Speaker 1: We're all very familiar at this point that Republicans fell
Speaker 1: short in the mid term elections. We did not do
Speaker 1: as well as we had hoped. We have not seen
Speaker 1: any changes as a result of that, though, as a
Speaker 1: result of those failures, as a result of coming up short,
Speaker 1: we just saw Kevin McCarthy elected as Speaker of the House.
Speaker 1: Mitch mccaddell has been re elected as Minority leader in
Speaker 1: the Senate. However, there's still an opportunity to make changes
Speaker 1: happen in leadership, and that's at the RNC. There is
Speaker 1: a race that is underway right now to be the
Speaker 1: chair of the RNC. Her Meat Dylan has challenged Rona McDaniel,
Speaker 1: who has been there through the mid term election where
Speaker 1: we lost. The two thousand twenty two midterm elections that
Speaker 1: we just did, we had her performed, we didn't do
Speaker 1: as well as we had hoped. So we're going to
Speaker 1: talk to her and meet Dylan about why she is
Speaker 1: challenging Rona McDaniel, what she hopes to accomplish, what changes
Speaker 1: would she like to see made at the RNC, you know,
Speaker 1: what our challenges moving forward as the Republican Party, and
Speaker 1: and what does she want to do about mail and ballot.
Speaker 1: So many questions for her. Meet Dylan, who is running
Speaker 1: to be RNC chair. So we'll get her take on
Speaker 1: all of those, really figure out where she's coming from,
Speaker 1: why she's running, and what she would hope to accomplish
Speaker 1: as the RNC chair. Also, you know, what does she
Speaker 1: think about the upcoming presidential election? How would she shape that,
Speaker 1: how would she guide that? So we'll talk to her
Speaker 1: about all of it. If you're unfamiliar with her, Meet Dylan.
Speaker 1: She's on Fox all the time. But even more importantly,
Speaker 1: she has fought for conservative causes as an attorney, fighting
Speaker 1: for civil liberties. As a constitutional attorney, she helped launch
Speaker 1: the nonprofit Center for American Liberty in two thousand eighteen.
Speaker 1: She is also the founder of a law practice called
Speaker 1: Dylan Law Group. I mean, we're talking about even during COVID,
Speaker 1: standing up against states, filing lawsuits against the state of
Speaker 1: California challenging its stay at home order, fighting on behalf
Speaker 1: of businesses, fighting on behalf of restaurants, fighting on behalf
Speaker 1: of people who had their constitutional rights violated. She also
Speaker 1: filed lawsuits against the governor's in New Jersey and Virginia
Speaker 1: at that time over the restrictions on religious service is
Speaker 1: so this is someone who not only talks to talk,
Speaker 1: but she walks the walk and she wins. I hope
Speaker 1: you enjoyed this conversation with her, meat Dylan. I hope
Speaker 1: you learn a little bit more about her and what
Speaker 1: she would hope to accomplish if she is elected. Stay
Speaker 1: tuned herd me before we get to the RNC race,
Speaker 1: which is really important and I want to spend most
Speaker 1: of the time talking about that. I wanted to get
Speaker 1: your take on Joe Biden's mishandling of classified information after
Speaker 1: he criticized Donald Trump for mishandling of classified information. Turns
Speaker 1: out that he has been holding documents for years now
Speaker 1: at multiple locations. Well, I think Joe Biden's got a
Speaker 1: real problem because President Trump has multiple defenses to claims
Speaker 1: that he's mishandled the documents. First of all, he was
Speaker 1: the commander in chief and was legitimately able to and
Speaker 1: contend that he declassified the documents that are being disputed
Speaker 1: at Mara. Lago said, even if they weren't declassified, if
Speaker 1: you accept the alternate interpretation of that situation, he had
Speaker 1: the right under the presidential Records Act to hold on
Speaker 1: to these documents for a period of time to sort
Speaker 1: through them and and then analyze what should be turned
Speaker 1: over to the National Archives. Joe Biden, by contrast, got
Speaker 1: possession of these documents as the Vice president of the
Speaker 1: United States. He has since that time been responsible for
Speaker 1: their move not once, not twice, but at least three times.
Speaker 1: And there may be other document caches based on the
Speaker 1: pattern that we're seeing. So he moved them out of
Speaker 1: the White House or his Vice presidential offices, moved them
Speaker 1: into one building, moved them into another building, and he's
Speaker 1: had various roles and lived in at least one home
Speaker 1: and spends every other weekend, it seems, in some luxurious
Speaker 1: vacation rental. And so there are probably multiple locations that
Speaker 1: if the Department of Justice and National Archives are serious
Speaker 1: about finding these documents, they should be searching right now.
Speaker 1: But I see no evidence of that. And ultimately, the
Speaker 1: other major distinction with the former vice president is the
Speaker 1: number of people around him who are appeared to be
Speaker 1: compromised by their relationships with foreign governments. This specifically includes
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden, James Biden to some degree, I would say
Speaker 1: even the Vice president, former vice president current president himself.
Speaker 1: Both China, Ukraine and possibly other countries have had their
Speaker 1: hands out for relationships with the name Biden and provided
Speaker 1: very lucrative remuneration in exchange for that. On one of
Speaker 1: the documents mentioned in the first trench of Documents and
Speaker 1: the presses it relates to the Ukraine. So you have
Speaker 1: to wonder why are these specific documents the ones that
Speaker 1: are in the former vice president's possession? Who had access
Speaker 1: to them? Some news reports suggests that in the case
Speaker 1: of the pen office, a Chinese operative had keys and
Speaker 1: access to this workspace. And and what happened in response
Speaker 1: to review of these documents? Who reviewed them? So I
Speaker 1: think it's good that the form that the Attorney General
Speaker 1: is now appointed a special prosecutor here. But for months,
Speaker 1: this whole fact pattern was the subject of a cover up. Specifically,
Speaker 1: the possession of these documents came to light at least
Speaker 1: in early November, but it was concealed from the American
Speaker 1: public until a a house was seated that was likely
Speaker 1: to begin issuing subpoena. You know, again, yet again you
Speaker 1: have the intelligence apper at us making moves to affect
Speaker 1: the outcome of an election. Uh, this is this is
Speaker 1: the second case involving the Biden's um. You might argue
Speaker 1: that the whole Ashley Biden raid against Project Veritas would
Speaker 1: be another example. So this is the exact kind of
Speaker 1: weaponization of our intelligence services that that I hope the
Speaker 1: House is serious about investigating as they promised to do
Speaker 1: in the Congress. And in the timing is weird too,
Speaker 1: of you know, this just now coming to light. But
Speaker 1: to your point, maybe it's because House. You know, Republicans
Speaker 1: have taken over the House and investigations are going to
Speaker 1: be underway. Um. You know, we did not get changes
Speaker 1: to congressional leadership. However, we still have an opportunity to
Speaker 1: make changes that the R and C, which one would
Speaker 1: think would be important given you know, a poor performance
Speaker 1: in the midterm elections. Uh. You know, for those unfamiliar,
Speaker 1: how do these RNC elections work for the position of chair. Well,
Speaker 1: there are hundred sixty voters in total, and it's a
Speaker 1: majority vote, but a secret ballot, and we have the
Speaker 1: deadline was earlier today to complete nomination. So to be nominated,
Speaker 1: you have to have two members of the three members
Speaker 1: from each of three separate states nominate per office. And
Speaker 1: so I've qualified for the chair position, so as RANA,
Speaker 1: we also have contested co chair and treasurer races, and
Speaker 1: all of that's going to be voted on in Danta Point,
Speaker 1: California in our winter. Are at beating in two weeks,
Speaker 1: two weeks from today, we may have a new chair
Speaker 1: of the r n C UM And so it's all
Speaker 1: a lot of horse trading and lobbying. This is a
Speaker 1: race against an entrenched incumbent who is you know, utilizing
Speaker 1: all the assets of the r n C in this race,
Speaker 1: press office, employees of the RNC, consultants of the r
Speaker 1: n C, you know, one prominent Fox News contributors paid
Speaker 1: by the r n C, and you know was making
Speaker 1: statements on the FLA VRATA earlier in this campaign. So
Speaker 1: you know that's what I'm up against. It I may
Speaker 1: sort of David versus Golife campaign. I have had the
Speaker 1: support of many members of the r n C, agree
Speaker 1: with growing number of members of the r n C.
Speaker 1: UH certainly the vast majority of the grassroots Republican voters
Speaker 1: in the country and Republican Party activists are supporting change
Speaker 1: at the RNC and specifically supporting me. A number of
Speaker 1: states have held votes on the leadership of the r
Speaker 1: and C, and each of the states that has held
Speaker 1: votes on it has overwhelmingly voted for me or for change,
Speaker 1: or both, and increasingly major donors in the conservative world
Speaker 1: have come out to support me. And this is in
Speaker 1: response to one of the claims of the incumbents supporters
Speaker 1: is that she's a very good at fundraising if you
Speaker 1: look at those facts. Actually, um, I think Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: name has been very to have been fundraising for the
Speaker 1: Republican National Committee. And when you have the White House,
Speaker 1: it's pretty easy to raise money. When you don't have
Speaker 1: the White House, it's not that easy to raise money,
Speaker 1: and in fact, our fundraising numbers show that. And when
Speaker 1: you are losing elections, it's hard to raise money. And
Speaker 1: when you are adopting and promoting the same old, stale
Speaker 1: leadership and consultant driven policymaking that we have at the
Speaker 1: r n C, I think the RNC is going to
Speaker 1: find it very difficult to raise funds unless we have
Speaker 1: a decisive change in leadership at the top. And so
Speaker 1: I'm gratified this week to have had at the beginning
Speaker 1: of the week more than two dozen major Republican mega
Speaker 1: donors and bundlers in a million dollar type range stated
Speaker 1: that they would not support the party until there was change.
Speaker 1: Bernie Marcus, the co founder of Home Depot billionaire donor,
Speaker 1: endorsed us on Wednesday, and today we had two major
Speaker 1: donors as well. One is Dick you Line, another Megadona
Speaker 1: billionaire who has long supported men, many, many many Republican
Speaker 1: candidates and causes, endorsed me today as well as Murph Burke,
Speaker 1: who is a prominent Wisconsin donor and philanthropist who is
Speaker 1: also interestingly on our Wisconsin RNC Convention committee, which itself
Speaker 1: has to raise millions of dollars. So you have people
Speaker 1: at every level in the Republican donor ecosystem demanding change.
Speaker 1: I don't know how the party can continue to ignore that.
Speaker 1: I think we actually have a fiduciary duty to look
Speaker 1: at who's the more likely in this scenario to be
Speaker 1: able to raise the funds that the party needs to
Speaker 1: use efficiently to distribute to states and to campaigns. Uh
Speaker 1: with with with support of field staff and things like that,
Speaker 1: and data and other assets to elect Republicans. It's that basic,
Speaker 1: and so you know, we hope they get able. We
Speaker 1: were able to convince the rest of the people to
Speaker 1: support Yeah, and to your point in Tiger Group recently
Speaker 1: did a poll finding the eighty six percent of Republicans
Speaker 1: want you to be chair over Rona McDaniel to your
Speaker 1: point of the grassroots winning change and wanting you to
Speaker 1: be that change. And you mentioned raising money, which obviously
Speaker 1: raising money is important in elections, but it's also what
Speaker 1: do you do with that money and are you effective
Speaker 1: in spending that money? And what we've seen is the
Speaker 1: challenge of mail in ballots that has had a big
Speaker 1: impact on the past two election cycles. How do you
Speaker 1: plan on tackling that challenge with mail and balloting? Yeah,
Speaker 1: great question. So, first of all, mail and balloting has
Speaker 1: been a thing in many states for some time. And
Speaker 1: you know, like some of the more rural states in
Speaker 1: the country, Utahn and Oregon, they've had all mail in
Speaker 1: balloting for for a long while. In California we've had
Speaker 1: what we call no excuse abstintee balloting for for decades.
Speaker 1: And during COVID, Democrats pretty much made this the norm
Speaker 1: and the majority of states and that laws has stayed
Speaker 1: in place despite the fact that COVID is effectively over
Speaker 1: so there are two ways to deal with it. You
Speaker 1: can sit on your behind, continue to call elections election
Speaker 1: day operations and pretend like nothing has changed, which is
Speaker 1: unfortunately the approach we've been adopting. Or you can be
Speaker 1: smart about it and compete with the Democrats, which is
Speaker 1: what a handful of states have been doing effectively California, Florida,
Speaker 1: some others, and adapt and we have to adapt or die.
Speaker 1: It's it's that diarist situation. And so until we can
Speaker 1: change the election laws to the way we like them,
Speaker 1: which is voter I D and no same day registration
Speaker 1: and really tight requirements around absentee ballots, combined with very
Speaker 1: clean voter rolls, we must defeat and outperform the Democrats
Speaker 1: in hustling our ballots into the ballot box. And so
Speaker 1: for many years we've had this emotional type of approach
Speaker 1: to appeal to voters to go and you know, stand
Speaker 1: in line and vote in person symbolically on election day,
Speaker 1: and the Democrats don't have that problem. So I've heard
Speaker 1: a lot of excuses out of the current leadership for
Speaker 1: the party saying, well, you know, Donald Trump picked bad candidates,
Speaker 1: and there was candidate selection issues, and there was ticket
Speaker 1: splitting and blah blah blah. But let's keep in mind
Speaker 1: who the Democrats have been able to elect with their machine.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden the biggest liar in American politics. And that's
Speaker 1: you know, even next to George Santos, Joe Biden is
Speaker 1: still by far the biggest liar. You look at John Fetterman,
Speaker 1: who couldn't even speak for much of his campaign because
Speaker 1: of his stroke. You have Katie Hobbs, who wouldn't debate
Speaker 1: in Arizona and became the governor over a much more
Speaker 1: articulate and I think appealing candidate, and so all of
Speaker 1: that adds up to it doesn't matter who the Democrats
Speaker 1: put up, because they have perfected the art of getting
Speaker 1: their voters ballots into the ballot boxes, not getting their
Speaker 1: voters to the polls. It's a very important distinction. Most
Speaker 1: of those Democrat voters never see the inside of a
Speaker 1: polling place anymore. In Arizona on election day where I
Speaker 1: was on the ground, the voters on election day were
Speaker 1: Republican voters. And so we lose every time if we
Speaker 1: let the Democrats set the agenda with us like that,
Speaker 1: and what it requires for us to outperform Democrats is
Speaker 1: a couple of things. First of all, a national strategic
Speaker 1: plan from the R and C. And then training and
Speaker 1: financial resources because when you go from election day operations
Speaker 1: to election month operations, it's going to cost more money.
Speaker 1: You may also have to train and recruit more volunteers
Speaker 1: and put them in and shifts. Uh. It's it's an
Speaker 1: organizational challenge that the party has not been up to,
Speaker 1: but it's not that difficult. If it were that difficult,
Speaker 1: Democrats couldn't luster it, and they have and so I
Speaker 1: think we can do it, but we have to have
Speaker 1: a will to do it. I haven't heard the current
Speaker 1: share talk about it at all, and I think that's
Speaker 1: because she's intimidated by the fact that many Republican Party
Speaker 1: activists don't like what I just said. And I don't
Speaker 1: like it, but the fact is you have to do
Speaker 1: it if you want to win. And if you don't
Speaker 1: have the political willpower to stand up and say something
Speaker 1: that may be unpopular with certain aspects of your party,
Speaker 1: you're not a leader. And so I think that's, you know,
Speaker 1: a big, big crossroads that we have. Are we willing
Speaker 1: to stand up and say things that that are unpopular
Speaker 1: or do we have to pander to every aspect of
Speaker 1: of the party commercial break more with her meat. Dylan
Speaker 1: on the other side, You've got a lot going on.
Speaker 1: I mean, you've run a law practice, the Dylan Law Group.
Speaker 1: I mean, I mean you're involved with, you know, many
Speaker 1: other things. Why why do you want this? Well, it's
Speaker 1: not a question of why do I want this? But
Speaker 1: who else is going to do it? And you're right,
Speaker 1: I'm very passionate about my day job heading a forty
Speaker 1: person law firm with five off this is around the
Speaker 1: country doing some of the most important conservative litigation in America.
Speaker 1: Very passionate about the nonprofit that you hear me talk about.
Speaker 1: I'll be talking about um a new case we followed
Speaker 1: this week about transgender grooming issues, and that's also very
Speaker 1: important work. I'm also the chairman of the Republican National
Speaker 1: Lawyers Association, so I'm a Republican election lawyer in the country,
Speaker 1: head of that organization right now on the board. And
Speaker 1: you know, obviously I'm a media commentator, but I'm gonna
Speaker 1: have to step aside from all of those rules except
Speaker 1: for probably media commentator and chair of the R and C.
Speaker 1: If I win this and that's because no other member
Speaker 1: of the Republican National Committee stepped forward to challenge for
Speaker 1: her fourth term. And you know, I'm sure she did
Speaker 1: her best for three terms. She's a person who obviously
Speaker 1: cares about Republicans and wants them to win elections. But
Speaker 1: after three terms, we lost the House, the Senate, the
Speaker 1: White House, and several governorships in net losses. We can't
Speaker 1: ignore that fact, and so I think it's really time
Speaker 1: for somebody else to step forward. And you know, R
Speaker 1: and C is a unique organization and everyone there is
Speaker 1: you know, sort of the top Republican people in their state,
Speaker 1: the chairman, and you know, senior leaders in the party.
Speaker 1: That's the National Committee men and woman. I failed that
Speaker 1: role from California. So it's very genteel. You know, there's
Speaker 1: no sharp elbows. Everyone gets along, and so it's rare
Speaker 1: to have a contested leadership race. You know, the kind
Speaker 1: of people trying to expect you to sit there and
Speaker 1: wait your turn. And I'm sorry, but America can't afford
Speaker 1: for us to wait our turn for somebody, you know,
Speaker 1: to step forward and make the changes necessary at the
Speaker 1: r NC. The country is suffering without a proper rebuke
Speaker 1: to Joe Biden and strong leadership in our party. We're
Speaker 1: going to suffer for four more years. I don't know
Speaker 1: what our countries don't look like after four more years
Speaker 1: of this disaster. The next two years is going to
Speaker 1: be bad enough. And so that's why I step forward
Speaker 1: to do it. Well, I'm glad you did. I mean,
Speaker 1: you've fought for a lot of important causes you have won,
Speaker 1: and I think we need that kind of leadership at
Speaker 1: the r n C. H it. Why do you think
Speaker 1: we fell short in the midterms? Oh? There are many reasons,
Speaker 1: and you know some of the reasons are the ones
Speaker 1: that I mentioned. There were definitely candidate mismatches between who
Speaker 1: could win the state. I mean, I think we should
Speaker 1: do better vetting where you know, even the former president
Speaker 1: has made a couple of endorsements that you know, I
Speaker 1: think it's hard to get elected in the state as
Speaker 1: a senator. I've never run for office before, and be
Speaker 1: you didn't live in that state for many years. That
Speaker 1: was a problem with two of our candidates, But they
Speaker 1: weren't worse than the Democratic candidates, to be very clear,
Speaker 1: we just didn't do as good a job at getting
Speaker 1: them elected as Democrats did at getting their grossly inferior
Speaker 1: candidates elected. Graphael Warnock is a terrible candidate on paper,
Speaker 1: and yet we weren't able to beat him with a
Speaker 1: very good candidate in many ways. Um. And so we
Speaker 1: see blame on the Dobbs issue also from our party
Speaker 1: leader Rod has blamed Dobbs. And I'm a pro life
Speaker 1: litigator and activist. I represent numerous pro life activists in
Speaker 1: court right now, I'm sewing planned parenthood and multiple cases.
Speaker 1: And uh. And so it seems to me like where
Speaker 1: you had a heads up that jobs was coming, with
Speaker 1: with what reasoning was coming, the party should have jumped
Speaker 1: on that and done a great job using this important
Speaker 1: federalism decision sending the issue back to the states, as
Speaker 1: as as something that we could message to both sides
Speaker 1: and message it well. We did not do that. We
Speaker 1: were afraid to talk about it. Candidates were advised not
Speaker 1: to talk about it. Uh. And I think that was
Speaker 1: a mistake. It should have been discussed and resolved in
Speaker 1: each state and by each campaign. Um. And then I
Speaker 1: think we have some technical failures that that are probably
Speaker 1: gonna warrior listeners. But you know, I think we are
Speaker 1: being outperformed by the Democrats in terms of the use
Speaker 1: of data. UM they invest financial resources in acquiring and
Speaker 1: harvesting and applying algorithms to data that allows them to
Speaker 1: target likely Democrat voters. And we also do that on
Speaker 1: the Republican side, and by the way, we do a
Speaker 1: very good job of it compared to the past, but
Speaker 1: we are not I think right now technically competing with
Speaker 1: the Democrats, are keeping up with them, and I think
Speaker 1: that's something that we can change with financial resource investment.
Speaker 1: And if you're blowing the money you're raising on overhead
Speaker 1: overhead to UH ineffective political consultants inside the Beltway, some
Speaker 1: of whom don't even want our America First candidates to win.
Speaker 1: That's very clear in their cocktail party chatter. They would
Speaker 1: be living in d C and and thriving in these circles. Then,
Speaker 1: instead of buying data, instead of paying social media influencers
Speaker 1: who are young and or from different ethnic backgrounds who
Speaker 1: can help us UH reach new audiences, we're losing. And
Speaker 1: so I think strong fiscal responsibility as a core tenet
Speaker 1: of Republican ideals, are not following it. At the Republican
Speaker 1: National Committee, the careful shepherding of donor dollars ought to
Speaker 1: be job one at the r and C, and it
Speaker 1: really isn't know, UM, I have a specific plan. It's
Speaker 1: not glamorous, but it's it's nuts and bolts. We need
Speaker 1: to bring in some people with the gray hair back
Speaker 1: into the r n C. I'm one of those people
Speaker 1: with gray hair, uh though I'm vain and uh you know,
Speaker 1: we have to bring some people with experience and state
Speaker 1: parties and people would experience outside the RNC to help
Speaker 1: us rebuild the party and really focus on winning, not
Speaker 1: on you know, glamour, not on podcasts, not on anything
Speaker 1: other than helping Republicans win elections and helping a Republican
Speaker 1: nominee whoever that is level playing field become the next
Speaker 1: president of the United States. At a time when it
Speaker 1: should be the easiest possible to defeat the left, we're
Speaker 1: struggling at doing that basic job, and so without a change,
Speaker 1: I'm very concerned that we will have no chance of winning.
Speaker 1: Win a change. It's going to be a challenge, but
Speaker 1: at least it's doable. I think a lot of people
Speaker 1: share your your frustration and would agree with what you
Speaker 1: just said. Real quick before we go. I know that
Speaker 1: the elections internal, but how can people help? Well, the
Speaker 1: members of the Republican National Committee are three in each
Speaker 1: of the fifty states and six territories. They in turn,
Speaker 1: are elected not directly by voters, but by the party
Speaker 1: activists in each states. So for example, in California, I
Speaker 1: am elected by fift hundred delegates of the state party.
Speaker 1: And so really the most effective advocacy is for those
Speaker 1: state party delegates or precinct committee men or limit or
Speaker 1: executive committee of the state party to contact the three
Speaker 1: members who they elect and tell them what their opinion
Speaker 1: is in no on certain terms. State parties are having
Speaker 1: special meetings all over the country. So for example, if
Speaker 1: you're one of those state party delegates in Florida, you
Speaker 1: have the opportunity in a week, one week from today,
Speaker 1: to travel to Tallahassee and vote on this issue. And
Speaker 1: that just happened in Arkansas and Louisiana, Alabama, Texas, Tennessee,
Speaker 1: and and uh I think Arizona. Throughout the country, it's happening.
Speaker 1: There's a vote coming up in Washington State shortly on
Speaker 1: this issue. And so those are the most effective. But
Speaker 1: if you are a voter in the state, and you're
Speaker 1: an active Republican, I would say you could reach out
Speaker 1: politely to the three members of your state or your territory,
Speaker 1: let them know you live in their state, because they're
Speaker 1: going to ignore it if you don't live in their
Speaker 1: state and share your preference and why politely and persuasively.
Speaker 1: That is having an impact on many of the members
Speaker 1: of the R and C. Other members of the R
Speaker 1: and C don't want to hear from voters directly, which
Speaker 1: itself is a problem, I think, but in any event,
Speaker 1: it's never persuasive to be anything other than polite. And
Speaker 1: uh so I regret that some people feel so passionately
Speaker 1: about this that they haven't been and I'm getting blamed
Speaker 1: for that. So so don't do that, please, And you know, finally,
Speaker 1: get engaged and get involved. If your Republican representatives at
Speaker 1: the Republican National Committee at your state party aren't doing
Speaker 1: what's right for you, but instead of doing what's right
Speaker 1: for them, they got a plump committee assignment, they got
Speaker 1: their photograph taken with some famous person, they got a
Speaker 1: nice seat at the table. Goal then they're portraying their
Speaker 1: promise to you. And so get involved and get yourself
Speaker 1: elected to one of those positions. That's what I can
Speaker 1: ask for Republican activists. But on Twitter and everyone that
Speaker 1: followed me, of the members that message directly and then
Speaker 1: the ones that had opened Twitter where you could message them,
Speaker 1: I said the US. I was very polite about it,
Speaker 1: but I expressed the desire for change with you, hurt,
Speaker 1: Meet Dylan. I'm rooting for you. I know you'd be
Speaker 1: a phenomenal chair and you would make the changes that
Speaker 1: we need, so I truly hope you get it. I
Speaker 1: appreciate you taking the time as always and uh always
Speaker 1: nice to catch up with you. Thank you so much, Lisa,
Speaker 1: take care. It's her, Meet Dylan truly hope she ends
Speaker 1: up being the RNC chair. That would be a really
Speaker 1: important place to make change US as a party heading
Speaker 1: into what is a monumental and consequential presidential election for
Speaker 1: I want to thank you guys for listening. I want
Speaker 1: to thank John Cassio for putting the podcast together as
Speaker 1: always Monday and Thursday, but you can listen throughout the week.
Speaker 1: Leave us a review at a rating on Apple Podcast
Speaker 1: love reading those. Appreciate you guys listening. Until next time.