WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Passing Team?

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Let's go. Are you

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>ready for a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah, And so much for that.

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com.

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Were with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Derek Eagleton. It is Monday, November eighteenth, twenty nineteen, Season

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>forty five, episode number eighty four. Welcome to another edition

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of The Break. We are live from the s WBC

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.959
<v Speaker 1>Mortgage Studios at the Star coming off a Cowboys win,

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys beating Detroit Lions in Detroit. They moved to a

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>record of six and four in the lead in the

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>NFC East. And we're gonna break down for you guys

0:00:57.520 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>what happened in that game yesterday. There were lots of

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>moments in that game, lots of ebbs and flows, and

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously a lot of storylines that come out of that game.

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 1>And to me, there's really no bigger storyline than Dak Prescott.

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'll start right there with you for you guys,

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>he was twenty nine to forty six sixty three completion rate,

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>completion percentage. Sorry, he was had four hundred and forty

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>four yards of passing, three touchdowns, one hundred and sixteen

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>point six quarterback rating. Man, it's pretty freaking good. Nick.

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>After the game, though, you made the comment there on

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the sideline, did miss a couple throws? No? No, No,

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not really what I was trying to say. Okay, okay,

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Well I wanted I wanted to talk about it because

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I actually agree with you. There were a couple of

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>throws he missed, but I didn't think they were necessarily

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. But let's talk. No, I wasn't trying

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>to I was only trying to see if this was

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the best game he's ever played, got it? And so

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I was like, did he Am I missing something here?

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Did he you know, seventeen in completions but they threw

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Yeah, I'm like, but I mean, I know

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that they went to beat the Lions. But I'm just

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>saying that he's doing things that are that he's kind

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of the guy that's and I even wrote maybe he's

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the straw that stirred this drink. So now because he's

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>starting to do things even though they're trying to take

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>away his weapons and he had a great game. Estray

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought, I thought he played phenomenal. He made it

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>rain on them bros. You know everyone gets that because

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>not everyone knows his name. It's true. His name's rain

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>Dakota Prescott. I would hope you know that if you're

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a Cowboys fan listening to this show in twenty nineteen. Man,

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>he was. He was really impressive. And it's funny. I

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>always say it like it's dumb until they come to

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that conclusion and then it's smart. Like last week, it

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>was like, well, you want to stay balanced. We did

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>make some adjustments, we threw the ball forty sixth time

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:43.239
<v Speaker 1>in the game, but you still want to try to

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>run and establish the run. And then after the game yesterday,

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I was like, well, why would you go away from

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>something that's working. Of course we're gonna throw the ball

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>like that's what we're gonna do, and why wouldn't Yeah,

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, why wouldn't you? I wish they had come

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.679
<v Speaker 1>to that conclusion in the week before, But everything was

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>working for dak Yeah, Tavon Austin bailed him out. He

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>had ball inexplicably go through Darius Slay's hands. But them's

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>the breaks. He is playing out of his mind. If

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys had beaten the Jets, I think he'd be

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>right up there with Lamar Jackson and Russell Wilson in

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of MVP conversation, like it was a nationally televised

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>flop of a game and rightful, I mean, there's six

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 1>and four. I'm not and again people love to jump

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to conclusions. I'm not saying he should win the MVP

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>because I think Lamar Jackson and Russell Wilson have both

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>out played him to this point. He would be much

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>more a part of the conversation if the Cowboys resume

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>was just a little bit better and highlighted by this

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>game right here. I know the Lions aren't super impressive defensively,

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 1>but that's impressive no matter who you're playing, right You

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Know what's really exciting to me is in the past,

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:49.839
<v Speaker 1>when we talked about Dak Prescot, we talked about him

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>needing that talented player to make him look better or

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to help him out. He couldn't be just an average guy.

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just saying the White Sievers are average or

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. They're better than average at this point.

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I think based on what we've seen, but the fact

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that Dak has been able to play like that with

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>so many different targets rather than him having to lean

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>on one person, which is Amari Cooper. You see him

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>just throwing the ball all to so many different guys.

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 1>So that's exciting to see from him, and at the

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>point that he's at in his career as a quarterback

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>as we look to move forward in the future with him.

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>That's actually a great point because it's not just even

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>about Amari. Basically, yesterday, he did that without his two

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>best offensive weapons, and I shouldn't say without, but they

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't have statistically the best games. I'm talking about Ezekiel

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Elliott and Amari Cooper. Neither one of them had great

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>games statistically, but they were able to find the guys

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that were open. He was able to get the balls,

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to get the ball to them, and they were able

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>to make place. You know, he's going to show these

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>defensive coordinators that you want to keep playing like this,

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. I'm going to keep throwing it around. And

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, obviously this game coming up, you know they've

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>got the critical they got they got the best coach

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>in NFL history, um coaching this week and so we'll

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>see what they scheme up for him. But the thing

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is is that he's showing that if you want to

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>just continue to crowd the box and stop Zeke, you know,

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I could make place in the red zone, though they haven't,

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>they haven't proven that they can do that when but

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that that's the only down part about that is shortened

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>shortened space. Can they make throws to get that? That

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>is a really fun element. And I mean, and look,

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you know this this wasn't like just the most complete

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>dominant effort. I'm sure we'll get to the defense. I

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>want to be careful not to just heap too much

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>praise for an eight point win against the you know,

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a team that they should have beaten. But everybody wants

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to knee jerk like, well, Zeke had another bad game,

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah blah blah. Is Tony Poller better? And

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>I think it's so silly. And what Nick just said

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>is what really intrigues me and excites me, is like,

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>if defenses are going to keep playing them this way

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>and Dak can keep taking advantage of it to the

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>two four hundred yards, it's gonna stop, real stop. It

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>will stop. And now'll loosen up and Zeke Elliott will

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>be just fine. And that's sorry. You want to make

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a point, but I mean, like that's balance. It's not

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>we ran the ball twenty five times and throw the

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>ball thirty times. Like that's not balanced balances. We can

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 1>get it done either way. Once you decide what you

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>want to take away, will kill you with the other thing.

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>And we know they can run the ball. We know

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>they can, but teams have been focusing on taking it

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>away and Dak is making him pay for it. He

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 1>couldn't do that earlier in his career and he clearly

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>can now. And again, I don't care that the Lions

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>are twenty eighth in the league in past defense. Four

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>forty four is four forty four. I mean that's not

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>common even in the modern age of the NFL. It's

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>I can't say enough about how impressive it was what

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>they I will say about that, though, is I do

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>think that you look at how the passing game has gone.

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>They've had other games this year what he's strolling the

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>ball all around the yard and had some big impressive

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>numbers and they ended up losing. And that's where I

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>wonder if teams get to the point where they say, uh,

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe we ought to rethink this. Maybe maybe

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>they look at the Cowboys and they say, we still

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>would rather have him throwing the ball, because when they're

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>running the ball and running it efficiently, they take way

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>more time off the clock. You have way fewer opportunities.

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>And so yes, they may have a great offensive day statistically,

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>but if it doesn't end up in a win, then

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really matter. And that's the part why I'm a

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit concerned about what's happening with the running game.

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I do think at some point they got to figure

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>out how to get that thing on track, because they

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>still have to be able to be able to I

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>think in order for this defensive play well, I think

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>they got to have time when that defense is not

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>on the field. Yeah. You know, the thing that is

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>encouraging is if you're not a very good blocker, you're

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>just not a good blocker, you know, like run, pass, whatever.

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that they are blocking so well in

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the passing game and Dak is going through all of

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>these reads, that makes me think that when they are

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to run it is loaded boxed. It's it's not

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that they're just missing blocks and they can't push people around.

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Maybe strength is a part of it, you know, you

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>want a stronger line on third and one, third and two.

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>But they're doing a phenomenal job with him just standing

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>back there and going through these reads that it makes

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>me think that the road line is fine. They're just

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>having a harder time with these stacked boxes. I mean,

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>for Randall Cobb to do what he did and Gallop

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and all those guys, I just think it was it

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>goes through the line saying this is how we're gonna

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have to throw to beat us. I

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>would throw this in there, and I wish, you know,

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could go back and take a look

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>at the game on game pass before we did this show.

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>But just spitballing off the top of my head. One

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:39.200
<v Speaker 1>thing I loved about this game was they executed the

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>basically short, easy passes that qualified as runs that me personally,

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I've been dying to see. We saw the Tony Pollard

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>pop pass. We saw a wide receiver screen. I think

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>it was to MARII Cooper didn't like hit for huge yards,

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>But those are basically runs in my book. So that's

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 1>another that's another fifteen to thirty yards when it copped

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>on the little short shovel. They did two or three

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of those, and they ran a screen to Ezekiel elliy

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>At that went for a touch night. It's that little

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I think we would all agree we've been

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>dying to see more of. It's not in the box

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>score under rushing yards, but I think of it the

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>same way. And when you consider that, it's a much

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>better day in that category than what the box scores suggests.

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think I take that into account when I

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>think about it. So let's look at the statistical from

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.199
<v Speaker 1>a statistical standpoint, thinking about the fact that they threw

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the ball forty six times in the game yesterday and

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>they only ran at twenty four times. Are we starting

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to see a shift in how the Cowboys will play offense?

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Because I do think that even when they all, like

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I said, other points to season, the offense has has

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>been in my opinion, passing has been what they've done best.

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I've seen this kind of discovery.

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there has been, but this seems really really slant

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:51.719
<v Speaker 1>it to the side of throwing the ball. Yeah, but

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>he just said it though. I mean, it's a couple

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 1>passes to Pollard, a couple of screens things like that

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that are high percentage rows that you know that that

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>pop pass is. You know, I think that play is

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>going to ruin fantasy football, honestly, but hasn't happened yet.

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I really believe it will. It's gonna change. You can't

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 1>just keep doing catches like that. But um, but I

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>just think that that's what Dave said. It was high

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>percentage place and they trust him and that. I thought

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the most telling thing was the fourth I mean, the

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in the final drive of the game. They can keep

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>just running in there, forced you to call all those

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>timeout pun it forty seconds to go whatever, and they said, no,

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna just let him roll out the pass. And

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing, Jason Garrett. He's not a great game

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>manager if people think that, and they do, and when

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it happens, it's, you know, high alert, oh my god it.

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>But when he does manage the game, well, it's never mentioned.

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>They managed it well. They did went for two like

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>they were supposed to. They got the fourteen point league

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and they said, you know what, we're gonna We're gonna

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>kill this game right now and go and so when it.

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>When it works, you gotta give him credit if he's

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna get crucified when he does when he doesn't. Which

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to get into this debate right now,

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>but we just talked about it because it happened the

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 1>last time they went to Detroit in twenty thirteen. The

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 1>old playing to win versus playing not to lose. This

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>is me. I know you feel differently, but playing not

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to lose would have been running three times, punning it

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and saying, Jeff Driscoll can't get that many yards in

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that short amount of time. That's playing not to lose.

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Playing to win is calling a high percentage pass that

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>lets you pick up the first down and in the

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>game on your terms. I thought that was fantastic. Whether

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>it was Kellamore, whether it was Jason Garrett, probably both.

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>However they came to that decision. I loved it. And

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that's how you get road wins is you put yourself

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you give you have the confidence to make those types

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of calls. And the only reason I always argue with

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you because I just think the result is the same.

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, whether you're trying not to lose or you're

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>playing to win, the result is always the same there.

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's just how aggressive do you want to be

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and where is your strength? What do you feel like?

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think the part of Dak Prescott rolling out,

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>being smart with the ball getting it to the tight

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>end is just as high percentage as them going They

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>weren't going to score if they would have punted. The

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Lions weren't going to drive and score. They don't have

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the Calvin Johnson type guy to go make the play

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>like that. They don't. Driscoll's not going to do it.

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>But your past interference penalty here changes everything. Or Xavier

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Woods leaves the game for two plays and they give

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>up fifty yards back to back, which is something that

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>happened ten minutes prior. Going back to your question about

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>them kind of turning more into a passing game, something

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that I heard. Someone asked Dak prescotting in the press

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>conference last night about that, and his answer was basically, well,

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>why are we going to steer away from something that

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>we see that is working? And I'm like, yes, final,

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 1>oh wow, finally last week. Yeah, but at least being

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:49.839
<v Speaker 1>able to hear that from there, I mean, doesn't mean

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that they're not doing it back there or talking about that.

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>But when you hear it just gives you a sense

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of like, Okay, we're not all crazy. We you guys

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>are kind of in the same page as us, and

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you guys still see what we see. So it was

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>just good to hear that and listen to them have

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that kind of mentality now of like, you know, if

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>we see that this is working, let's keep doing it

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully going into next week and the rest of

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the season when they go back and see how having

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Tony Poler on the field, how that helped the Yes,

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>keep doing it. All right, We're gonna take our first

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>break when we come back. We're gonna talk about Ezekiel Elli.

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>He had sixteen karries yesterday for forty five yards only

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a two point eight average, and of course that fumble

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 1>there on the first drive. We'll talk about that and

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll ask you the question, are you concerned about Zeke?

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll do that when we come back. This is Dallas

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Radio. I'm Jay nova Check, former tight

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>end for the Dallas Cowboys back in the day. I

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>was a guy who always got the tough yards and

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>that's why I run with John Deer today. In fact,

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 1>I have a John Dear three zero twenty five E

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>tractor that can handle any yard work I need to do,

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>even the tough yards way out back. So if you

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>have one acre or a thousand John Deer the equipment

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that's just right for you, visit a John Dear dealer

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>today and run with us. We are the official tractor

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>provider of your Dallas Cowboys. Whether you're into being a

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>part of this or more into something like this, Sea

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Geek has the tickets to the events you love. It's

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the easiest way to find, buy and sell tickets. Plus,

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>with their deal score technology, they'll recommend the best seats

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>in the house at the best value. So the next

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>time you're craving this, download the sea Geek app and

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>let's go seek. I want to use what the pros use.

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>How about the official men's skincare brand or the Dallas

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys Jack Black. Right now, you can get the Jack

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Black Starter, a curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>for just ten bucks with free shipping. The starter includes

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>four Jack Clack skincare favorites plus a full sized and

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>tense therapy lip bomb. Go to get Jack Black dot com.

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Slash Cowboys use the code word Team JB. That's get

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys, the Jack Black Starter,

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>ten Bucks free shipping. Ready, okay, give me a yes,

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>give me oh? What does that spell? So? So? Are

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>we gonna win? Just okay? Is not okay, whether it's

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>cheerleaders or your wireless network. At and T is America's

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>best wireless network. Best network based on GWS one score,

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>September twenty nineteen. Back to the break Welcome back. It

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is the second second of the break block in SWBC

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Mortgage Studios. At the start, we're talking about the Cowboys

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>big win yesterday over the Lions. Uh they win thirty

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>five twenty seven. Move to six and four. Let's talk

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>about Ezekiel Elliott. Yesterday he had sixteen carries for forty

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>five yards at two point eight average um. And did

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>he did you have one touchdown? But he also had

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that big fumble there in the early parts of the

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>game that the that the alliance turned into points. Are

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you guys at all concerned about Ezekiel Elliott and kind

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of how he's performing right now? I'm concerned anytime and

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>running back fumbles, I mean that that is and and

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>you know I made a joke about it on Twitter

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>yesterday is like, I don't want to talk about slow

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>starts for another seven days. But what choice do you

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>have when they do that? I mean fumble on the

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>second play of the game and a touchdown drive coming

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>right after me? What choice but you have? Do you

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>have but to talk about it? Um like in terms

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of you know, forty five rushing yards and not not really,

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I'm not not not when your quarterbacks

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>going for forty four. I mean that's the thing, like,

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>give give Dack fifty yards less and give it give

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it to Zeke, you know that kind of style of

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>running and and balance. Zeke's got ninety five and Dak's

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>got three ninety four and that's balance. And everyone's excited.

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, like we said earlier, as soon as

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you start, they can't do anything. Like if you have

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Saints games where Dad can't throw and

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Zeke can't run, Yeah, I think you have some concern,

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>But they the defensive coordinators are showing that their respect

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>for Zeke Elliott in the running game is still there.

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Until they have seven man boxes and still and stop him.

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Then I think you started getting concerned. But I'm not

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not there yet, and I don't know if this

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>week's going to change anything. But yeah, Jedi out there.

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean he'll he'll come up with some kind of

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>best defense in the league. Yeah, Ji, he is a Jedi. Oh,

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>he definitely is a Jedi. I just er and seven

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>linebackers and I don't know, he's definitely And I mean

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>we took a call about it last week. We've talked

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>about it plenty, like it is. Yeah, it sucks that

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have more long runs. I think he's got

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>one run of twenty or more on the season, and

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you would prefer he's more explosive. I mean, we've seen

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>him do it as a pro, and I mean he

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>did it at will in college. Obviously that was a

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>while ago at this point, but it's still what he

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 1>brings to the table as a workhorse, like as a

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>guy who can fight through that contact, take a minimum

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>of sixteen if not twenty five or thirty carries a

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>game and still be productive, be the focal point of

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>a Defensei's efforts and still produce I mean, yeah, forty

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>five rushing yards two point eight yards per carry along

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of eight that's bad. But then you know, two catches

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>for twenty eight yards, including a seventeen yard touchdown on

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a screen pass, which we all know how good he

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>is at that. Again, I mean all of that goes

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>into account, right, I just I'm not ready to be

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.400
<v Speaker 1>worried about it. Sorry? Could it be? I haven't I'm

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 1>trying to remember all these plays. But could it be

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe due to what the offensive line is doing and

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>what kind of holes they're being able or unable to

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>open up for him? I don't know. I think anytime

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>a running back is not getting a great deal of production,

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:47.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that's part of it, at least he goes in.

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>What I don't know. What I don't know is is

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Zeke seeing everything the way he should? Is he hitting

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the holes with the rate right kind of burst? Like

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>those are things that sometimes you can't really notice. You

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>just noticed there's not a there when he gets there.

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>But the question in becomes was there a hole there

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>preceding that? In? Was there an expectation that he should

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>have found that whole quicker and should have been through

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it by the time it closed up? That's what which

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 1>is what he's being able to do in the past years.

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 1>It's like he'll make a play out of nothing, and

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what we're missing now. He actually there

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>was a couple of plays in that game where I thought,

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think we were talking about one of them,

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>where I mean, he just kind of runs right into

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 1>the line and then all of a sudden he kind

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of sports out for four or five yards. I thought

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>he did a decent job of that. No big runs.

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Once the second week in a row that their longest

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>rush is less than ten yards, and the second week

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>in row that the longest rush is not by running back,

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>because Dak was nine yards and last week Tavon was eight.

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>So they're not getting any kind of long runs at all,

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>not even decent fifteen to twenty yard runs. It's tough

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>to say this without doing some tape study, but I wonder,

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's such a patient runner, and maybe he's

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>waiting so long for a hole to develop that will

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>give him a longer run that it prevents him from

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>just getting the typical three to four or five yard run.

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Like I'd like to go back and look at that,

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>but there is an element of that to where he

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, it looks like he's waiting so long to

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.880
<v Speaker 1>identify where he needs to be that the play doesn't

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:20.399
<v Speaker 1>wind up going anywhere. I mean, you know, Pollard had

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a great game. I'm ecstatic about it. He would that

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>is a picture perfect look at how I would like

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>them to use Tony Pollard. He caught four balls. Two

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>or three of those catches were really more runs than anything.

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>But his touchdown was going across the formation out of

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the slot. I mean he basically ran a drag from

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the slot. He can do that. It's awesome. He got

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>a couple of chances. It's funny because you know, the

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>opening kick was kind of a disaster, and I mean, like,

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, enough of Tony Pollard as a kick returner.

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>And then his play in the fourth quarter on the

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>one that went over his head was fantastic and big

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 1>play in the game. We talked, talked to a bunch

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of people in the locker room. I mean that he

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 1>played it the way you're supposed to play it, like

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 1>he lined up on the five or the ten and

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it went over his head, so you think it's gonna

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>be a touchback. It just took an amazing bounce, like

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:12.439
<v Speaker 1>just a hell of a play by Detroit's kicker and

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>then he still managed to corral it and get further

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>than he would have if it had been a touchback.

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>It was an awesome house. So I think eight total

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>touches for ninety eight yards and a touchdown again, and

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I would bet his snap count was less than twenty five.

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I like, I haven't looked at it. Yes, even less

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>than that. Yeah, I mean you look at just a

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>number of times that he actually had the ball, and

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about special teams. He had two carries

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>for twelve yards, and then he had four catches on

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 1>four targets for forty four yards and a touchdown. My

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>question for you guys, are you surprised the Cowboys didn't

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>go back to him. This all happened most that offensive

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>production happened at the end of the first quarter heading

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.239
<v Speaker 1>into the second quarter, and it doesn't. I don't think

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>he touched the ball again the rest of the game,

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>where you kind of shocked that they didn't going back

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to that little he had the two point conversion and

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the two posion whatever quarter. I guess I was talking

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>about more of the offense at It's like, Okay, you

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>saw him get that touchdown and getting the ball and

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>all that and people are excited. Tony Poler gets sit

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't even say sit Zeke down. But then you

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>see Zeke get the ball and then he gets moving,

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>then he gets a touchdown, and it's like, it made

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>me think of that, you know, when we wonder, okay,

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>what they do at tight end. It's like, okay, you

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 1>see Blake jar we're making it play. But now they

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like maybe they need to get the ball to

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Jason because he's the main guy and blah blah. So

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it made me think of that, and like, I wonder

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>if because of his small amount of success that Tony

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Poler had, do the Cowboys feel like maybe they need

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to give zek the ball and the opportunity for Zeke

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to make his own play. Yeah, you know, I don't

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:50.919
<v Speaker 1>know they think like that during the game, but I

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 1>see your point. I mean, it seemed a little curious

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:55.919
<v Speaker 1>they didn't go back to him after they saw the

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>success that he was having him. To me, that was

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 1>more about the matchups that he was getting, yeah, and

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>so why not continue to exploit those? But again, well

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>we're making when we're really splitting hairs because again, the

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>offense put up four yards, so it's kind of like

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 1>they were moving the ball, they didn't necessarily need to

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>go back to him. I guess, yeah, fourth straight touchdown,

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean fourth straight scoring possessions after the touchdown, then

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>they punted when zeke Bo was back in there, and

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>then went touchdown, touchdown, field goal, touchdown. So it's not like, yeah,

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a problem with that. I can't sit here.

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>They finally give him the workload that I want. I

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>can't sit here and nitpick it. And that's that's kind

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of my point is like Tony Pollard's good, he brings

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>some juice, he should be involved. That doesn't mean zeke

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>is a bad player needs to have his snap count

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>drastically reduced. I think that's the most knee jerk thing

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>in the entire world. But it's hard not to look

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>at this. I hope the coaching staff looks at this

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and says, this guy needs to be a sizeable part

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of the game plan. I mean sizeable meaning again eight

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen touches. Whereas you know, I can go back

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and I can show you the snap counts, like from

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the Miami game until like yesterday, you're talking five snaps

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>snaps or less, and that's just not good enough for

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 1>a guy with that much talent. That doesn't mean you

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 1>need to reduce Zeke's role. Was Zeke on the field

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>when these when they're doing these pot passes? Um, I

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>know that that series that he was Tony scored, he

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>was not on the field to that is going to

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>be important as well. Yeah, and I wondered if if

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Zeke was there, if they don't like they don't like

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>uh twenty one personnel for whatever reason, they just don't

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>like to do it. I don't get why. But they

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>did do it some yesterday early in the game, and

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>they kind of kind of they dilly with it. They're like,

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, we can do it once. But I'll tell

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you this in the Cowboys will face to Seem in

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>early December Chicago. Go look at how they use Tercohen.

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's how I would love for the Cowboys to

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>use Pollard. I mean, he is lining up in the

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>slot at wide receiver. Every once in a while he

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>lines up in the backfield, but they just use him.

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>The whole point of how they use him in the

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>offense is get him in matchups with linebackers. If you

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>can force linebackers to be covering him and he's going

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>down field, he's gonna win every turn every time. Try

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Cohen caught a touchdown like twenty yards down field last

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>night with a linebacker on him. I don't get what

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>stops them from doing that, but again, maybe maybe the

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that it worked is kind of like, all right,

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>we can do this now, Like, um, forgive me. I

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>don't remember the game, but Pauler dropped a screen earlier

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 1>this season that likely would have scored. Was it the

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Giants game, the road game? Yeah, maybe if he catches that,

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.239
<v Speaker 1>then it's kind of forward momentum on getting him more

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>involved and now, so maybe him being able to put

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>this on tape gives them the confidence to keep doing it.

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm not going to judge it based on the

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Patriots game, because that is a whole different animal. But

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>if this doesn't, you know, if if he just disappears

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>for the next month after this game, that would be

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 1>really frustrating. I will say this, and we don't want

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>to get too far into this, but I think this

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is the kind of week against the Patriots when they

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>need a guy like that. Because you look at the

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>history of the Patriots and how they play defense, They're

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna try to take a your top options. What you

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>did last week, you're gonna probably have to do that

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>again because they're probably gonna figure out a way to

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>take a mariout of game, and they're gonna figure out

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a way to take Zeke out of the game. It's

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 1>how can you be able to move the ball and

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>still score points when those two guys are taken out

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of game? And so that's gonna be really really important.

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's take our final break. We'll come back. We're gonna

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:19.479
<v Speaker 1>talk about this defense. That's some issue yesterday, but we'll

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>break all that down for you when we come right back.

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>This is Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio already okay? So

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 1>are we gonna win? Just? Okay? Is not okay whether

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 1>it's cheerleaders or your wireless network. AT and T is

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>America's best wireless network. Best network based on GWS one score,

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>September twenty nineteen. It's time for tailgating with the outer

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Box boys. The auto box that builds those crazy protective phonecases. Yep,

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and now they're changing the side dish game with the Auterbox. Trooper.

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Soft cooler, lightweight mobile, and leakproof Trooper is perfect for

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>blitzing a crowded parking lot with a Freedo pie. Amazing.

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Hey you think I could fit my seven layer salmon

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>salad into the Trooper cooler. Yep, but please don't. And

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that's been tailgating with the autobox boys. Learn more about

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the Trooper soft coolers at auterbox dot com. Whether you're

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>into being a part of this or more into something

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>like this, Sea Geek has the tickets to the events

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:34.199
<v Speaker 1>you love. It's the easiest way to find, buy and

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:38.640
<v Speaker 1>sell tickets. Plus, with their deal score technology, they'll recommend

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the best seats in the house at the best value.

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>So the next time you're craving this, download the sea

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Geek app and let's go seek kay Cowboys Nation. This season,

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>when the Cowboys win, you get to experience the sweet

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>taste of victory because if the Cowboys win the next day,

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Duncan is offering a free medium hot or iced coffee.

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>So don't just celebrate the Cowboys success from the sidelines,

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 1>head to Duncan and treat yourself to real victory. Because

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>this season, Cowboys fans aren't only winning on game day,

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>they're winning the next day too with a free medium coffee.

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys Nation runs on Duncan. Excludes Cold Brute Limit one

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>for guests. Participation may vary limited time offer back to

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the break. If you're not going to fly up to

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Boston and watch the Cowboys play the Patriots this weekend,

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 1>that you should at least go to the Star for

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys Official watch Party presented by AT and T.

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>It's on Sunday, November twenty fourth at the Tostitos Championship

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Plots At the Star, Cowboys will take on the Patriots.

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Submission is free, Parking is free The Star and frisco

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com for more details. Should be fun out there

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>if the weather cooperates. Song says, please come to Boston

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in the springtime. I don't know about the wintertime. I'm sorry,

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm just making all kinds of awful references that I

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what that song is. It's fine, all right, good,

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>all right. Let's talk about the defense yesterday. Cowboys defense.

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>It was a weird game for me because I looked

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 1>at if you watch the game or I'll put it

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 1>for myself. As I watched the game, and when the

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>game concluded, I thought, man, this defense had a bad day. However,

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>when you go back and you look statistically, I don't

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>know if it was a really bad day or fields

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a situation where they got put in some really bad situations.

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>There were a couple times when because of special teams,

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>because of offense turnovers they had, the other team got

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the ball in in favorable situations and the defense wasn't

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>able to make the stop. But you look at the

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>yards they gave up. I want to give up two

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred nine yards passing, give up one hundred and twenty

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>one yards rushing, But that that really was about the

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>fact that they could stop Driscoll from running he was

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, I mean Scarborough had he had fifty

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>five yards or three point nine average, that's not huge.

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>That didn't kill you. And so my point is, I

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know if the defense was really as bad as

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was. Watching the game, I'm interested to

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>see what you guys said respective if it were in

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>bad And I called myself and I wanted to think

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that way, I'm like, oh, they weren't that bad. But

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>then when you look at who was like running back,

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>who was playing quarterbacks, I mean, I mean that takes

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in effect as to how they played. They should have

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>played a lot better. I mean the quarterback. Here's a guy. Yes,

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>he had some really nice throws down the field, and

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>he impressed me that way. I was like, Okay, I

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't know you had that in you like that. But

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, he's a guy with not much experience.

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>You could see his hesitation. He doesn't have good anticipation.

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>He would always kind of self doubt himself trying to

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>figure out what to do. The defensive line was giving

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>him way too much time instead of getting to him

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and pressuring him. You know, when you talk about the

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>hot boys, I expected them to get that feeld on

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>fire and stop Driscoll from moving around and being able

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to escape. The pocket boys didn't get a sack yesterday. Now,

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>now Bennett had two and Quinn had one. Are they Quinn?

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Is I know for sure? I don't, Bennett said, I

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>remember the He's no, Michael Bennett said last week. I

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 1>remember the real hot boys. Those guys don't know what

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about. Cash money forever, Yeah, Benness, Michael Bennett's

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>two guys, and then there's Bennett. That's your sentiment. I mean,

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>he's not a part of what's what this whole thing

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is about. I mean, you know, we see it in

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the national anthem, we see stuff. He's doing his own thing.

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>He's his own guy. He's here for a different reason

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe I don't know. But when when the lights are on,

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>he goes and he gets it done. Now, he had

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>two off side penalties yesterday and that one was big.

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>One was very really could have been a big play.

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>But they do buckle down and he had a really

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>nice play that changed the game when he's when he

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>made that sack and forced him to punt, which head scratching.

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Really um because fourth and twenty six. I would have

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>gone for it, honestly, because what they were asking to

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>do to get the ball back was going to be

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>so they could get into hell Mary mode. So what's

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the difference. I understand that the odds of Cleveland, the

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>odds of picking up a fourth and twenty six are

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>not good, But you're not getting that ball back. You're

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>just you're probably not if you do. If you do

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>get Mary, it'll be, yeah, you'll have one play. I mean,

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>damned if you do, damned if you don't. But I

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>think you give yourself a better chance going for it.

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>That's anyway. I honestly, I think it's a that's a

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>good example of stats lying because the stats will tell

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you that they weren't terrible. But I don't think they

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>played a good game. I thought Robert Quinn actually he

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>had a good line where he was like, we had

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a bad day explosively in terms of limiting explosive plays. Yeah,

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and twelve yards, that's pretty good. You've got

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>three sacks, two of them came, or excuse me, one

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of them came, and a couple other pressures when it

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>really mattered. But explosive plays, I mean they had a

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>five play seventy five yard There were so many times

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>where I was like, okay, they're down for the count.

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>This game is now over, and then they just climbed

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 1>right back in. If they did it in the they

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 1>did in the first half where you know, they score

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>on the short field, I'm not going to kill all

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the defense for that. They've got put in a bad position.

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>But then after three punts, bad return sets him up,

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 1>they go forty yards and score a touchdown to to

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>clawback in it before the half, and then coming out

0:33:10.760 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of halftime ten plays seventy yards. I mean, they just

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>methodically moved it downfield. That included a thirty nine yard

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>pass the Hall got them down to the Dallas nine

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and then gave him an opportunity score. And then I

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>mean the really damning one for me. And I know

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Xavier Woods was heard and Donovan Wilson had to go

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 1>out there. I get that, but you know, it's thirty

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>five twenty one. They score, they get the two point conversion,

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of like, all right, there, we're iceing this

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>thing away. And then it's not just that they went

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and scored. They went in five five plays, seventy five yards,

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>took two minutes off the clock. Just just bad performance.

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I mean, you know, we talked about it

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>last week, like Driskolls got better athleticism than what you

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>would associate with a tall, white quarterback. He did, and

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>he burned him. And somebody said, yes last night in

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the post game. I can't remember one player said he

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:59.239
<v Speaker 1>ran a four? Four or four he ran he had

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody somebody mentioned that to me after I gave my

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Sky report. They were like, he ran a four or

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>five at the combine. I honestly I didn't know he

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 1>was that fast, but I knew he was more athletic

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>than you would associate with him running. There's some running

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 1>backs that don't run a four or five at the

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>combat like that is that's a really, really great time

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>for a quarterback. But the point being, like he did

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>so many things that sort of defied a basic scouting report,

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Like there were so many times that the pressure just

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of came off the edge and ran right past

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>him and gave him an easy lane. And honestly, I

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 1>said this during the game. I don't know if Jeff

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>driscoll was trying to prove something or what, but he

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>left about seventy five yards on the field by trying

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to make throws when he had room to run, like

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:42.399
<v Speaker 1>five or six different plays he had the first down,

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>he needs four yards or he needs eight yards, and

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 1>he tried to force a throw instead of just picking

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it up, like he could have run for one of them,

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 1>could have got picked he Yeah, no, I mean he

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 1>could have run for one hundred and extended several more

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 1>drives if he had just run, And thankfully he didn't

0:34:57.320 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>for the cowboys sake, but it was there so for

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 1>from this standpoint, the explosive plays. Do you think the

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys missed Jeff Heath yesterday? No, offense to Jeff Heath,

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:09.360
<v Speaker 1>but I don't. I mean, so many of them on

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>team that's you know, Rod Marinelli loves to keep him

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:15.839
<v Speaker 1>in the well like that's his line. And they did

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>not keep Jeff Driscoll in the well at all. They

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 1>did not, I mean he broke contain. And I'm not

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 1>so much talking about the quarterback explosive plays. I'm talking

0:35:25.800 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 1>about more some of those plays down fill, some of

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:29.839
<v Speaker 1>those passes that they were able to convert. The thirty

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>nine yard er, yeah, there was a twenty twenty one

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>yarder to a Mendola, twenty five yarder to Jones. I'm

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>wondering in those plays are you missing having the safety?

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing I'm trying to think if there was any

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:45.280
<v Speaker 1>play that I would make me think, oh, if Jeff

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Heath was in there, that would not have happened. You know,

0:35:48.800 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>he's not that difference maker for starters. I don't think

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.839
<v Speaker 1>of pass coverage as being like his amazing strength that

0:35:56.880 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>he's going to take those away. But then I'll contradict myself,

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Like Jeff Driscoll through for two hundred yards that's in

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the modern NFL. I will take that like you're just

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.359
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna give up some plays in football, Like that's

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>just is what it is. And so Kenny Galladay caught

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 1>one pass, Marvin Jones have four for forty three, two touchdowns.

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 1>But still like I'll take that stuff. It's the it's

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the explosive runs and not being able to get to driscoll.

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, up until the fourth quarter, it seemed like

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the pass rush either couldn't get to him or over

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:29.919
<v Speaker 1>pursued him. That's the stuff that bothers me more than

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 1>him throwing for a few chunk plays. I mean, I

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>get the sense. And we've I've heard a little bit

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 1>during the game after the game social media that you know,

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like, okay, is it. You know they won, but

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that they should have killed the Lions. I just don't agree.

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 1>Vegas doesn't agree. I mean, they did exactly what they

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>were supposed to do. One by eight on the line

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>was seven or seven and a half, that's what it was,

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and they did. I mean, like the thought of that

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>this team, this is a team that should be competing

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Super Bowl. They're not, Like, this is not

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 1>what the Cowboys are. They're not that great of a

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:07.839
<v Speaker 1>football team. That's why they're six and four. Can they

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>still get there? Yeah, they can't. They get on a

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>roll then get get hot. But this is I mean,

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 1>they did what they were supposed to do in this game.

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And if if Stafford would have played, maybe, you know,

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe would have been different. Maybe not. He's not going

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>for fifty yards a problems that we're brushing, but he

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>probably can throw for more in Galladay probably has more

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:27.400
<v Speaker 1>than one catch. I just think that based off that

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>this is exactly what the cow did, what they're supposed

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to do. If you don't like it, that's just on

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the way the team is. But this is what they

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>were supposed to do. More on your expectations, Yeah, I

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>mean at this point your expectations shouldn't be that different anybody.

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>By Thanksgiving you should have readjusted your expectations. But I

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>still think the way the way it happened, though, is

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>what gives me pause. Like my prediction was twenty seven

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to thirteen, and we said last week, like, this is

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 1>not a bad Lions team. They're not. They're not good,

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>but they're not. This is not the Jets, this is

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>not what they are. And yeah, um, but I don't know.

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Twenty seven points to a backup quarterback and a guy

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and a running back that they signed on Saturday. That

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that gives me pause. And I mean the defense, we

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 1>thought it would be so much better. The stats say

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they really didn't play a terrible game, but my eyes

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:15.240
<v Speaker 1>told me that they didn't play a good game. Yeah,

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you can't gift to anybody. That's the only way you're

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna you're gonna get a team like that in the

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 1>game is if you just fumble in the second play

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 1>of the game, or if you give up a punt

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to midfield, and you know, that doesn't mean the defense

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>has to let him score. You can't, you know, stop

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>him lead to a field goal. But yeah, it's short field,

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean you have to score touchdown, you know. So

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that they could have done a better job of buckling

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 1>down there, but you know, just driving down the field.

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:40.399
<v Speaker 1>They did it when they needed to, and that's that's

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the prevent style, you know, but usually it takes more

0:38:43.920 --> 0:38:46.280
<v Speaker 1>time off the clock than that. But I just think overall,

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it was a bad win. You know,

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 1>we had had a guy turned around and right on

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the field and said we should be killing these guys,

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just like, not really according to who you.

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:58.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just don't think so. I don't think

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 1>this team is as talented everyone thinks they are, that

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 1>they should be winning. They could have in this game,

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:06.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe one by fourteen. But they did it. I said

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>right after the game. It reminded me of the road

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>win against the Giants. Just I mean, yeah, you did

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 1>what you're supposed to do. It's not it's not an

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:19.360
<v Speaker 1>exciting win. It's not something that you should never feel

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:21.879
<v Speaker 1>bad about a win in the NFL. But but I don't,

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I didn't. I don't feel especially different about

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.799
<v Speaker 1>this team than I did on Saturday. I guess, you know. No,

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm encouraged that Dak can keep doing stuff like this.

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>That was Actually, this is my hypothetical for y'all. If

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you could rearrange it, they still win. We'll even say

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the margin is the same. But like Dak throws for

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:46.280
<v Speaker 1>two seventies, Zeke runs for one hundred and they score,

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty four. But the defense holds the Giants

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 1>down to like one hundred and seventy five yards, And

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 1>what did I said? The Giants Lions defense holds them

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to one eighty and ten points. I mean, just basically

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the same result, but it's more of a dominant defensive

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>performance than sixteen. Just kind of low. Yeah, well, okay,

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>they beat him twenty four sixteen. The offense is fine

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 1>but not great, and the defense really just kind of

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 1>sets the tone. Would you feel differently, would you feel better?

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it also depends on how the game played out,

0:40:16.840 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>because I think the feelings that people have right now

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:22.799
<v Speaker 1>about the defense wasn't necessarily about the end result as

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 1>much as it was what you saw, like they just

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>they weren't able like the things when you saw. There

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 1>was one drive in particular, and I remember which one

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:31.799
<v Speaker 1>it was, it was in the second half where they

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>were basically just gashing the Cowboys And that's where you know,

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to me, that's starting to look familiar now because there

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 1>have been several games this year where it's certain parts

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of the game offenses it happened against Minnesota. Will offense

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is just say we're about to run the ball and

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys are just like getting gashed just moving the

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 1>ball down the field. It's those kind of moments that

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>make you say, you know, regardless of what the outcome

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:53.839
<v Speaker 1>was at the end of the day, you know they

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't give up a ton of rushing yards. But when

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you watched it, you came away from it thinking, man,

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I said to you at one point, Nick, I was like,

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why they're not going to run the

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 1>ball every because they're getting as much as they want

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:08.399
<v Speaker 1>on the ground. And so that's where I still don't

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 1>know if I would feel differently if it was if

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 1>it was played the same way and the defense was

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:14.880
<v Speaker 1>giving up the stuff they were giving up in the

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:18.440
<v Speaker 1>way they gave it up. Well, maybe we can just driscoll.

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not that great of a quarterback. If

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:23.439
<v Speaker 1>we could just face like the best quarterback of all time,

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 1>then we can kind of figure out where they stand. Well,

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 1>he's can we do that? The question is is he

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna play like the greatest of all time now? Because

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:32.359
<v Speaker 1>he may not. He hasn't been playing like that. Let's

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 1>just put it like Brady came out that morning and

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>was like, Yeah, the strength of our team's defense. We're

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna lay it into that as much as we can.

0:41:38.360 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>You got it. I mean, the only way he's ever

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>been stopped is if you just get after his ass,

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and you have to that, and maybe the Cowboys have

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a guy on their team that is kind of pissed

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>off at the Patriots. That's nice, But the crazy, the

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 1>crazy part about that right now is they're winning with

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the offense not doing a ton. It's the defense that's

0:41:56.120 --> 0:41:59.280
<v Speaker 1>playing out of its mind and that matches up against

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboy st This is gonna be an interesting game.

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 1>And just when you look at the Cowboys do have

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 1>the number one offense, they still do. I mean in

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 1>five o nine, I don't. I can't imagine that they

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have the number one offense pages number one defense. Right,

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 1>let's go. We got like four more days of shows

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to fill. Guys. I do know this is gonna be fun,

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 1>all right to answer my sorry, answer my own question.

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I know. I know defenses win championships. I know the

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Pats won the Super Bowl thirteen to three. If my

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 1>quarterback can do that weekend and week out, give me

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:29.759
<v Speaker 1>that every time. And you know the Eagles won the

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl forty one thirty three. Their defense made like

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>one stop when it counted. Like, I'll take my chances

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that the defense can put it together just enough. But

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 1>if my offense is scoring and doing stuff like that

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>weekend and week out, I'll take that every the question

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:46.400
<v Speaker 1>will be can he do that again? A great defense

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:48.399
<v Speaker 1>and we saw it, we saw in New World, that's

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 1>what happened. Like you, it's a great defense. There are

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 1>many that believe. That's why they say defense when Chai

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Championships is they believe that a great defense will stop

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 1>a great offense. And so well, we'll see. I think

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.439
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of questions around that, but we're gonna

0:43:00.480 --> 0:43:03.400
<v Speaker 1>find out a lot about that this weekend. What a tease.

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate you, guys. Jonas. We were back tomorrow our

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>normal time till then for Nick Eatman, Dave Hambert, Dave,

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Dave Hellman, Dave Hamberg, Yeah, Dave Hellman, as will though

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I am Derek. This has been The Break live on

0:43:14.320 --> 0:43:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has been a production

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 1>of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.