recommend it.

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>You kind of just do it and they might sneeze

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>back and it's kind of a playful gesture. Or if

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>your dog sneezes at you and you sneeze back, they

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>might actually sort of then drop down into a play

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>bow because they're saying, oh, you want to play I

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of as like making this fake sneeze sound, which is, hey,

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm feeling kind of playful. You sneeze back, and now

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm in a play bow with their little paws on

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the ground and their butts in the air because they're thinking,

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you just responded to my place sneeze, so you want

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to play. So if you're a dog or cat owner,

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you probably have these like interesting little interactions all the time.

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>You may not even maybe just natural at this point, right,

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>but you are communicating with them using their language when

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you kind of learn these cues from them. Now, specifically

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>with cats, right, Like, I mean, anyone who's had a

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>cat or interacting with a cat, I'm sure we've all

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>faked a mew at a cat, tried to fake a

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>perretta cat, right and watched their reaction. Now, it's really

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting because cats don't really mew at each other that much.

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>They do, but like say feral cats or cats just

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of left in the company of other cats. They uh,

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>they do me ow at each other occasionally, but the

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:04.959
<v Speaker 1>main purpose of meowing in say the ancestors of cats,

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the African wild cat, is to communicate between the mother

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.439
<v Speaker 1>and the kittens. And then there's a lot of other

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>vocalizations that cats might communicate with each other, either for

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:19.959
<v Speaker 1>mating or for territoriality, which is going to be more

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of a growling and hissing. Right, So cats do communicate,

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>but the kind of mews that we so associate with

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:30.959
<v Speaker 1>cats and are so frequent and adult cats seem to

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>be unique to domesticated cats in their communications with humans

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>because meowing at humans gets them attention and love and stuff,

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's an instinct from when their kitchen, from when

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>they're kittens where meowing gets them attention from their mothers,

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and then when they're in the care of humans, it's like, hey,

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm meowing. I'm an adult, but I'm still basically being

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>taken care of by my human mommies. So I'm gonna

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:02.479
<v Speaker 1>keep mewing and getting attention, eating food, getting cuddles. So

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>because of this, it's really interesting. There there is some

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:11.120
<v Speaker 1>research in terms of like how cats respond to human communication,

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>and there's some evidence that cats can tell when a

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>human is addressing them versus just talking to another person.

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Our tones, i think change like when we look at

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a cat, we're like I missed the wish girls like

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:27.479
<v Speaker 1>our tones kind of change into this kind of like

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>baby talk cat talking. Cats, it seems, based on this research,

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 1>actually respond to that they can tell that it's being

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>addressed to them, or at least they pay more attention

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>to those vocalizations, seem to heed them more then say

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the way I'm talking to you right now, it's cats

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 1>may think nothing of this kind of conversation, but if

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I suddenly go, oh, heng you on, miss you wish girls,

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.120
<v Speaker 1>your cat might sort of perk up, pay a little

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>more attention because that sounds like something that is like, Okay,

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>I know this, this is something that's meant for me.

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>It's probably a learned response, right, They probably learned that

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of things are aimed towards them. And it's

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 1>also the exaggerated change and tones. The high pitch probably

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>also helps them be able to into it better, sort

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.199
<v Speaker 1>of your tone in the same way that like a

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>high pitched meal is different from a low pitch like

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>growling meal that's like stay back right. So, uh, when

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you meow at a cat, you're probably not really talking cat.

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine I think you're It's it's almost the opposite,

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>like when a cat meow's at you. They've learned how

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to modulate their vocalizations to be more supplicating to you.

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 1>So those kind of like you know that an adult

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>cat makes is something where it's like I've learned that

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they respond really well to this, and sometimes they even

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>make these little purring sounds that are a little more

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>whiney towards people because they found that that's more effective

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 1>to get the person to pay attention to them. So

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 1>when we meow back at a cat, we're kind of

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>like mimicking the cats who are not quite mimicking us,

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:13.120
<v Speaker 1>but the cats who have modified their language for us,

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>So we're not doing a natural cat sound, but we're

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of playing back for them this like this sound

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that the adult cat has learned to make for our

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>for attention from us. And uh, I think probably if

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>we're basically copying what they sound like, right Like if

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you're if it's a high pitched now that your cat

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is making when they have relaxed body language, and you

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of mimic that, or like a purring sound while

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>they're also relaxed, because purring can be done when they're anxious.

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 1>It's all a lot of this is a combination of

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the vocalization and their body language. You can tell when

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a cat is relaxed or agitated. Uh So if you're

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>mimicking the sounds they make when they're relaxed, they probably

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>just see it as a way of you saying like,

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm also relaxed and I'm paying attention to you. You're

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>not really speaking cat necessarily, but you are finding a

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>commonality with the cat, like a common kind of way

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to communicate with them that you are paying attention to them,

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and also that you're also chill. You're fine. Obviously. I

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 1>think if you try to antagonize a cat, which I

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>would never recommend, and you like hissed or growled at them,

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you could make them upset. The actual application of this

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>is like if you have a especially with a dog

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>who's barking. If you yell at a dog who's barking,

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you're just basically encouraging them to bark more because it's like, oh,

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you're barking, so then or the dog is barking and

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 1>then it hears you yelling, so you're matching that emotional

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>heightened like anxiety like, oh, you know, I think something's wrong.

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>They also think something's wrong, so I'm gonna bark even louder.

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>That's the same thing with cat. It's like if a

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>cat is growling and hissing and you get really kind

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of severe with your voice and really intimidating sounding, they're

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be even more scared or be even

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>more upset. So when you match your pet at sort

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of where they are in terms of if they're upset

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>or agitated, they're going to get more upset or agitated,

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>even if you're using human words right. In some cases,

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's been research on this. I've

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>just noticed it with the pets that I've had. When

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you have, say, if you have a pet who's scared

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of thunder, sometimes I mean certainly for me with my dog,

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I've developed a voice where it's like, oh poor baby,

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, coddling her, and I think sometimes using

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that tone of voice actually makes her more anxious because

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>she associates it with the bad thing, Like oh, right,

0:29:56.720 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>this is what Katie sounds like when there's thunder and

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of scared right now, So she hears the

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 1>oh you poor baby, and she'd get she like maybe

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>either gets more anxious or leans into the anxiety response

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>because she's getting attention for it. Whereas if during a thunderstorm,

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I kind of choose a very cheerful tone like oh hi, Cookie,

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>how'd you go on? Cookie? And then play with her

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe try to play with a squeaky toy or act

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>like things are fine. It tends to help her anxiety.

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't make it go away, will never go away

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>with thunderstorms, but with bad and other things like you know,

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>stroking her back or putting on a thundershirt, those things

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>do seem to help. In addition to a tone of

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>voice that's like light and care free and it's like, oh,

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you know it's thunder it's okay. And then you know,

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>playing with her and trying to make things seem like

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>fun and like a game that can actually help them.

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So animals are really responsive to tone of voice. Doesn't

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 1>really matter if you meow at them or you use

0:30:57.280 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>human words, it's really the tone of it. I think

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>they respond to the most purring, if you like fake

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a purr at cats. I couldn't find research about this.

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why someone should do it, but I

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine that might actually be something that makes them feel relaxed, right, like,

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>because you're sort of mimicking that relaxing sound. And cats

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>do per around like kittens will pur around their mothers

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>when they're feeding, So I don't know that adult cats

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>typically pur around each other. Like say, in like feral

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>cat populations, but I think domesticated cats also, like say

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you have more than one cat, you might notice like, hey,

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>these cats actually do seem to meow at each other

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>or pur around each other. I think that's kind of

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a learned response in this unusual situation of domestication. So anyways,

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I would say, keep meowing at your cats. I'm sure

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>they love it as long as you're meowing in a

0:31:54.920 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>nice way. All right, guys, So I I think the

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>last few weeks we had a few reruns. But the

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>mystery animal sound hint before I went on a brief

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.479
<v Speaker 1>break was this. This fierce little carnivore is like a

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>wolf that you can fit in your pocket. And here

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>is that sound now, all right, congratulations to rees I,

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Rob and Ali D for guessing correctly. This is a

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>grasshopper mouse, so they howl and this very hard to hear,

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>high pitched frequencies. I actually got a lot of emails

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>from people who could not hear this sound. I tried

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to turn the volume up a little bit. But part

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of it is just as are like for some people,

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>we just can't hear these higher frequencies. For me, it's

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>barely audible for my dog. She could certainly hear it

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and did not like it. So I apologize if your

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>dogs out there are unhappy. But yeah, they howl and

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>these really high pitches to defend their territory. They're also

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>fierce predators, eating in vertebrates and even smaller mice, and

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>they stalk their prey like a wolf and pounce on them.

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>So very terrifying but very tiny. All right, guys. So

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a quick programming note is I might do a few

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 1>more of these listener questions episodes in a row, so

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>please do send me your questions and I will do

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>my very best to answer them and thank you guys

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>so much for listening. If you're enjoying the show and

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you leave rating or review, it's always appreciated thanks to

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the space cause it's for their super awesome song ex Alumina.

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll just repeat the email if this might be useful.

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>If you do want to send in a question, you

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>can reach me at Creature Featurepod at gmail dot com.

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Creature Future is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>like the one you just heard, visit Dieheartradio app Apple

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 1>podcast or Hey guess what where of you listen to

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows. I'm not your mother. I can't tell

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:58.719
<v Speaker 1>you what to do. I can tell you, though, if

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you hear a tiny, high pitched owl could be a

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>grasshopper mouse that could be trying to have you for dinner.

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're the size of a grass. See

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you next Wednesday.