WEBVTT - New Leadership with Harmeet Dhillon

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>We're all very familiar at this point that Republicans fell

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>short in the mid term elections. We did not do

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>as well as we had hoped. We have not seen

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>any changes as a result of that, though, as a

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>result of those failures, as a result of coming up short,

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>we just saw Kevin McCarthy elected as Speaker of the House.

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>Mitch mccaddell has been re elected as Minority leader in

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the Senate. However, there's still an opportunity to make changes

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>happen in leadership, and that's at the RNC. There is

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a race that is underway right now to be the

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>chair of the RNC. Her Meat Dylan has challenged Rona McDaniel,

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>who has been there through the mid term election where

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>we lost. The two thousand twenty two midterm elections that

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>we just did, we had her performed, we didn't do

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>as well as we had hoped. So we're going to

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>talk to her and meet Dylan about why she is

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 1>challenging Rona McDaniel, what she hopes to accomplish, what changes

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>would she like to see made at the RNC, you know,

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>what our challenges moving forward as the Republican Party, and

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and what does she want to do about mail and ballot.

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>So many questions for her. Meet Dylan, who is running

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to be RNC chair. So we'll get her take on

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>all of those, really figure out where she's coming from,

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>why she's running, and what she would hope to accomplish

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>as the RNC chair. Also, you know, what does she

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>think about the upcoming presidential election? How would she shape that,

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>how would she guide that? So we'll talk to her

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>about all of it. If you're unfamiliar with her, Meet Dylan.

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>She's on Fox all the time. But even more importantly,

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:26.279
<v Speaker 1>she has fought for conservative causes as an attorney, fighting

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>for civil liberties. As a constitutional attorney, she helped launch

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the nonprofit Center for American Liberty in two thousand eighteen.

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>She is also the founder of a law practice called

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Law Group. I mean, we're talking about even during COVID,

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>standing up against states, filing lawsuits against the state of

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>California challenging its stay at home order, fighting on behalf

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of businesses, fighting on behalf of restaurants, fighting on behalf

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of people who had their constitutional rights violated. She also

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>filed lawsuits against the governor's in New Jersey and Virginia

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>at that time over the restrictions on religious service is

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>so this is someone who not only talks to talk,

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>but she walks the walk and she wins. I hope

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you enjoyed this conversation with her, meat Dylan. I hope

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you learn a little bit more about her and what

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>she would hope to accomplish if she is elected. Stay

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>tuned herd me before we get to the RNC race,

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>which is really important and I want to spend most

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>of the time talking about that. I wanted to get

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>your take on Joe Biden's mishandling of classified information after

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>he criticized Donald Trump for mishandling of classified information. Turns

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>out that he has been holding documents for years now

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>at multiple locations. Well, I think Joe Biden's got a

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>real problem because President Trump has multiple defenses to claims

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 1>that he's mishandled the documents. First of all, he was

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the commander in chief and was legitimately able to and

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>contend that he declassified the documents that are being disputed

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>at Mara. Lago said, even if they weren't declassified, if

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:18.399
<v Speaker 1>you accept the alternate interpretation of that situation, he had

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the right under the presidential Records Act to hold on

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to these documents for a period of time to sort

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>through them and and then analyze what should be turned

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>over to the National Archives. Joe Biden, by contrast, got

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>possession of these documents as the Vice president of the

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>United States. He has since that time been responsible for

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>their move not once, not twice, but at least three times.

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>And there may be other document caches based on the

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>pattern that we're seeing. So he moved them out of

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the White House or his Vice presidential offices, moved them

0:03:55.760 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>into one building, moved them into another building, and he's

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>had various roles and lived in at least one home

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and spends every other weekend, it seems, in some luxurious

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>vacation rental. And so there are probably multiple locations that

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>if the Department of Justice and National Archives are serious

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>about finding these documents, they should be searching right now.

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>But I see no evidence of that. And ultimately, the

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>other major distinction with the former vice president is the

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>number of people around him who are appeared to be

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>compromised by their relationships with foreign governments. This specifically includes

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Biden, James Biden to some degree, I would say

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>even the Vice president, former vice president current president himself.

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 1>Both China, Ukraine and possibly other countries have had their

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>hands out for relationships with the name Biden and provided

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>very lucrative remuneration in exchange for that. On one of

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 1>the documents mentioned in the first trench of Documents and

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the presses it relates to the Ukraine. So you have

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to wonder why are these specific documents the ones that

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:13.359
<v Speaker 1>are in the former vice president's possession? Who had access

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to them? Some news reports suggests that in the case

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>of the pen office, a Chinese operative had keys and

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>access to this workspace. And and what happened in response

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to review of these documents? Who reviewed them? So I

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's good that the form that the Attorney General

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>is now appointed a special prosecutor here. But for months,

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>this whole fact pattern was the subject of a cover up. Specifically,

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the possession of these documents came to light at least

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in early November, but it was concealed from the American

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 1>public until a a house was seated that was likely

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to begin issuing subpoena. You know, again, yet again you

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>have the intelligence apper at us making moves to affect

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>the outcome of an election. Uh, this is this is

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the second case involving the Biden's um. You might argue

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that the whole Ashley Biden raid against Project Veritas would

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 1>be another example. So this is the exact kind of

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>weaponization of our intelligence services that that I hope the

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>House is serious about investigating as they promised to do

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Congress. And in the timing is weird too,

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>of you know, this just now coming to light. But

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to your point, maybe it's because House. You know, Republicans

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>have taken over the House and investigations are going to

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>be underway. Um. You know, we did not get changes

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>to congressional leadership. However, we still have an opportunity to

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>make changes that the R and C, which one would

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.159
<v Speaker 1>think would be important given you know, a poor performance

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in the midterm elections. Uh. You know, for those unfamiliar,

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 1>how do these RNC elections work for the position of chair. Well,

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>there are hundred sixty voters in total, and it's a

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>majority vote, but a secret ballot, and we have the

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>deadline was earlier today to complete nomination. So to be nominated,

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to have two members of the three members

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>from each of three separate states nominate per office. And

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>so I've qualified for the chair position, so as RANA,

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>we also have contested co chair and treasurer races, and

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>all of that's going to be voted on in Danta Point,

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>California in our winter. Are at beating in two weeks,

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>two weeks from today, we may have a new chair

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>of the r n C UM And so it's all

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of horse trading and lobbying. This is a

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>race against an entrenched incumbent who is you know, utilizing

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>all the assets of the r n C in this race,

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>press office, employees of the RNC, consultants of the r

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>n C, you know, one prominent Fox News contributors paid

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>by the r n C, and you know was making

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>statements on the FLA VRATA earlier in this campaign. So

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that's what I'm up against. It I may

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of David versus Golife campaign. I have had the

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>support of many members of the r n C, agree

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>with growing number of members of the r n C.

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>UH certainly the vast majority of the grassroots Republican voters

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>in the country and Republican Party activists are supporting change

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>at the RNC and specifically supporting me. A number of

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>states have held votes on the leadership of the r

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and C, and each of the states that has held

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>votes on it has overwhelmingly voted for me or for change,

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 1>or both, and increasingly major donors in the conservative world

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>have come out to support me. And this is in

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>response to one of the claims of the incumbents supporters

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is that she's a very good at fundraising if you

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 1>look at those facts. Actually, um, I think Donald Trump's

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>name has been very to have been fundraising for the

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Republican National Committee. And when you have the White House,

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty easy to raise money. When you don't have

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the White House, it's not that easy to raise money,

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, our fundraising numbers show that. And when

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you are losing elections, it's hard to raise money. And

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 1>when you are adopting and promoting the same old, stale

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>leadership and consultant driven policymaking that we have at the

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>r n C, I think the RNC is going to

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>find it very difficult to raise funds unless we have

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a decisive change in leadership at the top. And so

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gratified this week to have had at the beginning

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of the week more than two dozen major Republican mega

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>donors and bundlers in a million dollar type range stated

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that they would not support the party until there was change.

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Marcus, the co founder of Home Depot billionaire donor,

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>endorsed us on Wednesday, and today we had two major

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>donors as well. One is Dick you Line, another Megadona

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>billionaire who has long supported men, many, many many Republican

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>candidates and causes, endorsed me today as well as Murph Burke,

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>who is a prominent Wisconsin donor and philanthropist who is

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>also interestingly on our Wisconsin RNC Convention committee, which itself

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 1>has to raise millions of dollars. So you have people

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>at every level in the Republican donor ecosystem demanding change.

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how the party can continue to ignore that.

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we actually have a fiduciary duty to look

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>at who's the more likely in this scenario to be

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>able to raise the funds that the party needs to

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>use efficiently to distribute to states and to campaigns. Uh

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>with with with support of field staff and things like that,

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and data and other assets to elect Republicans. It's that basic,

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, we hope they get able. We

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>were able to convince the rest of the people to

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>support Yeah, and to your point in Tiger Group recently

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>did a poll finding the eighty six percent of Republicans

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:00.959
<v Speaker 1>want you to be chair over Rona McDaniel to your

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 1>point of the grassroots winning change and wanting you to

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>be that change. And you mentioned raising money, which obviously

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>raising money is important in elections, but it's also what

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.319
<v Speaker 1>do you do with that money and are you effective

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>in spending that money? And what we've seen is the

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>challenge of mail in ballots that has had a big

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>impact on the past two election cycles. How do you

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>plan on tackling that challenge with mail and balloting? Yeah,

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>great question. So, first of all, mail and balloting has

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>been a thing in many states for some time. And

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, like some of the more rural states in

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the country, Utahn and Oregon, they've had all mail in

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>balloting for for a long while. In California we've had

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>what we call no excuse abstintee balloting for for decades.

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>And during COVID, Democrats pretty much made this the norm

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>and the majority of states and that laws has stayed

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in place despite the fact that COVID is effectively over

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>so there are two ways to deal with it. You

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>can sit on your behind, continue to call elections election

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>day operations and pretend like nothing has changed, which is

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately the approach we've been adopting. Or you can be

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>smart about it and compete with the Democrats, which is

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>what a handful of states have been doing effectively California, Florida,

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>some others, and adapt and we have to adapt or die.

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>It's it's that diarist situation. And so until we can

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>change the election laws to the way we like them,

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>which is voter I D and no same day registration

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:51.199
<v Speaker 1>and really tight requirements around absentee ballots, combined with very

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>clean voter rolls, we must defeat and outperform the Democrats

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in hustling our ballots into the ballot box. And so

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>for many years we've had this emotional type of approach

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to appeal to voters to go and you know, stand

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in line and vote in person symbolically on election day,

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Democrats don't have that problem. So I've heard

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:15.599
<v Speaker 1>a lot of excuses out of the current leadership for

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the party saying, well, you know, Donald Trump picked bad candidates,

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and there was candidate selection issues, and there was ticket

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.719
<v Speaker 1>splitting and blah blah blah. But let's keep in mind

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>who the Democrats have been able to elect with their machine.

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden the biggest liar in American politics. And that's

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, even next to George Santos, Joe Biden is

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>still by far the biggest liar. You look at John Fetterman,

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 1>who couldn't even speak for much of his campaign because

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of his stroke. You have Katie Hobbs, who wouldn't debate

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona and became the governor over a much more

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 1>articulate and I think appealing candidate, and so all of

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that adds up to it doesn't matter who the Democrats

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>put up, because they have perfected the art of getting

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 1>their voters ballots into the ballot boxes, not getting their

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>voters to the polls. It's a very important distinction. Most

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>of those Democrat voters never see the inside of a

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>polling place anymore. In Arizona on election day where I

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.959
<v Speaker 1>was on the ground, the voters on election day were

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Republican voters. And so we lose every time if we

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>let the Democrats set the agenda with us like that,

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and what it requires for us to outperform Democrats is

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things. First of all, a national strategic

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>plan from the R and C. And then training and

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>financial resources because when you go from election day operations

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to election month operations, it's going to cost more money.

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>You may also have to train and recruit more volunteers

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and put them in and shifts. Uh. It's it's an

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>organizational challenge that the party has not been up to,

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's not that difficult. If it were that difficult,

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Democrats couldn't luster it, and they have and so I

0:14:57.440 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>think we can do it, but we have to have

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a will to do it. I haven't heard the current

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>share talk about it at all, and I think that's

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>because she's intimidated by the fact that many Republican Party

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>activists don't like what I just said. And I don't

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>like it, but the fact is you have to do

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it if you want to win. And if you don't

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>have the political willpower to stand up and say something

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that may be unpopular with certain aspects of your party,

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you're not a leader. And so I think that's, you know,

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a big, big crossroads that we have. Are we willing

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to stand up and say things that that are unpopular

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>or do we have to pander to every aspect of

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of the party commercial break more with her meat. Dylan

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, You've got a lot going on.

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've run a law practice, the Dylan Law Group.

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean you're involved with, you know, many

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>other things. Why why do you want this? Well, it's

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>not a question of why do I want this? But

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>who else is going to do it? And you're right,

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm very passionate about my day job heading a forty

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>person law firm with five off this is around the

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>country doing some of the most important conservative litigation in America.

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Very passionate about the nonprofit that you hear me talk about.

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll be talking about um a new case we followed

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>this week about transgender grooming issues, and that's also very

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>important work. I'm also the chairman of the Republican National

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Lawyers Association, so I'm a Republican election lawyer in the country,

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>head of that organization right now on the board. And

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously I'm a media commentator, but I'm gonna

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>have to step aside from all of those rules except

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>for probably media commentator and chair of the R and C.

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>If I win this and that's because no other member

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Republican National Committee stepped forward to challenge for

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>her fourth term. And you know, I'm sure she did

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>her best for three terms. She's a person who obviously

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>cares about Republicans and wants them to win elections. But

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>after three terms, we lost the House, the Senate, the

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>White House, and several governorships in net losses. We can't

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>ignore that fact, and so I think it's really time

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>for somebody else to step forward. And you know, R

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and C is a unique organization and everyone there is

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of the top Republican people in their state,

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the chairman, and you know, senior leaders in the party.

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>That's the National Committee men and woman. I failed that

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>role from California. So it's very genteel. You know, there's

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>no sharp elbows. Everyone gets along, and so it's rare

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to have a contested leadership race. You know, the kind

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of people trying to expect you to sit there and

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 1>wait your turn. And I'm sorry, but America can't afford

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>for us to wait our turn for somebody, you know,

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 1>to step forward and make the changes necessary at the

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:35.199
<v Speaker 1>r NC. The country is suffering without a proper rebuke

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to Joe Biden and strong leadership in our party. We're

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>going to suffer for four more years. I don't know

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>what our countries don't look like after four more years

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of this disaster. The next two years is going to

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.400
<v Speaker 1>be bad enough. And so that's why I step forward

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to do it. Well, I'm glad you did. I mean,

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you've fought for a lot of important causes you have won,

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think we need that kind of leadership at

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the r n C. H it. Why do you think

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 1>we fell short in the midterms? Oh? There are many reasons,

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know some of the reasons are the ones

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.959
<v Speaker 1>that I mentioned. There were definitely candidate mismatches between who

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>could win the state. I mean, I think we should

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>do better vetting where you know, even the former president

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>has made a couple of endorsements that you know, I

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 1>think it's hard to get elected in the state as

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a senator. I've never run for office before, and be

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you didn't live in that state for many years. That

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>was a problem with two of our candidates, But they

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>weren't worse than the Democratic candidates, to be very clear,

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>we just didn't do as good a job at getting

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>them elected as Democrats did at getting their grossly inferior

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>candidates elected. Graphael Warnock is a terrible candidate on paper,

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and yet we weren't able to beat him with a

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>very good candidate in many ways. Um. And so we

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>see blame on the Dobbs issue also from our party

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>leader Rod has blamed Dobbs. And I'm a pro life

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>litigator and activist. I represent numerous pro life activists in

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>court right now, I'm sewing planned parenthood and multiple cases.

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>And uh. And so it seems to me like where

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you had a heads up that jobs was coming, with

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>with what reasoning was coming, the party should have jumped

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 1>on that and done a great job using this important

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>federalism decision sending the issue back to the states, as

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>as as something that we could message to both sides

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and message it well. We did not do that. We

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>were afraid to talk about it. Candidates were advised not

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it. Uh. And I think that was

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a mistake. It should have been discussed and resolved in

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.719
<v Speaker 1>each state and by each campaign. Um. And then I

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>think we have some technical failures that that are probably

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna warrior listeners. But you know, I think we are

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>being outperformed by the Democrats in terms of the use

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of data. UM they invest financial resources in acquiring and

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>harvesting and applying algorithms to data that allows them to

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>target likely Democrat voters. And we also do that on

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the Republican side, and by the way, we do a

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>very good job of it compared to the past, but

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>we are not I think right now technically competing with

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats, are keeping up with them, and I think

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that's something that we can change with financial resource investment.

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>And if you're blowing the money you're raising on overhead

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>overhead to UH ineffective political consultants inside the Beltway, some

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of whom don't even want our America First candidates to win.

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>That's very clear in their cocktail party chatter. They would

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>be living in d C and and thriving in these circles. Then,

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>instead of buying data, instead of paying social media influencers

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:39.959
<v Speaker 1>who are young and or from different ethnic backgrounds who

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>can help us UH reach new audiences, we're losing. And

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>so I think strong fiscal responsibility as a core tenet

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of Republican ideals, are not following it. At the Republican

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>National Committee, the careful shepherding of donor dollars ought to

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>be job one at the r and C, and it

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:04.360
<v Speaker 1>really isn't know, UM, I have a specific plan. It's

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>not glamorous, but it's it's nuts and bolts. We need

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to bring in some people with the gray hair back

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>into the r n C. I'm one of those people

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>with gray hair, uh though I'm vain and uh you know,

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>we have to bring some people with experience and state

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>parties and people would experience outside the RNC to help

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>us rebuild the party and really focus on winning, not

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>on you know, glamour, not on podcasts, not on anything

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>other than helping Republicans win elections and helping a Republican

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>nominee whoever that is level playing field become the next

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>president of the United States. At a time when it

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>should be the easiest possible to defeat the left, we're

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 1>struggling at doing that basic job, and so without a change,

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm very concerned that we will have no chance of winning.

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Win a change. It's going to be a challenge, but

0:21:57.520 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>at least it's doable. I think a lot of people

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>share your your frustration and would agree with what you

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>just said. Real quick before we go. I know that

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 1>the elections internal, but how can people help? Well, the

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 1>members of the Republican National Committee are three in each

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of the fifty states and six territories. They in turn,

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>are elected not directly by voters, but by the party

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>activists in each states. So for example, in California, I

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>am elected by fift hundred delegates of the state party.

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>And so really the most effective advocacy is for those

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>state party delegates or precinct committee men or limit or

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>executive committee of the state party to contact the three

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>members who they elect and tell them what their opinion

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>is in no on certain terms. State parties are having

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>special meetings all over the country. So for example, if

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you're one of those state party delegates in Florida, you

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:46.640
<v Speaker 1>have the opportunity in a week, one week from today,

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to travel to Tallahassee and vote on this issue. And

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that just happened in Arkansas and Louisiana, Alabama, Texas, Tennessee,

0:22:55.480 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and and uh I think Arizona. Throughout the country, it's happening.

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a vote coming up in Washington State shortly on

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>this issue. And so those are the most effective. But

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>if you are a voter in the state, and you're

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>an active Republican, I would say you could reach out

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>politely to the three members of your state or your territory,

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>let them know you live in their state, because they're

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>going to ignore it if you don't live in their

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>state and share your preference and why politely and persuasively.

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>That is having an impact on many of the members

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>of the R and C. Other members of the R

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and C don't want to hear from voters directly, which

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>itself is a problem, I think, but in any event,

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>it's never persuasive to be anything other than polite. And

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 1>uh so I regret that some people feel so passionately

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 1>about this that they haven't been and I'm getting blamed

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 1>for that. So so don't do that, please, And you know, finally,

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>get engaged and get involved. If your Republican representatives at

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the Republican National Committee at your state party aren't doing

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>what's right for you, but instead of doing what's right

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>for them, they got a plump committee assignment, they got

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 1>their photograph taken with some famous person, they got a

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>nice seat at the table. Goal then they're portraying their

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.719
<v Speaker 1>promise to you. And so get involved and get yourself

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>elected to one of those positions. That's what I can

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>ask for Republican activists. But on Twitter and everyone that

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>followed me, of the members that message directly and then

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the ones that had opened Twitter where you could message them,

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I said the US. I was very polite about it,

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>but I expressed the desire for change with you, hurt,

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Meet Dylan. I'm rooting for you. I know you'd be

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 1>a phenomenal chair and you would make the changes that

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we need, so I truly hope you get it. I

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you taking the time as always and uh always

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>nice to catch up with you. Thank you so much, Lisa,

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:55.400
<v Speaker 1>take care. It's her, Meet Dylan truly hope she ends

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:58.120
<v Speaker 1>up being the RNC chair. That would be a really

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>important place to make change US as a party heading

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 1>into what is a monumental and consequential presidential election for

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you guys for listening. I want

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to thank John Cassio for putting the podcast together as

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:14.360
<v Speaker 1>always Monday and Thursday, but you can listen throughout the week.

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Leave us a review at a rating on Apple Podcast

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>love reading those. Appreciate you guys listening. Until next time.