WEBVTT - Building A Newspaper Out of the Internet with Molly White

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Al Zone Media.

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Hell and welcome to Better Offline.

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm, of course your host ed zetron as ever, and

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:25.800
<v Speaker 3>today I am joined by the incredible critic and author

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 3>of the Citation Needed newsletter Molly. Why Molly, thank you

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 3>for joining me, Thanks for having me. So you generally

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 3>seem to this is a strange way to put it.

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Actually love the internet can be like like you're mad

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 3>at what they've done to it, but you actually enjoy

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 3>the computer quite a lot.

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 4>Yes, big fan of the computer over here.

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 3>You wrote this fantastic thing about RSS, and I think

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 3>like a lot of people kind of have the idea

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 3>it's a feed. Can you walk people through exactly what

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 3>our SS is and why you like it so much?

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? So, RSS is just a protocol. It's sort of

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 4>a system by which websites can make their content available

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 4>to be ingested by programs called feed readers, which are

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 4>websites or applications or you know, can be an app

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 4>on your phone where you can pull together feeds from

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 4>any number of sources, whether it's the newsletters you follow,

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 4>the news organizations that you subscribe to, podcasts, YouTube videos,

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 4>massed on feeds, any sort of feed like structure can

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 4>be pulled into these feed readers, and then you can

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 4>read them anytime you want, on your own time, without

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, going to the substack app, opening your massed

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 4>on account, you know, going to wired dot com. And

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 4>it's a really wonderful way to interact with the web

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 4>these days, because it's sort of radically different from how

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot of uh are online or actions have become

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:08.799
<v Speaker 4>this sort of abusive you know, wrestling match with whatever

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 4>it is that you're trying to read. You know, the

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 4>content appears there. There's usually no ads in your RSS feed.

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 4>There's not any goodhead.

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 3>And is it like you could you said, you can

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 3>put Mastodon posts and Bluesky into it, like you can

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 3>have your social feeds in that too.

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 4>A ton of different services provide RSS feeds, sometimes without

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 4>people even realizing it, so pretty much any WordPress site

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 4>will publish an RSS feed. Every ghost blog has an

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 4>RSS feed by default. Substack has RSS on by default.

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 4>There are other you know, content management systems where it's

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 4>either on by default or easily enabled with a click

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 4>or so. And the real benefit to the person using

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 4>an RSS reader is that you don't don't have to

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 4>rely on the sort of algorithmic feeds that we have

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 4>become accustomed to, where you know, if you go to

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 4>Twitter and you just want to see, you know, news

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 4>articles written by the journalists that you chose to follow, there,

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 4>chances are you're not going to see that. You're going

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 4>to see Twitter ads, You're going to see rage bait

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 4>that's being boosted.

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 2>By the algorithm four or five. That kind of yeah, like.

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk's posts always show up even though you don't

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 4>follow him, right, and then the journalists that you did

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 4>go out of your way to follow, the chances are

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 4>you're not going to see the news articles they wrote

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 4>because Twitter do downranks links, and so.

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 2>That's the same thing with threats as well, I think.

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, I mean it's extent Facebook. I mean, a

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 4>lot of social media websites have started down ranking links

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 4>to try to convince people to stay on the platforms

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 4>rather than going to wherever people actually publish their work.

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 4>And it's this horrendous situation for both publishers and readers.

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 4>And so you could sort of opt out of it

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 4>by using RSS to follow these things very directly and

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 4>avoid a lot of the surveillance and a lot of

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 4>the you know, sort of abusive practices that we're increasingly

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 4>seeing on platforms.

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 2>And do they still get the traffic?

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 3>So that was that's the one thing with ours that

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 3>they've really been able to get my hangof, because I know,

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't get subscribers like I won't get like reads,

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 3>which is fine, but does this does this not like

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 3>slightly disadvantaged publishers and suppurse they haven't turned it off?

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, it depends a lot on how a publisher makes

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 4>their money. So for example, I write a newsletter. People

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 4>can pay to subscribe to my newsletter, and it's really

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 4>no different to me if they read it in their

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 4>email inbox, if they come to my website, or if

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 4>they you know, read it in their RSS reader. You know,

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 4>it's sort of all the same. And then people who

0:04:56.760 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 4>publish Paywalt's content can an opt to have either excerpts

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 4>of their posts published on their RSS feeds or increasingly

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 4>we're starting to see people create subscriber RSS feeds so

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 4>that if you do yep, and you know, I subscribe

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 4>to four or four media and so I have a

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 4>specific RSS feed that I can follow there that gives

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 4>me the full text articles and so you know that's

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 4>a way in which publishers can still earn money through

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 4>subscriptions while offering RSS feeds. The place where it can

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 4>be challenging is ads supported, you know, publishers where they

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 4>really rely on you visiting the website to get the

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 4>AD traffic. And so you'll often see ads supported publishers

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 4>publishing excerpts from their RSS feeds, but not full text,

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 4>meaning that if you're following them in a feed reader,

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 4>you still have to open the page and it takes

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 4>you to the website and they get the traffic. And

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 4>so that's how a lot of those sites get around it.

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 4>But there are websites that basically decide that it's you know,

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 4>sort of a lost leader. It's like the Costco retissory chicken.

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 4>It gets people in the door, even if they lose

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.359
<v Speaker 4>some AD revenue. You know, you're still seeing their material

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 4>more that you might not otherwise, you're still visiting the site,

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 4>you might sign up for a subscription, whatever it might be,

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 4>And so they sort of decided it's a worthwhile trade off.

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 3>And you use innerader, right I do. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned this is a really specific one. But I

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 3>saw on your piece you were saying you no longer

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.919
<v Speaker 3>recommend Feedley. And I've heard Feedley mentioned a few times.

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Why is that.

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So I used to use Feedley, and I used

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 4>to recommend them pretty widely. You know, they were doing

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 4>they had a very nice, full featured RSS reader, and

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 4>then they sort of started to pivot in ways that

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 4>were a little bit uncomfortable, where it was very clear

0:06:56.440 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 4>that they were targeting you know, cybersecurity recres a lot

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 4>of the time and very like corporate uh you know people. Yeah,

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 4>it was a very odd like subset of traffic where

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 4>they were constantly trying to help me, like follow threats

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 4>online and stuff like that. Yes, they and then so

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 4>but that was fine, you know, I was like, Okay,

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm not the demographic for this.

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they've just changed their business.

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, except that once they after they did that for

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 4>a little bit, I started to get promotions about tracking

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 4>strikes and it was all about monitoring where there might

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:35.680
<v Speaker 4>be strikes happening.

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh and it.

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 4>There they they say that they sort of yeah, exactly.

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 4>They tried to sort of after I, you know, wrote

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 4>to them a little bit about this, they tried to

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 4>sort of play it off as like bad messaging and

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 4>that they were really just trying to help people protect.

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Their help people strike.

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it definitely came off as sort of strike breaking

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 4>as a service, and I decided I was done with

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 4>feed ley finally. Yeah, right, what we've all been waiting for.

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 4>But I mean, the one thing I really love about

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 4>RSS is that you know, it's a protocol, it's not

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 4>a service that you're locked into, and so it's actually

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 4>very easy to switch RSS readers if one of them

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 4>decides that it's going to start surveilling strikes.

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 2>That's a good question.

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 3>How does how do you so if you sit and

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 3>I really I'll be linking to this piece conspicuously or

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 3>excellent rss pace, but how do you move? Was actually

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 3>one of my questions.

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 4>It's incredibly easy. Pretty much every RSS reader allows you

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 4>to export all of the RSS feeds that you follow,

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 4>and it's just a simple XML file. It's the same

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:46.319
<v Speaker 4>thing that I used to publish my blog role in

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 4>my website. So if you're curious, like what blogs I read,

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 4>I just export those, you know, folders into a PML

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 4>file is with what it's called, and then I put

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 4>in on my website.

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 3>But the same just just open that file in Yeah,

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 3>what inner reader or what have you?

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 4>And it took me probably ten seconds to switch from

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 4>Feebley to my new very readers. Yeah.

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Wow, there is there's some stuff in the Internet that

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 3>works still.

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 2>It's magic.

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 3>And having you want here to talk about RSS was

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 3>important because first of all, people say I complain all

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 3>the time, and they are right, and it's just it's

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 3>nice to see that there are still some functional parts

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 3>of the Internet. Is there other other parts that you

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 3>actually like, other feet things like I don't know, RSS

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 3>that you use regularly that could make make the world's

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 3>make our listeners internet world's a little bit better.

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I think it's all part of a

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 4>theme of sort of avoiding these intermediaries that have these

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 4>incredibly extractive relationships with both the users and you know

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 4>and off publishers who are on, you know, the other

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 4>side of that relationship. And so I do everything I

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 4>can to sort of avoid those intermediaries where possible, and so,

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, for example, I write a newsletter. I use

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 4>the Ghost newsletter software, where you know, the relationship that

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 4>I have with the people who subscribe to me is

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 4>very direct. You know, people are subscribing to Molly White,

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 4>the writer, They're not subscribing to ghost the website that

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 4>then you know, danes to give me a cut of

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 4>whatever they're taking in, which is unlike some of the

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 4>other services out there, for example Patreon, where you know,

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 4>if you set up a Patreon account, everyone is actually

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 4>in a financial relationship with Patreon, not with you, and

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 4>so if you decide to leave, it can be incredibly

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 4>challenging to move people to another service, whereas with Ghosts,

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 4>if I want to leave, I can just set up

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 4>somewhere else, I can export my subscribers. The financial relationships

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 4>are already just directly with me, and so that's a

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 4>very powerful thing, the sort of escape hatch, where now

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.719
<v Speaker 4>if Ghosts decides, you know, hey, maybe we're gonna i

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 4>don't know, slap ads on everyone's newsletter without them agreeing

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 4>to it, they now have this incentive on the other end,

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 4>which is like, well, Molly and all the other people

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 4>who publish with ghost might not like that, and they

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 4>might just leave because they can, whereas other services that

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 4>have more of a locked in relationship can make those

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 4>decisions and take the gamble that well, it's so hard

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 4>to leave that people are probably just going to put

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 4>up with it, and so that's that's one place where

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 4>I do that. You know, there are sort of other

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 4>services throughout the web that you know, are sort of

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 4>similar where I try to keep the intermediaries to a

0:11:58.559 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 4>bare minimum.

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 3>I used Ghost myself when I used outposts from They're

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 3>very good.

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 2>It's basically it's.

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 3>One of the things I actually like about Ghost is

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 3>that you can build a company on top of it,

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 3>and the company is just, hey, we'll provide some of

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 3>those slick little features that you get from a substack

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.679
<v Speaker 3>or what have you, like following up with people if

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 3>their credit cards expired or what have you. But it's

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 3>and it's also for giant babies like me who can't

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 3>do code.

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 2>I didn't vibe coded, I swear.

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 3>But thinking of Substack, I've never seen a company go

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 3>quite as weirdly as them, putting aside on them obvious

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 3>promotions of nazis. It feels as if substack has just

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 3>turned into another dogshit social network.

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I mean substack is a weird platform because they

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 4>do in some ways have that similar ethos of you know,

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 4>your subscribers are subscribing to you, not to substack, and

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 4>so it's easy to leave to some extent, where you know,

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 4>I used to be on Substack. I decided to leave.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 4>I exported all of my email contacts, you know, I

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 4>moved all of my content to a different website and

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 4>it went fairly smoothly. And that's always been a part

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 4>of substax marketing is you know, this is a very

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 4>direct relationship. You'll be able to leave if you want.

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 4>But I'm getting the impression increasingly that they're almost regretting

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 4>that decision and that they are trying to install ways

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 4>that lock people into the platform without effectively locking people

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 4>in by trying to cut off their you know, escape

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.559
<v Speaker 4>patch essentially. You know, they could say, sorry, you can't

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 4>export your email lists anymore, or we're going to make

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.079
<v Speaker 4>it really challenging for you to get, you know, move

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 4>your content off the platform. And they haven't directly done that,

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 4>but they are.

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 2>They've got this following thing now.

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 4>Well that's that's what I was going to say, is

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 4>they are sort of trying to add in these new

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, so called features that make it very challenging

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 4>for people to leave. So there's now followers, which are

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 4>different from subscribers, and the ideas that you know, if

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 4>you attract followers, they may eventually convert into a subscriber,

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 4>and that's very potentially valuable, but you can't take your

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 4>followers with you. They have this sort of network and

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 4>this almost like short form social media platform now where

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 4>you publish these notes and you know, those don't come

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 4>with you when you leave. They are increased. Yeah, they're

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 4>increasingly encouraging people to use the substack app, you know,

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 4>which is the idea then, is that if you leave substack,

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 4>all of these people who've gotten used to reading on

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 4>the substack app will no longer find you, and they won't,

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, get access to your writing because you're not

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 4>there anymore. And so you know, we see this sort

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 4>of constant gravitational pull of in sertification to use Cory

0:14:55.720 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 4>Doctor's word, where you know, platform increasingly are trying to

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 4>keep people locked in so that they can then extract

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 4>more value both from the publisher and and from the

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 4>consumer and while making the experience worse for both.

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and you're kind of seeing and you've mentioned this

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 3>in your artcle as well. Publishers are moving towards the

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 3>newsletter format as well.

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 2>It's like twenty twenty one.

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Again, I don't know, do you remember in twenty twenty one,

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 3>when you had like The Atlantic and there was that

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 3>weird side channel thing, like all these people were like, oh,

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 3>we're going to build a community. Just gave up on that, right,

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 3>But it's you're seeing everyone starting newsletters again. It's just

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 3>you made the point as words at this point, it's

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 3>just moving stuff into your inbox in a way that

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 3>people probably don't necessarily want or at least find a

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 3>little overwhelming.

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So that is sort of the downside of this

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 4>newsletter boom, which is that it's exhausting if you read

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 4>a lot of newsletters, which I do you know to

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 4>get you know, if you follow ten newsletter writers who

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 4>are publishing maybe once a week, twice a week something

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 4>like that, then constantly throughout your workday or your weekend,

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 4>you're getting, you know, a notification in you're in box

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 4>at sort of a random time you need to read

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 4>this email, which maybe you're in the middle of something

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 4>and it's not time, you know, not a good time

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 4>for you to read, and so it's just sort of

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 4>constantly lurking there or waiting for you to read it.

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 4>It's you know, potentially edging out other more time critical

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 4>emails that you need to pay attention to and it's

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 4>just sort of this you know, daly uge of material.

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 4>Whereas it used to be that you know, you would

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 4>go to the websites that you follow, or you know,

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 4>open the physical newsletter or newspaper that you receive in

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 4>your mail, and you know, you could sit down and

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 4>read the news with your morning coffee. And now it's

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 4>sort of a different you know, it's it's more of

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 4>a push relationship than a pull relationship. You're not going

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 4>to read, you are being sort of inundated with the reading.

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 4>And so RSS is a really nice, uh way in

0:16:56.360 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 4>my opinion, to handle that as a reader, because now

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, if I subscribe to your newsletter, I can

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, turn off the email notifications, but put the

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 4>RSS feed in my feed reader, and then at my

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 4>leisure when I feel like reading my newsletters or going

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 4>and catching up on the news or whatever it is

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 4>that I'm reading, I can go do that and it's

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 4>all in that one place. And my email in box

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 4>is you know, safe to have just emails and all

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 4>of the stuff that's more suited to that.

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 3>It is funny, we kind of feel like everyone has

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 3>built these obtuse and complex ways of delivering the news

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 3>or selling the news, or getting people news in different forms,

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 3>and for the most part, the thing that keeps working

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 3>is the thing from what twenty thirty years ago, just

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 3>like reading words on a page. It's it's funny as well,

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 3>because looking at this move back to newsletters, like I

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 3>hate to give me like Petel any credit at all,

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 3>but Google zero is a real effect. I think, I

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 3>don't know if it's going to zero, but it's it's

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm still getting a ton for my newsletter. But it

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 3>is funny to watch people try and get back to newsletters.

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 3>But it almost feels like they're just treating them as

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.719
<v Speaker 3>the same thing as a regular article, rather than a

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 3>unique way of delivering use.

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Which I guess it is.

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 3>But I feel like that the email format is not

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 3>treated with any any necessary particular respect. It's just almost

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 3>become a dumping ground for these companies. Like it's just like, hey,

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 3>I think I with Washington Post. Let's see if I

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 3>still get them, because I got really pissed off. There

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 3>was a point when I was getting four or five

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 3>emails a day from the rest Word of God. It's

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 3>just its abuse on your inbox. In the same way

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 3>abuses your feed and so one and so forth right.

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 4>I think that's really true, is that especially high volume

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 4>publishers really need to grapple with the strategy when it

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 4>comes to these types of relationships with subscribers, because you know,

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 4>it's one thing to publish twenty articles a day on

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.439
<v Speaker 4>you know, Washington Post dot com. That's not you know,

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 4>that's not a problem for anybody. In fact, people probably

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 4>enjoy all of that choice. But getting twenty separate emails

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 4>is not a viable way to have, you know, a

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 4>respectful relationship with the people who have chosen to subscribe.

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 4>And so I think that, you know, it is incredibly

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 4>important to consider that. As you know, if you're a

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 4>publication that's thinking about creating a newsletter, is like, what

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 4>do people actually have the appetite to read? And how

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 4>can we maintain, you know, a respectful relationship with these

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 4>people who have you know, chosen to receive this material.

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 3>And my answer is ten thousand words, just some ten

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 3>thousand words every week or so. No one ever emails

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 3>me to say my stuff is too long. No one

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 3>has ever complained about it.

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 5>It's great.

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of depressing on some level though, because the

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 3>way it's going. I don't know how these large publishers can,

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 3>like it's like they don't understand any particular format. They're

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 3>just they're doing newsletters. Don't trying to bag on the

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 3>verge too much.

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know.

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Suddenly them doing newsletters a lot in the last year

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 3>doesn't feel like it's specific to It doesn't feel like

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 3>it's a specific format. It's just like, please give us

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 3>your emails so that we can continue to email you,

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 3>which is desperate.

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I think there is sort of reasonable desperation.

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I must be clear, like I totally understand

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 2>why they.

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I think a lot of publishers have

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 4>realized that relying on intermediaries, whether it's social media platforms

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 4>like Twitter to get your news in front of people,

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 4>or you know, Google search was used to be a

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 4>massive way that you know, news publications received readership. And

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 4>now you know, as people are increasingly using the excerpts

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 4>on Google, they're not clicking through to the page.

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 3>And you say accepts, you mean the AI summaries. It

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 3>depends on the summary.

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it used to be that Google News would just

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:11.679
<v Speaker 4>show like a literal excerpt from uh you know, the

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 4>top result, and then people would often not visit the

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 4>underlying website or you know, you see the like Wikipedia

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 4>knowledge panels that that just sort of summarize what you're

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 4>looking for. But now, yeah, more recently there's the AI

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 4>overviews that you know, attempt to do sort of a

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 4>similar thing, but often drawing from multiple sources. And then

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, if people are satisfied with what they see there,

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 4>they often don't click through. They don't either see the

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:42.679
<v Speaker 4>ads that are funding the website, or they don't, you know,

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 4>see the invitations to subscribe, They don't you know, view

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 4>all the other material that might be available to them,

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 4>and so on, and so the traffic is dwindling at

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 4>a sort of alarming rate. And so I think a

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 4>lot of these publishers are trying to get more direct

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 4>relationships with readers, and email newsletters are a way that

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 4>they're doing that, which I think is very reasonable. I mean,

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 4>I think that it is you know, incredibly important as

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 4>a writer to have a very direct relationship with your readers,

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 4>because if you are relying on Twitter or Google Search,

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 4>then the second Twitter or Google Search decides it's more

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 4>profitable for them to twiddle the knobs in a way

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 4>that is going to cut off the you know, flow

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 4>of subscribers to you. They're going to do so, and

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 4>you're going to be up a creek essentially. But I

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 4>do think that, you know, there needs to be some

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 4>thought put into this, especially by high volume publications, so

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 4>that they are not essentially, you know, directing a fire

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 4>hose at their readers and essentially turning them off from

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 4>the publication.

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it's also a challenge for a publication versus

0:22:58.080 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 3>a person, because we were talking about this on the

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 3>last episode, how it's people will gladly pay for a

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 3>person paying for an outlet that's different. I also think

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 3>the other problem is, and I'm not just to be clear,

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 3>I know I bag on the verge. This isn't about

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 3>them specifically, but it's the problem that I've seen with

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 3>legacy media at least, is they're terrified of giving a

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 3>voice to their people. They'll give it to their top columnists,

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 3>but they think, oh no, if we let people develop

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 3>a personal relationship with the writer, then they could leave

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 3>and have some sort of autonomy of their future.

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 2>It's not why we're in this business. But now it's

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 2>going back the other way.

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 3>Where they realized, oh crap, that's the only way in

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 3>which people will have any kind of sticky relationship with us.

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 3>After winning the fil for It Again award eleven times

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 3>in the space of fifteen years, with Google and everyone else,

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 3>even I am actually like I loved substack at the

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 3>beginning because it was free, it was really easy to use.

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 3>It was just a platform. Hamosh would go out and

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 3>do these things about this is the future of media,

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 3>and media is good and we love being free here.

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 3>But I think that just it was everything. It was

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 3>exactly what happens every time. It's oh, right, we need

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 3>to make more money than we spend.

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, how do we do that? Hmmm.

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 3>And it's just it's an inevitable point because it's almost

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 3>I have here is my media theory. I think media

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 3>outlets are just too big. I think if they need

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 3>to cap out at some point, because all of the

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 3>problems we talk about, every single one seems to start

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 3>when they get too large for a company or a

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 3>media outlet, they get too large to have any personality,

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 3>or they get to the point where they're too large

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 3>to have an editor who actually still writes and has

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 3>a personality themselves. So it's like, ah, we can't give

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 3>people too much freedom or anything. It's it's disappointing as well,

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 3>because you've kind of proven this exceedingly well with your

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 3>many successes, where it's like people will pay for someone

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 3>who is themselves, stands for something and gives a shit right,

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 3>and yet they don't want to copy that.

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think you're totally right on that where you

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 4>newspapers are sort of afraid of letting writers develop their

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 4>own personalities. As you say, I mean, you see this

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 4>with large newspapers, you know, restricting their writers on social

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 4>media for example, where if they say something to opinionated

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 4>on social media, that's you know, against the social media policy.

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 4>And you know, I think that is very contrary to

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 4>what people are looking for. They want to see people

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 4>who have strong opinions and strong beliefs and strong principles

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:31.719
<v Speaker 4>and stand up for those things. And so I do

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 4>think that, you know, that's a shortcoming. But I also

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 4>agree that newspapers, some some publications seem to be realizing

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 4>that that sort of direct relationship with a writer is

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 4>a valuable thing. You know, I mentioned my piece that

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 4>Wired was also one of the outlets that has recently

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 4>announced a major newsletter push, and their strategy has been,

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, here's five or ten options for different newsletters

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 4>that you can read, and they're written by specific people

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 4>at Wired who are you know, seen to be experts

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 4>in a specific area, so you can follow, you know,

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 4>the Kylie Robison Wired newsletter and I was.

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Like, mist Robinson's mudile behavior, I'll put a link in that, right.

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 4>And I saw that, and I was like, oh, hell yeah,

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 4>sign me up because I know that her work is

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 4>incredible and I'm going to read it when it shows

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 4>up in my newsletter or in my my feed reader.

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Whereas you know, I don't read every single article that

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 4>Wired publishes because that's just not feasible. Yeah, And so

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 4>I think that you know, publications would be wise to

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 4>do more of that and to sort of understand that

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 4>people do look at bylines, they do have specific authors

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 4>who they trust or who's writing they enjoy more, or

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 4>whatever it may be, rather than going for the sort

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 4>of faceless you know, we're just the Washington Post or

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 4>we're just the New York Times and the author doesn't

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 4>really matter.

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 3>It's classic, it's honestly, it's NBA Brain is its core

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 3>pro Brain where it's like, well, how do we how

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 3>do do you think that a person like thinks, oh,

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 3>I love my relationship with the New York Times, But

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 3>that's how they're thinking about it, Like, yeah, what is

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 3>the consumer's relationship with the newspulbl There is no relationship

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 3>with the newspaper. There might be a vibe, but there

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 3>is not a relationship. I think the Financial Times is

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 3>actually found, though not in the newsletter era. They've found

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 3>a very good balance between hard news and excellently they've

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 3>got Bryce Elder Skags as well as over a Baron's

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 3>now but you've got Alphaville. They found a way to

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 3>unleash it, and the ft has done very well. It's

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 3>just I don't know, there's some part that feels like

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 3>this is the come upance for fifteen twenty years of

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 3>hubris of follow, Google follow meta follow whoever will send

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 3>us traffic, build build as big as possible on this.

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and also the sort of view from nowhere news approach,

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 4>where you know, it's the belief was that there shouldn't

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.080
<v Speaker 4>be any sort of opinion, There's wouldn't be any sort

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:05.199
<v Speaker 4>of you know, principled analysis. It should all just be

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, both sides ism and this supposedly objective reporting,

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:14.719
<v Speaker 4>which does strip out a lot of the personality of

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 4>the writer, and it removes a lot of the you know,

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 4>reason that people identify with or appreciate specific writers. And

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 4>so I think that this was to some extent sort

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.920
<v Speaker 4>of a crisis of their own doing. In that sense

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 4>as well.

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 3>I also think that I also think that the raw

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 3>economics of media might be completely fucked on some level.

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 3>I think that there's just you see, and I think

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 3>it's because of the Google traffic and the social traffic

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 3>as well. You've got these massive ad stuffs, you've got

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 3>these massive social staffs every and it doesn't seem to

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 3>necessarily connect to anything.

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't. I don't know if it like drives results

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:57.239
<v Speaker 2>or not. I truly don't know.

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 3>But it's the way that every single media outlet at

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 3>some point in the last few years has act like

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 3>it's been acted like it's been pecked to death by birds.

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Just acted like the verge added their pay well, and

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 3>I get it, by the way things cost money, but

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 3>it's it almost feels as if these castles have been

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 3>built for a land that no longer exists anymore.

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I think that the news landscape is

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 4>incredibly challenging right now for a number of reasons. You know,

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 4>there's the traffic issues, there's the AI scraping issues that

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 4>are you know, causing a lot of news outlets to

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 4>put up paywalls that are then you know, blocking people

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 4>who previously like real people, not scrapers, who might previously

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 4>have you know, visited their sites and enjoyed their work.

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 4>And you know, now you see this double edged sword

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 4>whereas people paywall news media, you know, they might block

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 4>scrapers to some extent, but they're also blocking people from

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 4>reading the material that might then incentive them to subscribe.

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, if every article is paywall, there is no

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 4>way to know if you're going to like what's behind

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 4>the paywall, right And so I think that, you know,

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:13.239
<v Speaker 4>this is sort of an incredibly challenging moment for a

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 4>lot of news organizations that are really struggling to figure

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 4>out how to deal with it, you know, how to

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 4>maintain a sustainable news business when you're facing those types

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 4>of threats. You're also facing political threats, increasingly, especially in

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 4>the United States, for publishing any sort of controversial material

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 4>about the administration or you know, there's you're seeing an

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 4>incredible unwillingness by a lot of major publications to have

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 4>strong opinions or to say anything that is you know,

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 4>not supported by ten separate sources, you know, any kind

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 4>of speculation, that type of thing, because of the legal

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 4>environment that we're in. And so, you know, I have

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 4>some sympathy I think for a lot of these publications

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 4>that are trying to navigate it. But I also think

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:11.680
<v Speaker 4>that the ways in which they have been navigating it

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 4>have often been pretty misguided.

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 3>So to wrap us up, is there anything giving you

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 3>any hope online right now, anything that like genuinely is

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 3>like thinking things can be okay, even in a different form.

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean I would say so, I do think

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 4>that there. You know, one thing that has been made

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 4>very clear to me is that people still care a

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 4>lot about good writing and people who have you know,

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 4>new or interesting analysis. You know a lot of people

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 4>sort of look at the way that I do my newsletter,

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 4>which is, you know, everything is free. There's no paywall.

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 4>You don't have to even sign up, much less subscribe,

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 4>and I have a pay what you want model, so

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 4>you could pay you know, dollar a month, you can

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 4>pay ten dollars a month, whatever you want. And people

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 4>look at that and they're like, that can't work. You know,

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 4>they're like, no one's going.

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 2>To do that. And it works great.

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it works great. And you know, people sort of

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 4>have this belief that, well, if something's free, no one's

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 4>ever going to pay for it, which isn't true. I

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 4>think that people will actually strongly value the work that

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 4>people are doing even if they're not forced to pay

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 4>for it, and they understand that people need support to

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 4>be able to continue to do their work, and they

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 4>will gladly provide that. And so I do think that

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, there are models available that will work very

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 4>well that we can try, and different people are trying

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 4>those models. You know, we're seeing it widely throughout the

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 4>media landscape where people are just trying new things, whether

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 4>it's you know, the four or four medias and the

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 4>defectors and those folks who are doing you know, worker

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 4>owned media collectives that are doing incredible work. I mean

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 4>four or four is you know, trailblazing. I think in

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 4>a lot of ways their reporting is incredible and there

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, their sort of model is incredible. You know,

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing people very proactively setting up ways in which

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 4>they can create sustainable media that does not rely on ads,

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 4>that does not require paywalls, that does not you know,

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 4>rely on clickbait through social media websites, and so I

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 4>am very optimistic in some ways, even though the sort

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 4>of landscape is also fairly terrifying.

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 3>And on that that note will end it there, Molly,

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 3>where can people find you?

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>So?

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 4>You can find my newsletter at Citation needed dot news.

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 4>And then I am also at Mollywhite dot net, which

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 4>has links to all my social media and everything else.

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 3>And you can find me on this podcast better offline

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 3>dot com as well. And yeah, you can catch us

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 3>on the monologue this week. Molly, thank you so much

0:33:57.680 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 3>for joining us, and this has been Better Offline.

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for listening to Better Offline.

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 6>The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:14.879
<v Speaker 6>is Matasowski. You can check out more of his music

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 6>and audio projects at Matasowski dot com, M A T

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 6>T O S O W s ki dot com. You

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 6>can email me at easy at better offline dot com,

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 6>or visit better offline dot com to find more podcast

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.320
<v Speaker 6>links and of course my newsletter. I also really recommend

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 6>you go to Chat dot Where's Youreed dot at to

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 6>visit the discord, and go to our slash Better.

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:38.879
<v Speaker 2>Offline to check out our reddit. Thank you so much

0:34:38.920 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 2>for listening.

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Better Offline is a production of cool Zone Media. For

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:46.280
<v Speaker 1>more from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool Zonemedia

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:34:50.640 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 4>You get your podcasts.