1 00:00:02,440 --> 00:00:03,960 Speaker 1: Al Zone Media. 2 00:00:07,800 --> 00:00:09,280 Speaker 2: Hell and welcome to Better Offline. 3 00:00:09,320 --> 00:00:23,479 Speaker 3: I'm, of course your host ed zetron as ever, and 4 00:00:23,560 --> 00:00:25,800 Speaker 3: today I am joined by the incredible critic and author 5 00:00:25,840 --> 00:00:29,040 Speaker 3: of the Citation Needed newsletter Molly. Why Molly, thank you 6 00:00:29,080 --> 00:00:32,360 Speaker 3: for joining me, Thanks for having me. So you generally 7 00:00:32,560 --> 00:00:34,199 Speaker 3: seem to this is a strange way to put it. 8 00:00:34,240 --> 00:00:37,280 Speaker 3: Actually love the internet can be like like you're mad 9 00:00:37,280 --> 00:00:39,080 Speaker 3: at what they've done to it, but you actually enjoy 10 00:00:39,120 --> 00:00:40,400 Speaker 3: the computer quite a lot. 11 00:00:40,800 --> 00:00:42,920 Speaker 4: Yes, big fan of the computer over here. 12 00:00:43,640 --> 00:00:47,560 Speaker 3: You wrote this fantastic thing about RSS, and I think 13 00:00:47,640 --> 00:00:50,440 Speaker 3: like a lot of people kind of have the idea 14 00:00:50,560 --> 00:00:52,920 Speaker 3: it's a feed. Can you walk people through exactly what 15 00:00:53,080 --> 00:00:55,560 Speaker 3: our SS is and why you like it so much? 16 00:00:56,400 --> 00:00:59,960 Speaker 4: Yeah? So, RSS is just a protocol. It's sort of 17 00:01:00,480 --> 00:01:05,280 Speaker 4: a system by which websites can make their content available 18 00:01:06,360 --> 00:01:10,320 Speaker 4: to be ingested by programs called feed readers, which are 19 00:01:10,520 --> 00:01:13,640 Speaker 4: websites or applications or you know, can be an app 20 00:01:13,680 --> 00:01:18,800 Speaker 4: on your phone where you can pull together feeds from 21 00:01:19,080 --> 00:01:22,480 Speaker 4: any number of sources, whether it's the newsletters you follow, 22 00:01:22,680 --> 00:01:28,200 Speaker 4: the news organizations that you subscribe to, podcasts, YouTube videos, 23 00:01:28,319 --> 00:01:32,640 Speaker 4: massed on feeds, any sort of feed like structure can 24 00:01:32,680 --> 00:01:36,039 Speaker 4: be pulled into these feed readers, and then you can 25 00:01:36,080 --> 00:01:38,880 Speaker 4: read them anytime you want, on your own time, without 26 00:01:39,040 --> 00:01:42,240 Speaker 4: you know, going to the substack app, opening your massed 27 00:01:42,360 --> 00:01:46,800 Speaker 4: on account, you know, going to wired dot com. And 28 00:01:46,959 --> 00:01:50,520 Speaker 4: it's a really wonderful way to interact with the web 29 00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:56,440 Speaker 4: these days, because it's sort of radically different from how 30 00:01:56,680 --> 00:02:01,680 Speaker 4: a lot of uh are online or actions have become 31 00:02:02,440 --> 00:02:08,799 Speaker 4: this sort of abusive you know, wrestling match with whatever 32 00:02:08,840 --> 00:02:11,920 Speaker 4: it is that you're trying to read. You know, the 33 00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:16,840 Speaker 4: content appears there. There's usually no ads in your RSS feed. 34 00:02:17,880 --> 00:02:19,919 Speaker 4: There's not any goodhead. 35 00:02:20,080 --> 00:02:21,720 Speaker 3: And is it like you could you said, you can 36 00:02:21,720 --> 00:02:24,360 Speaker 3: put Mastodon posts and Bluesky into it, like you can 37 00:02:24,400 --> 00:02:25,720 Speaker 3: have your social feeds in that too. 38 00:02:25,960 --> 00:02:26,200 Speaker 4: Yeah. 39 00:02:26,760 --> 00:02:27,000 Speaker 1: Yeah. 40 00:02:27,400 --> 00:02:32,840 Speaker 4: A ton of different services provide RSS feeds, sometimes without 41 00:02:32,880 --> 00:02:36,520 Speaker 4: people even realizing it, so pretty much any WordPress site 42 00:02:36,560 --> 00:02:40,080 Speaker 4: will publish an RSS feed. Every ghost blog has an 43 00:02:40,200 --> 00:02:44,040 Speaker 4: RSS feed by default. Substack has RSS on by default. 44 00:02:45,040 --> 00:02:48,480 Speaker 4: There are other you know, content management systems where it's 45 00:02:48,520 --> 00:02:51,280 Speaker 4: either on by default or easily enabled with a click 46 00:02:51,360 --> 00:02:57,880 Speaker 4: or so. And the real benefit to the person using 47 00:02:57,919 --> 00:03:00,520 Speaker 4: an RSS reader is that you don't don't have to 48 00:03:00,600 --> 00:03:04,040 Speaker 4: rely on the sort of algorithmic feeds that we have 49 00:03:04,200 --> 00:03:07,240 Speaker 4: become accustomed to, where you know, if you go to 50 00:03:07,280 --> 00:03:11,480 Speaker 4: Twitter and you just want to see, you know, news 51 00:03:11,600 --> 00:03:14,480 Speaker 4: articles written by the journalists that you chose to follow, there, 52 00:03:15,120 --> 00:03:17,040 Speaker 4: chances are you're not going to see that. You're going 53 00:03:17,120 --> 00:03:20,560 Speaker 4: to see Twitter ads, You're going to see rage bait 54 00:03:20,639 --> 00:03:22,080 Speaker 4: that's being boosted. 55 00:03:21,600 --> 00:03:25,720 Speaker 2: By the algorithm four or five. That kind of yeah, like. 56 00:03:25,600 --> 00:03:28,240 Speaker 4: Elon Musk's posts always show up even though you don't 57 00:03:28,280 --> 00:03:32,240 Speaker 4: follow him, right, and then the journalists that you did 58 00:03:32,280 --> 00:03:35,120 Speaker 4: go out of your way to follow, the chances are 59 00:03:35,160 --> 00:03:37,080 Speaker 4: you're not going to see the news articles they wrote 60 00:03:37,120 --> 00:03:39,800 Speaker 4: because Twitter do downranks links, and so. 61 00:03:40,000 --> 00:03:41,960 Speaker 2: That's the same thing with threats as well, I think. 62 00:03:42,040 --> 00:03:44,760 Speaker 4: But yeah, I mean it's extent Facebook. I mean, a 63 00:03:44,800 --> 00:03:48,080 Speaker 4: lot of social media websites have started down ranking links 64 00:03:48,120 --> 00:03:50,840 Speaker 4: to try to convince people to stay on the platforms 65 00:03:50,920 --> 00:03:53,960 Speaker 4: rather than going to wherever people actually publish their work. 66 00:03:54,520 --> 00:03:58,760 Speaker 4: And it's this horrendous situation for both publishers and readers. 67 00:03:58,920 --> 00:04:01,280 Speaker 4: And so you could sort of opt out of it 68 00:04:01,360 --> 00:04:05,040 Speaker 4: by using RSS to follow these things very directly and 69 00:04:05,160 --> 00:04:07,880 Speaker 4: avoid a lot of the surveillance and a lot of 70 00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:12,960 Speaker 4: the you know, sort of abusive practices that we're increasingly 71 00:04:13,000 --> 00:04:14,920 Speaker 4: seeing on platforms. 72 00:04:14,880 --> 00:04:17,240 Speaker 2: And do they still get the traffic? 73 00:04:17,440 --> 00:04:19,280 Speaker 3: So that was that's the one thing with ours that 74 00:04:19,279 --> 00:04:21,839 Speaker 3: they've really been able to get my hangof, because I know, 75 00:04:21,920 --> 00:04:25,480 Speaker 3: I don't get subscribers like I won't get like reads, 76 00:04:25,480 --> 00:04:29,120 Speaker 3: which is fine, but does this does this not like 77 00:04:29,240 --> 00:04:32,480 Speaker 3: slightly disadvantaged publishers and suppurse they haven't turned it off? 78 00:04:33,440 --> 00:04:36,520 Speaker 4: Well, it depends a lot on how a publisher makes 79 00:04:36,560 --> 00:04:41,680 Speaker 4: their money. So for example, I write a newsletter. People 80 00:04:41,760 --> 00:04:45,360 Speaker 4: can pay to subscribe to my newsletter, and it's really 81 00:04:45,360 --> 00:04:47,280 Speaker 4: no different to me if they read it in their 82 00:04:47,320 --> 00:04:49,880 Speaker 4: email inbox, if they come to my website, or if 83 00:04:49,880 --> 00:04:53,599 Speaker 4: they you know, read it in their RSS reader. You know, 84 00:04:53,640 --> 00:04:56,720 Speaker 4: it's sort of all the same. And then people who 85 00:04:56,760 --> 00:05:03,800 Speaker 4: publish Paywalt's content can an opt to have either excerpts 86 00:05:03,839 --> 00:05:08,240 Speaker 4: of their posts published on their RSS feeds or increasingly 87 00:05:08,240 --> 00:05:12,640 Speaker 4: we're starting to see people create subscriber RSS feeds so 88 00:05:12,680 --> 00:05:17,120 Speaker 4: that if you do yep, and you know, I subscribe 89 00:05:17,120 --> 00:05:18,840 Speaker 4: to four or four media and so I have a 90 00:05:18,880 --> 00:05:21,760 Speaker 4: specific RSS feed that I can follow there that gives 91 00:05:21,800 --> 00:05:25,600 Speaker 4: me the full text articles and so you know that's 92 00:05:25,640 --> 00:05:30,040 Speaker 4: a way in which publishers can still earn money through 93 00:05:30,360 --> 00:05:36,039 Speaker 4: subscriptions while offering RSS feeds. The place where it can 94 00:05:36,040 --> 00:05:41,920 Speaker 4: be challenging is ads supported, you know, publishers where they 95 00:05:42,000 --> 00:05:44,800 Speaker 4: really rely on you visiting the website to get the 96 00:05:44,839 --> 00:05:50,000 Speaker 4: AD traffic. And so you'll often see ads supported publishers 97 00:05:50,040 --> 00:05:54,520 Speaker 4: publishing excerpts from their RSS feeds, but not full text, 98 00:05:54,960 --> 00:05:57,360 Speaker 4: meaning that if you're following them in a feed reader, 99 00:05:57,400 --> 00:05:58,960 Speaker 4: you still have to open the page and it takes 100 00:05:59,000 --> 00:06:00,680 Speaker 4: you to the website and they get the traffic. And 101 00:06:00,680 --> 00:06:04,040 Speaker 4: so that's how a lot of those sites get around it. 102 00:06:04,360 --> 00:06:08,159 Speaker 4: But there are websites that basically decide that it's you know, 103 00:06:08,200 --> 00:06:11,400 Speaker 4: sort of a lost leader. It's like the Costco retissory chicken. 104 00:06:11,440 --> 00:06:14,480 Speaker 4: It gets people in the door, even if they lose 105 00:06:14,520 --> 00:06:18,359 Speaker 4: some AD revenue. You know, you're still seeing their material 106 00:06:18,480 --> 00:06:22,520 Speaker 4: more that you might not otherwise, you're still visiting the site, 107 00:06:22,600 --> 00:06:24,760 Speaker 4: you might sign up for a subscription, whatever it might be, 108 00:06:25,480 --> 00:06:27,840 Speaker 4: And so they sort of decided it's a worthwhile trade off. 109 00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:32,520 Speaker 3: And you use innerader, right I do. Yeah, yeah, yeah, 110 00:06:32,560 --> 00:06:35,040 Speaker 3: you mentioned this is a really specific one. But I 111 00:06:35,080 --> 00:06:37,000 Speaker 3: saw on your piece you were saying you no longer 112 00:06:37,040 --> 00:06:39,919 Speaker 3: recommend Feedley. And I've heard Feedley mentioned a few times. 113 00:06:39,960 --> 00:06:41,080 Speaker 2: Why is that. 114 00:06:41,600 --> 00:06:43,960 Speaker 4: Yeah, So I used to use Feedley, and I used 115 00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:46,800 Speaker 4: to recommend them pretty widely. You know, they were doing 116 00:06:46,960 --> 00:06:51,280 Speaker 4: they had a very nice, full featured RSS reader, and 117 00:06:51,320 --> 00:06:54,120 Speaker 4: then they sort of started to pivot in ways that 118 00:06:54,160 --> 00:06:56,360 Speaker 4: were a little bit uncomfortable, where it was very clear 119 00:06:56,440 --> 00:07:00,839 Speaker 4: that they were targeting you know, cybersecurity recres a lot 120 00:07:00,839 --> 00:07:05,599 Speaker 4: of the time and very like corporate uh you know people. Yeah, 121 00:07:05,640 --> 00:07:08,760 Speaker 4: it was a very odd like subset of traffic where 122 00:07:08,800 --> 00:07:11,960 Speaker 4: they were constantly trying to help me, like follow threats 123 00:07:12,000 --> 00:07:16,640 Speaker 4: online and stuff like that. Yes, they and then so 124 00:07:16,840 --> 00:07:18,320 Speaker 4: but that was fine, you know, I was like, Okay, 125 00:07:18,400 --> 00:07:19,680 Speaker 4: I'm not the demographic for this. 126 00:07:19,800 --> 00:07:21,360 Speaker 2: Yeah, they've just changed their business. 127 00:07:21,480 --> 00:07:25,840 Speaker 4: Yeah, except that once they after they did that for 128 00:07:25,880 --> 00:07:30,520 Speaker 4: a little bit, I started to get promotions about tracking 129 00:07:30,600 --> 00:07:34,440 Speaker 4: strikes and it was all about monitoring where there might 130 00:07:34,480 --> 00:07:35,680 Speaker 4: be strikes happening. 131 00:07:35,720 --> 00:07:36,880 Speaker 2: Oh and it. 132 00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:43,840 Speaker 4: There they they say that they sort of yeah, exactly. 133 00:07:44,240 --> 00:07:47,000 Speaker 4: They tried to sort of after I, you know, wrote 134 00:07:47,000 --> 00:07:48,440 Speaker 4: to them a little bit about this, they tried to 135 00:07:48,480 --> 00:07:50,920 Speaker 4: sort of play it off as like bad messaging and 136 00:07:50,920 --> 00:07:53,400 Speaker 4: that they were really just trying to help people protect. 137 00:07:52,960 --> 00:07:55,200 Speaker 2: Their help people strike. 138 00:07:55,720 --> 00:07:58,880 Speaker 4: Yeah, it definitely came off as sort of strike breaking 139 00:07:58,920 --> 00:08:01,320 Speaker 4: as a service, and I decided I was done with 140 00:08:01,400 --> 00:08:05,120 Speaker 4: feed ley finally. Yeah, right, what we've all been waiting for. 141 00:08:05,760 --> 00:08:07,880 Speaker 4: But I mean, the one thing I really love about 142 00:08:07,960 --> 00:08:11,080 Speaker 4: RSS is that you know, it's a protocol, it's not 143 00:08:11,560 --> 00:08:15,000 Speaker 4: a service that you're locked into, and so it's actually 144 00:08:15,200 --> 00:08:18,640 Speaker 4: very easy to switch RSS readers if one of them 145 00:08:18,680 --> 00:08:21,600 Speaker 4: decides that it's going to start surveilling strikes. 146 00:08:21,840 --> 00:08:23,160 Speaker 2: That's a good question. 147 00:08:23,320 --> 00:08:26,040 Speaker 3: How does how do you so if you sit and 148 00:08:26,120 --> 00:08:29,000 Speaker 3: I really I'll be linking to this piece conspicuously or 149 00:08:29,080 --> 00:08:33,040 Speaker 3: excellent rss pace, but how do you move? Was actually 150 00:08:33,040 --> 00:08:34,000 Speaker 3: one of my questions. 151 00:08:34,120 --> 00:08:38,000 Speaker 4: It's incredibly easy. Pretty much every RSS reader allows you 152 00:08:38,040 --> 00:08:40,680 Speaker 4: to export all of the RSS feeds that you follow, 153 00:08:40,960 --> 00:08:44,480 Speaker 4: and it's just a simple XML file. It's the same 154 00:08:44,520 --> 00:08:46,319 Speaker 4: thing that I used to publish my blog role in 155 00:08:46,360 --> 00:08:48,880 Speaker 4: my website. So if you're curious, like what blogs I read, 156 00:08:48,960 --> 00:08:55,800 Speaker 4: I just export those, you know, folders into a PML 157 00:08:55,880 --> 00:08:57,520 Speaker 4: file is with what it's called, and then I put 158 00:08:57,559 --> 00:08:58,320 Speaker 4: in on my website. 159 00:08:59,000 --> 00:09:01,680 Speaker 3: But the same just just open that file in Yeah, 160 00:09:01,800 --> 00:09:03,080 Speaker 3: what inner reader or what have you? 161 00:09:03,280 --> 00:09:03,439 Speaker 2: Right? 162 00:09:03,480 --> 00:09:05,800 Speaker 4: And it took me probably ten seconds to switch from 163 00:09:05,800 --> 00:09:08,520 Speaker 4: Feebley to my new very readers. Yeah. 164 00:09:08,559 --> 00:09:11,920 Speaker 3: Wow, there is there's some stuff in the Internet that 165 00:09:12,000 --> 00:09:12,680 Speaker 3: works still. 166 00:09:13,080 --> 00:09:14,120 Speaker 2: It's magic. 167 00:09:25,000 --> 00:09:27,120 Speaker 3: And having you want here to talk about RSS was 168 00:09:27,120 --> 00:09:29,679 Speaker 3: important because first of all, people say I complain all 169 00:09:29,720 --> 00:09:33,120 Speaker 3: the time, and they are right, and it's just it's 170 00:09:33,200 --> 00:09:35,480 Speaker 3: nice to see that there are still some functional parts 171 00:09:35,480 --> 00:09:37,920 Speaker 3: of the Internet. Is there other other parts that you 172 00:09:38,000 --> 00:09:41,199 Speaker 3: actually like, other feet things like I don't know, RSS 173 00:09:41,200 --> 00:09:44,600 Speaker 3: that you use regularly that could make make the world's 174 00:09:45,280 --> 00:09:47,880 Speaker 3: make our listeners internet world's a little bit better. 175 00:09:48,800 --> 00:09:50,480 Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, I think it's all part of a 176 00:09:50,559 --> 00:09:54,640 Speaker 4: theme of sort of avoiding these intermediaries that have these 177 00:09:54,679 --> 00:09:59,200 Speaker 4: incredibly extractive relationships with both the users and you know 178 00:09:59,280 --> 00:10:02,440 Speaker 4: and off publishers who are on, you know, the other 179 00:10:02,520 --> 00:10:05,360 Speaker 4: side of that relationship. And so I do everything I 180 00:10:05,440 --> 00:10:10,760 Speaker 4: can to sort of avoid those intermediaries where possible, and so, 181 00:10:11,120 --> 00:10:13,360 Speaker 4: you know, for example, I write a newsletter. I use 182 00:10:13,440 --> 00:10:18,440 Speaker 4: the Ghost newsletter software, where you know, the relationship that 183 00:10:18,480 --> 00:10:21,480 Speaker 4: I have with the people who subscribe to me is 184 00:10:21,559 --> 00:10:26,079 Speaker 4: very direct. You know, people are subscribing to Molly White, 185 00:10:26,080 --> 00:10:30,120 Speaker 4: the writer, They're not subscribing to ghost the website that 186 00:10:30,200 --> 00:10:32,840 Speaker 4: then you know, danes to give me a cut of 187 00:10:33,559 --> 00:10:36,400 Speaker 4: whatever they're taking in, which is unlike some of the 188 00:10:36,440 --> 00:10:42,400 Speaker 4: other services out there, for example Patreon, where you know, 189 00:10:42,440 --> 00:10:46,520 Speaker 4: if you set up a Patreon account, everyone is actually 190 00:10:46,880 --> 00:10:50,760 Speaker 4: in a financial relationship with Patreon, not with you, and 191 00:10:50,800 --> 00:10:52,960 Speaker 4: so if you decide to leave, it can be incredibly 192 00:10:53,040 --> 00:10:57,480 Speaker 4: challenging to move people to another service, whereas with Ghosts, 193 00:10:57,559 --> 00:10:59,760 Speaker 4: if I want to leave, I can just set up 194 00:11:00,160 --> 00:11:03,880 Speaker 4: somewhere else, I can export my subscribers. The financial relationships 195 00:11:03,880 --> 00:11:07,920 Speaker 4: are already just directly with me, and so that's a 196 00:11:08,040 --> 00:11:12,080 Speaker 4: very powerful thing, the sort of escape hatch, where now 197 00:11:12,160 --> 00:11:15,719 Speaker 4: if Ghosts decides, you know, hey, maybe we're gonna i 198 00:11:15,720 --> 00:11:19,040 Speaker 4: don't know, slap ads on everyone's newsletter without them agreeing 199 00:11:19,080 --> 00:11:22,400 Speaker 4: to it, they now have this incentive on the other end, 200 00:11:22,400 --> 00:11:25,640 Speaker 4: which is like, well, Molly and all the other people 201 00:11:25,679 --> 00:11:29,400 Speaker 4: who publish with ghost might not like that, and they 202 00:11:29,440 --> 00:11:33,480 Speaker 4: might just leave because they can, whereas other services that 203 00:11:33,679 --> 00:11:37,480 Speaker 4: have more of a locked in relationship can make those 204 00:11:37,640 --> 00:11:41,000 Speaker 4: decisions and take the gamble that well, it's so hard 205 00:11:41,080 --> 00:11:44,360 Speaker 4: to leave that people are probably just going to put 206 00:11:44,440 --> 00:11:48,880 Speaker 4: up with it, and so that's that's one place where 207 00:11:48,880 --> 00:11:51,360 Speaker 4: I do that. You know, there are sort of other 208 00:11:52,320 --> 00:11:54,880 Speaker 4: services throughout the web that you know, are sort of 209 00:11:55,040 --> 00:11:58,520 Speaker 4: similar where I try to keep the intermediaries to a 210 00:11:58,559 --> 00:11:59,640 Speaker 4: bare minimum. 211 00:12:00,240 --> 00:12:00,440 Speaker 2: Yeah. 212 00:12:00,480 --> 00:12:04,200 Speaker 3: I used Ghost myself when I used outposts from They're 213 00:12:04,320 --> 00:12:04,600 Speaker 3: very good. 214 00:12:04,640 --> 00:12:06,120 Speaker 2: It's basically it's. 215 00:12:06,120 --> 00:12:07,800 Speaker 3: One of the things I actually like about Ghost is 216 00:12:07,800 --> 00:12:09,520 Speaker 3: that you can build a company on top of it, 217 00:12:09,559 --> 00:12:11,840 Speaker 3: and the company is just, hey, we'll provide some of 218 00:12:11,880 --> 00:12:14,199 Speaker 3: those slick little features that you get from a substack 219 00:12:14,320 --> 00:12:16,679 Speaker 3: or what have you, like following up with people if 220 00:12:16,720 --> 00:12:19,120 Speaker 3: their credit cards expired or what have you. But it's 221 00:12:19,240 --> 00:12:21,280 Speaker 3: and it's also for giant babies like me who can't 222 00:12:21,320 --> 00:12:22,800 Speaker 3: do code. 223 00:12:23,000 --> 00:12:24,560 Speaker 2: I didn't vibe coded, I swear. 224 00:12:25,559 --> 00:12:28,840 Speaker 3: But thinking of Substack, I've never seen a company go 225 00:12:29,000 --> 00:12:32,120 Speaker 3: quite as weirdly as them, putting aside on them obvious 226 00:12:32,280 --> 00:12:36,240 Speaker 3: promotions of nazis. It feels as if substack has just 227 00:12:36,280 --> 00:12:38,560 Speaker 3: turned into another dogshit social network. 228 00:12:39,520 --> 00:12:44,240 Speaker 4: Yeah. I mean substack is a weird platform because they 229 00:12:44,280 --> 00:12:48,080 Speaker 4: do in some ways have that similar ethos of you know, 230 00:12:48,120 --> 00:12:51,800 Speaker 4: your subscribers are subscribing to you, not to substack, and 231 00:12:51,840 --> 00:12:56,600 Speaker 4: so it's easy to leave to some extent, where you know, 232 00:12:56,840 --> 00:12:59,920 Speaker 4: I used to be on Substack. I decided to leave. 233 00:13:00,080 --> 00:13:03,959 Speaker 4: I exported all of my email contacts, you know, I 234 00:13:04,080 --> 00:13:06,920 Speaker 4: moved all of my content to a different website and 235 00:13:07,000 --> 00:13:10,760 Speaker 4: it went fairly smoothly. And that's always been a part 236 00:13:10,840 --> 00:13:13,760 Speaker 4: of substax marketing is you know, this is a very 237 00:13:13,800 --> 00:13:16,400 Speaker 4: direct relationship. You'll be able to leave if you want. 238 00:13:16,800 --> 00:13:21,040 Speaker 4: But I'm getting the impression increasingly that they're almost regretting 239 00:13:21,240 --> 00:13:26,160 Speaker 4: that decision and that they are trying to install ways 240 00:13:26,280 --> 00:13:30,560 Speaker 4: that lock people into the platform without effectively locking people 241 00:13:30,600 --> 00:13:35,199 Speaker 4: in by trying to cut off their you know, escape 242 00:13:35,200 --> 00:13:38,559 Speaker 4: patch essentially. You know, they could say, sorry, you can't 243 00:13:38,600 --> 00:13:41,120 Speaker 4: export your email lists anymore, or we're going to make 244 00:13:41,120 --> 00:13:44,079 Speaker 4: it really challenging for you to get, you know, move 245 00:13:44,120 --> 00:13:47,360 Speaker 4: your content off the platform. And they haven't directly done that, 246 00:13:47,559 --> 00:13:48,160 Speaker 4: but they are. 247 00:13:49,000 --> 00:13:50,920 Speaker 2: They've got this following thing now. 248 00:13:51,040 --> 00:13:52,680 Speaker 4: Well that's that's what I was going to say, is 249 00:13:52,679 --> 00:13:55,720 Speaker 4: they are sort of trying to add in these new 250 00:13:56,320 --> 00:13:59,240 Speaker 4: you know, so called features that make it very challenging 251 00:13:59,640 --> 00:14:02,559 Speaker 4: for people to leave. So there's now followers, which are 252 00:14:02,559 --> 00:14:05,920 Speaker 4: different from subscribers, and the ideas that you know, if 253 00:14:05,960 --> 00:14:09,439 Speaker 4: you attract followers, they may eventually convert into a subscriber, 254 00:14:09,480 --> 00:14:12,560 Speaker 4: and that's very potentially valuable, but you can't take your 255 00:14:13,160 --> 00:14:17,520 Speaker 4: followers with you. They have this sort of network and 256 00:14:17,720 --> 00:14:21,800 Speaker 4: this almost like short form social media platform now where 257 00:14:21,800 --> 00:14:24,480 Speaker 4: you publish these notes and you know, those don't come 258 00:14:24,480 --> 00:14:31,000 Speaker 4: with you when you leave. They are increased. Yeah, they're 259 00:14:31,000 --> 00:14:34,320 Speaker 4: increasingly encouraging people to use the substack app, you know, 260 00:14:34,360 --> 00:14:38,000 Speaker 4: which is the idea then, is that if you leave substack, 261 00:14:38,040 --> 00:14:39,880 Speaker 4: all of these people who've gotten used to reading on 262 00:14:39,920 --> 00:14:42,760 Speaker 4: the substack app will no longer find you, and they won't, 263 00:14:42,920 --> 00:14:46,640 Speaker 4: you know, get access to your writing because you're not 264 00:14:46,720 --> 00:14:49,480 Speaker 4: there anymore. And so you know, we see this sort 265 00:14:49,520 --> 00:14:55,640 Speaker 4: of constant gravitational pull of in sertification to use Cory 266 00:14:55,720 --> 00:15:01,640 Speaker 4: Doctor's word, where you know, platform increasingly are trying to 267 00:15:01,760 --> 00:15:05,080 Speaker 4: keep people locked in so that they can then extract 268 00:15:05,120 --> 00:15:08,280 Speaker 4: more value both from the publisher and and from the 269 00:15:08,400 --> 00:15:12,840 Speaker 4: consumer and while making the experience worse for both. 270 00:15:14,040 --> 00:15:15,880 Speaker 3: Yeah, and you're kind of seeing and you've mentioned this 271 00:15:15,920 --> 00:15:18,080 Speaker 3: in your artcle as well. Publishers are moving towards the 272 00:15:18,080 --> 00:15:19,280 Speaker 3: newsletter format as well. 273 00:15:19,360 --> 00:15:20,600 Speaker 2: It's like twenty twenty one. 274 00:15:20,680 --> 00:15:23,120 Speaker 3: Again, I don't know, do you remember in twenty twenty one, 275 00:15:23,120 --> 00:15:25,440 Speaker 3: when you had like The Atlantic and there was that 276 00:15:25,480 --> 00:15:28,040 Speaker 3: weird side channel thing, like all these people were like, oh, 277 00:15:28,040 --> 00:15:30,960 Speaker 3: we're going to build a community. Just gave up on that, right, 278 00:15:31,040 --> 00:15:34,200 Speaker 3: But it's you're seeing everyone starting newsletters again. It's just 279 00:15:34,800 --> 00:15:37,040 Speaker 3: you made the point as words at this point, it's 280 00:15:37,120 --> 00:15:39,840 Speaker 3: just moving stuff into your inbox in a way that 281 00:15:39,960 --> 00:15:43,000 Speaker 3: people probably don't necessarily want or at least find a 282 00:15:43,000 --> 00:15:43,840 Speaker 3: little overwhelming. 283 00:15:44,360 --> 00:15:46,480 Speaker 4: Yeah, So that is sort of the downside of this 284 00:15:46,600 --> 00:15:50,520 Speaker 4: newsletter boom, which is that it's exhausting if you read 285 00:15:50,680 --> 00:15:52,960 Speaker 4: a lot of newsletters, which I do you know to 286 00:15:53,080 --> 00:15:56,840 Speaker 4: get you know, if you follow ten newsletter writers who 287 00:15:56,840 --> 00:15:59,680 Speaker 4: are publishing maybe once a week, twice a week something 288 00:15:59,720 --> 00:16:03,920 Speaker 4: like that, then constantly throughout your workday or your weekend, 289 00:16:04,080 --> 00:16:06,680 Speaker 4: you're getting, you know, a notification in you're in box 290 00:16:06,720 --> 00:16:08,840 Speaker 4: at sort of a random time you need to read 291 00:16:08,880 --> 00:16:11,800 Speaker 4: this email, which maybe you're in the middle of something 292 00:16:11,840 --> 00:16:13,760 Speaker 4: and it's not time, you know, not a good time 293 00:16:13,760 --> 00:16:15,480 Speaker 4: for you to read, and so it's just sort of 294 00:16:15,520 --> 00:16:19,200 Speaker 4: constantly lurking there or waiting for you to read it. 295 00:16:19,200 --> 00:16:22,840 Speaker 4: It's you know, potentially edging out other more time critical 296 00:16:22,880 --> 00:16:25,520 Speaker 4: emails that you need to pay attention to and it's 297 00:16:25,560 --> 00:16:28,280 Speaker 4: just sort of this you know, daly uge of material. 298 00:16:28,800 --> 00:16:30,640 Speaker 4: Whereas it used to be that you know, you would 299 00:16:30,640 --> 00:16:34,480 Speaker 4: go to the websites that you follow, or you know, 300 00:16:34,520 --> 00:16:37,960 Speaker 4: open the physical newsletter or newspaper that you receive in 301 00:16:37,960 --> 00:16:40,080 Speaker 4: your mail, and you know, you could sit down and 302 00:16:40,120 --> 00:16:43,320 Speaker 4: read the news with your morning coffee. And now it's 303 00:16:43,360 --> 00:16:45,280 Speaker 4: sort of a different you know, it's it's more of 304 00:16:45,280 --> 00:16:48,400 Speaker 4: a push relationship than a pull relationship. You're not going 305 00:16:48,440 --> 00:16:51,840 Speaker 4: to read, you are being sort of inundated with the reading. 306 00:16:52,000 --> 00:16:56,320 Speaker 4: And so RSS is a really nice, uh way in 307 00:16:56,360 --> 00:17:01,240 Speaker 4: my opinion, to handle that as a reader, because now 308 00:17:01,480 --> 00:17:04,960 Speaker 4: you know, if I subscribe to your newsletter, I can 309 00:17:05,320 --> 00:17:09,000 Speaker 4: you know, turn off the email notifications, but put the 310 00:17:09,119 --> 00:17:12,600 Speaker 4: RSS feed in my feed reader, and then at my 311 00:17:12,680 --> 00:17:15,800 Speaker 4: leisure when I feel like reading my newsletters or going 312 00:17:15,880 --> 00:17:17,919 Speaker 4: and catching up on the news or whatever it is 313 00:17:17,920 --> 00:17:20,160 Speaker 4: that I'm reading, I can go do that and it's 314 00:17:20,200 --> 00:17:22,520 Speaker 4: all in that one place. And my email in box 315 00:17:22,720 --> 00:17:26,680 Speaker 4: is you know, safe to have just emails and all 316 00:17:26,720 --> 00:17:28,760 Speaker 4: of the stuff that's more suited to that. 317 00:17:29,640 --> 00:17:32,600 Speaker 3: It is funny, we kind of feel like everyone has 318 00:17:32,640 --> 00:17:36,080 Speaker 3: built these obtuse and complex ways of delivering the news 319 00:17:36,160 --> 00:17:38,760 Speaker 3: or selling the news, or getting people news in different forms, 320 00:17:39,160 --> 00:17:41,080 Speaker 3: and for the most part, the thing that keeps working 321 00:17:41,160 --> 00:17:43,879 Speaker 3: is the thing from what twenty thirty years ago, just 322 00:17:43,960 --> 00:17:48,240 Speaker 3: like reading words on a page. It's it's funny as well, 323 00:17:48,280 --> 00:17:51,560 Speaker 3: because looking at this move back to newsletters, like I 324 00:17:51,760 --> 00:17:54,600 Speaker 3: hate to give me like Petel any credit at all, 325 00:17:54,600 --> 00:17:56,879 Speaker 3: but Google zero is a real effect. I think, I 326 00:17:56,920 --> 00:18:00,000 Speaker 3: don't know if it's going to zero, but it's it's 327 00:18:00,400 --> 00:18:03,320 Speaker 3: I'm still getting a ton for my newsletter. But it 328 00:18:03,440 --> 00:18:06,160 Speaker 3: is funny to watch people try and get back to newsletters. 329 00:18:06,200 --> 00:18:09,000 Speaker 3: But it almost feels like they're just treating them as 330 00:18:09,040 --> 00:18:12,719 Speaker 3: the same thing as a regular article, rather than a 331 00:18:12,840 --> 00:18:14,040 Speaker 3: unique way of delivering use. 332 00:18:13,960 --> 00:18:14,840 Speaker 2: Which I guess it is. 333 00:18:15,280 --> 00:18:17,560 Speaker 3: But I feel like that the email format is not 334 00:18:17,640 --> 00:18:22,000 Speaker 3: treated with any any necessary particular respect. It's just almost 335 00:18:22,040 --> 00:18:24,400 Speaker 3: become a dumping ground for these companies. Like it's just like, hey, 336 00:18:24,880 --> 00:18:27,040 Speaker 3: I think I with Washington Post. Let's see if I 337 00:18:27,040 --> 00:18:28,920 Speaker 3: still get them, because I got really pissed off. There 338 00:18:28,960 --> 00:18:30,640 Speaker 3: was a point when I was getting four or five 339 00:18:30,640 --> 00:18:33,359 Speaker 3: emails a day from the rest Word of God. It's 340 00:18:33,400 --> 00:18:35,600 Speaker 3: just its abuse on your inbox. In the same way 341 00:18:35,720 --> 00:18:38,280 Speaker 3: abuses your feed and so one and so forth right. 342 00:18:38,400 --> 00:18:41,240 Speaker 4: I think that's really true, is that especially high volume 343 00:18:41,280 --> 00:18:44,800 Speaker 4: publishers really need to grapple with the strategy when it 344 00:18:44,840 --> 00:18:49,119 Speaker 4: comes to these types of relationships with subscribers, because you know, 345 00:18:49,119 --> 00:18:52,400 Speaker 4: it's one thing to publish twenty articles a day on 346 00:18:53,119 --> 00:18:56,439 Speaker 4: you know, Washington Post dot com. That's not you know, 347 00:18:56,480 --> 00:18:59,000 Speaker 4: that's not a problem for anybody. In fact, people probably 348 00:18:59,080 --> 00:19:02,840 Speaker 4: enjoy all of that choice. But getting twenty separate emails 349 00:19:03,240 --> 00:19:06,119 Speaker 4: is not a viable way to have, you know, a 350 00:19:06,240 --> 00:19:10,760 Speaker 4: respectful relationship with the people who have chosen to subscribe. 351 00:19:11,040 --> 00:19:13,359 Speaker 4: And so I think that, you know, it is incredibly 352 00:19:13,400 --> 00:19:16,359 Speaker 4: important to consider that. As you know, if you're a 353 00:19:16,359 --> 00:19:20,160 Speaker 4: publication that's thinking about creating a newsletter, is like, what 354 00:19:20,200 --> 00:19:24,240 Speaker 4: do people actually have the appetite to read? And how 355 00:19:24,280 --> 00:19:28,040 Speaker 4: can we maintain, you know, a respectful relationship with these 356 00:19:28,080 --> 00:19:31,880 Speaker 4: people who have you know, chosen to receive this material. 357 00:19:32,200 --> 00:19:35,640 Speaker 3: And my answer is ten thousand words, just some ten 358 00:19:35,680 --> 00:19:38,960 Speaker 3: thousand words every week or so. No one ever emails 359 00:19:38,960 --> 00:19:41,000 Speaker 3: me to say my stuff is too long. No one 360 00:19:41,000 --> 00:19:42,119 Speaker 3: has ever complained about it. 361 00:19:42,119 --> 00:19:53,480 Speaker 5: It's great. 362 00:19:57,320 --> 00:20:00,800 Speaker 3: It's kind of depressing on some level though, because the 363 00:20:00,840 --> 00:20:03,800 Speaker 3: way it's going. I don't know how these large publishers can, 364 00:20:04,160 --> 00:20:07,240 Speaker 3: like it's like they don't understand any particular format. They're 365 00:20:07,280 --> 00:20:09,840 Speaker 3: just they're doing newsletters. Don't trying to bag on the 366 00:20:09,920 --> 00:20:10,480 Speaker 3: verge too much. 367 00:20:10,480 --> 00:20:11,879 Speaker 2: But I don't know. 368 00:20:12,359 --> 00:20:14,760 Speaker 3: Suddenly them doing newsletters a lot in the last year 369 00:20:14,840 --> 00:20:17,879 Speaker 3: doesn't feel like it's specific to It doesn't feel like 370 00:20:17,920 --> 00:20:20,359 Speaker 3: it's a specific format. It's just like, please give us 371 00:20:20,400 --> 00:20:22,960 Speaker 3: your emails so that we can continue to email you, 372 00:20:23,480 --> 00:20:25,040 Speaker 3: which is desperate. 373 00:20:26,040 --> 00:20:29,240 Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, I think there is sort of reasonable desperation. 374 00:20:29,800 --> 00:20:31,919 Speaker 2: Oh yeah, I must be clear, like I totally understand 375 00:20:31,920 --> 00:20:32,280 Speaker 2: why they. 376 00:20:33,720 --> 00:20:35,720 Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, I think a lot of publishers have 377 00:20:35,840 --> 00:20:40,560 Speaker 4: realized that relying on intermediaries, whether it's social media platforms 378 00:20:40,600 --> 00:20:43,879 Speaker 4: like Twitter to get your news in front of people, 379 00:20:44,240 --> 00:20:47,679 Speaker 4: or you know, Google search was used to be a 380 00:20:47,800 --> 00:20:51,760 Speaker 4: massive way that you know, news publications received readership. And 381 00:20:51,800 --> 00:20:56,280 Speaker 4: now you know, as people are increasingly using the excerpts 382 00:20:56,320 --> 00:20:58,800 Speaker 4: on Google, they're not clicking through to the page. 383 00:20:59,200 --> 00:21:02,480 Speaker 3: And you say accepts, you mean the AI summaries. It 384 00:21:02,520 --> 00:21:03,600 Speaker 3: depends on the summary. 385 00:21:03,760 --> 00:21:07,520 Speaker 4: Yes, it used to be that Google News would just 386 00:21:07,560 --> 00:21:11,679 Speaker 4: show like a literal excerpt from uh you know, the 387 00:21:11,720 --> 00:21:15,600 Speaker 4: top result, and then people would often not visit the 388 00:21:15,680 --> 00:21:18,760 Speaker 4: underlying website or you know, you see the like Wikipedia 389 00:21:18,840 --> 00:21:22,160 Speaker 4: knowledge panels that that just sort of summarize what you're 390 00:21:22,160 --> 00:21:26,159 Speaker 4: looking for. But now, yeah, more recently there's the AI 391 00:21:26,359 --> 00:21:28,960 Speaker 4: overviews that you know, attempt to do sort of a 392 00:21:28,960 --> 00:21:33,200 Speaker 4: similar thing, but often drawing from multiple sources. And then 393 00:21:33,320 --> 00:21:35,640 Speaker 4: you know, if people are satisfied with what they see there, 394 00:21:35,680 --> 00:21:38,680 Speaker 4: they often don't click through. They don't either see the 395 00:21:38,760 --> 00:21:42,679 Speaker 4: ads that are funding the website, or they don't, you know, 396 00:21:42,760 --> 00:21:46,840 Speaker 4: see the invitations to subscribe, They don't you know, view 397 00:21:46,920 --> 00:21:49,120 Speaker 4: all the other material that might be available to them, 398 00:21:49,119 --> 00:21:52,119 Speaker 4: and so on, and so the traffic is dwindling at 399 00:21:52,160 --> 00:21:55,080 Speaker 4: a sort of alarming rate. And so I think a 400 00:21:55,080 --> 00:21:58,720 Speaker 4: lot of these publishers are trying to get more direct 401 00:21:58,800 --> 00:22:03,119 Speaker 4: relationships with readers, and email newsletters are a way that 402 00:22:03,119 --> 00:22:06,920 Speaker 4: they're doing that, which I think is very reasonable. I mean, 403 00:22:06,920 --> 00:22:10,080 Speaker 4: I think that it is you know, incredibly important as 404 00:22:10,280 --> 00:22:15,639 Speaker 4: a writer to have a very direct relationship with your readers, 405 00:22:15,760 --> 00:22:20,159 Speaker 4: because if you are relying on Twitter or Google Search, 406 00:22:20,680 --> 00:22:23,840 Speaker 4: then the second Twitter or Google Search decides it's more 407 00:22:23,880 --> 00:22:27,480 Speaker 4: profitable for them to twiddle the knobs in a way 408 00:22:27,520 --> 00:22:30,359 Speaker 4: that is going to cut off the you know, flow 409 00:22:30,359 --> 00:22:32,439 Speaker 4: of subscribers to you. They're going to do so, and 410 00:22:32,480 --> 00:22:37,000 Speaker 4: you're going to be up a creek essentially. But I 411 00:22:37,040 --> 00:22:39,240 Speaker 4: do think that, you know, there needs to be some 412 00:22:39,320 --> 00:22:44,760 Speaker 4: thought put into this, especially by high volume publications, so 413 00:22:44,840 --> 00:22:50,840 Speaker 4: that they are not essentially, you know, directing a fire 414 00:22:50,960 --> 00:22:53,800 Speaker 4: hose at their readers and essentially turning them off from 415 00:22:53,800 --> 00:22:54,480 Speaker 4: the publication. 416 00:22:55,280 --> 00:22:58,000 Speaker 3: I think it's also a challenge for a publication versus 417 00:22:58,080 --> 00:22:59,639 Speaker 3: a person, because we were talking about this on the 418 00:22:59,720 --> 00:23:02,760 Speaker 3: last episode, how it's people will gladly pay for a 419 00:23:02,840 --> 00:23:07,520 Speaker 3: person paying for an outlet that's different. I also think 420 00:23:07,560 --> 00:23:10,200 Speaker 3: the other problem is, and I'm not just to be clear, 421 00:23:10,240 --> 00:23:11,919 Speaker 3: I know I bag on the verge. This isn't about 422 00:23:11,920 --> 00:23:15,119 Speaker 3: them specifically, but it's the problem that I've seen with 423 00:23:15,240 --> 00:23:17,720 Speaker 3: legacy media at least, is they're terrified of giving a 424 00:23:17,800 --> 00:23:20,440 Speaker 3: voice to their people. They'll give it to their top columnists, 425 00:23:20,480 --> 00:23:22,840 Speaker 3: but they think, oh no, if we let people develop 426 00:23:22,880 --> 00:23:25,080 Speaker 3: a personal relationship with the writer, then they could leave 427 00:23:25,119 --> 00:23:27,080 Speaker 3: and have some sort of autonomy of their future. 428 00:23:27,240 --> 00:23:30,360 Speaker 2: It's not why we're in this business. But now it's 429 00:23:30,359 --> 00:23:31,040 Speaker 2: going back the other way. 430 00:23:31,040 --> 00:23:33,359 Speaker 3: Where they realized, oh crap, that's the only way in 431 00:23:33,440 --> 00:23:37,679 Speaker 3: which people will have any kind of sticky relationship with us. 432 00:23:38,480 --> 00:23:42,080 Speaker 3: After winning the fil for It Again award eleven times 433 00:23:42,119 --> 00:23:46,120 Speaker 3: in the space of fifteen years, with Google and everyone else, 434 00:23:46,160 --> 00:23:49,200 Speaker 3: even I am actually like I loved substack at the 435 00:23:49,200 --> 00:23:51,520 Speaker 3: beginning because it was free, it was really easy to use. 436 00:23:51,560 --> 00:23:54,480 Speaker 3: It was just a platform. Hamosh would go out and 437 00:23:54,520 --> 00:23:56,560 Speaker 3: do these things about this is the future of media, 438 00:23:56,600 --> 00:23:58,480 Speaker 3: and media is good and we love being free here. 439 00:23:59,040 --> 00:24:01,680 Speaker 3: But I think that just it was everything. It was 440 00:24:01,760 --> 00:24:05,400 Speaker 3: exactly what happens every time. It's oh, right, we need 441 00:24:05,440 --> 00:24:07,000 Speaker 3: to make more money than we spend. 442 00:24:07,480 --> 00:24:09,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, how do we do that? Hmmm. 443 00:24:09,960 --> 00:24:14,119 Speaker 3: And it's just it's an inevitable point because it's almost 444 00:24:14,200 --> 00:24:18,120 Speaker 3: I have here is my media theory. I think media 445 00:24:18,160 --> 00:24:21,720 Speaker 3: outlets are just too big. I think if they need 446 00:24:21,760 --> 00:24:24,080 Speaker 3: to cap out at some point, because all of the 447 00:24:24,119 --> 00:24:26,800 Speaker 3: problems we talk about, every single one seems to start 448 00:24:27,160 --> 00:24:29,840 Speaker 3: when they get too large for a company or a 449 00:24:29,840 --> 00:24:32,400 Speaker 3: media outlet, they get too large to have any personality, 450 00:24:32,640 --> 00:24:34,080 Speaker 3: or they get to the point where they're too large 451 00:24:34,119 --> 00:24:36,120 Speaker 3: to have an editor who actually still writes and has 452 00:24:36,119 --> 00:24:39,160 Speaker 3: a personality themselves. So it's like, ah, we can't give 453 00:24:39,200 --> 00:24:43,840 Speaker 3: people too much freedom or anything. It's it's disappointing as well, 454 00:24:43,880 --> 00:24:47,320 Speaker 3: because you've kind of proven this exceedingly well with your 455 00:24:47,480 --> 00:24:50,240 Speaker 3: many successes, where it's like people will pay for someone 456 00:24:50,240 --> 00:24:54,840 Speaker 3: who is themselves, stands for something and gives a shit right, 457 00:24:54,880 --> 00:24:57,080 Speaker 3: and yet they don't want to copy that. 458 00:24:57,480 --> 00:24:59,879 Speaker 4: Yeah, I think you're totally right on that where you 459 00:25:00,160 --> 00:25:03,760 Speaker 4: newspapers are sort of afraid of letting writers develop their 460 00:25:03,800 --> 00:25:06,480 Speaker 4: own personalities. As you say, I mean, you see this 461 00:25:06,600 --> 00:25:10,320 Speaker 4: with large newspapers, you know, restricting their writers on social 462 00:25:10,359 --> 00:25:14,720 Speaker 4: media for example, where if they say something to opinionated 463 00:25:14,760 --> 00:25:18,520 Speaker 4: on social media, that's you know, against the social media policy. 464 00:25:18,640 --> 00:25:21,840 Speaker 4: And you know, I think that is very contrary to 465 00:25:21,880 --> 00:25:24,040 Speaker 4: what people are looking for. They want to see people 466 00:25:24,040 --> 00:25:27,919 Speaker 4: who have strong opinions and strong beliefs and strong principles 467 00:25:27,960 --> 00:25:31,719 Speaker 4: and stand up for those things. And so I do 468 00:25:31,800 --> 00:25:34,120 Speaker 4: think that, you know, that's a shortcoming. But I also 469 00:25:34,160 --> 00:25:39,080 Speaker 4: agree that newspapers, some some publications seem to be realizing 470 00:25:39,160 --> 00:25:42,399 Speaker 4: that that sort of direct relationship with a writer is 471 00:25:42,440 --> 00:25:45,840 Speaker 4: a valuable thing. You know, I mentioned my piece that 472 00:25:45,960 --> 00:25:48,439 Speaker 4: Wired was also one of the outlets that has recently 473 00:25:48,480 --> 00:25:52,160 Speaker 4: announced a major newsletter push, and their strategy has been, 474 00:25:53,320 --> 00:25:57,040 Speaker 4: you know, here's five or ten options for different newsletters 475 00:25:57,080 --> 00:26:00,680 Speaker 4: that you can read, and they're written by specific people 476 00:26:00,960 --> 00:26:05,240 Speaker 4: at Wired who are you know, seen to be experts 477 00:26:05,280 --> 00:26:07,720 Speaker 4: in a specific area, so you can follow, you know, 478 00:26:07,760 --> 00:26:10,720 Speaker 4: the Kylie Robison Wired newsletter and I was. 479 00:26:10,720 --> 00:26:15,520 Speaker 2: Like, mist Robinson's mudile behavior, I'll put a link in that, right. 480 00:26:15,320 --> 00:26:16,920 Speaker 4: And I saw that, and I was like, oh, hell yeah, 481 00:26:17,000 --> 00:26:19,639 Speaker 4: sign me up because I know that her work is 482 00:26:19,680 --> 00:26:21,800 Speaker 4: incredible and I'm going to read it when it shows 483 00:26:21,840 --> 00:26:24,840 Speaker 4: up in my newsletter or in my my feed reader. 484 00:26:26,000 --> 00:26:28,800 Speaker 4: Whereas you know, I don't read every single article that 485 00:26:28,880 --> 00:26:32,119 Speaker 4: Wired publishes because that's just not feasible. Yeah, And so 486 00:26:32,160 --> 00:26:34,520 Speaker 4: I think that you know, publications would be wise to 487 00:26:34,560 --> 00:26:37,439 Speaker 4: do more of that and to sort of understand that 488 00:26:37,560 --> 00:26:42,160 Speaker 4: people do look at bylines, they do have specific authors 489 00:26:42,240 --> 00:26:45,640 Speaker 4: who they trust or who's writing they enjoy more, or 490 00:26:46,160 --> 00:26:48,920 Speaker 4: whatever it may be, rather than going for the sort 491 00:26:48,960 --> 00:26:53,480 Speaker 4: of faceless you know, we're just the Washington Post or 492 00:26:53,520 --> 00:26:56,200 Speaker 4: we're just the New York Times and the author doesn't 493 00:26:56,240 --> 00:26:56,760 Speaker 4: really matter. 494 00:26:57,040 --> 00:27:00,760 Speaker 3: It's classic, it's honestly, it's NBA Brain is its core 495 00:27:00,840 --> 00:27:03,640 Speaker 3: pro Brain where it's like, well, how do we how 496 00:27:03,680 --> 00:27:06,240 Speaker 3: do do you think that a person like thinks, oh, 497 00:27:06,280 --> 00:27:09,240 Speaker 3: I love my relationship with the New York Times, But 498 00:27:09,320 --> 00:27:11,560 Speaker 3: that's how they're thinking about it, Like, yeah, what is 499 00:27:11,560 --> 00:27:14,679 Speaker 3: the consumer's relationship with the newspulbl There is no relationship 500 00:27:14,680 --> 00:27:17,080 Speaker 3: with the newspaper. There might be a vibe, but there 501 00:27:17,119 --> 00:27:20,200 Speaker 3: is not a relationship. I think the Financial Times is 502 00:27:20,240 --> 00:27:24,000 Speaker 3: actually found, though not in the newsletter era. They've found 503 00:27:24,040 --> 00:27:27,040 Speaker 3: a very good balance between hard news and excellently they've 504 00:27:27,040 --> 00:27:30,240 Speaker 3: got Bryce Elder Skags as well as over a Baron's 505 00:27:30,320 --> 00:27:33,439 Speaker 3: now but you've got Alphaville. They found a way to 506 00:27:33,760 --> 00:27:36,680 Speaker 3: unleash it, and the ft has done very well. It's 507 00:27:36,800 --> 00:27:39,320 Speaker 3: just I don't know, there's some part that feels like 508 00:27:39,400 --> 00:27:42,760 Speaker 3: this is the come upance for fifteen twenty years of 509 00:27:42,840 --> 00:27:47,080 Speaker 3: hubris of follow, Google follow meta follow whoever will send 510 00:27:47,200 --> 00:27:50,680 Speaker 3: us traffic, build build as big as possible on this. 511 00:27:51,600 --> 00:27:55,040 Speaker 4: Yeah, and also the sort of view from nowhere news approach, 512 00:27:55,200 --> 00:27:58,560 Speaker 4: where you know, it's the belief was that there shouldn't 513 00:27:58,560 --> 00:28:01,080 Speaker 4: be any sort of opinion, There's wouldn't be any sort 514 00:28:01,119 --> 00:28:05,199 Speaker 4: of you know, principled analysis. It should all just be 515 00:28:06,080 --> 00:28:11,040 Speaker 4: you know, both sides ism and this supposedly objective reporting, 516 00:28:11,960 --> 00:28:14,719 Speaker 4: which does strip out a lot of the personality of 517 00:28:14,840 --> 00:28:18,800 Speaker 4: the writer, and it removes a lot of the you know, 518 00:28:18,920 --> 00:28:24,679 Speaker 4: reason that people identify with or appreciate specific writers. And 519 00:28:24,720 --> 00:28:27,520 Speaker 4: so I think that this was to some extent sort 520 00:28:27,560 --> 00:28:30,920 Speaker 4: of a crisis of their own doing. In that sense 521 00:28:30,960 --> 00:28:31,600 Speaker 4: as well. 522 00:28:32,040 --> 00:28:36,000 Speaker 3: I also think that I also think that the raw 523 00:28:36,080 --> 00:28:40,080 Speaker 3: economics of media might be completely fucked on some level. 524 00:28:40,240 --> 00:28:42,680 Speaker 3: I think that there's just you see, and I think 525 00:28:42,680 --> 00:28:45,600 Speaker 3: it's because of the Google traffic and the social traffic 526 00:28:45,640 --> 00:28:48,520 Speaker 3: as well. You've got these massive ad stuffs, you've got 527 00:28:48,520 --> 00:28:51,800 Speaker 3: these massive social staffs every and it doesn't seem to 528 00:28:51,840 --> 00:28:53,480 Speaker 3: necessarily connect to anything. 529 00:28:53,520 --> 00:28:55,840 Speaker 2: It doesn't. I don't know if it like drives results 530 00:28:55,960 --> 00:28:57,239 Speaker 2: or not. I truly don't know. 531 00:28:57,320 --> 00:29:01,360 Speaker 3: But it's the way that every single media outlet at 532 00:29:01,360 --> 00:29:02,960 Speaker 3: some point in the last few years has act like 533 00:29:02,960 --> 00:29:05,760 Speaker 3: it's been acted like it's been pecked to death by birds. 534 00:29:06,320 --> 00:29:08,800 Speaker 3: Just acted like the verge added their pay well, and 535 00:29:08,840 --> 00:29:10,920 Speaker 3: I get it, by the way things cost money, but 536 00:29:11,040 --> 00:29:15,800 Speaker 3: it's it almost feels as if these castles have been 537 00:29:15,800 --> 00:29:18,000 Speaker 3: built for a land that no longer exists anymore. 538 00:29:18,600 --> 00:29:21,680 Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, I think that the news landscape is 539 00:29:21,720 --> 00:29:26,360 Speaker 4: incredibly challenging right now for a number of reasons. You know, 540 00:29:26,600 --> 00:29:30,800 Speaker 4: there's the traffic issues, there's the AI scraping issues that 541 00:29:30,880 --> 00:29:35,160 Speaker 4: are you know, causing a lot of news outlets to 542 00:29:35,200 --> 00:29:38,160 Speaker 4: put up paywalls that are then you know, blocking people 543 00:29:38,200 --> 00:29:42,200 Speaker 4: who previously like real people, not scrapers, who might previously 544 00:29:42,280 --> 00:29:45,160 Speaker 4: have you know, visited their sites and enjoyed their work. 545 00:29:45,240 --> 00:29:48,600 Speaker 4: And you know, now you see this double edged sword 546 00:29:48,640 --> 00:29:53,920 Speaker 4: whereas people paywall news media, you know, they might block 547 00:29:54,000 --> 00:29:57,360 Speaker 4: scrapers to some extent, but they're also blocking people from 548 00:29:57,720 --> 00:30:01,160 Speaker 4: reading the material that might then incentive them to subscribe. 549 00:30:01,240 --> 00:30:03,600 Speaker 4: You know, if every article is paywall, there is no 550 00:30:04,360 --> 00:30:06,520 Speaker 4: way to know if you're going to like what's behind 551 00:30:06,520 --> 00:30:10,320 Speaker 4: the paywall, right And so I think that, you know, 552 00:30:10,400 --> 00:30:13,239 Speaker 4: this is sort of an incredibly challenging moment for a 553 00:30:13,280 --> 00:30:16,760 Speaker 4: lot of news organizations that are really struggling to figure 554 00:30:16,760 --> 00:30:20,840 Speaker 4: out how to deal with it, you know, how to 555 00:30:21,400 --> 00:30:25,400 Speaker 4: maintain a sustainable news business when you're facing those types 556 00:30:25,440 --> 00:30:30,040 Speaker 4: of threats. You're also facing political threats, increasingly, especially in 557 00:30:30,040 --> 00:30:36,400 Speaker 4: the United States, for publishing any sort of controversial material 558 00:30:36,560 --> 00:30:42,200 Speaker 4: about the administration or you know, there's you're seeing an 559 00:30:42,240 --> 00:30:46,800 Speaker 4: incredible unwillingness by a lot of major publications to have 560 00:30:46,880 --> 00:30:49,840 Speaker 4: strong opinions or to say anything that is you know, 561 00:30:51,240 --> 00:30:55,880 Speaker 4: not supported by ten separate sources, you know, any kind 562 00:30:55,920 --> 00:30:59,360 Speaker 4: of speculation, that type of thing, because of the legal 563 00:30:59,480 --> 00:31:03,200 Speaker 4: environment that we're in. And so, you know, I have 564 00:31:03,280 --> 00:31:05,760 Speaker 4: some sympathy I think for a lot of these publications 565 00:31:05,760 --> 00:31:07,760 Speaker 4: that are trying to navigate it. But I also think 566 00:31:07,800 --> 00:31:11,680 Speaker 4: that the ways in which they have been navigating it 567 00:31:11,760 --> 00:31:13,560 Speaker 4: have often been pretty misguided. 568 00:31:14,200 --> 00:31:16,320 Speaker 3: So to wrap us up, is there anything giving you 569 00:31:17,120 --> 00:31:20,680 Speaker 3: any hope online right now, anything that like genuinely is 570 00:31:20,720 --> 00:31:23,960 Speaker 3: like thinking things can be okay, even in a different form. 571 00:31:25,200 --> 00:31:27,480 Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean I would say so, I do think 572 00:31:27,520 --> 00:31:31,840 Speaker 4: that there. You know, one thing that has been made 573 00:31:31,920 --> 00:31:34,520 Speaker 4: very clear to me is that people still care a 574 00:31:34,560 --> 00:31:38,920 Speaker 4: lot about good writing and people who have you know, 575 00:31:39,760 --> 00:31:44,240 Speaker 4: new or interesting analysis. You know a lot of people 576 00:31:44,480 --> 00:31:47,400 Speaker 4: sort of look at the way that I do my newsletter, 577 00:31:48,080 --> 00:31:50,640 Speaker 4: which is, you know, everything is free. There's no paywall. 578 00:31:50,800 --> 00:31:53,880 Speaker 4: You don't have to even sign up, much less subscribe, 579 00:31:55,160 --> 00:31:58,880 Speaker 4: and I have a pay what you want model, so 580 00:31:59,000 --> 00:32:00,880 Speaker 4: you could pay you know, dollar a month, you can 581 00:32:00,920 --> 00:32:03,200 Speaker 4: pay ten dollars a month, whatever you want. And people 582 00:32:03,200 --> 00:32:04,960 Speaker 4: look at that and they're like, that can't work. You know, 583 00:32:05,120 --> 00:32:06,040 Speaker 4: they're like, no one's going. 584 00:32:05,960 --> 00:32:07,920 Speaker 2: To do that. And it works great. 585 00:32:08,200 --> 00:32:11,640 Speaker 4: Yeah, it works great. And you know, people sort of 586 00:32:11,760 --> 00:32:14,720 Speaker 4: have this belief that, well, if something's free, no one's 587 00:32:14,760 --> 00:32:17,040 Speaker 4: ever going to pay for it, which isn't true. I 588 00:32:17,040 --> 00:32:22,400 Speaker 4: think that people will actually strongly value the work that 589 00:32:22,440 --> 00:32:25,080 Speaker 4: people are doing even if they're not forced to pay 590 00:32:25,120 --> 00:32:29,440 Speaker 4: for it, and they understand that people need support to 591 00:32:29,440 --> 00:32:31,280 Speaker 4: be able to continue to do their work, and they 592 00:32:31,320 --> 00:32:34,000 Speaker 4: will gladly provide that. And so I do think that 593 00:32:34,240 --> 00:32:38,480 Speaker 4: you know, there are models available that will work very 594 00:32:38,480 --> 00:32:41,360 Speaker 4: well that we can try, and different people are trying 595 00:32:41,400 --> 00:32:45,280 Speaker 4: those models. You know, we're seeing it widely throughout the 596 00:32:45,640 --> 00:32:48,560 Speaker 4: media landscape where people are just trying new things, whether 597 00:32:48,640 --> 00:32:51,480 Speaker 4: it's you know, the four or four medias and the 598 00:32:51,520 --> 00:32:55,160 Speaker 4: defectors and those folks who are doing you know, worker 599 00:32:55,280 --> 00:32:58,720 Speaker 4: owned media collectives that are doing incredible work. I mean 600 00:32:59,040 --> 00:33:01,680 Speaker 4: four or four is you know, trailblazing. I think in 601 00:33:01,720 --> 00:33:04,640 Speaker 4: a lot of ways their reporting is incredible and there 602 00:33:06,040 --> 00:33:09,560 Speaker 4: you know, their sort of model is incredible. You know, 603 00:33:09,640 --> 00:33:16,960 Speaker 4: we're seeing people very proactively setting up ways in which 604 00:33:17,000 --> 00:33:21,640 Speaker 4: they can create sustainable media that does not rely on ads, 605 00:33:21,720 --> 00:33:25,440 Speaker 4: that does not require paywalls, that does not you know, 606 00:33:25,560 --> 00:33:29,040 Speaker 4: rely on clickbait through social media websites, and so I 607 00:33:29,080 --> 00:33:33,440 Speaker 4: am very optimistic in some ways, even though the sort 608 00:33:33,480 --> 00:33:36,200 Speaker 4: of landscape is also fairly terrifying. 609 00:33:37,320 --> 00:33:39,760 Speaker 3: And on that that note will end it there, Molly, 610 00:33:39,840 --> 00:33:40,920 Speaker 3: where can people find you? 611 00:33:41,640 --> 00:33:41,760 Speaker 1: So? 612 00:33:41,800 --> 00:33:44,680 Speaker 4: You can find my newsletter at Citation needed dot news. 613 00:33:44,720 --> 00:33:47,120 Speaker 4: And then I am also at Mollywhite dot net, which 614 00:33:47,120 --> 00:33:49,400 Speaker 4: has links to all my social media and everything else. 615 00:33:49,880 --> 00:33:52,280 Speaker 3: And you can find me on this podcast better offline 616 00:33:52,320 --> 00:33:55,680 Speaker 3: dot com as well. And yeah, you can catch us 617 00:33:55,720 --> 00:33:57,640 Speaker 3: on the monologue this week. Molly, thank you so much 618 00:33:57,680 --> 00:34:00,000 Speaker 3: for joining us, and this has been Better Offline. 619 00:34:07,920 --> 00:34:09,600 Speaker 2: Thank you for listening to Better Offline. 620 00:34:09,719 --> 00:34:12,160 Speaker 6: The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song 621 00:34:12,239 --> 00:34:14,879 Speaker 6: is Matasowski. You can check out more of his music 622 00:34:14,920 --> 00:34:18,560 Speaker 6: and audio projects at Matasowski dot com, M A T 623 00:34:18,560 --> 00:34:23,000 Speaker 6: T O S O W s ki dot com. You 624 00:34:23,040 --> 00:34:25,560 Speaker 6: can email me at easy at better offline dot com, 625 00:34:25,640 --> 00:34:27,960 Speaker 6: or visit better offline dot com to find more podcast 626 00:34:28,000 --> 00:34:31,320 Speaker 6: links and of course my newsletter. I also really recommend 627 00:34:31,360 --> 00:34:33,279 Speaker 6: you go to Chat dot Where's Youreed dot at to 628 00:34:33,400 --> 00:34:35,840 Speaker 6: visit the discord, and go to our slash Better. 629 00:34:35,680 --> 00:34:38,879 Speaker 2: Offline to check out our reddit. Thank you so much 630 00:34:38,920 --> 00:34:39,440 Speaker 2: for listening. 631 00:34:40,280 --> 00:34:42,960 Speaker 1: Better Offline is a production of cool Zone Media. For 632 00:34:43,080 --> 00:34:46,280 Speaker 1: more from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool Zonemedia 633 00:34:46,320 --> 00:34:49,160 Speaker 1: dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app, 634 00:34:49,200 --> 00:34:50,520 Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, or wherever 635 00:34:50,640 --> 00:35:09,400 Speaker 4: You get your podcasts.